ML090721095: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 18: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES
{{#Wiki_filter:March 12, 2009  
                                  NUC LE AR RE G UL AT O RY C O M M I S S I O N
                                                      R E GI ON I V
                                          612 EAST LAMAR BLVD , SU I TE 400
                                          AR LI N GTON , TEXAS 76011-4125
James R. Douet  
                                                March 12, 2009
Vice President Operations  
James R. Douet
Entergy Operations, Inc.  
Vice President Operations
Grand Gulf Nuclear Station  
Entergy Operations, Inc.
P.O. Box 756  
Grand Gulf Nuclear Station
Port Gibson, MS 39150
P.O. Box 756
Port Gibson, MS 39150
SUBJECT:  
SUBJECT:       GRAND GULF NUCLEAR STATION - NRC EXAMINATION REPORT
GRAND GULF NUCLEAR STATION - NRC EXAMINATION REPORT  
                05000416/2009301
05000416/2009301
Dear Mr. Douet:
On March 10, 2009, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed an examination
Dear Mr. Douet:  
at Grand Gulf Nuclear Station. The enclosed report documents the examination findings, which
were discussed on March 5, 2009, with yourself, Messrs. Jeremy Browning, Plant Manager,
On March 10, 2009, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed an examination  
Ernest Mathes, Assistant Operations Manager for Training, Jim Caery, Training Manager, and
at Grand Gulf Nuclear Station. The enclosed report documents the examination findings, which  
other members of your staff.
were discussed on March 5, 2009, with yourself, Messrs. Jeremy Browning, Plant Manager,  
The examination included the evaluation of two applicants for reactor operator licenses, two
Ernest Mathes, Assistant Operations Manager for Training, Jim Caery, Training Manager, and  
applicants for instant senior operator licenses, and two applicants for upgrade senior operator
other members of your staff.  
licenses. The written examinations and operating tests were developed using NUREG-1021,
"Operator Licensing Examination Standards for Power Reactors," Revision 9, Supplement 1.
The examination included the evaluation of two applicants for reactor operator licenses, two  
The license examiners determined that all applicants satisfied the requirements of 10 CFR
applicants for instant senior operator licenses, and two applicants for upgrade senior operator  
Part 55, and the appropriate licenses have been issued.
licenses. The written examinations and operating tests were developed using NUREG-1021,  
A licensee-identified Severity Level IV violation is listed in Section 4OA7 of this report. The
"Operator Licensing Examination Standards for Power Reactors," Revision 9, Supplement 1.
NRC is treating this violation as a non-cited violation consistent with Section VI.A.1 of the NRC
The license examiners determined that all applicants satisfied the requirements of 10 CFR
Enforcement Policy because it is a Severity Level IV violation and because it is entered into
Part 55, and the appropriate licenses have been issued.  
your corrective action program. If you contest this non-cited violation, you should provide a
response within 30 days of the date of this inspection report, with the basis for your denial, to
A licensee-identified Severity Level IV violation is listed in Section 4OA7 of this report. The  
the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN: Document Control Desk, Washington, D.C.
NRC is treating this violation as a non-cited violation consistent with Section VI.A.1 of the NRC  
20555-0001, with copies to the Regional Administrator, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
Enforcement Policy because it is a Severity Level IV violation and because it is entered into  
Region IV, 612 East Lamar Blvd., Suite 400, Arlington, Texas 76011; the Director, Office of
your corrective action program. If you contest this non-cited violation, you should provide a  
Enforcement, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001; and the
response within 30 days of the date of this inspection report, with the basis for your denial, to  
NRC Resident Inspector at Grand Gulf Nuclear Station.
the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN: Document Control Desk, Washington, D.C.  
20555-0001, with copies to the Regional Administrator, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission,  
Region IV, 612 East Lamar Blvd., Suite 400, Arlington, Texas 76011; the Director, Office of  
Enforcement, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001; and the  
NRC Resident Inspector at Grand Gulf Nuclear Station.  
UNITED STATES
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
R E GI ON  I V
612 EAST LAMAR BLVD, SUITE 400
ARLINGTON, TEXAS 76011-4125


Entergy Operations, Inc.                       -2-
Entergy Operations, Inc.  
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter and its
- 2 -  
enclosure will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document
Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRCs document system
(ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter and its  
rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).
enclosure will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document  
                                              Sincerely,
Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRCs document system  
                                              /RA/
(ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-
                                              BWStapleton for
rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).  
                                              Ryan E. Lantz, Chief
                                              Operations Branch
                                              Division of Reactor Safety
Docket: 50-416
License: NPF-29
Enclosure:
NRC Examination Report 05000416/2009301
  w/Attachment: Supplemental Information
Sincerely,
cc w/Enclosure:
Senior Vice President
Entergy Nuclear Operations
P. O. Box 31995
Jackson, MS 39286-1995
Senior Vice President and COO
Entergy Operations, Inc.
P. O. Box 31995
Jackson, MS 39286-1995
Vice President, Oversight
/RA/  
Entergy Services, Inc.
P. O. Box 31995
Jackson, MS 39286-1995
BWStapleton for  
Ryan E. Lantz, Chief  
Operations Branch  
Division of Reactor Safety  
Docket:   50-416  
License: NPF-29  
Enclosure:  
NRC Examination Report 05000416/2009301  
  w/Attachment: Supplemental Information  
cc w/Enclosure:  
Senior Vice President  
Entergy Nuclear Operations  
P. O. Box 31995  
Jackson, MS 39286-1995  
Senior Vice President and COO  
Entergy Operations, Inc.  
P. O. Box 31995  
Jackson, MS 39286-1995  
Vice President, Oversight  
Entergy Services, Inc.  
P. O. Box 31995  
Jackson, MS 39286-1995  


