NLS2008098, Decommissioning Cost Analysis: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
| issue date = 12/15/2008
| issue date = 12/15/2008
| title = Decommissioning Cost Analysis
| title = Decommissioning Cost Analysis
| author name = VanDerkamp D W
| author name = Vanderkamp D
| author affiliation = Nebraska Public Power District (NPPD)
| author affiliation = Nebraska Public Power District (NPPD)
| addressee name =  
| addressee name =  
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:N Nebraska Public Power District"Always there when you need us" NLS2008098 December 15, 2008 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attention:
{{#Wiki_filter:}}
Document Control Desk Washington, D.C. 20555-0001
 
==Subject:==
Decommissioning Cost Analysis Cooper Nuclear Station, Docket'No.
50-298, DPR-46
 
==Reference:==
 
Letter from Stewart B. Minahan (Nebraska Public Power District) to the U.S.Nuclear Regulatory Commission dated September 24, 2008, "License Renewal Application" (NLS2008071)
 
==Dear Sir or Madam:==
The purpose of this correspondence is to transmit the Nebraska Public Power District's (NPPD)Decommissioning Cost Analysis pursuant to the requirements of 10 CFR 50.75(f)(3), "Reporting and Recordkeeping for Decommissioning Planning." NPPD submitted a License Renewal Application for Cooper Nuclear Station (CNS) (Reference).
Although NPPD is seeking license renewal, the Preliminary Decommissioning Cost Estimate is submitted based on the current operating license expiration date of January 18, 2014. When the license for CNS is renewed, this 2008 Decommissioning Cost Estimate for the 2014 plant shutdown scenario would no longer be applicable.
Should you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact me at (402) 825-2904.Sincerely, David W. Van Der Kamp Licensing Manager/Jo Enclosure COOPER NUCLEAR STATION kg P.O. Box 98 / Brownville, NE 68327-0098 Telephone:
(402) 825-3871 / Fax: (402) 825-5211 www.nppd corn NLS2008098 Page 2 of 2 cc: Regional Administrator w/enclosure USNRC -Region IV Cooper Project Manager w/enclosure USNRC -NRR Project Directorate IV-1 Senior Resident Inspector w/enclosure USNRC -CNS NPG Distribution w/o enclosure CNS Records w/enclosure ATTACHMENT 3 LIST OF REGULATORY COMMITMENTS@
ATTACHMENT 3 LIST OF REGULATORY COMMITMENTS© Correspondence Number: NLS2008098 The following table identifies those actions committed to by Nebraska Public Power District (NPPD) in this document.
Any other actions discussed in the submittal represent intended or planned actions by NPPD. They are described for information only and are not regulatory commitments.
Please notify the Licensing Manager at Cooper Nuclear Station of any questions regarding this document or any associated regulatory commitments.
COMMITMENT COMMITTED DATE COMMITMENT NUMBER OR OUTAGE None+ 4+ 4+ 4 I PROCEDURE 0.42 REVISION 22 PAGE 18 OF 25 1 Document N01-1590-002, Rev. 1 DECOMMISSIONING COST ANALYSIS for the COOPER NUCLEAR STATION prepared for the NEBRASKA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT prepared by TLG Services, Inc.Bridgewater, Connecticut December 2008 Cooper Nuclear Station Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document N01-1590-002, Rev. 1 Page ii of xvii APPROVALS Project Manager Project Engineer Technical Manager William A. Cloutier, JP-/William J. Dietz Francis W. Sey uoe Date Date 1A S Dte" DAte'Quality Assurance Manager J eph JJer'ýH d&-TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station Document N01-1590-002, Rev. 1 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Page iii of xvii TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION -PAGE EXECUTIVE
 
==SUMMARY==
..................................................................................
vii-xvii 1. INTRODUCTION
.....................................................................................................
1-1 1.1 Objectives of Study ...........................................................................................
1-1 1.2 Site Description
.................................................................................................
1-1 1.3 Regulatory Guidance ...................................................................................
1-2 1.3.1 Nuclear W aste Policy Act ......................................................................
1-4 1.3.2 Low-Level Radioactive W aste Act ........................................................
1-6 1.3.3 Radiological Criteria for License Termination
....................................
1-7 2. DECOMMISSIONING ALTERNATIVES
..............................................................
2-1 2.1 D E C O N ..............................................................................................................
2-2 2.1.1 Period 1 -Preparations
.........................................................................
2-2 2.1.2 Period 2 -Decommissioning Operations
..............................................
2-4 2.1.3 Period 3 -Site Restoration
....................................................................
2-7 2.1.4 ISFSI Operations and Decommissioning
............................................
2-8 2.2 SAFSTOR and Delayed Decommissioning
.....................................................
2-9 2.2.1 Period 1 -Preparations
.......................................................................
2-10 2.2.2 Period 2 -Dormancy ............................................................................
2-11 2.2.3 Periods 3 and 4 -Deferred Decommissioning
.................
2-12 2.2.4 Period 5 -Site Restoration
..................................................................
2-13 3. COST ESTIMATES
...................................................................................................
3-1 3.1 Basis of Estimates
............................................................................................
3-1 3.2 Methodology
......................................................................................................
3-1 3.3 Financial Components of the Cost Model .......................................................
3-3 3.3.1 Contingency
...........................................................................................
3-4 3.3.2 Financial Risk ........................................................................................
3-5 3.4 Site-Specific Considerations
.............................................................................
3-6 3.4.1 Spent Fuel Management
.......................................................................
3-6 3.4.2 Reactor Vessel and Internal Components
...........................................
3-9 3.4.3 Primary System Components
.............................................................
3-10 3.4.4 Main Turbine and Condenser
.............................................................
3-11 3.4.5 Transportation Methods .....................................................................
3-11 3.4.6 Low-Level Radioactive W aste Conditioning and Disposal ...............
3-12 3.4.7 Site Conditions Following Decommissioning
....................................
3-13 TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station Document N01-1590-002, Rev. 1 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Page iv of xvii TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued)
SECTION -PAGE 3.5 A ssum ptions ....................................................................................................
3-14 3.5.1 Estim ating Basis ............................................................................
3-14 3.5.2 L abor C osts ..........................................................................................
3-14 3.5.3 D esign Conditions
................................................................................
3-15 3.5.4 G eneral .................................................................................................
3-16 3.6 Cost Estim ate Sum m ary ...............................................................................
3-18 4. S C H E D U L E ...............................................................................................................
4-1 4.1 Schedule Estim ate Assum ptions .....................................................................
4-1 4.2 Project Schedule ................................................................................................
4-2 5. RADIOA CTIVE W ASTES ........................................................................................
5-1 6. R E S U L T S .................................................................................................................
6-1 7. R E F E R E N C E S ..* .......................................................................................................
7-1 TABLES Cost Summary, 2014 Cessation of Operations
...............................................
xvi Cost Summary, 2034 Cessation of Operations
..............................................
xvii 3.1 2014 DECON, Schedule of Total Annual Expenditures
...............................
3-19 3.2 2014 Delayed DECON, Schedule of Total Annual Expenditures
................
3-21 3.3 2014 SAFSTOR, Schedule of Total Annual Expenditures
...........................
3-23 3.4 2034 DECON, Schedule of Total Annual Expenditures
...............................
3-25 3.5 2034 Delayed DECON, Schedule of Total Annual Expenditures
................
3-26 3.6 2034 SAFSTOR, Schedule of Total Annual Expenditures
...........................
3-28 5.1 Decommissioning Waste Summary .................................................................
5-3 5.2 2014 DECON, Decommissioning Waste Summary ........................................
5-4 5.3 2014 Delayed DECON, Decommissioning Waste Summary ..........................
5-5 5.4 2014 SAFSTOR, Decommissioning Waste Summary .....................................
5-6 5.5 2034 DECON, Decommissioning Waste Summary ........................................
5-7 5.6 2034 Delayed DECON, Decommissioning Waste Summary ..........................
5-8 5.7 2034 SAFSTOR, Decommissioning Waste Summary .....................................
5-9 TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station Document N01-1590-002, Rev. 1 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Page v of xvii TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued)
SECTION -PAGE TABLES (continued) 6.1 Cost Summary, 2014 Cessation of Operations
...............................................
6-4 6.2 Cost Summary, 2034 Cessation of Operations
...............................................
6-5 FIGURES 4.1 2014 DECON Activity Schedule.......................................................................
4-3 4.2 2014 Delayed DECON Activity Schedule ........................................................
4-6 4.3 2014 SAFSTOR Activity Schedule ...................................................................
4-9 4.4 2034 DECON Activity Schedule .....................................................................
4-12 4.5 2034 Delayed DECON Activity Schedule ......................................................
4-15 4.6 2034 SAFSTOR Activity Schedule .................................................................
4-18 4.7 D E C O N Tim elines .........................................................................................
4-21 4.8 Delayed DECON and SAFSTOR Timelines
..................................................
4-22 APPENDICES A. Unit Cost Factor Development
.......................................................................
A-1 B. Unit Cost Factor Listing ................................................................................
B-1 C. Detailed Cost Analyses, 2014 Cessation of Operations
.................................
C-1 T able C -1, D E C O N ................................................................................................
C -2 Table C-2, Delayed DECON ...........................................................................
C-13 Table C-3, SAFSTOR ......................................
C-24 D. Detailed Cost Analyses, 2034 Cessation of Operations
.................................
D-1 T able D -1, D E C O N ................................................................................................
D -2 Table D -2, Delayed D ECON ...............................................................................
D -13 Table D -3, SA FSTO R ..........................................................................................
D -24 E. Work Difficulty Adjustment Factors ................................................................
E-1 F .A rea M aps ..........................................................................................................
F -1 TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document N01-1590-002, Rev. 1 Page vi of xvii REVISION LOG No'R~. ~ 1 t R d -R f 'Revso 0 10-08-08 Original Issue Pages xvii-xviii Tables 3.1 through 3.6 1 T73-0804 12-08-08 Tables 6.1 and 6.2 Corporate Overhead Costs Revised Tables C-1, C-2, C-3 Tables D-1, D-2, D-3 TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station Document N01-1590-002, Rev. 1 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Page vii of xvii EXECUTIVE
 
==SUMMARY==
This report presents estimates of the cost to decommission the Cooper Nuclear Station (Cooper) for the selected decommissioning scenarios following a scheduled cessation of plant operations.
The estimates are designed to provide Nebraska Public Power District (NPPD) with the information needed to assess its financial obligations as they pertain to the eventual decommissioning of the nuclear station. This report is also designed to meet the requirements of 10 CFR 50.75(f)(3) in that it includes an assessment of the major factors that could affect the cost to decommission.
The primary goal of the decommissioning is the removal and disposal of the contaminated systems and structures so that the plant's operating license can be terminated.
The cost analysis recognizes that spent fuel will be stored at the site in the plant's storage pool and/or in an independent spent fuel storage installation (ISFSI)until such time that it can be transferred to the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE).Consequently, the estimates also include those costs to manage and subsequently decommission these interim storage facilities.
The estimates are based on numerous fundamental assumptions, including regulatory requirements, project contingencies, low-level radioactive waste disposal practices, high-level radioactive waste management options, and site restoration requirements.
The estimates incorporate a minimum cooling period for the spent fuel that resides in the storage pool when operations cease. Any residual fuel remaining in the pool after the cooling period is transferred directly to the DOE or relocated to the ISFSI for interim storage. The estimates also include the dismantling of site structures and non-essential facilities and the limited restoration of the site.Alternatives and Regulations The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) provided general decommissioning guidance in a rule adopted on June 27, 1988.[1] In this rule, the NRC set forth technical and financial criteria for decommissioning licensed nuclear facilities.
The regulations addressed planning needs, timing, funding methods, and environmental review requirements for decommissioning.
The rule also defmed three decommissioning alternatives as being acceptable to the NRC: DECON, SAFSTOR, and ENTOMB.DECON is defined as "the alternative in which the equipment, structures, and portions of a facility and site containing radioactive contaminants are removed or decontaminated to a level that permits the 1 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations, Title 10, Parts 30, 40, 50, 51, 70 and 72 "General Requirements for Decommissioning Nuclear Facilities," Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Federal Register Volume 53, Number 123 (p 24018 et seq.), June 27, 1988 TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station Document N01-1590-002, Rev. 1 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Page viii of xvii property to be released for unrestricted use shortly after cessation of operations."[
2]SAFSTOR is defined as "the alternative in which the nuclear facility is placed and maintained in a condition that allows the nuclear facility to be safely stored and subsequently decontaminated (deferred decontamination) to levels that permit release for unrestricted use."[3]Decommissioning is required to be completed within 60 years, although longer time periods will be considered when necessary to protect public health and safety. The safe-storage periods in the Delayed DECON analyses are selected to coincide with the removal of spent fuel from the site.ENTOMB is defined as "the alternative in which radioactive contaminants are encased in a structurally long-lived material, such as concrete; the entombed structure is appropriately maintained and continued surveillance is carried out until the radioactive material decays to a level permitting unrestricted release of the property."[
4] As with the SAFSTOR alternative, decommissioning is currently required to be completed within 60 years, although longer time periods will also be considered when necessary to protect public health and safety.The 60-year restriction has limited the practicality for the ENTOMB alternative at commercial reactors that generate significant amounts of long-lived radioactive material.
In 1997, the Commission directed its staff to re-evaluate this alternative and identify the technical requirements and regulatory actions that would be necessary for entombment to become a viable option. The resulting evaluation provided several recommendations, however, rulemaking has been deferred pending the completion of additional research studies (e.g., on engineered barriers).
In 1996, the NRC published revisions to its general requirements for decommissioning nuclear power plants to clarify ambiguities and codify procedures and terminology as a means of enhancing efficiency and uniformity in the decommissioning process.[5] The amendments allow for greater public participation and better defme the transition process from operations to decommissioning.
Regulatory Guide 1.184, issued in July 2000, further described the methods and procedures that are acceptable to the NRC 2 Ibid. Page FR24022, Column 3 3 Ibid.4 Ibid. Page FR24023, Column 2 5 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations, Title 10, Parts 2, 50, and 51, "Decommissioning of Nuclear Power Reactors," Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Federal Register Volume 61, (p 39278 et seq.), July 29, 1996 TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document N01-1590-002, Rev. 1 Page ix of xvii staff for implementing the requirements of the 1996 revised rule that relate to the initial activities and the major phases of the decommissioning process. The costs and schedules presented in this analysis follow the general guidance and sequence in the amended regulations.
Decommissioning Scenarios The following alternatives were evaluated and are representative of the alternatives available to the owner: 1. DECON: The plant is decommissioned shortly after the permanent cessation of plant operations.
Spent fuel, that is not transferred directly to the DOE, is relocated to the ISFSI for interim storage. Spent fuel storage operations continue at the site until the transfer of the fuel to the DOE is completed.
: 2. Delayed DECON: In the second scenario, the unit is prepared for an abbreviated period of storage. As in the first scenario, spent fuel storage operations continue at the site until the transfer of the fuel to the DOE is completed.
Once completed, decommissioning operations are initiated.
: 3. SAFSTOR: The third scenario is similar to the second scenario in that the unit is placed in safe-storage with concurrent spent fuel storage operations.
However, in this scenario, decommissioning is deferred beyond the fuel storage period to the maximum extent possible; termination of the license would conclude within the maximum required 60-year period.Six scenarios were identified for evaluation.
As shown below, the six scenarios evaluate a combination of shutdown dates (scheduled and anticipated) and decommissioning alternative (prompt or deferred).
Shutdown Spent Fuel Operating Scenario Date Option Transfer License Completed Terminated 1 2014 DECON 2046 2020 2 2014 Delayed DECON 2046 2053 3 2014 SAFSTOR 2046 2074 4 2034 DECON 2061 2040 5 2034 Delayed DECON 2061 2068 6 2034 SAFSTOR 2061 2094_ _ _ I __ _ I _ _ _ _ _ I _ _ _ _ I _ _TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station Document N01-1590-002, Rev. 1 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Page x of xvii Methodology The methodology used to develop the estimates described within this document follows the basic approach originally presented in the cost estimating guidelines[
6] developed by the Atomic Industrial Forum (now Nuclear Energy Institute).
This reference describes a unit cost factor method for estimating decommissioning activity costs. The unit cost factors used in this analysis incorporate site-specific costs and the latest available information about worker productivity in decommissioning.
The estimates are area-based estimates, i.e., the plant inventory has been correlated with site-specific area working conditions, and the plant work activities organized into discrete areas to better reflect the manner in which the decommissioning will be conducted.
The areas were determined on the basis of "common" conditions or attributes.
Each area was evaluated for work difficulty, including affects of radiation, external surface contamination, and access. This evaluation was used to adjust the work difficulty factors for removing equipment in a given area. A data base was constructed and identified the installed equipment in each area. This data base contains a list of components that have a unique identifier, such as valves, tanks, electrical equipment, and heat exchangers.
It also contains bulk commodities such as piping, ventilation ductwork, cable tray, electrical conduit, and supports.The inventory was organized according to its proposed disposition.
There were three primary waste streams identified for the Cooper inventory:
(1) clean material (expected to meet the release criteria without any decontamination), (2) contaminated material with recovery potential or requiring additional processing for disposal (expected to be sent to an off-site waste processor), and (3) contaminated material designated for direct disposal at a controlled low-level radioactive waste disposal site (i.e., material expected to exceed waste processor acceptance criteria or uneconomical to process).An activity duration critical path was used to determine the total decommissioning program schedule.
This was required for estimating the project costs, including program management, administration, field engineering, equipment rental, quality assurance, and security.This analysis reflects lessons learned from TLG's involvement in the Shippingport Station decommissioning, completed in 1989, as well as the decommissioning of the Cintichem reactor, hot cells, and associated facilities, completed in 1997. In addition, the planning and engineering for the Pathfinder, Shoreham, Rancho Seco, Trojan, Yankee Rowe, Big Rock Point, Maine Yankee, Humboldt Bay-3, Connecticut Yankee, 6 T.S. LaGuardia et al., "Guidelines for Producing Commercial Nuclear Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Estimates," AIF/NESP-036, May 1986 TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station Document N01-1590-002, Rev. 1 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Page xi of xvii and San Onofre-1 nuclear units have provided additional insight into the process, the regulatory aspects, and the technical challenges of decommissioning commercial nuclear units.Contingency Consistent with standard cost estimating practice, contingencies are applied to the decontamination and dismantling costs developed as "specific provision for unforeseeable elements of cost within the defined project scope, particularly important where previous experience relating estimates and actual costs has shown that unforeseeable events which will increase costs are likely to occur."[7] The cost elements in the estimates are based on ideal conditions; therefore, the types of unforeseeable events that are almost certain to occur in decommissioning, based on industry experience, are addressed through a percentage contingency applied on a line-item basis. This contingency factor is a nearly universal element in all large-scale construction and demolition projects.
It should be noted that contingency, as used in this analysis, does not account for price escalation and inflation in the cost of decommissioning over the remaining operating life of the station.Contingency funds are expected to be fully expended throughout the program. As such, inclusion of contingency is necessary to provide assurance that sufficient funding will be available to accomplish the intended tasks.Low-Level Radioactive Waste Disposal The contaminated and activated material generated in the decontamination and dismantling of a commercial nuclear reactor is classified as low-level radioactive waste, although not all of the material is suitable for shallow-land disposal.
With the passage of the "Low-Level Radioactive Waste Disposal Act" in 1980 and its Amendments of 1985,[8] the states became ultimately responsible for the disposition of low-level radioactive waste generated within their own borders.Until recently, there were two facilities available to NPPD for the disposal of low-level radioactive waste generated by Cooper. As of July 1, 2008, however, the facility in Barnwell, South Carolina was closed to generators outside the Atlantic Compact (comprised of the states of Connecticut, New Jersey and South Carolina).
This leaves the facility in Clive, Utah, operated by EnergySolutions, as the only available destination for low-level radioactive waste requiring controlled disposal.7 Project and Cost Engineers' Handbook, Second Edition, American Association of Cost Engineers, Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, New York, p. 239 8 "Low-Level Radioactive Waste Policy Amendments Act of 1985," Public Law 99-240, 1/15/86 TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station Document N01-1590-002, Rev. 1 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Page xii of xvii For the purpose of this analysis, the EnergySolutions' facility is used as the basis for estimating the disposal cost for the majority of the radioactive waste (Class A [91).EnergySolutions does not have a license to dispose of the more highly radioactive waste (Classes B and C), for example, generated in the dismantling of the reactor vessel. As a proxy, the disposal cost for this material is based upon the last published rate schedule for non-compact waste for the Barnwell facility.The dismantling of the components residing closest to the reactor core generates radioactive waste considered unsuitable for shallow-land disposal (i.e., low-level radioactive waste with concentrations of radionuclides that exceed the limits established by the NRC for Class C radioactive waste (GTCC)). The Low-Level Radioactive Waste Policy Amendments Act of 1985 assigned the federal government the responsibility for the disposal of this material.
The Act also stated that the beneficiaries of the activities resulting in the generation of such radioactive waste bear all reasonable costs of disposing of such waste. However, to date, the federal government has not identified a cost for disposing of GTCC or a schedule for acceptance.
As such, the GTCC radioactive waste has been packaged and disposed of as high-level waste, at a cost equivalent to that envisioned for the spent fuel.A significant portion of the waste material generated during decommissioning may only be potentially contaminated by radioactive materials.
This waste can be analyzed on site or shipped off site to licensed facilities for further analysis, for processing and/or for conditioning/recovery.
Reduction in the volume of low-level radioactive waste requiring disposal in a licensed low-level radioactive waste disposal facility can be accomplished through a variety of methods, including analyses and surveys or decontamination to eliminate the portion of waste that does not require disposal as radioactive waste, compaction, incineration or metal melt. The estimates for Cooper reflect the savings from waste recovery/volume reduction.
High-Level Radioactive Waste Management Congress passed the "Nuclear Waste Policy Act"['0 1 (NWPA) in 1982, assigning the federal government's long-standing responsibility for disposal of the spent nuclear fuel created by the commercial nuclear generating plants to the DOE. The NWPA provided that DOE would enter into contracts with utilities in which DOE would promise to take the utilities' spent fuel and high-level radioactive waste and utilities would pay the cost of the disposition services for that material.
NWPA, along with the individual contracts with the utilities, specified that the DOE was to begin accepting spent fuel by January 31, 1998.9 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations, Title 10, Part 61, "Licensing Requirements for Land Disposal of Radioactive Waste" 10 "Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982 and Amendments," DOE's Office of Civilian Radioactive Management, 1982 TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station Document N01-1590-002, Rev. 1 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Page xiii of xvii Since the original legislation, the DOE has announced several delays in the program schedule.
By January 1998, the DOE had failed to accept any spent fuel or high level waste, as required by the NWPA and utility contracts.
Delays continue and, as a result, generators have initiated legal action against the DOE in an attempt to obtain compensation for DOE's breach of contract.Operation of DOE's yet-to-be constructed repository is contingent upon the review and approval of the facility's license application by the NRC and the successful resolution of pending litigation.
The DOE submitted its license application to the NRC on June 3, 2008, seeking authorization to construct the repository at Yucca Mountain, Nevada.Assuming a timely review, and adequate funding, the DOE expects that receipt of fuel could begin by 2020.[111 It is generally necessary that spent fuel be actively cooled and stored for a minimum period at the generating site prior to transfer.
As such, the NRC requires that licensees establish a program to manage and provide funding for the management of all irradiated fuel at the reactor site until title of the fuel is transferred to the Secretary of Energy, pursuant to 10 CFR Part 50.54(bb).[121 This funding requirement is fulfilled through inclusion of certain cost elements in the decommissioning estimates, for example, associated with the isolation and continued operation of the spent fuel pool and ISFSI.At shutdown, the spent fuel pool is expected to contain freshly discharged assemblies (from the most recent refueling cycles) as well as the final reactor core. Over the following 51/2 years the assemblies are packaged into multipurpose canisters for transfer to the DOE or to the ISFSI. It is assumed that this period provides the necessary cooling for the final core to meet the storage system requirements and/or transport system requirements for decay heat.DOE's contracts with utilities generally order the acceptance of spent fuel from utilities based upon the oldest fuel receiving the highest priority.
For purposes of this analysis, acceptance of commercial spent fuel by the DOE is expected to begin in 2020.NPPD has 1,054 spent fuel assemblies from Cooper in storage at General Electric's wet-pool ISFSI in Morris, Illinois.
This analysis assumes that this inventory is preferentially transferred to the DOE, starting in 2022. The first assemblies removed from the Cooper site are assumed to be in 2027. With an estimated rate of transfer of 3,000 metric tons of uranium (MTU)/year, completion of the removal of fuel from the site is projected to be in the year 2046 for a 2014 shutdown and year 2061 for a 2034 11 "Testimony of Edward Sproat, Director, Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management, before a U.S. House of Representatives subcommittee on the status of Yucca Mountain, July 15, 2008 12 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations, Title 10, Part 50, "Domestic Licensing of Production and Utilization Facilities," Subpart 54 (bb), "Conditions of Licenses" TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station Document N01-1590-002, Rev. 1 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Page xiv of xvii 0 shutdown.
Consequently, costs are included within the estimates for the long-term caretaking of the spent fuel at the Cooper site until the transfer is completed.
An ISFSI, which can be operated under a separate and independent license, has been constructed to support continued plant operations and future decommissioning.
As such, the facility will be designed to accommodate the dry storage modules needed to off-load the wet storage pool so that dismantling activities can proceed. Once emptied, the Reactor Building can be either decontaminated and dismantled or prepared for long-term storage.NPPD's position is that the DOE has a contractual obligation to accept Cooper's fuel earlier than the projections set out above consistent with its contract commitments.
No assumption made in this study should be interpreted to be inconsistent with this claim. However, at this time, including the cost of storing spent fuel in this study is the most reasonable approach because it insures the availability of sufficient decommissioning funds at the end of the station's life if, contrary to its contractual obligation, the DOE has not performed earlier.Site Restoration
.Prompt dismantling of site structures (once the facilities are decontaminated) is clearly the most appropriate and cost-effective option. It is unreasonable to anticipate that these structures would be repaired and preserved after the radiological contamination is removed. The cost to dismantle site structures with a work force already mobilized on site is more efficient than if the process is deferred.
Site facilities quickly degrade without maintenance, adding additional expense and creating potential hazards to the public and the demolition work force. Consequently, this study assumes that site structures are removed to a nominal depth of three feet below the local grade level wherever possible.
The site is then to be graded and stabilized.
Summary The costs to decommission Cooper assumes the removal of all contaminated and activated plant components and structural materials such that the owner may then have unrestricted use of the site with no further requirements for an operating license.Low-level radioactive waste, other than GTCC waste, is sent to a commercial processor for treatment/conditioning or to a controlled disposal facility.Decommissioning is accomplished within the 60-year period required by current NRC regulations.
In the interim, the spent fuel remains in storage at the site until such time that the transfer to a DOE facility is complete.
Once emptied, the storage A facilities are also decommissioned.
TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station Document N01-1590-002, Rev. 1 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Page xv of xvii The decommissioning scenarios are described in Section 2. The assumptions are presented in Section 3, along with schedules of annual expenditures.
The major cost contributors are identified in Section 6, with detailed activity costs, waste volumes, and associated manpower requirements delineated in Appendices C and D. The major cost components are also identified in the cost summary provided at the end of this section.The cost elements in the estimates are assigned to one of three subcategories:
NRC License Termination, Spent Fuel Management, and Site Restoration.
The subcategory"NRC License Termination" is used to accumulate costs that are consistent with"decommissioning" as defmed by the NRC in its financial assurance regulations (i.e., 10 CFR Part 50.75). The cost reported for this subcategory is generally sufficient to terminate the unit's operating license, recognizing that there may be some additional cost impact from spent fuel management.
The "Spent Fuel Management" subcategory contains costs associated with the containerization and transfer of spent fuel to the ISFSI and the management of the ISFSI until such time that the transfer of all fuel from this facility to an off-site location (e.g., geologic repository) is completed.
O "Site Restoration" is used to capture costs associated with the dismantling and demolition of buildings and facilities demonstrated to be free from contamination.
This includes structures never exposed to radioactive materials, as well as those facilities that have been decontaminated to appropriate levels. Structures are removed to a depth of three feet and backfilled to conform to local grade.It should be noted that the costs assigned to these subcategories are allocations.
Delegation of cost elements is for the purposes of comparison (e.g., with NRC financial guidelines) or to permit specific financial treatment (e.g., Asset Retirement Obligation determinations).
In reality, there can be considerable interaction between the activities in the three subcategories.
For example, an owner may decide to remove non-contaminated structures early in the project to improve access to highly contaminated facilities or plant components.
In these instances, the non-contaminated removal costs could be reassigned from Site Restoration to an NRC License Termination support activity.
However, in general, the allocations represent a reasonable accounting of those costs that can be expected to be incurred for the specific subcomponents of the total estimated program cost, if executed as described.
As noted within this document, the estimates were developed and costs are presented in 2008 dollars. As such, the estimates do not reflect the escalation of costs (due to inflationary and market forces) over the remaining operating life of the reactor or during the decommissioning period.TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document N01-1590-002, Rev. 1 Page xvi of xvii COST
 
==SUMMARY==
2014 Cessation of Operations (thousands of 2008 dollars)Delayed Cost Element DECON DECON SAFSTOR Decontamination 12,832 18,547 18,399 Removal 73,606 74,005 75,346 Packaging 13,340 9,827 9,577 Transportation 8,571 6,672 6,346 Waste Disposal 75,482 43,839 44,260 Off-site Waste Processing 35,573 42,626 42,743 Program Management
[R1 360,232 426,204 490,053 Corporate A&G 15,657 10,100 10,100 Spent Fuel Management
[21 77,077 69,839 69,839 Insurance and Regulatory Fees 53,616 62,853 76,914.Energy 6,141 10,408 12,641 Characterization and Licensing Surveys 16,568 16,568 16,568 Miscellaneous Equipment 23,364 31,112 34,923 Total [31 772,0581 822,600 907,708 Cost Element License Termination 506,078 475,790 674,963 Spent Fuel Management 231,584 309,463 195,398 Site Restoration 34,396 37,347 37,347 Total [3] 772,058 822,600 907,708 I'] Includes engineering and security costs[21 Excludes program management costs (staffing) but includes costs for spent fuel loading/packaging/spent fuel pool O&M and EP fees[31 Columns may not add due to rounding TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document N01-1590-002, Rev. 1 Page xvii of xvii COST
 
==SUMMARY==
2034 Cessation of Operations (thousands of 2008 dollars)Delayed Cost Element DECON DECON SAFSTOR Decontamination 12,832 18,581 18,438 Removal 74,270 74,184 76,329 Packaging 13,342 9,820 9,871 Transportation 8,571 6,704 6,578 Waste Disposal 75,618 46,649 44,999 Off-site Waste Processing 35,573 42,626 42,743 Program Management
[1W 340,929 400,786 479,929 Corporate A&G 15,657 10,100 10,100 Spent Fuel Management
[2] 53,484 47,535 47,535 Insurance and Regulatory Fees 46,578 54,706 72,081 Energy 6,141 9,875 12,641 Characterization and Licensing Surveys 16,568 16,568 16,568 Miscellaneous Equipment 23,408 30,280 34,989 Total [3] 722,972 768,414 872,803 Cost Element License Termination 506,207 476,185 676,510 Spent Fuel Management 182,368 254,881 158,945 Site Restoration 34,396 37,348 37,348 Total [3] 722,972 768,414 872,803[R] Includes engineering and security costs[2] Excludes program management costs (staffing) but includes costs for spent fuel loading/packaging/spent fuel pool O&M and EP fees[3] Columns may not add due to rounding TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station Document N01-1590-002, Rev. 1 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 1, Page I of 8 1. INTRODUCTION This report presents estimates of the costs to decommission the Cooper Nuclear Plant (Cooper) following a scheduled cessation of plant operations.
The estimates are designed to provide Nebraska Public Power District (NPPD), the plant's owner, with the information needed to assess its financial obligations, as they pertain to the eventual decommissioning of the nuclear station. It is not a detailed engineering document, but a financial analysis prepared in advance of the detailed engineering that will be required to carry out the decommissioning.
 
