|
|
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) |
| Line 16: |
Line 16: |
|
| |
|
| =Text= | | =Text= |
| {{#Wiki_filter:J. Todd Conner Site Vice President DTE Energy Company 6400 N.Dixie Highway, Newport, MI 48166 Tel: 734,586,4849 Fax: 734.586.5295 Email: connerj@dteenergy.com DTE Energy" April 30, 2013 NRC-13-0021 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attention: Document Control Desk Washington D C 20555-0001 | | {{#Wiki_filter:}} |
| | |
| ==Reference:==
| |
| Fermi 2 NRC Docket No. 50-341 NRC License No. NPF-43
| |
| | |
| ==Subject:==
| |
| Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report and Radiological Environmental Operating Report In accordance with Technical Specifications 5.6.2 and 5.6.3, DTE Electric Company (previously, The Detroit Edison Company) hereby submits the Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report and the Radiological Environmental Operating Report for Fermi 2. Enclosure 1 provides the 2012 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report. provides the 2012 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report.
| |
| Both reports cover the time period from January 1 through December 31, 2012.
| |
| Should you have any questions regarding these reports, please contact Mr. Richard LaBurn, Manager - Radiation Protection at (734) 586-4974.
| |
| Sincerely, Enclosures cc: NRC Project Manager NRC Resident Office Reactor Projects Chief, Branch 5, Region III Regional Administrator, Region III Supervisor, Electric Operators; Michigan Public Service Commission
| |
| | |
| ENCLOSURE 1 To NRC-13-0021 2012 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report Total Pages - 45 Enrico Fermi Atomic Power Plant, Unit 2 NRC Docket No. 50-341 NRC License No. NPF-43
| |
| | |
| Fermi 2 - 2012 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report FERMI 2 NUCLEAR POWER PLANT DETROIT EDISON COMPANY OPERATING LICENSE NO. NPF - 43 Fermi 2 - 2012 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report for the period of January 1, 2012 through December 31, 2012 Prepared by:
| |
| Fermi 2 Radiological Engineering 1
| |
| | |
| Fermi 2 - 2012 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report Table of Contents Page Executive Summary 4 Introduction 5 Noble Gases 5 Iodines and Particulates 5 Tritium 6 Carbon-14 6 PlantEffluent Monitoring 6 Exposure Pathways to People 7 Dose Assessment 8 Radioactive Effluent Monitoring Results 9 Summary of Radioactive Waste Shipments 12 Additional Required Information 13 Appendices 13 ODCM Revisions 13 ODCM Monitors Out of Service 13 Outside Temporary Tanks 13 Major Changes to Radioactive Waste Systems 13 Abnormal RadiologicalReleases 13 Errata/Correctionsto PreviousARERRs 13 Appendix A: Effluent and Radwaste Data 14 Regulatory Limits for Radioactive Effluents 15 Gaseous Effluents 15 Liquid Effluents 16 Measurements andApproximations of Total Activity in Radioactive Effluents 17 Gaseous Effluents 17 Fission and Activation Gases 17 Radioiodines 17 Particulates 18 Tritium 18 GrossAlpha 18 Carbon-14 19 Liquid Effluents 19 StatisticalMeasurement Uncertainties 19 Gaseous Release by Individual Nuclide 19 ParticulateRadionuclides (Curies) 20 Noble Gases (Curies) 21 Radioiodines (Curies) 21 2
| |
| | |
| Fermi 2 - 2012 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report Shipments ofRadwaste 21 Spent resins, sludges, etc. 22 Dry compressible waste, contaminatedequipment, etc. 23 Irradiatedcomponents, control rods, etc. 23 Other 23 Appendix B: Ground Water Protection Program Data and Analysis 24 Appendix C: Rainwater Data and Analysis 34 Appendix D: Meteorological Joint Frequency Distributions 38 List of Tables Page Table 1 Fission and Activation Gases (Noble Gases) Summary 9 Table 2 RadioiodinesSummary 9 Table 3 ParticulatesSummary 10 Table 4 Tritium and Carbon-14 Summary 10 Table 5 2012 Gaseous Effluent Dose to Receptor with HighestSingle OrganDose 11 Table 6 Waste Shipped Offsite 12 Table 7 Waste Shipments 12 Table 8 Deep Monitor Well Tritium Analysis Results 28 Table 9 Shallow Monitor Well Tritium Analysis Results 29 Table 10 Emergent Event Monitor Well Tritium Analysis Results 32 Table 11 Rain Water andStorm Water Tritium Analysis Results 36 3
| |
| | |
| Fermi 2 - 2012 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report Executive Summary This report is published to provide information regarding radioactive effluent monitoring at the Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant. The 2012 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report covers the period from January 1, 2012 through December 31, 2012.
| |
| The Radioactive Effluent Release Report is produced annually, to document plant releases and offsite dose resulting from these releases. The data presented indicate that the operation of Fermi 2 results in offsite radiation exposures that are well below the applicable allowable levels set by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
| |
| There were no releases of liquid radioactive effluents from Fermi 2 in 2012. Data on releases of radioactive isotopes in gaseous effluents, as well as regulatory limits and sampling methods for these releases, are contained in the body of the report and in Appendix A.
| |
| Regulatory limits for radioactive effluents pertain to allowable offsite doses rather than to quantities of radioactivity released. The highest potential single organ dose to a person living offsite due to iodines, particulates, tritium, and carbon-14 released from the plant was calculated to be 0.16 mrem, which is approximately 1% of the applicable limit found in 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix I.
| |
| During 2012, no direct radiation dose to members of the public beyond the site boundary was attributed to the operation of Fermi 2, based on analysis of readings of thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLD) placed at various locations near the Fermi site.
| |
| The offsite dose due to effluents is a small fraction of the 40 CFR 190 limits. Therefore, the combined direct radiation and effluent dose due to Fermi 2 was in compliance with 40 CFR 190 in 2012.
| |
| Data on radioactivity contained in radwaste shipments from Fermi 2 to points offsite are contained in the body of the report and in Appendix A. The Offsite Dose Calculation Manual (ODCM) was not revised in 2012. Additional sections of the report address ODCM revisions, ODCM required monitors which were out of service for more than 30 days in 2012, major changes in radwaste processing, the contents of outside temporary tanks, abnormal releases, and errata to previous years' reports (see page 13).
| |
| Appendix B of this report describes the Fermi Integrated Ground Water Protection Program. This program was established as part of the site's commitment to conformance with an industry-wide ground water protection initiative. This appendix also contains the results of 2012 quarterly ground water sampling, from approximately 40 monitor wells around Fermi 2 (ground water sampling has been performed under this program since the fall of 2007). Some of these monitor wells, primarily to the east and south of Fermi 2, have yielded sporadic trace quantities of tritium that have been attributed to the recapture of tritium in precipitation from the plant's gaseous effluent. Appendix C of this report 4
| |
| | |
| Fermi 2 - 2012 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report provides data on tritium concentrations in rainwater samples collected onsite which represent this recapture phenomenon. Appendix D of this report contains the meteorological joint frequency distribution tables for 2012.
| |
| Introduction During the normal operation of a nuclear power plant, most of the fission products are retained within the fuel and fuel cladding. However, small amounts of radioactive fission products and trace amounts of the component and structure surfaces that have been activated are present in the primary coolant water, as well as tritium and carbon-14. The five types of radioactive material released are noble gases, iodines, particulates, tritium, and carbon-14.
| |
| Noble Gases Some of the fission products released in airborne effluents are radioactive isotopes of noble gases, such as xenon and krypton. These noble gases are released continuously at low levels while the reactor is operating. Noble gas releases to the environment are reduced by plant systems which delay release of these gases from the plant, which allows a portion of the noble gas activity to decay within plant systems prior to release.
| |
| Noble gases are biologically and chemically nonreactive. They do not concentrate in humans or other organisms. They contribute to human radiation dose by being an external source of radiation exposure to the body. They are readily dispersed in the atmosphere.
| |
| Iodines and Particulates Fermi 2 is required to calculate offsite dose due to releases of iodine-131 and iodine-133, which are radioisotopes of iodine with half lives of 8 days and 1 day, respectively, and particulates with half-lives greater than 8 days in gaseous and liquid effluents, and tritium. The principal radioactive particulates released are fission products (e.g.,
| |
| yttrium-91m and barium-139) and activation products (e.g., cobalt-58 and cobalt-60).
| |
| Annual releases of these radionuclides are well within industry norms. Factors such as their high chemical reactivity and solubility in water, combined with the high efficiency of gaseous and liquid processing and radwaste systems, minimize their discharge.
| |
| The main contribution of radioactive iodine to human radiation dose is to the thyroid gland, where the body concentrates iodine. This exposure results from inhalation or ingestion of these iodines. Radioactive cesiums and cobalts, when ingested or inhaled, contribute to radiation exposure of tissues such as the muscle, liver, and intestines. These iodines and particulates are also a source of external radiation exposure if deposited on the ground.
| |
| 5
| |
| | |
| Fermi 2 - 2012 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report Tritium Tritium, a radioactive isotope of hydrogen, is the predominant radionuclide in radioactive gaseous effluents. It is detected at Fermi 2 in ventilation exhaust samples.
| |
| Carbon-14 U.S. nuclear power plants are expected to report releases of carbon-14 (C-14). The releases reported are based on calculations involving the thermal power rating of the unit and 2012 monthly capacity factors. The Fermi 2 UFSAR estimates annual gaseous C-14 releases of 9.88 curies. The calculation performed for this report estimated a total 2012 C-14 release of 9.5 curies.
| |
| Plant Effluent Monitoring Effluents are strictly monitored to ensure that radioactivity released to the environment is as low as reasonably achievable and does not exceed regulatory limits. Effluent control includes the operation of monitoring systems, in-plant and environmental sampling and analyses programs, quality assurance programs for effluent and environmental programs, and procedures covering all aspects of effluent and environmental monitoring.
| |
| The radioactive waste treatment systems at Fermi 2 are designed to collect, process, and/or delay the release of liquid and gaseous wastes that contain radioactivity. For example, the 2.0 and 2.2 minute holdup pipes delay the release of radioactive gases so that radioactive decay can occur prior to release. The offgas system provides additional delay for such gases.
| |
| Radioactivity monitoring systems are used to verify that all releases are below regulatory limits. These instruments provide a continuous indication of radioactivity present at the release points. Each instrument is equipped with alarms and indicators in the control room. The alarm setpoints are low enough to ensure that applicable limits will not be exceeded. In some cases, these alarms restrict the release. For example, several alarms cause building ventilation systems to be shut down and/or gaseous releases to be diverted to the standby gas treatment system.
| |
| 6
| |
| | |
| Fermi 2 - 2012 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report All liquid and gaseous radioactive effluents are evaluated to identify the specific concentrations of radionuclides being released. Sampling and analysis provide a more sensitive and precise method of determining effluent composition than monitoring instruments, A meteorological tower is located on the Fermi 2 site. It is linked to computers that record the meteorological data. These data are used in calculating dispersion and deposition factors, which are essentially dilution factors between plant release points and points offsite. Coupled with the effluent release data, these factors are used to calculate dose to the public.
| |
| Beyond the plant, devices maintained in conjunction with the Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program constantly sample the air in the surrounding environment. Also, frequent samples of other environmental media, such as water and vegetation, are collected to verify that the station radiological effluent program is being appropriately implemented without adverse impact to the surrounding environment.
| |
| Exposure Pathways to People Radiological exposure pathways define the methods by which people may become exposed to radioactive material, The major pathways of concern are those that could cause the highest calculated radiation dose. These projected pathways are determined from the type and amount of radioactive material released, the environmental transport mechanism, and the use of the environment. The environmental transport mechanism includes consideration of physical factors, such as the hydrological and meteorological characteristics of the area.
| |
| An important factor in evaluating the exposure pathways is the use of the environment.
| |
| This is evaluated in the annual Land Use Census. Many factors are considered, such as the locations of homes, gardens, and milk or meat animals in the area.
| |
| The release of radioactive gaseous effluents involves pathways such as external whole body exposure, deposition of radioactive material on plants, deposition on soil, inhalation and ingestion by animals raised for human consumption, and inhalation by humans. The release of radioactive material in liquid effluents involves pathways such as drinking water and fish consumption.
| |
| 7
| |
| | |
| Fermi 2 - 2012 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report Although radionuclides can reach humans by many different pathways, some result in greater dose than others. The most significant pathway is the exposure pathway that will provide the greatest dose to a population, or to a specific individual. Identification of the most significant pathway depends on the radionuclides involved, the age and diet of the individual, and the location of the individual's residence. Doses delivered to the total body and to specific organs are calculated. The organ receiving the greatest dose is important in determining compliance with dose limits. The standard assumptions used in dose calculation result in conservative dose estimates.
| |
| Dose Assessment Dose is energy deposited by radiation in an exposed individual. Whole body exposure to radiation involves the exposure of all organs. Most exposures due to external sources of radiation are of this type. Both non-radioactive and radioactive elements can enter the body through inhalation or ingestion. When they do, they are usually not distributed evenly. For example, iodine concentrates in the thyroid gland, cesium collects in muscle and liver tissue, and strontium collects in bone tissue.
| |
| The total dose to organs from a given radionuclide depends on the amount of radioactive material present in the organ and the amount of time that the radionuclide remains in the organ. Some radionuclides remain for very short times due to their rapid radioactive decay and/or elimination rate from the body, while other radionuclides may remain in the body for longer periods of time. The form of the radionuclide (soluble vs. insoluble) and the method of uptake also influence residence times in the body.
| |
| The maximum dose to the general public in the area surrounding Fermi 2 is calculated for periods of gaseous release and for each liquid release. The dose due to radioactive material released in gaseous effluents is calculated using factors such as the amount of radioactive material released, the concentration beyond the site boundary, the locations of exposure pathways (for example cow milk, goat milk, vegetable gardens and residences),
| |
| and usage factors (inhalation and food consumption). The dose due to radioactive material released in liquid effluents is calculated using factors such as radionuclide concentrations, the total volume of liquid released, the total volume of dilution water, near field dilution, and usage factors (water and fish consumption). These calculations produce a conservative estimation of the dose.
| |
| 8
| |
| | |
| Fermi 2 - 2012 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report Radioactive Effluent Monitoring Results This section summarizes the results of effluent monitoring and offsite dose calculation for the year 2012. Calculated offsite doses are compared with Nuclear Regulatory Commission limits, and these limits are summarized in Appendix A. Appendix A also contains a detailed discussion of the methods used to determine quantities of radioactivity released in effluents, the types of solid radwaste shipped offsite, as well as tables of individual radionuclides released in effluents and shipped as solid radwaste. There were no routine releases of liquid radioactive effluents from Fermi 2 in 2012. There has not been a routine liquid radioactive discharge from Fermi 2 since 1994.
| |
| The data in the following gaseous effluent tables represent continuous and batch releases.
| |
| In 2012, there were 17 recorded containment purges in which radioactivity was detected.
| |
| The total time for these purges was 4005 minutes. Based on recorded start and stop times, the shortest of these purges lasted 105 minutes, the longest lasted 461 minutes, and the average purge length was 236 minutes. The amounts of radioactivity released in these purges were very small compared with the amounts released in continuous releases.
| |
| Table 1 - Fission and Activation Gases (Noble Gases) Summary Quarter 1 Quarter 2 Quarter 3 Quarter 4 Release (curies) 1.66E+00 8.36E-01 1.10E+00 1.23E+00 Average Release 2.11E-01 1.06E-01 1.38E-01 1.55E-01 Rate for Period (pCi/sec)
| |
| Table 2 - Radioiodines Summary
| |
| __________ Quarter 1 Quarter 2 Quarter 3 Quarter 4 Total 1-131 4.13E-04 3.02E-04 1.92E-04 5.98E-05 (curies)
| |
| Average Release 5.25E-05 3.84E-05 2.42E-05 7.52E-06 Rate for Period (pCi/sec) 9
| |
| | |
| Fermi 2 - 2012 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report Table 3 - Particulates Summary Quarter 1 Quarter 2 Quarter 3 Quarter 4 Particulates with 1.23E-04 6.33E-04 1.94E-04 5.20E-05 half lives > 8 days (curies)
| |
| Average 1.56E-05 8.05E-05 2.44E-05 6.54E-06 Release Rate for Period (pCi/sec)
| |
| Gross Alpha <5.3E-15* <5.3E-15* <5.3E-15* <5.3E-15*
| |
| Radioactivity uCi/cc uCi/cc uCi/cc uCi/cc
| |
| *In the above table, the "less than" value in units of microcuries per cubic centimeter (pCi/cc) is used when no radioactivity was detected and represents the lower limit of detection (LLD) value for a single sample.
| |
| Table 4 - Tritium (H-3) and Carbon-14 (C-14) Summary Quarter 1 Quarter 2 Quarter 3 Quarter 4 Total H-3 Release 7.53E+01 5.76E+01 4.40E+01 3.90E+01 (curies)
| |
| Average H-3 Release 9.58E+00 7.33E+00 5.53E+00 4.91E+00 Rate (pCi/sec)
| |
| Total C-14 Release 4.06E+00 2.28E+00 1.89E+00 1.22E+00 (curies)
| |
| Average C-14 Release 5.17E-01 2.90E-01 2.38E-01 1.53E-01 Rate (pCi/sec)
| |
| The offsite dose impact of the above releases was evaluated by calculating organ doses to the most highly exposed individual (an adult) living near the plant due to I-131, 1-133, H-3, C-14 and particulates with half lives greater than 8 days. The most significant pathways of exposure to this individual have been determined to be inhalation, vegetation ingestion, and direct radiation from material deposited on the ground. The results of this calculation, which employs conservative assumptions, are shown in the following table:
| |
| 10
| |
| | |
| Fermi 2 - 2012 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report Table 5 2012 Gaseous Effluent Dose to Organ Receptor with Highest Single Organ Dose Bone 1.57E-01 mrem Liver 8.33E-02 mrem Thyroid 9.58E-02 mrem Kidney 8.33E-02 mrem Lung 8.33E-02 mrem GI-LLI 8.35E-02 mrem Total body 8.34E-02 mrem The highest single organ dose is 1.57E-01 mrem to the bone. This is 1.0% of the federal limit of 15 mrem specified in 10 CFR 50, Appendix I. (The Fermi 2 Offsite Dose Calculation Manual requires maximum receptor dose calculation for releases of 1-131, I-133, H-3, and particulates with half lives greater than 8 days; for these isotopes, the thyroid is the highest dose organ. When C-14 is added, bone becomes the highest dose organ.)
| |
| In addition, gamma and beta air dose at the site boundary due to noble gases was calculated. In 2012, gamma air dose was 1.29E-03 mrad, 0.01% of the 10 mrad annual limit; beta air dose in 2012 was 5.20E-04 mrad, 0.003% of the 20 mrad annual limit.
| |
| Title 40, Part 190 of the Code of Federal Regulations requires that dose to an individual in the unrestricted area from the uranium fuel cycle, including direct radiation dose, be limited to 25 mrem/year to the total body and 75 mrem/year to the thyroid. During 2012, there was no direct radiation dose attributed to the operation of Fermi 2 beyond the site boundary, based on analysis of offsite TLD readings. Based on Table 5 above, the offsite dose due to effluents is 0.33% and 0.13% of 40 CFR 190 limits for the total body and thyroid, respectively. Therefore, Fermi 2 was in compliance with 40 CFR 190 in 2012.
| |
| Potential dose to visitors at Fermi 2 due to all radioactive effluents, including noble gases, was also calculated. The Offsite Dose Calculation Manual (ODCM) considers persons visiting the Fermi 2 Visitors Center (4 hours/year), and persons potentially ice fishing on Lake Erie near the plant (240 hours/year), to be visitors. Using ODCM assumptions about these categories of visitors, the maximum potential dose to a visitor to Fermi 2 in 2012 was 4.22E-03 mrem to the maximally exposed organ (thyroid) and 3.99E-03 mrem to the total body. These doses are below the annual maximum offsite doses due to gaseous effluents shown in Table 5, and are very small fractions of the 100 mrem/year limit for individual members of the public due to licensed operation of the plant provided in 10 CFR 20.1301.
| |
| 11
| |
| | |
| Fermi 2 - 2012 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report Summary of Radioactive Waste Shipments The radioactivity and volume of Fermi 2 solid waste shipped offsite is summarized in the following table:
| |
| Table 6 - Waste Shipped Offsite Est. total 12 month activity Type of waste Unit period error, %
| |
| Spent resins, sludges, etc. m3 1.38E+02 curies 2.99E+02 +/- 25 Dry compressible waste, m3 1.23E+03 contaminated equipment, etc. curies 1.28E+00 +/-25 Irradiated components, control m3 0 rods, etc. curies 0 N/A Other 3 m 0 curies 0 N/A Radioactive waste shipments from Fermi 2 in 2012 (to either disposal or to intermediate processors) are summarized in the following table:
| |
| Table 7 - Waste Shipments Type of shipment/ Number of Mode of Destination solidification process shipments transportation Spent resin, sludges, etc. 22 Tractor trailer Energy Solutions, Clive, UT with cask Dry compressible waste, 25 Tractor trailer, or Energy Solutions, Oak Ridge, TN contaminated equipment, tractor trailer with etc. cask 12
| |
| | |
| Fermi 2 - 2012 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report Additional Required Information Appendices Appendix A, Effluent and Radwaste Data, provides more detailed data on radiological effluents and radwaste shipments. Appendix B contains a description of the Fermi 2 Integrated Groundwater Protection Program, 2012 sampling data for this program, and a discussion of sampling results. Appendix C contains data on tritium concentrations in rainwater collected onsite and explains the significance of these data. Appendix D contains meteorological joint frequency distributions of wind speed and wind direction by atmospheric stability class, for all of 2012.
| |
| ODCMJRevisions The ODCM was not revised in 2012.
| |
| ODCM Monitors Out of Service No ODCM monitors were out of service longer than 30 days in 2012.
| |
| Outside Temporary Tanks In 2012 no outside temporary tank exceeded the 10 curie content limit for nuclides other than tritium and dissolved or entrained noble gases.
| |
| Major Changes to Radioactive Waste Systems There were no major changes to radioactive waste systems in 2012.
| |
| Abnormal Radiological Releases There were no abnormal radiological releases in 2012.
| |
| Errata/Corrections to Previous ARERRs No errata for the ARERR for 2011 have been noted.
| |
| 13
| |
| | |
| Fermi2 - 2012 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report Appendix A Effluent and Radwaste Data 14
| |
| | |
| Fermi 2 - 2012 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report Regulatory Limits for Radioactive Effluents The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) limits on liquid and gaseous effluents are incorporated into the Fermi 2 Offsite Dose Calculation Manual. These limits prescribe the maximum doses and dose rates due to radioactive effluents resulting from normal operation of Fermi 2. These limits are described in the following sections.
| |
| A. Gaseous Effluents I. Dose rate due to radioactivity released in gaseous effluents to areas at and beyond the site boundary shall be limited to the following:
| |
| a) Noble gases Less than or equal to 500 mrem/year to the total body.
| |
| Less than or equal to 3000 mrem/year to the skin.
| |
| b) Iodine-131, iodine-133, tritium, and for all radionuclides in particulate form with half lives greater than 8 days Less than or equal to 1500 mrem/year to any organ.
| |
| II. Air dose due to noble gases to areas at and beyond the site boundary shall be limited to the following:
| |
| a) Less than or equal to 5 mrad for gamma radiation Less than or equal to 10 mrad for beta radiation
| |
| - During any calendar quarter b) Less than or equal to 10 mrad for gamma radiation Less than or equal to 20 mrad for beta radiation
| |
| - During any calendar year 15
| |
| | |
| Fermi 2 - 2012 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report III. Dose to a member of the public from iodine-131, iodine-133, tritium, and all radionuclides in particulate form with half lives greater than 8 days in gaseous effluents released to areas at and beyond the site boundary shall be limited to the following:
| |
| a) Less than or equal to 7.5 mrem to any organ
| |
| - During any calendar quarter b) Less than or equal to 15 mrem to any organ
| |
| - During any calendar year Note: The calculated site boundary dose rates for Fermi 2 are based on identification of individual isotopes and on use of dose factors specific to each identified isotope or a highly conservative dose factor. Since individual isotopes are identified, average energy values are not used in these calculations, and therefore are not reported even though their use in these calculations is allowed by Regulatory Guide 1.21.
| |
| B. Liquid Effluents I. The concentration of radioactive material released in liquid effluents to unrestricted areas shall be limited to ten times the concentrations specified in Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) Part 20 (Standards for Protection Against Radiation), Appendix B, Table 2, Column 2 for radionuclides other than dissolved or entrained noble gases, as required by the Fermi 2 Offsite Dose Calculation Manual. For dissolved or entrained noble gases, the concentration shall be limited to 2E-4 (.0002) microcuries/ml total activity. This limit is based on the Xe-135 air submersion dose limit converted to an equivalent concentration in water as discussed in the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) Publication 2.
| |
| II. The dose or dose commitment to a member of the public from radioactive materials in liquid effluents released to unrestricted areas shall be limited to the following:
| |
| a) Less than or equal to 1.5 mrem to the total body Less than or equal to 5 mrem to any organ
| |
| - During any calendar quarter b) Less than or equal to 3 mrem to the total body Less than or equal to 10 mrem to any organ
| |
| - During any calendar year As noted previously, Fermi 2 did not perform radioactive liquid releases in 2012.
| |
| 16
| |
| | |
| Fermi 2 - 2012 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report Measurements and Approximations of Total Activity in Radioactive Effluents As required by NRC Regulatory Guide 1.21, this section describes the methods used to measure the total radioactivity in effluent releases and to estimate the overall errors associated with these measurements. The effluent monitoring systems are described in Chapter 11.4 of the Fermi 2 Updated Final Safety Analysis Report (UFSAR).
| |
| A. Gaseous Effluents I. Fission and Activation Gases Samples are obtained from each of the six plant radiation monitors which continuously monitor the five ventilation exhaust points. The fission and activation gases are quantified by gamma spectroscopy analysis of periodic samples.
| |
| The summary values reported are the sums of all fission and activation gases quantified at all monitored release points.
| |
| I. Radioiodines Samples are obtained from each of the six plant radiation monitors which continuously monitor the five ventilation exhaust points. The radioiodines are entrained on charcoal and then quantified by gamma spectroscopy analysis.
| |
| For each sample, the duration of sampling and continuous flow rate through the charcoal are used in determining the concentration of radioiodines. From the flow rate of the ventilation system, a rate of release can be determined.
| |
| The summary values reported are the sums of all radioiodines quantified at all continuously monitored release points.
| |
| 17
| |
| | |
| Fermi 2 - 2012 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report III.Particulates Samples are obtained from each of the six plant effluent radiation monitors which continuously monitor the five ventilation exhaust points. The particulates are collected on a filter and then quantified by gamma spectroscopy analysis.
| |
| For each sample, the duration of sampling and the continuous flow rate through the filter are used in determining the concentration of particulates.
| |
| From the flow rate of the ventilation system, a rate of release can be determined.
| |
| Quarterly, the filters from each ventilation release point are composited and then radiochemically separated and analyzed for strontium (Sr)-89/90.
| |
| The summary values reported are the sums of all particulates quantified at all monitored release points.
| |
| IV Tritium Samples are obtained from each of the six plant effluent radiation monitors which continuously monitor the five ventilation exhaust points. The sample is passed through a bottle containing water and the gaseous tritium is collected in this water. Portions of the collecting water are analyzed for tritium using liquid scintillation counting techniques. For each sample, the duration of sample and sample flow rate is used to determine the concentration. From the flow rate of the ventilation system, a release rate can be determined.
| |
| In addition to tritium releases from the five ventilation exhaust points, gaseous tritium releases from the Condensate Storage Tank and Condensate Return Tank have been calculated. These releases are due to evaporation of tritiated water in these tanks which is released through tank vents. However this is not a significant release point for tritium, contributing well less than 1% of total tritium releases. These releases were calculated to total 8.80E-03 curies in 2012; adding them to reported tritium releases from the ventilation release points does not change the reported release quantities, which are greater than 10 curies in each quarter and are expressed to three significant digits.
| |
| The summary values reported are the sums of all tritium quantified at all monitored release points.
| |
| V Gross Alpha The gaseous particulate filters from the six plant effluent radiation monitors are stored for one week to allow for decay of naturally occurring alpha 18
| |
| | |
| Fermi 2 - 2012 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report emitters. These filters are then analyzed for gross alpha radioactivity by gas proportional counting, and any such radioactivity found is assumed to be plant related. The quantity of alpha emitters released can then be determined from sample flow rate, sample duration, and stack flow rate.
| |
| The summary values reported are the sums of all alpha emitters quantified at all monitored release points.
| |
| VI. Carbon-14 Carbon-14 releases are calculated using a method published by the Electric Power Research Institute in December 2010. Plant rated thermal power and monthly capacity factors were used in the calculation of quarterly releases.
| |
| B. Liquid Effluents The liquid radwaste processing system and the liquid effluent monitoring system are described in the Fermi 2 UFSAR. Fermi 2 did not perform any releases of radioactive liquid effluents in 2012.
| |
| C. Statistical Measurement Uncertainties The statistical uncertainty of the measurements in this section has been calculated and summarized in the following table:
| |
| Measurement Type Sample Type One Sigma Uncertainty Fission and Activation Gaseous 30%
| |
| Gases Radioiodines Gaseous 17%
| |
| Particulates Gaseous 16%
| |
| Tritium Gaseous 25%
| |
| Gross Alpha Gaseous 16%
| |
| Gaseous Releases by Individual Nuclide Values in the following tables which are preceded by the "less than" symbol represent the lower limit of detection (LLD) in units of microcuries per cubic centimeter (pCi/cc) for individual samples, and indicate that the nuclide in question was not detected in gaseous effluent samples in the indicated quarter of 2012. For quantities of gross alpha radioactivity, tritium, and carbon-14 in gaseous effluents, see Tables 3 and 4 on page 10 of this report.
| |
| 19
| |
| | |
| Fermi 2 - 2012 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report A. Particulate Radionuclides (Curies*)
| |
| Nuclide Quarter 1 Quarter 2 Quarter 3 Quarter 4 Mn-54 1.14E-05 4.76E-05 4.81E-06 <2.9E-13 Co-58 8.89E-06 1.17E-05 <1.0E-13 <1.0E-13 Co-60 2.82E-05 1.04E-04 4.80E-05 3.11E-06 Cr-51 2.14E-05 8.70E-05 <7.5E-14 <7.5E-14 Fe-59 <2.6E-13 1.39E-05 <2.6E-13 <2.6E-13 Zn-65 8.95E-06 1.70E-05 <9.8E-13 <9.8E-13 Tc-99m <2.7E-13 <2.7E-13 <2.7E-13 1.01E-06 Ba-139 3.68E-02 9.30E-02 5.00E-02 4.93E-02 La-140 4.81E-05 1.36E-04 3.75E-05 5.41E-05 Ba-140 <6.1E-14 7.12E-05 1.42E-05 2.12E-05 Y-91m 2.91E-03 1.78E-02 6.18E-03 4.49E-03 Rb-89 <2.0E-10 <2.0E-10 2.24E-02 1.27E-02 Cs-138 1.13E-02 4.71E-02 1.58E-02 3.51E-02 Br-82 8.15E-06 <2.1E-13 <2.1E-13 <2.1E-13 Sr-91 <1.1E-12 1.23E-04 1.38E-04 1.29E-04 Sr-89 1.15E-05 1.96E-05 2.05E-05 1.11E-05 Sr-90 <9.7E-16 1.41E-06 7.75E-07 4.25E-07 Fe-55 3.23E-05 2.60E-04 1.06E-04 1.62E-05 Cs-134 <4.1E-14 <4.1E-14 <4.1E-14 <4.1E-14 Cs-137 <6.6E-14 <6.6E-14 <6.1E-14 <6.1E-14 Ce-141 <2.2E-14 <2.2E-14 <2.2E-14 <2.2E-14 Ce-143 <1.5E-13 <1.5E-13 <1.5E-13 <1.5E-13 Ce-144 <1.0E-13 <1.0E-13 <1.0E-13 <1.0E-13 Total 5.12E-02 1.59E-01 9.47E-02 1.02E-01
| |
| *Less than (<) values are in units of uCi/cc.
| |
| 20
| |
| | |
| Fermi 2 - 2012 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report B. Noble Gases (Curies*)
| |
| Ar-41 5.86E-01 3.20E-01 3.16E-01 1.82E-01 Kr-88 <1.5E-07 <1.5E-07 1.63E-01 <1.5E-07 Kr-85m 2.76E-02 <3.9E-08 1.61E-01 1.03E-01 Xe-129m <5.0E-07 <5.0E-07 <5.0E-07 1.32E-01 Xe-133 <6.3E-08 <6.3E-08 1.37E-02 7.85E-02 Xe-135 4.93E-02 <2.9E-08 6.20E-03 3.13E-02 Xe-135m 4.87E-01 5.16E-01 2.27E-01 1.24E-01 Xe-138 5.09E-01 <2.1E-05 2.14E-01 5.77E-01 Total 1.66E+00 8.36E-01 1.10E+00 1.23E+00 C. Radioiodines (Curies*)
| |
| I-131 4.13E-04 3.02E-04 1.92E-04 5.98E-05 I-132 3.79E-03 1,39E-03 <8.3E-13 <8.3E-13 I-133 1.41E-03 1.48E-03 7.17E-04 4.25E-04 I-134 <1.5E-11 2.45E-03 <1.5E-11 <1.5E-11 1-135 2.76E-04 1.66E-03 <1.6E-12 <1.6E-12 Total 5.98E-03 7.28E-03 9.09E-04 4.85E-04
| |
| *Less than (<) values are in units of uCi/cc, Shipments of Radwaste Fermi 2 complies with the extensive federal regulations that govern radioactive waste shipments. Radioactive solid waste shipments from the Fermi 2 site consist of waste generated during water treatment, radioactive trash, irradiated components, etc. Shipment destinations are either a licensed burial site or intermediate processing facilities. Waste shipped to intermediate processing facilities is shipped directly from these facilities to a licensed burial site after processing, The following tables contain estimates of major nuclide composition, by class of waste, of Fermi 2 solid radwaste shipped offsite in 2012.
| |
| The waste volumes shown in these tables are the volumes shipped, not the final volumes sent for burial after processing.
| |
| 21
| |
| | |
| Fermi 2 - 2012 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report
| |
| : a. Spent resins, sludges, etc. All waste in this category in 2012 was Class A waste and consisted of spent resins. It was shipped in shielded transportation casks (1 Type B, and 21 General Design Bulk Packages), directly to the Clive, UT burial facility. This waste was dewatered prior to shipment. All quantities were determined by measurement.
| |
| Spent resins, sludges, etc, (Class A)
| |
| Isotope mCi Percent Ag- l0m 9.09E+01 3.04E-02 Ba-133 1.95E+01 6.52E-03 Ba-140 9.03E+00 3.02E-03 C-14 6.40E+03 2.14E+00 Ce-144 1.19E+01 3.98E-03 Co-57 1.70E+01 5.69E-03 Co-58 1.90E+03 6.36E-01 Co-60 5.70E+04 1.91E+01 Cr-51 1.49E+03 4.99E-01 Cs-137 5.09E+02 1.70E-01 Fe-55 1.81E+05 6.06E+01 Fe-59 1.90E+03 6.36E-01 H-3 2.39E+02 8.00E-02 Hf-181 1.71E+01 5.72E-03 I-129 (LLD) 6.33E+00 N/A 1-131 1.29E+01 4.32E-03 La-140 9.13E+00 3.06E-03 Mn-54 3.37E+04 1.13E+01 Nb-95 2.95E+01 9.87E-03 Ni-63 3.25E+03 1.09E+00 Pu-238 9.68E-03 3.24E-06 Sb-124 5.20E+01 1.74E-02 Sb-125 4.75E+00 1.59E-03 Sr-89 3.52E+02 1.18E-01 Sr-90 7.55E+01 2.53E-02 Tc-99 1.66E+01 5.56E-03 Zn-65 1.06E+04 3.55E+00 Zr-95 5.28E+01 1.77E-02 Total Activity 2.99E+05 1.00E+02 Volume Shipped 1.38E+02 cubic meters 22
| |
| | |
| Fermi 2 - 2012 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report
| |
| : b. Dry compressible waste, contaminated equipment, etc. Waste in this category in 2012 was shipped in strong tight containers (46 General Design Bulk Packages) of various sizes or within shielded transportation casks (3 General Design Bulk Packages),
| |
| and was classified as Dry Active Waste (DAW). All DAW waste was shipped to an intermediate processor for processing, e.g. compaction or incineration. All quantities were determined by measurement.
| |
| Dry Active Waste (Class A)
| |
| Isotope mCi %
| |
| C-14 (LLD) 2.96E+01 N/A Co-57 7.88E-02 6.16E-03 Co-58 8.58E-01 6.70E-02 Co-60 5.16E+02 4.03E+01 Cr-51 1.62E-06 1.27E-07 Cs-137 6.86E-01 5.36E-02 Fe-55 5.29E+02 4.13E+01 Fe-59 7.45E-01 5.82E-02 H-3 8.61E+01 6.73E+00 I-129 (LLD) 1.36E+01 N/A Mn-54 1.23E+02 9.61E+00 Ni-63 1.16E+01 9.06E-01 Sb-124 2.40E-06 1.88E-07 Sb-125 6.06E-01 4.74E-02 Sr-89 5.55E-01 4.34E-02 Sr-90 4.16E-02 3.25E-03 Tc-99 1.77E-01 1.38E-02 Zn-65 1.03E+01 8.05E-01 Total Activity 1.28E+03 1.00E+02 Volume Shipped cubic meters 1.23E+03
| |
| : c. Irradiated components, control rods, etc.: No waste in this category
| |
| : d. Other, e.g. oil: No waste in this category 23
| |
| | |
| Fermi 2 - 2012 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report Appendix B Ground Water Protection Program Data and Analysis 24
| |
| | |
| Fermi 2 - 2012 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report EXECUTIVE
| |
| | |
| ==SUMMARY==
| |
| | |
| Fermi personnel conclude that the occasional positive tritium sample results in ground water from the shallow and deep monitor wells is not due to a leak from plant systems. Tritium in ground water in the shallow aquifer is the result of washout and recapture of tritium in precipitation that has passed through gaseous effluent from monitored plant systems. Low-level tritium activity was only detected in ground water from the bedrock aquifer in one sample and this result is deemed spurious because none of the adjacent shallow aquifer wells have elevated tritium levels nor is there a credible source for licensed material in the bedrock aquifer.
| |
| PROGRAM OVERVIEW Quarterly sampling and gauging of the Fermi 2 Integrated Ground Water Protection Program (IGWPP) monitor wells continued uninterrupted in 2012.
| |
| Procedurally, each IGWPP specified monitor well is required to be sampled for tritium and plant-related gamma-emitting radioisotopes each quarter. Furthermore, once per year ground water from three monitor wells adjacent to the condensate storage tanks, or associated piping, is analyzed for hard-to-detect (HTD) radionuclides (Fe-55, Sr-89, and Sr-90).
| |
| Samples analyzed for gamma-emitting radionuclides, as well as HTDs, are counted to environmental lower limits of detection (LLD) for each given radioisotope of interest, with the exception of La-140 and Ba-140 (due to their extremely short half-lives). For tritium there is no required limit of detection, beyond what is prescribed for ground water samples taken as part of the site's Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program (REMP). The REMP Lower Limit of Detection (LLD) is set at 2,000 pCi/L which is 1/ 10 th of the EPA's drinking water limit of 20,000 pCi/L. Fermi 2's contract laboratory achieved LLDs for tritium of 500 pCi/L, or less, for all ground-water samples taken during 2012.
| |
| In 2012 Fermi personnel continued to take an additional sample split for tritium analysis. These samples were analyzed for the presence of tritium by the Fermi chemistry laboratory. This process ensures more accurate data for shipping the samples to the offsite contract laboratory and to facilitate immediate mitigating actions, if required.
| |
| RESULTS Deep Wells (Table 8)
| |
| Tritium was not detected in samples of ground water from the Fermi 2 deep monitor wells, with the exception of a ground-water sample from monitor well EF2-07-009D (241 pCi/L).
| |
| Plant-related gamma-emitting radioisotopes were not detected in any samples collected from deep monitor wells in 2012.
| |
| Shallow Wells (Table 9)
| |
| Most shallow monitor wells have consistently yielded results indicating that tritium is not present at the detection limit. Of the 30 shallow monitor wells that are sampled quarterly (periodic sample events), only three samples from three wells produced results with tritium levels above the detection limit. The positive results were sporadic and variable with tritium activities all less than or equal to 479 pCi/L (less than 3% of the EPA drinking water limit for tritium).
| |
| 25
| |
| | |
| Fermi 2 - 2012 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report Emergent Sample Events (Table 10)
| |
| In 2012 Fermi 2 performed several emergent sample events. Emergent sample events are performed in response to a leak of licensed material, in response to a spill, unusual analytical results in samples taken during the course of periodic sampling, or if station personnel are concerned over the integrity of a system, structure, or component containing licensed material.
| |
| All emergent sample events (E-2012-G-01 through E-2012-G-08) were performed in response to the discovery of indications of possible corrosion found on a spare condensate line associated with the Fermi 2 Condensate Return Tank (CRT). Analytical results from these emergent sample events indicate that the spare condensate line is intact (maximum tritium activity 875 pCi/L).
| |
| Plant-related gamma-emitting radioisotopes and hard-to-detect radioisotopes were not detected in any ground-water samples collected from shallow monitor wells in 2012.
| |
| DISCUSSION Results of tritium analysis of ground water sampled in 2012 have shown that ground water from many of the site's wells have never yielded a positive result. In 2012, positive ground water results for tritium ranged from 203 - 875 pCi/L. These values are well within the range of historic values and lower than the range of values seen in 2011. Furthermore, since the Integrated Ground Water Protection Program was initiated in the Fall of 2007, plant-related gamma isotopes and hard-to-detect isotopes have never been identified in ground-water samples from any of the monitor wells.
| |
| If the tritium found in ground water from shallow wells were attributable to a leaking plant system then one would expect the levels to steadily increase over time, especially during the winter when there is, normally, less recharge from surface water. Instead the results from shallow monitor wells show periodic low-level hits for tritium in ground water with no trend. This pattern is consistent with what one would expect to see if the tritium were attributable to recapture in precipitation. Recapture of tritium emitted from nuclear power plant stacks in precipitation is well documented and these emissions are continuously monitored and reported annually by the utility as part of an approved effluents program. A tritium rain-water washout study performed at the Fermi site revealed that tritium is found in rain water collected at the site. Tritium activity in rain water samples, taken at the site over a period of two months, ranged from ca. 400 pCi/L to 5,750 pCi/L.
| |
| In 2012 tritium was found at very low levels in one deep monitor well. The positive result (241 pCi/L) was in the third-quarter ground water sample from monitor well EF2-07-009D, located at the eastern edge of the Fermi 2 Protected Area. This positive result is considered spurious because of the extremely low level reported (less than one-half the LLD) and there was only one positive sample from this monitor well. Furthermore, adjacent shallow monitor wells produced ground-water samples that were either negative for tritium, or, sporadically, of such low values that ground water from the surficial aquifer is not a credible source (see discussion below).
| |
| The deep monitor wells in the vicinity of Fermi 2 are screened 40-45 feet below ground surface in bedrock. An approximately 10-foot thick inorganic clay layer between surficial aquifer and the bedrock aquifer impedes flow to such a degree that the bedrock aquifer is saturated and under pressure to the point that static pressure in deep monitor wells rises to a level several feet above the top of the clay layer in deep monitor wells. Plant components, outside of buildings, that contain large quantities of tritiated water are either above ground in tanks or in piping running through aggregate at or above the water table. If these components were to generate a leak the 26
| |
| | |
| Fermi 2 - 2012 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report contamination would be evident by the presence of high levels of activity in nearby shallow monitor wells screened in the surficial aquifer. Furthermore, buildings completed in bedrock (e.g. Reactor Building, Turbine Building, and Radwaste Building), that contain contaminated systems, are so far below the potentiometric surface that, should they leak, ground water would flow into the building and therefore the leak could not be a source of contamination under any probable circumstance (for an evaluation of this see Fermi 2 UFSAR, Chapter 2).
| |
| Under these conditions (hydrogeological and plant construction) it is highly improbable that the positive tritium values in ground water from deep monitor wells are indicative of plant-related tritium because there is no known pathway for plant-related tritium to contaminate the bedrock aquifer. Furthermore, to date, the levels of detectible tritium activity in the surficial aquifer, when it occurs, are far too low to be a plausible source of tritium in the bedrock aquifer.
| |
| Additionally, natural radioisotopes commonly found in bedrock, such as Pb-210, produce low-energy betas in a similar energy range as tritium and may cause spurious results. The low-level of activity in ground water from deep monitor wells may also be attributable to chemiluminescence due to natural compounds that occur in the hard water from the bedrock (Bass Islands Group) dolomite.
| |
| In 2012 emergent sample events were performed to ensure that a spare condensate line from the CRT, that had indications of possible corrosion based on results from a non-destructive evaluation, has not begun to leak. This condensate line exits the CRT into the CRT valve galley where it is routed through a penetration in the concrete wall. The line is completed just outside of the valve galley and therefore risks spilling process water to the environment should the pipe fail.
| |
| Although the line contains a valve, its condition is unknown so no credit is taken for the valve to be able to prevent the CRT from draining if the line would fail. An evaluation of this circumstance was performed and personnel concluded that if the line failed catastrophically, the CRT would drain and Operations would identify the leak; however, if the line started to leak at a low rate, that leak could only be identified by analyzing ground water from adjacent monitor wells for tritium. To ensure that such a condition did not go undetected, station personnel established an emergent sample routine to ensure the sentinel wells in the vicinity of the CST diked area are sampled monthly (credit was taken for the months when the monitor wells were sampled as part of the quarterly, periodic, sample program). Based on the results of these samples, there is no indication of condensate leaking from the spare CRT line at this time.
| |
| 27
| |
| | |
| Fermi2 - 2012 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report Data Table 8: Deep Monitor Well Tritium Analysis Results for Year 2012 (Periodic [Quarterly]
| |
| Sample Events).
| |
| MONITOR LAB WELL EVENT ID QA TYPE ID PARAMETER PREFIX VALUE UNITS EF2-07-OO1D P-2012-G-Q1 NORMAL GEL H-3 < 3.60E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-001D P-2012-G-Q2 NORMAL GEL H-3 < 3.73E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-001D P-2012-G-Q3 DUPLICATE GEL H-3 < 4.14E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-001D P-2012-G-Q3 NORMAL GEL H-3 < 4.21E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-001D P-2012-G-Q4 NORMAL GEL H-3 < 3.56E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-003D P-2012-G-Q1 NORMAL GEL H-3 < 4.05E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-003D P-2012-G-Q2 NORMAL GEL H-3 < 4.65E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-003D P-2012-G-Q3 NORMAL GEL H-3 < 4.13E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-003D P-2012-G-Q4 NORMAL GEL H-3 < 4.32E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-004D P-2012-G-Q1 NORMAL GEL H-3 < 3.64E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-004D P-2012-G-Q2 NORMAL GEL H-3 < 3.93E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-004D P-2012-G-Q3 NORMAL GEL H-3 < 3.00E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-004D P-2012-G-Q4 NORMAL GEL H-3 < 4.22E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-006D P-2012-G-Q1 NORMAL GEL H-3 < 3.61E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-006D P-2012-G-Q2 NORMAL GEL H-3 < 4.47E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-006D P-2012-G-Q3 Note 1 EF2-07-006D P-2012-G-Q4 NORMAL GEL H-3 < 4.42E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-008D P-2012-G-Q1 NORMAL GEL H-3 < 4.18E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-008D P-2012-G-Q2 NORMAL GEL H-3 < 4.69E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-008D P-2012-G-Q3 NORMAL GEL H-3 < 4.10E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-008D P-2012-G-Q4 NORMAL GEL H-3 < 4.34E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-009D P-2012-G-QI DUPLICATE GEL H-3 < 4.07E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-009D P-2012-G-Q1 NORMAL GEL H-3 < 4.03E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-009D P-2012-G-Q2 DUPLICATE GEL H-3 < 4.62E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-009D P-2012-G-Q2 NORMAL GEL H-3 < 4.68E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-009D P-2012-G-Q3 NORMAL GEL H-3 2.41E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-009D P-2012-G-Q4 NORMAL GEL H-3 < 4.30E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-015D P-2012-G-Q1 NORMAL GEL H-3 < 4.04E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-015D P-2012-G-Q2 NORMAL GEL H-3 < 4.79E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-015D P-2012-G-Q3 NORMAL GEL H-3 < 2.97E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-015D P-2012-G-Q4 NORMAL GEL H-3 < 3.59E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-020D P-2012-G-Q1 NORMAL GEL H-3 < 3.65E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-020D P-2012-G-Q2 NORMAL GEL H-3 < 4.63E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-020D P-2012-G-Q2 DUPLICATE GEL H-3 < 3.94E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-020D P-2012-G-Q3 NORMAL GEL H-3 < 2.95E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-020D P-2012-G-Q4 NORMAL GEL H-3 < 3.85E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-029D P-2012-G-Q1 DUPLICATE GEL H-3 < 4.11E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-029D P-2012-G-Q1 NORMAL GEL H-3 < 4.02E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-029D P-2012-G-Q2 NORMAL GEL H-3 < 4.66E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-029D P-2012-G-Q3 NORMAL GEL H-3 < 3.08E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-029D P-2012-G-Q4 NORMAL GEL H-3 < 4.29E+02 PCI/L Note 1: Monitor well could not be accessed because well was obstructed.
| |
| 28
| |
| | |
| Fermi 2 - 2012 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report Table 9: Shallow Monitor Well Tritium Analysis Results for Year 2012 (Periodic [Quarterly]
| |
| Sample Events).
| |
| MONITOR LAB WELL EVENT ID QA TYPE ID PARAMETER PREFIX VALUE UNITS 392S P-2012-G-Q1 NORMAL GEL H-3 < 4.13E+02 PCI/L 392S P-2012-G-Q2 DUPLICATE GEL H-3 < 4.84E+02 PCI/L 392S P-2012-G-Q2 NORMAL GEL H-3 < 4.78E+02 PCI/L 392S P-2012-G-Q3 NORMAL GEL H-3 < 2.16E+02 PCI/L 392S P-2012-G-Q4 DUPLICATE GEL H-3 < 2.49E+02 PCI/L 392S P-2012-G-Q4 NORMAL GEL H-3 < 2.51E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-002S P-2012-G-Q1 NORMAL GEL H-3 < 4.15E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-002S P-2012-G-Q2 NORMAL GEL H-3 < 4.79E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-002S P-2012-G-Q3 NORMAL GEL H-3 < 3.01E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-002S P-2012-G-Q4 DUPLICATE GEL H-3 < 2.49E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-002S P-2012-G-Q4 NORMAL GEL H-3 < 3.65E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-003S P-2012-G-Q1 NORMAL GEL H-3 < 4.17E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-003S P-2012-G-Q2 NORMAL GEL H-3 < 4.65E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-003S P-2012-G-Q3 NORMAL GEL H-3 < 2.96E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-003S P-2012-G-Q4 NORMAL GEL H-3 < 4.34E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-005S P-2012-G-Q1 NORMAL GEL H-3 3.92E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-005S P-2012-G-Q2 NORMAL GEL H-3 < 3.70E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-005S P-2012-G-Q3 NORMAL GEL H-3 < 4.09E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-005S P-2012-G-Q4 NORMAL GEL H-3 < 4.29E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-007S P-2012-G-QI NORMAL GEL H-3 < 3.58E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-007S P-2012-G-Q2 NORMAL GEL H-3 < 4.66E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-007S P-2012-G-Q3 NORMAL GEL H-3 < 4.15E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-007S P-2012-G-Q4 NORMAL GEL H-3 < 3.59E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-008S P-2012-G-Q1 NORMAL GEL H-3 < 4.12E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-008S P-2012-G-Q2 NORMAL GEL H-3 < 4.63E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-008S P-2012-G-Q3 NORMAL GEL H-3 < 3.05E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-008S P-2012-G-Q4 NORMAL GEL H-3 < 4.30E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-012S P-2012-G-Q1 NORMAL GEL H-3 < 3.72E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-012S P-2012-G-Q2 NORMAL GEL H-3 < 4.59E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-012S P-2012-G-Q3 NORMAL GEL H-3 < 2.99E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-012S P-2012-G-Q4 NORMAL GEL H-3 < 2.48E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-013S P-2012-G-Q1 NORMAL GEL H-3 < 4.11E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-013S P-2012-G-Q2 NORMAL GEL H-3 < 4.47E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-0135 P-2012-G-Q3 NORMAL GEL H-3 < 2.98E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-013S P-2012-G-Q4 NORMAL GEL H-3 < 3.53E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-014S P-2012-G-Q1 NORMAL GEL H-3 < 4.10E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-0145 P-2012-G-Q2 NORMAL GEL H-3 < 3.90E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-014S P-2012-G-Q3 NORMAL GEL H-3 < 4.18E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-014S P-2012-G-Q4 NORMAL GEL H-3 < 4.22E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-015S P-2012-G-Q1 NORMAL GEL H-3 < 4.02E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-015S P-2012-G-Q2 NORMAL GEL H-3 < 4.72E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-015S P-2012-G-Q3 NORMAL GEL H-3 < 3.01E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-015S P-2012-G-Q4 NORMAL GEL H-3 < 3.63E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-016S P-2012-G-Ql NORMAL GEL H-3 < 4.17E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-016S P-2012-G-Q2 NORMAL GEL H-3 < 4.84E+02 PCI/L 29
| |
| | |
| Fermi 2 - 2012 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report EF2-07-016S P-2012-G-Q3 NORMAL GEL H-3 < 3.05E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-016S P-2012-G-Q4 NORMAL GEL H-3 < 3.68E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-017S P-2012-G-Ql NORMAL GEL H-3 < 3.62E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-017S P-2012-G-Q2 NORMAL GEL H-3 < 3.68E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-017S P-2012-G-Q3 NORMAL GEL H-3 < 3.01E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-017S P-2012-G-Q4 NORMAL GEL H-3 < 4.36E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-018S P-2012-G-Q1 NORMAL GEL H-3 < 3.72E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-018S P-2012-G-Q2 NORMAL GEL H-3 < 3.79E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-018S P-2012-G-Q3 NORMAL GEL H-3 < 4.04E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-018S P-2012-G-Q4 NORMAL GEL H-3 < 4.39E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-019S P-2012-G-Q1 DUPLICATE GEL H-3 < 3.60E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-019S P-2012-G-Q1 NORMAL GEL H-3 < 3.65E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-019S P-2012-G-Q2 NORMAL GEL H-3 < 3.73E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-019S P-2012-G-Q3 NORMAL GEL H-3 < 4.21E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-019S P-2012-G-Q4 NORMAL GEL H-3 < 3.56E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-020S P-2012-G-QI NORMAL GEL H-3 < 3.66E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-020S P-2012-G-Q2 NORMAL GEL H-3 < 4.67E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-020S P-2012-G-Q3 NORMAL GEL H-3 < 3.00E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-020S P-2012-G-Q4 NORMAL GEL H-3 < 4.30E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-021S P-2012-G-Q1 NORMAL GEL H-3 3.76E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-021S P-2012-G-Q2 NORMAL GEL H-3 < 4.83E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-021S P-2012-G-Q3 Note 1 EF2-07-021S P-2012-G-Q4 Note 2 EF2-07-022S P-2012-G-Q1 NORMAL GEL H-3 < 3.51E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-022S P-2012-G-Q2 NORMAL GEL H-3 < 4.66E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-022S P-2012-G-Q3 NORMAL GEL H-3 < 4.17E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-022S P-2012-G-Q4 DUPLICATE GEL H-3 < 3.71E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-022S P-2012-G-Q4 NORMAL GEL H-3 < 3.51E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-023S P-2012-G-Q1 NORMAL GEL H-3 4.79E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-023S P-2012-G-Q2 NORMAL GEL H-3 < 3.87E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-023S P-2012-G-Q3 NORMAL GEL H-3 < 2.12E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-023S P-2012-G-Q4 NORMAL GEL H-3 < 4.23E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-024S P-2012-G-Q1 NORMAL GEL H-3 < 4.13E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-024S P-2012-G-Q2 NORMAL GEL H-3 < 3.79E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-024S P-2012-G-Q3 NORMAL GEL H-3 < 2.99E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-024S P-2012-G-Q4 NORMAL GEL H-3 < 3.55E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-025S P-2012-G-Q1 NORMAL GEL H-3 < 4.11E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-025S P-2012-G-Q2 NORMAL GEL H-3 < 3.89E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-025S P-2012-G-Q3 NORMAL GEL H-3 < 4.18E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-025S P-2012-G-Q4 NORMAL GEL H-3 < 4.41E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-026S P-2012-G-Q1 NORMAL GEL H-3 < 3.67E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-026S P-2012-G-Q2 NORMAL GEL H-3 < 4.53E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-026S P-2012-G-Q3 NORMAL GEL H-3 < 4.18E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-026S P-2012-G-Q4 NORMAL GEL H-3 < 3.48E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-027S P-2012-G-Q1 NORMAL GEL H-3 < 3.67E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-027S P-2012-G-Q2 NORMAL GEL H-3 < 4.67E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-027S P-2012-G-Q3 NORMAL GEL H-3 < 4.21E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-027S P-2012-G-Q4 NORMAL GEL H-3 < 4.35E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-028S P-2012-G-Q1 NORMAL GEL H-3 < 4.10E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-028S P-2012-G-Q2 NORMAL GEL H-3 < 4.74E+02 PCI/L 30
| |
| | |
| Fermi 2 - 2012 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report EF2-07-028S P-2012-G-Q3 NORMAL GEL H-3 < 2.98E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-028S P-2012-G-Q4 NORMAL GEL H-3 < 2.49E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-029S P-2012-G-Q1 NORMAL GEL H-3 < 4.29E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-029S P-2012-G-Q2 NORMAL GEL H-3 < 4.56E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-029S P-2012-G-Q3 NORMAL GEL H-3 < 4.12E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-029S P-2012-G-Q4 NORMAL GEL H-3 < 4.37E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-031S P-2012-G-Ql Note 3 EF2-07-031S P-2012-G-Q2 NORMAL GEL H-3 < 3.76E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-031 S P-2012-G-Q3 DUPLICATE GEL H-3 < 2.87E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-031S P-2012-G-Q3 NORMAL GEL H-3 < 2.94E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-031S P-2012-G-Q4 NORMAL GEL H-3 < 3.68E+02 PCI/L MW-9 P-2012-G-Q1 Note 2 MW-9 P-2012-G-Q2 Note 2 MW-9 P-2012-G-Q3 Note 2 MW-9 P-2012-G-Q4 Note 2 MW-10 P-2012-G-Q1 Note 2 MW-10 P-2012-G-Q2 Note 2 MW-10 P-2012-G-Q3 Note 2 MW-10 P-2012-G-Q4 Note 2 MW-11 P-2012-G-Q1 NORMAL GEL H-3 < 3.64E+02 PCI/L MW-11 P-2012-G-Q2 NORMAL GEL H-3 < 3.76E+02 PCI/L MW-11 P-2012-G-Q3 DUPLICATE GEL H-3 < 4.10E+02 PCI/L MW-11 P-2012-G-Q3 NORMAL GEL H-3 < 4.28E+02 PCI/L MW-11 P-2012-G-Q4 NORMAL GEL H-3 < 3.57E+02 PCI/L MW-18 P-2012-G-Q1 NORMAL GEL H-3 < 3.57E+02 PCI/L MW-18 P-2012-G-Q2 NORMAL GEL H-3 < 3.75E+02 PCI/L MW-18 P-2012-G-Q3 NORMAL GEL H-3 < 4.20E+02 PCI/L MW-18 P-2012-G-Q4 NORMAL GEL H-3 < 3.56E+02 PCI/L MW-21 P-2012-G-Q1 NORMAL GEL H-3 < 3.55E+02 PCI/L MW-21 P-2012-G-Q2 NORMAL GEL H-3 < 3.80E+02 PCI/L MW-21 P-2012-G-Q3 DUPLICATE GEL H-3 < 4.13E+02 PCI/L MW-21 P-2012-G-Q3 NORMAL GEL H-3 < 4.17E+02 PCI/L MW-21 P-2012-G-Q4 NORMAL GEL H-3 < 3.63E+02 PCI/L Note 1: Monitor well could not be accessed because it was in a construction area.