Entergy Operations, Inc.               -3-
Entergy Operations, Inc.  
Chief, Energy and Transportation Branch
- 3 -  
Environmental Compliance and
  Enforcement Division
Mississippi Department of
Chief, Energy and Transportation Branch  
Environmental Quality
Environmental Compliance and  
P. O. Box 10385
  Enforcement Division  
Jackson, MS 39289-0385
Mississippi Department of
President
  Environmental Quality  
Claiborne County
P. O. Box 10385  
Board of Supervisors
Jackson, MS 39289-0385  
510 Market Street
Port Gibson, MS 39150
President  
Senior Manager
Claiborne County  
Nuclear Safety & Licensing
Board of Supervisors  
Entergy Nuclear Operations
510 Market Street  
P. O. Box 31995
Port Gibson, MS 39150  
Jackson, MS 39286-1995
Manager, Licensing
Senior Manager  
Entergy Operations, Inc.
Nuclear Safety & Licensing  
Grand Gulf Nuclear Station
Entergy Nuclear Operations  
P. . Box 756
P. O. Box 31995  
Port Gibson, MS 39150
Jackson, MS 39286-1995  
Attorney General
Department of Justice
Manager, Licensing  
State of Louisiana
Entergy Operations, Inc.  
P. O. Box 94005
Grand Gulf Nuclear Station  
Baton Rouge, LA 70804-9005
P. . Box 756  
Office of the Governor
Port Gibson, MS 39150  
State of Mississippi
P.O. Box 139
Attorney General  
Jackson, MS 39205
Department of Justice  
Attorney General
State of Louisiana  
Assistant Attorney General
P. O. Box 94005  
State of Mississippi
Baton Rouge, LA 70804-9005
P. O. Box 220
Jackson, MS 39205
Office of the Governor  
State of Mississippi  
P.O. Box 139  
Jackson, MS 39205  
Attorney General  
Assistant Attorney General  
State of Mississippi  
P. O. Box 220  
Jackson, MS 39205  


Entergy Operations, Inc.                 -4-
Entergy Operations, Inc.  
State Health Officer
- 4 -  
State Health Board
P. O. Box 1700
Jackson, MS 39215
State Health Officer  
Associate General Counsel
State Health Board  
Entergy Nuclear Operations
P. O. Box 1700  
P. O. Box 31995
Jackson, MS 39215
Jackson, MS 39286-1995
Louisiana Dept. of Environmental Quality
Associate General Counsel  
Radiological Emergency Planning and
Entergy Nuclear Operations  
  Response Division
P. O. Box 31995  
P. O. Box 4312
Jackson, MS 39286-1995  
Baton Rouge, LA 70821-4312
Louisiana Dept. of Environmental Quality  
Radiological Emergency Planning and  
  Response Division  
P. O. Box 4312  
Baton Rouge, LA 70821-4312  


Entergy Operations, Inc.                           -5-
Entergy Operations, Inc.  
Electronic distribution by RIV:
- 5 -  
Regional Administrator (Elmo.Collins@nrc.gov)
Deputy Regional Administrator (Chuck.Casto@nrc.gov)
DRP Director (Dwight.Chamberlain@nrc.gov)
Electronic distribution by RIV:  
DRP Deputy Director (Anton.Vegel@nrc.gov)
Regional Administrator (Elmo.Collins@nrc.gov)  
DRS Director (Roy.Caniano@nrc.gov)
Deputy Regional Administrator (Chuck.Casto@nrc.gov)  
DRS Deputy Director (Troy.Pruett@nrc.gov)
DRP Director (Dwight.Chamberlain@nrc.gov)  
Senior Resident Inspector Rich.Smith@nrc.gov)
DRP Deputy Director (Anton.Vegel@nrc.gov)  
Resident Inspector (Andy.Barrett@nrc.gov)
DRS Director (Roy.Caniano@nrc.gov)  
Branch Chief, DRP/C (Geoffrey.Miller@nrc.gov)
DRS Deputy Director (Troy.Pruett@nrc.gov)  
Senior Project Engineer, DRP/C (Wayne.Walker@nrc.gov)
Senior Resident Inspector Rich.Smith@nrc.gov)  
GG Site Secretary (Nancy.Spivey@nrc.gov)
Resident Inspector (Andy.Barrett@nrc.gov)  
Public Affairs Officer (Victor.Dricks@nrc.gov)
Branch Chief, DRP/C (Geoffrey.Miller@nrc.gov)  
Team Leader, DRP/TSS (Chuck.Paulk@nrc.gov)
Senior Project Engineer, DRP/C (Wayne.Walker@nrc.gov)  
RITS Coordinator (Marisa.Herrera@nrc.gov)
GG Site Secretary (Nancy.Spivey@nrc.gov)  
ML
Public Affairs Officer (Victor.Dricks@nrc.gov)  
SUNSI Rev Compl.         Yes     No   ADAMS       Yes No       Reviewer Initials   GWA
Team Leader, DRP/TSS (Chuck.Paulk@nrc.gov)  
Publicly Avail           Yes     No   Sensitive     Yes  No   Sens. Type Initials GWA
RITS Coordinator (Marisa.Herrera@nrc.gov)  
OE:OB             OE:OB           SOE:OB         SOE:OB       C:PBC           C:OB
GWApger           SHedger         BTLarson       SGarchow     GMiller         RELantz
/RA/             /RA/             /RA/           /RA/         /RA/           /RA/
03/11/09         03/11/09         03/11/09       03/11/09     03/11/09       03/12/09
OFFICIAL RECORD COPY                                   T=Telephone       E=E-mail     F=Fax
ML  
SUNSI Rev Compl.  
Yes No  
ADAMS  
Yes No  
Reviewer Initials  
GWA  
Publicly Avail  
Yes No  
Sensitive  
Yes  No  
Sens. Type Initials  
GWA  
OE:OB  
OE:OB  
SOE:OB  
SOE:OB  
C:PBC  
C:OB  
GWApger  
SHedger  
BTLarson  
SGarchow  
GMiller  
RELantz  
/RA/  
/RA/  
/RA/  
/RA/
/RA/
/RA/  
03/11/09  
03/11/09  
03/11/09  
03/11/09  
03/11/09  
03/12/09  
OFFICIAL RECORD COPY
T=Telephone           E=E-mail       F=Fax  


