ML090721095: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 19: Line 19:
=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:March 12, 2009  
{{#Wiki_filter:March 12, 2009  
 
James R. Douet Vice President Operations Entergy Operations, Inc. Grand Gulf Nuclear Station P.O. Box 756  
James R. Douet  
Vice President Operations  
Entergy Operations, Inc.  
Grand Gulf Nuclear Station  
P.O. Box 756  
Port Gibson, MS  39150   
Port Gibson, MS  39150   
  SUBJECT: GRAND GULF NUCLEAR STATION - NRC EXAMINATION REPORT 05000416/2009301   
   
SUBJECT:  
GRAND GULF NUCLEAR STATION - NRC EXAMINATION REPORT  
05000416/2009301   
   
   
Dear Mr. Douet:  
Dear Mr. Douet:  
On March 10, 2009, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed an examination at Grand Gulf Nuclear Station.  The enclosed report documents the examination findings, which were discussed on March 5, 2009, with yourself, Messrs. Jeremy Browning, Plant Manager, Ernest Mathes, Assistant Operations Manager for Training, Jim Caery, Training Manager, and other members of your staff.
The examination included the evaluation of two applicants for reactor operator licenses, two applicants for instant senior operator licenses, and two applicants for upgrade senior operator licenses.  The written examinations and operating tests were developed using NUREG-1021, "Operator Licensing Examination Standards for Power Reactors," Revision 9, Supplement 1.  The license examiners determined that all applicants satisfied the requirements of 10 CFR  Part 55, and the appropriate licenses have been issued.
A licensee-identified Severity Level IV violation is listed in Section 4OA7 of this report.  The NRC is treating this violation as a non-cited violation consistent with Section VI.A.1 of the NRC
Enforcement Policy because it is a Severity Level IV violation and because it is entered into your corrective action program.  If you contest this non-cited violation, you should provide a response within 30 days of the date of this inspection report, with the basis for your denial, to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN: Document Control Desk, Washington, D.C. 20555-0001, with copies to the Regional Administrator, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Region IV, 612 East Lamar Blvd., Suite 400, Arlington, Texas 76011; the Director, Office of Enforcement, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001; and the NRC Resident Inspector at Grand Gulf Nuclear Station. UNITED STATESNUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSIONREGION IV612 EAST LAMAR BLVD, SUITE 400ARLINGTON, TEXAS 76011-4125
Entergy Operations, Inc. - 2 -
  In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter and its enclosure will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRC's document system (ADAMS).  ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).
      Sincerely, 
   
   
        /RA/      BWStapleton for       Ryan E. Lantz, Chief Operations Branch      Division of Reactor Safety
On March 10, 2009, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed an examination
at Grand Gulf Nuclear Station.  The enclosed report documents the examination findings, which
were discussed on March 5, 2009, with yourself, Messrs. Jeremy Browning, Plant Manager,
Ernest Mathes, Assistant Operations Manager for Training, Jim Caery, Training Manager, and
other members of your staff.
The examination included the evaluation of two applicants for reactor operator licenses, two
applicants for instant senior operator licenses, and two applicants for upgrade senior operator
licenses.  The written examinations and operating tests were developed using NUREG-1021,
"Operator Licensing Examination Standards for Power Reactors," Revision 9, Supplement 1. 
The license examiners determined that all applicants satisfied the requirements of 10 CFR 
Part 55, and the appropriate licenses have been issued.
A licensee-identified Severity Level IV violation is listed in Section 4OA7 of this report.  The
NRC is treating this violation as a non-cited violation consistent with Section VI.A.1 of the NRC
Enforcement Policy because it is a Severity Level IV violation and because it is entered into
your corrective action program.  If you contest this non-cited violation, you should provide a
response within 30 days of the date of this inspection report, with the basis for your denial, to
the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN: Document Control Desk, Washington, D.C.
20555-0001, with copies to the Regional Administrator, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
Region IV, 612 East Lamar Blvd., Suite 400, Arlington, Texas 76011; the Director, Office of  
Enforcement, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001; and the
NRC Resident Inspector at Grand Gulf Nuclear Station.
UNITED STATES
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
R E GI ON  I V
612 EAST LAMAR BLVD, SUITE 400
ARLINGTON, TEXAS 76011-4125


  Docket:  50-416 License:  NPF-29  
Entergy Operations, Inc.
- 2 -
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter and its
enclosure will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document
Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRCs document system
(ADAMS).  ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-
rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).
Sincerely, 
/RA/
BWStapleton for
Ryan E. Lantz, Chief
Operations Branch
Division of Reactor Safety
Docket:  50-416  
License:  NPF-29  
Enclosure:
NRC Examination Report 05000416/2009301
  w/Attachment: Supplemental Information
cc w/Enclosure:
Senior Vice President
Entergy Nuclear Operations
P. O. Box 31995
Jackson, MS  39286-1995
Senior Vice President and COO
Entergy Operations, Inc.
P. O. Box 31995
Jackson, MS  39286-1995
Vice President, Oversight
Entergy Services, Inc.
P. O. Box 31995
Jackson, MS  39286-1995


  Enclosure: NRC Examination Report 05000416/2009301   w/Attachment: Supplemental Information
Entergy Operations, Inc.
- 3 -
   