| |
| Note 2: Monitor well could not be accessed because it has been buried in gravel/soil due to recent construction.
| |
| Note 3: Monitor well could not be accessed because of flooding.
| |
| 31
| |
| | |
| Fermi 2 - 2012 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report Table 10: Monitor Well Tritium Analysis Results for Year 2012 (Emergent Sample Events)
| |
| MONITOR LAB WELL EVENT ID QA TYPE ID PARAMETER PREFIX VALUE UNITS EF2-07-013S E-2012-G-01 NORMAL FERMI H-3 3.47E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-022S E-2012-G-01 NORMAL FERMI H-3 2.03E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-023S E-2012-G-01 NORMAL FERMI H-3 4.05E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-024S E-2012-G-01 NORMAL FERMI H-3 3.18E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-025S E-2012-G-01 NORMAL FERMI H-3 7.24E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-026S E-2012-G-01 NORMAL FERMI H-3 < 1.74E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-027S E-2012-G-01 NORMAL FERMI H-3 4.92E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-013S E-2012-G-02 NORMAL FERMI H-3 8.75E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-022S E-2012-G-02 NORMAL FERMI H-3 4.51E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-023S E-2012-G-02 NORMAL FERMI H-3 5.64E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-024S E-2012-G-02 NORMAL FERMI H-3 4.51E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-025S E-2012-G-02 NORMAL FERMI H-3 7.05E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-026S E-2012-G-02 NORMAL FERMI H-3 3.95E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-027S E-2012-G-02 NORMAL FERMI H-3 3.39E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-013S E-2012-G-03 NORMAL FERMI H-3 5.68E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-022S E-2012-G-03 NORMAL FERMI H-3 < 2.08E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-023S E-2012-G-03 NORMAL FERMI H-3 7.18E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-024S E-2012-G-03 NORMAL FERMI H-3 4.15E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-025S E-2012-G-03 NORMAL FERMI H-3 5.64E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-026S E-2012-G-03 NORMAL FERMI H-3 2.67E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-027S E-2012-G-03 NORMAL FERMI H-3 < 2.08E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-013S E-2012-G-04 NORMAL FERMI H-3 5.54E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-022S E-2012-G-04 NORMAL FERMI H-3 4.62E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-023S E-2012-G-04 NORMAL FERMI H-3 4.62E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-024S E-2012-G-04 NORMAL FERMI H-3 4.31E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-025S E-2012-G-04 NORMAL FERMI H-3 6.46E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-026S E-2012-G-04 NORMAL FERMI H-3 3.69E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-027S E-2012-G-04 NORMAL FERMI H-3 2.77E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-013S E-2012-G-05 NORMAL FERMI H-3 3.57E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-022S E-2012-G-05 NORMAL FERMI H-3 2.38E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-023S E-2012-G-05 NORMAL FERMI H-3 4.75E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-024S E-2012-G-05 NORMAL FERMI H-3 4.46E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-025S E-2012-G-05 NORMAL FERMI H-3 3.86E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-026S E-2012-G-05 NORMAL FERMI H-3 2.67E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-027S E-2012-G-05 NORMAL FERMI H-3 < 1.78E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-013S E-2012-G-06 NORMAL FERMI H-3 < 2.03E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-022S E-2012-G-06 NORMAL FERMI H-3 < 2.03E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-023S E-2012-G-06 NORMAL FERMI H-3 < 2.03E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-024S E-2012-G-06 NORMAL FERMI H-3 < 2.03E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-025S E-2012-G-06 NORMAL FERMI H-3 < 2.03E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-026S E-2012-G-06 NORMAL FERMI H-3 < 2.03E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-027S E-2012-G-06 NORMAL FERMI H-3 < 2.03E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-013S E-2012-G-07 NORMAL FERMI H-3 5.75E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-022S E-2012-G-07 NORMAL FERMI H-3 2.88E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-023S E-2012-G-07 NORMAL FERMI H-3 3.45E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-024S E-2012-G-07 NORMAL FERMI H-3 5.47E+02 PCI/L 32
| |
| | |
| Fermi 2 - 2012 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report EF2-07-025S E-2012-G-07 NORMAL FERMI H-3 5.75E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-026S E-2012-G-07 NORMAL FERMI H-3 2.59E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-027S E-2012-G-07 NORMAL FERMI H-3 3.74E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-013S E-2012-G-08 NORMAL FERMI H-3 4.96E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-022S E-2012-G-08 NORMAL FERMI H-3 4.66E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-023S E-2012-G-08 NORMAL FERMI H-3 4.37E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-024S E-2012-G-08 NORMAL FERMI H-3 3.21E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-025S E-2012-G-08 NORMAL FERMI H-3 4.96E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-026S E-2012-G-08 NORMAL FERMI H-3 3.21E+02 PCI/L EF2-07-027S E-2012-G-08 NORMAL FERMI H-3 3.79E+02 PCI/L Map of Current Monitor Well Locations Integrated Ground WaterMonitoring Program Base Map Fermi Energy Center 6 Nested Shallow and Deep Wevl Shallow Well Deep Well 0 EF2-1.5 EEF2 07 0171
| |
| )y 7F-O0I552e1*
| |
| EEF2 EF24 01 EF2F2-07033 EF2 07327 E 7 EF2-27EF20 2 EF2472
| |
| - F2F247- S - EF27-Ot3 w S EF2-57EF22 1N cEF2-07 .FEF2-77-0 0 5E)2 $ -15 t eF-75 E 72-07-0 27 332-07-0llS 0 EF2-07.0141 EFEF2-O7283 -
| |
| u F2-07-O3SS EF2.07.6: 70
| |
| ' Ff2O7-SO21 -
| |
| 33
| |
| | |
| Fermi 2 - 2012 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report Appendix C Rainwater Data and Analysis 34
| |
| | |
| Fermi 2 - 2012 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report Fermi 2 has documented the phenomenon of rainwater washout of gaseous effluents, in which tritium concentrations above background levels are routinely detected in rainwater samples collected at the site. These positive samples are most often observed in down-wind sectors from the plant. The largest gaseous tritium release point at the site is the Turbine Building ventilation exhaust vent. The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has also recognized this phenomenon of recapture of legally released gaseous effluents in NRC Regulatory Issue Summary 2008-03.
| |
| Fermi 2 continues to monitor this phenomenon through the collection of rainwater samples and storm-water outfall samples at least once per quarter. These samples are analyzed for tritium to a Lower Limit of Detection (LLD) of 500 pCi/L. The table and map at the end of this appendix show tritium results and collection locations for 2012 rainwater samples. The following general points may be made about these data:
| |
| : 1) Higher rainwater tritium levels were detected in down-wind sectors from the plant.
| |
| This is to be expected based on the prevailing wind direction and proximity to the turbine building vent, as explained above. It is also consistent with the occasional detection of tritium in shallow groundwater wells, as mentioned in Appendix B.
| |
| : 2) Detection of tritium in rainwater samples is more frequent and at somewhat higher levels than in shallow groundwater wells. This is consistent with the dilution of rainwater tritium prior to its occurrence in groundwater wells.
| |
| : 3) Tritium levels seen at the storm-water outfall can be explained by runoff of relatively highly tritiated water from plant roofs (near plant vents).
| |
| : 4) Tritium levels in rainwater near the CST can be explained by periodic venting of tritiated water vapor from the CST and CRT (minor release points for tritium).
| |
| : 5) With the exception of one precipitation sample taken during the first quarter of 2012 (2,090 pCi/L), all rainwater and storm-water tritium concentrations were less than one tenth of the EPA drinking water limit (20,000 pCi/L). That is, the EPA considers water with tritium concentrations greater than 10 times the levels commonly detected in Fermi rainwater to be safe for drinking.
| |
| The Table 11 presents 2012 rainwater and storm-water tritium analyses. The designation
| |
| "< CL" indicates that tritium in the sample was less than the "Critical Level" for that sample. The Critical Level is the net count rate that must be exceeded before the sample is said to have activity above background. Rainwater and storm-water samples are analyzed by Fermi 2 Chemistry personnel using a Liquid Scintillation Counter. Although the lab is requested to count these samples to an LLD of 500 pCi/L; the samples for two quarters (second and fourth quarter 2012) were counted to LLDs of 1,100 pCi/L (this is the nominal site LLD for Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program). The Critical Level (CL - a statistical limit for quantification of a positive sample) during those quarters (584 and 575 pCi/L, respectively) approached the requested LLDs and these results do not affect the interpretation. The CL for each sample is presented in the table.
| |
| 35
| |
| | |
| Fermi 2 - 2012 Annual RadioactiveEffluent Release Report Table 11: Rain Water and Storm Water Tritium Analysis Results for Year 2012 SAMPLE H3 RESULT CL SAMPLE LOCATION SAMPLEID DATE PREFIX (pCi/L) (pCi/L)
| |
| OUTFALL 002 702060 10-Jan-12 6.08E+02 2.00E+02 OUTFALL 002 702068 7-Feb-12 3.67E+02 2.00E+02 H3-PR-01 702115 27-Mar-12 9.69E+02 2.00E+02 H3-PR-04 702116 27-Mar-12 2.86E+02 2.00E+02 H3-PR-05 702117 27-Mar-12 5.13E+02 2.00E+02 H3-PR-06 702118 27-Mar-12 7.12E+02 2.00E+02 H3-PR-07 702119 27-Mar-12 3.71E+02 2.00E+02 H3-PR-08 702120 27-Mar-12 8.55E+02 2.00E+02 H3-PR-14 702121 27-Mar-12 3.14E+02 2.00E+02 H3-PR-23 702122 27-Mar-12 9.97E+02 2.00E+02 H3-PR-24 702123 27-Mar-12 Note 1 2.00E+02 EAST OF TB VENT 702124 27-Mar-12 2.09E+03 2.00E+02 OUTFALL 002 702125 27-Mar-12 2.28E+02 2.00E+02 WEST OF H3-PR-09 702126 27-Mar-12 6.84E+02 2.00E+02 H3-PR-01 702144 18-Jun-12 < CL 5.84E+02 H3-PR-04 702145 18-Jun-12 < CL 5.84E+02 H3-PR-05 702146 18-Jun-12 < CL 5.84E+02 H3-PR-06 702147 18-Jun-12 < CL 5.84E+02 H3-PR-07 702148 18-Jun-12 < CL 5.84E+02 H3-PR-08 702149 18-Jun-12 < CL 5.84E+02 H3-PR-14 702150 18-Jun-12 < CL 5.84E+02 H3-PR-23 702151 18-Jun-12 < CL 5.84E+02 H3-PR-24 702152 18-Jun-12 < CL 5.84E+02 OUTFALL 002 702153 18-Jun-12 < CL 5.84E+02 H3-PR-09A 702154 18-Jun-12 < CL 5.84E+02 H3-PR-01A 702155 18-Jun-12 < CL 5.84E+02 H3-PR-01 702286 27-Aug-12 4.13E+02 1.77E+02 H3-PR-04 702287 27-Aug-12 2.95E+02 1.77E+02 H3-PR-05 702288 27-Aug-12 < CL 1.77E+02 H3-PR-06 702289 27-Aug-12 < CL 1.77E+02 H3-PR-07 702290 27-Aug-12 < CL 1.77E+02 H3-PR-08 702291 27-Aug-12 < CL 1.77E+02 H3-PR-14 702292 27-Aug-12 < CL 1.77E+02 H3-PR-23 702293 27-Aug-12 1.77E+02 1.77E+02 H3-PR-24 702294 27-Aug-12 3.84E+02 1.77E+02 OUTFALL 002 702295 27-Aug-12 3.84E+02 1.77E+02 H3-PR-09A 702296 27-Aug-12 2.36E+02 1.77E+02 H3-PR-01A 702297 27-Aug-12 2.07E+02 1.77E+02 OUTFALL 002 702381 12-Nov-12 < CL 5.75E+02 H3-PR-01 702382 12-Nov-12 5.75E+02 5.75E+02 H3-PR-04 702383 12-Nov-12 < CL 5.75E+02 H3-PR-05 702384 12-Nov-12 < CL 5.75E+02 H3-PR-06 702385 12-Nov-12 < CL 5.75E+02 H3-PR-07 702386 12-Nov-12 < CL 5.75E+02 H3-PR-08 702387 12-Nov-12 < CL 5.75E+02 H3-PR-14 702388 12-Nov-12 < CL 5.75E+02 36
| |
| | |
| Fermi 2 - 2012 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report H3-PR-23 702389 12-Nov-12 < CL 5.75E+02 H3-PR-24 702390 12-Nov-12 < CL 5.75E+02 Note 1: Less than minimum required sample quantity collected.
| |
| The map below shows the locations of the samples listed in the table on the preceding page:
| |
| RAIN WATER COLLECTION LOCATIONS t
| |
| 11
| |
| ,
| |
| - 8 H3-PR -19 H3 PR-1 H3-PR-17 H3-PR- 2 H3-PR-06 - H3-PR-16 H3-PR-20 R
| |
| - H3-PR-045 H3-PR 21 2 L a { ' cH3-PR-15 H3PR-22 H3-PR-8
| |
| - -H33R-03 H-PR-02 - H3-PR-14
| |
| { I4 H3-R4 H3-PR- H3-PR-1340 r G1. 1 =H3-PR-10 H3-PR-12 37
| |
| | |
| Fermi 2 - 2012 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report Appendix D Meteorological Joint Frequency Distributions 38
| |
| | |
| Fermi 2 - 2012 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report Ferri 2 Joint Frequency Distribution Table - 2012 Stability Class - A Wind Speed (mph) N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW Oto 0.75 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0.76to 2.5 0 1 7 4 3 0 1 3 2 2 3 7 5 7 2 4 2.51 to 4.5 10 9 8 12 21 21 23 18 18 18 18 25 18 34 20 14 4.51 to 6.5 31 7 27 29 33 65 80 44 51 73 26 38 28 34 44 21 6.51 to 8.5 11 16 32 28 25 73 121 51 60 77 35 37 14 32 23 11 8.51 to 11.5 11 16 10 13 27 61 55 42 15 52 24 7 9 40 16 14 11.51to 14.5 12 4 3 0 0 10 5 1 2 6 19 3 1 18 18 6 14.51to 18.5 1 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 2 0 4 3 0 2 18.51to 23.5 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 4 Totals: 79 53 87 86 109 233 285 159 148 229 132 117 80 168 123 76 Grand Total: 2164 39
| |
| | |
| Fermi 2 - 2012 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report Ferm 2 oint Frequency Distribution Table - 2012 Stability Class - B Wind Speed (mph) N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW Oto 0.75 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.76to 2.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 2.51to 4.5 2 3 0 2 3 0 4 1 2 3 2 6 7 4 4 2 4.51to 6.5 8 2 3 2 3 5 2 2 2 6 5 4 6 6 6 5 6.51to 8.5 8 3 1 2 1 6 2 3 3 8 11 2 0 6 1 4 8.51to 11.5 3 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 3 6 9 5 1 9 4 2 11.51to 14.5 2 0 0 1 2 0 1 0 0 1 2 2 0 1 1 1 14.51to 18.5 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 18.51to 23.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Totals: 10 5 8 12 12 10 9 11 26 29 20 16 26 17 14 23 Grand Total: 248 40
| |
| | |
| Fermi 2 - 2012 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report Fermi 2 Joint Frequency Distribution Table - 2012 Stability Class - C Wind Speed (mph) N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW Oto 0.75 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.76to 2.5 0 1 0 2 2 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 2.51to 4.5 1 2 3 1 1 1 2 1 2 3 1 9 3 7 8 0 4.51to 6.5 4 3 5 4 0 4 1 3 3 4 4 8 4 3 5 2 6.51to 8.5 5 2 2 4 3 6 6 1 1 8 4 1 2 5 2 4 8.51to 11.5 1 4 6 1 0 2 4 0 1 4 7 3 1 9 6 4 11.51to 14.5 1 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 2 3 6 1 1 1 1 3 14.51to 18.5 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 2 1 0 0 2 18.51to 23.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Totals: 12 13 16 12 8 15 13 6 10 23 26 24 13 25 22 15 Grand Total: 253 41
| |
| | |
| Fermi 2 - 2012 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report Fermi 2 Joint Frequency Distribution Table - 2012 SLabiity Class - D Wind Speed (mph) N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0to 0.75 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 4 1 1 0 1 0.76 to 2.5 7 7 5 2 3 4 2 1 8 2 5 11 15 25 11 11 2.51 to 4.5 25 28 30 10 14 14 22 13 13 15 22 54 62 43 45 25 4.51to 6.5 32 35 73 41 42 50 27 22 31 51 49 82 50 53 33 43 6.51to 8.5 40 23 63 70 44 44 27 14 23 37 59 46 53 48 30 35 8.51 to 11.5 37 22 20 42 28 31 22 7 19 67 95 34 23 34 38 26 11.51to 14.5 10 7 8 5 14 10 1 13 5 29 28 9 11 7 17 8 14.51to 18.5 10 6 5 1 19 1 1 1 0 10 13 5 2 2 8 14 18.51to 23.5 2 0 0 0 2 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 Totals: 164 128 204 171 167 158 102 71 99 212 271 245 217 213 182 179 Grand Total: 2783 42
| |
| | |
| Fermi 2 - 2012 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report Fermi 2 Joint Frequency Distribution Table - 2012 Stability Class - E Wind Speed (mph) N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW Oto 0.75 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0.76 to 2.5 9 8 9 1 5 5 6 8 9 19 14 31 41 45 25 16 2.51 to 4.5 35 24 18 14 9 18 21 19 52 54 70 99 42 53 71 36 4.51 to 6.5 25 22 30 14 23 29 27 38 42 86 49 28 27 33 15 23 6.51to 8.5 8 3 3 3 11 26 22 25 47 89 24 5 6 10 8 11 8.51 to 11.5 5 3 0 3 0 2 11 19 31 64 34 2 1 2 4 5 11.51to 14.5 4 0 0 0 1 0 4 4 6 37 7 1 0 0 2 0 14.51to 18.5 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 11 1 0 0 0 0 0 18.51to 23.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Totals: 90 61 60 35 49 80 92 114 189 361 199 167 117 143 126 91 Grand Total: 1974 43
| |
| | |
| Fermi 2 - 2012 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report Fermi 2 Joint Frequency Distribution Table - 2012 Stability Class - F Wind Speed (mph) N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW Oto 0.75 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 2 2 0 3 1 0 0 0.76to 2.5 11 8 2 4 5 4 0 10 14 19 18 36 36 49 24 10 2.51 to 4.5 29 1 2 2 8 13 12 19 18 44 31 23 9 34 33 24 4.51to 6.5 4 0 0 1 5 22 6 14 17 14 6 0 0 1 1 5 6.51to 8.5 0 0 0 0 5 6 2 9 9 15 4 0 0 0 0 0 8.51to 11.5 0 1 0 0 2 2 3 10 13 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 11.51to 14.5 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 3 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 14.51to 18.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.51to 23.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Totals: 45 10 5 8 27 47 23 67 71 116 61 59 48 85 58 39 Grand Total: 769 44
| |
| | |
| Fermi 2 - 2012 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report Fermi 2 Joint Frequency Distribution Table - 2012 Staim> Cass-G Wind Speed (mph) N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW Oto 0.75 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0.76to 2.5 5 7 5 2 2 4 8 7 2 7 7 18 27 82 36 20 2.51to 4.5 15 0 1 1 5 15 6 2 11 10 6 4 3 37 15 36 4.51to 6.5 2 0 0 0 7 12 13 12 3 7 0 0 0 0 0 1 6.51to 8.5 0 0 0 0 0 13 1 8 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 8.51to 11.5 0 0 0 0 5 3 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 11.51to 14.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14.51to 18.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.51to 23.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Totals: 22 8 8 3 19 47 28 30 18 28 13 22 31 120 51 58 Grand Total: 506 END 45
| |
| | |
| ENCLOSURE 2 To NRC-13-0021 2012 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report Total Pages - 188 Enrico Fermi Atomic Power Plant, Unit 2 NRC Docket No. 50-341 NRC License No. NPF-43
| |
| | |
| FERMI 2 NUCLEAR POWER PLANT DETROIT EDISON COMPANY OPERATING LICENSE NO. NPF - 43 Fermi 2 - 2012 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report for the period of January 1, 2012 through December 31, 2012 Prepared by:
| |
| Fermi 2 Radiological Engineering
| |
| | |
| Fermi 2 - 2012 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report Table of Contents Page Executive Summary 1 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Results 3 Direct Radiation Monitoring 3 ThermoluminescentDosimeters 3 Atmospheric Monitoring 4 Air Sampling 5 TerrestrialMonitoring 8 Milk Sampling 8 GroundwaterSampling 9 Garden Sampling 10 Aquatic Monitoring 11 Drinking Water Sampling 11 Surface Water Sampling 13 Sediment Sampling 14 Fish Sampling 16 Land Use Census 18 2012 Land Use Census Results 19 Appendix A Sampling Locations A-1 Appendix B EnvironmentalDataSummary B-I Appendix C EnvironmentalData Tables C-I Appendix D EnvironmentalProgramExceptions D-1 DirectRadiation Monitoring D-1 Atmospheric Monitoring D-1 TerrestrialMonitoring D-1 Milk Sampling D-1 Garden Sampling D-1 GroundwaterSampling D-1 Aquatic Monitoring D-2 Drinking Water Sampling D-2 Suface Water Sampling D-2 Sediment Sampling D-2 FishSampling D-2 Program Changes D-2 ii
| |
| | |
| Fermi 2 - 2012 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report Appendix E InterlaboratoryComparisonData, GEL Laboratories' QualityAssurance Programs2012Annual QualityAssurance Report and the Annual Quality Assurance Status Report EnvironmentalDosimetry Company iii
| |
| | |
| Fermi 2 - 2012 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report List of Figures Page Figure 1 Fermi 2 Annual Average TLD Gamma Exposure 4 Figure 2 HistoricalGross Beta andIodine-131 Activity in Air Samples 6 Figure 3 Fermi 2 Air ParticulateGross Beta for 2012 7 Figure 4 HistoricalStrontium-90 Activity in Local Milk Samples 9 Figure 5 HistoricalGross Beta Activity in Drinking Water Samples 13 Figure 6 HistoricalCesium-137 Activity in Sediment Samples 16 Map 1 SamplingLocations By Station Number (within 1 mile) App.-A Map 2 Sampling Locations By Station Number (1 to 5 miles) App.-A Map 3 SamplingLocations By Station Number (greaterthan 5 miles) App.-A List of Tables Page Table 1 2012 Average Gross Beta Concentrationsin Air Particulates 6 Table 2 ClosestResidences 20 Table 3 Closest Gardens 21 Table 4 Milk Locations 22 Table 5 Closest Meat Locations 23 Table A-1 DirectRadiation Sample Locations A-1 Table A-2 Air Particulateand Air Iodine Sample Locations A-7 Table A-3 Milk Sample Locations A-8 Table A-4 Garden Sample Locations A-8 Table A-5 Drinking Water Sample Locations A-8 Table A-6 Surface Water Sample Locations A-9 Table A-7 GroundwaterSample Locations A-9 Table A-8 Sediment Sample Locations A-10 Table A-9 Fish Sample Locations A-10 Table B-1 RadiologicalEnvironmentalMonitoring ProgramSummary B-1 iv
| |
| | |
| Fermi 2 - 2012 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report Executive Summary This Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report is a detailed report on the Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program (REMP) conducted at Detroit Edison's Fermi 2 nuclear power plant from January 1 through December 31, 2012.
| |
| Samples collected as part of the REMP program were analyzed by GEL Laboratories, LLC. Radioactivity measurements for these samples are reported in terms of sample concentration or less than the Lab's Minimum Detectable Activity (MDA). Standard units of measure for reporting radioactivity are the Curie (Ci) for the amount of activity, and the Roentgen (R) for the amount of radiation exposure in free air. The unit of radioactivity used in this report is the picocurie (pCi). A picocurie is one-one trillionth of a curie. The unit of direct radiation used in this report is milliroentgen (mR). A milliroentgen is one-one thousandth of a roentgen The Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program is divided into four major parts.
| |
| These four parts are direct radiation monitoring, atmospheric monitoring, terrestrial monitoring, and aquatic monitoring. The results of 2012 data showed that environmental radioactivity levels have not increased from background radioactivity levels detected prior to the operation of Fermi 2.
| |
| Direct radiation measurements were taken at 79 locations using thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLD). The average quarterly exposure was 15.0 mR/standard quarter for indicating locations. This average exposure is equivalent to the ambient radiation levels measured prior to the operation of Fermi 2.
| |
| Atmospheric monitoring results for 2012 showed only naturally occurring radioactivity and were consistent with levels measured prior to the operation of Fermi 2. No radioactivity attributable to activities at Fermi 2 was detected greater than the MDA in any atmospheric samples during 2012.
| |
| Terrestrial monitoring results for 2012 of milk, groundwater, and leafy garden vegetable samples, showed only naturally occurring radioactivity. The radioactivity levels detected were consistent with levels measured prior to the operation of Fermi 2. No radioactivity attributable to activities at Fermi 2 was detected greater than the MDA in any terrestrial samples during 2012.
| |
| 1
| |
| | |
| Fermi 2 - 2012 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report Aquatic monitoring results for 2012 of drinking water, surface water, sediment, and fish, showed only naturally occurring radioactivity and radioactivity associated with fallout from past atmospheric nuclear weapons testing and were consistent with levels measured prior to the operation of Fermi 2. No radioactivity attributable to activities at Fermi 2 was detected above the MDA in any aquatic samples during 2012.
| |
| REMP sampling did not identify any radioactivity above the MDA attributable to the operation of Fermi 2.
| |
| 2
| |
| | |
| Fermi 2 - 2012 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Results Direct Radiation Monitoring Radiation is a normal component of the environment resulting primarily from natural sources, such as cosmic radiation and naturally occurring radionuclides; and to a lesser extent, from manmade sources such as fallout from past nuclear weapons testing. The earth is constantly bombarded by cosmic radiation in the form of high energy gamma rays and particulates. The earth's crust also contains natural radioactive material, such as uranium and potassium-40, which contributes to the background radiation. Direct radiation monitoring primarily measures ionizing radiation from cosmic and terrestrial sources.
| |
| Thermoluminescent Dosimeters Fermi 2 uses thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs) to measure direct gamma radiation in the environs of Fermi 2. The TLDs are thoroughly tested to comply with NRC Regulatory Guide 4.13 and American National Standards Institute's (ANSI) publication N545-1975, which assure accurate measurements under varying environmental conditions before being placed in the field.
| |
| Fermi 2 has 79 TLD locations within a fifteen mile radius of the plant. Of the 79 TLD locations, 26 are located on-site and are not used for comparison with the control locations. These 26 TLDs are affected by Hydrogen Water Chemistry's sky shine and are not representative of off-site dose. Indicator TLDs are located within a ten mile radius of the plant and control TLDs are located at a distance that is outside the potential influence of the plant. While in the field, TLDs are exposed to background radiation and, if measurable, gaseous effluents and direct radiation from Fermi 2. Environmental TLDs are exchanged and processed on a quarterly basis. TLD data are reported in terms of milliroentgen per standard quarter (mR/std qtr), with a standard quarter being 91 days.
| |
| 3
| |
| | |
| Fermi 2 - 2012 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report In 2012, the average exposure for TLDs at all off-site indicator locations was 15.0 mR/std qtr and for all control locations was 14.0 mR/std qtr. These exposures are consistent with preoperational and past operational measurements as shown in Figure 1.
| |
| Fermi 2 Annual Average TLD Gamma Exposure 25 20 a 15 In 10 Preoperational Operational 5
| |
| Ii 0
| |
| c- 02 0) c o Co 2 02 2 02 02 0 N V t0 c0 O N Indicator -o- Control Figure 1 - Fermi 2 Annual Average TLD Gamma Exposure: The similarity between indicator and control results demonstrates that the operation of Fermi 2 has not caused any abnormal gamma exposure.
| |
| Atmospheric Monitoring A potential exposure pathway to people is inhalation of airborne radioactive materials.
| |
| Fermi 2 continuously samples the ambient air surrounding Fermi 2 for radioactivity. Air sampling began in 1979 during the preoperational program. At each sampling location, a mechanical air sampler is used to draw a continuous volume of air through two filters designed to collect particulates and radioiodines. Air samples are collected weekly and analyzed for gross beta radiation and iodine-131 gamma radiation. The particulate filters for each sampling location are combined on a quarterly basis to form a "composite sample" and are analyzed for gamma emitting radionuclides. There are four indicator sampling locations which were selected based on an evaluation of the predominant wind directions. A fifth sampling location is approximately fourteen miles west of the plant and is considered to be in a location unaffected by the operation of the plant. This is used as the control location.
| |
| 4
| |
| | |
| Fermi 2 - 2012 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report Air Sampling On October 16, 1980, the People's Republic of China conducted an atmospheric nuclear weapon test. The fallout from this test was detected in Fermi 2 preoperational environmental air samples in 1981 (see Figure 2). The average gross beta for 1981 was 1.60E-1 pCi/cubic meter for indicator samples and 2.40E-1 pCi/cubic meter for control samples which was a factor of ten times greater than background gross beta. Gamma spectroscopic analyses of the particulate filters indicated cesium-137, cerium-141, cerium-144, ruthenium-103, ruthenium-106, zirconium-95, niobium-95, manganese-54, and antimony-125 in the atmosphere as a result of this test. In 1986, as shown in Figure 2, there was a slight increase in gross beta activity and a 2.70E-1 pCi/cubic meter "spike" in the iodine-131 activity. These elevated levels in 1986 are attributed to the nuclear accident at Chernobyl on April 26, 1986. For all other years, the iodine-131 activity was below the lower limit of detection (LLD) of 7.0E-2 pCi/cubic meter.
| |
| On March 11, 2011, following the Tohoku earthquake and tsunami the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant in Japan, experienced a series of equipment failures, fuel-melt, and releases of radioactivity to the environment.
| |
| Within weeks of the accident, US nuclear power plant REMP programs and other monitoring stations detected the radioactivity from Japan mainly in the form of airborne iodine-131.
| |
| During the week of April 5, 2011, all five (5) of Fermi's air monitoring stations detected radioactivity greater than the MDA at an average airborne gross beta of 7.12E-2 pCi/cubic meter and 8.12E-2 pCi/cubic meter for iodine-131 due to the accident at Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant.
| |
| During 2012, two hundred and sixty (260) particulate air filters and charcoal cartridges were collected and analyzed for gross beta activity and iodine-131 respectively. The average gross beta for indicator samples was 4.73E-2 pCi/cubic meter and 4.60E-2 pCi/cubic meter for control samples. None of the charcoal filters collected showed detectable levels of iodine- 131 greater than the MDA attributable to the operation of Fermi 2. The following table contains the annual average gross beta results of all five sample locations for 2012.
| |
| 5
| |
| | |
| Fermi 2 - 2012 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report 2012 Average Gross Beta Concentrations in Air Particulates 3
| |
| (pCi/m )
| |
| Table 1 Station Description (sector/distance) Annual Average API-1 Estral Beach (NE/1.4 mi.) 4.66E-2 API-2 (I) Site Boundary (NNW/0.6 mi.) 4.45E-2 API-3 (I) Site Boundary (NW/0.6 mi.) 4.79E-2 API-4 (C) North Custer Rd. (W/14 mi.) 4.60E-2 API-5 Site Boundary (S/1.2 mi.) 5.04E-2 (I) = Indicator Station (C) = Control Station Twenty (20) quarterly particulate filter composites were prepared and analyzed for gamma emitting radionuclides. Naturally occurring beryllium-7 was detected in both indicator and control samples and naturally occurring potassium-40 was detected in indicator samples.
| |
| In conclusion, the atmospheric monitoring data are consistent with preoperational and prior operational data and show no adverse long-term trends in the environment attributable to operation of Fermi 2 as illustrated in Figures 2 and 3.
| |
| Historical Gross Beta and Iodine - 131 3.E-01 Chinese Weapon Test Activty in Air Samples Chemobyl Event 3.E-01 d 2.E-01 E
| |
| 2.E U1.E-01 - tat 5.E1-02 $-i O.E+0O 0M M U - 0MC M ) -
| |
| NJ 0) M) 40 N 0)
| |
| N CO C 00 M0 ) 0) 0) 0) r) M) C) ) C) C) rn M( nN (N N (N N (N Indicator Gross Beta -+- Control Gross Beta - Iodine - 131 Figure 2 - Historical Gross Beta and Iodine-131 Activity in Air Samples; The similarity between indicator and control gross beta results demonstrates that the operation of Fermi 2 has had no adverse long-term trends in the environment. The lower limit of detection (LLD) for iodine-131 is 0.07 pCi/cubic meter.
| |
| 6
| |
| | |
| Fermi 2 - 2012 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report Fermi 2 Air Particulate Gross Beta 2012 1.E-01 9.E-02 8.E ,.7E +-'+
| |
| E 6.E-02 + n +4++
| |
| 3.E-02 +
| |
| 2.E-02 1.E-02 O.E+00 >
| |
| ~
| |
| ) .
| |
| 0J 0.>
| |
| d
| |
| .0C.n >' >,
| |
| T C > > > )
| |
| 0 0) 0f()
| |
| (L~l LL Q g-Q QQNNCC Collection Date
| |
| -o- Indicator -+- Control Figure 3 - Fermi 2 Air Particulate Gross Beta for 2012; the concentration of beta emitting radionuclides in airborne particulates samples was essentially identical at indicator and control locations. Gross beta activity varies throughout the year and is primarily an effect of seasonal precipitation.
| |
| 7
| |
| | |
| Fermi 2 - 2012 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report Terrestrial Monitoring Radionuclides released to the atmosphere may deposit on soil and vegetation, and therefore, may eventually be incorporated into the human food chain. To assess the impact of Fermi 2 operations to humans from the ingestion pathway, samples of milk, green leafy vegetables, and groundwater are collected and analyzed for radioactivity. The following sections discuss the type and frequency of terrestrial sampling, analyses performed, and a comparison of 2012 data to previous operational and preoperational data.
| |
| Milk Sampling A major pathway in the human food chain is the consumption of milk from grazing animals (dairy cows or goats) due to biological concentration and the short turn around time in this pathway. Milk is collected from one indicator location and one control location semimonthly when animals are in the pasture, and monthly when the animals are on stored feed. The milk is analyzed for iodine-131, gamma emitting radionuclides, and strontium-89/90. At times when milk samples are not available, grass samples are collected at both the control milk sample location and the location where milk is not available. Grass samples are analyzed for iodine-131 and other gamma emitting radionuclides. During 2012, no grass samples were scheduled or collected for the REMP.
| |
| Milk sampling began in 1979 during the preoperational program. During this time period, milk samples were analyzed for iodine-131 and other gamma emitting radionuclides. Cesium-137 and naturally occurring potassium-40 were the only radionuclides detected in milk samples during the preoperational program. The cesium-137 concentration averaged 3.60E+0 pCi/liter and is due to past atmospheric nuclear weapons testing. In 1986, after the nuclear accident at Chernobyl, iodine-131 and cesium-137 were detected in both indicator and control milk samples. The average concentration was 3.70E+0 pCi/liter for iodine-131 and 6.60E+0 pCi/liter for cesium-137.
| |
| The analysis for strontium-89/90 began in 1988, and strontium-90 is routinely detected in both indicator and control milk samples because of past atmospheric nuclear weapons testing.
| |
| During 2012, thirty four (34) milk samples were collected and analyzed for iodine-131, gamma emitting radionuclides, and strontium-89/90. No iodine-131 or strontium-89/90 was detected greater than the MDA in any of the samples.
| |
| 8
| |
| | |
| Fermi 2 - 2012 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report Naturally occurring potassium-40 and beryllium-7 were detected in both indicator and control samples.
| |
| In 1970, the concentration of strontium-90 in Monroe County milk was 6.00E+0 pCi/liter according to the Michigan Department of Health's "Milk Surveillance," Radiation Data and Reports, Vol. 11-15, 1970-1974. Figure 4 shows the calculated radiological decay curve for the 1970 concentration of strontium-90 and the average concentrations since 1988. This graph illustrates that the inventory of strontium-90 in the local environment is decreasing with time and closely follows the calculated decay curve. This supports the determination that the inventory of strontium-90 in the environment is due to fallout from past atmospheric nuclear weapons testing and not the operation of Fermi 2.
| |
| Historical Strontium-90 Activity in Local Milk Samples 6.0
| |
| *d 4.0 r20 O- s (N In not area N- by CO nc 00 OD CD Cd s C0 water 00 OD ND suple 0 fo0 dO) ND ic u areCC)
| |
| C) r- ti rD CD cD 00 0CCD CD 00 O) CA CD CD CD O) O) O) O) C)
| |
| 'N 'N
| |
| : 6) (TO CA O T C ON 'N 'N N 'N p
| |
| I Average Sr-90 Activity Calculated Decay Figure 4 - Historical Strontium-90 Activity in Local Milk Samples; the concentration of strontium-90 in local milk samples is decreasing with time and is below the calculated decay curve. This supports the fact that strontium-90 in local milk is due to fallout from past atmospheric nuclear weapons testing and not the operation of Fermi 2.
| |
| Groundwater Sampling In areas not served by municipal water systems, water supplies for domestic use are generally obtained from private wells. The network of private wells presently in use forms the source of water for domestic and livestock purposes in farms and homes west and north of the site. With the construction of new water plants and distribution systems, the water use trend in the area is from groundwater (local wells) to surface water (municipal water supply).
| |
| 9
| |
| | |
| Fermi 2 - 2012 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report Groundwater is collected on a quarterly basis from four wells surrounding Fermi 2. The groundwater is analyzed for gamma emitting radionuclides and tritium. Sampling location GW-4, which is located approximately 0.6 miles west northwest, is designated as the control location because it is up-gradient and is least likely to be affected by the operation of the plant. The other three sampling locations are down-gradient from Fermi 2 and designated as indicator locations.
| |
| Groundwater sampling began in 1987, during the operational period of the REMP program. From 1987 to 1996, naturally occurring potassium-40, cesium-137, and tritium were detected in both indicator and control samples. The average concentration was 7.71E+0 pCi/liter for cesium-137 and 1.50E+2 pCi/liter for tritium. The presence of cesium-137 and tritium in groundwater samples is due to fallout from past atmospheric nuclear weapons testing leaching into the soil and becoming incorporated into the groundwater. From 1997 to 2008, only naturally occurring potassium-40 activity was detected in groundwater samples.
| |
| In 2012, sixteen (16) groundwater samples were collected and analyzed for gamma emitting radionuclides and tritium. During 2012, no samples detected any activity greater than the MDA.
| |
| Garden Sampling Fermi 2 collects samples of broad leaf vegetables from indicator locations identified by the annual Land Use Census. Samples are also collected at a control location that is at a distance and direction which is considered to be unaffected by plant operations. Samples are collected once a month during the growing season (June through September) and are analyzed for iodine-131 and other gamma emitting radionuclides.
| |
| Vegetable sampling started in 1982. During the preoperational period from 1982 to 1985, only naturally occurring potassium-40 was detected in both indicator and control vegetable samples. During the operational period from 1985 to 1990 and 1994 to 1995, only naturally occurring potassium-40 was detected in both indicator and control vegetable samples. However, in 1991, 1992, and 1993, cesium-137 was detected in one indicator sample each year and had an average concentration of 1.2E+1 pCi/kilogram.
| |
| Cesium-137 may become incorporated into plants by either uptake from the soil or direct deposition on foliar surfaces. Since cesium-137 is normally not detected in gaseous effluent samples from Fermi 2, and there have been no recent atmospheric weapons testing or nuclear accidents, the incorporation of cesium-137 by direct deposition is highly unlikely. The most probable source of cesium-137 in vegetable samples is the uptake of previously deposited cesium-137, which has leached into the soil. This cesium activity is attributed to fallout from past atmospheric weapons testing and to the nuclear accident at Chernobyl.
| |
| 10
| |
| | |
| Fermi 2 - 2012 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report During 2012, twelve (12) vegetable samples were collected and analyzed for iodine-131 and other gamma emitting radionuclides. No iodine-131 was detected greater than the MDA in vegetable samples during 2012. The only gamma emitting radionuclide detected were naturally occurring potassium-40 and beryllium-7 in both indicator and control samples.
| |
| Terrestrial monitoring results for 2012 of milk, groundwater and leafy garden vegetable samples, showed only naturally occurring radioactivity. The radioactivity levels detected were consistent with levels measured prior to the operation of Fermi 2 and no radioactivity attributable to activities at Fermi 2 was detected greater than the MDA in any terrestrial sample. In conclusion, the terrestrial monitoring data show no adverse trends in the terrestrial environment.
| |
| Aquatic Monitoring Lake Erie, on which Fermi 2 borders, is used as a source for drinking water, as well as for recreational activities such as fishing, swimming, sunbathing, and boating. For this reason, Lake Erie and its tributaries are routinely monitored for radioactivity.
| |
| The aquatic monitoring portion of the REMP consists of sampling raw municipal drinking water, surface water, lake sediments, and fish for the presence of radioactivity.
| |
| The following sections discuss the type and frequency of aquatic sampling, analyses performed, and a comparison of 2012 data to previous operational and preoperational data.
| |
| Drinking Water Sampling Fermi 2 monitors drinking water at one control location and one indicator location using automatic samplers. The automatic samplers collect samples at time intervals that are very short (hourly) relative to the sample collection period (monthly) in order to assure that a representative sample is obtained. Indicator water samples are obtained at the Monroe water intake located approximately 1.1 miles south of the plant. Detroit municipal water is used for the control samples and is obtained at the Allen Park water intake located approximately 18.6 miles north of the plant. Drinking water samples are collected on a monthly basis and analyzed for gross beta, strontium-89/90, and gamma emitting radionuclides. The monthly samples for each location are combined on a quarterly basis and analyzed for tritium activity.
| |
| 11
| |
| | |
| Fermi 2 - 2012 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report In late 1980, as shown in Figure 5, an atmospheric nuclear weapon test was conducted by the People's Republic of China. As a result of this test, the average gross beta for 1981 was 9.80E+0 pCi/liter for water samples. Figure 5 also shows that, except for the Chinese weapons testing, the historic drinking water sample data are below or slightly above the lower limit of detection (4.OOE+0 pCi/liter) required by US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) National Interim Primary Drinking Water regulations. Even during the Chinese weapons testing, the drinking water samples did not exceed the USEPA maximum allowable criteria of 5.00E+1 pCi/liter gross beta. In 1980 and 1983, cesium-137 was detected in drinking water samples at levels ranging from 5.40E+0 pCi/liter to 1.90E+1 pCi/liter. Tritium was also detected during the preoperational program and had an average of 3.25E+2 pCi/liter. The presence of cesium-137 and detectable levels of tritium in these water samples is due to fallout from past atmospheric nuclear weapons testing and naturally occurring tritium.
| |
| From 1985 to 2011, the average annual gross beta activity for indicator samples was 3.86E+0 pCi/liter and 3.32E+0 pCi/liter for control samples. The analysis for strontium-89/90 began in 1988, and strontium-90 has in the past been detected in both indicator and control samples. The average strontium-90 activity for indicator samples was 7.25E-1 pCi/liter and 7.56E-1 pCi/liter for control samples during this time period. Tritium was also detected in both indicator and control drinking water samples during this time period.
| |
| The average tritium activity for indicator samples was 2.52E+2 pCi/liter and 2.60E+2 pCi/liter for control samples. The presence of strontium-90 and detectable levels of tritium in these water samples is due to fallout from past atmospheric nuclear weapons testing and naturally occurring tritium.
| |
| In 2012, twenty-four (24) drinking water samples were collected and analyzed for gross beta, gamma emitting radionuclides, strontium-89/90, and tritium. Gross beta activity was detected in two indicator samples at an average of 4.80E+0 pCi/liter. Naturally occurring potassium-40 was detected in both indicator and samples. No strontium-89/90 activity was detected greater than the MDA in drinking water samples during 2012. Eight (8) quarterly composite drinking water samples were prepared and analyzed for tritium.
| |
| No tritium activity was detected greater than the MDA in drinking water samples during 2012.
| |
| 12
| |
| | |
| Fermi 2 - 2012 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report 12.0 Historical Gross Beta Activity in Drinking Water Samples Chinese Weapons Test 10.0 d 8.0 U
| |
| 6.0 2.0 0o OD ND V Co CD ) 0) 0) 0o 0) O) N) C Co 0C) 00 0M 0) 0M 0) O) O) O) O) O) C
| |
| ) 0) 0) co 01
| |
| --- Indicator Gross Beta - Control Gross Beta - - - - - -EPA LLD Figure 5 - Historical Gross Beta Activity in Drinking Water Samples. Since 1982, the annual concentrations of beta emitting radionuclides in drinking water samples collected from indicator locations have been consistent with those from control locations.
| |
| This shows that Fermi 2 has had no measurable radiological impact on local drinking water.
| |
| Surface Water Sampling Fermi 2 monitors surface water at two locations using automatic samplers. As with drinking water, surface water samples are collected at time intervals that are very short (hourly) relative to the sample collection period (monthly) in order to assure obtaining a representative sample. Indicator surface water samples are obtained at the Fermi 2 General Service Water building, located approximately 0.3 miles south southeast from Fermi 2. The control surface water samples are obtained from Trenton Channel Power Plant's cooling water intake on the Detroit River, which is approximately 11.7 miles north northeast of Fermi 2. Surface water samples are collected on a monthly basis and analyzed for strontium-89/90 and gamma emitting radionuclides. The monthly samples for each location are combined on a quarterly basis to form a quarterly composite sample and are analyzed for tritium.
| |
| 13
| |
| | |
| Fermi 2 - 2012 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report Surface water sampling began in 1979, and the samples were analyzed for gamma emitting radionuclides and tritium. During this preoperational program, no gamma emitting radionuclides, except for naturally occurring potassium-40, were detected.
| |
| Tritium was detected in both indicator and control samples during this time period and had an average concentration of 3.15E+2 pCi/liter. This tritium activity represents the background concentration due to naturally occurring tritium and tritium produced during past atmospheric nuclear weapons testing.
| |
| From 1985 to 2011, as part of the operational program, surface water samples were analyzed for gamma emitting radionuclides and tritium. The analysis for strontium-89/90 did not begin until 1988, and strontium-90 was detected in both indicator and control samples. The average strontium-90 concentration for this time period was 1.13E+0 pCi/liter. In 1990, two indicator samples showed detectable activity for cesium-137 at an average concentration of 1.20E+1 pCi/liter. The presence of cesium-137 and strontium-90 in these water samples is due to fallout from past atmospheric nuclear weapons testing. Tritium was detected in both indicator and control surface water samples during this time period at a concentration of 2.31E+2 pCi/liter. This tritium activity is consistent with background levels measured during the preoperational program.
| |
| In 2012, twenty-four (24) surface water samples were collected and analyzed for gamma emitting radionuclides and strontium-89/90. From these samples, eight (8) quarterly composite samples were prepared and analyzed for tritium. During 2012, one control sample detected naturally occurring potassium-40 no strontium-89/90 or tritium was detected greater than the MDA in surface water samples.
| |
| Sediment Sampling Sediments often act as a sink (temporary or permanent) for radionuclides, but they may also become a source, as when they are resuspended during periods of increased turbulence or are dredged and deposited elsewhere. Sediment, in the vicinity of the liquid discharge point, represents the most likely site for accumulation of radionuclides in the aquatic environment, and with long-lived radionuclides, a gradual increase in radioactivity concentration would be expected over time if discharges occur. Sediment, therefore, provides a long-term indication of change that may appear in other sample media (i.e., water and fish samples).
| |
| 14
| |
| | |
| Fermi 2 - 2012 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report Lake Erie shoreline and bottom sediments from five locations are collected on a semiannual basis (Spring and Fall) and are analyzed for gamma emitting radionuclides and strontium-89/90. There is one control location and four indicator locations. The control sample is collected near the Trenton Channel Power Plant's cooling water intake.
| |
| The indicator samples are collected at Estral Beach, north of the Fermi 2 liquid discharge area, the shoreline at the end of Pointe Aux Peaux, and Indian Trails Community Beach.
| |
| During the preoperational program, there was not a control location, and indicator samples were analyzed for gamma emitting radionuclides. During the preoperational program, except for naturally occurring radionuclides, only cesium-137 was detected in sediment samples. For this time period, the average cesium-137 concentration was 3.27E+2 pCi/kilogram. The presence of cesium-137 in these sediment samples is due to fallout from past atmospheric nuclear weapons testing.
| |
| From 1985 to 2011, cesium-137, strontium-90, and naturally occurring radionuclides were detected in sediment samples. The average cesium-137 concentration was 1.20E+2 pCi/kilogram for all samples. The analysis for strontium-89/90 began in 1988, and strontium-90 has been routinely detected at similar concentrations in both indicator and control samples. The average strontium-90 activity for indicator samples was 1.80E+2 pCi/kilogram and 1.98E+2 pCi/kilogram for control samples. The presence of cesium-137 and strontium-90 in these sediment samples is due to fallout from past atmospheric nuclear weapons testing.
| |
| In 1990 and 1991, the Spring samples taken at the Fermi 2 liquid discharge line (Location S-2) showed activity for plant related radionuclides (manganese-54, cobalt-58, cobalt-60, and zinc-65) and was determined to be a result of liquid effluent from Fermi 2. The sample results were well below any regulatory reporting limits and were consistent with the activity released from the plant in liquid effluents as per the approved effluent program. The dose impact was negligible due to these effluents.
| |
| In 2012, ten (10) sediment samples were collected and analyzed for gamma emitting radionuclides and strontium 89/90. Cesium-137 was detected in two control samples with an average concentration of 9.22E+1 pCi/kilogram. The presence of cesium-137 in sediment samples is due to fallout from past atmospheric nuclear weapons testing.
| |
| Naturally occurring radionuclide potassium-40 was also detected in both indicator and control sediment samples for this sampling period.
| |
| 15
| |
| | |
| Fermi 2 - 2012 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report Historical Cesium-137 Activity in Sediment Samples 7.E+02 6.E+02 E 5.E+02 o0 4.E+02 Y 3.E+02 2.E+02 CoO Nl- 00 (N
| |
| 00
| |
| ~
| |
| C CO
| |
| (
| |
| Co o
| |
| 00O O C (N M M)
| |
| D M)
| |
| Co CO M)
| |
| C C
| |
| O)
| |
| N O
| |
| V' O
| |
| O O
| |
| c0 0O O
| |
| C N CAC 2 O (O N (N (N (N (N (N (N Figure 6 - Historical Cesium-137 Activity in Sediment Samples. As the calculated trend shows, the concentration of cesium-137 in Lake Erie sediments is decreasing with time. This supports the fact that cesium-137 in Lake Erie sediments is due to fallout from past atmospheric nuclear weapons testing and not the operation of Fermi 2.
| |
| Figure 6 shows the historical concentration of cesium-137 in sediment samples from 1978 to 2012. Using the data from these years, and the statistical method of least squares, an exponential curve can be calculated that represents the cesium-137 concentration in sediment. This curve has a negative slope which indicates the overall concentration of cesium-137 in the environment is decreasing with time. This supports the fact that the inventory of cesium-137 in the environment is due to fallout from past atmospheric nuclear weapons testing and not from the operation of Fermi 2.
| |
| Fish Sampling Samples of fish are collected from Lake Erie at three locations on a semiannual basis.
| |
| There are two control locations and one indicator location. The two control locations are offshore of Celeron Island and in Brest Bay. The indicator location is approximately 1200 feet offshore of the Fermi 2 liquid effluent discharge. Edible portions of the fish are analyzed for gamma emitting radionuclides and strontium-89/90.
| |
| During the preoperational program, fish samples were analyzed for gamma emitting radionuclides. Only cesium-137 and naturally occurring potassium-40 were detected during this time period. The average concentration of cesium-137 for indicator samples was 3.53E+1 pCi/kilogram and 4.20E+1 pCi/kilogram for control samples. The presence of cesium-137 in these fish samples is due to fallout from past atmospheric nuclear weapons testing.
| |
| 16
| |
| | |
| Fermi 2 - 2012 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report From 1985 to 2011, cesium-137 and naturally occurring potassium-40 were detected in fish samples. The average cesium-137 concentration for indicator samples was 3.82E+1 pCi/kilogram and 3.92E+1 pCi/kilogram for control samples. The analysis for strontium-89/90 began in 1990, and strontium-90 was routinely detected at similar concentrations in both indicator and control samples. The average strontium-90 concentration for indicator samples was 3.84E+1 pCi/kilogram and 3.15E+1 pCi/kilogram for control samples. The presence of cesium-137 and strontium-90 in these fish samples is due to fallout from past atmospheric nuclear weapons testing.
| |
| In 2012, twenty-four (24) fish samples were collected and analyzed for gamma emitting radionuclides and strontium-89/90. Only naturally occurring potassium-40 was detected in both control and indicator fish samples for 2012.
| |
| Aquatic monitoring results for 2012 of water, sediment, and fish showed only naturally occurring radioactivity and radioactivity associated with fallout from past atmospheric nuclear weapons testing and were consistent with levels measured prior to the operation of Fermi 2. In conclusion, no radioactivity attributable to activities at Fermi 2 was detected greater than the MDA in any aquatic sample during 2012 and no adverse long-term trends are shown in the aquatic monitoring data.
| |
| 17
| |
| | |
| Fermi 2 - 2012 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report Land Use Census The Land Use Census is conducted in accordance with the Fermi 2 Offsite Dose Calculation Manual (ODCM), control 3.12.2, and satisfies the requirements of Section IV.B.3 of Appendix I to 10 CFR Part 50. This census identifies changes in the use of unrestricted areas to permit modifications to monitoring programs for evaluating doses to individuals from principal pathways of exposure. The pathways of concern are listed below:
| |
| " Inhalation Pathway - Internal exposure as a result of breathing radionuclides carried in the air.
| |
| " Ground Exposure Pathway - External exposure from radionuclides deposited on the ground.
| |
| " Plume Exposure Pathway - External exposure directly from a plume or cloud of radioactive material.
| |
| " Vegetation Pathway - Internal exposure as a result of eating vegetables which have absorbed deposited radioactive material or which have absorbed radionuclides through the soil.
| |
| " Milk Pathway - Internal exposure as a result of drinking milk which may contain radioactive material as a result of dairy animals grazing on a pasture contaminated by radionuclides.
| |
| " Meat Pathway - Internal exposure as a result of consuming meat which may contain radioactive material as a result of animals grazing on a pasture contaminated by radionuclides.
| |
| The Land Use Census is conducted during the growing season and is used to identify, within a radius of 5 miles, the location of the nearest residences, milk animals, meat animals, and gardens (greater than 50 square meters and containing broad leaf vegetation) in each of 16 meteorological sectors surrounding Fermi 2. Gardens greater than 50 square meters are the minimum size required to produce the quantity (26 kg/year) of leafy vegetables assumed in NRC Regulatory Guide 1.109 for consumption by a child. To determine this minimum garden size, the following assumptions were made: (1) 20% of the garden is used for growing broad leaf vegetation (i.e., lettuce and cabbage); and (2) a vegetation yield of 2 kg/square meter.
| |
| 18
| |
| | |
| Fermi 2 - 2012 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report 2012 Land Use Census Results The Land Use Census is conducted in accordance with ODCM control 3.12.2 and satisfies the requirements of Section IV.B.3 of Appendix I to 10 CFR Part 50. This census identifies changes in the use of unrestricted areas to permit modifications to monitoring programs for evaluating doses to individuals from principal pathways of exposure. The annual Land Use Census is conducted during the growing season and is used to identify, within a radius of 5 miles, the location of the closest residences, milk animals, meat animals, and gardens in each of the 11 land based meteorological sectors surrounding Fermi 2.
| |
| The 2012 Land Use Census was performed during the month of August. The 2012 census data were obtained with the use of Global Positioning System (GPS) equipment.
| |
| These data were compared to the 2011 data to determine any significant changes in the use of the land. The results of the census are tabulated in Tables 2 - 5 of this report.
| |
| No changes in the land use between 2011 and 2012 were found that would require changing the location of the "maximum exposed individual." There were no changes in any of the categories. All milk locations that were identified are pets and, any milk produced, is not use for human consumption. The "maximum exposed individual" is located in the West-North-West sector and at one time participated in the IREMP program. In the past few years this location did not have a garden, but in past a garden has been planted at this location. With past surveys, this census identified new residential housing construction that shows a continuing trend of converting agricultural land to other uses in the area surrounding Fermi 2.
| |
| As stated above, there were no significant changes in the 2012 land use that would require changing the location of the "maximum exposed individual." For that reason, the location of "maximum exposed individual" remains the same and is described as follows:
| |
| Azimuth Distance Age Maximum Pathway Sector (degrees) (miles) Group Organ Ingestion WNW 300.6 0.72 Adult Thyroid/
| |
| (vegetation) Bone*
| |
| *-For the 10 CFR 50 Appendix Irequired calculation of dose due to 1-131, 1-133, H-3, and particulates with half-lives greater than 8 days, the thyroid is the maximum organ.
| |
| However, if C-14 is added to this dose calculation, bone becomes the maximum organ.
| |
| 19
| |
| | |
| Fermi 2 - 2012 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report 2012 LAND USE CENSUS Closest Residences Table 2 Azimuth Distance Change Sector Year (degrees) (miles) (miles)
| |
| N 2011 8.9 1.11 2012 8.9 1.11 0.00 NE 2011 34.7 1.10 2012 34.7 1.10 0.00 NNE 2011 16.6 1.08 2012 16.6 1.08 0.00 NNW 2011 334.9 1.09 2012 334.9 1.09 0.00 NW 2011 309.7 1.07 2012 309.7 1.07 0.00 S 2011 169.6 1.03 2012 169.6 1.03 0.00 SSW 2011 200.1 1.12 2012 200.1 1.12 0.00 SW 2011 229.3 1.26 2012 229.3 1.26 0.00 W 2011 259.2 1.19 2012 259.2 1.19 0.00 WNW(a) 2011 302.3 0.72 2012 302.3 0.72 0.00 WSW 2011 236.3 1.39 2012 236.3 1.39 0.00 (a) = Location of "maximum exposed individual" 20
| |
| | |
| Fermi 2 - 2012 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report 2012 LAND USE CENSUS Closest Gardens Table 3 Azimuth Distance Change Sector Year de rees) (miles) (miles)
| |
| N 2011 0.1 1.61 2012 0.1 1.61 0.00 NE 2011 51.8 1.85 2012 51.8 1.85 0.00 NNE 2011 27.9 1.84 2012 27.9 1.84 0.00 NNW 2011 327.1 1.41 2012 327.1 1.41 0.00 NW 2011 315.5 1.51 2012 315.5 1.51 0.00 S 2011 170.0 1.01 2012 170.0 1.01 0.00 SSW 2011 192.4 1.44 2012 192.4 1.44 0.00 SW 2011 234.7 4.26 2012 234.7 4.26 0.00 W 2011 260.9 1.60 2012 260.9 1.60 0.00 WNW 2011 287.5 4.38 2012 287.5 4.38 0.00 WSW 2011 245.1 1.79 2012 245.1 1.79 0.00 21
| |
| | |
| Fermi 2 - 2012 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report 2012 LAND USE CENSUS Milk Locations Table 4 Azimuth Distance Change Sector Year degrees) (miles) (miles) Type N 2011 9.9 4.32 Goat 2012 9.9 4.32 0.00 Goat NE 2011 None identified None identified 2012 None identified None identified NNE 2011 None identified None identified 2012 None identified None identified NNW 2011 None identified None identified 2012 None identified None identified NW 2011 None identified None identified 2012 None identified None identified S 2011 None identified None identified 2012 None identified None identified SSW 2011 None identified None identified 2012 None identified None identified SW 2011 None identified one identified 2012 None identified None identified W 2011 None identified None identified 2012 None identified None identified WNW 2011 297.4 2.38 Goat 2012 297.4 2.38 0.00 Goat
| |
| _WSW 2011 None identified None identified 2012 None identified None identified 22
| |
| | |
| Fermi 2 - 2012 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report 2012 LAND USE CENSUS Closest Meat Locations Table 5 Azimuth Distance Change Sector Year (degrees) miles miles Type N 2011 None identified None identified 2012 None identified None identified NE 2011 None identified None identified 2012 None identified None identified NNE 2011 None identified None identified 2012 None identified None identified NNW 2011 338.2 4.36 Sheep 2012 338.2 4.36 0.00 Sheep NW 2011 321.4 3.02 Beef 2012 321.4 3.02 0.00 Beef S 2011 None identified None identified 2012 None identified None identified SSW 2011 , None identified None identified 2012 None identified None identified SW 2011 None identified None identified 2012 None identified None identified SW 2011 None identified None identified 2012 None identified None identified 2011 287.5 2NW 1.65 Beef 2012 287.5 1.65 0.00 Beef WSW 2011 None identified None identified 2012 None identified None identified 23
| |
| | |
| O U
| |
| N c3 V1
| |
| | |
| Fermi 2 - 2012 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report Direct Radiation Sample Locations Table A-1 Meteorological Distance Station Sector/Azimuth from Reactor Collection Number (Degrees) (Approx.) Description Frequency Type T1 NE/38* 1.3 mi. Estral Beach, Pole on Q I Lakeshore 23 Poles S of Lakeview. (Special Area)
| |
| T2 NNE/22° 1.2 mi. Pole at termination of Q I Brancheau St.