                U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
                                  REGION IV
Docket:     50-416
- 1 -
Licenses:   NPF-29
Enclosure
Report No.: 05000416/2009301
Licensee:   Entergy Operations, Inc.
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION  
Facility:   Grand Gulf Nuclear Station
            Waterloo Road
REGION IV  
Location:
            Port Gibson, Mississippi 39150
Docket:  
Dates:       March 3 - 10, 2009
50-416  
Inspectors: Steve Garchow (Chief Examiner)
Licenses:  
            Gabriel Apger (Examiner, Chief Examiner Under Instruction)
NPF-29  
            Brian Larson (Examiner)
Report No.:  
            Sean Hedger (Examiner Under Instruction)
05000416/2009301  
Approved By: Ryan E. Lantz
Licensee:  
                                        -1-                            Enclosure
Entergy Operations, Inc.  
Facility:  
Grand Gulf Nuclear Station  
Location:
Waterloo Road
Port Gibson, Mississippi 39150  
Dates:  
March 3 - 10, 2009  
Inspectors:  
Steve Garchow (Chief Examiner)  
Gabriel Apger (Examiner, Chief Examiner Under Instruction)  
Brian Larson (Examiner)  
Sean Hedger (Examiner Under Instruction)  
Approved By:  
Ryan E. Lantz  


                                    SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
ER05000416/2009301; March 3-10, 2009; Grand Gulf Nuclear Station; Initial Operator
Licensing Examination Report.
- 2 -
NRC examiners evaluated the competency of two applicants for reactor operator licenses, two
Enclosure
applicants for instant senior operator licenses, and two applicants for upgrade senior operator
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS  
licenses at Grand Gulf Nuclear Station.
The licensee developed the examinations using NUREG-1021, "Operator Licensing
ER05000416/2009301; March 3-10, 2009; Grand Gulf Nuclear Station; Initial Operator  
Examination Standards for Power Reactors," Revision 9, Supplement 1. The written
Licensing Examination Report.  
examinations were administered by the licensee on March 9, 2009. NRC examiners
administered the operating tests on March 3 - 5, 2009.
NRC examiners evaluated the competency of two applicants for reactor operator licenses, two  
The examiners determined that all applicants satisfied the requirements of 10 CFR Part 55, and
applicants for instant senior operator licenses, and two applicants for upgrade senior operator  
the appropriate licenses have been issued.
licenses at Grand Gulf Nuclear Station.  
A.     NRC-Identified and Self-Revealing Findings
        No findings of significance were identified.
The licensee developed the examinations using NUREG-1021, "Operator Licensing  
B.     Licensee-Identified Violations
Examination Standards for Power Reactors," Revision 9, Supplement 1. The written  
        A licensee identified Severity Level IV non-cited violation has been reviewed by the
examinations were administered by the licensee on March 9, 2009. NRC examiners  
        examiners. Corrective actions taken or planned by the licensee have been entered into
administered the operating tests on March 3 - 5, 2009.  
        the licensees corrective action program. This violation and its corrective action tracking
        numbers are listed in Section 4OA7 of this report.
The examiners determined that all applicants satisfied the requirements of 10 CFR Part 55, and  
                                                    -2-                                  Enclosure
the appropriate licenses have been issued.  
A.  
NRC-Identified and Self-Revealing Findings  
No findings of significance were identified.  
B.
Licensee-Identified Violations  
A licensee identified Severity Level IV non-cited violation has been reviewed by the  
examiners. Corrective actions taken or planned by the licensee have been entered into  
the licensees corrective action program. This violation and its corrective action tracking  
numbers are listed in Section 4OA7 of this report.  


