ML20236K318: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot change)
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 13: Line 13:
| document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, OUTGOING CORRESPONDENCE
| document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, OUTGOING CORRESPONDENCE
| page count = 3
| page count = 3
| project =
| stage = Draft Other
}}
}}



Latest revision as of 06:08, 6 October 2021

Requests That State of Ok,Dept of Environ Quality Confirm,Or Update 980126 Response to .Principal Elements Identified That Should Be Included in Complete Draft Application Submitted
ML20236K318
Person / Time
Issue date: 06/18/1998
From: Lohaus P
NRC OFFICE OF STATE PROGRAMS (OSP)
To: Broderick M
OKLAHOMA, STATE OF
References
NUDOCS 9807090274
Download: ML20236K318 (3)


Text

- _ . , . _ _ _ . _ _

_ _ _ = _ _ _ - - _ - - _ - _ _ _ - - . . _ _ _ _ _ - _ - _ - - - - - - _ - _ _ - _ _ .

4 Ketug g t UNITED STATES g

j NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20eeH001

'% ... . . ,o June 18, 1998 Mr. Mike Broderick, Administrator Radiation Management Section Department of Environmental Quality 1000 Northeast Tenth Street Oklahoma City, OK 73117-1212

Dear Mr. Broderick:

To assist us in the development of the planning assumptions to support our Fiscal Year 2000 budget, we corresponded with you on December 19,1997, requesting information regarding your schedule to enter into an Agreement with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). In particular, we requested your target dates for submitting a complete draft application package for NRC staff review, and for submitting a formal request for the Agreement from the Governor to the Chairman. We are writing again asking that you confirm, or update your January 26, 1998 response to our December 19,1997 letter. j For your assistance, we have identified below the principal elements that should be included in a complete draft application:  !

l

1. Draft letter from the Governor to the Chairman making the certifications required i by the Atomic Energy Act, and requesting an agreement. l
2. Copies of the State's statutes or legislation authorizing the radiation control program and assumption of regulatory authority under an agreement.
3. Copies of the State's radiation control regulations.
4. Narrative description of the State's radiation control program.
5. Description of State's licensing, inspection and enforcement program; staff training and qualification program; incident and allegation response program; and process for updating of State regulations. >
6. Listing of all State implementing procedures and guidance documents for

! licensing, inspection, enforcement, training and qualification of staff, incident response, response to allegations, and updating of State regulations.

7. Copies of sample forms and licenses.

l

8. Copies of all position descriptions.

en 39

_ q ']d m, +

39 ; 4 Y

f (

YS5E* gflY 9907090274 990618 PDR STPRO ESOOK PDR

i Mike Broderick -2 JUN 181158

9. Identification of al perst.nnel that will be working in the program and their resumes.
10. Analysis demonstrating that the program meets the criteria set out in the 1981 and 1983 policy statements. The integrated Materials Performance Evaluation Program common and applicable non-common performance indicator criteria in Management Directive 5.6 may also provide insights on areas that you may want to address in the analysis.

Assuming there are no major issues, NRC staff would expect to complete a review of a draft application for an agreement, and provide comments to you for resolution, within 6 months of receipt. NRC staff would expect to complete processing of a formal request for an agreement from the Govemor within 5-7 months of receipt. " Processing" of the formal request includes staff and Commission review of the proposed agreement and approval for publication in the Federal Register for public review and comment, resolution of public comments, and final Commission review and approval of the agreement. Following Commission approval, up to one month may be necessary te schedule and hold a signing ceremony, if desired by the State.

The agreement is also usually made effective one month following the date of signature to provide time for an orderly transition in regulatory authority (e.g., transfer license and inspection files).

If you have any questions conceming this letter, please contact me or Patricia Larkins of my staff (301) 415-2309 or Intemet: PML@NRC. GOV.

l} Q (Paul(Wv I k H. Lohaus, Deputy Director Office of State Programs i

l l

l

+

Mike Broderick JUN 181993

9. Identification of all personnel that will be working in the program and their resumes.
10. Analysis demonstrating that the program meets the criteria set out in the 1981 and 1983 policy statements. The Integrated Materials Performance Evaluation Program common and applicable non-common performance indicator criteria in Management Directive 5.6 may also provide insights on areas that you may want to address in the analysis.

Assuming there are no major issues, NRC staff would expect to complete a review of a draft application for an agreement, and provide comments to you for resolution, within 6 months of receipt. NRC staff would expect to complete processing of a formal request for an agreement from the Governor within 5-7 months of receipt. " Processing" of the formal request includes staff and Commission review of the proposed agreement and approval for publication in the Federal Reoister for public review and comment, resolution of public comments, and final Commission review and approval of the agreement. Following Commission approval, up to one month may be necessary to schedule and hold a signing ceremony, if desired by the State.

The agreement is also usually made effective one month following the date of signature to provide time for an orderly transition in regulatory authority (e g., transfer license and inspection files).

If you have any questions concerning this letter, please contact me or Patricia Larkins of my staff (301) 415-2309 or Internet: PML@NRC. GOV.

Sincerely, StiginalSigned By:

PAULH.LOHAUS Paul H. Lohaus, Deputy Director Office of State Programs Distribution:

DIR RF DCD (SP08 )

SDroggitis PDR (YES,f_, NO )

Oklahoma File DOCUMENT NAME: G:\PML\BRODERICK To r"-crivs a cop r of this document, Indicate in the box: "C" a D 3p / Ithout attachrnent/ enclosure "E" = Cop r with attachment / enclosure "N" a No copy OFFICE OSP Of!fff$ l OSP:Dh o l NAME PLarkins:nb PHLohaus ' RLBangart %

DATE 06/ /98 06/ l/98 06//f/98 OSP FILE CODE: SP-NA-16

_ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _