TXX-6927, Final Deficiency Rept CP-87-18 Re Deficient Vendor Qualification Documentation for Component Cooling Water Hxs. Initially Reported on 870608.HXs Acceptable Under as-built Loading W/O Mod.Condition Not Reportable Per 10CFR50.55(e): Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
StriderTol Bot insert
 
StriderTol Bot change
 
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:_-                      . - - -          - - - - _ - _    -
{{#Wiki_filter:.
r p     W s
r p
M EE- . . -                          log # TXX-6927
W s
                                                                  .                                  File # 10110
MEE log # TXX-6927 File # 10110
                                                                  ='             =                           909.2 M# ELECTRIC                           Ref # 10CFR50.55(e)
='
      ,        wmiam c. counsii                                                                     November 6,1987 t -
=
              ' Executin nee Presi&nt
909.2 M# ELECTRIC Ref # 10CFR50.55(e) wmiam c. counsii November 6,1987 t -
' Executin nee Presi&nt
{
{
U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
: ATTN:     Document Control Desk Washington, D.C. 20555                                                                                                     '!
: ATTN:
Document Control Desk Washington, D.C.
20555


==SUBJECT:==
==SUBJECT:==
  ~COMANCHEPEAKSTEAMELECTRICSTATION(CPSES)
  ~COMANCHEPEAKSTEAMELECTRICSTATION(CPSES)
DOCKET N05. 50-445 AND 50-446 COMPONENT COOLING WATER (CCW) HEAT EXCHANGER SEISMIC QUALIFICATION SDAR: CP-87-18l(FINALREPORT)
DOCKET N05. 50-445 AND 50-446 COMPONENT COOLING WATER (CCW) HEAT EXCHANGER SEISMIC QUALIFICATION SDAR:
Gentlemen:                                                                                                                   .
CP-87-18l(FINALREPORT)
Gentlemen:
On June 8, 1987, we verbally notified your Mr. I. Barnes of a deficiency involving errors identified during a review of vendor qualification
On June 8, 1987, we verbally notified your Mr. I. Barnes of a deficiency involving errors identified during a review of vendor qualification
                ' documentation for the CCW heat exchangers that indicated the seismic and                                                     ;
' documentation for the CCW heat exchangers that indicated the seismic and nozzle loading conditions exceed specification requirements and could be overstressed. Our most recent report was logged TXX-6716, dated September 11, 1
nozzle loading conditions exceed specification requirements and could be                                                     !
1987.
overstressed. Our most recent report was logged TXX-6716, dated September 11,                                               1
The_ reanalysis of the Unit 1 & 2 heat exchanger utilizing the as-built piping nozzle loads have been completed.
;                  1987.
Calculations IMT-CA-EQ-0119-MS-49 for Unit g
The_ reanalysis of the Unit 1 & 2 heat exchanger utilizing the as-built piping nozzle loads have been completed. Calculations IMT-CA-EQ-0119-MS-49 for Unit                                                 g 1 and IMT-CA-EQ-154-MS-49 for Unit 2 demonstrates that the heat exchangers are                                             _t acceptable under the as-built loading without modification.                                                                 ]
1 and IMT-CA-EQ-154-MS-49 for Unit 2 demonstrates that the heat exchangers are
1 In addition, we have also completed an evaluation of the identified vendor                                                     l qualification deficiencies. These deficiencies, which involve the vendor's                                                     '
_t acceptable under the as-built loading without modification.
methodology used in establishing the seismic qualification of the component, could affect other nuclear facilities.                             Calculation IMT-CA-EQ-0155-MS-49                             ;
]
demonstrated that qualification deficiencies discovered in vendor report No.                                                     l 74-06-32467, " Seismic Qualification of CCW Heat Exchanger," resulted in the effected equipment not meeting the design requirements specified in Mechanical l:                 Specification 2323-MS-049, "CCW Heat Exchanger." Had the Comanche Peak as-
1 In addition, we have also completed an evaluation of the identified vendor l
                . built piping loads on this heat exchanger not been less than the purchase specification values, the heat exchanger would have been overstressed. Loss of this heat exchanger following a seismic event would represent a substantial
qualification deficiencies.
                . safety hazard. This report completes our notification of a possible deficiency in the. vendor design processes. This item would be reported under the provisions of 10CFR21 but the NRC has been adequately informed of the deficiency by previous TV Electric letters concerning this SDAR.
These deficiencies, which involve the vendor's methodology used in establishing the seismic qualification of the component, could affect other nuclear facilities.
8711160287 871106                                                                                                     d gDR       ADOCK 05 g g5                                                                                             [ t' L
Calculation IMT-CA-EQ-0155-MS-49 demonstrated that qualification deficiencies discovered in vendor report No.
400 North Obvc Street         LII HI   Dallas Texas 75201
l 74-06-32467, " Seismic Qualification of CCW Heat Exchanger," resulted in the effected equipment not meeting the design requirements specified in Mechanical l:
Specification 2323-MS-049, "CCW Heat Exchanger." Had the Comanche Peak as-
. built piping loads on this heat exchanger not been less than the purchase specification values, the heat exchanger would have been overstressed.
Loss of this heat exchanger following a seismic event would represent a substantial
. safety hazard.
This report completes our notification of a possible deficiency in the. vendor design processes.
This item would be reported under the provisions of 10CFR21 but the NRC has been adequately informed of the deficiency by previous TV Electric letters concerning this SDAR.
8711160287 871106 d
gDR ADOCK 05 g g5
[ t' L
400 North Obvc Street LII HI Dallas Texas 75201