Chief, Energy and Transportation Branch
Environmental Compliance and
   Enforcement Division
Mississippi Department of 
  Environmental Quality
P. O. Box 10385
Jackson, MS  39289-0385
President
Claiborne County
Board of Supervisors
510 Market Street
Port Gibson, MS 39150
   
   
cc w/Enclosure: Senior Vice President Entergy Nuclear Operations P. O. Box 31995 Jackson, MS  39286-1995
Senior Manager
 
Nuclear Safety & Licensing
Senior Vice President and COO Entergy Operations, Inc. P. O. Box 31995 Jackson, MS  39286-1995
Entergy Nuclear Operations  
 
P. O. Box 31995  
Vice President, Oversight Entergy Services, Inc. P. O. Box 31995 Jackson, MS  39286-1995  
Jackson, MS  39286-1995  
 
Entergy Operations, Inc. - 3 -
  Chief, Energy and Transportation Branch Environmental Compliance and    Enforcement Division
Mississippi Department of    Environmental Quality P. O. Box 10385 Jackson, MS  39289-0385
   
   
President Claiborne County Board of Supervisors 510 Market Street Port Gibson, MS 39150
Manager, Licensing
Senior Manager
Entergy Operations, Inc.
Nuclear Safety & Licensing Entergy Nuclear Operations P. O. Box 31995 Jackson, MS  39286-1995
Grand Gulf Nuclear Station
P. . Box 756
Port Gibson, MS  39150
   
   
Manager, Licensing Entergy Operations, Inc. Grand Gulf Nuclear Station P. . Box 756 Port Gibson, MS  39150
Attorney General  
 
Department of Justice  
Attorney General Department of Justice State of Louisiana P. O. Box 94005  
State of Louisiana  
P. O. Box 94005  
Baton Rouge, LA  70804-9005   
Baton Rouge, LA  70804-9005   
  Office of the Governor State of Mississippi P.O. Box 139  
   
Office of the Governor  
State of Mississippi  
P.O. Box 139  
Jackson, MS  39205
Attorney General
Assistant Attorney General
State of Mississippi
P. O. Box 220
Jackson, MS  39205  
Jackson, MS  39205  
Attorney General Assistant Attorney General State of Mississippi P. O. Box 220 Jackson, MS  39205 
 
Entergy Operations, Inc. - 4 -  
Entergy Operations, Inc.  
  State Health Officer State Health Board P. O. Box 1700  
- 4 -  
State Health Officer  
State Health Board  
P. O. Box 1700  
Jackson, MS  39215   
Jackson, MS  39215   
  Associate General Counsel Entergy Nuclear Operations P. O. Box 31995  
   
Associate General Counsel  
Entergy Nuclear Operations  
P. O. Box 31995  
Jackson, MS  39286-1995  
Jackson, MS  39286-1995  
  Louisiana Dept. of Environmental Quality Radiological Emergency Planning and    Response Division P. O. Box 4312 Baton Rouge, LA  70821-4312
   
Entergy Operations, Inc. - 5 -  
Louisiana Dept. of Environmental Quality  
  Electronic distribution by RIV: Regional Administrator (Elmo.Collins@nrc.gov) Deputy Regional Administrator (Chuck.Casto@nrc.gov)  
Radiological Emergency Planning and  
DRP Director (Dwight.Chamberlain@nrc.gov) DRP Deputy Director (Anton.Vegel@nrc.gov) DRS Director (Roy.Caniano@nrc.gov) DRS Deputy Director (Troy.Pruett@nrc.gov) Senior Resident Inspector Rich.Smith@nrc.gov) Resident Inspector (Andy.Barrett@nrc.gov) Branch Chief, DRP/C (Geoffrey.Miller@nrc.gov) Senior Project Engineer, DRP/C (Wayne.Walker@nrc.gov) GG Site Secretary (Nancy.Spivey@nrc.gov) Public Affairs Officer (Victor.Dricks@nrc.gov) Team Leader, DRP/TSS (Chuck.Paulk@nrc.gov) RITS Coordinator (Marisa.Herrera@nrc.gov)  
   Response Division  
P. O. Box 4312  
Baton Rouge, LA  70821-4312  
 
Entergy Operations, Inc.  
- 5 -  
Electronic distribution by RIV:  
Regional Administrator (Elmo.Collins@nrc.gov)  
Deputy Regional Administrator (Chuck.Casto@nrc.gov)  
DRP Director (Dwight.Chamberlain@nrc.gov)  
DRP Deputy Director (Anton.Vegel@nrc.gov)  
DRS Director (Roy.Caniano@nrc.gov)  
DRS Deputy Director (Troy.Pruett@nrc.gov)  
Senior Resident Inspector Rich.Smith@nrc.gov)  
Resident Inspector (Andy.Barrett@nrc.gov)  
Branch Chief, DRP/C (Geoffrey.Miller@nrc.gov)  
Senior Project Engineer, DRP/C (Wayne.Walker@nrc.gov)  
GG Site Secretary (Nancy.Spivey@nrc.gov)  
Public Affairs Officer (Victor.Dricks@nrc.gov)  
Team Leader, DRP/TSS (Chuck.Paulk@nrc.gov)  
RITS Coordinator (Marisa.Herrera@nrc.gov)  
ML
SUNSI Rev Compl.
Yes  No
ADAMS
Yes  No
Reviewer Initials
GWA
Publicly Avail
Yes  No
Sensitive
Yes  No
Sens. Type Initials
GWA
OE:OB
OE:OB
SOE:OB
SOE:OB
C:PBC
C:OB
GWApger
SHedger
BTLarson
SGarchow
GMiller
RELantz
/RA/
/RA/
/RA/
/RA/
/RA/
/RA/
03/11/09
03/11/09
03/11/09
03/11/09
03/11/09
03/12/09
OFFICIAL RECORD COPY 
T=Telephone          E=E-mail        F=Fax