| |
| (Special Area)
| |
| T3 N/94 1.1 mi. Pole, NW corner of Swan Q I Boat Club fence. (Special Area)
| |
| T4 NNW/3370 0.6 mi. Site boundary and Toll Rd. Q I on Site fence by API #2.
| |
| T5 NW/313° 0.6 mi. Site boundary and Toll Rd. Q I on Site fence by API #3.
| |
| T6 WNW/294° 0.6 mi. On Site fence at south end Q I of N. Bullet Rd.
| |
| T7 W/270° 14.0 mi. Pole, at Michigan Gas Q C substation on N. Custer Rd., 0.66 miles west of Doty Rd.
| |
| T8 NW/3050 1.9 mi. Pole on Post Rd. near NE Q I corner of Dixie Hwy. and Post Rd.
| |
| T9 NNW/334* 1.5 mi. Pole, NW corner of Q I Trombley and Swan View Rd.
| |
| T10 N/6° 2.1 mi. Pole, S side of Massarant- Q I 2 poles W of Chinavare.
| |
| I = Indicator C = Control O = On-site Q = Quarterly A-1
| |
| | |
| Fermi 2 - 2012 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report Direct Radiation Sample Locations (Table A-I continued)
| |
| Meteorological Distance Station Sector/Azimuth from Reactor Collection Number (Degrees) (Approx.) Description Frequency Type Ti 1 NNE/23° 6.2 mi. Pole, NE corner of Q I Milliman and Jefferson.
| |
| T12 NNE/29° 6.3 mi. Pointe Mouille Game Area Q I Field Office, Pole near tree, N area of parking lot.
| |
| T13 N/3560 4.1 mi. Labo and Dixie Hwy. Pole Q I on SW corner with light.
| |
| T14 NNW/3370 4.4 mi. Labo and Brandon Pole on Q I SE corner near RR.
| |
| T15 NW/315* 3.9 mi. Pole, behind building at the Q I corner of Swan Creek and Mill St.
| |
| T16 WNW/283* 4.9 mi. Pole, SE corner of War and Q I Post Rd.
| |
| T17 W/271° 4.9 mi. Pole, NE corner of Nadeau Q I and Laprad near mobile home park.
| |
| T18 WSW/247° 4.8 mi. Pole, NE corner of Mentel Q I and Hurd Rd.
| |
| T19 SW/236* 5.2 mi. Fermi siren pole on Q I Waterworks Rd. NE corner of intersection - Sterling State Park Rd. Entrance Drive/Waterworks.
| |
| T20 WSW/257° 2.7 mi. Pole, S side of Williams Q I Rd, 9 poles W of Dixie Hwy. (Special Area)
| |
| T21 WSW/239° 2.7 mi. Pole, N side of Pearl at Q I Parkview Woodland Beach. (Special Area)
| |
| I = Indicator C = Control O = On-site Q= Quarterly A-2
| |
| | |
| Fermi 2 - 2012 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report Direct Radiation Sample Locations (Table A-1 continued)
| |
| Meteorological Distance Station Sector/Azimuth from Reactor Collection Number (Degrees) (Approx.) Description Frequency Type T22 S/172° 1.2 mi. Pole, N side of Pointe Aux Q I Peaux 2 poles W of Long -
| |
| Site Boundary.
| |
| T23 SSW/195° 1.1 mi. Pole, S side of Pointe Aux Q I Peaux 1 pole W of Huron next to Vent Pipe - Site Boundary.
| |
| T24 SW/225° 1.2 mi. Fermi Gate along Pointe Q I Aux Peaux Rd. on fence wire W of gate Site Boundary.
| |
| T25 WSW/252* 1.4 mi. Pole, Toll Rd. - 12 poles S Q I of Fermi Drive.
| |
| T26 WSW/259* 1.1 mi. Pole, Toll Rd. - 6 poles S Q I of Fermi Drive.
| |
| T27 SW/225° 6.8 mi. Pole, NE corner of Q I McMillan and East Front St. (Special Area)
| |
| T28 SW/2290 10.6 mi. Pole, N side of Mortar Q C Creek between Hull and LaPlaisance.
| |
| T29 WSW/237* 10.3 mi. Pole, NE corner of S Dixie Q C and Albain.
| |
| T30 WSW/247* 7.8 mi. E side S end of foot bridge, Q I St. Mary's Park corner of Elm and Monroe St.
| |
| (Special Area)
| |
| T31 WSW/255° 9.6 mi. 1st pole W of entrance Q C drive Milton "Pat" Munson Recreational Reserve on North Custer Rd.
| |
| I = Indicator C = Control O = On-site Q = Quarterly A-3
| |
| | |
| Fermi 2 - 2012 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report Direct Radiation Sample Locations (Table A-1 continued)
| |
| Meteorological Distance Station Sector/Azimuth from Reactor Collection Number (Degrees) (Approx.) Description Frequency Type T32 WNW/295° 10.3 mi. Pole, corner of Stony Creek Q I and Finzel Rd.
| |
| T33 NW/3170 9.2 mi. Pole, W side of Grafton Q I Rd. 1 pole N of Ash and Grafton intersection.
| |
| T34 NNW/338° 9.8 mi. Pole, SW corner of Port Q I Creek and Will-Carleton Rd.
| |
| T35 N/359° 6.9 mi. Pole, S Side of S Huron Q I River Dr. across from Race St. (Special Area)
| |
| T36 N/358* 9.1 mi. Pole, NE corner of Q I Gibraltar and Cahill Rd.
| |
| T37 NNE/21° 9.8 mi. Pole, S corner of Adams Q I and Gibraltar across from Humbug Marina.
| |
| T38 WNW/294° 1.7 mi. Residence - 6594 N. Dixie Q I Hwy.
| |
| T39 S/176° 0.3 mi. SE corner of Protected Q O Area Fence (PAF).
| |
| T40 S/170° 0.3 mi. Midway along OBA - PAF. Q O T41 SSE/161° 0.2 mi. Midway between OBA and Q O Shield Wall on PAF.
| |
| T42 SSE/149° 0.2 mi. Midway along Shield Wall Q O on PAF.
| |
| T43 SE/131* 0.1 mi. Midway between Shield Q O Wall and Aux Boilers on PAF.
| |
| T44 ESE/1090 0.1 mi. Opposite OSSF door on Q O PAF.
| |
| I = Indicator C = Control O = On-site Q = Quarterly A-4
| |
| | |
| Fermi 2 - 2012 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report Direct Radiation Sample Locations (Table A-1 continued)
| |
| Meteorological Distance Station Sector/Azimuth from Reactor Collection Number (Degrees) (Approx.) Description Frequency Type T45 E/86 0 0.1 mi. NE Corner of PAF. Q O T46 ENE/67° 0.2 mi. NE side of barge slip on Q O fence.
| |
| T47 S/185* 0.1 mi. South of Turbine Bldg. Q O rollup door on PAF.
| |
| T48 SW/235° 0.2 mi. 30 ft. from corner of AAP Q O on PAF.
| |
| T49 WSW/251* 1.1 mi. Corner of Site Boundary Q I fence north of NOC along Critical Path Rd.
| |
| T50 W/270* 0.9 mi. Site Boundary fence near Q I main gate by the south Bullet Street sign.
| |
| T51 N/3° 0.4 mi. Site Boundary fence north Q 0 of north Cooling Tower.
| |
| T52 NNE/20* 0.4 mi. Site Boundary fence at the Q O corner of Arson and Tower.
| |
| T53 NE/55* 0.2 mi. Site Boundary fence east of Q O South Cooling Tower.
| |
| T54 S/1890 0.3 mi. Pole next to Fermi 2 Q O Visitors Center.
| |
| T55 WSW/251° 3.3 mi. Pole, north side of Nadeau Q I Rd. across from Sodt Elementary School Marquee.
| |
| T56 WSW/256° 2.9 mi. Pole, entrance to Jefferson Q I Middle School on Stony Creek Rd.
| |
| I = Indicator C = Control O = On-site Q = Quarterly A-5
| |
| | |
| Fermi 2 - 2012 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report Direct Radiation Sample Locations (Table A-1 continued)
| |
| Meteorological Distance Station Sector/Azimuth from Reactor Collection Number (Degrees) (Approx.) Description Frequency Type T57 W/260* 2.7 mi. Pole, north side of Q I Williams Rd. across from Jefferson High School entrance.
| |
| T58 WSW/249° 4.9 mi. Pole west of Hurd Q I Elementary School Marquee.
| |
| T59 NW/325° 2.6 mi. Pole north of St. Charles Q I Church entrance on Dixie Hwy.
| |
| T60 NNW/341* 2.5 mi. 1st pole north of North Q I Elementary School entrance on Dixie Hwy.
| |
| T61 W/268° 10.1 mi. Pole, SW corner of Stewart Q I and Raisinville Rd.
| |
| T62 SW/2320 9.7 mi. Pole, NE corner of Albain Q I and Hull Rd.
| |
| T63 WSW/245° 9.6 mi. Pole, NE corner of Dunbar Q I and Telegraph Rd.
| |
| T64 WNW/286° 0.2 mi. West of switchgear yard on Q O PAF.
| |
| T65 NW/3220 0.1 mi. PAF switchgear yard area Q O NW of RHR complex.
| |
| T66 NE/50 0.1 mi. Behind Bldg. 42 on PAF. Q O T67 NNW/338* 0.2 mi. Site Boundary fence West Q O of South Cooling Tower.
| |
| T68 WNW/303° 0.6 mi Langton Rd. seven poles Q I East of Leroux Rd.
| |
| T69 NW/306* 0.8 mi Langton Rd. five poles East Q I of Leroux Rd.
| |
| T70 NNW/333° 1.1 mi Leroux Rd. last pole North Q I of Fermi Dr.
| |
| T71 WNW/300° 1.1 mi Leroux Rd. six poles North Q I of Fermi Dr.
| |
| I =Indicator C = Control O = On-site Q = Quarterly A-6
| |
| | |
| Fermi 2 - 2012 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report Direct Radiation Sample Locations (Table A-1 continued)
| |
| Meteorological Distance Station Sector/Azimuth from Reactor Collection Number (Degrees) (Approx.) Description Frequency Type ISFSI-1 WNW/302.3* 0.175 mi. Center of west ISFSI fence. Q O ISFSI-2 NW/310.2° 0.186 mi. NW corner ISFSI fence. Q O ISFSI-3 NW/313.2* 0.166 mi. Center of north ISFSI Q O fence.
| |
| ISFSI-4 NW/315.6° 0.149 mi. NE corner ISFSI fence. Q O ISFSI-5 NW/305.4° 0.140 mi Center of east ISFSI fence. Q O ISFSI-6 WNW/294.1* 0.136 mi SE corner ISFSI fence. Q O ISFSI-7 WNW/293.0* 0.157 mi Center of south ISFSI Q O fence.
| |
| ISFSI-8 WNW/293° 0.177 mi SW corner ISFSI fence. Q O I = Indicator C = Control O = On-site Q = Quarterly Air Particulate and Air Iodine Sample Locations Table A-2 Meteorological Distance Station Sector/Azimuth from Reactor Collection Number (Degrees) (Approx.) Description Frequency Type API-1 NE/39° 1.4 mi. Estral Beach Pole on W I Lakeshore, 18 Poles S of Lakeview (Nearest Community with highest X/Q).
| |
| API-2 NNW/337° 0.6 mi. Site Boundary and Toll W I Road, on Site Fence by T-4.
| |
| API-3 NW/313° 0.6 mi. Site Boundary and Toll W I Road, on Site Fence by T-5.
| |
| API-4 W/270* 14.0 mi. Pole, at Michigan Gas W C substation on N. Custer Rd., 0.66 miles west of Doty Rd.
| |
| API-5 S/188° 1.2 mi. Pole, N corner of Pointe W I Aux Peaux and Dewey Rd.
| |
| I =Indicator C = Control W = Weekly A-7
| |
| | |
| Fermi 2 - 2012 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report Milk Sample Locations Table A-3 Meteorological Distance Station Sector/Azimuth from Reactor Collection Number (Degrees) (Approx.) Description Frequency Type M-2 NW/3190 5.4 mi. Reaume Farm - 2705 E M-SM I Labo.
| |
| M-8 WNW/289* 9.9 mi. Calder Dairy - 9334 Finzel M-SM C Rd.
| |
| I = Indicator C = Control M = Monthly SM = Semimonthly Garden Sample Locations Table A-4 Meteorological Distance Station Sector/Azimuth from Reactor Collection Number (Degrees) (Approx.) Description Frequency Type FP-1 NNE/21* 3.8 mi. 9501 Turnpike Highway. M I FP-9 W/2610 10.9 mi. 4074 North Custer Road. M C I = Indicator C = Control M= Monthly (when available)
| |
| Drinking Water Sample Locations Table A-5 Meteorological Distance Station Sector/Azimuth from Reactor Collection Number (Degrees) (Approx.) Description Frequency Type DW-1 S/174* 1.1 mi. Monroe Water Station N M I Side of Pointe Aux Peaux 1/2 Block W of Long Rd.
| |
| DW-2 N/8° 18.5 mi. Detroit Water Station M C 14700 Moran Rd, Allen Park.
| |
| A-8
| |
| | |
| Fermi 2 - 2012 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report I = Indicator C = Control M = Monthly Surface Water Sample Locations Table A-6 Meteorological Distance Station Sector/Azimuth from Reactor Collection Number (Degrees) (Approx.) Description Frequency Type SW-2 NNE/20° 11.7 mi. DECo's Trenton Channel M C Power Plant Intake Structure (Screenhouse #1).
| |
| SW-3 SSE/1600 0.2 mi. DECO's Fermi 2 General M I Service Water Intake Structure.
| |
| I = Indicator C = Control M = Monthly Groundwater Sample Locations Table A-7 Meteorological Distance Station Sector/Azimuth from Reactor Collection Number (Degrees) (Approx.) Description Frequency Type GW-1 S/175* 0.4 mi. Approx. 100 ft W of Lake Q I Erie, EF-1 Parking lot near gas fired peakers.
| |
| GW-2 SSW/208 1.0 mi. 4 ft S of Pointe Aux Peaux Q I (PAP) Rd. Fence 427 ft W of where PAP crosses over Stoney Point's Western Dike.
| |
| GW-3 SW/226 1.0 mi. 143 ft W of PAP Rd. Gate, Q I 62 ft N of PAP Rd. Fence.
| |
| GW-4 WNW/299* 0.6 mi. 42 ft S of Langton Rd, 8 ft Q C E of Toll Rd. Fence.
| |
| I = Indicator C = Control Q = Quarterly A-9
| |
| | |
| Fermi 2 - 2012 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report Sediment Sample Locations Table A-8 Meteorological Distance Station Sector/Azimuth from Reactor Collection Number (Degrees) (Approx.) Description Frequency Type S-1 SSE/165* 0.9 mi. Pointe Aux Peaux, SA I Shoreline to 500 ft offshore sighting directly to Land Base Water Tower.
| |
| S-2 E/81* 0.2 mi. Fermi 2 Discharge, approx. SA I 200 ft offshore.
| |
| S-3 NE/39° 1.1 mi. Estral Beach, approx. 200 SA I ft offshore, off North shoreline where Swan Creek and Lake Erie meet.
| |
| S-4 WSW/2410 3.0 mi. Indian Trails Community SA I Beach.
| |
| S-5 NNE/20° 11.7 mi. DECo's Trenton Channel SA C Power Plant intake area.
| |
| I = Indicator C = Control SA = Semiannually Fish Sample Locations Table A-9 Meteorological Distance Station Sector/Azimuth from Reactor Collection Number (Degrees) (Approx.) Description Frequency Type F-1 NNE/31* 9.5 mi. Near Celeron Island. SA C F-2 E/86° 0.4 mi. Fermi 2 Discharge (approx. SA I 1200 ft offshore).
| |
| F-3 SW/2270 3.5 mi. Brest Bay. SA C I = Indicator C = Control SA = Semiannually A-10
| |
| | |
| c) S 3 Q 9 22 ) \5 A I 686 LAKE 6- T46~~
| |
| ~-&~~ - 2 F-2 ERIE Ttlf ' j7 ' 1y MAP1- 1 0 N --
| |
| cv --- 5 BYSATO NUMBE MA 1 WITHIN 1 MILE LEGEND
| |
| @ T- DIRECT RADIATION 0 API- AIR PART ICULATES/AIR IODINE A S-- SEDIMENTS
| |
| /A DW/SW- DRTINKING WAT ER/SURFACE WAT ER C W- GROUND WA T ER o .
| |
| M- MILA Z FP- 1-ODD PRODUCT S FrHICALE WIr TN MILES
| |
| | |
| T16 T8 P1-MAP - N SAMLKE LA bh BY STATIN NUMBE GRUDWAE GW-ta
| |
| -D PRDUT oAP- AI PATCLAEER IRIOEN 5 C-q/.S AL N I E SAMPLING DRINKINS (1 MIM- LK MAP-SDIMENT BYGW STATOND NUMBERo A F- FOD PRODUC SF-WFS DRINKNGEWAER/SRF
| |
| | |
| G ST PIN!'T TT
| |
| >U DE
| |
| ---------
| |
| PET RS RG - T 3 MOR -R?~
| |
| lIE1 CtlERIE T' EAC MIDL ASS SLAND TOLTLA - Of SAMP LOCATIONS NG BYI NUMBE STATION LEGEND'"l' AEL S-E SEIMNT S WSW-LIN KIN WATR/URAC WATER 5 51 3 WATE W-M UND Z ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ FP FO I PODCS CAEINMIE F- FTSH a D
| |
| | |
| Appendix B Environmental Data Summary
| |
| | |
| Fermi 2 - 2012 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report Table B-1 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Summary Name of Facility: Enrico Fermi Unit 2 Docket No.: 50-341 Reporting Period: January - December 2012 Location of Facility: 30 miles southeast of Detroit, Michigan (Frenchtown Township)
| |
| Location with Highest Type and Indicator Annual Mean Control Number of Sample Type (Units) Number of Locations Locations Non-routine Analysis LLD (b) Mean and Range (d Location (e) Mean and Range (d Mean and Range d) Results Direct Radiation Gamma (TLD) 1.0 15.0 (190/190) T-49 (Indicator) 20.1 (4/4) 14.0 (16/16) None mR/std qtr (a) 206 11.0 to 22.0 19.2 to 21.9 11.8 to 16.8 Airborne Gross Beta 260 1.00E-2 4.73E-2 (208/208) API-5 (Indicator) 5.04E-2 (52/52) 4.60E-2 (52/52) None Particulates 3.975E-3 to 1.13E-1 2.38E-2 to 9.71E-2 2.73E-2 to 7.14E-2 pCi/cu. m. Gamma Spec. 20 Be-7 N/A 4.87E-2 (16/16) API-1 (Indicator) 5.79E-2 (4/4) 4.27E-2 (4/4) None 1.13E-2 to 8.81E-2 4.11E-2 to 7.18E-2 1.65E-2 to 8.81E-2 K-40 N/A 1.35E-2 (6/16) API-1 (Indicator) 1.48E-2 (1/4) <MDA None 1.13E-2 to 1.48E-2 Mn-54 N/A <MDA <MDA None Co-58 N/A <MDA <MDA None Fe-59 N/A <MDA <MDA None Co-60 N/A <MDA <MDA None Zn-65 N/A <MDA <MDA None Zr-95 N/A <MDA <MDA None Nb-95 N/A <MDA <MDA None Ru-103 N/A <MDA <MDA None Ru-106 N/A <MDA <MDA None Cs-134 5.00E-2 <MDA <MDA None Cs-137 6.00E-2 <MDA <MDA None Ba-140 N/A <MDA <MDA None La-140 N/A <MDA <MDA None Ce-141 N/A <MDA <MDA None Ce-144 N/A <MDA <MDA None Airborne Iodine 1-131 260 7.00E-2 <MDA <MDA None pCi/cu. m.
| |
| B-1
| |
| | |
| Fermi 2 - 2012 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report Table B-1 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Summary (cont.)
| |
| Name of Facility: Enrico Fermi Unit 2 Docket No.: 50-341 Reporting Period: January - December 2012 Location of Facility: 30 miles southeast of Detroit, Michigan (Frenchtown Township)
| |
| Location with Highest Type and Indicator Annual Mean Control Number of Sample Type Number of Locations Locations Non-routine (Units)
| |
| Analvsis LLD b) Mean and Range (d Location e Mean and Range (d Mean and Range (d) Results (
| |
| Milk I-131 34 1.00E+0 <MDA <MDA None pCi/l Sr-89 34 N/A <MDA <MDA None Sr-90 N/A <MDA None Gamma Spec. 34 Be-7 N/A <MDA <MDA None K-40 N/A 1.49E+3 (17/17) M-2 (Indicator) 1.49E+3 (17/17) 1.45E+3 (17/17) None 1.36E+3 to 1.61E+3 1.36E+3 to 1.61E+3 1.38E+3 to 1.54E+3 Mn-54 N/A <MDA <MDA None Co-58 N/A <MDA <MDA None Fe-59 N/A <MDA <MDA None Co-60 N/A <MDA <MDA None Zn-65 N/A <MDA <MDA None Zr-95 N/A <MDA <MDA None Nb-95 N/A <MDA <MDA None Ru-103 N/A <MDA <MDA None Ru-106 N/A <MDA <MDA None Cs-134 1.50E+1 <MDA <MDA None Cs-137 1.80E+1 <MDA <MDA None Ba-140 1.50E+1 <MDA <MDA None La-140 1.50E+1 <MDA <MDA None Ce-141 N/A <MDA <MDA None Ce-144 N/A <MDA <MDA None Vegetation I-131 12 6.00E+1 <MDA <MDA None pCi/kg wet Gamma Spec. 12 Be-7 N/A 1.64E+2 (6/6) FP-9 (Control) 2.42E+2 (6/6) 2.42E+2 (6/6) None 6.72E+1 to 2.59E+2 7.26E+1 to 4.38E+2 7.26E+1 to 4.38E+2 K-40 N/A 3.74E+3 (6/6) FP-9 (Control) 4.30E+3 (6/6) 4.30E+3 (6/6) None 2.30E+3 to 5.14E+3 3.32E+3 to 4.78E+3 3.32E+3 to 4.78E+3 B-2
| |
| | |
| Fermi 2 - 2012 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report Table B-1 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Summary (cont.)
| |
| Name of Facility: Enrico Fermi Unit 2 Docket No.: 50-341 Reporting Period: January - December 2012 Location of Facility: 30 miles southeast of Detroit, Michigan (Frenchtown Township)
| |
| Location with Highest Type and Indicator Annual Mean Control Number of Sample Type (Units) Number of Locations Locations Non-routine Analysis LLD (b) Mean and Range (d Location e) Mean and Range d) Mean and Range d) Results (f)
| |
| Vegetation Mn-54 N/A <MDA <MDA None (cont.) Co-58 N/A <MDA <MDA None pCi/kg wet Fe-59 N/A <MDA <MDA None Co-60 N/A <MDA <MDA None Zn-65 N/A <MDA <MDA None Zr-95 N/A <MDA <MDA None Nb-95 N/A <MDA <MDA None Ru-103 N/A <MDA <MDA None Ru-106 N/A <MDA <MDA None Cs-134 6.00E+1 <MDA <MDA None Cs-137 8.00E+1 <MDA <MDA None Ba-140 N/A <MDA <MDA None La-140 N/A <MDA <MDA None Ce-141 N/A <MDA <MDA None Ce-144 N/A <MDA <MDA None Drinking Water Gross Beta 24 4.00E+0 4.80E+0 (2/12) DW-1 (Indicator) 4.80E+0 (2/12) <MDA None pCi/ 3.47E+0 to 6.12E+0 3.47E+0 to 6.12E+0 Sr-89 24 N/A <MDA <MDA None Sr-90 N/A <MDA <MDA None Gamma Spec. 24 Be-7 N/A <MDA <MDA None K-40 N/A 2.54E+1 (2/12) DW-2 (Control) 3.66E+1 (1/12) 3.66E+1 (1/12) None 2.46E+1 to 2.62E+1 Cr-51 N/A <MDA <MDA None Mn-54 1.50E+1 <MDA <MDA None Co-58 1.50E+1 <MDA <MDA None Fe-59 3.00E+1 <MDA <MDA None Co-60 1.50E+1 <MDA <MDA None Zn-65 3.00E+1 <MDA <MDA None Zr-95 1.50E+1 <MDA <MDA None Nb-95 1.50E+1 <MDA <MDA None B-3
| |
| | |
| Fermi 2 - 2012 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report Table B-1 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Summary (cont.)
| |
| Docket No.: 50-341 Reporting Period: January - December 2012 Name of Facility: Enrico Fermi Unit 2 Location of Facility: 30 miles southeast of Detroit, Michigan (Frenchtown Township)
| |
| Location with Highest Annual Mean Control Number of Sample Type Type and Indicator Locations Non-routine (Units) Number of Locations Location e) Mean and Range (d Mean and Range d) Results (f)
| |
| Analysis LLD b) Mean and Range (d
| |
| <MDA <MDA None Drinking Water Ru-103 N/A
| |
| <MDA None (cont.) pCi/Z Ru-106 N/A <MDA
| |
| <MDA <MDA None Cs-134 1.50E+1
| |
| <MDA <MDA None Cs-137 1.80E+1
| |
| <MDA <MDA None Ba-140 1.50E+1
| |
| <MDA <MDA None La-140 1.50E+1
| |
| <MDA <MDA None Ce-141 N/A
| |
| <MDA <MDA None Ce-144 N/A
| |
| <MDA <MDA None H-3 8 2.00E+3
| |
| <MDA <MDA None Surface Water Sr-89 24 N/A
| |
| <MDA <MDA None pCi/ Sr-90 N/A Gamma Spec. 24
| |
| <MDA <MDA None Be-7 N/A N/A <MDA SW-3(Control) 3.00E+1 (1/12) 3.00E+1 (1/12) None K-40
| |
| <MDA <MDA None Cr-51 N/A
| |
| <MDA <MDA None Mn-54 1.50E+1 1.50E+1 <MDA <MDA None Co-58
| |
| <MDA <MDA None Fe-59 3.00E+1
| |
| <MDA <MDA None Co-60 1.50E+1
| |
| <MDA <MDA None Zn-65 3.00E+1
| |
| <MDA <MDA None Zr-95 1.50E+1
| |
| <MDA <MDA None Nb-95 1.50E+1
| |
| <MDA <MDA None Ru-103 N/A N/A <MDA <MDA None Ru-106 1.50E+1 <MDA <MDA None Cs-134
| |
| <MDA <MDA - None Cs-137 1.80E+1
| |
| <MDA <MDA None Ba-140 1.50E+1 1.50E+1 <MDA <MDA None La-140 N/A <MDA <MDA None Ce-141 B-4
| |
| | |
| Fermi 2 - 2012 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report Table B-1 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Summary (cont.)
| |
| Docket No.: 50-341 Reporting Period: January - December 2012 Name of Facility: Enrico Fermi Unit 2 Location of Facility: 30 miles southeast of Detroit, Michigan (Frenchtown Township)
| |
| Location with Highest Annual Mean Control Number of Sample Type Type and Indicator Locations Locations Non-routine (Units) Number of LLD (b) Mean and Range (d Location (e) Mean and Range (d Mean and Range d) Results Analysis
| |
| <MDA <MDA None Surface Water Ce-144 N/A
| |
| <MDA None (cont.) pCi/l H-3 8 2.00E+3 <MDA Groundwater Gamma Spec. 16
| |
| <MDA <MDA None pCi/l Be-7 N/A N/A <MDA <MDA None K-40 N/A <MDA <MDA None Cr-51 1.50E+1 <MDA <MDA None Mn-54 1.50E+1 <MDA <MDA None Co-58 3.00E+1 <MDA <MDA None Fe-59 1.50E+1 <MDA <MDA None Co-60 3.00E+1 <MDA <MDA None Zn-65 1.50E+1 <MDA <MDA None Zr-95 1.50E+1 <MDA <MDA None Nb-95 N/A <MDA <MDA None Ru-103 N/A <MDA <MDA None Ru-106 1.50E+1 <MDA <MDA None Cs-134 1.80E+1 <MDA <MDA None Cs-137 1.50E+1 <MDA <MDA None Ba-140 La-140 1.50E+1 <MDA <MDA None N/A <MDA <MDA None Ce-141 N/A <MDA <MDA None Ce-144 16 2.00E+3 <MDA <MDA None H-3 Sediment Sr-89 10 N/A <MDA <MDA
| |
| <MDA <MDA None pCi/kg dry Sr-90 N/A Gamma Spec. 10 N/A <MDA None Be-7 K-40 N/A 1.23E+4 (8/8) S-2 (Indicator) 1.73E+4 (2/2) 8.23E+3 (2/2) 8.08E+3 to 1.74E+4 1.71E+4 to 1.74E+4 7.08E+3 to 9.34E+3 None B-5
| |
| | |
| Fermi 2 - 2012 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report Table B-1 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Summary (cont.)
| |
| Docket No.: 50-341 Reporting Period: January - December 2012 Name of Facility: Enrico Fermi Unit 2 Location of Facility: 30 miles southeast of Detroit, Michigan (Frenchtown Township)
| |
| Location with Highest Annual Mean Control Number of Sample Type Type and Indicator Locations Non-routine (Units) Number of Locations Location e Mean and Range (d Mean and Range (d) Results (f Analysis LLD b) Mean and Range (d
| |
| <MDA None Sediment (cont.) Mn-54 N/A <MDA
| |
| <MDA None pCi/kg dry Co-58 N/A <MDA
| |
| <MDA <MDA None Fe-59 N/A
| |
| <MDA <MDA None Co-60 N/A
| |
| <MDA <MDA None Zn-65 N/A
| |
| <MDA <MDA None Zr-95 N/A
| |
| <MDA <MDA None Nb-95 N/A
| |
| <MDA <MDA None Ru-103 N/A
| |
| <MDA <MDA None Ru-106 N/A
| |
| <MDA <MDA None Cs-134 1.50E+2
| |
| <MDA S-5 (Control) 9.22E+1 (2/2) 9.22E+1 (2/2) None Cs-137 1.80E+2 7.63E+1 to 1.08E+2 7.63E+1 to 1.08E+2
| |
| <MDA <MDA None Ba-140 N/A
| |
| <MDA <MDA None La-140 N/A
| |
| <MDA <MDA None Ce-141 N/A
| |
| <MDA <MDA None Ce-144 N/A N/A <MDA <MDA None Fish Sr-89 24
| |
| <MDA <MDA None pCi/kg wet Sr-90 N/A Gamma Spec. 24 N/A <MDA <MDA None Be-7 3.19E+3 (14/14) F-2 (Indicator) 3.19E+3 (14/14) 2.92E+3 (25/25) None K-40 N/A 2.81E+3 to 3.81E+3 2.81E+3 to 3.81E+3 3.54E+3 to 3.90E+3
| |
| <MDA <MDA None Mn-54 1.30E+2
| |
| <MDA <MDA None Co-58 1.30E+2
| |
| <MDA <MDA None Fe-59 2.60E+2
| |
| <MDA <MDA None Co-60 1.30E+2
| |
| <MDA . <MDA None Zn-65 2.60E+2 B-6
| |
| | |
| Fermi 2 - 2012 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report Table B-1 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Summary (cont.)
| |
| Name of Facility: Enrico Fermi Unit 2 Docket No.: 50-341 Reporting Period: January - December 2012 Location of Facility: 30 miles southeast of Detroit, Michigan (Frenchtown Township)
| |
| Location with Highest Indicator Annual Mean Control Number of Sample Type Type and Locations Locations Non-routine (Units) Number of Analysis LLD b) Mean and Range (d Location e Mean and Range (d Mean and Range d) Results Zr-95 N/A <MDA <MDA None Fish (cont.)
| |
| N/A <MDA <MDA None pCi/kg wet Nb-95 Ru-103 N/A <MDA <MDA None Ru-106 N/A <MDA <MDA None Cs-134 1.30E+2 <MDA <MDA None Cs-137 1.50E+2 <MDA <MDA None Ba-140 N/A <MDA <MDA None La-140 N/A <MDA <MDA None Ce-141 N/A <MDA <MDA None Ce-144 N/A <MDA <MDA None (a) Direct Radiation mean and range values are for off-site TLDs (b) LLD = Fermi 2 ODCM LLD: nominal lower limit of detection based on 4.66 sigma error for background sample.
| |
| (c) <MDA = Less than the lab's minimum detectable activity which is less than the LLD.
| |
| (d) Mean and range based upon detectable measurements only. Fraction of detectable measurements at specified locations is indicated in parentheses (F).
| |
| (e)Locations are specified by Fermi 2 code and are described in Appendix A Sampling Locations.
| |
| (f) Non-routine results are those which are reportable according to Fermi 2 ODCM control 3.12.1.
| |
| Note: Other nuclides were considered in analysis results, but only those identifiable were reported in addition to ODCM listed nuclides.
| |
| B-7
| |
| | |
| Appendix C Environmental Data Tables
| |
| | |
| Fermi 2 - 2012 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report FERMI 2 OFFSITE TLD ANALYSIS (mR/Std Qtr STATION FIRST SECOND THIRD FOURTH NUMBER QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER T-1 12.15 13.55 14.65 12.83 T-2 11.53 13.62 13.53 13.14 T-3 10.99 11.85 13.36 13.14 T-4 13.24 14.89 15.86 14.79 T-5 13.45 15.58 16.61 15.23 T-6 14.22 15.35 17.89 a T-7 14.31 15.38 16.77 15.99 T-8 14.77 16.40 16.80 16.08 T-9 12.88 14.42 14.71 14.63 T-10 13.95 15.63 16.66 14.79 T-11 12.63 14.23 15.09 13.78 T-12 11.73 12.89 14.15 13.07 T-13 14.78 16.00 16.91 15.70 T-14 14.69 15.75 17.79 16.57 T-15 12.15 13.73 14.46 13.06 T-16 16.39 18.26 18.90 17.52 T-17 12.32 13.66 14.44 12.80 T-18 12.92 13.59 14.77 14.05 T-19 14.29 15.97 16.77 16.68 T-20 14.93 16.75 17.41 16.30 T-21 12.70 13.49 14.66 13.61 T-22 13.59 15.15 15.65 14.28 T-23 12.39 13.91 15.71 13.68 T-24 a 13.15 14.03 13.09 T-25 15.84 (a) 17.91 17.66 T-26 15.86 17.28 18.98 17.97 T-27 11.69 12.65 12.57 12.15 T-28 12.85 13.20 14.11 12.69 T-29 11.75 12.85 13.66 12.76 T-30 13.88 13.41 a a T-31 13.20 14.54 14.83 14.46 T-32 13.99 15.69 16.22 15.71 T-33 12.23 13.35 14.41 12.73 T-34 12.82 14.25 15.31 14.32 T-35 13.06 14.11 15.41 13.43 T-36 12.84 13.91 14.77 14.60 T-37 13.41 15.84 15.08 14.80 T-38 14.36 16.30 17.53 16.09 T-49 19.17 19.75 21.99 19.33 T-50 14.90 15.31 18.51 15.70 T-55 14.52 15.58 16.97 16.11 T-56 13.49 14.61 15.93 14.89 T-57 16.41 17.37 19.60 18.01 T-58 12.16 13.53 15.22 13.24 T-59 13.25 a 14.20 13.82 T-60 13.66 15.70 16.50 15.01 T-61 14.49 15.87 16.97 16.10 (a) TLD missing, see Appendix D - Program Execution.
| |
| C-1
| |
| | |
| Fermi 2 - 2012 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report FERMI 2 OFFSITE TLD ANALYSIS (CONT.)
| |
| (mR/Std Qtr)
| |
| STATION FIRST SECOND THIRD FOURTH NUMBER QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER T-62 15.10 15.83 16.53 15.59 T-63 11.98 13.06 13.31 13.25 T-68 15.76 18.61 19.18 19.66 T-69 15.37 16.80 19.15 17.66 T-70 14.57 15.22 17.20 15.58 T-71 15.12 16.48 18.06 17.49 ONSITE TLD ANALYSIS (mR/Std Qtr)
| |
| STATION FIRST SECOND THIRD FOURTH NUMBER QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER T-39 16.53 15.10 14.22 12.66 T-40 15.22 15.38 14.07 12.83 T-41 22.20 20.51 17.02 13.90 T-42 20.25 24.88 17.16 15.24 T-43 24.01 24.07 19.86 15.37 T-44 21.51 20.03 16.52 14.48 T-45 16.29 14.60 12.98 11.54 T-46 14.28 14.66 12.87 12.50 T-47 25.28 21.80 19.92 16.00 T-48 19.28 18.43 16.01 14.19 T-51 10.36 10.37 12.16 10.93 T-52 12.01 12.21 13.31 12.52 T-53 14.15 13.82 14.80 13.03 T-54 13.69 12.54 13.49 11.83 T-64 12.64 12.96 13.30 11.94 T-65 14.01 14.21 14.16 12.10 T-66 30.56 25.04 20.30 16.97 T-67 13.27 13.75 14.81 13.65 ISFSI-1 13.39 13.17 13.03 12.19 ISFSI-2 12.60 13.50 13.21 11.94 ISFSI-3 13.68 13.28 14.30 12.09 ISFSI-4 13.32 13.99 13.86 11.72 ISFSI-5 13.48 14.22 13.68 12.69 ISFSI-6 12.55 13.86 12.33 11.39 ISFSI-7 13.53 13.62 12.96 11.36 ISFSI-8 13.77 15.10 13.14 11.79 C-2
| |
| | |
| Fermi 2 - 2012 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report FERMI 2 AIR PARTICULATE GROSS BETA (pCi/cubic meter)
| |
| API-1 FIRST QUARTER Date Activity 3-Jan-12 5.56E-02 10-Jan-12 5.23E-02_
| |
| 17-Jan-12 6.05E-02 24-Jan-12 5.64E-02 31-Jan-12 5.88E-02 7-Feb-12 6.32E-02 14 Feb-1 F.9E0 21-Feb-12I 5.49E-02 28-Feb-12 4.78E-02 6-Mar-12 4.38E-02 13-Mar-12 5.58E-02 20-Mar-12 3.75E-02 27-Mar-123 70E-02 API-1 SECOND QUARTER Date Activity 3-Apr-12 3.68E-02 10-Apr-12 3.88E-02 17-Apr-12 3.48E-02 25-Apr-12 4.56E-02 1May-12 4.89E-02 8-May-12 4.OOE-02 15-May-12 4.54E-02 22-May-12 4.71E-02 29-May-12 5.79E-02 5-Jun-12 3.33E-02 11-Jun-12 5.28E-02 19-Jun-12 3.43E-02 26-Jun-12 3.97E-03 C-3
| |
| | |
| Fermi 2 - 2012 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report FERMI 2 AIR PARTICULATE GROSS BETA (pCi/cubic meter)
| |
| API-1 THIRD QUARTER Date Activity 3-Jul-12 6.25E-02 17-Jul-12 5.99E-02 17-Jul-12 _5.33E-02 23-Jul-12 4.23E-02 31-Jul-12 3.62E-02 6-Aug-1 4.99E-02 14-Aug-12 3.61E-02 22-Aug-12 3.39E-02 28-Aug-12 7.09E-02 4-Sep-12 4.57E-02 10-Sep-12 5.71E-02 18-Sep-12 41E-02 25-Sep-12 4.07E-02 API-1 FOURTH QUARTER Date Activity 2-Oct-12 4.20E-02 9-Oct-12] 3.75E-02 16-Oct-12 3.69E-02 23-Oct-12 4.12E-02 30-Oct-12 3.94E-02 6-Nov-12 2.34E-02 13-Nov-12 4.29E-02 20-Nov-12 6.02E-02 27-Nov-12 7.57E-02 4-Dec-12 7.42E-02 11-Dec-12 3.82E-02 18-Dec-12 4.85E-02 26-Dec-12 4.65E-02 C-4
| |
| | |
| Fermi 2 - 2012 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report FERMI 2 AIR PARTICULATE GROSS BETA (pCi/cubic meter)
| |
| API-2 FIRST QUARTER Date Activity 3-Jan-12 4.30E-02 10-Jan-12 3.49E-02 17-Jan-12 5.49E-02 24-Jan-12 4.63E-02 31-Jan-12 5.97E-02 7-Feb-12 5.59E-02 14-Feb-12 4.3E-02 21-Feb-12 5.23E-02 28-Feb-12 4.02E-02 6-Mar-12 4.03E-02 13-Mar-12 4.70E-02 20-Mar-12 3.82E-02 27-Mar-12 3.96E-02 API-2 SECOND QUARTER Date Activit 3-Apr-12 3.49E-02 10-Apr-12 3.93E-02 17-Apr-12 3.79E-02 25-Apr-12 3.86E-02 1-May-12 4.22E-02 8-May-12 4.20E-02 15-May-12 4.74E-02 22-May-12 3.49E-02 29-May-12 4.88E-02 5-Jun-12 3.71E-02 11-Jun-12 3.86E-02 19-Jun-12 4.06E-02 26-Jun-12 3.95E-02 C-5
| |
| | |
| Fermi 2 - 2012 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report FERMI 2 AIR PARTICULATE GROSS BETA (pCi/cubic meter)
| |
| API-2 THIRD QUARTER Date Activity 3-Jul-12! 4.53E-02 10-Jul-12 4.26E-02 17-Jul-12 4.52E-02 23-Jul-12 _3.99E-02 31-Jul-12 4.28E-02 Aug-12 3.80E-02 14-Aug12 2.93-02 22-Aug-12 3.87E-02 28-Aug-12 16.28E-02 4-S 3.54E-02 10-Sep-12 3.42E-02 18-Sep-12! 4.90E-02 25-Sep-12 2.39E-02 API-2 FOURTH QUARTER Date Activity 2-Oct-12! 4.99E-02 9-Oct-12 3.75E-02 16-Oct-12 4.37E-02 23-Oct-12 4.07E-02 30-Oct-12 4.42E-02 6-Nov-12 2.23E-02 13-Nov-12 5.20E-02 20-Nov-12! 7.31E-02 27-Nov-12 8.13E-02 4-Dec-12 7.44E-02 11-Dec-12! 3.42E-02 18-Dec-12 5.68E-02 26-Dec-12 5.14E-02 C-6
| |
| | |
| Fermi 2 - 2012 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report FERMI 2 AIR PARTICULATE GROSS BETA (pCi/cubic meter)
| |
| API-3 FIRST QUARTER Date Activity 3-Jan-12 4.55E-02 10-Jan-12 4.33E-02 17-Jan-12. 6.54E-02 24-Jan-12 3.81E-02 31-Jan-12 4.82E-02 7-Feb-12 4.44E-02 14-Feb-12 3.78E-02 21-Feb-12 4.64E-02 28-Feb-12 4.01E-02 6-Mar-12 4.71E-02 13-Mar-12 4.27E-02 20-Mar-12 3.75E-02 27-Mar-12 4.06E-02 API-3 SECOND QUARTER Date Activity 3-Apr-12 3.28E-02 10-Apr-12 4.13E-02 17-Apr-12 3.78E-02 25-Apr-12 3.77E-02 1-May-12 3.89E-02 8-May-12 ( 4.18E-02 15-May-12 4.39E-02 22-May-12 4.88E-02 29-_May-12 4.61E-02 5-Jun-12 3.46E-02 11-Jun-12I 3.96E-02 19-Jun-12 3.13E-02 26-Jun-12 4.12E-02 C-7
| |
| | |
| Fermi 2 - 2012 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report FERMI 2 AIR PARTICULATE GROSS BETA (pCi/cubic meter)
| |
| API-3 THIRD QUARTER Date Activity 3-Jul-12 4.94E-02 10-Jul-12 5.40E-02 17-Jul-12 4.90E-02 23-Jul-12 4.61E-02 31-Jul-12 3.97E-02 6-Aug-12 4.21E-02 14-Aug:12 12.95E-02 22-Aug-12 4.26E-02 28-Aug-12 6.46E-02 4-Sep-12 4.71E-02 10-Sep-12 3.80E-02 18-Sep-12 4.83E-02 25-Sep-12 3.77E-02 API-3 FOURTH QUARTER Date Activity 2-Oct-121 6.11E-02 9-Oct-12 5.59E-02 16-Oct-12 5.74E-02 23-Oct-12J 5.17E-02 30-Oct-12 4.67E-02 6-Nov-12 2.87E-02 13-Nov-12 6.35E-02 20-Nov-12 8.47E-02 27-Nov-12 1.13E-01 4-Dec-12 7.97E-02 11-Dec-12 4.51E-02 18-Dec-12 6.18E-02 26-Dec-12 5.99E-02 C-8
| |
| | |
| Fermi 2 - 2012 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report FERMI 2 AIR PARTICULATE GROSS BETA (pCi/cubic meter)
| |
| API-4 FIRST QUARTER Date Activity 3-Jan-12 3.39E-02 10-Jan-12 3.91E-02 17-Jan-12 5.12E-02 24-Jan-12 4.28E-02 31-Jan-1 4.10E-02 7-Feb-12 4.63E-02 14-Feb-12 4.37E-02 21-Feb-12 3.33E-02 28-Feb-12 3.77E-02 6-Mar-12 4.39E-02 13-Mar-12 4.42E-02 20-Mar-12 4.98E-02 27-Mar-12 4.62E-02 API-4 SECOND QUARTER Date Activity 3-Apr 3.50E-02 10-Apr-12 j 4.24E-02 17-Apr-12 3.63E-02 25-Apr-12 4.53E-02
| |
| _1-May-12 5 67E-02 8-May-12 4.39E-02
| |
| __15-May-12 4.55E-02 22-May-12 4.01E-02 29-May-12 4.81E-02 5-Jun-12 4.24E-02 11-Jun-12 4.53E-02 19-Jun-12 4.00E-02 26-Jun-12 4.3E-02 C-9
| |
| | |
| Fermi 2 - 2012 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report FERMI 2 AIR PARTICULATE GROSS BETA (pCi/cubic meter)
| |
| API-4 THIRD QUARTER Date Activity 3-Jul-12 5.82E-02 10-Jul-12 5.45E-02 17-Jul-12 5.21E-02 23-Jul-12 4.30E-02 31-Jul-12 4.93E-02 6-Aug-12 5.13E-02 14-Aug-1 3.09E-02 22-Aug-12 3.83E-02 28-Aug-12 6.98E-02 4-Sep-12 3.78E-02 10-Sep-12 ( 3.96E-02 18-Sep-12 4.94E-02 25-Sep-12 3.82E-02 API-4 FOURTH QUARTER Date Activity 2-Oct-12j 4.96E-02 9-Oct-12 4.42E-02 16-Oct-12 4.99E-02 23-Oct-12 4.89E-02 30-Oct-12 3.80E-02 6-Nov-12 2.73E-02 13-Nov-12 6.30E-02 20-Nov-12 6.98E-02 27-Nov-12 6.99E-02 4-Dec-12 7.14E-02 11-Dec-12 3.71E-02 18-Dec-12 4.65E-02 26-Dec-12 4.51E-02 C-10
| |
| | |
| Fermi 2 - 2012 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report FERMI 2 AIR PARTICULATE GROSS BETA (pCi/cubic meter)
| |
| API-5 FIRST QUARTER Date Activity 3-Jan-12 4.17E-02 10-Jan-12 5.26E-02 17-Jan-12 6.22E-02 24-Jan-12 5.59E-02 31-Jan-12 3.93E-02 7-Feb-12 6.45E-02 14-Feb-1 4.69E-02 21-Feb-12! 6.19E-02 28-Feb-1 4.34E-02 6-Mar-12 5.17E-02 13-Mar-12 4.88E-02 20-Mar-12 4.67E-02 27-Mar-12 4.32E-02 API-5 SECOND QUARTER Date Activity 3-Apr-12_ 3.38E-02 10-Apr-12 4.29E-02 17-Apr-i2 4.03E-02 25-Apr-12 4.86E-02 1-May-12 4.79E-02 8-May-12 4?82E-02 15-May-12 5.10E-02 22-May-12[ 3.88E-02 29-May-12 5.25E-02 5-Jun-12 3.83E-02 11-Jun-12j 4.72E-02 19-Jun-121 3.57E-02 26-Jun-12 4.76E-02 C-11
| |
| | |
| Fermi 2 - 2012 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report FERMI 2 AIR PARTICULATE GROSS BETA (pCi/cubic meter)
| |
| API-5 THIRD QUARTER Date Activity 3-Jul-12 6.30E-02 10-Jul-12 5.43E-02 17-Jul-12 4.37E-02 23-Jul-12 5.53E-02 31-Jul-12 4.12E-02 6-Aug-12 5.OOE-02 14-Aug-12j 3.24E-02 22-Aug-12 3.71E-02 28-Aug-12 7.35E-02 2
| |
| 4-Sep- 1 3.86E-02 10-Sep-12 3.93E-02 18-Sep-12 5.57E-02 25-Sep-12 3.69E-02 API-5 FOURTH QUARTER Date Activity 2-Oct-12 4.54E-02 9-Oct-12 5.02E-02 16-Oct-12 5.87E-02 23-Oct-12 5.40E-02 30-Oct-12 5.18E-02 6-Nov-12) 2.38E-02 13-Nov-12 5.97E-02 20-Nov-12 8.30E-02 27-Nov-12 9.71E-02 4-Dec-12 8.18E-02 11-Dec-12 4.81E-02 18-Dec-12 5.77E-02 26-Dec-12 5.53E-02 C-12
| |
| | |
| Fermi 2 - 2012 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report FERMI 2 AIR IODINE -131 (pCi/cubic meter)
| |
| API-1 FIRST QUARTER Date Activity 3-Jan-12 __1.68E-02 10-Jan-12 < 1.67E-02 17-Jan-12 3.50E-02 24-Jan-12 I < 3.63E-02 31-Jan-12 < 2.74E-02 7-Feb-12 < 1.84E-02 14-Feb-12 <J2.00E-02 21-Feb-12 <l1.70E-02 28-Feb-12 < 1.88E-02 6-Mar-12 < 1.59E-02 13-Mar-12 < 2.28E-02 20-Mar-12 < 2.12E-02 27-Mar-12 <l4.37E-02 API-1 SECOND QUARTER Date Activity
| |
| _3-Apr-12 T <[157E-02 i0-Apr-121 < 9.96E-03_
| |
| 17-Apr-12 < 2.68E-02 25-Apr-12 < 1.59E-02 1-May-12 < 1.70E-02 8-May-12 < 2.91E-02 15-May-12 < 1.88E-02 22-May-12 < 2.81E-02 29-May i2 < 1.75E-02 5-Jun-12 < 3.60E-03 11-Jun-12 < 2.82F-02 19-Jun-12f <13.11E-02 26-Jun-121 < 1.16E-02 C-13
| |
| | |
| Fermi 2 - 2012 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report FERMI 2 AIR IODINE - 131 (pCi/cubic meter)
| |
| API-1 THIRD QUARTER Date Activity 3-Jul-121 < 2.17E-02 10-Jul-12 < 2.51E-02 17-Jul-12 < 3.14E-02 23-Jul-12 <j2.21E-02 31-Jul-12 <[1.11E-02 6-Aug-12 < 4.32E-02 14-Aug-12 < 4.49E-02 22-Aug-12 < 1.88E-02 28-Aug-12 < 3.77E-02 4-Sep-12 I < 1.99E-02 10-Sep-12 1.37E-02 18-Sep-121 < 1.59E-02 25-Sep-12 <l2.33E-02 API-1 FOURTH QUARTER Date Activity 2-Oct-12 [ < 2.37E-02 9-Oct-i2 <j 7.28E-03 16-Oct-12 < 1.10E-02 23-Oct-12 < 1.77E-02 30-Oct-12 <I2.OOE-02 6-Nov-12 < 3.22E-02 13-Nov-12] < 1.71E-02 20-Nov-12 < 3.28E-02 27-Nov-12 < 4.05E-02 4-Dec-12 < 2.19E-02 11-Dec-12 < 1.98E-02 T18-Dec-12 I <I l.89E-02 26-Dec-12j <1.24E-02 C-14
| |
| | |
| Fermi 2 - 2012 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report FERMI 2 AIR IODINE -131 (pCi/cubic meter)
| |
| API-2 FIRST QUARTER Date Activity 3-Jan-12 <,2.27E-02 10-Jan-12 < 3.46E-02 17-Jan-12 <)1.90E-02 24-Jan-12 < 5.96E-03 31-Jan-12 < 3.56E-02 7-Feb-12 < 3.13E-02 14-Feb-12 < 1.69E-02 21-Feb-12 < 2.08E-02 28-Feb-12. 1.75E-02 6-Mar-12 < 1.63E-02 13-Mar-12 1 < 2.35E-02 20-Mar-12 I < 1.53E-02 27-Mar-12 <2.90E-02 API-2 SECOND QUARTER Date Activity 3-Apr-12 <1.60E-02 10-Apr-12 2.52E-02 17-Apr-12 < 2.35E-02 25-Apr-12 < 1.38E-02 1-May-12 < 2.66E-02 8-May-12 iI2.63E-02
| |
| <
| |
| 15-May-12 _ <1 1.92E-02 22-May-12 < 1.43E02
| |
| _29-May1 < 1.41E-02T 5-Jun-12] < 3.34E-03 11-Jun-12 < 3.45E-02 19-Jun-12 < 1.91E 02 26-Jun- 121 < 2.08E-02 C-15
| |
| | |
| Fermi 2 - 2012 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report FERMI 2 AIR IODINE - 131 (pCi/cubic meter)
| |
| API-2 THIRD QUARTER Date Activity 3-Jul-12 <2.48E-02 10-Jul-12 < 5.32E-02 17-Jul-12 j < 1.72E-02 23-Jul-12 < 2.34E-02 31-Jul-12 < 1.34E-02 6-Aug-12 <4.56E-02 14 Aug < 1.75E-02 22-Aug-12 <J2.36E-02 28-Aug-12 < 2.86E-02 4-Sep-12 < 1.36E-02 10-Sep-12 <2.78E-02 18-Sep-12 < 1.83E-02 25-Sep-12 j < 8.36E-03 API-2 FOURTH QUARTER Date Activity 2-Oct-12 < 1.59E-02 9-Oct-12 _< 7.02E-03 16-Oct-12 < 1.11E-02 23-Oct-12 < 2.55E-02 30-Oct-12 < 2.54E-02 6-Nov-l <2.12E-02 13-Nov-12 < 1.90E-02 20-Nov-12 <-2.36E-02 27-Nov-12 < 2.32E-02 4-Dec-12 < 2.37E-02 11-Dec-12 < 1.88E-02 18-Dec-12 < 1.73E-02 26-Dec-12 < 1.12E-02 C-16
| |
| | |
| Fermi 2 - 2012 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report FERMI 2 AIR IODINE - 131 (pCi/cubic meter)
| |
| API-3 FIRST QUARTER Date Activity 3-Jan- 12 <12.74LE-02 10-Jan-12 < 1.90E-02 17-Jan-12 <j2.14E-02 24-Jan-12 < 2.26E-02 31-Jan-12 < 2.40E-02 7-Feb-12 < 1.72E-02 14-Feb-12 < 2.57E-02 21-Feb-12 < 2.31E-02 28-Feb-12 < 1.48E-02 6-Mar-12 < 1.51E-02 13-Mar-121 I1.96E-02 20-Mar-12 < 3.62E-02 27-Mar-12 <14.14E-02 API-3 SECOND QUARTER Date Activity 3-Apr-12I <)1.51E-02 10-Apr-12 <I 1.37E-02 17-Apr-12 <-I1.56E-02
| |
| <
| |
| 25-Apr-12 < 1.38E-02 1-May-12 < 1.64E-02 8-May-12 _ < 1.52E-02_
| |
| 15-May-12 .<3.51E-02 22-May-12 < 1.96E-02 29-May-12 2.29E-02 5-Jun-12 < 4.34E-03 11-Jun-12 < 3.02E-02 19-Jun-12 < 1I.76E-02 26-Jun-12( < 1.58E-02 C-17