===1.1 OBJECTIVES===
 
OF STUDY The objectives of this study were to prepare comprehensive estimates of the costs to decommission Cooper, to provide a sequence or schedule for the associated activities, and to develop waste stream projections from the decontamination and dismantling activities.
The construction permit for Cooper was issued in June of 1968, with commercial operation in July of 1974. For the purposes of this study, two shutdown dates were evaluated:
the current license expiration date of January 18, 2014 and a projected date assuming license renewal of January 18, 2034.These dates were used in scheduling the decommissioning activities.
1.2 SITE DESCRIPTION Cooper is a single unit facility located on the west bank of the Missouri River between the villages of Brownville and Nemaha, Nebraska.
The nuclear station is owned and operated by NPPD, a public corporation and political subdivision of the state of Nebraska engaging in generation, transmission, distribution, and sale of electric energy.The station is comprised of a single cycle, forced circulation, boiling water reactor designed by the General Electric Company, producing steam for direct use in the steam turbine: The original supporting facilities were engineered and constructed by Burns and Roe, Inc. The Multi-Purpose Facility, Office Building Addition, Warehouses, Flammable Liquid Storage Building and other on-site structures were designed and built by others.The reactor vessel and the recirculation piping system are contained within the drywell of a pressure suppression system housed within the Reactor Building.The pressure suppression system consists of a drywell, a pressure suppression chamber which stores a large volume of water and a connecting submerged TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station Document N01-1590-002, Rev. 1 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 1, Page 2 of 8 vent system between the drywell and water pool, isolation valves, containment cooling systems and other service equipment.
The Reactor Building encloses the primary containment system thereby providing a secondary containment.
Heat produced in the reactor is converted to electrical energy by the power conversion system. A turbine-generator system converts the thermal energy of the steam produced in the reactor into mechanical shaft power and then into electrical energy. The turbine consists of one high-pressure, double-flow turbine element, and two low-pressure, double-flow turbine elements all aligned in tandem. The generator is a direct-driven, 1,800 rpm hydrogen-cooled synchronous generator.
The turbine is operated in a closed feedwater cycle, which condenses the steam; the heated feedwater is returned to the reactor.The heat rejected to the main condenser is removed by the circulating water system. Based upon the recent power uprate, Cooper's generating capacity will be approximately 836 Megawatts electric (MWe).The circulating water system provides the heat sink required for removal of waste heat in the power plant's thermal cycle. The system has the principal function of removing heat by absorbing this energy in the main condenser.
Circulating water is drawn from the Missouri River with heated cooling water returned to the river.1.3 REGULATORY GUIDANCE The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or Commission) provided initial decommissioning requirements in its rule "General Requirements for Decommissioning Nuclear Facilities," issued in June 1988. 1
* This rule set forth financial criteria for decommissioning licensed nuclear power facilities.
The regulation addressed decommissioning planning needs, timing, funding methods, and environmental review requirements.
The intent of the rule was to ensure that decommissioning would be accomplished in a safe and timely manner and that adequate funds would be available for this purpose.Subsequent to the rule, the NRC issued Regulatory Guide 1.159, "Assuring the Availability of Funds for Decommissioning Nuclear Reactors,"[
2 1 which provided additional guidance to the licensees of nuclear facilities on the financial methods acceptable to the NRC staff for complying with the requirements of the rule. The regulatory guide addressed the funding requirements and provided guidance on the content and form of the financial assurance mechanisms indicated in the rule.* References provided in Section 7 of the document TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station Document N01-1590-002, Rev. 1 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 1, Page 3 of 8 The rule defined three decommissioning alternatives as being acceptable to the NRC: DECON, SAFSTOR, and ENTOMB. The DECON alternative assumes that any contaminated or activated portion of the plant's systems, structures and facilities are removed or decontaminated to levels that permit the site to be released for unrestricted use shortly after the cessation of plant operations.
The rule also placed limits on the time allowed to complete the decommissioning process. For SAFSTOR, the process is restricted in overall duration to 60 years, unless it can be shown that a longer duration is necessary to protect public health and safety. The guidelines for ENTOMB are similar, providing the NRC with both sufficient leverage and flexibility to ensure that these deferred options are only used in situations where it is reasonable and consistent with the definition of decommissioning.
At the conclusion of a 60-year dormancy period (or longer for ENTOMB if the NRC approves such a case), the site would still require significant remediation to meet the unrestricted release limits for license termination.
The ENTOMB alternative has not been viewed as a viable option for power reactors due to the significant time required to isolate the long-lived radionuclides for decay to permissible levels. However, with rulemaking permitting the controlled release of a site,[3] the NRC has re-evaluated this alternative.
The resulting feasibility study, based upon an assessment by Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, concluded that the method did have conditional merit for some, if not most reactors.
However, the staff also found that additional rulemaking would be needed before this option could be treated as a generic alternative.
The NRC had considered rulemaking to alter the 60-year time for completing decommissioning and to clarify the use of engineered barriers for reactor entombments.[
4] However, the NRC's staff has recommended that rulemaking be deferred, based upon several factors, e.g., no licensee has committed to pursuing the entombment option, the unresolved issues associated with the disposition of greater-than-Class C material (GTCC), and the NRC's current priorities, at least until after the additional research studies are complete.
The Commission concurred with the staffs recommendation.
In 1996, the NRC published revisions to the general requirements for decommissioning nuclear power plants.[5 1 When the decommissioning regulations were adopted in 1988, it was assumed that the majority of licensees would decommission at the end of the facility's operating licensed life.Since that time, several licensees permanently and prematurely ceased operations.
Exemptions from certain operating requirements were required once the reactor was defueled to facilitate the decommissioning.
Each case was handled individually, without clearly defined generic requirements.
The NRC amended the decommissioning regulations in 1996 to clarify ambiguities and TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station Document N01-1590-002, Rev. 1 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 1, Page 4 of 8 codify procedures and terminology as a means of enhancing efficiency and uniformity in the decommissioning process. The amendments allow for greater public participation and better define the transition process from operations to decommissioning.
Under the revised regulations, licensees will submit written certification to the NRC within 30 days after the decision to cease operations.
Certification will also be required once the fuel is permanently removed from the reactor vessel.Submittal of these notices will entitle the licensee to a fee reduction and eliminate the obligation to follow certain requirements needed only during operation of the reactor. Within two years of submitting notice of permanent cessation of operations, the licensee is required to submit a Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report (PSDAR) to the NRC. The PSDAR describes the planned decommissioning activities, the associated sequence and schedule, and an estimate of expected costs. Prior to completing decommissioning, the licensee is required to submit an application to the NRC to terminate the license, which will include a license termination plan (LTP).1.3.1 Nuclear Waste Policy Act Congress passed the "Nuclear Waste Policy Act"[6] (NWPA) in 1982, assigning the federal government's long-standing responsibility for disposal of the spent nuclear fuel created by the commercial nuclear generating plants to the DOE. The NWPA provided that DOE would enter into contracts with utilities in which DOE would promise to take the utilities' spent fuel and high-level radioactive waste and utilities would pay the cost of the disposition services for that material.
NWPA, along with the individual contracts with the utilities, specified that the DOE was to begin accepting spent fuel by January 31, 1998.Since the original legislation, the DOE has announced several delays in the program schedule.
By January 1998, the DOE had failed to accept any spent fuel or high level waste, as required by the NWPA and utility contracts.
Delays continue and, as a result, generators have initiated legal action against the DOE in an attempt to obtain compensation for DOE's breach of contract.Operation of DOE's yet-to-be constructed repository is contingent upon the review and approval of the facility's license application by the NRC and the successful resolution of pending litigation.
The DOE submitted its license application to the NRC on June 3, 2008, seeking authorization to construct the repository at Yucca Mountain, Nevada. Assuming a TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station Document N01-1590-002, Rev. 1 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 1, Page 5 of 8 timely review, and adequate funding, the DOE expects that receipt of fuel could begin by 2020.[71 It is generally necessary that spent fuel be actively cooled and stored for a minimum period at the generating site prior to transfer.
As such, the NRC requires that licensees establish a program to manage and provide funding for the management of all irradiated fuel at the reactor site until title of the fuel is transferred to the Secretary of Energy, pursuant to 10 CFR Part 50.54(bb).[
8 1 This funding requirement is fulfilled through inclusion of certain cost elements in the decommissioning estimate, for example, associated with the isolation and continued operation of the spent fuel pool and ISFSI.At shutdown, the spent fuel pool is expected to contain freshly discharged assemblies (from the most recent refueling cycles) as well as the final reactor core. Over the following 5Y years the assemblies are packaged into multipurpose canisters for transfer to the DOE or to the ISFSI. It is assumed that this period provides the necessary cooling for the final core to meet the storage system requirements and/or transport system requirements for decay heat.DOE's contracts with utilities generally order the acceptance of spent fuel from utilities based upon the oldest fuel receiving the highest priority.
For purposes of this analysis, acceptance of commercial spent fuel by the DOE is expected to begin in 2020.NPPD has 1,054 spent fuel assemblies from Cooper in storage at General Electric's wet-pool ISFSI in Morris, Illinois.
This analysis assumes that this inventory is preferentially transferred to the DOE, starting in 2022. The first assemblies removed from the Cooper site are assumed to be in 2027. With an estimated rate of transfer of 3,000 metric tons of uranium (MTU)/year from the commercial generators, completion of the removal of fuel from the Cooper site is projected to be in the year 2046 for a 2014 shutdown and year 2061 for a 2034 shutdown.
Consequently, costs are included within the estimates for the long-term caretaking of the spent fuel at the Cooper site until the transfer is completed.
An ISFSI, which can be operated under a separate and independent license, is constructed to support plant operations and decommissioning.
As such, the facility will be designed to accommodate the dry storage modules needed to off-load the wet storage pool so that dismantling TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station Document N01-1590-002, Rev. 1 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 1, Page 6 of 8 activities can proceed. Once emptied, the Reactor Building can be either decontaminated and dismantled or prepared for long-term storage.NPPD's position is that the DOE has a contractual obligation to accept Cooper's fuel earlier than the projections set out above consistent with its contract commitments.
No assumption made in this study should be interpreted to be inconsistent with this claim. However, at this time, including the cost of storing spent fuel in this study is the most reasonable approach because it insures the availability of sufficient decommissioning funds at the end of the station's life if, contrary to its contractual obligation, the DOE has not performed earlier.1.3.2 Low-Level Radioactive Waste Acts The contaminated and activated material generated in the decontamination and dismantling of a commercial nuclear reactor is classified as low-level (radioactive) waste, although not all of the material is suitable for "shallow-land" disposal.
With the passage of the"Low-Level Radioactive Waste Policy Act" in 1980,[91 and its Amendments of 1985,110]
the states became ultimately responsible for the disposition of low-level radioactive waste generated within their own borders.Until recently, there were two facilities available to NPPD for the disposal of low-level radioactive waste generated by Cooper. As of July 1, 2008, however, the facility in Barnwell, South Carolina was closed to generators outside the Atlantic Compact (comprised of the states of Connecticut, New Jersey and South Carolina).
This leaves the facility in Clive, Utah, operated by EnergySolutions, as the only available destination for low-level radioactive waste requiring controlled disposal.For the purpose of this analysis, the EnergySolutions' facility is used as the basis for estimating the disposal cost for the majority of the radioactive waste (Class A[1"]). EnergySolutions does not have a license to dispose of the more highly radioactive waste (Class B and C), for example, generated in the dismantling of the reactor vessel. As a proxy, the disposal costs for this material are based upon the last published rate schedule for non-compact waste for the Barnwell facility.The dismantling of the components residing closest to the reactor core generates radioactive waste considered unsuitable for shallow land disposal (i.e., low-level radioactive waste with concentrations of radionuclides that exceed the limits established by the NRC for Class C TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station Document N01-1590-002, Rev. 1 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 1, Page 7 of 8 radioactive waste (GTCC)). The Low-Level Radioactive Waste Policy Amendments Act of 1985 assigned the federal government the responsibility for the disposal of this material.
The Act also stated that the beneficiaries of the activities resulting in the generation of such radioactive waste bear all reasonable costs of disposing of such waste.However, to date, the federal government has not identified a cost for disposing of GTCC or a schedule for acceptance.
As such, the GTCC radioactive waste has been packaged and disposed of as high-level waste, at a cost equivalent to that envisioned for the spent fuel.A significant portion of the waste material generated during decommissioning may only be potentially contaminated by radioactive materials.
This waste can be analyzed on site or shipped off site to licensed facilities for further analysis, for processing and/or for conditioning/recovery.
Reduction in the volume of low-level radioactive waste requiring disposal in a licensed low-level radioactive waste disposal facility can be accomplished through a variety of methods, including analyses and surveys or decontamination to eliminate the portion of waste that does not require disposal as radioactive waste, compaction, incineration or metal melt. The estimates for Cooper reflect the savings from waste recovery/volume reduction.
 
====1.3.3 Radiological====
 
Criteria for License Termination In 1997, the NRC published Subpart E, "Radiological Criteria for License Termination,"[1 2 1 amending 10 CFR Part 20. This subpart provides radiological criteria for releasing a facility for unrestricted use.The regulation states that the site can be released for unrestricted use if radioactivity levels are such that the average member of a critical group would not receive a Total Effective Dose Equivalent (TEDE) in excess of 25 millirem per year, and provided that residual radioactivity has been reduced to levels that are As Low As Reasonably Achievable (ALARA).The decommissioning estimates assume that the Cooper site will be remediated to a residual level consistent with the NRC-prescribed level.It should be noted that the NRC and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) differ on the amount of residual radioactivity considered acceptable in site remediation.
The EPA has two limits that apply to radioactive materials.
An EPA limit of 15 millirem per year is derived from criteria established by the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA or Superfund).[
1 3 1 An additional and separate limit of 4 millirem per year, as defined in 40 CFR §141.16, is applied to drinking water.[141 TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station Document N01-1590-002, Rev. 1 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 1, Page 8 of 8 On October 9, 2002, the NRC signed an agreement with the EPA on the radiological decommissioning and decontamination of NRC-licensed sites. The Memorandum of Understanding (MOU)['5] provides that EPA will defer exercise of authority under CERCLA for the majority of facilities decommissioned under NRC authority.
The MOU also includes provisions for NRC and EPA consultation for certain sites when, at the time of license termination, (1) groundwater contamination exceeds EPA-permitted levels; (2) NRC contemplates restricted release of the site; and/or (3) residual radioactive soil concentrations exceed levels defined in the MOU.The MOU does not impose any new requirements on NRC licensees and should reduce the involvement of the EPA with NRC licensees who are decommissioning.
Most sites are expected to meet the NRC criteria for unrestricted use, and the NRC believes that only a few sites will have groundwater or soil contamination in excess of the levels specified in the MOU that trigger consultation with the EPA. However, if there are other hazardous materials on the site, the EPA may be involved in the cleanup. As such, the possibility of dual regulation remains for certain licensees.
The present study does not include any costs for this occurrence.
TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document N01-1590-002, Rev. 1 Section 2, Page 1 of 13 2. DECOMMISSIONING ALTERNATIVES Detailed cost estimates were developed to decommission the Cooper nuclear unit for the scenarios described below. Although they differ with respect to technique, process, cost, and schedule, they attain the same result: the ultimate release of the site for unrestricted use.The following alternatives were evaluated (for both a 2014 and 2034 cessation of plant operations) and are representative of the alternatives available to the owner: 1. DECON: The plant is decommissioned shortly after the permanent cessation of plant operations.
Spent fuel, that is not transferred directly to the DOE, is relocated to the ISFSI for interim storage. Spent fuel storage operations continue at the site until the transfer of the fuel to the DOE is completed.
: 2. Delayed DECON: In the second scenario, the unit is prepared for an abbreviated period of storage. As in the first scenario, spent fuel storage operations continue at the site until the transfer of the fuel to the DOE is completed.
Once completed, decommissioning operations are initiated.
: 3. SAFSTOR: The third scenario is similar to the second scenario in that the unit is placed in safe-storage with concurrent spent fuel storage operations.
However, decommissioning is deferred beyond the fuel storage period to the maximum extent possible; termination of the license would conclude within the maximum required 60-year period.Six scenarios were identified for evaluation.
As shown below, evaluate a combination of shutdown dates (scheduled and decommissioning alternative (prompt or deferred).
the six scenarios anticipated) and Shutdown Spent Fuel Operating Scenario Date Option Transfer License Completed Terminated 1 2014 DECON 2046 2020 2 2014 Delayed DECON 2046 2053 3 2014 SAFSTOR 2046 2074 4 2034 DECON 2061 2040 5 2034 Delayed DECON 2061 2068 6 2034 SAFSTOR 2061 2094 TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station Document N01-1590-002, Rev. 1 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 2, Page 2 of 13 The following sections describe the basic activities associated with each alternative.
Although detailed procedures for each activity identified are not provided, and the actual sequence of work may vary, the activity descriptions provide a basis not only for estimating but also for the expected scope of work, i.e., engineering and planning at the time of decommissioning.
The conceptual approach that the NRC has described in its regulations divides decommissioning into three phases. The initial phase commences with the effective date of permanent cessation of operations and involves the transition of both plant and licensee from reactor operations (i.e., power production) to facility de-activation and closure. During the first phase, notification is to be provided to the NRC certifying the permanent cessation of operations and the removal of fuel from the reactor vessel. The licensee is then prohibited from reactor operation.
The second phase encompasses activities during the storage period or during major decommissioning activities, or a combination of the two. The third phase pertains to the activities involved in license termination.
The decommissioning estimates developed for Cooper are also divided into phases or periods; however, demarcation of the phases is based upon major milestones within the project or significant changes in the projected expenditures.
 
===2.1 DECON===
The DECON alternative, as defined by the NRC, is "the alternative in which the equipment, structures, and portions of a facility and site containing radioactive contaminants are removed or decontaminated to a level that permits the property to be released for unrestricted use shortly after cessation of operations." This study does not address the cost to dispose of the spent fuel residing at the site; such costs are funded through a surcharge on electrical generation.
However, the study does estimate the costs incurred with the interim on-site storage of the fuel pending shipment by the DOE to an off-site disposal facility.2.1.1 Period 1 -Preparations In anticipation of the cessation of plant operations, detailed preparations are undertaken to provide a smooth transition from plant operations to site decommissioning.
Through implementation of a staffing transition plan, the organization required to manage the intended decommissioning activities is assembled from available plant staff and outside resources.
Preparations include the planning for permanent defueling of the reactor, revision of technical specifications applicable to the operating conditions and requirements, a TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station Document N01-1590-002, Rev. 1 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 2, Page 3 of 13 characterization of the facility and major components, and the development of the PSDAR.Engineering and Planning The PSDAR, required within two years of the notice to cease operations, provides a description of the licensee's planned decommissioning activities, a timetable, and the associated financial requirements of the intended decommissioning program. Upon receipt of the PSDAR, the NRC will make the document available to the public for comment in a local hearing to be held in the vicinity of the reactor site. Ninety days following submittal and NRC receipt of the PSDAR, the licensee may begin to perform major decommissioning activities under a modified 10 CFR §50.59 procedure, i.e., without specific NRC approval.
Major activities are defined as any activity that results in permanent removal of major radioactive components, permanently modifies the structure of the containment, or results in dismantling components (for shipment)containing GTCC, as defined by 10 CFR §61. Major components are further defined as comprising the reactor vessel and internals, large bore reactor recirculation system piping, and other large components that are radioactive.
The NRC includes the following additional criteria for use of the §50.59 process in decommissioning.
The proposed activity must not: " foreclose release of the site for possible unrestricted use,* significantly increase decommissioning costs,* cause any significant environmental impact, or* violate the terms of the licensee's existing license.Existing operational technical specifications are reviewed and modified to reflect plant conditions and the safety concerns associated with permanent cessation of operations.
The environmental impact associated with the planned decommissioning activities is also considered.
Typically, a licensee will not be allowed to proceed if the consequences of a particular decommissioning activity are greater than that bounded by previously evaluated environmental assessments or impact statements.
In this instance, the licensee would have to submit a license amendment for the specific activity and update the environmental report.The decommissioning program outlined in the PSDAR will be designed to accomplish the required tasks within the ALARA guidelines (as defined in 10 CFR §20) for protection of personnel from exposure to TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station Document N01-1590-002, Rev. 1 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 2, Page 4 of 13 0 radiation hazards. It will also address the continued protection of the health and safety of the public and the environment during the dismantling activity.
Consequently, with the development of the PSDAR, activity specifications, cost-benefit and safety analyses, work packages and procedures, would be assembled to support the proposed decontamination and dismantling activities.
Site Preparations Following final plant shutdown, and in preparation for actual decommissioning activities, the following activities are initiated:
* Characterization of the site and surrounding environs.
This includes radiation surveys of work areas, major components (including the reactor vessel and its internals), internal piping, and sacrificial shield cores.* Isolation of the spent fuel storage pool and fuel handling systems, such that decommissioning operations can commence on the balance of the plant. The pool will remain operational for approximately 51/2years following the cessation of operations before the inventory resident at shutdown can be transferred to the ISFSI.* Specification of transport and disposal requirements for activated materials and/or hazardous materials, including shielding and waste stabilization." Development of procedures for occupational exposure control, control and release of liquid and gaseous effluent, processing of radwaste (including dry-active waste, resins, filter media, metallic and non-metallic components generated in decommissioning), site security and emergency programs, and industrial safety.2.1.2 Period 2 -Decommissioning Operations This period includes the physical decommissioning activities associated with the removal and disposal of contaminated and activated components and structures, including the successful termination of the 10 CFR §50 operating license. Significant decommissioning activities in this phase include: Construction of temporary facilities and/or modification of existing facilities to support dismantling activities.
This may include a centralized processing area to facilitate equipment removal and component preparations for off-site disposal.TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station Document N01-1590-002, Rev. 1 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 2, Page 5 of 13 Reconfiguration and modification of site structures and facilities as needed to support decommissioning operations.
This may include the upgrading of roads (on- and off-site) to facilitate hauling and transport.
Modifications may be required to the containment structure to facilitate access of large/heavy equipment.
Modifications may also be required to the refueling area of the Reactor Building to support the segmentation of the reactor vessel internals and component extraction." Design and fabrication of temporary and permanent shielding to support removal and transportation activities, construction of contamination control envelopes, and the procurement of specialty tooling.o Procurement (lease or purchase) of shipping canisters, cask liners, and industrial packages for the disposition of low-level radioactive waste.* Decontamination of components and piping systems as required to control (minimize) worker exposure.* Removal of piping and components no longer essential to support decommissioning operations.
* Disconnection of the control blades from the drives on the vessel lower head. Blades are transferred to the spent fuel pool for packaging.
o Transfer of the steam separator and dryer assemblies to the dryer-separator pool for segmentation.
Segmentation will maximize the loading of the shielded transport casks, i.e., by weight and activity.The operations are conducted under water using remotely operated tooling and contamination controls.* Disassembly, segmentation and packaging of the core shroud and in-core guide tubes. Some of the material is expected to exceed Class C disposal requirements.
As such, those segments will be packaged in a modified fuel canister for geologic disposal.
Interim storage can be in the pool, as space permits, or in the ISFSI.o Removal and segmentation of the remaining internals including the jet pump assemblies, fuel support castings and core plate assembly.* Draining and decontamination of the reactor well and permanently sealing of the spent fuel transfer gate. Install shielded platform for segmentation of reactor vessel. Cutting operations are performed in air using remotely operated equipment within a contamination control envelope, with the water level maintained just below the cut TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station Document N01-1590-002, Rev. 1 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 2, Page 6 of 13 to minimize the working area dose rates. Sections are transferred to the dryer-separator pool for packaging and interim storage.* Disconnection of the control rod drives and instrumentation tubes from reactor vessel lower head. The lower reactor head and vessel supporting structure will then be segmented.
* Removal of the reactor recirculation pumps. Exterior surfaces are decontaminated and openings covered. Components can serve as their own burial containers provided that all penetrations are properly sealed." Demolition of the sacrificial shield activated concrete by controlled demolition.
At least two years prior to the anticipated date of license termination, an LTP is required.
Submitted as a supplement to the Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR) or its equivalent, the plan must include: a site characterization, description of the remaining dismantling activities, plans for site remediation, procedures for the final radiation survey, designation of the end use of the site, an updated cost estimate to complete the decommissioning, and any associated environmental concerns.
The NRC will notice the receipt of the plan, make the plan available for public comment, and schedule a local hearing. LTP approval will be subject to any conditions and limitations as deemed appropriate by the Commission.
The licensee may then commence with the final remediation of site facilities and services, including: " Removal of remaining plant systems and associated components as they become nonessential to the decommissioning program or worker health and safety (e.g., waste collection and treatment systems, electrical power and ventilation systems).* Removal of the steel liners from the drywell, disposing of the activated and contaminated sections as radioactive waste. Removal of any activated/contaminated concrete.* Removal of the steel liners from the steam separator and dryer pool, reactor well and spent fuel storage pool.* Surveys of the decontaminated areas of the containment structure." Removal of the contaminated equipment and material from the Turbine and Radwaste buildings and any other contaminated facility.Use radiation and contamination control techniques until radiation surveys indicate that the structures can be released for unrestricted access and conventional demolition.
This activity may necessitate the TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station Document N01-1590-002, Rev. 1 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 2, Page 7 of 13 0 dismantling and disposition of most of the systems and components (both clean and contaminated) located within these buildings.
This activity will facilitate surface decontamination and subsequent verification surveys required prior to obtaining release for demolition.
Incorporated into the LTP is the Final Survey Plan. This plan identifies the radiological surveys to be performed once the decontamination activities are completed and is developed using the guidance provided in the "Multi-Agency Radiation Survey and Site Investigation Manual (MARSSIM)."[
6 I This document incorporates the statistical approaches to survey design and data interpretation used by the EPA. It also identifies state-of-the-art, commercially available instrumentation and procedures for conducting radiological surveys. Use of this guidance ensures that the surveys are conducted in a manner that provides a high degree of confidence that applicable NRC criteria are satisfied.
Once the survey is complete, the results are provided to the NRC in a format that can be verified.
The NRC then reviews and evaluates the information, performs an independent confirmation of radiological site conditions,* and makes a determination on final termination of the license.The NRC will terminate the operating license if it determines that site remediation has been performed in accordance with the LTP, and that the terminal radiation survey and associated documentation demonstrate that the facility is suitable for release.2.1.3 Period 3 -Site Restoration Following completion of decommissioning operations, site restoration activities will begin. Efficient removal of the contaminated materials and verification that residual radionuclide concentrations are below the NRC limits will result in substantial damage to many of the structures.
Although performed in a controlled, safe manner, blasting, coring, drilling, scarification (surface removal), and the other decontamination activities will substantially degrade power block structures including the reactor, augmented radwaste, radwaste and turbine buildings.
Under certain circumstances, verifying that subsurface radionuclide concentrations meet NRC site release requirements will require removal of grade slabs and lower floors, potentially weakening footings and structural supports.
This removal activity will be necessary for those facilities and plant areas where historical records, when available, indicate the potential for radionuclides having been present in the soil, where system failures have been recorded, or where it is required to TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station Document N01-1590-002, Rev. 1 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 2, Page 8 of 13 confirm that subsurface process and drain lines were not breached over the operating life of the station.Prompt dismantling of site structures is clearly the most appropriate and cost-effective option. It is unreasonable to anticipate that these structures would be repaired and preserved after the radiological contamination is removed. The cost to dismantle site structures with a work force already mobilized on site is more efficient than if the process were deferred.
Site facilities quickly degrade without maintenance, adding additional expense and creating potential hazards to the public as well as to future workers. Abandonment creates a breeding ground for vermin infestation as well as other biological hazards.This cost study presumes that non-essential structures and site facilities are dismantled as a continuation of the decommissioning activity.Foundations and exterior walls are removed to a nominal depth of three feet below grade. The three-foot depth allows for the placement of gravel for drainage, as well as topsoil, so that vegetation can be established for erosion control. Site areas affected by the dismantling activities are restored and the plant area graded as required to prevent ponding and inhibit the refloating of subsurface materials.
Non-contaminated concrete rubble produced by demolition activities is processed to remove reinforcing steel and miscellaneous embedments.
The processed material is then used on site to backfill foundation voids.Excess non-contaminated materials are trucked to an off-site area for disposal as construction debris.2.1.4 ISFSI Operations and Decommissioning The ISFSI will continue to operate under a separate and independent license (10 CFR §72) following the termination of the §50 operating license. Assuming the DOE starts accepting fuel from commercial generators in 2020, transfer of spent fuel from the ISFSI to the DOE would begin in 2027, with the transfer completed by 2046 for a 2014 shutdown and year 2061 for a 2034 shutdown.At the conclusion of the spent fuel transfer process, the ISFSI will be decommissioned.
The Commission will terminate the §72 license when it determines that the remediation of the ISFSI has been performed in accordance with an ISFSI license termination plan and that the final radiation survey and associated documentation demonstrate that the TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station DocunentN01-1590-002, Rev. 1 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 2, Page 9 of 13 facility is suitable for release. Once the requirements are satisfied, the NRC can terminate the license for the ISFSI.The assumed design for the ISFSI is based upon the use of a multi-purpose canister and a horizontal concrete module for pad storage. For purposes of this cost analysis, it is assumed that once the inner canisters containing the spent fuel assemblies have been removed, any required decontamination performed on the storage modules (some minor activation is assumed), and the license for the facility terminated, the modules can be dismantled using conventional techniques for the demolition of reinforced concrete.
The concrete storage pad is then removed and the area regraded.2.2 SAFSTOR AND DELAYED DECOMMISSIONING The NRC defines SAFSTOR as "the alternative in which the nuclear facility is placed and maintained in a condition that allows the nuclear facility to be safely stored and subsequently decontaminated (deferred decontamination) to levels that permit release for unrestricted use." The facility is left intact (during the dormancy period), with structures maintained in a sound condition.
Systems not required to operate in support of the spent fuel pool or site surveillance and security are drained, de-energized, and secured.Minimal cleaning/removal of loose contamination and/or fixation and sealing of remaining contamination is performed.
Access to contaminated areas is secured to provide controlled access for inspection and maintenance.
The engineering and planning requirements are similar to those for the DECON alternative, although a shorter time period is expected for these activities due to the more limited work scope. Site preparations are also similar to those for the DECON alternative.
However, with the exception of the required radiation surveys and site characterizations, the mobilization and preparation of site facilities is less extensive.
The following discussion is appropriate for both the SAFSTOR and Delayed DECON scenarios, the primary differences being in the length of the dormancy period. In the Delayed DECON scenario, decommissioning operations are assumed to begin once fuel is off site. By contrast, in the SAFSTOR scenario, the plant remains in safe-storage after the fuel is removed from site. Decommissioning operations are initiated such that the license is terminated within the required 60-year time period.TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station Document N01-1590-002, Rev. 1 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 2, Page 10 of 13 2.2.1 Period 1 -Preparations Preparations for long-term storage include the planning for permanent defueling of the reactor, revision of technical specifications appropriate to the operating conditions and requirements, a characterization of the facility and major components, and the development of the PSDAR.The process of placing the plant in safe-storage includes, but is not limited to, the following activities:
* Isolation of the spent fuel storage services and fuel handling systems located in the Reactor Building so that safe-storage operations may commence on the balance of the plant. This activity may be carried out by plant personnel in accordance with existing operating technical specifications.
Activities are scheduled around the fuel handling systems to the greatest extent possible.* Relocation of the spent fuel from the spent fuel storage pool to the ISFSI.* Draining and de-energizing of the non-contaminated systems not required to support continued site operations or maintenance.
* Disposing of contaminated filter elements and resin beds not required for processing wastes from layup activities for future operations." Draining of the reactor vessel, with the internals left in place and the vessel head secured.* Draining and de-energizing non-essential, contaminated systems with decontamination as required for future maintenance and inspection.
* Preparing lighting and alarm systems whose continued use is required; de-energizing portions of fire protection, electric power, and HVAC systems whose continued use is not required.* Cleaning of the loose surface contamination from building access pathways.* Performing an interim radiation survey of plant, posting warning signs where appropriate.
* Erecting physical barriers and/or securing all access to radioactive or contaminated areas, except as required for inspection and maintenance.
TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station Document N01-1590.002, Rev. 1 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 2, Page 11 of 13 Installing security and surveillance monitoring equipment and relocating security fence around secured structures, as required.2.2.2 Period 2 -Dormancy The second phase identified by the NRC in its rule addresses licensed activities during a storage period and is applicable to the dormancy phases of the deferred decommissioning alternatives.
Dormancy activities include a 24-hour security force, preventive and corrective maintenance on security systems, area lighting, general building maintenance, heating and ventilation of buildings, routine radiological inspections of contaminated structures, maintenance of structural integrity, and a site environmental and radiation monitoring program.Resident maintenance personnel perform equipment maintenance, inspection activities, routine services to maintain safe conditions, adequate lighting, heating, and ventilation, and periodic preventive maintenance on essential site services.An environmental surveillance program is carried out during the dormancy period to ensure that releases of radioactive material to the environment are prevented and/or detected and controlled.
Appropriate emergency procedures are established and initiated for potential releases that exceed prescribed limits. The environmental surveillance program constitutes an abbreviated version of the program in effect during normal plant operations.
Security during the dormancy period is conducted primarily to prevent unauthorized entry and to protect the public from the consequences of its own actions. The security fence, sensors, alarms, and other surveillance equipment provide security.
Fire and radiation alarms are also monitored and maintained.
While remote surveillance is an option, it does not offer the immediate response time of a physical presence.The transfer of the spent fuel to a DOE facility continues during this period until complete.
After an optional period of storage (such that license terminations are accomplished within 60 years of final shutdown), it is required that the licensee submit applications to terminate the license, along with an LTP (described in Section 2.1.2), thereby initiating the third phase.TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station Document N01-1590-002, Rev. 1 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 2, Page 12 of 13 2.2.3 Periods 3 and 4 -Delayed Decommissioning Prior to the commencement of decommissioning operations, preparations are undertaken to reactivate site services and prepare for decommissioning.
Preparations include engineering and planning, a detailed site characterization, and the assembly of a decommissioning management organization.
Final planning for activities and the writing of activity specifications and detailed procedures are also initiated at this time.Much of the work in developing a termination plan is relevant to the development of the detailed engineering plans and procedures.
The activities associated with this phase and the follow-on decontamination and dismantling processes are detailed in Sections 2.1.1 and 2.1.2. The primary difference between the sequences anticipated for the DECON and deferred scenarios is the absence, in the latter, of any constraint on the availability of the fuel storage facilities located within the Reactor Building for decommissioning.
Variations in the length of the dormancy period are expected to have little effect upon the quantities of radioactive wastes generated from system and structure removal operations.
Given the levels of radioactivity and spectrum of radionuclides expected from forty to sixty years of plant operation, no plant process system identified as being contaminated upon final shutdown will become releasable due to the decay period alone, i.e., there is no significant reduction in the waste generated from the decommissioning activities.
However, due to the lower activity levels, a greater percentage of the waste volume can be designated for off-site processing and recovery.The delay in decommissioning also yields lower working area radiation levels. As such, the estimates for the delayed scenarios incorporate reduced ALARA controls for the lower occupational exposure potential.
Although the initial radiation levels due to 6°Co will decrease during the dormancy period, the internal components of the reactor vessel will still exhibit sufficiently high radiation dose rates to require remote sectioning under water due to the presence of long-lived radionuclides such as 94Nb, 5 9 Ni, and 6 3 Ni. Therefore, the dismantling procedures described for the DECON alternative would still be employed during deferred scenarios.
Portions of the sacrificial shield will still be radioactive due to the presence of activated trace elements with long half-lives (1 5 2 Eu and 154Eu). Decontamination will require controlled TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station Document N01-1590-002, Rev. 1 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 2, Page 13 of 13 removal and disposal.
It is assumed that radioactive corrosion products on inner surfaces of piping and components will not have decayed to levels that will permit unrestricted use or allow conventional removal.These systems and components will be surveyed as they are removed and disposed of in accordance with the existing radioactive release criteria.2.2.4 Period 5 -Site Restoration Following completion of decommissioning operations, site-restoration activities can begin. If the site structures are to be dismantled, dismantling as a continuation of the decommissioning process is clearly the most appropriate and cost-effective option, as described in Section 2.1.3. The basis for the dismantling cost in the deferred scenarios is consistent with that described for DECON, presuming the removal of structures and site facilities to a nominal depth of three feet below grade and the limited restoration of the site. I TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station Document N01-1590-002, Rev. 1 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 3, Page 1 of29 3. COST ESTIMATES The estimates prepared for decommissioning Cooper consider the unique features of the site, including the nuclear steam system supply, electric power generating systems, structures, and supporting facilities.
The basis of the estimates, including the sources of information relied upon, the estimating methodology employed, site-specific considerations, and other pertinent assumptions, is described in this section.3.1 BASIS OF ESTIMATES The current estimates are area-based estimates, i.e., the plant inventory has been correlated with site-specific area working conditions, and the plant work activities organized into discrete areas to better reflect the manner in which the decommissioning will take place. The areas were determined on the basis of "common" conditions or attributes.
Each area was evaluated for work difficulty, including affects of radiation, external surface contamination, and access. This evaluation was used to adjust the work difficulty factors for removing equipment in a given area.3.2 METHODOLOGY The methodology used to develop the estimates follows the basic approach originally presented in the cost estimating guidelines developed by the Atomic Industrial Forum (now Nuclear Energy Institute).
The "Guidelines for Producing Commercial Nuclear Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Estimates," (AIF/NESP-036)
[17] and the DOE "Decommissioning Handbook."['
8]describe a unit cost factor method for estimating decommissioning activity costs. The unit cost factors used in this analysis were developed using these guidance documents, updated for more recent decommissioning experience and modified to incorporate site-specific costs.The activity-dependent costs were then estimated with the item quantities (cubic yards and tons), developed from plant drawings and plant design information.
A data base was constructed identifying the installed equipment in each designated work area. This data base contains a list of components that have a unique identifier, such as valves, tanks, electrical equipment, and heat exchangers.
It also contains bulk commodities such as piping, ventilation ductwork, cable tray, electrical conduit, and supports.
Data base categories were consistent with unit cost factors described previously.
TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station Document N01-1590-002, Rev. 1 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 3, Page 2 of29 Removal rates and material costs for the conventional disposition of components and structures relied upon information available in the industry publication, "Building Construction Cost Data," published by R.S. Means.[1 9 1 The unit factor method provides a demonstrable basis for establishing reliable cost estimates.
The detail provided in the unit factors, including activity duration, labor costs (by craft), and equipment and consumable costs, ensures that essential elements have not been omitted. Appendix A presents the detailed development of a typical unit factor. Appendix B provides the values contained within one set of factors developed for this analysis.The inventory was also organized according to its proposed disposition.
There were three primary waste streams identified for the Cooper inventory:
(1) clean material (expected to meet the release criteria without any decontamination), (2) contaminated material with recovery potential or requiring additional processing for disposal (expected to be sent to an off-site waste processor), and (3) contaminated material designated for direct disposal at a controlled low-level radioactive waste disposal site (i.e., material expected to exceed waste processor acceptance criteria or uneconomical to process).An activity duration critical path was used to determine the total decommissioning program schedule.
This is required for calculating the carrying costs, which include program management, administration, field engineering, equipment rental, quality assurance, and security.
This systematic approach for assembling decommissioning estimates ensures a high degree of confidence in the reliability of the resulting costs.This analysis reflects lessons learned from TLG's involvement in the Shippingport Station decommissioning, completed in 1989, as well as the decommissioning of the Cintichem reactor, hot cells, and associated facilities, completed in 1997. In addition, the planning and engineering for the Pathfinder, Shoreham, Rancho Seco, Trojan, Yankee Rowe, Big Rock Point, Maine Yankee, Humboldt Bay-3, Connecticut Yankee, and San Onofre-1 nuclear units have provided additional insight into the process, the regulatory aspects, and the technical challenges of decommissioning commercial nuclear units.Work Difficulty Factors TLG has historically applied work difficulty adjustment factors (WDFs) to account for the inefficiencies in working in a power plant environment.
WDFs are assigned to each unique set of unit factors, commensurate with the working conditions.
The ranges used for the WDFs are as follows: TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station Document N01-1590-002, Rev. 1 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 3, Page 3 of 29 o Access Factor 0% to 30%" Respiratory Protection Factor 0% to 50%o Radiation/ALARA Factor 0% to 100%* Protective Clothing Factor 0% to 50%o Work Break Factor 8.33%The factors and their associated range of values were originally developed in conjunction with the AIF/NESP-036 study. The factors (and their suggested application) are discussed in more detail in Appendix E.Scheduling Program Durations Area activity durations are used to develop the total decommissioning program schedule.
The unit cost factors, adjusted for WDFs as described above, are applied against the inventory of materials to be removed in each defined work area. The work area is then evaluated for the most efficient number of workers/crews for the identified decommissioning activities.
The adjusted unit cost factors are then compared against the available manpower so that an overall duration for removal of components and piping from each work area can be calculated.
The schedule is used to assign carrying costs, which include program management, administration, field engineering, equipment rental, and support services such as quality control and security.3.3 FINANCIAL COMPONENTS OF THE COST MODEL TLG's proprietary decommissioning cost model, DECCER, produces a number of distinct cost elements.
These direct expenditures, however, do not comprise the total cost to accomplish the project goal (i.e., license termination and site restoration).
Inherent in any cost estimate that does not rely on historical data is the inability to specify the precise source of costs imposed by factors such as tool breakage, accidents, illnesses, weather delays, and labor stoppages.
In the DECCER cost model, contingency fulfills this role. Contingency is added to each line item to account for costs that are difficult or impossible to develop analytically.
Such costs are historically inevitable over the duration of a job of this magnitude; therefore, this cost analysis includes funds to cover these types of expenses.TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station Document N01-1590-002, Rev. 1 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 3, Page 4 of 29 3.3.1 Contingency The activity-and period-dependent costs are combined to develop the total decommissioning cost. A contingency is then applied on a line-item basis, using one or more of the contingency types listed in the AIF/NESP-036 study. "Contingencies" are defined in the American Association of Cost Engineers "Project and Cost Engineers' Handbook"[
2 0 1 as "specific provision for unforeseeable elements of cost within the defined project scope; particularly important where previous experience relating estimates and actual costs has shown that unforeseeable events which will increase costs are likely to occur." The cost elements in this analysis are based upon ideal conditions and maximum efficiency; therefore, consistent with industry practice, contingency is included.
In the AIF/NESP-036 study, the types of unforeseeable events that are likely to occur in decommissioning are discussed and guidelines are provided for percentage contingency in each category.
It should be noted that contingency, as used in this analysis, does not account for price escalation and inflation in the cost of decommissioning over the remaining operating life of the station.Contingency funds are an integral part of the total cost to complete the decommissioning process. Exclusion of this component puts at risk a successful completion of the intended tasks and, potentially, subsequent related activities.
For this study, TLG examined the major activity-related problems (decontamination, segmentation, equipment handling, packaging, transport, and waste disposal) that necessitate a contingency.
Individual activity contingencies ranged from 10% to 75%, depending on the degree of difficulty judged to be appropriate from TLG's actual decommissioning experience.
The contingency values used in this study are as follows:* Decontamination 50%" Contaminated Component Removal 25%" Contaminated Component Packaging 10%" Contaminated Component Transport 15%o Low-Level Radioactive Waste Disposal 25%o Reactor Segmentation 75%* NSSS Component Removal 25%o Reactor Waste Packaging 25%* Reactor Waste Transport 25%o Reactor Vessel Component Disposal 50%" GTCC Disposal 15%TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station Document N01-1590-002, Rev. 1 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 3, Page 5 of 29 o Non-Radioactive Component Removal 15%o Heavy Equipment and Tooling 15%" Supplies 25%" Engineering 15%o Energy 15%o Characterization and Termination Surveys 30%o Construction 15%o Taxes and Fees 10%o Insurance 10%o Staffing 15%The contingency values are applied to the appropriate components of the estimates on a line item basis. A composite value is then reported at the end of each detailed estimate (as provided in Appendices C and D).3.3.2 Financial Risk In addition to the routine uncertainties addressed by contingency, another cost element that is sometimes necessary to consider when bounding decommissioning costs relates to uncertainty, or risk.Examples can include changes in work scope, pricing, job performance, and other variations that could conceivably, but not necessarily, occur.Consideration is sometimes necessary to generate a level of confidence in the estimate, within a range of probabilities.
TLG considers these types of costs under the broad term "financial risk." Included within the category of financial risk are: Transition activities and costs: ancillary expenses associated with eliminating 50% to 80% of the site labor force shortly after the cessation of plant operations, added cost for worker separation packages throughout the decommissioning program, national or company-mandated retraining, and retention incentives for key personnel.
Delays in approval of the decommissioning plan due to intervention, public participation in local community meetings, legal challenges, and national and local hearings.Changes in the project work scope from the baseline estimate, involving the discovery of unexpected levels of contaminants, contamination in places not previously expected, contaminated soil previously undiscovered (either radioactive or hazardous material TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station Document N01-1590-002, Rev. 1 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 3, Page 6 of 29 0 contamination), variations in plant inventory or configuration not indicated by the as-built drawings." Regulatory changes, for example, affecting worker health and safety, site release criteria, waste transportation, and disposal." Policy decisions altering national commitments (e.g., in the ability to accommodate certain waste forms for disposition), or in the timetable for such, for example, the start and rate of acceptance of spent fuel by the DOE.o Pricing changes for basic inputs such as labor, energy, materials, and disposal.
Items subject to widespread price competition (such as materials) may not show significant variation; however, others such as waste disposal could exhibit large pricing uncertainties, particularly in markets where limited access to services is available.
It has been TLG's experience that the results of a risk analysis, when compared with the base case estimate for decommissioning, indicate that the chances of the base decommissioning estimate's being too high is a low probability, and the chances that the estimate is too low is a higher probability.
This is mostly due to the pricing uncertainty for low-level radioactive waste burial, and to a lesser extent due to schedule increases from changes in plant conditions and to pricing variations in the cost of labor (both craft and staff). This cost study, however, does not add any additional costs to the estimate for financial risk, since there is insufficient historical data from which to project future liabilities.
Consequently, the areas of uncertainty or risk are revisited periodically and addressed through repeated revisions or updates of the base estimates.
3.4 SITE-SPECIFIC CONSIDERATIONS There are a number of site-specific considerations that affect the method for dismantling and removal of equipment from the site and the degree of restoration required.
The cost impact of the considerations identified below is included in this cost study.3.4.1 Spent Fuel Management The cost to dispose the spent fuel generated from plant operations is not reflected within the estimates to decommission Cooper. Ultimate disposition of the spent fuel is within the province of the DOE's Waste Management System, as defined by the Nuclear Waste Policy Act. As such, the disposal cost is financed by a 1 mill/kWhr surcharge paid into TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station Document N01-1590-002, Rev. 1 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 3, Page 7 of 29 the DOE's waste fund during operations.
However, the NRC requires licensees to establish a program to manage and provide funding for the management of all irradiated fuel at the reactor site until title of the fuel is transferred to the Secretary of Energy. This funding requirement is fulfilled through inclusion of certain high-level waste cost elements within the estimates, as described below.Completion of the decommissioning process is highly dependent upon the DOE's ability to remove spent fuel from the site. The timing for removal of spent fuel from the site is based upon the DOE's most recently published annual acceptance rates of 400 MTU/year for year 1, 3,800 MTU total for years 2 through 4 and 3,000 MTU/year for year 5 and beyond.[2 1 1 The DOE contracts provide mechanisms for altering the oldest fuel first allocation scheme, including emergency deliveries, exchanges of allocations amongst utilities and the option of providing priority acceptance from permanently shutdown nuclear reactors.Because it is unclear how these mechanisms may operate once DOE begins accepting spent fuel from commercial reactors, this study assumes that DOE will accept spent fuel in an oldest fuel first order.Morris Wet-Pool Storage Facility NPPD has 1,054 spent fuel assemblies from Cooper in storage at General Electric's wet-pool ISFSI in Morris, Illinois.
This analysis assumes that this inventory is preferentially transferred to the DOE, starting in 2022. Completion of the transfer would be in year 2027. At that time, the transfer of spent fuel would be exclusively from the Cooper site.ISFSI The ISFSI, constructed to support plant operations, will continue to operate throughout decommissioning, and beyond the termination of the operating license in the DECON decommissioning scenario, until such time that the transfer of spent fuel to the DOE can be completed.
Assuming that DOE commences repository operation in 2020, and Morris fuel is transferred first, spent fuel from the Cooper site is projected to be removed beginning in 2027. The process is expected to be completed by the year 2046 for a 2014 shutdown and year 2061 for a 2034 shutdown.
The process is similar for the Delayed DECON and SAFSTOR scenarios; however, based upon the expected completion date for fuel transfer, the ISFSI will be emptied prior to the commencement of decommissioning operations.
TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station Document N01-1590-002, Rev. 1 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 3, Page 8 of 29 Operation and maintenance costs for the ISFSI are included within the estimate and address the cost for staffing the facility, as well as security, insurance, and licensing fees. The estimates include the costs to purchase, load, and transfer the fuel storage canisters.
Costs are also provided for the final disposition of the facility once the transfer is complete.Storage Canister Design The design and capacity of the ISFSI is based upon the NUHOMS system, with a 61 fuel assembly capacity.
A unit cost of $785,000 is used for pricing the internal multi-purpose canister (MPC) and the horizontal concrete storage module.Canister Loading and Transfer An average cost of $440,000 is used for the labor and equipment to seal each spent fuel canister once it is loaded and for the labor to transfer the spent fuel canister from the pool into a DOE transport cask or onto the ISFSI pad. For estimating purposes, 50% of this cost is used to estimate the cost to transfer the fuel from the ISFSI into a DOE transport cask.Operations and Maintenance An annual cost (excluding labor) of approximately
$746,000 and $85,000 are used for operation and maintenance of the spent fuel pool and the ISFSI, respectively.
Pool operations are expected to continue approximately 51/2 years after the cessation of operations.
ISFSI operating costs are based upon expectations of DOE performance, as described previously.
ISFSI Design Considerations A multi-purpose (storage and transport) dry shielded storage canister with a horizontal, reinforced concrete storage module is used as a basis for the cost analysis.
The final core off load, equivalent to 8 modules, are assumed to have some level of neutron-induced activation as a result of the long-term storage of the fuel (i.e., to levels exceeding free-release limits). The steel support structure is assumed to be removed from these modules for controlled disposal.
The cost of the disposition of this material, as well as the demolition of the ISFSI facility, is included in the estimates.
TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station Document N01-1590-002, Rev. 1 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 3, Page 9 of 29 GTCC The dismantling of the reactor internals generates radioactive waste considered unsuitable for shallow land disposal (i.e., low-level radioactive waste with concentrations of radionuclides that exceed the limits established by the NRC for Class C radioactive waste (GTCC)).The Low-Level Radioactive Waste Policy Amendments Act of 1985 assigned the federal government the responsibility for the disposal of this material.
The Act also stated that the beneficiaries of the activities resulting in the generation of such radioactive waste bear all reasonable costs of disposing of such waste. Although there are strong arguments that GTCC waste is covered by the spent fuel contact with DOE and the fees being paid pursuant to that contract, DOE has taken the position that GTCC waste is not covered by that contract or its fees and that utilities will have to pay an additional fee for the disposal of their GTCC waste. However, to date, the federal government has not identified a cost for disposing of GTCC or a schedule for acceptance.
As such, the GTCC radioactive waste has been packaged and disposed of as high-level waste, at a cost equivalent to that envisioned for the spent fuel.For purposes of this study, GTCC is packaged in the same canisters used to store spent fuel. Disposal costs are based upon a cost equivalent to that envisioned for the spent fuel. It is not anticipated that the DOE would accept this waste prior to completing the transfer of spent fuel.Therefore, until such time the DOE is ready to accept GTCC waste, it is reasonable to assume that this material would remain in storage with the spent fuel in the ISFSI at the Cooper site (for the DECON alternative).
In the Delayed DECON and SAFSTOR scenarios, the GTCC material is shipped directly to a DOE facility as it is generated since the fuel has been removed from the site prior to the start of decommissioning and the ISFSI deactivated.
 