                                        REPORT DETAILS
4.     OTHER ACTIVITIES (OA)
4OA5 Other Activities (Initial Operator License Examination)
- 3 -
  .1   License Applications
Enclosure
    a. Scope
REPORT DETAILS  
      NRC examiners reviewed all license applications submitted to ensure each applicant
      satisfied relevant license eligibility requirements. Examiners also audited three of the
4.  
      license applications in detail to confirm that they accurately reflected the subject
OTHER ACTIVITIES (OA)  
      applicants qualifications. This audit focused on the applicants experience and on-the-
      job training, including control manipulations that provided significant reactivity changes.
    b. Findings
      No findings of significance were identified.
.2     Examination Development
    a. Scope
      NRC examiners developed the outlines, written examinations and portions of the
      operating tests. The NRC staff submitted the operating test outlines and test material to
4OA5 Other Activities (Initial Operator License Examination)  
      the licensee to validate and finalize for submittal as draft operating tests. NRC
      examiners reviewed the draft operating tests submitted by the licensee against the
  .1  
      requirements in NUREG-1021.
License Applications  
    b. Findings
      NRC examiners provided draft examination and post-validation comments to the
      licensee. The licensee satisfactorily completed comment resolution prior to examination
a.  
      administration.
Scope  
      NRC examiners determined that the draft operating tests submitted by the licensee did
      not meet the requirements of NUREG-1021. Specifically, the simulator scenario
NRC examiners reviewed all license applications submitted to ensure each applicant  
      Applicants Actions portion of the Form ES-D-2 did not contain sufficient detail. Errors
satisfied relevant license eligibility requirements. Examiners also audited three of the  
      in identifying malfunctions were found. The job performance measures were not
license applications in detail to confirm that they accurately reflected the subject  
      validated, and they contained numerous technical, formatting and grammatical errors. A
applicants qualifications. This audit focused on the applicants experience and on-the-
      contributing factor is the licensee replaced the operating test developer two weeks
job training, including control manipulations that provided significant reactivity changes.  
      before on-site validation, and had no process in place to ensure the developer
      effectively implemented the requirements of NUREG-1021.
                                                    -3-                                  Enclosure
b.  
Findings  
No findings of significance were identified.  
.2  
Examination Development  
a.  
Scope  
NRC examiners developed the outlines, written examinations and portions of the  
operating tests. The NRC staff submitted the operating test outlines and test material to  
the licensee to validate and finalize for submittal as draft operating tests. NRC  
examiners reviewed the draft operating tests submitted by the licensee against the  
requirements in NUREG-1021.  
b.  
Findings  
NRC examiners provided draft examination and post-validation comments to the  
licensee. The licensee satisfactorily completed comment resolution prior to examination  
administration.  
NRC examiners determined that the draft operating tests submitted by the licensee did  
not meet the requirements of NUREG-1021. Specifically, the simulator scenario  
Applicants Actions portion of the Form ES-D-2 did not contain sufficient detail. Errors  
in identifying malfunctions were found. The job performance measures were not  
validated, and they contained numerous technical, formatting and grammatical errors. A  
contributing factor is the licensee replaced the operating test developer two weeks  
before on-site validation, and had no process in place to ensure the developer  
effectively implemented the requirements of NUREG-1021.  


.3   Operator Knowledge and Performance
  a. Scope
      On March 9, 2009, the licensee proctored the administration of the written examinations
- 4 -
      to all six applicants. The licensee staff graded the written examinations, analyzed the
Enclosure
      results, and presented their analysis to the NRC on March 10, 2009.
.3  
      The NRC examination team administered the various portions of the operating tests to
Operator Knowledge and Performance  
      all applicants on March 3 - 5, 2009.
  b. Findings
      No findings of significance were identified.
a.  
      All applicants passed the written examination and all parts of the operating test. The
Scope  
      final written examinations, operating tests and post-examination analysis can be
      accessed in the ADAMS system under the accession numbers noted in the attachment.
On March 9, 2009, the licensee proctored the administration of the written examinations  
      There were no post-examination comments as indicated in a letter received from the
to all six applicants. The licensee staff graded the written examinations, analyzed the  
      licensee, dated March 9, 2009.
results, and presented their analysis to the NRC on March 10, 2009.  
.4   Simulation Facility Performance
  a. Scope
The NRC examination team administered the various portions of the operating tests to  
      The NRC examiners observed simulator performance with regard to plant fidelity during
all applicants on March 3 - 5, 2009.
      examination validation and administration.
  b. Findings
      No findings of significance were identified.
b.  
.5   Examination Security
Findings  
  a. Scope
      The NRC examiners reviewed examination security for examination development during
No findings of significance were identified.  
      both the onsite preparation week and examination administration week for compliance
      with 10 CFR 55.49 and NUREG-1021. Plans for simulator security and applicant control
All applicants passed the written examination and all parts of the operating test. The  
      were reviewed and discussed with licensee personnel.
final written examinations, operating tests and post-examination analysis can be  
  b. Findings
accessed in the ADAMS system under the accession numbers noted in the attachment.
      A compromise of the simulator scenario portion of the operating test occurred during
There were no post-examination comments as indicated in a letter received from the  
      examination development that resulted in the licensee-identified non-cited violation
licensee, dated March 9, 2009.  
      documented in section 4OA7 of this report. The finding is being treated under traditional
      enforcement because the violation, if not found or corrected, had the potential to impede
.4  
      the NRCs regulatory function. Specifically, licensing decisions could have been made
Simulation Facility Performance  
      based on an invalid and compromised examination. To ensure a valid examination, the
      following changes were made to the simulator scenario portion of the operating test:
                                                  -4-                                Enclosure
a.  
Scope  
The NRC examiners observed simulator performance with regard to plant fidelity during  
examination validation and administration.  
b.  
Findings  
No findings of significance were identified.  
.5  
Examination Security  
a.  
Scope  
The NRC examiners reviewed examination security for examination development during  
both the onsite preparation week and examination administration week for compliance  
with 10 CFR 55.49 and NUREG-1021. Plans for simulator security and applicant control  
were reviewed and discussed with licensee personnel.
b.  
Findings  
A compromise of the simulator scenario portion of the operating test occurred during  
examination development that resulted in the licensee-identified non-cited violation  
documented in section 4OA7 of this report. The finding is being treated under traditional  
enforcement because the violation, if not found or corrected, had the potential to impede  
the NRCs regulatory function. Specifically, licensing decisions could have been made  
based on an invalid and compromised examination. To ensure a valid examination, the  
following changes were made to the simulator scenario portion of the operating test:  


