ML19309C955: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| number = ML19309C955 | | number = ML19309C955 | ||
| issue date = 03/04/1980 | | issue date = 03/04/1980 | ||
| title = Responds to NRC | | title = Responds to NRC Re Violations Noted in IE Insp Rept 50-346/79-30.Corrective Actions:Reorganized Authorized Access List,Updated Drawings & Monitored Distribution & Control of Drawings | ||
| author name = Crouse R | | author name = Crouse R | ||
| author affiliation = TOLEDO EDISON CO. | | author affiliation = TOLEDO EDISON CO. | ||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
| contact person = | | contact person = | ||
| document report number = NUDOCS 8004090424 | | document report number = NUDOCS 8004090424 | ||
| title reference date = 02-12-1980 | |||
| package number = ML19309C946 | | package number = ML19309C946 | ||
| document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, INCOMING CORRESPONDENCE, UTILITY TO NRC | | document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, INCOMING CORRESPONDENCE, UTILITY TO NRC | ||
| Line 17: | Line 18: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:/- | {{#Wiki_filter:/- | ||
v March 4, 1980 TOLEDO EDISDN Rcsso P Cacust Decket No. 50-346 von,,.s ua.a License No. NPF-3 | |||
v | "*i""" | ||
Serial No. 1-117. | |||
March 4, 1980 | |||
Mr. R. F. Heishman, Chief Reactor Operations and Nuclear Support Branch U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region III 799 Roosevelt Road Glen Ellyn, Illinois 60137 | Mr. R. F. Heishman, Chief Reactor Operations and Nuclear Support Branch U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region III 799 Roosevelt Road Glen Ellyn, Illinois 60137 | ||
==Dear Mr. Heishman:== | ==Dear Mr. Heishman:== | ||
Toledo Edison acknowledges receipt of your {{letter dated|date=February 12, 1980|text=February 12, 1980 letter}} (Log No. 1-310) and enclosures, Appendix A and Report 79-30, referencing apparent deviations from Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Unit 1 commitments to the NRC listed as a "De-ficiency", and " Infractions" in Appendix A. | |||
Toledo Edison acknowledges receipt of your February 12, 1980 letter (Log No. 1-310) and enclosures, Appendix A and Report 79-30, referencing apparent deviations from Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Unit 1 commitments to the NRC listed as a "De-ficiency", and " Infractions" in Appendix A. | |||
Following an examination of the items of concern, Toledo Edison herein offers information regarding the items of non-compliance. | Following an examination of the items of concern, Toledo Edison herein offers information regarding the items of non-compliance. | ||
Deficiency: | Deficiency: | ||
ANSI N45.2.9 and AD 1848.04 require that measures be established which ensure that quality assurance records are properly collected, stored and maintained | 10CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion XVII states that records shall be identifiable and retrievable and that the applicant shall establish requirements concerning record retention, such as duration, location and assignment of responsibilities. | ||
ANSI N45.2.9 and AD 1848.04 require that measures be established which ensure that quality assurance records are properly collected, stored and maintained. | |||
Contrary to the above, a limited access list was not established to control access to the Station Central Files as required by AD 1848.04 and the Allowable Operating Transient Cycle Log Book was not kept current. | Contrary to the above, a limited access list was not established to control access to the Station Central Files as required by AD 1848.04 and the Allowable Operating Transient Cycle Log Book was not kept current. | ||
Response | |||
===Response=== | |||
1. | |||
Discussions were held with Station Section Heads to determine what the needs of each section were with respect to file access. A list of personnel from each section was requested, to serve as a basis for establishing an Authorized Access List. | |||
Major Modification M-3697 to AD 1848.04 has been written and approved by the Station Superintendent. This Major Modification establishes an Authorized Access List identifying who may utilize documents which require limited access. | Major Modification M-3697 to AD 1848.04 has been written and approved by the Station Superintendent. This Major Modification establishes an Authorized Access List identifying who may utilize documents which require limited access. | ||
THE TOLEDO EOISON COMPANY | THE TOLEDO EOISON COMPANY EDISON PLAZA 300 MADISON AVENUE TOLEDb. 3 364980 th $90% | ||
\\ | |||
Docket No. 50-346-License No. NPF-3 Serial No. 1-117 Page 2 Full compliance with AD 1848.04 has been achieved with the approval of Major Modification M-3697. | |||
