ML23045A366: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:2/14/23, 3: | {{#Wiki_filter:2/14/23, 3:09PM blob:https://www.fdms.gov/817d9f3e-68d8-4632-aa32-b163d01a411d blob:https://www.fdms.gov/817d9f3e-68d8-4632-aa32-b163d01a411d 1/2 PUBLIC SUBMISSION As of: 2/14/23, 3:09 PM Received: January 12, 2023 Status: Pending_Post Tracking No. lct-l60e-5csd Comments Due: January 30, 2023 Submission Type: API Docket: NRC-2022-0183 Vistra Operations Company LLC Comanche Peak Power Company LLC Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2 Comment On: NRC-2022-0183-0003 Notice of Intent To Conduct Scoping Process and Prepare Environmental Impact Statement; Vistra Operations Company LLC; Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2 Document: NRC-2022-0183-DRAFT-0644 Comment on FR Doc # 2022-27025 Submitter Information Name: Rhonda D. Wright MD Email:rdwright67@gmail.com General Comment RE: Docket ID NRC-2022-0183 | ||
==Dear NRC:== | ==Dear NRC:== | ||
Dont extend aging Comanche Peak nuclear licenses. | Dont extend aging Comanche Peak nuclear licenses. | ||
I urge you to reject the application by Vistra to extend the operating licenses for the Comanche Peak nuclear power reactors for an additional 20 years. To protect public health, safety, security, and financial health, the reactors should retire as licensed, on or before 2030 and 2033. | I urge you to reject the application by Vistra to extend the operating licenses for the Comanche Peak nuclear power reactors for an additional 20 years. To protect public health, safety, security, and financial health, the reactors should retire as licensed, on or before 2030 and 2033. | ||
| Line 26: | Line 24: | ||
Both an afternoon and evening public meeting were scheduled, but then postponed at the last moment, without adequate public notice. Four hours of in-person meeting time were reduced to only two hours online. There is now no evening opportunity to participate for people who work in the day, and not everyone can access online meetings. There will be no exhibits or opportunity to speak directly with NRC staff. | Both an afternoon and evening public meeting were scheduled, but then postponed at the last moment, without adequate public notice. Four hours of in-person meeting time were reduced to only two hours online. There is now no evening opportunity to participate for people who work in the day, and not everyone can access online meetings. There will be no exhibits or opportunity to speak directly with NRC staff. | ||
I am concerned about the increased safety and financial risks that would result from allowing another 20 years of Comanche Peak nuclear reactor operation. Risks from stress corrosion cracking, metal fatigue and embrittlement would all increase, and thereby increase accident risks and the potential for radiation releases. There are 7.76 million residents in nearby Dallas/Ft. Worth. Public health and safety should come first in this decision. | I am concerned about the increased safety and financial risks that would result from allowing another 20 years of Comanche Peak nuclear reactor operation. Risks from stress corrosion cracking, metal fatigue and embrittlement would all increase, and thereby increase accident risks and the potential for radiation releases. There are 7.76 million residents in nearby Dallas/Ft. Worth. Public health and safety should come first in this decision. | ||
SUNI Review Complete Template=ADM-013 E-RIDS=ADM-03 ADD: Tam Tran, Ted Smith, Antoinette Walker-Smith, Mary Neely Comment (644) | |||
Publication Date: | |||
12/13/2022 Citation: 87 FR 76219 | |||
2/14/23, 3: | 2/14/23, 3:09PM blob:https://www.fdms.gov/817d9f3e-68d8-4632-aa32-b163d01a411d blob:https://www.fdms.gov/817d9f3e-68d8-4632-aa32-b163d01a411d 2/2 Scoping should consider that there is no need for 20 more years of nuclear power. Renewable solar and wind generation are the most affordable and safest way to meet energy needs. Texas has abundant renewable resources to tap and a grid to move the power as needed. | ||
Seismic concerns of both the reactors and the Squaw Creek Reservoir need to be re-examined in light of recent earthquake activity. Comanche Peak is within the Barnett Shale, a region with extensive fracking and numerous injection wells. There are fault lines in the area and a magnitude 3 earthquake had its epicenter only 20 miles from the site. The reservoir water contains radioactive tritium, and the integrity of the earthen dam must be included in the scoping, including the extent of inspections and past and anticipated impacts to the dam from seismic activity. | Seismic concerns of both the reactors and the Squaw Creek Reservoir need to be re-examined in light of recent earthquake activity. Comanche Peak is within the Barnett Shale, a region with extensive fracking and numerous injection wells. There are fault lines in the area and a magnitude 3 earthquake had its epicenter only 20 miles from the site. The reservoir water contains radioactive tritium, and the integrity of the earthen dam must be included in the scoping, including the extent of inspections and past and anticipated impacts to the dam from seismic activity. | ||
