ML18153B049: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
| number = ML18153B049
| number = ML18153B049
| issue date = 08/30/1994
| issue date = 08/30/1994
| title = Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-32 & DPR-37,revising TS to Accomodate Core Uprating,In Accordance w/WCAP-10263, Review Plan for Uprating Licensed Power of PWR Power Plant.
| title = Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-32 & DPR-37,revising TS to Accomodate Core Uprating,In Accordance w/WCAP-10263, Review Plan for Uprating Licensed Power of PWR Power Plant
| author name = Ohanlon J
| author name = Ohanlon J
| author affiliation = VIRGINIA POWER (VIRGINIA ELECTRIC & POWER CO.)
| author affiliation = VIRGINIA POWER (VIRGINIA ELECTRIC & POWER CO.)
Line 19: Line 19:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:- ---- i
{{#Wiki_filter:'
.... *- '.....
e VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY RICHMOND, VIRGINIA 23261 August 30, 1994 United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attention: Document Control Desk Washington, D. C. 20555 Gentlemen:
* VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY RICHMOND, VIRGINIA 23261 e
VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY Serial No.
August 30, 1994 United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission             Serial No. 94-509 Attention: Document Control Desk                         NL&P/CGL      RO' Washington, D. C. 20555                                   Docket Nos. 50-280 50-281 License Nos. DPR-32 DPR-37 Gentlemen:
NL&P/CGL Docket Nos.
VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY SURRY POWER STATION UNITS 1 AND 2 PROPOSED TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION CHANGES TO ACCOMMODATE CORE UPRATING Pursuant to 10CFR50.90, the Virginia Electric and Power Company requests changes to the Operating License Nos. DPR-32 and DPR-37 and the Technical Specifications for Surry Power Station Units 1 and 2, respectively. The proposed changes and the supporting documentation will accommodate plant operation at an uprated reactor core power level of 2546 MWt. This is an increase of approximately 4.3% from the currently licensed power level of 2441 MWt. The proposed changes are included as Attachment 1. The supporting documentation for this request has been prepared in accordance with Westinghouse Topical Report WCAP-10263, entitled "A Review Plan for Uprating the Licensed Power of a Pressurized Water Reactor Power Plant," and utilizes NRG-approved methodology.
License Nos.
The proposed changes and the supporting documentation have been reviewed and approved by the Station Nuclear Safety and Operating Committee and the Management Safety Review Committee. It has been determined that the proposed changes and the supporting documentation do involve an unreviewed safety question as defined in 10CFR50.59, which requires NRC review prior to implementation. It has also been determined that the proposed changes do not create a significant hazards consideration as defined in 10CFR50.92. A discussion of the proposed changes and the bases for these determinations are included in Attachment 2. Supporting documentation for the proposed changes is contained in the Surry Core Uprate Licensing Report (Attachment 3).
SURRY POWER STATION UNITS 1 AND 2 PROPOSED TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION CHANGES TO ACCOMMODATE CORE UPRATING 94-509 RO' 50-280 50-281 DPR-32 DPR-37 Pursuant to 1 OCFR50.90, the Virginia Electric and Power Company requests changes to the Operating License Nos. DPR-32 and DPR-37 and the Technical Specifications for Surry Power Station Units 1 and 2, respectively. The proposed changes and the supporting documentation will accommodate plant operation at an uprated reactor core power level of 2546 MWt. This is an increase of approximately 4.3% from the currently licensed power level of 2441 MWt. The proposed changes are included as. The supporting documentation for this request has been prepared in accordance with Westinghouse Topical Report WCAP-10263, entitled "A Review Plan for Uprating the Licensed Power of a Pressurized Water Reactor Power Plant," and utilizes NRG-approved methodology.
The typical implementation time frame for Surry Operating License Amendments is 30 days after issuance. In this case, it may be necessary to have a different implementation schedule. We will identify the required time frame for implementation prior to your approval of the proposed changes.
The proposed changes and the supporting documentation have been reviewed and approved by the Station Nuclear Safety and Operating Committee and the Management Safety Review Committee. It has been determined that the proposed changes and the supporting documentation do involve an unreviewed safety question as defined in 1 OCFR50.59, which requires NRC review prior to implementation. It has also been determined that the proposed changes do not create a significant hazards consideration as defined in 1 OCFR50.92. A discussion of the proposed changes and the bases for these determinations are included in Attachment 2.
              ----
Supporting documentation for the proposed changes is contained in the Surry Core Uprate Licensing Report (Attachment 3).
940908024~ 940830 F*DR AD0C~ 05000280PDF<:
The typical implementation time frame for Surry Operating License Amendments is 30 days after issuance.
p
In this case, it may be necessary to have a different implementation schedule. We will identify the required time frame for implementation prior to your approval of the proposed changes.
* e Given the significant economic benefits to be obtained from operation at the uprated power level, we request that you complete your review as soon as possible. To facilitate your review, we are available to meet with the NRC staff at your convenience.
940908024~ 940830 F*DR AD0C~ 05000280 PDF<:
Very truly yours,
p i
 