Docket No. 50-346-License No. NPF-3 Serial No. 1-117 Page 2 | 2. | ||
Full compliance with AD 1848.04 has been achieved with the approval | Per AD 1839.01, " Documentation of Allowable Operating Transient Cycles", the documentation for each A0TC shall be kept in the Trip and Transient Book under the control of the Technical Sec-tion, or must be retrievable from the Master File. The Trip and Transient Book is a working document which is kept current from a weekly review of logs and strip charts. While the Master File is not required to be kept current by the above, it realistically should be, for archival purposes. Though no infraction existed, AD 1839.01 has been modified to require both documents to be kept up to date. Full compliance will be achieved by March 6, 1980. | ||
Infraction: | |||
10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion VI, Document Control states that | |||
Infraction: | " measures shall be established to control the issuance of documents, such as instructions, procedures and drawings, including changes there to, which prescribe all activities affecting quality." ANSI N18.7 - 1972, Paragraph 5, Facility Administrative Policies and Pro-cedures 2060 " Document Control" also state the requirements to con-trol the issuance of documents and the changes to be incorporated there to. | ||
Contrary to the above, the inspector found that a number of plant drawings were not being keptup-to-date and obsolete documents are not being properly controlled. | Contrary to the above, the inspector found that a number of plant drawings were not being keptup-to-date and obsolete documents are not being properly controlled. | ||
Response | |||
The distribution and control of the drawings is now being more | ===Response=== | ||
1. | |||
closely monitored. When superseded drawings are not returned according to the log the controlled copy holder is contacted and verbally requested to return superseded drawings. | All cot. trolled copies of M001-M051 drawings at the Station were replaced with a complete new set of drawings which include the latest revisions and applicable DCN's. | ||
The distribution and control of the drawings is now being more closely monitored. When superseded drawings are not returned according to the log the controlled copy holder is contacted and verbally requested to return superseded drawings. | |||
1 Full compliance has been achieved. | 1 Full compliance has been achieved. | ||
2. | |||
The drawing room clerk was instructed how to properly log the distribution and receipt of superseded drawings per procedure l | |||
AD 1848.05.01. The requirements of AD 1828.13 have been met by the Office Supervisor meeting with the clerk and instructing her per the appropricte requirements. | |||
e | |||
a Docket No. 50-346 License No. NPF-3 Serial No. 1-117 | a Docket No. 50-346 License No. NPF-3 Serial No. 1-117 | ||
~ | |||
Page 3 | Page 3 Closer supervision of the drawing room clerk and more frequent revied'of her records is serving to alleviate the problems iden-tified herein. | ||
Continued supervision will serve to achieve full compliance with the applicable procedures. | Continued supervision will serve to achieve full compliance with the applicable procedures. | ||
Infraction: Technien1 Specifications 6.5.2.7.e states that "the CNRB shall review violations of codes, regulations orders Technical Specifications, license requirements, or of internal procedures or instructions having nuclear safety significance. Technical Specification 6.5.2.10.b states that " reports of reviews encompassed by section 6.5.2.7 shall be prepared. approved and forwarded to the Executive Vice President, Oper-ations and CNRB members within 14 days following completion of review." | Infraction: Technien1 Specifications 6.5.2.7.e states that "the CNRB shall review violations of codes, regulations orders Technical Specifications, license requirements, or of internal procedures or instructions having nuclear safety significance. Technical Specification 6.5.2.10.b states that " reports of reviews encompassed by section 6.5.2.7 shall be prepared. approved and forwarded to the Executive Vice President, Oper-ations and CNRB members within 14 days following completion of review." | ||
Contrary to the above requirements, the inspector found that violations of Technical Specifications and regulations identified in NRC Inspec-tion Reports 50-346/79-02, 79-16, 79-19 and 79-29 were not reviewed by the CNRB as required. | Contrary to the above requirements, the inspector found that violations of Technical Specifications and regulations identified in NRC Inspec-tion Reports 50-346/79-02, 79-16, 79-19 and 79-29 were not reviewed by the CNRB as required. | ||
Response | |||
===Response=== | |||