====3.4.2 Reactor====
Vessel and Internal Components The reactor pressure vessel and internal components are segmented for disposal in shielded, reusable transportation casks. Segmentation is performed in the dryer-separator pool, where a turntable and remote cutter are installed.
The vessel is segmented in place, using a mast-mounted cutter supported off the lower head and directed from a shielded work platform installed overhead in the reactor well.Transportation cask specifications and transportation regulations dictate the segmentation and packaging methodology.
TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station Document N01-1590-002, Rev. 1 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 3, Page 10 of 29 Intact disposal of reactor vessel shells has been successfully demonstrated at several of the sites currently being decommissioned.
Access to navigable waterways has allowed these large packages to be transported to the Barnwell disposal site with minimal overland travel.Intact disposal of the reactor vessel and internal components can provide savings in cost and worker exposure by eliminating the complex segmentation requirements, isolation of the GTCC material, and transport/storage of the resulting waste packages.
Portland General Electric (PGE) was able to dispose of the Trojan reactor as an intact package (including the internals).
However, its location on the Columbia River simplified the transportation analysis since:* the reactor package could be secured to the transport vehicle for the entire journey, i.e., the package was not lifted during transport,* there were no man-made or natural terrain features between the plant site and the disposal location that could produce a large drop, and* transport speeds were very low, limited by the overland transport vehicle and the river barge.As a member of the Northwest Compact, PGE had a site available for disposal of the package -the US Ecology facility in Washington State.The characteristics of this arid site proved favorable in demonstrating compliance with land disposal regulations.
It is not known whether this option will be available when the Cooper unit ceases operation.
Future viability of this option will depend upon the ultimate location of the disposal site, as well as the disposal site licensee's ability to accept highly radioactive packages and effectively isolate them from the environment.
Consequently, the study assumes the reactor vessel will require segmentation, as a bounding condition.
With lower levels of activation, the vessel shell can be packaged more efficiently than the curie-limited internal components.
This will allow the use of more conventional waste packages rather than shielded casks for transport (although some shielded casks are still required).
 
====3.4.3 Primary====
System Components In the DECON scenario, the reactor recirculation system components are assumed to be decontaminated using chemical agents prior to the start of dismantling operations.
This type of decontamination can be TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station Document N01-1590-002, Rev. 1 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 3, Page 11 of 29 expected to have a significant ALARA impact, since in this scenario the removal work is done within the first few years of shutdown.
A decontamination factor (average reduction) of 10 is assumed for the process. Disposal of the decontamination solution effluent is included within the estimate as a "process liquid waste" charge. In the SAFSTOR scenario, radionuclide decay is expected to provide the same benefit and, therefore, a chemical decontamination is not included.Reactor recirculation piping is cut from the reactor vessel once the water level in the vessel (used for personnel shielding during dismantling and cutting operations in and around the vessel) drops below the nozzle zone. The piping is boxed and shipped by shielded van. The reactor recirculation pumps and motors are lifted out intact, packaged, and transported for processing or disposal.3.4.4 Main Turbine and Condenser The main turbine is dismantled using conventional maintenance procedures.
The turbine rotors and shafts are removed to a laydown area. The lower turbine casings are removed from their anchors by controlled demolition.
The main condensers are also disassembled and moved to a laydown area. Material is then prepared for transportation to an off-site recycling facility where it is surveyed and designated for either decontamination or volume reduction, conventional disposal, or controlled disposal.
Components are packaged and readied for transport in accordance with the intended disposition.
 
====3.4.5 Transportation====
 
Methods Contaminated piping, components, and structural material other than the highly activated reactor vessel and internal components will qualify as LSA-I, II or III or Surface Contaminated Object, SCO-I or II, as described in Title 49.[221 The contaminated material will be packaged in Industrial Packages (IP-1, IP-2, or IP-3, as defined in subpart 173.411)for transport unless demonstrated to qualify as their own shipping containers.
The reactor vessel and internal components are expected to be transported in accordance with Part 71, as Type B. It is conceivable that the reactor, due to its limited specific activity, could qualify as LSA II or III. However, the high radiation levels on the outer surface would require that additional shielding be incorporated within the packaging so as to attenuate the dose to levels acceptable for transport.
TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station Document N01.1590-002, Rev. 1 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 3, Page 12 of 29 Any fuel cladding failure that occurred during the lifetime of the plant is assumed to have released fission products at sufficiently low levels that the buildup of quantities of long-lived isotopes (e.g., l 3 7 Cs, 9 0 Sr, or transuranics) has been prevented from reaching levels exceeding those that permit the major reactor components to be shipped under current transportation regulations and disposal requirements.
Transport of the highly activated metal, produced in the segmentation of the reactor vessel and internal components, will be by shielded truck cask. Cask shipments may exceed 95,000 pounds, including vessel segment(s), supplementary shielding, cask tie-downs, and tractor-trailer. The maximum level of activity per shipment assumed permissible was based upon the license limits of the available shielded transport casks. The segmentation scheme for the vessel and internal segments is designed to meet these limits.The transport of large intact components (e.g., large heat exchangers and other oversized components) will be by a combination of truck, rail, and/or multi-wheeled transporter.
Transportation costs for material requiring controlled disposal are based upon the mileage to the EnergySolutions facility in Clive, Utah.Transportation costs for off-site waste processing are based upon the mileage to Memphis, Tennessee.
Truck transport costs are estimated using published tariffs from Tri-State Motor Transit.[2]3.4.6 Low-Level Radioactive Waste Conditioning and Disposal To the greatest extent practical, metallic material generated in the decontamination and dismantling processes is processed to reduce the total cost of controlled disposal.
Material meeting the regulatory and/or site release criterion, is released as scrap, requiring no further cost consideration.
Conditioning (preparing the material to meet the waste acceptance criteria of the disposal site) and recovery of the waste stream is performed off site at a licensed processing center. Any material leaving the site is subject to a survey and release charge, at a minimum.The mass of radioactive waste generated during the various decommissioning activities at the site is shown on a line-item basis in the detailed Appendices C and D, and summarized in Section 5. The quantified waste summaries shown in these tables are consistent with 10 CFR Part 61 classifications.
Commercially available steel containers are presumed to be used for the disposal of piping, small components, TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station Document N01-1590-002, Rev. 1 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 3, Page 13 of 29 and concrete.
Larger components can serve as their own containers, with proper closure of all openings, access ways, and penetrations.
The volumes are calculated based on the exterior package dimensions for containerized material or a specific calculation for components serving as their own waste containers.
The more highly activated reactor components will be shipped in reusable, shielded truck casks with disposable liners. In calculating disposal costs, the burial fees are applied against the liner volume, as well as the special handling requirements of the payload. Packaging efficiencies are lower for the highly activated materials (greater than Type A quantity waste), where high concentrations of gamma-emitting radionuclides limit the capacity of the shipping canisters.
Disposal fees are based upon estimated charges, with surcharges added for the highly activated components, for example, generated in the segmentation of the reactor vessel. The cost to dispose of the majority of the material generated from the decontamination and dismantling activities is based upon the current cost for disposal at EnergySolutions facility in Clive, Utah. Disposal costs for the higher activity waste (Class B and C) were based upon the last published rate schedule for non-compact waste for the Barnwell facility (as a proxy).3.4.7 Site Conditions Following Decommissioning The NRC will terminate (or amend) the site license if it determines that site remediation has been performed in accordance with the license termination plan, and that the terminal radiation survey and associated documentation demonstrate that the facility is suitable for release. The NRC's involvement in the decommissioning process ends at this point.Building codes and state environmental regulations dictate the next step in the decommissioning process, as well as the owner's own future plans for the site.Structures are removed to a nominal depth of three feet below grade.Concrete rubble generated from demolition activities is processed and made available as clean fill. The Intake Structure is assumed to be removed back to the riverbank.
The riverbank and the station grounds will be regraded such that the site will have a final contour consistent with adjacent surroundings, i.e., the configuration of the Missouri River levee will be maintained.
The large underground tunnels between the water intake and Turbine Building will be isolated, sealed, and abandoned in place. Site utilities and service piping are abandoned in TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station Document N01-1590-002, Rev. 1 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 3, Page 14 of 29 place. Electrical manholes are backfilled with suitable earthen material and abandoned.
Asphalt surfaces in the immediate vicinity of site buildings are broken up and removed.The existing electrical switchyard and access roads will remain in support of the electrical transmission and distribution system. The site access road will be left intact.The estimates do not assume the remediation of any contaminated soil.This assumption may be affected by continued plant operations and/or future regulatory actions, such as the development of site-specific release criteria.3.5 ASSUMPTIONS The following assumptions were made in the development of the estimates for decommissioning the Cooper unit.3.5.1 Estimating Basis The study follows the principles of ALARA through the use of work duration adjustment factors. These factors address the impact of activities such as radiological protection instruction, mock-up training, and the use of respiratory protection and protective clothing.
The factors lengthen a task's duration, increasing costs and lengthening the overall schedule.
ALARA planning is considered in the costs for engineering and planning, and in the development of activity specifications and detailed procedures.
Changes to worker exposure limits may impact the decommissioning cost and project schedule.3.5.2 Labor Costs The craft labor required to decontaminate and dismantle the nuclear unit is acquired through standard site contracting practices.
The current cost of labor at the site is used as an estimating basis.NPPD, as the licensee, will continue to provide site operations support, including decommissioning program management, licensing, radiological protection, and site security.
A Decommissioning Operations Contractor (DOC) will provide the supervisory staff needed to oversee the labor subcontractors, consultants, and specialty contractors needed to perform the work required for the decontamination and dismantling effort. The DOC will also provide the engineering services needed to develop TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station Document N01-1590-002, Rev. 1 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 3, Page 15 of 29 activity specifications, detailed procedures, detailed activation analyses, and support field activities such as structural modifications.
Personnel costs are based upon average salary information provided by NPPD. Overhead costs are included for site and corporate support, reduced commensurate with the staffing of the project.Security, while reduced from operating levels, is maintained throughout the decommissioning for access control, material control, and to safeguard the spent fuel.3.5.3 Design Conditions Any fuel cladding failure that occurred during the lifetime of the plant is assumed to have released fission products at sufficiently low levels that the buildup of quantities of long-lived isotopes (e.g., 1 3 7 Cs, 9 0 Sr, or transuranics) has been prevented from reaching levels exceeding those that permit the major NSSS components to be shipped under current transportation regulations and disposal requirements.
The curie contents of the vessel and internals at final shutdown are derived from those listed in NUREG/CR-3474.[
2 4 1 Actual estimates are derived from the curie/gram values contained therein and adjusted for the different mass of the Cooper components, projected operating life, and different periods of decay. Additional short-lived isotopes were derived from CR-0130[2 5 1 and CR-0672,[2 6 1 and benchmarked to the long-lived values from CR-3474.The disposal cost for the control blades removed from the vessel with the final core load is included within the estimates.
Disposition of any blades stored in the pools from operations is considered an operating expense and therefore not accounted for in the decommissioning estimates.
Activation of the Reactor Building structures is confined to the area around the sacrificial shield. More extensive activation (at very low levels) of the interior structures within containment has been detected at several reactors and the owners have elected to dispose of the affected material at a controlled facility rather than reuse the material as fill on site or sending it to a landfill.
The ultimate disposition of the material removed from the Reactor Building will depend upon the site release criteria applied, as well as the designated end use for the Site.TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station Document N01-1590-002, Rev. 1 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 3, Page 16 of 29 3.5.4 General Transition Activities Existing warehouses are cleared of non-essential material and remain for use by NPPD and its subcontractors.
The plant's operating staff performs the following activities at no additional cost or credit to the project during the transition period: Drain and collect fuel oils, lubricating oils, and transformer oils for recycle and/or sale.Drain and collect acids, caustics, and other chemical stores for recycle and/or sale.Process operating waste inventories, i.e., the estimates do not address the disposition of any legacy wastes; the disposal of operating wastes during this initial period is not considered a decommissioning expense.Scrap and Salvage The existing plant equipment is considered obsolete and suitable for scrap as deadweight quantities only. NPPD will make economically reasonable efforts to salvage equipment following final plant shutdown.However, dismantling techniques assumed by TLG for equipment in this analysis are not consistent with removal techniques required for salvage (resale) of equipment.
Experience has indicated that some buyers wanted equipment stripped down to very specific requirements before they would consider purchase.
This required expensive rework after the equipment had been removed from its installed location.
Since placing a salvage value on this machinery and equipment would be speculative, and the value would be small in comparison to the overall decommissioning expenses, this analysis does not attempt to quantify the value that an owner may realize based upon those efforts.It is assumed, for purposes of this analysis, that any value received from the sale of scrap generated in the dismantling process would be more than offset by the on-site processing costs. The dismantling techniques assumed in the decommissioning estimates do not include the additional cost for size reduction and preparation to meet "furnace ready" conditions.
For example, the recovery of copper from electrical cabling may require the removal and disposition of any contaminated insulation, an added expense. With a volatile market, the potential profit margin in TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station Document N01-1590-002, Rev. 1 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 3, Page 17 of 29 scrap recovery is highly speculative, regardless of the ability to free release this material.
This assumption is an implicit recognition of scrap value in the disposal of clean metallic waste at no additional cost to the project.Furniture, tools, mobile equipment such as forklifts, trucks, bulldozers, and other property is removed at no cost or credit to the decommissioning project. Disposition may include relocation to other facilities.
Spare parts are also made available for alternative use.Energy For estimating purposes, the plant is assumed to be de-energized, with the exception of those facilities associated with spent fuel storage.Replacement power costs are used to calculate the cost of energy consumed during decommissioning for tooling, lighting, ventilation, and essential services.Insurance Costs for continuing coverage (nuclear liability and property insurance) following cessation of plant operations and during decommissioning are included and based upon current operating premiums.
Reductions in premiums, throughout the decommissioning process, are based upon the guidance and the limits for coverage defined in the NRC's proposed rulemaking "Financial Protection Requirements for Permanently Shutdown Nuclear Power Reactors."[
2 7 1 The NRC's financial protection requirements are based on various reactor (and spent fuel)configurations.
Taxes The only tax payment (or fee) included in the estimates is associated with the river levee maintenance costs.Site Modifications The perimeter fence and in-plant security barriers will be moved, as appropriate, to conform to the Site Security Plan in force during the various stages of the project.TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station Document N01-1590-002, Rev. 1 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 3, Page 18 of 29 3.6 COST ESTIMATE
 
