TXX-6450, Final Deficiency Rept CP-86-59 Re Support Installations W/ Concrete Attachments in Violation of Applicable Design Specs.Initially Reported on 860829.QC Will Perform Reinsp of Installation Using Revised Design & Change Documents: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
StriderTol Bot insert
 
StriderTol Bot change
 
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:..s, M                             Log # TXX-6450
{{#Wiki_filter:..s, M
                                                        =llll" =     ~
Log # TXX-6450
File # 10110 L           -
=llll" =
903.8 E         E                 Ref # 10CFR50.55(e) 1UELECTRIC
File # 10110
  ~
~
w n.. c. co.a                                                                     May 15, 1987 Emurne Vke hesident U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Desk Washington, D.C.             20555
L 903.8 E
E Ref # 10CFR50.55(e) 1UELECTRIC
~ w n.. c. co.a May 15, 1987 Emurne Vke hesident U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Desk Washington, D.C.
20555


==SUBJECT:==
==SUBJECT:==
Line 27: Line 30:
DOCKET NOS. 50-445 AND 50-446 SUPPORT INSTALLATIONS - SPACING VIOLATIONS SDAR: CP-86-59 (FINAL REPORT)
DOCKET NOS. 50-445 AND 50-446 SUPPORT INSTALLATIONS - SPACING VIOLATIONS SDAR: CP-86-59 (FINAL REPORT)
Gentlemen:
Gentlemen:
On August 29, 1986, we verbally Notified your Mr. T. Westerman of a deficiency involving support installations with concrete attachments in violation of applicable CPSES design specifications. Our latest interim report logged TXX-6109 was issued November 24, 1986. This issue is applicable to Units 1 and 2 and affects pipe, conduit, cable tray, and other support installations.
On August 29, 1986, we verbally Notified your Mr. T. Westerman of a deficiency involving support installations with concrete attachments in violation of applicable CPSES design specifications.
Our latest interim report logged TXX-6109 was issued November 24, 1986. This issue is applicable to Units 1 and 2 and affects pipe, conduit, cable tray, and other support installations.
We have concluded the deficiencies identified above are reportable under the provisions of 10CFR50.55(e) and the required information follows.
We have concluded the deficiencies identified above are reportable under the provisions of 10CFR50.55(e) and the required information follows.
DESCRIPTION Engineering Evaluation Separation Violation (EESV) forms are used to document support spacing design problems which require engineering resolution.
DESCRIPTION Engineering Evaluation Separation Violation (EESV) forms are used to document support spacing design problems which require engineering resolution.
Modification to a support design resulting from the engineering resolution requires the initiation of the appropriate design change documents to implement the change.
Modification to a support design resulting from the engineering resolution requires the initiation of the appropriate design change documents to implement the change.
Our evaluation has identified the following deviations from the established design change control program.
Our evaluation has identified the following deviations from the established design change control program.
: 1.           EESV forms have been issued for support installations without the required design char;ge documents. These installations were accepted by Quality Control (QC) based on technical data provided by the EESV form.
1.
: 2.           Engineering disciplines have, in some cases, not controlled the issue / distribution of EESVs such that documented interdiscipline evaluation of all areas of the design and installation has rot been assured.
EESV forms have been issued for support installations without the required design char;ge documents. These installations were accepted by Quality Control (QC) based on technical data provided by the EESV form.
: 3.           Procedural control of the EESV criteria has been inadequate.
2.
i 8705220055 870515 DR     ADOCK 0500               5                                                                 [
Engineering disciplines have, in some cases, not controlled the issue / distribution of EESVs such that documented interdiscipline evaluation of all areas of the design and installation has rot been assured.
4X) North Olive Street I B. 81 Dallas. Texas 75201 '                   $
3.
                            ,,_,9                                                   r-   --.y ,-
Procedural control of the EESV criteria has been inadequate.
8705220055 870515
[
i DR ADOCK 0500 5
4X) North Olive Street I B. 81 Dallas. Texas 75201 '
,,_,9 r-
--.y