Following the inspection ending December 20, 1979 the CNRB Chairman, in Meeting #51, apprised the CNRB membership of areas cited by the NRC inspector as requiring additional attention by the CNRB, Further reviews of the issue were conducted in CNRB Meetings #53 and #54. | |||
The responses to NRC Inspection Reports 50-346/79-02, 79-16, 79-19, and 79-29 have been issued to CNRB members for their review and discussion at the next CNRB meeting. | The responses to NRC Inspection Reports 50-346/79-02, 79-16, 79-19, and 79-29 have been issued to CNRB members for their review and discussion at the next CNRB meeting. | ||
The CNRB Chairman has apprised the membership through discussions at CNRB Meetings #51, #53, and #54 of the CNRB review responsibilities setforth in the Davis-Besse Unit 1 Technical Specification and in the CNRB Charter. In the future, responses to violations of Technical Specification and regulations identified in NRC Inspection Reports (which also cite the violation) will be issued to the CNRB members, and will subsequently be open for discussion at properly constituted CNRB meetings. CNRB action will be duly noted in CNRB meeting minutes, and appropriate reports made to the Toledo Edison President whose postion has superseded that of the Executive Vice President. | The CNRB Chairman has apprised the membership through discussions at CNRB Meetings #51, #53, and #54 of the CNRB review responsibilities setforth in the Davis-Besse Unit 1 Technical Specification and in the CNRB Charter. | ||
Action has been taken to assure distribution of future NRC Inspection Report responses to CNRB members. The cited Inspection Report responses will be open for discussion at a CNRB meeting before March 28, 1980. | In the future, responses to violations of Technical Specification and regulations identified in NRC Inspection Reports (which also cite the violation) will be issued to the CNRB members, and will subsequently be open for discussion at properly constituted CNRB meetings. CNRB action will be duly noted in CNRB meeting minutes, and appropriate reports made to the Toledo Edison President whose postion has superseded that of the Executive Vice President. | ||
Action has been taken to assure distribution of future NRC Inspection Report responses to CNRB members. | |||
The cited Inspection Report responses will be open for discussion at a CNRB meeting before March 28, 1980. | |||
Yours very truly, R. P. Crouse Vice President, Nuclear RPC/TDM/DAH/ daw}} | Yours very truly, R. P. Crouse Vice President, Nuclear RPC/TDM/DAH/ daw}} | ||
Latest revision as of 03:22, 2 January 2025
| ML19309C955 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Davis Besse  |
| Issue date: | 03/04/1980 |
| From: | Crouse R TOLEDO EDISON CO. |
| To: | Heishman R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19309C946 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8004090424 | |
| Download: ML19309C955 (3) | |
Text
/-
v March 4, 1980 TOLEDO EDISDN Rcsso P Cacust Decket No. 50-346 von,,.s ua.a License No. NPF-3
"*i"""
Serial No. 1-117.
Mr. R. F. Heishman, Chief Reactor Operations and Nuclear Support Branch U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region III 799 Roosevelt Road Glen Ellyn, Illinois 60137
Dear Mr. Heishman:
Toledo Edison acknowledges receipt of your February 12, 1980 letter (Log No. 1-310) and enclosures, Appendix A and Report 79-30, referencing apparent deviations from Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Unit 1 commitments to the NRC listed as a "De-ficiency", and " Infractions" in Appendix A.
Following an examination of the items of concern, Toledo Edison herein offers information regarding the items of non-compliance.
Deficiency:
10CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion XVII states that records shall be identifiable and retrievable and that the applicant shall establish requirements concerning record retention, such as duration, location and assignment of responsibilities.
ANSI N45.2.9 and AD 1848.04 require that measures be established which ensure that quality assurance records are properly collected, stored and maintained.
Contrary to the above, a limited access list was not established to control access to the Station Central Files as required by AD 1848.04 and the Allowable Operating Transient Cycle Log Book was not kept current.
Response
1.
Discussions were held with Station Section Heads to determine what the needs of each section were with respect to file access. A list of personnel from each section was requested, to serve as a basis for establishing an Authorized Access List.
Major Modification M-3697 to AD 1848.04 has been written and approved by the Station Superintendent. This Major Modification establishes an Authorized Access List identifying who may utilize documents which require limited access.