==SUMMARY==
Schedules of expenditures are provided in Tables 3.1 through 3.6. The tables delineate the cost contributors by year of expenditures as well as cost contributor (e.g., labor, materials, and waste disposal).
Decommissioning costs are reported in 2008 dollars. Costs are not inflated, escalated, or discounted over the period of expenditure (or projected lifetime of the plant). The schedules are based upon the detailed activity costs reported in Appendices C and D, along with the timelines presented in Section 4.In the appendices, the cost elements are also assigned to one of three subcategories: "License Termination, .... Spent Fuel Management," and "Site Restoration." The subcategory "License Termination" is used to accumulate costs that are consistent with "decommissioning" as defined by the NRC in its financial assurance regulations (i.e., 10 CFR §50.75). The cost reported for this subcategory is generally sufficient to terminate the unit's operating license, recognizing that there may be some additional cost impact from spent fuel management.
The "Spent Fuel Management" subcategory contains costs associated with the construction of an ISFSI, the containerization and transfer of spent fuel to the ISFSI over the five and one-half years of post-shutdown pool operations, and the management of the ISFSI until such time that the transfer of all fuel from this facility to an off-site location (e.g., geologic repository) is complete."Site Restoration" is used to capture costs associated with the dismantling and demolition of buildings and facilities demonstrated to be free from contamination.
This includes structures never exposed to radioactive materials, as well as those facilities that have been decontaminated to appropriate levels. Structures are removed to a depth of three feet and backfilled to conform to local grade.TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document N01-1590-002, Rev. 1 Section 3, Page 19 of 29 TABLE 3.1 2014 DECON SCHEDULE OF TOTAL ANNUAL EXPENDITURES (thousands, 2008 dollars)Equipment
&Labor Materials Year Energy Burial Other Total 2014 47,079 9,874 1,016 87 7,982 66,039 2015 63,173 21,674 1,573 22,361 13,287 122,069 2016 49,998 21,848 1,004 41,033 9,480 123,362 2017 44,806 11,549 799 12,824 6,767 76,745 2018 44,806 11,549 799 12,824 6,767 76,745 2019 39,861 10,474 617 13,219 5,473 69,643 2020 25,445 3,467 181 49 2,123 31,266 2021 16,129 6,815 107 0 1,730 24,781 2022 9,078 3,166 44 0 1,764 14,052 2023 4,046 562 0 0 1,788 6,397 2024 4,057 564 0 0 1,793 6,414 2025 4,046 562 0 0 1,788 6,397 2026 4,046 562 0 0 1,788 6,397 2027 4,046 562 0 0 1,788 6,397 2028 4,057 564 0 0 1,793 6,414 2029 4,046 562 0 0 1,788 6,397 2030 4,046 562 0 0 1,788 6,397 2031 4,046 562 0 0 1,788 6,397 2032 4,057 564 0 0 1,793 6,414 2033 4,046 562 0 0 1,788 6,397 2034 4,046 562 0 0 1,788 6,397 2035 4,046 562 0 0 1,788 6,397 2036 4,057 564 0 0 1,793 6,414 2037 4,046 562 0 0 1,788 6,397 2038 4,046 562 0 0 1,788 6,397 2039 4,046 562 0 0 1,788 6,397 2040 4,057 564 0 0 1,793 6,414 2041 4,046 562 0 0 1,788 6,397 2042 4,046 562 0 0 1,788 6,397 2043 4,046 562 0 0 1,788 6,397 2044 4,057 564 0 0 1,793 6,414 2045 4,046 562 0 0 1,788 6,397 2046 4,061 1,334 0 1 10,384 15,779 TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document N01-1590-002, Rev. 1 Section 3, Page 20 of 29 TABLE 3.1 (continued) 2014 DECON SCHEDULE OF TOTAL ANNUAL EXPENDITURES (thousands, 2008 dollars)Equipment
&Labor Materials Year Energy Burial Other Total 2047 1,819 439,379 868 115,564 0 6,141 68 102,465 1,597 108,509 4,352 772,058 TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station Decommissio~ning Cost Analysis Document N01-1590-002, Rev. 1 Section 3, Page 21 of 29 TABLE 3.2 2014 Delayed DECON SCHEDULE OF TOTAL ANNUAL EXPENDITURES (thousands, 2008 dollars)Equipment
&Labor Materials Year Energy Burial Other Total 2014 38,591 9,434 1,016 87 7,982 57,111 2015 38,786 10,829 676 1,988 11,278 63,557 2016 12,446 5,991 214 62 3,851 22,564 2017 12,412 5,974 213 62 3,841 22,503 2018 12,412 5,974 213 62 3,841 22,503 2019 9,150 3,617 164 60 2,877 15,869 2020 5,297 824 107 58 1,739 8,025 2021 5,282 822 107 58 1,735 8,003 2022 5,282 822 107 58 1,735 8,003 2023 5,282 822 107 58 1,735 8,003 2024 5,297 824 107 58 1,739 8,025 2025 5,282 822 107 58 1,735 8,003 2026 5,282 822 107 58 1,735 8,003 2027 5,282 822 107 58 1,735 8,003 2028 5,297 824 107 58 1,739 8,025 2029 5,282 822 107 58 1,735 8,003 2030 5,282 822 107 58 1,735 8,003 2031 5,282 822 107 58 1,735 8,003 2032 5,297 824 107 58 1,739 8,025 2033 5,282 822 107 58 1,735 8,003 2034 5,282 822 107 58 1,735 8,003 2035 5,282 822 107 58 1,735 8,003 2036 5,297 824 107 58 1,739 8,025 2037 5,282 822 107 58 1,735 8,003 2038 5,282 822 107 58 1,735 8,003 2039 5,282 822 107 58 1,735 8,003 2040 5,297 824 107 58 1,739 8,025 2041 5,282 822 107 58 1,735 8,003 2042 5,282 822 107 58 1,735 8,003 2043 5,282 822 107 58 1,735 8,003 2044 5,297 824 107 .58 1,739 8,025 2045 1 5,282 822 1071 58 1,735 8,003 2046 1 5,360 824 1 109 158 1,732 8,082 TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document N01-1590-002, Rev. 1 Section 3, Page 22 of 29 TABLE 3.2 (continued) 2014 Delayed DECON SCHEDULE OF TOTAL ANNUAL EXPENDITURES (thousands, 2008 dollars)Equipment
&Labor Materials Energy Year Burial Other Total 2047 33,523 1,412 1,066 77 743 36,822 2048 43,779 15,439 1,042 16,243 6,546 83,049 2049 40,386 14,058 931 25,770 8,761 89,906 2050 39,158 6,342 799 15,542 3,274 65,116 2051 39,158 6,342 799 15,542 3,274 65,116 2052 24,949 3,036 221 819 759 29,785 2053 13,322 6,769 107 0 38 20,236 2054 7,993 4,062 64 0 23 12,141 508,866 121,495 10,408 77,874 103,957 822,600 TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document N01-1590-002, Rev. 1 Section 3, Page 23 of 29 TABLE 3.3 2014 SAFSTOR SCHEDULE OF TOTAL ANNUAL EXPENDITURES (thousands, 2008 dollars)Equipment
&Labor Materials Year Energy Burial Other Total 2014 38,591 9,434 1,016 87 7,982 57,111 2015 38,786 10,829 676 1,988 11,278 63,557 2016 12,446 5,991 214 62 3,851 22,564 2017 12,412 5,974 213 62 3,841 22,503 2018 12,412 5,974 213 62 3,841 22,503 2019 9,150 3,617 164 60 2,877 15,869 2020 5,297 824 107 58 1,739 8,025 2021 5,282 822 107 58 1,735 8,003 2022 5,282 822 107 58 1,735 8,003 2023 5,282 822 107 58 1,735 8,003 2024 5,297 824 107 58 1,739 8,025 2025 5,282 822 107 58 1,735 8,003 2026 5,282 822 107 58 1,735 8,003 2027 5,282 822 107 58 1,735 8,003 2028 5,297 824 107 58 1,739 8,025 2029 5,282 822 107 58 1,735 8,003 2030 5,282 822 107 58 1,735 8,003 2031 5,282 822 107 58 1,735 8,003 2032 5,297 824 107 58 1,739 8,025 2033 5,282 822 107 58 1,735 8,003 2034 5,282 822 107 58 1,735 8,003 2035 5,282 822 107 58 1,735 8,003 2036 5,297 824 107 58 1,739 8,025 2037 5,282 822 107 58 1,735 8,003 2038 5,282 822 107 58 1,735 8,003 2039 5,282 822 107 58 1,735 8,003 2040 5,297 824 107 58 1,739 8,025 2041 5,282 822 107 58 1,735 8,003 2042 5,282 822 107 58 1,735 8,003 2043 5,282 822 107 58 1,735 8,003 2044 5,297 824 107 58 1,739 8,025 2045 5,282 822 107 58 1,735 8,003 2046 5,276 821 107 58 1,732 7,993 TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document N01-1590-002, Rev. 1 Section 3, Page 24 of 29 TABLE 3.3 (continued) 2014 SAFSTOR SCHEDULE OF TOTAL ANNUAL EXPENDITURES (thousands, 2008 dollars).Equipment
&Labor Materials Year Energy Burial Other Total 2047 3,063 249 107 56 671 4,146 2048 3,072 249 107 57 673 4,157 2049 3,063 249 107 56 671 4,146 2050 3,063 249 107 56 671 4,146 2051 3,063 249 107 56 671 4,146 2052 3,072 249 107 57 673 4,157 2053 3,063 249 107 56 671 4,146 2054 3,063 249 107 56 671 4,146 2055 3,063 249 107 56 671 4,146 2056 3,072 249 107 57 673 4,157 2057 3,063 249 107 56 671 4,146 2058 3,063 249 107 56 671 4,146 2059 3,063 249 107 56 671 4,146 2060 3,072 249 107 57 673 4,157 2061 3,063 249 107 56 671 4,146 2062 3,063 249 107 56 671 4,146 2063 3,063 249 107 56 671 4,146 2064 3,072 249 107 57 673 4,157 2065 3,063 249 107 56 671 4,146 2066 3,063 249 107 56 671 4,146 2067 3,063 249 .107 56 671 4,146 2068 25,078 1,070 801 72 725 27,745 2069 41,529 10,664 1,054 7,391 3,362 64,001 2070 40,733 17,502 981 30,409 11,019 100,644 2071 39,109 6,285 799 15,410 3,229 64,833 2072 39,216 6,303 802 15,453 3,238 65,011 2073 30,623 3,074 387 4,609 1,507 40,200 2074 13,962 6,534 112 3 72 20,683 2075 11,278 5,731 90 0 32 17,131______ 572,411 126,422 12,641 78,413 117,822 907,708 TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document N01-1590-002, Rev. 1 Section 3, Page 25 of 29 TABLE 3.4 2034 DECON SCHEDULE OF TOTAL ANNUAL EXPENDITURES (thousands, 2008 dollars)Equipment
&Labor Materials Year Energy Burial Other Total 2034 44,992 3,613 1,016 87 7,982 57,690 2035 62,426 19,434 1,573 22,403 13,287 119,124 2036 49,346 19,889 1,004 41,120 9,480 120,838 2037 44,584 10,883 799 12,824 6,767 75,857 2038 44,584 10,883 799 12,824 6,767 75,857 2039 39,850 10,440 617 13,219 5,473 69,598 2040 25,569 3,838 181 49 2,142 31,779 2041 16,225 7,102 107 0 1,793 25,227 2042 9,093 3,211 44 0 1,790 14,139 2043 4,003 435 0 0 1,788 6,226 2044 4,014 436 0 0 1,793 6,243 2045 4,003 435 0 0 1,788 6,226 2046 4,003 435 0 0 1,788 6,226 2047 4,003 435 0 0 1,788 6,226 2048 4,014 436 0 0 1,793 6,243 2049 4,003 435 0 0 1,788 6,226 2050 4,003 435 0 0 1,788 6,226 2051 4,003 435 0 0 1,788 6,226.2052 4,014 436 0 0 1,793 6,243 2053 4,003 435 0 0 1,788 6,226 2054 4,003 435 0 0 1,788 6,226 2055 4,003 435 0 0 1,788 6,226 2056 4,014 436 0 0 1,793 6,243 2057 4,003 435 0 0 1,788 6,226 2058 4,003 435 0 0 1,788 6,226 2059 4,003 435 0 0 1,788 6,226 2060 4,014 436 0 0 1,793 6,243 2061 4,023 1,212 0 1 10,384 15,620 2062 2,269 1,080 0 75 1,664 5,088 415,076 99,415 6,141 102,601 99,739 722,972 TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document N01-1590-002, Rev. 1 Section 3, Page 26 of 29 TABLE 3.5 2034 Delayed DECON SCHEDULE OF TOTAL ANNUAL EXPENDITURES (thousands, 2008 dollars)Equipment
&Labor Materials Year Energy Burial Other Total 2034 36,504 3,172 1,016 87 7,982 48,762 2035 38,173 8,992 676 1,988 11,278 61,108 2036 12,064 4,843 214 62 3,851 21,034 2037 12,031 4,830 213 62 3,841 20,977 20:38 12,031 4,830 213 62 3,841 20,977 2039 8,934 2,969 164 60 2,877 15,004 2040 5,276 763 107 58 1,739 7,944 2041 5,262 761 107 58 1,735 7,922 2042 5,262 761 107 58 1,735 7,922 2043 5,262 761 107 58 1,735 7,922 2044 5,276 763 107 58 1,739 7,944 2045 5,262 761 107 58 1,735 7,922 2046 5,262 761 107 58 1,735 7,922 2047 5,262 761 107. 58 1,735 7,922 2048 5,276 763 107 58 1,739 7,944 2049 5,262 761 107 58 1,735 7,922 2050 5,262 761 107 58 1,735 7,922 2051 5,262 761 107 58 1,735 7,922 2052 5,276 763 107 58 1,739 7,944 2053 5,262 761 107 58 1,735 7,922 2054 5,262 761 107 58 1,735 7,922 2055 5,262 761 107 58 1,735 7,922 2056 5,276 763 107 58 1,739 7,944 2057 5,262 761 107 58 1,735 7,922 2058 5,262 761 107 58 1,735 7,922 2059 5,262 761 107 58 1,735 7,922 2060 5,276 763 107 58 1,739 7,944 2061 5,339 763 109 58 1,732 8,001 2062 33,523 1,412 1,066 77 743 36,822 2063 43,666 15,393 1,039 17,523 6,519 84,140 2064 40,561 14,137 934 27,554 8,817 92,002 2065 39,319 6,395 799 15,559 3,313 65,385 2066 39,319 6,395 799 15,559 3,313 65,385 TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document N01-1590-002, Rev. 1 Section 3, Page 27 of 29 TABLE 3.5 (continued) 2034 Delayed DECON SCHEDULE OF TOTAL ANNUAL EXPENDITURES (thousands, 2008 dollars)Equipment
&Labor Materials Year Energy Burial Other Total 2067 24,928 2,963 221 820 761 29,693 2068 13,393 6,872 107 0 38 20,410 2069 8,014 4,112 64 0 23 12,213___ 478,387 104,080 9,875 80,685 95,387 768,414 TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document N01-1590-002, Rev. 1 Section 3, Page 28 of 29 TABLE 3.6 2034 SAFSTOR SCHEDULE OF TOTAL ANNUAL EXPENDITURES (thousands, 2008 dollars)Equipment
&Labor Materials Year Energy Burial Other Total 2034 36,504 3,172 1,016 87 7,982 48,762 2035 38,173 8,992 676 1,988 11,278 61,108 2036 12,064 4,843 214 62 3,851 21,034 2037 12,031 4,830 213 62 3,841 20,977 2038 12,031 4,830 213 62 3,841 20,977 2039 8,934 2,969 164 60 2,877 15,004 2040 5,276 763 107 58 1,739 7,944 2041 5,262 761 107 58 1,735 7,922 2042 5,262 761 107 58 1,735 7,922 2043 5,262 761 107 58 1,735 7,922 2044 5,276 763 107 58 1,739 7,944 2045 5,262 761 107 58 1,735 7,922 2046 5,262 761 107 58 1,735 7,922 2047 5,262 761 107 58 1,735 7,922 2048 5,276 763 107 58 1,739 7,944 2049 5,262 761 107 58 1,735 7,922 2050 5,262 761 107 58 1,735 7,922 2051 5,262 761 107 58 1,735 7,922 2052 5,276 763 107 58 1,739 7,944 2053 5,262 761 107 58 1,735 7,922 2054 5,262 761 107 58 1,735 7,922 2055 5,262 761 107 58 1,735 7,922 2056 5,276 763 107 58 1,739 7,944 2057 5,262 761 107 58 1,735 7,922 2058 5,262 761 107 58 1,735 7,922 2059 5,262 761 107 58 1,735 7,922 2060 5,276 763 107 58 1,739 7,944 2061 5,256 760 107 58 1,732 7,912 2062 3,063 249 107 56 671 4,146 2063 3,063 249 107 56 671 4,146 2064 3,072 249 107 57 673 4,157 2065 3,063 2491 107 56 671 4,146 2066 3,063 2491 107 156 1 671 4,146 TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document N01.1590-002, Rev. 1 Section 3, Page 29 of 29 TABLE 3.6 (continued) 2034 SAFSTOR SCHEDULE OF TOTAL ANNUAL EXPENDITURES (thousands, 2008 dollars)Equipment
&Labor Materials Year Energy Burial Other Total 2067 3,063 249 107 56 671 4,146 2068 3,072 249 107 57 673 4,157 2069 3,063 249 107 56 671 4,146 2070 3,063 249 107 56 671 4,146 2071 3,063 249 107 56 671 4,146 2072 3,072 249 107 57 673 4,157 2073 3,063 249 107 56 671 4,146 2074 3,063 249 107 56 671 4,146 2075 3,063 249 107 56 671 4,146 2076 3,072 249 107 57 673 4,157 2077 3,063 249 107 56 671 4,146 2078 3,063 249 107 56 671 4,146 2079 3,063 249 107 56 671 4,146 2080 3,072 249 107 57 673- 4,157 2081 3,063 249 107 56 671 4,146 2082 3,063 249 107 56 671 4,146 2083 3,063 249 107 56 671 4,146 2084 3,072 249 107 57 673 4,157 2085 3,063 249 107 56 671 4,146 2086 3,063 249 107 56 671 4,146 2087 3,063 249 107 56 671 4,146 2088 25,078 1,070 801 72 725 27,745 2089 41,651 10,681 1,054 7,544 3,410 64,340 2090 41,223 17,574 981 30,995 11,207 101,980 2091 39,269 6,326 799 15,413 3,257 65,064 2092 39,376 6,343 802 15,456 3,266 65,243 2093 30,670 3,086 387 4,610 1,515 40,268 2094 13,995 6,615 112 3 72 20,796 2095 11,307 5,802 90 0 32 17,231 557,843 110,367 12,641 79,152 112,799 872,803 TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station Document N01-1590-002, Rev. 1 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 4, Page 1 of 22 4. SCHEDULE The schedules for the decommissioning scenarios considered in this analysis follow the general sequence presented in the AIF/NESP-036 study, with minor changes to reflect recent experience and site-specific constraints.
In addition, the scheduling has been revised to reflect the spent fuel management plans described in Section 3.4.1.Schedules or the individual sequence of activities for each scenario are presented in Figures 4.1 through 4.6. The schedules reflect the six scenarios identified in Section 2. The key activities listed in the schedules do not reflect a one-to-one correspondence with those activities in the detailed cost tables (shown in the Appendices C and D), but divide some activities for clarity and combine others for convenience.
The schedule was prepared using "Microsoft Project Professional 2003" computer software.
[28]4.1 SCHEDULE ESTIMATE ASSUMPTIONS The schedules are generated using a precedence network and associated software.
Activity durations are based upon the actual man-hour estimates calculated for each area (Appendix F). The schedules are assembled by sequencing the work areas, consider work crew availability and material access/egress.
The following assumptions were made in the development of the decommissioning schedule(s).
o The fuel handling area of the Reactor Building is isolated until such time that all spent fuel has been discharged from the spent fuel pool to the DOE and/or the ISFSI. Decontamination and dismantling of the fuel handling area is initiated once the pool is emptied (DECON scenarios)." All work (except vessel and internals removal) is performed during an 8-hour workday, 5 days per week, with no overtime." Reactor and internals removal activities are performed by using separate crews for different activities working on different shifts, with a corresponding backshift charge for the second shift.* Multiple crews work parallel activities to the maximum extent possible, consistent with optimum efficiency, adequate access for cutting, removal and laydown space, and with the stringent safety measures necessary during demolition of heavy components and structures.
TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station Document N01-1590-002, Rev. 1 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 4, Page 2 of 22 For plant systems removal, the systems with the longest removal durations in areas on the critical path are considered to determine the duration of the activity.4.2 PROJECT SCHEDULE The period-dependent costs presented in Appendices C and D are based upon the durations developed in the various schedules for decommissioning.
Durations are established between several milestones in each project period;these durations are used to establish a critical path for the entire project. In turn, the critical path duration for each period is used as the basis for determining the period-dependent costs.Scenario timelines are provided as Figures 4.2 and 4.3. Milestone dates are based on either a 2014 or 2034 shutdown.
In all cases, the fuel pool is emptied approximately 5Y years after shutdown, with ISFSI operations continuing at the site until the DOE can complete the transfer of assemblies to its geologic repository.
TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document N01-1590-002 Rev. 1 Section 4, Page 3 of 22 FIGURE 4.1 2014 DECON ACTIVITY SCHEDULE-I--Cooper Nuclear Station 2014 hU lmOWn PLANT SHUTDOWN DATE- January 18, 2014 Wet Storage Delay 5 years. 6 months Preparaoton tar reactor vessel removal Reactor vessel 8 internals Recirt Pumps and Piping Drywell (Systems Pemoval)TORUS Clean Structures Demolition in support of systems removal Reactor 903 Elevation Reactor El 903 Areal Turbine 932 Elevation Main Turtine/Generator Turbine El 932 Areal Turbine El 932 Area2 Turbine El 932 Area3 Turbine 903 Elevation Main Condenser Dry fuel operations Fuel storage pool operations Muoti-Purpose Building Multi-Purpose Facility Mula-Purpose FacilityDECON APW Building Augmented Radwaste El 929 Augmented Rtoowaste El 918 Augmented Racwaste El 903 Augmented Padwaste El 877 Augmented Radlwaste Decon Protected Area Yard (contaminated structmures Dhwell Lner Reactor 859 Elevation Reactor El 859 Area2 Reactor El 859 Areal Reactor El 859 Area3 Reactor El 859 Area4 Reactor El 859 Area5 Reactor 903 Elevation Reactor El 903 Area2 Reactor El 903 Area3 Reactor El 903 Area4.........
... ....... ..... .............. ...% ----- ----------------
............
------ -------- -----.... .. ..----------
_-----... .........
.. ...........
............
.. ...... ..............-- ------------
..........
..................
... ............
I....... ...... .....---- --- ---..... .....v V I TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document N01-1590-002, Rev. 1 Section 4, Page 4 of 22 FIGURE 4.1 2014 DECON ACTIVITY SCHEDULE (continued)
TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document N01-1590-002, Rev. 1 Section 4, Page 5 of 22 FIGURE 4.1 2014 DECON ACTIVITY SCHEDULE (continued)
DESCRIPTION Y-6 IY-2 MY3 Ii17 IyU IY15 Y19 .Y23 1 Y27 1Y31 Reactor 976 Elevation Reactor El 976 Areal Reactor El 976 Areti2 Reactor 1001 Elevation Reactor El 1001 Areal Post Fuel DECON Dry fuel operations Building demolitons, backlill and landscaping Demolition 0f Other Structures Demolition 0f Turbine, Cnntiol &Reactor Bldg Lantisc ape Site Per~oS 3c Fuel Storage Operallons
& Snipping Peno 3d GTCC Snipping Periotd 3e ISF5 Decontamnination
,..oo.
........ .!Penod 3' ISFSI Site Restoration Epd of Project July , 2047 TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document N01-1590-002, Rev. 1 Section 4, Page 6 of 22 FIGURE 4.2 2014 Delayed DECON ACTIVITY SCHEDULE aECiF NlI IYS IY9 Y13 IY17 IY21 IY25 IY29 I Y3 !Y7 IY41 Plant Shutdown January 18, 2014 Pe0od 13 Shutdown Through Transibon Period tO Limited DECON ACtroles Period lc Preparations for SAFS TOP Period 20 SAFS TOP Dormancy / Wet Fuel Peirold 2 SAFSTOP Dormancy/
Dry Fuel Period 2c SAFSTOI Donmancy / No Fuel Reactrvate Site..........
:'. 1 1 Reconfigure plant Site speotic decommissioning cost estimate submitted Pecontgure plant (continued)
Prepare detailed worn procedures Decon NSSS Preparation for reactor vessel remroval Reactor vessel & internals Pecirc Pumps & Piping Orywell (Systems Removal)TORUS Turbine 932 Elevation Main Turnine/Generator Turbine El 932 Areal TurbIne El 932 Are32 Turbine El 932 Area3 Turbine 903 Elevaton Main Condenser APW Building Augmented Pactwaste EP 929 Areal Augmented Padoaste El 916 Arear Augmented Radwaste El 903 Arear Augmented Radwaste El 877 Areal Augmented Radwaste Decon Protected Area Yard (contaminated structures)
I 4; , :ý 1, " , 7 t, Drywell Liner Reactor 903 Elevaton Reactor El 903 Areal Reactor El 903 Area2 Reactor 859 Elevation Reactor El 859 Area2 Reactor El 859 Areal Reactor El 859 Area,?.... ......----------
-.... ..........
..........
..................
....... ................... .........
........ ........... ... .J 0, I.. ...... .........
... ..... ....h ........---- -----ReItrEl89Ira'Ii TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document NO1-1590-OO Rev. 1 Section 4, Page 7 of 22 FIGURE 4.2 2014 Delayed DECON ACTIVITY SCHEDULE (continued))ESCRIPTION i yl I y5 (r 113 IYl7 I 21 IY25 IY29 Y33 IY37 IY41 Reac~or E1 u59 Area4 Reactor El 859 Area5 Reactor 903 Elevation Reactor El 903 Area3 Reactor El 903 Area4 Reactor 931 Elevation Reactor El 931 Areal Reactor El 931 Area2 Reactor El 931 Area3 Reactor El 931 Areat Reactor El 931 Area5 Reactor 958 Elevation Reactor El 958 Areal Reactor El 958 Area2 Reactor El 958 Area3 Reactor 976 Elevation Reactor El 976 Areal Reactor El 976 Area2 Reactor t001 Elevation Reactor El 1001 Areal Post Fuel DECON Reactor Building DECON irhrip. 903 Flevatlnn Turbine El 903 Areal Turbine El 903 N.e32 Turbine El 903 Area3 Turbine El 903 Nea4 Turbine 802 Elevation Turbine El 882 Areal Turbine El 882 Area2 Turbone El 82 Area3 Turbine Bl0g .DECON Control Bulding Control El 932 Areal Control El 918 Areal Control El 903 Areal Control El 082 Areal Radwaste Building RacW3ste El 949 Areal Racteraste El 934 Area2 Radwaste El 934 Areal Radwaste El 918 Areal Raclwaste El 918 Area2 Pactwaste El 918 Area3 Ractwaste El 903 Area3 Raitwaste El 903 Area2..........
.............
.......--- --------...........
...........
....................
...................
...........I... .. ... ... .. ... ... .. ..... .. ... ........ -... ... .... ......l " a........i ...... ...... .. ........ ~ i ,,, ..... 1. .. .TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document N01-1590-002, Rev. 1 Section 4, Page 8 of 22 FIGURE 4.2 2014 Delayed DECON ACTIVITY SCHEDULE (continued)
DESCRIPTION YI IY5 I9 M Iy1 3  IY17 Y21 !Y25 IY29 ]Y33 Y37 IY41 Ractwaste El 903 Areal Radw~aste El .877 Areal Radwaste El 877 Area2 Raileaste El 877 Area3 Racreaste-DECON Multi-Purpose Buldiog ...: .Multi-Purpose Facilyit Multi-Purpose Facility DEC00 Protected Area Uicense Terminated B8011dlg dem olrttons.
tiacIk1l1 and lanldscaping..
....... .........
....... .... .. ...... ... ..... ......... .... ......Yad(emoian s truturerstr)ue Demoltinoun of Turoine. Control & Reactor 81dgs Landscape Site ie Restoraton Complete-August 8. 2r04e TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document N01-1590-002, Rev. 1 Section 4, Page 9 of 22 FIGURE 4.3 2014 SAFSTOR ACTIVITY SCHEDULE cecoluninNi T ooperNaucear Station 2034 Shutdown Plant Shutdown January 18, 2014 Period la Shutdown Through Transiion Perod lb ULmited DECON Actir4es Perod Ic Preparations for SAFS TOP Period 2a SAFSTOR Dormancy I Wet Fuel Peirod 2b SAFSTOR Dormancy/ODi Fuel Period 2c SAFSTO: Dormancy / No Fuel Reactvate Site Date set at 1/18184 51v r- Lr-~vte ý t'Reconfigure plant Site specific decommissioning cost estimate Pecoengure plant (continued)
Prepare detailed work procedures Decon NSSS Preparabon for reactor vessel removal Reactor vessel & internals Recirt Pumps & Piping Drwell (Systems Removal)TORUS Tiriune 032 FlPiatinn Main Turbine/Generator Turbine E 1932 Areal Turbine El 932 Area2 Turbine E 1932 Area3 Turbine 903 Elevation Main Condenser ARW Building Augmented Raomaste El 929 Areal Augmented Radtwaste El 918 Areal Augmented Ractwaste El 903 Areal Augmented Racwaste El 877 Areal Augmented Radwaste Decon Protected Area Yard (contaminated structures)
Drywell Uner Reactor 903 Elevation Reactor El 903 Areal Reactor El 903 Area2 Reactor 859 Elevation Reactor El 859 Area2 Reactor El 859 Areal Reactor El 859 Area3 submitted...........
....... ..........
....... .................
..........
..... ...... ..... ..... ... ............
................
...........
................. .. .............
........ .. .... ...........
-........ ....... ....... .... .... ...... ....... ...... -...... ........ .. -.... ..........
-.... ..........
............ .... ...... ...... ........ ....... ........---- ------I TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document N01-1590-002, Rev. 1 Section 4, Page 10 of 22 FIGURE 4.3 2014 SAFSTOR ACTIVITY SCHEDULE (continued)
DESCRIPTION Y? 1Y5 IY9 IY13 IY17 IY21 1Y25 1(29 IY33 IY37 IY41 1'(45 1Y49 I Y53 1Y57 IY61 Reactor El 859 Areat ..-.Reactor El 859 ArearO Reactor 903 Elevation Reactor El 903 Area3 Reactor El 903 Area4 Reactor 931 Elevation P e c o l9 8 A e l. .. .. ...........
.............
..-------
...[... ........Reactor El 931 Areal Reactor El 931 Area2 Reactor El 931 Area3 Reactor El 931 Areat Reactor El 931 Are'a Reactor 958 Elevatl ON RPeactor El 908 Areal Reactor El 908 Area2 Reactor El 908 Area3 Reactor 976 Elevation Reactor El 976 Areal Reactor El 976 Area2 Reactor 1 Elev Areatio Post Fuel DECOR Reactor Building DECOR TIM-,0 9113 Flevorioa~iw s te B Uld l ..... ..... ...... ... ..... ....... ...... .. .... ... .... .. .. ........ ....... ........ ...Turbine El 903 AreatEl 903 Area2 Turbine El 903 Ar003 Turbine El 903 irea4 Turbine 882 Elevat~on Turbinfe E01882 ArealIE 1862 Nea2r Turbilne El 1882 Area3 Turbine 8ldg9-DECOR Nl Control Builing.Control El 922 Areal Control El 918 Areal Control El 903 Areal Control 901882 Areal ....Ractwaste Building Raltwasate El1949 Areal R actreaste El 934 Area2 Ractreaste El 934 Areal Ractwaste El 918 Areal Rartwaste El 918 Aea2 01l~~e l918 Area3 Radaraste 01 903 Nea33 Radineaste El1903 Area2 0 TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document N01-1590-002, Rev. 1 Section 4, Page 11 of 22 FIGURE 4.3 2014 SAFSTOR ACTIVITY SCHEDULE (continued)
DESCRIPTION Yl IY5 IY9 1Y 13 JYl7 IY21 IY25 IY29 lY33 IY37 IY41 1Y45 IY49 Y53 Y57 Y61 Padwaste El 903 Areal El -877 neal RadtwaSte El 877 Area2 Ractwaste El 877 Area3 Radreaste-DECON 1 MUlti-Purpose Facility[Mutlr-Purpose Facility DEC ON Protected Area Yard (clean structures)
Intake License Termination Survey NRC Review License Terminated 60 yr after shutdown -January 18,.2074 ...... ........Building demoaitions, backfill and landscaping D emoliton of 010Cer Structures Demolition of Turbine. Control &Reactor Elctgs Landscape Site Site Restoration Complete -ictooer 30, 2095 -TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document N01-1590-002, Rev. 1 Section 4, Page 12 of 22 FIGURE 4.4 2034 DECON ACTIVITY SCHEDULE TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document N01-1590-002, Rev. 1 Section 4, Page 13 of 22 FIGURE 4.4 2034 DECON ACTIVITY SCHEDULE (continued)
DESCRIPTION Y-6 ]Y-2 IY? IYll IY15 IY19 IY23 IY27 IY31 Reactor~ec~
El 903 Areaa 9 3 Ar.-.-.-...-.-.---..
-.-.-.-.--.-...-.
i iiiiii!iiiiiiiiiiiiii~iiiiiiiiiiiii Reactor 931 Elevation Reactor El 931 Areal Reactor El 931 Area2 --------Reactor El 931 Area3 Reactor 938 Elevation Reactor El 938 Areal Reactor El 958 Area2 Reactor El 958 Area3...... ... ... .. .. ... ... .. ..Reactor BuillOlng DEC09 "" TurbineC 983 Elevation Reactore El 9031 Neal..r.rlne El 903 ,.ea2 Turbirre El 983 Area3 Poractoe El 903 Area4 Reac-nte 8 Elevatron earatoe El 958 Areal Reactore El 958 Area2 Reacste El 958 Area3 Tea -DEr Ouldng E urbainaste El 97 Aneal Raurbaste El 903 Area2 Rtadwraste Dealn RCoentro El Ut8Neng Trbinte El 903 Area2......9 3 ,. .. .-n ... .. ....... ... .Tuatroe El 903 Area3 Trbinase El 903 Nreal Trabiane82 Elev877onel-aeraite El 877 Area I ard cnte El 877 Areas CoTuroln El 832 Area3 PRoatec ted AEa14 Ae-ar ..c.....n .tr.ct....
TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document N01.1590-002, Rev. 1 Section 4, Page 14 of 22 FIGURE 4.4 2034 DECON ACTIVITY SCHEDULE (continued)
IFOOPITIfN I 11 -Dry fuel operations Fuel storage pool operations Reactor 976 Elevation Reactor El 976 Areal Reactor El 976 Area2 Reactor 1001 Elevabon Reactor El 1001 Areal Post Fuel DECON Dry fuel operations ULcense Terminaton Survey NRC Review Dry fuel operations Building demolitions, backfill and landscaping Demoohton of Other Structures Demolition of Turbine. Control & Reactor Bldg Landscape SOte Period 3: Fuel Storage Operations
& Shipping Period 3d GTCC Snipping Period 3e ISFSI Decontamrnaton Period 3 ISFSI Site Pestoration End of ProjectJuly 1, X62.. .........
I ...........
...... ............
..........
I ...........
......p.........
........4 TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document N01-1590-002, Rev. 1 Section 4, Page 15 of 22 FIGURE 4.5 2034 Delayed DECON ACTIVITY SCHEDULE r 1 Cooper Nuclear Station 2034 Shutdown Plant Shutdowndanuary 18, 2034 Penod la Shutdown Through Transion Period I0 Limited Decon Activties Period Ic Preparations for SAFSTOR Pelod 2a SAFSTOR Dormancy/Wet Fuel Peirod 21b SAFSTOR Dormancy/Dry Fuel Period 2c -N ot Used Reactriate Site Date set at 1/18154 Reconftgure plant Site specific decormlssionlng cost estimate submitted Recontfgure plant (continued)
Prepare detailed worli procedures Decon NSSS Preparation for reactor vessel removal Reactor vessel & internals Recirc Pumps & Piping Dryiell (Systems Removal)TORUS Turbine 932 Elevation Main Turbine/Generator Turbine El 932 Areal Turtine El 932 A/ea2 Turbine El 932 Area3 Turbine 903 Elevation Main Condenser ARW Building Augmented Radwaste El 929 AreaI Augmented Radeaste El 918 AreaI Augmented Paciarste El 903 Areal Augmented Radwaste El 877 Areal Augmented Ractwaste Decon Protected Area Yard (contaminated struc tures)Drywell Lner Reactor 903 Elevation Reactor El 903 Areal Reactor El 903 Area2 Reactor 859 Elevation Reactor El 859 Area2ýy -I IY5 IY9 IY13 JY17 IY21 I Y25 IY29 IY33 i n........ ....... ...... ...... .. -..............
-.- .... ...... ...... -........ .. ..... ...............
...... ..... -..........
.... ... ...... .. .... .......... ...............
................
..............
...............
........ .............
.... ........ .----'I................
.. ........ ...... ................. ..............
.................
...........
....... .......... ..... .TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document N01-1590-002, Rev. 1 Section 4, Page 16 of 22 FIGURE 4.5 2034 Delayed DECON ACTIVITY SCHEDULE (continued)
Pnrtor F! 909 Area I I Reactor El 859 Area3 Reactor El 859 Area4 Reactor El 859 Area5 Reactor 903 Elevation Reactor El 903 Area3 Reactor El 903 Area4 Reactor 931 El evareon Reactor El 931 Area]Reactor El 931 Area2 Reactor El 931 Area3 Reactor El 931 Area4 Reactor El 931 Area5 Reactor 958 Elevaton Reactor El 958 Areal Reactor El 958 Area2 Reactor El 958 Area3 Reactor 976 Elevation Reactor El 976 Areal Reactor El 976 Area2 Reactor 1001 Elevation Reactor El 1001 Areal Post Fuel DECON Reactor Building DECON Turbine 903 Elevation Turbine El 903 Areal Turbine El 903 Area2 Turbine El 903 ANea3 Turbine El 903 Area4 Tu~rtlne 882 Elevation Turbine El 882 Areal Turbine El 882 Area2 Turbine El 882 Area3 Turbine Bldg -DECON Control Building Control El 932 AreaI Control El 918 Areat Control El 903 Areal Control El 882 Area I Roadwaste Building Radwaste El 949 Areal Ractwaste El 934 Area2 Raowaste El 934 Areal Radwaste El 918 Areal... .... ... ............
....................
............
.........
...... .---- ..........
....... .. ............
.. ...... ........ -.............
.. ...........
......................
..... ...........
...... .............
....... ...............
............
.... ............
..........
.. -..........
..... ............
................
..........
..........
.............
.. .........
.. .................
..............
.........................
........................
..........
...........
...........
..............
...........
............
........ .. .... ........ .... ..........
-................
-....... .........................
-..........
......--- -------------------
..................
..............
............
---- ---------
-..........
...........
...........
.............
.....................
....... .. ...... ....... .... ... ..... .... ..............
..........
.... .. ............ ....................
....... ..........
.... ............................
....... ........TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document N01-1590-002, Rev. 1 Section 4, Page 17 of 22 FIGURE 4.5 2034 Delayed DECON ACTIVITY SCHEDULE (continued) iFOCOiDTifltJ T-_______________
_____________
Radwaste El 9I iArea2 Radlwaste El 918 Area3 Radwaste El 903 Area3 Racteaste El 903 Area2 Pa3ctrwaste El 903 Areal Radwaste El -877 Area1 Padwaste El 877 Area2 Radwaste El 877 Area3 Pactwaste-DE CON Multi-Purpose Building Multi-Purpose Facility Multi-Purpose Facility DECON Protected Area Yard (clean structures)
Intake Ucense Termination Survey NRC Review ucense Terminated Building demolitions, backfill and landscaping Demolition of Oiler Structures Demolition of Turline. Control & PeactOr Slugs Landscape Site Site Restoration Complete -August P. 2069....... ...---------
------------
..........
....... .... ...........
............
_____________________________
J ____________
-____________
-____________
TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document N01-1590-002, Rev. 1 Section 4, Page 18 of 22 FIGURE 4.6 2034 SAFSTOR ACTIVITY SCHEDULE______ V _____________
Ii I11 49 , Plant ShutdowneJanuary 18, 2034 Period la Shutdown Through Transicon Period b imited DECON Acdtes Perod Ic Preparations for SAFSTOR Pe0od 2a SAFSTOR Dormancy / Wet Fuel Peirod bSAFSTOR Dormancy/Dry Fuel Perod 2 SAFSTOR Dormancy /No Fuel Reactrvate Site Reconfigure plant Site specific decommissioning cost estimate sucmitted Reconfigure plant (conbnued)
Prepare detailed work procedures Decon NSSS Preparabon tor reactor vessel ren uval Reactor vessel & internals Recire Pumps & Piping Driwell (Systems Remov3l)TORUS Turbine 932 Elevabon Main Turoine/Generator Turbine El 932 Areal Turbine El 932 Area2 Turbine El 932 Area3 Turbine 903 Elevation Main Condenser ARW Building Augmented Radwaste El 929 Areat Augmented Padwaste El 918 Areal Augmented Racdaste El 903 Areal Augmented Raroaste El 877 Areal Augmented Pacwaste Decon Protected Area Yard (contaminated structures)
,£j it , tl:- ":r :-,r , It 'r Drywell Liner Reactor 903 Elevabon Reactor El 903 Areal Reactor El 903 Area&Reactor 059 Elevation Reactor El 859 Area2............
.......x........-
-...... ........-.... ... .... ... ...-.- -- ... ... .... ...............
................
..............
------ -------... .......---------------
-....................
------ ---- ----- ---- ------- --- ------ --..........
TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document N01-1590-002, Rev. 1 Section 4, Page 19 of 22 FIGURE 4.6 2034 SAFSTOR ACTIVITY SCHEDULE (continued)
TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document N01-1590-002, Rev. 1 Section 4, Page 20 of 22 FIGURE 4.6 2034 SAFSTOR ACTIVITY SCHEDULE (continued)
DESCRIPTION Y! IY5 I Y9 IY13 IY17 IY21 IY25 1Y29 IY33 IY37 I Y41 IY45 IY49 lY53 IY57 IY61 Radwaste El 918 Area2 Padw~aste El 918 Ate33 Racwaste El 903 Area3 Raiwaste El 903 Area2 Rad'waste El 903 Areal Radwaste El -877 Areal i ... .. .Radwaste El 877 Area2 Rardwaste El 877 Area3I-Radwaste-DECON Mult-Purpose Building Mult-Purpose Facility Multi-urpose Faclity DECON Protected Area Yard (clean structures)
Intake License Termllation Survey NPC Review License Terminated 60 yr after shutdown -January 18, i 2094 Bo~~ld~~og~
o ,,a ,od a ,o. ... ... ... ........ .. ..... .. .. ....1121 ....... i iiiii] ..Building demolitions.
tiacllflll san landscaping Demolition of Other Structures Demolition of Turtine. Control & Reactor Bl.gs Ltnesc ape Stee Site Restoration Comrplete
-Octoter 30. 2095 TLG Services, Inc.
0 Cooper Nuclear Station Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document N01-1590-002, Rev. I Section 4, Page 21 of 22 FIGURE 4.7 DECON TIMELINES SCENARIO 1 2014 Decon Shutdown 1 2014 Y Prompt Decommissioning ISFSI Operational Post -Decomrassionng ISFSI Operations I ISFS1 with capacity of 50 casks Part 110 Licens ISFSI DemolitionI Part 72 License In lb 18-Jan-14 18-Jan-15 1.0 0.50 1.5 2a 2b 2c 2e 3b 19-Jul-15 27-Jan-17 18-Jul-19 16-Dec-19 15-Sep-20 1.5 2.5 0.41 0.75 1.7 3.0 5.5 5.9 6.7 8.4 Sub Period Duratin Elapsed Time SCENARIO 4 2034 Decon Sub Period Duration Elapsed Time 3c 3d 3e 3f End 06-Jun-22 17-Dec-46 31-Dec-46 01-May-47 02-Jul-47 24.53 0.04 0.33 0.17 32.9 33.0 33.3 33.5 F Post -Decommissioning ISFSI Operations S Shutdown 2034 ISFSI with capacjty of 79 casks Prompt Decommissioning ISFSI Operational T f iP'aar 7 uLinwn Part 72 License ISFSI Deioittion la lb 18-Jan-34 18-Jan-35 1.0 0.50 1.5 2a 2b 2c 2e 3b 19-Jul-35 27-Jan-37 18-Jul-39 16-Dec-39 15-Sep-40 1.5 2.5 0.41 0.75 1.7 3.0 5.5 5.9 6.7 8.4 3c 3d 30 3f End 06-Jun-42 17-Dec-61 31-Dec-61 01-May-62 02-Jul-62 19.53 0.04 0.33 0.17 27.9 28.0 28.3 28.5 TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station Decomnmissoning Cost Analysis Document N01-1590-002, Rev. I Section 4, Page 22 of 22 FIGURE 4.8 DELAYED DECON and SAFSTOR TIMELINES SCENARIO 2 2014 Delayed De-o-Wet & Dry Fue Doo-acoy ISFSI Delayed Decomnisng I ISPSI oeth caoy, of 50 canE, Part 50 U~oln iSFSI DeoIo4bo 1l 184Jon-14 10 lb 1C 18-J-n15 18-Ap-15 025 025 12 15 2a 18-Jui-t5 40 55 S0b PenKt DOat db Elapsed T.e.18-Jul.19 2746 330 31-D.,-46 3a 3b 4a 4b 40 5b End 31-Dec-46 31-D.-47 01-Juo48 14-Aul.49 18-Jan-52 20-Ot-52 08-Aug-54 100 050 1 12 243 0.75 180 339 34.5 356 380 388 40.6 SCENARIO 3 2014 Safator 201 SF51-- Opetbott0 Dottony Delayed Demo:nosnlng I tSFSIOn8t c~,onty of 500mb.P8,150 L.o.nn ISFSI Demotbon 18-J-n-14 10 lb 1C 18-Jon-I15 l-_Aor-l5 0.25 0.25 12 1S5 2a 18-JuO-15 40 5.5 2b 18-Ju-19 2746 33.0 2c 31-Dec-46 21 28 54.2 Sub Pew Donsod Elapsed Time 30 3b 4a 4b 4e 5b End 12-Aprt-8 12-Apr-09 12-Oct-6S 08-Nov-70 19-Apt-73 18-Jan-74 06-Nov-75 1.00 050 107 2.44 0.75 1.80 552 557 50.0 59.2 600 61.8 Delayed Deco. -Vnooo SCENARIO 5 2034 Dedayed De-o, Stloidoon  2034 Sal 2O34 "hfe-Oto9age IOPSI W405 caao~ty of 79 0885.Wet & Dry Fuel Ontn80y f ISFSI Opte~aSorl ISFSI  POti 50 Uo.nn 18 18-Jan-34 10 l b 1C 18-Jan-35 18-Apr-35 0.25 0.25 12 1 5 28 18-Jui-35 4.0 55 25 18-Jul_39 2246 280 38 3b 48 4b 48 5b End 31-Dec-61 31-Dec-62 02-J1.-63 14-Aug-,4 1.-Jan-7 21-Oct.67 08-Au-69 10 0.50 1 12 2.43 0.75 1.80 290 29.5 306 33.0 33.8 3&6 Sub P'iod Doa1-on Elapsed Time SCENARIO ,.SF04 capotlyof 79 cas5s 203458.0 P8,50Ucn Delayed Decotmmeconito ISFSI Demolbon 18 18-Jan-34 10 1b 10 18-Jar-35 18-Apr-35 0.25 025 12 15 Sub Petiod Durtoon Elapoed Teme 18-Jt-35 40 55 2b 18-Jul-39 2246 280 20 31-Dec-61 2628 542 38 3b 4a 4b 40 5b End 12-Aprt-8 12-Apt-8 12-Oct-89 08-No-90 19-Apt-93 18-Ja-94 06-Nov-95 1.00 050 107 2.44 0.75 1580 852 557 568 59.2 60.0 619 TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station Document N01-1590-002, Rev. 1 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 5, Page 1 of 9 5. RADIOACTIVE WASTES The objectives of the decommissioning process are the removal of all radioactive material from the site that would restrict its future use and the termination of the NRC license. This currently requires the remediation of all radioactive material at the site in excess of applicable legal limits. Under the Atomic Energy Act,[2 9 1 the NRC is responsible for protecting the public from sources of ionizing radiation.
Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations delineates the production, utilization, and disposal of radioactive materials and processes.
In particular, Part 71 defines radioactive material as it pertains to transportation and Part 61 specifies its disposition.
Most of the materials being transported for controlled burial are categorized as Low Specific Activity (LSA) or Surface Contaminated Object (SCO) materials containing Type A quantities, as defined in 49 CFR Parts 173-178. Shipping containers are required to be Industrial Packages (IP-1, IP-2 or IP-3, as defined in 10 CFR§173.411).
For this study, commercially available steel containers are presumed to be used for the disposal of piping, small components, and concrete.
Larger components can serve as their own containers, with proper closure of all openings, access ways, and penetrations.
The volumes of radioactive waste generated during the various decommissioning activities at the site are shown on a line-item basis in Appendices C and D, and summarized in Tables 5.1 through 5.7. The quantified waste volume summaries shown in these tables are consistent with Part 61 classifications.
The volumes are calculated based on the exterior dimensions for containerized material and on the displaced volume of components serving as their own waste containers.
The reactor vessel and internals are categorized as large quantity shipments and, accordingly, will be shipped in reusable, shielded truck casks with disposable liners.In calculating disposal costs, the burial fees are applied against the liner volume, as well as the special handling requirements of the payload. Packaging efficiencies are lower for the highly activated materials (greater than Type A quantity waste), where high concentrations of gamma-emitting radionuclides limit the capacity of the shipping canisters.
No process system containing/handling radioactive substances at shutdown is presumed to meet material release criteria by decay alone (i.e., systems radioactive at shutdown will still be radioactive over the time period during which the decommissioning is accomplished, due to the presence of long-lived radionuclides).
While the dose rates decrease with time, radionuclides such as 1 3 7 Cs will still control the disposition requirements.
TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station Document N01-1590-002, Rev. 1 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 5, Page 2 of 9 The waste material produced in the decontamination and dismantling of the nuclear units is primarily generated during Period 2 of DECON and Period 4 of SAFSTOR. Material that is considered potentially contaminated when removed from the radiological controlled area is sent to processing facilities in Tennessee for conditioning and disposal.
Heavily contaminated components and activated materials are routed for controlled disposal.
The disposal volumes reported in the tables reflect the savings resulting from reprocessing and recycling.
For purposes of constructing the estimates, the cost for disposal at the EnergySolutions facility was used as a proxy for future disposal facilities.
Separate rates were used for containerized waste and large components.
Demolition debris including miscellaneous steel, scaffolding, and concrete was disposed of at a bulk rate. The decommissioning waste stream also included resins and dry active waste.Since EnergySolutions is not currently able to receive the more highly radioactive components generated in the decontamination and dismantling of the reactor, disposal costs for the Class B and C material were based upon the last published rate schedule for non-compact waste for the Barnwell facility (as a proxy).Additional surcharges were included for activity, dose rate, and/or handling added as appropriate for the particular package.TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document N01-1590-002, Rev. 1 Section 5, Page 3 of 9 TABLE 5.1 DECOMMISSIONING WASTE
 