e-44,  ;..       x,.g
e ;..
                            .g ,
x,.g
t, v                                       #
.g,
TIp'
t, v
                                ,,i, s - s ,
-44, TIp'
pl( ' p                       "
,,i, s - s,
            .        ,  .,        :TXX-6927
pl( ' p
, ;; g ,                 t,' November 6,1987
:TXX-6927
                                    -:.Page --2l of. 2 i =             "
, ;; g,
                                  ,.                                                                                                                     .>.R, u
t,' November 6,1987
03         '
-:.Page --2l of. 2 i =
                                    .t                   .
R,
3 LWe.'hav'e concluded..in~the' event:this issue had remained undetected,.~no condition: adverse to'. safety-would have existed. This issue-is n.ot= reportable                                     !
,.u 03
                                      'under' the provisions;of 10CFR50.55(e) . ' Records supporting -this conclusion"are'-
.t 3
        ,                ,            Javailable for:yourfinspectors to review at the:CPSES Project Site'.
LWe.'hav'e concluded..in~the' event:this issue had remained undetected,.~no condition: adverse to'. safety-would have existed. This issue-is n.ot= reportable
cc '                                                                                     Very.truly yours,.
'under' the provisions;of 10CFR50.55(e). ' Records supporting -this conclusion"are'-
                                                                                          $ Co. O W. G..Counsil'                                                   ,
Javailable for:yourfinspectors to review at the:CPSES Project Site'.
By:                                                               o D. R. Woodlan
cc '
                                                                                                                      ~
Very.truly yours,.
l 1
$ Co. O W. G..Counsil' By:
                                                                                            . Supervisor, Docket Licensing.
o D. R. Woodlan l
~
1
. Supervisor, Docket Licensing.
NCP/mgt
NCP/mgt
                                                                                                                                                            'q
'q
                                        'c.-~R.lD.': Martin,' Region IV                                                                                       '
'c.-~R.lD.': Martin,' Region IV L.
L.                                               Resident Inspectors, CPSES (3)
Resident Inspectors, CPSES (3)
        ,                                                                                                                                                  :)
:)
r J
r J
I y   4.
I y 4.
p                                                                                                                                                           .i
p
                                                                                                                                                            .i i.
.i
1 i
.i 1
e                                                                                                                                   !
i.
_=____z______                                       ._-                      _ __                              _      . _ .                          __]}}
i e
_=____z______
__]}}