| |
| | |
| Fermi 2 - 2012 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report FERMI 2 AIR IODINE - 131 (pCi/cubic meter)
| |
| API-3 THIRD QUARTER Date Activity 3-Jul-12 < 2.18E-02 10-Jul-12 < 3.19E-02 17-Jul-12 < 1.88E-02 23-Jul-12 < 1.71E-02 31-Jul-12 < 2.20E-02 6-Aug-12 <4.40E-02 14-Aug-12 ( < 1.68E-02 22-Aug-12 < 1.99E-02 28-Aug-12 <J1.83E-02 4-Sep-12 < 9.68E-03 10-Sep-12 4.21E-02 18-Sep-12 <I2.OSE-02 25-Sep-121 < 1.83E-02 API-3 FOURTH QUARTER Date Activity 2-Oct-12 < 2.50E-02 9-Oct-12 <j9.75E-03 16-Oct-12 <1.45E-02 23-Oct-12 < 1.32E-02 30-Oct-12 <I2.90E-02 6-Nov-12 <I 1.87E-02 13-Nov-12 < 1.79E-02 20-Nov-12 <I 1.71E-02 27-Nov-12 < 2.03E-02 4-Dec-12 -13.06E-02 11-Dec-12 < 1.71E-02 18-Dec-121 <j 1.98E-02 26-Dec-12 < 1.42E-02 C-18
| |
| | |
| Fermi 2 - 2012 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report FERMI 2 AIR IODINE - 131 (pCi/cubic meter)
| |
| API-4 FIRST QUARTER Date Activity 3-Jan-12 < 1.67E-02 10-Jan-12 < 1.53E-02 17-Jan-12 < 2.12E-02 24-Jan-12 < 1.76E-02 31-Jan-12 < 1.83E-02 7-Feb-12 < 2.63E-02 14-Feb-12 < 3.13E-02 21-Feb-12 < 1.36E-02 28-Feb-12 < 1.66E-02 6-Mar-12 < 1.39E-02 13-Mar-12 <i2.46E-02 20-Mar-12 <13.15E-02 27-Mar-12, <13.14E-02 API-4 SECOND QUARTER Date Activity 3-Apr-12 j< 2.60E-02 10-Apr-12( <I .20E-02 17-Apr-12 < 2.15E-02 25-Apr-12 < 2.73E-02 1-May-12 < 2.32E-02 8-May-12 < 2.07E-02 15-May-12 [ I2.56E-02 22-May-12 <j 1.78E-02 29-May-12 < 2.04E-02 5-Jun-12 < 4.40E-03 11-Jun-12I < 2.51E-02 19 Jun-12 <2.OOE-02 26-Jun-12 < 1.33E-02 C-19
| |
| | |
| Fermi 2 - 2012 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report FERMI 2 AIR IODINE - 131 (pCi/cubic meter)
| |
| API-4 THIRD QUARTER Date Activity 3-Jul-12 < 2.51E-02 10-Jul-12 < 3.04E-02 17-Jul-12 < 245E-02 23-Jul-12 _< 3.06E-02 31-Jul-12 < 1.31E-02 6-Aug-12 <13.49E-02 14-Aug-12 < 2.08E-02 22-Aug-12 < 2.22E-02 28-Aug-121 < 1.96E-02 4-Sep2 < 1.59E-02 10-Sep12 < 1.41E-02 18-Sep-12 < 1.34E-02 25-Sep-1 2 _<I 1.8-02 API-4 FOURTH QUARTER Date Activity 2-Oct-12 < 1.73E-02 9-Oct-12 < 1.45E-02 16-Oct-12 1 <j 1.36E-02 23-Oct-12 -< 2.56E-02 30-Oct-i2 < 1.73E-02 6-Nov-12 <J 2.06E-02 13-Nov-12 < 2.10E-02 20-Nov-121 <I 2.08E-02 27-Nov-12 < 3.23E-02 4-Dec-1 < 2.37E-02 11-Dec-1 < 1.79E-02 18-Dec-121 <I 1.86E-02 26-Dec-12 < 1.07E-02 C-20
| |
| | |
| Fermi 2 - 2012 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report FERMI 2 AIR IODINE - 131 (pCi/cubic meter)
| |
| API-5 FIRST QUARTER Date Activity 3-Jan-12 < 2.16E-02 10-Jan-12 < 1.90E-02 17-Jan-12 < 3.11E-02 24-Jan-12 < 4.37E-02 31-Jan-12 < 1.64E-02 7-Feb-12 < 1.79E-02 14-Feb-12 < 1.84E-02 21-Feb-12 <11.8 3E-02 28-Feb-12 <!3.56E-03 6-Mar-12 < 9.39E-03 13-Mar-12 < 2.17E-02 20-Mar-12 < 1.19E-02 27-Mar-12 < 3.39E-02 API-5 SECOND QUARTER Date Activity 3-Apr-12 <171E02 10-Apr-12! <j 1.5 1-02 17-Apr-12 < 2.53E-02 25
| |
| :Apr-1 2 < 4.08E-02 1-May-12 _< 2.06E-02 8-May-12 < 2.53E-02 15-May-12 < 2.12E-02 22-May 1.88E-02 29-May-12 < 3.99E-02 5-Jun-12 < 3.61E-03 11-Jun- 12 < 2.45E-02 19-Jun-12! < 1.64E-02 26-Jun-12 <1-. 69E-02 C-21
| |
| | |
| Fermi 2 - 2012 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report FERMI 2 AIR IODINE -131 (pCi/cubic meter)
| |
| API-5 THIRD QUARTER Date Activity 3-Jul-12 < 4.17E-02 10-Jul-12 <I3.51E-02 17-Jul-12 < 2.18E-02 23-Jul-12 < 2.75E-02 31-Jul-12 < 142E-02
| |
| -g-12 g-12 <I20E-02 14-Aug-12 -,< 1.97E-02 22-Aug-12 L2.5E-02_
| |
| 28-Aug-12 <I2.47E-02 4-Sep-12 < 9.15E-03 10-Sep-12 < 1.84E-02 18-Sep-12 < 3.54E-02 25
| |
| -Sep-1 2 <l2.33E-02 API-5 FOURTH QUARTER Date Activity 2-Oct-121 <I2.13E-02 9-Oct-12 <1.08E-03 16-Oct-12 < 8.51E-03 23-Oct-12 < 1.82E-02 30-Oct-12 < 1.99E-02 6-Nov-12 <I 1.75E-02 13-Nov-12 < 1.64E-02 20-Nov-12 < 3.52E-02 27-Nov-12 <[2.45E-02 4-Dec-12 < 1.97E-02 11-Dec-12i <_4.09E-02 18-Dec-12 <I1.68E-02 26-Dec-12_ <I1.32E-02 C-22
| |
| | |
| Fermi 2 - 2012 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report FERMI 2 AIR PARTICULATE QUARTERLY COMPOSITE ANALYSIS API-1 (indicator)
| |
| (pCi/cubic meter)
| |
| Nuclide First Quarter Second Quarter Ba-140 <[3.12E-02 < 9.70E-03 Be-7 7.18E-02 4.70E-02 Ce-141 <11.73E-03 <2.03E-03 Ce-14 2.57E-03 <2.08E-03 Co-58 <jX.48E-04 <7.91E-04 Co-60 < 6.95E-04 <15.84E-04 Cr-51 <1.31E-02 <I1.85E-02 Cs-134 6.47E-04 _ 4.96E-04 Cs-137 <15.22E-04 <468E-04 Fe-59 <12.38E-03 <j2.88E-03 K-40 _3.45E-03j <1.14E-02 La-140 < 9.13E-03 <l9.70E-03 Mn-54 <5.36E-04 < 5.70E-04 Nb-95 < 1.01E-03 < 9.60E-04 Ru-103 <IL22E-03 <1,31E-03 Ru-106 4.75E-03 I <3.94E-03 Zn-65 [ 1.34E-03_" <j1.31E-03 Zr-95 _ 1.86E-03 < 1.46E-03 API-1 (indicator)
| |
| (pCi/cubic meter)
| |
| Nuclide Third Quarter Fourth Quarter Ba-140 <l3.12E-02 <l3.26E-02 Be-7 17.18E-02 4.11E-02 Ce-141 < l.73E-03 < 1.89E-03 Ce-144 <l2.57E-03 < 2.88E-03 Co-58 <l8.48E-04 < 6.80E-04 Co-60 <l6.95E-04 <16.13E-04 Cr-51 <l1.31E-02 < 1.40E-02 Cs-134 < 6.47E-04 < 5.54E-04 Cs-137 <[5.22E-04 <5.48E-04 Fe-59 <j2.38E-03 < 2.74E-03 K-40 l l1.48E-02 < 5.12E-03 La-140 i 913E r <01.55 2 Mn-54 < 5.36E-04 [ <16.50E-04 Nb-95 < 1.01E-03 < 1.10E-03 Ru-103 < 1.22E-03 < 1.14E-03 Ru-106 -[4.75E-03 _<14.85E 03 Zn-65 < 1.34E-03 <I1.30E-03 Zr95 1i1 86E-03 _ 1.82E-03 C-23
| |
| | |
| Fermi 2 - 2012 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report FERMI 2 AIR PARTICULATE QUARTERLY COMPOSITE ANALYSIS API-2 (indicator)
| |
| (pCi/cubic meter)
| |
| Nuclide First Quarter Second Quarter Ba-140 <1.k?23E-02 <4.74E-02 Be-7 5.45E-02 7.29E-02 Ce-141 < 1.71E-03 < 3.66E-03 Ce-144 < 2.43E-03 < 3.66E-03 Co-58 < 9.43E-04 < 1.69E-03 Co-60 <,7 62E-04 <1.58E-04 Cr-51 < 1.51E-02 <2.98E-02 Cs-134 < 7.35E-04 < 8.28E-04 Cs-137 <[6.26E-04 <3.90E-04 Fe-59 <13.21E-03 U<13.05E-03 K-40 7 1 15E-02 < 1.69E-02 La-140 < 1.23E-02 <4.74E-02 Mn-54 < 4.24E-04 < 7.73E-04 Nb-95 < 7.33E-04 < 1.49E-03 Ru-103 < 1.19E-03 _ < 2.34E-03 Ru-106 <5.18E-03 < 5.20E-03 Zn-65 < 1.46E-03' < 1 68E-03 Zr-95 I <1.38E-03 <2.72E-03 API-2 (indicator)
| |
| (pCi/cubic meter)
| |
| Nuclide Third Quarter Fourth Quarter Ba-140 < 2.90E-02 <2.39E-02 Be-7 6.18E-02 4.91E-02 Ce-141 < 1.92E-03 < 1.60E-03 Ce-144 <2.70E-03 < 2.37E-03_
| |
| Co-58 <l8.58E-04 < 7.95E-04 Co-60 7.5S<
| |
| 1E-04 <7.15E-04 Cr-51 < 1.30E-02 < 1.18E-02 Cs-134 <I5.3E-04]<6.67E_-0 Cs-137 <5.86E-04 < 5.55E-04 Fe-59 < 1.93E-03 < 2.39E-03 K-40 13E03 La-140 I 1.24E-02 < 1.08E-02 Mn-54 Nb-95 <\(6 I72E-04 8.98E-04 <14.76E-04
| |
| < 9.70E-04 Ru-103 < 1.15E-03 < .02E-03 Ru-106 I<15.92E-03 < 4.28E-03 Zn-65 < 1.51E-03 < 1.42E-03 Zr-95 < 1.34E-03 I 1i.68E-03 C-24
| |
| | |
| Fermi 2 - 2012 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report FERMI 2 AIR PARTICULATE QUARTERLY COMPOSITE ANALYSIS API-3 (indicator)
| |
| (pCi/cubic meter)
| |
| Nuclide First Quarter Second Quarter Ba-140 L<3.01E-02 < 2.25E-02 Be-7 657E-02 8.36E-02 Ce-141 < 1.60E-03 < 3.25E-03 Ce-144 L< 2.40E-03 <13.46E-03 Co-58 <8.32E-04 < 9.29E-04 Co-60 < 6.93E-04 <9.65E-04 Cr-51 [<1.33E-02 < 2.65E-02 Cs-134 < 5.66E-04 <8.49E-04 Cs-137 =<_5.97E-04 <16.26E-04 Fe-59 <2.16E-03 < 1.97E-03 K-40 1.65E-02 < 6.67E-03 La-140 < 1.25E-02 < 2.25E-02 Mn-54 < 82E-O4 [ <j8.22E-04 Nb-95 I < 1.1OE-03 I <1.59E-03 R-103__I_<_1.39E-03 < 2.24E-03 Ru-106 < .35E-03 < 6.32E-03 Zn-65 < 1.54E-03 < 1.90E-03 Zr-95 j <f1.51E-03 < 1.97E-03 API-3 (indicator)
| |
| (pCi/cubic meter)
| |
| Nuclide Third Quarter Fourth Quarter Ba-140 <13.01E-02 <12.37E-02 Be-7 6.57E-02 5.87E-02 Ce-141 <I1.60E-03 <j1.60E-03 Ce-144 I < 2.40E-03 <2.71E-03 Co-58 _ 8.32E-04 <18.20E-04 Co-60 <6.93E-04 [ 6.26E-04 Cr-51 1.33E-02 < 1.41E-02 Cs-134__ < .6E0 < 5.18E-04 Cs-137 <5.97E-04 <15.81E-04 Fe-59 <2.16E-03 <2.07E03 K-40 11.65E-02 < 7.01E-03 La-140 <
| |
| <I1.25E-02 < 1.1OE-02 Mn-54 <6.82E-04 <4.95E-04 Nb-95 <l1.10E-03 <7.95E-04 Ru-103 _ < .39E-03 < 1.03E-03 Ru-106 <4.35E-03 _ 4.60E-03 Zn-65 <1.54E-03 <I1.54E-03 Zr-95 1_51E-03 <j1.54E-03 C-25
| |
| | |
| Fermi 2 - 2012 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report FERMI 2 AIR PARTICULATE QUARTERLY COMPOSITE ANALYSIS API-4 (control)
| |
| (pCi/cubic meter)
| |
| Nuclide First Quarter Seecond Quarter Ba-140 < 1.55E-02 < 3.94E-02 2
| |
| Be-7 [495E-02_ 8.81E-02 Ce-141 <2.04E-03 < 4.18E-03 Ce-144 <3.12E-03 4.61E-03 Co-58 <8.89E-04 I< 1.87E-03 Co-60 <{6.72E-04 < 9.59E-04 Cr-51 ] 1.63E-02 < 3.62E-02 Cs-134 <l7.35E-04 < 1.23E-03 Cs-137 <l5.89E-04 < 1.04E-03 Fe-59 <2.88E-03 < 50E-03 K-40 <15.96E-03 l <I1.79E-02 La-140 <1.55E-02 <[3.94E-02 Mn-54 <6.44E-04 <9.18E-04 Nb-95 <9.94E-04 <2.03E-03 Ru-103 <1.35E-03 I< 2.64E-03 Ru 106 <{4 96 E-03K<9.22E-03 O
| |
| Zn-65 < 1.47E-03 <1.59E-03 Zr-95 <11.56E-03 13.03E-03 API-4 (control)
| |
| (pCi/cubic meter)
| |
| Nuclide Third Quarter Fourth Quarter Ba-140 <3.15E-02 _<3.89E-02_
| |
| Be-7 6.63E-02 385E-02 Ce-141 1.46E-03 < 1.83E-03 Ce-144 <2.54E-03 { <3.15E-03 Co-58 <9.77E-04 [ 9.56E-04 Co-60 < 7.20E-04 <7.84E-04 Cr-5i < 1.48E-02 < 1.80E-02 Cs- 134 5.95E 8.43E-04 Cs-137 <5.42E-04 { <6.87E-04 Fe-59 <
| |
| <2.35E3-03 I < 1.93E3-03 K-40 <!4 35E-03 1.69E-02 La-140 <{ 1.10E-02 { < 9.34E-03 Mn-54 < 5.19E-04 < 7.70E-04 Nb-95 <8 .81E-04 <[1.06E-03 Ru- 03 I<1.13E-03 < .42E-03 Ru-106 < 5.46E-03 _ < 6.64E-03 Zn-65 < 1.70E-03 I<l 1.74E-03 Zr-95 1 .54E03 < 1.96E-03 C-26
| |
| | |
| Fermi 2 - 2012 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report FERMI 2 AIR PARTICULATE QUARTERLY COMPOSITE ANALYSIS API-5 (Indicator)
| |
| (pCi/cubic meter)
| |
| Nuclide First Quarter Second Quarter Ba-140 <11.31E-02 <5.87E-02 Be-7 5.95E-02 8.38E-02 Ce-141 < 1.85E-03 < 3.22E-03 Ce-144 1< 2.92E-03 <3.27E-03 Co-58 < 7.98E-04 <2.08E-03 Co-60 < 6.41E-04 <1.20E-03 Cr-51 < 1.53E-02 L 2.46E-02 Cs-134 < 6.83E-04 <46E-04 Cs-137 < 5.83E-04 <19.23E-04 Fe-59_ < 2.83E-03 <I8.48E-03 K-40 <l1.17E-02 <l2.22E-02 La-140 < 1.31E-02 < 5.87E-02 Mn-54 < 5.64E-04 < 1.12E-03 Nb-95 Ru-103 Ru-106 9.24E-04
| |
| _<1.18E-03
| |
| <5.15E-03 F < 1.89E-03 3.42E-03
| |
| <7.58E-03 Zn-65 <1.46E-03 <1.89E-03 Zr-95__ <1.75E-03 <2.90E-03 API-5 (Indicator)
| |
| (pCi/cubic meter)
| |
| Nuclide Ba-140 Third Quarter
| |
| <3.57E-02 8.47E-02 FFourth Quarter 5.85E-02 7.65E-02 Be -7 Ce-141 1.87E-03 <2.76E-03 Ce-144 <3 17E-03 <4.23E-03 Co-58 <8.44E-04 < 1.80E-03 Co-60 <8.18E-04 <1.03E-03 Cr-51 < 1.89E-02 <2.47E-02 Cs- 34 < 8.48E04 <I1.37E-03 Cs-137 < 7.47E-04 <1.20E-03 Fe-59 < 2.15E-03 <4.06E-03 K-40 < 5.48E-03 1.16E-02 La-140 < 1.62E-02 < 1.87E-02 Mn-54 < 7.81E-04 <1.11E-03 Nb-95 <l9.24E-04 < 1.64E-03 Ru-103 - 1.36E-03 < 2.27E-03 Ru-106 6.31E-03 <9.61E-03 Zn-65 __ 1.52E-03 < 2.63E-03 (Zr 95 ( <1.7 8E-03 1_<13.17E-03 C-27
| |
| | |
| Fermi 2 - 2012 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report FERMI 2 MILK ANALYSIS M-2 (Indicator)
| |
| (pCi/liter)
| |
| Nuclide 19-JAN 16-FEB 8-MAR Ba-140 3.17E+00 < 3.35E+00 < 2.82E+00 Be-7 <2.23E+01 <' 2.14E+01 1.76E+01 Ce-141 4.03E+00 4.17E+00 < 3.62E+00 Ce-144 <1.63E+01 < 1.64E+01 < 1.40E+01 Co-58 <2.73E+00 <12.49E+00 <12.24E+00 Co-60 < 3.05E+00 < 2.92E+00 < 2.60E+00 Cs-134 <j3.26E+00 < 3.28E+00 _<2.77E+00 Cs-137 <2.71E+00 < 2.81E+00 <2.23E+00 Fe-59 < 5.74E+00 <6.13E+00 < 5.03E+00 1-131 <17.38E-01 < 6.33E-01 <l5.52E-01 K-40 1.45E+03 1.45E+03 1.51E+03 La-140 <j3.17E+00 _<3.35E+00 <2.82E+00 Mn-54 < 2.74E+00 < 2.62E+00 <l2.08E+00 Nb-95 .80E+00 < 2.83E+00 <30E+00 Ru-103 <2.56E+00 <2.51E+00 < 2.10E+00 Ru-106 <2.32E+01 < 2.20E+01 < 1.92E+01 Sr-89 _<j3 06E+00 < 1.42E+00 <ji.69E+00 Sr-90 _ <1.78E+00 < 1.70E+00 <-1.73E+00 Zn-65 <16.08E+00 <15.89E+00 .33E+00 Zr-95 <4.62E+00 _
| |
| <4.14E+00 <[4.11E+00 Nuclide 12-APR 10-MAY 24-MAY Ba-140 <2.42E+00 <l1.88E+00 <j2.OOE+00 Be-7 j <I1.51E+01 <1.59E+01 <1.64E+01 Ce-141 < 3.15E+00 <2. 99E+00 <l3.17E+00 Ce-144 <I1.30E+01 <1.29E+01 <)1.31E+01 Co-58 < 1.91E+00 <1.95E+00 <1.98E+00 Co-60 < 2.31E-+00 <2.45E+00 <2.30E+00 Cs-134 <12.71E+00 <2.60E+00 < 2.51E+00 Cs-137 <12.26E+00 <2.08E+00 <2.13E+00 Fe-59 <4,64E+00 I<4.44E+00 <4.15E+00 1-131 < 4.28E-01 <[7.58E-01 <7.05E-01 K-40 1.41E+03 1.51E+03 1.53E+03 La-140 ( <}2.42E+00 <1.88E+00 <2.00E+00 Mn-54 .00E+00 < 1.81E+00 <2.00E+00 Nb-95 < 2.03E+00 <2.10E+00 < 2.05E+00 Ru-103 < 1.91E+00 <1.88E+00 < 1.98E+00 Ru-106 <1.82E+01 <l1.70E+01 < 1.74E+01 Sr-89 __ 1.52E+00 <I1.48E+00 <1.55E+00 Sr-90 <I1.80E+00 <1.31E+00 < 1.73E+00 Zn 65 <5.200 55+00 <4.89E+00 Zr-95 3.37E00 5
| |
| <3.53E+00 <13 58E+00 C-28
| |
| | |
| Fermi 2 - 2012 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report FERMI 2 MILK ANALYSIS M-2 (Indicator)
| |
| (pCi/liter)
| |
| Nuclide 7-JUN 21-JUN 12-JUL Ba-140 <12.22E+00 <'2.37E+00 <1.86E+00 Be-7 ___ 1.52E+01 _< 1.51E+01 <1.49E+01 Ce-141 2.98E+ < 3.03E+00 < 3.20E+00 Ce-144 <1.18E+01 <1.18E+01 <1.25E+01 Co-58 1.88E+00 < 1.97E+00 < 1.79E+00 Co-60 <I1.90E+00 <2.26E+OO <2.10E+00 Cs-134 2.20E+00 <12.31E+00 < 2.09E+00 Cs-137 < 1.94E+00 < 2.03E+00 < 1.85E+00 Fe-59 4.22E+00 <1.4.51E+00 <4.08E+00 I-131 _<9 34E-01 < 5.95E-01 6.51E-01 K-40 1.51E+03 1.54E+03_ 1.48E+03
| |
| <2.37E+00 < 1.86E+00 F5 La-140 < 2.22E+00 Mn-54 _ <1.84E+00 <I2.00E+00 < 1.75E+00
| |
| ___ < 1 79E+00 <)1 99E+00o < 1.77E+00O Ru-103 <1.67E+00 < 1.84E+00 1.71E+00 Ru-106 1< 1.63E+01 <l1.66E+01 < 1.54E+01 Sr-89 <l2.30E+00 <1.84E+00 < 2.20E+00 Sr-90 < 1.32E+00 < 1.83E+00 < 8.98E-O1 Zn-65 <i4.54E+00 < 4.81E+00 < 4.30E+00 Zr-95 <j3.26E+00 < 3.29E+0 < 3.05E+00 Nuclide 26-JUL 9-AUG 23-AUG Ba-140 <I2.46E+00 <2.98E+00 < 3.41E+00 Be-7 < 1.63E+01 <1.66E+01 <2.05E+01 Ce-141 <3.42E+00 <3.70E+00 <[4.23E+00 Ce-144 <1.34E+01 <j1.29E+01 < 1.56E+01 Co-58 Co-60
| |
| < 1.89E+00
| |
| <[2.02E+00
| |
| <I1.80E+00
| |
| < 2.09E+00 2.16E+00 F < 2.25E+00 2.60E+00
| |
| <2.90E+00 Cs-134 <2.60E+00 Cs-137 2.16E+00 { < 1.79E+00 < 2.59E+00 Fe-59 <4.30E+00 < 4.32E+00 < 5.87E+00 I-131 <7.7E-01 < 6.28E-01 <576E-01 K-40 159E+03 1.53E+03 1.45E+03 La-140 <[2.46E+00 < 2.98E+00 < 3.41E+00 Mn-54 I <2.06E+00 I 1.61E+00 <2.47E+00 Nb-95 <2.08E+00 < 1.98E+00 <2.38E+00 Ru-103 < 201E+00 <]2.04E+00 < 2.49E+00 Ru-1_06 <186E+01 <161E+01 < 209E+01 Sr-89 <1.50E+00 < 2.28E+00 l 1.61E+00 Sr-90 <I1.33E+00 <.46E+00 < 1.62E+00 Zn-65 I <4.77E+00 <4.74E+00 <T5.87E+00 Zr-95 <I3.37E+00I <13.40E+OO <419E+0 C-29
| |
| | |
| Fermi 2 - 2012 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report FERMI 2 MILK ANALYSIS M-2 (Indicator)
| |
| (pCi/liter)
| |
| Nuclide 6-SEP 20-SEP 11-OCT Ba-140 < 2.78E+00 <j3.42E+00 < 2.03E+00 Be-7 < 1.83E+01 < 62.26E+01 < 1.40E+01 Ce-141 < 3.39E+00 < 3.99E+00 J 2.82E+00 Ce-144 < 1.41E+01 < 1.51E+01 < 1.17E+01 Co-58 < 2.39E+00 < 2.57E+00 1.71E+00 Co-60 2.20E+00 <[3.02E+00 <1.86E+00 Cs-134 < 2.62E+00 < 3.79E+00 <2.17E+00 Cs-137 < 2.15E+00 < 3.10E+00 <1.81E+00 Fe-59 < 5.04E+00 < 6.92E+00 <I3.91E+00 1-131 < 5.28E-01 < 5.87E-01 <I620E-01 K-40 1.41E+03 1.36E+03 1.52E+03 La-140 < 2.78E+00 < 3.42E+00 2.03E+00 Mn-54 < 2.23E+00 .10E+00 <1.77E+00 Nb95 < 2.51E+00 <12.77E+00 <j1.82E+00 Ru-103 <12.OE+00 <<253E+00j <I1.64E+00 Ru-106 < 1.85E+01 <2.33E+01 <1.56E+01 Sr-89 <L1.66E+00 <13.87E+00 3.49E+00 Sr-90 <l1.89E+00 < 1.77E+00 < 1.81E+00 Zn-65 <(5.44E+I00I<6.59E+00 <4.49E+-00 Zr-95 _ <4.21E+00 <4.59E+00 <3.08E+00 Nuclide 15-NOV 13-DEC Ba-140 <2.58E+00 < 2.53E+00 Be-7 < 1.84E+01 < 1.83E+01 Ce-141 < 3.96E+00 <3.42E+00 Ce-144 < 1.55E+01 < 1.45E+01 Co-58 < 2.10E+00 < 2.29E+00 Co-60 <l2.69E+00 < 2.75E+00 Cs-134 l<2.42E+00 < 2.43E+00 Cs-137 <2.44E+00 <l2.38E+00 Fe-59 <j5.05E+00 __<j4.98E+00 1-131 L 443E:01 < [8.43E-01 K40 61E3 _1.52E+03 La-140 < 2.58E+00 < 2.53E+00 Mn-54_ l < 2.22E+00 <l2.37E+00 Nb-95_ <221E+00 <j2.37E00 Ru-103 <12.14E+00 <2.24E+00 Ru-106 < 2.04E+01 < 2.02Et01 Sr-89 - 1.33E+00 I 33E+00 Sr-90 1.74E+00 <1.64E+00 Zn-65 <15.75E+00 <5.22E+00 Zr-95 -<4.21E+00 <4.05E+00 C-30
| |
| | |
| Fermi 2 - 2012 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report FERMI 2 MILK ANALYSIS M-8 (Control)
| |
| (pCi/liter)
| |
| Nuclide 19-JAN 16-FEB 8-MAR Ba-140 <13.02E+00 - <2.93E+00 <3.05E+00 Be-7 < 2.11E+01 <1.83E+01 <2.05E+01 Ce-141 < 4.36E+00 I 3.45E+00 <4.31E+00 Ce-I44 .72E+01 <1.41E+01 <1.59E+01 Co 58 <230E+00 <224E+00 2.45E00 Co-60 <3.15E+00 <2.77E+00 <2.56E+00 Cs-134 <3.34E+00 < 2.84E+00 -<2.99E+00 Cs-137 _< 2.79E+00 < 2.77E+00 <2.40E+00 Fe-59 <5.91E+00 < 5.61E+00 < 5.76E+00 1-131 <l7.02E-01 < 5.34E-01 < 6.42E-01 K-40 (1 47E+03 I N 1.53E+03 1.45E+03 La-140 -< 3.02E+00 <12.93E+00 <3.05E+00 Mn-54 _ < 2.72E+00 < 2.37E+00 <2.32E+00 Nb-95 <2.81E+00 <2.22E+00 <2.38E+00 Ru-103 <j2.48E+00 < 2.01E+00 < 2.44E+00 Ru-106 <12.21E+01 ) <2.07E+01 2.24E+01 Sr-89 <2.98E+00 < 2.56E+00 j 1.60E+00 Sr-90 <1.79E+00 <I1.66E+00 O 1.69E+00 Zn-65 < 6.64E+00 <5.75E+00 <j6.11E+00 Zr-95 <4.67E+00 -<4.09E+00 < 4.00E+00 Nuclide 12-APR 10-MAY 24-MAY Ba-140 ] <]2.66E+00 <l3.53E+00 <12.11E+00 Be-7 <I2.00E+01 <2.31E+01 <11.75E+01 Ce-141_ <I2.96E+00 <13.83E+00 I < 3.76E+00 Ce-144 <1.25E+01 <11.49E+01 <1.59E+01 Co58 < 244E+00 <2.84E+00 <I1.91E+00 Co-60 j<2.88E+00 <3.55E+00 < 2.25E+00 Cs134 <IZ99E+00 <I3.39E+00 2 56F00 Cs-137 <I2.88E+00 <12.84E+00 <2,26E+00 Fe-59 <5.94E+00 < 6.60E+00 <I4.26E+00 1-131 <4.64E-01 < 6.10E-01 <5.64E-01 K-40 1.41E+03 .44E+03 1.54E+03 La-140 ( <2.66E+00 <3.53E+00 <2.11E+00 Mn-54 <2.53E+00 <2.96E+00 < 1.95E+00 Nb-95 <2.57E+00 < 281E+00 <2.05E+00 Ru-103 < 2.1OE+00 <2.77E+00 <L2.00E+00 Ru-106 <j2.0OE+O1 <2.41E+01 <J1.95E+01 Sr-89 < 1.86E+00 < 1.22E+00 <I1.49E+00 Sr-90 1.84E+00 <I 1.61E+00 1.75E+00 Zn-65 - 93E+001 I7.23E+00 I 15.32E+00 Zr-95 36E+00 <5.22E+00 <13.55E+00 C-31
| |
| | |
| Fermi 2 - 2012 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report FERMI 2 MILK ANALYSIS M-8 (Control)
| |
| (pCi/liter)
| |
| Nuclide 7-JUN 21-JUN 12-JUL Ba-140 <12.52E+00 <2.73E+00 < 2.71E+00 Be-7 < 1.71E+01 < 1.72E+01 J< 1.87E+01 Ce-141 < 3.56E+00 < 3.30E+00 < 3.93E+00 Ce-144 <1.41E+01 < 1.32E+01 <1.55E+01 Co-58 <2.10E+00 < 2.09E+00 <2.20E+00 Co-60 <2.23E+00 < 2.13E+00 <255E+00 u Cs-134 j< 2.50E+00 <2.46E+00 <2.74E+I00 Cs-137 [<.17E+00 <2.13E+00 < 2.37E+00 Fe-59 J <4.53E+00 <4.55E+00 < 5.15E+00 I-131 <6.89E-01 < 7.52E-01 i 8.44E-01 K-40 1.45E+03 ( 1.47E+03 I l1.40E+03 La-140 < 2.52E+00 < 2.73E+00j<2.71E+00 Mn-54 <2.05E+00 2.12E+00 <2.32E+00 Nb-95 <2.14E+00 < 2.09E+00 < 2.27E+00 Ru-103 <J1.98E+00 < 1.97E+00 <I2.29E+00_
| |
| Ru-106 1.79E+01 < 1.90E+01 < 1.90E+01 Sr-89 <1.75E+00 < 1.89E+00 <2.39E+00 Sr-90 11OE+00 F <1.93E+00 j <6.62E-01 Zn 65 < 4.97E+00 <4.78E+00 <5.60EI00 Zr-95 < 3,63E+00 < 3.56E+00 < 3.77E+00 Nuclide 26-JUL 9-AUG 23-AUG Ba 140 < 3.10E+00 <13.08E+00 < 3.59E+00 Be-7 I 1.90E+01 <I1.60E+01 I<1.71E+01 Ce- 41 I <3396E+00 <l3.45E+00 <3.52E+00 Ce-144 <I1.58E+01 J 1.21E+01 <1.29E+01 Co-58 <236E+0 E<.92E+00<2.1OE+00 Co-60 < 2.68E+00 <2.10E+00 < 2.41E+00 Cs-134 <2.81E+00 <2.12E+00 I<2.65E+0 Cs-137 < 2.38E+00 <1.93E+00 <2.10E+00 Fe-59 < 5.65E+00] <4.40E+00 <5.26E+0 I-131 <6.10E-01 _ < 7.05E-O1 < 6.16E-01 K-40 1.42E+03 1.42E+03 1.45E+03 La-140 .<310E+00 <3.08E+00 <j3.59E+00 Mn-54 2.33E+00 <I1.79E+00 <)1.88E+00 Nb-95 < 2.27E+00 < 2.02E+00 I <I2.08E+00 Ru-103 225E+00 1.92E+00 < 1.98E+00 Ru-106 I 1.99E+01 <1.59E+01 <l1.88E+01 Sr 89 I<I1.92E+00 <2.94E+00 ( < .62E+00O Sr-90 <11.82E+00 <1.54E+00 <1.57E+00 Zn 65 <5. 85+00 <4.29E+00 89E+00
| |
| _.4 Zr-95 _ 3.97E+00 <3.08E+00 3.96E+00 C-32
| |
| | |
| Fermi 2 - 2012 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report FERMI 2 MILK ANALYSIS M-8 (Control)
| |
| (pCi/liter)
| |
| Nuclide 6-SEP 20-SEP 1t-OCT Ba-140 < 3.23E+00 < 2.40E+00 < 2.44E+00 Be-7 <1.86E+01 <b1.65E+01 < 1.83E+01 Ce-141 <3.55E+00 < 3.45E+00 L 3.21E+00 Ce-144 < 1.41E+01 < 1.28E+01 < 1.29E+01 Co-58 <2.43E+00 < 2.19E+00 < 2.24E+00-Co-60 < 2.50E+00 <2.27E+00 < 3.02E+00 Cs-134 < 2.89E+00 < 2.44E+00 < 3.01E+00 Cs-137 <2.48E+00 < 2.27E+00 < 2.58E+00 Fe-59 j < 5.69E+00 <15.12E+00 < 5.55E+00 1-131 _ <l5.86E-01 <}4.48E-01 <16.86E-01 K-40 j1.38E+03 1.42E+ 03 1.42E+03 La-140 1< 3.23E+00 < 2.40E+00 <2.44E+0 Mn-54 <2.36E+00 < 2.0E+00 ( < 2.21E+00 Nb-95 <2.54E+00 < 2.12E+00 <2.44E+00 Ru-103 <2.11E+00 <1.92E+00 <12.13E+00 Ru-106 < 1.95E+01 <1.86E+01 <I1.85E+01 Sr-89 <1.4 E+00 < 2.56E+00 < 2.60E+00 Sr-90 <1.71E+00 < 1.84E+00 [<1.80E+00 Zn-65 < 5.64E+00 <5.25E+00 I <6.15E+00 Zr-95 _4.19E+00 <3.71E+001 <4.10E+00 Nuclide 15-NOV 13-DEC Ba-140_ j <I2.91E+00 I- <2.72E+00 Be-7 < 1.69E+01 <(1.71E+01 Cc-141 < 2.97E+00 <3.52E+00 Ce-144 < 1.13E+01 < 1.34E+01 Co-58 < 2.47E+00 <2.18E+00 Co-60 < 3.11E+00 < 2.52E+00 Cs-i134 _<2.80E+00 -<1,2.-42E+00 Cs-137 <2.64E+00 < 2.15E+00 Fe-59 _ <5.99E+00 <5.51E+00 1-131 <3.85E-01 <9.48E-01 K-40 1.42E+03 1.53E+03 La-140 < 2.91E+00 <2.72E+00 Mn-54 < 2.39E+00 < 1.94E+00 Nb-95 < 2.39E+00 < 2.13E+00 Ru-103 2.02E+00 < 2.04E+00 Ru-106 <I1.94E+01 <1.81E+01 Sr-89 <1.61E+00 <3.43E+00 Sr-90 I<1.44E+00 <1.71E+00 Zn-65 <6.32E+00 <5.29E+00 Zr-95 <14.34E+00 <13.78E+00 C-33
| |
| | |
| Fermi 2 - 2012 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report FERMI 2 VEGETABLE ANALYSIS FP-1 (Indicator)
| |
| (pCi/kg wet) 26-JUL 26-JUL 26-JUL Nuclide Broccoli Cabbage Collards Ba-140 <1.42E+01 <1.13E+01 < 1.45E+01 Be-7 1.52E+02 6.72E+01 2.03E+02 Ce-141 1.32E+01 <1.17E+01 < 9.73E+00 Ce-144 < 4.83E+01 < 4.14E+01 < 3.37E+01 Co-58 <[8.63E+00 < 8.11E+00 < 9.46E+00 Co-60 < 1.02E+01 9.98E+00 < 1.15E+01 Cs-134 <I1.08E+01 < 9.77E+00 < 1.11E+01 Cs-137 < 9.02E+00 < 8.53E+00 < 9.78E+00 Fe-59 < 1.98E+01 < 1.82E+01 j < 2.17E+01 1-131 < 1.44E+01 < 1.26E+01 <j1.34E+01 K-40 3.79E+03 4.00E+03 4.51E+03 La-140 <[1.42E+01 < 1.13E+01 F< 1.45E+01 Mn-54 <19.11E+00 < 8.07E+00 1<9.70E+00 Nb-95 <19.35E+00 < 8.24E+00 I <19.61E+00 Ru 103_ < 8.46E+00 < 7.62E+00 <l8.31E+00 Ru-106 <j7.44E+01 < 7.20E+01 < .54E+01 Zn-65 <1.98E+01 < 2.03E+01 <2.22E+01 Zr-95 < -1.41E+01 < 1.29E+01 <1.70E+01 30-AUG 30-AUG 30-JUL Nuclide Broccoli Cabbage Collards Ba-140 <1.28E+01 <I7.96E+00 < 9.65E+00 Be-7 _ <1.51E+02 1.51E+02 I 2.59E+02 Ce-141 < 1.16E+01 <I9.88E+00 <19.22E+00 Ce-144 < 4.19E+01_j < 3.61E+01 3.72E+01 Co-58 <7.43E+00 <6.301+00 < 6.54E+00 Co-60 <9.32E+00 <7.24E+00 < 8.13E+00 Cs-134 <9.61E+00 .30E+00 <8.29E+00 Cs-137 < 7.97E+00 <5.94E+00 _u<17.02E+00 Fe-59 < 1.84E+01 <j1.29E+01 K1.43E+01 I-131 <1.35E+01 < 9.71E+00 <1.02E+01 K-40 5.14E+03 2.69E+03 2.30E+03 La-140 <I1.28E+01 < 7.96E+00 1 9.65E+00 Mn-54 E<I7.54E+00 < 5.79E+00 < 6.55E+00 Nb-95 < 8.47E+00 I < 6.34E+00 <6.47E+00 Ru-103 <17.55E+00 <5.88E+00 <5.83E+00 Ru-106 <7.06E+01 < 5.27E+01 I <6.07E+01 Zn-65 < 1.92E+01 <11.40E+01 I<1.58E+01 Zr-95 < 1.33E+01 <11.06E+01 <11.16E+0I FP-1 (Indicator)
| |
| (pCi/kg wet)
| |
| C-34
| |
| | |
| Fermi 2 - 2012 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report FERMI 2 VEGETABLE ANALYSIS FP-9 (Control)
| |
| (pCi/kg wet) 26-JUL 26-JUL 26-JUL Nuclide Broccoli Cabba e Collards Ba-140 <l1.17E+01 <I1.05E+01 <L9.26E+00 Be-7 2.13E+02_ <7.26E+01 1.63E+02 Ce-141 < 1.23E+01 <1.07E+01 <1.04E+01 Ce-144 <l4.55E+01 < 3.89E+01 < 3.65E+01 Co-58 <9.43E+00 <8.19E+00 < 7.16E+00 Co 60 <[9.58E+00 <7.73E+00 < 8.89E+00 Cs-134 < 1.12E+01 <-9.14E+00 < .36E+00 Cs-137 <7.88E+00 <8.06E+00 < 9.32E+00 Fe-59 < 1.89E+01 < 1.85E+01 <1.71E+01 1-131 < 1.42E+01 <1.26E+01 < 1.19E+01 K-40 4.78E+03 3.56E+03 _ 4.58E+03 La 140 < 1.17E+01 <]1.05E+01 <]9.26E+00 Mn-54 < 8.97E+00 <7.95E+00 < 7.10E+00_
| |
| Nb-95 <18.93E+00 < 8.27E+00 <7.09E+00 Ru-103 <l8.45E+00 <7.55E+00 <6.40E+00 Ru-106 <l7.81E+01 <I6.74E+01 < 6.05E+01 Zn-65 j<.89E+01 <2.11E+01 <ll.90E+001 Zr-95 <1.66E+01 < 1.46E+01 < 1.19E+01 FP-9 (Control)
| |
| (pCi/kg wet) 30-JUL 30-JUL 30-JUL Nuclide Broccoli Cabbage Collards Ba-140 < 1.60E+01 <1.44E+01 < 9.78E+00 Be-7 2.58E+02 4.38E+02 3.06E+02 Ce-141 ( < 1.38E+01 < 1.32E+01 <j9.71E+00 Ce-144 <5.23E+01 <4.76E+01 <3.48E+01 Co-58 <[1.03E+01 < 8.08E+00 <6.74E+00 Co-60 1< 1.01E+01] <9.98E+00 <I8.43E+00 Cs-134 1.3E+0 1.02E+01 8.02E+00 Cs-137 <I1.05E!+01 < 9.39E+00 < 7.01E+00 Fe-59 < 2.04E+01 < 2.03E+01 1.66E+01 I1 <1.76E+01 <1.58E+01 I <1.07E+01 K-40 1 3.32E+03 4.7E+03 4.76E+03 La-140 < 1.60E+01 <1.44E+01 < 9.78E+00 Mn-54 < 9.98E+00 < 8.87E+00 <I6.24E+00 Nb-95 < 1.08E+01 <19.10E+00 <16.72E+00 Ru-103 < 9.12E+00 < 8.42E+00 < 6.82E+00 Ru-106 <l8.95E+01 I <17.19E+01 5.5E+01 Zn-65 <l2.5 1E+01 2.5E+1 <1.85E+01 Zr 95 _ 84E+01 <5 1C.40E+-3 1.29E+01 C-35
| |
| | |
| Fermi 2 - 2012 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report FERMI 2 DRINKING WATER ANALYSIS DW-1 (Indicator)
| |
| (pCi/liter)
| |
| Nuclide 31-JAN 28-FEB 27-MAR Ba-140 < 2.41E+00 <2.76E+00 <]3.66E+00 Be 7 17E0E< .64E+01 < 1 7O Ce-141 <3.85E+00 < 3.18E+00 <3.72E+00 Ce-144 < 1.49E+01 < 1.30E+01 <ii.36E+01 Co-58 < 1.81E+00 < 1.78E+00 < 1.89E+00 Co60 <2.24E+00 < 1.91E+00 < 2.24E+00 Cr-51 < 1.78E+01 < 1.64E+01 < 1.93E+01 Cs 134 < 2.39E+00 <241E+00 < 2.54E+00 Cs-137 < 1.92E+00 < 2.14E+00 < 1.98E+00 Fe-59 <3.29E+00 <13.80E+00 ]< 4 23E+00 GR-B < 3 09E+00 < 3.08E+00 l <13.31E+00 K-40 <12.89E+01 <t1.86E+01 <2.64E+01 La-140 <2.41E+00 <IZ76E+00 _ 3.66E+00 Mn-54 < 1.82E+00 < 1.95E+00 <1.96E+00 Nb-95 < 2.05E+00 < 1.97E+00 < 2.19E+00 Ru-103 2.14E+00 1.83E+00 < 2.18E+00 Ru-1061 <[1.85E+01 <1.60E+01 < 1.74E+01 Sr-89 <12.05E+00 < 1.21E+00 < 1.42E+00 Sr-90 1 <11.57E+00 <1.69E+00 < 1.55E+00 Zn-65 <13.89E+00 < 3.45E+00 _< 4.05E+00 Zr-95 < 3.42E+00 < 33E+00 <3.68E+00 Nuclide 25-APR 29-MAY 26-JUN Ba-140 <15.43E+00_ <1.89E+00 <3.05E+00 Be-7 <2.99E+01 < 1.21E+01 1i.39E+01 Ce-141 < 6.29E+00 <12.56E+00 2.54E+00 Ce-144 <12.40E+01 <I1.04E+01 <9.12_E+00 Co-58 <]3.55E+00 <I1.42E+00 < 1.75E+00 Co-60 <4.02E+00 < 1.64E+00 < 1.96E+00 Cr-51 <3.37E+01 < 1.30E+01 _1.49E+01 Cs-134 <15.08E+00 <li.79E+00 <2.12E+00 Cs-137 <I4.24E+00 <I1.60E+00 <1.86E+00 Fe-59 < 8.06E+00 < 2.84E+00 I 4.22E+00 GR-B <3.63E+00 <13.14E+00 <3.21E+00 K-40 < 5.44E+01 12.46E+01 2.62E+01 La-140 < 5.43E+00 <i1.89E+00 k3. 05E+00 Mn-54 <13.41E+00 < 1.71E+00 <I1.71E+00 Nb-95 < 4.45E+00 I <]1.55E+00 2 09E+00 Ru-103 _<I3.79E+00 <1.48E+00 <J.78E+00 Ru-106 3 701 < 1.39E+01 <l1.61E+01 Sr-89 <1.82E+00 <9.62E-01 < 1.78E+00 Sr-90 < 1.79E_+00 < 1.01E+00 - 1 15E+00 Zn-65 < 6.62E+00 h<I3.32E+00 <J3.73E+00 S95 _< 6.62E+00l <L.61E+-00 <1C3.49E+00 C-36
| |
| | |
| Fermi 2 - 2012 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report FERMI 2 DRINKING WATER ANALYSIS DW-1(Indicator)
| |
| (pCi/liter)
| |
| Nuclide 31-JUL 28-AUG 25-SEP Ba-140 < 2.98E+00 <13.10E+00 <]3.67I+000 Be-7 < 1.57E+01 j< 1.45E+01 < 2.66E+01 Ce-141 < 3.39E+00 <12.97E+00 < 4.99E+00 Ce-144 < 1.42E+01 <r1.15E+01 2.16E+01 Co-58 <f1.66E+00 < 1.80E+00 2.47E+00 Co-60 < 1.98E+00 j <2.13E+00 j <3.63E+00 Cr-51 <I1.63E+01 <1.62E+01 < 2.75E+01 Cs134 < 2.07E+00 <2.13E+00 < 3.54E+00 Cs-137 2.00E+00 1.87E+00 <3.04E+00 Fe-59 < 3.33E+00 < 3.82E+00 <5.47E+00 GR-B 6. 1 2E+00 <2.22E+00 3.47E+00 K-40 < 2.40E+0 1 <12.48E+01 <,4.71E+01 La-140 < 2.98E+00 <3 10E+00 j 3.67E+00 Mn-54 < 1.85E+00 < 1.69E+00 < 2.92E+00 Nb-95 < 1.85E+00 < 1.79E+00 <L3.20E+00 Ru-103 <1.88E+00 < 1.78E+00 <j3.03E+00 Ru 106 <I1.77E+01 <1.41E+01 <2.7 1E+01 Sr-89 <I1.33E+00 < 2.41E+00 < 1.88E+00 Sr90 <1.54E+00 <174E+00 <l1.69E+O0 Zn-65 <3.66E+00 L 3.77E+00 <7.63E+00 Zr-95 I3.8E+00 - 2.99E+00 I58E+0 Nuclide 30-OCT 27-NOV 26-DEC Ba-140 <]2.54E+00 <4.69E+00 < 1.94E+00 Be-7 <1.35E+01 2.12E+01 <.05E+01 0
| |
| Ce-141 _ <l2.81E+00 <3.65E+00 < 2.27E+00 Ce-144 <I1.11E+01 <. 41E+01 < 8.7I900 Co-58 < 1.47E+00 < 2.12E+00 < 1.26E+00 Co-60 <1.68E+00 < 2.94E+00 <1.30E+00 Cr-51 <L1.41E+01 - < 2.17E+01 < 1.21E+01 Cs-134 <1.81E+00 < < 1.45E+00 02.79E+00 Cs-137 <2.20E+00 j <[2.38E+900 <i.34E+-00 Fe-59 <I3.o0E+00 < 5.11E+00 2.42E+O0O GR-B <2.41E+00 <3.20E+00 <12.12E+00 K-40 <.10E+01 < 3.46E+01 < 1.92E+0I1 La-140 <>2.54E+00 < 4.69E+00 < 1.94E+00 Mn-54 ( <I1.54E+00 <12.41E+00 < 1.25E+00 Nb-95 < 1.65E+00 < 2.50E+00 < 1.22E+00 Ru-103 <1.53E+00 L <2.55E+00 < 1.31E+00 Ru-106 < 1.42E+01 <2.22E+01 < 1.11E+01 Sr-89 <2.11E+00 - < .43E+0 E- <1<.67E+00 Sr-90 <1.76E+00 1< .39E+00 <[1.52E+00 Zn-65 3.48E+00 I <15.67E+00 4 < 2.36E+00 Zr-95 j 4.27E+00
| |
| _2.74E+00 < 2.19E+00 C-37
| |
| | |
| Fermi 2 - 2012 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report FERMI 2 DRINKING WATER ANALYSIS DW-2 (Control)
| |
| (pCi/liter)
| |
| Nuclide 25-JAN 22-FEB 27-MAR Ba-140 1<1.95E+00 <2.35E+00 <2.66E+00 Be-7 < 1.46E+01 <I1.51E+01 < 1.39E+01 Ce-141 < 2.9011+00 < 3.29E+00 < 2.85E+00 Ce-144 <1.16E+01 1.28E+01 ( .14E+01 Co-58 <j1.58E+00 < 1.86E+00 <l1.54E+00 Co-60 < 1.82E+00 < 2.05E+00 < .78E+00 Cr-51 < 1.51E+01 <1.76E+01 <j1.57E+01 Cs-134 <1.96E+00 <2.23E+00 < 2.05E+00 Cs137 1.81E+00 <1.95E+00 I<1.73E+00 Fe59 2.90E+00 <3.95E+00 < 3.53E+00 GR-B <3.84E+00 < 3.66E+00 <13.55E+00 K-40 66E_+1 <2.96E+01 2.33E+01 La-140 <1.95E+00 <2.35E+00 < 2.66E+00 Mn-54 <1.56E+00 I <1.81E+00 <1.67E+00 Nb-95 < 1.66E+00 1.95E+00 -<I89E+00 Ru-103 <lo1.70E+00 < 1.71E+00 <1.74E+00 Ru-106 < 1.59E+01lljl.65E+01 <1.40E+01 Sr-89 <2.03E+00 <2.34E+00 < 1.10E+00 Sr-90 ( <1.67E+00 I 1.69E+00 E 1.50E+00 Zn-65 < 3.3111+00 <13.85E+00 < 3.21E+00 Zr 95 < 2.991+00 < 3.31E+00 <2.94E+00 Nuclide 25-APR 29-MAY 26-JUN Ba-140 < 4.76E+00 __<2.45E+00 <2.21E+00 Be -7 n_ <2.81E+01 _< 1.52E+01 T< 1.14E+01 Ce-141 <16.41E+00 < 3.34E+00 <12.25E+00 Ce-144 < 2.37E+01 < 1.36E+01 < 8.71E+00 Co-58 <3.24E+00 _< 1.76E+00 - 1.25E+00 Co-60 < 3 48E+00 <2.01E+00 <11.31E+00 Cr-51 1 <2.91E+01 < 1.75E+01 < 1.27E+01 Cs 134 - <35011+00 3 <22911+00
| |
| < < 1.5611+00 Cs-137 3.49E+00 < 1.99E+00 < 1.33E+00 Fe-59 <16.51E+00 3.85E+00 2.64E+00 GR-B <3.83E+00 <3.301E+00 < 3.60E+00 0 <4.24E+01 O<
| |
| 05E+01 < 1.73E+01 La-140 4.76+00 <2.45E+00 2.2_
| |
| Mn-54 <13.21E+00 < 1.73E+00 <1 .21E+00 Nb-95 3.54E+00 < 1.89E+00 <1.31E+00 Ru-103 < 3.38E+00 < 1.78E+00 <1.38F+00 Ru-106 <12.86E+01 < 1.65E+01 < 1.15E+01 Sr-89 <1 1.72E+00 <48.77E-01 < 1.75E+00 Sr-90 <)1.52E+00 <14.75 E-01 <18.72E-01 Zn-65 <15.931E+00 < 3.52E+00 1<2.62E+00 Zr-95 <5.62E+00 < 3.16E+00._ <
| |
| C-3 8
| |
| | |
| Fermi 2 - 2012 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report FERMI 2 DRINKING WATER ANALYSIS DW-2 (Control)
| |
| (pCi/liter)
| |
| Nuclide 31-JUL 28-AUG 29-SEP Ba-140 < 2.61E+00 j 3.05E+00 4.03E+00 Be-7 <)1.43E+01 <j1.46E+01 <) 3.00E+01 Ce-141 <42.79E+00 < 3.17E+00 <i6.37E+00 Ce-144 < 1.17E+01 < 1.19E+01 < 2.33E+01 Co-58 <j1.43E+00 < 1.57E+00 < 3.06E+00 Co-60 < 1.91E+00 < 1.79E+00 <3.52E+00 Cr-51 < 1.50E+01 < 1.60E+01 < 2.83E+01 Cs-134 < 2.1 1E+00 < 2.08E+00 < 3.73E+00 Cs-137 1.76E+00 < 1.87E+00 < 3.57E+00 Fe-59 < 3.22E+00 3.52E+00 < 7.1OE+00 GR-B -< 3.47E+00 < 2.05E+00 <2.65E+00 K-40 < 1.68E+01 < 2.38E+01 < 4.80E+01 La-140 < 2.61E+00 < 3.05E+00 <4.03E+00 M5 <L1.69E+00 <1.70E+00 <3.02E+00 Nb-95 <1.74E+00 <1.72E+00 <3.53E+00 Ru-103 <I1.65E+00 <1.68E+00 <3.49E+00 Ru-106 < 1.46E+01 < 1.66E+01 <3.07E+01 Sr-89 I < 1.28E+00 < 242E+00 <2.18E+00 Sr-90 1.56E+00 j<1.68E+00 < 1.79E+00 Zn-65 < 3.52E+00 <3.30E+00 <17.01E+00 Zr-95 < 3.15E+00 < 3.06E+00 < 5.10E+00 Nuclide 30-OCT 2~7-NOV 26-DEC Ba-140 l<l2.37E+00 l <l3.40E+00 <l2.20E+00 Be-7 l<l1.37E+01l <l2.39E+01 <l1.23E+01 Ce-141 <3.01E+0 <5.21E+00 <2.84E+00 Ce-144 <I1.19E+01 <1.82E+01 <I1.06E+01 Co-58 <1.53E+00 < 2.73E+00 < 1.42E+00 Co-60 < 1.62E+00 <3.10E+00 < 1.56E+00 Cr-51 <1.57E+01 <2.66E+0-1 < 1.39E+01 Cs-134 <1.83E+00 <2.57E+00 <1.59E+00 Cs-137 ( 1.67E+00 <2.87E+0 <I1.50E+00 Fe-59 < 3.09E+00 <5.94E+00 <2.61E+00 GR-B < 2.25E+00 <I3.32E+00 <2.09E+00 K-40 < 1.50E+01 < 3.86E+01 <1.82E+01 La-140 <237E+00 < 3.40E+00 <2.20E+00 Mn-54 <1.47E+00 <2.43E+00 . E1.321+00 Nb-95 <1.61E+00 < 2.38E+00 < 1.53E+00 Ru-103 <1.55E+00 < 2.90E+00 < 1.39E+00 Ru-106 <1.44E+01 <2.37E+01 < 1.28E+01 Sr-89 .82E+00 <1 88E+00 - 1.84E+00 Sr-90 <I1.71E+00 < 14E+00 < 1.56E+00 Zn-65_ <I2.95E+00 < 15.69E+00 I <2.94E+00 Zr-95.71 C- 4.49E+00 E <31E+00 C-39
| |
| | |
| Fermi 2 - 2012 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report FERMI 2 SURFACE WATER ANALYSIS SW-2 (Control)
| |
| (pCi/liter)
| |
| Nuclide 31-JAN 28-FEB 30-MAR Ba-140 _ 3.01E+00 <,3.08E+00 I <j3.1 1E+00 Be-7 12.13E+01 < 1.88E+01 <11.67E+01 Ce-141 I <4.49E+00 I2.98E+00 I< 3.76E+00 Ce-144 <1.80E+01 <]1.18E+01 < 1.41E+01 Co-58 _ <2.27E+00 <2.32E+00 <I1.74E+00 Co-60 < 2.49E+00 < 2.48E+00 <1.87E+00 Cr-51 <I2.23E+01 <1.70E+01 <1.82E+01 Cs-134 < 300E+00 < 2.98E+00 <2.06E+00 Cs137 2.64E+00 < .57E+00 < 1.90E+00 Fe-59 <[4.20E+00 < 5.35E+00 <3.535E+00 K-40 < .92E+01 3.00E+01 < 2.34E+01 La-140 <3.011E+00 <13.08E+00 <3.11E+00 Mn-54 <12.29E+00 <2.21E+00 I <1.68E+00 Nb-95 <2.49E+00 2.28E+00 1.90E+00 Ru-103 < 2.53E+00 < 2.12E+00 < 1.94E+00 Ru-106 _ _<2.22E+01 <1.93E+01 ] <1.60E+01 Sr-89 <2.25E+00 <1.22E+00 < 1.90E+00 Sr-90 <'1.71E+00 < 1.64E+00 -<I1.70E+00 Zn-65 {4.97E+00 <5_.36E+00 <3.23E+00 Zr-95 <14.004E+00 ix4.17E+00 <l3.38E+00 Nuclide 25-APR 29-MAY 28-JUN Ba-140 <I4.26E+00 I <l2.96E+00 2.03E+00 Be-7 <2.58E+01 <1.64E+01 <l1.17E+01 Ce-141 < 5.28E+00 <3.44E+00 ( <I2.40E+00 Ce-144 <1.95E+01 <1.43E+01 <J8.71E+00 Co-58 3,09E+00
| |
| . 1.94E+00 < 1.18E+00 Co-60 < 3.09E+00 I < 1.94E+00 < 1.61E+00 Cr-51 <3.04E+01 <1.74E+01 < 1.30E+01 Cs-134 3.54E+.0 < 2,56E+00 2 < 1.49E+00 Cs-137 < 3.82E+00 < 2.05E+00 < 1.42E+00 Fe-59 < 5.99E+00 I <3.76E+00< .50E+00 K-40 <4.24E+01 <2.93E+01 I <I1.94E+01 La-140 < 4.26E+00 2.96E+00 I 2.03E+00 Mn-54 < 2.47E+00 <1.82E+00 < 1.17E+00 Nb-95 <j2.74E+00 <1.96E+ 1.35E+00 Ru-103 <13.33E+00 < 1.95E+00 j 1.37E+00 Ru-106 <2.41E+01 ( <I1.88E+01 <1.15E+01 Sr-89 I .12E+00 < 7.70E-01 < 1.78E+00 Sr-90 l<I1.52E+00 <19.75E-01 I <1.81E+00 Zn-65 < 6.72E+00 2 3.81+00 I < 2.64E+00 Zr95 5.11E+00 <3.10E+00 I2.48E+00 C-40
| |
| | |
| Fermi 2 - 2012 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report FERMI 2 SURFACE WATER ANALYSIS SW-2 (Control)
| |
| (pCi/liter)
| |
| Nuclide 31-JUL 28-AUG 25-SEP Ba-140 <4.36E+00 <12.54E+00 <12.47E+00 Be-7 < 1.86E+01 < 1.68E+01 < 1.29E+01 Ce-141 <3.83E+00 3.52E+00 < 2.77E+00 Ce-144 < 1.40E+01 <1.35E+01 < 1.06E+01 Co-58 < 2.20E+00 <2.05E+00 <1.55E+00 Co-60 <2.47E+00 <1.94E+00 < 1.66E+00 Cr-5i K12.101+01 < 1.82E+01 < 1.41E+01 Cs-134 < 2.41E+00 <2.31E+00 <11.82E+00 Cs-137 <2.12E+00 < 2.10E+00 <1.76E+00 Fe-59 < 4.11E+00 < 3.51E+00 [ 3.08E+00 K-40 < 2.71E+01 < 2.44E+01 < 2.17E+01 La-140 <14.36E+00 < 2.54E+00 < 2.47E+00 Mn-54 _1.84E+00 <[2.031E+00 <11.451E+00 Nb-95 < 1.97E+00 < 1.99E+00 <V 53E+00 Ru-103 < 2.41E+00 <2.04E+00 <1.51E+00 Ru-106 I< 2.04E+01 < 1.71E+01 < 1.35E+01 Sr-89 <1.421142E+
| |
| < < 2.20E+00 <1.511E+00 Sr-90 <1.49E+00 <1.90E+00 <11.72E+00 Zn-65 <34.30E+00 <3.50E+00 <3.21E+00 Zr-95 3.5E+00 < 3 A8E+00 <2.86E+00 Nuclide 30-OCT 27-NOV 26-DEC Ba-140 <13.76E+00 <1643E+00 <I2.68E+00 Be-7 _ <11.97E+01 <12.52E+01 < 1.44E+01 Ce-141 <3.64E+00 <15.55E+00 < 2.67E+00 Ce-144 <1.42E+01 <12.01E+01 < 1.03E+01 Co-58 <1.91E+00 < 2.88E+00 <11.42E+00 Co-60 <2.75E+00 <13.50E+00 <1.79E+00 Cr-51 < 1.93E+01 <3.14E+01 <1.42E+01 Cs-134 <[2.73E+00 <3.17E+00 < 1.72E+00 Cs-137 <2.66E+00 <3.08E+00 1 1.79E+00 Fe-59 5.24E+00 <83E+00 3.27E+00 K-40 <13 46E+01 <13.20E+01 < 2.30E+01 La-140 <13.76E+00 <643E+00 < 2.68E+00 Mn-54 <12.29E+00 <2.99E+00 ( <1.49E+00 Nb-95 [ 2.28E+00 <3001+00 <1.51E+00 Ru-103_ <.43E+00 <13.75E+00 i1.69F+00 Ru-106 <12.09E+01 <2.65E+01 1 35E+01 Sr89 < 2.12E+00 1 2.12E+00 < 1.84E+00 Sr<90 1.78E+00 <1.51E+00 < 1.63E+00 Zn-65 <4.83F+00 < 630E+001 E <3.51E+00 Zr-95 < 3.37E+00 < 5 71E+00 < 2.72E+00 C-41
| |
| | |
| Fermi 2 - 2012 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report FERMI 2 SURFACE WATER ANALYSIS SW-3 (Indicator)
| |
| (pCi/liter)
| |
| Nuclide 31-JAN 28-FEB 29-MAR Ba-140 2.911+00 < 2.28E+00 < 2.13E+00 Be-7 <1.71E+01 <1.45E+01 <1.32E+01 Ce-141 < 3.79E+00 <12 97E+0 ( <2.61E+00 Ce 144 < 1.57E+0i < .18E+01 < 1.06E+01 Co-58 < 195E+00 < 1.63E+00 <1.50E+00 Co-60 2.26E+00 <1.80E+00 f 1.66E+00 Cr-51_ < 1.93E+01 < 1.51E+01 < 1.38E+01 Cs-134 <2.52E+00 <j2.15E+00 < 1.98E+00 Cs I <2.24E+00 < 1.89E+00 <I174E+00 Fe-59 I4.75E+00 I <I2.59E+00 I <I3.19E+00 K-40 < 2.81E+01 I2.43E+011
| |
| < <11.50E+0-1 La-140 <2.91E+00 I<2.28E+00 2.13E+00 Mn-54 <j1.94E+00O < 1.54E+0 <I1.50E+00 Nb-95 2.17E+00 1.69E+00 1.56E+00 Ru-103 219E+00 < 1.71E+00 <1.56E+00 Ru-106 l1.90iE+01 1j.48E+01 1l.38E+01 Sr 89 <2.13E+00 <1.33E+0_ <1.01E+0 Sr-90 _ < 1.66E+00_ <1.75E+00 <l1.45E+00 Zn-65 <4.02E+00 < 3.29E+00 < 3.24E+00 Zr-95 .23E+00 < 2.82E+00 I<2.97E+00_
| |
| Nuclide 26-APR 29-MAY 26-JUN Ba-140 < 4.35E+00 <2.69E+00 < 2.43E+00 Be-7 (< 2.21E+01 <1 .68E+01 < 1.34E+01 Ce-141 < 518E+00 <12.65E+00 < 2.80E+00 Ce-144 I I2 .27E+01 <I1.09E+01 l 9.95E+00 Co-58 < 2.47E+0O <2.18E+00 _<I.49E+OO Co-60 <l2.80E+00 <2.26E+00 j < 1.53E+00 Cs-134 <14.09E+00 <.70E+00 <I1.72E+00 Cs-137 I3 ,09E+00 <I2.37E+0 < 1.52E+00 Fe-59 < 6.24E+00 1 <14.92E+00 < 2.88E+00 K-40 <3.46E+01 I<2.91E+01 1<2.03E+01 La-140 l<4.35E+00 <2.69E+00 l < 2.43E+00 Mn-54_ <I315E+00 I <12 16E+00O < 1i.45E+00-O Nb-95 <l2.55E+00 <I2.12E+00 l < 1.55E+00 Ru 03 <[2.98E+0 1 <t1.92E+00 < 1.65E+00 Ru-106 <2.61E+01 <I1.80E+01 <l1.37E+01 Sr-89 < 1jl06E+00O <l.03E+00 <]1.92E+00 Sr-90 <.49E+00 1 <I1.05E+00 <j1.45E+00 Zn-65 < 6.53E+00 I < 4.24E+00 < 2.86E+00 Zr 95 <[4 84E+00 1 < 3.61E+OO I <2.63E+00 C-42
| |
| | |
| Fermi 2 - 2012 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report FERMI 2 SURFACE WATER ANALYSIS SW-3 (Indicator)
| |
| (pCi/liter)
| |
| Nuclide 31-JUL 28-AUG 25-SEP Ba-140 < 4.37E+00 <12.11E+00 < 252E+00 Be-7 <2.0Q1 E+01 I 1.25E+01 <I1.38E+01 Ce-141 <I4.04E+00 I .67E+00 <L3.08E+00 Ce-144 < 1.45E+01 <1.05E+01 <1 14E+1 Co-58 < 2.29E+00 <1.60E+00 <I1.55E+00 Co-60 < 2.31E+00 [<1.63E+00 <.62E+00 Cr-51 <2.24E+01 < 1.35E+01 < 1.62E+01 Cs-134 < 2.91E+-00 <1.98E+00 22.00E+00 Cs-137 < 2.36E+00 1.75E+00 <1.64E+00 Fe-59 < 4.54E+00 <13.OE+00 < 3.04E+00 K-40 <j3.37E+01 2.02E+01 < 2.30E+01 La-140 <4.37E+00 <2.i1E+00 <12.52E+00 Mn-54 < 2.01E+00 < 1.52E+00 < 1.52E+00 Nb-95 < 2.37E+00 <I1.66E+00 <1.64E+00 Ru-103 < 2.32E+00 ( <i1.66E+00 <1.66E+00 Ru-106 < 1.94E+01 <i 1.34E+01 < 1.48E+01 Sr-89 < 1.12E+00 <I1.57E+00 L <12.32E+00 Sr-90 < 1.79E+00 <1.87E+00 < 1.70E+00 Zn-65 < 4.47E+00 < 3.42E+00 <3.24E+00 Zr-95 <3.86E+00 < 2.64E+00 < 2.73E+00 Nuclide 30-OCT 27-NOV 26-DEC Ba-140 3.08E+00 <6.39E+00 < 2.26E+00 Be-7 < 1.50E+01 < 2.66E+01 <1.24E+I01 Ce-141 <3.24E+00 < 4.77E+00I < 2.79E+00 Ce 144 <1.18E+01 f 1 < 1.05E+01 0.82E+01 Co-58 < 1.81E+00 <12.78E+00 l <l1.30E+00 Cr-51 < 1.70E+01 < 2.63E+01 <l1.38E+01 Cs 134 < 1.86E+i00 < 2.61E+I00 < 1.67E+I00 Cs-137 1.90E+00 <2.89E+00 _<1.52E+00 Fe 9 <3.50E+00 < 5.80E+0 <3.09E+0 K-40 <1.67E+01 _<4.37E+01 < 2.18E+01 La-140 < 3.08E+00 J6.39E+00 J<226E+00 Mn-54 < 1.65E+00 <I2.38E+00 < 1.46E+00 Nb-95 < 1.90E+00 <3.30E+00 < 1.60E+00 Ru-103 <1.77E+00 _ 3.09E+00 <1.52E+00 Ru-106 <1.66E+01 <2.21E+01 <1.39E+01 Sr-89 <1.55E+00 < 2.15E+00 1.68E+00 Sr-90 <I1.74E+00 < 1.16E+00 j 1.77E+00 Zn-65 <3.84E+00 <4.54E+00 <3.04E+00 9 <J3 24E+00 4.93E+00 j 69E+0 C-43
| |
| | |
| Fermi 2 - 2012 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report FERMI 2 DRINKING AND SURFACE WATER QUARTERLY COMPOSITE SAMPLES Tritium (pCi/liter)
