ML11221A365: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot change)
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 15: Line 15:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:POTENTtAL SETTLEMENT BASED ON 1.5% E CRITERIA { INCHES) 750 0 I 2        3  4 5        6 750 (E)        POTENTIAL SETTLEMENT BASED ON 6% E: CRITERIA (INCHES)
{{#Wiki_filter:750  
ERCW                                                DESIGN WATER TABLE 740 i: '
          -DISCHA%      .--    I X WATER TABLE (24HR)
MH SOIL CLASSIFICATION
-k./
-k./
I3 8 U W COUNT
730 I
                                                            ~     POTENTIALLY LIQUEFIABLE SOIL 730                                            730            (SEE NOTE)
720 7 IO 700 690 680 670 6 60 0
                                                            -WS WEATHERED SHALE I                                                        NOTE:
I 2
I , LIQUEFACTION BASED ON TOP OF 720                                            720        GROUND ACCELERATION OF 0 . 4 - g AND SEED-IRRISS (1971)
3 4
CORRELATION FOR SANDS.
5 6
7 IO iG;~
ERCW
G- SP- SM 710 700                                            700 690                                            690 Added by Amendment 50 680 680 WATTS BAR NUCLEAR PLANT FINAL SAFETY 670                                            670              ANALYSlS REPORT ERGW PIPELINE SECTION G-G FIGURE 2 . 5 - 5 7 3 6 60                                          660 e- c}}
-DISCHA%
I i: '
e-c i G ; ~
G-SP-SM 750 740 730 720 710 700 690 680 670 660 POTENTtAL SETTLEMENT BASED ON 1.5% E CRITERIA { INCHES)
(E) POTENTIAL SETTLEMENT BASED ON 6% E:
CRITERIA (INCHES)
DESIGN WATER TABLE X WATER TABLE (24HR)
MH SOIL CLASSIFICATION I3 8 U W COUNT  
~
POTENTIALLY LIQUEFIABLE SOIL (SEE NOTE)  
-WS WEATHERED SHALE NOTE:
I, LIQUEFACTION BASED ON TOP OF GROUND ACCELERATION OF 0.4-g CORRELATION FOR SANDS.
AND SEED-IRRISS (1971)
Added by Amendment 50 WATTS BAR NUCLEAR PLANT FINAL SAFETY ANALYSlS REPORT ERGW PIPELINE SECTION G-G FIGURE 2.5-573}}

Latest revision as of 04:52, 13 January 2025

Amendment 102 to Final Safety Analysis Report (Fsar), Figure 2.5-573, ERCW Pipeline Section C-C
ML11221A365
Person / Time
Site: Watts Bar Tennessee Valley Authority icon.png
Issue date: 12/17/2010
From:
Tennessee Valley Authority
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
Download: ML11221A365 (1)


Text

750

-k./

730 I

720 7 IO 700 690 680 670 6 60 0

I 2

3 4

5 6

ERCW

-DISCHA%

I i: '

e-c i G ; ~

G-SP-SM 750 740 730 720 710 700 690 680 670 660 POTENTtAL SETTLEMENT BASED ON 1.5% E CRITERIA { INCHES)

(E) POTENTIAL SETTLEMENT BASED ON 6% E:

CRITERIA (INCHES)

DESIGN WATER TABLE X WATER TABLE (24HR)

MH SOIL CLASSIFICATION I3 8 U W COUNT

~

POTENTIALLY LIQUEFIABLE SOIL (SEE NOTE)

-WS WEATHERED SHALE NOTE:

I, LIQUEFACTION BASED ON TOP OF GROUND ACCELERATION OF 0.4-g CORRELATION FOR SANDS.

AND SEED-IRRISS (1971)

Added by Amendment 50 WATTS BAR NUCLEAR PLANT FINAL SAFETY ANALYSlS REPORT ERGW PIPELINE SECTION G-G FIGURE 2.5-573