        *   All four scenarios were removed from the examination, and
        *   Two new scenarios were developed by the NRC and the facility during the onsite
            validation week. There was no overlap with any of the removed scenarios.
- 5 -
4OA6 Meetings, Including Exit
Enclosure
    The chief examiner presented the preliminary examination results to Mr. James R.
    Douet and members of his staff on March 5, 2009. A telephonic exit was conducted on
*  
    March 11, 2009 between Messrs. Gabriel Apger, Examiner, and Bruce Bryant,
All four scenarios were removed from the examination, and  
    Operations Training Superintendant, Initial.
    The licensee did not identify any information or materials used during the examination
*  
    as proprietary.
Two new scenarios were developed by the NRC and the facility during the onsite  
4OA7 Licensee Identified Violations
validation week. There was no overlap with any of the removed scenarios.  
    The following Severity Level IV violation was identified by the licensee and is a violation
    of NRC requirements that meets the criteria of Section VI of the Enforcement Policy,
4OA6 Meetings, Including Exit  
    NUREG 1600, for being dispositioned as a Non-Cited Violation.
          *   10CFR55.49 states in part: Applicants, licensees, and facility licensees shall
The chief examiner presented the preliminary examination results to Mr. James R.  
              not engage in any activity that compromises the integrity of any application, test,
Douet and members of his staff on March 5, 2009. A telephonic exit was conducted on  
              or examination required by this part. The integrity of a test or examination is
March 11, 2009 between Messrs. Gabriel Apger, Examiner, and Bruce Bryant,  
              considered compromised if any activity, regardless of intent, affected, or, but for
Operations Training Superintendant, Initial.  
              detection, would have affected the equitable and consistent administration of
              the test or examination. Contrary to the above, during scenario development in
The licensee did not identify any information or materials used during the examination  
              December of 2008, the facility licensee left unsecured examination scenario
as proprietary.  
              paperwork on the simulator printer. The paperwork for one of the four scenarios
              was discovered by a facility licensee contractor on January 27, 2009 during
4OA7 Licensee Identified Violations  
              onsite validation with the NRC examination team. The facility licensee
              immediately reported this to the NRC chief examiner and entered this into their
The following Severity Level IV violation was identified by the licensee and is a violation  
              corrective action program under CR-CGN-2009-00388. Because the paperwork
of NRC requirements that meets the criteria of Section VI of the Enforcement Policy,  
              was left on the printer for approximately one month; the facility licensee could
NUREG 1600, for being dispositioned as a Non-Cited Violation.  
              not definitively determine that the other three scenarios had not been printed;
              and applicants were inside the simulator within eyesight of the printer, the NRC
*  
              Chief Examiner determined that the integrity of the simulator scenario portion of
10CFR55.49 states in part: Applicants, licensees, and facility licensees shall  
              the examination had been compromised. This is a Severity Level IV violation
not engage in any activity that compromises the integrity of any application, test,  
              because it was a unintentional compromise of the examination, it was
or examination required by this part. The integrity of a test or examination is  
              discovered and reported by the licensee, and the compromised portion of the
considered compromised if any activity, regardless of intent, affected, or, but for  
              examination was replaced prior to making licensing decisions.
detection, would have affected the equitable and consistent administration of  
ATTACHMENT: SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
the test or examination. Contrary to the above, during scenario development in  
                                                  -5-                                  Enclosure
December of 2008, the facility licensee left unsecured examination scenario  
paperwork on the simulator printer. The paperwork for one of the four scenarios  
was discovered by a facility licensee contractor on January 27, 2009 during  
onsite validation with the NRC examination team. The facility licensee  
immediately reported this to the NRC chief examiner and entered this into their  
corrective action program under CR-CGN-2009-00388. Because the paperwork  
was left on the printer for approximately one month; the facility licensee could  
not definitively determine that the other three scenarios had not been printed;  
and applicants were inside the simulator within eyesight of the printer, the NRC  
Chief Examiner determined that the integrity of the simulator scenario portion of  
the examination had been compromised. This is a Severity Level IV violation  
because it was a unintentional compromise of the examination, it was  
discovered and reported by the licensee, and the compromised portion of the  
examination was replaced prior to making licensing decisions.  
ATTACHMENT: SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION


                              SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
                                KEY POINTS OF CONTACT
Licensee Personnel
A-1
Randy Douet, Site Vice President
Attachment
Jeremy Browning, Plant Manager
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION  
Jim Caery, Training Manager
Ernest Mathes, Assistant Operations Manager, Training
KEY POINTS OF CONTACT  
Charles Roberts, Operations Training Superintendant, Requalification
Bruce Bryant, Operations Training Superintendant, Initial
Licensee Personnel  
Rita Jackson, Licensing
Randy Douet, Site Vice President
Will Ryder, Exam Team
Jeremy Browning, Plant Manager
Kyle Grillis, Exam Team
Jim Caery, Training Manager  
NRC Personnel
Ernest Mathes, Assistant Operations Manager, Training
Richard Smith, Senior Resident Inspector
Charles Roberts, Operations Training Superintendant, Requalification  
                          ADAMS DOCUMENTS REFERENCED
Bruce Bryant, Operations Training Superintendant, Initial  
Accession No. ML090700248 - FINAL WRITTEN EXAMS
Rita Jackson, Licensing  
Accession No. ML090700228 - FINAL OP TEST
Will Ryder, Exam Team  
Kyle Grillis, Exam Team
NRC Personnel  
Richard Smith, Senior Resident Inspector  
ADAMS DOCUMENTS REFERENCED  
Accession No. ML090700248 - FINAL WRITTEN EXAMS  
Accession No. ML090700228 - FINAL OP TEST  
Accession No. ML090700256 - POST EXAM COMMENTS-ANALYSIS
Accession No. ML090700256 - POST EXAM COMMENTS-ANALYSIS
                                            A-1                    Attachment
}}
}}

Latest revision as of 12:50, 14 January 2025

Er 05000416-09-301; March 3-10, 2009; Grand Gulf Nuclear Station; Initial Operator Licensing Examination Report
ML090721095
Person / Time
Site: Grand Gulf Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 03/12/2009
From: Ryan Lantz
Operations Branch IV
To: Douet J
Entergy Operations
References
ER-09-301 50-416/09-301
Download: ML090721095 (11)


See also: IR 05000416/2009301

Text

March 12, 2009

James R. Douet

Vice President Operations

Entergy Operations, Inc.

Grand Gulf Nuclear Station

P.O. Box 756

Port Gibson, MS 39150

SUBJECT:

GRAND GULF NUCLEAR STATION - NRC EXAMINATION REPORT

05000416/2009301

Dear Mr. Douet:

On March 10, 2009, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed an examination

at Grand Gulf Nuclear Station. The enclosed report documents the examination findings, which

were discussed on March 5, 2009, with yourself, Messrs. Jeremy Browning, Plant Manager,

Ernest Mathes, Assistant Operations Manager for Training, Jim Caery, Training Manager, and

other members of your staff.

The examination included the evaluation of two applicants for reactor operator licenses, two

applicants for instant senior operator licenses, and two applicants for upgrade senior operator

licenses. The written examinations and operating tests were developed using NUREG-1021,

"Operator Licensing Examination Standards for Power Reactors," Revision 9, Supplement 1.

The license examiners determined that all applicants satisfied the requirements of 10 CFR

Part 55, and the appropriate licenses have been issued.

A licensee-identified Severity Level IV violation is listed in Section 4OA7 of this report. The

NRC is treating this violation as a non-cited violation consistent with Section VI.A.1 of the NRC

Enforcement Policy because it is a Severity Level IV violation and because it is entered into

your corrective action program. If you contest this non-cited violation, you should provide a

response within 30 days of the date of this inspection report, with the basis for your denial, to

the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN: Document Control Desk, Washington, D.C.

20555-0001, with copies to the Regional Administrator, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission,

Region IV, 612 East Lamar Blvd., Suite 400, Arlington, Texas 76011; the Director, Office of

Enforcement, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001; and the

NRC Resident Inspector at Grand Gulf Nuclear Station.

UNITED STATES

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

R E GI ON I V

612 EAST LAMAR BLVD, SUITE 400

ARLINGTON, TEXAS 76011-4125

Entergy Operations, Inc.

- 2 -

In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter and its

enclosure will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document

Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRCs document system

(ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-

rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).

Sincerely,

/RA/

BWStapleton for

Ryan E. Lantz, Chief

Operations Branch

Division of Reactor Safety

Docket: 50-416

License: NPF-29

Enclosure:

NRC Examination Report 05000416/2009301

w/Attachment: Supplemental Information

cc w/Enclosure:

Senior Vice President

Entergy Nuclear Operations

P. O. Box 31995

Jackson, MS 39286-1995

Senior Vice President and COO

Entergy Operations, Inc.

P. O. Box 31995

Jackson, MS 39286-1995

Vice President, Oversight

Entergy Services, Inc.

P. O. Box 31995

Jackson, MS 39286-1995

Entergy Operations, Inc.