==SUMMARY==
Decommissioning Scenario 1 2 3 4 5 6 Waste Waste Waste Waste Waste Waste Class Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Waste Stream [1] (ft3) (ft3) (ft3) (ft3) (ft3) (ft3)Low-Level Radioactive A 233,906 207,449 277,370 234,031 199,891 227,217 Waste (near-surface disposal)
B 3,877 1,377 1,377 3,647 4,111 1,252 C 976 344 344 1,205 470 470 Fmq m 1. t I I 1- -t 1 FGreater than Class C (geologic repository) 508 GTCC 508 508 508 508 508 Processed/Conditioned (off-site recycling center) A 319,826 384,277 384,676 319,826 384,277 384,676 Total [2] 559,092 593,956 614,276 559,217 589,257 614,123[Il Waste is classified according to the requirements as delineated in Title 10 CFR, Part 61.55[2] Columns may not add due to rounding.TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document N01-1590-002, Rev. 1 Section 5, Page 4 of 9 TABLE 5.2 2014 DECON DECOMMISSIONING WASTE
 
==SUMMARY==
Waste Volume Mass Waste Cost Basis Class [1] (cubic feet) (pounds)Low-Level Radioactive EnergySolutions A 233,906 17,533,514 Waste (near-surface disposal)
Barnwell B 3,877 505,964 Barnwell C 976 68,415 Greater than Class C Spent Fuel (geologic repository)
Equivalent GTCC 508 89,497 Processed/Conditioned Recycling (off-site recycling center) Vendors A 319,826 13,449,330 Total [21 559,092 31,646,720
[1] Waste is classified according to the requirements as delineated in Title 10 CFR, Part 61.55[21 Columns may not add due to rounding.TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document N01-1590-002, Rev. 1 Section 5, Page 5 of 9 TABLE 5.3 2014 Delayed DECON DECOMMISSIONING WASTE
 
==SUMMARY==
Waste Volume Mass Waste Cost Basis Class [1] (cubic feet) (pounds)Low-Level Radioactive EnergySolutions A 207,449 12,564,095 Waste (near-surface disposal)
Barnwell B 1,377 166,192 Barnwell C 344 41,290 Greater than Class C Spent Fuel (geologic repository)
Equivalent GTCC 508 89,497 Processed/Conditioned Recycling (off-site recycling center) Vendors A 384,277 16,115,520 Total [21 593,956 28,976,594 (Ul Waste is classified according to the requirements as delineated in Title 10 CFR, Part 61.55['a Columns may not add due to rounding.0 TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document N01-1590-002, Rev. 1 Section 5, Page 6 of 9 TABLE 5.4 2014 SAFSTOR DECOMMISSIONING WASTE
 
==SUMMARY==
Waste Volume Mass Waste Cost Basis Class [1] (cubic feet) (pounds)Low-Level Radioactive EnergySolutions A 227,370 12,678,887 Waste (near-surface disposal)
Barnwell B 1,377 166,192 Barnwell C 344 41,290 Greater than Class C Spent Fuel (geologic repository)
Equivalent GTCC 508 89,497 Processed/Conditioned Recycling (off-site recycling center) Vendors A 384,676 16,159,800 Total [21 614,276 29,135,666
[1] Waste is classified according to the requirements as delineated in Title 10 CFR, Part 61.55[2] Columns may not add due to rounding.TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document N01-1590-002, Rev. 1 Section 5, Page 7 of 9 TABLE 5.5 2034 DECON DECOMMISSIONING WASTE
 
==SUMMARY==
Waste Volume Mass Waste Cost Basis Class [1] (cubic feet) (pounds)Low-Level Radioactive EnergySolutions A 234,031 17,535,998 Waste (near-surface disposal)
Barnwell B 3,647 477,867 Barnwell C 1,205 96,512 Greater than Class C Spent Fuel (geologic repository)
Equivalent GTCC 508 89,497 Processed/Conditioned Recycling (off-site recycling center) Vendors A 319,826 13,449,330 Total [21 559,217 31,649,204
[11 Waste is classified according to the requirements as delineated in Title 10 CFR, Part 61.55[21 Columns may not add due to rounding.TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document N01-1590-002, Rev. 1 Section 5, Page 8 of 9 TABLE 5.6 2034 Delayed DECON DECOMMISSIONING WASTE
 
==SUMMARY==
Waste Volume Mass Waste Cost Basis Class [1] (cubic feet) (pounds)Low-Level Radioactive EnergySolutions A 199,891 12,233,558 Waste (near-surface disposal)
Barnwell B 4,111 444,306 Barnwell C 470 59,220 Greater than Class C Spent Fuel (geologic repository)
Equivalent GTCC 508 89,497 Processed/Conditioned Recycling (off-site recycling center) Vendors A 384,277 16,115,520 Total [2] 589,257 28,942,101
[1] Waste is classified according to the requirements as delineated in Title 10 CFR, Part 61.55[21 Columns may not add due to rounding.TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document N01-1590-002, Rev. 1 Section 5, Page 9 of 9 TABLE 5.7 2034 SAFSTOR DECOMMISSIONING WASTE
 
==SUMMARY==
Waste Volume Mass Waste Cost Basis Class [I] (cubic feet) (pounds)Low-Level Radioactive EnergySolutions A 227,217 12,679,105 Waste (near-surface disposal)
Barnwell B 1,252 148,262 Barnwell C 470 59,220 Greater than Class C Spent Fuel (geologic repository)
Equivalent GTCC 508 89,497 Processed/Conditioned Recycling (off-site recycling center) Vendors A 384,676 16,159,800 Total [21 614,123 29,135,884
[1] Waste is classified according to the requirements as delineated in Title 10 CFR, Part 61.55[21 Columns may not add due to rounding.TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station Document N01-1590-002, Rev. 1 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 6, Page 1 of 5 6. RESULTS The estimates described in this report are based on numerous fundamental assumptions, including regulatory requirements, project contingencies, low-level radioactive waste disposal practices, high-level radioactive waste management options, and site restoration requirements.
The decommissioning scenarios assume continued operation of the station's spent fuel pool for a minimum of 51/2 years following the cessation of operations for continued cooling of the assemblies.
An ISFSI will be used to safeguard the spent fuel, once sufficiently cooled, until such time that the DOE can complete the transfer of the assemblies to its repository.
The primary cost contributors, identified in Tables 6.1 and 6.2, are either labor-related or associated with the management and disposition of the radioactive waste.Program management is the largest single contributor to the overall cost. The magnitude of the expense is a function of both the size of the organization required to manage the decommissioning, as well as the duration of the program. It is assumed, for purposes of this analysis, that NPPD will oversee the decommissioning program, using a DOC to manage the decommissioning labor force and the associated subcontractors.
The size and composition of the management organization varies with the decommissioning phase and associated site activities.
However, once the operating license is terminated, the staff is substantially reduced for the conventional demolition and restoration of the site, and the long-term care of the spent fuel (for the DECON alternative).
As described in this report, the spent fuel pool will remain operational for a minimum of 51/2 years following the cessation of operations.
The pool will be isolated and an independent spent fuel island created. This will allow decommissioning operations to proceed in and around the pool area. Over the 51/2-year period, the spent fuel will be packaged into transportable canisters for loading into a DOE-provided transport cask. The canisters will be stored in concrete modules at the ISFSI until the DOE is able to receive them. Dry storage of the fuel under a separate license provides additional flexibility in the event the DOE is not able to meet the current timetable for completing the transfer of assemblies to an off-site facility and minimizes the associated caretaking expenses.The cost for waste disposal includes only those costs associated with the controlled disposition of the low-level radioactive waste generated from decontamination and dismantling activities, including plant equipment and components, structural material, filters, resins and dry-active waste. As described in Section 5, disposition of the low-level radioactive material required controlled disposal is at the EnergySolutions' facility.
Highly activated components, requiring additional TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station Document N01-1590-002, Rev. 1 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 6, Page 2 of 5 isolation from the environment (GTCC), are packaged for geologic disposal.
The cost of geologic disposal is based upon a cost equivalent for spent fuel.A significant portion of the metallic waste is designated for additional processing and treatment at an off-site facility.
Processing reduces the volume of material requiring controlled disposal through such techniques and processes as survey and sorting, decontamination, and volume reduction.
The material that cannot be unconditionally released is packaged for controlled disposal at one of the currently operating facilities.
The cost identified in the summary tables for processing is all-inclusive, incorporating the ultimate disposition of the material.Removal costs reflect the labor-intensive nature of the decommissioning process, as well as the management controls required to ensure a safe and successful program.Decontamination and packaging costs also have a large labor component that is based upon prevailing wages. Non-radiological demolition is a natural extension of the decommissioning process. The methods employed in decontamination and dismantling are generally destructive and indiscriminate in inflicting collateral damage. With a work force mobilized to support decommissioning operations, non-radiological demolition can be an integrated activity and a logical expansion of the work being performed in the process of terminating the operating license. Prompt demolition reduces future liabilities and can be more cost effective than deferral, due to the deterioration of the facilities (and therefore the working conditions) with time.The reported cost for transport includes the tariffs and surcharges associated with moving large components and/or overweight shielded casks overland, as well as the general expense, e.g., labor and fuel, of transporting material to the destinations identified in this report. For purposes of this analysis, material is primarily moved overland by truck.Decontamination is used to reduce the plant's radiation fields and minimize worker exposure.
Slightly contaminated material or material located within a contaminated area is sent to an off-site processing center, i.e., this analysis does not assume that contaminated plant components and equipment can be decontaminated for uncontrolled release in-situ. Centralized processing centers have proven to be a more economical means of handling the large volumes of material produced in the dismantling of a nuclear unit.License termination survey costs are associated with the labor intensive and complex activity of verifying that contamination has been removed from the site to the levels specified by the regulating agency. This process involves a systematic survey of all remaining plant surface areas and surrounding environs, sampling, isotopic analysis, and documentation of the findings.
The status of any plant TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station Document N01-1590-002, Rev. 1 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 6C, Page 3 of 5 components and materials not removed in the decommissioning process will also require confirmation and will add to the expense of surveying the facilities alone.The remaining costs include allocations for heavy equipment and temporary services, as well as for other expenses such as regulatory fees and the premiums for nuclear insurance.
While site operating costs are greatly reduced following the final cessation of plant operations, certain administrative functions do need to be maintained either at a basic functional or regulatory level.TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document N01-1590-002, Rev. 1 Section 6, Page 4 of 5 TABLE 6.1 COST
 
==SUMMARY==
2014 Cessation of Operations (thousands of 2008 dollars)Delayed Cost Element DECON DECON SAFSTOR Decontamination 12,832 18,547 18,399 Removal 73,606 74,005 75,346 Packaging 13,340 9,827 9,577 Transportation 8,571 6,672 6,346 Waste Disposal 75,482 43,839 44,260 Off-site Waste Processing 35,573 42,626 42,743 Program Management
[1] 360,232 426,204 490,053 Corporate A&G 15,657 10,100 10,100 Spent Fuel Management
[21 77,077 69,839 69,839 Insurance and Regulatory Fees 53,616 62,853 76,914 Energy 6,141 10,408 12,641 Characterization and Licensing Surveys 16,568 16,568 16,568 Miscellaneous Equipment 23,364 31,112 34,923 Total [31 772,058 822,600 907,708 Cost Element License Termination 506,078 475,790 674,963 Spent Fuel Management 231,584 309,463 195,398 Site Restoration 34,396 37,347 37,347 Total [3J 772,058 822,600 907,708[1] Includes engineering and security costs[21 Excludes program management costs (staffing) but includes costs for spent fuel loading/packaging/spent fuel pool O&M and EP fees[31 Columns may not add due to rounding TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document N01-1590-002, Rev. 1 Section 6, Page 5 of 5 TABLE 6.2 COST
 