   
   
   
   
   
- 1 -  
   
Enclosure  
  ML SUNSI Rev Compl.  Yes  No ADAMS  Yes  No Reviewer Initials GWA Publicly Avail  Yes  No Sensitive  Yes  No Sens. Type Initials GWA OE:OB OE:OB SOE:OB SOE:OB C:PBC  C:OB GWApger SHedger BTLarson SGarchow GMiller  RELantz
   
/RA/ /RA/ /RA/ /RA//RA//RA/ 03/11/09 03/11/09 03/11/09 03/11/09 03/11/09  03/12/09 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY  T=Telephone          E=E-mail        F=Fax  
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION  
  - 1 - Enclosure  
   
  U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION  
REGION IV  
  REGION IV  
   
  Docket: 50-416 Licenses: NPF-29  
Docket:  
Report No.: 05000416/2009301  
50-416  
Licensee: Entergy Operations, Inc.  
Licenses:  
Facility: Grand Gulf Nuclear Station Location: Waterloo Road  Port Gibson, Mississippi  39150 Dates: March 3 - 10, 2009 Inspectors: Steve Garchow (Chief Examiner) Gabriel Apger (Examiner, Chief Examiner Under Instruction) Brian Larson (Examiner) Sean Hedger (Examiner Under Instruction) Approved By: Ryan E. Lantz  
NPF-29  
     
Report No.:  
 
05000416/2009301  
  - 2 - Enclosure SUMMARY OF FINDINGS  
Licensee:  
Entergy Operations, Inc.  
Facility:  
Grand Gulf Nuclear Station  
Location:  
Waterloo Road   
Port Gibson, Mississippi  39150  
Dates:  
March 3 - 10, 2009  
Inspectors:  
Steve Garchow (Chief Examiner)  
Gabriel Apger (Examiner, Chief Examiner Under Instruction)  
Brian Larson (Examiner)  
Sean Hedger (Examiner Under Instruction)  
Approved By:  
Ryan E. Lantz  
 
- 2 -  
Enclosure  
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS  
   
   
ER05000416/2009301; March 3-10, 2009; Grand Gulf Nuclear Station; Initial Operator  
ER05000416/2009301; March 3-10, 2009; Grand Gulf Nuclear Station; Initial Operator  
Licensing Examination Report.  
Licensing Examination Report.  
   
   
NRC examiners evaluated the competency of two applicants for reactor operator licenses, two applicants for instant senior operator licenses, and two applicants for upgrade senior operator licenses at Grand Gulf Nuclear Station.  
NRC examiners evaluated the competency of two applicants for reactor operator licenses, two  
  The licensee developed the examinations using NUREG-1021, "Operator Licensing  
applicants for instant senior operator licenses, and two applicants for upgrade senior operator  
Examination Standards for Power Reactors," Revision 9, Supplement 1.  The written examinations were administered by the licensee on March 9, 2009.  NRC examiners administered the operating tests on March 3 - 5, 2009.   
licenses at Grand Gulf Nuclear Station.  
  The examiners determined that all applicants satisfied the requirements of 10 CFR Part 55, and the appropriate licenses have been issued.   
   
The licensee developed the examinations using NUREG-1021, "Operator Licensing  
Examination Standards for Power Reactors," Revision 9, Supplement 1.  The written  
examinations were administered by the licensee on March 9, 2009.  NRC examiners  
administered the operating tests on March 3 - 5, 2009.   
   
The examiners determined that all applicants satisfied the requirements of 10 CFR Part 55, and  
the appropriate licenses have been issued.   
A.
NRC-Identified and Self-Revealing Findings
No findings of significance were identified.
B. 
Licensee-Identified Violations
A licensee identified Severity Level IV non-cited violation has been reviewed by the
examiners.  Corrective actions taken or planned by the licensee have been entered into
the licensees corrective action program.  This violation and its corrective action tracking
numbers are listed in Section 4OA7 of this report.
 
