ML19345C536: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 13: Line 13:
| document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, INCOMING CORRESPONDENCE, UTILITY TO NRC
| document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, INCOMING CORRESPONDENCE, UTILITY TO NRC
| page count = 2
| page count = 2
| project =
| stage = Request
}}
}}


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:% *
{{#Wiki_filter:*
  \
\\
BALTIMORE G AS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY P.O. BOX 1475 C ALTIMOR E. M A RYLAND 212o3 AntHun E. I,UNDVAbbedR-Vice ParsectNT                                                December 3, 1980 som.
BALTIMORE G AS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY P.O. BOX 1475 C ALTIMOR E. M A RYLAND 212o3 AntHun E. I,UNDVAbbedR-December 3, 1980 Vice ParsectNT som.
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C. 20555 ATTENTION:         Mr. R. A. Clark, Chief Operating Reactors Branch #3 Division of Licensing
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C. 20555 ATTENTION:
Mr. R. A. Clark, Chief Operating Reactors Branch #3 Division of Licensing


==SUBJECT:==
==SUBJECT:==
Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant Unit No.1, Docke: No. 50-317 Amendment to Operating License DPR-53 Fif th Cycle License Application Responses to NRC Staff Questions Gentlemen:
Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant Unit No.1, Docke: No. 50-317 Amendment to Operating License DPR-53 Fif th Cycle License Application Responses to NRC Staff Questions Gentlemen:
Enclosed are our reponses to questions posed by NRC staff on the subject application.
Enclosed are our reponses to questions posed by NRC staff on the subject application.
Very truly yours, BALTIMORE GAS ApD ELECTRIC COMPAAY y'l                   &fbx L l A. E. Lun$all, Jr.
Very truly yours, BALTIMORE GAS ApD ELECTRIC COMPAAY y'l
Vice President - Supply AEL/W3L/mit Copy To:           J. A. Biddison, Esquire (w/out Encl.)
&fbx L l A. E. Lun$all, Jr.
Vice President - Supply AEL/W3L/mit Copy To:
J. A. Biddison, Esquire (w/out Encl.)
G. F. Trowbridge, Esquire (w/out Encl.)
G. F. Trowbridge, Esquire (w/out Encl.)
Messrs.       E. L. Conner, Jr., NRC P. W. Kruse, CE
Messrs.
;        Enclosure (40 copies) pm S30!!?d35Ea:       "
E. L. Conner, Jr., NRC P. W. Kruse, CE Enclosure (40 copies) pm S30!!?d35Ea:
(           a v tu v 30 CO 3g1205oi: 54               g g.g               .
(
a v tu v 30 CO 3g1205oi: 54 g g.g


t ENCLOSURE QUESTION Table 6-1 contains values for core average heat flux and average linear heat rate for both cycle 5 and the reference cycle 4 of Unit 1. The cycle'5 to cycle 4 ratios of these two quantities should be equal but are not. Please explain why.
t ENCLOSURE QUESTION Table 6-1 contains values for core average heat flux and average linear heat rate for both cycle 5 and the reference cycle 4 of Unit 1.
The cycle'5 to cycle 4 ratios of these two quantities should be equal but are not. Please explain why.


===RESPONSE===
===RESPONSE===
The value of Average Linear Heat Rate given in Table 6-1 for cycle 5 (6.45 kw/ft)_has been found to be inconsistent with the associated descrip-tive label. The correct value for cycle 5 is 6.23 kw/ft. Contrary to the descriptive label in the submittal,-the earlier value corresponded to densified fuel without accounting for the fraction of heat generated out-side the fuel rod. Use of 6.23 kw/ft in the cycle 5 to cycle 4 ratio results in agreement with the cycle 5 to cycle'4 ratio of Core Average Heat Flux.
The value of Average Linear Heat Rate given in Table 6-1 for cycle 5 (6.45 kw/ft)_has been found to be inconsistent with the associated descrip-tive label. The correct value for cycle 5 is 6.23 kw/ft. Contrary to the descriptive label in the submittal,-the earlier value corresponded to densified fuel without accounting for the fraction of heat generated out-side the fuel rod.
Use of 6.23 kw/ft in the cycle 5 to cycle 4 ratio results in agreement with the cycle 5 to cycle'4 ratio of Core Average Heat Flux.
e}}
e}}

Latest revision as of 10:00, 24 December 2024

Forwards Response to NRC Questions Re Application to Amend License DPR-53 for Fifth Cycle Operation.Values for Core Average Heat Flux & Average Liner Heat Rate Clarified
ML19345C536
Person / Time
Site: Calvert Cliffs Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 12/03/1980
From: Lundvall A
BALTIMORE GAS & ELECTRIC CO.
To: Clark R
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NUDOCS 8012050454
Download: ML19345C536 (2)


Text

\\

BALTIMORE G AS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY P.O. BOX 1475 C ALTIMOR E. M A RYLAND 212o3 AntHun E. I,UNDVAbbedR-December 3, 1980 Vice ParsectNT som.

Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C. 20555 ATTENTION:

Mr. R. A. Clark, Chief Operating Reactors Branch #3 Division of Licensing

SUBJECT:

Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant Unit No.1, Docke: No. 50-317 Amendment to Operating License DPR-53 Fif th Cycle License Application Responses to NRC Staff Questions Gentlemen:

Enclosed are our reponses to questions posed by NRC staff on the subject application.

Very truly yours, BALTIMORE GAS ApD ELECTRIC COMPAAY y'l

&fbx L l A. E. Lun$all, Jr.

Vice President - Supply AEL/W3L/mit Copy To:

J. A. Biddison, Esquire (w/out Encl.)

G. F. Trowbridge, Esquire (w/out Encl.)

Messrs.

E. L. Conner, Jr., NRC P. W. Kruse, CE Enclosure (40 copies) pm S30!!?d35Ea:

(

a v tu v 30 CO 3g1205oi: 54 g g.g

t ENCLOSURE QUESTION Table 6-1 contains values for core average heat flux and average linear heat rate for both cycle 5 and the reference cycle 4 of Unit 1.

The cycle'5 to cycle 4 ratios of these two quantities should be equal but are not. Please explain why.

RESPONSE

The value of Average Linear Heat Rate given in Table 6-1 for cycle 5 (6.45 kw/ft)_has been found to be inconsistent with the associated descrip-tive label. The correct value for cycle 5 is 6.23 kw/ft. Contrary to the descriptive label in the submittal,-the earlier value corresponded to densified fuel without accounting for the fraction of heat generated out-side the fuel rod.

Use of 6.23 kw/ft in the cycle 5 to cycle 4 ratio results in agreement with the cycle 5 to cycle'4 ratio of Core Average Heat Flux.

e