Revision as of 18:05, 11 November 2019

Text

Engineering Report CALC-ANO1-CS-12-00002, Rev. 0, Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Pages 332 Through 560
	ML12342A221
Person / Time
Site:	Arkansas Nuclear
Issue date:	11/16/2012
From:	Smolarek S; Entergy Nuclear
To:	; Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
	1CAN111201 CALC-ANO1-CS-12-00002, Rev 0
	Download: ML12342A221 (414)
	v • d • e

{{#Wiki_filter:Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS-i12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 332 of 560 Sheet I of 5 Status: YZ NEI UF-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-065 Equipment ID No. F-52B Equip. Class' 17- ENGINE GENERATORS Equipment Description DG2 ENGINE MOUNTED TURBO FILTER Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 369 Room, Area 86 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Electro-Motive Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE] No of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

No anchorage configuration verification required.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YE NEI UE] N/AE-The anchorageis free of bent, broken, missing and loose hardware.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y'Z NEI uE- N/AE oxidation?

The anchorage is free of corrosion.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YZ NEI UE1 N/AE-anchors?

This component is anchored directly to the EDG skid. No cracks in concrete around skid observed. I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 333 of 560 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: Y[ NO UI-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-065 Equipment ID No. F-52B Equip. Class2 17- ENC INE GENERA TORS Fv-iinmp.nt 1l3c..rintinn /f)(2FN(INF MOIJNTFfl TUJRRO FILTF-R

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? Y[-- NEI ULI N/AE (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

This is not applicablesince it is not part of the 50% of SWEL items requiringanchorage configuration verification.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YE N[W U[I potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Based on the above anchorage evaluations, the anchorage is free of potentiallyadverse seismic conditions. Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NEI UEIZ N/AEl The turbochargerfilter is bolted at the rearend of the diesel engine.

There were no major structures or equipment that could have any significantinteraction with the filter.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NO UEL N/AEZ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

There is overhead duct work that is properlysecured with steel hangers.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? '(Y NEI UED N/AL[

Attached lines have adequate flexibility.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y[( NE] UFl of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Based on the above seismic interactionevaluations, the equipment is free of potentiallyadverse seismic interactioneffects. 2 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 334 of 560 Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YZ NE] U[- Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-065 Equipment ID No. F-52B Equip. Class3 17- ENGINE GENERATORS Equipment Description DG2 ENGINE MOUNTED TURBO FILTER Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NE] UZý adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

It was looked for, and no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment were found. Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) The TurbochargerFilteris a criticalcomponent of the diesel engine. Every mounting bolt was observed to be in place. The entire engine appearedclean and well maintained. There were no visible leaks or signs of previous leaks at any location were accessorycomponents were bolted to the main engine block. TW ug. Vh.R-V- IOC0Isn6" Evaluated by: DanielParker %', { -- Date: 10/03/2012 Eric Dilbone 10/03/2012 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 335 of 560 Sheet 4 of 5 Status: Y[ NEI U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-065 Equipment ID No. F-52B Equip. Class4 17- ENGINE GENERATORS Equipment Description DG2 ENGINE MOUNTED TURBO FILTER Photographs Note: Note: Top of Component 4 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS-12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 336 of 560 Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YZ NE U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-065 Equipment ID No. F-52B Equip. Class5 17- ENGINE GENERATORS Equipment Description DG2 ENGINE MOUNTED TURBO FILTER Note: Component Attachment 5 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANOI-CS-12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 337 of 560 Sheet I of 5 Status: YZ Nil UL] Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-066 Equipment ID No. M-225B Equip. Class, 17- Engine Generators Equipment Description DIESEL GENERATOR TURBOCHARGER Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 369 Room, Area 86 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Electro-Motive T2001 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YD NZ of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

No anchorage configuration verification required.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YZ NEI U[- N/A[D The anchorageis free of bent, broken, missing and loose hardware.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YZ N[I UD N/A[]

oxidation? The anchorageis free of corrosion.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the Y; NEI U[1 N/A[-

anchors? This component is anchored directly to the EDG skid. 1 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 338 of 560 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YZ NF UI-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-066 Equipment ID No. M-225B - Equip. Class2 17- Engine Generators Equipment Description DIESEL GENERATOR TURBOCHARGER

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE NE-' uEF N/AN (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

This is not applicable since it is not part of the 50% of SWEL items requiringanchorage configurationverification.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y[ NI-] ULI potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Based on the above anchorageevaluations, the anchorage is free of potentiallyadverse seismic conditions. Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y[ NEI UE1 N/A[-]

The turbochargeris bolted at the rearend of the diesel engine. There were no significantstructures or equipment that could have any significantinteraction with the turbocharger.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NE'] UE N/AE-and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

There is overhead duct work that is properlysecured with steel hangers.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y' NEi UEi N/A['-

Attached lines have adequate flexibility.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NEI UEJ of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Based on the above seismic interactionevaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects. 2 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 339 of 560 Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YZ NEI Ur-1 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl -066 Equipment ID No. M-225B -Equip. ClaSS3 17 -Engine Generators Enuinment Descrintion DEISEL GENERATOR TURBOCHARGER Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y' NIZ U[-

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? It was looked for, and no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment were found. Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) The turbochargeris a critical component of the diesel engine. Every mounting bolt was observed to be in place. The entire engine appearedclean and well maintained. There were no visible leaks or signs of previous leaks at any location were accessorycomponents were bolted to the main engine block. Three-Ouwtrr Right Rear View, I6.Cylnftr Evaluated by: Daniel Parker Date: 10/22012 Eric Dilbone 10/2/2012 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 340 of 560 Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YE NF- U-- Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-066 Equipment ID No. M-225B Equip. CIass4 17- Engine Generators Equipment Description DEISEL GENERATOR TURBOCHARGER Photociraphs Note: Component Overview Note: Component Overview 4 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 341 of 560 Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YE NF U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-066 Equipment ID No. M-225B Equip. Class5 17- Enqine Generators Equipment Description DEISEL GENERATOR TURBOCHARGER Note: Close up of Component from underside Note: Close up of component from underside 5 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 342 of 560 Sheet I of 5 Status: YZ No UI-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 067 Equipment ID No. SS-5211 Equip. Class' 18 - Instrument Racks Equipment Description DG1 OVERSPEED TRIP SWITCH Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 369 Room, Area 87 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YZI NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Item is not part of the 50%.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YO N[il U[:] N/A[:l The bolts anchoring the switch to the EDG skid are free of bent, broken, missing and loose hardware.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YZ NDl UD N/ADl oxidation?

The anchorage had very mild surface oxidation, but is free of corrosion otherwise. No adverse seismic conditions exist because of this.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YZ NDI UiD N/AED anchors?

The switch is anchoredto the EDG. No cracks around EDG skid were observed. 1 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 343 of 560 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YE NEI UE-- Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 067 Equipment ID No. SS-5211 Equip. Class 1*8 - Instrument Racks Equipment Description DG1 OVERSPEED TRIP SWITCH

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE N[E UEi N/AZ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

This does not apply since this item is not part of the 50% requiring anchorageconfiguration verification.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y] NEI UE-potentially adverse seismic conditions?

All visible anchorage was free of potentially adverse seismic conditions. Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YEr NEi UEi N/AE There are no soft targets that could be impacted by nearby equipment or structures.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YO NE UEI N/AE and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

There are no masonry block walls or ceiling tiles in the room. The lights are in good condition, and do not present an interaction effect.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YO NEI UEi N/AE-The attached lines have adequate flexibility.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y[ NE] UEJ of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Based on the above evaluation, the switch is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS-i12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 344 of 560 Sheet 3 of 5 Status: Y[I NR U[F] Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 067 Equipment ID No. SS-5211 Equip. Class 18- Instrument Racks Equipment Description DG1 OVERSPEED TRIP SWITCH Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO N[il ULI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

It was looked for, and no other seismic conditions,that could adversely affect the safety functions were found. Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) SS-5211 is not immediately identifiable using the primary equipment ID tag. A tag of "S 23" is visible on the component, and this is listed in Asset Suite as a ComponentAlternate Tag for SS-5211. Evaluated by: DanielParker t,, - Date: 10/11/2012 Eric Dilbone 6* 10/11/2012

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 345 of 560 Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YE NEI UI-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 067 Equipment ID No. SS-5211 Equip. Class 18 - Instrument Racks Equipment Description DGI OVERSPEED TRIP SWITCH Photographs Note: Altemate tag showing S 23 identifies Note: Overspeed trip switch is shown the component SS-521 1. mounted to the EDG.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 346 of 560 Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YEI NEI UI-1 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 067 Equipment ID No. SS-5211 Equip. Class 18 - Instrument Racks Equipment Description DG1 OVERSPEED TRIP SWITCH Note: The manufacturertao is shown for the Note: overspeed trip switch.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 347 of 560 Sheet I of 4 Status: YZ Nr I Url Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-068 Equipment ID No. SE-5220 Equip. Class' 18- INSTRUMENT RACKS Equipment Description SPEED DETECTOR FOR K-4B Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 369 Room, Area 86 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y[-] NZ of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Anchorage configuration verification is not requiredfor this component.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YZ NEI U[] N/A'-

The anchoragehardware is free of bent, broken, missing and loose hardware.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YZ N[:] Ur- N/A-oxidation?

The anchorageis free of corrosion.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the Y[-] N[l U[I- N/AZ anchors?

The component is not anchored into concrete; therefore, this question is not applicable. I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 348 of 560 Sheet 2 of 4 Status: YZ N[-- U[- Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-068 Equipment ID No. SE-5220 - Equip. Class 18- INSTRUMENT RACKS Equipment Description SPEED DETECTOR FOR K-4B

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YEI NEI UE- N/AZ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage configuration verification is not required for this component; therefore, this question is not applicable.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YE NE:] UEr potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Based on the above anchorageevaluation, the anchorageis free of potentially adverse seismic conditions. Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NEi U[E- N/A[E]

The primarysoft target in the area is the electrical cable connected to SE-5220. The cable is free from impact by any nearby equipment or structures.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YN NEI UE[ N/AE-and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

There are no potentialinteractionswith overhead equipment, lighting or masonry block walls.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NEI uE1 N/AEr The attachedlines have adequateflexibility to avoid damage.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YE NE- UEi of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Based on the above seismic interactionevaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS-12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 349 of 560 Sheet 3 of 4 Status: YZ N] UI-I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-068 Equipment ID No. SE-5220 Equip. Class 18-INSTRUMENT RACKS Equipment Description SPEED DETECTOR FOR K-4B Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN N[:] U-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

It was looked for, and no seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety function of the equipment was found. Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) SE-5220, Speed Detector for K-4B does not have an equipment tag; the component location was positively identified on design drawings and field verified by the Unit 1 Emergency Diesel GeneratorsSystem Engineer. The Speed Detectoris very well anchored. Evaluated by: Chris Johnson Date: 11/08/12 Oiaswi Shrestha 4 -LA 11081 11108112

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO1-CS-12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 350 of 560 Sheet 4 of 4 Status: YZ NE]I- UE-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-068 Equipment ID No. SE-5220 Equip. Class 18- INSTRUMENT RACKS Equipment Description SPEED DETECTOR FOR K-4B Photographs Note: This photo shows the relative location of Note: SE-5220 is mounted next the flywheel SE-5220 on K-4B. as indicated by the yellow arrow.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 351 of 560 Sheet I of 5 Status: YE NEI UD-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELI-069 Equipment ID No. PS-5284 Equip. Class' 18- INSTRUMENT RACKS Equipment Description K4B CRANKCASE PRESS HI Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 369 Room, Area 86 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Electro-Motive 645E4B TurbocharqedDiesel Enqine Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE- NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

No anchorage configuration verification required.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Y] NEI UEi N/A--

The anchorage is free of bent, broken, missing and loose hardware.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YO NEI U-- N/AD oxidation?

The anchorageis free of corrosion.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the Y[ NDI UD- N/A[D-anchors?

This component is anchored directly to the EDG skid. No cracks in the concrete aroundthe anchorageof the skid were observed. I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 352 of 560 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YZ NEI U-- Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-069 Equipment ID No. PS-5284 Equip. Class2 18-INSTRUMENT RACKS Equipment Description K4B CRANKCASE PRESS HI

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YrI NE] U[-] N/As (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

This is not applicable since it is not part of the 50% of SWEL items requiringanchorage configuration verification.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ NE] ULi potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Based on the above anchorageevaluations, the anchorage is free of potentiallyadverse seismic conditions. Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? '(Y NEI U[I N/AZl Soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment and structures.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, '(N NEI U-1 N/AZl and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Overhead equipment, distributionsystems and lighting are not likely to collapse onto the equipment.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YS( NEl uL1 N/A'-

Attached lines have adequate flexibility.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NEI UM of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Based on the above seismic interactionevaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects. 2 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 353 of 560 Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YZ NEI U[-] Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-069 Equipment ID No. PS-5284 Equip. Class3 18- INSTRUMENT RACKS Eauinment Description K4B CRANKCASE PRESS HI Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y( NED U[-I adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

It was looked for, and no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment were found. Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) The Crankcase PressureDetector is a criticalcomponent of the diesel engine. Every mounting bolt was observed to be in place. The entire engine appeared clean and well maintained. There were no visible leaks or signs of previous leaks at any location were accessory components were bolted to the main engine block. Croankcose Presure Detectcr TWree.uarter Left Fr*nt View, 16-C¥!i1der Evaluated by: Daniel Parker Date: 10/2/2012 Eric Dilbone 10/2/2012 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 354 of 560 Sheet 4 of 5 Status: Y[I NEI UD-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-069 Equipment ID No. PS-5284 Equip. Class4 18-INSTRUMENT RACKS Equipment Description K4B CRANKCASE PRESS HI Photographs Note: Front of PS-5284 Note: Upper Mounting Bolts of PS-5284 4 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 355 of 560 Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YZ N[i] U--i Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-069 Equipment ID No. PS-5284 Equip. Classs 18-INSTRUMENT RACKS Equipment Description K4B CRANKCASE PRESS HI Note: Lower Mounting Bolts of PS-5284 Note: 5 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 356 of 560 Sheet 1 of 5 Status: YZ NEI U-- Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 070 Equipment ID No. D14 Equip. Class' 18 - Instrument Racks Equipment Description D06 MANUAL DISCONNECT Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 372 Room, Area 98 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YZ NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

This item is partof the 50%.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Y[ NE] U'- N/A['1 No bent broken or missing hardware was found.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YN NEI UEl N/A[-

oxidation? No corrosion was observed.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YZ NEI UiE N/AD--

anchors? Concrete around anchors in support frame base plates were observed to be free of cracks. I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 357 of 560 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YE NEI U-iJ Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 070 Equipment ID No. D14 Equip. Class 18 - Instrument Racks Eauinment Descrintion DO6 MANUAL DISCONNECT

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YZ NDi UD- N/AD-(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage configurationwas determined to be consistent with CALC-94-SQ-1001-18, pages 19-29.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y' NDI U[D potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Anchorage was determined to be free from adverse seismic conditions. Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YM NDi UD N/ADl No soft targets were observed.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NDI UDi N/AD'-

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? Overheadsupport conditions appearedto be adequate.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NDI uDl N/ADl Attached lines appearto be ok (both flexible and rigid conduits)

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ ND] UD1 of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

No adverse seismic interaction conditions were observed.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 358 of 560 Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YN NIEI U[-i Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 070 Equipment ID No. 014 Equip. Class 18 - Instrument Racks Eauipment Description D06 MANUAL DISCONNECT Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN N[] Ur adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

No other adverse seismic conditions were observed. Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) No adverse seismic conditions were observed. Evaluated by: DanielAndoh Date: 10/10/2012 Genaro BarraqanJr. " 'f 10/10/2012

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 359 of 560 Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YZ NO-- U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 070 Equipment ID No. D14 Equip. Class 18 - InstrumentRacks Equipment Description D06 MANUAL DISCONNECT Photographs Note: Equipment Tag Note: Support frame base plate

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS-i12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 360 of 560 Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YZ NO ULI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 070 Equipment ID No. D14 Equip. Class 18 - Instrument Racks Equipment Description D06 MANUAL DISCONNECT connection to wall Note: Panel support to frame

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 361 of 560 Sheet I of 5 Status: Y] NE-- U-- Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-071 Equipment ID No. PT-2667A Equip. Class' 18 - Instrument Racks Equipment Description E24B MAIN STM PRESS-MSLI Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 386 Room, Area 144 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YM NE!

of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)? Yes, this is one of the 50% of SWEL items requiringanchorage configuration verification.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Y'( NE] UE- N/AE!

The anchorageis free of the conditions listed above.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y( NE[-] UE- N/A[-]

oxidation? The anchorage is free of corrosion.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the Y; NE! UE] N/A[!

anchors? The anchoragefor the plate was inspected and there were no visible cracks in the concrete. I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 362 of 560 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YZ N-- U[- Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-071 Equipment ID No. PT-2667A Equip. Class 18 - Instrument Racks Equipment Description E24B MAIN STM PRESS-MSLI

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? Y[ NE] UE- N/Ar (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Yes, anchorageconfigurationis consistent with CALC-94-SQ-1001-18, pages 202-206.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y[ NE] uLI potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes, the anchorage is free of potentiallyadverse seismic conditions. Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? "'Y NE] U[-] N/AEI-All soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y* NEJ U[E N/AEl and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Overhead equipment is not likely to collapse onto the pressure transmitter.This room is not crowded and items are well dispersed throughout the room.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NEl UE1 N/A[-]

All attachedlines appearto have adequateflexibility.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y' NEI ur-1 of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Equipment is free of potentially adverse interactioneffects.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 363 of 560 Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YE NEI UM Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-071 Equipment ID No. PT-2667A Equip. Class 18 - Instrument Racks Equipment Description E24B MAIN STM PRESS-MSLI Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[ NEi UFJ adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes, no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment were identified. Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Anchorage was consistent with the plant documentation. The anchorage of concem was the 16 x 30 x 1/4 inch plate anchored to the wall. The pressure transmitter(PT-2667A) was bolted to this plate. The plate was bolted to the wall with a pairof Unistruts. Each Unistrut was anchored with two expansion anchors. See SEWS package, PT-2667A (Rev.0) for more details. Evaluated by: Genaro BarraqanJr.i Date: 10/9/2012 Eric Dilbone 6U I 10/9/2012

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 364 of 560 Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YE Nn-l U[] Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-071 Equipment ID No. PT-2667A Equip. Class 18 - Instrument Racks Equipment Description E24B MAIN STM PRESS-MSLI Photographs Note: General image of the equipment Note: Generalimage of the Pressure tag, PT-2667A. Transmitteranchored to the plate in the wall.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 365 of 560 Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YZ Nn U-I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-071 Equipment ID No. PT-2667A Equip. Class 18 - Instrument Racks Equipment Description E24B MAIN STM PRESS-MSLI I Note: General image of the PT-2667A. Note: General image of the PT-2667A.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 366 of 560 Sheet I of 5 Status: YWI NFi- U-I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-072 Equipment ID No. N/A Equip. Class' N/A Equipment Description NOT USED Location: Bldg. N/A Floor El. N/A Room, Area N/A Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y[:] N[]

of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Y-I NE:] U[] N/AZ

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YE] NE] UI- N/AZ--

oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YE] NE] UEJ N/A-anchors?

IEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS-12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 367 of 560 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YEJ NEI ULI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-072 Equipment ID No. N/A Equip. Class N/A Equipment Description NOT USED

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE] NE-1 U[E N/AE[

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YE] NEI UE potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y[-E NEi UE N/AE

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YE NE UE1 N/AE-and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YF- NE- UE[ N/AE1

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YE- NEi UE of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 368 of 560 Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YEl- NO UL-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-072 Equipment ID No. N/A Equip. Class N/A Equipment Description NOT USED Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y-l N il UIM adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated by: Date:

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 369 of 560 Sheet 4 of 5 Status: Y-I NEI U-- Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl -072 Equipment ID No. N/A Equip. Class N/A Equipment Description NOT USED Photographs Note: Note:

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 370 of 560 Sheet 5 of 5 Status: Y-- NDý Ur-1 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-072 Equipment ID No, N/A Equip. Class N/A Equipment Description NOT USED Note: Note:

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO1-CS-12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 371 of 560 Sheet I of 5 Status: YZ NE- U El Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 073 Equipment ID No. LSL-5206 Equip. Class' 18- Instrument Racks Equipment Description LOW LEVEL DIESEL SWITCH Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 369 Room, Area 87 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE-] N[

of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)? Item is not part of the 50%.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Y" NEI UEJ N/AE3 The bolts anchoring the switch to the EDG skid are free of bent, broken, missing and loose hardware.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YZ NE] UE-] N/AE[

oxidation? The anchorage had very mild surface oxidation, but is free of corrosion otherwise.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YZ NE-] UEJ N/AE*

anchors? The switch is anchored to the EDG skid. No cracks in concrete were observed around the skid anchorage. I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 372 of 560 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YZ N] U[I] Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 073 Equipment ID No. LSL-5206 Equip. Class2 18 - Instrument Racks Equipment Description LOW LEVEL DIESEL SWITCH

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YO- N[! UE! N/AZ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

This does not apply since this item is not part of the 50% requiring anchorageconfiguration

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ N[! ULI potentially adverse seismic conditions?

All anchorage was free of potentially adverse seismic conditions. Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y[ NE! UE- N/A[-]

There are no soft targets that could be impacted by nearby equipment or structures.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YO NE!I UE! N/AD-and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

There are no masonry block walls or ceiling tiles in the room. The lights are in good condition, and do not present an interaction effect.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YED N[E] UE- N/A[D The attachedlines have adequate flexibility.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y" NEI UD1 of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Based on the above evaluation, the component is free of potentially adverse seismic interactioneffects. 2 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 373 of 560 Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YZ NEI U[-1 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 073 Equipment ID No. LSL-5206 Equip. Class3 18 - Instrument Racks Equipment Description LOW LEVEL DIESEL SWITCH Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NE] Ur--

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? It was looked for, and no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions were found. Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) n' Evaluated by: Daniel Parker O-- Date: 10/11/2012 Eric Dilbone

5 10/11/2012 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 374 of 560 Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YZ NO U -- Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 073 Equipment ID No. LSL-5206 Equip. Class4 18 - Instrument Racks Equipment Description LOW LEVEL DIESEL SWITCH Photographs Note: View of the level switch with the Note: Side view of the switch showing the equipment ID tag. anchorageto the skid. 4 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 375 of 560 Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YZ NEI UI-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 073 Equipment ID No. LSL-5206 Equip. Class5 18 - Instrument Racks Equipment Description LOW LEVEL DIESEL SWITCH Note: Overhead view of the switch showing Note: General view of the level switch the anchorbolt not visible in the previous showing attached lines. image. 5 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 376 of 560 Sheet I of 5 Status: YE NE-I UD Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-074 Equipment ID No. PT-2812 Equip. Class' 18-INSTRUMENT RACKS Equipment Description EFWP P-7B DISCHARGE PRESSURE Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 335 Room, Area 38 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE] NZ of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

No anchorage configuration verification required.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YZ NE- U[-] N/AE--

The observed anchorageis free of bent, broken, missing and loose hardware.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YZ N[-] UE] N/A[E]

oxidation? The observed anchorageis free of corrosion.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YE] NE[ UE- N/AZ anchors?

The component is anchored by a bracket to a clamp on a pipe, so concrete near the anchorage is not applicable. 1 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANOI-CS-12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 377 of 560 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YZ NF U-I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-074 Equipment ID No. PT-2812 Equip. Class2 18- INSTRUMENT RACKS Equipment Description EFWP P-7B DISCHARGE PRESSURE

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE] NE] UE- N/A[9 (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

This is not part of the 50%.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y[9 NWI U[--

potentially adverse seismic conditions? Based on the above anchorageevaluations, the anchorageis free of potentially adverse seismic conditions. Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y[Z NEI U[L N/AZ-All adjacent equipment are adequately spaced apart from each other where this component is mounted.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y( NE- UL] N/A--

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? All overhead piping systems and electrical conduit are adequately secured.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YN N[' U-] N/Ar-Attached lines have adequate flexibility.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NEI UWl of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Based on the above seismic interactionevaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects. 2 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO1-CS-12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 378 of 560 Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YZ NOI U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-074 Equipment ID No. PT-2812 Equip. Class3 18- INSTRUMENT RACKS Equipment Description EFWP P-7B DISCHARGE PRESSURE Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Yo NEJ U--

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? A fire extinguisher is mounted on the wall near this component. Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) The PT-2812 component is clamped to an ~I Y2 "diameterpipe support bolted into the adjacentRC wall. This pipe support and clamp appearto be adequately secure to support the equipment during a seismic event. Evaluated by: Michael E Perez Date: 10/8/2012 Daniel Parker _ -,_ _Q1 10/8/2012 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 379 of 560 Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YN NEI U-] Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-074 Equipment ID No. PT-2812 Equip. Class4 18-INSTRUMENT RACKS Equipment Description EFWP P-7B DISCHARGE PRESSURE Photographs Note: PT-2812 with equipment identification tag. 4 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 380 of 560 Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YE NRI U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-074 Equipment ID No. PT-2812 Equip. Class5 18-INSTRUMENT RACKS Equipment Description EFWP P-7B DISCHARGE PRESSURE Note: Pipe anchorageto RC wall. 5 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 381 of 560 Sheet 1 of 5 Status: YEI NEI U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-075 Equipment ID No. N/A Equip. Class' N/A Equipment Description NOT USED Location: Bldg. N/A Floor El. N/A Room, Area N/A Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YE NE UE:] N/AE"]

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YE NE:] UE- N/AE-oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YE- NE UE- N/AE-1 anchors?