- 3 -
Enclosure
REPORT DETAILS
4.
OTHER ACTIVITIES (OA)
4OA5 Other Activities (Initial Operator License Examination)
   
   
A. NRC-Identified and Self-Revealing Findings
  .1
  No findings of significance were identified.
License Applications  
  B. Licensee-Identified Violations
  A licensee identified Severity Level IV non-cited violation has been reviewed by the examiners.  Corrective actions taken or planned by the licensee have been entered into the licensee's corrective action program.  This violation and its corrective action tracking numbers are listed in Section 4OA7 of this report. 
  - 3 - Enclosure REPORT DETAILS
4. OTHER ACTIVITIES (OA)
        4OA5 Other Activities (Initial Operator License Examination)
  .1 License Applications
  a. Scope  NRC examiners reviewed all license applications submitted to ensure each applicant satisfied relevant license eligibility requirements.  Examiners also audited three of the license applications in detail to confirm that they accurately reflected the subject applicant's qualifications.  This audit focused on the applicant's experience and on-the-job training, including control manipulations that provided significant reactivity changes.
  b. Findings
  No findings of significance were identified.
.2 Examination Development
 
a. Scope  NRC examiners developed the outlines, written examinations and portions of the operating tests.  The NRC staff submitted the operating test outlines and test material to the licensee to validate and finalize for submittal as draft operating tests.  NRC
examiners reviewed the draft operating tests submitted by the licensee against the requirements in NUREG-1021. 
  b. Findings
  NRC examiners provided draft examination and post-validation comments to the licensee.  The licensee satisfactorily completed comment resolution prior to examination administration.
NRC examiners determined that the draft operating tests submitted by the licensee did
not meet the requirements of NUREG-1021.  Specifically, the simulator scenario "Applicant's Actions" portion of the Form ES-D-2 did not contain sufficient detail.  Errors in identifying malfunctions were found.  The job performance measures were not validated, and they contained numerous technical, formatting and grammatical errors.  A contributing factor is the licensee replaced the operating test developer two weeks before on-site validation, and had no process in place to ensure the developer effectively implemented the requirements of NUREG-1021. 
  - 4 - Enclosure  .3 Operator Knowledge and Performance
  a. Scope  On March 9, 2009, the licensee proctored the administration of the written examinations
to all six applicants.  The licensee staff graded the written examinations, analyzed the results, and presented their analysis to the NRC on March 10, 2009.
The NRC examination team administered the various portions of the operating tests to all applicants on March 3 - 5, 2009. 
  b. Findings
  No findings of significance were identified.
All applicants passed the written examination and all parts of the operating test.  The final written examinations, operating tests and post-examination analysis can be
accessed in the ADAMS system under the accession numbers noted in the attachment.  There were no post-examination comments as indicated in a letter received from the licensee, dated March 9, 2009.
  .4 Simulation Facility Performance
  a. Scope  The NRC examiners observed simulator performance with regard to plant fidelity during examination validation and administration.
  b. Findings
  No findings of significance were identified.
   
   
  .5 Examination Security
  a. Scope  The NRC examiners reviewed examination security for examination development during  
a.
both the onsite preparation week and examination administration week for compliance with 10 CFR 55.49 and NUREG-1021.  Plans for simulator security and applicant control were reviewed and discussed with licensee personnel.   
Scope
  b. Findings
  A compromise of the simulator scenario portion of the operating test occurred during  
NRC examiners reviewed all license applications submitted to ensure each applicant
examination development that resulted in the licensee-identified non-cited violation documented in section 4OA7 of this report. The finding is being treated under traditional enforcement because the violation, if not found or corrected, had the potential to impede the NRC's regulatory function.  Specifically, licensing decisions could have been made based on an invalid and compromised examination.  To ensure a valid examination, the  
satisfied relevant license eligibility requirements.  Examiners also audited three of the
following changes were made to the simulator scenario portion of the operating test:   
license applications in detail to confirm that they accurately reflected the subject
  - 5 - Enclosure  
applicants qualifications.  This audit focused on the applicants experience and on-the-
  * All four scenarios were removed from the examination, and  
job training, including control manipulations that provided significant reactivity changes.
  * Two new scenarios were developed by the NRC and the facility during the onsite validation week.  There was no overlap with any of the removed scenarios.  
  4OA6 Meetings, Including Exit
  The chief examiner presented the preliminary examination results to Mr. James R.  
b.
Douet and members of his staff on March 5, 2009.  A telephonic exit was conducted on March 11, 2009 between Messrs. Gabriel Apger, Examiner, and Bruce Bryant, Operations Training Superintendant, Initial.  
Findings
  The licensee did not identify any information or materials used during the examination  
No findings of significance were identified.
.2
Examination Development
a.
Scope
NRC examiners developed the outlines, written examinations and portions of the
operating tests.  The NRC staff submitted the operating test outlines and test material to
the licensee to validate and finalize for submittal as draft operating tests.  NRC
examiners reviewed the draft operating tests submitted by the licensee against the
requirements in NUREG-1021. 
b.
Findings
NRC examiners provided draft examination and post-validation comments to the
licensee.  The licensee satisfactorily completed comment resolution prior to examination
administration.
NRC examiners determined that the draft operating tests submitted by the licensee did
not meet the requirements of NUREG-1021.  Specifically, the simulator scenario
Applicants Actions portion of the Form ES-D-2 did not contain sufficient detail.  Errors
in identifying malfunctions were found.  The job performance measures were not
validated, and they contained numerous technical, formatting and grammatical errors.  A
contributing factor is the licensee replaced the operating test developer two weeks
before on-site validation, and had no process in place to ensure the developer
effectively implemented the requirements of NUREG-1021.
 