| |
| First Second Station Quarter Quarter DW-1 i < 4.37E+021<1.84E+02 DW-2 < 4.34E+02 <<1,80E+02 SW-2 <14.38E+02 < 1.80E+02 SW-3 <4.27E+02 < 1.81E+02 Third Fourth Station Quarter Quarter DW-1 < 4.61iE+02 < 3.82E+02 DW-2{< 4.37E+021 <3.79E+02 SW-2 < 4.46E+02 < 3.79E+02 SW-3 I 4.27E+02 <3.98E+02 C-44
| |
| | |
| Fermi 2 - 2012 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report FERMI 2 GROUNDWATER ANALYSIS GW-1 (Indicator)
| |
| (pCi/liter)
| |
| First Second Nuclide Quarter Quarter Ba-140 < 3.03E+00 <13.90E+00 Be-7_ <1.38E+01 <11.58E+01 Ce-141 <3.09E+00 < 13.53E+00 Ce-144 <1.10E+01 < 1.11E+01 Co-58 <11.75E+00 < 1.67E+00 Co-60 <.6E+00 < 1.92E+00 Cs-134 <1.98E+00 < 1.91E+00 Cs-17 _< 1.51E+00 < 1.92E+00 Fe-59 <3.26E+00 <3.70E+00 H-3 < 2.65E+02 < 3.91E+02 K-40 < 1.64E+01 < 2.47E+01_
| |
| La-140 <3.03E+00 < 3.90E+00 Mn-54 < .46E+00 < .70E+00 Nb-95 <J1.59E+00 < 1.86E+00 Ru-103 <173E+00 < 1.92E+00 Ru-106 <1.41E+01 < 1.49E+01 Zn-65 < 3.27E+00 < 3.07E+00 Zr-95 <12.95E+00 < 3.29E+00 ]
| |
| Third Fourth Nuclide Quarter Quarter Ba--140 1.12E+00 < 2.41B+00 Be-7 < 4.65E+00 <]1.21E+01 Ce-141ij 1.01E+00 <12.70E+00 Ce-144 <3.49E+00 <I1.07E+01 Co-58 < 5.39E-01 <1.51E+00 Co-60 <5.68E-01 <11.59E+00 Cs-134 < .39E-01 < 1.61E+00 Cs-137 < 5.52E-01 < 2.10E+00 Fe-59 <1.13E+00 <13.07E+00 H-3 <1.04E+02 <13.29E+02 K-40 <9.83E+00 < 2.50E+01 La-140 <1.12E+00 < 2.41E+00 Mn-54 [ 5.15E-O1 F< <1.41E+00 Nb-95 <5.36E-01 < 1.55E+00 Ru-103 < 7.16E-01 <1.42E+00 Ru-106 <4.99E+00I< 1.39E+01 Zn-65 1.28E+00 < 3.12E+00 Zr-95 < 9 63E-01 <12.55E+00 C-45
| |
| | |
| Fermi 2 - 2012 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report FERMI 2 GROUNDWATER ANALYSIS GW-2 (Indicator)
| |
| (pCi/liter)
| |
| First Second Nuclide Quarter Quarter Ba-S10 <3.57E+00_I<11.89E+00 Be-7 <1.92E+01 < 1.16E+01 Ce-141 < 4.51E+00 <2.36E+00 Ce-144 I1.65E+01 <9.16E+00 Co-58 <I1.99E+00 < 1.22E+00 Co-60 2.17E+00 l 1.31E+00 Cs 134 <2.71E+0 <6 .56E+0 Cs-137 < 2.29E+00 <1.44E+00 Fe-59 4.42E+00 <2.49E+00 H-3 <14.42E+02 <3.91E+02 K-40 <12.70E+01 < 1.29E+01 La-140 <3.57E+00 < 1.89E+00 Mn-54 < 2.19E+00 < 1.30E+00 Nb-95 <12.47E+00 <I1.35E+00 Ru-103 <2.33E+00 < 1.30E+00 Ru-106 <2.07E+01 <t 16E+01 Zn-65 <j4.22E+00 < 2.68E+00 Zr-95 < 3.52E+00 2.23E+00 Third Fourth Nuclide Quarter Quarter Ba-140 <[3.19E+00 <l1.82E+00 Be-7 <1.68E+01 <l1.34E+01 Ce-141 <,3.57E+00 <l3.19E+00 Ce-144 <Ii.39E+01 f<1.24E+01 Co-58 <11.97E+00 <1.55E+00 Co-60 <2.17E+00 <1.67E+00 Cs-134 <2.46E+00 <1.79E+00 Cs-137 < 2.02E+00 < 1.80E+00 Fe:59 < 4.09E+00 < 2.79E+00 H-3 <4.32E+02 <13.32E+02 K-40 <2.13E+0_1 <1.71E+01 La-140 <3.19E+00 < 1.82E+00 Mn-54 < 1.77E+00 < 1.46E+00 Nb-95 <l1.79E+00 < 1.65E+00 Ru-103 <12.02E+00 <1.66E+00 Ru-106 _<Ii .82E+01 <f1.51E+01 Zn-65 <4.71E+00 <3.14E+00 Zr-95 < 3.51E+00 2.82E+00 C-46
| |
| | |
| Fermi 2 - 2012 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report FERMI 2 GROUNDWATER ANALYSIS GW-3 (Indicator)
| |
| (pCi/liter)
| |
| First Second Nuclide Quarter Quarter Ba-140 I 3.08E+00 _< .03E+00 Be-7 < 1.71E+01 <j1.73E+01 Ce-141 < 3.90E+00 <2.91E+00 Ce-144 < 1.49E+01 < 1.09E+01 Co-58 < 1.97E+00 < 2.06E+00 Co-60 < 2.47E+00 j < 2.35E+00 Cs-134 <2.61E+05 < 2.66E+00 Cs-137 < 2.14E+00 < 2.20E+00 Fe-59 <4.36E+00 j<4.48E+00 H-3 < 4.41E+02 <i 447E+02 K-40 < 2.51E+01 < 2.15E+01 La-140 < 3.08E+00 <3.03E+00 Mn-54 < 2.16E+00 < 2.08E+00 Nb-95 < 2.30E+00 < 2.23E+00 Ru-103 <I2.12E_+00 < 1.78E+00 Ru-106 <j1.80E+01 <1.86E+01 Zn 65 <j3. 67E+00 < 4.68E+O0 Zr-95 < 3.71E+00 < 3.90E+00 Third Fourth Nuclide Quarter Quarter Ba-140 <I3.12E+00 ( <2.24E+00 Be-7 < 1.60E+01 < 1.39E+01 Ce-141 < 3.38E+00 _<2.98E+00 Ce-144 < 1.30E+01 < 1.22E+01 Co-58 < 1.70E+00 < 1.61E+00 Co-60 < 1.83E+00 < 2.13E+00 Cs-134 <f2.18E+00 < 1.72E+00 Cs-137 < 1.84E+00 <I1.71E+00 Fe-59 < 3.70E+00 < 2.96E+00 H-3 < 4.25E+02 ( <3.49E+02 K-40 < 1.77E+01 <ik1.65E+01 La-140 < 32E+00 <2.24E+00 Mn-54 _<1:71E+00 <j1.41E+00 Nb-95 <I 198E+00 < 198E+00 Ru-103 < 1.91E+00 <]1.62E+00 Ru-106 < 1.60E+01 17< 1.46E+01 Zn-65 <3.30E+00 < 3.37E+00 Zr-95 <3.36E+00 22.77E+00 C-47
| |
| | |
| Fermi 2 - 2012 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report FERMI 2 GROUNDWATER ANALYSIS GW-4 (Control)
| |
| (pCi/liter)
| |
| First Second Nuclide Quarter Quarter Ba-140 < 3.26E+00 <2.88E+00 Be-7 <I1.72E+01 <11.88E+01 Ce-141 < 3.45E+00 <3.68E+00 Ce-144 [ 1.46E+01 <1.47E+01 Co-58 <1.91E+001 2.07E+00 Co-60 1.94E+00 <12_18E+00 Cs-134 < 2.42E+00 <2.53E+00 Cs-17-- 2.07E+00 .28E+00 Fe-59 < 3.95E+00 <13.92E+00 H-3 <<4.41E+02 < 4.34E+02 K 40 <[1.93E+01 < 2.49E+01 La-140 < 3.26E+00 <2.88E+00 Mn-54 <1.98E+00 < 2.18E+00 Nb-95 < 2.14E+00 < 2.24E+00 Ru-103 < 2.09E+00 <12.10E+00 Ru-106 < 1.62E+01 < 1.82E+01 Zn-65 < 3.79E+00 <13.91E+00 Zr-95 <3.47E+00
| |
| < <13.68E+00 Third Fourth Nuclide Quarter Quarter Ba-140 < 3.73E+00 < 2.52E+00 Be-7 < 1.87E+01 <11.53E+01 Ce-141 < 3.41E+00 <13.30E+00-Ce-144 < 1.27E+01 < 1.40E+01 Co-58 <2.34E+00 <1 .75E+00 Co-60 <2.52E+00 <1.86E+00 Cs-134 16E+0 1.84E+00 Cs-137 < 2.53E+00 [71.81E+00 Fe-59 <15.45E+00 <I3.52E+00 H-3 < 4.27E+02 <3.45E+02 K-40 3. 32E+00 < 1.83E+01 La-140 3.22E+01 2.52E+00 Mn-54 <I3.73E+00 < 1.73E+00 Nb-95 <2.53E+00
| |
| . 147E+00 A
| |
| Ru-103 <l.57E+00 < 1.74E+00 Ru-106 < 2.46E+00 < 1.59E+01 Zn-65 <2.07E+01 <3.28E+00 Zr-95 <5.02E+00 <3.09E+00 C-48
| |
| | |
| Fermi 2 - 2012 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report FERMI 2 SEDIMENT ANALYSIS S-1 (Indicator)
| |
| (pCi/kg dry)
| |
| Nuclide 20-JUN 10-OCT Ba-140 < 2.44E+02 3.55E+02 Be-7 <13.65E+02 <3.86E+02 Ce-141 < 9.21E+01 <7.07E+01 Ce-144 <1.77E+02 _ < 1.89E+02 Co-58 <3.94E+01 < 3.72E+01 Co-60 < 3.09E+01 <2.99E+01 Cs-134 < 3.86E+01 _ 4.33E+01 Cs-137 < 2.75E+01 < 3.69E+01 Fe-59 < 1.04E+02 < 1.00E+02 K-40 1.03E+04 9.70E+03 La-140 <l2.44E+02 <1.29E+02 Mn-54 < 2.92E+01 < 3.85E+01 Nb-95 <14.75E+01 < 5.12E+01 Ru-103 4.02E+01 <4.28E+01 Ru-106 <2.24E+02 < 2.81E+02 Sr-89 < 1.52E+02 <C1.22E+02 Sr-90 < 1.25E+02 < 9.39E+01 Zn-65 < 7.34E+01 < 8.43 0E+01 Zr-95 < 7.07E+01 < 5.88E+01 S-2 (Indicator)
| |
| (pCi/kg dry)
| |
| Nuclide 20-JUN 24-OCT Ba-140 <7.28E+02 3.36E+02 Be-7 < 7.13E+02 jl3.57E+02 Ce-141 .66E+02 8.29E+01 Ce-144 <2.99E+02 < 2.15E+02 Co-58 7.81E+01 <4.05E+01 Co-60 <6.06E+01 <Z4.27EI01 Cs-134 < 8.65E+01 < 5.19E+01 Cs-137 <6.05E+01 < 3.57E+01 Fe-59 <2.14E+02 i 1.04E+02 K-40 171E+04 I 1.74E+04 La-140 <7.28E+02 < 1.08E+02 Mn-54 <6.89E+01 <I5.00E+01 Nb-95 1.01E+02 < 5.10E+01 Ru-103 - I 9.01E+01 II3.85E+01 Ru-106 <4.30E+02 < 3.19E+02 Sr-89 <2.03E+02 <1.66E+02 Sr-90 _ <1.50E+02 <1.01E+02 Zn-65 <l1.59E+02 < 9.55E+01 Zr-95 <F1.49E+02 <8.63E+01 C-49
| |
| | |
| Fermi 2 - 2012 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report FERMI 2 SEDIMENT ANALYSIS S-3 (Indicator)
| |
| (pCi/kg dry)
| |
| Nuclide 14-MAY 24-OCT Ba-140 <2.14E-+03 < 2.71E+02 Be-7 j<5.64E+02 {<2.72E+02 Ce-141 <167E+02 < 4.76E+01 Ce-144 <170E+02 < 1.45E+02 Co-58 < 5.89E+01 <12.64E+01 Co-60 <3.59E+01 < 3.76E+01 Cs-134 <3.34E+01 <3.14E+01 Cs-137 <2.97E+01 < 3.33E+01 Fe-59 [<.02E+02 <19 21E+01 K-40 1.29E+04 1.19E+04 La 140 < 2.14E+03 < 7.68E+01 Mn-54 <I3.07E+01 <2.58E+01
| |
| <I Nb-95 _578E+01 < 2.84E+01 Ru 103 I<8.46E+1 < 2.79E+01 Ru-106 <2.58E+02 <2.19E+02 Sr-89 < 2.01E+02 _<.26E+02 Sr90 <1.24E+02 < 1.23E+02 Zn 65 <7.85E+01 < 7.79E+01 Zr-95 [ 980E+01 < 5.99E+01 S-4 (Indicator)
| |
| (pCi/kg dry)
| |
| Nuclide 14-MAY 24-OCT Ba-140 .il 1.16E+03 <1.44E+02 Be-7 < 5.46E+02 < 2.95E+02 Ce-141 1.79E+02 <_65E+01 Ce-144 <1.00E+02 <1.31E+02 Co-58 <5.79E+01 < 3.64E+01 Co-60 <2.60E+01 <5.11E+01 Cs-134 <4.06E+01 <[4.58E+01 Cs-137 < 3.10E+01 <j3.56E+01 Fe-59 <I1.80E+02 <18.13E+01 K-40 8.08E+03 I 1.14E+04 La-140 <I1.16E+03 <j3.94E+01 Mn-54 < 3.42E+01 <3.36E+01 Nb-95 <_.93E+01 <3.78E+01 Ru-103 <8.21E+01 <I2.99E+01 Ru-106 3.20E+02 310E+02
| |
| .
| |
| Sr-89 < 2.48E+02 < 6.83E+01 Sr-90 <1.50E+02 <1.05E+02 Zn-65 <18.27E+01 <]1.03E+02 Zr 95 1 00E+02 < 5.35E+01 C-50
| |
| | |
| Fermi 2 - 2012 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report FERMI 2 SEDIMENT ANALYSIS S-5 (Control)
| |
| (pCi/kg dry)
| |
| Nuclide 14-MAY 24-OCT Ba-140 <11.51E+03 <J4.30E+02 Be-7 <J5.70E+02 <3.93E+02 Ce-141 <1.79E+02 < 7.57E+01 Ce-144 < 1.62E+02 < 1.87E+02 Co-58 <14.11E+01 < 4.03E+01 Co-60 < 337A01 < 3.16E+01 Cs-134 < 3.80E+01 <4.77E+01 Cs-137 7.63E+01 1.08E+02 Fe-59 < 1.56E+02 <9.14E+01 K-40 9.38E+03 7.08E+03 La-140 <j1 51E+03 <9 33E+01 Mn-54 < 2.94E+01 <3.82E+01 Nb-95 < 6.14E+01 <4.60E+01 Ru-103 <8.36E+01 < 4.64E+01 Ru-106 <2 52E+02 <3.17E+02 Sr-89 <12.46E+02 <)1.06E+02 Sr-90 <I1.41E+02 < 1.01E+i02 Zn-65 <7.93E+01 < 8.55E+01 Zr-95 < 1.04E+02 < 7.80E+01 C-51
| |
| | |
| Fermi 2 - 2012 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report FERMI 2 FISH ANALYSIS F-1 (Control)
| |
| (pCi/kg wet) 11-MAY 11-MAY 11-MAY Nuclide Catfish Car Shad Ba-140 < 1.18E+03 2.42E+02 < 1.01E+02 Be-7 < 2.55E+02 <6.08E+01 <8.18E+01 Ce-141 < 6.88E+01 < 1.94E+01 <3.30E+01 Ce-144 < 6.00E+01 <1.72E+1 1.79E+01O Co-58 <2.52E+01 < 5.89E+00 <2.14E+01 Co-60 < 1.33E+01 < 3.54E+00 < 1.69E+01 Cs-134 < 1.59E+01 < 3.41E+00 <I1.08E+02 Cs-137 < 1.16E+01 < 340E+00 <13 20E+03 Fe-59 < 7.57E+01 < 2.21E+01 <I1.29E+03 K-40 2.60E+03 2.64E+03 1.83E+01 La-140 <1.18E+03 <2.42E+021 <13 92E+01 Mn-54 < 1.37E+01 <3.35E+00 < 5.69E+01 Nb 95 I
| |
| <.2.80E+O1 < 5.4601+O < 1 64+02 Ru-103 < 4.36E+01 <9.90E+00 < 2.03E+02 Ru-106 < 1.23E+02 < 2.89E+01 <13.23E+01 Sr-89 _< 1.43E+02 <1.17E+02 <14.22E+01 Sr-90 < 3.16E+01 <3.33E+01 <16.48E+01 Zn-65 < 3.33E+01 I 9.05E+00 <j1.01E+02 Zr-95{ < 4.89E+01 11.12E+01 <18.18E+01 11-MAY 11-MAY 11-MAY Nuclide L. M. Bass Garfish Rock Bass Ba-140 < 1.96E+03 <l1.26E+03 < 1.43E+03 Be-7 <14 101E+02 <J2 .0E+02 <J2.95E+02 Ce-141 < 1.30E+02 <4.73E+01 <9.85E+01 Ce-144 <I1.11E+02 <14.01E+01 <8 .39E+01 Co-58 <13 99E+01 <l2.30E+01 <I2 86E+01 Co-60 < 1.98E+01 < 1.47E+01_ < 1.68E+01 Cs-134 <j2.36E+01 < 1.32E+01 < 1.62E+01 Cs-137 <[1.90E+01 < 1.21E+01 < .51E+01_
| |
| Fe-59 < 1.22E+02 <8.06E+01 <9.26E+01 K-40 3.33E+03 2.54E+03 .16E+03 La-140 < 1.96E+0 1 6E03 <1.43E+i03 Mn 54 <2.22E+0I < 1.+01 <1.61E+01 Nb-95 <4.44E+01 <{2.47E+01 <3.38E+01 Ru-103 <!6.84E+01 <13.81E+01 < 5.29E+01 Ru-106 < 1.88E+02 <[9.70E+01 <-1.56E+02 Sr-89 < 7.40E+01 - < 1.07E+02 < 7.94E+01 Sr-90 < 3.72E+01 I<3.13E+0I 4.46E+01 Zn-65 < 5.27E+O1 <3.47E+0_1 <3.95E+01 Zr-95 < 7.33E+01 <4.63E+01 <5.30E+01 C-52
| |
| | |
| Fermi 2 - 2012 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report F-1 (Control)
| |
| (pCi/kg wet) 11-MAY 11-MAY 11-MAY Nuclide White Bass White Perch Yellow Perch Ba-140 <I 2.19E+01 <1.44E+03 <}1.67E+03 Be-7 < 2.04E+01 <3.24E+02 <l3.48E+02 Ce-141 < 6.39E+00 < 9.73E+01 <l1.02E+02 Ce-144 < 3.74E+00 < 8.47E+01 < 8.70E+01 Co-58 < 4.16E+00 < 3.OOE+O1 <3.42E+01 Co-60 < 3.05E+00 < 1.94E+01 < 2.14E+01 Cs-134 <[2.47E+01 <1.96E+01 i<2.26E+01 Cs-137 < 2.85E+03 <1.91E+01 <[1.86E+01 Fe-59 < 2.54E+02 < 1.00E+02 < 1.21E+02 K-40 3.54E+00 3.48E+03 3.90E+03 La-140 < 7.34E+00 < 1.44E+03 } < 1.67E+03 Mn-54 < 1.13E+01 <[1.69E+01 <l2.16E+01 Nb-95 < 2.9+1 <13.53E+01I <3..99E+0-1 Ru-103 < 8.36E+01 < 1E+01 < 5.99E+01 R106 < 6.24E+01 < 1.48E+02 < 1.78E+02 Sr-89 < 9.92E+00 < 8,83E+01 <l1.53E+02 Sr-90 < 1.21E+01 < 4.59E+01 < 5.49E+01 Zn-65 < 2.19E+01 < 4.27E+01 I<4.64E+01 Zr-95 <2.04E+0-1 <5.94E+ 1 <738E+O1 24-OCT 24-OCT 24-OCT Nuclide Bullhead Catfish Shad Ba-140 < 2.74E+02 <12.66E+01 <j4.07E+01 Be-7 < 2.59E+02 <l2.65E+01 J<3.92E+0 1 Ce-141 <4.73E+01 < 5.40E+00 17.65E+00 Ce-144 < 1.27E+02 <1.57E+01 52.12E+01 Co-58 <3.41E+01 Y3. 20E+0 <4.51E+00 Co-60 <3.43E+01 < 3.36E+00 <4.58E+00 Cs-134 < 3.19E+01 <13.03E+00 ( <4.31E+00 Cs-137 <2.88E+01 <l3.18E+00 < 4.37E+00 Fe-59 < 7.10E+01 <I8.57E+00 .11E+01 K-40 -_ 2.99E+03 3.26_+03 2.67E+03 La-140 <9.24E+01 <7.56E+00 < 1.12E+01 Mn-54 < j <92.96E+00 02.86E+01 <3.85E+OO Nb-95 <3.45E+01 <3.44E+00 <4.77E+00 Ru-103 <3.42E+01 <3.31E+00 < 5.09E+00 Ru-106 < 2.48E+02 <2.45E+01 <3.80E+01 Sr-89 < 1.18E+02 < 9.84E+01 <1.02E+02 Sr-90 <I9. 65E+01 j <I1.02E+02 <17.89E+01 Zn-65 <6.73E+O1 <l7.45E+00 <19.30E+00 Zr--95 571E+O1 6.10E+00 <8.29E+00 C-53
| |
| | |
| Fermi 2 - 2012 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report F-1 (Control)
| |
| (pCi/kg wet) 24-OCT 24-OCT 24-OCT Nuclide Rock Bass Walleye Yellow Perch Ba-140 <}2.76E+02 < 3.06E+01 <11.45E+02 Be-7 <2.74E+02 <jjZ58E+01 < 1.41E+02 Ce-141 <4.49E+01 <5.62E+00 < 2.63E+01 Ce-144 <1.22E+02 < 1.59E+01 <]7.68E+01 Co-58 ]< 3.05E+01 <12.98E+00 <1.78E+O1 Co-60 < 3.65E+01 < 3<17E+00 < 1.93E+01 Cs 134 <3.25E+1 ] 3.13E+00 <1.61E+01 Cs-137 I 3.13E+01 <2.54E+00 < 1.52E+01 Fe-59 L <j7.18E+01 < 8.65E+00 <}3.59E+01 K-40 2.84E+03 3.47E+03 3.71E+03 La-140 Mn-54 Nb-95
| |
| < 1.09E+02
| |
| < 2.97E+01
| |
| < 3.55E+01
| |
| [ < 8.82E+00
| |
| <2.69E+00
| |
| <3.28E+00
| |
| < 4.98E+01
| |
| <1.47E+O1
| |
| < 1.74E+01 Ru-103 < 3.35E+01 < 3.41E+00 < 1.95E+01 Ru-106 < 2.56E+02 < 2.42E+01 <[1.40E+02 Sr-89 <1.14E+02 <9.94E+01 6 < 7.75E+01 Sr 90 <1.05E+02 I <7.48_E+01 <5.69E+01 Zn-65 < 6.71E+01 <6.91E+00 3.86E+01 Zr-95I <16.04EF+01 <5.89E+OO <2.95E+01 C-54
| |
| | |
| Fermi 2 - 2012 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report FERMI 2 FISH ANALYSIS F-2 (Indicator)
| |
| (pCi/kg wet) 20-JUN 20-JUN 20-JUN Nuclide Drum Shad Garfish Ba-140 < 1.79E+02 < 1.50E+02 < 3.83E+01 Be-7 < 2.22E+02 < 1.83E+02 < 4.21E+01 Ce-141 < 4.80E+01 < 3.82E+01 <1.07E+01 Ce-144 f <18.69E+01 <17.44E+01 <1.88E+01 Co-58 <12.42E+01 __1.99E+01 <4.82E+00 Co-60 < 2.47E+01 <F1.84E+O1 4.21E+00 Cs-134 <12.10E+01 < 1.83E+01 <4.32E+00 Cs-137 <l1.71E+01 <1.56E+01 < 3.48E+00 Fe-59_ < 6.22E+01 < 5.37E+01 <1.46E+01 K-40 2.90E+03 3.09E+03 2.81E+03 La-140 < 1.79E+02 < 1.50E+02 <3.83E+01 Mn-54 < 1.90E+01 <i1.52E+01 <3.54E+00 Nb-95 < 2.69E+01 <L2.10E+01 <5.09E+00 Ru-103 < 2.94E+01 < 2.58E+01 < 6.08E+00 Ru-106 <1.52E+02 < 1.46E+02 <2296E+01 Sr-89 < 4.20E+01f<4.92E+01 < 5.90E+01 Sr-90 < 2.48E+01 < 4.29E+01 j 3.53E+01 Zn-65 < 4.15E+01 <f3.58E+01 <[9.24E+00 Zr-95 < 4.56E+01 < 3.82E+01 < 9.05E+00 20-JUN 20-JUN 20-JUN Nuclide Pike White Sucker White Bass Ba-140 <13.13E+01 <l9.39E+01 < 1.56E+02 Be-7 <13.59E+01 <l1.15E+02 < 1.78E+02 Ce-141 < 9.16E+00 <l2.69E+01 <3.87E+01 Ce-144 < 1.72E+01 <5.00E+01 < 7.21E+01 Co-58 < .09E+00 <ll.21E+O1 < 1.70E+01 Co-60 < 4.06E+00 < 9.28E+00 < 1.57E+01 Cs-134 <3.62E+00 < 1.07E+01 <1.59E+01 Cs-137 < 3.01E+00 <l9.10E+00 I< 1.31E+01 Fe5 1.35E+01
| |
| < < 3.11E+01 < 5.03E+01 K-40 3.32E+03 l3.32E+03 2.81E+03 La-140 <13.13E+01 < 9.39E+01 <)1.56E+02 Mn-541 < 3.22E+001<920E+00 < 1.51E+I01 Nb-95 < 4.49E+00 < 1.41E+01 < 1.90E+01 Ru-103 < 5.31E+00 < 1.65E+01 < 2.44E+01 Ru-106 74E+01 <8.24E+01 < 1.28E+02 Sr-89 < 4.59E+01 < 5.43E+01 < 6.02E+01 Sr 90 1 <4.70E+01 < 4.49E+01 <<3.23E+i01 Zn-65 .83E+00 < 2.14E+01 L F<325E+01 Zr-95 759E+00 <2.38E+01 <13.61E+01 C-55
| |
| | |
| Fermi 2 - 2012 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report FERMI 2 FISH ANALYSIS F-2 (Indicator)
| |
| (pCi/kg wet) 20-JUN 20-JUN 25-OCT Nuclide White Perch Walleye Catfish Ba-140 < 1.28E+02 < 1.03E+02 <j1.66E+02 Be-7 < 1.42E+02 <1.60E+02 < 1.57E+02 Ce-141 < 2.73E+01 <3.74E+01 <2.85E+01 Ce-144_ <5.08E+01
| |
| < < 7.04E+FO1 < 7.40E+01 Co-58 < 1.50E+01 <1.78E+01 <1.92E+01 Co-60 < 1.23E+01 <1.21E+01 <1.67E+01 Cs-134 Es I33 _ j 8+0_<L16E+01 f1.48E+01 65 I < 1.83E+I01
| |
| .II+l Cs-137 < 1.27E+01 <1.20E+01 <I1.69E+01 Fe-59 < 4.49E+01 <4.21E+01 <4.20E+01 K-40 3.14E+03 3.79E+03 3.17E+03 La-140 < .28E+02 <1.03E+02 <4.84E+01 Mn 54 <1.25E+01 < 1 39E+01 I <.68EFOI Nb-95 <1.73E+01 <1.80E+01_ <j2.07E+01 Ru-103 < 2.07E+01 <.31E+01 <12.09E+01 Ru-106 <1.12E+02 < 1.18E+02 <j1.51E+02 Sr-89 < 6.11E+01 <5.22E+01 <1.30E+02 Sr-90 < 4.79E+01 < 4.40E+01 <5.03E+01 Zn-65 <12.86E+01 < 2.78E+01 < 3.60E+01 Zr-95 3.05E+01{3.13E+01 <3.44E+01 25-OCT 25-OCT 25-OCT Nuclide Pike Silver Bass Sucker Ba-140 <6.29E+01 <2.53E+01 < 1.09E+02 Be-7 < 6.79E+01 <I2.62E+01 <1.04E+02 Ce-141 <1.27E+01 < 4.90E+00 <1.85E+01 Ce-144 <13.71E+01 I <J1.51E+01 I<15.03E+01 Co-58 <34E+00 f 10E+00
| |
| <l3 <l.20E+01 Co-60 <6.49E+00 <2.91E+00 <'1.18E+01 Cs-134 <7.89E+00 <3.30E+0_0 _ 1.23E+01 Cs-137 <6.67E+00 < 2.66E+00 <l1.20E+01 Fe-59 < 1.86E+01 <j8.37E+00 < 2.73E+01 K-40 (2.81 E+03 _3.00E+03 3.42E+03 La 140 j <12.08E+01 [<17 65E+00~ yjL3.90E+01 Mn-54 < 7.14E+00 < 2.96E+00 _ 1.14E+01 Nb-95 <l7.95E+00 <3.37E+00 1<1.39E+01 Ru-103 8.72E+00 <3.46E+00 < 1.32E+01 Ru-106 < 6.36E+01 <l2.43E+01 <l9.90E+01 Sr-89 <9.35E+01 <758E+01 9.79+01 Sr-90 <5.91E+01 < 6.01E+01 < 6.82E+01 Zn-65 < 1.59E+01 <7.31E+00 <2.60E+01 Zr-95 <1.39E+01 < 5.42E+00 < 2.15E+01 C-56
| |
| | |
| Fermi 2 - 2012 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report F-2 (Indicator)
| |
| (pCi/kg wet) 25-OCT 25-OCT Nuclide White Perch Walleye Ba-140 < 3.75E+01 < 3.04E+01 Be-7 < 4.00E+01 < 2.79E+01 Ce-141 < 8.32E+00 < 6.16E+00 Ce-144 < 2.40E+01 < 1.75E+01 Co-58 < 4.81E+00 < 3.63E+00 Co-60 <(5.11E+00 < 3.70E+00 Cs-134 _ <4.77E+00 < 3.39E+OO Cs-137 < 4.32E+00 < 3.34E+00 Fe-59 < 1.28E+01 < 1.03E+01 K-40 3.22E+03 3.81E+03 La-140 < 1.26E+01 <18.17E+00 Mn-54 <4.39E+00 < .35E+00 Nb-95 < 4.89E+00 <3.78E+00 Ru-103 < 4.98E+00 < 3.84E+00 Ru-106 < 3.78E+01 <2.86E+01 Sr-89 _ < 8.72E+01 < 1.09E+02 Sr-90 < 6.98E+01 < 9.37E+01 Zn-65 <I 1.07E+01 J < 8.25E+00 Zr-95 <867E+00_ <6.81E+00 C-57
| |
| | |
| Fermi 2 - 2012 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report FERMI 2 FISH ANALYSIS F-3 (Control)
| |
| (pCi/kg wet) 22-JUN 22-JUN 22-JUN Nuclide Red Sucker Drum Lon Sucker Ba-140 < 9.35E+02 <7.60E+02 <4.31E+02 Be-7 <13.03E+02 <2.69E+02F < 1.76E+02 Ce-141 < 8.95E+01 < 8.18E+01 < 5.03E+01 Ce-144 <9.63E+01 <18.68E+01 <I5.60E+01 Co-58 <2.88E+01 <2.56E+01 <11.72E+01 Co-60 <[1.87E+01 <1.76E+01 < 1.04E+01 Cs-134 [ 2.1E+01 < 1.91E+1 <1.20E+01 Cs-137 <[1.67E+01 <0154E+0L <j1.30E+01 Fe-59 < 9.16E+01 I <7.68E+01 <5.42E+01 K-40 3.20E+03 1 2.88E+03 3.36E+03 La-140 < 9.35E+02 7.60E+02 <14.31E+02 Mn-54 < 1.88E+01 I<1.59E+01 <I1.04E+01 Nb-95 <13.39E+01 ( <j2.98E+01 <1.97E+01 Ru-103 <14.86E+01 <4.45E+01 < 2.90E+01 Ru-106 < 1.59E+02 <1.33E+02 < 9.45E+01 Sr-89 1<1.11E+02 <7.16E+01 <4.78E+01 Sr 9 < 4.53E+01 < 4.27E+01 <}3.06E+01 Zn-65 I <4.I74E+01 I <13.66E+01 j <12.41E+01 Zr-95 j <5.63E+01 <15.38E+01 <13.28E+01 22-JUN 22-JUN 22-JUN Nuclide Quillback White Bass White Perch Ba-140 - < 1.44E+03 <1.64E+02 < 3.83E+02 Be-7 <I4.76E+02 <6.68E+01 <1.55E+02 Ce-141 <1.11E+02 < 2.12E+01 - <4.29E+01 Ce-144 1.24E+02 I <2.32E+01 1 <4.58E+01 Co-58 <14.41E+01 <6.47E+00 I <11.38E+01 Co-60 <2.94E+01 < 4.04E+00 <8.89E+00 Cs-134 <3.38E+01 < 4.50E+00 8.92E+00 Cs-137 2.59E+01 340E+00 <8.76E+00 Fe-59 <I1.59E+02 <12.32E+01 3.90E+01 La-140 < 1.44E+03 < 1.64E+02 < 3.83E+02 Mn-54 < 2.81E+01 1 <4.13E+00 _ 8.64E+00 Nb-95 < 17E+01 < 6.52E+00 < 1.50E+01 Ru-103 <I7.15E+01 1.03E+01 <I2.18E+01 Ru-106 <2.51E+02 < 3.32E+01 <7.80E+01 Sr-89 <9.36E+01 < 6.48E+01 8.19E+01 Sr-90 <2.51E+01 <4.12E+01 j <1 2.62E+01 Zn-65 6 43+0_1_ I 1.12E+0O1 <1.95E+01 Zr-95 19.85E+01 [ <1.21E+01 - <2.83E+01 C-58
| |
| | |
| Fermi 2 - 2012 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report FERMI 2 FISH ANALYSIS F-3 (Control)
| |
| (pCi/kg wet) 22-JUN 22-JUN 6 NOV Nuclide White Sucker Walleye Walleye Ba-140 < 9.45E+02 <5.98E+02 < 4.14E+01 Be-7 < 3.24E+02 < 1.49E+02 <684E+01 Ce-141 < 8.90E+01 <3.07E+01 f< 1.23E+01 Ce-144 I< 9.61E+01 <13.29E+01 I< 4.12E+01 Co-58 < 2.86E+01 < 1.61E+01 < 7.58E+00 Co-60 <I1.84E+1 <1.23E+01 <8.96E+00 Cs 134 < 207E+01 <1.15E+01 <f8.10E+00 Cs-137 < 1.68E+01 < 9.12E+00 < 8.47E+00 Fe-59 9.36E+01 < 5.76E+01 < 1.73E+01 K-40 3.83E+03 2.93E+03 3.27E+03 La-140 <9.45E+02 < 5.98E+02 <135Ei1^
| |
| Mn-54 < 1.93E+01 < 9.81E+00 <17.62E+00 Nb-95 <3.74E+01 <1.78E+01 <7.94E+00 Ru-103 1< 4.76E+01 [<12 52E+1I <17.55E+00 Ru-106 <1.61E+02 < 7.89E+01 <6.81E+01 Sr-89 ( < 6.73E+01 < 7.68E+01 < 1.42E+02 Sr-90 5.26E+01 <12.41E+01 I< 5.66E+01 Zn-65 1 <14.53E+O01 <13.06E+01 I <I .81E+01 Zr-95 _ 5.35E+01 [<3.30E+01 < 1.31E+01 6 NOV Nuclide Yellow Perch Ba-140 < 1.19E+02 Be-7 1 <11.76E+02 Ce-141 < 2.05E+01 Ce-144 1<17 27E+01 Co-58 <12.70E+01 Co-60 [<3.90E+01 Cs-134 < 2.84E+01 Cs-137 1 < 2.70E+01 Fe-59 < 6.52E+01 K-40 13.14E+03 La-140 < 6.09E+01 Mn-54 < 2.57E+01 Nb-951 <2.65E+01 Ru-103 <12.22E+01 Ru-i106 < .7+02 Sr-89 <8.79E+01 Sr-90 <6.68E+01 Zn-65 <7.43E+01 Zr-95 <14.40E+01 C-59
| |
| | |
| Appendix D Environmental Program Exceptions
| |
| | |
| Fermi 2 - 2012 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report Environmental Program Exceptions On occasions, samples cannot be collected. This can be due to a variety of events, such as equipment malfunction, loss of electrical power, severe weather conditions, or vandalism. In 2012, missed samples were a result of missing field TLDs. The following sections list all missed samples, changes and corrective actions taken during 2012. These missed samples did not have a significant impact on the execution of the REMP.
| |
| Direct Radiation Monitoring All TLDs are placed in the field in inconspicuous locations to minimize the loss of TLDs due to vandalism. During 2012, three hundred sixteen (316) TLDs were placed in the field for the REMP program and all but four (4) TLDs were collected and processed.
| |
| " During the first quarter collection T-24, was found missing and was replaced with the next quarter's TLDs.
| |
| " During the second quarter collection T-25was found missing and was replaced with the next quarter's TLDs.
| |
| " During the third quarter collection T-30was found missing and was replaced with the next quarter's TLDs.
| |
| " During the fourth quarter collection T-30was found missing and was replaced with the next quarter's TLDs.
| |
| Atmospheric Monitoring During 2012, two hundred sixty (260) air samples were placed in the field and all were collected and processed. There were no changes to the Atmospheric Monitoring program during 2012.
| |
| Terrestrial Monitoring - None Milk Sampling - None Garden Sampling - None Groundwater Sampling - None D-1
| |
| | |
| Fermi 2 - 2012 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report Aquatic Monitoring - None Drinking Water Sampling - None Surface Water Sampling - None Sediment Sampling - None Fish Sampling - None Program Changes - None D-2
| |
| | |
| Appendix E Interlaboratory Comparison Data GEL Laboratories' Quality Assurance Programs and the Annual Quality Assurance Status Report Environmental Dosimetry Company
| |
| | |
| Fermi 2 - 2012 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report Interlaboratory Comparison Program for 2012 In an interlaboratory comparison program, participant laboratories receive from a commerce source, environmental samples of known activity concentration for analysis.
| |
| After the samples have been analyzed by the laboratory, the manufacturer of the sample reports the known activity concentration of the samples to the laboratory. The laboratory compares its results to the reported concentrations to determine any significant deviations, investigates such deviations if found, and initiates corrective action if necessary. Participation in this program provides assurance that the contract laboratory is capable of meeting accepted criteria for radioactivity analysis. The following is GEL Laboratories' participation in an interlaboratory comparison program and the Annual Quality Assurance Status Report for the Environmental Dosimetry Company.
| |
| E-1
| |
| | |
| lll[ LaboratorieS LLC 2012 ANNUAL QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT FOR THE RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM (REMP)
| |
| GEL LABORATORIES, LLC P.O. Box 30712, Charleston, SC 29417 843.556.8171
| |
| | |
| LaboratorieS LLC P.O. Box 30712, Charleston, SC 29417 2012 ANNUAL QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT Page 2 of 60 2012 ANNUAL QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT FOR THE RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM (REMP)
| |
| Approved By: February 28, 2013 Robert L. Pullano Date Director, Quality Systems
| |
| | |
| Laboratories LLC P.O. Box 30712, Charleston, SC 29417 2012 ANNUAL QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT Page 3 of 60 TABLE OF CONTENTS
| |
| : 1. INTRODUCTION......................................................................................................................5
| |
| : 2. QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAMS FOR INTER-LABORATORY, INTRA-LABORATORY AND THIRD PARTY CROSS-CHECK ..................................................................................... 6
| |
| : 3. QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM FOR INTERNAL AND EXTERNAL AUDITS.................7
| |
| : 4. PERFORMANCE EVALUATION ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA FOR ENVIRONMENTAL S A MPLE A NALY S IS ................................................................................................................ 8
| |
| : 5. PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SAMPLES ........................................................................... 8
| |
| : 6. QUALITY CONTROL PROGRAM FOR ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLE ANALYSIS.................8
| |
| : 7. SUM MA RY O F DATA RESULTS.............................................................................................9
| |
| : 8.
| |
| | |
| ==SUMMARY==
| |
| OF PARTICIPATION IN THE ECKERT & ZIEGLER ANALYTICS ENVIRONMENTAL CROSS-CHECK PROGRAM ................................................................. 10
| |
| : 9.
| |
| | |
| ==SUMMARY==
| |
| OF PARTICIPATION IN THE MAPEP MONITORING PROGRAM....................10
| |
| : 10.
| |
| | |
| ==SUMMARY==
| |
| OF PARTICIPATION IN THE ERA MRAD PT PROGRAM .............................. 10
| |
| : 11.
| |
| | |
| ==SUMMARY==
| |
| OF PARTICIPATION IN THE ERA PT PROGRAM..........................................10
| |
| : 12. CORRECTIVE ACTION REQUEST AND REPORT (CARR) .............................................. 11 13 . R EFER ENCES ..................................................................................................................... 12
| |
| | |
| LaboratorieS LLC P.O. Box 30712, Charleston, SC 29417 2012 ANNUAL QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT Page 4 of 60 TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONTINUED)
| |
| TABLES Table 1 2012 Radiological Proficiency Testing Results and Acceptance Criteria.....................13 Table 2 2012 Eckert & Ziegler Analytics Performance Evaluation Results ............................... 23 Table 3 2012 Department of Energy Mixed Analyte Performance Evaluation Program (MAPEP)
| |
| Results................................................................................................................26 Table 4 2012 ERA Program Performance Evaluation Results .................................................. 30 Table 5 2012 ERA Program (MRAD) Performance Evaluation Results....................................32 Table 6 REMP Intra-Laboratory Data Summary: Bias and Precision By Matrix.....................46 Table 7 All Radiological Intra-Laboratory Data Summary: Bias and Precision By Matrix........................................................................................................48 Table 8 2012 Corrective Action Report Summary...........................................................55 FIGURES Figure 1 Cobalt-60 Performance Evaluation Results and % Bias..............................................37 Figure 2 Cesium-137 Performance Evaluation Results and % Bias ......................................... 38 Figure 3 Tritium Performance Evaluation Results and % Bias .................................................. 39 Figure 4 Strontium-90 Performance Evaluation Results and % Bias.........................................40 Figure 5 Gross Alpha Performance Evaluation Results and % Bias..........................................41 Figure 6 Gross Beta Performance Evaluation Results and % Bias ........................................... 42 Figure 7 lodine-131 Performance Evaluation Results and % Bias ............................................ 43 Figure 8 Americium-241 Performance Evaluation Results and % Bias ..................................... 44 Figure 9 Plutonium-238 Performance Evaluation Results and % Bias ...................................... 45
| |
| | |
| i J, l Laboratories LLC P.O. Box 30712, Charleston, SC 29417 2012 ANNUAL QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT Page 5 of 60 2012 ANNUAL QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT FOR THE RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM (REMP)
| |
| : 1. Introduction GEL Laboratories, LLC (GEL) is a privately owned environmental laboratory dedicated to providing personalized client services of the highest quality. GEL was established as an analytical testing laboratory in 1981. Now a full service lab, our analytical divisions use state of the art equipment and methods to provide a comprehensive array of organic, inorganic, and radiochemical analyses to meet the needs of our clients.
| |
| At GEL, quality is emphasized at every level of personnel throughout the company.
| |
| Management's ongoing commitment to good professional practice and to the quality of our testing services to our customers is demonstrated by their dedication of personnel and resources to develop, implement, assess, and improve our technical and management operations.
| |
| The purpose of GEL's quality assurance program is to establish policies, procedures, and processes to meet or exceed the expectations of our clients. To achieve this, all personnel that support these services to our clients are introduced to the program and policies during their initial orientation, and annually thereafter during company-wide training sessions.
| |
| GEL's primary goals are to ensure that all measurement data generated are scientifically and legally defensible, of known and acceptable quality per the data quality objectives (DQOs), and thoroughly documented to provide sound support for environmental decisions. In addition, GEL continues to ensure compliance with all contractual requirements, environmental standards, and regulations established by local, state and federal authorities.
| |
| GEL administers the QA program in accordance with the Quality Assurance Plan, GL-QS-B-001.
| |
| Our Quality Systems include all quality assurance (QA) policies and quality control (QC) procedures necessary to plan, implement, and assess the work we perform. GEL's QA Program establishes a quality management system (QMS) that governs all of the activities of our organization.
| |
| This report entails the quality assurance program for the proficiency testing and environmental monitoring aspects of GEL for 2012. GEL's QA Program is designed to monitor the quality of analytical processing associated with environmental, radiobioassay, effluent (10 CFR Part 50),
| |
| and waste (10 CFR Part 61) sample analysis.
| |
| This report covers the category of Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program (REMP) and includes:
| |
| " Intra-laboratory QC results analyzed during 2012.
| |
| . Inter-laboratory QC results analyzed during 2012 where known values were available.
| |
| | |
| Laboratories LLC P.O. Box 30712, Charleston, SC 29417 2012 ANNUAL QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT Page 6 of 60
| |
| : 2. Quality Assurance Programs for Inter-laboratory, Intra-laboratory and Third Party Cross-Check In addition to internal and client audits, our laboratory participates in annual performance evaluation studies conducted by independent providers. We routinely participate in the following types of performance audits:
| |
| " Proficiency testing and other inter-laboratory comparisons
| |
| * Performance requirements necessary to retain Certifications
| |
| * Evaluation of recoveries of certified reference and in-house secondary reference materials using statistical process control data.
| |
| " Evaluation of relative percent difference between measurements through SPC data.
| |
| We also participate in a number of proficiency testing programs for federal and state agencies and as required by contracts. It is our policy that no proficiency evaluation samples be analyzed in any special manner. Our annual performance evaluation participation generally includes a combination of studies that support the following:
| |
| " US Environmental Protection Agency Discharge Monitoring Report, Quality Assurance Program (DMR-QA). Annual national program sponsored by EPA for laboratories engaged in the analysis of samples associated with the NPDES monitoring program.
| |
| Participation is mandatory for all holders of NPDES permits. The permit holder must analyze for all of the parameters listed on the discharge permit. Parameters include general chemistry, metals, BOD/COD, oil and grease, ammonia, nitrates, etc.
| |
| " Department of Energy Mixed Analyte Performance Evaluation Program (MAPEP). A semiannual program developed by DOE in support of DOE contractors performing waste analyses. Participation is required for all laboratories that perform environmental analytical measurements in support of environmental management activities. This program includes radioactive isotopes in water, soil, vegetation and air filters.
| |
| " ERA's MRAD-Multimedia Radiochemistry Proficiency test program. This program is for labs seeking certification for radionuclides in wastewater and solid waste. The program is conducted in strict compliance with USEPA National Standards for Water Proficiency study.
| |
| " ERA's InterLaB RadCheM Proficiency Testing Program for radiological analyses. This program completes the process of replacing the USEPA EMSL-LV Nuclear Radiation Assessment Division program discontinued in 1998. Laboratories seeking certification for radionuclide analysis in drinking water also use the study. This program is conducted in strict compliance with the USEPA National Standards for Water Proficiency Testing Studies. This program encompasses Uranium by EPA method 200.8 (for drinking water certification in Florida/Primary NELAP), gamma emitters, Gross Alpha/Beta, lodine-131, naturally occurring radioactive isotopes, Strontium-89/90, and Tritium.
| |
| | |
| !j LaboratorieS LLC P.O. Box 30712, Charleston, SC 29417 2012 ANNUAL QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT Page 7 of 60
| |
| " ERA's Water Pollution (WP) biannual program for waste methodologies includes parameters for both organic and inorganic analytes.
| |
| " ERA's Water Supply (WS) biannual program for drinking water methodologies includes parameters for organic and inorganic analytes.
| |
| " Environmental Cross-Check Program administered by Eckert & Ziegler Analytics, Inc.
| |
| This program encompasses radionuclides in water, soil, milk, naturally occurring radioactive isotopes in soil and air filters.
| |
| GEL procures single-blind performance evaluation samples from Eckert & Ziegler Analytics to verify the analysis of sample matrices processed at GEL. Samples are received on a quarterly basis. GEL's Third-Party Cross-Check Program provides environmental matrices encountered in a typical nuclear utility REMP. The Third-Party Cross-Check Program is intended to meet or exceed the inter-laboratory comparison program requirements discussed in NRC Regulatory Guide 4.15, revision 1. Once performance evaluation samples have been prepared in accordance with the instructions provided by the PT provider, samples are managed and analyzed in the same manner as environmental samples from GEL's clients.
| |
| : 3. Quality Assurance Program for Internal and External Audits During each annual reporting period, at least one internal assessment of each area of the laboratory is conducted in accordance with the pre-established schedule from Standard Operating Procedure for the Conduct of Quality Audits, GL-QS-E-001. The annual internal audit plan is reviewed for adequacy and includes the scheduled frequency and scope of quality control actions necessary to GEL's QA program. Internal audits are conducted at least annually in accordance with a schedule approved by the Quality Systems Director. Supplier audits are contingent upon the categorization of the supplier, and may or may not be conducted prior to the use of a supplier or subcontractor. Type I suppliers and subcontractors, regardless of how they were initially qualified, are re-evaluated at least once every three years.
| |
| In addition, prospective customers audit GEL during pre-contract audits. GEL hosts several external audits each year for both our clients and other programs. These programs include environmental monitoring, waste characterization, and radiobioassay. The following list of programs may audit GEL at least annually or up to every three years depending on the program.
| |
| * NELAC, National Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program
| |
| . DOECAP, U.S. Department of Energy Consolidated Audit Program
| |
| * DOELAP, U.S. Department of Energy Laboratory Accreditation Program
| |
| * DOE QSAS, U.S. Department of Energy, Quality Systems for Analytical Services
| |
| " ISO/IEC 17025
| |
| * A2LA, American Association for Laboratory Accreditation
| |
| * DOD ELAP, US Department of Defense Environmental Accreditation Program
| |
| " NUPIC, Nuclear Procurement Issues Committee
| |
| * South Carolina Department of Heath and Environmental Control (SC DHEC)
| |
| The annual radiochemistry laboratory internal audit (12-RAD-001) was conducted in March 2012.
| |
| Two (2) findings, three (3) observations, and three (3) recommendations resulted from this
| |
| | |
| Laboratories LLC P.O. Box 30712, Charleston, SC 29417 2012 ANNUAL QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT Page 8 of 60 assessment. In May, 2012, each finding was closed and appropriate laboratory staff addressed each observation and recommendation.
| |
| The Nuclear Procurement Issues Committee (NUPIC) follow up verification audit was conducted on October 16, 2012 through October 17, 2012. This Duke Energy/NUPIC QA audit was performed to verify that the six audit findings identified in the 2011 NUPIC audit had been successfully implemented.
| |
| The audit confirmed that the actions taken to the six findings have been adequately addressed by GEL. The Audit Report # 22837-A for Supplier Number 5644 has been posted on the NUPIC website.