1 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 382 of 560 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YE] NE] UE] Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-075 Equipment ID No. N/A Equip. Class N/A Equipment Description NOT USED

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YEI NEi UE: N/AEl (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YE] NE] UE]

potentially adverse seismic conditions? Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y(E-- NEI UE- N/AE1

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y(E NEI UEi N/AE-and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y-E NEI UEi N/AEl

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YE- NEI UM of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 383 of 560 Sheet 3 of 5 Status: Yr-L NI1 UZI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-075 Equipment ID No. N/A Equip. Class N/A Equipment Description NOT USED Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[-- NEl UEI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated by: Date:

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 384 of 560 Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YE-- NEI UDý Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-075 Equipment ID No. N/A Equip. Class N/A Equipment Description NOT USED Photographs Note: Note:

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 385 of 560 Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YLI NEI U-- Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-075 Equipment ID No. N/A Equip. Class N/A Equipment Description NOT USED

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 386 of 560 Sheet I of 5 Status: Y-I NE UI-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-076 Equipment ID No. TE-1139 Equip. Class' 19- Temperature Sensors Equipment Description 'B'LOOP TH TEMP Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. 410 Room, Area 150 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y[I NZ of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Y[-] N[I] UN N/A[D

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YE] NEI] U N/A-]

oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the Y-I NEI U[ N/A--

anchors? I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO1-CS-12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 387 of 560 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YOI NZ UD Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-076 Equipment ID No. TE-1139 Equip. Class 19- Temperature Sensors Equipment Description 'B' LOOP TH TEMP

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YD- NDI UZ N/AD-(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yil NEI U[

potentially adverse seismic conditions? Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YDI ND-' UZ N/AD--

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y-I ND- UZ N/AD-and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YD- NDI UZ N/AD-

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YD-NEI UZ of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 388 of 560 Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YE[ NE U[-- Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-076 Equipment ID No. TE-1139 Equip. Class 19- Temperature Sensors Equipment Description 'B'LOOP TH TEMP Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO NEIl US adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

. Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated by: Date:

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANOI-CS-12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 389 of 560 Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YDI NE U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-076 Equipment ID No. TE-1139 Equip. Class 19- Temperature Sensors Equipment Description 'B' LOOP TH TEMP Photographs

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 390 of 560 Sheet 5 of 5 Status: Y-I NZ U'I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-076 Equipment ID No. TE-1139 Equip. Class 19- Temperature Sensors Equipment Description 'B' LOOP TH TEMP

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 391 of 560 Sheet 1 of 5 Status: YZ Nr I UrD Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-077 Equipment ID No. TS-7904 Equip. Class, 19- TEMPERATURE SENSORS Equipment Description H&V EMGCY D-G RM FAN D Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 369 Room, Area 86 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y[ ND]

of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)? This item is part of the 50% configuration check.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Y" NEI UD- N/AD-The anchorageis free of bent, broken, missing and loose hardware.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YN NDI U-- N/AD-oxidation?

The anchorageis free of corrosion.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YZ NDI UiJ N/AFD anchors?

Mounted to Unistrut. Unistrut anchorage to concrete. Concrete is free of cracks. 'Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 392 of 560 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YZ N-- U--] Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-077 Equipment ID No. TS-7904 - Equip. Clas S2 19 - TEMPERA TURE SENSORS Equipment Description H&V EMGCY D-G RM FAN D

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YZ NEI Ur- N/AE-(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

TS-7904 temperaturesensoris mounted to piece of Unistrut which is adequately anchoredto the north wall near the center of the room. The anchorageconfiguration is consistent with CALC-94-SQ-1001-19, page 32.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ NEI UE potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Based on the above anchorageevaluations, the anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions. Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YN N[-] U[-1 N/A[:]

All components mounted on the wall near TS-7904 are mounted similarly on anchored uni-strut. Overhead fluorescent lighting fixtures are adequately secured to prevent falling during a seismic event.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YN NEI U[-1 N/AZ1 and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

All rigid electricalconduit, piping, and exhaust ducts overhead are adequatelysecured to prevent any seismic interaction with the component.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YN NEI U-I N/A--

Attached lines have adequate flexibility.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y" NEM U--

of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects? Based on the above seismic interactionevaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interactioneffects. 2 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 393 of 560 Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YE NIZ U-- Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-077 Equipment ID No. TS-7904 Equip. Class3 19- TEMPERATURE SENSORS Equipment Description H&VEMGCYD-G RM FAN D Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[ N[- UI-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

It was looked for, and no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment were found. Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) The component was mounted to a piece of uni-strut anchoredto the RC wall. The anchorage was judged to be adequate and sufficient as perANO documentation, 6030.113 Seismic Raceway Supports, Attachment 3, Support Mounting Details, Attachment 10, Box Supports. Evaluated by: Eric Dilbone 6

Date: 10/2/2012 Daniel Parker 10/2/2012 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 394 of 560 Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YZ NEI U[-- Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-077 Equipment ID No. TS-7904 Equip. Class4 19- TEMPERATURE SENSORS Equipment Description H&VEMGCYD-G RM FAN D Photographs Note: TS-7904 Temperature Sensor Note: TS-7904 Temperature Sensor, Uni-Strut Anchorage to Wall. 4 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 395 of 560 Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YZ NEI U-il Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-077 Equipment ID No. TS-7904 Equip. Cla Ss5 19- TEMPERATURE SENSORS Equipment Description H&V EMGCY D-G RM FAN D Note: TS-7904 Temperature Sensor, Uni-Strut Note: Above TS-7904 Temperature Sensor. Anchorage to Wall. 5 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 396 of 560 Sheet I of 5 Status: YZ ND UD Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-078 Equipment ID No. C10 Equip. Class' 20 - Instrumentationand Control Panels Equipment Description VERT BD- ELEC AUX Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 386 Room, Area 129 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YD] NZ of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

This item is not part of the 50%.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YZ NDI UDl N/AD3 Visual confirmation of 7 welds on front of cabinet in good condition. It was confirmed that 2 anchorbolts in the front of the cabinet are in good shape. The 2 corresponding anchorbolts in the rearof the cabinet were not visible due to wires on floor.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YZ NDI UDl N/A[D]

oxidation? No mild surface oxidation present.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YZ ND-] UDI N/AD-anchors?

Cabinet is welded to an embedded steel channel, but the concrete surroundingthe channel was free of cracks. 1 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 397 of 560 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YZ ND] UI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-078 Equipment ID No. CIO Equip. Class2 20 - Instrumentation and Control Panels Equipment Description VERT BD- ELEC AUX

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? Y[-] ND] ULI N/A[

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.) All anchorage that was visible was confirmed against CALC-94-SW-1001-20, pages 39-52, but not all anchoragecould be seen.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YE ND-- UD-potentially adverse seismic conditions?

All visible anchoragewas free of potentially adverse seismic conditions. Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y] NDI UD] N/AD-There are no soft targetsthat could be impacted by nearby equipment or structures.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ N[D UD- N/AD-and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Masonry block walls in the room are seismically qualified, and painted with a qualification number. Ceiling tiles and lights are all in good condition, and are adequatelysupported.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NDl UDl N/AD The attachedlines have adequate flexibility.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NDJ UD-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Based on the above evaluation, the cabinet is free of potentially adverse seismic interaciton effects. 2 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 398 of 560 Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YZ NEI U-I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-078 Equipment ID No. C10 Equip. Class3 20 - Instrumentationand Control Panels Equipment Description VERT BD- ELEC AUX Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[( Ni[ UIM adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

It was looked for, and no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions were found. Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated by: Roy Berryman Date: 10/4/2012 Eric Dilbone 6U.:- " 10/4/2012 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 399 of 560 Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YZ NEI] ULI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-078 Equipment ID No. C10 Equip. Class4 20- Instrumentationand Control Panels Equipment Description VERT BD- ELEC AUX Photographs Note: Cabinet CIO tag from the back. Note: View inside the cabinet. Some of the steel channel anchor bolts were covered by wires that could not be moved for inspection. 4 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 400 of 560 Sheet 5 of 5 Status: Y[ NE] UD-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl--078 Equipment ID No. C10 Equip. Class5 20 - Instrumentationand Control Panels Equipment Description VERT BD- ELEC AUX Note: A representativeweld on the front of the Note: Cabinet CIO from the front. cabinet to the steel channel. 5 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 401 of 560 Sheet I of 5 Status: YN NEI U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 079 Equipment ID No. PY-2618-A1 Equip. Class' 20 - Instrumentation and Control Panels Equipment Description IW CONVERTER STM GEN A PRESS Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 368 Room, Area 104 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Yil NZ of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

This item is not part of the 50%.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YZ NEI ur-D N/Ar-This component is located in a nest in cabinet C539A. No bent, broken, missing or loose hardware was observed.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y[ NEI U[1 N/AFD oxidation?

No corrosion was observed.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the 'YZ N[:] UIE] N/AEl anchors?

The component is located in a nest of cabinet C539A. No cracks in the concrete were observed around the panel anchorage IEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 402 of 560 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YE NIZ U[-- Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 079 Equipment ID No. PY-2618-Al Equip. Class2 20 - Instrumentation and Control Panels Equipment Description IN CONVERTER STM GEN A PRESS

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE- NEJ ULI N/AE (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

This item is not part of the 50%.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YE NEJ U[I potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Based on the above anchorageevaluations, the anchorageis free of potentially adverse seismic conditions. Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NEI UE1 N/A[E]

Soft targets are free from impact since they are in a cabinet that is latched closed.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, 'Y[] NE:] UE1 N/AZ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

This does not apply since the component is located inside of a cabinet.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NEI U- N/AE1 Attached lines have adequateflexibility.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NE] UM of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentiallyadverse seismic interactioneffects. 2 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANOI-CS-12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 403 of 560 Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YZ NOI U-I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 079 Equipment ID No. PY-2618-A1 Equip. Class3 20 - Instrumentationand Control Panels Equipment Description I/V CONVERTER STM GEN A PRESS Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[ N[] Ur-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

It was looked for, and no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions were found. Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated by: Eric Dilbone 6u &- Date: 10/10/2012 Daniel Parker 10/10/2012 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO1-CS-12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 404 of 560 Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YE NE] UI] Seismic Walkdown Checklist, (SWC) SWELl- 079 Equipment ID No. PY-2618-A1 Equip. Class4 20- Instrumentation and Control Panels Equipment Description I/V CONVERTER STM GEN A PRESS Photographs Note: Front view of component. Note: Sign on cabinet door. 4 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 405 of 560 Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YZ NE] UM Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 079 Equipment ID No. PY-2618-Al Equip. CIass5 20 - Instrumentation and Control Panels Equipment Description IW CONVERTER STM GEN A PRESS Note: Wingnut and washerare used to keep Note: the metal plate over the door to keep it from swinging open. As the nameplate reads, this is necessary to maintain seismic qualificationsfor the cabinet. Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 406 of 560 Sheet I of 4 Status: YZ NiF ULI-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-080 Equipment ID No. PB-0144 Equip. Class, 20 - Instrumentation and Control Panels Equipment Description START BUTTON FOR DIESEL GENERATOR #1 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 386 Room, Area 129 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE- No of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

This item is not part of the 50%.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Y' NEi UEJ N/AE[-

This component is face mounted to a cabinet. No bent, broken, missing or loose hardware was observed.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YZ NEI uEr N/AE-1 oxidation?

This component is face mounted to a cabinet. No corrosion was observed.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YZ NEI UE- N/AE-1 anchors?

This component is face mounted to a cabinet. No cracks in concrete were observed. IEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 407 of 560 Sheet 2 of 4 Status: YZ NF1 U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-080 Equipment ID No. PB-0144 Equip. Class2 20 - Instrumentationand Control Panels Equipment Description START BUTTON FOR DIESEL GENERATOR #1

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YEI NEI U[] N/AZ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

This item is not part of the 50%.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ NE]I UE potentially adverse seismic conditions?

The anchorageis not visible since it is mounted in the face of a panel. The cabinet could not be opened due to Control Room Operations. However, the button appearsto be installedproperly and there is no apparentreason why it would be adversely affected in a seismic event. Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y[ NEI UE] N/AE]

There are no soft targetsthat could be impacted by nearby equipment or structures.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y[ NE] UEI N/AE]

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? Masonry block walls in the room are seismically qualified, and painted with a qualificationnumber. Ceiling tiles and lights are all in good condition, and are adequatelysupported.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? '(Y NEI UE] N/AE]

There are no visible attachedlines, since the button is mounted on the face of a panel.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y0 NEI UE]

of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects? Based on the above evaluation, the button is free of potentially adverse seismic interacitoneffects. 2 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 408 of 560 Sheet 3 of 4 Status: YZ NF U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-080 Equipment ID No. PB-0144 Equip. Class3 20 - Instrumentationand Control Panels Equipment Description START BUTTON FOR DIESEL GENERATOR #1 Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ N[] UM adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

It was looked for, and no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions were found. Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated by: Roy Berryman Date: 10/4/2012 Eric flbohnse 6z41 10/4/2012 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 409 of 560 Sheet 4 of 4 Status: YZ NEi] UF-1 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-080 Equipment ID No. PB-0144 Equip. Class4 20 - Instrumentationand Control Panels Equipment Description START BUTTON FOR DIESEL GENERATOR #1 Photographs Note: PB-0144 is shown mounted in the face Note: of a panel 4 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 410 of 560 Sheet I of 5 Status: YZ NEI UDE-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 081 Equipment ID No. C539A Equip. Class' 20 - Instrumentationand Control Panels Equipment Description EFIC SIGNAL CONDITIONING CABINET Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 368 Room, Area 104 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y[I- NZ of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

This is not part of the 50%.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Y' NEi ULi N/A-'

The visible anchorage is free of bent, broken and loose hardware. However, only half of the anchoragewas visible.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YZ N[i U[i] N/A[--

oxidation? The visible anchorage is free of corrosion.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YZ NEI U[I N/A--

anchors? The cabinet anchorageis free of cracks in the concrete near the anchors. Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 411 of 560 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YZ No] U' Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 081 Equipment ID No. C539A Equip. Class 20 - Instrumentation and Control Panels Equipment Description EFIC SIGNAL CONDITIONING CABINET

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE] NE] UE] N/AZ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

This item is not part of the 50%. However, visible anchorage is consistent with CALC-94-SQ-1001-20, pages 235-246.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ NEI UE]

potentially adverse seismic conditions? All visible anchoragewas free of potentially adverse seismic conditions. Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NEi UIE] N/AE1 Soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment and structures.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, 'Y[Z NE] UE-] N/AE]

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? There are no masonry block walls or ceiling tiles in the room. The lights are in good condition, and do not present an interaction effect.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y[ NEI UE1 N/A[-]

The attachedlines have adequate flexibility.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y[ NE] UE]

of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects? Based on the above evaluation, the cabinet is free of potentially adverse seismic interactioneffects.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 412 of 560 Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YZ NEI' U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 081 Equipment ID No. C539A Equip. Class 20 - Instrumentation and Control Panels Equipment Description EFIC SIGNAL CONDITIONING CABINET Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN N[: Uij adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

It was looked for, and no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions were found. Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated by: Eric Dilbone Date: 10/10/2012 Daniel Parker 10/10/2012

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 413 of 560 Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YE NF Ur Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 081 Equipment ID No. C539A Equip. Class 20 - Instrumentation and Control Panels Equipment Description EFIC SIGNAL CONDITIONING CABINET Photographs m Note: (* Note: View of the inside of the front of C A.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 414 of 560 Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YZ NF U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 081 Equipment ID No. C539A - Equip. Class 20 - Instrumentation and Control Panels Equipment Description EFIC SIGNAL CONDITIONING CABINET Note: View of bottom of C539A from the rear. Note: View of C5 taken off.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 415 of 560 Sheet I of 5 Status: Y-I NE] U-I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-082 Equipment ID No. N/A Equip. Class, N/A Equipment Description NOT USED Location: Bldg. N/A Floor El. N/A Room, Area N/A Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y[-- NE of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YE-] NEl UEi N/AEl

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YE-] NE] UEi N/AEl oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YE NEl UE-] N/AE--

anchors? 1 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 416 of 560 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YE- NI- U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-082 Equipment ID No. N/A Equip. Class N/A Equipment Description NOT USED

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE NEI UE N/AE (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y[- NE UE-1 potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YO NE uE N/AE-1

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YE] NE UE:] N/AE:

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YE NE UE N/A[-]

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YE- NEI U--

of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-C S- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 417 of 560 Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YE[- NF] U-] Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-082 Equipment ID No. N/A Equip. Class N/A Equipment Description NOT USED Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[-] NE ULI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated by: Date:

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 418 of 560 Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YEr- NEI U -] Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-082 Equipment ID No. N/A Equip. Class N/A Equipment Description NOT USED Photographs Note: Note:

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 419 of 560 Sheet 5 of 5 Status: Y[-- NEI Uni-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-082 Equipment ID No. N/A Equip. Class N/A Equipment Description NOT USED Note: Note:

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 420 of 560 Sheet I of 5 Status: YEI NF ULI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-083 Equipment ID No. N/A Equip. Class, N/A Equipment Description NOT USED Location: Bldg. N/A Floor El. N/A Room, Area N/A Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y[--W NEW of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YW-] N[l U- N/A-

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y[-- NEI UW- N/A[--

oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the Y-I NWJ U-- N/A[]

anchors? 1 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 421 of 560 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: Y-- Nn Ur Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-083 Equipment ID No. N/A Equip. Class N/A Equipment Description NOT USED

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? Y[-- NWi UW3 N/A'-

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YLI NEI ULI potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? *YEI Nn UW N/A[-]

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y[-] NW] UW-1 N/Ar-and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y-I NE] UWJ N/A[:

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YEJ NEJ Un of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 422 of 560 Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YO-] NE] U[-] Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-083 Equipment ID No. N/A Equip. Class N/A Equipment Description NOT USED Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO-- N[-] U[-]

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated by: Date:

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 423 of 560 Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YO- No U[D Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-083 Equipment ID No. N/A Equip. Class N/A Equipment Description NOT USED Photographs Note: Note:

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 424 of 560 Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YO NF U[- Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-083 Equipment ID No. N/A Equip. Class N/A Equipment Description NOT USED Note: Note:

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO1-CS-12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 425 of 560 Sheet I of 5 Status: YZ NE-] U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 084 Equipment ID No. PI-2811A Equip. Class' 20 - Instrumentation and Control Panels Equipment Description EFWP P-7A DISCH PRESS Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 335 Room, Area 38 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YZ N[-

of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)? Verification is requiredfor this item. There are four anchorbolts in the item, and thus, this item is partof the 50%.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YZ NEI ULI N/AZ!

Anchorage in the item appears to be free from the conditions stated above.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YZ NEI] Ur- N/AF-oxidation?

There was no sign of corrosion found anywhere in the item.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YZ NEI UEl N/AZ!

anchors? No visible cracks have been found. ' Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 426 of 560 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YZ ND] UFD Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 084 Equipment IDNo. PI-2811A Equip. Class 20 - Instrumentation and Control Panels Equipment Description EFWP P-7A DISCH PRESS

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? 'YZ ND] UD- N/AD-(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

The anchorageconfigurationmatches with the description specified in CALC-94-SQ-1001-20, pages 1048 to 1051.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y( ND- UD potentially adverse seismic conditions?

No potentially adverse seismic conditions have been found. Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y" NDI uD-] N/AD-1 All soft targets appearto be free from any impact by nearby equipment and structures.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, "Y NDI UD1 N/AD-and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Overheadequipment is properlyplaced. Therefore, it is very unlikely that they would collapse onto this item.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ ND-1 UD- N/AD-All attachedlines appearto have adequateflexibility.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ N[:D UM of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Because all the mass is found near the anchor,it is very unlikely that it will seismically interactwith other equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 427 of 560 Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YZ NE] UW-- Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 084 Equipment ID No. PI-2811A Equip. Class 20 - Instrumentation and Control Panels Equipment Description EFWP P-7A DISCH PRESS Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[ NEJ UFJ adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

No other seismic conditions were found in the area to affect the equipment's safety functions. Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Component is found to be in adequateconditions with respect to anchorage,soft targets,overhead equipment, flexibility in attachedlines, and seismic interaction. No severe issues have been found to affect the component's integrity. Evaluated by: Daniel Parker Date: 10/8/2012 Michael E. Perez / 10/8/2012

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 428 of 560 Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YZ NEI UL-I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 084 Equipment ID No. PI-2811A Equip. Class 20 - Instrumentation and Control Panels Equipment Description EFWP P-7A DISCH PRESS Photographs Note: Equipment ID tag for Item PI-281 IA. Note: Equipment is mounted on a pipe rack that is anchored by 4 M*" bolts, as specified in the SEWS. As can be seen, the anchorageis in adequate conditions.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 429 of 560 Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YZ NO UI' Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 084 Equipment ID No. PI-2811A Equip. Class 20 - Instrumentation and Control Panels Equipment Description EFWP P-7A DISCH PRESS Note: Note that the additionalanchors found Note: within the component are free from any signs of corrosion.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 430 of 560 Sheet 1 of 5 Status: YE No UD-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-085 Equipment ID No. C88 Equip. Class, 20 - Instrumentation and Control Panels Equipment Description ESAS CABINET ANALOG SUBSYSTEM No. 1 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 386 Room, Area 129 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y5 ND-of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Not part of the 50% anchorageconfiguration verification.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YZ NEI UD-- N/AD-]

All anchorageis visible, and is free of bent, broken, missing and loose hardware.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YN ND-] U[-] N/Ar oxidation?

There was no observablecorrosion,or even mild surface oxidation on the anchorage.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YN ND-I U'- N/AD-'

anchors? The anchorageis free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors. 1 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 431 of 560 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: Y[ NEI UrD Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-085 Equipment ID No. C88 Equip. Class2 20 - Instrumentation and Control Panels Equipment Description ESAS CABINET ANALOG SUBSYSTEM No. I

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YZ N[1 UE" N/AD--

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.) The anchorageconfiguration is consistent with plant documentation. The anchorageis in accordancewith the description in CALC-94-SQ-1001-20, page 299. Additionally, the configurationis consistent with Drawing C-264, Detail 4.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y[ N[-] U[]

potentially adverse seismic conditions? Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NEI U[:] N/A-There are no soft targets that are susceptible to impact by nearby equipment or structures. All soft targets are containedwithin the cabinet, and the cabinet is latched closed.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y[ N[-] U[-] N/A[D-and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

None of the overhead equipment, ceiling tiles or lighting are likely to collapse onto the equipment. The masonry block walls in the room are seismically qualified.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NDI U[-D N/AD1 Attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YN NDI UD of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Based on the above seismic interactionevaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects. 2 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 432 of 560 Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YZ NEI U[- Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-085 Equipment ID No. C88 Equip. Class3 20 - Instrumentation and Control Panels Equipment Description ESAS CABINET ANALOG SUBSYSTEM No. 1 Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[ NE] U[-

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? It was looked for, and no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment were found. It was observed that neighboring cabinets were appropriatelybolted together to avoid interactioneffects. Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated by: Roy Berryman Date: 10/4/2012 Eric Dilbone 6 A &1F.--. - 10/4/2012 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 433 of 560 Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YM N- UF-I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-085 Equipment ID No. C88 Equip. CIass4 20 - Instrumentationand Control Panels Equipment Description ESAS CABINET ANALOG SUBSYSTEM No. 1 Photographs V Expansion anchors Note: Equipment ID tag identifying the Note: View inside the? bottom of the front of cabinet. the cabinet with the door open. Two of the four expansion anchors are visible. 4 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 434 of 560 Sheet 5 of 5 Status: Y[ NEI UrD Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-085 Equipment ID No. C88 Equip. Classs 20 - Instrumentation and Control Panels Equipment Description ESAS CABINET ANALOG SUBSYSTEM No. 1 I Expansion anchor Note: View of one of the expansion anchors in Note: View of the bottom of the cabinet from the rearof the cabinet, as seen from the front the outside. Consistent with plant with the door open. documentation,no anchorage is visible without opening the cabinet. 5 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANOI-CS-12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 435 of 560 Sheet I of 5 Status: YE NIh U[-- Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-086 Equipment ID No. C89 Equip. Class' 20 - Instrumentation and Control Panels Equipment Description ESAS ANALOG SUBSYSTEM No. 2 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 386 Room, Area 129 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y" NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

This item is part of the 50%.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YN NEI U[L N/A[--

All anchorageis visible, and is free of bent, broken, missing and loose hardware.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YZ NEI UI1 N/AZI oxidation?

There was no observable corrosion, or even mild surface oxidation on the anchorage.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YZ NEil UI1 N/A-'

anchors? The anchorageis free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors. 1 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-C S- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 436 of 560 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YE ND UD-1 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-086 Equipment ID No. C89 Equip. Class2 20 - Instrumentation and Control Panels Equipment Description ESAS ANALOG SUBSYSTEM No. 2

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YZ NDI UD- N/AD-'

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.) The anchorage configurationis consistent with plant documentation. The anchorageis in accordance with the description in CALC-94-SQ-1001-20, page 303. Additionally, the configurationis consistent with Drawing C-264, Detail4.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y" ND-] u[--

potentially adverse seismic conditions? Based on the above anchorage evaluations, the anchorageis free of potentially adverse seismic conditions. Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YN NDJ U[-D N/A[D There are no soft targets that are susceptible to impact by nearby equipment or structures. All soft targets are containedwithin the cabinet, and the cabinet is latched closed.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NDI UD1 N/ADl and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

None of the overhead equipment, ceiling tiles or lighting are likely to collapse onto the equipment. The masonry block walls in the room are seismically qualified.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y' NDJ UD- N/AD-Attached lines have adequateflexibility to avoid damage.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y' NDi UD-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Based on the above seismic interactionevaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects. 2 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 437 of 560 Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YZ NE] U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-086 Equipment ID No. C89 Equip. Class3 20 - Instrumentationand Control Panels Equipment Description ESAS ANALOG SUBSYSTEM No. 2 Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y' N] UMi adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

It was looked for, and no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment were found. It was observed that neighboringcabinets were appropriatelybolted together to avoid interaction effects. Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated by: Roy Berryman Date: 10/4/2012 Eric Dilbone 2 10/4/2012 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 438 of 560 Sheet 4 of 5 Status: Y[ NEI U[- Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-086 Equipment ID No. C89 Equip. Class4 20 - Instrumentationand ControlPanels Equipment Description ESAS ANALOG SUBSYSTEM No. 2 Photographs Note: Equipment ID tag identifying the Note: View inside the bottom of the front of cabinet. the cabinet. 4 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 439 of 560 Sheet 5 of 5 Status: Y[ NR-- U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-086 Equipment ID No. C89 Equip. CIass5 20 - Instrumentation and Control Panels Equipment Description ESAS ANALOG SUBSYSTEM No. 2 COl Note: View of the side of the cabinet with the Note: Closer view inside the bottom of the door open. The cabinet is bolted to the cabinet from the front with the door open. neighboring cabinet as shown. 5 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 440 of 560 Sheet 1 of 5 Status: YE NE] U[Ij Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-087 Equipment ID No. C90 Equip. Class' 20 - Instrumentation and Control Panels Equipment Description ESAS CABINET ANALOG SUBSYSTEM No. 3 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 386 Room, Area 129 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YN ND]

of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)? This item is partof the 50%.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Y[ NEI UD- N/A[D]

All anchorageis visible, and is free of bent, broken, missing and loose hardware.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y[ NDI ULI N/AD-oxidation?