e Given the significant economic benefits to be obtained from operation at the uprated power level, we request that you complete your review as soon as possible. To facilitate your review, we are available to meet with the NRC staff at your convenience.
Very truly yours,  
~:::~~
~:::~~
Senior Vice President - Nuclear Attachments:
Senior Vice President - Nuclear Attachments:
: 1. Proposed Technical Specification Changes
: 1. Proposed Technical Specification Changes
: 2. Discussion of Changes and Significant Hazards Consideration
: 2. Discussion of Changes and Significant Hazards Consideration
: 3. Surry Core Uprate Licensing Report cc:     U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (with Attachments 1- 3)
: 3. Surry Core Uprate Licensing Report cc:
U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (with Attachments 1-3)
Region II 101 Marietta Street, N. W.
Region II 101 Marietta Street, N. W.
Suite 2900 Atlanta, Georgia 30323 Mr. M. W. Branch (with Attachments 1- 3)
Suite 2900 Atlanta, Georgia 30323 Mr. M. W. Branch (with Attachments 1-3)
NRC Senior Resident Inspector Surry Power Station Commissioner (with Attachments 1- 3)
NRC Senior Resident Inspector Surry Power Station Commissioner (with Attachments 1-3)
Department of Health Room 400 109 Governor Street Richmond, Virginia 23219
Department of Health Room 400 109 Governor Street Richmond, Virginia 23219  


;
,I:'*--..
..;'
COMMONWEAL TH OF VIRGINIA )  
              ...
)
    ,I:'*-- ..
COUNTY OF HENRICO  
* COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA )
)
                                                          )
COUNTY OF HENRICO                   )
The foregoing document was acknowledged before me, in and for the County and Commonwealth aforesaid, today by J. P. O'Hanlon, who is Senior Vice President -
The foregoing document was acknowledged before me, in and for the County and Commonwealth aforesaid, today by J. P. O'Hanlon, who is Senior Vice President -
Nuclear, of Virginia Electric and Power Company. He is duly authorized to execute and file the foregoing document in behalf of that Company, and the statements in the document are true to the best of his knowledge and belief.
Nuclear, of Virginia Electric and Power Company. He is duly authorized to execute and file the foregoing document in behalf of that Company, and the statements in the document are true to the best of his knowledge and belief.
Acknowledged before me this My Commission Expires: /    ,!/1,
Acknowledged before me this _'.JtJ Z?>'day o  
_'.JtJZ?>'day o 3
, 19P/:...
                                                                                      , 19P/:...
My Commission Expires: /,!/1, 3 1/h -~ -i!uJ.U Nota!'yublic (SEAL)  
:.*
-1}}
1/h -~ -i!uJ.U Nota!'yublic           '
(SEAL)}}