- 4 -
Enclosure
.3
Operator Knowledge and Performance
a.
Scope
On March 9, 2009, the licensee proctored the administration of the written examinations
to all six applicants.  The licensee staff graded the written examinations, analyzed the
results, and presented their analysis to the NRC on March 10, 2009.
The NRC examination team administered the various portions of the operating tests to
all applicants on March 3 - 5, 2009. 
b.
Findings
No findings of significance were identified.
All applicants passed the written examination and all parts of the operating test.  The
final written examinations, operating tests and post-examination analysis can be
accessed in the ADAMS system under the accession numbers noted in the attachment. 
There were no post-examination comments as indicated in a letter received from the
licensee, dated March 9, 2009.
.4
Simulation Facility Performance
a.
Scope
The NRC examiners observed simulator performance with regard to plant fidelity during
examination validation and administration.
b.
Findings
No findings of significance were identified.
  .5  
Examination Security  
a.  
Scope  
   
The NRC examiners reviewed examination security for examination development during  
both the onsite preparation week and examination administration week for compliance  
with 10 CFR 55.49 and NUREG-1021.  Plans for simulator security and applicant control  
were reviewed and discussed with licensee personnel.   
b.  
Findings  
A compromise of the simulator scenario portion of the operating test occurred during  
examination development that resulted in the licensee-identified non-cited violation  
documented in section 4OA7 of this report. The finding is being treated under traditional  
enforcement because the violation, if not found or corrected, had the potential to impede  
the NRCs regulatory function.  Specifically, licensing decisions could have been made  
based on an invalid and compromised examination.  To ensure a valid examination, the  
following changes were made to the simulator scenario portion of the operating test:  
 
   
- 5 -  
Enclosure  
   
*  
All four scenarios were removed from the examination, and  
   
*  
Two new scenarios were developed by the NRC and the facility during the onsite  
validation week.  There was no overlap with any of the removed scenarios.  
   
4OA6 Meetings, Including Exit  
The chief examiner presented the preliminary examination results to Mr. James R.  
Douet and members of his staff on March 5, 2009.  A telephonic exit was conducted on  
March 11, 2009 between Messrs. Gabriel Apger, Examiner, and Bruce Bryant,  
Operations Training Superintendant, Initial.  
   
The licensee did not identify any information or materials used during the examination  
as proprietary.  
as proprietary.  
4OA7 Licensee Identified Violations
  The following Severity Level IV violation was identified by the licensee and is a violation of NRC requirements that meets the criteria of Section VI of the Enforcement Policy, NUREG 1600, for being dispositioned as a Non-Cited Violation.
* 10CFR55.49 states in part:  "Applicants, licensees, and facility licensees shall not engage in any activity that compromises the integrity of any application, test, or examination required by this part.  The integrity of a test or examination is considered compromised if any activity, regardless of intent, affected, or, but for detection, would have affected the equitable and consistent administration of the test or examination."  Contrary to the above, during scenario development in
December of 2008, the facility licensee left unsecured examination scenario paperwork on the simulator printer.  The paperwork for one of the four scenarios was discovered by a facility licensee contractor on January 27, 2009 during onsite validation with the NRC examination team.  The facility licensee immediately reported this to the NRC chief examiner and entered this into their
corrective action program under CR-CGN-2009-00388.  Because the paperwork was left on the printer for approximately one month; the facility licensee could not definitively determine that the other three scenarios had not been printed; and applicants were inside the simulator within eyesight of the printer, the NRC Chief Examiner determined that the integrity of the simulator scenario portion of
the examination had been compromised.  This is a Severity Level IV violation because it was a unintentional compromise of the examination, it was discovered and reported by the licensee, and the compromised portion of the examination was replaced prior to making licensing decisions.
   
   
ATTACHMENT:  SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION  
4OA7 Licensee Identified Violations
  A-1 Attachment SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
  KEY POINTS OF CONTACT  
The following Severity Level IV violation was identified by the licensee and is a violation
of NRC requirements that meets the criteria of Section VI of the Enforcement Policy,
NUREG 1600, for being dispositioned as a Non-Cited Violation.
*
10CFR55.49 states in part:  Applicants, licensees, and facility licensees shall
not engage in any activity that compromises the integrity of any application, test,
or examination required by this part.  The integrity of a test or examination is
considered compromised if any activity, regardless of intent, affected, or, but for
detection, would have affected the equitable and consistent administration of
the test or examination.  Contrary to the above, during scenario development in
December of 2008, the facility licensee left unsecured examination scenario
paperwork on the simulator printer.  The paperwork for one of the four scenarios
was discovered by a facility licensee contractor on January 27, 2009 during
onsite validation with the NRC examination team.  The facility licensee
immediately reported this to the NRC chief examiner and entered this into their
corrective action program under CR-CGN-2009-00388.  Because the paperwork
was left on the printer for approximately one month; the facility licensee could
not definitively determine that the other three scenarios had not been printed;
and applicants were inside the simulator within eyesight of the printer, the NRC
Chief Examiner determined that the integrity of the simulator scenario portion of
the examination had been compromised.  This is a Severity Level IV violation
because it was a unintentional compromise of the examination, it was
discovered and reported by the licensee, and the compromised portion of the
examination was replaced prior to making licensing decisions.
ATTACHMENT:  SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
 