==SUMMARY==
2034 Cessation of Operations (thousands of 2008 dollars)Delayed Cost Element DECON DECON SAFSTOR Decontamination 12,832 18,581 18,438 Removal 74,270 74,184 76,329 Packaging 13,342 9,820 9,871 Transportation 8,571 6,704 6,578 Waste Disposal 75,618 46,649 44,999 Off-site Waste Processing 35,573 42,626 42,743 Program Management
[R1 340,929 400,786 479,929 Corporate A&G 15,657 10,100 10,100 Spent Fuel Management
[21 53,484 47,535 47,535 Insurance and Regulatory Fees 46,578 54,706 72,081 Energy 6,141 9,875 12,641 Characterization and Licensing Surveys 16,568 16,568 16,568 Mfiscellaneous Equipment 23,408 30,280 34,989 Total [31 722,972 768,414 872,803 Cost Element License Termination 506,207 476,185 676,510 Spent Fuel Management 182,368 254,881 158,945 Site Restoration 34,396 37,348 37,348 Total [31 722,972 768,414 872,803[M1 Includes engineering and security costs[21 Excludes program management costs (staffing) but includes costs for spent fuel loading/packaging/spent fuel pool O&M and EP feesColumns may not add due to rounding TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station Document N01-1590-002, Rev. 1 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 7, Page 1 of 3 7. REFERENCES
: 1. U.S. Code of Federal Regulations, Title 10, Parts 30, 40, 50, 51, 70 and 72,"General Requirements for Decommissioning Nuclear Facilities," Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Federal Register Volume 53, Number 123 (p 24018 et seq.), June 27, 1988 2. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Regulatory Guide 1.159, "Assuring the Availability of Funds for Decommissioning Nuclear Reactors," October 2003 3. U.S. Code of Federal Regulations, Title 10, Part 20, Subpart E, "Radiological Criteria for License Termination" 4. U.S. Code of Federal Regulations, Title 10, Parts 20 and 50, "Entombment Options for Power Reactors," Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, Federal Register Volume 66, Number 200, October 16, 2001 5. U.S. Code of Federal Regulations, Title 10, Parts 2, 50 and 51,"Decommissioning of Nuclear Power Reactors," Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Federal Register Volume 61 (p 39278 et seq.), July 29, 1996 6. "Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982 and Amendments," U.S. Department of Energy's Office of Civilian Radioactive Management, 1982 7. Testimony of Edward Sproat, Director, Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management, before a U.S. House of Representatives subcommittee on the status of Yucca Mountain, July 15, 2008 8. U.S. Code of Federal Regulations, Title 10, Part 50, "Domestic Licensing of Production and Utilization Facilities," Subpart 54 (bb), "Conditions of Licenses" 9. "Low Level Radioactive Waste Policy Act," Public Law 96-573, 1980 10. "Low-Level Radioactive Waste Policy Amendments Act of 1985," Public Law 99-240, 1986 11. Waste is classified in accordance with U.S. Code of Federal Regulations, Title 10, Part 61.55 12. U.S. Code of Federal Regulations, Title 10, Part 20, Subpart E, "Radiological Criteria for License Termination," Federal Register, Volume 62, Number 139 (p 39058 et seq.), July 21, 1997 TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station Document N01-1590-002, Rev. 1 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 7, Page 2 of 3 7. REFERENCES (continued)
: 13. "Establishment of Cleanup Levels for CERCLA Sites with Radioactive Contamination," EPA Memorandum OSWER No. 9200.4-18, August 22, 1997 14. U.S. Code of Federal Regulations, Title 40, Part 141.16, "Maximum contaminant levels for beta particle and photon radioactivity from man-made radionuclides in community water systems" 15. "Memorandum of Understanding Between the Environmental Protection Agency and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission:
Consultation and Finality on Decommissioning and Decontamination of Contaminated Sites," OSWER 9295.8-06a, October 9, 2002 16. "Multi-Agency Radiation Survey and Site Investigation Manual (MARSSIM)," NUREG/CR-1575, Rev. 1, EPA 402-R-97-016, Rev. 1, August 2000 17. T.S. LaGuardia et al., "Guidelines for Producing Commercial Nuclear Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Estimates," AIF/NESP-036, May 1986 18. W.J. Manion and T.S. LaGuardia, "Decommissioning Handbook," U.S.Department of Energy, DOE/EV/10128-1, November 1980 19. "Building Construction Cost Data 2008," Robert Snow Means Company, Inc., Kingston, Massachusetts
: 20. Project and Cost Engineers' Handbook, Second Edition, p. 239, American Association of Cost Engineers, Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, New York, 1984 21. Civilian Radioactive Waste Management System Waste Acceptance System Requirements Document, Revision 5" (DOE/RW-0351) issued May 31, 2007 22. U.S. Department of Transportation, Title 49 of the Code of Federal Regulations,"Transportation," Parts 173 through 178, 2007 23. Tri-State Motor Transit Company, published tariffs, Interstate Commerce Commission (ICC), Docket No. MC-427719 Rules Tariff, March 2004, Radioactive Materials Tariff, February 2006 TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station Document N01-1590-002, Rev. 1 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 7, Page 3 of 3 7. REFERENCES (continued)
: 24. J.C. Evans et al., "Long-Lived Activation Products in Reactor Materials" NUREG/CR-3474, Pacific Northwest Laboratory for the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
August 1984 25. R.I. Smith, G.J. Konzek, W.E. Kennedy, Jr., "Technology, Safety and Costs of Decommissioning a Reference Pressurized Water Reactor Power Station," NUREG/CR-0130 and addenda, Pacific Northwest Laboratory for the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
June 1978 26. H.D. Oak, et al., "Technology, Safety and Costs of Decommissioning a Reference Boiling Water Reactor Power Station," NUREG/CR-0672 and addenda, Pacific Northwest Laboratory for the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
June 1980 27. "Financial Protection Requirements for Permanently Shutdown Nuclear Power Reactors," 10 CFR Parts 50 and 140, Federal Register Notice, Vol. 62, No. 210, October 30, 1997 28. "Microsoft Project Professional 2003," Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA.29. "Atomic Energy Act of 1954," (68 Stat. 919)TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document N01-1590-002, Rev. 1 Appendix A, Page I of 4 APPENDIX A UNIT COST FACTOR DEVELOPMENT TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station Document N01-1590-002, Rev. 1 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Appendix A, Page 2 of 4 APPENDIX A UNIT COST FACTOR DEVELOPMENT Example: Unit Factor for Removal of Contaminated Heat Exchanger
< 3,000 lbs.1. SCOPE Heat exchangers weighing < 3,000 lbs. will be removed in one piece using a crane or small hoist. They will be disconnected from the inlet and outlet piping. The heat exchanger will be sent to the waste processing area.2. CALCULATIONS Activity Critical Act Activity Duration Duration ID Description (minutes) (minutes)*
a Remove insulation 60 (b)b Mount pipe cutters 60 60 c Install contamination controls 20 (b)d Disconnect inlet and outlet lines 60 60 e Cap openings 20 (d)f Rig for removal 30 30 g Unbolt from mounts 30 30 h Remove contamination controls 15 15 i Remove, wrap, send to waste processing area 60 60 Totals (Activity/Critical) 355 255 Duration adjustment(s):
+ Respiratory protection adjustment (25% of critical duration) 64+ Radiation/ALARA adjustment (14% of critical duration) 35 Adjusted work duration 354+ Protective clothing adjustment (30% of adjusted duration) 106 Productive work duration 460+ Work break adjustment (8.33 % of productive duration) 38 Total work duration (minutes) 498*** Total duration = 8.30 hr **** alpha designators indicate activities that can be performed in parallel TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document N01-1590-002, Rev. 1 Appendix A, Page 3 of 4 APPENDIX A (continued)
: 3. LABOR REQUIRED Duration (hours)Rate ($/hr)Crew Number Cost Laborers 3.00 8.300 $19.65 $489.29 Craftsmen 2.00 8.300 $44.85 $744.51 Foreman 1.00 8.300 $46.12 $382.80 General Foreman 0.25 8.300 $47.12 $97.77 Fire Watch 0.05 8.300 $19.67 $8.15 Health Physics Technician 1.00 8.300 $43.95 $364.79 Total Labor Cost 4. EQUIPMENT
& CONSUMABLES COSTS Equipment Costs Consumables/Materials Costs-Blotting paper 50 @ $0.45 sq ft (1}-Plastic sheets/bags 50 @ $0.13/sq ft {2}-Gas torch consumables 1 @ $8.02/hr x 1 hr (3}Subtotal cost of equipment and materials Overhead & profit on equipment and materials
@ 16.00 %Total costs, equipment
& material TOTAL COST: Removal of contaminated heat exchanger
<3000 pounds:$2087.31 none$22.50$6.50$8.02$37.02$5.74$42.76 Total labor cost: Total equipment/material costs: Total craft labor man-hours required per unit:$2,130.07$2,087.31$42.76 60.59 TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station Document N01-1590-002, Rev. 1 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Appendix A, Page 4 of 4 5. NOTES AND REFERENCES
* Work difficulty factors were developed in conjunction with the Atomic Industrial Forum's (now NEI) program to standardize nuclear decommissioning cost estimates and are delineated in Volume 1, Chapter 5 of the "Guidelines for Producing Commercial Nuclear Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Estimates," AIF/NESP-036, May 1986.* References for equipment
& consumables costs: 1. McMaster-Carr, Item 7193T88, Spill Control 2. R.S. Means (2008) Division 01 56, Section 13.60-0200, page 20 3. R.S. Means (2008) Division 01 54 33, Section 40-6360, Reference-10" Material and consumable costs were adjusted using the regional indices for Lincoln, Nebraska.TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document N01-1590-002, Rev. 1 Appendix B, Page 1 of 7 APPENDIX B UNIT COST FACTOR LISTING (DECON: Power Block Structures Only)TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document N01-1590.002, Rev. 1 Appendix B, Page 2 of 7 APPENDIX B DECON UNIT COST FACTOR LISTING (Power Block Structures Only)Unit Cost Factor Cost/Unit($)
Removal of clean instrument and sampling tubing, $/linear foot Removal of clean pipe 0.25 to 2 inches diameter, $/linear foot Removal of clean pipe >2 to 4 inches diameter, $/linear foot Removal of clean pipe >4 to 8 inches diameter, $/linear foot Removal of clean pipe >8 to 14 inches diameter, $/linear foot Removal of clean pipe >14 to 20 inches diameter, $/linear foot Removal of clean pipe >20 to 36 inches diameter, $/linear foot Removal of clean pipe >36 inches diameter, $/linear foot Removal of clean valve >2 to 4 inches Removal of clean valve >4 to 8 inches Removal of clean valve >8 to 14 inches Removal of clean valve >14 to 20 inches Removal of clean valve >20 to 36 inches Removal of clean valve >36 inches Removal of clean pipe hanger for small bore piping Removal of clean pipe hanger for large bore piping Removal of clean pump, <300 pound Removal of clean pump, 300-1000 pound Removal of clean pump, 1000-10,000 pound Removal of clean pump, >10,000 pound Removal of clean pump motor, 300-1000 pound Removal of clean pump motor, 1000-10,000 pound Removal of clean pump motor, >10,000 pound Removal of clean heat exchanger
<3000 pound Removal of clean heat exchanger
>3000 pound Removal of clean feedwater heater/deaerator Removal of clean moisture separator/reheater Removal of clean tank, <300 gallons Removal of clean tank, 300-3000 gallon Removal of clean tank, >3000 gallons, $/square foot surface area 0.26 2.59 3.97 8.81 16.12 20.96 30.84 36.64 56.13 88.12 161.25 209.60 308.39 366.43 17.53 58.45 148.39 437.99 1,691.23 3,269.60 184.32 704.73 1,585.64 908.50 2,285.25 6,439.66 13,235.93 190.93 602.49 5.37 TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station .Document N01-1590-002, Rev. 1 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Appendix B, Page 3 of 7 APPENDIX B DECON UNIT COST FACTOR LISTING (Power Block Structures Only)Unit Cost Factor Cost/Unit($)
Removal of clean electrical equipment, <300 pound 81.09 Removal of clean electrical equipment, 300-1000 pound 300.10 Removal of clean electrical equipment, 1000-10,000 pound 600.21 Removal of clean electrical equipment, >10,000 pound 1,457.82 Removal of clean electrical transformer
< 30 tons 1,012.43 Removal of clean electrical transformer
> 30 tons 2,915.64 Removal of clean standby diesel generator, <100 kW 1,034.12 Removal of clean standby diesel generator, 100 kW to 1 MW 2,308.21 Removal of clean standby diesel generator, >1 MW 4,778.47 Removal of clean electrical cable tray, $/linear foot 7.57 Removal of clean electrical conduit, $/linear foot 3.31 Removal of clean mechanical equipment, <300 pound 81.09 Removal of clean mechanical equipment, 300-1000 pound 300.10 Removal of clean mechanical equipment, 1000-10,000 pound 600.21 Removal of clean mechanical equipment, >10,000 pound 1,457.82 Removal of clean HVAC equipment, <300 pound 81.09 Removal of clean HVAC equipment, 300-1000 pound 300.10 Removal of clean HVAC equipment, 1000-10,000 pound 600.21 Removal of clean HVAC equipment, >10,000 pound 1,457.82 Removal of clean HVAC ductwork, $/pound 0.28 Removal of contaminated instrument and sampling tubing, $/linear foot 0.74 Removal of contaminated pipe 0.25 to 2 inches diameter, $/linear foot 10.42 Removal of contaminated pipe >2 to 4 inches diameter, $/linear foot 17.53 Removal of contaminated pipe >4 to 8 inches diameter, $/linear foot 30.13 Removal of contaminated pipe >8 to 14 inches diameter, $/linear foot 56.53 Removal of contaminated pipe >14 to 20 inches diameter, $/linear foot 67.65 Removal of contaminated pipe >20 to 36 inches diameter, $/linear foot 92.88 Removal of contaminated pipe >36 inches diameter, $/linear foot 109.76 Removal of contaminated valve >2 to 4 inches 225.71 Removal of contaminated valve >4 to 8 inches 275.44 TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station Document N01-1590-002, Rev. 1 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Appendix B, Page 4 of 7 APPENDIX B DECON UNIT COST FACTOR LISTING (Power Block Structures Only)Unit Cost Factor CostlUnit($)
Removal of contaminated valve >8 to 14 inches 531.78 Removal of contaminated valve >14 to 20 inches 675.48 Removal of contaminated valve >20 to 36 inches 895.33 Removal of contaminated valve >36 inches 1,064.12 Removal of contaminated pipe hanger for small bore piping 57.98 Removal of contaminated pipe hanger for large bore piping 175.66 Removal of contaminated pump, <300 pound 474.63 Removal of contaminated pump, 300-1000 pound 1,131.61 Removal of contaminated pump, 1000-10,000 pound 3,609.88 Removal of contaminated pump, >10,000 pound 8,757.44 Removal of contaminated pump motor, 300-1000 pound 494.41 Removal of contaminated pump motor, 1000-10,000 pound 1,474.09 Removal of contaminated pump motor, >10,000 pound 3,326.88 Removal of contaminated heat exchanger
<3000 pound 2,130.07 Removal of contaminated heat exchanger
>3000 pound 6,206.46 Removal of contaminated feedwater heater/deaerator 15,545.56 Removal of contaminated moisture separator/reheater 33,630.07 Removal of contaminated tank, <300 gallons 790.67 Removal of contaminated tank, >300 gallons, $/square foot 16.09 Removal of contaminated electrical equipment, <300 pound 362.30 Removal of contaminated electrical equipment, 300-1000 pound 899.95 Removal of contaminated electrical equipment, 1000-10,000 pound 1,736.08 Removal of contaminated electrical equipment, >10,000 pound 3,557.00 Removal of contaminated electrical cable tray, $/linear foot 17.95 Removal of contaminated electrical conduit, $/linear foot 8.46 Removal of contaminated mechanical equipment, <300 pound 412.08 Removal of contaminated mechanical equipment, 300-1000 pound 1,027.95 Removal of contaminated mechanical equipment, 1000-10,000 pound 1,985.03 Removal of contaminated mechanical equipment, >10,000 pound 3,557.00 Removal of contaminated HVAC equipment, <300 pound 412.08 TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station Document N01-1590-002, Rev. 1 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Appendix B, Page 5 of 7 APPENDIX B DECON UNIT COST FACTOR LISTING (Power Block Structures Only)Unit Cost Factor Cost/Unit($)
Removal of contaminated HVAC equipment, 300-1000 pound 1,027.95 Removal of contaminated HVAC equipment, 1000-10,000 pound 1,985.03 Removal of contaminated HVAC equipment, >10,000 pound 3,557.00 Removal of contaminated HVAC ductwork, $/pound 1.13 Removal/plasma arc cut of contaminated thin metal components, $/linear in. 1.97 Additional decontamination of surface by washing, $/square foot 3.85 Additional decontamination of surfaces by hydrolasing, $/square foot 21.10 Decontamination rig hook up and flush, $/ 250 foot length 3,504.89 Chemical flush of components/systems, $/gallon 12.58 Removal of clean standard reinforced concrete, $/cubic yard 53.52 Removal of grade slab concrete, $/cubic yard 60.83 Removal of clean concrete floors, $/cubic yard 254.88 Removal of sections of clean concrete floors, $/cubic yard 751.47 Removal of clean heavily rein concrete w/#9 rebar, $/cubic yard 77.08 Removal of contaminated heavily rein concrete w/#9 rebar, $/cubic yard 1,154.71 Removal of clean heavily rein concrete w/#18 rebar, $/cubic yard 104.43 Removal of contaminated heavily rein concrete w/#18 rebar, $/cubic yard 1,523.99 Removal heavily rein concrete w/#18 rebar & steel embedments, $/cubic yard 327.04 Removal of below-grade suspended floors, $/cubic yard 146.31 Removal of clean monolithic concrete structures, $/cubic yard 626.97 Removal of contaminated monolithic concrete structures, $/cubic yard 1,150.82 Removal of clean foundation concrete, $/cubic yard 493.01 Removal of contaminated foundation concrete, $/cubic yard 1,071.14 Explosive demolition of bulk concrete, $/cubic yard 22.86 Removal of clean hollow masonry block wall, $/cubic yard 56.99 Removal of contaminated hollow masonry block wall, $/cubic yard 159.69 Removal of clean solid masonry block wall, $/cubic yard 56.99 Removal of contaminated solid masonry block wall, $/cubic yard 159.69 Backfill of below-grade voids, $/cubic yard 21.24 Removal of subterranean tunnels/voids, $/linear foot 73.39 TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station Document N01-1590-002, Rev. 1 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Appendix B, Page 6 of 7 APPENDIX B DECON UNIT COST FACTOR LISTING (Power Block Structures Only)Unit Cost Factor Cost/Unit($)
Placement of concrete for below-grade voids, $/cubic yard 112.21 Excavation of clean material, $/cubic yard 2.30 Excavation of contaminated material, $/cubic yard 24.06 Removal of clean concrete rubble (tipping fee included), $/cubic yard 174.10 Removal of contaminated concrete rubble, $/cubic yard 16.10 Removal of building by volume, $/cubic foot 0.23 Removal of clean building metal siding, $/square foot 0.60 Removal of contaminated building metal siding, $/square foot 1.87 Removal of standard asphalt roofing, $/square foot 1.23 Removal of transite panels, $/square foot 1.45 Scarifying contaminated concrete surfaces (drill & spall), $/square foot 8.02 Scabbling contaminated concrete floors, $/square foot 4.06 Scabbling contaminated concrete walls, $/square foot 10.43 Scabbling contaminated ceilings, $/square foot 35.09 Scabbling structural steel, $/square foot 3.70 Removal of clean overhead crane/monorail
< 10 ton capacity 449.46 Removal of contaminated overhead crane/monorail
< 10 ton capacity 1,017.50 Removal of clean overhead crane/monorail
>10-50 ton capacity 1,078.74 Removal of contaminated overhead crane/monorail
>10-50 ton capacity 2,442.15 Removal of polar crane > 50 ton capacity 4,565.92 Removal of gantry crane > 50 ton capacity 18,222.75 Removal of structural steel, $/pound 0.15 Removal of clean steel floor grating, $/square foot 3.51 Removal of contaminated steel floor grating, $/square foot 7.70 Removal of clean free standing steel liner, $/square foot 8.05 Removal of contaminated free standing steel liner, $/square foot 18.86 Removal of clean concrete-anchored steel liner, $/square foot 4.02 Removal of contaminated concrete-anchored steel liner, $/square foot 21.87 Placement of scaffolding in clean areas, $/square foot 11.97 Placement of scaffolding in contaminated areas, $/square foot 16.37 TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document N01-1590-002, Rev. 1 Appendix B, Page 7 of 7 APPENDIX B DECON UNIT COST FACTOR LISTING (Power Block Structures Only)Unit Cost Factor CostlUnit($)
Landscaping with topsoil, $/acre Cost of CPC B-88 LSA box & preparation for use Cost of CPC B-25 LSA box & preparation for use Cost of CPC B-12V 12 gauge LSA box & preparation for use Cost of CPC B-144 LSA box & preparation for use Cost of LSA drum & preparation for use Cost of cask liner for CNSI 14 195 cask Cost of cask liner for CNSI 8 120A cask (resins)Cost of cask liner for CNSI 8 120A cask (filters)Decontamination of surfaces with vacuuming, $/square foot 19,274.92 1,407.31 1,235.45 1,209.41 7,583.15 102.27 106.24 5,700.21 581.58 0.41 TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document N01-1590-002, Rev. 1 Appendix C, Page 1 of 35 APPENDIX C DETAILED COST ANALYSES 2014 CESSATION OF OPERATIONS T able C -1, D E C O N ...............................................................................................
C -2 Table C-2, Delayed DECON ...............................................................................
C-13 T able C -3, SA FSTO R ..........................................................................................
C -24 TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station Decamnmieaioning Cost Analysis Document N01.1590-002, Rev. I Appendix C, Page 2 of 35 Table C-i Cooper Nuclear Station 2014 DECON Decommissioning Cost Estimate (thousands of 2008 dollars)A-c-nty -off-Site LLRW NRC Spent Fuel Site Processed Burial Volumes Burial I Utility and Devon Removal Packaging Transport Processing Disposal Other Total Total Lit. Term. Managenment Restoraton Volume Clans A Class B Class C GTCC Processed Craft Contractor Cst cost Costs Costs Costs Costs Csts Colnuoun,, Costs Costs Cots Costs Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Fet Cu. Faet WL. Lbs. Manhours Manhourst A I n ex .v 0 PERIOD Is -Shutdown through Transition Period 1a Direct Decommissioning Activites 1:.1.1 Prepare preliminary decommissioning cost I , 1.2 Notification of Cessation of Operations l.1 .3 Remove ue & source material Ia.1.4 Notification of Permanent Defueling la.1.5 Deactivate plant systems & process waste la.1.6 Prepare and submit PSDAR la.1.7 Review plant dwgs & specs.10.,1.8 Perform detailed red survey 10.1.9 Estimate by-product inventory 1:.1.10 End product description I0.1,11 Detailed by-product inventory la.1.12 Define major work sequence 10.1.13 Perform SER and EA l.1e--14.
Perform Site-Specitic Cost Study 1a.1.15 Prepare/submit License Termination Plan la.1.16 Receive NRC approval of termnnation plan Activty Specifcations la.1.17.t Plant & tenporary facilities Ia.1.17.2 Plart systems la.1.17.3 NSSS Decontamination Flush la.1.17.4 Reactor ieamte la.1.17.5 Reactr essel 10.1.17.6 Sacrificial shield 1. 1.17.7 Moisture soparatoesnrheaters 1a.1.17,8 Reinforced concrete 1a.1.17.9 Main Turline la.1.17.10 Main Condensers la.1.17.11 Pressure suppression structure la.1.17.12 Drpwell Ia.1.1713 Plant structures
& buildings la.1.17.14 Waste managernt 1a.1.17.15 Facility & site doseaout 1a.1.17 Total PlRnning & Site Preparations la 1.18 Prepare dimantling seqience 1l.1.19 Plant prep. & temp. svtes 1a.1.20 Desig waterm deanup system 1.1.21 RiggiugfCord.
Cntd Envlpsntoofingletc.
la.1.22 Procure casksilinens
& containers la.1 Subtotal Period la Actirty Cots Period la Collateral Costs 1a.3.1 Spent Fuel Capital and Transfer 1a.3.2 Corporate Overheads 10.3 Subtotal Period la Collateral Costs Period 10 Period-Dependent Costs 18.4.1 Insurance 1.4.2 Property taxes la.4.3 Health jorysics supplies 10.4A Heavy equiplent rental 130 20 150 150 rd.8 1,300 200 4600 100 100 130 750 310 500 410 492 417 50 710 650 5D 100 160 209 209 200 160 312 460 90 4.268 240 Z,700 140 2,100 123 12.661 30 230 230 69 529 529 15 115 115 15 115 115 20 150 150 113 863 863 47 357 357 75 575 575 61 471 471 a 74 566 509 63 479 431 8 58 58 107 517 817 98 748 748 8 58 58 15 115 115 24 184 92 31 240 240 31 240 240 30 230 230 24 184 184 47 359 179 69 529 529 14 104 52 640 4,909 4.481 36 276 276 405 3,105 3,105 21 161 161 315 2,415 2.415 18 141 141 1,899 14.560 14,132 1,550 11.886 468 3,570 3,570 2,016 15,458 3,570 160 1,760 1,760 0 4 4 93 463 463 55 423 423 57 48 92 179 52 428 428 2.000 4,600 1,000 1,000 1,300 7.500 3.100 5,000 4.096 4.920 4,167 500 7,100 6,500 5oo 1,000 1,600 2,088 2,088 2,000 1,600 3,120 4.600 900 42.683 2,400 1.400 1.230 78.609 10,335 3,105 13.440 11,888 11,888 370 368 1,600 4 TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station Decoomissioning Codt Analysis Document N01-1590-002, Rev. I Appendix C, Page 3 of 35 Table C-1 Cooper Nuclear Station 2014 DECON Decommissioning Cost Estimate (thousands of 2008 dollars)Off-Sit. LLRW NRC Spent Fuel Site Processed Burial Volumes Burial I Utiity and Activity Decon Removal Packaging Transport Processing Disposal Other Total Total Lic. Term. Management Restoration Volume Clans A Class B Class C GTCC Processed Craft Contractor Index Activity Description Cost Cost Costs Costs Costs Costs Costs Contllnency Costs Costs Costs Costs Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet -Wt. Lbs. Manhours Manhours Period la Period-Dependert Costs (continued) 1a.4.5 Disposal of DAW generated la.4.6 Plant energy budget la.4.7 NRC Fees 1a.4.8 Emergency Planning Fees 1a.4.9 Spent Fuel Pool O&M la.4.10 ISFSI Operating Costs la.4.11 Secuity Staff Cost la.4.12 Utility Staff Cost la.4 Subtotal Period la Period-Oependemt Costs 1a.0 TOTAL PERIOD la COST PERIOD lb -Decommissioning Preparations Period 1b Direct Decommissioning Activities Detailed Wor Procedures lb.1.1.1 Plant systems lb.1.1,2 NSSS Decontamiation Flush lb.1.1.3 Reactor intemals It.1.1.4 Remaining buildings lb.1.1.5 CRDhousings
& Nts 10.1.1.6 Inore instrumaentation 1b.1.1.7 Removal primnary containment 1b.1.1.8 Reactor yessel 1b.1.1.6 Facility closeout 1b.1.1.10 Sacrificial shield 1b.1.1.11 Reinforced conete 1b.1.1.12 Man Turbine lb.1.1.13 Main Condensers 1b.1.1.14 Moisture separators
& reheaters 1b.1.1.15 Raortasta building lb.1.1.16 Reactor building 1b.1.1 Total Ib.1.2 Decon NSSS I1b.1 Subtotal Period lb Acxtvity Costs Period b Addriional Costs 1 b.2.1 Spent Fuel Pool Isolation I b.2.2 Site Charcterization 1 b.2.3 Asbestos Insulation Disposal lb.2 Subtotal Period lb Additional Costs Period lb Collateral Costs lb.3.1 Decon equipment lb.3.2 DOC staff relocation expenses 1b.3.3 Process liquid waste 1b.3.4 Small tool allouwance lb.3.5 Pipe cutting equipment lb,3.6 Decon rig 1b.3.7 Spent Fuel Capital and Transfer 1 b.3.*8 Corporate Overheads 1b.3 Subtotal Period lb Collateral Costs 738 73 927 706 1-185 745 85 5,483 22.690 73 33.424 19 100 100 139 1,066 1,066 71 776 776 118 1.303 112 857 13 88 822 6,306 6,306 3.403 26.093 260.03 5,006 39,249 30,991 1,303 857 98 2.258 14,144 428 1,575 1,575 1,575 14,445 14,445 157,471 423,400 5 580,871 5 3 738 5 3 73 59,525 8.921 69,265 54,693 14,445 5 659.480 473 100 400 135 100 100 200 363 120 120 100 208 209 200 273 273 3,374 71 544 490 15 115 115 s0 460 460 20 155 39 15 115 115 15 115 115 30 230 230 54 417 417 18 138 69 18 138 138 15 115 so 31 239 239 31 240 240 30 230 230 41 314 283 41 314 283 506 3,880 3,520 174 523 523 54 116 69 58 31 31 300 4,733 1,000 4,000 1,350'1.000 1,000 2,000 3,630 1.200 1,200 1,000 2,080 z088 2.000 2,730 2,730-33,741 1.067 1,067 33,741 348 348 773 773 713 64 -"11-1,000 1,400 2,177 1.011 1 65 1 65 3,374 680 4.403 4,043 9.407 1.411 10,818 10.818-5,395 1,619 7.014 7,014 558 -265 1,662 1.662 558 14,802 3,295 19,493 19,493 360 10,333 10,333 134.329 10,002 134.329 10,002 48 48 249 249 912 1,800 3,054-1,554 1,806 5,520 107 820 820 137 1,049 1,049 525 2,690 2,690 2 12 12 150 1,150 1,150 210 1,610 1,610 458 3,512 -233 1,787 1,787 1,822 12,631 9,118 3,512 3,512 427 427 543 543 85.905 85,905 189 186 TLG Services, Inc.