There was no observable corrosion, or even mild surface oxidation on the anchorage.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the Y[ NDI U[-- N/AD--

anchors? The anchorage is free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors. I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-C S- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 441 of 560 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YZ NE] U[I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-087 Equipment ID No. C90 Equip. Class2 20 - Instrumentationand Control Panels Equipment Description ESAS CABINET ANALOG SUBSYSTEM No. 3

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YZ NE] UEL N/AZ1 (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

The anchorageconfiguration is consistent with plant documentation. The anchorageis in accordance with the description in CALC-94-SQ-1001-20, page 307. Additionally, the configuration is consistent with Drawing C-264, Detail 4.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ NEI UEJ potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Based on the above anchorageevaluations, the anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions. Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y[ NEI UE] N/AE]

There are no soft targets that are susceptible to impact by nearby equipment or structures. All soft targets are containedwithin the cabinet, and the cabinet is latched closed.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NEI UE] N/A[-]

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? None of the overhead equipment, ceiling tiles or lighting are likely to collapse onto the equipment. The masonry block walls in the room are seismically qualified.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NE] uE] N/AE]

Attached lines have adequateflexibility to avoid damage.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ N[:] UE]

of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects? Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentiallyadverse seismic interactioneffects. 2 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 442 of 560 Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YZ No U-- Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-087 Equipment ID No. C90 - Equip. Class3 20 - Instrumentation and Control Panels Equipment Description ESAS CABINET ANALOG SUBSYSTEM No. 3 Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ Nil U[I adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

It was looked for, and no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment were found. It was observed that neighboringcabinets were appropriatelybolted together to avoid interactioneffects. Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated by: Roy Berryman Date: 10/4/2012 Eric Dilbone "" `,'c - 10/4/2012 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 443 of 560 Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YE NEI UL-I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-087 Equipment ID No. C90 Equip. Class4 20 - Instrumentationand Control Panels Equipment Description ESAS CABINET ANALOG SUBSYSTEM No. 3 Photographs Note: Equipment ID tag identifying the Note: View inside the bottom of the cabinet cabinet. with the front door open. 4 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 444 of 560 Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YZ NDI U in Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-087 Equipment ID No. C90 Equip. Class5 20 - Instrumentationand Control Panels Equipment Description ESAS CABINET ANALOG SUBSYSTEM No. 3 Note: View of the side of the cabinet with the Note: front door open. The bolting to the neighboring cabinet is visible along the side. 5 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 445 of 560 Sheet I of 4 Status: YZ NL- U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-088 Equipment ID No. PWR-2406 Equip. Class' 20 - Instrumentation and Control Panels Equipment Description REACTOR BLDG SPRAY ENG SAFEG'D POWER SUPPLY Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 386 Room, Area 129 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YDi NZ of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

This item is not part of the 50%.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YZ NEI UEI N/AD1 Item is mounted in a cabinet. No adverse hardware conditions were observed.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YZ N[I- U-I N/AD-oxidation?

Item is mounted in a cabinet. No oxidation was observed

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YZ NEI UED N/AD--

anchors? Item is mounted in a cabinet. No cracks in concrete were observed I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO1-CS-12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 446 of 560 Sheet 2 of 4 Status: YZ ND ULI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-088 Equipment ID No. PWR-2406 Equip. Class2 20 - Instrumentationand Control Panels Equipment Description REACTOR BLDG SPRAY ENG SAFEG'D POWER SUPPLY

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YOI ND UIl N/AZ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

This item is not part of the 50%.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ NEI U[D potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Based on the above anchorageevaluations, the anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions. Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YN NDI UDl N/AD There are no soft targets that could be impacted by nearby equipment or structures.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NDI UD N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Masonry block walls in the room are seismically qualified, and painted with a qualificationnumber. Ceiling tiles and lights are all in good condition, and are adequately supported.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YO ND U[-] N/A--

There are no visible attachedlines, since the power supply is rack-mounted in a cabinet that can only be opened from the front without disassembling the cabinet.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YE ND Uil of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Based on the above evaluation, the power supply is free of potentially adverse seismic interaciton effects. 2 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 447 of 560 Sheet 3 of 4 Status: YZ NEI UI-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-088 Equipment ID No. PWR-2406 Equip. Class3 20 - Instrumentationand Control Panels Equipment Description REACTOR BLDG SPRAY ENG SAFEG'D POWER SUPPLY Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y' NiZ U[

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? It was looked for, and no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions were found. Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated by: Roy Berryman Date: 10/4/2012 Eric Dilbone 6 _ _ _ _ 10/4/2012 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANOI-CS-12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 448 of 560 Sheet 4 of 4 Status: YO NEI U[- Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-088 Equipment ID No. PWR-2406 Equip. CIass4 20 - Instrumentation and Control Panels Equipment Description REACTOR BLDG SPRAY ENG SAFEG'D POWER SUPPLY Photographs Note: PWR-2406 as seen from the front with Note: View inside the cabinet door. The power the cabinet door open. supply is identified as the top two rack positions, as seen in the previous image (upper). Also, a zoomed in version of the section in the rectangle is shown (lower). 4 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 449 of 560 Sheet I of 5 Status: YZ NE] UD-- Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-089 Equipment ID No. C14 Equip. Class, 20 - Instrumentation and Control Panels Equipment Description VERTICAL BOARD, PRIMARY COOLANT Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 386 Room, Area 129 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y[-- NZ of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

This item is not partof the 50%.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YZ N[1 ULI N/A[-]

There were no missing bolts or welds.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YZ NEI ur- N/AD-oxidation?

There were no signs of oxidation on hardware.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YZ NEI UD- N/AD-]

anchors? The concrete was free of cracks near anchors.

' Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 450 of 560 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YZ NE U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-089 Equipment ID No. C14 Equip. Class2 20 - Instrumentation and Control Panels Equipment Description VERTICAL BOARD, PRIMARY COOLANT

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE NE] UE- N/As (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

There was sufficient plant documentation to perform an anchorage verification, but one of the anchors was not visible due to cables on the ground.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ NE: UE:

potentially adverse seismic conditions? Based on the above anchorageevaluation,the anchorage is free of potentiallyadverse seismic conditions. Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NEI UE1 N/AE1 There were no soft targets to be impacted by equipment in the area.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NEJ UE- N/A[-]

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? Masonry block walls in the room are seismically qualified, and painted with a qualificationnumber. Ceiling tiles and lights are all in good condition, and are adequately supported.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ N[E] UE- N/AEJ The attached lines have adequateflexibility.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NEI UE-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Based on the above evaluation, the cabinet is free of potentially adverse seismic interaciton effects. 2 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 451 of 560 Sheet 3 of 5 Status: Y[ NEI U[-- Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-089 Equipment ID No. C14 Equip. Class3 20 - Instrumentationand Control Panels Equipment Description VERTICAL BOARD, PRIMARY COOLANT Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[ NI-] U-I adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

It was looked for, and no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions were found. Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated by: Roy Berryman Date: 10/4/2012 Eric Dilbone 6e-. - -- 10/4/2012 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 452 of 560 Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YZ NO U-- Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-089 Equipment ID No. C14 Equip. Class4 20 - Instrumentationand Control Panels Equipment Description VERTICAL BOARD, PRIMARY COOLANT Photographs Note: Cabinet C14 from the front. Note: Bottom of cabinet C14 as viewed from the back. The cables in the far left corner obscured the view of the last anchor bolt. 4 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 453 of 560 Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YZ N[-I U-] Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-089 Equipment ID No. C14 Equ ip. Classs 20 - Instrumentationand Control Panels Equipment Description VERTICAL BOARD, PRIMARY COOLANT Note: View of a weld to the embedded steel Note: View of anchorbolt for the embedded channel,and an anchorbolt for the embedded steel channel. steel channel. 5 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 454 of 560 Sheet 1 of 5 Status: YN NE U-- Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-090 Equipment ID No. C42 Equip. Class, 20 - Instrumentationand Control Panels Equipment Description NI & RPS SYSTEM B Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 386 Room, Area 129 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE] NZ of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Anchorage configuration verification is not possible because only two of the four documented anchors are visible due to fireboard covering.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YZ NEI UE- N/AE-All hardware visible was present, tight and in good condition.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface "Z NEI UE- N/AE-oxidation?

Mild surface oxidation was observed on some of the anchorage in the bottom of the cabinet. There is no adverse conditions as a result

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the "Z N[1 U[E] N/AE' anchors?

No cracks in concrete were observed. 1 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANOI-CS-12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 455 of 560 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YE NEI U-] Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-090 Equipment ID No. C42 Equip. Class2 20 - Instrumentationand Control Panels Equipment Description NI & RPS SYSTEM B

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? Y--] N[l U[-] N/AZ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

This cabinet was not partof the 50%, so this is not applicable.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ NEl ULi potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Based on the above anchorage evaluations, the anchorage is free of potentiallyadverse seismic conditions. Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y[] NEJ U[i N/A[-]

Soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment and structures.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NEI UEi N/AF and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

The masonry block wall in the room is seismically qualified. The ceiling tiles and lighting in the room are in good condition, and are not likely to collapse onto the cabinet.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ N[-] U[i- N/A[--

Attached lines have adequateflexibility.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YE NE! Uif-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Based on the above seismic interactionevaluations, the equipment is free of potentiallyadverse seismic interactioneffects. 2 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 456 of 560 Sheet 3 of 5 Status: Y[ NIE] U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-090 Equipment ID No. C42 Equip. Class3 20 - Instrumentation and Control Panels Equipment Description NI & RPS SYSTEM B Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ N[- U[

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? It was looked for, and no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety funcitons of the equipment were found. Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated by: Roy Berryman Date: 10/4/2012 Eric Dilbone 6z4-. 10/4/2012 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 457 of 560 Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YZ NEI UM Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-090 Equipment ID No. C42 Equip. Class4 20 - Instrumentationand Control Panels Equipment Description NI & RPS SYSTEM B Photoqraphs Note: Equipment ID tag identifying the Note: View into the bottom of the cabinet with cabinet. the door open on the front. 4 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 458 of 560 Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YZ N- UI-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-090 Equipment ID No. C42 - Equip. CIass5 20 - Instrumentation and Control Panels Equipment Description NI & RPS SYSTEM B Note: Closer front view of the bottom and side Note: View of the bottom of the rearof the of the cabinet with the door open. cabinet with the door open. 5 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 459 of 560 Sheet I of 5 Status: YZ NE] UI1 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-091 Equipment ID No. C44 Equip. Class' 20 - Instrumentation and Control Panels Equipment Description NI & RPS SYSTEM D Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 386 Room, Area 129 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y[-1 NZ of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Anchorage configuration verification is not possible because only two of the four documented anchors are visible due to fireboard covering.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YZ NEI ur N/AD' All hardware visible was present, tight and in good condition.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YZ N[D] UD1 N/A-1 oxidation?

Mild surface oxidation was observed on some of the anchorage in the bottom of the cabinet.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the Y[ NDl U[:] N/A[D anchors?

No cracks in concrete were observed. 1 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS-12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 460 of 560 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YZ NE] U-] Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-091 Equipment ID No. C44 Equip. Class2 20 - Instrumentation and Control Panels Equipment Description NI & RPS SYSTEM D

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE] NEI UI' N/AE (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

This cabinet was not part of the 50%, so this is not applicable.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YE Nn- UI-potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Based on the above anchorageevaluations, the anchorageis free of potentially adverse seismic conditions. Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NE] u[-] NIAE-Soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment and structures.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, 'Y[Z N[il U[--] N/A[--]

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? The masonry block wall in the room is seismically qualified. The ceiling 'Y[ NE-] UE-] NIAE-] tiles and lighting in the room are in good condition, and are not likely to collapse onto the cabinet.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y[ NEI uE] N/AEu Attached lines have adequate flexibility.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZNEI UE]

of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects? Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects. 2 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 461 of 560 Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YZ NEI-I U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-091 Equipment ID No. C44 Equip. Class3 20 - Instrumentation and Control Panels Equipment Description NI & RPS SYSTEM D Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[N NE] ULi adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

It was looked for, and no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety funcitons of the equipment were found. Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) It was noted that a bolt on top of the cabinet was not screwed in all the way. This bolt is not part of the cabinet anchorage,and was tightened at the time of inspection by Operationspersonnel. See image below.

                                   ,42 Evaluated by: Roy Berryman                                                               Date: 10/4/2012 Eric Dilbone &eA,            -                                                10/4/2012 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-C S- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 462 of 560 Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YZ NEI UF--I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-091 Equipment ID No. C44 Equip. Class4 20 - Instrumentationand Control Panels Equipment Description NI & RPS SYSTEM D Photographs Note: Equipment ID tag identifying cabinet. Note: View inside the bottom of the cabinet with the front door open. Anchorage is not visible. 4 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 463 of 560 Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YZ NEI] U-- Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-091 Equipment ID No. C44 Equip. CIass5 20 - Instrumentationand Control Panels Equipment Description NI & RPS SYSTEM D LooseI bolt Note: View of the front of the cabinet with the Note: A loose bolt is shown on top of cabinet doors closed. The anchorage is not visible, C44. The bolt was tightened at the time of since it is contained within the cabinet. inspection by Operationspersonnel. 5 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 464 of 560 Sheet 1 of 5 Status: YZ NEI UDý Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-092 Equipment ID No. C26 Equip. Class, 20 - Instrumentationand Control Panels Equipment Description VERT BD- SUP ENGR SFGO Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 386 Room, Area 129 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO NZ of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Not part of the 50%.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YO NE:l ULI N/A[]

The welds on the underside of the front of the cabinet are all in good condition, and are consistent with plant documentation. The back cabinet doors were opened, but the rearwelds were not visible without crossing the plane of the cabinet.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YN NEI uJE N/AZ oxidation?

There were no signs of any oxidation on the visible anchorage.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YN N[:] UL N/AEJ anchors?

There were no visible cracks in the concrete near the vicinity of the cabinet. I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 465 of 560 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YM NO Ur Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-092 Equipment ID No. C26 Equip. Class2 20 - Instrumentation and Control Panels Equipment Description VERT BD- SUP ENGR SFGO

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? Y' NEI U[-E N/AZ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

All visible anchorage is consistent with plant documentation. However, not all anchoragecould be verified without extensive cabinet disassembly.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ NEI U[E potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Based on the above anchorageevaluations, all visible anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions. Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y[ NEI uE1 N/A-There are no soft targets that could potentially be impacted by nearby equipment or structures.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NEI UE- N/AE1 and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Masonry block walls in the room are seismically qualified,and painted with a qualificationnumber. Ceiling tiles and lights are all in good condition, and are adequately supported.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NEJ UE] N/AE:

The attached lines have adequateflexibility.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NEI uE-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Based on the above evaluation, the cabinet is free of potentially adverse seismic interaciton effects. 2 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-C S- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 466 of 560 Sheet 3 of 5 Status: Y[ NI 1 U-- Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-092 Equipment ID No. C26 Equip. Class3 20 - Instrumentationand Control Panels Equipment Description VERT BD- SUP ENGR SFGO Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NE] U[-

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? It was looked for, and no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions were found. Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Additionally, it was noted that there were four emergency respiratoryprotective equipment cases that were stacked upon one anotherand were not secured. The cases were deemed far enough from the cabinet not to present an interactioneffect. Evaluated by: Roy Berryman Date: 10/4/2012 Eric Dilbone 6Z41- 10/4/2012 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO1-CS-12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 467 of 560 Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YE NF U-- Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-092 Equipment ID No. C26 Equip. CIass4 20 - Instrumentationand Control Panels Equipment Description VERT BD- SUP ENGR SFGO Photographs Note: View of front of C-26. Note: View of welds on the font, bottom edge of cabinet C-26. 4 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO1-CS-12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 468 of 560 Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YZ NE] U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-092 Equipment ID No. C26 Equip. CIass5 20 - Instrumentation and Control Panels Equipment Description VERT BD- SUP ENGR SFGO Note: Shown above are the louvers on the Note: reardoors of cabinet C-26. No anchorage is visible from the rearof the cabinet. 5 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 469 of 560 Sheet I of 5 Status: YE NEI Ur-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 093 Equipment ID No. PY-1042A Equip. Class, 20 - Instrumentationand Control Panels Equipment Description RCS PRESSURE Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 368 Room, Area 104 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YJ- NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

This item is not partof the 50%.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YZ NiD U[-] N/ADJ This component is located in a nest in cabinet C539A. No bent, broken, missing or loose hardware was observed.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YO NDl U[-- N/AD--

oxidation? No corrosion was observed

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YO ND-' U['] N/AD-]

anchors? No cracks in concrete were observed near cabinet

' Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 470 of 560 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YZ N[- UL] Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 093 Equipment ID No. PY-1042A Equip. Class2 20 - Instrumentationand Control Panels Equipment Description RCS PRESSURE

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? Y[I NWi ULI N/A[

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.) This item is not partof the 50%.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of 'YE Nn U[I potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Based on the above anchorage evaluations,the anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions. Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y" NW'- UW- N/AD" Soft targets are free from impact since they are in a cabinet that is latched closed.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YEI NWI UW1 N/AZ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

This does not apply since the component is located inside of a cabinet.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NW-] UW1 N/AW1 Attached lines have adequate flexibility.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NEI UW1 of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations,the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interactioneffects. 2 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 471 of 560 Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YN NEI- U-- Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 093 Equipment ID No. PY-1042A Equip. Class3 20 - Instrumentation and Control Panels Equipment Description RCS PRESSURE Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NEI Ui adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

It was looked for, and no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions were found. Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated by: Eric Dilbone 6 6 Date: 10/110/2012 Daniel Parker % O'ý Y"-Q," 10/10/2012 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 472 of 560 Sheet 4 of 5 Status: Y[ ND UD-- Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 093 Equipment ID No. PY-1042A Equip. Class4 20 - Instrumentationand Control Panels Equipment Description RCS PRESSURE Photographs

Note: Front view of component. Note: Sign on cabinet door. 4 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 473 of 560 Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YE NF U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 093 Equipment ID No. PY-1042A Equip. CIasss 20 - Instrumentationand Control Panels Equipment Description RCS PRESSURE Note: Wingnut and washer are used to keep Note: the metal plate over the door to keep it from swinging open. As the nameplate reads, this is necessary to maintain seismic qualificationsfor the cabinet. 5 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO l-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 474 of 560 Sheet I of 5 Status: YZ NEI U-i Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-094 Equipment IDeNo. LY-1411A Equip. Class' 20 - Instruments and Control Panels Equipment Description BWST LEVEL #1 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 374 Room, Area 96 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO NZ of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

This item is not part of the 50%.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YN NOi ULII N/A-The bolts holding the component into the cabinet are free of all of the above conditions.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YZ ND U- N/AD oxidation?

The bolts holding the component into the cabinet are free of corrosion.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the Y' NDI U[-] N/A[-D anchors?

No cracks in concrete were observed near anchorage of cabinet. 1 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 475 of 560 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YZ NE] U-- Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-094 Equipment ID No. LY-1411A Equip. Class2 20 - Instruments and Control Panels Friiinm*.nt flp.cerintinn RWqTILEVEI #1

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YEI NEI U[-I NIAED (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Item is not partof the 50%.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ NEi UEi potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Component mounted inside cabinet C543. Located in "grey"nest box 3. All mounting bolts for component and support box were identified and adequate. Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YN NEi U[E N/A--

Soft targets are free from impact since the component is located inside of a cabinet.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NEI UEI N/AF-and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

The component is located in cabinet C543. It is protected from any intrusion from adjacent equipment when the doorpanel is in the normal closed and locked position.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NEI UE- N/A--

Attached lines have adequate flexibility.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YE NEI U[--

of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects? Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentiallyadverse seismic interaction effects. 2 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 476 of 560 Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YZ NEI U-I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-094 Equipment ID No. LY-1411A Equip. Class3 20- Instruments and Control Panels Equipment Description BWST LEVEL #1 Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ Nr-I U[M adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

It was looked for, and no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment were found. Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated by: Daniel Parker 2:QN-Y -* Date: 10/10/2012 Eric Dilbone

_ 10/10/2012 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 477 of 560 Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YZ N[-] U-- Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-094 Equipment ID No. LY-1411A Equip. CIass4 20- Instruments and Control Panels Equipment Description BWST LEVEL #1 Photographs Note: Component LY-1411A inside nested Note: Component LY-1411A inside nested panel box. panel box. 4 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 478 of 560 Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YZ NEI U' Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-094 Equipment ID No. LY-1411A Equip. Class5 20- Instruments and Control Panels Equipment Description BWST LEVEL #1 Note: Cabinet containing LY-1411A. s Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO1-CS-12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 479 of 560 Sheet I of 5 Status: YN NEI UE Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 095 Equipment ID No. LY-4204A Equip. Class' 20 - Instrumentationand Control Panels Equipment Description CST T41B LEVEL RED// Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 368 Room, Area 104 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y[E] NZ of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

This item is not part of the 50%.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YZ NE] U[] N/AE-No adverse hardware conditions were observed.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YZ N[E] UE N/AE-oxidation?

No corrosion observed.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YZ NEI UIE N/AE-1 anchors?

No cracks in concrete observed 1 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 480 of 560 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YZ NF] U-] Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 095 Equipment ID No. LY-4204A Equip. Class2 20 - Instrumentation and Control Panels Equipment Description CST T41B LEVEL REDI/V

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? Y-I NEi UI- N/AE (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

This item is not part of the 50%.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YE NoJ UrI potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Based on the above anchorageevaluations, the anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions. Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ N[:] UE] N/All Soft targets are free from impact since they are in a cabinet that is latched closed.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YiE NEI UE] N/AZ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

This does not apply since the component is located inside of a cabinet.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YM NE:] ur- N/AE-Attached lines have adequate flexibility.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YN NEI UE]

of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects? Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects. 2 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 481 of 560 Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YE No' UD-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 095 Equipment ID No. LY-4204A Equip. Class3 20 - Instrumentationand Control Panels Equipment Description CST T41B LEVEL REDIN Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NDI U[-]

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? It was looked for, and no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions were found. Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated by: Eric Dilbone Date: 10/10/2012 Daniel Parker < , - 10/10/2012 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 482 of 560 Sheet 4 of 5 Status: Y[ NF U[- Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 095 Equipment ID No. LY-4204A Equip. Class4 20 - Instrumentation and Control Panels Equipment Description CST T41B LEVEL REDI/V Photographs

Note: View of equipment ID tag identifying the component. 4 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 483 of 560 Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YE NEI Ur-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 095 Equipment ID No. LY-4204A Equip. CIasss 20 - Instrumentation and Control Panels Equipment Description CST T41B LEVEL REDIN Note: Wingnut and washerare used to keep Note: the metal plate over the door to keep it from swinging open. As the nameplate reads, this is necessary to maintain seismic qualificationsfor the cabinet. 5 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 484 of 560 Sheet 1 of 5 Status: YZ NEI Ur-- Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 096 Equipment ID No. PY-2667-Al Equip. Class' 20 - Instrumentation and Control Panels Equipment Description I/V CONVERTER STM GEN B PRESS Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 368 Room, Area 104 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

This item is not part of the 50%.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YN NE- UE- N/A[]

No adverse hardware conditions were observed.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YZ N[E UE- N/A--

oxidation? No corrosion observed.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YZ NEI U N/AR-anchors?

No cracks in concrete observed

'Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 485 of 560 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YZ NEI ULI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 096 Equipment ID No. PY-2667-A1 Equip. Class 20- Instrumentation and Control Panels Equipment Description IN CONVERTER STM GEN B PRESS

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? Y-I NWI U[1 N/A2 (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

This item is not part of the 50%.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ NWi UW-potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Based on the above anchorageevaluations, the anchorageis free of potentially adverse seismic conditions. Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YN N[-] UW' N/AWl Soft targets are free from impact since they are in a cabinet that is latched closed.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y[-- NWJ U-- N/AZ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

This does not apply since the component is located inside of a cabinet.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YO NWI U-- N/A[-]

Attached lines have adequate flexibility.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YN NWI Uil of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 486 of 560 Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YZ No U[-- Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 096 Equipment ID No. PY-2667-A1 Equip. Class 20 - Instrumentation and Control Panels Equipment Description IW CONVERTER STM GEN B PRESS Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YM No UEI]

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? It was looked for, and no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions were found. Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated by: Eric Dilbone 6 1 Date: 10/10/2012 Daniel ParkerDaniel Parker 10/10/20 12 1011012012

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 487 of 560 Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YN NO] U-I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 096 Equipment ID No. PY-2667-A1 Equip. Class 20 - Instrumentation and Control Panels Equipment Description I/V CONVERTER STM GEN B PRESS Photoqraphs i/ Note: View of equipment ID tag identifying the component. Note: Alternate view of the component.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-C S- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 488 of 560 Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YZ NE] UI-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 096 Equipment ID No. PY-2667-A1 Equip. Class 20- Instrumentation and Control Panels Equipment Description IV CONVERTER STM GEN B PRESS Note: Wingnut and washerare used to keep Note: the metal plate over the door to keep it from swinging open. As the nameplate reads, this is necessary to maintain seismic qualificationsfor the cabinet.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 489 of 560 Sheet I of 4 Status: YZ No uID Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-097 Equipment ID No. PB-2670 Equip. Class' 20 - Instrumentation and Control Panels Equipment Description EMERG EW TO SG A FROM P7B VLV CV-2670 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 386 Room, Area 129 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO N Z of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

This item is not part of the 50%.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Y[( NI ULI N/A[Z No adverse hardwareconditions were observed.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YZ NI UL] N/AZý oxidation?

No corrosion observed.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the Y[ NO UrI N/AZ anchors?

No cracks in concrete observed Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 490 of 560 Sheet 2 of 4 Status: YZ NE] UW-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl -097 Equipment ID No. PB-2670 Equip. Class2 20 - Instrumentationand Control Panels Equipment Description EMERG EW TO SG A FROM P7B VLV CV-2670

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YEI NEI UIZ N/An (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

This item is not partof the 50%.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YN NEI ULI potentially adverse seismic conditions?

