RIS 2007-19, Communicating Clarifications of Staff Positions in Rg 1.205 Concerning Issues Identified During Pilot Application of NFPA Std 805: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(6 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
| issue date = 08/20/2007
| issue date = 08/20/2007
| title = Communicating Clarifications of Staff Positions in Rg 1.205 Concerning Issues Identified During Pilot Application of NFPA Std 805
| title = Communicating Clarifications of Staff Positions in Rg 1.205 Concerning Issues Identified During Pilot Application of NFPA Std 805
| author name = Case M J
| author name = Case M
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/ADRA/DPR
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/ADRA/DPR
| addressee name =  
| addressee name =  
Line 13: Line 13:
| document type = NRC Regulatory Issue Summary
| document type = NRC Regulatory Issue Summary
| page count = 4
| page count = 4
| revision = 0
}}
}}
{{#Wiki_filter:
{{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES
[[Issue date::August 20, 2007]]
                              NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
 
                          OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION
NRC REGULATORY ISSUE SUMMARY 2007-19:PROCESS FOR COMMUNICATING CLARIFICATIONS OF STAFF POSITIONS PROVIDED IN REGULATORY GUIDE 1.205 CONCERNING ISSUES IDENTIFIED DURING THE PILOT APPLICATION OF NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION ASSOCIATION STANDARD 805  
                                  WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 August 20, 2007 NRC REGULATORY ISSUE SUMMARY 2007-19:
        PROCESS FOR COMMUNICATING CLARIFICATIONS OF STAFF POSITIONS
                PROVIDED IN REGULATORY GUIDE 1.205 CONCERNING ISSUES
                      IDENTIFIED DURING THE PILOT APPLICATION OF
                NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION ASSOCIATION STANDARD 805  


==ADDRESSEES==
==ADDRESSEES==
All holders of operating licenses for nuclear power reactors that are transitioning to the risk-informed, performance-based fire protection licensing basis under Title 10 of the Code ofFederal Regulations (10 CFR) Part 50, Section 48(c), National Fire Protection AssociationStandard (NFPA) 805 Rul
All holders of operating licenses for nuclear power reactors that are transitioning to the risk- informed, performance-based fire protection licensing basis under Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) Part 50, Section 48(c), National Fire Protection Association Standard (NFPA) 805 Rule.


==INTENT==
==INTENT==
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is issuing this regulatory information summary(RIS) to describe the process for communicating additional clarifications of existing NRC staffpositions identified during the pilot application of the NFPA 805 Rul This RIS requires noaction or written response by addressee
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is issuing this regulatory information summary (RIS) to describe the process for communicating additional clarifications of existing NRC staff positions identified during the pilot application of the NFPA 805 Rule. This RIS requires no action or written response by addressees.