- 3 -

Chief, Energy and Transportation Branch

Environmental Compliance and

Enforcement Division

Mississippi Department of

Environmental Quality

P. O. Box 10385

Jackson, MS 39289-0385

President

Claiborne County

Board of Supervisors

510 Market Street

Port Gibson, MS 39150

Senior Manager

Nuclear Safety & Licensing

Entergy Nuclear Operations

P. O. Box 31995

Jackson, MS 39286-1995

Manager, Licensing

Entergy Operations, Inc.

Grand Gulf Nuclear Station

P. . Box 756

Port Gibson, MS 39150

Attorney General

Department of Justice

State of Louisiana

P. O. Box 94005

Baton Rouge, LA 70804-9005

Office of the Governor

State of Mississippi

P.O. Box 139

Jackson, MS 39205

Attorney General

Assistant Attorney General

State of Mississippi

P. O. Box 220

Jackson, MS 39205

Entergy Operations, Inc.

- 4 -

State Health Officer

State Health Board

P. O. Box 1700

Jackson, MS 39215

Associate General Counsel

Entergy Nuclear Operations

P. O. Box 31995

Jackson, MS 39286-1995

Louisiana Dept. of Environmental Quality

Radiological Emergency Planning and

Response Division

P. O. Box 4312

Baton Rouge, LA 70821-4312

Entergy Operations, Inc.

- 5 -

Electronic distribution by RIV:

Regional Administrator (Elmo.Collins@nrc.gov)

Deputy Regional Administrator (Chuck.Casto@nrc.gov)

DRP Director (Dwight.Chamberlain@nrc.gov)

DRP Deputy Director (Anton.Vegel@nrc.gov)

DRS Director (Roy.Caniano@nrc.gov)

DRS Deputy Director (Troy.Pruett@nrc.gov)

Senior Resident Inspector Rich.Smith@nrc.gov)

Resident Inspector (Andy.Barrett@nrc.gov)

Branch Chief, DRP/C (Geoffrey.Miller@nrc.gov)

Senior Project Engineer, DRP/C (Wayne.Walker@nrc.gov)

GG Site Secretary (Nancy.Spivey@nrc.gov)

Public Affairs Officer (Victor.Dricks@nrc.gov)

Team Leader, DRP/TSS (Chuck.Paulk@nrc.gov)

RITS Coordinator (Marisa.Herrera@nrc.gov)

ML

SUNSI Rev Compl.

Yes No

ADAMS

Yes No

Reviewer Initials

GWA

Publicly Avail

Yes No

Sensitive

Yes No

Sens. Type Initials

GWA

OE:OB

OE:OB

SOE:OB

SOE:OB

C:PBC

C:OB

GWApger

SHedger

BTLarson

SGarchow

GMiller

RELantz

/RA/

/RA/

/RA/

/RA/

/RA/

/RA/

03/11/09

03/11/09

03/11/09

03/11/09

03/11/09

03/12/09

OFFICIAL RECORD COPY

T=Telephone E=E-mail F=Fax

- 1 -

Enclosure

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

REGION IV

Docket:

50-416

Licenses:

NPF-29

Report No.:

05000416/2009301

Licensee:

Entergy Operations, Inc.

Facility:

Grand Gulf Nuclear Station

Location:

Waterloo Road

Port Gibson, Mississippi 39150

Dates:

March 3 - 10, 2009

Inspectors:

Steve Garchow (Chief Examiner)

Gabriel Apger (Examiner, Chief Examiner Under Instruction)

Brian Larson (Examiner)

Sean Hedger (Examiner Under Instruction)

Approved By:

Ryan E. Lantz

- 2 -

Enclosure

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS

ER05000416/2009301; March 3-10, 2009; Grand Gulf Nuclear Station; Initial Operator

Licensing Examination Report.

NRC examiners evaluated the competency of two applicants for reactor operator licenses, two

applicants for instant senior operator licenses, and two applicants for upgrade senior operator

licenses at Grand Gulf Nuclear Station.

The licensee developed the examinations using NUREG-1021, "Operator Licensing

Examination Standards for Power Reactors," Revision 9, Supplement 1. The written

examinations were administered by the licensee on March 9, 2009. NRC examiners

administered the operating tests on March 3 - 5, 2009.

The examiners determined that all applicants satisfied the requirements of 10 CFR Part 55, and

the appropriate licenses have been issued.

A.

NRC-Identified and Self-Revealing Findings

No findings of significance were identified.

B.

Licensee-Identified Violations

A licensee identified Severity Level IV non-cited violation has been reviewed by the

examiners. Corrective actions taken or planned by the licensee have been entered into

the licensees corrective action program. This violation and its corrective action tracking

numbers are listed in Section 4OA7 of this report.

- 3 -

Enclosure

REPORT DETAILS

4.

OTHER ACTIVITIES (OA)

4OA5 Other Activities (Initial Operator License Examination)

.1

License Applications

a.

Scope

NRC examiners reviewed all license applications submitted to ensure each applicant

satisfied relevant license eligibility requirements. Examiners also audited three of the

license applications in detail to confirm that they accurately reflected the subject

applicants qualifications. This audit focused on the applicants experience and on-the-

job training, including control manipulations that provided significant reactivity changes.

b.

Findings

No findings of significance were identified.

.2

Examination Development

a.

