ML20154C788: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot change)
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
| number = ML20154C788
| number = ML20154C788
| issue date = 02/24/1986
| issue date = 02/24/1986
| title = Responds to 851209 Ltr Informing NRC of Steps Taken to Correct Violations Noted in Insp Repts 50-160/85-03 & 50-276/85-02.Violation 2,Subpart a Deleted.Response to Subparts b-d Required within 30 Days
| title = Responds to Informing NRC of Steps Taken to Correct Violations Noted in Insp Repts 50-160/85-03 & 50-276/85-02.Violation 2,Subpart a Deleted.Response to Subparts b-d Required within 30 Days
| author name = Walker R
| author name = Walker R
| author affiliation = NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
| author affiliation = NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
Line 11: Line 11:
| contact person =  
| contact person =  
| document report number = NUDOCS 8603050320
| document report number = NUDOCS 8603050320
| title reference date = 12-09-1985
| document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, NRC TO EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTION, OUTGOING CORRESPONDENCE
| document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, NRC TO EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTION, OUTGOING CORRESPONDENCE
| page count = 1
| page count = 1
Line 17: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:o/Nebeb/ )
{{#Wiki_filter:o/Nebeb/
                                                                                                      :
Georgia Institute of Technology
  Georgia Institute of Technology
ATTN:
  ATTN:   Dr. Ratib A. Karam, Director
Dr. Ratib A. Karam, Director
              of Nuclear Research Center
of Nuclear Research Center
  900 Atlantic Drive, N.W.
900 Atlantic Drive, N.W.
  Atlanta, GA 30332
Atlanta, GA 30332
  Gentlemen:
Gentlemen:
  SUBJECT:     INSPECTION REPORT NOS. 50-160/85-03 AND 50-276/85-02
SUBJECT:
  Our letter dated January 9,1986, in response to your letter of December 9,1985,
INSPECTION REPORT NOS. 50-160/85-03 AND 50-276/85-02
  stated that your response to the Notice of Violation enclosed with the above
Our letter dated January 9,1986, in response to your letter of December 9,1985,
  report was under review and that you would be notified of the results of this
stated that your response to the Notice of Violation enclosed with the above
  review at a later date.
report was under review and that you would be notified of the results of this
  In response to Violation 1, concerning sampling for liquid effluent releases, we
review at a later date.
  have reviewed the steps you have taken to correct this violation and will examine           e
In response to Violation 1, concerning sampling for liquid effluent releases, we
  the implementation of your corrective actions during future in:pections.
have reviewed the steps you have taken to correct this violation and will examine
  With regard to Violation 2,         subpart a, we agree with your position and have
e
  deleted the subpart from our records.
the implementation of your corrective actions during future in:pections.
  Violation 2, subparts b, c and d were not addressed in your December 9,1985,
With regard to Violation 2,
  response. Therefore, in accordance with the requirements of 10 CFR 2.201,
subpart a, we agree with your position and have
  please submit to this office within 30 days of the date of this letter, a written
deleted the subpart from our records.
  statement which includes admission or denial of subparts b, c and d of the
Violation 2, subparts b, c and d were not addressed in your December 9,1985,
  alleged violation, the reason for the violation, if admitted, the corrective
response.
  steps which have been taken and the results achieved, corrective steps which
Therefore, in accordance with the requirements of 10 CFR 2.201,
  will be taken to avoid further violations, and the date when full compliance
please submit to this office within 30 days of the date of this letter, a written
  will be achieved.
statement which includes admission or denial of subparts b, c and d of the
  The responses directed by this letter and the enclosure are not subject to the
alleged violation, the reason for the violation, if admitted, the corrective
  clearance procedures of the Office of Management and Budget issued under the
steps which have been taken and the results achieved, corrective steps which
  Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980, PL 96-511.
will be taken to avoid further violations, and the date when full compliance
  We appreciate your cooperation in this matter.
will be achieved.
                                                  Sincerely,
The responses directed by this letter and the enclosure are not subject to the
                                                  BAS!"B1MK1bv
clearance procedures of the Office of Management and Budget issued under the
                                                  Roger D. Walker, Director
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980, PL 96-511.
                                                  Division of Reactor Projects
We appreciate your cooperation in this matter.
  cc: vDr. T. E. Stelson, Vice President
Sincerely,
            for Research
BAS!"B1MK1bv
  bec:. License Fee Management Branch
Roger D. Walker, Director
        Document Control Desk
Division of Reactor Projects
        State of Georgia
cc: vDr. T. E. Stelson, Vice President
  -..
for Research
          kn'              DC      i s.    tohr      f              o r. Lei    V  nc ia
bec:. License Fee Management Branch
Document Control Desk
State of Georgia
-..
.
.
      2/g/86
kn'
                  C
C
                                /86                    /4 /86              2/29/86   pj
DC
                  2/\( /86 2//7           2{C(/86
i s.
          8603050320 860224                                                                     g
tohr
          PDR     ADOCK 05000160                                                                   0
f
          G                   PDR                                                                 t
o r.
                                                                                              1 20/
Lei
                                  _ _ _   _   _   ___     _ _ . _ _
V
nc
ia
2/g/86
2/\\( /86
2//7
2{C(/86
/4 /86
2/29/86
pj
/86
8603050320 860224
g
PDR
ADOCK 05000160
0
G
PDR
t
1 20/
_ _ _
_
_
___
_ _ . _ _
}}
}}