The anchorageis not visible since it is mounted in the face of a panel. The cabinet could not be opened due to Control Room Operations. However, the button appearsto be installed properly and there is no apparentreason why it would be adversely affected in a seismic event. Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YN NiE U[-] N/AI' There are no soft targets that could be impacted by nearby equipment or structures.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y" N[-- U-I N/AI-]

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? Masonry block walls in the room are seismically qualified, and painted with a qualification number. Ceiling tiles and lights are all in good condition, and are adequatelysupported.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YE NEI UW1 N/A[]

There are no visible attachedlines, since the button is mounted on the face of a panel.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ N[- UED of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Based on the above evaluation, the button is free of potentially adverse seismic interaciton effects. 2 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 491 of 560 Sheet 3 of 4 Status: YZ NEIl UD Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-097 Equipment ID No. PB-2670 Equip. Class3 20 - Instrumentationand Control Panels Equipment Description EMERG EW TO SG A FROM P7B VLV CV-2670 Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ Nil Ur-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

It was looked for, and no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions were found. Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated by: Roy Berryman Date: 10/4/2012 Frir D~ilhnnto&e, 10/4/2012 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 492 of 560 Sheet 4 of 4 Status: YE NEI U-- Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-097 Equipment ID No. PB-2670 Equip. CIass4 20 - Instrumentationand Control Panels Equipment Description EMERG EW TO SG A FROM P7B VLV CV-2670 Photographs Note: PB-2670 is shown mounted in the face Note: -oomec in version or me previous of a panel image. 4 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-C S- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 493 of 560 Sheet I of 4 Status: YZ NIJ UF Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-098 Equipment ID No. SS-1220 Equip. Class' 20 - Instrumentation and Control Panels Equipment Description HPI ISO VV CV 1220 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 386 Room, Area 129 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

This item is not partof the 50%.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YO NEi U[I: N/A[D No adverse hardware conditions were observed.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YZ NDl U[l N/AF-]

oxidation? No corrosion observed.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YZ N[D U-- N/A[-

anchors? No cracks in concrete observed I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 494 of 560 Sheet 2 of 4 Status: YZ NO UDý Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-098 Equipment ID No. SS-1220 Equip. Class2 20 - Instrumentationand Control Panels Equipment Description HPI ISO VV CV 1220

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? 'Y[E NE] U[-] N/AZ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not part of the 50%.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ N[EI UE-potentially adverse seismic conditions?

The cabinet was opened from the back, and no adverse seismic conditions were observed. Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YN NEI UE1 N/AEl There are no soft targets that could be impacted by nearby equipment or structures.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y' NEI uE1 N/AE-]

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? Masonry block walls in the room are seismically qualified, and painted with a qualification number. Ceiling tiles and lights are all in good condition, and are adequatelysupported.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YN NEI UE1 N/AE--

The attachedlines have adequate flexibility.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y[ NEI UE--

of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects? Based on the above evaluation, the switch is free of potentially adverse seismic interaciton effects. 2 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 495 of 560 Sheet 3 of 4 Status: YN NO UDý Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-098 Equipment ID No. SS-1220 Equip. Class3 20 - Instrumentationand Control Panels Equipment Description HPI ISO VV CV 1220 Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEI UI-]

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? It was looked for, and no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions were found. Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated by: Roy Berryman Date: 10/4/2012 Eric Dilbone 10/4/2012 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 496 of 560 Sheet 4 of 4 Status: YZ NEI U-- Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-09 8 Equipment ID No. SS-1220 Equip. Class4 20 - Instrumentation and Control Panels Equipment Description HPI ISO VV CV 1220 Photographs Note: View of the front of cabinet C18, which Note: Zoomed version of the previous image, contains SS-1220. detailing SS-1220. 4 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 497 of 560 Sheet 1 of 4 Status: YZ Nn U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-099 Equipment ID No. TR-1139 Equip. Class, 20 - Instrumentation and Control Panels Equipment Description RC LOOP B WR HOT LEG TEMP Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 386 Room, Area 129 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y[] N[Z of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

This item is not partof the 50%.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Y" NEI UE] N/AEl No adverse hardware conditions were observed.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YZ NE-] UE N/AE-]

oxidation? No corrosion observed.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the Y[ NE] UIE-I N/AEl anchors?

No cracks in concrete observed

' Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS-i12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 498 of 560 Sheet 2 of 4 Status: YE NE U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-099 Equipment ID No. TR-1139 Equip. Class2 20 - Instrumentationand Control Panels Equipment Description RC LOOP B WR HOT LEG TEMP

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? Y[] NE] UE] N/A2 (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not part of the 50%.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YN NE] ULI potentially adverse seismic conditions?

No other adverse seismic conditions were observed. Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y[Z NEI UE1 N/AE-There are no soft targets that could be impacted by nearby equipment or structures.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, '(Y NEJ UE[ N/AEl and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Masonry block walls in the room are seismically qualified, and painted with a qualificationnumber. Ceiling tiles and lights are all in good condition, and are adequately supported.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? '(Y NEI UE: N/A[-1 The attachedlineshave adequate flexibility.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free 1 NEl U --

of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects? Based on the above evaluation, the temperaturerecorderis free of potentiallyadverse seismic interaciton effects. 2 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 499 of 560 Sheet 3 of 4 Status: YZ NI U[--I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-099 Equipment ID No. TR-1139 Equip. Class3 20 - Instrumentation and Control Panels Equipment Description RC LOOP B WR HOT LEG TEMP Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[ Nil U--

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? It was looked for, and no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions were found. Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated by: Roy Berryman Date: 10/4/2012 Eric Dilbone ,,*. . 10/4/2012 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO1-CS-12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 500 of 560 Sheet 4 of 4 Status: YO NF-- UL-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-099 Equipment ID No. TR-1139 Equip. Class4 20- Instrumentationand Control Panels Equipment Description RC LOOP B WR HOT LEG TEMP Photographs TR-1139 Note: View of the panel containing TR-1 139. Note: Zoomed view of the previous image. 4 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 501 of 560 Sheet I of 5 Status: YZ NE] UDF-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-100 Equipment ID No. LIS-1421 Equip. Class' 20 - Instrumentationand Control Panels Equipment Description BWST LEVEL No. 2 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 386 Room, Area 129 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) _ Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y[] N[

of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)? This item is not part of the 50%.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YN NEI UDJ N/A[:D The level indicatoris mounted in cabinet C18, and the hardware is visible from inside the rearof the cabinet. The anchorageis free of bent, broken and loose hardware.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YZ NEI UI[I N/A[-]

oxidation? No mild surface oxidation present on anchorage.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YZ NDl U-1 N/AD1 anchors?

The level indicatoris mounted in the front face of the cabinet. No cracks in concrete aroundcabinet anchorage. 1 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 502 of 560 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YE NR U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-100 Equipment ID No. LIS-1421 E-quip. Class2 20 - Instrumentationand Control Panels Pnauinment Descrintinn RWS;T LFVFI No_ 2

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? Y[] NE-- UE' N/AO (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

This item is not part of the 50%.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y[ NE] U[-]

potentially adverse seismic conditions? All visible anchoragewas free of potentially adverse seismic conditions. Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NEI UE- N/AE--

There are no soft targets that could be impacted by nearby equipment or structures.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y[ NE-1 UE[ N/AE-and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Masonry block walls in the room are seismically qualified, and painted with a qualificationnumber. Ceiling tiles and lights are all in good condition, and are adequately supported.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NE] UEi N/AE--

The attached lines have adequate flexibility.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YE N[-E UE-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Based on the above evaluation, the level indicatorin the cabinet is free of potentiallyadverse seismic interacitoneffects. 2 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 503 of 560 Sheet 3 of 5 Status: Y[ NEI Ur-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELI-1O0 Equipment ID No. LIS-1421 Equip. Class3 20 - Instrumentation and Control Panels Equipment Description BWST LEVEL No. 2 Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[ NE] UDJ adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

It was looked for, and no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions were found. Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated by: Roy Berryman Date: 10/4/2012 Eric Dilbone 10/4/2012 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-C S- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 504 of 560 Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YE NOI UD-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-1O0 Equipment ID No. LIS-1421 Equip. Class4_ 20 - Instrumentation and Control Panels Equipment Description BWST LEVEL No. 2 Photoqraphs LIS-1421 from rear Note: LIS-1421 equipment ID tag. Note: View inside the back of cabinet C18, containingLIS-1421. 4 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 505 of 560 Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YZ Nn U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-100 Equipment ID No. LIS-1421 Equip. CIass5 20 - Instrumentationand Control Panels Equipment Description BWST LEVEL No. 2 LIS-1421 from rear Note: General view of the back of cabinet Note: C18. 5 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 506 of 560 Sheet I of 5 Status: YZ NE] U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 101 Equipment ID No. T-78A Equip. Class' 21 - Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment Description EMERG. DIESEL GEN (K4A) COOLING WATER EXP TANK Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 369 Room, Area 87 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y[ NE]

of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)? Item is part of the 50%.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YZ NEI UDl N/ADl The bolts anchoringthe tank to the EDG skid are free of bent, broken, missing and loose hardware.Additionally, the welds were all in good condition.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YZ NDI UD1 N/AD-oxidation?

The anchorageis free of corrosion and is paintedblue without any chipped paint.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YZ NEI UDl N/ADl anchors?

The tank is anchored to a steel frame on the EDG skid. No cracks around EDG skid anchorage I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I -CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 507 of 560 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YZ NEI U[-I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 101 Equipment ID No. T-78A Equip. Class 21 - Tanks and Heat Exchanqers Equipment Description EMERG. DIESEL GEN (K4A) COOLING WATER EXP T4NK

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YN N[-] UI- N/A[-]

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.) Anchorage is consistent with calculation 6600-M12AC-117-1.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ Nil U[-I potentially adverse seismic conditions?

All visible anchoragewas free of potentially adverse seismic conditions. Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y[ NEI ur- N/A[-

There are no soft targets that could be impacted by nearby equipment or structures.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YN NEI UEl N/A[--

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? There are no masonry block walls or ceiling tiles in the room. The lights are in good condition, and do not present an interaction effect.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NEI UE-- N/AEl The attachedlines have adequateflexibility.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YN NEl UM-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Based on the above evaluation, the level switch is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANOI-CS-12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 508 of 560 Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YE NEI U[- Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 101 Equipment ID No. T-78A Equip. Class 21 - Tanks and Heat Exchanqers Enuinment Description EMERG. DIESEL GEN (K4A) COOLING WATER EXP TANK Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE N[- UI--

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? It was looked for, and no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions were found. Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated by: Daniel Parker " , - Date: 10/11/2012 Eric Dilbone 6 u & l- 10/11/2012

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 509 of 560 Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YN NO U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 101 Equipment ID No. T-78A Equip. Class 21 - Tanks and Heat Exchanqers Equipment Description EMERG. DIESEL GEN (K4A) COOLING WATER EXP TANK Photographs Note: Close-up view of T-78A welded to Note: Tank T-78A welded to bracket that is bracket used to bolt to steel frame on skid. bolted to steel frame on K4A skid. View from View from North side of skid. North side of skid.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 510 of 560 Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YM N[-- U-- Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 101 Equipment ID No. T-78A - Equip. Class 21 - Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment Description EMERG. DIESEL GEN (K4A) COOLING WATER EXP TANK Note: View from North side of skid showing Note: View from South side of skid showing attachedlines, the steel frame used to mount bracket welded to T-78A (top of picture).

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO1-CS-12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 511 of 560 Sheet I of 4 Status: YZ NDI UD-1 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-102 Equipment ID No. T-78B Equip. Class' 21 - Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment Description EMERG. DIESEL GEN (K4B) COOLING WATER EXP. TANK Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 369 Room, Area 86 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Electro-Motive Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YZ NDJ of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Item is part of the 50% configuration.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Y[ NDJ UD-- N/AD-The anchorageis free of bent, broken, missing and loose hardware.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YN NDJ UD- N/AD-oxidation?

The anchorageis free of corrosion.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YZ NDl UD- N/AD anchors?

Component mounted to EDG skid. No cracks around skid anchorage. ' Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-C S- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 512 of 560 Sheet 2 of 4 Status: YZ NF U-I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-102 Equipment ID No. T-78B Equip. Class2 21 - Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment Description EMERG. DIESEL GEN (K4B) COOLING WATER EXP. TANK

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE NE] U[-] N/A--

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.) Anchorage is consistent with calculation 6600-M12AC-1 17-1.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of 'YE NE] UEi potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Based on the above anchorageevaluations, the anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions. Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y[D NEi UE- N/A[E The water expansion tank was mounted to the accessory end of the diesel generator.A large air-ductmounted overhead adequately supported with steel hangers. There is no other equipment overhead or nearby that could have a credible significant interaction with the tank during a seismic event.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y[ NEI UEI N/AE--

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? There is overhead duct work that is properly secured with steel hangers.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y[N NE] U[-- N/AE[-

Attached lines have adequate flexibility.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y[ NEI UEl of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Based on the above seismic interactionevaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects. 2 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 513 of 560 Sheet 3 of 4 Status: YN NEI Ui' Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-102 Equipment ID No. T-78B Equip. Class3 21 - Tanks and Heat Exchanqers Equipment Description EMERG. DIESEL GEN (K4B) COOLING WATER EXP. TANK Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y' N[i ULI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

It was looked for, and no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment were found. Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) The cooling water expansion tank was mounted horizontally at the accessory end of the diesel generator.The tank was welded directly to support brackets on either side of the tanks. The supportbrackets were bolted directly to the structuralframe of the diesel engine. Evaluated by: Eric Dilbone 6 1 '-" Date: 10/212012 Daniel Parker *j 10/212012 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 514 of 560 Sheet 4 of 4 Status: YZ NE] UI-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-102 Equipment ID No. T-78B Equip. Class4 21 - Tanks and Heat Exchanqers Equipment Description EMERG. DIESEL GEN (K4B) COOLING WATER EXP. TANK Photographs Note: Component ID Note: Component Overview 4 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-C S- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 515 of 560 Sheet I of 5 Status: YE NEIl U[- Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-103 Equipment ID No. E-197A Equip. Class' 21 - Tanks and Exchangers Equipment Description A EDG LUBE OIL HEAT EXCHANGER Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 369 Room, Area 87 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y[ NZ of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Item is not part of the 50%.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YZ NO ulfl N/A[:]

The bolts anchoringthe heat exchanger to the EDG skid are free of bent, broken, missing and loose hardware.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YZ NO U-1 N/A[-]

oxidation? Some of the blue paint is cracked, but there are no signs of corrosion.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the Y' NEI ur N/AD-1 anchors?

The heat exchanger is anchored to a steel frame on the EDG skid. No cracks in concrete aroundskid observed. IEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 516 of 560 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YZ N[:] U[- Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 103 Equipment ID No. E-197A Equip. Class 21 - Tanks and Exchangers Equipment Description A EDG LUBE OIL HEAT EXCHANGER

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? Y[-E NEI U- N/AZ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

This does not apply since this item is not part of the 50% requiring anchorageconfiguration.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YN NEi U-"

potentially adverse seismic conditions? All visible anchoragewas free of potentially adverse seismic conditions. Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NEI UD N/AD There are no soft targets that could be impacted by nearby equipment or structures.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ ND uF-I N/AD-'

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? There are no masonry block walls or ceiling tiles in the room. The lights are in good condition, and do not present an interaction effect.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ ND UD N/A[D]

The attachedlines have adequate flexibility.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y' NM uDU of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Based on the above evaluation, the heat exchanger is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 517 of 560 Sheet 3 of 5 Status: Y[ N- U--1 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 103 Equipment ID No. E-197A Equip. Class 21 - Tanks and Exchangers Equipment Description A EDG LUBE OIL HEAT EXCHANGER Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NiE U-I adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

It was looked for, and no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions were found. Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated by: Daniel Parker Date: 10/11/2012 Eric Dilbone 1/20 1011112012

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 518 of 560 Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YZ NI- ULID Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 103 Equipment ID No. E-197A Equip. Class 21 - Tanks and Exchangers Equipment Description A EDG LUBE OIL HEAT EXCHANGER Photographs Note: Close-up view of equipment ID tag and Note: Side view from South side of skid bolts anchoring heat exchanger to the steel showing diagonalorientation of heat frame. exchanger.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 519 of 560 Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YZ NEI] Uil Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 103 Equipment ID No. E-197A Equip. Class 21 - Tanks and Exchangers Equipment Description A EDG LUBE OIL HEAT EXCHANGER Note: View of anchor bolts along the upper Note: View of anchorbolts used to mount the (top) and lower (bottom) edges of the heat heat exchanger to the steel frame located on exchanger. the K4A skid.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-C S- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 520 of 560 Sheet 1 of 5 Status: Y] NF UI-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 104 Equipment ID No. E-109 Equip. Class' 21 - Tanks and Heat Exchanqers Equipment Description OIL COOLER Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 335 Room, Area 38 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YZ N[-

of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)? This equipment item is part of the 50% of SWEL items requiring anchorageconfiguration verification.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YN NEIl U[-] N/A--

All anchorage was free of the conditions listed above.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YX NE] U[-- N/A-1 oxidation?

No corrosion was observed.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YZ NEI UD- N/AE-anchors?

No visible cracks were observed in the concrete.

' Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 521 of 560 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YN NEI UI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 104 Equipment ID No. E-109 Equip. Class 21 - Tanks and Heat Exchanqers Equipment Description OIL COOLER

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE NI U[EI N/AD-(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Information for anchorage configurationwas taken from CR-ANO-I-2008-01239 pg. 103. The anchorageconfiguration consists of four bolts, two per angle beam support and each .625 inch in diameter. The anchorageconfiguration in the equipment drawing was consistent with what was evident in the seismic inspection.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YE NEI UM potentially adverse seismic conditions?

All anchorage is free of adverse seismic conditions. Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ ND] UD] N/AD]

All soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YM N[-] UD1 N/AD-and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Overheadequipment is not likely to collapse onto the equipment item.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NDl UD] N/AD:

All attachedlines have adequate flexibility.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NEI UD-1 of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects. Item is well anchored to the floor.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 522 of 560 Sheet 3 of 5 Status: Y] NO U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 104 Equipment ID No. E-109 Equip. Class 21 - Tanks and Heat Exchanqers Equipment Description OIL COOLER Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y" NMi UMi adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes, no other seismic conditions that could affect the safety functions of the equipment were discovered. Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Equipment item, E-109, had no clear visible tag number. Although this was evident in the inspection, the oil cooler was clearly identified through an image in the SEWS package and also through the tag on the component feeding into the Oil Cooler. Date: 1 2 Evaluated by: Genaro BarraqanJr. Date: 101912012 Eric Dilbone '10//2 1 101912012

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANOI-CS-12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 523 of 560 Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YZ NEi-] UI-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 104 Equipment ID No. E-109 Equip. Class 21 - Tanks and Heat Exchanqers Equipment Description OIL COOLER Photographs

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 524 of 560 Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YZ ND U[7 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 104 Equipment ID No. E-109 Equip. Class 21 - Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment Description OIL COOLER Note: Generalimage of Oil Cooler (E-109). Note: General image of Oil Cooler (E-109).

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 525 of 560 Sheet I of 5 Status: Y- NF U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-105 Equipment ID No. N/A Equip. Class, Equipment Description NOT USED Location: Bldg. N/A Floor El. N/A Room, Area N/A Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE"] Nn of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YEJ NEJ UE[ N/AE[

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YE- NFE UE- N/AE--

oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YE] NE: UEJ N/AE[-

anchors? I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 526 of 560 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YE] NI] U-- Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-105 Equipment ID No. N/A Equip. I Equipment Description NOT USED

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YEI- NE] UE] N/A[]

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YE] NE-] UE]

potentially adverse seismic conditions? Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YE] NEi UE] N/AE]

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YEI NEI UE] N/AE-]

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YEI NE] UE]1 N/AE]

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YEI NE[:] UE]-

of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 527 of 560 Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YO] NO] Ut] Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWE Equipment ID No. N/A Equip. Equipment Description NOT USED Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[L]NE]UFJ adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated by: Date:

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 528 of 560 Sheet 4 of 5 Status: Y-- NE] Ur-1 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-105 Equipment ID No. N/A Equip. Class N/A Equipment Description NOT USED Photographs

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 529 of 560 Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YW-- Nil Ur-1 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-105 Equipment ID No. N/A Equip. Class N/A Equipment Description NOT USED Note: Note:

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 530 of 560 Sheet 1 of 6 Status: YZ NE] UE1 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-106 Equipment ID No. T-208 - Equip. Class' 21-Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment Description ACCUM TANK FOR CV-2234 AIR OPERATOR Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 356 Room, Area 77 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y[] NZ of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

This item is anchored to Item CV-2234 using steel frames. This item is also not partof the 50%.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YZ NEI UE- N/AE-It appears that one of the anchored bolts is slightly loose. However, there are no signs for this being an adverse seismic condition for the equipment item. Other than this minor issue, all other anchorageis free of the conditionslisted above.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y' N[E uE-l N/AE-oxidation?

No corrosion was observed.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YE- NE] UEi N/AZ anchors?

Equipment is attachedto a metal frame in Item CV-2234. I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 531 of 560 Sheet 2 of 6 Status: Y[ NEiI UDl Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-106 Equipment ID No. T-208 Equip. Class 21-Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment Description ACCUM TANK FOR CV-2234 AIR OPERATOR

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? Y-- NF] U' N/AZ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Item is not partof the 50%.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YN NI] U[]

potentially adverse seismic conditions? Anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions. Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NEi ULI N/A[--

Soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YE NEil UZI' N/A[--

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? Steel frame protects the tank from overhead hazards.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y' NEI uLI N/A--

Lines appearto have adequate flexibility.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NE- U '-1 of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Equipment has enough space in its surroundingsto avoid negative interactioneffects.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 532 of 560 Sheet 3 of 6 Status: Y[ NEIl U[- Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-106 Equipment ID No. T-208 Equip. Class 21-Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment Description ACCUM TANK FOR CV-2234 AIR OPERATOR Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NoI UF-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

No other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment were observed. Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Accumulator tank did not have an equipment ID tag. Tank ID was noted on the tee fitting directly above the tank. Also, one of the anchored bolts was slightly loose; there are no signs of it being a seismic concern for the accumulator.See images below. Evaluated by: Genaro BarraqanJr. . ' Date: 10/3/2012 Michael E. Perez 10//2-101312012

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 533 of 560 Sheet 4 of 6 Status: YZ NEI UD-] Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-106 Equipment ID No. T-208 Equip. Class 21-Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment Description ACCUM TANK FOR CV-2234 AIR OPERATOR Photographs Note: Image shows the Accumulator tank ID Note: It seems that there is one bolt that T-208. appears to be slightly loose. Although this may not show signs of an adverse seismic condition, it is advised that the bolt should be checked for tightness.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 534 of 560 Sheet 5 of 6 Status: YZ NEI-] UI-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-106 Equipment ID No. T-208 Equip. Class 21-Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment Description ACCUM TANK FOR CV-2234 AIR OPERATOR Note: General image of Accumulator Tank. Note: Image shows the anchorage configuration of the accumulatortank.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 535 of 560 Sheet 6 of 6 Status: YZ N[-] U-I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-106 Equipment ID No. T-208 Equip. Class 21-Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment Description ACCUM TANK FOR CV-2234 AIR OPERATOR Note: General image showing the top section Note: of the tank.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 536 of 560 Sheet 1 of 5 Status: YLI NR U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-107 Equipment ID No. N/A Equip. I Equipment Description NOT USED Location: Bldg. N/A Floor El. N/A Room, Area N/A Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one 'Y[-E NE-]

of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Y[E] NEJ U[-E N/AE-

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YE- NEI UE-' N/AE--

oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the 'YE NE:] UEJ N/A[E]

anchors? 1 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 537 of 560 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YEI Nn- U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl -107 Equipment ID No. N/A Equip. Class N/A Equipment Description NOT USED

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE- NE- U[:] N/Ar]

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YE- NE UE]

potentially adverse seismic conditions? Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YEI NEi UE- N/AE-

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YEI NEI UE1 N/AE1 and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y[I NEI UE- N/AE-

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YEI NEI UE of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 538 of 560 Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YD-- NE] U-- Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-107 Equipment ID No. N/A Equip. Class N/A Equipment Description NOT USED Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE]" Nil uD-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated by: Date: Date: Evaluated by:

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 539 of 560 Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YD-- No-- ULII Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-107 Equipment ID No. N/A Equip. Class N/A Equipment Description NOT USED Photographs

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 540 of 560 Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YDI NEI U-- Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-107 Equipment ID No. N/A Equip. Class N/A Equipment Description NOT USED Note: Note:

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 541 of 560 Sheet I of 5 Status: YZ N[:] UM Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-108 Equipment ID No. E-35A Equip. Class' 21 - Tanks and Heat Exchanqers Equipment Description 'A' LOOP DH CLR Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 317 Room, Area 14 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YZ N[E of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

This equipment is anchoredto two concrete pedestals. Anchorage configuration verification is requiredfor this equipment.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YE N[: UE- N/AE"]

Anchorage appears to be free from the conditions stated above.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YZ N[: UE- N/AEl oxidation?

No signs of any type of corrosion have been found on the anchorageof the component.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YZ NEl U[-] N/A[--

anchors? No cracks were observed in the concrete piers in the vicinity of the anchor bolts. Concrete piers (3ft high) appearedto be in sound condition. 1 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 542 of 560 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: Y[ NE] U[] Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-108 Equipment ID No. E-35A Equip. Class 21 - Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment Description A' LOOP DH CLR

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? Y[ NEI U[- N/AD-(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

The anchorageconfiguration that has been found during the inspection complied with the specificationsstated in the documentation (CALC SQ-1001-21, page 25 and Drawing C-261, Sht. 1, Rev. 15).

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ NE] UD-]

potentially adverse seismic conditions? All anchoragesupporting the system was found to be free from adverse seismic conditions. Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y[N ND-] UD- N/AD-None of the soft targets found in the equipment have been shown to potentiallysuffer impact by nearby equipment.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y[D ND:] UD- N/AD-and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Overheadequipment near Item E-35B appeared to be properlysecured so as to avoid any collapse during a seismic hazard.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y' NDI UD- N/AD-All attachedlines have been ruled to have adequate flexibility.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YN ND"] U[-D of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Equipment appears to be free from seismic interaction effects.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 543 of 560 Sheet 3 of 5 Status: Y[ NIF U-] Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-108 Equipment ID No. E-35A Equip. Class 21 - Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment Description 'A'LOOP OH CLR Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NEI UD1 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

No other seismic conditions were found to affect the equipment's integrity. Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) The anchoragefound in the system appeared to be in very good condition. There was no sign of oxidation. Additionally, no cracks in the concrete were observed. Evaluated by: Michael Perez - - Date: 10/11/2012 Sean Smolarek Z/122 1011112012

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO1-CS-12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 544 of 560 Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YZ NI] U-- Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-108 Equipment ID No. E-35A Equip. Class 21 - Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment Description 'A' LOOP DH CLR Photographs Note: General Overview Note: Concrete Pedastel

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 545 of 560 Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YE NrD UI-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-108 Equipment ID No. E-35A Equip. Class 21 - Tanks and Heat Exchanqers Equipment Description 'A' LOOP DH CLR Note: Anchorage Note: Overhead

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 546 of 560 Sheet I of 5 Status: Y[ NE U-- Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-109 Equipment ID No. E-35B Equip. Class, 21 - Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment Description 'B' LOOP DH CLR Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 317 Room, Area 11 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

This equipment is anchored to two concrete pedestals. Anchorage configuration verification is requiredfor this equipment.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Y[ N[] U- N/A-]

Anchorage appearsto be free from the conditions stated above.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YN NE] Ul N/AZ--

oxidation? No signs of any type of corrosion have been found on the anchorage of the component.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YZ NEI U[- N/A--

anchors? No cracks were observed in the concrete piers in the vicinity of the anchorbolts. Concrete piers (3ft high) appearedto be in sound condition. 1 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS-12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 547 of 560 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YN N-- Ur-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-109 Equipment ID No. E-35B Equip. Class 21 - Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment Description 'B' LOOP DH CLR

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? Y'] NEI UEr N/A--

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.) The anchorage configurationthat has been found during the inspection complied with the specifications stated in the documentation (CALC SQ-1001-21, page 25 and Drawing C-261, Sht. 1, Rev. 15).