| |
| : 4. Performance Evaluation Acceptance Criteria for Environmental Sample Analysis GEL utilized an acceptance protocol based upon two performance models. For those inter-laboratory programs that already have established performance criteria for bias (i.e., MAPEP, and ERA/ELAP), GEL will utilize the criteria for the specific program. For intra-laboratory or third party quality control programs that do not have a specific acceptance criteria (i.e. the Eckert-Ziegler Analytics Environmental Cross-check Program), results will be evaluated in accordance with GEL's internal acceptance criteria.
| |
| : 5. Performance Evaluation Samples Performance Evaluation (PE) results and internal quality control sample results are evaluated in accordance with GEL acceptance criteria. The first criterion concerns bias, which is defined as the deviation of any one result from the known value. The second criterion concerns precision, which deals with the ability of the measurement to be replicated by comparison of an individual result with the mean of all results for a given sample set.
| |
| At GEL, we also evaluate our analytical performance on a regular basis through statistical process control (SPC) acceptance criteria. Where feasible, this criterion is applied to both measures of precision and accuracy and is specific to sample matrix. We establish environmental process control limits at least annually.
| |
| For Radiochemistry analysis, quality control evaluation is based on static limits rather than those that are statistically derived. Our current process control limits are maintained in GEL's AlphaLIMS. We also measure precision with matrix duplicates and/or matrix spike duplicates.
| |
| The upper and lower control limits (UCL and LCL respectively) for precision are plus or minus three times the standard deviation from the mean of a series of relative percent differences. The static precision criteria for radiochemical analyses are 0 - 20%, for activity levels exceeding the contract required detection limit (CRDL).
| |
| : 6. Quality Control Program for Environmental Sample Analysis GEL's internal QA Program is designed to include QC functions such as instrumentation calibration checks (to insure proper instrument response), blank samples, instrumentation backgrounds, duplicates, as well as overall staff qualification analyses and statistical process controls. Both quality control and qualification analyses samples are used to be as similar as the matrix type of those samples submitted for analysis by the various laboratory clients. These performance test samples (or performance evaluation samples) are either actual sample
| |
| | |
| Laboratories LLC P.O. Box 30712, Charleston, SC 29417 2012 ANNUAL QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT Page 9 of 60 submitted in duplicate in order to evaluate the precision of laboratory measurements, or fortified blank samples, which have been given a known quantity of a radioisotope that is in the interest to GEL's clients.
| |
| Accuracy (or Bias) is measured through laboratory control samples and/or matrix spikes, as well as surrogates and internal standards. The UCLs and LCLs for accuracy are plus or minus three times the standard deviation from the mean of a series of recoveries. The static limit for radiochemical analyses is 75 - 125%. Specific instructions for out-of-control situations are provided in the applicable analytical SOP.
| |
| GEL's Laboratory Control Standard (LCS) is an aliquot of reagent water or other blank matrix to which known quantities of the method analytes are added in the laboratory. The LCS is analyzed exactly like a sample, and its purpose is to determine whether the methodology is in control, and whether the laboratory is capable of making accurate and precise measurements. Some methods may refer to these samples as Laboratory Fortified Blanks (LFB). The requirement for recovery is between 75 and 125% for radiological analyses excluding drinking water matrix.
| |
| Bias (%) = (observed concentration)
| |
| * 100 %
| |
| (known concentration)
| |
| Precision is a data quality indicator of the agreement between measurements of the same property, obtained under similar conditions, and how well they conform to themselves. Precision is usually expressed as standard deviation, variance or range in either absolute or relative (percentage) terms.
| |
| GEL's laboratory duplicate (DUP or LCSD) is an aliquot of a sample taken from the same container and processed in the same manner under identical laboratory conditions. The aliquot is analyzed independently from the parent sample and the results are compared to measure precision and accuracy.
| |
| If a sample duplicate is analyzed, it will be reported as Relative Percent Difference (RPD). The RPD must be 20 percent or less, if both samples are greater than 5 times the MDC. If both results are less than 5 times MDC, then the RPD must be equal to or less than 100%. If one result is above the MDC and the other is below the MDC, then the RPD can be calculated using the MDC for the result of the one below the MDC. The RPD must be 100% or less. In the situation where both results are above the MDC but one result is greater than 5 times the MDC and the other is less than 5 times the MDC, the RPD must be less than or equal to 20%. If both results are below MDC, then the limits on % RPD are not applicable.
| |
| Difference (%) = (high duplicate result - low duplicate result)
| |
| * 100 %
| |
| (average of results)
| |
| : 7. Summary of Data Results During 2012, forty-three (43) radioisotopes associated with seven (7) matrix types were analyzed under GEL's Performance Evaluation program in participation with ERA, MAPEP, and Eckert &
| |
| Ziegler Analytics. Matrix types were representative of client analyses performed during 2012. Of the four hundred forty-four (444) total results reported, 98% (433 of 444) were found to be acceptable. The list below contains the type of matrix evaluated by GEL.
| |
| | |
| Laboratories LLC P.O. Box 30712, Charleston, SC 29417 2012 ANNUAL QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT Page 10 of 60
| |
| " Air Filter
| |
| " Cartridge
| |
| * Water
| |
| * Milk
| |
| * Soil
| |
| * Liquid
| |
| " Vegetation Graphs are provided in Figures 1-9 of this report to allow for the evaluation of trends or biases.
| |
| These graphs include radioisotopes Cobalt-60, Cesium-137, Tritium, Strontium-90, Gross Alpha, Gross Beta, lodine-131, Americium-241, and Plutonium-238.
| |
| : 8. Summary of Participation in the Eckert & Ziegler Analytics Environmental Cross-Check Program Eckert & Ziegler Analytics provided samples for nintety-two (92) individual environmental analyses. The accuracy of each result reported to Eckert & Ziegler Analytics, Inc. is measured by the ratio of GEL's result to the known value. All results fell within GEL's acceptance criteria (100%). .
| |
| : 9. Summary of Participation in the MAPEP Monitoring Program MAPEP Series 25, 26 and 27 were analyzed by the laboratory. Of the one hundred twenty-nine (129) analyses, 94% (121 out of 129) of all results fell within the PT provider's acceptance criteria. Eight analytical failures occurred: Cobalt-57 in soil, Uranium-234/235 in filter, Strontium-90 in vegetation, Uranium 234/235 in vegetation, Strontium-90 in soil, Uranium-234/235 in filter, Uranium-238 in filter and Gross Alpha in Filter.
| |
| For the corrective actions associated with MAPEP Series 26 and 27, refer to CARR120711-694, CARR120711-698, CARR121127-742, CARR121127-743, and CARR121127-744 please see Table 8.
| |
| : 10. Summary of Participation in the ERA MRaD PT Program The ERA MRad program provided samples (MRAD-16 and MRAD-17) for one hundred seventy-nine individual environmental analyses. All results (100%) fell within the PT provider's acceptance criteria.
| |
| : 11. Summary of Participation in the ERA PT Program The ERA program provided samples (RAD-88, RAD-89, RAD-90 and RAD-91) for forty-four (44) individual environmental analyses. Of the 44 analyses, 93% (41 out of 44) of all results fell within the PT provider's acceptance criteria. Three analytical failures occurred: Barium-133 in water, Zinc-65 in soil, and 1-131 in water.
| |
| For the corrective actions associated with RAD-88, and RAD-90, refer to corrective actions CARR120306-667 and CARR120831-715 (Table 8).
| |
| | |
| [ ' ]l Laboratories LLC P.O. Box 30712, Charleston, SC 29417 2012 ANNUAL QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT Page 11 of 60
| |
| : 12. Corrective Action Request and Report (CARR)
| |
| There are two categories of corrective action at GEL. One is corrective action implemented at the analytical and data review level in accordance with the analytical SOP. The other is formal corrective action documented by the Quality Systems Team in accordance with GL-QS-E-002. A formal corrective action is initiated when a nonconformance reoccurs or is so significant that permanent elimination or prevention of the problem is required. Formal corrective action investigations include root cause analysis.
| |
| GEL includes quality requirements in most analytical standard operating procedures to ensure that data are reported only if the quality control criteria are met or the quality control measures that did not meet the acceptance criteria are documented. A formal corrective action is implemented according to GL-QS-E-002 for Conducting Corrective/Preventive Action and Identifying Opportunities for Improvement. Recording and documentation is performed following guidelines stated in GL-QS-E-012 for Client NCR Database Operation.
| |
| Any employee at GEL can identify and report a nonconformance and request that corrective action be taken. Any GEL employee can participate on a corrective action team as requested by the QS team or Group Leaders. The steps for conducting corrective action are detailed in GL-QS-E-002. In the event that correctness or validity of the laboratory's test results in doubt, the laboratory will take corrective action. If investigations show that the results have been impacted, affected clients will be informed of the issue in writing within five (5) calendar days of the discovery.
| |
| Table 8 provides the status of CARRs for radiological performance testing during 2012. It has been determined that causes of the failures did not impact any data reported to our clients.
| |
| | |
| [ ! Laboratories LLC P.O. Box 30712, Charleston, SC 29417 2012 ANNUAL QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT Page 12 of 60
| |
| : 13. References
| |
| : 1. GEL Quality Assurance Plan, GL-QS-B-001
| |
| : 2. GEL Standard Operating Procedure for the Conduct of Quality Audits, GL-QS-E-001
| |
| : 3. GEL Standard Operating Procedure for Conducting Corrective/Preventive Action and Identifying Opportunities for Improvement, GL-QS-E-002
| |
| : 4. GEL Standard Operating Procedure for AlphaLIMS Documentation of Nonconformance Reporting and Dispositioning and Control of Nonconforming Items, GL-QS-E-004
| |
| : 5. GEL Standard Operating Procedure for Handling Proficiency Evaluation Samples, GL-QS-E-013
| |
| : 6. GEL Standard Operating Procedure for Quality Assurance Measurement Calculations and Processes, GL-QS-E-014
| |
| : 7. 40 CFR Part 136 Guidelines Establishing Test Procedures for the Analysis of Pollutants
| |
| : 8. ISO/IEC 17025-2005, General Requirements for the Competence of Testing and Calibration Laboratories
| |
| : 9. ANSI/ASQC E4-1994, Specifications and Guidelines for Quality Systems for Environmental Data Collection and Environmental Technology Programs, American National Standard
| |
| : 10. 2003 NELAC Standard, National Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program
| |
| : 11. MARLAP, Multi-Agency Radiological Laboratory Analytical Protocols
| |
| : 12. 10 CFR Part 21, Reporting of Defects and Noncompliance
| |
| : 13. 10 CFR Part 50 Appendix B, Quality Assurance Criteria for Nuclear Power Plants and Fuel Reprocessing Plants
| |
| : 14. 10 CFR Part 61, Licensing Requirements for Land Disposal and Radioactive Waste
| |
| : 15. NRC REG Guide 4.15 and NRC REG Guide 4.8
| |
| | |
| Laboratories LLC P.O. Box 30712, Charleston, SC 29417 2012 ANNUAL QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT Page 13 of 60 TABLE 1 2012 RADIOLOGICAL PROFICIENCY TESTING RESULTS AND ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA Acceptan PT Quarter / Analytical Sample Sample Analyte / GEL Known ce Range/
| |
| Provider Year Date Number Media Unit Nuclide Value value Ratio Evaluation ERA 1"/2012 03/06/12 RAD - 88 Water pCl/L Barium-133 58.2 57.1 47.3-63.0 Acceptable ERA 1st/2012 03/06/12 RAD - 88 Water pC/L Cesium-134 63.5 64 52.0-70.4 Acceptable ERA 1st/2012 03/06/12 RAD - 88 Water pCi/L Cesium-137 89.5 91.2 82.1-103 Acceptable ERA 1st/2012 03/06/12 RAD - 88 Water pC1/L Cobalt-60 49.5 48.9 44.0-56.4 Acceptable ERA 1st/2012 03/06/12 RAD - 88 Water pCi/L Zinc-65 75 71.8 64.2-86.7 Acceptable ERA 1st/2012 03/06/12 RAD - 88 Water pCi/L Gross Alpha 31.0 35.7 18.4-45.9 Acceptable ERA 1st/2012 03/06/12 RAD - 88 Water pCi/L Gross Beta 27.3 28.8 18.3-36.6 Acceptable ERA 1st/2012 03/06/12 RAD - 88 Water pCi/L Gross Alpha 29.8 35.7 18.4-45.9 Acceptable ERA 1st/2012 03/06/12 RAD - 88 Water pCi/L Radium-226 8.89 8.73 6.55-10.2 Acceptable ERA 1st/2012 03/06/12 RAD - 88 Water pCi/L Radium-228 5.9 5.78 3.53-7.60 Acceptable ERA 1st/2012 03/06/12 RAD - 88 Water pCi/L Uranium (Nat) 31.6 32.5 26.2-36.3 Acceptable Uranium (Nat)
| |
| ERA 1st/2012 03/06/12 RAD - 88 Water ug/L mass 49.9 47.5 38.3-53.1 Acceptable ERA 1st/2012 03/06/12 RAD - 88 Water pC/L Radium-226 8.80 8.73 6.55-10.2 Acceptable ERA 1st/2012 03/06/12 RAD - 88 Water pCi/L Radium-228 4.8 5.78 3.53-7.60 Acceptable ERA 1st/2012 03/06/12 RAD - 88 Water pCi/L Uranium (Nat) 27.6 32.5 26.2-36.3 Acceptable Uranium (Nat)
| |
| ERA 1st/2012 03/06/12 RAD - 88 Water ug/L mass 41.2 47.5 38.3-53.1 Acceptable 16800- Not ERA 1st/2012 03/06/12 RAD - 88 Water pCi/L Tritium 16200 19200 21100 Acceptable ERA 1st/2012 03/06/12 RAD - 88 Water pCi/L Strontium-89 38.4 42.5 32.7-49.6 Acceptable ERA 1st/2012 03/06/12 RAD - 88 Water pCi/L Strontium-90 23.5 24.2 17.4-28.3 Acceptable ERA 1st/2012 03/06/12 RAD - 88 Water pCi/L Strontium-89 42.2 42.5 32.7-49.6 Acceptable ERA 1st/2012 03/06/12 RAD - 88 Water pCi/L Strontium-90 24.2 24.2 17.4-28.3 Acceptable ERA 1st/2012 03/06/12 RAD -88 Water pCi/L lodine-131 28.4 25.7 21.3-30.3 Acceptable ERA 1st/2012 03/06/12 RAD -88 Water pCi/L lodine-131 28.4 25.7 21.3-30.3 Acceptable EZA 1st/2012 02/08/12 E8197-278 Cartridge pCi Iodine-131 9.52E+01 8.92E+01 1.07 Acceptable EZA 1st/2012 02/08/12 E8197-278 Milk pCi/L Strontium-89 8.78E+01 8.96E+01 0.98 Acceptable EZA 1st/2012 02/08/12 E8197-278 Milk pCi/L Strontium-90 1.51E+01 1.48E+01 1.02 Acceptable EZA 1st/2012 02/08/12 E8197-278 Milk pCi/L lodine-131 9.36E+01 9.02E+01 1.04 Acceptable EZA 1st/2012 02/08/12 E8197-278 Milk pCi/L Chromium-51 5.53E+02 5.66E+02 0.98 Acceptable EZA 1st/2012 02/08/12 E8197-278 Milk pCi/L Cesium-134 1.59E+02 1.71E+02 0.93 Acceptable EZA 1st/2012 02/08/12 E8197-278 Milk pCi/L Cesium-137 2.27E+02 2.10E+02 1.08 Acceptable EZA 1st/2012 02/08/12 E8197-278 Milk pCi/L Cobalt-58 2.18E+02 2.21E+02 0.99 Acceptable EZA 1st/2012 02/08/12 E8197-278 Milk pCi/L Manganese-54 2.52E+02 2.41E+02 1.05 Acceptable EZA 1st/2012 02/08/12 E8197-278 Milk pCi/L Iron-59 1.90E+02 1.83E+02 1.04 Acceptable EZA 1st/2012 02/08/12 E8197-278 Milk pCi/L Zinc-65 3.19E+02 2.91E+02 1.09 Acceptable EZA 1st/2012 02/08/12 E8197-278 Milk pCi/L Cobalt-60 2.82E+02 2.70E+02 1.04 Acceptable EZA 1st/2012 02/08/12 E8197-278 Milk pCi/L Cesium-141 1.00E+01 Not spiked None Acceptable EZA 1st/2012 02/08/12 E8197-278 Water pCi/L lodine-131 8.44E+01 8.87E+01 0.95 Acceptable EZA 1st1/2012 02/08/12 E8197-278 Water pCi/L Chromium-51 5.32E+02 5.66E+02 0.94 Acceptable EZA 1st/2012 02/08/12 E8197-278 Water pCi/L Cesium-134 1.56E+02 1.71E+02 0.91 Acceptable
| |
| | |
| Laboratories LLc P.O. Box 30712, Charleston, SC 29417 2012 ANNUAL QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT Page 14 of 60 EZA 1st/2012 02/08/12 E8197-278 Water pCi/L Cesium-137 2.06E+02 2.10E+02 0.98 Acceptable EZA 1st/2012 02/08/12 E8197-278 Water pCi/L Cobalt-58 2.02E+02 2.21E+02 0.92 Acceptable EZA 1st/2012 02/08/12 E8197-278 Water pCi/L Manganese-54 2.50E+02 2.41E+02 1.04 Acceptable EZA 1st/2012 02/08/12 E8197-278 Water pCI/L Iron-59 1.81E+02 1.83E+02 0.99 Acceptable EZA 1st/2012 02/08/12 E8197-278 Water pCi/L Zinc-65 2.95E+02 2.91E+02 1.01 Acceptable EZA 1st/2012 02/08/12 E8197-278 Water pCi/L Cobalt-60 2.58E+02 2.70E+02 0.96 Acceptable EZA 1st/2012 02/08/12 E8197-278 Water pCi/L Cesium-141 -9.60E+01 Not spiked None Acceptable EZA 1st/2012 03/15/12 E10043 Water pCi/L lodine-131 1.01E+02 9.38E-01 1.08 Acceptable EZA 1st/2012 03/15/12 E10043 Water pCi/L Cerium-141 2.64E+00 2.60E+00 1.01 Acceptable EZA 1st/2012 03/15/12 E10043 Water pCi/L Chromium-51 3.34E+02 3.09E+02 1.08 Acceptable EZA 1st/2012 03/15/12 E10043 Water pCi/L Cesium-134 9.90E-01 1.13E+02 0.94 Acceptable EZA 1st/2012 03/15/12 E10043 Water pCi/L Cesium-137 1.26E+02 1.13E+02 1.12 Acceptable EZA 1st/2012 03/15/12 E10043 Water pCI/L Cobalt-58 9.55E-01 9.34E-01 1.02 Acceptable EZA 1st/2012 03/15/12 E10043 Water pCl/L Manganese-54 1.49E+02 1.38E+02 1.08 Acceptable EZA 1st/2012 03/15/12 E10043 Water pCi/L Iron-59 1.40E+02 1.19E+02 1.18 Acceptable EZA 1st/2012 03/15/12 E10043 Water pCi/L Zinc-65 2.58E+02 2.35E+02 1.1 Acceptable EZA 1st/2012 03/15/12 E10043 Water pCi/L Cobalt-60 2.14E+02 1.97E+02 1.09 Acceptable EZA 1st/2012 03/15/12 E10041 Milk pCI/L Strontium-89 7.94E-01 7.99E-01 0.99 Acceptable EZA 1st/2012 03/15/12 E10041 Milk pCi/L Strontium-90 1.12E+01 1.14E+01 0.98 Acceptable EZA 1st/2012 03/15/12 E10042 Milk pCi/L Iodine-131 1.02E+02 1.54E+02 1.10 Acceptable EZA 1st/2012 03/15/12 E10042 Milk pCi/L Cerium-141 2.64E+02 2.60E+02 1.01 Acceptable EZA 1st/2012 03/15/12 E10042 Milk pCi/L Chromium-51 4.46E+02 4.36E+02 1.02 Acceptable EZA 1st/2012 03/15/12 E10042 Milk pCi/L Cesium-134 1.31E+02 1.49E+02 0.88 Acceptable EZA 1st/2012 03/15/12 E10042 Milk pCi/L Cesium-137 1.62E+02 1.59E+02 1.02 Acceptable EZA 1st/2012 03/15/12 E10042 Milk pCi/L Cobalt-58 1.28E+02 1.32E+02 0.97 Acceptable EZA 1st/2012 03/15/12 E10042 Milk pCi/L Manganese-54 1.99E+02 1.95E+02 1.02 Acceptable EZA 1st/2012 03/15/12 E10042 Milk pCi/L Iron-59 1.96E+02 1.68E+02 1.17 Acceptable EZA 1st/2012 03/15/12 E10042 Milk pCi/L Zinc-65 3.50E+02 3.33E+02 1.05 Acceptable EZA 1st/2012 03/15/12 E10040 Milk pCi/L Cobalt-60 2.90E+02 2.79E+02 1.04 Acceptable EZA 1st/2012 03/15/12 E7465-278 Cartridge pCi lodine-131 8.93E+01 9.42E+01 0.95 Acceptable ERA 2nd/2012 05/18/12 MRAD-16 Soil pCI/kg Actinium-228 1330 1570 110-2180 Acceptable ERA 2nd/2012 05/18/12 MRAD-16 Soil pCi/kg Americium-241 900 938 549-1220 Acceptable ERA 2nd/2012 05/18/12 MRAD-16 Soil pCI/kg Bismuth-212 1540 1550 413-2280 Acceptable ERA 2nd/2012 05/18/12 MRAD-16 Soil pCi/kg Bismuth-214 1100 1100 665-1590 Acceptable ERA 2nd/2012 05/18/12 MRAD-16 Soil pCI/kg Cesium-134 2380 2180 1420-2620 Acceptable ERA 2nd/2012 05/18/12 MRAD-16 Soil pCi/kg Cesium-137 10700 8770 6720-11300 Acceptable ERA 2nd/2012 05/18/12 MRAD-16 Soil pCi/kg Cobalt-60 4060 3500 2370-4820 Acceptable ERA 2nd/2012 05/18/12 MRAD-16 Soil pCi/kg Lead-212 1380 1510 992-2110 Acceptable ERA 2nd/2012 05/18/12 MRAD-16 Soil pCi/kg Lead-214 1350 1110 647-1650 Acceptable ERA 2nd/2012 05/18/12 MRAD-16 Soil pCI/kg Manganese-54 <37.2 <1000 0-1000 Acceptable ERA 2nd/2012 05/18/12 MRAD-16 Soil pCi/kg Plutonium-238 842 984.00 592-1360 Acceptable ERA 2nd/2012 05/18/12 MRAD-16 Soil pCi/kg Plutonium-239 793 879.00 575-1210 Acceptable ERA 2nd/2012 05/18/12 MRAD-16 Soil pCi/kg Potassium-40 10400 11600 8470-15600 Acceptable ERA 2nd/2012 05/18/12 MRAD-16 Soil pCi/kg StrontIum-90 7370 8800 3360-13900 Acceptable ERA 2nd/2012 05/18/12 MRAD-16 Soil pCi/kg Thorium-234 2360 2000 632-3760 Acceptable ERA 2nd/2012 05/18/12 MRAD-16 Soil pCi/kg Zinc-65 4540 3650 2910-4850 Acceptable ERA 2nd/2012 05/18/12 MRAD-16 Soil pCi/kg Strontium-90 7370 8800 3360-13900 Acceptable ERA 2nd/2012 05/18/12 MRAD-16 Soil pCi/kg Uranium-234 2250 1960 1200-2510 Acceptable
| |
| | |
| Ee.[l Laboratories ac P.O. Box 30712, Charleston, SC 29417 2012 ANNUAL QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT Page 15 of 60 ERA 2nd/2012 05/18/12 MRAD-16 Soil pCI/kg Uranium-238 1620 2000 1240-2540 Acceptable ERA 2nd/2012 05/18/12 MRAD-16 Soil pCi/kg Uranium-Total 4220 4030 2190-5320 Acceptable Uranium-ERA 2nd/2012 05/18/12 MRAD-16 Soil ug/kg Total(mass) 5070 5880 3240-7400 Acceptable ERA 2nd/2012 05/18/12 MRAD-16 Veg pCi/kg Americium-241 4270 4540 2780-6040 Acceptable ERA 2nd/2012 05/18/12 MRAD-16 Veg pCi/kg Curium-244 829 812 400 - 1260 Acceptable ERA 2nd/2012 05/18/12 MRAD-16 Veg pCi/kg Plutonium-238 2300 2570 1400-3220 Acceptable ERA 2nd/2012 05/18/12 MRAD-16 Veg pCi/kg Plutonium-239 2480 2570 1580-3540 Acceptable ERA 2nd/2012 05/18/12 MRAD-16 Veg pCI/kg Uranium-234 3310 3610 2370-4640 Acceptable ERA 2nd/2012 05/18/12 MRAD-16 Veg pCi/kg Uranium-238 3540 3580 2390-4550 Acceptable ERA 2nd/2012 05/18/12 MRAD-16 Veg pCi/kg Uranium-Total 7025 7350 4980-9150 Acceptable Uranium-ERA 2nd/2012 05/18/12 MRAD-16 Veg up/kg Total(mass) 10600 10700 7170-13600 Acceptable ERA 2nd/2012 05/18/12 MRAD-16 Veg pCi/kg Americium-241 4270 4540 2780-6040 Acceptable ERA 2nd/2012 05/18/12 MRAD-16 Veg pCi/kg Cesium-134 2840 2920 1880-3790 Acceptable ERA 2nd/2012 05/18/12 MRAD-16 Veg pCi/kg Cesium-137 1330 1340 972-1860 Acceptable ERA 2nd/2012 05/18/12 MRAD-16 Veg pCi/kg Cobalt-60 2380 2210 1520-3090 Acceptable ERA 2nd/2012 05/18/12 MRAD-16 Veg pCI/kg Manganese-54 <68.8 <300 0.00-300 Acceptable 20700-ERA 2nd/2012 05/18/12 MRAD-16 Veg pCi/kg Potassium-40 33700 28600 40100 Acceptable ERA 2nd/2012 05/18/12 MRAD-16 Veg pCi/kg Zinc-65 2570 2310 1670-3240 Acceptable ERA 2nd/2012 05/18/12 MRAD-16 Veg pCi/kg Strontium-90 7000 8520 4860-11300 Acceptable ERA 2nd/2012 05/18/12 MRAD-16 Filter pCi/Filter Americium-241 72.4 68.8 42.4-93.1 Acceptable ERA 2nd/2012 05/18/12 MRAD-16 Filter pCi/Filter Plutonium-238 57.3 63.2 43.3-83.1 Acceptable ERA 2nd/2012 05/18/12 MRAD-16 Filter pCi/Filter Plutonium-239 58.8 63 45.6-82.4 Acceptable ERA 2nd/2012 05/18/12 MRAD-16 Filter pCi/Filter Uranium-234 42.5 47.5 29.4-71.6 Acceptable ERA 2nd/2012 05/18/12 MRAD-16 Filter pCi/Filter Uranium-238 44.5 47.4 30.4-65.1 Acceptable ERA 2nd/2012 05/18/12 MRAD-16 Filter pCi/Filter Uranium-Total 89.4 96.7 53.5-147 Acceptable Uranium-ERA 2nd/2012 05/18/12 MRAD-16 Filter ug/Filter Total(mass) 134 141 90.2-198 Acceptable ERA 2nd/2012 05/18/12 MRAD-16 Filter pCi/Filter Americium-241 72.4 68.8 42.4-93.1 Acceptable ERA 2nd/2012 05/18/12 MRAD-16 Filter pCi/Filter Cesium-134 260 279 182-345 Acceptable ERA 2nd/2012 05/18/12 MRAD-16 Filter pCi/Filter Cesium-137 1210 1130 849-1480 Acceptable ERA 2nd/2012 05/18/12 MRAD-16 Filter pCI/Filter Cobalt-60 942 880 681-1100 Acceptable ERA 2nd/2012 05/18/12 MRAD-16 Filter pCi/Filter Manganese-54 <7.68 <50.0 0-50.0 Acceptable ERA 2nd/2012 05/18/12 MRAD-16 Filter pCi/Filter Zinc-65 1040 897 642-1240 Acceptable ERA 2nd/2012 05/18/12 MRAD-16 Filter pCi/Filter Strontium-90 87 89.6 43.8-134 Acceptable ERA 2nd/2012 05/18/12 MRAD-16 Filter pCi/Filter Iron-55 776 739 229-1440 Acceptable Uranium-ERA 2nd/2012 05/18/12 MRAD-16 Filter ug/Filter Total(mass) 147 141 90.2-198 Acceptable ERA 2nd/2012 05/18/12 MRAD-16 Filter pCi/Filter Gross Alpha 93.9 77.8 26.1-121 Acceptable ERA 2nd/2012 05/18/12 MRAD-16 Filter pCi/Filter Gross Beta 57.3 52.5 33.2-76.5 Acceptable ERA 2nd/2012 05/18/12 MRAD-16 Water pCi/L Uranium-234 92.6 105 78.9-135 Acceptable ERA 2nd/2012 05/18/12 MRAD-16 Water pCi/L Uranium-238 94.9 104 79.3-128 Acceptable ERA 2nd/2012 05/18/12 MRAD-16 Water pCi/L Uranium-Total 192.6 214 157-277 Acceptable Uranium-ERA 2nd/2012 05/18/12 MRAD-16 Water ug/L Total(mass) 285 312 249-377 Acceptable ERA 2nd/2012 05/18/12 MRAD-16 Water pCi/L Americium-241 132 135 91.0-181 Acceptable ERA 2nd/2012 05/18/12 MRAD-16 Water pCl/L Plutonium-238 127 135 99.9-168 Acceptable ERA 2nd/2012 05/18/12 MRAD-16 Water pC/L Plutonium-239 107 112 86.9-141 Acceptable ERA 2nd/2012 05/18/12 MRAD-16 Water pCi/L Cesium-134 580 609 447-700 Acceptable ERA 2nd/2012 05/18/12 MRAD-16 Water pCi/L Cesium-137 1290 1250 1060-1500 Acceptable ERA 2nd/2012 05/18/12 MRAD-16 Water pCi/L Cobalt-60 910 875 760-1020 Acceptable ERA 2nd/2012 05/18/12 MRAD-16 Water pCi/L Manganese-54 <5.0 <100 0.00-100 Acceptable ERA 2nd/2012 05/18/12 MRAD-16 Water pCi/L Zinc-65 822 749 624-945 Acceptable ERA 2nd/2012 05/18/12 MRAD-16 Water pCi/L Strontium-90 970 989 644-1310 Acceptable ERA 2nd/2012 05/18/12 MRAD-16 Water pCI/L Iron-55 987 863 514-1170 Acceptable
| |
| | |
| Laboratories LLC P.O. Box 30712, Charleston, SC 29417 2012 ANNUAL QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT Page 16 of 60 ERA 2nd/2012 05/18/12 MRAD-16 Water pCi/L Gross Alpha 95.9 103 36.6-160 Acceptable ERA 2nd/2012 05/18/12 MRAD-16 Water pC/L Gross Beta 50 43.7 25.0-64.7 Acceptable ERA 2nd/2012 05/18/12 MRAD-16 Water pCi/L Tritium 8740 9150 6130-13000 Acceptable 13800-ERA 2nd/2012 05/24/12 RAD-89 Water pCi/L Tritium 1700 15800 17400 Acceptable MAPEP False Pos.
| |
| MAPEP 2nd/2012 05/03/12 GrF24 Filter Bq/sample Gross Alpha 0.000 0.000 Test Acceptable MAPEP False Pos.
| |
| MAPEP 2nd/2012 05/03/12 GrF24 Filter Bq/sample Gross Beta 0.000 0.000 Test Acceptable EZA 2nd/2012 06/14/12 E10175 Cartridge pC lodine-131 9.67E+01 9.72E+01 0.99 Acceptable EZA 2nd/2012 06/14/12 E10176 Milk pCi/L Strontium-89 1.11E+02 9.98E+01 1.11 Acceptable EZA 2nd/2012 06/14/12 E10176 Milk pCi/L Strontium-90 1.06E+02 1.27E+01 0.83 Acceptable EZA 2nd/2012 06/14/12 E10177 Milk pCi/L Iodine-131 9.94E+01 9.97E+01 1.00 Acceptable EZA 2nd/2012 06/14/12 E10177 Milk pCi/L Cerium-141 8.62E+01 8.22E+01 1.05 Acceptable EZA 2nd/2012 06/14/12 E10177 Milk pCi/L Chromium-51 3.76E+02 4.02E+02 0.94 Acceptable EZA 2nd/2012 06/14/12 E10177 Milk pCi/L Cesium-134 1.63E+02 1.74E+02 0.93- Acceptable EZA 2nd/2012 06/14/12 E10177 Milk pCi/L Cesium-137 2.08E+02 2.12E+02 0.98 Acceptable EZA 2nd/2012 06/14/12 E10177 Milk pCi/L Cobalt-58 8.94E+01 9.23E+01 0.97 Acceptable EZA 2nd/2012 06/14/12 E10177 Milk pCI/L Manganese-54 1.27E+02 1.32E+02 0.96 Acceptable EZA 2nd/2012 06/14/12 E10177 Milk pCi/L Iron-59 1.46E+02 1.28E+02 1.14 Acceptable EZA 2nd/2012 06/14/12 E10177 Milk pCI/L Zinc-65 2.22E+02 1.99E+02 1.11 Acceptable EZA 2nd/2012 06/14/12 E10177 Milk pCi/L Cobalt-60 3.52E+02 3.55E+02 0.99 Acceptable EZA 2nd/2012 06/14/12 E10178 Water pCi/L lodine-131 9.94E+01 9.94E+01 1.00 Acceptable EZA 2nd/2012 06/14/12 E10178 Water pCi/L Cerium-141 1.31E+02 1.12E+02 1.17 Acceptable EZA 2nd/2012 06/14/12 E10178 Water pCi/L Chromium-51 5.51E+02 5.48E+02 1.01 Acceptable EZA 2nd/2012 06/14/12 E10178 Water pCi/L Cesium-134 2.22E+02 2.38E+02 0.93 Acceptable EZA 2nd/2012 06/14/12 E10178 Water pCi/L Cesium-137 2.91E+02 2.89E+02 1.01 Acceptable EZA 2nd/2012 06/14/12 E10178 Water pC/L Cobalt-58 1.35E+02 1.26E+02 1.07 Acceptable EZA 2nd/2012 06/14/12 E10178 Water pCi/L Manganese-54 1.83E+02 1.80E+02 1.02 Acceptable EZA 2nd/2012 06/14/12 E10178 Water pCi/L Iron-59 2.00E+02 1.74E+02 1.15 Acceptable EZA 2nd/2012 06/14/12 E10178 Water pCl/L Zinc-65 2.94E+02 2.72E+02 1.08 Acceptable EZA 2nd/2012 06/14/12 E10178 Water pCl/L Cobalt-60 5.04E+02 4.84E+02 1.04 Acceptable MAPEP MAPEP 3rd/2012 07/26/12 MaS26 Soil mg/kg Americium-241 152 159 111-207 Acceptable MAPEP MAPEP 3rd/2012 07/26/12 MaS26 Soil mg/kg Cesium-134 754 828 580-1076 Acceptable MAPEP False Pos MAPEP 3rd/2012 07/26/12 MaS26 Soil mg/kg Cesium-137 0 0 Test Acceptable MAPEP MAPEP 3rd/2012 07/26/12 MaS26 Soil mg/kg Cobalt-57 1430.0 1179 825-1533 Warning MAPEP MAPEP 3rd/2012 07/26/12 MaS26 Soil mg/kg Cobalt-60 0.97 1.56 Sens. Eval. Acceptable MAPEP MAPEP 3rd/2012 07/26/12 MaS26 Soil mg/kg Iron-55 1456 1370 959-1781 Acceptable MAPEP MAPEP 3rd/2012 07/26/12 MaS26 Soil mg/kg Manganese-54 596 558 391-725 Acceptable MAPEP MAPEP 3rd/2012 07/26/12 MaS26 Soil mg/kg Nickel-63 888.0 862 603-1121 Acceptable MAPEP MAPEP 3rd/2012 07/26/12 MaS26 Soil mg/kg Plutonium-238 127.0 136 95-177 Acceptable MAPEP Plutonium-MAPEP 3rd/2012 07/26/12 MaS26 Soil mg/kg 239/240 61.13 65.8 46.1-85.5 Acceptable MAPEP MAPEP 3rd/2012 07/26/12 MaS26 Soil mg/kg Potassium-40 1495 1491 1044-1938 Acceptable MAPEP MAPEP 3rd/2012 07/26/12 MaS26 Soil mg/kg Strontium-90 391.7 392 274-510 Acceptable MAPEP MAPEP 3rd/2012 07/26/12 MaS26 Soil mg/kg Technetium-99 345.3 374 262-486 Acceptable MAPEP MAPEP 3rd/2012 07/26/12 MaW26 Water Bq/L Americium-241 1.5067 1.630 1.14-2.12 Acceptable MAPEP False Pos MAPEP 3rd/2012 07/26/12 MaW26 Water Bq/L Cesium-134 0.09 0.0 Test Acceptable MAPEP MAPEP 3rd/2012 07/26/12 MaW26 Water Bq/L Cesium-137 41.2 39.9 27.9-51.9 Acceptable MAPEP 3rd/2012 07/26/12 MAPEP Water Ba/L Cobalt-57 34.45 32.9 23.0-42.8 Acceptable
| |
| | |
| Laboratories LLC P.O. Box 30712, Charleston, SC 29417 2012 ANNUAL QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT Page 17 of 60 MaW26 MAPEP MAPEP 3rd/2012 07/26/12 MaW26 Water Bq/L Cobalt-60 23.90 23.7 16.60-30.84 Acceptable MAPEP MAPEP 3rd/2012 07/26/12 MaW26 Water Bq/L Hydrogen-3 481.7 437 306-568 Acceptable MAPEP MAPEP 3rd/2012 07/26/12 MaW26 Water Bq/L Iron-55 88.10 81.9 57.3-106.5 Acceptable MAPEP MAPEP 3rd/2012 07/26/12 MaW26 Water Bq/L Manganese-54 33.3 31.8 22.3-41.3 Acceptable MAPEP MAPEP 3rd/2012 07/26/12 MaW26 Water Bq/L Nickel-63 59.6 60.0 42.0-78.0 Acceptable MAPEP MAPEP 3rd/2012 07/26/12 MaW26 Water Bq/L Plutonium-238 0.555 0.629 0.110-0.818 Acceptable MAPEP Plutonium-MAPEP 3rd/2012 07/26/12 MaW26 Water Bq/L 239/240 1.230 1.340 0.94-1.74 Acceptable MAPEP MAPEP 3rd/2012 07/26/12 MaW26 Water Bq/L Potassium40 156.5 142 99-185 Acceptable MAPEP False Pos MAPEP 3rd/2012 07/26/12 MaW26 Water Bq/L Strontium-90 0.01 0.00 Test Acceptable MAPEP MAPEP 3rd/2012 07/26/12 MaW26 Water Bq/L Technetium-99 26.3 27.90 19.5-36.3 Acceptable MAPEP Uranium-MAPEP 3rd/2012 07/26/12 MaW26 Water Bq/L 234/233 0.381 0.39 0.270-0.510 Acceptable MAPEP MAPEP 3rd/2012 07/26/12 MaW26 Water Bq/L Uranium-238 2.537 2.76 1.93-3.59 Acceptable MAPEP False Pos MAPEP 3rd/2012 07/26/12 MaW26 Water Bq/L Zinc-65 -0.220 0.00 Test Acceptable MAPEP MAPEP 3rd/2012 07/26/12 GrW26 Water Bq/L Gross Alpha 2.043 2.140 0.64-3.64 Acceptable MAPEP MAPEP 3rd/2012 07/26/12 GrW26 Water Bq/L Gross Beta 6.820 6.36 3.18-9.54 Acceptable MAPEP 0.0131-MAPEP 3rd/2012 07/26/12 RdF26 Filter ug/sampte Uranium-235 0.200 0.019 0.243 Acceptable MAPEP MAPEP 3rd/2012 07/26/12 RdF26 Filter ug/sample Uranium-238 9.5 10.0 7.0-13.0 Acceptable MAPEP MAPEP 3rd/2012 07/26/12 RdF26 Filter ug/sample Uranium-Total 9.98 10.0 7.0-13.0 Acceptable MAPEP MAPEP 3rd/2012 07/26/12 RdF26 Filter ug/sample Americium-241 0.660 0.073 0.051-0.095 Acceptable MAPEP MAPEP 3rd/2012 07/26/12 RdF26 Filter Bq/sample Ceslum-134 2.29 2.38 1.67-3.09 Acceptable MAPEP MAPEP 3rd/2012 07/26/12 RdF26 Filter Bq/sample Cesium-137 1.910 1.79 1.25-2.33 Acceptable MAPEP False Pos MAPEP 3rd/2012 07/26/12 RdF26 Filter Bq/sample Cobalt-57 0.008 0.00 Test Acceptable MAPEP MAPEP 3rd/2012 07/26/12 RdF26 Filter Bq/sample Cobalt-60 2.235 2.18 1.527-2.837 Acceptable MAPEP MAPEP 3rd/2012 07/26/12 RdF26 Filter Bq/sample Manganese-54 3.440 3.24 2.27-4.21 Acceptable MAPEP MAPEP 3rd/2012 07/26/12 RdF26 Filter Bq/sample Plutonium-238 0.004 0.002 Sens. Eval. Acceptable MAPEP Plutonium-MAPEP 3rd/2012 07/26/12 RdF26 Filter Bq/sample 239/240 0.088 0.0970 0.068-0.126 Acceptable MAPEP . False Pos MAPEP 3rd/2012 07/26/12 RdF26 Filter Bq/sample Strontium-90 0.012 0.00 Test Acceptable MAPEP Uranium- 0.0132- Not MAPEP 3rd/2012 07/26/12 RdF26 Filter Bq/sample 234/233 0.010 0.0188 0.0244 Acceptable MAPEP MAPEP 3rd/2012 07/26/12 RdF26 Filter Bq/sample Uranium-238 0.111 0.124 0.087-0.161 Acceptable MAPEP MAPEP 3rd/2012 07/26/12 RdF26 Filter Bq/sample Zinc-65 3.460 2.99 2.09-3.89 Acceptable MAPEP MAPEP 3rd/2012 07/26/12 RdF26 Filter Bq/sample Gross Alpha 0.780 1.200 0.4-2.0 Acceptable MAPEP MAPEP 3rd/2012 07/26/12 RdF26 Filter Bq/sample Gross Beta 2.59 2.40 1.2-3.6 Acceptable MAPEP False Pos MAPEP 3rd/2012 07/26/12 RdF26 Filter Bq/sample Americium-241 0.005 0.00 Test Acceptable MAPEP MAPEP 3rd/2012 07/26/12 RdV26 Vegetation Bq/sample Cesium-134 7.655 8.43 5.90-10.96 Acceptable MAPEP False Pos MAPEP 3rd/2012 07/26/12 RdV26 Vegetation Bq/sample Cesium-137 -0.025 0.00 Test Acceptable MAPEP MAPEP 3rd/2012 07/26/12 RdV26 Vegetation Bq/sample Cobalt-57 11.950 12.00 8.4-15.6 Acceptable MAPEP MAPEP 3rd/2012 07/26/12 RdV26 Vegetation B/sample Cobalt-60 6.255 6.05 4.24-7.87 Acceptable
| |
| | |
| Laboratories LLC P.O. Box 30712, Charleston, SC 29417 2012 ANNUAL QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT Page 18 of 60 MAPEP False Pos MAPEP 3rd/2012 07/26/12 RdV26 Vegetation Bq/sample Manganese-54 0.029 0.00 Test Acceptable MAPEP MAPEP 3rd/2012 07/26/12 RdV26 Vegetation Bq/sample Plutonium-238 0.194 0.219 0.153-0.285 Acceptable MAPEP Plutonium-MAPEP 3rd/2012 07/26/12 RdV26 Vegetation Bq/sample 239/240 0.1226 0.152 0.106-0.198 Acceptable MAPEP MAPEP 3rd/2012 07/26/12 RdV26 Vegetation Bq/sample Strontium-90 1.613 2.11 1.48-2.74 Warning MAPEP Uranium- 0.0288-MAPEP 3rd/2012 07/26/12 RdV26 Vegetation Bq/sample 234/233 0.030 0.411 0.0534 Warning MAPEP MAPEP 3rd/2012 07/26/12 RdV26 Vegetation Bq/sample Uranium-238 0.224 0.278 0.195-0.361 Acceptable MAPEP MAPEP 3rd/2012 07/26/12 RdV26 Vegetation Bq/sample Zinc-65 9.720 8.90 6.23-11.57 Acceptable EZA 3rd/2012 11/06/12 E10281 Cartridge pCi Iodine-131 1.02E+02 9.64E+01 1.06 Acceptable EZA 3rd/2012 11/06/12 E10283 Milk pCi/L Strontium-89 9.87E+01 9.96E+01 0.99 Acceptable EZA 3rd/2012 11/06/12 E10283 Milk pCI/L Strontium-90 1.44E+01 1.60E+01 0.9 Acceptable EZA 3rd/2012 11/06/12 E10284 Milk pCi/L Iodine-131 9.69E+01 9.96E+01 0.97 Acceptable EZA 3rd/2012 11/06/12 E10284 Milk pCi/L Cerium-141 1.61E+02 1.64E+02 0.98 Acceptable EZA 3rd/2012 11/06/12 E10284 Milk pCi/L Chromium-51 2.92E+02 2.48E+02 1.18 Acceptable EZA 3rd/2012 11/06/12 E10284 Milk pCi/L Cesium-134 9.85E+01 1.08E+02 0.91 Acceptable EZA 3rd/2012 11/06/12 E10284 Milk pCi/L Cesium-137 1.76E+02 1.74E+02 1.01 Acceptable EZA 3rd/2012 11/06/12 E10284 Milk pCi/L Cobalt-58 9.72E+01 1.00E+02 0.97 Acceptable EZA 3rd/2012 11/06/12 E10284 Milk pCi/L Manganese-54 1.98E+02 1.96E+02 1.01 Acceptable EZA 3rd/2012 11/06/12 E10284 Milk pCi/L Iron-59 1.62E+02 1.52E+02 1.07 Acceptable EZA 3rd/2012 11/06/12 E10284 Milk pCi/L Zinc-65 2.08E+02 1.92E+02 1.08 Acceptable EZA 3rd/2012 11/06/12 E10284 Milk pCi/L Cobalt-60 1.59E+02 1.52E+02 1.05 Acceptable EZA 3rd/2012 11/06/12 E10285 Water pCi/L Iodine-131 1.10E+02 9.99E+01 1.1 Acceptable EZA 3rd/2012 11/06/12 E10285 Water pCi/L Cerium-141 2.49E+02 2.51E+02 0.99 Acceptable EZA 3rd/2012 11/06/12 E10285 Water pCi/L Chromium-51 3.75E+02 3.80E+02 0.99 Acceptable EZA 3rd/2012 11/06/12 E10285 Water pCi/L Cesium-134 1.51E+02 1.66E+02 0.91 Acceptable EZA 3rd/2012 11/06/12 E10285 Water pCi/L Cesium-137 2.72E+02 2.67E+02 1.02 Acceptable EZA 3rd/2012 11/06/12 E10285 Water pCi/L Cobalt-58 1.56E+02 1.54E+02 1.01 Acceptable EZA 3rd/2012 11/06/12 E10285 Water pCi/L Manganese-54 3.16E+02 3.00E+02 1.05 Acceptable EZA 3rd/2012 11/06/12 E10285 Water pCi/L Iron-59 2.65E+02 2.33E+02 1.14 Acceptable EZA 3rd/2012 11/06/12 E10285 Water pCi/L Zinc-65 3.20E+02 2.95E+02 1.09 Acceptable EZA 3rd/2012 11/06/12 E10285 Water pCi/L Cobalt-60 2.42E+02 2.33E+02 1.04 Acceptable MAPEP MAPEP 4th/2012 11/26/12 MaS27 Soil Bq/kg Americium-241 106.67 111 78-144 Acceptable MAPEP MAPEP 4th/2012 11/26/12 MaS27 Soil Bq/kg Cesium-134 839.5 939 657-1221 Acceptable MAPEP MAPEP 4th/2012 11/26/12 MaS27 Soil Bq/kg Cesium-137 1230.0 1150 805-1495 Acceptable MAPEP MAPEP 4th/2012 11/26/12 MaS27 Soil Bq/kg Cobalt-57 1605 1316 921-1711 Acceptable MAPEP MAPEP 4th/2012 11/26/12 MaS27 Soil Bq/kg Cobalt-60 551.5 531 372-690 Acceptable MAPEP MAPEP 4th/2012 11/26/12 MaS27 Soil Bq/kg Iron-55 459.3 508 356-660 Acceptable MAPEP MAPEP 4th/2012 11/26/12 MaS27 Soil Bq/kg Manganese-54 1015 920 644-1196 Acceptable MAPEP MAPEP 4th/2012 11/26/12 MaS27 Soil Bq/kg Plutonium-238 104.6 106 74.1-137.5 Acceptable MAPEP Plutonium-MAPEP 4th/2012 11/26/12 MaS27 Soil Bq/kg 239/240 132.33 134 94-174 Acceptable MAPEP MAPEP 4th/2012 11/26/12 MaS27 Soil Bq/kg Potassium-40 723 632 442-822 Acceptable MAPEP MAPEP 4th/2012 11/26/12 MaS27 Soil Bq/kg Strontium-90 476.7 508 356-660 Warning MAPEP MAPEP 4th/2012 11/26/12 MaS27 Soil Bq/kg Technetium-99 385.3 469 328-610 Acceptable MAPEP Uranium-MAPEP 4th/2012 11/26/12 MaS27 Soil Bq/kg 234/233 51.6 60 42.2-78.4 Acceptable MAPEP MAPEP 4th/2012 11/26/12 MaS27 Soil Bq/kg Uranium-238 238.33 263 184-342 Acceptable MAPEP 4th/2012 11/26/12 MAPEP Soil Balkg Zinc-65 721.5 606 424-788 Acceptable
| |
| | |
| Laboratories LLC P.O. Box 30712, Charleston, SC 29417 2012 ANNUAL QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT Page 19 of 60 MaS27 MAPEP MAPEP 4th/2012 11/26/12 MaW27 Water Bq/L Americium-241 0.9407 1.06 0.74-1.38 Acceptable MAPEP MAPEP 4th/2012 11/26/12 MaW27 Water Bq/L Cesium-134 20.6 23.2 16.2-30.2 Acceptable MAPEP MAPEP 4th/2012 11/26/12 MaW27 Water Bq/L Cesium-137 17.05 16.7 11.7-21.7 Acceptable MAPEP MAPEP 4th/2012 11/26/12 MaW27 Water Bq/L Cobalt-57 29.45 29.3 20.5-38.1 Acceptable MAPEP False MAPEP 4th/2012 11/26/12 MaW27 Water Bq/L Cobalt-60 0.03 0.0 Positive Acceptable MAPEP MAPEP 4th/2012 11/26/12 MaW27 Water Bq/L Hydrogen-3 334 334 234-434 Acceptable MAPEP MAPEP 4th/2012 11/26/12 MaW27 Water Bq/L Manganese-54 18.4 17.8 12.5-23.1 Acceptable MAPEP MAPEP 4th/2012 11/26/12 MaW27 Water Bq/L Nickel-63 66.2 66.3 46.4-86.2 Acceptable MAPEP Sensitivity MAPEP 4th/2012 11/26/12 MaW27 Water Bq/L Plutonium-238 0.0088 0.0 Eval. Acceptable MAPEP Plutonium-MAPEP 4th/2012 11/26/12 MaW27 Water Bq/L 239/240 1.44 1.61 1.13-2.09 Acceptable MAPEP MAPEP 4th/2012 11/26/12 MaW27 Water Bq/L Potassium-40 140.5 134 94-174 Acceptable MAPEP MAPEP 4th/2012 11/26/12 MaW27 Water Bq/L Strontium-90 11.13 12.2 8.5-15.9 Acceptable MAPEP MAPEP 4th/2012 11/26/12 MaW27 Water Bq/L Technetium-99 4.5 4.58 3.21-5.95 Acceptable MAPEP Uranium-MAPEP 4th/2012 11/26/12 MaW27 Water Bq/L 234/233 0.414 0.451 0.316-0.586 Acceptable MAPEP MAPEP 4th/2012 11/26/12 MaW27 Water Bq/L Uranium-238 2.96 3.33 2.33-4.33 Acceptable MAPEP MAPEP 4th/2012 11/26/12 MaW27 Water Bq/L Zinc-65 28.15 25.9 18.1-33.7 Acceptable MAPEP MAPEP 4th/2012 11/26/12 GrW27 Water Bq/L Gross Alpha 1.737 1.79 0.54-3.04 Acceptable MAPEP MAPEP 4th/2012 11/26/12 GrW27 Water Bq/L Gross Beta 8.893 9.1 4.6-13.7 Acceptable MAPEP MAPEP 4th/2012 11/26/12 XaW27 Water Bq/L lodine-129 6.229 6.82 4.77-8.87 Acceptable MAPEP 0.0104-MAPEP 4th/2012 11/26/12 RdF27 Filter up/sample Uranium-235 0.0154 0.0148 0.0192 Acceptable MAPEP MAPEP 4th/2012 11/26/12 RdF27 Filter uq/sample Uranium-238 7.77 8 5.6-10.4 Acceptable MAPEP MAPEP 4th/2012 11/26/12 RdF27 Filter uq/sample Uranium-Total 7.785 8.1 5.7-10.5 Acceptable MAPEP 0.0546-MAPEP 4th/2012 11/26/12 RdF27 Filter uq/sample Americium-241 0.0716 0.078 0.1014 Acceptable MAPEP MAPEP 4th/2012 11/26/12 RdF27 Filter uq/sample Ceslum-134 2.795 2.74 1.92-3.56 Acceptable MAPEP False MAPEP 4th/2012 11/26/12 RdF27 Filter uq/sample Cesium-137 -0.016 0 Positive Acceptable MAPEP MAPEP 4th/2012 11/26/12 RdF27 Filter u/sample Cobalt-57 2.265 1.91 1.34-2.48 Acceptable MAPEP MAPEP 4th/2012 11/26/12 RdF27 Filter up/sample Cobalt-60 1.865 1.728 1.210-2.246 Acceptable MAPEP MAPEP 4th/2012 11/26/12 RdF27 Filter up/sample Manganese-54 2.465 2.36 1.65-3.07 Acceptable MAPEP 0.0438-MAPEP 4th/2012 11/26/12 RdF27 Filter up/sample Plutonium-238 0.061 0.0625 0.0813 Acceptable MAPEP Plutonium- Sensitivity MAPEP 4th/2012 11/26/12 RdF27 Filter u/sample 239/240 -0.002 0.00081 Eval. Acceptable MAPEP MAPEP 4th/2012 11/26/12 RdF27 Filter up/sample Strontium-90 0.914 1.03 0.72-1.34 Acceptable MAPEP Uranium- 0.0099- Not MAPEP 4th/2012 11/26/12 RdF27 Filter up/sample 234/233 0.009 0.0141 0.0183 Acceptable MAPEP Not MAPEP 4th/2012 11/26/12 RdF27 Filter up/sample Uranium-238 0.087 0.1 0.070-0.130 Acceptable MAPEP False MAPEP 4th/2012 11/26/12 RdF27 Filter u/sample Zinc-65 -0.154 0 Positive Acceptable MAPEP Not MAPEP 4th/2012 11/26/12 GrF27 Filter Bqlsample Gross Alpha 0.2253 0.97 0.29-1.65 Acceptable MAPEP MAPEP 4th/2012 11/26/12 GrF27 Filter Bq/sample Gross Beta 1.93 1.92 0.96-2.88 Acceptable MAPEP MAPEP 4th/2012 11/26/12 RdV27 Vegetation Bq/sample Americium-241 0.142 0.163 0.114-0.212 Acceptable
| |
| | |