THE TOLEDO EOISON COMPANY EDISON PLAZA 300 MADISON AVENUE TOLEDb. 3 364980 th $90%
\\
Docket No. 50-346-License No. NPF-3 Serial No. 1-117 Page 2 Full compliance with AD 1848.04 has been achieved with the approval of Major Modification M-3697.
2.
Per AD 1839.01, " Documentation of Allowable Operating Transient Cycles", the documentation for each A0TC shall be kept in the Trip and Transient Book under the control of the Technical Sec-tion, or must be retrievable from the Master File. The Trip and Transient Book is a working document which is kept current from a weekly review of logs and strip charts. While the Master File is not required to be kept current by the above, it realistically should be, for archival purposes. Though no infraction existed, AD 1839.01 has been modified to require both documents to be kept up to date. Full compliance will be achieved by March 6, 1980.
Infraction:
10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion VI, Document Control states that
" measures shall be established to control the issuance of documents, such as instructions, procedures and drawings, including changes there to, which prescribe all activities affecting quality." ANSI N18.7 - 1972, Paragraph 5, Facility Administrative Policies and Pro-cedures 2060 " Document Control" also state the requirements to con-trol the issuance of documents and the changes to be incorporated there to.
Contrary to the above, the inspector found that a number of plant drawings were not being keptup-to-date and obsolete documents are not being properly controlled.
Response
1.
All cot. trolled copies of M001-M051 drawings at the Station were replaced with a complete new set of drawings which include the latest revisions and applicable DCN's.
The distribution and control of the drawings is now being more closely monitored. When superseded drawings are not returned according to the log the controlled copy holder is contacted and verbally requested to return superseded drawings.
1 Full compliance has been achieved.
2.
The drawing room clerk was instructed how to properly log the distribution and receipt of superseded drawings per procedure l
AD 1848.05.01. The requirements of AD 1828.13 have been met by the Office Supervisor meeting with the clerk and instructing her per the appropricte requirements.
e
a Docket No. 50-346 License No. NPF-3 Serial No. 1-117
~
Page 3 Closer supervision of the drawing room clerk and more frequent revied'of her records is serving to alleviate the problems iden-tified herein.
Continued supervision will serve to achieve full compliance with the applicable procedures.
Infraction: Technien1 Specifications 6.5.2.7.e states that "the CNRB shall review violations of codes, regulations orders Technical Specifications, license requirements, or of internal procedures or instructions having nuclear safety significance. Technical Specification 6.5.2.10.b states that " reports of reviews encompassed by section 6.5.2.7 shall be prepared. approved and forwarded to the Executive Vice President, Oper-ations and CNRB members within 14 days following completion of review."
Contrary to the above requirements, the inspector found that violations of Technical Specifications and regulations identified in NRC Inspec-tion Reports 50-346/79-02, 79-16, 79-19 and 79-29 were not reviewed by the CNRB as required.
Response
Following the inspection ending December 20, 1979 the CNRB Chairman, in Meeting #51, apprised the CNRB membership of areas cited by the NRC inspector as requiring additional attention by the CNRB, Further reviews of the issue were conducted in CNRB Meetings #53 and #54.
The responses to NRC Inspection Reports 50-346/79-02, 79-16, 79-19, and 79-29 have been issued to CNRB members for their review and discussion at the next CNRB meeting.
The CNRB Chairman has apprised the membership through discussions at CNRB Meetings #51, #53, and #54 of the CNRB review responsibilities setforth in the Davis-Besse Unit 1 Technical Specification and in the CNRB Charter.
In the future, responses to violations of Technical Specification and regulations identified in NRC Inspection Reports (which also cite the violation) will be issued to the CNRB members, and will subsequently be open for discussion at properly constituted CNRB meetings. CNRB action will be duly noted in CNRB meeting minutes, and appropriate reports made to the Toledo Edison President whose postion has superseded that of the Executive Vice President.
Action has been taken to assure distribution of future NRC Inspection Report responses to CNRB members.
The cited Inspection Report responses will be open for discussion at a CNRB meeting before March 28, 1980.
Yours very truly, R. P. Crouse Vice President, Nuclear RPC/TDM/DAH/ daw