Please extend the deadline for intervention and host in-person meetings and hearings. | Please extend the deadline for intervention and host in-person meetings and hearings. | ||
Thank you. | Thank you.}} | ||
Latest revision as of 10:23, 27 November 2024
| ML23045A366 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Comanche Peak  |
| Issue date: | 01/12/2023 |
| From: | Wright R - No Known Affiliation |
| To: | Office of Administration |
| References | |
| NRC-2022-0183, 87FR76219 00644 | |
| Download: ML23045A366 (1) | |
Text
2/14/23, 3:09PM blob:https://www.fdms.gov/817d9f3e-68d8-4632-aa32-b163d01a411d blob:https://www.fdms.gov/817d9f3e-68d8-4632-aa32-b163d01a411d 1/2 PUBLIC SUBMISSION As of: 2/14/23, 3:09 PM Received: January 12, 2023 Status: Pending_Post Tracking No. lct-l60e-5csd Comments Due: January 30, 2023 Submission Type: API Docket: NRC-2022-0183 Vistra Operations Company LLC Comanche Peak Power Company LLC Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2 Comment On: NRC-2022-0183-0003 Notice of Intent To Conduct Scoping Process and Prepare Environmental Impact Statement; Vistra Operations Company LLC; Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2 Document: NRC-2022-0183-DRAFT-0644 Comment on FR Doc # 2022-27025 Submitter Information Name: Rhonda D. Wright MD Email:rdwright67@gmail.com General Comment RE: Docket ID NRC-2022-0183
Dear NRC:
Dont extend aging Comanche Peak nuclear licenses.
I urge you to reject the application by Vistra to extend the operating licenses for the Comanche Peak nuclear power reactors for an additional 20 years. To protect public health, safety, security, and financial health, the reactors should retire as licensed, on or before 2030 and 2033.
I request that in-person scoping meetings be held in Texas, as originally planned, when Covid risks subside. I request that a hearing opportunity be allowed for those seeking to intervene and that the deadline for requesting a hearing be postponed for 90 days past the current January 30 deadline.
Both an afternoon and evening public meeting were scheduled, but then postponed at the last moment, without adequate public notice. Four hours of in-person meeting time were reduced to only two hours online. There is now no evening opportunity to participate for people who work in the day, and not everyone can access online meetings. There will be no exhibits or opportunity to speak directly with NRC staff.
I am concerned about the increased safety and financial risks that would result from allowing another 20 years of Comanche Peak nuclear reactor operation. Risks from stress corrosion cracking, metal fatigue and embrittlement would all increase, and thereby increase accident risks and the potential for radiation releases. There are 7.76 million residents in nearby Dallas/Ft. Worth. Public health and safety should come first in this decision.
SUNI Review Complete Template=ADM-013 E-RIDS=ADM-03 ADD: Tam Tran, Ted Smith, Antoinette Walker-Smith, Mary Neely Comment (644)
Publication Date:
12/13/2022 Citation: 87 FR 76219
2/14/23, 3:09PM blob:https://www.fdms.gov/817d9f3e-68d8-4632-aa32-b163d01a411d blob:https://www.fdms.gov/817d9f3e-68d8-4632-aa32-b163d01a411d 2/2 Scoping should consider that there is no need for 20 more years of nuclear power. Renewable solar and wind generation are the most affordable and safest way to meet energy needs. Texas has abundant renewable resources to tap and a grid to move the power as needed.
Seismic concerns of both the reactors and the Squaw Creek Reservoir need to be re-examined in light of recent earthquake activity. Comanche Peak is within the Barnett Shale, a region with extensive fracking and numerous injection wells. There are fault lines in the area and a magnitude 3 earthquake had its epicenter only 20 miles from the site. The reservoir water contains radioactive tritium, and the integrity of the earthen dam must be included in the scoping, including the extent of inspections and past and anticipated impacts to the dam from seismic activity.
Please extend the deadline for intervention and host in-person meetings and hearings.
Thank you.