ML062130184: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:SDP/EA REQUEST & STRATEGY FORM Case Data | {{#Wiki_filter:SDP/EA REQUEST & STRATEGY FORM Case Data DDIAN.: | ||
DDIAN.: | "'04-13-f1 Disputed: | ||
Number: n4 Related Cases: | |||
Discussion ( | Docket No.: 05000298 Request Date: V* 5 Region: IV CaseType:,.. | ||
DOJ Referral? | Rx"e Small Entity. [] No f1Yes Licensee: | ||
Nebrask Publi Power Di~tct -act/Cy.ooper License No.: | |||
DPR-46 Last Day of Insp.: 7=2204 Insp. Rpt No.: | |||
Discretion or Order? | I R-Q4!Q4 Keywords: | ||
Future Action Conference? | ES: | ||
drs Facts Falluretpo perrbs re he serv*ce wa~terto s rvomialoobflguratbn f1bwng Foulnejie t~hnarpice | |||
ýtat ~he Icens-ee (EATS): | |||
didno reaibiagh the gland waterfk q service water m~aintenance. The faikare to reabn' th6 gland w~ater was attributed to indequ~ate instrctnsi. The adqteinstructions led to the cross connection of gland watr resulting ina bs-'f servie water redundiancy. | |||
Discussion (if required): One green fWnding and violation of Criterion V for inadequate written instructions for restoring service water to operable status folowing maintenance. DuringrbD final significance determination, the SERP members did not reach consensus on the final risk oh CC-x 5-SDP El1No nXYes Assessment x | |||
[jWhilte | |||
[Ylow NOV Yes | |||
]No Wrongdoing [1No X | |||
Yes O Ref. Date OI Rpt No.:: | |||
01.Rpt Date. | |||
DOJ Referral? | |||
D No flYes Ref. Date Action Date D.ecline Accept Additional 01 Status 01] | |||
01 Investigating E--01 needs to be notified D | |||
OMOE dispute memo needed | |||
=1]Additional cordination needed ElAwating DOJ j]Needs coordination with DOJ Escalated. Action Consequence: | |||
[IlActual [ Potental []Reg. Impact Willfulness Prior Esc. Action? | |||
El1 No M Yes EA. | |||
Date: | |||
ID Credit? | |||
ENo E]Yes MTBD SL:E CA Credit? | |||
ElNo ElYes Z]TBD Supp:l CP? | |||
El-No CP El Base E-Double Base ['M other: | |||
Discretion or Order? | |||
[ | |||
No r-'Yes Explain: | |||
Future Action Conference? | |||
5W No EY-es | |||
[] Open El Cbsed Additional Action? | |||
0l No VMolation Re-panel ED PEC~ | |||
Letter Choice Letter H | |||
Choice Call E | |||
St.IV NOV B | |||
Re-caucus UJRegion Issue Esc. Action U Full Package Review by HO U DEDR Review C | |||
commission U Disagreement NCV OtterAction? | |||
One green finding and violation of Criterion V A. Howell, S. Schwind, K.. Fuller, W. Walker, T. Vegel, D. Loveless, G. Shear, D. Chamberlain, G. Sanborn, K Kennedy, D. Loveless, S. Cochrum | |||
==Participants:== | ==Participants:== | ||
Region | Region OE J. Luehman, G. Morell, C. Nolan, D. Starkey OGC/OI komiawion m Oh rGcod wa de~ | ||
4 - | 4 - | ||
49Z | |||
000 | 000 NOT IC S | ||
HOUT ROV H | |||
CT,0 R. Franovich, R. Giibbs, D. Coe, M. Tshilftz, M. Reinhart, S. Richards, S. Meng Wong, B. Palla, Program S. Lavie, M. Honcharik, See-Meng Wong, Office A.. E-Bassioni, R.Bywater, S.Lavie Other Remarks/Comments/Lessons Learned: | |||
Approved, Dir. OE: IRA/ | Approved, Dir. OE: IRA/ | ||
Date: 02/09/05}} | Date: 02/09/05}} | ||
Latest revision as of 07:40, 15 January 2025
| ML062130184 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Cooper  |
| Issue date: | 02/09/2005 |
| From: | Luehman J, Morell G, Nolan M, Starkey R NRC/OE |
| To: | |
| References | |
| EA-04-131, FOIA/PA-2006-0007, IR-04-014 EA-04-131-4 | |
| Download: ML062130184 (2) | |
Text
SDP/EA REQUEST & STRATEGY FORM Case Data DDIAN.:
"'04-13-f1 Disputed:
Number: n4 Related Cases:
Docket No.: 05000298 Request Date: V* 5 Region: IV CaseType:,..
Rx"e Small Entity. [] No f1Yes Licensee:
Nebrask Publi Power Di~tct -act/Cy.ooper License No.:
DPR-46 Last Day of Insp.: 7=2204 Insp. Rpt No.:
I R-Q4!Q4 Keywords:
ES:
drs Facts Falluretpo perrbs re he serv*ce wa~terto s rvomialoobflguratbn f1bwng Foulnejie t~hnarpice
ýtat ~he Icens-ee (EATS):
didno reaibiagh the gland waterfk q service water m~aintenance. The faikare to reabn' th6 gland w~ater was attributed to indequ~ate instrctnsi. The adqteinstructions led to the cross connection of gland watr resulting ina bs-'f servie water redundiancy.
Discussion (if required): One green fWnding and violation of Criterion V for inadequate written instructions for restoring service water to operable status folowing maintenance. DuringrbD final significance determination, the SERP members did not reach consensus on the final risk oh CC-x 5-SDP El1No nXYes Assessment x
[jWhilte
[Ylow NOV Yes
]No Wrongdoing [1No X
Yes O Ref. Date OI Rpt No.::
01.Rpt Date.
DOJ Referral?
D No flYes Ref. Date Action Date D.ecline Accept Additional 01 Status 01]
01 Investigating E--01 needs to be notified D
OMOE dispute memo needed
=1]Additional cordination needed ElAwating DOJ j]Needs coordination with DOJ Escalated. Action Consequence:
[IlActual [ Potental []Reg. Impact Willfulness Prior Esc. Action?
El1 No M Yes EA.
Date:
ID Credit?
ENo E]Yes MTBD SL:E CA Credit?
ElNo ElYes Z]TBD Supp:l CP?
El-No CP El Base E-Double Base ['M other:
Discretion or Order?
[
No r-'Yes Explain:
Future Action Conference?
5W No EY-es
[] Open El Cbsed Additional Action?
0l No VMolation Re-panel ED PEC~
Letter Choice Letter H
Choice Call E
St.IV NOV B
Re-caucus UJRegion Issue Esc. Action U Full Package Review by HO U DEDR Review C
commission U Disagreement NCV OtterAction?
One green finding and violation of Criterion V A. Howell, S. Schwind, K.. Fuller, W. Walker, T. Vegel, D. Loveless, G. Shear, D. Chamberlain, G. Sanborn, K Kennedy, D. Loveless, S. Cochrum
Participants:
Region OE J. Luehman, G. Morell, C. Nolan, D. Starkey OGC/OI komiawion m Oh rGcod wa de~
4 -
49Z
000 NOT IC S
HOUT ROV H
CT,0 R. Franovich, R. Giibbs, D. Coe, M. Tshilftz, M. Reinhart, S. Richards, S. Meng Wong, B. Palla, Program S. Lavie, M. Honcharik, See-Meng Wong, Office A.. E-Bassioni, R.Bywater, S.Lavie Other Remarks/Comments/Lessons Learned:
Approved, Dir. OE: IRA/
Date: 02/09/05