0 Cooper Nuclear Station Deconmirsioning Cost Analysis Document N01-1590-002, Rev. I Appendix C, Page 4 of85 Table C-1 Cooper Nuclear Station 2014 DECON Decommissioning Cost Estimate (thousands of 2008 dollars)Off-Site LLRW NRC Spent Fuel Site Processed Burial Volumes Burial/ Utility and Activty Decon Removal Packaging Transport Processing Disposal Other Total Total LiU. Term. Management Restoration Volume Class A Class B Class C GTCC Processed Craft Contractor Index Activity Description Cost Cost Costs Costs Costs Costs Costs Continaency Costs Costs Costs Costs Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Foot Cu. Foot Wt. Lbs. Manhours Manhours Period l b Period-Dependmnt Costs 1b.4.1 Decon supplies 1b.4.2 Insurance lb.4.3 Properlty taxes lb.4. Health physics supplies Ib.4.5 Heavy equipment rental Ib.4.6 Disposal of DAW generated ib.4.7 Plant energy budget Ib.4.8 NRC Fees lb.4.9 Emergency Planning Fees 1b.4.10 Spent Fuel Pool O&M lb.4.1 ISFSI Operating Costs Ib.4.12 Security Staff Cost Ib.4.13 DOC Staff Cost Ib.4.14 Uitiity Staff Cost Sb.4 Subtotal Period 1b Penod-Dependent Costs 1b.0 TOTAL PERIOD 1 b COST PERIOD I TOTALS PERIOD 2a -Large Component Removal Period 2a Direct Decommissioning Actvities Nucear Steam Supply System Removal 2a.1.1.1 Reciclation System Piping & Valves 20.1.1.2 Recircudation Pumps & Motom 2 .1.1.3 CRDMs & NIs Removal 2L.1.1.4 Reactor Vessel Internals 2a.1.1.5 Reactor Vessel 20.1.1 Totals Removal of Major Equipment 2a.1.2 Main Turtine/Generator 2a.1.3 Main Condensers Cascading Costs from Clean Building Demolition 2a.1A.1 Reactor 2a.1 .4.2 Augmented Radwaste 2a.1A.3 Radsoste 20.1.4. Turbineto 2a.l.4 Totals Disposal of Plant Systems 2a.1.5.1 Augmented Radwrste El 877 ArealA 2a.1 5.2 Augmented Redwaste a 903 ArealA 2a.1.5.3 Augmented Redwaste al 918 AralA 2a.1.5.4 Augmented Radwaste El 929 AmalA 2a.1.5.5 Augmented Redwaste El 929 AreaoB 28.1.5.0 DRYVVELL ArealA 28.1.5.7 DRYWVELL AealB 2a.1.5.8 Muib-Purpose Facility 29.1.5.9 Reactor El 903 AJOelA 2a.1.5.10 Reactor a 903 ArealB 20.1.5.11 Turbine El 032 ArealB 2a.5.5.t2 Turbine El 932 Aea2C 22 4* 242 183 22 425 3 2 3 2 244 2 43 924 352 591 372 42 Z734 4,759 S 11,380 43 21,400 5 27 27 24 269 269 0 2 2 60 302 302 27 211 211 11 58 58 139 1,063 1,063 35 387 387 59 650 56 427 6 49 410 3,144 3,144 714 5,473 5,473 1.707 13,086 13,086 3,255 25,149 24,023 650 427 49 1,126 4,638 360 18.782 788 920 920 11,680 543 13,255 543 8.439 8,439 3 78,520 83.440 212,160 3 354,120 2,547 2,209 49 316 2.547 2.947 54 318 2,407 45,096 9,052 61,676 56,677 2.480 104,622 17,973 130,940 111,370 228,674 11,261 387,861 243,119 11265 1,047.341 90 71 33 28 133 139 110 2,382 56 5,457 431 8,058 14 20 11 29 377 92 5,343 2,09 1,460 762 7,205 2,912 303 321 317 16,355 218 5,358 218 22.653 437 171 028 379 6,057 309 722 552 273 3,773 812 260 25 43 285 613 207 68 53 21 3 534 134 202 404 462 332 8 142 639 639 109 532 532 232 1,291 1,291 11,879 30,285 38,285 7,388 20,700 20,700 19.751 61,447 61,447 1,188 0,011 9,011 1,045 7,177 7.177 39 299 299 4 28 28 7 50 50 43 328 328 92 705 705 167 862 062 45 230 230 50 261 261 25 128 128 1 8 8 477 2,470 2,470 50 274 274 95 566 560 276 1,428 1,428 221 1.305 1,305 416 2.505 2.505 1 9 997 1.188 6,935 1,878 1,205 11,211 2.128 22,209 3,334 08,524 1,725 36,456 3,604 120,597 4,031 132,888 1,683-126,494 0,209 676 376,084 28,075 1,255-1,440,354 28,075 1,255 976 2.196,409 68,073 2,510 2,788,381 4,555 1,63.840 19,066 2,488 235 359 4,419 7,498 28 28 6 7 10 9 4 5 0 0 85 84 3 5 6 15 56 42 13 34 52 99 432 104 139 73 3 0 1.289 54 28 201 47-651 443 131 882 725 0 2,055 460 765 324 38 1 5,726 577 126 2,148 214 2,892 4,739 583 9,442 3,220 172,205 5,783 41,606 1,889 55.345 1,451 29,038 591 1,538 77 513,627 15,069 34,718 4,142 105,982 5,547 259,190 10,573 244,706 12,864 672,225 9,481 237 TLG Servcees, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Stoaton Decommissioning Cost Aoodyaie Document N01-1590-002, Rev. I Appendix C, Page 5 of 35 Table C-1 Cooper Nuclear Station 2014 DECON Decommissioning Cost Estimate (thousands of 2008 dollars)Off-Sit. LLRW NRC Spent Fuel Site Processed Burial Volumes Burial I Utility and Activity Decon Removal Packaging Transport Processing Disposal Other Total Total Lic. Term. Management Restoration Volume Class A Class B Class C GTCC Processed Craft Contractor Index Activity Description Cost Cost Costs Costs Costs Costs Costs Continenc Costs Costs Costs Costs Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Wt, Lbs. Manhours Manhours Disposal of Plast Systems (coninued) 2a.1.5,13 Turbine El 932 Area3C 2a.1.5.14 YardAfealB 2a.1.5 Totals 2a. 1.6 Scaffolding in support of decommissioning 2a.1 Subtotal Penod 2a Activity Costs Period 2a Collateral Costs 2a.3.1 Process liquid waste 2a.3,2 Small tool allowance 2a.3.3 Spent Fuel Copital and Transfer 2a.3.4 Crporate Overheads 2a.3 Subtotal Period 2a Collateral Costs Period 2a Perieo-Dependent Costs 2a.4.1 Decce supplies 2a.4.2 Insurance 2a.4.3 Property taxes 2a.4.4 Health physics supplies 20.4.5 Heavy equipment rental 2a.4.6 Disposal of DAW generated 2a.4.7 Plant energy budget 2a,4.8 NRC Fees 2a.4.9 Emergency Planning Fees 2a.4.10 Spent Fuel Pool O&M 2e.4.11 ISFS0 Operating Costs 2a,4.12 Security Staff Cost 2a.4.13 DOC Staff Cost 2a.4.14 Utility Staff Cost 2a.4 Subtotal Period 2a Pedod.Dependent Costs 2a.0 TOTAL PERIOD 2a COST PERIOD 2b -Site Decontamination Period 2b Direct Decommissioning Activities Disposal of Ptant Systems 2b.1.1.1 Control El 882 Arealt 2b.1.1.2 Control El 903 AreatC 2b.t1..3 Control Ei 918 ArealC 2b.1.1.4 Control El 932 AmealC 2b.1.1.5 Intake 2b.1.t.6 18Radwraste Cl 877 ArealA 2b.1.t.7 Raoteaste 8877 Area2A 2b 1.1.8 Radwaste El 877 Area3A 2b.1.1.9 Radsaste 8 903 AnalA 2b.1.1.10 Radastes 8 9D3 Arsa2A 2b.1..t11 Radwaste E 903 Area3A 2b.1.1.12 Radwasts [ 9168AalA 2b.1.t.13 Radwast= C 918 Amea2A 2b.1.1.14 Radwasta 8916Atea3A 2b.1.1.15 Rafsts El 934 AreaeA 2b.1.1.16 Radwaste : E934 Area2A 2b.1.1.17 Radwasta ]S49ArealA 67 ....518 110 284 3.535 1.198 3,013 374 612 5,117 4,817 2,070 24 11 168 23 431 14,647 8,983 4,188 15,116 28.694 437 135 -124 135 124 81 1.262 2,480 61 3,741 44 231 44 231 34 19 34 19 264 8.576-3.202 264 11,778 688 6 537 --1,235 923 1,183 1.046 119 6,631 16,275 22,962 537 51,067 10 78 1,013 6,657 6,657 2.847 16.780 16,693 553 2,848 2,848 25,476 97,968 97,881 173 847 847 19 143 129 1,286 9,862 -480 3,682 3,682 1,.58 14,534 4,657 15 78 76 69 756 756 1 6 6 315 1,577 1,577 372 2,852 2,852 140 730 730 185 1,420 1,420 92 1,016 1.016 118 1,301 157 1,203 18 137 -995 7,626 7,626 2,441 18,718 18.716 3,444 26,407 26,407 8,363 63,822 61,182 35,797 176,325 163,720 199 1,243 1,243 25 185 10 76 3 26 15 116 355 1,845 1,845 41 214 214 75 388 308 69 355 355 166 961 891 37 191 191 13 68 68 15 76 76 137 710 710 22 11t 115 72 372 372 9 47 47 78 --37,846 5,399 87 54.788 21,774 1,621 101 87 151,388 49.413 3,334--921 14 9,862 ,9982 14 621 1,301 1,203 137 2,640 11,545 1 11,545-2.083 2,014,081 14.477 4,144.259 84,262 81,992 28.092 976 11,174,880 212,445 2.510 55,244 185 -55.244 180 105,898 35 185.051 222,354 413,989-105.898 35 821,394 976 11,336.020 212,660 823,904 627 18,513 9,060 4,437 15,116 29,494 63.282 12,503 102 151,388 61,878 3.334 285 170 66 22 101 405 44 84 113 192 37 21 17 188 26 100 12 17 42 75 62 9 7 16 13 9 10 36 29 6 7 2 2 3 3 23 22 3 4 11 12 1 2 554 147 948 113 201 153 439 104 30 39 338 60 177 24-5,929 674 195 -76 26 116 5,097 613 1.156 684 1.955 463 135 201 1,690 266 808 105 299,222 7,975-5,155 2,100 702-3,136 377,917 11.133 44,992 1,207 79,963 2,349 81,153 3,102 175.093 5,412 41,366 1,047 12,033 572 15,667 455 134,827 5,152 23,735 692 70,665 2.706 9,381 310 TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuaclar Station Decoamss~aioning Coat Analsayis Docoarars NOI.-1590.002, Rev. I Appendix C, Page 6 ef 85 Table C-1 Cooper Nuclear Station 2014 DECON Decommissioning Cost Estimate (thousands of 2008 dollars)Off-Site LLRW NRC Spent Fuel Site Processed Burial Volumes Burial I Utility and Activity Decon Removal Packaging Transport Processing Disposal Other Total Total Lie. Term. Management Restoration Volume Clans A Class B Class C GTCC Processed Craft Contractor Inde. Activity Oscription Cost Cost Costs Costs Costs Costs Costs Contiagen co Costs Costs Costs Costs Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Ce. CFot Cu.Fon Cu. Font Wt. Lbs. Manhours Manhouns Disposal of Rant Systems (continued) 2b.1.1.18 Reactor El 859 AralA 2b.1.1.19 Reactor El t59 ArealB 2b.1.1.20 Reactor El 859 Area2A 2b 1.1.21 Reactor El 859 Area2B 2b.1.1.22 Reactor El 859 Ara3A 2b.1.1.23 Reactor El 859 Area3B 2b.1.1.24 Reactor El 859 Area4A 2b.1.1.25 Reactor El 659 Area4B 2b,1.1.26 Reactor El 859 Are"SA 2b.1.1.27 Reactor El 859 AraSB 2b.1.1.28 Reactor El 903 Area2A 2b.1.1.29 Reactor EJ 903 Area2B 2b.1.1.30 Reactor C 903 Area3A 2b.1.1.31 ReactorEl 903 Area3B 2b.1.1.32 Reactor El 903 Area4A 2b.1.1.33 Reactor EJ 903 Area4B 2b.1.1.34 Reactor El 931 ArealA 2b.1.1.35 Reactor El 931 Areal B 2b.1.1.36 Reactor Ei931 Area2A 2b.1.1.37 Reactor EC 931 Aroe2B 2b.1.1.38 Reactor E 931 Area3A 2b.1.1.39 Reactwor E 931 Area3B 2b.1.1.40 Reactor EJ 931 Area4C 2b.1.1.41 ReactorEl 931 AreaSC 2b.1.1.42 Reactor El 958 ArealA 2b.1.1.43 Reactor El 958 ArealB 2b.1.1.44 Reactor El 958 Ar-a2A 2b.1.1.45 Reactor EJ 558 Area2B 2b.1.1.48 ReactorB 958 Area3A 2b.1.1.47 Reactor El 958 AreM33 2b.1.1.48 Turbine El 882 AalA 2b.1.1.49 Turbine El 882 AralB 2b.1.1.50 Turbine El 882 Area2A 2b51.1.51 Turbine C 882 Area2B 2b.1.1.52 Turbine El 882 Ares3A 2b.1.1.53 Turaln El 882 Area3B 2b.1.1.54 Turbine E8 903 ArealA 2b.1.1.55 Turbine El 903 Areal B 2b.1.1.56 Turbine El 903 Area2A 2".1.1.57 Turbine El 903 Area2B 2.1.1.1.58 Turbine EC 903 Area3B 2b.1.1.59 Turbine 5 903 Aea3C 2b.1.1.60 Turbine El 903 Ama4B 2b.1.1.81 YardAVatIC 21.1.1 Totals 72 449 73 70 48 34 51 17 64 38 4 71 37 25 31 24 25 307 31 3 123 3 24 7 57 171 49 15 38 17 38 394 22 213 17 820 9 995 5 147 3 108 12 197 6,646 15 16 -248 28 64 712 344 25 26 401 3 8 99 40 9 9 137 2 3 23 23 9 8 117 1 2 19 14 16 17 262 2 3 23 23 0 0 8 5 12 149 51 10 11 -167 2 3 37 17 8 9 136 1 3 38 17 3 3 -52 22 45 483 256 2 2 -35 0 0 1 0 23 22 336 0 0 1 0 9 10 149 8 18 209 88 10 10 -153 1 1 6 14 4 3 -48 1 1 6 12 3 3 -50 46 95 1,101 476 2 2 29 10 23 301 89 2 1 -23 82 156 1.960 633 I 1 -15 134 271 2.726 1.717 1 1 -9 3 a 105 30 0 2 33 2 0 2 26 3 693 1,087 8,611 8,996 83 432 432 317 1.914 1,914 125 650 650 44 264 264 49 252 252 18 103 103 44 229 229 11 65 65 86 445 445 19 107 107 3 14 14 55 342 342 54 279 279 17 101 101 44 229 229 17 101 101 20 104 104 222 1,334 1,334 17 87 87 1 5 5 120 625 625 1 4 4 4 28 1 8 -54 279 279 100 594 594 53 276 276 8 46 46 22 116 116 8 45 45 23 117 117 402 2.515 2,515 13 68 68 125 762 762 10 53 53 637 4,068 4,068 6 33 33 1,141 6,983 6,983 4 20 20 62 355 355 7 48 48 16 124 8 50 50 30 227 8,365 31,398 30,598 691 3.560 3,560 2,767 13.241 13,241 71 316 316 372 1,815 1,815 118 579 579 196 850 850 689 3,001 3,001 4C214 19,801 19,80t 28 8 124 227 80 1,091 7,624 1.526-1,780 1,055 177 6O8 249 103-520 208 62 1,163 242 102 26 1,594 225-741 401 77 608 411 75-232 5,169 1,137 154 7 1 1.651 7 0-662 2,238 392-681 66 63-214 60 54-222 11,784 2,117-129 3,227 405-101 20,984 2,817-68 29,180 7.631-42 1,122 133 357 9 276 11 92,188 41,682 2,026 126 50,830 16.343 242 2.189 8,129 679 1,234 3,087 404 5,888 688 23.302 61,526 51,485 97,874 2,068 448,483 12,746 159,714 2,137 58.760 2.009 54,543 1,356 19,362 975 46,666 1,416 14,010 487 104,381 1,839 18,927 1,114 2,372 123 84,943 1,983 68,516 1,109 23,200 744 54,373 928 23,408 717 20.858 681 311.878 8,640 13,824 881 380 91 134,007 3,509 345 85 767-213 59,432 1,492 128,002 4,814 61,083 1.425 8,331 430 19,185 1,070 7.250 491 19,878 1,028 868.352 11.459 11,556 597 166,542 5,929 9.017 461 1.104.460 17,788 6.127 239 1,868,932 28,509 3,729 145 57,476 4,141 15,340 97-3,412 12,251 367-5,770 7.327,776 189,487 102,490 35.115 3,680,298 101.984 228,383 2,299 395,527 13,327 356.985 3.680 603,975 6.839 2,357,288 21,920 150,050 2b.1.2 Scaffolding in support of decommissioning Decontamination of Se Buildings 2b.1.3.1 Reactor 28,1.3.2 Augmented Radwaste 2b.,1.3.3 Miscellaneous Structures
-Contaminated 2b.1.3.4 Mueti-urpose Facility 2b.1,3.5 Radvaste 2b.1.3.6 Turbine 2b,1.3 Totals 2,588 30 14 210 28 2,702 55 377 72 167 552 3,924 1,457 32 174 73 88 267 2.088 131 320 7 10 15 43 11 19 18 26 70 97 252 515 4,748 1,116 23 119 759 74 115 172 38 319 64 1,261 5,747 3,061 TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station Document N01.1590.002, Rev. I De-omrissioning Cost Analysis Appendix C, Page 7 of 35 Table C-1 Cooper Nuclear Station 2014 DECON Decommissioning Cost Estimate (thousands of 2008 dollars)Off-Site LLRW NRC Spent Fuel Site Processed Burial Volures Burial I Utility and Activity Oe0n Removal Packaging Transport Processing Disposal Other Total Total LIc. Term. Management Restoration Volume Clans A Class B Clans C GTCC Processed Craft Contractor Index Activity Description Cost Cost Costs Coste Costs C Cost Csts Contin en Costs Costs Costs Costs Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu.Feet Cu. Feet WL. Lbs. Manhours Manhours 2b.1 Subtotal Pedod 2b Actvity Costs 3,924 11,322 975 1.616 Period 2b Collateral Costs 2b.3.1 Process liquid waste 164 -54 283 2b.3.2 Small tool allowance
-195 -2b.3.3 Spent Fuel Capital and Transfer --2b.3A Corporate Overheads
...2b.3 Subtotal Period 2b Collateral Costs 164 195 54 283 Period 2b Period-Dependent Costs 2b.4.1 Decon supplies 1,318 -2b.4.2 Insurance 2b94.3 Property taxes 2b.4.4 Health physics supplies 2.257 2b.4.5 Heavy equipment rental 4,559 2b.48 Disposal of DAW generated
-53 29 2b.4.7 Plant energy budget 2b.48 NRC Fees 2b.4.9 Emergency Planning Fees 2b.4.10 Spent Fuel Pool O&M 2b.4.1 1 Liquid Radwaste Processing EquipmentlServices 2b.4.12 ISFSI Operating Costs 2b.4.13 Security Staff Cost 2b.4.14 DOC Staff Cost 2b.4.15 Utility Staff Cost 2b.4 Subtotal Petiod 2b Period-Dependent Costs 1,318 6.816 53 29 2b.0 TOTAL PERIOD 2b COST 5,407 18,334 1,081 1,928 PERIOD 2c -Decontamination Following Wet Fuel Storage Period 2c Direct Decommissioning Acitvities 2c.1.1 Remove spent ftel racks 267 33 79 89 Disposal of Plant Systems 2c.1.2.1 Reactor Ff 1001 Amea1A 50 7 8 2c.1.2.2 Reactor El 1001 AremtB 64 1 4 2c. 1.2.3 Reactor l 976 Are1A 11 1 1 2c.1.2.4 ReactorElg7 97eArWel ISO 11 27 2c. 1 .2.5 Reactor El 976 Aee2A 7 1 1 2c.1.2.6 Reactor El 976 Are2B 38 1 3 2c.1.2 Totals 321 23 44 14.567 12,086 -10,269 54,759 53,960 -800 155.741 93,273 --15,052,720 374.651 -323 211 1.035 1,035 29 225 225 17.873 2,681 20.554 -5,754 863 6,618 6,618 323 23,627 3.784 28,431 7,877-330 1,648 1,648 1,273 127 1,400 1,400 10 1 11 11-564 2,822 2,822-684 5,243 5,243 835 -218 1,135 1,135-1.805 271 2,076 2,076 1,709 171 1,880 1,880 2,190 219 2,409 1,939 290 2,227 -487 73 560 560 220 33 254 -12,279 1,842 14,120 14,120 29.008 4,351 33,359 33,359 40,864 8,130 46,993 46.993 835 91,781 15,304 116,137 111,248 14,567 13,243 115,409 29,358 199,327 173,085 20,554 20.554 1,126 67,588 220 1,126 87,588 220 2,409 2,227 254 4,889 25.442 17,954 164,691 55 342.634 395,451 734,023 17,954 164,691 55 1,472,109 800 155,741 112,354 15,285,000 374,926 1,472.109 1.348 121 54 13 16 328 115-13 42 16 424 293 163 1.742 183 1.742 42 g 630 3,389 500 2,316 2,316 45 231 231 28 164 164 7 36 38 121 752 752 5 26 26 20 121 121 226 1,331 1,331 747 3,856 3,656 747 3,656 3,656 138 712 712 1,611 8,014 8,014 362 1,567 1.567 362 1,567 1,597 5,986 537,141 1,004-537 48,175 1.273 578 57 28,513 1,737-72 6,482 304 3,516 511 188,501 4,017-57 5,136 174 449 72 24,474 1.056 4,543 1,305 301,281 8,561 1,749 32,119 3,281.859 18,302 1,749 32,119 3.281,659 18,302 405 25 20,498 7,023 6,697 39,437 4.140.579 34,890 Decratamivatioa of Site Buddngs 2c 1.3.1 Reactor (post fuel)2c.1.3 Totals 20 1.4 Scaffonldig In support of deconvrvussioning 2c.1 Subtotal Peitod 2c Activity Costs Period 2c Additional Costs 2c.2.1 Final Site Survey 2c.2 Subtotal Period 2c Additbonal Costs 257 510 97 138 257 510 97 138 518 8 3 525 1,382 205 273 1.205 1,205 12,480 12,480 TLG Services, Inc.
S Cooper Nuclear Station Decommssnioning Cast Analysis Documenl N01-1590-002, Rev. I Appendix C, Page 8 of"35 Table C-1 Cooper Nuclear Station 2014 DECON Decommissioning Cost Estimate (thousands of 2008 dollars)Off-Site LLRW NRC Spent Fuel Site Processed Burial Volumes Burial I Utility and Activity Devon Removal Packaging Transport Processing Disposal Other Total Total Lic. Term. Management Restoration Volume Clan A Clans B Class C GTCC Processed Craft Contractor Index Activity Description Cost Cost Costs Costs Costs Costs Costs Contln Oscy Costs Costs Costs Costs Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Wt. Lbs. Manhours Manhours Period 2c Collateral Costs 2c.3.1 Process liquid waste 2c 3.2 Smau tool aliomance 2c.3.3 Decommissiong Equipment Disposition 2c.3A4 Spent Fuel Capital and Transfer 2c. 3 Subtotal Pennd 2c Colsateral Costs 101 -33 175 200-22 -88 50 621 84 -1,595 101 22 121 225 621 284 1,595 Period 2c Period-Dependent Costs 2c.4.1 Decon supplies 90 -2c4.2 Insurance 197 2c.4.3 Property taxes -2 2C.44 Health physics supplies 256 -2c.4.5 Heavy equipment rntal 707 ---2c.4.6 Disposal of DAW generated
-12 6 184 -2c.4.7 Plant energy budget -149 2c.4.8 NRC Fees 265 2c.4.9 Emergency Planning Fees 340 2c.4.10 Liquid Radwaste Processing EquipmentrServicos 151 2c.4.11 ISFSI Operating Costs 34 2c.4.12 Security Staff Cost 1,159 2c.4.13 DOC Staff Cost 3,126 2c-4.14 Utility Staff Cost 4,699 2c.4 Subtotal Period 2c Penod-Dependent Costs 90 983 12 6 184 10,123 130 639 639 3 25 25 130 973 973 239 1,834 -503 3,471 1,637 23 113 113 20 217 217 0 2 2 64 320 320 106 813 813 48 250 250 22 172 172 27 292 292 34 373 -23 174 174 5 29 -174 1,333 1,333 469 3,595 3,595 705 5,404 5,404 1,719 13,096 12,684 4,194 26.148 23.902 1,834 1,834 373 39 413 2,247 696 41,756 136 6,000 373 303.507 88 6,000 1,069 345.263 224 3,949 36,227 12 27,930 42,000 80,220 3,949 38,227 12 150,150 2c.0 TOTAL PERIOD 2c COST PERIOD 2e -License Ternination Period 2e Direct Decommissioning Activioes 2e 1.1 ORISE confiratoty survey 2e 1'2 Terrmnate license 2e.1 Subtotal Period 2e Activity Costs Period 2e Additonal Costs 2e.2.1 Final Stte Surney 2e.2 Subtotal Period 2e Addibonal Costs Period 2e Collateral Costs 2e.3.1 DOC staff relocatio expenses 2e.3.2 Spent Fuel Capital and Transfer 2e.3 Subtotal Period 2e Collateral Costs Period 2e Period-Dependent Costs 2e.4.1 Insurance 2e.4 2 Property taxes 2e.4.3 Health physics supplies 2e.4.4 Disposal of DAW generated 2e.4.5 Plant energy budget 2e.4.6 NRC Fees 2e.4.7 Emergency Planning Fees 2e.4.8 ISFSI Operatig Costs 2e.4.9 Security Staff Cost 2ed.410 DOC Staff Cost 2e.4.11 Utility Staff Cost 2e.4 Subtotal Period 2e Pedod-Dependent Costs 2e.0 TOTAL PERIOD 2e COST 716 2,367 337 504 1,251 3,858 12,922 12,697 44,455 4,522,069 35,126 162,630 147 44 191 191 147 44 191 191------5,998-, ----5,890 912 217 1,129 327 3 737 ---3 1 42 139 530 633 64 2,125 4,442 5,071 737 3 1 42 13.334 1,799 7,797 7,797 1,799 7,797 7,797 137 1,049 1,049 33 250 -169 1,299 1,049 33 360 360 0 3 3 184 921 921 11 58 58 21 160 160 53 583 583 63 696 -10 73 -319 2,444 2,444 666 5,108 5,108 761 5,832 5,832 2.121 16,238 15,468 148,435 6,240 148,435 6,240 250 -----250 -----696 73 769 1,019 914 8,380 3 50,886 57,149-80.634 914 8.380 3 1888669 737 3 1 42 20,608 4.134 25.525 24,506 914 8,380 148,438 194,909 TLG Servicee, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station Decommissioning Cost Analysis Documrent NOI-1590-002, Rev. I Appendix C, Page 9 of35 Table C-1 Cooper Nuclear Station 2014 DECON Decommissioning Cost Estimate (thousands of 2008 dollars)Off-Sits .LLRW NRC Spent Fuel Sits Processed Borial Volurmes Burial I Utility and Actvtty Oeson Removal Packaging Transport Processlng Disposal Other Total Total Lit. Torm Management Restoration Volume Clan A Class B Class C GTCC Processed Craft Contractor Index Activity Description Cost Cost costs costs Costs Costs Costs Continencv Costs Costs Costs Costs Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Wt. Lbs. Manhours Manhours PERIOD2TOTALS 6.750 39,950 10.481 6,870 30,933 46,637 212,221 73,483 427,325 385,213 41,211 901 319,826 219.601 3,334 976 -31,151,470 771,150 2.653,551 PERIOD 3b -Site Restoration Period 32 Direct Decommissioning Acfiv&#xfd;ies Demolition of Remaining Site Buildngs 3b.1.1.1 Reactr 3b.1.1.2 Augmented Radwaste 3b.1.1.3 Control 3b.1.1.4 Intake Structure 3b.1.1.5 LLRW Storage Pad 3b.1.1.6 Misceuaneous Structures
-Clean 3b,1.1.7 Miscellaneous Structures
-Contaminrated 3b.1.1.8 Muli-Purpose Facility 3b.1.1.9 OWC Gas Generator 3b.1.1.10 Offce 3b.1.1.11 Radwaste 3b.1.1.12 Seat Well 3b.1.1.13 Sewage Treatment Area 3b.1.1.14 Transformer Yard 3b2 1.1.15 Tubine 3b.1.1.16 Turbine Pedestal 3b.1.1.17 Reactor(post fuel)3b.1.1 Totals Site Closeout Acivites 3b.1.2 Remove Rubble 3b. 1.3 Grade & landscape site 3b.14A Final report to NRC 3b. 1 Subtotal Period 3b Activity Costs Period 3b Additional Costs 3b.2.1 Conorete Crushing 3b.2.2 Cofferdam 3b.2 Subtotal Period 3b Additional Costs Period 3b Collateral Costs 3b.3.1 Small tool aflomnce 3b,32 Spent Fuel Capital and Transfer 3b.3 Subtotal Period 3b Collaeral Costs Period 3b Period-Dependent Costs 3b.4.1 Insurance 3b24.2 Property taxes 3b.4.3 Heavy equipment rental 3b.4.4 Plant energy budget 3b.4.5 NRC ISFSI Fees 32,4.8 Emergency Planning Fess 3b.4,7 iSFS Operating Costs 25.48 Security Staff Cost 3b.4.9 DOC Staff Cost 3b.4.10 Utility Staff Cost 3b.4 Subtotal Period 3b Period-Dependent Costs 3b.0 TOTAL PERIOD 3b COST 1,473 222 214 523 145 1,196 27 123 1t8 156 391 17 4 20 2,596 277 18 7,418 424 578 8,421 221 1,694 33 255 32 246 78 602 22 167 179 1,375 4 30 1 t 141 3 20 23 179 59 449 3 20 1 5 3 24 389 2,985 42 318 3 21 1,113 8,531 1,694 255 246 602 167 1,375 30 141 20 179 449 20 5 24 2,985 318 21 8,531 488 665 9,684 14,089 2,119 1,655 5,621 1,227 11.837 572 1.982 283 1,920 3,229 166 53 172 40.503 2.100 512 88,040 64 488-87 665 156 23 179 179 156 1,286 9,863 179 3,286 1,578 S -1,560 92,904 1.580 499 a 458 957 8 53 S 92183 53 183 76 582 69 527 145 1,109 8 61 27 211 35 271 582 627 1,109-61 211 211 61 3,045 5,130 8,175 4,053 4,053 13,483 751 7-160 339 1,453 146 4.878 9.777 5.903 23,415 75 826 826 608 4,661 24 184 -34 373 373 145 1,598 1,598 22 168 18 732 5,610 4,937 1,467 11,244 -885 6,789 0 1,697 3,993 31,460 8 9,607 4,681 184 673 11,244 5,091 21,853 116,814 122,206 97,944 336.964 101,079 338,524 23,762 5,459 42,704 179 9.818 32,707 TLG Servicea, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Stations Decommissuioninrg Coot Anralysis Docurent N01-1590-002, Rev. 1 Appendix C, Page 10 of 35 Table C-i Cooper Nuclear Station 2014 DECON Decommissioning Cost Estimate (thousands of 2008 dollars)sInde Activity Oescrlption PERIOD 3c -Fuel Storage Operations/Shipping Period 3c Collateral Costs 3c.3.1 Spent Fuel Capital and Transfer 3c.3 Subtotal Period 3c Collateral Costs Period 3c Period-Deperdent Costs 3c.4.1 Insurance 3C.4.2 Propenty taxes 3c.4.3 Plant energy budget 3c.44 NRC ISFSI Fees 3c.4.5 Emergency Planning Fees 3c.4.6 ISFSI Operating Costs 3c.4.7 Security Staff Cost 3CA4,8 Utility Staff Cost 3c.4 Subtotal Period 3c Peiodt-Dependent Costs 3c.0 TOTAL PERIOD 3c COST PERIOD 3d -GTCC shipping Period 3d Direct Decommissioning Acilvities Nuclear Steam Supply System Removal 3d.1.1.t Vessel & Internals GTCC Disposal 3d.1.1 Totals 3d.1 Subtotal Period 3d Actisly Costs Period 3d Collateral Costs 3d.3.1 Spent Fuel Capital and Transfer 3d.3 Subtotal Period 3d Collateral Costs Period 3d Period-Dependent Costs 3d.4.1 Insurance 3d.4.2 Property taxes 3d.4.3 Plant energy budget 3d.4.4 NRC ISFSI Fees 3d.4.5 Emergency Planning Fees 3d..8 ISFSI Operating Costs 3d.4.7 Security Staff Cost 3d.4.8 Utility Staff Cost 3M.4 Subtotal Period 3d Period-Dependent Costs 3d.0 TOTAL PERIOD 3d COST PERIOD 3a -ISFSI Decontamination Period 3e Direct Decommissioning Activites Period 3e Additinal Costs 3e.2.1 ISFSI Decorntamination 3e.2 Subtotal Period 3e Additlonal Costs Period 3e Collateral Costs 3a.3.1 Small tool alowaunce 3e.32 Spent Fuel Capital and Transfer 30.3 Subtotal Period 3e Cotlateral Costs Ott-Site LLRW NRC Spent Fuel site Proeessed Burial volumes Burial i Utilrty a Decon Reeontal Packaging Transport Processing Disposal Other Total Total LUc. Term. Management Restoration Volume Class A Class B Class C GTCC Processed Craft Contractor Cost Cost Costs Costa Costs CasTS COSts Contingency Costs Costs Costs Costs Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Wt. Lbs. Manhours Manhours 16,015 2,402 18,418 16,01b 2,402 18,418 18,418 18,418 10,708 1,071 11.776 11,776 98 10 108 108 6,234 623 6,857 6,857 20,704 2,070 22.774 22,774 2.085 313 2,398 2.398 61,192 9,179 70,371 70,371 21,209 3,181 24,390 24,390 122,227 16,447 138,674 138,674 138.242 18,849 157,092 157,092 1,383,017 345,754 1,728,771 1.728,771 660 7,470 660 7,470 660 7,470* * --78 1,188 9,316 9.316 1,186 9.316 9,316 1.186 9.316 9,316 11 87 -11 87 508 89,497 508 89.497 508 89,497 87 -- -..-660 17 2 18 0 0 0 8 1 8 32 3 36 3 0 4 96 14 110 33 5 38 189 25 214 7.470 265 1,223 9.618 9,316 18 0 8 36 4 110 38 214 302-.* * ..540--.* .-Z700* ..5-089 89.497 -2,700 656 4 24 55 1.192 360 2.290 656 4 24 55 1'192 360 2,290 2290 2!290 1,050 1.050 162,629 17,515 2,560 162,629 17,515 2,560 9-9*
* 0-* 6 1 10 1 6 2 18 10 16 TLG Service., Ine.
Cooper Nuclear Stationa Decrommissionting Coast Ansalysis Document N01.1590-02, Rev. I Appendix C, Page 11 of"35 Table C-1 Cooper Nuclear Station 2014 DECON Decommissioning Cost Estimate (thousands of 2008 dollars)Off-Site LLRW NRC Spent Fuel Site Processed Burial Volumes Burial I Utility and Activtty Oecon Removal Packaging Transport Processing Disposal Other Total Total Li. Ter-T .Management Restoration Volume Clans A Class 8 Class C GTCC Processed Craft Contractor Index Acvitiits Description Cast Cost Costs Costs Costs Costs ste Contintesc Costs Costs Costs Costs Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet WI. Lbs. Manhours Manhours Period 30 Period-Dependent Costs 30.4.1 Insurance 3e.4.2 Propery taxes 30.4.3 Heavy equipment rental 3e.4.4 Plant energy budget 3e.4.5 Securnty Staff Cost 3e.4.6 Utility Staff Cost 30.4 Subtotal Period 3e Period-Dependent Costs 3e.0 TOTAL PERIOD 30 COST PERIOD 3f -ISFSI Site Restoration Period 31 Direct Deconmissioning Adivities Period 31 Additional Costs 3f.2.1 ISFSI Demolition 3f2 Subtotal Period 3f Additional Costs Period 31 Collateral Costs 31.3.1 SmaI tool anowance 31.3 Subtotal Period 31 Collateral Costs Period 3f Period-Dependent Costs 3f.4.1 Insurance 3f.4.2 Property taxes 3f.4.3 Heavy equipment rental 3f.4.4 Plant energy budget 3f.4.5 Security Staff Cost 3f.4.9 Utaity Staff Cost 3f.4 Subtotal Period 3W Period-Dependent Costs 3f.0 TOTAL PERIOD 31 COST PERIOD 3 TOTALS TOTAL COST TO DECOMMISSION 232 232 897 4 24 487 487-2t7-2 --145 303 249 699 55 1,896 44 44 14 159 0 1 35 267 46 349 37 287 132 1,063 495 3,370 80 611 80 611 O 3 0 3 159 1 -267 349 287 1,063 3,370 1,050 5,013 3,803-68,816 162,629 17,515 11,376 611 4,336 160 4.336 18S 3 ------3 ------1 0 1 1 79 12 91 91 155 23 179 179 2,569-110 16 126 126 1,594 79 266 52 396 396 4,163 568 --310 132 1,010 1,010 -4.336 4.323 14,948 664 24 -7.524 164.475 26,158 213,793 9,495 171,591 32.707 1.050 -508 252.126 122,930 2,085,694 9.296 57,845 11.199 7,212 30.933 56,640 481,317 117.614 772,058 516,078 231,584 34.396 319.826 233,906 3,877 976 508 31,646,710 905,345 5,788.586 TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nacka, Sotation De-i-~muioning Cast An.aLyxia Document N01-1590.002, Rev. I Appendix C, Page 12 of 35 Table C-1 Cooper Nuclear Station 2014 DECON Decommissioning Cost Estimate (thousands of 2008 dollars)Off-Situ LLRW NRC Spent Fuel Situ Processed Burial Volumes Burial I Utility and Activity Decon Removal Packaging Transport Processing Disposal Other Total Total LIc. Turm. Management Restoration Volume Class A Class B Claus C GTCC Processed Craft Contractor Index Activity Descriptin Cost Cost Costs Costs Costs Costs Costs Continaencv Costs Costs Costs Costs Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Wt. Lbs. Manhours Manhours TOTAL COST TO DECOMMISSION WITH 17.97% CONTINGENCY:
$772,058 thousands of 2008 dollars TOTAL NRC UCENSE TERMINATION COST IS 65.55% OR: $606,078 thousands of 2008 dollars SPENT FUEL MANAGEMENT COST IS 30% OR: $231,584 thousands of 2008 dollars ON-NUCLEAR DEMOUTION COST IS 4.46% OR: $34,396 thousands of 2006 dollars TOTAL LOW-LEVE RADIOACTIVE WASTE VOLUME BURIED (EXCLUDING GTCC): 238,758 cubic feet TOTAL GREATER THAN CLASS C RADWASTE VOLUME GENERATED:
600 cubic feet TOTAL SCRAP METAL REMOVED: 30,345 tons'OTALCRAFT LABOR REQUIREMENTS:
905,346 man-hours End Notes: Weu -indicates that this actsty not charged as decommissioning expense.a -indicates that this activity performed by decommissioning staff.0 -indicates trat this value is less than 0.5 but is non-zero.a ceal cotaining"-" indicates a zero value TLG Services, Inc.
0 Cooper Nuclear Stalin Decommissioning Coal Analysis Document N01.1590-002, Rev. I Appendix r, Page 13 of 35 Table C-2 Cooper Nuclear Station 2014 Delayed DECON Decommissioning Cost Estimate (thousands of 2008 dollars)I Activity Off-Situ LLRW NRC Spent Fuel Site Processed Burial Volumes Burial IaUoiy end Decon Removal Packaging Transport Processing Disposal Other Total Total Lic. Term. Management Restoration Volume Class A Class B Class C GTCC Processed Craft Contractor Cnst cost costs costs Costs Costs Costs Continaeny Casts Costs Costs Costa Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Wt. Lbs. Manhours Manhours I ActWIty II Ind.. ;'inl]nn Index Acdvttv Description PERIOD Ia -Shutdown through Transition Peried 1 a Direct Decommissioning Activties Sa.1.1 SAFSTOR site characterization survey la. 1.2 Prepare preliminary decommissioning cost la. 1.3 Notificion of Cessation of Operations la.1.4 Remove fuel & source material la.1.5 Notilication of Permanent Defueling la.e 16 Deactivate plant systems & process waste la.1.7 Prepare and submit PSDAR la.1.8 Review piant dwgs & specs.1l.1.9 Perform detailed red survey 10.1.10 Estimate by-product inventory 1:.1.11 End product description la.1.12 Detailed by-product inventory la.1.13 Define major work sequence 1.1.14 Perform SER and EA 1a8..15 Perform SitsSpecttc Cost S"udy Activity Specifcations la.16,1.1 Prepare plant and facilies for SAFSTOR Ia.1.16.2 Plant systems ,a.1-16.3 Plant structures and buildings 18.1.16.4 Waste management la.1.16.5 Facility and site dormancy la:1.1816 Total Detailed Work Procedures 10.1.17.1 Plantsystems 10.1.17.2 Facilitiy closeout & dormancy la.1.17 Total la.1.18 Procure vacuum drying system 1l.1,19 Draintde-energize non-cont.
systems la 1,20 Drain & dry NSSS 1I.1.21 Drainlde~energbe contaminated systems 1:.122 Oeconssecure contaminated systems la.1 Subtotal Period 1a Activity Costs Penod 18 Collateral Costs 18.3.1 Spent Fuel Capital and Transfer la.3.2 Corporate Overheads 18.3 Subtotal Period 18 CoUeateral Costs Period 18 Period-Dependent Costs la.4.1 Insurance 10.4.2 Property taues la,4.3 Health physics supplies la.4.4 Heavy equipment rental 18.4.5 Disposeal of DAW generated 18.4.6 Plant energy budgel 1a.4.7 NRC Fees a8.4.8 Emergency Planning Fees 10.4.9 Spent Fuel Pool OAM'a.4.10 ISFSI Operating Costs 1..4.11 Security Staff Cost 346 130 200 130 100 100 150 100 310 o0o 104 450 450 20 150 150 a a 30 230 230 20 10 150 15 115 115 15 115 115 23 173 173 15 115 115 47 357 357 75 575 575 74 566 566 63 479 479 47 359 359 30 230 230 30 230 230 243 1,864 1,864 18 136 136 18 138 138 36 274 274 1,300 2,000 1,300 1,000 1,000 1,500 1,000 3,100 5,000 417 312 200* 200* 1,621 4,920 4,167 3,120 2,000 2,000 16,207* ---l11* ---120--.-238 1,183 1,200 2.383 10 2 12 12 1]0o a 3,935 642 4.577 4,577 35.890----10,335* ---3,105-.--13.440 370 368 1,600 4 73 -927 706 1,185 745 85 6,021 1,550 11,886 468 3,570 3,570 2,016 15,456 3.570 160 1,760 1,760 0 4 4 93 463 463 55 423 423 19 100 100 139 1,066 1,066 71 776 776 118 1,303 112 857 13 98 -903 6.924 6,24 857 98 1,575 14,445 1 157,471 11.888 6 11,888 6 TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station Decomnmissionintg Cast Annalysis Document NI01.1590-002, Rev. 1 Appendix C, Page 14 of 35 Table C-2 Cooper Nuclear Station 2014 Delayed DECON Decommissioning Cost Estimate (thousands of 2008 dollarsu)I Activity Off-Site LLRW NRC Spent Fuel Site Processed Burial Volumes Burial I Utility and I Decon Removal Packaging Transport Processing Disposal Other Total Total Lic. Tenn. Management Restoration Volume Class A Class B Class C GTCC Processed Craft Contractor Cost Cost Costs Costs Costs Cests Costs Contingencv costs Costs Costs Costs Co. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Wt. Lbs. Manhours Manhours m  n ex Ac &#xfd; c at n Period la Period-Dependent Costs (continued) la.4.12 Utility Staff Cost 1a.4 Subtotal Period Ia Period-Dependent Costs la.0 TOTAL PERIOD o a COST PERIOD lb -SAFSTOR Limited DECON Activities Period l b Direct Decornmissiornng Actevities Decartarinaion of Site Buildings lb.1.1.1 Reactor l1b.1.1.2 Augmented Radwaste lb.1.1.3 Miscellaneous Struaurns
-Contaminated lb.1.1.4 Mult-Purpese Facility lb.1.1.5 Radwaste lbit.1.6 Turbine 1.1.1 Totals 10b.1 Subtotal Period lb Activity Costs Period lb Additional Costs lb.2.1 Spent Fuel Pool Isolation 1b.2.2 Asbestos Insulation Disposal 0b.2 Subtotal Period l b Additional Costs Period lb Collateral Costs lb.3.1 Decon equipment l b.3.2 Process liquid waste 10b3.3 Small tool allowance 1b.3.4 Spent Fuel Capital and Transfer lb.3.5 Corporate Overheads 1b.3 Subtotal Period l b Collateral Costs Perod lb Period-Dependent Costs lb.4.1 Decon supplies 1b.4.2 Insurance lb.4.3 Property tones 1b.4.4 Health physics supplies 1b.4.5 Heavy equipment rental 1 b0.4 Disposal of DAW generated 0b.4.7 Plant energy budget 1b.4.6 NRC Fees lb4.9 Emergency Planning Fees 1b04.10 Spent Fuel Pool O&M 1b.4.11 ISFSI Operating Costs 1b.4.12 Security Staff Cost 1b.4.13 Utlity Staff Cost 10.4 Subtotal Period 1b Peoitod-Dependent Costs 1b.0 TOTAL PERIOD I b COST 738 738 2,929 -52 376 68 158 520 4.103 4.103-22,690 73 33,962 73 51,338 3,403 26,093 26,093 5,087 39,867 37,609 7.745 59,901 45,757 1.465 4,394 4,394 26 78 78 188 565 565 34 101 101 79 237 237 260 780 780 2,052 6,155 6,155 2,052 6.155 6,155 2,258 14,144 1.575 1,575.- 9,407 1,411 10,818 10,818 773 1 65 558 -265 1,662 1,662 773 1 65 558 9,407 1,676 12,480 12,480 10,333 10.333 S --423.400 14.445 5 580,871 14,445 5 616,761-68,438 -1,562 8.542 2.036 4.761 15.667 101,008 101.006 134,329 10.002 134.329 10,002 93,644 304 93,644 304 15.968 5 X30829 104,400 15,908 5 143,229 243,942 111,318 143,229 713 229-70 942 70 1,156 473 91 1,156 564 6.201 1.407 74 392 74 392 5 3 5 3 850 480 448 1,510-768 448 2,276 121-1 81 -229 174 292 184 21 1.485-5,595 81 8,101 1,087 19.783 107 820 820 293 1,436 1,436 11 81 81 227 1,737 -115 880 880 752 4,954 3,217 289 1,445 1,445 12 133 133 0 1 1 118 592 592 14 104 104 21 110 110 34 203 263 17 191 191 29 321 28 211 3 24 -223 1,707 1,707 839 8,434 8.424 1,628 11.538 10,981 8,107 35,126 32,833 1.737 1,737 321 211 24 557 2,294 1.561 1,561 1,741 1,741 13,635 TLG Services, lne, Cooper Nuclear Station Deromnmissonieong Cost Analysis Document NO1.1590-002, Rev. I Appendix C, Page 15 of 35 Table C-2 Cooper Nuclear Station 2014 Delayed DECON Decommissioning Cost Estimate (thousands of 2008 dollars)Off-Site LLRW NRC Spent Fuel Site Processed Burial Volumes Burial / Utilty and Activity Decon Removal Packaging Transport Processing Disposal Other Total Total LIc. Term. Management Restoration Volume Class A Class B Class C GTCC Processed Craft Contractor Index Activt Description Cost Cost Costs Costs Costs Costs Costs Contln en costs costs s Costs Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Co. Feet Co. Feel Wt Lbs. Manhours Manhours PERIOD lc -Preparations for SAFSTOR Dormancy Period 1c Direct Decommissioning Activities 1c.1.1 Prepare support equipment for storage 1c.1 .Inslall containment pressure equal. lines Ic.1.3 Interim survey prior to dormancy 1c. 1.4 Secure building accesses 1c. 1.5 Prepare & submit interim report 1c.1 Subtotal Period 1c Activity Costs Period Ic Collateral Costs Ic.3.1 Process iquid oaste ic.3.2 Small to0 altuwance 1c.3.3 Spent Fuel Capital and Transfer 1c.3.4 Corporate Overneads lc.3 Subtotal Period lc Collatera Costs Period 1 c Period-Dependent Costs 0l.4.1 Insurance 1c.4.2 Property taces IC.4.3 Helth physics supplies 1c.4.4 Heavy equipment rental lc.4 5 Disposal of DAW generated lc.4.6 Plant energy budget lc.4.7 NRC Fees 1c.4.8 Emergency Planning Fees le.4.9 Spent Fuel Pool O&M 1.4.10 ISFS1 Operatong Costs 1c.4.11 Security Staff Cost 1C.4.12 U~ty Staff Cost 1c.4 Subtotal Period Ic Period-Dependent Costs 1c.0 TOTAL PERIOD 1c COST PERIOD I TOTALS PERIOD 2a -SAFSTOR Dormancy wRh Wet Spent Fuel Storage Period 2a Direct Decommissioning Activities 2a.1.1 Quarteply Inspection 2a.1.2 Sermi-annual envionmental survey 2a. 1.3 Prepare reports 2a 1.4 Bituminous roof replacement 20.1.5 Maintenance supplies 2a.1 Subtotal Period 2a Activity Costs Period 2a Co/Lateral Costs 2B.3.1 Spent Fuel Capital and Transfer 2a.32 Corporate Overheads 20.3 Subtotal Period 2a Collateral Costs Period 2a Period-Dependent Costs 2a.4.1 Insurance 2a.4.2 Property laces 2a.4.3 Health physics supplies 387 31 419 733 58 791 58 445 445 5 36 36 220 953 953 a 9 67 67 291 1,501 1,501 301 1,475 1,475 0 3 3 229 1,756 -116 890 890 646 4,124 2,368 235 235 76 403 76 403 460 1,527-774 460 2,301 1,756 1,756 160 92 252 1 1 235 673 77 404 8.437 2,818 162 866 122 12 134 134 1 0 1 1 40 200 200-14 105 105 18 -5 25 25 231 35 266 266 176 18 194 194 295 30 325 -186 28 214 21 3 24 -1,501 225 1,726 1,726 5,657 849 6,505 6,505 18 8,191 1257 9,720 9,157 478 11.283 2,195 15,345 13,026 1,638 82,404 16,047 110,372 91,616 325 214 24 563 2,319 18,757 1,603 1,603 393 393 1,996 17,205 3.000 700 15,696 583 19,396 583 96.195 313 96,195 313 3,601 1 39,260 105,560 3,601 1 144,820 99,796 19,710 145,403 358,183 131.033 905,393-.-..-63-...503-.....568 9 72 72 126 629 629 135 701 701-..-26.468 3,970 30,435 -* ..-4,139 621 4,759 4,759-. -.-30,604 4,501 35,195 4,759 30,435 --30,435 .-2,158 .-18 344 1,962 16 196 2,158 2 18 -88 430 430 4LG Services, Inc.