==BACKGROUND==
==BACKGROUND==
Regulatory Guide (RG) 1.205, "Risk-Informed, Performance-Based Fire Protection for ExistingLight-Water Nuclear Power Plants," provides one acceptable method for complying with 10 CFR50.48(c). It endorses Revision 1 of Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) 04-02, "Guidance forImplementing a Risk-Informed, Performance-Based Fire Protection Program under 10 CFR50.48(c)," with several exceptions. Since transitioning from a licensing basis that is founded on the current deterministicrequirements to a licensing basis that is founded on performance-based, risk-informedrequirements constitutes a significant change, the NRC staff is working with two pilot plants(Shearon Harris and Oconee) to refine the infrastructure that will facilitate the transition to thenew licensing basi This involves developing a draft Standard Review Plan, developing draftInspection Guidance, and revising RG 1.205 using lessons learned from the pilot plant Boththe NRC staff and the industry recognized the need for additional clarifications and guidancebeyond that provided in RG 1.205 and NEI 04-02, Rev. 1 (NEI 04-02).In a letter to the NRC, the NEI requested that the NRC staff establish a process that providestimely clarifications of additional staff positions usually communicated via RG 1.205 andNEI 04-0 The NRC staff accepted the NEI proposed process, with several modification  The details of the NRC staff's modified process are described in a July 12, 2006, letter to NEI(Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession NumberML061660105). This new process has been named the NFPA 805 Frequently Asked Question(FAQ) Proces Both NEI and the NRC staff envision the FAQ Process as a structured avenueto seek NRC staff interpretations and clarifications of NEI 04-02 guidance and NFPA 805requirements, in accordance with 10 CFR 50.48(c), in a timely manner.SUMMARY OF THE FAQ PROCESS Under the FAQ Process, transition issues (referred to as FAQs) requiring additionalclarifications are submitted, in accordance with the above proscribed process, to the NEI NFPA805 Task Force for an initial revie Subsequently, they are presented to the NRC during oneof the monthly public FAQ meeting These FAQs may be submitted by any stakeholder,including the public, the NRC, and pilot or non-pilot licensees.The monthly public FAQ meetings between NRC staff, NEI, and other stakeholders are a vitalpart of the proces The FAQ public meetings are noticed under the normal NRC process, andare Category 2 public meeting At these FAQ meetings, unresolved FAQs are discussed andnew FAQs are introduced with a detailed explanation for the basis of the additional guidance. Detailed discussion of the new FAQ is deferred to the next meeting to enable all stakeholdersan opportunity to consider and research the issues involve The NRC staff and the licenseescontinue to discuss issues pertaining to the FAQ at subsequent meeting Detailed discussionwill continue until of the issues have been resolved.When the NRC staff has substantive comments on a FAQ, these comments are presented inwriting at the monthly public meetin The FAQ owner then revises the FAQ and presents it at asubsequent meetin When all of the comments are resolved, the person submitting the FAQcreates a final version of the FAQ, including the necessary revised sections of NEI 04-0 Oncean acceptable FAQ is submitted to the NRC, the Fire Protection Branch Chief issues a publiclyavailable memorandum to file which indicates that the revised FAQ is acceptable guidance fortransitioning to NFPA 805, and should be incorporated into NEI 04-0 If a resolution is notreached in a reasonable time frame, the Fire Protection Branch Chief may issue a closurememo describing the staff's resolution to the FAQ, recognizing that consensus may not havebeen achieved by all stakeholders.These closure memos are preliminary extensions of the implementation guidance in NEI 04-02. Final official closure of the FAQs occurs when an updated RG 1.205, endorsing the revisedNEI 04-02, is approved by the NRC.REFERENCES
Regulatory Guide (RG) 1.205, Risk-Informed, Performance-Based Fire Protection for Existing Light-Water Nuclear Power Plants, provides one acceptable method for complying with 10 CFR
*NFPA 805, 2001 Edition (available through the Public Document Room or NFPA)  
50.48(c). It endorses Revision 1 of Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) 04-02, Guidance for Implementing a Risk-Informed, Performance-Based Fire Protection Program under 10 CFR
*NEI 04-02, Revision 1 (ADAMS Accession Number ML052590476)
50.48(c), with several exceptions.
*RG 1.205 (ADAMS Accession Number ML061100174)
 
*NFPA 805 FAQ Process Document, Revision 1 (ADAMS Accession Number ML061660105)  
Since transitioning from a licensing basis that is founded on the current deterministic requirements to a licensing basis that is founded on performance-based, risk-informed requirements constitutes a significant change, the NRC staff is working with two pilot plants (Shearon Harris and Oconee) to refine the infrastructure that will facilitate the transition to the new licensing basis. This involves developing a draft Standard Review Plan, developing draft Inspection Guidance, and revising RG 1.205 using lessons learned from the pilot plants. Both the NRC staff and the industry recognized the need for additional clarifications and guidance beyond that provided in RG 1.205 and NEI 04-02, Rev. 1 (NEI 04-02).
In a letter to the NRC, the NEI requested that the NRC staff establish a process that provides timely clarifications of additional staff positions usually communicated via RG 1.205 and NEI 04-02. The NRC staff accepted the NEI proposed process, with several modifications.
 
The details of the NRC staffs modified process are described in a July 12, 2006, letter to NEI
(Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession Number ML061660105). This new process has been named the NFPA 805 Frequently Asked Question (FAQ) Process. Both NEI and the NRC staff envision the FAQ Process as a structured avenue to seek NRC staff interpretations and clarifications of NEI 04-02 guidance and NFPA 805 requirements, in accordance with 10 CFR 50.48(c), in a timely manner.
 
SUMMARY OF THE FAQ PROCESS
Under the FAQ Process, transition issues (referred to as FAQs) requiring additional clarifications are submitted, in accordance with the above proscribed process, to the NEI NFPA
805 Task Force for an initial review. Subsequently, they are presented to the NRC during one of the monthly public FAQ meetings. These FAQs may be submitted by any stakeholder, including the public, the NRC, and pilot or non-pilot licensees.
 