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ N[] U[E]

potentially adverse seismic conditions? All anchoragesupportingthe system was found to be free from adverse seismic conditions. Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YN N[E] UE- N/A--

None of the soft targets found in the equipment have been shown to potentially suffer impact by nearby equipment.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NE-] UE1 N/AZ--

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? Overhead equipment near Item E-35B appearedto be properlysecured so as to avoid any collapse during a seismic hazard.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? '(Y NE-1 U[-] N/AZl All attached lines have been ruled to have adequate flexibility.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NE] UEl of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Equipment appears to be free from seismic interaction effects.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANOI-CS-12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 548 of 560 Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YN NEI Ui Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-109 Equipment ID No. E-35B Equip. Class 21 - Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment Description 'B' LOOP DH CLR Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN( N[i] UE adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

No other seismic conditions were found to affect the equipment's integrity. Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) The anchoragefound in the system appeared to be in very good conditions. Anchor bolts did not show any signs of oxidation, nor were cracks in the concrete piers detected. No tag ID was found for this component, but it was clear to determine the identity of this equipment item due to its description and large size. Evaluated by: DanielAndoh _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date: 10/4/2012 Michael E. Perez / 10/4/20.12 101412012

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 549 of 560 Sheet 4 of 5 Status: Y[ NI- U -- Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-109 Equipment ID No. E-35B Equip. Class 21 - Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment Description 'B' LOOP DH CLR Photographs Note: The anchorageof this component Note: Anchorage on the other side of the appearsto be in adequate conditions. No component also appears to be in adequate corrosion was observed in the anchorbolts, conditions. nor cracks in the concrete piers in the vicinity of the anchorbolts.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 550 of 560 Sheet 5 of 5 Status: Yo No-] U-- Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)- SWELl-109 Equipment ID No. E-35B Equip. Class 21 - Tanks and Heat Exchanqiers Equipment Description 'B' LOOP DH CLR Note: Overhead equipment appearsto be in Note: adequate conditions. Therefore, it is unlikely that it would collapse onto Item E-35B. And if these were to ever collapse, the likelihood of damaging the equipment is very minimal.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 551 of 560 Sheet 1 of 5 Status: YZ NE] UrI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-110 Equipment ID No. P-107B Equip. Class' 5- Horizontal Pumps Equipment Description LUBE OIL SCAVENGING PUMP Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 369 Room, Area 86 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Electro-Motive 645E4B TurbocharcqedDiesel Engine Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE NZ of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Items is not partof the 50% anchorage configuration verification.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YZ NEi UiE N/AE]

The anchorageis free of bent, broken, missing and loose hardware.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YZ NEI UE-1 N/AE-oxidation?

The anchorageis free of corrosion.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the Y[ NEI UE- N/AE--

anchors? Component mounted to EDG skid. No cracks in concrete around skid anchorage. 1 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 552 of 560 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YE NL-- UL-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-110 Equipment ID No. P-107B Equip. Class 5- Horizontal Pumps Equipment Description LUBE OIL SCAVENGING PUMP

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE NEI U- N/AZ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

This is not applicable since it is not partof the 50% of SWEL items requiringanchorageconfiguration verification.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ NE: U--

potentially adverse seismic conditions? Based on the above anchorageevaluations, the anchorageis free of potentially adverse seismic conditions. Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YM NEI UE N/AE The Lube Oil Scavenger Pump is bolted low at the accessory end of the diesel engine. This component is shielded by additionalengine components attached above on the accessoryend.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, '(Y NE UE-] N/AE-]

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? There is overhead duct work that is properly secured with steel hangers.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NO UE N/AE Attached lines have adequate flexibility.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free 'YZ NE uE of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Based on the above seismic interactionevaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interactioneffects.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 553 of 560 Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YE N[-- U[-] Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-110 Equipment ID No. P-107B Equip. Class 5- Horizontal Pumps Equipment Description LUBE OIL SCAVENGING PUMP Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[ NE] UE]

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? It was looked for, and no otherseismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment were found. Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) The Lube Oil Scavenger Pump is a critical component of the diesel engine. Every mounting bolt was observed to be in place. The entire engine appearedclean and well maintained.There were no visible leaks or signs of previous leaks at any location were accessory components were bolted to the main engine block. ThroeQuarter Left Front View. 16-Cylinder Evaluated by: Daniel Parker Date: 10/212012 Eric Dilbone 10/212012

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 554 of 560 Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YZ No UM Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-110 Equipment ID No. P-107B Equip. Class 5- HorizontalPumps Equipment Description LUBE OIL SCAVENGING PUMP Photographs Note: Component ID Note: Overview of Component

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 555 of 560 Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YZ N[-] UI-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-110 Equipment ID No. P-107B Equip. Class 5- Horizontal Pumps Equipment Description LUBE OIL SCAVENGING PUMP Note: Overview of Component Note:

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 556 of 560 Sheet I of 5 Status: YZ NE] UE0 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2-001 Equipment ID No. SW-72 Equip. Class' 7- Pneumatic-OperatedValves Equipment Description SW TO SFP EL 404' SERV CONN Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 404 Room, Area 159 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YEI NZ of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Anchorage verification is not requiredsince this is an in-line component.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YE] NE] U[:] N/A[

This is not applicable since this is an in-line component.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YE] NE] UE-- N/AZ oxidation?

This is not applicable since this is an in-line component.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YEI NEI UEi N/AZ anchors?

This is not applicable since this is an in-line component.

' Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 557 of 560 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YZ Nn- UI-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL-2-OO11 Equipment ID No. SW-72 Equip. Class 7 - Pneumatic-OperatedValves Frii inmpnt fl,.rrintinn ,£W TO P,FP Fl 404' 5£FRV CC)NN

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YEI NEI UE] N/AZ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

This item is not part of the 50%.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YM NEI UI[]

potentially adverse seismic conditions? The anchorageis free of potentially adverse seismic conditions. Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YN NE] UE- N/A[]

There are no soft targets to be affected by nearby equipment or structures.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y[ NE] uE] N/AE]

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? There is a masonry block wall next to the component, but it is seismically qualified.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y[ NEI UE] N/AE]

Attached lines have adequate flexibility.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y" NE] UF]

of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects? Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations,the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interactioneffects.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO1-CS-12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 558 of 560 Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YN NEI U[M Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2-001 Equipment ID No. SW-72 Equip. Class 7- Pneumatic-OperatedValves Equipment Description SW TO SFP EL 404' SERV CONN Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could '(Y Ni] Ui[

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? It was looked for, and no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety fuctions were found. Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated by: Sean Smolarek 5 Date: 10/1212012 Eric Dilbone e &1 1011212012 2

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 559 of 560 Sheet 4 of 5 Status: Y[ NF U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2-001 Equipment ID No. SW-72 Equip. Class 7 - Pneumatic-OperatedValves Equipment Description SW TO SFP EL 404' SERV CONN PhotouraDhs Note: View of the component equipment ID Note: General view of the component. tag.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS- 12-00002 Attachment C Rev. 0 Page 560 of 560 Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YM Nn Ur-I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2-O01 Equipment ID No. SW-72 Equip. Class 7- Pneumatic-OperatedValves Equipment Description SW TO SFP EL 404' SERV CONN Note: View of the component showing the Note: Side view of the component. seismic block wall behind.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS- 12-00002 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 1 of 152 Attachment D Area Walk-By Checklists (AWCs)

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS- 12-00002 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 2 of 152 Sheet 1 of 5 Status: Y[ NI[] ul-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 001 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 369 Room, Area' 87 SWEL Components: SWELl- 001 (M-112A), 011 (P-108A). 015 (P-104A), 016 (CV-5218), 046 (SV-5218), 056 (KMA-1). 057 (TV-7901B), 062 (F-50A), 063 (M-227A). 067 (SS-5211). 073 (LSL-5206). 101 (T-78A), 103 (E-197A) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of Y[ NEI uI] N/AI]

potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)? Anchorage of equipment in the area appearsto be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of Y[ N[D UD- N/AD-significant degraded conditions?

Anchorage of equipment in the area is free of significantdegraded conditions.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit Y' ND- UD- N/AD-raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

From the floor, cable/conduitraceways and HVAC ducting appearsto be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions. 1 If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS- 12-00002 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 3 of 152 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YZ NEi] U[I Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 001 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 369 Room, Area 87

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NEI- U[I N/AD spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

The area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatialinteractionswith other equipment in the area.

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NE] u- N/A[-]

interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area? There is a fire water system in the room, in addition to service water piping. The room is equipped with floor drains to mitigate a release of water in the room.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic '(Y N- u[-] N/AF-interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

The area appearsto be free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic '(Z NEI UE] N/AE]1 interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

It was noted that engineering-approvedscaffolding is assembled on the North, East and West sides of the room at the time of inspection.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS- 12-00002 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 4 of 152 Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YZ NE UD-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 001 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 369 Room, Area 87

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEil UiF1 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

It was looked for, and no other seismic conditions that could affect the safety functions of equipment in the area were found. Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated by: Daniel Parker Date: 10/11/2012 Eric Dilbone 10/11/2012

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS- 12-00002 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 5 of 152 Sheet 4 of 5 Status: Y[ N[-] UF-'1 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 001 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 369 Roo/m, Area2 87 SWEL Components: SWELl- 001 (M-112A), 011 (P-108A), 015 (P-104A), 016 (CV-5218), 046 (SV-5218). 056 (KMA-1). 057 (TV-7901 B), 062 (F-50A), 063 (M-227A), 067 (SS-5211). 073 (LSL-5206). 101 (T-78A), 103 (E-197A) Photographs Note: Picture of scaffold assembled on the Note: View of equipment and conduit West wall of the room. overhead in Room 87. 2 If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS- 12-00002 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 6 of 152 Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YZ ND] U-I Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 001 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 369 Room, Area3 87 SWEL Components: SWELl- 001 (M-112A), 011 (P-108A), 015 (P-104AL. 016 (CV-5218). 046 (SV-5218). 056 (KMA-1). 057 (TV-7901 B), 062 (F-50A), 063 (M-227A), 067 (SS-5211). 073 (LSL-5206). 101 (T-78A), 103 (E-197A) Note: View of overhead equipment, lighting and conduit in Room 87. 3 If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS- 12-00002 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 7 of 152 Sheet I of 6 Status: Y[ NE] UR Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 002 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 335 Room, Areal 38 (Entire Room) SWEL Components: SWELl - 002(K-3), 004(CV-6601 A), 01 2(P-7A). 084fPI-281 1A), 104(E-1 09). 043(CV-2806). 025(CV-2800). 074(PIT-2812) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YN N[I U[I- N/A[--

potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)? Anchorage of equipment in the area appearsto be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YZ NEI U[-] N/AZ1 significant degraded conditions?

Anchorage of equipment in the areaappears to be free of significant degradedconditions.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit Y[ NEI UZ1 N/A[:]

raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)? All rigid electricalconduit is adequatelyanchored to the overhead and the walls. Overheadpiping and ducts appearto be properly secured.

' If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS- 12-00002 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 8 of 152 Sheet 2 of 6 Status: YZ NE] UL-I Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 002 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 335 Room, Area 38 (Entire Room)

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN NEIl ULI N/A[-]

spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)? There is unique connection in a lighting fixture above Item P-7B. It seems that the support of the lighting fixture has broken and to remedy the missing piece, a metal tie was applied to tie the broken support. However, this is acceptable considering the weight of the light and since it can't be disconnected from the support.

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y[ NE] U-1 N/AEr interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

The area appearsto be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions that could cause flooding or spray in the area.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NEI UE- N/A']

interactions that could cause a fire in the area? One pipe has insulation which has been soaked in oil. However, this has already been acknowledged by maintenance. A "caution"sign is placed near the insulatedpipe.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NEI UM N/A[-]

interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)? The area appearsto be free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associatedwith housekeeping practices,storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS- 12-00002 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 9 of 152 Sheet 3 of 6 Status: YO NEI U[O Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 002 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 335 Room, Area 38 (Entire Room)

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ( NEI U[-

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area? There are no other seismic conditions that were identified. Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Anchorages in the area are found to be in adequate conditions. There is a fire extinguisher in the area that may come loose, but there are no credible targets. There is one overhead equipment item (VUC-6) that may potentiallyaffect the area. But because it is well supported by 2 thread rods (one on each side) as well as 4 welded angle sections, it is very unlikely for a seismic hazard to occur. Evaluated by: Daniel Parker [Date: 10/8/2012 Michael E. Perez F -_-- 10/8/2012

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS- 12-00002 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 10 of 152 Sheet 4 of 6 Status: YV NEI UD Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 002 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 335 Room, Area 38 (Entire Room) SWEL Components: SWELl-002(K-3), 004(CV-6601A), 012(P-7A), 084(PI-2811A), 104(E-109). 043(CV-2806). 025(CV-2800). 074(PIT-2812) Photographs Note: Anchorage in the area appearsto be in Note: Observe unusual light support, good condition. however, this will induce no motion during a seismic event.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS- 12-00002 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 11 of 152 Sheet 5 of 6 Status: Y[I N-- U-- Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 002 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 335 Room, Area 38 (EntireRoom) SWEL Components: SWELl - 002(K-3). 004(CV-6601A), 012(P-7A). 084(PI-281 1A). 104(E-109). 043(CV-2806). 025(CV-2800). 074(PIT-2812) Note: There is a pipe whose insulationhas Note: Drainsare present in the area, thus been soaked in oil. However, this has been mitigating any seismic hazards that would acknowledged by maintenance and a "caution" cause flooding. sign has been placed.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS- 12-00002 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 12 of 152 Sheet 6 of 6 Status: YZ NEI ul-l Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 002 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 335 Room, Area 38 (EntireRoom) SWEL Components: SWELl - 002(K-3), 004(CV-6601A), 012(P-7A). 084(PI-2811A). 104(E-109). 043(CV-2806), 025(CV-2800), 074(PIT-2812) Note: Overheadpipe. Note: Overhead unit (VUC-6) does not seem likely to collapse on other equipment, since there are two threadedrods as well as 4 welded angle sections that are supporting the unit.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS- 12-00002 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 13 of 152 Sheet I of 5 Status: YZ NEI UFl Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 003 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 335 Room, Area' 56 SWEL Components: SWEL- 003(F-57A), 030(CV-1276) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YZ NEI UEL N/AE!

potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)? Anchorage of equipment in the area appearsto be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YZ NEI U[-] N/AD-significant degraded conditions?

Anchorage of equipment in the area appearsto be free of significant degraded conditions.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YZ NEI UE] N/A[--

raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)? HVAC ductwork is in good general condition. 'If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO1-CS-12-00002 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 14 of 152 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YZ No] U-- Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 003 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 335 - Room, Area2 56

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NE] U[ N/A--

spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)? The area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactionswith other equipment in the area.

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN NEI U-] N/AZ-interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

The area appearsto be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions that could cause flooding or spray in the area.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NEI ULI N/A[-

interactions that could cause a fire in the area? A verticalpipe near CV-1276 was wrapped in clearplastic.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y ] N[: U[--] N/AD interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

The area appears to be free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associatedwith housekeeping practices, storage of portableequipment, and temporaryinstallations. 2 If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWFL item.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS- 12-00002 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 15 of 152 Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YZ NF- UI'-J Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 003 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 335 Room, Area3 56

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEI U[I adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

It was looked for, and no otherseismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area were found. Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated by: Daniel Parker "J Date: 10/12/2012 Eric Dilbone *

10/12/2012 3 If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS- 12-00002 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 16 of 152 Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YZ NF UFII Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 003 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 335 Room, Area4 56 SWEL Components: SWEL- 003(F-57A), 030(CV-1276) Photographs Note: Room 56 Overhead ducting. Note: Room 56 overhead insulatedpipes. 4 If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS- 12-00002 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 17 of 152 Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YE NE] U-I Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 003_ Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 335 - Room, Area5 56 SWEL Components: SWEL- 003(F-57A). 030(C V-I 276) Note: Room 56 insulatedpipe with plastic Note: FloorDrain in room 56. wrap near component CV-1276. 5 If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS- 12-00002 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 18 of 152 Sheet i of 5 Status: YN N-' U[] Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 004_ Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 368 - Room, Area' 104 SWEL Components: SWELl- 005 (D-15), 079 (PY-2618-A1), 093 (PY-1042A), 095 (LY-4204A), 096 (PY-2667-A1), 081 (C539A) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YZ NEI U[I N/AD1 potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

Anchorage of equipment in the area appearsto be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YZ NEI UE] N/A[-

significant degraded conditions? Anchorage in the area appearsto be free of significantdegraded conditions.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit Y[ NEI UEl N/ADl raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill

        *conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

Based on visual inspection from the floor, the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appearto be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions. IIf the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS- 12-00002 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 19 of 152 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YZ NEI- Ur] Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 004 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 368 Room, Area 104

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y[ ND U[I N/AD spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

The area appearsto be free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment.

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YE( NDI UD] N/AD]

interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area? A room cooler is present in the room. It appears to be adequately installed and will not present a source of flooding or spray. It is located far enough away from safety relatedequipment that if it were to induce spray, it would not adversely impact the safe shutdown of the plant. Floor drains are present.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN N[-] UD N/AD-interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

The area appears to be free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NED UED N/AD-interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

The areais free of potentiallyadverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment and temporary installations.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS- 12-00002 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 20 of 152 Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YZ NE] U[I Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 004 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 368 Room, Area 104

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y] NE- UF-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

It was looked for and no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area were found. Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated by: Eric Dilbone I D Date: 10/10/2012 Daniel Parker 10/10/2012

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS- 12-00002 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 21 of 152 Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YZ NE] UF-1 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 004 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 368 Room, Area 104 SWEL Components: SWELl- 005 (D-15), 079 (PY-2618-A1). 093 (PY-1042A), 095 (LY-4204A), 096 (PY-2667-A1). 081 (C539A) Photographs Note: View of the overhead space in Room Note: View of anchorage on a component in 104. Room 104.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS- 12-00002 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 22 of 152 Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YZ NE]J UDl Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 004 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 368 Room, Area 104 SWEL Components: SWELl- 005 (D-15). 079 (PY-2618-A1), 093 (PY-1042A), 095 (LY-4204A), 096 (PY-2667-A1). 081 (C539A) Note: View of a drain line that runs to a floor Note: View of cabinet C539A in Room 104. drain.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO1-CS-12-00002 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 23 of 152 Sheet I of 5 Status: YZ N[I UF-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 005 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 372 Room, Area, 99 SWEL Components: SWELl- 007 (B-6) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of Y' NO UD-I N/A-potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

Anchorage of equipment in the area appearsto be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YZ ND U[D1 N/AD-significant degraded conditions?

Anchorage in the area appears to be free of significant degraded conditions.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YN NO UD N/AD raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

Based on visual inspection from the floor, the cable/conduitraceways and HVAC ducting appearto be free of potentiallyadverse seismic conditions. 1 If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO1-CS- 12-00002 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 24 of 152 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YN NEJ UOF Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 005_ Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 372 - Room, Area 99

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN N[:] U[] N/AE--

spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)? The area appearsto be free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactionswith other equipment. Lighting near sensitive equipment is mounted on unistrut, and near non-sensitive equipment is on chains and closed S-hooks.

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN( Ni[ U-I N/A[--

interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area? A room cooleris present in the room. It appearsto be adequately installed and will not present a source of flooding or spray. It is located far enough away from safety related equipment that if it were to induce spray, it would not adversely impact the safe shutdown of the plant. Floor drainsare present.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NEI UEl N/A[]

interactions that could cause a fire in the area? The area appears to be free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NEi UE] N/A[l interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

The areais free of potentiallyadverse seismic interactionsassociated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment and temporary installations. It was noted that a ladderin the room is stored on the floor and chained to the wall.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS- 12-00002 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 25 of 152 Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YZ NF U-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 005 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 372 Room, Area 99

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEIUE adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

It was looked for and no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area were found. Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated by: Daniel Parker Date: 10/11/2012 Eric Dilbone 10/11/2012

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS- 12-00002 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 26 of 152 Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YZ NFil U[] Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 005 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 372 Room, Area 99 SWEL Components: SWELl- 007 (B-6) Photoara~hs

                                           -n Note: View of equipment in Room 99,            Note: Equipment ID tag of the room cooler including SWEL item, B-6.                      identified in the room.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS- 12-00002 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 27 of 152 Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YN NE] UZ1 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 005 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 372 Room, Area 99 SWEL Components: SWELl- 007 (B-6) Note: Attachment of drain line to drip pan for the room cooler seen in the previous image.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS- 12-00002 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 28 of 152 Sheet i of 6 Status: YN NF! UI-- Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 006_ Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 372 - Room, Areal 100 SWEL Components: SWELl- 008 (X-52), 061 (Y-03) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YE NEI U[-] N/AE[

potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)? No potentially adverse seismic conditions were observed in equipment anchoragein the area.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YE NEI UJI N/AE1 significant degraded conditions?

Anchor bolts in surroundingequipment were observed to be ok. No cracks in the concrete were found.

3. Based on a visual inspection'from the floor, do the cable/conduit Y[ N[] uLIE] N/AE-raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

HVAC and pipe supports appearedto be adequate and in good condition. Cable trays were not overfilled and appear to be adequately supported. I If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS- 12-00002 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 29 of 152 Sheet 2 of 6 Status: YZ NIF U-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 006_ Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 372 - Room, Area 100

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YM NEI U[_ N/AE]

spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)? The area appears to be free of potentially adverse spatialinteractions with other equipment in the area.

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NEI Ur- N/A--

interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area? The area appearsto be free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y[ NE- U[-] N/Ar-interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

The area appearsto be free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NEI uE] N/AZ-interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

No potentiallyadverse seismic interactions were observed.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS- 12-00002 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 30 of 152 Sheet 3 of 6 Status: YZ NF UF Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 006 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 372 Room, Area 100

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could '(Z N[: U E adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

No other adverse seismic conditions were observed. Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) In general the area was observed to be free of degraded conditions. Anchorage appearsto be in good condition. Evaluated by: Daniel Andoh [Date: 10/12/2012 Genaro BarraanJr. 10/12/2012

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANOI-CS-12-00002 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 31 of 152 Sheet 4 of 6 Status: Y[ NF U-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 006 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 372 Room, Area 100 SWEL Components: SWELl- 008 (X-52). 061 (Y-03) Photographs Note: Overhead supports Note: Surrounding conditions

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-C S- 12-00002 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 32 of 152 Sheet 5 of 6 Status: YE NO UI-- Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 006_ Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 372 - Room, Area 100 SWEL Components: SWEILl- 008 (X-52). 061 (Y-03)

                                           !1 Note: Overhead supports                        Note: Overhead supports

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS-i12-00002 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 33 of 152 Sheet 6 of 6 Status: YZ NE] U -- Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 006 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 372 Room, Area 100 SWEL Components: SWELl- 008 (X-52). 061 (Y-03) Note: Overhead supports Note: Adjacent floor anchorages

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO1-CS-12-00002 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 34 of 152 Sheet I of 5 Status: YZ NE] UD Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 007 Location: Bldg. DSB Floor El. YARD Room, Area' 252 SWEL Components: SWELl- 010 (P-16A) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of Y[ NI U-EI N/AD-potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

No potential adverse anchorageissues.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YE- N[N UE1 N/AD significant degraded conditions?

Anchor bolts below FO-IOA have significantdegradation.CR-ANO 2012-1536 is initiated.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit Y[ NEI U[1 N/A--

raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)? There is no tray in room, conduit supports and HVAC ducting are supported well.

'If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS- 12-00002 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 35 of 152 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YZ NE] U-] Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 007 Location: Bldg. DSB Floor El. YARD Room, Area2 252

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NEI U[-I N/A-I spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

No tiles in room, lights are supported well.

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NE-I U[] N/A[l-interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

Large tank is a source of potentialflooding also fire suppresion system.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y" N[E- UE' N/Ar"I interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

The only fire source is the tank in room.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YM NEI UI-1 N/A-interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

         #18 rebarlaying on ground. Hose in room is secured. No other housekeeping issues identified.

2 If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS- 12-00002 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 36 of 152 Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YN N[-] UDl Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 007 Location: DSB Floor El. YARD Room, Area3 252 Bldg.

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YEI NEI ULi adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Rust on pipe supportfor fire suppression system. Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Degradationhas been found for the anchor bolts within Item FO-IOA, which needs further inspection. Housekeeping appeared to be adequatein the area. Nuts on a personnel platform were loose. CR-ANO-1-2012-01537 initiated Evaluated by: Roy Bernrman -. Date: 10/10/2012 Michael E. Perez 7 10/10/2012 3 If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS- 12-00002 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 37 of 152 Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YN NO U[-D Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 007 Location: Bldg. DSB Floor El. YARD Room, Area4 252 SWEL Components: SWELl- 010 (P-16A) Photographs Note: Anchorages in the area have been Note: HVAC ducting and conduits are shown to be in adequate conditions. properly secured and free from adverse seismic conditions. 4 If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS- 12-00002 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 38 of 152 Sheet 5 of 5 Status: Y[ NEI UDl Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 007 Location: Bldg. DSB Floor El. YARD Room, Areas 252 SWEL Components: SWELl- 010 (P-16A) Note: Lighting appearedto be adequately Note: Fire suppression system, as well as the secured in the area. conduit appears to be properly secured. Because there is a fire suppressionsystem in the area,it is very unlikely that a fire hazard would cause significant damage in the area. 5 If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS- 12-00002 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 39 of 152 Sheet I of 5 Status: YZ ND] UDr-1 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 008 Location: Bldg. DSB Floor El. YARD Room, Area, 251 SWEL Components: SWELl- 014 (P-16B) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YEI NO uD- N/AD-potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

Tank equipment ID T-57B in room has an anchorbolt that appearsto be bent and is not tightened fully. No other anchorageissues identified. CR-ANO-1-2012-1537 has been initiated.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of Y- NO U["] N/AD'-

significant degraded conditions? Anchor bolts below FO-IOB have significantdegradation.2 anchor bolts have significantdegradation on tank (T-57B). CR-ANO-1-2012-1536 is initiated.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YZ N[D UD-' N/AD-raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

There is no tray in room, conduit supports and HVAC ducting are supported well. 'If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS- 12-00002 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 40 of 152 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YZ NE] U[--1 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 008 Location: Bldg. DSB Floor El. YARD Room, Area2 251

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NEI U[-1 N/A[-

spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)? No tiles in room, lights are supported well.