Latest revision as of 19:19, 5 January 2025

Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-32 & DPR-37,revising TS to Accomodate Core Uprating,In Accordance w/WCAP-10263, Review Plan for Uprating Licensed Power of PWR Power Plant
ML18153B049
Person / Time
Site: Surry  Dominion icon.png
Issue date: 08/30/1994
From: Ohanlon J
VIRGINIA POWER (VIRGINIA ELECTRIC & POWER CO.)
To:
NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
Shared Package
ML18151A184 List:
References
NUDOCS 9409080245
Download: ML18153B049 (3)
v • d • e


Text

'

e VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY RICHMOND, VIRGINIA 23261 August 30, 1994 United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attention: Document Control Desk Washington, D. C. 20555 Gentlemen:

VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY Serial No.

NL&P/CGL Docket Nos.

License Nos.

SURRY POWER STATION UNITS 1 AND 2 PROPOSED TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION CHANGES TO ACCOMMODATE CORE UPRATING 94-509 RO' 50-280 50-281 DPR-32 DPR-37 Pursuant to 1 OCFR50.90, the Virginia Electric and Power Company requests changes to the Operating License Nos. DPR-32 and DPR-37 and the Technical Specifications for Surry Power Station Units 1 and 2, respectively. The proposed changes and the supporting documentation will accommodate plant operation at an uprated reactor core power level of 2546 MWt. This is an increase of approximately 4.3% from the currently licensed power level of 2441 MWt. The proposed changes are included as. The supporting documentation for this request has been prepared in accordance with Westinghouse Topical Report WCAP-10263, entitled "A Review Plan for Uprating the Licensed Power of a Pressurized Water Reactor Power Plant," and utilizes NRG-approved methodology.

The proposed changes and the supporting documentation have been reviewed and approved by the Station Nuclear Safety and Operating Committee and the Management Safety Review Committee. It has been determined that the proposed changes and the supporting documentation do involve an unreviewed safety question as defined in 1 OCFR50.59, which requires NRC review prior to implementation. It has also been determined that the proposed changes do not create a significant hazards consideration as defined in 1 OCFR50.92. A discussion of the proposed changes and the bases for these determinations are included in Attachment 2.

Supporting documentation for the proposed changes is contained in the Surry Core Uprate Licensing Report (Attachment 3).

The typical implementation time frame for Surry Operating License Amendments is 30 days after issuance.

In this case, it may be necessary to have a different implementation schedule. We will identify the required time frame for implementation prior to your approval of the proposed changes.

940908024~ 940830 F*DR AD0C~ 05000280 PDF<:

p i

e Given the significant economic benefits to be obtained from operation at the uprated power level, we request that you complete your review as soon as possible. To facilitate your review, we are available to meet with the NRC staff at your convenience.

Very truly yours,

~:::~~

Senior Vice President - Nuclear Attachments:

1. Proposed Technical Specification Changes
2. Discussion of Changes and Significant Hazards Consideration
3. Surry Core Uprate Licensing Report cc:

U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (with Attachments 1-3)

Region II 101 Marietta Street, N. W.

Suite 2900 Atlanta, Georgia 30323 Mr. M. W. Branch (with Attachments 1-3)

NRC Senior Resident Inspector Surry Power Station Commissioner (with Attachments 1-3)

Department of Health Room 400 109 Governor Street Richmond, Virginia 23219

,I:'*--..

COMMONWEAL TH OF VIRGINIA )

)

COUNTY OF HENRICO

)

The foregoing document was acknowledged before me, in and for the County and Commonwealth aforesaid, today by J. P. O'Hanlon, who is Senior Vice President -

Nuclear, of Virginia Electric and Power Company. He is duly authorized to execute and file the foregoing document in behalf of that Company, and the statements in the document are true to the best of his knowledge and belief.

Acknowledged before me this _'.JtJ Z?>'day o

, 19P/:...

My Commission Expires: /,!/1, 3 1/h -~ -i!uJ.U Nota!'yublic (SEAL)

-1

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML18153B049&oldid=4985794"