The monthly public FAQ meetings between NRC staff, NEI, and other stakeholders are a vital part of the process. The FAQ public meetings are noticed under the normal NRC process, and are Category 2 public meetings. At these FAQ meetings, unresolved FAQs are discussed and new FAQs are introduced with a detailed explanation for the basis of the additional guidance.
 
Detailed discussion of the new FAQ is deferred to the next meeting to enable all stakeholders an opportunity to consider and research the issues involved. The NRC staff and the licensees continue to discuss issues pertaining to the FAQ at subsequent meetings. Detailed discussion will continue until of the issues have been resolved.
 
When the NRC staff has substantive comments on a FAQ, these comments are presented in writing at the monthly public meeting. The FAQ owner then revises the FAQ and presents it at a subsequent meeting. When all of the comments are resolved, the person submitting the FAQ
creates a final version of the FAQ, including the necessary revised sections of NEI 04-02. Once an acceptable FAQ is submitted to the NRC, the Fire Protection Branch Chief issues a publicly available memorandum to file which indicates that the revised FAQ is acceptable guidance for transitioning to NFPA 805, and should be incorporated into NEI 04-02. If a resolution is not reached in a reasonable time frame, the Fire Protection Branch Chief may issue a closure memo describing the staffs resolution to the FAQ, recognizing that consensus may not have been achieved by all stakeholders.
 
These closure memos are preliminary extensions of the implementation guidance in NEI 04-02.
 
Final official closure of the FAQs occurs when an updated RG 1.205, endorsing the revised NEI 04-02, is approved by the NRC.
 
REFERENCES
*   NFPA 805, 2001 Edition (available through the Public Document Room or NFPA)
*   NEI 04-02, Revision 1 (ADAMS Accession Number ML052590476)
*   RG 1.205 (ADAMS Accession Number ML061100174)
*   NFPA 805 FAQ Process Document, Revision 1 (ADAMS Accession Number ML061660105)  


==BACKFIT DISCUSSION==
==BACKFIT DISCUSSION==
This RIS requires no action or written response and is, therefore, not a backfit under 10 CFR50.10 Consequently, the staff did not perform a backfit analysis.
This RIS requires no action or written response and is, therefore, not a backfit under 10 CFR
50.109. Consequently, the staff did not perform a backfit analysis.


===FEDERAL REGISTER NOTIFICATION===
===FEDERAL REGISTER NOTIFICATION===
A notice of opportunity for public comment on this RIS was not published in the FederalRegister because this RIS is informational.
A notice of opportunity for public comment on this RIS was not published in the Federal Register because this RIS is informational.


===CONGRESSIONAL REVIEW ACT===
===CONGRESSIONAL REVIEW ACT===
This RIS is not a rule as designated by the Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C. §§ 801-886)and, therefore, is not subject to the Act.
This RIS is not a rule as designated by the Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C. §§ 801-886)
and, therefore, is not subject to the Act.


===PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT STATEMENT===
===PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT STATEMENT===
The information collections contained in this regulatory issue summary are covered by therequirements of 10 CFR Part 50, which was approved by the Office of Management and Budget(OMB), approval numbers 3150-0011.Public Protection NotificationThe NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a request forinformation or an information collection requirement unless the requesting document displays acurrently valid OMB control number.
The information collections contained in this regulatory issue summary are covered by the requirements of 10 CFR Part 50, which was approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), approval numbers 3150-0011.
 
Public Protection Notification The NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a request for information or an information collection requirement unless the requesting document displays a currently valid OMB control number.


==CONTACT==
==CONTACT==
Please direct any questions about this matter to the technical contacts listed below./RA/
Please direct any questions about this matter to the technical contacts listed below.
Michael Case, DirectorDivision of Policy and RulemakingOffice of Nuclear Reactor RegulationTechnical Contacts:Charles E. Moulton, NRRPaul W. Lain, NRR(301) 415-2751(301) 415-2346E-mail: cem4@nrc.govEmail: pwl@nrc.govNote: NRC generic communications may be found on the NRC public Web site,http://www.nrc.gov, under Electronic Reading Room / Document Collection
 
/RA/
                                                      Michael Case, Director Division of Policy and Rulemaking Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Technical Contacts:     Charles E. Moulton, NRR                Paul W. Lain, NRR
                        (301) 415-2751                         (301) 415-2346 E-mail: cem4@nrc.gov                  Email: pwl@nrc.gov Note: NRC generic communications may be found on the NRC public Web site, http://www.nrc.gov, under Electronic Reading Room / Document Collections.