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YM NEI ULI N/A--

interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area? Large tank is a source of potentialflooding also fire suppresion system.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NEI iJE! N/AE!

interactions that could cause a fire in the area? The only fire source is the tank in room.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NEI UE- N/A['-

interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)? No portableequipment in room. No other housekeeping issues identified. 2 If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS- 12-00002 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 41 of 152 Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YZ NI] U[-1 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 008 Location: DSB Floor El. YARD Room, Area3 251 Bldg.

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YEJ NI] ULI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

No other adverse seismic conditions were identified. Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Most of the issues in the area occur at the anchorageof the tank. The first issue is that there is one anchor bolt that appearsto be slightly bent. This may need to be adjusted (Ref. CR-ANO-1-2012-1536). The second issue is that for two anchor bolts for this fuel tank, there is significant degradationfor both the steel plate and the concrete below that that is evident. All other items in the area appearto be free from potentially adverse seismic conditions. Evaluated___ __ by: Roy Berryman Date: 10/102012 Michael E. Perez -- 10/10/2012 3 If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS- 12-00002 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 42 of 152 Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YZ NE] U[-- Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 008 Location: Bldg. DSB Floor El. YARD Room, Area4 251 SWEL Components: SWELl- 014 (P-16B) Photographs Note: There is one anchorbolt supporting the Note: Significant degradationhas been tank in the room that is slightly bent and is also observed on two anchorbolts supporting the not tightened fully. tank in the area. The degradationis evident in the steel plate below it. 4 If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS- 12-00002 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 43 of 152 Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YN ND- UD Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 008_ Location: Bldg. DSB Floor El. YARD Room, Area5 251 SWEL Components: SWELl- 014 (P-16B) Note: Some degradationin the bolts for Item Note: Lighting supports in the area are FO-IOB is evident. properly installed. 5 If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS- 12-00002 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 44 of 152 Sheet I of 5 Status: YN NElI Ur-1 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 009 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 404 Room, Area, 170 (Entire Room) SWEL Components: SWELl- 017 (PSV-2684) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YV N[D1 ULI N/A--

potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)? Anchorage of equipment in the area appearsto be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YZ NEI UD- N/A--

significant degraded conditions? Anchorage of equipment in the area appearsto be free of significant degraded conditions.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YN ND1 UD- N/AD-]

raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)? All rigid electrical conduit is adequately anchoredto the overhead and the walls. Overheadpiping and ducts appearto be properly secured. I If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANOI-CS-12-00002 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 45 of 152 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YZ NF UD Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 009 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 404 Room, Area 170 (Entire Room)

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ ND UD N/AD spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

The area appears to be free of potentiallyadverse seismic spatial interactionswith other equipment.

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YE NEI U[ N/A-interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

The areaappears to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions that could cause flooding or spray in the area.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NO U" N/Ar interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

The area appearsto be free of potentiallyadverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y' NEI UD_ N/AD-interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

The area appears to be free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS- 12-00002 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 46 of 152 Sheet 3 of 5 Status: Y[ NEI U[--1 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 009 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 404 Room, Area 170 (Entire Room)

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE NI" urL adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

It was looked for, and no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area were found. Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Room 170 was found to be in appropriateconditions. There was no issue with housekeeping practices and only mild surface oxidation was observed on the valves. The temperature in the room was high, but only due to the normal operating condition of the system. Evaluated by: Genaro BarracqanJr. Date: 10/9/2012 Eric Dilbone 6

10/9/2012

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS- 12-00002 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 47 of 152 Sheet 4 of 5 Status: Y[ NE] U-- Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 009 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 404 Room, Area 170 (EntireRoom) SWEL Components: SWELl- 017 (PSV-2684) Photographs Note: General image of the anchorage in the Note: General image of the anchorage in the area. area.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS- 12-00002 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 48 of 152 Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YE NEI U-- Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 009 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 404 Room, Area 170 (EntireRoom) SWEL Components: SWELl- 017 (PSV-2684) Note: This image shows the different valves in Note: This is a general image of the area. No the room. housekeeping concerns were observed.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS- 12-00002 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 49 of 152 Sheet I of 5 Status: YZ No UDl Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 010 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 317 Room, Area' 11 SWEL Components: SWELl- 018 (CV-1 432), 109 (E-35B), 033 (CV-14437) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YN N[E] U[-] N/A["]

potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)? Anchorage of equipment in the area appearsto be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YZ N" UI-I N/A[]

significant degraded conditions? Anchorage of equipment in the area appearsto be free of significant degradedconditions.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit Y[ NEI Ur- N/AD-raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

All rigid electrical conduit is adequately anchoredto the overhead and the walls. Overheadpiping and ducts appearto be properly secured. 1If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS- 12-00002 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 50 of 152 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: Y[ NE] U-- Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 010 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 317 Room, Area 11

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NEI U[-- N/AE-spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

There is one lighting fixture in the area, and it is properly secured and free from spatial interactionswith other nearby equipment.

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y[ NE] UEI N/A["]

interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area? The area appearsto be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions that could cause flooding or spray in the area.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic 'YZ NEI uE- N/AE-interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

The area appearsto be free of potentiallyadverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ N[-- U[-1 N/AI-interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

The area appears to be free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associatedwith housekeepingpractices, storageof portable equipment, and temporary installations.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS- 12-00002 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 51 of 152 Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YZ NF-] U["l Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 010 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 317 Room, Area 11

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEi U0i adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

It was looked for, and no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area were found. Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Equipment in the area is found to be in adequate conditions. Anchorage is free from corrosion and concrete cracks. Cables and conduits are properlyinstalled on walls and ceilings. The temporary scaffolding found in the area has an engineering-approvedtag. Good housekeeping is evident throughout the room. Overall, all items in the area are free from seismic conditions that could affect their safety functions. Evaluated by: DanielAndoh Date: 10/04/2012 Michael E. Perez / 10/04/2012

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANOI-CS-12-00002 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 52 of 152 Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YZ Nr"] U-- Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 010 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 317 Room, Area 11 SWEL Components: SWELl- 018 (CV-1432). 109 (E-35B), 033 (CV-1437) Photographs Note: Anchorage in the area has been shown Note: Cables, conduits, and pipe supports in to be in properconditions. No signs of the area are shown to be properly secured. corrosion and concrete cracking have been found.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS- 12-00002 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 53 of 152 Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YE NE] UIF Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-010 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 317 Roomn,Area 11 SWEL Components: SWELl- 018 (CV-1432), 109 (E-35B), 033 (CV-1437) Note: Temporary scaffolding in the area Note: appearsto be properly secured and placed in the adequate location. It is also free from damaging any nearby equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS- 12-00002 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 54 of 152 Sheet I of 5 Status: YZ ND' UD-- Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 011 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 317 Room, Area' 13 SWEL Components: SWEL1- 019 (CV-1052) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of '(Y NEJ ULI N/AD potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

Anchorage of equipment in the area appearsto be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of Y' ND-] UD-] N/AD1 significant degraded conditions?

Anchorage of equipment in the area appearsto be free of significant degradedconditions.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit Y[ ND UD- N/AD raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

All rigid electrical conduit is adequatelyanchored to the overhead and the walls. Overheadpiping and ducts appearto be properlysecured. 1If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS- 12-00002 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 55 of 152 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YZ NEr] UO] Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 011_ Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 317 - Room, Area 13

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y[K NE] ULI N/AZ!

spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)? There several lighting fixtures in the area and they appearto be properly secured.

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YO NEI U[-] N/AD--

interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area? There is a drain present in the room, making it highly unlikely that flooding would to occur in the area.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN NEI U[I N/A[!

interactions that could cause a fire in the area? The area appearsto be free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YO NE]I U[_ N/AL]

interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)? The area appearsto be free of potentiallyadverse seismic interactions associatedwith housekeeping practices,storage of portable equipment, and temporaryinstallations.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS- 12-00002 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 56 of 152 Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YV NEIl UFl Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 011 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 317 - Room, Area 13

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y~NNIU0 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

It was looked for, and no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area were found. Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Equipment in the area is found to be in adequateconditions. Anchorage is free from corrosionand concrete cracks. Cables and conduits are properlyinstalled on walls and ceilings. Good housekeeping is evident throughout the room. Overall, all items in the area are free from seismic conditions that could affect their safety functions. Evaluated by: Daniel Andoh Date: 10/4/2012 Michael E. Perez 10/4/2012

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS- 12-00002 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 57 of 152 Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YZ NE] U[II Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 011 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 317 Room, Area 13 SWEL Components: SWELl- 019 (CV-1052) Photographs Note: Anchorage in the area appearsto be in Note: Cables, conduits, and pipe supports in good condition. No signs of corrosion and the area appearto be properly secured. concrete cracking have been found. Lighting fixtures appearto be properly anchored.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS- 12-00002 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 58 of 152 Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YZ NE] U[-- Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 011_ Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 317 Room, Area 13 SWEL Components: SWEILl- 019 (CV-1 052) Note: Floordrains are present to the area in Note: Good housekeeping is evident in the order to mitigate flooding hazards, if they were area. ever to occur. This would not be the case here since all equipment items in the area do not show signs that promote these hazards.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS- 12-00002 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 59 of 152 Sheet I of 5 Status: Y] NE] U-i Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 012 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 356 Room, Area' 77 (EntireRoom) SWEL Components: SWELl- 020(CV-2214), 021 (CV-2233), 022(CV-2234), 036(CV-2235), 047(SV-2243B), 048(SV-2233A), 049(SV-2234B).106(T-208) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of Y[K NEI U[I N/A[]

potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)? Anchorage of equipment in the area appearsto be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of Y[ N[-] U[D N/A[:

significant degraded conditions? Anchorage of equipment in the area appearsto be free of significant degradedconditions.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YZ NEI ur- N/AD-i raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

All rigid electricalconduit is adequately anchoredto the overhead and the walls. Overheadpiping and ducts appearto be properly secured. I If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS- 12-00002 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 60 of 152 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YZ No U[-- Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 012 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 356 Room, Area 77 (EntireRoom)

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y[ N[I] ULI N/All spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

The area appearsto be free of potentiallyadverse seismic spatial interactionswith other equipment.

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ{ NEI UEW N/A[Z interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

The area appears to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions that could cause flooding or spray in the area.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ N[:] UEI N/A[:]

interactions that could cause a fire in the area? The area appears to be free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YM NEI uE1 N/A[E]

interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)? No adverse conditions were observed related to housekeeping practices.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS- 12-00002 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 61 of 152 Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YZ NI-' U-- Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 012 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 356 Room, Area 77 (Entire Room)

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[ N[i U[I-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

It was looked for, and no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area were found. Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated by: Genaro BarraQanJr. SDate: 10/03/12 Michael E. Perez 0 10/03/12

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS- 12-00002 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 62 of 152 Sheet 4 of 5 Status: Y[ NO UZ'- Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 012 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 356 Room, Area 77 (EntireRoom) SWEL Components: SWELl- 020(CV-2214). 021 (CV-2233). 022(CV-2234). 036(CV-2235). 047(SV-2243B), 048(SV-2233A), 049(SV-2234B),106(T-208) Photographs Note: FeedwaterIsolation Valve had a minor Note: Image of the area with rust colored leak. water from the feedwater valve overhead.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS- 12-00002 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 63 of 152 Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YE NEI-' U-I Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 012 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 356 Room, Area 77 (Entire Room) SWEL Components: SWELl- 020(CV-2214). 021 (CV-2233), 022(CV-2234). 036(CV-2235), 047(SV-2243B), 048(SV-2233A), 049(SV-2234B),106(T-208) Note: Image shows the pipingin the end of the room that had some minor corrosion. This would not affect the safety functions of the system in case of seismic event.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS- 12-00002 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 64 of 152 Sheet I of 5 Status: YN NF U-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 013 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 335 Room, Area' 46 SWEL Components: SWELl- 024 (CV-2620) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YEI NZ UEW NIAE potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

Nearby support (PI-3812A) was observed to be missing two anchor bolts. CR-ANO-1-2012-01611 initiated.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YZ NEI UW] N/A[-

significant degraded conditions? Anchorage present appears to be in good condition.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YN NEIZ UEI N/AEl raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

HVAC in cornerof room. Appears to be in general conformance.

'If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS- 12-00002 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 65 of 152 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YZ NF UF Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 013 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 335 Room, Area 46

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NW] Uil N/AD]

spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)? Lights observed may sway. However, they would impact piping insulation, absorbingthe impact. Additionally, the piping is inherently rugged when compared to the light.

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y" N[W UWJ N/AE]

interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area? Floordrains present. No sources of flood or spray were observed.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NEI U[- N/AD--

interactions that could cause a fire in the area? The area appears to be free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ N[-- U-- N/AD-interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

No scaffolding present. Ladders observed to be secured. See image below.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS- 12-00002 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 66 of 152 Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YZ NEI U[I Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-013 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 335 Room, Area 46

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NEI UE1 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

No other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area were found. Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Anchorage for support for Item PI-3812A was observed to be missing a bolt. Evaluated by: Michael E. Perez Date: 10/10/2012 Sean Smolarek Z 10/10/2012

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS- 12-00002 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 67 of 152 Sheet 4 of 5 Status: Y[ NE] Uor-1 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 013 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 335 - Room, Area 46 SWEL Components: SWELl- 024 (0V-2620) Photographs Photographs Note: General area overview. Note: Ladder adequatelysecured.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS- 12-00002 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 68 of 152 Sheet 5 of 5 Status: Y[ NrI U-IZ Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 013 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 335 Room, Area 46 SWEL Components: SWELl- 024 (CV-2620) Note: Support Missing Anchor Bolt Note: Component with Support Missing Anchor Bolt

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS- 12-00002 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 69 of 152 Sheet I of 4 Status: YN NE] Uo1 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-014 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 335 Room, Area' 35 (Entire Room) SWEL Components: SWELl- 026 (CV-2646) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of Y[ N[: UEr N/A--

potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)? Anchorage of equipment in the area appearsto be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YZ NEI U-1 N/AE-significant degraded conditions?

Anchorage of equipment in the area appears to be free of significant degraded conditions.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YZ NEI] U[] N/A[-

raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)? All rigid electrical conduit is adequately anchored to the overhead and the walls. Overheadpiping and ducts appearto be properly secured. 1 If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS- 12-00002 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 70 of 152 Sheet 2 of 4 Status: YZ NF UO Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 014 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 335 Room, Area 35 (Entire Room)

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y[K NEI IUE N/AE[

spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)? Overhead fluorescent lighting was secured with chain supports. No open S hooks were observed. Nylon zip ties were present to take up excess chain.

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NEI UE- N/A[E interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

The area appears to be free of potentiallyadverse seismic conditions that could cause flooding or spray in the area.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y'( NEI UE[ N/AE-interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

The area appearsto be free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN NEI u[E] N/AE-1 interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

The area appearsto be free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associatedwith housekeeping practices,storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS- 12-00002 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 71 of 152 Sheet 3 of 4 Status: Y[ NE] U[-- Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 014 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 335 Room, Area 35 (Entire Room)

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[ NE] U-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

It was looked for, and no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area were found. Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Room 35 was found to be in great housekeeping practices.Area was clean and well organized. Evaluated by: Genaro BarraqanJr. -' Date: 10/9/2012 Eric Dilbone 10/9/2012

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS- 12-00002 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 72 of 152 Sheet 4 of 4 Status: Y[ NE[] U[] Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 014 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 335 Room, Area 35 (EntireRoom) SWEL Components: SWELl- 026 (CV-2646) Photographs Note: General image of the area. This room Note: was exceptional in house-keeping practices.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS- 12-00002 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 73 of 152 Sheet 1 of 6 Status: Y[ NIF- UE-I Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 015_ Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 354 Room, Area, 63 (35'Radius) SWEL Components: SWELl- 027 (CV-I 407) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YZ NEI UE- N/AE-potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

Anchorage of equipment in the area appearsto be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YZ NEI UEr N/A[--

significant degraded conditions? Anchorage of equipment in the area appearsto be free of significant degradedconditions.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YV NEI UM N/A[:]

raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)? HVAC ductwork is in good condition.

' If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS- 12-00002 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 74 of 152 Sheet 2 of 6 Status: YN N[-] UM Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 015_ Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 354 - Room, Area 63

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic '(N NE] U[:] N/A[J spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Open S-hooks on light over 1A3-1101 next to GCH-43. Open S-hooks were observed above cabinet C1 15. This must be corrected to meet the IPEEEcommitments. CR-ANO- 1-2012-01613 initiated.

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ N[1 ULI N/AEI interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

Fire Pipingis present. Drainsare on the adjacent concrete, but grating is below the component such that any waterreleased would flow down to the lower levels.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN NEIl UI- N/AE1 interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

The area appearsto be free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y[ NEIl ULI N/A[Z interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Ladder was secured. Computer stored nearby, but could not fall onto safety related equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS- 12-00002 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 75 of 152 Sheet 3 of 6 Status: YZ NE] UI Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 015 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 354 Room, Area 63

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NEI U-I adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

It was looked for, and no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area were found. Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Seismic block walls (6-B-45 and 6-B-49) were observed in the area. Evaluated by: Michael E. Perez Date: 10/10/2012 Sean Smolarek 10/10/2012

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS- 12-00002 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 76 of 152 Sheet 4 of 6 Status: YZ NE] U[] Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 015 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 354 - Room, Area 63 SWEL Components: SWELhs-027 (CV-I 407) Photographs Note: GeneralArea Note: There appearto be some open S-hooks on some of the lighting fixtures in the area.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANOI-CS-12-00002 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 77 of 152 Sheet 5 of 6 Status: YE NE] U-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 015_ Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 354 - Room, Area 63 SWEL Components: SWELl - 027 (CV-1 407) Note: There is an open S-hook for one lighting Note: Computer stored in area fixture that is above Cabinet Cl 15 in the area. This can easily collapse onto the cabinet during a seismic hazard.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS- 12-00002 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 78 of 152 Sheet 6 of 6 Status: YE NEI UI-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 015_ Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 354 - Room, Area 63 SWEL Components: SWEILl- 027 (CV-1407) Note: HVAC ducts and fire piping Note:

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS- 12-00002 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 79 of 152 Sheet 1 of 5 Status: YZ ND] UDl Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 016 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 372 Room, Area' 94 SWEL Components: SWELl- 028 (CV-1300) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of Y; NEI U[-] N/A--

potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)? No adverse seismic conditions were observed in anchorage

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of Y] NDI UD_ N/AD']

significant degraded conditions? No significantdegradedconditions were observed in the area

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit Y[ NEI UD- N/A[D raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

HVAC and conduit appear to be in good condition 1 If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS- 12-00002 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 80 of 152 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YM NIl] UI-I Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 016 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 372 Room, Area 94

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NEI ULI N/AEl spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

An open S-hook was observed. However, if this light were to fall, it would fall to a Unistrut support.

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YE NEI u[:] N/A--

interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area? No fire piping observed.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NEj UE1 N/AZ-interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

No sources of fire were observed.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ N[E U[-] N/A-interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

No temporary installationswere observed.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS- 12-00002 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 81 of 152 Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YZ NO U-iJ Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 016 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 372 Room, Area 94

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZNEIULI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

No other adverse seismic conditions were observed Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated by: Michael Perez"*-. Date: 10/10/2012 Sean Smolarek 10/10/2012

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS- 12-00002 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 82 of 152 Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YN NF UI-I Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 016 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 372 Room, Area 94 SWEL Components: SWELl- 028 (CV-1300) Photographs Note: CV-1300 Note: Approximate area of AWC

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS- 12-00002 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 83 of 152 Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YE NE]- U' Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-016 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 372 Room, Area 94 SWEL Components: SWELl- 028 (CV-1300) Note: Observe anchorage in good condition Note: Observe overhead

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS- 12-00002 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 84 of 152 Sheet I of 4 Status: YZ NEi] ULI Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 017 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 360 Room, Area' 79 (Entire Room) SWEL Components: SWELl- 029 (CV-1220), 042 (CV-1206). 051 (SV-1 118). 034 (1227) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YZ NEI UE- N/AE:-

potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)? Anchorage of equipment in the area appearsto be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of Y[ NEI uEr N/A[-]

significant degraded conditions? Anchorage of equipment in the area appearsto be free of significant degraded conditions.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit Y[ NEI UE1 N/AE1 raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

All rigid electrical conduit is adequately anchoredto the overhead and the walls. Overheadpiping and ducts appearto be properly secured. I If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS- 12-00002 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 85 of 152 Sheet 2 of 4 Status: YZ NEI] UL-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-017 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 360 Room, Area 79 (Entire Room)

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y-] NZ UE] N/A--]

spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)? Light above CV-1206 has an open S-hook. This hook must be closed to meet an IPEEE commitment. CR-ANO-1-2012-01613 initiated.

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN N[-] uE] N/A[-]

interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area? The area appears to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions that could cause flooding or spray in the area.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YER NEI UEI N/A[]

interactions that could cause a fire in the area? The area appearsto be free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y' NE] UE- N/A-I interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

The area appearsto be free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associatedwith housekeeping practices,storage of portable equipment, and temporaryinstallations.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANOI-CS-12-00002 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 86 of 152 Sheet 3 of 4 Status: YN NEI UD-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 017 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 360 Room, Area 79 (EntireRoom)

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE N[l U" adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

It was looked for, and no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area were found. Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) The only finding was an open S-hook right above CV- 1206. The rest of the area is in appropriate condition. Evaluated by: Genaro BarracanJr. Date: 10/9/2012 Eric Dilbone 6e01 0/9/2012

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS- 12-00002 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 87 of 152 Sheet 4 of 4 Status: YZ NE] UFI-1 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 017 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 360 Room, Area 79 (Entire Room) SWEL Components: SWELl- 029 (CV-1220). 042 (CV-1206). 051 (SV-1818). 034 (1227) Photographs Note: Liaht above CV-1206 has an open S-hook.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS- 12-00002 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 88 of 152 Sheet I of 7 Status: YZ N[I] U[-- Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 018 Location: Bldg. INTAKE Floor El. 354 Room, Area' 241(Entire Room) BLDG SWEL Components: SWELl- 040 (CV-3646) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YE N[-- u[-- N/AE-potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

No adverse anchorageconditions were observed in the area

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YN NEI uEr N/AD' significant degraded conditions?

Minor corrosion was identified in the lower level on several components. The conduits attachedto the WEST wall (nearthe floor) had minor corrosion. Also in the lower level, the anchoragefor component HBD-14-H49 had signs of minor corrosion.See images in Sheet 4.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YN NEI UEr N/AD-raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

No adverse seismic conditions were observed for cable/conduit raceways and HVAC. If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS- 12-00002 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 89 of 152 Sheet 2 of 7 Status: YZ NE] U-] Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 018 Location: Bldg. INTAKE Floor El. 354 Room, Area 241(Entire Room) BLDG

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NE]I UE N/AE]

spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)? There is no other equipment in the area that could cause potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions.

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y' NEI UE] N/AE--

interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area? Located in the intake structure. Water is present below the structure and within components in the structure. These do not represent credible sources.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN NEI U[] N/AE]

interactions that could cause a fire in the area? Area heaters were observed to be approximately 6 ft above the slab. No sources of ignition were present

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN NEI U[] N/AE[]

interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)? No conditions were observed

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO1-CS-12-00002 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 90 of 152 Sheet 3 of 7 Status: YZ NF UD Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 018 Location: Bldg. INTAKE Floor El. 354 Room, Area 241(Entire Room) BLDG

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NM UF-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

No other seismic conditions were observed Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Two components in the lower level of the intake building were found to have minor issues with corrosion. The anchoragefor the conduit on the WEST wall near the floor was corroded.Also, the anchoragefor equipment item HBD-14-H49 had corrosion. The corrodedanchoragesfor the conduit and equipment item HBD-14-H49 are believed to not be a current seismic concern. The light in the upper level of the intake building near P-4A service waterpump contained an open S-hook. Evaluated by: Genaro BarraqanJr. Date: 10/9/2012 Eric Dilbone 10/9/2012

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS- 12-00002 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 91 of 152 Sheet 4 of 7 Status: YZ N[-] UM Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 018 Location: Bldg. INTAKE Floor El. 354 Room, Area 241(Entire Room) BLDG SWEL Components: SWELl- 046 (CV-3646) Photographs Note: This image shows the conduits Note: The anchoragefor component anchoredto the WEST wall near the floor. It is HBD-14-H49 had signs of corrosion. This item evident through this image that there is a is found in the lower level of the intake corrosion issue on this anchorage. This conduit building. is found in the lower level of the intake building.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS- 12-00002 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 92 of 152 Sheet 5 of 7 Status: YEJ NM ULIM Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 018 Location: Bldg. INTAKE Floor El. 354 Room, Area 241(Entire Room) BLDG SWEL Components: SWELl- 046 (CV-3646) Note: General image of the lower level. All Note: General image of the lower level of the other anchoragein the area was identified to intake building. Area was free of adverse be free of potentially adverse seismic seismic conditions associated with house-conditions. keeping practices. Room was clean and well maintained.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS- 12-00002 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 93 of 152 Sheet 6 of 7 Status: YN NE[-I UL-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 018 Location: Bldg. INTAKE Floor El. 354 Room, Area 241(Entire Room) BLDG SWEL Components: SWELl- 046 (CV-3646) 7! Note: General image showing a crack in the Note: General image showing a crack in a grout pad. Item is found in upper level of the ceiling-wall intersection. Found in the upper intake building, below P-4A service water level near southwest wall. This crack does not pump. Ruled to not be a seismic concern. pose any seismic concerns.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS- 12-00002 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 94 of 152 Sheet 7 of 7 Status: YE NE] U[IZ Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-018 Location: Bldg. INTAKE Floor El. 354 Room, Area 241(Entire Room) BLDG SWEL Components: SWELl- 046 (CV-3646) Note: Image shows an open S-hook near the Note: General image of the upper level of the P-4A service water pump. intake building.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS- 12-00002 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 95 of 152 Sheet I of 5 Status: YZ NE] UOi Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-019 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 335 Room, Area' 34 (EntireRoom) SWEL Components: SWELl- 041 (CV-3850), 044 (CV-3851) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YM NEI U[-1 N/AD--

potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)? Anchorage of equipment in the area appears to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YZ NEI Ur1 N/A[-]

significant degraded conditions? Anchorage of equipment in the area appearsto be free of significant degradedconditions.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YZ NEI UE1 N/ArI raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

All rigid electrical conduit is adequatelyanchored to the overhead and the walls. Overheadpiping and ducts appearto be properly secured. ,If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS- 12-00002 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 96 of 152 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: Y[ NEI LIU Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 019 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 335 Room, Area 34 (Entire Room)

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN N[D U[:I N/A[D]

spatial interactions with other equipment ih the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)? I There was a light near valve CV-3851 & CV-3050 (right around the corner-SOUTH) that was attached with zip-ties. There was also a free rigid support on the ceiling, as well as a miscellaneous rod coming out of the ceiling (discoverednear the entrance to room 34). Lighting appearedto have closed s-hooks in all observed cases.