A-1  
Attachment  
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION  
KEY POINTS OF CONTACT  
Licensee Personnel
Randy Douet, Site Vice President 
Jeremy Browning, Plant Manager 
Jim Caery, Training Manager
Ernest Mathes, Assistant Operations Manager, Training 
Charles Roberts, Operations Training Superintendant, Requalification
Bruce Bryant, Operations Training Superintendant, Initial
Rita Jackson, Licensing
Will Ryder, Exam Team
Kyle Grillis, Exam Team 
NRC Personnel
Richard Smith, Senior Resident Inspector
ADAMS DOCUMENTS REFERENCED
   
   
Licensee Personnel
Accession No. ML090700248 - FINAL WRITTEN EXAMS  
Randy Douet, Site Vice President 
Accession No. ML090700228 - FINAL OP TEST  
Jeremy Browning, Plant Manager  Jim Caery, Training Manager Ernest Mathes, Assistant Operations Manager, Training  Charles Roberts, Operations Training Superintendant, Requalification Bruce Bryant, Operations Training Superintendant, Initial
Accession No. ML090700256 - POST EXAM COMMENTS-ANALYSIS
Rita Jackson, Licensing Will Ryder, Exam Team Kyle Grillis, Exam Team 
 
NRC Personnel
Richard Smith, Senior Resident Inspector
  ADAMS DOCUMENTS REFERENCED
Accession No. ML090700248 - FINAL WRITTEN EXAMS Accession No. ML090700228 - FINAL OP TEST Accession No. ML090700256 - POST EXAM COMMENTS-ANALYSIS
}}
}}

Latest revision as of 12:50, 14 January 2025

Er 05000416-09-301; March 3-10, 2009; Grand Gulf Nuclear Station; Initial Operator Licensing Examination Report
ML090721095
Person / Time
Site: Grand Gulf Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 03/12/2009
From: Ryan Lantz
Operations Branch IV
To: Douet J
Entergy Operations
References
ER-09-301 50-416/09-301
Download: ML090721095 (11)


See also: IR 05000416/2009301

Text

March 12, 2009

James R. Douet

Vice President Operations

Entergy Operations, Inc.

Grand Gulf Nuclear Station

P.O. Box 756

Port Gibson, MS 39150

SUBJECT:

GRAND GULF NUCLEAR STATION - NRC EXAMINATION REPORT

05000416/2009301

Dear Mr. Douet:

On March 10, 2009, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed an examination

at Grand Gulf Nuclear Station. The enclosed report documents the examination findings, which

were discussed on March 5, 2009, with yourself, Messrs. Jeremy Browning, Plant Manager,

Ernest Mathes, Assistant Operations Manager for Training, Jim Caery, Training Manager, and

other members of your staff.

The examination included the evaluation of two applicants for reactor operator licenses, two

applicants for instant senior operator licenses, and two applicants for upgrade senior operator

licenses. The written examinations and operating tests were developed using NUREG-1021,

"Operator Licensing Examination Standards for Power Reactors," Revision 9, Supplement 1.

The license examiners determined that all applicants satisfied the requirements of 10 CFR

Part 55, and the appropriate licenses have been issued.

A licensee-identified Severity Level IV violation is listed in Section 4OA7 of this report. The

NRC is treating this violation as a non-cited violation consistent with Section VI.A.1 of the NRC

Enforcement Policy because it is a Severity Level IV violation and because it is entered into

your corrective action program. If you contest this non-cited violation, you should provide a

response within 30 days of the date of this inspection report, with the basis for your denial, to

the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN: Document Control Desk, Washington, D.C.

20555-0001, with copies to the Regional Administrator, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission,

Region IV, 612 East Lamar Blvd., Suite 400, Arlington, Texas 76011; the Director, Office of

Enforcement, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001; and the

NRC Resident Inspector at Grand Gulf Nuclear Station.

UNITED STATES

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

R E GI ON I V

612 EAST LAMAR BLVD, SUITE 400

ARLINGTON, TEXAS 76011-4125

Entergy Operations, Inc.

- 2 -

In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter and its

enclosure will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document

Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRCs document system

(ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-

rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).

Sincerely,

/RA/

BWStapleton for

Ryan E. Lantz, Chief

Operations Branch

Division of Reactor Safety

Docket: 50-416

License: NPF-29

Enclosure:

NRC Examination Report 05000416/2009301

w/Attachment: Supplemental Information

cc w/Enclosure:

Senior Vice President

Entergy Nuclear Operations

P. O. Box 31995

Jackson, MS 39286-1995

Senior Vice President and COO

Entergy Operations, Inc.

P. O. Box 31995

Jackson, MS 39286-1995

Vice President, Oversight

Entergy Services, Inc.

P. O. Box 31995

Jackson, MS 39286-1995

Entergy Operations, Inc.

- 3 -

Chief, Energy and Transportation Branch

Environmental Compliance and

Enforcement Division

Mississippi Department of

Environmental Quality

P. O. Box 10385

Jackson, MS 39289-0385

President

Claiborne County

Board of Supervisors

510 Market Street

Port Gibson, MS 39150

Senior Manager

Nuclear Safety & Licensing

Entergy Nuclear Operations

P. O. Box 31995

Jackson, MS 39286-1995

Manager, Licensing

Entergy Operations, Inc.