==BACKFIT DISCUSSION==
==BACKFIT DISCUSSION==
This RIS requires no action or written response and is, therefore, not a backfit under 10 CFR50.10 Consequently, the staff did not perform a backfit analysis.
This RIS requires no action or written response and is, therefore, not a backfit under 10 CFR
50.109. Consequently, the staff did not perform a backfit analysis.


===FEDERAL REGISTER NOTIFICATION===
===FEDERAL REGISTER NOTIFICATION===
A notice of opportunity for public comment on this RIS was not published in the FederalRegister because this RIS is informational.
A notice of opportunity for public comment on this RIS was not published in the Federal Register because this RIS is informational.


===CONGRESSIONAL REVIEW ACT===
===CONGRESSIONAL REVIEW ACT===
This RIS is not a rule as designated by the Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C. §§ 801-886)and, therefore, is not subject to the Act.
This RIS is not a rule as designated by the Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C. §§ 801-886)
and, therefore, is not subject to the Act.


===PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT STATEMENT===
===PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT STATEMENT===
The information collections contained in this regulatory issue summary are covered by therequirements of 10 CFR Part 50, which was approved by the Office of Management and Budget(OMB), approval numbers 3150-0011.Public Protection NotificationThe NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a request forinformation or an information collection requirement unless the requesting document displays acurrently valid OMB control number.
The information collections contained in this regulatory issue summary are covered by the requirements of 10 CFR Part 50, which was approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), approval numbers 3150-0011.
 
Public Protection Notification The NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a request for information or an information collection requirement unless the requesting document displays a currently valid OMB control number.


==CONTACT==
==CONTACT==
Please direct any questions about this matter to the technical contacts listed below./RA/Michael Case, DirectorDivision of Policy and RulemakingOffice of Nuclear Reactor RegulationTechnical Contacts:Charles E. Moulton, NRRPaul W. Lain, NRR(301) 415-2751(301) 415-2346E-mail: cem4@nrc.govEmail: pwl@nrc.govNote: NRC generic communications may be found on the NRC public Web site,http://www.nrc.gov, under Electronic Reading Room / Document Collections.ADAMS Accession #: ML071590227OfficeAFPBAFPBTechnical EditorBC:AFPBD:DRANameCMoultonPLainCarina ClarkSWeerakkodyCHoldenDate6/18/20076/18/20076/8/076/25/20076/26/2007 OfficeD:DORLBC:TSBD:DFERRNameCHaney/JLubinskiforTKobetz/CSchultenforMCunningham/JUhleforDate7/5/20077/5/20077/6/2007 OfficeOEOGC/NLOOGC/CRAPMDAOIS NameDSolorioLSubinDReddickLHillMJanney/CColburn forDate7/27/20077/11/20077/11/20077/3/20077/27/2007OfficeLA:PGCBPGCBBC:PGCBD:DPR NameCHawesAMarkleyMMurphyMCase Date08/02/200707/30/200708/10/200708/20/2007
Please direct any questions about this matter to the technical contacts listed below.
 
/RA/
                                                          Michael Case, Director Division of Policy and Rulemaking Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Technical Contacts:       Charles E. Moulton, NRR                  Paul W. Lain, NRR
                          (301) 415-2751                           (301) 415-2346 E-mail: cem4@nrc.gov                    Email: pwl@nrc.gov Note: NRC generic communications may be found on the NRC public Web site, http://www.nrc.gov, under Electronic Reading Room / Document Collections.
 