Scope

NRC examiners developed the outlines, written examinations and portions of the

operating tests. The NRC staff submitted the operating test outlines and test material to

the licensee to validate and finalize for submittal as draft operating tests. NRC

examiners reviewed the draft operating tests submitted by the licensee against the

requirements in NUREG-1021.

b.

Findings

NRC examiners provided draft examination and post-validation comments to the

licensee. The licensee satisfactorily completed comment resolution prior to examination

administration.

NRC examiners determined that the draft operating tests submitted by the licensee did

not meet the requirements of NUREG-1021. Specifically, the simulator scenario

Applicants Actions portion of the Form ES-D-2 did not contain sufficient detail. Errors

in identifying malfunctions were found. The job performance measures were not

validated, and they contained numerous technical, formatting and grammatical errors. A

contributing factor is the licensee replaced the operating test developer two weeks

before on-site validation, and had no process in place to ensure the developer

effectively implemented the requirements of NUREG-1021.

- 4 -

Enclosure

.3

Operator Knowledge and Performance

a.

Scope

On March 9, 2009, the licensee proctored the administration of the written examinations

to all six applicants. The licensee staff graded the written examinations, analyzed the

results, and presented their analysis to the NRC on March 10, 2009.

The NRC examination team administered the various portions of the operating tests to

all applicants on March 3 - 5, 2009.

b.

Findings

No findings of significance were identified.

All applicants passed the written examination and all parts of the operating test. The

final written examinations, operating tests and post-examination analysis can be

accessed in the ADAMS system under the accession numbers noted in the attachment.

There were no post-examination comments as indicated in a letter received from the

licensee, dated March 9, 2009.

.4

Simulation Facility Performance

a.

Scope

The NRC examiners observed simulator performance with regard to plant fidelity during

examination validation and administration.

b.

Findings

No findings of significance were identified.

.5

Examination Security

a.

Scope

The NRC examiners reviewed examination security for examination development during

both the onsite preparation week and examination administration week for compliance

with 10 CFR 55.49 and NUREG-1021. Plans for simulator security and applicant control

were reviewed and discussed with licensee personnel.

b.

Findings

A compromise of the simulator scenario portion of the operating test occurred during

examination development that resulted in the licensee-identified non-cited violation

documented in section 4OA7 of this report. The finding is being treated under traditional

enforcement because the violation, if not found or corrected, had the potential to impede

the NRCs regulatory function. Specifically, licensing decisions could have been made

based on an invalid and compromised examination. To ensure a valid examination, the

following changes were made to the simulator scenario portion of the operating test:

- 5 -

Enclosure

All four scenarios were removed from the examination, and

Two new scenarios were developed by the NRC and the facility during the onsite

validation week. There was no overlap with any of the removed scenarios.

4OA6 Meetings, Including Exit

The chief examiner presented the preliminary examination results to Mr. James R.

Douet and members of his staff on March 5, 2009. A telephonic exit was conducted on

March 11, 2009 between Messrs. Gabriel Apger, Examiner, and Bruce Bryant,

Operations Training Superintendant, Initial.

The licensee did not identify any information or materials used during the examination

as proprietary.

4OA7 Licensee Identified Violations

The following Severity Level IV violation was identified by the licensee and is a violation

of NRC requirements that meets the criteria of Section VI of the Enforcement Policy,

NUREG 1600, for being dispositioned as a Non-Cited Violation.

10CFR55.49 states in part: Applicants, licensees, and facility licensees shall

not engage in any activity that compromises the integrity of any application, test,

or examination required by this part. The integrity of a test or examination is

considered compromised if any activity, regardless of intent, affected, or, but for

detection, would have affected the equitable and consistent administration of

the test or examination. Contrary to the above, during scenario development in

December of 2008, the facility licensee left unsecured examination scenario

paperwork on the simulator printer. The paperwork for one of the four scenarios

was discovered by a facility licensee contractor on January 27, 2009 during

onsite validation with the NRC examination team. The facility licensee

immediately reported this to the NRC chief examiner and entered this into their

corrective action program under CR-CGN-2009-00388. Because the paperwork

was left on the printer for approximately one month; the facility licensee could

not definitively determine that the other three scenarios had not been printed;

and applicants were inside the simulator within eyesight of the printer, the NRC

Chief Examiner determined that the integrity of the simulator scenario portion of

the examination had been compromised. This is a Severity Level IV violation

because it was a unintentional compromise of the examination, it was

discovered and reported by the licensee, and the compromised portion of the

examination was replaced prior to making licensing decisions.

ATTACHMENT: SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION

A-1

Attachment

SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION

KEY POINTS OF CONTACT

Licensee Personnel

Randy Douet, Site Vice President

Jeremy Browning, Plant Manager

Jim Caery, Training Manager

Ernest Mathes, Assistant Operations Manager, Training

Charles Roberts, Operations Training Superintendant, Requalification

Bruce Bryant, Operations Training Superintendant, Initial

Rita Jackson, Licensing

Will Ryder, Exam Team

Kyle Grillis, Exam Team

NRC Personnel

Richard Smith, Senior Resident Inspector

ADAMS DOCUMENTS REFERENCED

Accession No. ML090700248 - FINAL WRITTEN EXAMS

Accession No. ML090700228 - FINAL OP TEST

Accession No. ML090700256 - POST EXAM COMMENTS-ANALYSIS