Latest revision as of 00:44, 3 December 2024

Final Deficiency Rept CP-87-18 Re Deficient Vendor Qualification Documentation for Component Cooling Water Hxs. Initially Reported on 870608.HXs Acceptable Under as-built Loading W/O Mod.Condition Not Reportable Per 10CFR50.55(e)
ML20236N683
Person / Time
Site: Comanche Peak  
Issue date: 11/06/1987
From: Counsil W, Woodlan D
TEXAS UTILITIES ELECTRIC CO. (TU ELECTRIC)
To:
NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION & RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (ARM)
References
CP-87-18, TXX-6927, NUDOCS 8711160287
Download: ML20236N683 (2)


Text

.

r p

W s

MEE log # TXX-6927 File # 10110

='

=

909.2 M# ELECTRIC Ref # 10CFR50.55(e) wmiam c. counsii November 6,1987 t -

' Executin nee Presi&nt

{

U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

ATTN:

Document Control Desk Washington, D.C.

20555

SUBJECT:

~COMANCHEPEAKSTEAMELECTRICSTATION(CPSES)

DOCKET N05. 50-445 AND 50-446 COMPONENT COOLING WATER (CCW) HEAT EXCHANGER SEISMIC QUALIFICATION SDAR:

CP-87-18l(FINALREPORT)

Gentlemen:

On June 8, 1987, we verbally notified your Mr. I. Barnes of a deficiency involving errors identified during a review of vendor qualification

' documentation for the CCW heat exchangers that indicated the seismic and nozzle loading conditions exceed specification requirements and could be overstressed. Our most recent report was logged TXX-6716, dated September 11, 1

1987.

The_ reanalysis of the Unit 1 & 2 heat exchanger utilizing the as-built piping nozzle loads have been completed.

Calculations IMT-CA-EQ-0119-MS-49 for Unit g

1 and IMT-CA-EQ-154-MS-49 for Unit 2 demonstrates that the heat exchangers are

_t acceptable under the as-built loading without modification.

]

1 In addition, we have also completed an evaluation of the identified vendor l

qualification deficiencies.

These deficiencies, which involve the vendor's methodology used in establishing the seismic qualification of the component, could affect other nuclear facilities.

Calculation IMT-CA-EQ-0155-MS-49 demonstrated that qualification deficiencies discovered in vendor report No.

l 74-06-32467, " Seismic Qualification of CCW Heat Exchanger," resulted in the effected equipment not meeting the design requirements specified in Mechanical l:

Specification 2323-MS-049, "CCW Heat Exchanger." Had the Comanche Peak as-

. built piping loads on this heat exchanger not been less than the purchase specification values, the heat exchanger would have been overstressed.

Loss of this heat exchanger following a seismic event would represent a substantial

. safety hazard.

This report completes our notification of a possible deficiency in the. vendor design processes.

This item would be reported under the provisions of 10CFR21 but the NRC has been adequately informed of the deficiency by previous TV Electric letters concerning this SDAR.

8711160287 871106 d

gDR ADOCK 05 g g5

[ t' L

400 North Obvc Street LII HI Dallas Texas 75201

e ;..

x,.g

.g,

t, v

-44, TIp'

,,i, s - s,

pl( ' p

TXX-6927

, ;; g,

t,' November 6,1987

-:.Page --2l of. 2 i =

R,

,.u 03

.t 3

LWe.'hav'e concluded..in~the' event:this issue had remained undetected,.~no condition: adverse to'. safety-would have existed. This issue-is n.ot= reportable

'under' the provisions;of 10CFR50.55(e). ' Records supporting -this conclusion"are'-

Javailable for:yourfinspectors to review at the:CPSES Project Site'.

cc '

Very.truly yours,.

$ Co. O W. G..Counsil' By:

o D. R. Woodlan l

~

1

. Supervisor, Docket Licensing.

NCP/mgt

'q

'c.-~R.lD.': Martin,' Region IV L.

Resident Inspectors, CPSES (3)

)

r J

I y 4.

p

.i

.i 1

i.

i e

_=____z______

__]