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN NI IUD1 N/AD-1 interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

The area appears to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions that could cause flooding or spray in the area.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NDI UD- N/AD']

interactions that could cause a fire in the area? The area appearsto be free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NDl ULID N/AD--

interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)? The area appearsto be free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associatedwith housekeeping practices,storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS- 12-00002 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 97 of 152 Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YE]- N-- U-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 01'9 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 335 Room, Area 34 (EntireRoom)

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[ NR U[

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area? It was looked for, and no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area were found. Comments (Additional pages may be added as pecessary) To summarize the findings in this room:

Light attached with zip-ties near SOUTH side of room.
Free rigid support hanging from ceiling See images below.

Evaluated by: Genaro Barragan Jr. Date: 10/9/2012 Eric Dilbone 10/9/2012

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-C S-12-00002 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 98 of 152 Sheet 4 of 5 Status: Y[* NEI u[-- Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 019 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 335 Room, Area 34 (Entire Room) SWEL Components: SWELl- 041 (CV-3850). 044 (CV-3851) Photographs Note: This light near the SOUTH side of room Note: Image shows the light that was was making contact with the insulationon the supported with zip-ties near the SOUTH side of pipe shown. room 34.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANOI-CS-12-00002 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 99 of 152 Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YZ NE] UOF Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 019_ Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 335 1 Room, Area 34 (Entire Room) SWEL Components: SWELl - 041 (CV-3850). 044 (CV-3851) Note: Light above 2F-295 S-hook. Note: Image shows the free rigid support hanging from the ceiling. Although this is not a seismic hazard,it is not supporting any equipment.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANOI-CS-12-00002 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 100 of 152 Sheet 1 of 5 Status: YM NF U-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 020 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 386 Room, Area, 258 SWEL Components: SWELl - 052 (VEF-24 A) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YN NEI UD-- N/A[-1 potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

No adverse seismic conditions were observed.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of Y' NEI UD-- N/AD--

significant degraded conditions? Mild cracks and spalling concrete was observed at the opening around the exhaust pipe. This is judged not to be an adverse seismic condition as the conditions are minor.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YZ ND-- UD- N/AD-raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

Conduits appearto be adequately supported. Steel supports for grating above appearto be in good condition. 'If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS- 12-00002 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 101 of 152 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YZ NFD Ur-- Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 020 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 386 Room, Area 258

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NEI UM N/A[--

spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)? No adverse seismic spatial interactionswere observed.

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YE N[I U[-] N/AD-interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

No source of flooding was observed. A floor drain was observed in the vicinity. YZ NEI uMI N/A[-D

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

No credible sources of fire located within the area.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y" NEI Ur1 N/A-1 interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

No adverse seismic interactionsassociated with temporary installations were identified.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANOI-CS-12-00002 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 102 of 152 Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YZ NF UW Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 020 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 386 Room, Area 258

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NW- UW-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

No other adverse seismic conditions were observed. Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated by: DanielAndoh & _ ýý a Date: 10/10/2012 Genaro BarracanJr. 10/10/2012

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO1 -CS- 12-00002 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 103 of 152 Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YZ NR U-- Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 020 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 386 Room, Area 258 SWEL Components: SWELl- 052 (VEF-24A) Photographs Note: Concrete spalling onto floor from Note: Flame arrestorwith oil spray marks on deterioratedconditions at penetration above. wall.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO1-CS-12-00002 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 104 of 152 Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YE NEI UO Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 020_ Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 386 - Room, Area 258 SWEL Components: SWEI-l- 052 (VEF-24A) 7 Note: Gratingsupport. Note: Floordrain.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS- 12-00002 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 105 of 152 Sheet 1 of 4 Status: YZ NEI UOF Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 021 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 372 Room, Area' 95 SWEL Components: SWELl- 059 (RA-2) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of '([ NEi UL- N/ADl potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

Anchorage of equipment in the area appears to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YZ NEI U[-D N/AD-significant degraded conditions?

Anchorage of equipment in the areaappears to be free of significant degraded conditions.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YZ NEI U[- N/AD--

raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)? All rigid electricalconduit is adequately anchored to the overhead and the walls. Overheadpiping and ducts appearto be properlysecured. 1 If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS- 12-00002 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 106 of 152 Sheet 2 of 4 Status: Y ] N--I Ul-- Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 021 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 372 Room, Area 95

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NE] U[-' N/A[l spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

There were no ceiling tiles in the room, and lighting is supported with chains and closed S-hooks.

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y" NEI U[- N/AZ-interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

It was observed that there was a room cooler mounted overhead in the room. The room cooler has chilled water running through it, and contains a drip pan and drain line to a floor drain.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YO NEI UE- N/A[:]

interactions that could cause a fire in the area? The area appearsto be free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y] N[-- UE- N/AE-interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

The area appearsto be free of potentiallyadverse seismic interactions associatedwith housekeeping practices,storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS- 12-00002 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 107 of 152 Sheet 3 of 4 Status: YZ NFI U-I Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 021 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 372 Room, Area 95

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y'( NF-] Ur-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

It was looked for, and there no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area were found. Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated by: Daniel Parker 0J [)ate: 10/11/2012 Eric Dilbone 10/11/2012

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS- 12-00002 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 108 of 152 Sheet 4 of 4 Status: Y[ NEI UI-] Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 021 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 372 Room, Area 95 SWEL Components: SWELl- 059 (RA-2) Photographs m 95. Note: View of cables and conduit in the overhead.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS- 12-00002 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 109 of 152 Sheet I of 5 Status: YZ NE] UO] Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 022 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 372 Room, Area' 110 SWEL Components: SWELl- 060 (D-07) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YZ NIl UI-- N/A-potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

Conduit supports on walls appearto be adequateand in good condition.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of Y; NEI! UM N/All significant degraded conditions?

No degradedconditions were observed in the anchorages.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YZ N[! UEI N/A[-]

raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)? HVAC and conduit supports including light supports appearto be adequate and in good condition. 'If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS- 12-00002 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 10 of 152 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: Y[Z NE]I UE Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 022 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 372 Room, Area 110

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic 'YZ NE] UE- N/AE]

spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)? No potentially adverse seismic spatialinteractions were observed.

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y[ NE] U-- N/AE[

interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area? No potentialsources of flooding were observed.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NEI UE- N/AZI interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

No adverse seismic fire conditions were observed.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YH NEI uE- N/A--

interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)? The area is free of potentiallyadverse seismic interactionsassociated with housekeeping practices,storage of portable equipment and temporary installations.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS- 12-00002 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 111 of 152 Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YZ NEII U-' Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 022 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 372 Room, Area 110

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[KNEI UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

No other adverse seismic conditions were observed. Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) No adverse seismic conditions were observed. Evaluated by: DanielAndoh Date: 10/16/2012 Genaro BarraqanJr. ' 10/16/2012

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS- 12-00002 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 112 of 152 Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YZ N[] Uor-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 022 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 372 Room, Area 110 SWEL Components: SWELl- 060 (D-07) Photographs Note: Overhead HVAC and conduit supports. Note, Overhead HVAC and conduit supports.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS- 12-00002 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 113 of 152 Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YE Nr UI-- Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 022 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 372 Room, Area 110 SWEL Components: SWELl- 060 (D-07) Note: HVAC steel supports. Note: Conduit supports.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS- 12-00002 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 114 of 152 Sheet I of 5 Status: YN Nil ULI"- Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 023 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 372 Room, Area' 98 SWEL Components: SWELl- 070 (D14) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of V[Z NEi U-i N/A'-

potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)? Anchorage of equipment in the area appearsto be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YN N[-- UI' N/A[-

significant degraded conditions? No significantdegraded conditions were observed.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YZ( NEI Ur1 N/A[D raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

Cable trays were observed to have adequate fill, and were properly supported.HVAC ducts and conduits appearedto be adequately supported. 1 If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS- 12-00002 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 115 of 152 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: Y[ NEI U-- Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 023 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 372 Room, Area 98

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NEI U[: N/A[D]

spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)? No adverse seismic spatialinteractionswere observed.

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NDI UiD N/ADI interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

No flooding or spray sources were observed in the area.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NDI UDl N/AD--

interactions that could cause a fire in the area? The area appears to be free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN ND-1 uD N/AD interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

The area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactionsassociated with housekeeping practices,storage of portable equipment and temporaryinstallations.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS- 12-00002 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 116 of 152 Sheet 3 of 5 Status: Y[ NF UF Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 023 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 372 Room, Area 98

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y'( NWE] U[--

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area? No other adverse seismic conditions were observed. Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated by: Daniel Andoh Date: 10/10/2012 Genaro BarraqanJr.*- 10/10/2012

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS- 12-00002 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 117 of 152 Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YZ NE] U-- Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 023 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 372 Room, Area 98 SWEL Components: SWELl- 070 (014) Photographs Note: Overhead view of area Note: Overhead view of area

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS- 12-00002 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 118 of 152 Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YOI NrI U01-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 023_ Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 372 - Room, Area 98 SWEL Components: SWEILl- 070 (D14) Note: Conduit mounted on wall Note: Overhead view, of area

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS- 12-00002 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 119 of 152 Sheet I of 4 Status: YZ NE] Uor-- Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 024 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 386 Room, Area' 144 (Entire Room) SWEL Components: SWELl- 071 (PT-2667A) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YZ NEI U[: NIA[:

potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)? Anchorage of equipment in the area appearsto be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YZ NI] UL"I N/A[:]

significant degraded conditions? Anchorage of equipment in the area appearsto be free of significant degradedconditions.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YZ NEI UE] NIAE]

raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)? All rigid electricalconduit is adequately anchoredto the overhead and the walls. Overheadpiping and ducts appearto be properly secured. I If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS- 12-00002 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 120 of 152 Sheet 2 of 4 Status: YN NIJ U"I Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 024 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 386 Room, Area 144 (Entire Room)

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YO NEI ULI N/A[-]

spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)? The area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactionswith other equipment in the area.

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ( NIl U-I N/A[--

interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area? The area appearsto be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions that could cause flooding or spray in the area.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ N[l UE3 N/AD1 interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

The area appearsto be free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NEI UE1 N/A-I interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

The area appears to be free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associatedwith housekeeping practices,storageof portableequipment, and temporary installations.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS- 12-00002 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 121 of 152 Sheet 3 of 4 Status: YN NEI URI Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 024 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 386 Room, Area 144 (Entire Room)

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ N[i UI[:

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area? It was looked for, and no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area were found. Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Equipment in the area appearedto be well anchored.Room was a dark, but the anchorage of the equipment in the area was located using a flashlight. All components appearedto be in appropriate conditions. Evaluated by: Genaro BarraqanJr. [)ate: 10/9/2012 Eric Dilbone 6

10/9/2012

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS-i12-00002 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 122 of 152 Sheet 4 of 4 Status: YZ ND'1 U r-1 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 024 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 386 Room, Area 144 (EntireRoom) SWEL Components: SWELl- 071 (PT-2667A) Photographs Note: Anchorage of the equipment in the area Note: Close up view of anchorage. appears to be free of degraded conditions.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO1-CS-12-00002 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 123 of 152 Sheet 1 of 5 Status: YZ N'-] ur-D Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 025_ Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 374 Room, Area' 96 SWEL Components: SWEI-l- 094 (LY-1 411 A) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YE NEI U['- N/AD potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

All of the electricalcabinets within the room appeared to be adequately anchoredto the floor and did not appearto pose a hazard during a seismic event.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YE NEI UE- N/AZ significant degraded conditions?

Anchorage of equipment in the area appearsto be free of significant degraded conditions.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit Y' N[-I U[- N/A[-]

raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)? All rigid electrical conduit is adequatelyanchored to the overhead and the walls. Overheadpiping and ducts appearto be properly secured. 'If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANOI-CS-12-00002 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 124 of 152 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YZ No--I Ur Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 025 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 374 Room, Area2 96

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y' NEI UE- N/A[]

spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)? The area is free of potential adverse spatial interactions. Lighting over safety-related equipment is mounted on unistrut.

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NEI ur[ NIA[-]

interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area? A fire water system was observed and appearedto be installed to meet plant specifications. A fire extinguisher was supportedon a typical wall mount that was observed throughout the plant. During a seismic event it may bounce of the support and fall to the floor but it was judged to not be a significant hazard during a seismic event.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y" NEI uEr NIAE-interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

The area appears to be free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NEI uE- N/AE1 interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

The area was partof the protected train during the time of the inspection so there was no equipment or tools in the area that would represent a seismic hazard. 2 If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS- 12-00002 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 125 of 152 Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YZ No- ur] Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 025 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 374 Room, Area3 96

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NE] UEý adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

It was looked for, and no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area were found. Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated by: DanielParker \ Date: 10/10/2012 Eric Dilbone 10/10/2012 3 If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS- 12-00002 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 126 of 152 Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YZ NE] ULI Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 025 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 374 Room, Area4 96 SWEL Components: SWELl- 094 (LY-1411A) Photographs Note: Cabinet containingLY-1411A. 4 If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANOI-CS-12-00002 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 127 of 152 Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YE NE]I U-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 025 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 374 Room, Areas 96 SWEL Components: SWELl- 094 (LY-1411A) Note: Overhead lighting in Room 96. Note: 5 If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS- 12-00002 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 128 of 152 Sheet I of 5 Status: Y[ NFJ UEI Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 026 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 386 Room, Area' 129 SWEL Components: SWELl- 058(RS-2), 078(C1O), 080(PB-0144). 085(C88), 086(C89), 087(C90), 088(PWR-2406). 089(C14), 090(C42), 091(C44), 092(C26), 097(PB-2670), 098(SS-1220), 099(TR-1139), 100(LIS-1421) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YZ N[E ULI N/A['-

potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)? Anchorage of equipment in the area appearsto be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YZ NEJ UE- N/AE[-

significant degraded conditions? Anchorage in the area appearsto be free of significantdegraded conditions.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YE NEi UE- N/AE-raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

Based on visual inspectionfrom the floor, the cable/conduitraceways and HVAC ducting appearto be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions. IIf the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO1-CS-12-00002 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 129 of 152 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: Y[ NE] UDý Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 026_ Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 386 - Room, Area 129

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ N[E] U[-] N/A[-]

spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)? The lighting in the room is all secure, and ceiling tiles are in good condition as well.

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NE] UEl N/AD1 interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

There are no apparentpotentially adverse seismic interacitons in the area that could cause spray. Additionally, there are floor drainsin the floor to mitigate effects of any spills that may occur.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ N[E] UE-' N/AOl interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

The area appears to be free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y" NEI U['- N/AD-interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

It was observed that there are four emergency respiratoryprotection boxes stored behind cabinet C26. Though they do not present a potentially adverse seismic interacitoneffect to safety-related equipment, they may fall and impede walkways since they are not secured.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS- 12-00002 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 130 of 152 Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YE NI]I U[-- Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 026 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 386 Room, Area 129

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YS~ NEIl uF1 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

It was looked for and no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area were found. Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) It was observed that there is a cartas well as a ladder stored behind cabinet C26, however, these two items are secured to the wall: Evaluated by: Roy Berryman D.ate: 10/4/20.12 Eric Dilbone 10/4/2012

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS- 12-00002 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 131 of 152 Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YN NF U'- Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 026 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 386 Roo/m, Area2 129 SWEL Components: SWELl- 058(RS-2), 078(C 0). 080(PB-0144). 085(C88), 086(C89). 087(C90). 088(PWR-2406). 089(C14). 090(C42), 091(C44). 092(C26), 097(PB-2670)., 098(SS-1220), 099(TR-1139), 100(LIS-1421) Photographs Note: Picture shows emergency respiratory Note: Photo showing seismic block wall protection boxes stacked upon each other. located in the control room. 2 If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS- 12-00002 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 132 of 152 Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YE NE] U-- Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 026_ Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 386 - Room, Area3 129 SWEL Components: SWELl- 058(RS-2), 078(C1O), 080(PB-0144). 085(.88), 086(C89), 087(C90), 088(PWR-2406), 089(C14). 090(C42). 091(C44), 092(C26). 097(PB-2670), 098(SS-1220), 099(TR-1139), 100(LIS-1421) Note: View showing one of a number of Note: panels in the control room. 3 If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS- 12-00002 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 133 of 152 Sheet i of 5 Status: YZ NE] U-' Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 027_ Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 369 - Room, Area' 86 SWEL Components: SWELl- 110(P-107B), 069(PS-5284), 077(TS-7904), 068(SE-5220), 066(M-225B) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of '(N N[- uE] N/AE3 potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

Anchorage of equipment in the area appearsto be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YZ NEJ UED N/AE1 significant degraded conditions?

Anchorage of equipment in the area appearsto be free of significant degraded conditions.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit Y'K N[E] U[: N/A[E raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

All rigid electricalconduit is adequately anchoredto the overhead and the walls. Overheadpiping and ducts appearto be properly secured. 1 If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS- 12-00002 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 134 of 152 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YZ ND1 UD-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 027_ Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 369 - Room, Area 86

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y[ N[D] U[D N/AD-spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Overheadfluorescent lighting was secured with chain supports. No open S hooks were observed. Nylon zip ties were present to take up excess chain.

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y' N[1 UD' N/AD-interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

The area appearsto be free of potentiallyadverse seismic conditions that could cause flooding or spray in the area.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y[ NEI U[i N/AD-interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

The area appears to be free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic 'Y[ NDI UiD N/ADI interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

The area appears to be free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associatedwith housekeeping practices,storage of portableequipment, and temporary installations.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO1-CS-12-00002 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 135 of 152 Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YZ NE] UOI Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 027 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 369 Room, Area 86

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could 'YZ NEi ULi adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

It was looked for, and no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area were found. Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) The zip ties on the light fixture chain supports were used to adjust the position of the lights such that they would not trip the overheadfire/flash detectors when the diesel generatoris in operation. Evaluated by: Daniel Parker Date: 10/2/2012 [<J Eric Dilbone 10/2/2012

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-C S-12-00002 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 136 of 152 Sheet 4 of 5 Status: Y[ NE] UF-D Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 027 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 369 Room, Area 86 SWEL Components: SWELl- 110(P-107B), 069(PS-5284), 077(TS-79041), 068(SE-5220). 066(M-225B) Photographs Note: Overhead ventilation duct with steel Note: Example of nylon zip tie on light fixture support hanger. chain support.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANOI-CS-12-00002 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 137 of 152 Sheet 5 of 5 Status: Y[ NE] IOF Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 027 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 369 Room, Area 86 SWEL Components: SWELl- 11O(P-107B), 069(PS-5284), 077(TS-7904), 068(SE-5220), 066(M-225B) Note: Overhead rigid conduit, piping, and Note: exhaust.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS- 12-00002 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 138 of 152 Sheet I of 5 Status: YZ N[F U-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 028_ Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 369 - Room, Area' 86 SWEL Components: SWELl-006(E-21), 053(VFP-26B), 050(SV-5239). 065(F-52B). 013(P-106B2), 064(F-50B), 102(T-78B) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YZ ND-] UD-- N/A"-

potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)? Anchorage of equipment in the area appearsto be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YN NDI UD'- N/ADl significant degraded conditions?

Anchorage of equipment in the area appearsto be free of significant degradedconditions.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YN NDI UD: N/AD:

raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)? All rigid electrical conduit is adequately anchoredto the overhead and the walls. Overheadpiping and ducts appearto be properly secured. 'If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS- 12-00002 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 139 of 152 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YZ N[] Ur-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 028 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 369 Room, Area 86

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ N[D] U[I N/AD-spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Overhead fluorescent lighting was secured with chain supports. No

      'open S hooks were observed. Nylon zip ties were present to take up excess chain.

A fire extinguisherwas mounted on a support hook near the fire door and E-21. The verticalhook mount was relatively short. During a seismic event the fire extinguishermay bounce of the support and fall to the ground. This may cause it to expel its contents. This will not have in potentially adverse seismic impact.

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NEI U[D- N/AD-interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

The area appearsto be free of potentiallyadverse seismic conditions that could cause flooding or spray in the area.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NDI UD1 N/ADI interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

The area appears to be free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y[ ND- UD1 N/ADI interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

The area appearsto be free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associatedwith housekeeping practices,storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS-i12-00002 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 140 of 152 Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YZ ND UD-- Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 028 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 369 Room, Area 86

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEI U--

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area? It was looked for, and no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area were found. Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) The zip ties on the light fixture chain supports were used to adjust the position of the lights such that they would not trip the overheadfire/flash detectors when the diesel generatoris in operation. Evaluated by: Daniel Parker Date: 10/2/2012 Eric Dilbone - 10/2/2012

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS- 12-00002 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 141 of 152 Sheet 4 of 5 Status: Y[ NE] UI-] Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 028 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 369 Room, Area 86 SWEL Components: SWELl- 006(E-21). 053(VFP-26B). 050(SV-5239), 065(F-52B), 013(P-106B2). 064(F-50B). 102(T-78B) Photographs I Note: Fire Extinguishernear door and Note: Example of nylon zip tie on light fixture electrical cabinet E-21 chain support.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS- 12-00002 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 142 of 152 Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YE ND-U[-- Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 028 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 369 Room, Area 86 SWEL Components: SWELl- 006(E-21), 053(VFP-26B), 050(SV-5239), 065(F-52B). 013(P-106B2). 064(F-50B), 102(T-78B) Note: Overhead ventilation duct with steel Note: support hanger.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS- 12-00002 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 143 of 152 Sheet i of 5 Status: YZ NEI Ur-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-029 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 404 - Room, Area 159 SWEL Components: SWEL2-001 (SW-72) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YZ N[E u[_ N/AE1 potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

Anchorage of equipment in the areaare appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YZ NEI U[:] N/AE1 significant degraded conditions?

Anchorage of equipment in the area appearsto be free of significant degraded conditons.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YZ NEI U['] N/AE-raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

All rigid electrical conduit is adequatelyanchored to the overhead and the walls. Overheadpiping and ducts appearto be properly secured.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS- 12-00002 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 144 of 152 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YZ NE] U-I Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-029 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 404 Room, Area 159

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN NEI UDJ N/A--

spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)? The area appearsto be free of potentiallyadverse seismic spatial interactionswith other equipment in the area.

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y] NDI UD- N/AD-interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

The area is free of potentiallyadverse seismic interactionsthat could cause flooding or spray. Drains in the floor provide a means to mitigate flooding in the event of a pipe break or release of water.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y'( ND] UD N/A[D]

interactions that could cause a fire in the area? The area appearsto be free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN( NDI UD1 N/ADl interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

The area appearsto be free of potentiallyadverse seismic interactions with the items listed.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS- 12-00002 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 145 of 152 Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YjZ NF UO Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-029 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 404 Room, Area 159

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN N[i U[:I adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

It was looked for, and no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety fuctions were found. Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated by: Sean Smolarek Date: 10/12/2012 Eric Dilbone 10/12/2012

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS- 12-00002 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 146 of 152 Sheet 4 of 5 Status: Y[ NL-' U[- Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 029 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 404 Room, Area 159 SWEL Components: SWEL2-001 (SW-72) Photographs Note: View of the area surroundingSW-72. Note: Seismic block wall next to SW-72.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS- 12-00002 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 147 of 152 Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YZ NEI U[ Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 029_ Location: Bldg. RAB . Floor El. 404 - Room, Area 159 SWEL Components: SWEL-2-001 (SW-72) Note: View of the area surroundingSW-72. Note:

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS- 12-00002 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 148 of 152 Sheet I of 5 Status: YZ NE] U-I Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 030 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 317 Room, Area' 14 SWEL Components: SWELl- 023 (CV-1433), 108 (E-35A) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YZ NEI ULI N/A[:

potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)? All components in the room appearedto be adequately anchoredto the floor and did not appearto pose a hazard during a seismic event.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YZ NEI Ul N/A[-]

significant degraded conditions? Anchorage of equipment in the areaappears to be free of significant degradedconditions.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YZ NEI U[-E N/AI1 raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

All rigid electrical conduit is adequately anchored.to the overhead and the walls. Overheadpiping and ducts appearto be properly secured. 'If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS-12-00002 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 149 of 152 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YN NF U-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 030 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 317 Room, Area2 14

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NE UI- N/A[:]

spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)? The area is free of potentialadverse spatialinteractions.