Latest revision as of 11:51, 24 May 2025

Responds to Informing NRC of Steps Taken to Correct Violations Noted in Insp Repts 50-160/85-03 & 50-276/85-02.Violation 2,Subpart a Deleted.Response to Subparts b-d Required within 30 Days
ML20154C788
Person / Time
Site: Neely Research Reactor, 05000276
Issue date: 02/24/1986
From: Walker R
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To: Karam R
Neely Research Reactor, ATLANTA, GA
References
NUDOCS 8603050320
Download: ML20154C788 (1)
v • d • e


See also: IR 05000160/1985003

Text

o/Nebeb/

Georgia Institute of Technology

ATTN:

Dr. Ratib A. Karam, Director

of Nuclear Research Center

900 Atlantic Drive, N.W.

Atlanta, GA 30332

Gentlemen:

SUBJECT:

INSPECTION REPORT NOS. 50-160/85-03 AND 50-276/85-02

Our letter dated January 9,1986, in response to your letter of December 9,1985,

stated that your response to the Notice of Violation enclosed with the above

report was under review and that you would be notified of the results of this

review at a later date.

In response to Violation 1, concerning sampling for liquid effluent releases, we

have reviewed the steps you have taken to correct this violation and will examine

e

the implementation of your corrective actions during future in:pections.

With regard to Violation 2,

subpart a, we agree with your position and have

deleted the subpart from our records.

Violation 2, subparts b, c and d were not addressed in your December 9,1985,

response.

Therefore, in accordance with the requirements of 10 CFR 2.201,

please submit to this office within 30 days of the date of this letter, a written

statement which includes admission or denial of subparts b, c and d of the

alleged violation, the reason for the violation, if admitted, the corrective

steps which have been taken and the results achieved, corrective steps which

will be taken to avoid further violations, and the date when full compliance

will be achieved.

The responses directed by this letter and the enclosure are not subject to the

clearance procedures of the Office of Management and Budget issued under the

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980, PL 96-511.

We appreciate your cooperation in this matter.

Sincerely,

BAS!"B1MK1bv

Roger D. Walker, Director

Division of Reactor Projects

cc: vDr. T. E. Stelson, Vice President

for Research

bec:. License Fee Management Branch

Document Control Desk

State of Georgia

-..

.

kn'

C

DC

i s.

tohr

f

o r.

Lei

V

nc

ia

2/g/86

2/\\( /86

2//7

2{C(/86

/4 /86

2/29/86

pj

/86

8603050320 860224

g

PDR

ADOCK 05000160

0

G

PDR

t

1 20/

_ _ _

_

_

___

_ _ . _ _

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20154C788&oldid=5490857"