ML18186A516: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| issue date = 07/05/2018 | | issue date = 07/05/2018 | ||
| title = E-mail from Sandra Talley to Duncan White on Feedback from Thpos of Topics/Questions of Interest for the April 2018 Webinar on the Wy Agreement Application | | title = E-mail from Sandra Talley to Duncan White on Feedback from Thpos of Topics/Questions of Interest for the April 2018 Webinar on the Wy Agreement Application | ||
| author name = Talley S | | author name = Talley S | ||
| author affiliation = NRC/NMSS | | author affiliation = NRC/NMSS | ||
| addressee name = White D | | addressee name = White D | ||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
| docket = | | docket = | ||
| license number = | | license number = | ||
| contact person = Poy S | | contact person = Poy S | ||
| package number = ML18186A455 | | package number = ML18186A455 | ||
| document type = E-Mail | | document type = E-Mail |
Revision as of 01:55, 17 June 2019
ML18186A516 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Issue date: | 07/05/2018 |
From: | Sandra Talley Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards |
To: | Duane White Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards |
Poy S | |
Shared Package | |
ML18186A455 | List: |
References | |
Download: ML18186A516 (2) | |
Text
From: Talley, Sandra To: White, Duncan Cc: Michalak, Paul
- Einberg, Christian
Subject:
Feedback from THPOs of topics/questions of interest for the April 2018 webinar on the WY Agreement application Date: Wednesday, March 14, 2018 8:27:06 AM Duncan: Per our discussions.
I called all the THPOs that received the original mailing from NRC (28 nations) twice. I left messages for the many that I could not reach. Below is the feedback from those that I could reach. Thanks, Sandy From Northern Cheyenne~ What happens to consultation with Tribal nations if WY takes over review of uranium recovery applications?
Will Tribes be cut out of the process completely?
~ What has NRC communicated to the State on WY on a consultation process with Tribes?~ There are 20-30 Tribes that have an interest in activity in WY. How will these Tribes be represented in this process?~ If there is a proposed project on BLM land, would Federal or State review regulations apply?Northern Arapaho~ The Northern Arapaho Nation is opposed to WY's application to become an NRC agreement state~ The NRC has a legal obligation to consult with Tribal nations for a federal undertaking such as the transfer of authority to WY for project reviews~ The State of WY has legislation (SF101) that states that the Federal government's consultations under NHPA impact private property rights; the Northern Arapaho also oppose this legislation as it undermines Tribal consultation for federal undertakings
~ The State of WY wants to exclude Tribes from consultation on projects regulated under the Agreement State~ NRC needs to lead a consultation with tribes that consider the state of WY to be associated with their ancestral migratory routes. A webinar is not sufficient.
Ute Mountain Ute~ If WY becomes the regulator, what happens when uranium milling is proposed for Tribal land?~ What would be the interaction between THPOs and state officials for uranium milling activities
~ Who would ensure that Tribal nations have input into the licensing review process Sisseton-Wapeton
~ You have concerns that the regulations developed by the State of Wyoming for regulating nuclear materials will be more lax than federal regulations
~ This transfer of authority seems to represent the Federal government shirking its responsibility for a process that should be regulated at the Federal and not the State level~ How will the Federal government continue to uphold its treaty responsibilities if regulatory authority is transferred.
Fort Belknap
~ When NRC turns regulatory authority over to the State of WY, what participation by Tribal nations will there be in the regulatory review processes?
~ Will there be consultation with Tribes under NHPA Section 106?