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NEI UE1 N/AE-interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

There were floor drains installed in the floor, which would mitigate any flooding concerns. Additionally, there was nothing in the area that presented a major flooding concern as a result of seismic interactions.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y[ NEI U[E N/AE-]

interactions that could cause a fire in the area? The area appearsto be free of potentiallyadverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NE-] UE- N/AE-interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

There was an area in the room that was roped off as a contaminated area, but this does not present a seismic concern. 2 If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS- 12-00002 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 150 of 152 Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YZ NF- U' Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 030 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 317 Room, Area3 14

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEI Ur-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

It was looked for, and no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area were found. Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated by: Sean Smolarek [Date: 10/3/2012 Michael E. Perez 10/3/2012 3 If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS- 12-00002 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 151 of 152 Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YZ NO U'- Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 030 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 317 Room, Area4 14 SWEL Components: SWELl- 023 (CV-1433), 108 (E-35A) Photographs 7-Note: View of overhead in Room 14. Note: View of supports anchored to wall. 4 If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS- 12-00002 Attachment D Rev. 0 Page 152 of 152 Sheet 5 of 5 Status: Y[I N[D UD Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 030 Location: Bldg. RAB Floor El. 317 Room, Area5 14 SWEL Components: SWELl- 023 (CV-1433). 108 (E-35A) Note: View of equipment properly anchored to Note: Seismic block wall. floor. 5 If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS- 12-00002 Attachment E Rev. 0 Page 1 of 3 Attachment E Potentially Adverse Seismic Conditions

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I -CS- 12-00002 Attachment E Rev. 0 Page 2 of 3 Table 1 - Potentially Adverse Seismic Conditions swC- During Fukushima Seismic walkdowns, a Condition entered Initial Action: CR-ANO-1-2012-01534 initiated CR-ANO-1-2012-01534 SWEL1-010/ concrete pedestal for items P-16A and P-16B directly into CAP closed to CR-C-2012-swC- was measured to be approximately 10 inch 2801. CR Action: Revise drawings as required SWELl-014 tall: Drawing C-48 states that this platform should be 4inch tall. Operability Review: The condition was reviewed by the CR process and it was determined that there is no adverse operability concerns since the CR describes only a minor discrepancy in documentation. N/A SWC- During Fukushima Seismic walkdowns, a Condition entered Initial Action: CR-ANO-1-2012-01535 and WR-286913 initiated CR-ANO-1-2012-01535 SWELl-010 vent is out of alignment below penetration directly into CAP closed. 252-0008 in the Diesel Vault above P-16A. CR Action: WR-286913 initiated to properly install the vent. WR-286913 initiated. Operability Review: The condition was reviewed by the CR process and it was determined that there is no adverse operability concerns since the vent is firmly attached and is not in danger of falling. Even if the vent cover were to fall, there is no equipment immediately below it, although the P-16A Diesel Fuel Oil transfer pump is in the immediate vicinity. N/A AWC-007 Anchor bolts below FO-10A have significant Condition entered Initial Action: CR-ANO-1-2012-1536 and WR-287317 initiated CR-ANO-1-2012-1536 degradation. directly into CAP closed. CR Action: WR-287317 initiated to touch up paint WR-287317 initiated. Operability Review: The condition was reviewed by the CR process and it was determined that the supports show signs of only surface corrosion (flaking paint) and light rust. As a result, the supports and FO-10A/B and the A" and "B" Diesel Fuel Oil systems remain operable. N/A AWC-008 During Fukushima Seismic walkdowns, Condition entered Initial Action: CR-ANO-1-2012-01537 initiated and WR-286915 initiated CR-ANO-1-2012-01537 anchor bolts at the base of the tank supports directly into CAP closed. for T-57B, Emergency Diesel Fuel Tank, are CR Action: WR-286g15 initiated bent and corrosion on the base plates was WR-286915 initiated. observed. Operability Review: The condition was reviewed by the CR process and it was determined that the nuts/bolts show signs of light corrosion and peeled paint. The base plate shows signs of corrosion and dirt/debris build up, but does not exhibit any signs of wastage or pitting of the base plate material. Therefore, the T-57B support and T-57B tank are considered operable. N/A AWC-007 During Fukushima inspections Nuts in Condition entered Initial Action: CR-ANO-1-2012-01538 initiated and WR-286917 initiated CR-ANO-1-2012-01538 personnel platform in room with tank T-57A in directly into CAP closed. the Diesel Vault are loose. CR Action: WR-286917 initiated WR-286917 initiated. Operability Review: This condition report describes a condition of an SSC that is not within the scope of the Operability Determination Process. An Operability Determination is NOT REQUIRED for the stated condition. N/A SWC- During Fukushima Seismic walkdowns, an S- Condition entered Initial Action: CR-ANO-1-2012-01613 initiated and WR-286917 initiated CR-ANO-1-2012-01613 SWELl-040 hook supporting an overhead light fixture was directly into CAP closed. identified to be open over CV-3646 in the

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I -CS- 12-00002 Attachment E Rev. 0 Page 3 of 3 Table 1 - Potentially Adverse Seismic Conditions Intake Structure, EL 354, Room 241. CR Action: WR-286917 initiated WR-286917 initiated Operability Review: The condition was reviewed by the CR process and it was determined that uplifting forces under DBE conditions would be less than the dead load of the fixture. Therefore, all identified safety related equipment remains operable. N/A AWC-015 During Fukushima Seismic walkdowns, an S- Condition entered Initial Action: CR-ANO-1-2012-01613 initiated and WR-286917 initiated CR-ANO-1-2012-01613 hook supporting an overhead light fixture was directly into CAP closed. identified to be open over 1A3-1 101 next to GCH-43 in the Aux Bldg, EL 354, Room 63. CR Action: WR-286917 initiated WR-286917 initiated Operability Review: The condition was reviewed by the CR process and it was determined that uplifting forces under DBE conditions would be less than the dead load of the fixture. Therefore, all identified safety related equipment remains operable. N/A AWC-015 During Fukushima Seismic walkdowns, an S- Condition entered Initial Action: CR-ANO-1-2012-01613 initiated and WR-286917 initiated CR-ANO-1-2012-01613 hook supporting an overhead light fixture was directly into CAP closed. identified to be open over Cl 15 in the Aux Bldg, EL 354, Room 63. CR Action: WR-286917 initiated WR-28691 7 initiated Operability Review: The condition was reviewed by the CR process and it was determined that uplifting forces under DBE conditions would be less than the dead load of the fixture. Therefore, all identified safety related equipment remains operable. N/A AWC-017 During Fukushima Seismic walkdowns, an S- Condition entered Initial Action: CR-ANO-1-2012-01613 initiated and WR-286917 initiated CR-ANO-1-2012-01613 hook supporting an overhead light fixture was directly into CAP closed. identified to be open over CV-1206 in the Aux CR Action: WR-286917 initiated Bldg, EL 360, Room 79. WR-286917 initiated Operability Review: The condition was reviewed by the CR process and it was determined that uplifting forces under DBE conditions would be less than the dead load of the fixture. Therefore, all identified safety related equipment remains operable. N/A AWC-013 During Fukushima Seismic walkdowns, a Condition entered Initial Action: CR-ANO-1-2012-01611 initiated and WR-289091 initiated CR-ANO-1-2012-01611 steel support for PI-3812A is missing an directly into CAP closed. anchor bolt into the concrete watl in Room 46, Elevation 335 in the Aux Building. CR Action: WR-289091 initiatedinitiated Operability Review: The condition was reviewed by the CR process and it was determined that PI-3812A is isolated from the Service Water System by normally closed isolation valve SW-3812A. SW-3812A is maintained in the closed position. Therefore, the integrity of the Service Water System boundary is maintained. Therefore, the Service Water System and the Emergency Cooling Pond remain Operable. Prepared by: Date: 11/15/2012 Sean Smolarek Reviewed by: Date: 11/15/2012 Eric Dilbone

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS- 12-00002 Attachment F Rev. 0 Page 1 of 1 Attachment F Licensing Basis Evaluation Forms (NOT USED)

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS- 12-00002 Attachment G Rev. 0 Page 1 of 4 Attachment G Peer Review Checklist for SWIEL

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS- 12-00002 Attachment G Rev. 0 Page 2 of 4 Peer Review Checklist for SWEL Instructions for Completing Checklist This peer review checklist may be used to document the review of the Seismic Walkdown Equipment List (SWEL) in accordance with Section 6: Peer Review. The space below each question in this checklist should be used to describe any findings identified during the peer review process and how the SWEL may have changed to address those findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Were the five safety functions adequately represented in the SWEL 1 selection? YO N--]

The SWEL1 contains components which address all five safety functions. Many components provide safety functions for multiple systems, and/or are part of frontline support systems. All five safety functions discussed in EPRI Report 1025286 are well representedin the SWEL.

2. Does SWEL 1 include an appropriate representation of items having the following sample selection attributes:

a. Various types of systems? YO NEI Items included on the SWEL comprise a variety of ESF systems such as Emergency Diesel Generatorsand Auxiliaries, Service Water System, Component Cooling Water System, Residual Heat Removal System, and vital electricalsystems.

b. Major new and replacement equipment? Y[[ NZ Based on input from plantpersonnel and EC searches, equipment selection personnel identified no "major"changes to safety-related equipment and components made to the plant in the past 15 years.

c. Various types of equipment? Y[ NLI SWEL 1 includes at least one example of each of the 21 classes of equipment, except class 3 and 6. Two class 3 components were containedon Base List 1; however, both were energized 4160 KV switchgearand access was not recommended for safety reasons. As such, no class 3 components were suitable for inclusion in the SWEL. Class 6 was also minimally represent on Base List I and inaccessible. Note also that several classes (11 and 12) are not on Base List 1. As such, they are also not representedon the SWEL 1. All of the other equipment classes are well represented.

d. Various environments? Y[ NF-1 The SWEL contains components in mild, harsh, and outdoor environments. The components are located in different buildings, rooms, and/oron different builidng elevations.

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS- 12-00002 Attachment G Rev. 0 Page 3 of 4 Peer Review Checklist for SWEL

e. Equipment enhanced based on the findings of the IPEEE (or equivalent) program? YO NEI The SWEL includes components that were identified during the IPEEE as being potentially vulnerable to a seismic event. A sample of these components are included in the SWEL 1.

f. Were risk insights considered in the development of SWEL 1? YZ NEI SWEL I includes high risk components based on risk significancein the plant probabilisticrisk assessment (PRA) models.

3. For SWEL 2:

a. Were spent fuel pool related items considered, and if applicable included in YZI NEI SWEL 2?

The walkdown team identified only a small population of SFP components that are Seismic Category I. These components are included on SWEL 2.

b. Was an appropriate justification documented for spent fuel pool related items not YE NE!

included in SWEL 2? There were no components that could contribute to rapid SFP draindown that were identified. There are no penetrationsin the SFP wall below 10 ft above the top of the fuel assemblies, and all piping that communicate with the pool was installed along the refuel floor the top of the pool and then turns down into the pool

4. Provide any other comments related to the peer review of the SWELs.

The peer review team reviewed the initial SWEL 1 and SWEL 2, and provided comments and suggestions for modification of the SWEL. Comments included suggestions to remove equipment mounted to panels and cabinets because they are qualifiedas a whole (ie; handswtiches), and to include the Letdown heat exchangers. The peer reviewers ensured the SWELs met the requirementsof EPRI Report 1025286. Required changes to the SWEL necessary during the walkdown due to inaccessibilitywere reviewed by the peer reviewers to verify that the changes did not impact the level of compliance to the EPRI report.

5. Have all peer review comments been adequately addressed in the final SWEL? YN NE!

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS- 12-00002 Attachment G Rev. 0 Page 4 of 4 Peer Review Checklist for SWEL Peer Reviewer #1: Frank Cobb K2LZ- K&-Z Date: 10/22/2012 A Peer Reviewer #2: Rodney Carter Date: 10/29/2012

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS- 12-00002 Attachment H Rev. 0 Page 1 of 6 Attachment H Peer Review Comment Form

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS- 12-00002 Attachment H Rev. 0 Page 2 of 6 Seismic Walkdown Submittal Report

    -"Entergy                                                    Review Comments and Resolutions Form Engineering        CALC-ANOI-CS-12-00002                        Rev. 0   Title Report Number                                                            ANO-1 Seismic Walkdown Report - SWCs and AWCs Quality Related: E] Yes     Z No                               Special Notes or Instructions:

Comment Section/Page No. Review Comment Response/Resolution Reviewer's Number Accept Initials General, Several of the SWCs reviewed note mild surface Explicit statements included for these BDK SWC+AWC oxidation or other minor condition observations where situations. CRs generated are noted on the question has been marked "Y". In these situations, the SWCs and AWCs, regardless of the SWC should also include an explicit judgment from whether it represents a seismic condition the SWEs stating that the observation is not a seismic or not. concern. Where these seismically unrelated observations require correction, it would be useful to also include the CR number generated even if not reported as a seismic concern in the NTTF 2.3: Seismic program. General, Where potential conditions are identified, it would be CRs and WRs written have been BDK SWC+AWC highly beneficial to include CR numbers generated (as included in all SWCs and AWCs. available). This assists with cross-referencing. General, Anytime "N/A is marked, a brief explanation/justification All N/A items now have an explanation of BDK SWC+AWC should be provided. (For line-mounted items with why it has been marked that way. common justification for anchorage questions, can be provided once on SWC). This includes anchorage, flexibility of lines, etc. General, Generally, consistency between the justification text, The checklists have been cleaned up BDK SWC+AWC question responses, and CRs initiated should be from hand-written notes, and the final improved, copies have improved consistency. General, Additional detail regarding observed block walls should Identified block walls are seismically BDK SWC+AWC be included on the checklists to confirm they were designed, and are noted on the considered appropriately, checklists where relevant. General, The initial sample of checklists reviewed has not Seismic interaction concerns such as the BDK SWC+AWC identified potentially adverse seismic conditions related examples described in the EPRI to interaction. Please confirm that seismic interaction Guidance and in EPRI SWE training

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS- 12-00002 Attachment H Rev. 0 Page 3 of 6 concerns are considered during walkdowns and area were being considered during walk-bys. walkdowns and area walk-bys. Peer review confirmed this during observation walkdowns. Expanded sample of checklists included examples where seismic interaction concerns were noted, where appropriate. General, For items requiring anchorage configuration verification, All walkdowns where an anchorage BDK SWC it is useful to note the document #s used for comparison configuration verification check is with the configuration observed in the field. performed now includes basis document numbers. General, Please confirm that all cabinet/panel doors were opened Confirmed. Additional clarification is now BDK SWC (i.e., MCC cubicles). If not, the SWC should include included on SWC forms where useful. justification for how the goals of the inspection are still being met without opening the cabinet (see supplemental NRC FAQ dated 9-18-12), or should be marked as incomplete pending deferral to when the cabinets will be able to be opened (i.e., outagle). General, Additional clarification is recommended to explain what General description of how non- BDK SWC the anchorage question responses mean for in-line anchored components were treated is components that have no formal anchorage. included in the body of the report. General, It would be useful to indicate the equipment class Equipment class names are on each BDK SWC name/description on the SWCs, not just the number. SWC. General, Several SWEL items appear to be described using Corrections made to SWCs, Base List 1, BDK SWC incorrect/inappropriate equipment class designations. and SWEL 1. Each SWC includes the Please revisit the classes assigned and correct where proper equipment class. necessary. I General, Several of the AWCs reviewed were somewhat unclear Where an area considered was less than BDK AWC about what "Area" around the SWEL item(s) is the entire room, a brief description has considered. Recall that an acceptable "Area" is an been included on the AWC. approximate 35' radius from the SWEL item. Consider including a more general photo of the area and/or include brief statement of area considered (i.e., if entire room looked at, say so).

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANOI-CS-12-00002 Attachment H Rev. 0 Page 4 of 6 General, Include a photo on the AWC of each seismic condition Photos are included wherever conditions BDK AWC identified during that area walk-by. were identified, as well as a general photo of the area in most cases. General, Need to discuss why the block wall will remain stable Additional information is provided on PAM SWC+AWC during a seismic event block walls. Note that ANO has painted all of their seismically qualified block walls with a blue stripe. General, List the anchorage dwgs in the SWC if a configuration Drawings/calculations/plant PAM SWC verification is performed documentation is now referenced in all SWCs where an anchorage configuration verification is performed. General, Must justify that minor corrosion/surface oxidation does Added a statement justifying any noted PAM SWC+AWC not adversely impact seismic qualification, mild corrosion or surface oxidation. Reviewed By: Paul A. Miktus Date 10/11/12 Site/Department: ENERCON/PM Ph. 770-792-6972 Reviewed By: Benjamin D. Kosbab Date 10/11/12 Resolved By: Sean Smolarek Site/Department: ENERCON/Civil Ph. 770-590-2179 Date: 10/25/2012

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS- 12-00002 Attachment H Rev. 0 Page 5 of 6 I nt Seismic Walkdown Submittal Report Review Comments and Resolutions Form Engineering CALC-ANOI-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Title: ANO-1 Fukushima Seismic - SWC &AWC Review Report Number II Quality Related: E] Yes Z No Special Notes or Instructions: Comment Section/Page Review Comment Response/Resolution Reviewer's Number No. SWELl COMMENTS Accept Initials 1 SWELl Remove Hand Switches from SWEL as the mounting will Removed Hand Switches FC likely not be visible (even with the cabinet opened) and the switches will be evaluated with the panel as a whole 2 SWELl Ensure any items identified to be inaccessible on A preliminary walkdown was performed FC/RC preliminary walkdowns are swapped out with equivalent to identify any inaccessible items or items (class, environment, etc) components. These items were swapped out by Equipment Selection Personnel and sent back to the SWEL peer reviewer for concurrence. 3 SWELl Verify each class of component is adequately represented. Two class 3 components were contained FC/RC It appears a few do not show up in the SWEL. on Base List 1; however, both were energized 4160 KV switchgear and access was not recommended for safety reasons. As such, no class 3 components were suitable for inclusion in the SWEL. Class 6 was also minimally represented on Base List 1 and inaccessible. Note also that several classes (11 and 12) are not on Base List 1. As such, they are also not represented on the SWELl. SWELl Are there any major new or replacement components Plant personnel as well as the electronic FC included? database were consulted to find new and replacement items. Many items were identified on the SWEL to be new or have been replaced since the IPEEE report. However, the Guidance defines the new and replacement classification as "major",

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS- 12-00002 Attachment H Rev. 0 Page 6 of 6 of which none of the components fit. 5 SWELl Suggest expanding representation of equipment class 21 Decay Heat coolers were added. FC with some of the major heat removal equipment (i.e., heat Letdown Heat Exchanger was not added exchangers). at the request of RP - this heat exchanger is in a significant dose area. SWEL 2 COMMENTS 6 SWEL2 Verify Safety Classification of SFP Cooling System Per the Upper Level Document on the FC Spent Fuel Pool, The SFP Cooling System is Non-Safety and Non-Seismic. Safety-related service water to SFP connection valve is included on SWEL 2. Reviewed By: Rodney Carter/Frank Cobb Date 10/24/12 Resolved By: I Sean Smolarek Site/Department: OPS/Mech Date: 10/25/12

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS- 12-00002 Attachment I Rev. 0 Page 1 of 19 Attachment I Seismic Walkdown Engineering Training Certificates

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS- 12-00002 Attachment I Rev. 0 Page 2 of 19 Seismic Walkdown Engineers Sean Smolarek Eric Dilbone. Daniel Andoh Roy Berryman Genaro Barragan Michael Perez Daniel Parker Chris Johnson Ojaswi Shrestha

Engineenng Report No CALC-ANO 1-CS- 12-00002 En i e r na e o t N Att achnien t I

Rev. 0

                     ~   4   '~                                                                                      11ýPge 3of 19
         *E.                        N,      E,.

Excellence-Everyproject. Every day. Certificate- of Completion is hereby granted to Sean. Srnoiark for.successful completion of TRAINING ON NEAR TERM TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATION 23. PLANT SEISMIC WALKDOWNS August 22, 2012 - Kennesaw, GA " A:/" "7"5J/' Date - Location Kursat Kinali, PhD P.E. EPRI Certified Seismic Walkdown Engineer Alexandria. VA -7/27/2012:

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1 -CS- 12-00002 Attachment I Rev. 0 Page 4 of 19 NEERCO N Excellence-Every project. Every doy. Certificate of Completion is hereby granted to Eric Dilbone for successful completion of TRAINING ON NEAR TERM TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATION 2.3 PLANT SEISMIC WALKDOWNS Awarded: 7/11/2012 in Kennesaw, GA Kevin Bessell Kenneth Whitmore Certified Seismic Walkdown Engineer Certified Seismic Walkdown Engineer Palo Alto, CA - 6/13/2012 Alexandria, VA - 6/20/2012

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO1-CS-12-00002

                                                                                                                 . ... .: ,A t ach men t I
                                                                               ~22                                          Page 5of 19 TV,1 Excellence-Every project. Every day.

Certificate of Completion is hereby granted to Daniel Andoh D .'a. n , ;"~ for successful completion of TRAINING ON NEAR TERM TASK FORCE, RECOMMENDATION 2.3 : PLANT: SEISMIC WALKDOWNS. August 22, 2012 - Kennesaw, GA 2 Date - Location Kursat Kinali, Ph.D., P.E. EPRI Certified Seismic Walkdown Engineer Alexandria,.VA - 7/27/2012

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO!-CS-!2-00002 Attachment I Rev. 0

                                                                     ~                                                                          Page 6 of 19 CerTtificate o-)f Completion                                                                                         ;*

is hereby granted to

*: * ' :

                        ' , 'i*
           . ::. :..*: .-.....

Roy914m

                                         .. ..

Beryma

                                                    !:, .;....
                                                           ...              . !!!*;  -: ......
                                                                                .......                  * *r .. . .. .. .-
                                                                                                     '. ...........       ...... ----                   ....

for successful completion of TRAINING ON NEAR TERM TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATION 2.3 PLAN TSEISMI C WA LKDO0WNS Awarded: 7/11/20 12 in Kennesaw, GA Kevin Bessell Kenneth Whitmore Certified Seismic Walkdown Engineer Certified Seismic Walkdown Engineer Palo Alto, CA - 6/13/2012 Alexandria, VA - 6/20/2012

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS-12-00002 Attachment I Rev. 0 i1w7of19 StructuraIntegrtyAssociates, Inc! Certificate of Completion G1.ENARO BARR-IAýGAN Training on Near Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3

   - Plant Seismic Walkdowns 9- 3-D Date                    ao H7_

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS- 12-00002 Attachment I I'.0 Page 1;*f 19 NT~ W POWE Certificateof Completion Michael Perez Training on Near Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3

  - Plant Seismic Walkdowns July 27, 2012           if K44CA474ý
                                    /

Date Robert K. Kassawara EPRI Manager, Structural Reliability & Integrity

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS- 12-00002 Attachment I V. 0 Page f 19 Certificate of Completion D)an Parker Training on Near Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3 Plant Seismic Walkdowns July2?7, 2012 Date Robert K. Kassawara EPRI Manager, Structural Reliability &Integrity

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS- 12-00002 LWL, #KeI IIN tU Page 1001ý 9 IELECTRIC POWER

                   ~I2IR    ESEARCH INTTT Certificateof Completion Chris Johnson Training on Near Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3
  - Plant Seismic Walkdowns June 13, 2012 Date R'Ie, . 44ýý .

Robert K. Kassawara EPRI Manager, Structural Reliability & Integrity

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS- 12-00002 Attachment I Pa e . U 1z aefof19 ELECTRICPOWER~

                  ~IS~I jRESEARCH  INSTITUTE Certificateof                   Completion Ojaswi Shrestha Training on Near Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3
  - Plant Seismic Walkdowns July 11,2012 Date                               Robert K. Kassawara EPRI Manager, Structural Reliability & Integrity

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS- 12-00002 Attachment I Rev. 0 Page 12 of 19 Seismic Walkdown Peer Reviewers Paul Miktus Ben Kosbab

S:?:QU f t: of Ac1~frtvcznrnit UU~1is is TIP fiiriff-`14ýalt 4.M .P." f, ~t~oun rrcnIn~l ~tt~b ~7A~j sxnir ~t U~itinn ~fr ~inir~q C60-U-T.SIP

                        ~hxn~ 2~-2~ i9qa Neil. P.)Smith,   Commonwealth Edison-:

David A. Freed. MPR Associates Robert P- Kassawara, EPRI. SQUG, Program n:,Manager SSQUG:Training Coordinator

n~in rin Repo No CALC-ANO1-CS-12-00002 W two V2~~~~~71 YI2LI%,2YM YY * , -_ .Wo EPR I

                                          ~~ Electric Power.

Research Institute

       ~ctificzztc ufel Ad~irn~cmwt Qt41zi  is to        'vi     4  at~jt PtiuJl      A. Aik!us 1JUS     (Gomptet-eb t4c
          ~ismi               K1P  A                                               (G0 Ur's -V tq a7729, 199a David A. Freed, MPR Associates                                     Robert P. Kassawara, EPRI SQUG Training Coordinator                                          SQUG Program Manager

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO I-CS- 12-00002 Attachment I Rev. 0 Page 15 of 19 Excellence -Every poiecL Every May Certificate of Completion is hereby granted to "*; Ben1-wjaomin Kosba-;ýb for successful completion of TRAINING ON NEAR TERM TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATION 2.3 PLANT SEISMIC WALKDOWNS Awarded: 7/11/2012 in Kennesaw, GA K yin Bessell Kenneth Whitmore Certi fied Seismic Walkdown Engineer Certified Seismic Walkdown Engineer Palo Alto, CA- 6/13/2012 Alexandria, VA - 6/20/2012

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS- 12-00002 Attachment I Rev. 0 Page 16 of 19 EPRI-Qualified SWE Trainers Kevin Bessell Kursat Kinali Ken Whitmore

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS-12-00002 Attachment I D Page 17 19 a rI aI2 RESEARCHINTUE Certificate.ofCompletion Kevin Bessell Training on Near Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3

  - Plant Seismic Walkdowns June 13, 2012 Date .                           Robert K. Kassawara EPRI Manager,.

Structural Reliability & Integrity

Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS- 12-00002 Attachment I Pagel18 ,f19 a f= fa E'ýEA RC H IN 5 I I yz' TV r' Certificateof Completion Kursat Kinali Training on Near Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3 Plant Seismic Walkdowns July 27, 2012 Date Robert K. Kassawara EPRI Manager, Structural Reliability & Integrity

2 T' Engineering Report No. CALC-ANO 1-CS- 12-00002

Rev.

RjIev. 0 Page of 19 a-r-1r ani Certificateof Completion IT' is enneth Willtmore Training on Near Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3

        - Plant Seismic Walkdowns III III Iii June 21, 2012 til                Date                      Robert K. Kassawara EPRI Manager, Structural ReliabUity & Integrity III LI.         -                          -}}

1CAN111201, Engineering Report CALC-ANO1-CS-12-00002, Rev. 0, Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Pages 332 Through 560: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 18:05, 11 November 2019

Text

Navigation menu

1CAN111201, Engineering Report CALC-ANO1-CS-12-00002, Rev. 0, Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Pages 332 Through 560: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 18:05, 11 November 2019

Text

Navigation menu

Search