Grand Gulf Nuclear Station

P. . Box 756

Port Gibson, MS 39150

Attorney General

Department of Justice

State of Louisiana

P. O. Box 94005

Baton Rouge, LA 70804-9005

Office of the Governor

State of Mississippi

P.O. Box 139

Jackson, MS 39205

Attorney General

Assistant Attorney General

State of Mississippi

P. O. Box 220

Jackson, MS 39205

Entergy Operations, Inc.

- 4 -

State Health Officer

State Health Board

P. O. Box 1700

Jackson, MS 39215

Associate General Counsel

Entergy Nuclear Operations

P. O. Box 31995

Jackson, MS 39286-1995

Louisiana Dept. of Environmental Quality

Radiological Emergency Planning and

Response Division

P. O. Box 4312

Baton Rouge, LA 70821-4312

Entergy Operations, Inc.

- 5 -

Electronic distribution by RIV:

Regional Administrator (Elmo.Collins@nrc.gov)

Deputy Regional Administrator (Chuck.Casto@nrc.gov)

DRP Director (Dwight.Chamberlain@nrc.gov)

DRP Deputy Director (Anton.Vegel@nrc.gov)

DRS Director (Roy.Caniano@nrc.gov)

DRS Deputy Director (Troy.Pruett@nrc.gov)

Senior Resident Inspector Rich.Smith@nrc.gov)

Resident Inspector (Andy.Barrett@nrc.gov)

Branch Chief, DRP/C (Geoffrey.Miller@nrc.gov)

Senior Project Engineer, DRP/C (Wayne.Walker@nrc.gov)

GG Site Secretary (Nancy.Spivey@nrc.gov)

Public Affairs Officer (Victor.Dricks@nrc.gov)

Team Leader, DRP/TSS (Chuck.Paulk@nrc.gov)

RITS Coordinator (Marisa.Herrera@nrc.gov)

ML

SUNSI Rev Compl.

Yes No

ADAMS

Yes No

Reviewer Initials

GWA

Publicly Avail

Yes No

Sensitive

Yes No

Sens. Type Initials

GWA

OE:OB

OE:OB

SOE:OB

SOE:OB

C:PBC

C:OB

GWApger

SHedger

BTLarson

SGarchow

GMiller

RELantz

/RA/

/RA/

/RA/

/RA/

/RA/

/RA/

03/11/09

03/11/09

03/11/09

03/11/09

03/11/09

03/12/09

OFFICIAL RECORD COPY

T=Telephone E=E-mail F=Fax

- 1 -

Enclosure

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

REGION IV

Docket:

50-416

Licenses:

NPF-29

Report No.:

05000416/2009301

Licensee:

Entergy Operations, Inc.

Facility:

Grand Gulf Nuclear Station

Location:

Waterloo Road

Port Gibson, Mississippi 39150

Dates:

March 3 - 10, 2009

Inspectors:

Steve Garchow (Chief Examiner)

Gabriel Apger (Examiner, Chief Examiner Under Instruction)

Brian Larson (Examiner)

Sean Hedger (Examiner Under Instruction)

Approved By:

Ryan E. Lantz

- 2 -

Enclosure

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS

ER05000416/2009301; March 3-10, 2009; Grand Gulf Nuclear Station; Initial Operator

Licensing Examination Report.

NRC examiners evaluated the competency of two applicants for reactor operator licenses, two

applicants for instant senior operator licenses, and two applicants for upgrade senior operator

licenses at Grand Gulf Nuclear Station.

The licensee developed the examinations using NUREG-1021, "Operator Licensing

Examination Standards for Power Reactors," Revision 9, Supplement 1. The written

examinations were administered by the licensee on March 9, 2009. NRC examiners

administered the operating tests on March 3 - 5, 2009.

The examiners determined that all applicants satisfied the requirements of 10 CFR Part 55, and

the appropriate licenses have been issued.

A.

NRC-Identified and Self-Revealing Findings

No findings of significance were identified.

B.

Licensee-Identified Violations

A licensee identified Severity Level IV non-cited violation has been reviewed by the

examiners. Corrective actions taken or planned by the licensee have been entered into

the licensees corrective action program. This violation and its corrective action tracking

numbers are listed in Section 4OA7 of this report.

- 3 -

Enclosure

REPORT DETAILS

4.

OTHER ACTIVITIES (OA)

4OA5 Other Activities (Initial Operator License Examination)

.1

License Applications

a.

Scope

NRC examiners reviewed all license applications submitted to ensure each applicant

satisfied relevant license eligibility requirements. Examiners also audited three of the

license applications in detail to confirm that they accurately reflected the subject

applicants qualifications. This audit focused on the applicants experience and on-the-

job training, including control manipulations that provided significant reactivity changes.

b.

Findings

No findings of significance were identified.

.2

Examination Development

a.

Scope

NRC examiners developed the outlines, written examinations and portions of the

operating tests. The NRC staff submitted the operating test outlines and test material to

the licensee to validate and finalize for submittal as draft operating tests. NRC

examiners reviewed the draft operating tests submitted by the licensee against the

requirements in NUREG-1021.

b.

