ML19338B974: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) StriderTol Bot change |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) StriderTol Bot change |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| number = ML19338B974 | | number = ML19338B974 | ||
| issue date = 09/30/1977 | | issue date = 09/30/1977 | ||
| title = Order Denying Petitioners | | title = Order Denying Petitioners Emergency Motion to Enforce Mandate.Related Correspondence | ||
| author name = Bazelon | | author name = Bazelon | ||
| author affiliation = U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT | | author affiliation = U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT | ||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:.m | {{#Wiki_filter:.m | ||
. ~ - _ | |||
.-.......-.q | |||
~- | |||
^ #j hitch 5fafas Ecurf of AbpeaY'*= | |||
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBI A CIRCUlT | FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBI A CIRCUlT No. | ||
No. | 73-1776 - | ||
September Term,19 77 | |||
l | -) | ||
Nelson Aeschliman, et al, | i g-e a | ||
l 1 | |||
l Nelson Aeschliman, et al, | |||
%\\ | |||
l g | |||
-7 l | |||
Petitioners | |||
,cp i | |||
( | ( | ||
?j O | |||
N United States Atomic Energy Comission | |||
United States Atomic Energy Comission | ,j@ | ||
and thited States of America, c, | |||
A,y. | |||
/ | |||
Respondents | j Respondents | ||
.* / wt United States Court of Appeals Consumers Power Company, for t:w DistM. cf cd=. bis che:lt Intervenor fil.ED 007271977 No. 73-1867 Saginaw Valley Nuclear Study Group, GEORC-{A FISHER g | |||
fil.ED | ct al Petitioners v. | ||
Saginaw Valley Nuclear Study Group, | i United States Atomic Energy Comission and United States of America, Respondents i | ||
Petitioners v. | ConsumersTower Company, 1 | ||
i United States Atomic Energy Comission | Intervenor | ||
Respondents | ~ | ||
BEIM E: Bazelen, Chief Judge; Fahy, Senior Circuit Judge and Justice *, | |||
? | |||
BEIM E: Bazelen, Chief Judge; Fahy, Senior Circuit Judge and Justice *, | -U.S. District Judge for the Eastern District of Texas. | ||
.O.R.D.E..R l | |||
.Upon consideration of petitioners' emergericy motion to enforce mandate, of their f | |||
motion for imediate and-expedited consideration thereof, of the responses filed by. | |||
reply to the responses, and it app 6aring to the Court that it previously has refused to | i respondent Comission and by intervenor Consumers Power Company, and of petitioners' H | ||
reply to the responses, and it app 6aring to the Court that it previously has refused to y | |||
stay the mandate and that it is _still in effect, and it further appearing that the L. | |||
1 Comission should completely carry out this' Court's remand with all reasonable expedition, and it further appearing that our mandate has not itself required a cessation of | |||
. construction and that matter.is under consideration within the Commission, it is' | |||
[9 E ni1221 $ 13I25 6 Durf Qf Spp2als | [9 E ni1221 $ 13I25 6 Durf Qf Spp2als FOR THE OlSTRICT OF cot.UMGI A CIRCulT 2 | ||
FOR THE OlSTRICT OF cot.UMGI A CIRCulT | - No. 73-1776, et at September Term,19.77 e | ||
2 | . ORDERED by the Court that petitioners' emergency motion to enforce mandate is denied, the Court noting that continuation of construction pending resolution of L | ||
the remanded issues is at the risk of intervenor Ccasumers Power Company. | |||
Per Curiam For the Court: | Per Curiam For the Court: | ||
e C.M/ | e C.M/ | ||
cao | cao | ||
* Sitting by designation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 5 292(d). | .. nsasa Clerk i ' | ||
* Sitting by designation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 5 292(d). | |||
Judge Justice did not participate in the foregoing order. | Judge Justice did not participate in the foregoing order. | ||
h 1 | |||
1 | l 1 | ||
1 | |||
\\ | |||
e f | e f | ||
i O | i O | ||
l l | l l | ||
1 | |||
.. j.. | |||
9 | |||
.}} | |||
Latest revision as of 16:26, 25 December 2024
| ML19338B974 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Midland |
| Issue date: | 09/30/1977 |
| From: | Bazelon U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT |
| To: | Saginaw Intervenor |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19338B972 | List: |
| References | |
| 73-1776, NUDOCS 8007291119 | |
| Download: ML19338B974 (2) | |
Text
{{#Wiki_filter:.m . ~ - _ .-.......-.q ~- ^ #j hitch 5fafas Ecurf of AbpeaY'*= FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBI A CIRCUlT No. 73-1776 - September Term,19 77 -) i g-e a l 1 l Nelson Aeschliman, et al, %\\ l g -7 l Petitioners ,cp i ( ?j O N United States Atomic Energy Comission ,j@ and thited States of America, c, A,y. / j Respondents .* / wt United States Court of Appeals Consumers Power Company, for t:w DistM. cf cd=. bis che:lt Intervenor fil.ED 007271977 No. 73-1867 Saginaw Valley Nuclear Study Group, GEORC-{A FISHER g ct al Petitioners v. i United States Atomic Energy Comission and United States of America, Respondents i ConsumersTower Company, 1 Intervenor ~ BEIM E: Bazelen, Chief Judge; Fahy, Senior Circuit Judge and Justice *, ? -U.S. District Judge for the Eastern District of Texas. .O.R.D.E..R l .Upon consideration of petitioners' emergericy motion to enforce mandate, of their f motion for imediate and-expedited consideration thereof, of the responses filed by. i respondent Comission and by intervenor Consumers Power Company, and of petitioners' H reply to the responses, and it app 6aring to the Court that it previously has refused to y stay the mandate and that it is _still in effect, and it further appearing that the L. 1 Comission should completely carry out this' Court's remand with all reasonable expedition, and it further appearing that our mandate has not itself required a cessation of . construction and that matter.is under consideration within the Commission, it is'
[9 E ni1221 $ 13I25 6 Durf Qf Spp2als FOR THE OlSTRICT OF cot.UMGI A CIRCulT 2 - No. 73-1776, et at September Term,19.77 e . ORDERED by the Court that petitioners' emergency motion to enforce mandate is denied, the Court noting that continuation of construction pending resolution of L the remanded issues is at the risk of intervenor Ccasumers Power Company. Per Curiam For the Court: e C.M/ cao .. nsasa Clerk i '
- Sitting by designation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 5 292(d).
Judge Justice did not participate in the foregoing order. h 1 l 1 1 \\ e f i O l l 1 .. j.. 9 .}}