ADAMS Accession #: ML071590227 Office  AFPB                AFPB              Technical Editor    BC:AFPB        D:DRA
Name    CMoulton            PLain              Carina Clark        SWeerakkody    CHolden Date    6/18/2007            6/18/2007          6/8/07              6/25/2007      6/26/2007 Office  D:DORL              BC:TSB            D:DFERR
        CHaney/JLubinski    TKobetz/CSchulten  MCunningham/JUhle Name for                  for                for Date    7/5/2007            7/5/2007          7/6/2007 Office  OE                  OGC/NLO            OGC/CRA              PMDA            OIS
Name    DSolorio            LSubin            DReddick            LHill          MJanney/CColburn for Date    7/27/2007            7/11/2007          7/11/2007            7/3/2007        7/27/2007 Office  LA:PGCB              PGCB              BC:PGCB              D:DPR
Name    CHawes              AMarkley          MMurphy              MCase Date    08/02/2007          07/30/2007        08/10/2007          08/20/2007
}}
}}


{{RIS-Nav}}
{{RIS-Nav}}

Latest revision as of 06:29, 23 November 2019

Communicating Clarifications of Staff Positions in Rg 1.205 Concerning Issues Identified During Pilot Application of NFPA Std 805
ML071590227
Person / Time
Issue date: 08/20/2007
From: Michael Case
NRC/NRR/ADRA/DPR
To:
References
RIS-07-019
Download: ML071590227 (4)


UNITED STATES

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 August 20, 2007 NRC REGULATORY ISSUE SUMMARY 2007-19:

PROCESS FOR COMMUNICATING CLARIFICATIONS OF STAFF POSITIONS

PROVIDED IN REGULATORY GUIDE 1.205 CONCERNING ISSUES

IDENTIFIED DURING THE PILOT APPLICATION OF

NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION ASSOCIATION STANDARD 805

ADDRESSEES

All holders of operating licenses for nuclear power reactors that are transitioning to the risk- informed, performance-based fire protection licensing basis under Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) Part 50, Section 48(c), National Fire Protection Association Standard (NFPA) 805 Rule.

INTENT

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is issuing this regulatory information summary (RIS) to describe the process for communicating additional clarifications of existing NRC staff positions identified during the pilot application of the NFPA 805 Rule. This RIS requires no action or written response by addressees.

BACKGROUND

Regulatory Guide (RG) 1.205, Risk-Informed, Performance-Based Fire Protection for Existing Light-Water Nuclear Power Plants, provides one acceptable method for complying with 10 CFR 50.48(c). It endorses Revision 1 of Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) 04-02, Guidance for Implementing a Risk-Informed, Performance-Based Fire Protection Program under 10 CFR 50.48(c), with several exceptions.

Since transitioning from a licensing basis that is founded on the current deterministic requirements to a licensing basis that is founded on performance-based, risk-informed requirements constitutes a significant change, the NRC staff is working with two pilot plants (Shearon Harris and Oconee) to refine the infrastructure that will facilitate the transition to the new licensing basis. This involves developing a draft Standard Review Plan, developing draft Inspection Guidance, and revising RG 1.205 using lessons learned from the pilot plants. Both the NRC staff and the industry recognized the need for additional clarifications and guidance beyond that provided in RG 1.205 and NEI 04-02, Rev. 1 (NEI 04-02).

In a letter to the NRC, the NEI requested that the NRC staff establish a process that provides timely clarifications of additional staff positions usually communicated via RG 1.205 and NEI 04-02. The NRC staff accepted the NEI proposed process, with several modifications.

The details of the NRC staffs modified process are described in a July 12, 2006, letter to NEI

(Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession Number ML061660105). This new process has been named the NFPA 805 Frequently Asked Question (FAQ) Process. Both NEI and the NRC staff envision the FAQ Process as a structured avenue to seek NRC staff interpretations and clarifications of NEI 04-02 guidance and NFPA 805 requirements, in accordance with 10 CFR 50.48(c), in a timely manner.

SUMMARY OF THE FAQ PROCESS

Under the FAQ Process, transition issues (referred to as FAQs) requiring additional clarifications are submitted, in accordance with the above proscribed process, to the NEI NFPA

805 Task Force for an initial review. Subsequently, they are presented to the NRC during one of the monthly public FAQ meetings. These FAQs may be submitted by any stakeholder, including the public, the NRC, and pilot or non-pilot licensees.

The monthly public FAQ meetings between NRC staff, NEI, and other stakeholders are a vital part of the process. The FAQ public meetings are noticed under the normal NRC process, and are Category 2 public meetings. At these FAQ meetings, unresolved FAQs are discussed and new FAQs are introduced with a detailed explanation for the basis of the additional guidance.

Detailed discussion of the new FAQ is deferred to the next meeting to enable all stakeholders an opportunity to consider and research the issues involved. The NRC staff and the licensees continue to discuss issues pertaining to the FAQ at subsequent meetings. Detailed discussion will continue until of the issues have been resolved.

