ML21159A223: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
| (6 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| number = ML21159A223 | | number = ML21159A223 | ||
| issue date = 06/11/2021 | | issue date = 06/11/2021 | ||
| title = Public Meeting Between NRC & NEI Migration to | | title = Public Meeting Between NRC & NEI Migration to RG 1.200 Revision 3 for Existing Risk-Informed Applications June 11, 2021 | ||
| author name = Miller G, Vasavada S | | author name = Miller G, Vasavada S | ||
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL, NRC/NRR/DRA | | author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL, NRC/NRR/DRA | ||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
| document type = Slides and Viewgraphs | | document type = Slides and Viewgraphs | ||
| page count = 3 | | page count = 3 | ||
| project = | |||
| stage = Meeting | |||
}} | }} | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:}} | {{#Wiki_filter:Public Meeting between NRC & NEI Migration to RG 1.200 Revision 3 for Existing Risk-Informed Applications June 11, 2021 Shilp Vasavada, Chief (A), PRA Licensing Branch B Division of Risk Assessment Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Ed Miller, Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch II-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation 1 | ||
==Purpose:== | |||
Discuss process for licensees to incorporate RG 1.200, Revision 3, in existing risk-informed applications that were originally approved using a previous revision. | |||
2 | |||
Discussion | |||
* When a risk-informed application is approved, the version of RG 1.200 used to support the application is incorporated into the plant licensing basis (either explicitly or implicitly) | |||
* Changes to the licensing basis (such as using a different revision of RG 1.200) need to be evaluated for the need for prior NRC review and approval | |||
* 10 CFR 50.59 provides criteria unless there is a more specific change control process in the code (e.g., 10 CFR 50.54(a), 10 CFR 50.55a, etc.) | |||
* Licensees are responsible for performing this evaluation and the evaluation is subject to inspection 3}} | |||
Latest revision as of 20:32, 17 April 2023
| ML21159A223 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 06/11/2021 |
| From: | Geoffrey Miller, Shilp Vasavada Division of Operating Reactor Licensing, NRC/NRR/DRA |
| To: | Nuclear Energy Institute |
| Miller G | |
| References | |
| Download: ML21159A223 (3) | |
Text
Public Meeting between NRC & NEI Migration to RG 1.200 Revision 3 for Existing Risk-Informed Applications June 11, 2021 Shilp Vasavada, Chief (A), PRA Licensing Branch B Division of Risk Assessment Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Ed Miller, Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch II-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation 1
Purpose:
Discuss process for licensees to incorporate RG 1.200, Revision 3, in existing risk-informed applications that were originally approved using a previous revision.
2
Discussion
- When a risk-informed application is approved, the version of RG 1.200 used to support the application is incorporated into the plant licensing basis (either explicitly or implicitly)
- Changes to the licensing basis (such as using a different revision of RG 1.200) need to be evaluated for the need for prior NRC review and approval
- 10 CFR 50.59 provides criteria unless there is a more specific change control process in the code (e.g., 10 CFR 50.54(a), 10 CFR 50.55a, etc.)
- Licensees are responsible for performing this evaluation and the evaluation is subject to inspection 3