w   ..
w TXX-6450
TXX-6450
:May 15, 1987 Page 2 of 2 SAFETY IMPLICATION The improper use of EESVs has resulted in indeterminate design conditions
:May 15, 1987 Page 2 of 2 SAFETY IMPLICATION The improper use of EESVs has resulted in indeterminate design conditions
  .whereby the function of the basic components (supports) can not-be assured during seismic events.
.whereby the function of the basic components (supports) can not-be assured during seismic events.
CORRECTIVE ACTIONS Procedure ECE-3.06-15 " Evaluation-and Documentation of Concrete Attachment Spacing Violations" has been established to effectively. control, transmit and document spacing violations. This procedure-is scheduled for issue by June 15, 1987, and specifically assigns and clarifies engineering and inspection responsibilities. To validate the support and structure interface and to assure the integrity of the installations, an interdiscipline review will be performed. In addition, QC will perform a 100% reinspection of the                                                 1 installations using revised design and design ~ change documents.
CORRECTIVE ACTIONS Procedure ECE-3.06-15 " Evaluation-and Documentation of Concrete Attachment Spacing Violations" has been established to effectively. control, transmit and document spacing violations. This procedure-is scheduled for issue by June 15, 1987, and specifically assigns and clarifies engineering and inspection responsibilities. To validate the support and structure interface and to assure the integrity of the installations, an interdiscipline review will be performed.
In addition, QC will perform a 100% reinspection of the installations using revised design and design ~ change documents.
The status of any modification required as a. result of this deficiency will be reported as corrective actions for the deficiency documented per SDAR: CP-86-04.
The status of any modification required as a. result of this deficiency will be reported as corrective actions for the deficiency documented per SDAR: CP-86-04.
Very truly yours, W. G. Counsil                                                       ,
Very truly yours, W. G. Counsil WLS/dl c - Mr. R. D. Martin - Region IV Mr. D. L. Kelley, RI - Region IV Mr. H. S. Phillips, RI - Region IV i
WLS/dl c - Mr. R. D. Martin - Region IV Mr. D. L. Kelley, RI - Region IV Mr. H. S. Phillips, RI - Region IV i
l,
l, l
-}}
l}}

Latest revision as of 03:20, 4 December 2024

Final Deficiency Rept CP-86-59 Re Support Installations W/ Concrete Attachments in Violation of Applicable Design Specs.Initially Reported on 860829.QC Will Perform Reinsp of Installation Using Revised Design & Change Documents
ML20214E362
Person / Time
Site: Comanche Peak  
Issue date: 05/15/1987
From: Counsil W
TEXAS UTILITIES ELECTRIC CO. (TU ELECTRIC)
To:
NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION & RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (ARM)
References
CP-86-59, TXX-6450, NUDOCS 8705220055
Download: ML20214E362 (2)


Text

..s, M

Log # TXX-6450

llll"

File # 10110

~

L 903.8 E

E Ref # 10CFR50.55(e) 1UELECTRIC

~ w n.. c. co.a May 15, 1987 Emurne Vke hesident U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Desk Washington, D.C.

20555

SUBJECT:

COMANCHE PEAK STEAM ELECTRIC STATION (CPSES)

DOCKET NOS. 50-445 AND 50-446 SUPPORT INSTALLATIONS - SPACING VIOLATIONS SDAR: CP-86-59 (FINAL REPORT)

Gentlemen:

On August 29, 1986, we verbally Notified your Mr. T. Westerman of a deficiency involving support installations with concrete attachments in violation of applicable CPSES design specifications.

Our latest interim report logged TXX-6109 was issued November 24, 1986. This issue is applicable to Units 1 and 2 and affects pipe, conduit, cable tray, and other support installations.

We have concluded the deficiencies identified above are reportable under the provisions of 10CFR50.55(e) and the required information follows.

DESCRIPTION Engineering Evaluation Separation Violation (EESV) forms are used to document support spacing design problems which require engineering resolution.

Modification to a support design resulting from the engineering resolution requires the initiation of the appropriate design change documents to implement the change.

Our evaluation has identified the following deviations from the established design change control program.

1.

EESV forms have been issued for support installations without the required design char;ge documents. These installations were accepted by Quality Control (QC) based on technical data provided by the EESV form.

2.

Engineering disciplines have, in some cases, not controlled the issue / distribution of EESVs such that documented interdiscipline evaluation of all areas of the design and installation has rot been assured.

3.

Procedural control of the EESV criteria has been inadequate.

8705220055 870515

[

i DR ADOCK 0500 5

4X) North Olive Street I B. 81 Dallas. Texas 75201 '

,,_,9 r-

--.y

w TXX-6450

May 15, 1987 Page 2 of 2 SAFETY IMPLICATION The improper use of EESVs has resulted in indeterminate design conditions

.whereby the function of the basic components (supports) can not-be assured during seismic events.

CORRECTIVE ACTIONS Procedure ECE-3.06-15 " Evaluation-and Documentation of Concrete Attachment Spacing Violations" has been established to effectively. control, transmit and document spacing violations. This procedure-is scheduled for issue by June 15, 1987, and specifically assigns and clarifies engineering and inspection responsibilities. To validate the support and structure interface and to assure the integrity of the installations, an interdiscipline review will be performed.

In addition, QC will perform a 100% reinspection of the installations using revised design and design ~ change documents.

The status of any modification required as a. result of this deficiency will be reported as corrective actions for the deficiency documented per SDAR: CP-86-04.

Very truly yours, W. G. Counsil WLS/dl c - Mr. R. D. Martin - Region IV Mr. D. L. Kelley, RI - Region IV Mr. H. S. Phillips, RI - Region IV i

l,

-