When the NRC staff has substantive comments on a FAQ, these comments are presented in writing at the monthly public meeting. The FAQ owner then revises the FAQ and presents it at a subsequent meeting. When all of the comments are resolved, the person submitting the FAQ

creates a final version of the FAQ, including the necessary revised sections of NEI 04-02. Once an acceptable FAQ is submitted to the NRC, the Fire Protection Branch Chief issues a publicly available memorandum to file which indicates that the revised FAQ is acceptable guidance for transitioning to NFPA 805, and should be incorporated into NEI 04-02. If a resolution is not reached in a reasonable time frame, the Fire Protection Branch Chief may issue a closure memo describing the staffs resolution to the FAQ, recognizing that consensus may not have been achieved by all stakeholders.

These closure memos are preliminary extensions of the implementation guidance in NEI 04-02.

Final official closure of the FAQs occurs when an updated RG 1.205, endorsing the revised NEI 04-02, is approved by the NRC.

REFERENCES

  • NFPA 805, 2001 Edition (available through the Public Document Room or NFPA)

BACKFIT DISCUSSION

This RIS requires no action or written response and is, therefore, not a backfit under 10 CFR 50.109. Consequently, the staff did not perform a backfit analysis.

FEDERAL REGISTER NOTIFICATION

A notice of opportunity for public comment on this RIS was not published in the Federal Register because this RIS is informational.

CONGRESSIONAL REVIEW ACT

This RIS is not a rule as designated by the Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C. §§ 801-886)

and, therefore, is not subject to the Act.

PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT STATEMENT

The information collections contained in this regulatory issue summary are covered by the requirements of 10 CFR Part 50, which was approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), approval numbers 3150-0011.

Public Protection Notification The NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a request for information or an information collection requirement unless the requesting document displays a currently valid OMB control number.

CONTACT

Please direct any questions about this matter to the technical contacts listed below.

/RA/

Michael Case, Director Division of Policy and Rulemaking Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Technical Contacts: Charles E. Moulton, NRR Paul W. Lain, NRR

(301) 415-2751 (301) 415-2346 E-mail: cem4@nrc.gov Email: pwl@nrc.gov Note: NRC generic communications may be found on the NRC public Web site, http://www.nrc.gov, under Electronic Reading Room / Document Collections.

BACKFIT DISCUSSION

This RIS requires no action or written response and is, therefore, not a backfit under 10 CFR 50.109. Consequently, the staff did not perform a backfit analysis.

FEDERAL REGISTER NOTIFICATION

A notice of opportunity for public comment on this RIS was not published in the Federal Register because this RIS is informational.

CONGRESSIONAL REVIEW ACT

This RIS is not a rule as designated by the Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C. §§ 801-886)

and, therefore, is not subject to the Act.

PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT STATEMENT

The information collections contained in this regulatory issue summary are covered by the requirements of 10 CFR Part 50, which was approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), approval numbers 3150-0011.

Public Protection Notification The NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a request for information or an information collection requirement unless the requesting document displays a currently valid OMB control number.

CONTACT

Please direct any questions about this matter to the technical contacts listed below.

/RA/

Michael Case, Director Division of Policy and Rulemaking Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Technical Contacts: Charles E. Moulton, NRR Paul W. Lain, NRR

(301) 415-2751 (301) 415-2346 E-mail: cem4@nrc.gov Email: pwl@nrc.gov Note: NRC generic communications may be found on the NRC public Web site, http://www.nrc.gov, under Electronic Reading Room / Document Collections.

ADAMS Accession #: ML071590227 Office AFPB AFPB Technical Editor BC:AFPB D:DRA

Name CMoulton PLain Carina Clark SWeerakkody CHolden Date 6/18/2007 6/18/2007 6/8/07 6/25/2007 6/26/2007 Office D:DORL BC:TSB D:DFERR

CHaney/JLubinski TKobetz/CSchulten MCunningham/JUhle Name for for for Date 7/5/2007 7/5/2007 7/6/2007 Office OE OGC/NLO OGC/CRA PMDA OIS

Name DSolorio LSubin DReddick LHill MJanney/CColburn for Date 7/27/2007 7/11/2007 7/11/2007 7/3/2007 7/27/2007 Office LA:PGCB PGCB BC:PGCB D:DPR

Name CHawes AMarkley MMurphy MCase Date 08/02/2007 07/30/2007 08/10/2007 08/20/2007