| Laboratories LLC P.O. Box 30712, Charleston, SC 29417 2012 ANNUAL QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT Page 20 of 60 MAPEP MAPEP 4th/2012 11/26/12 RdV27 Vegetation Bq/sample Cesium-134 6.355 6.51 4.56-8.46 Acceptable MAPEP MAPEP 4th/2012 11/26/12 RdV27 Vegetation Bq/sample Cesium-137 4.575 4.38 3.07-5.69 Acceptable MAPEP MAPEP 4th/2012 11/26/12 RdV27 Vegetation Bq/sample Cobalt-57 6.04 5.66 3.96-7.36 Acceptable MAPEP MAPEP 4th/2012 11/26/12 RdV27 Vegetation Bq/sample Cobalt-60 5.44 5.12 3.58-6.66 Acceptable MAPEP MAPEP 4th/2012 11/26/12 RdV27 Vegetation Bq/sample Manganese-54 3.565 3.27 2.29-4.25 Acceptable MAPEP MAPEP 4th/2012 11/26/12 RdV27 Vegetation Bq/sample Plutonium-238 0.176 0.187 0.131-0.243 Acceptable MAPEP Plutonium-MAPEP 4th/2012 11/26/12 RdV27 Vegetation Bq/sample 239/240 0.12 0.123 0.086-0.160 Acceptable MAPEP False MAPEP 4th/2012 11/26/12 RdV27 Vegetation Bq/sample Strontium-90 0.0018 0 Positive Acceptable MAPEP Uranium- 0.0180-MAPEP 4th/2012 11/26/12 RdV27 Vegetation Bq/sample 234/233 0.024 0.0257 0.0334 Acceptable MAPEP MAPEP 4th/2012 11/26/12 RdV27 Vegetation Bq/sample Uranium-238 0.143 0.158 0.111-0.205 Acceptable MAPEP MAPEP 4th/2012 11/26/12 RdV27 Vegetation Bq/sample Uranium-Total 11.1 12.7 8.9-16.5 Acceptable MAPEP False MAPEP 4th/2012 11/26/12 RdV27 Vegetation Bq/sample Zinc-65 -0.04 0 Positive Acceptable MAPEP MAPEP 4th/2012 11/26/12 XaW25 Water Bq/sample lodine-129 8.723 9.5 6.7 -12.4 Acceptable ERA 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Soil pCi/kg Uranium-234 4310 4310 2830-5540 Acceptable ERA 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Soil pCi/kg Uranium-238 4330 4280 2860-5440 Acceptable ERA 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Soil pCi/kg Uranium-Total 4849 5190 2960 - 7010 Acceptable Uranium-Total ERA 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Soil ug/kg (mass) 8860 8790 5960-10900 Acceptable ERA 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Soil pCi/kg Uranium-234 3720 3400 2080-4360 Acceptable ERA 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Soil pCi/kg Uranium-238 3350 3420 2120-4340 Acceptable ERA 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Soil pCi/kg Uranium-Total 7232 6970 3780-9200 Acceptable Uranium-Total ERA 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Soil ug/kg (mass) 10400 10200 5620-12800 Acceptable ERA 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Soil pCi/kg Actinium-228 1400 1240 795-1720 Acceptable ERA 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Soil pCi/kg Americium-241 847 728 426-946 Acceptable ERA 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Soil pCi/kg Bismuth-212 1300 1240 330-1820 Acceptable ERA 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Soil pCI/kg Bismuth-214 1310 1290 777-1860 Acceptable ERA 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Soil pCi/kg Cesium-134 2210 1980 1290-2380 Acceptable ERA 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Soil pCi/kg Cesium-137 4140 3470 2660-4460 Acceptable ERA 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Soil pCi/kg Cobalt-60 5270 4310 2910-5930 Acceptable ERA 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Soil pCi/kg Lead-212 1250 1240 812-1730 Acceptable ERA 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Soil pCi/kg Lead-214 1580 1290 753-1920 Acceptable ERA 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Soil pCi/kg Manganese-54 <35 < 1000 0.00-1000 Acceptable ERA 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Soil pCi/kg Plutonium-238 1250 981 590-1350 Acceptable ERA 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Soil pCi/kg Plutonium-239 1110 871 569-1200 Acceptable ERA 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Soil pCi/kg Potassium-40 11000 12300 8980-16500 Acceptable ERA 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Soil pCi/kg Thorium-234 5120 3420 1080-6430 Acceptable ERA 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Soil pCi/kg Zinc-65 3770 2880 2290-3830 Acceptable ERA 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Soil pCi/kg Strontium-90 6670 6860 2620-10800 Acceptable ERA 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Soil pCi/kg Uranium-234 2640 2530 1600 - 3140 Acceptable ERA 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Soil pCi/kg Uranium-238 2450 2560 1560 - 3250 Acceptable ERA 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Soil pCi/kg Uranium-Total 5200 5190 2960-7010 Acceptable Uranium-Total ERA 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Soil ug/kg (mass) 7286 7570 4160-9520 Acceptable Uranium-Total ERA 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Soil ug/kg (mass) 7430 7570 4160-9520 Acceptable ERA 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Soil pCi/kg Americium-241 3040 2980 1700 - 4090 Acceptable ERA 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Soil pCi/kg Curium-244 697 642 316 - 1000 Acceptable ERA 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Soil pCi/kg Plutonium-238 3000 2880 1560 - 4220 Acceptable ERA 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Soil pCi/kg Plutonium-239 2910 2980 1850 - 4060 Acceptable ERA 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Soil pCi/kg Uranium-234 2580 2420 1660 - 3210 Acceptable
| |
| | |
| 0Laborato8es LLC P.O. Box 30712, Charleston, SC 29417 2012 ANNUAL QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT Page 21 of 60 ERA 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Soil pCi/kg Uranium-238 2660 2400 1690 - 3030 Acceptable ERA 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Soil pCI/kg Uranium-Total 5356 4920 3330 - 6120 Acceptable Uranium-Total ERA 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Soil ug/kg (mass) 7970 7180 4810-9120 Acceptable ERA 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Soil pCI/kg Cesium-134 1480 1380 790 - 1910 Acceptable ERA 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Soil pCi/kg Cesium-137 1570 1270 932 - 1760 Acceptable ERA 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Soil pCi/kg Cobalt-60 1800 1500 1010-2160 Acceptable ERA 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Soil pCi/kg Manganese-54 < 44.0 < 300 0.00 - 300 Acceptable 20700 -
| |
| ERA 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Soil pCi/kg Potassium-40 32100 28800 40800 Acceptable ERA 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Soil pCi/kg Zinc-65 3470 2770 2000 - 3790 Acceptable ERA 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Soil pCi/kg Strontium-90 6320 5440 3040 - 7220 Acceptable ERA 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Vegetation pCi/kg Americium-241 3780 3540 2160-4710 Acceptable ERA 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Vegetation pCi/kg Curium-244 1910 1850 906-2880 Acceptable ERA 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Vegetation pCi/kg Plutonium-238 2360 2250 1340-3080 Acceptable ERA 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Vegetation pCi/kg Plutonium-239 2270 2170 1330-2990 Acceptable ERA 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Vegetation pCi/kg Uranium-234 4310 4310 2830-5540 Acceptable ERA 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Vegetation pCi/kg Uranium-238 4330 4280 2860-5440 Acceptable ERA 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Vegetation pCi/kg Uranium-Total 8860 8790 5960-10900 Acceptable Uranium-Total ERA 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Vegetation ug/kg (mass) 13000 12800 8580-16200 Acceptable Uranium-Total ERA 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Vegetation ug/kg (mass) 11900 12800 8580-16200 Acceptable ERA 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Vegetation pCi/kg Cesium-134 2240 2350 1510-3050 Acceptable ERA 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Vegetation pCi/kg Cesium-137 2190 2070 1500-2880 Acceptable ERA 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Vegetation pCi/kg Cobalt-60 2360 2030 1400-2840 Acceptable ERA 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Vegetation pCi/kg Manganese-54 < 38.6 < 300 0.00 - 300 Acceptable 21400-ERA 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Vegetation pCi/kg Potassium-40 36000 29600 41500 Acceptable ERA 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Vegetation pCi/kg Zinc-65 2500 1970 1420-2760 Acceptable ERA 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Vegetation pCI/kg Strontium-90 9040 10000 5700-13300 Acceptable ERA 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Filter pCI/Filter Americium-241 64.7 67.1 41.4-90.8 Acceptable ERA 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Filter pCI/Filter Plutonium-238 50.3 55 37.7-72.3 Acceptable ERA 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Filter pCI/Filter Plutonium-239 53.8 56.8 41.1-74.2 Acceptable ERA 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Filter pCi/Filter Uranium-234 49.1 55.2 34.2-83.2 Acceptable ERA 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Filter pCi/Filter Uranium-238 55 54.7 35.3-75.6 Acceptable ERA 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Filter pCi/Filter Uranium-Total 106.6 112 62.0-170 Acceptable Uranium-Total ERA 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Filter ug/Filter (mass) 165 164 105-231 Acceptable ERA 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Filter pCi/Filter Cesium-134 393 429 273-532 Acceptable ERA 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Filter pCi/Filter Cesium-137 810 793 596-1040 Acceptable ERA 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Filter pC/Filter Cobalt-60 532 521 403-651 Acceptable ERA 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Filter pCi/Filter Manganese-54 < 3.97 < 50.0 0.00-50.0 Acceptable ERA 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Filter pCi/Filter Zinc-65 765 692 496-955 Acceptable ERA 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Filter pCi/Filter Strontium-90 167 166 81.1-249 Acceptable Uranium-Total ERA 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Filter pCi/Filter (mass) 152 164 105-231 Acceptable Uranium-Total ERA 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Filter pCI/Filter (mass) 160 164 105-231 Acceptable ERA 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Filter pCI/Filter Gross Alpha 110 87 30.3-87.8 Acceptable ERA 4th /2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Filter pCi/Filter Gross Beta 71.2 62.7 39.6-91.4 Acceptable ERA 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Water pCi/L Uranium-234 155 159 119-205 Acceptable ERA 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Water pCi/L Uranium-238 161 158 120-194 Acceptable ERA 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Water pCi/L Uranium-Total 323.6 324 238-419 Acceptable Uranium-Total ERA 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Water ug/L (mass) 482 473 337-572 Acceptable ERA 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Water pCi/L Americium-241 96.3 91.8 61.8-123 Acceptable ERA 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Water pCi/L Plutonium-238 98 97.7 72.3-122 Acceptable ERA 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Water pCi/L Plutonium-239 82.5 85.8 66.6-108 Acceptable
| |
| | |
| Laboratories LLC P.O. Box 30712, Charleston, SC 29417 2012 ANNUAL QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT Page 22 of 60 ERA 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Water pCi/L Uranium-234 155 159 119-205 Acceptable ERA 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Water pCi/L Uranium-238 161 158 120-194 Acceptable ERA 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Water pCi/L Uranium-Total 312.6 324 238-419 Acceptable Uranium-Total ERA 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Water ug/L (mass) 482 473 377-572 Acceptable ERA 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Water pCi/L Cesium-134 786 876 643-1010 Acceptable ERA 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Water pCi/L Cesium-137 2050 2040 1730-2440 Acceptable ERA 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Water pCi/L Cobalt-60 1270 1260 1090-1470 Acceptable ERA 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Water pCi/L Manganese-54 <7.27 <100 0.00-100 Acceptable ERA 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Water pCl/L Zinc-65 950 879 733-1110 Acceptable ERA 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Water pC/L Strontium-90 577 681 444-900 Acceptable ERA 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Water pCi/L Uranium-234 158 159 119-205 Acceptable ERA 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Water pCi/L Uranium-238 162 158 120-194 Acceptable ERA 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Water pCi/L Uranium-Total 327.7 324 238-419 Acceptable Uranium-Total ERA 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Water pCi/L (mass) 485 473 337-572 Acceptable ERA 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Water pCi/L Uranium-234 156 159 119-205 Acceptable ERA 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Water pCi/L Uranium-238 162 158 120-194 Acceptable ERA 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Water pCi/L Uranium-Total 318 324 238-419 Acceptable Uranium-Total ERA 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Water pCi/L (mass) 482 473 337-572 Acceptable Uranium-Total ERA 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Water pCi/L (mass) 463 473 337-572 Acceptable ERA 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Water pCi/L Iron-55 673 548 327-743 Acceptable ERA 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Water pCi/L Gross Alpha 62.1 76.9 27.3-119 Acceptable ERA 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Water pCi/L Gross Beta 57.4 62.6 35.8-92.7 Acceptable 12500-ERA 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Water pCi/L Tritium 17900 18700 26700 Acceptable Not ERA 3rd/2012 8/31/2012 RAD-90 Water pCi/L Barium-133 72.7 65.0 54.1-71.5 Acceptable ERA 3rd/2012 8/31/2012 RAD-90 Water pC/L Cesium-134 87.5 92.5 76.0-102 Acceptable ERA 3rd/2012 8/31/2012 RAD-90 Water pCi/L Cesium-137 219 216 194-239 Acceptable ERA 3rd/2012 8/31/2012 RAD-90 Water pCi/L Cobalt-50 55.6 51.3 46.2-59.0 Acceptable ERA 3rd/2012 8/31/2012 RAD-90 Water pCi/L Zinc-65 108 98.9 89.0-118 Acceptable ERA 3rd/2012 8/31/2012 RAD-90 Water pCi/L Gross Alpha 38.8 48.2 25.1-60.8 Acceptable ERA 3rd/2012 8/31/2012 RAD-90 Water pCVL Gross Beta 34.4 36.8 24.2-44.4 Acceptable ERA 3rd/2012 8/31/2012 RAD-90 Water pCi/L Gross Alpha 40.9 48.2 25.1-60.6 Acceptable ERA 3rd/2012 8/31/2012 RAD-90 Water pCi/L Radium-226 14.4 12.6 9.40-14.5 Acceptable Not ERA 3rd/2012 8/31/2012 RAD-90 Water pCi/L Radium-226 14.6 12.6 9.40-14.5 Acceptable ERA 3rd/2012 8/31/2012 RAD-90 Water pCi/L Radium-228 4.3 5.01 2.99-6.72 Acceptable ERA 3rd/2012 8/31/2012 RAD-90 Water pCi/L Uranium (Nat) 49.4 49.7 40.3-55.2 Acceptable Uranium (Nat)
| |
| ERA 3rd/2012 8/31/2012 RAD-90 Water ug/L mass 73.4 72.5 58.8-80.6 Acceptable ERA 3rd/2012 8/31/2012 RAD-90 Water pCi/L Tritium 7290 6790 5860-7470 Acceptable ERA 3rd/2012 8/31/2012 RAD-90 Water pCi/L Strontium-89 55 47.9 37.5-55.2 Acceptable ERA 3rd/2012 8/31/2012 RAD-90 Water pCi/L Strontium-90 27.1 28.7 20.9-33.4 Acceptable ERA 3rd/2012 8/31/2012 RAD-90 Water pC/L Strontium-89 48.3 47.9 37.5-55.2 Acceptable ERA 3rd/2012 8/31/2012 RAD-90 Water pCi/L Strontium-90 28.9 28.7 20.9-33.4 Acceptable ERA 3rd/2012 8/31/2012 RAD-91 Water pC/L Barium-133 84.9 84.8 71.3-93.3 Acceptable ERA 3rd/2012 8/31/2012 RAD-91 Water Ci/L Radium-226 12.8 15 11.2-17.2 Acceptable
| |
| | |
| Le !] Laboratories LLC P.O. Box 30712, Charleston, SC 29417 2012 ANNUAL QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT Page 23 of 60 TABLE 2 2012 ECKERT & ZIEGLER ANALYTICS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION RESULTS Quarter / Report Sample Sample Analyte / GEL Known Acceptance PT Provider Year Date Number Media Unit Nuclide Value value Range/ Ratio Evaluation EZA 1st/2012 02/08/12 E8197-278 Cartridge pCi lodine-131 9.52E+01 8.92E+01 1.07 Acceptable EZA 1st/2012 02/08/12 E8197-278 Milk pCi/L Strontium-89 8.78E+01 8.96E+01 0.98 Acceptable EZA 1st/2012 02/08/12 E8197-278 Milk pCi/L Strontium-90 1.51E+01 1.48E+01 1.02 Acceptable EZA 1st/2012 02/08/12 E8197-278 Milk pCi/L lodine-131 9.36E+01 9.02E+01 1.04 Acceptable EZA 1st/2012 02/08/12 E8197-278 Milk pCi/L Chromium-51 5.53E+02 5.66E+02 0.98 Acceptable EZA 1st/2012 02/08/12 E8197-278 Milk pCi/L Cesium-134 1.59E+02 1.71E+02 0.93 Acceptable EZA 1st/2012 02/08/12 E8197-278 Milk pCi/L Cesium-137 2.27E+02 2.10E+02 1.08 Acceptable EZA 1st/2012 02/08/12 E8197-278 Milk Ci/L Cobalt-58 2.18E+02 2.21E+02 0.99 Acceptable EZA 1st/2012 02/08/12 E8197-278 Milk pCi/L Manganese-54 2.52E+02 2.41E+02 1.05 Acceptable EZA 1st/2012 02/08/12 E8197-278 Milk Ci/L Iron-59 1.90E+02 1.83E+02 1.04 Acceptable EZA 1st/2012 02/08/12 E8197-278 Milk pCi/L Zinc-65 3.19E+02 2.91E+02 1.09 Acceptable EZA 1st/2012 02/08/12 E8197-278 Milk pCi/L Cobalt-60 2.82E+02 2.70E+02 1.04 Acceptable EZA 1st/2012 02/08/12 E8197-278 Milk pCi/L Cesium-141 1.00E+01 Not spiked None Acceptable EZA 1st/2012 02/08/12 E8197-278 Water pCi/L lodine-131 8.44E+01 8.87E+01 0.95 Acceptable EZA 1st/2012 02/08/12 E8197-278 Water Ci/L Chromium-51 5.32E+02 5.66E+02 0.94 Acceptable EZA 1st/2012 02/08/12 E8197-278 Water Ci/L Cesium-134 1.56E+02 1.71E+02 0.91 Acceptable EZA 1st/2012 02/08/12 E8197-278 Water Ci/L Cesium-137 2.06E+02 2.10E+02 0.98 Acceptable EZA 1st/2012 02/08/12 E8197-278 Water pCi/L Cobalt-58 2.02E+02 2.21E+02 0.92 Acceptable EZA 1st/2012 02/08/12 E8197-278 Water pCi/L Manganese-54 2.50E+02 2.41E+02 1.04 Acceptable EZA 1st/2012 02/08/12 E8197-278 Water pCi/L Iron-59 1.81E+02 1.83E+02 0.99 Acceptable EZA 1st/2012 02/08/12 E8197-278 Water pCi/L Zinc-65 2.95E+02 2.91E+02 1.01 Acceptable EZA 1st/2012 02/08/12 E8197-278 Water pCi/L Cobalt-60 2.58E+02 2.70E+02 0.96 Acceptable EZA 1st/2012 02/08/12 E8197-278 Water pCi/L Cesium-141 -9.60E+01 Not spiked None Acceptable EZA 1st/2012 03/15/12 E10043 Water pCi/L lodine-131 1.01E+02 9.38E-01 1.08 Acceptable EZA 1st/2012 03/15/12 E10043 Water pCi/L Cerium-141 2.64E+00 2.60E+00 1.01 Acceptable EZA 1st/2012 03/15/12 E10043 Water pCi/L Chromium-51 3.34E+02 3.09E+02 1.08 Acceptable EZA 1st/2012 03/15/12 E10043 Water pCi/L Cesium-134 9.90E-01 1.13E+02 0.94 Acceptable EZA 1st/2012 03/15/12 E10043 Water pCi/L Cesium-137 1.26E+02 1.13E+02 1.12 Acceptable EZA 1st/2012 03/15/12 E10043 Water pCi/L Cobalt-58 9.55E-01 9.34E-01 1.02 Acceptable EZA 1st/2012 03/15/12 E10043 Water pCi/L Manganese-54 1.49E+02 1.38E+02 1.08 Acceptable EZA 1st/2012 03/15/12 E10043 Water pCi/L Iron-59 1.40E+02 1.19E+02 1.18 Acceptable EZA 1st/2012 03/15/12 E10043 Water pCi/L Zinc-65 2.58E+02 2.35E+02 1.1 Acceptable EZA 1st/2012 03/15/12 E10043 Water pCi/L Cobalt-60 2.14E+02 1.97E+02 1.09 Acceptable EZA 1st/2012 03/15/12 E10041 Milk pCi/L Strontium-89 7.94E-01 7.99E-01 0.99 Acceptable EZA 1st/2012 03/15/12 E10041 Milk pCi/L Strontium-90 1.12E+01 1.14E+01 0.98 Acceptable EZA 1st/2012 03/15/12 E10042 Milk pCi/L lodine-131 1.02E+02 1.54E+02 1.10 Acceptable EZA 1st/2012 03/15/12 E10042 Milk pCi/L Cerium-141 2.64E+02 2.60E+02 1.01 Acceptable EZA 1st/2012 03/15/12 E10042 Milk pCi/L Chromium-51 4.46E+02 4.36E+02 1.02 Acceptable EZA 1st/2012 03/15/12 E10042 Milk pCi/L Cesium-134 1.31E+02 1.49E+02 0.88 Acceptable EZA 1st/2012 03/15/12 E10042 Milk nCi/L Cesium-137 1.62E+02 1.59E+02 1.02 Acceptable
| |
| | |
| '[ Laboratories LLc P.O. Box 30712, Charleston, SC 29417 2012 ANNUAL QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT Page 24 of 60 EZA 1st/2012 03/15/12 E10042 Milk Ci/L Cobalt-58 1.28E+02 1.32E+02 0.97 Acceptable EZA 1st/2012 03/15/12 E10042 Milk pCi/L Manganese-54 1.99E+02 1.95E+02 1.02 Acceptable EZA 1st/2012 03/15/12 E10042 Milk Ci/L Iron-59 1.96E+02 1.68E+02 1.17 Acceptable EZA 1st/2012 03/15/12 E10042 Milk pCi/L Zinc-65 3.50E+02 3.33E+02 1.05 Acceptable EZA 1st/2012 03/15/12 E10040 Milk pCi/L Cobalt-60 2.90E+02 2.79E+02 1.04 Acceptable EZA 1st/2012 03/15/12 E7465-278 Cartridge pCi Iodine-131 8.93E+01 9.42E+01 0.95 Acceptable EZA 2nd/2012 06/14/12 E10175 Cartridge pCi Iodine-131 9.67E+01 9.72E+01 0.99 Acceptable EZA 2nd/2012 06/14/12 E10176 Milk pCi/L Strontium-89 1.11E+02 9.98E+01 1.11 Acceptable EZA 2nd/2012 06/14/12 E10176 Milk pCi/L Strontium-90 1.06E+02 1.27E+01 0.83 Acceptable EZA 2nd/2012 06/14/12 E10177 Milk pCi/L lodine-131 9.94E+01 9.97E+01 1.00 Acceptable EZA 2nd/2012 06/14/12 E10177 Milk Ci/L Cerium-141 8.62E+01 8.22E+01 1.05 Acceptable EZA 2nd/2012 06/14/12 E10177 Milk pCi/L Chromium-51 3.76E+02 4.02E+02 0.94 Acceptable EZA 2nd/2012 06/14/12 E10177 Milk pCi/L Cesium-134 1.63E+02 1.74E+02 0.93 Acceptable EZA 2nd/2012 06/14/12 E10177 Milk Ci/L Cesium-137 2.08E+02 2.12E+02 0.98 Acceptable EZA 2nd/2012 06/14/12 E10177 Milk pCi/L Cobalt-58 8.94E+01 9.23E+01 0.97 Acceptable EZA 2nd/2012 06/14/12 E10177 Milk pCi/L Manganese-54 1.27E+02 1.32E+02 0.96 Acceptable EZA 2nd/2012 06/14/12 E10177 Milk pCi/L Iron-59 1.46E+02 1.28E+02 1.14 Acceptable EZA 2nd/2012 06/14/12 E10177 Milk Ci/L Zinc-65 2.22E+02 1.99E+02 1.11 Acceptable EZA 2nd/2012 06/14/12 E10177 Milk pCi/L Cobalt-60 3.52E+02 3.55E+02 0.99 Acceptable EZA 2nd/2012 06/14/12 E10178 Water pCi/L lodine-131 9.94E+01 9.94E+01 1.00 Acceptable EZA 2nd/2012 06/14/12 E10178 Water pCi/L Cerium-141 1.31E+02 1.12E+02 1.17 Acceptable EZA 2nd/2012 06/14/12 E10178 Water pCi/L Chromium-51 5.51E+02 5.48E+02 1.01 Acceptable EZA 2nd/2012 06/14/12 E10178 Water Ci/L Cesium-134 2.22E+02 2.38E+02 0.93 Acceptable EZA 2nd/2012 06/14/12 E10178 Water pCi/L Cesium-137 2.91E+02 2.89E+02 1.01 Acceptable EZA 2nd/2012 06/14/12 E10178 Water pCi/L Cobalt-58 1.35E+02 1.26E+02 1.07 Acceptable EZA 2nd/2012 06/14/12 E10178 Water Ci/L Manganese-54 1.83E+02 1.80E+02 1.02 Acceptable EZA 2nd/2012 06/14/12 E10178 Water Ci/L Iron-59 2.00E+02 1.74E+02 1.15 Acceptable EZA 2nd/2012 06/14/12 E10178 Water pCi/L Zinc-65 2.94E+02 2.72E+02 1.08 Acceptable EZA 2nd/2012 06/14/12 E10178 Water pCi/L Cobalt-60 5.04E+02 4.84E+02 1.04 Acceptable EZA 3rd/2012 11/06/12 E10281 Cartridge Ci lodine-131 1.02E+02 9.64E+01 1.06 Acceptable EZA 3rd/2012 11/06/12 E10283 Milk pCi/L Strontium-89 9.87E+01 9.96E+01 0.99 Acceptable EZA 3rd/2012 11/06/12 E10283 Milk pCi/L Strontium-90 1.44E+01 1.60E+01 0.9 Acceptable EZA 3rd/2012 11/06/12 E10284 Milk Ci/L lodine-131 9.69E+01 9.96E+01 0.97 Acceptable EZA 3rd/2012 11/06/12 E10284 Milk pCi/L Cerium-141 1.61E+02 1.64E+02 0.98 Acceptable EZA 3rd/2012 11/06/12 E10284 Milk Ci/L Chromium-51 2.92E+02 2.48E+02 1.18 Acceptable EZA 3rd/2012 11/06/12 E10284 Milk pCi/L Cesium-134 9.85E+01 1.08E+02 0.91 Acceptable EZA 3rd/2012 11/06/12 E10284 Milk Ci/L Cesium-137 1.76E+02 1.74E+02 1.01 Acceptable EZA 3rd/2012 11/06/12 E10284 Milk Ci/L Cobalt-58 9.72E+01 1.00E+02 0.97 Acceptable EZA 3rd/2012 11/06/12 E10284 Milk pCi/L Manganese-54 1.98E+02 1.96E+02 1.01 Acceptable EZA 3rd/2012 11/06/12 E10284 Milk pCi/L Iron-59 1.62E+02 1.52E+02 1.07 Acceptable EZA 3rd/2012 11/06/12 E10284 Milk pCi/L Zinc-65 2.08E+02 1.92E+02 1.08 Acceptable EZA 3rd/2012 11/06/12 E10284 Milk pCi/L Cobalt-60 1.59E+02 1.52E+02 1.05 Acceptable EZA 3rd/2012 11/06/12 E10285 Water pCi/L lodine-131 1.10E+02 9.99E+01 1.1 Acceptable EZA 3rd/2012 11/06/12 E10285 Water Ci/L Cerium-141 2.49E+02 2.51E+02 0.99 Acceptable EZA 3rd/2012 11/06/12 E10285 Water Ci/L Chromium-51 3.75E+02 3.80E+02 0.99 Acceptable EZA 3rd/2012 11/06/12 E10285 Water pCi/L Cesium-134 1.51E+02 1.66E+02 0.91 Acceptable EZA 3rd/2012 11/06/12 E10285 Water Ci/L Cesium-137 2.72E+02 2.67E+02 1.02 Acceptable
| |
| | |
| Laboratories LLC P.O. Box 30712, Charleston, SC 29417 2012 ANNUAL QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT Page 25 of 60 EZA 3rd/2012 11/06/12 E10285 Water pCi/L Cobalt-58 1.56E+02 1.54E+02 1.01 Acceptable EZA 3rd/2012 11/06/12 E10285 Water Ci/L Manganese-54 3.16E+02 3.00E+02 1.05 Acceptable EZA 3rd/2012 11/06/12 E10285 Water pCi/L Iron-59 2.65E+02 2.33E+02 1.14 Acceptable EZA 3rd/2012 11/06/12 E10285 Water pCi/L Zinc-65 3.20E+02 2.95E+02 1.09 Acceptable EZA 3rd/2012 11/06/12 E10285 Water Ci/L Cobalt-60 2.42E+02 2.33E+02 1.04 Acceptable
| |
| | |
| Laboratories LLC P.O. Box 30712, Charleston, SC 29417 2012 ANNUAL QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT Page 26 of 60 TABLE 3 2012 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY MIXED ANALYTE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION PROGRAM (MAPEP) RESULTS Analytical Sample GEL Known Acceptance Quarter/ Year Date Sample Number Media Unit Analyte / Nuclide Value value Range/ Ratio Evaluation False Pos.
| |
| 2nd/2012 05/03/12 MAPEP-11-GrF24 Filter Bq/sample Gross Alpha 0.000 0.000 Test Acceptable False Pos.
| |
| 2nd/2012 05/03/12 MAPEP-11-GrF24 Filter Bq/sample Gross Beta 0.000 0.000 Test Acceptable 3rd/2012 07/26/12 MAPEP-12-MaS26 Soil mg/kg Americium-241 152 159 111-207 Acceptable 3rd/2012 07/26/12 MAPEP-12-MaS26 Soil mg/kg Cesium-134 754 828 580-1076 Acceptable False Pos 3rd/2012 07/26/12 MAPEP-12-MaS26 Soil mg/kg Cesium-137 0 0 Test Acceptable 3rd/2012 07/26/12 MAPEP-12-MaS26 Soil mg/kg Cobalt-57 1430.0 1179 825-1533 Warning 3rd/2012 07/26/12 MAPEP-12-MaS26 Soil mg/kg Cobalt-60 0.97 1.56 Sens. Eval. Acceptable 3rd/2012 07/26/12 MAPEP-12-MaS26 Soil mg/kg Iron-55 1456 1370 959-1781 Acceptable 3rd/2012 07/26/12 MAPEP-12-MaS26 Soll mg/kg Manganese-54 596 558 391-725 Acceptable 3rd/2012 07/26/12 MAPEP-12-MaS26 Soil mg/kg Nickel-63 888.0 862 603-1121 Acceptable 3rd/2012 07/26/12 MAPEP-12-MaS26 Soil mg/kg Plutonium-238 127.0 136 95-177 Acceptable 3rd/2012 07/26/12 MAPEP-12-MaS26 Soil mg/kg Plutonium-239/240 61.13 65.8 46.1-85.5 Acceptable 3rd/2012 07/26/12 MAPEP-12-MaS26 Soil mg/kg Potassium-40 1495 1491 1044-1938 Acceptable 3rd/2012 07/26/12 MAPEP-12-MaS26 Soil mg/kg Strontium-90 391.7 392 274-510 Acceptable 3rd/2012 07/26/12 MAPEP-12-MaS26 Soil mg/kg Technetium-99 345.3 374 262-486 Acceptable 3rd/2012 07/26/12 MAPEP-12-MaW26 Water Bq/L Americium-241 1.5067 1.630 1.14-2.12 Acceptable False Pos 3rd/2012 07/26/12 MAPEP-12-MaW26 Water Bq/L Cesium-134 0.09 0.0 Test Acceptable 3rd/2012 07/26/12 MAPEP-12-MaW26 Water Bq/L Cesium-137 41.2 39.9 27.9-51.9 Acceptable 3rd/2012 07/26/12 MAPEP-12-MaW26 Water Bq/L Cobalt-57 34.45 32.9 23.0-42.8 Acceptable 3rd/2012 07/26/12 MAPEP-12-MaW26 Water Bq/L Cobalt-60 23.90 23.7 16.60-30.84 Acceptable 3rd/2012 07/26/12 MAPEP-12-MaW26 Water Bq/L Hydrogen-3 481.7 437 306-568 Acceptable 3rd/2012 07/26/12 MAPEP-12-MaW26 Water Bq/L Iron-55 88.10 81.9 57.3-106.5 Acceptable 3rd/2012 07/26/12 MAPEP-12-MaW26 Water Bq/L Manganese-54 33.3 31.8 22.3-41.3 Acceptable 3rd/2012 07/26/12 MAPEP-12-MaW26 Water Bq/L Nickel-63 59.6 60.0 42.0-78.0 Acceptable 3rd/2012 07/26/12 MAPEP-12-MaW26 Water Bq/L Plutonium-238 0.555 0.629 0.110-0.818 Acceptable 3rd/2012 07/26/12 MAPEP-12-MaW26 Water Bq/L Plutonium-239/240 1.230 1.340 0.94-1.74 Acceptable 3rd/2012 07/26/12 MAPEP-12-MaW26 Water Bq/L Potassium-40 156.5 142 99-185 Acceptable False Pos 3rd/2012 07/26/12 MAPEP-12-MaW26 Water Bq/L Strontium-90 0.01 0.00 Test Acceptable 3rd/2012 07/26/12 MAPEP-12-MaW26 Water Bq/L Technetium-99 26.3 27.90 19.5-36.3 Acceptable 3rd/2012 07/26/12 MAPEP-12-MaW26 Water Bq/L Uranium-234/233 0.381 0.39 0.270-0.510 Acceptable 3rd/2012 07/26/12 MAPEP-12-MaW26 Water Bq/L Uranium-238 2.537 2.76 1.93-3.59 Acceptable False Pos 3rd/2012 07/26/12 MAPEP-12-MaW26 Water Bq/L Zinc-65 -0.220 0.00 Test Acceptable 3rd/2012 07/26/12 MAPEP-12-GrW26 Water Bq/L Gross Alpha 2.043 2.140 0.64-3.64 Acceptable 3rd/2012 07/26/12 MAPEP-12-GrW26 Water Bq/L Gross Beta 6.820 6.36 3.18-9.54 Acceptable 3rd/2012 07/26/12 MAPEP-12-RdF26 Filter ug/sample Uranium-235 0.200 0.019 0.0131-0.243 Acceptable 3rd/2012 07/26/12 MAPEP-12-RdF26 Filter ug/sample Uranium-238 9.5 10.0 7.0-13.0 Acceptable 3rd/2012 07/26/12 MAPEP-12-RdF26 Filter ug/sample Uranium-Total 9.98 10.0 7.0-13.0 Acceptable 3rd/2012 07/26/12 MAPEP-12-RdF26 Filter u/sample Americium-241 0.066 0.073 0.051-0.095 Acceptable
| |
| | |
| ;l Laboratories LLc P.O. Box 30712, Charleston, SC 29417 2012 ANNUAL QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT Page 27 of 60 3rd/2012 07/26/12 MAPEP-12-RdF26 Filter Bq/sample Cesium-134 2.29 2.38 1.67-3.09 Acceptable 3rd/2012 07/26/12 MAPEP-12-RdF26 Filter Bq/sample Cesium-137 1.910 1.79 1.25-2.33 Acceptable False Pos 3rd/2012 07/26/12 MAPEP-12-RdF26 Filter Bq/sample Cobalt-57 0.008 0.00 Test Acceptable 3rd/2012 07/26/12 MAPEP-12-RdF26 Filter Bq/sample Cobalt-60 2.235 2.18 1.527-2.837 Acceptable 3rd/2012 07/26/12 MAPEP-12-RdF26 Filter Bq/sample Manganese-54 3.440 3.24 2.27-4.21 Acceptable 3rd/2012 07/26/12 MAPEP-12-RdF26 Filter Bq/sample Plutonium-238 0.004 0.002 Sens. Eval. Acceptable 3rd/2012 07/26/12 MAPEP-12-RdF26 Filter Bq/sample Plutonium-239/240 0.088 0.0970 0.068-0.126 Acceptable False Pos 3rd/2012 07/26/12 MAPEP-12-RdF26 Filter Bq/sample Strontium-90 0.012 0.00 Test Acceptable 0.0132- Not 3rd/2012 07/26/12 MAPEP-12-RdF26 Filter Bq/sample Uranium-234/233 0.010 0.0188 0.0244 Acceptable 3rd/2012 07/26/12 MAPEP-12-RdF26 Filter Bq/sample Uranium-238 0.111 0.124 0.087-0.161 Acceptable 3rd/2012 07/26/12 MAPEP-12-RdF26 Filter Bq/sample Zinc-65 3.460 2.99 2.09-3.89 Acceptable 3rd/2012 07/26/12 MAPEP-12-RdF26 Filter Bq/sample Gross Alpha 0.780 1.200 0.4-2.0 Acceptable 3rd/2012 07/26/12 MAPEP-12-RdF26 Filter Bq/sample Gross Beta 2.59 2.40 1.2-3.6 Acceptable False Pos 3rd/2012 07/26/12 MAPEP-12-RdF26 Filter Bq/sample Americium-241 0.005 0.00 Test Acceptable 3rd/2012 07/26/12 MAPEP-12-RdV26 Veg. Bq/sample Cesium-134 7.655 8.43 5.90-10.96 Acceptable False Pos 3rd/2012 07/26/12 MAPEP-12-RdV26 Veg. Bq/sample Cesium-137 -0.025 0.00 Test Acceptable 3rd/2012 07/26/12 MAPEP-12-RdV26 Veg. Bq/sample Cobalt-57 11.950 12.00 8.4-15.6 Acceptable 3rd/2012 07/26/12 MAPEP-12-RdV26 Veg. Bq/sample Cobalt-60 6.255 6.05 4.24-7.87 Acceptable False Pos 3rd/2012 07/26/12 MAPEP-12-RdV26 Veg. Bq/sample Manganese-54 0.029 0.00 Test Acceptable 3rd/2012 07/26/12 MAPEP-12-RdV26 Veg. Bq/sample Plutonium-238 0.194 0.219 0.153-0.285 Acceptable 3rd/2012 07/26/12 MAPEP-12-RdV26 Veg. Bq/sample Plutonium-239/240 0.1226 0.152 0.106-0.198 Acceptable 3rd/2012 07/26/12 MAPEP-12-RdV26 Veg. Bq/sample Strontium-90 1.613 2.11 1.48-2.74 Warning 0.0288-3rd/2012 07/26/12 MAPEP-12-RdV26 Veg. Bq/sample Uranium-234/233 0.030 0.411 0.0534 Warning 3rd/2012 07/26/12 MAPEP-12-RdV26 Veg. Bqlsample Uranium-238 0.224 0.278 0.195-0.361 Acceptable 3rd/2012 07/26/12 MAPEP-12-RdV26 Veg. Bq/sample Zinc-65 9.720 8.90 6.23-11.57 Acceptable 4th/2012 11/26/12 MAPEP-12-MaS27 Soil Bq/kg Americium-241 106.67 111 78-144 Acceptable 4th/2012 11/26/12 MAPEP-12-MaS27 Soil Bq/kg Cesium-134 839.5 939 657-1221 Acceptable 4th/2012 11/26/12 MAPEP-12-MaS27 Soil Bq/kg Cesium-137 1230.0 1150 805-1495 Acceptable 4th/2012 11/26/12 MAPEP-12-MaS27 Soil Bq/kg Cobalt-57 1605 1316 921-1711 Acceptable 4th/2012 11/26/12 MAPEP-12-MaS27 Soil Bq/kg Cobalt-60 551.5 531 372-690 Acceptable 4th/2012 11/26/12 MAPEP-12-MaS27 Soil Bq/kg Iron-55 459.3 508 356-660 Acceptable 4th/2012 11/26/12 MAPEP-12-MaS27 Soil Bq/kg Manganese-54 1015 920 644-1196 Acceptable 4th/2012 11/26/12 MAPEP-12-MaS27 Soil Bq/kg Plutonium-238 104.6 106 74.1-137.5 Acceptable 4th/2012 11/26/12 MAPEP-12-MaS27 Soil Bq/kg Plutonium-239/240 132.33 134 94-174 Acceptable 4th/2012 11/26/12 MAPEP-12-MaS27 Soil Bq/kg Potassium-40 723 632 442-822 Acceptable 4th/2012 11/26/12 MAPEP-12-MaS27 Soil Bq/kg Strontium-90 476.7 508 356-660 Warning 4th/2012 11/26/12 MAPEP-12-MaS27 Soil Bq/kg Technetium-99 385.3 469 328-610 Acceptable 4th/2012 11/26/12 MAPEP-12-MaS27 Soil Bq/kg Uranium-234/233 51.6 60 42.2-78.4 Acceptable 4th/2012 11/26/12 MAPEP-12-MaS27 Soil Bq/kg Uranium-238 238.33 263 184-342 Acceptable 4th/2012 11/26/12 MAPEP-12-MaS27 Soil Bq/kg Zinc-65 721.5 606 424-788 Acceptable 4th/2012 11/26/12 MAPEP-12-MaW27 Water Bq/L Americium-241 0.9407 1.06 0.74-1:38 Acceptable 4th/2012 11/26/12 MAPEP-12-MaW27 Water Bq/L Cesium-134 20.6 23.2 16.2-30.2 Acceptable 4th/2012 11/26/12 MAPEP-12-MaW27 Water Bq/L Cesium-137 17.05 16.7 11.7-21.7 Acceptable 4th/2012 11/26/12 MAPEP-12-MaW27 Water Bq/L Cobalt-57 29.45 29.3 20.5-38.1 Acceptable False 4th/2012 11/26/12 MAPEP-12-MaW27 Water Ba/L Cobalt-60 0.03 0.0 Positive Acceptable
| |
| | |
| [ [I Laboratories LLC P.O. Box 30712, Charleston, SC 29417 2012 ANNUAL QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT Page 28 of 60 4th/2012 11/26/12 MAPEP-12-MaW27 Water Bq/L Hydrogen-3 334 334 234-434 Acceptable 4th/2012 11/26/12 MAPEP-12-MaW27 Water Bq/L Manganese-54 18.4 17.8 12.5-23.1 Acceptable 4th/2012 11/26/12 MAPEP-12-MaW27 Water Bq/L Nickel-63 66.2 66.3 46.4-86.2 Acceptable Sensitivity 4th/2012 11/26/12 MAPEP-12-MaW27 Water Bq/L Plutonium-238 0.0088 0.0 Eval. Acceptable 4th/2012 11/26/12 MAPEP-12-MaW27 Water Bq/L Plutonium-239/240 1.44 1.61 1.13-2.09 Acceptable 4th/2012 11/26/12 MAPEP-12-MaW27 Water Bq/L Potassium-40 140.5 134 94-174 Acceptable 4th/2012 11/26/12 MAPEP-12-MaW27 Water Bq/L Strontium-90 11.13 12.2 8.5-15.9 Acceptable 4th/2012 11/26/12 MAPEP-12-MaW27 Water Bq/L Technetium-99 4.5 4.58 3.21-5.95 Acceptable 4th/2012 11/26/12 MAPEP-12-MaW27 Water Bq/L Uranium-234/233 0.414 0.451 0.316-0.586 Acceptable 4th/2012 11/26/12 MAPEP-12-MaW27 Water Bq/L Uranium-238 2.96 3.33 2.33-4.33 Acceptable 4th/2012 11/26/12 MAPEP-12-MaW27 Water Bq/L Zinc-65 28.15 25.9 18.1-33.7 Acceptable 4th/2012 11/26/12 MAPEP-12-GrW27 Water Bq/L Gross Alpha 1.737 1.79 0.54-3.04 Acceptable 4th/2012 11/26/12 MAPEP-12-GrW27 Water Bq/L Gross Beta 8.893 9.1 4.6-13.7 Acceptable 4th/2012 11/26/12 MAPEP-12-XaW27 Water Bq/L Iodine-129 6.229 6.82 4.77-8.87 Acceptable 0.0104-4th/2012 11/26/12 MAPEP-12-RdF27 Filter uq/sample Uranium-235 0.0154 0.0148 0.0192 Acceptable 4th/2012 11/26/12 MAPEP-12-RdF27 Filter uq/sample Uranium-238 7.77 8 5.6-10.4 Acceptable 4th/2012 11/26/12 MAPEP-12-RdF27 Filter ug/sample Uranium-Total 7.785 8.1 5.7-10.5 Acceptable 0.0546-4th/2012 11/26/12 MAPEP-12-RdF27 Filter uq/sample Americium-241 0.0716 0.078 0.1014 Acceptable 4th/2012 11/26/12 MAPEP-12-RdF27 Filter uq/sample Cesium-134 2.795 2.74 1.92-3.56 Acceptable False 4th/2012 11/26/12 MAPEP-12-RdF27 Filter uq/sample Cesium-137 -0.016 0 Positive Acceptable 4th/2012 11/26/12 MAPEP-12-RdF27 Filter uq/sample Cobalt-57 2.265 1.91 1.34-2.48 Acceptable 4th/2012 11/26/12 MAPEP-12-RdF27 Filter uq/sample Cobalt-60 1.865 1.728 1.210-2.246 Acceptable 4th/2012 11/26/12 MAPEP-12-RdF27 Filter uq/sample Manganese-54 2.465 2.36 1.65-3.07 Acceptable 0.0438-4th/2012 11/26/12 MAPEP-12-RdF27 Filter uq/sample Plutonium-238 0.061 0.0625 0.0813 Acceptable Sensitivity 4th/2012 11/26/12 MAPEP-12-RdF27 Filter uq/sample Plutonium-239/240 -0.002 0.00081 Eval. Acceptable 4th/2012 11/26/12 MAPEP-12-RdF27 Filter uq/sample Strontium-90 0.914 1.03 0.72-1.34 Acceptable 0.0099- Not 4th/2012 11/26/12 MAPEP-12-RdF27 Filter uq/sample Uranium-234/233 0.009 0.0141 0.0183 Acceptable Not 4th/2012 11/26/12 MAPEP-12-RdF27 Filter uq/sample Uranium-238 0.087 0.1 0.070-0.130 Acceptable False 4th/2012 11/26/12 MAPEP-12-RdF27 Filter uq/sample Zinc-65 -0.154 0 Positive Acceptable Not 4th/2012 11/26/12 MAPEP-12-GrF27 Filter Bq/sample Gross Alpha 0.2253 0.97 0.29-1.65 Acceptable 4th/2012 11/26/12 MAPEP-12-GrF27 Filter Bq/sample Gross Beta 1.93 1.92 0.96-2.88 Acceptable 4th/2012 11/26/12 MAPEP-12-RdV27 Veg Bq/sample Americium-241 0.142 0.163 0.114-0.212 Acceptable 4th/2012 11/26/12 MAPEP-12-RdV27 Veg Bq/sample Cesium-134 6.355 6.51 4.56-8.46 Acceptable 4th/2012 11/26/12 MAPEP-12-RdV27 Veg Bq/sample Ceslum-137 4.575 4.38 3.07-5.69 Acceptable 4th/2012 11/26/12 MAPEP-12-RdV27 Veg Bq/sample Cobalt-57 6.04 5.66 3.96-7.36 Acceptable 4th/2012 11/26/12 MAPEP-12-RdV27 Veg Bq/sample Cobalt-60 5.44 5.12 3.58-6.66 Acceptable 4th/2012 11/26/12 MAPEP-12-RdV27 Veg Bq/sample Manganese-54 3.565 3.27 2.29-4.25 Acceptable 4th/2012 11/26/12 MAPEP-12-RdV27 Veg Bq/sample Plutonium-238 0.176 0.187 0.131-0.243 Acceptable 4th/2012 11/26/12 MAPEP-12-RdV27 Veg Bq/sample Plutonium-239/240 0.12 0.123 0.086-0.160 Acceptable False 4th/2012 11/26/12 MAPEP-12-RdV27 Veg Bq/sample Strontium-90 0.0018 0 Positive Acceptable 0.0180-4th/2012 11/26/12 MAPEP-12-RdV27 Veg Bq/sample Uranium-234/233 0.024 0.0257 0.0334 Acceptable 4th/2012 11/26/12 MAPEP-12-RdV27 Veg Bq/sample Uranium-238 0.143 0.158 0.111-0.205 Acceptable 4th/2012 11/26/12 MAPEP-12-RdV27 Veg Bq/sample Uranium-Total 11.1 12.7 8.9-16.5 Acceptable False 4th/2012 11/26/12 MAPEP-12-RdV27 Veag B/sample Zinc-65 -0.04 0 Positive Acceptable
| |
| | |
| = Laboratories LLC P.O. Box 30712, Charleston, SC 29417 2012 ANNUAL QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT Page 29 of 60 4th/2012 11/26/12 I MAPEP-11-XaW25 I Water Bq/sample I Iodine-129 I 8.723 9.5 I 6.7-12.4 I Acceptable
| |
| | |
| [ = Laboratories LLC P.O. Box 30712, Charleston, SC 29417 2012 ANNUAL QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT Page 30 of 60 TABLE 4 2012 ERA PROGRAM PERFORMANCE EVALUATION RESULTS Acceptance Analytical Sample Sample Analyte / GEL Known Range/
| |
| Quarter / Year Date Number Media Unit Nuclide Value value Ratio Evaluation 1st/2012 03/06/12 RAD - 88 Water pCi/L Barium-133 58.2 57.1 47.3-63.0 Acceptable 1st/2012 03/06/12 RAD - 88 Water pCi/L Cesium-134 63.5 64 52.0-70.4 Acceptable 1st/2012 03/06/12 RAD - 88 Water pCi/L Cesium-137 89.5 91.2 82.1-103 Acceptable 1st/2012 03/06/12 RAD - 88 Water pCi/L Cobalt-60 49.5 48.9 44.0-56.4 Acceptable 1st/2012 03/06/12 RAD - 88 Water pCi/L Zinc-65 75 71.8 64.2-86.7 Acceptable 1st/2012 03/06/12 RAD - 88 Water pCi/L Gross Alpha 31.0 35.7 18.4-45.9 Acceptable 1st/2012 03/06/12 RAD - 88 Water pCi/L Gross Beta 27.3 28.8 18.3-36.6 Acceptable 1st/2012 03/06/12 RAD - 88 Water pCi/L Gross Alpha 29.8 35.7 18.4-45.9 Acceptable 1st/2012 03/06/12 RAD - 88 Water pCi/L Radium-226 8.89 8.73 6.55-10.2 Acceptable 1st/2012 03/06/12 RAD - 88 Water pCi/L Radium-228 5.9 5.78 3.53-7.60 Acceptable 1st/2012 03/06/12 RAD - 88 Water pCi/L Uranium (Nat) 31.6 32.5 26.2-36.3 Acceptable Uranium (Nat) 1st/2012 03/06/12 RAD - 88 Water ug/L mass 49.9 47.5 38.3-53.1 Acceptable 1st/2012 03/06/12 RAD - 88 Water pCi/L Radium-226 8.80 8.73 6.55-10.2 Acceptable 1st/2012 03/06/12 RAD - 88 Water pCi/L Radium-228 4.8 5.78 3.53-7.60 Acceptable 1st/2012 03/06/12 RAD - 88 Water pCi/L Uranium (Nat) 27.6 32.5 26.2-36.3 Acceptable Uranium (Nat) 1st/2012 03/06/12 RAD - 88 Water ug/L mass 41.2 47.5 38.3-53.1 Acceptable Not 1st/2012 03/06/12 RAD - 88 Water pCi/L Tritium 16200 19200 16800-21100 Acceptable 1st/2012 03/06/12 RAD - 88 Water pCi/L Strontium-89 38.4 42.5 32.7-49.6 Acceptable 1st/2012 03/06/12 RAD - 88 Water pCi/L Strontium-90 23.5 24.2 17.4-28.3 Acceptable 1st/2012 03/06/12 RAD - 88 Water pCi/L Strontium-89 42.2 42.5 32.7-49.6 Acceptable 1st/2012 03/06/12 RAD - 88 Water pCi/L Strontium-90 24.2 24.2 17.4-28.3 Acceptable 1st/2012 03/06/12 RAD - 88 Water pCi/L lodine-131 28.4 25.7 21.3-30.3 Acceptable 1st/2012 03/06/12 RAD - 88 Water pCi/L lodine-131 28.4 25.7 21.3-30.3 Acceptable 2nd/2012 05/24/12 RAD-89 Water pCi/L Tritium 1700 15800 13800-17400 Acceptable Not 3rd/2012 8/31/2012 RAD-90 Water pCi/L Barium-133 72.7 65.0 54.1-71.5 Acceptable 3rd/2012 8/31/2012 RAD-90 Water pCi/L Cesium-134 87.5 92.5 76.0-102 Acceptable 3rd/2012 8/31/2012 RAD-90 Water pCi/L Cesium-137 219 216 194-239 Acceptable 3rd/2012 8/31/2012 RAD-90 Water pCi/L Cobalt-50 55.6 51.3 46.2-59.0 Acceptable 3rd/2012 8/31/2012 RAD-90 Water pCi/L Zinc-65 108 98.9 89.0-118 Acceptable 3rd/2012 8/31/2012 RAD-90 Water pCi/L Gross Alpha 38.8 48.2 25.1-60.8 Acceptable 3rd/2012 8/31/2012 RAD-90 Water pCi/L Gross Beta 34.4 36.8 24.2-44.4 Acceptable 3rd/2012 8/31/2012 RAD-90 Water pCi/L Gross Alpha 40.9 48.2 25.1-60.6 Acceptable 3rd/2012 8/31/2012 RAD-90 Water pCi/L Radium-226 14.4 12.6 9.40-14.5 Acceptable Not 3rd/2012 8/31/2012 RAD-90 Water pCi/L Radium-226 14.6 12.6 9.40-14.5 Acceptable 3rd/2012 8/31/2012 RAD-90 Water pCi/L Radium-228 4.3 5.01 2.99-6.72 Acceptable 3rd/2012 8/31/2012 RAD-90 Water pCi/L Uranium (Nat) 49.4 49.7 40.3-55.2 Acceptable Uranium (Nat) 3rd/2012 8/31/2012 RAD-90 Water ug/L mass 73.4 72.5 58.8-80.6 Acceptable 3rd/2012 8/31/2012 RAD-90 Water nCi/L Tritium 7290 6790 5860-7470 Acceptable
| |
| | |
| Laboratories LLC P.O. Box 30712, Charleston, SC 29417 2012 ANNUAL QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT Page 31 of 60 3rd/2012 8/31/2012 RAD-90 Water pCi/L Strontium-89 55 47.9 37.5-55.2 Acceptable 3rd/2012 8/31/2012 RAD-90 Water pCi/L Strontium-90 27.1 28.7 20.9-33.4 Acceptable 3rd/2012 8/31/2012 RAD-90 Water pCi/L Strontium-89 48.3 47.9 37.5-55.2 Acceptable 3rd/2012 8/31/2012 RAD-90 Water pCi/L Strontium-90 28.9 28.7 20.9-33.4 Acceptable 3rd/2012 8/31/2012 RAD-91 Water pCi/L Barium-133 84.9 84.8 71.3-93.3 Acceptable 3rd/2012 8/31/2012 RAD-91 Water oCi/L Radium-226 12.8 15 11.2-17.2 Acceptable
| |
| | |
| Laboratories Lac P.O. Box 30712, Charleston, SC 29417 2012 ANNUAL QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT Page 32 of 60 TABLE 5 2012 ERA PROGRAM (MRAD) PERFORMANCE EVALUATION RESULTS Acceptance Quarter / Analytical Sample Sample Analyte / GEL Known Range!
