ML20134B749: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot insert)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Adams
#REDIRECT [[IR 05000520/2007011]]
| number = ML20134B749
| issue date = 08/12/1985
| title = Notice of Violation from Insp on 850520-0711
| author name = Harrison J
| author affiliation = NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
| addressee name =
| addressee affiliation =
| docket = 05000456
| license number =
| contact person =
| document report number = 50-456-85-26, NUDOCS 8508160058
| package number = ML20134B744
| document type = NOTICE OF VIOLATION OF A REGULATION, TEXT-INSPECTION & AUDIT & I&E CIRCULARS
| page count = 2
}}
See also: [[see also::IR 05000520/2007011]]
 
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:.
  .
                                            Appendix
                                      NOTICE OF VIOLATION
      Commonwealth Edison Company                                      Docket No. 50-456
                                                                      .        .
      As a result of the inspection conducted on May 20 through July 11, 1985, and
      in accordance with the General Policy and Procedures for NRC Enforcement
      Actions, (10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C), the following violations were identified:
      A.  10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion XI, " Test Control," as implemented
          by the Commonwealth Edison Quality Assurance Manual, Quality
          Requirement 11.0 and the Braidwood Startup Manual requires that testing
          to demonstrate that systems perform satisfactorily in service be
          performed in accordance with written test procedures which incorporate
,
          the requirements and acceptance limits contained in design documents.
          10 CFR 50, Appendix E, Criterion V, " Instructions, Procedures, and
          Drawings", as implemented by Commonwealth Edison Company Quality
          Assurance Manual, Quality Requirement 5.0, requires that appropriate
          acceptance criteria be included in documents affecting quality to show
          that the activity nas been completed satisfactorily.
          Contrary to the aboVE, sufficient testing and acceptance Criteria
          were not incorporated in tne Auxiliary Feedwater ( AFW) system test
          procedure to ensure that the design basis of the Braidwood FSAR is
          verified. The design basis in question is verified by performing an
'
          AFW pump endurance run to ensure satisfactory bearing / bearing oil
          temperature and vibration and that pump room temperature and humidity
          remain within environmental cualification limits for safety related
!
          equipment.    The preoperational test procedure does perform the pump
          endurance run for both AFW pumps, but does not require sufficient data
j          to be taken or recorded and the acceptance criteria does not encompass
          all that is necessary to verify this design basis (456/85026-01(DRS)).
I          This is a Severity Level V violation (Supplement II).
      E.  10 CFR 50, Appendix E, Criterion XVI, " Corrective Action," as implemented
          by the Commonwealth Edison Quality Assurance Manual, Quality Reouirement
          16.0 and the Braidwood Startup Manual states, in part, " Measures shall
          be established to assure conditions adverse to quality such as...
          deficiencies...are promptly identified and corrected."
          Contrary tc tne aDnVE.'
;
            1.  A test deficiency was not written for the BWPT FC-10 preoperational
                test by the System Test Engineer to identify a deficient condition
                until directed by the Test Review Board (456/85026-02a(DRS)).
l
!
                                        ~
!            8508160058 850812
l            PDR  ADOCK 05000456
l
            G                  PM
l
 
    .
  .
I
      Appendix                                2
            2.  The description of the deficient condition was inadequate to
                  properly define the problem that test deficiency FC-10-K was
                  initiated to correct in that the deficient-condition involved
                  both writing and verifying procedures while the description only
                  addressed writing procedures (456/85026-02b(DRS)).-          _
          ' 3.  Corrective actions taken to resolve deficient conditions were
                  not adequate to close test deficiencies: for FC-10-K, the
                  deficiency itself was closed even though the deficient condition
                'had not been corrected; for 00-12-80, no documentation of the
                  verification of procedures existed;'and for RH-10-123, the
!
'
                  deficiency was closed with temporary equipment installed
                  (456/85026-02c(DRS)).
            This is'a Severity Level V violation (Supplement II).
      Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, you are required to submit to
      this office within. thirty cays of the date of this Notice a written statement
      or explanation in reply, including for each violation: (1) corrective action
      -taken and the results achieved; (2) corrective action to be taken to avoid
      further violations; and (3) the date when full compliance will be achieved.
      Consideration may be given to extending your response time for good cause shown.
                                                                      !  .
                                                                    -
            AU212 $35
      Datec-                                            J. J. Harrison, Chief
                                                        Engineering Branch
                                                      ..
1
i
                                                            . - - .                  .
}}

Latest revision as of 21:25, 25 September 2020

Redirect to:

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20134B749&oldid=2945795"