ML22356A157: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 December 21, 2022 BY ELECTRONIC MAIL Eden Brown Gaines, Esq. | {{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 | ||
December 21, 2022 | |||
BY ELECTRONIC MAIL | |||
Eden Brown Gaines, Esq. | |||
Brown Gaines, LLC 800 Maine Avenue, S.W. | Brown Gaines, LLC 800 Maine Avenue, S.W. | ||
Suite 200 Washington, D.C. 20024 egaines@browngaines.com Re: | Suite 200 Washington, D.C. 20024 egaines@browngaines.com | ||
Re: Global Incite, LLC v. Government Business Solutions, LLC No. 2022 CA 003608 B (D.C. Superior Court) | |||
TR-22-03 | TR-22-03 | ||
==Dear Counsel:== | ==Dear Counsel:== | ||
We are in receipt of a subpoena issued by your firm to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. This office has assigned the processing number of TR-22-03 to your request. | We are in receipt of a subpoena issued by your firm to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. This office has assigned the processing number of TR-22-03 to your request. | ||
Please refer to that number in all future communications regarding this matter. | Please refer to that number in all future communications regarding this matter. | ||
While you have served a state court subpoena on a federal agency, state court subpoenas cannot be enforced against federal agencies unless the agency has explicitly waived its sovereign immunity. See, e.g., Boron Oil Company v. Downie, 873 F.2d 67, 70 (4th Cir. 1989). | While you have served a state court subpoena on a federal agency, state court subpoenas cannot be enforced against federal agencies unless the agency has explicitly waived its sovereign immunity. See, e.g., Boron Oil Company v. Downie, 873 F.2d 67, 70 (4th Cir. 1989). | ||
Here, the NRC has not waived that immunity; thus, the subpoena is not enforceable against the NRC. However, the General Counsel can exercise her discretion to provide documents in response to a state court subpoena if the requester can satisfy the requirements of 10 C.F.R | Here, the NRC has not waived that immunity; thus, the subpoena is not enforceable against the NRC. However, the General Counsel can exercise her discretion to provide documents in response to a state court subpoena if the requester can satisfy the requirements of 10 C.F.R | ||
§ 9.200 et seq. See generally United States ex rel Touhy v. Ragen, 340 U.S. 462 (1951). Such requests must be approved by the General Counsel for a decision. Id. § 9.201(a). | § 9.200 et seq. See generally United States ex rel Touhy v. Ragen, 340 U.S. 462 (1951). Such requests must be approved by the General Counsel for a decision. Id. § 9.201(a). | ||
The General Counsel will consider whether to provide materials that are relevant to the above-referenced case, provided that such production comports with applicable laws and privileges. To this end, please be aware that we cannot release information that has been designated as proprietary absent the consent of the owner of such information. Finally, please note that you will be charged fees for the processing of this request if the agency expends more than 50 hours of work in response to it. 10 C.F.R. § 9.201(b). | The General Counsel will consider whether to provide materials that are relevant to the above-referenced case, provided that such production comports with applicable laws and privileges. To this end, please be aware that we cannot release information that has been designated as proprietary absent the consent of the owner of such information. Finally, please note that you will be charged fees for the processing of this request if the agency expends more than 50 hours of work in response to it. 10 C.F.R. § 9.201(b). | ||
E. Gaines, Esq. | E. Gaines, Esq. | ||
Please feel free to contact me by e-mail or at (301) 415-1956 should you have any questions. | Please feel free to contact me by e-mail or at (301) 415-1956 should you have any questions. | ||
Sincerely, | |||
Sincerely, | |||
Andrew P. Averbach Solicitor}} | |||
Latest revision as of 13:21, 15 November 2024
| ML22356A157 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 12/21/2022 |
| From: | Andrew Averbach NRC/OGC |
| To: | Gaines E Brown Gaines |
| References | |
| TR-22-03 | |
| Download: ML22356A157 (1) | |
Text
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001
December 21, 2022
BY ELECTRONIC MAIL
Eden Brown Gaines, Esq.
Brown Gaines, LLC 800 Maine Avenue, S.W.
Suite 200 Washington, D.C. 20024 egaines@browngaines.com
Re: Global Incite, LLC v. Government Business Solutions, LLC No. 2022 CA 003608 B (D.C. Superior Court)
TR-22-03
Dear Counsel:
We are in receipt of a subpoena issued by your firm to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. This office has assigned the processing number of TR-22-03 to your request.
Please refer to that number in all future communications regarding this matter.
While you have served a state court subpoena on a federal agency, state court subpoenas cannot be enforced against federal agencies unless the agency has explicitly waived its sovereign immunity. See, e.g., Boron Oil Company v. Downie, 873 F.2d 67, 70 (4th Cir. 1989).
Here, the NRC has not waived that immunity; thus, the subpoena is not enforceable against the NRC. However, the General Counsel can exercise her discretion to provide documents in response to a state court subpoena if the requester can satisfy the requirements of 10 C.F.R
§ 9.200 et seq. See generally United States ex rel Touhy v. Ragen, 340 U.S. 462 (1951). Such requests must be approved by the General Counsel for a decision. Id. § 9.201(a).
The General Counsel will consider whether to provide materials that are relevant to the above-referenced case, provided that such production comports with applicable laws and privileges. To this end, please be aware that we cannot release information that has been designated as proprietary absent the consent of the owner of such information. Finally, please note that you will be charged fees for the processing of this request if the agency expends more than 50 hours5.787037e-4 days <br />0.0139 hours <br />8.267196e-5 weeks <br />1.9025e-5 months <br /> of work in response to it. 10 C.F.R. § 9.201(b).
E. Gaines, Esq.
Please feel free to contact me by e-mail or at (301) 415-1956 should you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Andrew P. Averbach Solicitor