| |
| Year Date Number Media Unit Nuclide Value value Ratio Evaluation 2nd/2012 05/18/12 MRAD-16 Soil pCi/kg Actinium-228 1330 1570 110-2180 Acceptable 2nd/2012 05/18/12 MRAD-16 Soil pCi/kg Americium-241 900 938 549-1220 Acceptable 2nd/2012 05/18/12 MRAD-16 Soil pCi/kg Bismuth-212 1540 1550 413-2280 Acceptable 2nd/2012 05/18/12 MRAD-16 Soil pCi/kg Bismuth-214 1100 1100 665-1590 Acceptable 2nd/2012 05/18/12 MRAD-16 Soil pCi/kg Cesium-134 2380 2180 1420-2620 Acceptable 2nd/2012 05/18/12 MRAD-16 Soil pCi/kg Cesium-137 10700 8770 6720-11300 Acceptable 2nd/2012 05/18/12 MRAD-16 Soil pCi/kg Cobalt-60 4060 3500 2370-4820 Acceptable 2nd/2012 05/18/12 MRAD-16 Soil pCi/kg Lead-212 1380 1510 992-2110 Acceptable 2nd/2012 05/18/12 MRAD-16 Soil pCi/kg Lead-214 1350 1110 647-1650 Acceptable 2nd/2012 05/18/12 MRAD-16 Soil pCi/kg Manganese-54 <37.2 <1000 0-1000 Acceptable 2nd/2012 05/18/12 MRAD-16 Soil pCi/kg Plutonium-238 842 984.00 592-1360 Acceptable 2nd/2012 05/18/12 MRAD-16 Soil pCi/kg Plutonium-239 793 879.00 575-1210 Acceptable 2nd/2012 05/18/12 MRAD-16 Soil pCi/kg Potassium-40 10400 11600 8470-15600 Acceptable 2nd/2012 05/18/12 MRAD-16 Soil pCi/kg Strontium-90 7370 8800 3360-13900 Acceptable 2nd/2012 05/18/12 MRAD-16 Soil pCi/kg Thorium-234 2360 2000 632-3760 Acceptable 2nd/2012 05/18/12 MRAD-16 Soil pCi/kg Zinc-65 4540 3650 2910-4850 Acceptable 2nd/2012 05/18/12 MRAD-16 Soil pCi/kg Strontium-90 7370 8800 3360-13900 Acceptable 2nd/2012 05/18/12 MRAD-16 Soil pCi/kg Uranium-234 2250 1960 1200-2510 Acceptable 2nd/2012 05/18/12 MRAD-16 Soil pCi/kg Uranium-238 1620 2000 1240-2540 Acceptable 2nd/2012 05/18/12 MRAD-16 Soil pCi/kg Uranium-Total 4220 4030 2190-5320 Acceptable Uranium-2nd/2012 05/18/12 MRAD-16 Soil ug/kg Total(mass) 5070 5880 3240-7400 Acceptable 2nd/2012 05/18/12 MRAD-16 Vegetation pCi/kg Americium-241 4270 4540 2780-6040 Acceptable 2nd/2012 05/18/12 MRAD-16 Vegetation pCi/kg Curium-244 829 812 400 - 1260 Acceptable 2nd/2012 05/18/12 MRAD-16 Vegetation pCi/kg Plutonium-238 2300 2570 1400-3220 Acceptable 2nd/2012 05/18/12 MRAD-16 Vegetation pCi/kg Plutonium-239 2480 2570 1580-3540 Acceptable 2nd/2012 05/18/12 MRAD-16 Vegetation pCi/kg Uranium-234 3310 3610 2370-4640 Acceptable 2nd/2012 05/18/12 MRAD-16 Vegetation pCi/kg Uranium-238 3540 3580 2390-4550 Acceptable 2nd/2012 05/18/12 MRAD-16 Vegetation pCi/kg Uranium-Total 7025 7350 4980-9150 Acceptable Uranium-2nd/2012 05/18/12 MRAD-16 Vegetation ug/kg Total(mass) 10600 10700 7170-13600 Acceptable 2nd/2012 05/18/12 MRAD-16 Vegetation pCi/kg Americium-241 4270 4540 2780-6040 Acceptable 2nd/2012 05/18/12 MRAD-16 Vegetation pCi/kg Cesium-134 2840 2920 1880-3790 Acceptable 2nd/2012 05/18/12 MRAD-16 Vegetation pCi/kg Cesium-137 1330 1340 972-1860 Acceptable 2nd/2012 05/18/12 MRAD-16 Vegetation pCi/kg Cobalt-60 2380 2210 1520-3090 Acceptable 2nd/2012 05/18/12 MRAD-16 Vegetation pCi/kg Manganese-54 <68.8 <300 0.00-300 Acceptable 2nd/2012 05/18/12 MRAD-16 Vegetation pCi/kg Potassium-40 33700 28600 20700-40100 Acceptable 2nd/2012 05/18/12 MRAD-16 Vegetation pCi/kg Zinc-65 2570 2310 1670-3240 Acceptable 2nd/2012 05/18/12 MRAD-16 Vegetation pCi/kg Strontium-90 7000 8520 4860-11300 Acceptable 2nd/2012 05/18/12 MRAD-16 Filter pCi/Filter Americium-241 72.4 68.8 42.4-93.1 Acceptable 2nd/2012 05/18/12 MRAD-16 Filter pCi/Filter Plutonium-238 57.3 63.2 43.3-83.1 Acceptable 2nd/2012 05/18/12 MRAD-16 Filter pCi/Filter Plutonium-239 58.8 63 45.6-82.4 Acceptable
| |
| | |
| Laboratories LLC P.O. Box 30712, Charleston, SC 29417 2012 ANNUAL QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT Page 33 of 60 2nd/2012 05/18/12 MRAD-16 Filter pCi/Filter Uranium-234 42.5 47.5 29.4-71.6 Acceptable 2nd/2012 05/18/12 MRAD-16 Filter pCi/Filter Uranium-238 44.5 47.4 30.4-65.1 Acceptable 2nd/2012 05/18/12 MRAD-16 Filter pCi/Filter Uranium-Total 89.4 96.7 53.5-147 Acceptable Uranium-2nd/2012 05/18/12 MRAD-16 Filter ug/Filter Total(mass) 134 141 90.2-198 Acceptable 2nd/2012 05/18/12 MRAD-16 Filter pCi/Filter Americium-241 72.4 68.8 42.4-93.1 Acceptable 2nd/2012 05/18/12 MRAD-16 Filter pCi/Filter Cesium-134 260 279 182 - 345 Acceptable 2nd/2012 05/18/12 MRAD-16 Filter pCi/Filter Cesium-137 1210 1130 849-1480 Acceptable 2nd/2012 05/18/12 MRAD-16 Filter pCi/Filter Cobalt-60 942 880 681-1100 Acceptable 2nd/2012 05/18/12 MRAD-16 Filter pCi/Filter Manganese-54 <7.68 <50.0 0-50.0 Acceptable 2nd/2012 05/18/12 MRAD-16 Filter pCi/Filter Zinc-65 1040 897 642-1240 Acceptable 2nd/2012 05/18/12 MRAD-16 Filter pCi/Filter Strontium-90 87 89.6 43.8-134 Acceptable 2nd/2012 05/18/12 MRAD-16 Filter pCi/Filter Iron-55 776 739 229-1440 Acceptable Uranium-2nd/2012 05/18/12 MRAD-16 Filter ug/Filter Total(mass) 147 141 90.2-198 Acceptable 2nd/2012 05/18/12 MRAD-16 Filter pCi/Filter Gross Alpha 93.9 77.8 26.1-121 Acceptable 2nd/2012 05/18/12 MRAD-16 Filter pCi/Filter Gross Beta 57.3 52.5 33.2-76.5 Acceptable 2nd/2012 05/18/12 MRAD-16 Water pCi/L Uranium-234 92.6 105 78.9-135 Acceptable 2nd/2012 05/18/12 MRAD-16 Water pCi/L Uranium-238 94.9 104 79.3-128 Acceptable 2nd/2012 05/18/12 MRAD-16 Water pCi/L Uranium-Total 192.6 214 157-277 Acceptable Uranium-2nd/2012 05/18/12 MRAD-16 Water ug/L Total(mass) 285 312 249-377 Acceptable 2nd/2012 05/18/12 MRAD-16 Water pCi/L Americium-241 132 135 91.0-181 Acceptable 2nd/2012 05/18/12 MRAD-16 Water pCi/L Plutonium-238 127 135 99.9-168 Acceptable 2nd/2012 05/18/12 MRAD-16 Water pCi/L Plutonium-239 107 112 86.9-141 Acceptable 2nd/2012 05/18/12 MRAD-16 Water pCi/L Cesium-134 580 609 447-700 Acceptable 2nd/2012 05/18/12 MRAD-16 Water pCi/L Cesium-137 1290 1250 1060-1500 Acceptable 2nd/2012 05/18/12 MRAD-16 Water pCi/L Cobalt-60 910 875 760-1020 Acceptable 2nd/2012 05/18/12 MRAD-16 Water pCi/L Manganese-54 <5.0 <100 0.00-100 Acceptable 2nd/2012 05/18/12 MRAD-16 Water pCi/L Zinc-65 822 749 624-945 Acceptable 2nd/2012 05/18/12 MRAD-16 Water pCi/L Strontium-90 970 989 644-1310 Acceptable 2nd/2012 05/18/12 MRAD-16 Water pCi/L Iron-55 987 863 514-1170 Acceptable 2nd/2012 05/18/12 MRAD-16 Water pCi/L Gross Alpha 95.9 103 36.6-160 Acceptable 2nd/2012 05/18/12 MRAD-16 Water pCi/L Gross Beta 50 43.7 25.0-64.7 Acceptable 2nd/2012 05/18/12 MRAD-16 Water pCi/L Tritium 8740 9150 6130-13000 Acceptable 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Soil pCi/kg Uranium-234 4310 4310 2830-5540 Acceptable 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Soil pCi/kg Uranium-238 4330 4280 2860-5440 Acceptable 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Soil pCi/kg Uranium-Total 4849 5190 2960 - 7010 Acceptable Uranium-Total 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Soil ug/kg (mass) 8860 8790 5960-10900 Acceptable 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Soil pCi/kg Uranium-234 3720 3400 2080-4360 Acceptable 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Soil pCi/kg Uranium-238 3350 3420 2120-4340 Acceptable 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Soil pCi/kg Uranium-Total 7232 6970 3780-9200 Acceptable Uranium-Total 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Soil ug/kg mass 10400 10200 5620-12800 Acceptable 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Soil pCi/kg Actinium-228 1400 1240 795-1720 Acceptable 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Soil pCi/kg Americium-241 847 728 426-946 Acceptable 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Soil pCi/kg Bismuth-212 1300 1240 330-1820 Acceptable 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Soil pCi/kg Bismuth-214 1310 1290 777-1860 Acceptable 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Soil pCi/kg Cesium-134 2210 1980 1290-2380 Acceptable
| |
| | |
| Laboratories LLc P.O. Box 30712, Charleston, SC 29417 2012 ANNUAL QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT Page 34 of 60 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Soil pCi/kg Cesium-137 4140 3470 2660-4460 Acceptable 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Soil pCi/kg Cobalt-60 5270 4310 2910-5930 Acceptable 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Soil pCi/kg Lead-212 1250 1240 812-1730 Acceptable 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Soil pCi/kg Lead-214 1580 1290 753-1920 Acceptable 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Soil pCi/kg Manganese-54 < 35 < 1000 0.00 - 1000 Acceptable 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Soil pCi/kg Plutonium-238 1250 981 590-1350 Acceptable 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Soil pCi/kg Plutonium-239 1110 871 569-1200 Acceptable 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Soil pCi/kg Potassium-40 11000 12300 8980-16500 Acceptable 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Soil pCi/kg Thorium-234 5120 3420 1080-6430 Acceptable 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Soil pCi/kg Zinc-65 3770 2880 2290-3830 Acceptable 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Soil pCi/kg Strontium-90 6670 6860 2620-10800 Acceptable 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Soil pCi/kg Uranium-234 2640 2530 1600 - 3140 Acceptable 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Soil pCi/kg Uranium-238 2450 2560 1560 - 3250 Acceptable 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Soil pCi/kg Uranium-Total 5200 5190 2960 - 7010 Acceptable Uranium-Total 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Soil ug/kg (mass) 7286 7570 4160 - 9520 Acceptable Uranium-Total 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Soil ug/kg (mass) 7430 7570 4160 - 9520 Acceptable 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Soil pCi/kg Americium-241 3040 2980 1700 - 4090 Acceptable 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Soil pCi/kg Curium-244 697 642 316 - 1000 Acceptable 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Soil pCi/kg Plutonium-238 3000 2880 1560 - 4220 Acceptable 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Soil pCi/kg Plutonium-239 2910 2980 1850 - 4060 Acceptable 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Soil pCi/kg Uranium-234 2580 2420 1660 - 3210 Acceptable 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Soil pCi/kg Uranium-238 2660 2400 1690 - 3030 Acceptable 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Soil pCi/kg Uranium-Total 5356 4920 3330 - 6120 Acceptable Uranium-Total 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Soil ug/kg (mass) 7970 7180 4810 - 9120 Acceptable 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Soil pCi/kg Cesium-134 1480 1380 790 - 1910 Acceptable 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Soil pCi/kg Cesium-137 1570 1270 932 - 1760 Acceptable 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Soil pCi/kg Cobalt-60 1800 1500 1010-2160 Acceptable 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Soil pCi/kg Manganese-54 44.0 < 300 0.00 - 300 Acceptable 20700-4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Soil pCi/kg Potassium-40 32100 28800 40800 Acceptable 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Soil pCi/kg Zinc-65 3470 2770 2000 - 3790 Acceptable 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Soil pCi/kg Strontium-90 6320 5440 3040 - 7220 Acceptable 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Vegetation pCi/kg Americium-241 3780 3540 2160-4710 Acceptable 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Vegetation pCi/kg Curium-244 1910 1850 906-2880 Acceptable 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Vegetation pCi/kg Plutonium-238 2360 2250 1340-3080 Acceptable 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Vegetation pCi/kg Plutonium-239 2270 2170 1330-2990 Acceptable 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Vegetation pCi/kg Uranium-234 4310 4310 2830-5540 Acceptable 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Vegetation pCi/kg Uranium-238 4330 4280 2860-5440 Acceptable 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Vegetation pCi/kg Uranium-Total 8860 8790 5960-10900 Acceptable Uranium-Total 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Vegetation ug/kg (mass) 13000 12800 8580-16200 Acceptable Uranium-Total 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Vegetation ug/kg (mass) 11900 12800 8580-16200 Acceptable 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Vegetation pCi/kg Cesium-134 2240 2350 1510-3050 Acceptable 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Vegetation pCi/kg Cesium-137 2190 2070 1500-2880 Acceptable 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Vegetation pCi/kg Cobalt-60 2360 2030 1400-2840 Acceptable 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Vegetation pCi/kg Manganese-54 38.6 < 300 0.00 - 300 Acceptable
| |
| | |
| Laboratories LLC P.O. Box 30712, Charleston, SC 29417 2012 ANNUAL QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT Page 35 of 60 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Vegetation pCi/kg Potassium-40 36000 29600 21400-41500 Acceptable 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Vegetation pCi/kg Zinc-65 2500 1970 1420-2760 Acceptable 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Vegetation pCi/kg Strontium-90 9040 10000 5700-13300 Acceptable 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Filter pCi/Filter Americium-241 64.7 67.1 41.4-90.8 Acceptable 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Filter pCi/Filter Plutonium-238 50.3 55 37.7-72.3 Acceptable 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Filter pCi/Filter Plutonium-239 53.8 56.8 41.1-74.2 Acceptable 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Filter pCi/Filter Uranium-234 49.1 55.2 34.2-83.2 Acceptable 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Filter Uranium-238 55 54.7 35.3-75.6 Acceptable 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Filter pCi/Filter Uranium-Total 106.6 112 62.0-170 Acceptable Uranium-Total 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Filter ug/Filter (mass) 165 164 105-231 Acceptable 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Filter pCi/Filter Cesium-134 393 429 273-532 Acceptable 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Filter pCi/Filter Cesium-137 810 793 596-1040 Acceptable 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Filter pCi/Filter Cobalt-60 532 521 403-651 Acceptable 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Filter pCi/Filter Manganese-54 3.97 < 50.0 0.00-50.0 Acceptable 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Filter pCi/Filter Zinc-65 765 692 496-955 Acceptable 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Filter pCi/Filter Strontium-90 167 166 81.1-249 Acceptable Uranium-Total 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Filter pCi/Filter (mass) 152 164 105-231 Acceptable Uranium-Total 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Filter 'pCi/Filter (mass) 160 164 105-231 Acceptable 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Filter pCi/Filter Gross Alpha 110 87 30.3-87.8 Acceptable 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Filter pCi/Filter Gross Beta 71.2 62.7 39.6-91.4 Acceptable 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Water pCi/L Uranium-234 155 159 119-205 Acceptable 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Water pCi/L Uranium-238 161 158 120-194 Acceptable 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Water pCi/L Uranium-Total 323.6 324 238-419 Acceptable Uranium-Total 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Water ug/L (mass) 482 473 337-572 Acceptable 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Water pCi/L Americium-241 96.3 91.8 61.8-123 Acceptable 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Water pCi/L Plutonium-238 98 97.7 72.3-122 Acceptable 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Water pCi/L Plutonium-239 82.5 85.8 66.6-108 Acceptable 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Water pCi/L Uranium-234 155 159 119-205 Acceptable 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Water pCi/L Uranium-238 161 158 120-194 Acceptable 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Water pCi/L Uranium-Total 312.6 324 238-419 Acceptable Uranium-Total 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Water ug/L (mass) 482 473 377-572 Acceptable 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Water pCi/L Cesium-134 786 876 643-1010 Acceptable 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Water pCi/L Cesium-137 2050 2040 1730-2440 Acceptable 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Water pCi/L Cobalt-60 1270 1260 1090-1470 Acceptable 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Water pCi/L Manganese-54 7.27 < 100 0.00 - 100 Acceptable 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Water pCi/L Zinc-65 950 879 733-1110 Acceptable 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Water pCi/L Strontium-90 577 681 444-900 Acceptable 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Water pCi/L Uranium-234 158 159 119-205 Acceptable 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Water pCi/L Uranium-238 162 158 120-194 Acceptable 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Water pCi/L Uranium-Total 327.7 324 238-419 Acceptable Uranium-Total 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Water pCi/L mass 485 473 337-572 Acceptable 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Water pCi/L Uranium-234 156 159 119-205 Acceptable 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Water pCi/L Uranium-238 162 158 120-194 Acceptable 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Water nCi/L Uranium-Total 318 324 238-419 Acceptable
| |
| | |
| i Laboratories LLC P.O. Box 30712, Charleston, SC 29417 2012 ANNUAL QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT Page 36 of 60 Uranium-Total 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Water pCi/L (mass) 482 473 337-572 Acceptable Uranium-Total 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Water pCi/L mass 463 473 337-572 Acceptable 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Water pCi/L Iron-55 673 548 327-743 Acceptable 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Water pCi/L Gross Alpha 62.1 76.9 27.3-119 Acceptable 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Water pCi/L Gross Beta 57.4 62.6 35.8-92.7 Acceptable 4th/2012 12/12/12 MRAD-17 Water pCi/L Tritium 17900 18700 12500-26700 Acceptable
| |
| | |
| h i Laboratories LLC P.O. Box 30712, Charleston, SC 29417 2012 ANNUAL QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT Page 37 of 60 FIGURE 1 COBALT-60 PERFORMANCE EVALUATION RESULTS AND % BIAS 2012 Cobalt-60 Performance Evaluation Results and % Bias 100.0 75.0 50.0 Co-60 25.0------------------ -------------------
| |
| Lower Control
| |
| * - -- Limit m 0.0
| |
| - - - - Upper Control Limit
| |
| -25.0._------ ----------- ---- ---------------------------
| |
| -50.0
| |
| -75.0
| |
| -100.0
| |
| | |
| Laboratories LLC P.O. Box 30712, Charleston, SC 29417 2012 ANNUAL QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT Page 38 of 60 FIGURE 2 CESIUM-137 PERFORMANCE EVALUATION RESULTS AND % BIAS 2012 Cesium-137 Performance Evaluation Results and % Bias 100.0 75.0 50.0 Cs-137 25.0
| |
| - - --Lower Control m 0.0 - - - * * *- *
| |
| * Limit
| |
| - - - - Upper Control
| |
| -25.0- - ------- ---------------------------- Limit
| |
| -50.0
| |
| -75.0
| |
| -100.0 January2012 - December 2012
| |
| | |
| L [Laboratories LLC P.O. Box 30712, Charleston, SC 29417 2012 ANNUAL QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT Page 39 of 60 FIGURE 3 TRITIUM PERFORMANCE EVALUATION RESULTS AND % BIAS 2012 Tritium Performance Evaluation Results and % Bias 100.0 75.0 50.0
| |
| .H-3 25.0----------- -----25.0 -- -- - - -- - - --
| |
| - - Lower Control j 0.0 Limit
| |
| ---- Upper Control
| |
| -25.0- ---------------------------- Limit
| |
| -50.0
| |
| -75.0
| |
| -100.0 January 2012 - December 2012
| |
| | |
| Laboratorles LLC P.O. Box 30712, Charleston, SC 29417 2012 ANNUAL QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT Page 40 of 60 FIGURE 4 STRONTIUM-90 PERFORMANCE EVALUATION RESULTS AND % BIAS 2012 Strontium-90 Performance Evaluation Results and % Bias 100.0 50.0 -
| |
| Strontium-90
| |
| -- -- Lower Control j 0.0 Limit o ~---- Upper Control
| |
| - - - - - - Lim it
| |
| -50.0 -
| |
| -100.0 January2012 - December 2012
| |
| | |
| LaboratorieS LLC P.O. Box 30712, Charleston, SC 29417 2012 ANNUAL QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT Page 41 of 60 FIGURE 5 GROSS ALPHA PERFORMANCE EVALUATION RESULTS AND % BIAS 2012 Gross Alpha Performance Evaluation Results and % Bias 100.0 50.0 -
| |
| -+- Gross Alpha U - - - Lower Control j 0.0 Limit
| |
| - - - - Upper Control Limit
| |
| -50.0
| |
| -100.0 January 2012- December 2012
| |
| | |
| Laboratories LLC P.O. Box 30712, Charleston, SC 29417 2012 ANNUAL QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT Page 42 of 60 FIGURE 6 GROSS BETA PERFORMANCE EVALUATION RESULTS AND % BIAS 2012 Gross Beta Performance Evaluation Results and % Bias 100.0 50.0
| |
| -.-- Gross Beta
| |
| - - - - Lower Control 0.0 Limit
| |
| - Upper Control Limit
| |
| -50.0
| |
| -100.0-January 2012 - December 2012
| |
| | |
| Laboratories LLC P.O. Box 30712, Charleston, SC 29417 2012 ANNUAL QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT Page 43 of 60 FIGURE 7 IODINE-131 PERFORMANCE EVALUATION RESULTS AND % BIAS 2012 lodine-131 Performance Evaluation Results and % Bias 100.0 75.0 50.0 250-lodine-131 25.0 --- -------------- -------------------------------------
| |
| 0 ---- Lower Control mg 0.0 -Limit
| |
| ----- Upper Control
| |
| -25.0 Limit
| |
| -50.0
| |
| -75.0
| |
| -100.0 January2012 -December2012
| |
| | |
| 3[ l Laboratories LLC P.O. Box 30712, Charleston, SC 29417 2012 ANNUAL QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT Page 44 of 60 FIGURE 8 AMERICIUM-241 PERFORMANCE EVALUATION RESULTS AND % BIAS 2012 Americium-241 Performance Evaluation Results and % Bias 100.0 75.0 50.0 Am-241 25.0 (fl - - - - Lower Control m 0.0 Limit
| |
| * * * - Upper Control
| |
| -25.0 --- ---------------------------------------- Limit
| |
| -50.0
| |
| -75.0-
| |
| -100.0 January 2012 - December 2012
| |
| | |
| [ LaboratorieS LLC P.O. Box 30712, Charleston, SC 29417 2012 ANNUAL QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT Page 45 of 60 FIGURE 9 PLUTONIUM-238 PERFORMANCE EVALUATION RESULTS AND % BIAS 2012 Plutonium-238 Performance Evaluation Results and %Bias 100.0 75.0 50.0 Plutonium-238 25.0
| |
| - - - - Lower Control M 0.0 Limit
| |
| - - - - Upper Control
| |
| -25.0 -------------------------------------------------- Limit
| |
| -50.0
| |
| -75.0
| |
| -100.0 January 2012- Decem ber 2012
| |
| | |
| LaboratorieS LLC P.O. Box 30712, Charleston, SC 29417 2012 ANNUAL QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT Page 46 of 60 TABLE 6 REMP INTRA-LABORATORY DATA
| |
| | |
| ==SUMMARY==
| |
| : BIAS AND PRECISION BY MATRIX Precision Criteria 2012 Bias Criteria + / - 250/ Note 1 WITHIN OUTSIDE WITHIN OUTSIDE CRITERIA CRITERIA CRITERIA CRITERIA MILK Gas Flow Sr 2nd count 42 0 43 0 Gas Flow Total Strontium 29 0 29 0 Gamma Spec Liquid RAD A-013 with Ba, La 74 0 147 0 SOLID ____ ____
| |
| Gamma Spec Solid RAD A-013 21 0 31 0 LSC Nickel 63 9 0 9 0 Gas Flow Sr 2nd count 5 0 5 0 Gas Flow Strontium 90 3 0 3 0 Gas Flow Total Strontium 11 0 11 0 Gamma Spec Solid RAD A-013 with Ba, La 8 0 13 0 Gamma Spec Solid RAD A-013 with Iodine 5 0 6 0 FILTER Gamma Spec Filter RAD A-013 8 0 8 0 Gas Flow Sr 2nd Count 5 0 5 0 Alpha Spec Am241Curium 5 0 5 0 Gas Flow Total Strontium 5 0 5 0 Gross A & B 528 0 543 0 Gas Flow Sr-90 1 0 1 0 Gamma Spec Filter 51 0 52 0 LIQUID Alpha Spec Uranium 15 0 18 0 Tritium 331 0 333 0 LSC Iron-55 67 0 65 0 LSC Nickel 63 65 2 65 0 Gamma Spec Liquid RAD A-013 33 0 33 0 Gamma Iodine-131 34 0 36 0 Alpha Spec Plutonium 18 0 18 0 Gas Flow Sr 2nd count 41 0 41 0 Alpha Spec Am241 Curium 23 0 23 0 Gas Flow Total Strontium 153 0 153 0 Gross Alpha Non Vol Beta 106 0 110 0 Gamma Spec Liquid RAD A-013 with Ba, La 102 0 192 0 Gamma Spec Liquid RAD A-013 with Iodine 54 0 98 0 TISSUE __________ __________
| |
| Gamma Spec Solid RAD A-013 47 0 48 0 LSC Nickel 63 7 0 7 0 Gas Flow Sr 2nd count 21 0 21 0 Gas Flow Total Strontium 26 0 26 0
| |
| | |
| Laboratories LLC P.O. Box 30712, Charleston, SC 29417 2012 ANNUAL QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT Page 47 of 60 Gamma Spec Solid RAD A-013 with Ba, La 9 0 9 0 Gamma Spec Solid RAD A-013 with Iodine 24 0 24 0 VEGETATION Gamma Spec Solid RAD A-013 6 0 6 0 Gas Flow Sr 2nd count 13 0 13 0 Gamma Spec Solid RAD A-013 with Iodine 87 0 90 0 AIR CHARCOAL Gamma Iodine 131 RAD A-013 549 0 552 0 DRINKING WATER Alpha Spec Uranium 2 0 2 0 Tritium 42 0 42 0 LSC Iron-55 18 0 20 0 LSC Nickel 63 18 0 20 0 Gamma Iodine-131 32 0 34 0 Alpha Spec Thorium 2 0 2 0 Gas Flow Sr 2nd count 17 0 17 0 Gas Flow Total Strontium 21 0 21 0 Gross Alpha Non Vol Beta 94 0 93 0 Gamma Spec Liquid RAD A-013 with Ba, La 53 0 93 0 Gamma Spec Liquid RAD A-013 with Iodine 1 0 1 0 Total 2941 3242 Note 1: The RPD must be 20 percent or less, if both samples are greater than 5 times the MDC. If both results are less than 5 times MDC, then the RPD must be equal to or less than 100%. If one result is above the MDC and the other is below the MDC, then the RPD can be calculated using the MDC for the result of the one below the MDC. The RPD must be 100% or less. In the situation where both results are above the MDC but one result is greater than 5 times the MDC and the other is less than 5 times the MDC, the RPD must be less than or equal to 20%. If both results are below MDC, then the limits on % RPD are not applicable. All not applicable results are revised to 0.
| |
| | |
| Laboratories LLc P.O. Box 30712, Charleston, SC 29417 2012 ANNUAL QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT Page 48 of 60 TABLE 7 ALL RADIOLOGICAL INTRA-LABORATORY DATA
| |
| | |
| ==SUMMARY==
| |
| :
| |
| BIAS AND PRECISION BY MATRIX Bias Criteria Precision Criteria
| |
| + / - 25%) Note 1 WITHIN OUTSIDE WITHIN OUTSIDE 2012 CRITERIA CRITERIA CRITERIA CRITERIA MILK Gamma Spec Liquid RAD A-013 8 0 8 0 Gamma Iodine-129 0 0 1 0 Gamma Iodine-131 44 0 154 0 Gas Flow Sr 2nd count 51 0 48 0 Gas Flow Strontium 90 7 0 7 0 Gas Flow Total Strontium 29 0 29 0 Gross Alpha Non Vol Beta 1 0 1 0 Gamma Spec Liquid RAD A-013 with Ba, La 74 0 147 0 Gamma Spec Liquid RAD A-013 with Iodine 6 0 5 0 SOLID Gas Flow Radium 228 16 0 20 0 Tritium 368 0 402 0 Carbon-14 274 0 358 0 LSC Iron-55 203 0 215 0 Alpha Spec Polonium Solid 90 0 148 0 Gamma Nickel 59 RAD A-022 184 0 240 0 LSC Chlorine-36 in Solids 13 0 24 0 Gamma Spec Ra226 RAD A-013 142 0 178 0 Gamma Spec Solid RAD A-013 815 0 1181 1 LSC Nickel 63 263 0 312 0 LSC Plutonium 268 0 285 2 Technetium-99 429 0 458 0 Gamma Spec Liquid RAD A-013 5 0 5 0 ICP-MS Technetium-99 in Soil 95 0 92 0 LSC Selenium 79 4 0 4 0 Total Activity, 10 0 11 0 Tritium 4 0 4 0 Alpha Spec Am243 42 0 74 0 Gamma Iodine-129 215 0 228 0 Gas Flow Lead 210 41 0 38 0 Total Uranium KPA 7 0 10 0 Alpha Spec Uranium 451 0 614 0 LSC Promethium 147 26 0 37 0 LSC, Rapid Strontium 89 and 90 116 0 129 0 Alpha Spec Polonium 2 0 2 0 Alpha Spec Thorium 257 0 392 0
| |
| | |
| LaboratorieS LLC P.O. Box 30712, Charleston, SC 29417 2012 ANNUAL QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT Page 49 of 60 ICP-MS Uranium-233, 234 in Solid 11 0 8 0 LSCSulfur35 2 0 2 0 Alpha Spec Plutonium 309 0 448 3 ICP-MS Technetium-99 Prep in Soil 88 0 85 0 Alpha Spec Neptunium 293 0 321 1 Alpha Spec Plutonium 157 0 206 0 Alpha Spec Radium 226 12 0 15 1 Gamma Spec Solid with Ra226, Ra228 7 0 13 0 Gas Flow Sr 2nd count 15 0 17 0 Gas Flow Strontium 90 239 0 312 0 Gas Flow Total Radium 2 0 2 0 Lucas Cell Radium 226 43 0 55 0 Total Activity Screen 8 0 48 0 Alpha Spec Am241 Curium 402 0 536 0 LSC Phosphorus-32 3 0 3 0 Gas Flow Total Strontium 88 0 90 0 Gross Alpha Non Vol Beta 2 0 2 0 ICP-MS Uranium-233, 234 Prep in Solid 13 0 8 0 ICP-MS Uranium-235, 236, 238 in Solid 15 0 12 0 Gamma Spec Solid RAD A-013 with Ba, La 8 0 13 0 Gamma Spec Solid RAD A-013 with Iodine 5 0 6 0 Organically Bound Tritium 7 0 16 0 GFC Chlorine-36 in Solids 3 0 2 0 Gamma Spec Solid RAD A-013 (pCi/Sample) 3 0 8 0 Technetium-99 0 0 1 0 Tritium 4 0 4 0 Alpha Spec Am241 Ci/Sam le 0 0 1 0 ICP-MS Uranium-234, 235, 236, 238 in Solid 290 0 281 0 ICP-MS Uranium-235, 236, 238 Prep in Solid 11 0 7 0 Carbon-14 2 0 2 0 Gross Alpha/Beta 299 0 456 1 Alpha Spec Neptunium 0 0 1 0 Gross Alpha/Beta (Americium Calibration) Solid 1 0 1 0 ICP-MS Uranium-234, 235, 236, 238 Prep in Solid 139 0 147 0 Lucas Cell Radium 226 by DOE HASL 300 Ra-04 Solid 1 0 2 0 FILTER_________________
| |
| Alpha Spec Uranium 11 0 20 0 Alpha Spec Polonium 5 0 15 0 Gamma I-131, filter 5 0 5 0
| |
| .LSC Plutonium Filter 133 0 158 0
| |
| | |
| ] Laboratories LLC P.O. Box 30712, Charleston, SC 29417 2012 ANNUAL QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT Page 50 of 60 Tritium 123 0 181 0 Carbon-14 88 0 151 0 Nickel-63 0 0 6 0 LSC Iron-55 136 0 154 0 Gamma Nickel 59 RAD A-022 132 0 151 0 Gamma Iodine 131 RAD A-013 4 0 4 0 Gamma Spec Solid RAD A-013 1 0 1 0 LSC Nickel 63 136 0 181 0 LSC Plutonium 1 0 1 0 Technetium-99 90 0 136 0 Gamma Spec Filter RAD A-013 217 0 288 0 LSC Chlorine-36 in Filters 0 0 1 0 AIphaspec Np Filter per Liter 32 0 40 0 AIphaspec Pu Filter per Liter 22 0 32 0 Gamma Iodine-125 11 0 0 0 Gamma Iodine-129 110 0 128 0 Gross Alpha/Beta 0 0 76 0 Alpha Spec Am243 16 0 30 0 Gas Flow Lead 210 0 0 3 0 LSC Plutonium Filter per Liter 36 0 42 0 Total Uranium KPA 7 0 10 0 Alpha Spec Uranium 61 0 79 0 LSC Promethium 147 1 0 6 0 LSC, Rapid Strontium 89 and 90 128 0 170 0 Alpha Spec Thorium 35 0 48 0 Alpha Spec Plutonium 85 0 106 0 Alpha Spec Neptunium 108 0 135 0 Alpha Spec Plutonium 134 0 181 0 Alpha Spec Polonium,(Filter/Liter) 0 0 17 0 Gas Flow Sr 2nd Count 86 0 92 0 Gas Flow Strontium 90 50 0 61 0 Lucas Cell Radium-226 0 0 1 0 Alpha Spec Am241Curium 157 0 189 0 Gas Flow Total Strontium 6 0 12 0 Total Activity in Filter, 2 0 7 0 Alphaspec Am241 Curium Filter per Liter 36 0 43 0 Tritium 127 0 127 0 GFC Chlorine-36 in Filters 1 0 2 0 Gamma Spec Filter RAD A-013 Direct Count 3 0 3 0 Carbon-14 52 0 60 0 Direct Count-Gross Alpha/Beta 67 0 0 0 Gross Alpha/Beta 73 0 93 0 ICP-MS Uranium-234, 235, 236, 238 in Filter 4 0 10 0 Alpha Spec U 28 0 66 0 Gross A & B 649 0 603 0
| |
| | |
| Laboratories LLC P.O. Box 30712, Charleston, SC 29417 2012 ANNUAL QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT Page 51 of 60 Gross Alpha/Beta 1 0 1 0 LSC Iron-55 44 0 55 0 Technetium-99 32 0 38 0 Gas Flow Sr-90 36 0 41 0 LSC Nickel 63 40 0 47 0 Gas Flow Pb-210 24 0 45 0 Gas Flow Ra-228 27 0 36 0 Gamma Iodine 129 50 0 51 0 ICP-MS Uranium-234, 235, 236, 238 Prep in Filter 2 0 6 0 Gamma Spec Filter 172 0 215 0 Lucas Cell Ra-226 30 0 43 0 Alpha Spec Thorium 37 0 52 0 LIQUID Alpha Spec Uranium 523 0 802 0 Alpha Spec Polonium 2 0 6 0 Electrolytic Tritium 21 0 35 0 Tritium 1377 0 1465 0 Carbon-14 263 0 300 0 Chlorine-36 in Liquids 1 0 3 0 Iodine-131 10 0 18 6 LSC Iron-55 298 0 363 0 Gamma Nickel 59 RAD A-022 26 0 41 0 Gamma Iodine 131 RAD A-013 3 0 4 0 LSC Nickel 63 359 0 402 0 LSC Plutonium 83 0 102 2 LSC Radon 222 9 0 31 0 Technetium-99 364 0 458 0 Gamma Spec Liquid RAD A-013 879 0 941 0 Total Activity, 4 0 4 0 Alpha Spec Am243 10 0 16 0 Gamma Iodine-129 103 0 160 0 Gamma Iodine-131 34 0 36 0 ICP-MS Technetium-99 in Water 4 0 28 0 ICP-MS Uranium-238 in Liquid 0 0 43 0 Gas Flow Lead 210 102 0 101 0 Total Uranium KPA 96 0 249 0 LSC Promethium 147 3 0 11 0 LSC Rapid Strontium 89 and 90 15 0 18 0 Alpha Spec Polonium 1 0 1 0 Alpha Spec Thorium 257 0 384 0 Gas Flow Radium 228 286 0 333 0 Gas Flow Radium 228 12 0 12 0 Alpha Spec Plutonium 319 0 407 0 ICP-MS Uranium-238 Prep in Liquid 0 0 41 0 Alpha Spec Neptunium 118 0 160 0 Alpha Spec Plutonium 60 0 77 0 Alpha Spec Radium 226 0 0 14 0
| |
| | |
| E Laboratories LLC P.O. Box 30712, Charleston, SC 29417 2012 ANNUAL QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT Page 52 of 60 Gas Flow Sr 2nd count 337 0 359 0 Gas Flow Strontium 90 482 0 517 0 Gas Flow Strontium 90 1 0 1 0 Gas Flow Strontium 90 2 0 3 0 Gas Flow Total Radium 83 0 112 0 ICP-MS Technetium-99 Prep in Water 4 0 28 0 ICP-MS Uranium-233, 234 in Liquid 4 0 5 0 Lucas Cell Radium 226 335 0 406 0 Lucas Cell Radium-226 15 0 15 0 Total Activity Screen 0 0 2 0 Chlorine-36 in Liquids 8 0 14 0 Alpha Spec Am241 Curium 327 0 426 0 Gas Flow Total Strontium 240 0 253 0 Gross Alpha Non Vol Beta 1289 0 1521 6 Lucas Cell Radium 226 by Method Ra-04 2 0 0 0 ICP-MS Uranium-233, 234 Prep in Liquid 4 0 5 0 Tritium in Drinking Water by EPA 906.0 16 0 17 0 Gamma Spec Liquid RAD A-013 with Ba La 104 0 194 0 Gamma Spec Liquid RAD A-013 with Iodine 165 0 230 0 Gas Flow Strontium 89 & 90 7 0 3 0 ICP-MS Uranium-235, 236, 238 in Liquid 8 0 8 0 Gas Flow Total Alpha Radium 2 0 2 0 Gross Alpha Co-precipitation 14 0 13 0 ICP-MS Uranium-235, 236, 238 Prep in Liquid 4 0 5 0 ICP-MS Uranium-234, 235, 236, 238 in Liquid 52 0 146 0 Gross Alpha Beta (Americium Calibration) Liquid 21 0 24 0 ICP-MS Uranium-234, 235, 236, 238 Prep in Liquid 23 0 68 0 TISSUE Tritium 5 0 6 0 LSC Iron-55 7 0 7 0
| |
| _Gamma Spec Solid RAD A-013 100 0 105 0 LSC Nickel 63 7 0 7 0 Tritium 2 0 2 0 Alpha Spec Uranium 7 0 8 0 Alpha Spec Plutonium 10 0 11 0 Gas Flow Sr 2nd count 21 0 21 0 Gas Flow Strontium 90 26 0 33 0 Lucas Cell Radium 226 2 0 2 0 Alpha Spec Am241 Curium 3 0 3 0 Gas Flow Total Strontium 26 0 26 0
| |
| | |
| - l Laboratories LLC P.O. Box 30712, Charleston, SC 29417 2012 ANNUAL QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT Page 53 of 60 Gamma Spec Solid RAD A-013 with Ba, La 9 0 9 0 Gamma Spec Solid RAD A-013 with Iodine 24 0 24 0 Organically Bound Tritium 1 0 1 0 Gross Alpha/Beta 4 0 5 0 VEGETATION Carbon-14 6 0 6 0 Gamma Nickel 59 RAD A-022 4 0 4 0 Gamma Spec Solid RAD A-013 25 0 30 0 LSC Nickel 63 4 0 4 0 LSC Plutonium 5 0 4 0 Technetium-99 7 0 7 0 Tritium 16 0 16 0 Gamma Iodine-129 4 0 3 0 Gas Flow Lead 210 4 0 4 0 Total Uranium KPA 2 0 2 0 Alpha Spec Uranium 25 0 27 0 Alpha Spec Thorium 7 0 8 0 Alpha Spec Plutonium 12 0 9 0 Alpha Spec Neptunium 1 0 1 0 Alpha Spec Plutonium 1 0 1 0 Gas Flow Sr 2nd count 13 0 13 0 Gas Flow Strontium 90 16 0 14 0 Gas Flow Total Radium 0 0 1 0 Alpha Spec Am241 Curium 9 0 6 0 Gamma Spec Solid RAD A-013 with Iodine 87 0 90 0 Gamma Spec Solid RAD A-013 (pCi/Sample) 2 0 2 0 Alpha Spec Am241 (pCi/Sample) 4 0 2 0 ICP-MS Uranium-234, 235, 236, 238 in Solid 6 0 3 0 Alpha Spec Uranium 2 1 2 0 Gross Alpha/Beta 7 2 9 0 Alpha Spec Plutonium 2 2 2 0 Gas Flow Strontium 90 4 0 2 0 ICP-MS Uranium-234, 235, 236, 238 Prep in Solid 4 0 2 0 AIR CHARCOAL Gamma I-131, filter 4 0 4 0 Gamma Iodine 131 RAD A-013 549 0 552 0 Carbon-14 8 0 6 0 DRINKING WATER Alpha Spec Uranium 7 0 8 0 Tritium 44 0 44 0 Iodine-131 0 0 18 6 LSC Iron-55 18 0 20 0 LSC Nickel 63 22 0 24 0
| |
| | |
| = Laboratories P.O. Box 30712, Charleston, SC 29417 LLC 2012 ANNUAL QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT Page 54 of 60 LSC Radon 222 78 1 99 0 Gamma Spec Liquid RAD A-013 16 0 46 0 Gamma Iodine-129 2 0 7 0 Gamma Iodine-131 32 0 34 0 Total Uranium KPA 19 0 38 0 Alpha Spec Thorium 2 0 2 0 Gas Flow Radium 228 174 0 143 0 Gas Flow Sr 2nd count 17 0 17 0 Gas Flow Strontium 90 18 0 18 0 LSC Calcuim 45 4 0 4 0 Lucas Cell Radium-226 158 0 169 0 Gas Flow Total Strontium 21 0 21 0 Gross Alpha Non Vol Beta 393 0 327 0 LSC Phosphorus-32 5 0 25 0 Tritium in Drinking Water by EPA 906.0 35 0 35 0 Gamma Spec Liquid RAD A-013 with Ba, La 53 0 93 0 Gamma Spec Liquid RAD A-013 with Iodine 2 0 2 0 Gas Flow Strontium 89 & 90 19 0 12 0 Gas Flow Total Alpha Radium 4 0 4 0 Gross Alpha Co-precipitation 109 0 107 0 Alpha/Beta (Americium Calibration)
| |
| Drinking Water 13 0 14 0 ECLS-R-GA NJ 48 Hr Rapid Gross Alpha 9 0 9 0 Total 22305 27436 Note 1: The RPD must be 20 percent or less, if both samples are greater than 5 times the MDC. If both results are less than 5 times MDC, then the RPD must be equal to or less than 100%. If one result is above the MDC and the other is below the MDC, then the RPD can be calculated using the MDC for the result of the one below the MDC. The RPD must be 100% or less. In the situation where both results are above the MDC but one result is greater than 5 times the MDC and the other is less than 5 times the MDC, the RPD must be less than or equal to 20%. If both results are below MDC, then the limits on % RPD are not applicable. All not applicable results are revised to 0.
| |
| | |
| Laboratories LLC P.O. Box 30712, Charleston, SC 29417 2012 ANNUAL QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT Page 55 of 60 TABLE 8 2012 CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORT
| |
| | |
| ==SUMMARY==
| |
| | |
| CORRECTIVE ACTION ID#
| |
| & DISPOSITION PE FAILURE CARR120306-667 The low bias associated with the tritium result for RAD-88 initiated an investigation of the liquid scintillation detector ISO Documentation of PT Failures in used for the original reported result after the original vials RAD-88 Study - Tritium in Water were recounted on a different detector and met acceptance criteria. The tritium efficiency for the detector was reviewed and a slight low bias was observed. A service call was initiated.
| |
| Tritium and carbon-14 efficiencies were calculated on all liquid scintillation detectors to ensure that service was not required.
| |
| No other deficiencies were noted. The data reported using this detector was also reviewed and were deemed acceptable as originally reported In the future, the efficiency of each detector will be monitored monthly in order to rapidly identify any change that may require service.
| |
| A second PT was successfully analyzed for this matrix.
| |
| CARR120831-715 Barium-133 All data were reviewed and it appears that the cause of the ISO Documentation of PT Failures in high bias was due to the calibration standard.
| |
| RAD-90 Study - Barium-133 and The reported result was counted on a detector that omitted Radium-226 the Hg-203 nuclide from the efficiency calibration due to its short half-life and an inability to accumulate 10,000 counts in a reasonable amount of time. The duplicate sample in the batch counted on a detector that had the Hg-203 point included in its efficiency calibration and generated a result of 64.83 pCi/L. This result compares well with the assigned value of 65 pCi/L.
| |
| Radium-226 After a review of the data, an apparent reason for this discrepancy could not be determined. Multiple steps were taken to prove that this high bias was an isolated occurrence and that our overall process is within control.
| |
| | |
| Laboratories LLC P.O. Box 30712, Charleston, SC 29417 2012 ANNUAL QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT Page 56 of 60 Two sample duplicates were also prepared and counted along with the reported result. Both results fell well within the acceptance range Actions to Prevent Potential Occurrence or Recurrence:
| |
| Barium-133 In the future additional points will be included in the efficiency curve to better estimate the efficiencies across the entire energy spectrum.
| |
| Radium-226 The laboratory must assume an unidentified random error caused the high bias because all quality control criteria were met for the batch. The lab will continue to monitor the recoveries of this radionuclide to ensure that there are no issues.
| |
| | |
| [ l Laboratories LLc P.O. Box 30712, Charleston, SC 29417 2012 ANNUAL QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT Page 57 of 60 CARR120711-694 and 698 For Failures of MAPEP 26 Study for MAPEP-12-RdF26 Uranium 234/233 in Filters and Uranium-234/233 Vegitation After a thorough review of the data, the root cause of the low bias on the reported values was due to a high counting uncertainty. The counting uncertainty achieved for the U-233/4 results was approximately 100% of the reported results.
| |
| Since the Relative Error Ratio between the result and the true value was 1.72, this indicates that the measured result is within the uncertainty of the measurement.
| |
| Update January 2013 Originally, it was suspected that the failure of the low bias on the reported values was due to a high counting uncertainty.
| |
| The counting uncertainty achieved for the U-233/4 results was approximately 100% of the reported results. However, after the receipt of a similar failure in MAPEP 27 and a conversation with Mr. David Sill of the RESL Laboratory, it is certain that the aliquot used to analyze the sample was insufficient to detect the Uranium-234/233 spiked onto the filter (which is directly related to the high counting uncertainty).
| |
| MAPEP-12-RdV26 Uranium-2341233 After a thorough review of the data, the root cause of the low bias on the reported values was due to a high counting uncertainty. The counting uncertainty achieved for the U-233/4 results was approximately 60% of the reported results.
| |
| Since the Relative Error Ratio between the result and the true value was 1.14, this indicates that the measured result is within the uncertainty of the measurement.
| |
| Permanent Corrective/Preventive Actions or Improvements:
| |
| Since guidance on acceptable uncertainties or Action Levels are not provided, to avoid potential warnings and failures due to high counting uncertainty in the future, our internal review process has been adjusted.
| |
| If the result has measurable activity but a low count rate, the count time will be extended and the sample re-analyzed with a larger aliquot to achieve better counting statistics.
| |
| | |
| [ l rll l' Laboratories LLC P.O. Box 30712, Charleston, SC 29417 2012 ANNUAL QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT Page 58 of 60 Root Cause Analysis of MAPEP-12-MaS27 CARR121127-742 Selenium MAPEP 27 Unacceptable and After a review of the data, a definitive reason for this Warning - Selinium, Gross Alpha discrepancy could not be determined. However, it is suspected that something occurred during the digestion of the batch to produce the lower recovery. The following steps were taken to ensure that this was an isolated occurrence and that our overall process is within control.
| |
| Actions Taken: MAPEP-12-MaS27 Selenium The laboratory must assume an unidentified random error caused the lower result. However, closer attention must be paid to the matrix QC failures. In the future, the samples should be re-extracted to confirm results prior to reporting.
| |
| MAPEP-12-GrF27 Gross Alpha Prior to counting, this filter was taken through the opening and labeling procedures specified in CARR120118-659. It is not suspected that previous Gross Alpha MAPEP issues contributed to this failure. While reviewing results from previous studies, a low bias was observed. Itwas suspected that this bias was due to a difference in instrument efficiency due to the filter media. To investigate further, a previous MAPEP filter containing activity was counted and used to establish an efficiency. When applied to the counts of MAPEP 27, the result were acceptable but the low bias was still observed. Source standards were then created using blank filter media from previous MAPEP studies. The blank filters were spiked with Th-230 and counted to determine an average efficiency. When this efficiency was applied to the MAPEP 27 count, the result fell well within the acceptance range. Using the blank filter to create an instrument efficiency is part of the study instructions as an option. This efficiency is much more accurate than what was used and will be used for future MAPEP studies.
| |
| Actions taken : MAPEP-12-GrF27 Gross Alpha Since using the blank filter to create an instrument efficiency is part of the study instructions, it will be used for future MAPEP studies. GEL found that this efficiency is much more accurate than the one previously used.
| |
| | |
| Laboratories LLC P.O. Box 30712, Charleston, SC 29417 2012 ANNUAL QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT Page 59 of 60 CARR 121127-743 MAPEP-12-RdF27 MAPEP 27 Study Unacceptable and Uranium-234/233 Warning ratings for U234/233 in Filter Upon notification of the failures, the data were reviewed again for accuracy. Investigations on quality control checks and trending were preformed to ensure that the low bias was isolated to the MAPEP sample procedure and not indicative of a systematic failure.
| |
| Also, an additional MAPEP-12-RdF27 filter was obtained and prepared per standard protocol. Based on the recommendations from Mr. David Sill of the RESL laboratory, the entire filter was used for analysis. The U-233/234 and U-238 results for this analysis were 98% of the known values.
| |
| The cause of the failure was the limited sample amount used to prepare the initial sample. Multiple aliquots had been removed from the digested filter for other analyses, the RESL Laboratory had had prepared this sample as a single analysis.
| |
| Action Taken: MAPEP-12-RdF26 and MAPEP-12-RdF27 Uranium-234/233 Since guidance on acceptable uncertainties or Action Levels are not provided, to avoid potential warnings and failures due to high counting uncertainty in the future, our internal review process has been adjusted.
| |
| If the result has measurable activity but a low count rate, the count time will be extended and/or the sample re-analyzed using a larger sample aliquot to achieve better counting statistics. Although the MAPEP instructions are written such that the laboratory should have confidence in using smaller aliquots and still attain sufficiently low counting uncertainties, it is now our understanding that the design of the MAPEP filter program requires the analysis of a complete filter aliquot for each parameter analyzed.
| |
| GEL will procure from MAPEP a filter for each parameter, analyze the entire filter for each parameter, and no longer perform batch duplicates for filter analysis of MAPEP samples.
| |
| CARR121109-744 MAPEP-12-MaS26 & MAPEP-12-MaS27 Co-57 MAPEP 27 Study for biased high GEL received warnings for Co-57 results in the soil matrix in trends of Cobalt-57 the past two testing rounds of the MAPEP. While Co-57 received warning flags all other gamma emitting isotopes in the soil matrix had acceptable results. Due to a potential trend, a corrective action was opened.
| |
| After receiving the results from MAPEP-27 and a second biased high result for Co-57, a thorough review of our process
| |
| | |
| Laboratories LLC P.O. Box 30712, Charleston, SC 29417 2012 ANNUAL QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT Page 60 of 60 was conducted. This review indicated an issue associated with the calibration correction factors (absorption factors or density corrections) applied to results due to differing densities between the sample and the calibration standard. A potential 20% positive bias for Co-57 (122 keV) was observed. Note: This bias was within the acceptable uncertainty of the method (+/- 25%) for duplicate results.
| |
| Results for Am-241(59.5 keV) were also reviewed to ensure that biases were not observed.
| |
| Action Taken: MAPEP-12-MaS26 & MAPEP-12-MaS27 Co-57 The reported results compared very well to the reference values for both MAPEP-26 and MAPEP-27 (-97% and 101%,
| |
| respectively). Since absorption factors (or density corrections) are only applied to our 100 ml aluminum can geometry for soils, no other matrices were impacted. A review of the annual analytical data for this isotope indicated that the reported data to clients were not impacted by this bias.
| |
| | |
| ENVIRONMENTAL DOSIMETRY COMPANY ANNUAL QUALITY ASSURANCE STATUS REPORT January - December 2012 Prepared By: , . / >la 4 Date:
| |
| Approved By: Date: _
| |
| Environmental Dosimetry Company 10 Ashton Lane Sterling, MA 01564
| |
| | |
| TABLE OF CONTENTS Page LIST OF TABLES..................................................................................................................... iii EXECUTIVE
| |
| | |
| ==SUMMARY==
| |
| ............................................................................................................ iv I. INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................ 1 A. QC Program........................................................................................................ 1 B. QA Program ........................................................................................................ 1 II. PERFORMANCE EVALUATION CRITERIA................................................................... 1
| |
| : 1. Acceptance Criteria for Internal Evaluations........................................................ 1
| |
| : 2. QC Investigation Criteria and Result Reporting ................................................ 3
| |
| : 3. Reporting of Environmental Dosimetry Results to EDC Customers .................. 3 III. DATA
| |
| | |
| ==SUMMARY==
| |
| FOR ISSUANCE PERIOD JANUARY-DECEMBER 2012 .............. 3 A. General Discussion........................................................................................... 3 B. Result Trending .............................................................................................. 4 IV. STATUS OF EDC CONDITION REPORTS (CR) ........................................................ 4 V. STATUS OF AUDITS/ASSESSMENTS...................................................................... 4
| |
| : 1. Inte rn a l................................................................................................................ 4
| |
| : 2. E xte rn a l .............................................................................................................. 4 VI. PROCEDURES AND MANUALS REVISED DURING JANUARY - DECEMBER 2012...4 VII. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................................. 4 VIII. REFERENCES...............................................................................................................4 APPENDIX A DOSIMETRY QUALITY CONTROL TRENDING GRAPHS
| |
| -ii-
| |
| | |
| LIST OF TABLES Page
| |
| : 1. Percentage of Individual Analyses Which Passed EDC Internal Criteria, January - December 2012 5
| |
| : 2. Mean Dosimeter Analyses (n=6), January - December 2012 5
| |
| : 3. Summary of Independent QC Results for 2012 5
| |
| -iii-
| |
| | |
| EXECUTIVE
| |
| | |
| ==SUMMARY==
| |
| | |
| Routine quality control (QC) testing was performed for dosimeters issued by the Environmental Dosimetry Company (EDC) .
| |
| During this annual period, 100% (72/72) of the individual dosimeters, evaluated against the EDC internal performance acceptance criteria (high-energy photons only), met the criterion for accuracy and 100% (72/72) met the criterion for precision (Table 1). In addition, 100% (12/12) of the dosimeter sets evaluated against the internal tolerance limits met EDC acceptance criteria (Table 2) and 100% (6/6) of independent testing passed the performance criteria (Table 3). Trending graphs, which evaluate performance statistic for high-energy photon irradiations and co-located stations are given in Appendix A.
| |
| Two assessments were performed in 2012, one internal and one external. All findings were closed out in September of 2012.
| |
| -iv-
| |
| | |
| I. INTRODUCTION The TLD systems at the Environmental Dosimetry Company (EDC) are calibrated and operated to ensure consistent and accurate evaluation of TLDs. The quality of the dosimetric results reported to EDC clients is ensured by in-house performance testing and independent performance testing by EDC clients, and both internal and client directed program assessments.
| |
| The purpose of the dosimetry quality assurance program is to provide performance documentation of the routine processing of EDC dosimeters. Performance testing provides a statistical measure of the bias and precision of dosimetry processing against a reliable standard, which inturn points out any trends or performance changes. Two programs are used:
| |
| A. QC Program Dosimetry quality control tests are performed on EDC Panasonic 814 Environmental dosimeters. These tests include: (1) the in-house testing program coordinated by the EDC QA Officer and (2) independent test perform by EDC clients. In-house test are performed using six pairs of 814 dosimeters, a pair is reported as an individual result and six pairs are reported as the mean result.
| |
| Results of these tests are described in this report.
| |
| Excluded from this report are instrumentation checks. Although instrumentation checks represent an important aspect of the quality assurance program, they are not included as process checks in this report. Instrumentation checks represent between 5-10% of the TLDs processed.
| |
| B. QA Program An internal assessment of dosimetry activities is conducted annually by the Quality Assurance Officer (Reference 4). The purpose of the assessment is to review procedures, results, materials or components to identify opportunities to improve or enhance processes and/or services.
| |
| II. PERFORMANCE EVALUATION CRITERIA
| |
| : 1. Acceptance Criteria for Internal Evaluations (a) Bias For each dosimeter tested, the measure of bias is the percent deviation of the reported result relative to the delivered exposure.
| |
| The percent deviation relative to the delivered exposure is calculated as follows:
| |
| (Hi'- H,)
| |
| 10 0 H,
| |
| where:
| |
| H = the corresponding reported exposure for the ith dosimeter (i.e., the reported exposure) 1 of 6
| |
| | |
| Hi = the exposure delivered to the ith irradiated dosimeter (i.e., the delivered exposure)
| |
| (b) Mean Bias For each group of test dosimeters, the mean bias is the average percent deviation of the reported result relative to the delivered exposure. The mean percent deviation relative to the delivered exposure is calculated as follows:
| |
| (H; - H)
| |
| H,100 -
| |
| C1 where:
| |
| H = the corresponding reported exposure for the ith dosimeter (i.e., the reported exposure)
| |
| H = the exposure delivered to the ith irradiated test dosimeter (i.e., the delivered exposure) n = the number of dosimeters in the test group (c) Precision For a group of test dosimeters irradiated to a given exposure, the measure of precision is the percent deviation of individual results relative to the mean reported exposure. At least two values are required for the determination of precision. The measure of precision for the ith dosimeter is:
| |
| - 100 where:
| |
| H; = the reported exposure for the ith dosimeter (i.e., the reported exposure)
| |
| H = the mean reported exposure; i.e., H= ZH n = the number of dosimeters in the test group (d) EDC Internal Tolerance Limits All evaluation criteria are taken from the "EDC Quality System Manual," (Reference 2). These criteria are only applied to individual test dosimeters irradiated with high-energy photons (Cs-137) and are as follows for Panasonic Environmental dosimeters: +/- 15% for bias and +/- 12.8% for precision.
| |
| 2 of 6
| |
| : 2. QC Investigation Criteria and Result Reporting EDC Quality System Manual (Reference 2) specifies when an investigation is required due to a QC analysis that has failed the EDC bias criteria. The criteria are as follows:
| |
| (a) No investigation is necessary when an individual QC result falls outside the QC performance criteria for accuracy.
| |
| (b) Investigations are initiated when the mean of a QC processing batch is outside the performance criterion for bias.
| |
| : 3. Reporting of Environmental Dosimetry Results to EDC Customers (a) All results are to be reported in a timely fashion.
| |
| (b) If the QA Officer determines that an investigation is required for a process, the results shall be issued as normal. If the QC results, prompting the investigation, have a mean bias from the known of greater than +/-20%, the results shall be issued with a note indicating that they may be updated in the future, pending resolution of a QA issue.
| |
| (c) Environmental dosimetry results do not require updating if the investigation has shown that the mean bias between the original results and the corrected results, based on applicable correction factors from the investigation, does not exceed +/-20%.
| |
| IIl. DATA
| |
| | |
| ==SUMMARY==
| |
| FOR ISSUANCE PERIOD JANUARY-DECEMBER 2012 A. General Discussion Results of performance tests conducted are summarized and discussed in the following sections. Summaries of the performance tests for the reporting period are given in Tables 1 through 3 and Figures 1 through 4.
| |
| Table 1 provides a summary of individual dosimeter results evaluated against the EDC internal acceptance criteria for high-energy photons only. During this period, 100% (72/72) of the individual dosimeters, evaluated against these criteria met the tolerance limits for accuracy and 100% (72/72) met the criterion for precision.
| |
| A graphical interpretation is provided in Figures 1 and 2.
| |
| Table 2 provides the Bias + Standard deviation results for each group (N=6) of dosimeters evaluated against the internal tolerance criteria. Overall,100%
| |
| (12/12) of the dosimeter sets evaluated against the internal tolerance performance criteria met these criteria. A graphical interpretation is provided in Figures 3 Table 3 presents the independent blind spike results for dosimeters processed during this annual period. All results passed the performance acceptance criterion. Figure 4 is a graphical interpretation of Seabrook Station blind co-located station results.
| |
| 3 of 6
| |
| | |
| B. Result Trending One of the main benefits of performing quality control tests on a routine basis is to identify trends or performance changes. The results of the Panasonic environmental dosimeter performance tests are presented in Appendix A. The results are evaluated against each of the performance criteria listed in Section II, namely: individual dosimeter accuracy, individual dosimeter precision, and mean bias.
| |
| All of the results presented in Appendix A are plotted sequentially by processing date.
| |
| IV. STATUS OF EDC CONDITION REPORTS (CR)
| |
| During this annual period, one EDC Condition Report was issued. CR 1-2012 was issued to document the findings from the DTE Energy Audit 12-006.
| |
| V. STATUS OF AUDITS/ASSESSMENTS
| |
| : 1. Internal EDC Internal Quality Assurance Assessment was conducted during the fourth quarter 2012. There were not any findings as a result of this assessment.
| |
| : 2. External The DTE Energy Audit 12-006 was conducted on June 5, 2012. Two findings were issued as a result of this audit. The EDC responded to these findings and they were closed on September 6, 2012 VI. PROCEDURES AND MANUALS REVISED DURING JANUARY - DECEMBER 2012 Manual 1 was revised on August 1, 2012.
| |
| Procedure 700 was revised on August 31,2012 Procedure 750 was revised on February 15,2012 VII. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS The quality control evaluations continue to indicate the dosimetry processing programs at the EDC satisfy the criteria specified in the Quality System Manual. The EDC demonstrated the ability to meet all applicable acceptance criteria.
| |
| VIII. REFERENCES
| |
| : 1. EDC Quality Control and Audit Assessment Schedule, 2012.
| |
| : 2. EDC Manual 1, Quality System Manual, Rev. 3, August 1, 2012.
| |
| 4 of 6
| |
| | |
| TABLE 1 PERCENTAGE OF INDIVIDUAL DOSIMETERS THAT PASSED EDC INTERNAL CRITERIA JANUARY - DECEMBER 2012(1)' (2)
| |
| Number Passed Bias Crtria. % Passed Precision Dosimeter Type Tested /e Criteria Panasonic Environmental 72 100 100
| |
| (')This table summarizes results of tests conducted by EDC.
| |
| (2)Environmental dosimeter results are free in air.
| |
| TABLE 2 MEAN DOSIMETER ANALYSES (N=6)
| |
| JANUARY - DECEMBER 2012()'' (2)
| |
| Standard Tolerance Process Date Mean Bias / Deviation % Limit +/-15%
| |
| 4/18/2012 7.7 1.7 Pass 4/21/2012 11.6 1.4 Pass 5/1/2012 1.1 1.4 Pass 6/5/2012 -0.5 1.3 Pass 7/19/2012 2.3 1.6 Pass 7/23/2012 -4.0 0.8 Pass 11/1/2012 2.5 2.2 Pass 11/4/2012 1.5 0.9 Pass 11/26/2012 -2.3 2.6 Pass 1/23/2013 -3.2 1.1 Pass 1/28/2013 4.4 1.3 Pass 2/2/2013 -0.1 1.2 Pass
| |
| (')This table summarizes results of tests conducted by EDC for TLDs issued in 2012.
| |
| (2)Environmental dosimeter results are free in air.
| |
| TABLE 3
| |
| | |
| ==SUMMARY==
| |
| OF INDEPENDENT DOSIMETER TESTING JANUARY - DECEMBER 2012(), (2)
| |
| Standard Pass / Fail Issuance Period Client Mean Bias "/ Deviation %
| |
| 15'Qtr.2012 Millstone -10.4 2.6 Pass 2" Qtr.2012 Millstone -4.7 1.6 Pass 2" Qtr.2012 Seabrook -0.8 1.5 Pass Millstone -13.9 2.6 Pass 3 rd Qtr. 2012 4 h Qtr.2012 Millstone 4.3 1.5 Pass Seabrook -5.2 1.3 Pass 4 h Qtr.2012
| |
| (')Performance criteria are +/- 30%.
| |
| (2)Blind spike irradiations using Cs-137 5 of 6
| |
| | |
| APPENDIX A DOSIMETRY QUALITY CONTROL TRENDING GRAPHS ISSUE PERIOD JANAURY - DECEMBER 2012 6 of 6
| |
| | |
| % BIAS
| |
| > rr P Q'1 OS f+- N O W A N O N A KA W O N y, I I^ a I" o
| |
| y ( I a ° r "
| |
| G' I le I I °I I
| |
| ' I i e " I e '
| |
| I I I G
| |
| 0 r "
| |
| o ,
| |
| C7 ° T C c7 °'a I I rn z r I I. I Td' 6'c' I I " e i r
| |
| iyR I I° "
| |
| I r Ti'' I I "° I r I as I I G' I ' " I I r I a 1 I
| |
| , e r I I a I
| |
| , I " I " I a ,
| |
| OJT
| |
| | |
| INDIVIDUAL PRECISION ENVIRONMENTAL FIGURE 2 16 14-12-10-8-
| |
| 6-4-
| |
| z e W- 2 -
| |
| 0 0 0 0 0 0
| |
| : a. 0
| |
| -2 - e ~~
| |
| - - - - -
| |
| -10
| |
| -14
| |
| -16 1 1 PROCESSING DATE
| |
| | |
| MEAN ACCURACY ENVIRONMENTAL FIGURE 3 16 14-12-10 6
| |
| 4-
| |
| -4 "
| |
| -2
| |
| -100 -14 PROCESSING DATE
| |
| | |
| SEABROOK STATION CO-LOCATED ACCURACY FIGURE 4 20 ->=-L'i- - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - -- - --- -- -- -- ---- - - -
| |
| 18-16 14-12-10-8-
| |
| 6 0 4
| |
| V) 2
| |
| < 0 -~
| |
| 2
| |
| -a-e e 0
| |
| ee 0
| |
| -20
| |
| -16
| |
| -20 M~ - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - ----
| |
| -20 EXPECTED FIELD EXPOSURE (mR/STD. QUARTER)}}
| |
