ML073100534: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:From: | {{#Wiki_filter:From: <escher@waterkeeper.org> | ||
To: | To: <IndianPointEIS@nrc.gov> | ||
Date: 10/8/2007 11:41:52 AM | |||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
Indian Point EIS Comments | Indian Point EIS Comments Bo Pham | ||
Bo Pham | |||
==Dear Bo Pham,== | ==Dear Bo Pham,== | ||
Indian Point is a dangerous and badly run power plant. It will | Indian Point is a dangerous and badly run power plant. It will take courage on the part of public officials and decision-makers like yourself to take a real look at the risks and dangers of operating this nuclear plant in such a populated place. But I urge you to do so. | ||
I formally request that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission address the following environmental and public health issues in the Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Indian Point nuclear power plant: | |||
1: the impacts of a terrorist attack or large-scale accident at Indian Point on the Croton Reservoir, a drinking water supply for New York City and Westchester County residents; 2: the impacts of Indian Point's once-through cooling system on the Hudson River fish populations - including entrainment, impingement, and thermal pollution - using the most current scientific studies; 3: the build-up of high-level radioactive waste at Indian Point and the ongoing radioactive leaks originating from at least two spent fuel pools; 4: the alternatives to Indian Point's nuclear power, using a combination of renewable energy (wind, solar, geothermal), | |||
conservation, and clean natural gas, as offered by the 2006 National Academy of Sciences report. | |||
Sincerely, Eddie Scher 84 Bellewood Ave Suite 100 | |||
Dobbs Ferry, NY 10522 Federal Register Notice: 72FR45075 Comment Number: 63 Mail Envelope Properties (47306FAE.HQGWDO01.OWGWPO04.200.2000001.1.1514C0.1) | |||
Federal Register Notice: | |||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
Indian Point EIS Comments | Indian Point EIS Comments Creation Date: 10/8/2007 11:41:52 AM From: <escher@waterkeeper.org> | ||
Created By: | Created By: escher@waterkeeper.org Recipients | ||
<IndianPointEIS@nrc.gov> | |||
Post Office Route OWGWPO04.HQGWDO01 nrc.gov Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 1371 10/8/2007 11:41:52 AM Mime.822 2210 11/6/2007 1:44:14 PM Options Priority: Standard Reply Requested: No Return Notification: None None Concealed | |||
Post Office | |||
Files | |||
Concealed | |||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
No | No Security: Standard}} | ||
Revision as of 01:07, 23 November 2019
| ML073100534 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Indian Point  |
| Issue date: | 10/08/2007 |
| From: | Public Commenter Public Commenter |
| To: | Division of License Renewal |
| References | |
| 72FR45075 | |
| Download: ML073100534 (3) | |
Text
From: <escher@waterkeeper.org>
To: <IndianPointEIS@nrc.gov>
Date: 10/8/2007 11:41:52 AM
Subject:
Indian Point EIS Comments Bo Pham
Dear Bo Pham,
Indian Point is a dangerous and badly run power plant. It will take courage on the part of public officials and decision-makers like yourself to take a real look at the risks and dangers of operating this nuclear plant in such a populated place. But I urge you to do so.
I formally request that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission address the following environmental and public health issues in the Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Indian Point nuclear power plant:
1: the impacts of a terrorist attack or large-scale accident at Indian Point on the Croton Reservoir, a drinking water supply for New York City and Westchester County residents; 2: the impacts of Indian Point's once-through cooling system on the Hudson River fish populations - including entrainment, impingement, and thermal pollution - using the most current scientific studies; 3: the build-up of high-level radioactive waste at Indian Point and the ongoing radioactive leaks originating from at least two spent fuel pools; 4: the alternatives to Indian Point's nuclear power, using a combination of renewable energy (wind, solar, geothermal),
conservation, and clean natural gas, as offered by the 2006 National Academy of Sciences report.
Sincerely, Eddie Scher 84 Bellewood Ave Suite 100
Dobbs Ferry, NY 10522 Federal Register Notice: 72FR45075 Comment Number: 63 Mail Envelope Properties (47306FAE.HQGWDO01.OWGWPO04.200.2000001.1.1514C0.1)
Subject:
Indian Point EIS Comments Creation Date: 10/8/2007 11:41:52 AM From: <escher@waterkeeper.org>
Created By: escher@waterkeeper.org Recipients
<IndianPointEIS@nrc.gov>
Post Office Route OWGWPO04.HQGWDO01 nrc.gov Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 1371 10/8/2007 11:41:52 AM Mime.822 2210 11/6/2007 1:44:14 PM Options Priority: Standard Reply Requested: No Return Notification: None None Concealed
Subject:
No Security: Standard