Findings

NRC examiners provided draft examination and post-validation comments to the

licensee. The licensee satisfactorily completed comment resolution prior to examination

administration.

NRC examiners determined that the draft operating tests submitted by the licensee did

not meet the requirements of NUREG-1021. Specifically, the simulator scenario

Applicants Actions portion of the Form ES-D-2 did not contain sufficient detail. Errors

in identifying malfunctions were found. The job performance measures were not

validated, and they contained numerous technical, formatting and grammatical errors. A

contributing factor is the licensee replaced the operating test developer two weeks

before on-site validation, and had no process in place to ensure the developer

effectively implemented the requirements of NUREG-1021.

- 4 -

Enclosure

.3

Operator Knowledge and Performance

a.

Scope

On March 9, 2009, the licensee proctored the administration of the written examinations

to all six applicants. The licensee staff graded the written examinations, analyzed the

results, and presented their analysis to the NRC on March 10, 2009.

The NRC examination team administered the various portions of the operating tests to

all applicants on March 3 - 5, 2009.

b.

Findings

No findings of significance were identified.

All applicants passed the written examination and all parts of the operating test. The

final written examinations, operating tests and post-examination analysis can be

accessed in the ADAMS system under the accession numbers noted in the attachment.

There were no post-examination comments as indicated in a letter received from the

licensee, dated March 9, 2009.

.4

Simulation Facility Performance

a.

Scope

The NRC examiners observed simulator performance with regard to plant fidelity during

examination validation and administration.

b.

Findings

No findings of significance were identified.

.5

Examination Security

a.

Scope

The NRC examiners reviewed examination security for examination development during

both the onsite preparation week and examination administration week for compliance

with 10 CFR 55.49 and NUREG-1021. Plans for simulator security and applicant control

were reviewed and discussed with licensee personnel.

b.

Findings

A compromise of the simulator scenario portion of the operating test occurred during

examination development that resulted in the licensee-identified non-cited violation

documented in section 4OA7 of this report. The finding is being treated under traditional

enforcement because the violation, if not found or corrected, had the potential to impede

the NRCs regulatory function. Specifically, licensing decisions could have been made

based on an invalid and compromised examination. To ensure a valid examination, the

following changes were made to the simulator scenario portion of the operating test:

- 5 -

Enclosure

All four scenarios were removed from the examination, and

Two new scenarios were developed by the NRC and the facility during the onsite

validation week. There was no overlap with any of the removed scenarios.

4OA6 Meetings, Including Exit

The chief examiner presented the preliminary examination results to Mr. James R.

Douet and members of his staff on March 5, 2009. A telephonic exit was conducted on

March 11, 2009 between Messrs. Gabriel Apger, Examiner, and Bruce Bryant,

Operations Training Superintendant, Initial.

The licensee did not identify any information or materials used during the examination

as proprietary.

4OA7 Licensee Identified Violations

The following Severity Level IV violation was identified by the licensee and is a violation

of NRC requirements that meets the criteria of Section VI of the Enforcement Policy,

NUREG 1600, for being dispositioned as a Non-Cited Violation.

10CFR55.49 states in part: Applicants, licensees, and facility licensees shall

not engage in any activity that compromises the integrity of any application, test,

or examination required by this part. The integrity of a test or examination is

considered compromised if any activity, regardless of intent, affected, or, but for

detection, would have affected the equitable and consistent administration of

the test or examination. Contrary to the above, during scenario development in

December of 2008, the facility licensee left unsecured examination scenario

paperwork on the simulator printer. The paperwork for one of the four scenarios

was discovered by a facility licensee contractor on January 27, 2009 during

onsite validation with the NRC examination team. The facility licensee

immediately reported this to the NRC chief examiner and entered this into their

corrective action program under CR-CGN-2009-00388. Because the paperwork

was left on the printer for approximately one month; the facility licensee could

not definitively determine that the other three scenarios had not been printed;

and applicants were inside the simulator within eyesight of the printer, the NRC

Chief Examiner determined that the integrity of the simulator scenario portion of

the examination had been compromised. This is a Severity Level IV violation

because it was a unintentional compromise of the examination, it was

discovered and reported by the licensee, and the compromised portion of the

examination was replaced prior to making licensing decisions.

ATTACHMENT: SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION

A-1

Attachment

SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION

KEY POINTS OF CONTACT

Licensee Personnel

Randy Douet, Site Vice President

Jeremy Browning, Plant Manager

Jim Caery, Training Manager

Ernest Mathes, Assistant Operations Manager, Training

Charles Roberts, Operations Training Superintendant, Requalification

Bruce Bryant, Operations Training Superintendant, Initial

Rita Jackson, Licensing

Will Ryder, Exam Team

Kyle Grillis, Exam Team

NRC Personnel

Richard Smith, Senior Resident Inspector

ADAMS DOCUMENTS REFERENCED

Accession No. ML090700248 - FINAL WRITTEN EXAMS

Accession No. ML090700228 - FINAL OP TEST

Accession No. ML090700256 - POST EXAM COMMENTS-ANALYSIS