0 Coop~er Nuclear Station Decomsmissioning Cast Anaslysis Document N01-1590-002, Rev. I Appendix C, Page 16 of 35 Table C-2 Cooper Nuclear Station 2014 Delayed DECON Decommissioning Cost Estimate (thousands of 2008 dollars)IActivity Off-Site LLRW NRC Spent Fuel Site Processed Burial Volumes Burial / Utility and Decon Removal Packaging Transport Processing Disposal Other Total Total Lic. Teom. Management Restoration Volume Class A Class B Class C GTCC Processed Craft Contractor Cost Cost Costs Costs Cost. Costs Costs Continmescy Costs Costs Costs Costs Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Wt, Lbs. Manhours Manhours E H n ex Peoted 2a Period-Dependent Costs (continued) 2a.4.4 Disposal of DAW generated 2a.4.5 Plant energy budget 20a.4.6 NRC Fees 2a.4.7 Emergency Planning Fees 2a.4.8 Spent Fuel Pool O&M 2a.4.9 ISFSI Operating Costs 20.4.10 Security Staff Cost 2a.4.11 Utity Staff Cost 20.4 Subtotal Period 2a Period-Dependent Costs 20.0 TOTAL PERIOD 2a COST PERIOD 2b. SAFSTOR Dormancy with Dry Spent Fuel Storage Period 2b Direct Decommissioning Activities 2b.1.1 Quarterly Inspection 2b.1.2 Semi-annual environmental survey 2b.1.3 Prepare reports 2b.1.4 Bituminous roof replacement 2b..1.5 Maintenance supplies 2b.1 Subtotal Period 20 Activity Costs Pertod 2b Collateral Costs 2b.3.1 Spent Fuel Capital and Transfer 2b.3 Subtotal Period 2b Collateral Costs Period 2b Period-Dependent Costs 2b.4.1 InsuSrnce 2b.4.2 Property tooas 2b.4.3 Health physics supplies 2b.4A .Dopoe l of DAWgenerated 2b.4.5 Plant energy budget 2b.4.6 NRC Fees 20.4.7 Emergency Planning Fees 20.4.8 ISFS1 Operating Costs 2).4.9 Security Staff Cost 2b.4.10 Utility Staff Cost 2b.4 Subtotal Period 20 Peorid-Dependent Costs 2b.0 TOTAL PERIOD 2b COST PERIOD 2 TOTALS PERIOD 3 -Reactivate Sits Following SAFSTOR Dormancy Peaod 3a Direct Decommissioring Acrvities 32.1.1 Prepare preliminary decommnssioning cOst 3a.1.2 Review plant dwgs & specs.3a.1.3 Perform detailed red survey 3a.1.4 End product description 3a. 1.5 Detailed by-product inventory 3a.1.6 Define major work sequence 3a. 1.7 Perform SER and EA 3a. 1.0 Perform Site-Speolc Cost Study 3a.1.9 Prepare/submit License Termination Plan 3a.1.10 Receive NRC approval of termination plan 344 344 13 13 13 198 -52 270 270 -742 111 853 -853 807 81 887 887 -3,374 337 3,712 3.712 2,984 448 3,431 3,431 340 51 391 391 17,728 2,659 20,387 20,387 18.816 2,822 21,639 21,639 198 46,768 6,845 54,176 1,587 52,588 198 77,939 11,571 90,072 7,048 83,024 4.267 39,139 13 444,561--329,769 4,267 39,139 13 774,330 4.267 39,139 13 774,330 a 65 497 497 863 4,317 4,317 928 4,814 4,814 432 3,453 3,886 18.092 2,714 20.806 18,092 2,714 20,806 20,806 20,800 1,981 1,981 1,981 2.325 80 44 80 44 80 44 93 51 S11.977 1,198 13.174 13.174 110 11 121 -121-495 2,476 2,476 1,268 -332 1,725 1,725 -2,546 382 2,928 2,928 5,536 554 6,090 6,090 23,161 2,316 25,477 25,477 2,332 350 2,682 2,682 70,072 10,511 80,583 80,583 51,313 7,697 59,010 -59,010 1.268 167,047 23,845 194,266 10,290 183,976 1.268 189,025 27,487 219,886 15,104 204,781 1.467 266.964 39,058 30%,957 22,152 287,805 27,278 250,212 84 1,547,177 916.846 27,278 250.212 84 2.464,023 27.278 250.212 84 2.464,023 31,545 289,351 97 3,238,353 130 460 100 130 750 310 500 410 20 150 150 69 529 529 15 115 115 20 150 150 113 863 863 47 357 357 75 575 575 61 471 471 a 1,300 4,600 1,000 1,300 7,500 3,100 5,000 4,090 TLG Service., Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station Decommissioning Cost Analysis Doeumnent N01-1590.002, Rev. I Appendix C, Page 17 of 35 Table C-2 Cooper Nuclear Station 2014 Delayed DECON Decommissioning Cost Estimate (thousands of 2008 dollars)Off-Sits LLRW NRC Spent Fuel Site Processed Burial Volures Burial I Utility and Activity Decon Removal Packaging Transport Processing Disposal Other Total Total Lic. Term. Management Restoration Volume Class A Class B Class C GTCC Processed Craft Contractor Index ActivSit Description Cost Cost Costs Costs Costs Costs Costs Contingenc Costs Costs Costs Costs Cu. Feet Cu. Foet Co. Fecl Ca. Fot Cu. Feet WLt Lbs. Manhours Manhours Activity Specifiations 3a.1.11.1 Re-activate plant & temporary facilities 30.1.11.2 Plant systems 3a.1.11.3 Reactor internals 3a.1.11,4 Reactor vessel 3a.1.11.5 Sacrif-al shield 3a.1.1 1.6 Moisture separatorslroheateo 3a 11, 7 Relnforced concrete 3a.,. 1.1 Main Turbie 3a.1.11.9 Main Condelsers 3a. 1.11.10 Pressure suppression structure 3a.1. 1111 Dryrele 3a 1.11 2 Plant structures
& buildings 3a.11.13 Wastse asagement 3a.1.1 1.14 Facility & site ciut 3.1.11 Total Plann & site Preparations 3a.1.12 Prepare dismantling sequence 3a. 1.13 Plant prep. & temp. svces 3s.1,14 Design vater ciearnup system 3a.1.15 Rigging/Cont Cntt Envlps/totlitgletc.
3a.. 116 Procure casks/finers
& containers 3a, 1 Subtotal Period 3a Acivity Costs Perod 3a Period-Dependent Costs 3a.4.1 'osuraro 3a.4-2 Propefry tanes 3..4.3 Healt physics supplies 3a.4.4 Heavy equipment rental 3a.4.5 Disposal of DAW generated 3a.4.6 Plant energy budget 3a.4.7 NRC Fees 3a.4.8 Security Staff Cost 3a.4.9 Utility Staff Cost 3a.4 Subtotal Period 3a Period-Dependeol Costs 3a.0 TOTAL PERIOD 3a COST PERIOD 3b -Decomrissioning Preparations Penod 3b Direct Decommissioning Activities Detailed Work Procedures 3b.1.1.1 Plant systems 3b.1.1.2 Reactor internals 3b.1.1.3 Remaining budings 3b.1.1.4 CRDousigs
& Nis 3...1. 5 Incore instumrentation 31,.1. 6 Removal primary cosotarnmnt 3b.1.1.7 Reactor vessel 3b.1.1.8 Faciity  31b.1 .9 Sacriofna shreld 3b.1.1.10 Reinforced concrete 3b.1 111 Main Turbie 3b.1.1.12 Man Condensers 737 417 710 650 50 100 160 209 209 200 160 312 460 90 4.463 324 368 691 4 2 4 2 240 2,700 140 2,100 123 12,558 420 4 62 -927 249 2,855-14,190 62 18,644 ill 848 763 63 479 431 107 817 817 98 748 748 8 58 58 15 115 115 24 184 92 31 240 240 31 240 240 30 230 230 24 184 184 47 359 179 69 529 529 14 104 52 669 5,133 4,677 36 276 276 405 3,105 3.105 21 181 161 315 2,410 2,415 18 141 141 1,883 14,439 13.683 42 462 462 0 4 4 81 405 405 55 423 423 16 84 84 139 1,066 1,066 25 274 274 428 3,283 3,283 2,128 16,318 16,318 2,915 22,318 22,318 85 48"92 179 52 456 ---456 ---1.329 1,329 7,370 4,167 7,100 6,500 O5D 1,00O 1.600 2,088 2,088 2,000 1,600 3,120 4.600 900 44,633 2,400 t1,400 1.230 77,559 4 65,179 2 258,629 4 323,807 12,190 12.190-691 4 2 62 31,200 4,799 36,758 36,302 456 1,329 12.190 4 401,366 473 400 135 100 100 200 363 120 120 100 208 209 71 544 490 60 460 460 20 155 39 15 115 115 15 115 115 30 230 230 54 417 417 18 138 69 18 138 138 15 115 56 31 239 239 31 240 240 118 ---69 --4,733 4,000 1,350 t1.000 1,000 2.000 3,630 1,200 1,200 1,000 2,080 2,088 TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Statdion Decuraraissioniag Cost Anobait.Document NO1-1590-002, Rev. 1 Appendix C, Page 18 of 35 Table C-2 Cooper Nuclear Station 2014 Delayed DECON Decommissioning Cost Estimate (thousands of 2008 dollars)jA tin vti On-site LLRW NRC Spent Fuel Site Processed Burial Volumes Burial I UUtty and I D0con Removal Packaging Transport Processing Disposal Other Total Total Lie. Termo Management Restoreaton Volume Class A Class B Class C GTCC Processed Craft Contractor Cost Cost Costs Costs Costs Costs Costs Contingency Costs Costs Costs Costs Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet WL. Lbs. Manhourm Manaoure I n exU L~~ l Detaied Work Procedures (continued) 3b.1.1.13 Moisture separators&
reheatars 3b.1.1.14 Radwaste building 3b.1.1.15 Reactor building 3b.1.1 Total 3b.1 Subtotal Period 3b Acivity Costs Period 3b Additioeal Costs 3b.2.1 Site Characterization 3b.2 Subtotal Period 3b Additional Costs Pedod 30 Collateral Costs 3b.3.1 Decon equipment 3b.3.2 DOC ldaff relocation expenses 3b.3.3 Pipe cutting equipment 3b.3 Subtotal Period 3b Collateral Costs Period 3b Period-Dependent Costs 3b.4.1 Decon srupplas 3b.4.2 Insurance 3b.4.3 Property tuaes 3b.4.4 Health physics supplies 3b.4.5 Heavy equipment rental 3b.4.6 Disposal of DAW generated 3b.4.7 Plant energy budget 3b.4.8 NRC Fees 3b.4.9 Security Staff Cost 3b.4.10 DOC Staff Cost 3b.4.11 Utlity Staff Cost 3b.4 Subtotal Period 3b Period-Dependent Costs 3W.0 TOTAL PERIOD 3b COST PERIOD 3 TOTALS PERIOD 4a -Large Component Removal Period 4a Diract Decomnmissioning Activites Nuclear Steam Supply System Removal 4a.1.1.1 Recirculation System Piping & Valves 4a.1.1.2 Recircutatio Pumps & Motors 4a.1.1.3 CRDMs & Nis Removal 4a,1.1.4 ReactorVessel Internals 4a.1.1.5 Vessel & Internals GTCC Disposal 4a.1.1.6 Reactor Vessel 4a.1.1 Totals Removal of Major Equipment 4a. 1.2 Main TurbiterGeneatorr 4a. 1 .3 Main Condensers Cascading Costs from Clean Budding Demolition 4a.1.4.1 Reactor 4a.1,4.2 Augmented Radheuste 4a.1.4.3 Radwaste 200 273 273 3.274 3,274 30 230 230 41 314 283 41 314 283 491 3,765 3,405 491 3,765 3,405 31 31 360 360 2,000 2.730 2,730 32,741 32,741 5,395 1,619 7,014 7,014 5,390 1.619 7,014 7,014 713 t1,000 713 1,000 22 -179 184 22 363 735 1,363 735 2,055 912 912 107 820 820 137 1,049 1,049 150 1,150 1,150 394 3,019 3.019-5 27 27 246 25 270 270 2 0 2 2 45 224 224-28 212 212 35 -9 48 48 465 70 534 034 125 12 137 137 1,431 215 1,648 1,646 4,378 657 5.035 5.035-7.114 1,067 8,181 8.181 35 13,781 2,133 16,317 16,317 35 23,342 4,830 30,115 29,755 97 54,542 9,435 68,872 66.056 360 816 754 754 754 2,083 6,913 2 32,679 58,560--129,669 6.913 2 220,907 6,913 2 253,648 19,104 6 655,014 3 18 70 6 28 24 139 86 1.959 5,054 132 7,.50 14 11 377 3,871 906 5,179 14 25 272 101 512 512 26 321 95 488 488 68 317 174 1,099 1,099 912 4,981 155 5,222 17,185 17,185-7,470 -1,120 8,590 8,590 351 3,006 155 5,631 15,103 15,103 1,371 25 16,367 309 12,343 42,977 42,977 100 897 119,606 2,487-1,188 132,880 1,125 6,935 --126,494 3,972 1,878 1.377 344 -359,044 18,900 888-508 89,497 ---14,106 ---1,447,089 18,900 888 100 25.004 1,377 344 508 2,274,810 45,384 1,776 167 845 372 6.376 708 588 259 4,439 260 25 43 1,138 8,898 8,898 940 6,932 6,932 39 299 299 4 28 28 7 50 50 61,604 2,772,179 4,438 42,889 1,930,000 18,519 2,486 235 359 TLG Servivea, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station Deconmissioning Cost Analysis Document N01-1590-002, Rev. I Appendix C, Page 19 of 35 Table C-2 Cooper Nuclear Station 2014 Delayed DECON Decommissioning Cost Estimate (thousands of 2008 dollars)IActivity off-Site LLRW NRC Spent Fuel Site Processed Burial Volumes Burial I Utility and Decon Removal Packaging Transport Processing Disposal Other Total Total Lit. Term. Management Restoration Volume Class A Class B Class C GTCC Processed Craft Contractor C,..s Cos Cost. Coo. uts Costs C Contlononen Crste Costs Coto Centst C... Feat Co. Feet Cu. Feet Co. Feet Co. Feet WE Lbs. Munoutoos Monhouts 1 M ex v c of It cost cast costs costs costs C;0sts Costs ContInQencv costs costs costs costs Cu Feet Cu Fast Cu Feet Cu Feet Cu Fast WL Lbs. Manhours Manhours Cascading Costs from Clean Building Demolition (coninued) 4a.1.4.4 Turbine 4a 1 .4 Totals Disposal of Plant Systems 4a.1.5.1 Augmented Radwaste El 877 AreslA 4a. 1.5.2 Augmented Radwaste El 903 Ar.elA 4a.1.5.3 Augmented Radmuste El 918 ArealA 4a.1.5.4 Augmented Radwaste El 929 ArealA 4a.1.5.5 Augmented Radwaste El 929 Aeal B 4a.1.5.6 DRYWELL ArealA 4a. 1.5.7 DRYWELL Area16 4a.1 .5'8 Turbine El 932 ArealB 4a 1.5.9 Turbine El 932 Area2C 4a 1.5.10 Turbine El 932 Ara3C 4a. .5 11 YardArealB 4a15 Totats-285 -6 13- .203 66 52 21 3 457 112 324 67 518 1,831 28 28 6 7 10 9 4 5 O 0 85 84 1 5 16 86 00 264 202 487 24 11 6,828 2,500 432 104 139-73 4 -1,289 75 2 1.477 -4,517 -6.073 2,040 168 23 17,081 18,430 309 4a 1.6 Scaffolding in support of decommissioning
-2,049 4a.1 Subtotal Period 4a Acviaty Costs 132 12,816 Period 4a Coulateml Costs 4a.3.1 Process iquid aste 61 -48.3.2 Small tool allowance
-90 4a.3 Subtotal Period 4a Collateral Costs 61 90 Perod 4a Perod-Dependent Costs 4a.4.1 Decon supplies 49 4a4.2 Insurance 4a4.3 Property laxes 4.4.4 Health physics supplies 944 4as4.5 Heavy equipment rental 1,981 4a.4.6 Disposal of DAW generated 4a.47 Plant energy budget 484.8 NRC Fees 4a.4.9 Liquid Radwaste Processing Equipment/Services 4a.4.10 Security Staff Cost 4a'4.11 DOC Staff Cost 4.4.812 Uility Steff Cost 4a.4 Subtotal Period 4a Period-Dependent Costs 49 2,925 4a.0 TOTAL PERIOD 4o COST 242 15,631 PERIOD 4b -Site Decontamination Period 4b Direct Decommissioning Actvities 4b81.1 Remove spent fuel rocks 262 33 Disposal of Plant Systems 4b.1.2.1 ContrlElO2 Areul- 280 4b1 .2.2 Contro El 03 Amel C 8170 4b.1.2.3 Control El 918 AealC 66 4b.1.2.4 Control El 932 AmealC 22 4b5.1.2.5 Intake 101 4b.1,2.6 Mult-Purpose Fauility 198 4b 12.7 Radwaste El 877 ArealA 398 21 113 129 21 113 129 26 14 26 14 6.885 2,628 78 68 7 39 3 14 75 62 549 4 405 87 737 420 3,199 11,638 16,014 405 33,548 17,081 18,964 33,858-1,348 674 239-949 43 328 328 92 705 705 166 857 857 44 228 228 50 260 260 25 127 127 1 8 8 458 2,373 2,373 41 235 235 317 2,220 2,220 1 9 10 78 852 6,201 6,201 1,964 12,597 12,510 547 2,821 2.821 17,025 74,831 74,844 82 409 408 14 104 94 96 512 502 12 61 61 55 604 604 0 5 4 236 1,180 1,180 297 2,278 2,278 106 551 551 148 1,135 1,135 74 811 811 63 483 483 480 3,679 3,679 1,746 13,384 13,384 2,402 18,416 18,416 5,619 42,586 42,585 22,740 118,029 117,931 498 2,306 2,308 176 1,176 1,178 25 195 -10 76 3 28 15 118 88 541 541 353 1,838 1,836 2,055 469 765.-324 38 5,726 806 10-15.808 9 78-48,385 -87 65,016 9,348 1,621 101 117 171,229 34,453 1,377--451 10 -10 451 0 8,708 0 -8,708 -98 171,229 43,613 1,377 172,205 5,668 41,608 1,842 55,345 1,432 29,038 579 1,529 75 513.627 12,634 33,576 3,384, 641,963 9,170--237-2,083 1,964,114 14,340 3,453,003 51.444 81,992 27,411 344 508 10,511,780 155,694 1,776-27,075 88 -27,075 88 4.419 7,498 344 79,878 27 73,036 161,263 292,143 79,878 27 526,441 508 10,618,740 155,809 528,217-537,141 1,004 292,908 7,797 5,155 2,100 702-3,136 103,862 5,430 377,917 10,930 5,986-7.213 195 76 26 116 2,558-5,097 MTG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document N01.1590-002, Rev. I Appendix C, Page 20 of 35 Table C-2 Cooper Nuclear Station 2014 Delayed DECON Decommissioning Cost Estimate (thousands of 2008 dollars)IActivity Off-Sits LLRW NRC spent Fuel Sit e Processed Burial Volume ws tur ial IU tiit a .. I Decon Removal Packaging Transport Processing Disposal Other Total Total Lic. Tero. Management Restoration Volume Class A Class B Class C GTCC Processed Craft Contractor Cost Cost Costs Costs Costs Costs Costs Contingeney Costs Costs Costs Costs Ca. Feet Co. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet WtL Lbs. Manhours Manhours n as -I-...-Y --Disposal of Plant Systems (continued) 4b.1.2.8 Radwaste EJ 877 Aea2A 4b.1.2.9 Redwaste El 877 Area3A 4b.1,210 Radwase El 903 AnealA 4b11.2.11 Radwaste El 903 Area2A 4b.1.2.12 Radwe seEl 903 Area3A 4b.1.2.13 Radwaste El 918 ArealA 4b.1.2.14 Radwasas El 918 Area2A 4b.1,2.15 Radwaste E 918 Area3A 41,h*2.16 Rawasis El 934 ArealA 4b.1.2.17 Radwaste El 934 A0ea2A 4b.1t... 18 Radwaste El 949 ArealA 4b.1.2.19 Reactor El 1001 ArealA 4b.1.2.20 Reactor EC 1001 Areal B 41b1 2.21 Reactor El 859ArealA 41,b.2.22 Reactor EC 859 ArealB 41b.12.22 Reactor El 859 Area2A 41,1.2.24 Reactor El 859 Area2B 4b1,.2,25 Reactor al 859 Area3A 41.1.2.26 Reactor C 8599 Ae3B 4b.1.2.27 Reactor El 859 Area4A 4b.1.2.28 Reactor El 859 Area4B 41,1.2.29 Reactor El 859 Area5A 41,1.2.30 Reactor E 859 AreaSB 4b11.2.31 Reactor El 903 AreaA 4b.1.2.32 Reactor El 903 ArealB 4b.1.2.33 Reactor EC 903 Area2A 4b,1.2.34 Reactor E 903 Area2B 4b.1.2.35 Reactor EC 903 Area3A 41.1.2.38 Reactor EC 903 Area3B 4b.1.2.37 Reactor EC 903 Area4 4b,1.2.38 Reactor El 903 Area4B 41,1.2.39 Reactor E6931 ArealA 4b,1.2.40 Reactor El931ArealB 4b.1.2.41 Reactor E 931 Amea2A 4b.1.2.42 Reactor El 931 Area2B 41 ,1.2.43 Reactor EC 931 Area3A 4b.1.2.44 Reactor El 931 Area3e 41.1.2.45 Reactor EC 631 Aea4C 4b.1,.2.46 Reactor El 931 Area5C 4b.,1.2.47 Reactor EC 959 ArealA 4b1,12.48 Reactor El 958 ArealB 4b1. 1 .49 Reactor EC 958 Arem2A 41b1.2.50 Reactor El 958 Area2B 4b.1.2.51 Reactor El 958 Area3A 4b.1.2.52 Reactor El 958 Afem3B 41b1.2.53 Reactor El 976 ArealA 4b.1.2.54 Reactor El 976 ArealB 4b.1.2.55 Reactor El 976 Area2A 4b.1.2.56 Reactor El 976 Arma2B 4b.1.2.57 Turbine 8SU2 ArealA 4b.1.2.58 Turbine El 812 Aream B 4b,1.2.59 Turbine El 812 Area2A 4b.1.2.60 TurObn El 892 Area2B 4b.1.2.61 Turbine C 882 Area3A 4b1,2 .3.62 Turbine EC 882 Area3B 4b.1.2.63 Turbine EC 903 ArealA 7 113 13 201 10 153 29 439 7 104 2 30 3 39 22 338 4 60 12 177 2 24 8 121 4 64 16 246 58 994 -26 401 8 131 9 -137 2 42 8 117 2 31 -17 262 2 41 651 32 550 O 6 11 190 iI -167 3 52 -9 136 3 52 3 52 40 692 -2 35 0 I 0 22 336 0 1 10 149 16 281 153 1 12 7 3 48 1 10 6 1 16 25 422 1 13 3 55 50 87 1,490 29 22 374 23 145 2,478 -I -15 41 213 213 72 372 372 68 351 351 165 856 856 37 190 190 12 64 64 15 75 75 136 705 705 22 115 115 72 370 370 9 47 47 45 230 230 26 157 157 83 430 430 269 1,771 1.U71 125 648 648 38 247 247 48 251 251 15 93 93 44 227 227 9 59 59 85 443 443 16 98 98 275 1,424 1.424 201 1,240 1,240 3 14 14 48 320 320 52 272 272 14 90 90 43 223 223 14 90 90 20 104 164 186 1,227 1,227 14 74 74 1 3 3 109 567 567 1 3 3 4 28 1 8 -54 278 278 87 554 554 49 253 253 6 37 37 21 109 109 7 39 39 7 36 36 104 703 703 5 26 26 18 114 114 23 118 116 335 2,313 2,313 13 67 67 112 721 721 10 52 52 548 3,805 3,805 6 32 32 613 M,56 684 1.955 463 135 201 1,690 266 808 105 537 689-1.091 10,641-1,780 1,406 -608 453-520 331 -1.163 442-2,892 5,890 --226 2,039 --741 553 -606 558 232 7.412-154 9 0 1,651 8-662 3,009-681 125 33 214 109 29 72 4,521 57 586-222 15,948-129 4,006 101 26,533 -S 6988 44.992 1,189 79.963 1,969 61,153 3,015 175.093 5,282 41.66 1,029 12.033 477 15,667 448 134,827 5,045 23.735 680 70,665 Z663 9.381 305 48,175 1,261 27,979 1,681 97,074 2,024 432,136 12,411 159,714 Z094 57,093 1,954 54,543 1,321 18,381 951 46,666 1,374 13,424 476 104,381 1,798 17.962 1,087 259,190 10,497 239.197 12.496 2,372 120 82,815 1,915 66,518 929 22,464 618 54,373 776 22,692 597 20,858 670 301,017 8,410 13,824 544 371 53 134,007 2,165 340 49 767-213 59,432 1,472 122,212 4,693 61,083 080 8,024 263 19,185 898 7,011 410 6,482 298 183,615 3,931 5,136 172 23,813 1,033 19,878 1,004 647.659 11,113 11,556 984 162,678 5,781 9,017 451 1,077,531 17,302 6,127 232 TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station Decommissioning Coast Analysis Document N01-1590.002, Rev. I Appendix C, Page 21 of 35 Table C-2 Cooper Nuclear Station 2014 Delayed DECON Decommissioning Cost Estimate (thousands of 2008 dollars)Off-Sits LLRW NRC Spent Fuel Sits Processed Burial Volumes Burial I Utilty and Activity Decon Removal Packaging Transport Processing Disposal Other Total Total Lie. Tanm. Management Restoration Volume Class A Class B Class C GTCC Processed Craft Contractor SIndex Activt'y Description Cost Cost Costs Costs Costs Costs Costs Continocv Costs Costs Costs Costs Cu. Foot Ca CFoFt Co.Foal Cu. Feet Co. Feet WI. Lbs. Manhours Manhours Disposal of piord Systems (contnued) 4b.12.64 Turbine El 903 ArealB 4b.1 .2.65 Turbine El 903 Area2A 4b. 1 .2.66 Turbine El 903 Area2B 4b. 1.2.67 Turbine El 903 Area3B 4bd 1.2.68 Turbine El 903 Area3C 4b.1.2.69 Turbine El 903 Ae&a4B 4b.1.2.70 Yard AreaiC 4b.1 .2 Totals 4b.1.3 Scaffolding in support of decommissioning Decontamination of Site Buildings 4b.1.4.1 Readsr 4b.1.4.2 Augmented Radwuast 4b.1.4.3 Miscetanleous Strutures
-Contaminated 41.1 4.4 MuS-Purpose Facility 4b 14.5 Radwasto 41,4.6 Turbine 4b.1.4 Totals 4b.1 Subtotal Period 4b Activity Costs Period 4b Addiaonal Costs 49.2.1 ISFSI Decontamination 4b.2.2 Final Site Survey 4b.2 Subtotal Period 4b Additional Costs 974 5 144 3 108 12 197 7,771 46 241 1 1 1 7 0 2 0 2 556 1,148 4.133 " 128 35 29 13,202 5,814-3,073 36 17 252 34 2.880 1,820 202 422 4,911 2.376 52 19 4 6 23 60 368 167 15 42 759 62 68 55 6 12 115 89 159 50 9 14 38 161 526 142 35 51 64 633 4,055 2,253 271 547 5,910 3,382 4,318 13,131 942 1,800 19,364 10,578 904 6,299 6,299 4 20 20 56 337 337 9 47 47 19 124 -7 49 49 30 227 -5,535 34,027 33,227 821 4,232 4,232 3,310 15,922 15,922 51 215 215 363 1,777 1,777 90 437 437 141 572 572 477 1,928 1.928 4,432 20,850 20,850 11,285 61,417 60,618 656 4 24 55 1.192 369 2,290 -.* --1,205 362 1,567 1,567 656 4 24 55 2.397 722 3,857 1,567 44,251--42 1,375 S -376 124 -299 227 -o00 141,342 27,486 2,431 151 52,579 39,538 242 1,099 8,129 452 1,234 1,567 404 2,953 688 11,664 63.275 57,271 800 207.048 90,895 2,290 * -1,050 2,290 1.050 945 6.000 373 69000 1.319 18.832 18,832 2,290 800 213.046 112.096 1,797,054 27.874 3.729 142 55,851 4.040 15,251 97-3,412 12,139 367-5,770 8,056,388 218,627 122,986 41,117 6,069,283 115,053 119,386 1,978 372,774 12,956 205,066 3,237 310,769 5,9963 1,193,496 18,679 8,270.774 157,766 16,987.290 418,513 162,629 17,515 2,560--12.480 162,829 17,515 15.040 Period 4b Collateral Costs 4b.3.1 Process liquid waste 128 -4b.3.2 Swall tool allowance 230 40.3.3 Decommissioning Equipment Disposition
--4b.3 Subtotal Period 4b Collateral Costs 128 230 Period 49 Period-Depondent Costs 4b.4.1 Decon supplies 1,252 -4b.4.2 Insurance
-4b.4.3 Property tares -4.4.4 Health physics supplies 2,373 4b.4.5 Heavy equipment rental 4,270 4b.4.6 Disposal of DAW generated
-4b.4.7 Plant energy budget 4b.4.8 NRC Fees 4b.4.9 Liquid Radwaste Processng Equipment/Seruices 4b.4.10 Security Staff Cost 4b.4.11 DOC Staff Cost 4b.4.12 Utity Staff Cost 4b.4 Subtotal Period 49 Period-Dependent Costs 1,252 6,43 4b.0 TOTAL PERIOD 4b COST 5.697 20.681 PERIOD 4* -License Termination Perod 4o Direct Decommissioning Activities 4e. 1.1 ORISE confinrutary survey 4e.1.2 Tenninato license 4e. 1 Subtotal Period 4e Activity Costs 45 238 271 99 50 62.1 94 133 287 621 355 55 31 55 31 1,192 10 876 --1,691 1,601 913 6.945 24.622 33,080 879 70,053 172 853 853 35 265 265 130 973 973 337 2,091 2,091 313 1,594 1,564 119 1,312 1,312 1 11 11 593 2,966 2,968 641 4,911 4,911 229 1,191 1,191 254 1,945 1.945 160 1,761 1,761 137 1,049 1,049 1,042 7,987 7,987 3,693 28,315 28.315 4,992 38,042 38,042 12,144 91,053 91,053 24,487 158,419 155,329 56,728 184 303,507 88 360,233 272 172,741 58 158,571 339.977 598,766 172,741 59 1,097.314 17,682,890 436,358 1,112,354 1,134 2,141 19,985 11,863 72,450 147 44 191 191 147 44 191 191 TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station Decommsosioninaog Cast Analyasi Docuentes NOI.1590-002, Revr. I Appeadiv C, Page 22 vf385 Table C-2 Cooper Nuclear Station 2014 Delayed DECON Decommissioning Cost Estimate (thousands of 2008 dollars)Off-Site LLRW NRC Spent Fuel Site Processed Burial Volumes Burial I Utility and Activity Decon Removal Packaging Transport Processing Disposal Other Total Total Lic. Term. Management Restoration Volume Class A Class B Class C GTCC Processed Craft Contractor Index Activit Description Cost Cost Costa Costs Costs Costs Costa Contingency Costs Costs Costs Costs Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feat Cu. Feet WL. Lbs. Manhours Manhours Period 4e AddiStonal Costs 4e.2.1 Final Site Survey 4e.2 Subtotal Period 4e Additional Costs Period 4e Collateral Costs 4e.3.1 DOC staff relocation expenses 4e.3 Subtotal Period 4o Coiateral Costs Period 4e Period-Dependent Costs 4e.4.1 Insurance 4e.4.2 Property taxes 4e.4.3 Health physics supplies 4e.4.4 Disposal of DAW generated 4e.4.5 Plant energy budget 4e.4.6 NRC Fees 4e.4.7 Security Staff Cost 4e.4.8 DOC Staff Cost 4e.4.9 Utility Staff Cost 4e.4 Subtotal Period 4e Perrod-Dependent Costs 4e.0 TOTAL PERIOD 4e COST PERIOD 4 TOTALS PERIOD Sb -Site Restoraion Period 5b Direct Decommissioning Activities Demolition of Remrainig Site Buildings 5b 1.1.1 Reactor 5b. 1.1 2 Augmented Radwaste 5b.1.1.3 Control 5b. 11.4 Intake Structure 5b.1.1.5 LLRW Sturage Pad 5b 1.1.6 Miscet-,eous Structures
-Clean 5b.1 .1.7 Miscellaneous Stuctums -Contaminated 56.1.1.8 Mutt-Purpose Faciity 5b.1.1.9 OWC Gas Generator 5b.1.1.10 Office 5b.1.1.11 Radwaste 5.1.1.2 Seal Well 5b.1.1.13 Sewage Treatment Area 5b.1.1.1.4 Transformner Yard 5b.1.1.15 Turbine 5b.1.1.16 Turbine Pedestal 5b.11 Totals Site Closeout Activites 51.1 .2 Reonoe Rubble 5b. 1.3 Grade & landscae site 5b. 1.4 Final report to NRC 5b. 1 Subtotal Period 5b Activity Costs Period 5b Additional Costs 5b.2.1 ISFSI Demolition 5b.2.2 Concrete Crushing 5b.2.3 Cofferdam* ..-5.998* -...0,900 912 912 795 --3 1 795 3 1 795 3 1 3 42 -140 532 1,012 4,458-4,895 42 10,839 1,799 7,797 7,797 1,799 7.797 7,797 137 1,049 1,049 137 1,049 1,049 0 3 3 199 993 993 11 57 57 21 161 161 53 585 585 152 1,164 1,164 669 5,126 5.126 704 5,399 5,399 1,809 13,489 13,489 165,605 6,240 165,605 6.240 907 907 907 897 384,277 156,617 1,377 8,324 3 18.857 57,357--74,643 8.324 3 150,857 8,324 165.608 157,097 344 508 28,309,950 757,775 1,797,669 42 17,697 3,789 22,527 22,527 5,939 37,086 8,022 4,771 37.066 30,870 124,205 51,016 298,974 295,786 2,290 1,491 222 214 523 145 1,196 27 123 s1 156 391 17 4 20 2,596 277 7,418 424 578 8,421 156 156 224 1,715 33 255 32 246 78 602 22 167 179 1,375 4 30 10 141 3 20 23 179 59 449 3 20 1 5 3 24 389 2,985 42 318 1,113 8,531 64 488 87 665 23 179 179 1,286 9.863 179 80 611 76 582 69 527 1,715 255 246 602 167 1,375 30 141 20 179 449 20 5 24 2,985 318 8,531 488 665 9.684 611 -5a2 527 14,601-2,119 1,655 5,621 1,227 11,837 572 1,982 283 1,920 3,229 166 53 172 40,503 2,100 88,040 3,286 1,578-* 1,560 92.904 1,560 4,336 160 3,1045 5,130 487 499 458 TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station Decommisiwoning Coast Analysis Document N01.1590-002, Rev. 1 Appendix C, Page 23 of"35 Table C-2 Cooper Nuclear Station 2014 Delayed DECON Decommissioning Cost Estimate (thousands of 2008 dollars)Off-Site LLRW NRC Spent Fuel Site Processed Burial Volumes Burial I Utility and Activity Decon Removal Packaging Transport Processing Disposal Other Total Total Lit. Torm. Management Restoration Volume Class A Class 8 Class C GTCC Processed Craft Contractor index Activity Description Cost Cost Costs Costs Costs Costs Costs Contingency Costs Costs Costs Costs Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet WLI Lbs. Manhours Manhours 5b.2 Subtotal Period 5b Additional Costs 1.444 52 224 1,720 611 1,109 12,511 160 Perod 5b Collateral Costs 5b.3.1 Smut tool alnwurnce 5b.3 Subtotal Period 5b CoUateral Costs Period 5b Period-Dependent Costs 5b.4.1 Insurance 5b.4.2 Property tanes 5b.4.3 Heavy eq.ipment rental 5b.4.4 Pltat energy budget 5b.4.5 Security Stuff Cost 5b 4.6 DOC Staff Cost 5b.4.7 Utility Stuff Cost 5bA Subtotal Period 5b Perlod-Dependent Costs 50.0 TOTAL PERIOD 5b COST PERIOD 5 TOTALS TOTAL COST TO DECOMMISSION 55 55 8 63 8 63 63 63-7 1 8 8 4,233 -635 4,869 4,869-167 25 192 192 2.419 363 2,782 2,782 45,051 10,212 1.532 11,744 11,744 127,646-4.507 676 5,183 5.183 73,209 4,233 17,312 3.232 24,777 -24,777 -245.906 14,153 17,520 4.751 36,424 179 611 35,634 105.415 247,626 14,153 17,520 4.751 36,424 179 611 35,634 105,415 247,626 13,111 58,437 8,282 5,692 37,066 34,071 545,635 120,307 922,600 475.790 309,463 37,347 384,277 207,449 1,377 344 508 28,976,590 994,325 6.844,054 TOTAL COST TO DECOMMISSION WITH 17.13% CONTINGENCY:
$822,600 thousands of 2008 dollars TOTAL NRC LICENSE TERMINATION COST IS 57.84% OR: $479,790 thousands of 2008 dollars SPENT FUEL MANAGEMENT COST IS 37.62% OR: $309,463 thousands of 2008 dollars ON-NUCLEAR DEMOLITION COST IS 4.64% OR: $37,347 thousands of 2008 dollars TOTAL LOW4.EVEL RADIOACTIVE WASTE VOLUME BURIED (EXCLUDING GTCC): 209,171 cubic feet TOTAL GREATER THAN CLASS C RADWASTE VOLUME GENERATED:
508 cubic feet TOTAL SCRAP METAL REMOVED: 30,276 tons TOTAL CRAFT LABOR REQUIREMENTS:
994,329 tnan-hours End Notes: n/a -indicates that this activity not charged as decommissioning expense.a -indicates that this activity perorrmed by deconmmissioning staff.0 -indicates that this value is less than 0.5 but is ron-zero.a cell contaihing"*
.indicates a zero value TLG Servicea, Inc.
Coaoper Nuclear Station Decommissionaing Cast Analaysis Document N01-1590-00 Rev. I Appendix C, Page 24 of 35 Table C-3 Cooper Nuclear Station 2014 SAFSTOR Decommuissioning Cost Estimate (thouisands of 2008 dollars)m IAct ity Off-Sit. LLRW NRC Spent Fuel Site Processed Burial Volumes Burial I Utility and Decon Removal Packaging Transport Processing Disposal Other Total Total Lie. Torm. Management Restoration Volume Clan A Class 5 Claws C GTCC Processed Craft Contractor Cost Cost Costs costs Contlngency Costs Costs Costs Costs Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Fast Wt. Lbs. Manhours Manhours I Index Actlvltv Descriotlon PERIOD Is -Shutdown through Transition Period Ia Direct Decommissioning Activities la.1.1 SAFSTOR nile characterization su0sy la.1.2 Prepare preliminary decrimissioning cost la.1.3 Notification of Cessatos of Operations la.14 Remove fuet & sourte material la.1.5 Notification of Permanent Defueling la.1.6 Deactivate plant systems & process waste la.1.7 Prepare and submit PSDAR ta.1.8 Reoiew plant dwgs & specs.ta.1.9 Perform detailed rod survey Iai.10 Estirate by-product inventory la.1.11 End product descrption la.1.12 Detailed by-product inventory ta.1.13 Defne major work sequence ta.1.14 Perform SER and EA 1 8. 1.15 Perform Site-Specific Cost Study Activity Specifcations Ia:l.1..l Prepare plant and facilities for SAFSTOR Ia.1.16.2 Plant systems la.1.16.3 Plant structures and bu0l0ings Ia.1.16.4 Waste management la.1.16.5 Facility and site dormancy la.1.16 Total Detailed Work Procedures la.1.17.1 Plant systems la.1.17.2 Facility *losout & dormancy ta.1l17 Total 1 8al Procure vacuum drying system t1o s19 Draundde-energize nos-cont.
systems ia.120 Dman & dry NSSS t.1.21 Drain/de-energize cortaminated systems la.l.22 Decoofsecure contaminated systems la.t Subtotal Period la Aztvity Costs Period ta Collateral Costs la.3.1 Spent Fuel Capital and Transfer 1a.3.2 Corporate Overheads:-.3 Subtotal Period In Colateral Costs Period ta Period-Dependent Costs la.4.1 Insurance 1:.4.2 Propety taxes ta.4.3 Health physics supplies 1:.4.4 Heavy equipment rental la.4.5 Disposal of DAW generated la.4.6 Rant energy budget 10.4.7 NRC Fees 1t.4.8 Emergency Planning Fees 10.4.9 Spent Fuel Pool O&M Ia.4.10 ISFSI Operating Costs 18.4.11 Securdy Staff COst 346 130 200 130 100 100 150 100 310 500 104 450 450 20 150 150 a a 30 230 230 20 100 150 15 110 115 15 115 115 23 173 173 15 115 115 47 357 357 75 575 575 74 560 566 63 479 479 47 359 359 30 230 230 30 230 230 243 1,864 1,884 15 136 130 15 138 138 36 274 274 1,300 2,000 1,300 1,000 1,o00 1,500 1,000 3,100 5,000 4,920 4,167 3,120 2,000 2,000 16,207* .492 417 312 200--200* -1,621* -.---I11-...--120* -* -238--1,183--1,200---2,383* -100 10 2 12 12 a 3,930 642 4,077 4,077 35,890 10,335 3,105 13,440 370 368 1,600 4 73 -927 706 1,185 745 85 6,021 1,550 11,880 468 3,570 3,570 2,016 15,456 3,570 160 1,760 1.760 0 4 4 93 463 463 55 423 423 19 100 100 139 1,068 1,060 71 776 776 118 1,303 112 857 13 98 903 6,924 6,924 11,0006 11,886 1,303 857 98 1,575 14,445 5 157,471 TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nucleaor Staton~~Deco~rnms,,aioniag Cc"l Analfysis Docuerant NOI.1590.002, Remr I Appenadix C, Page 25 of 80 Table C-3 Cooper Nuclear Station 2014 SAFSTOR Decommissioning Cost Estimate (thousands of 2008 dollars)Off-Site LLRW NRC Spent Fuel Site Processed Burial Volumes Burial / Utilty an0 Activity Decon Removal Packaging Transport Processing Disposal Other Total Total Lic. Tenme Management Restoration Volume Clans A Class B Class C GTCC Processed Craft Contractor index Activity Descripton Cost Cost Costs Costs Costs Costs Costs Continuencs Costs Costs Costs Costs Cm. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet WLt Lbs. Manhours Manhour Period la Period-Dependent Costs (continued) 1a.4.12 Utiity Staff Cost 1a.4 Subtotal Period 1 a Period-Dependent Costs 18.0 TOTAL PERIOD 10 COST PERIOD lb -SAFSTOR Limied DECON Activities Period 1b Direct Decommissioning Activities Decontamination o1 Site Buildings lb.1.1.1 Reactor lb.1.1.2 Augmented Radwaste lb.1.1.3 Mlscetaneous Structures
-Contaminated lb.1 .1.4 Muit-Potose Facility 1b1.1.5 Radwaste lb,1.1.6 Turbine lb.1.1 Totals l1b.t Subtotal Period lb Activity Costs Period I b Additional Costs lb.2.1 Spent Fuel Poci  b.,2.2 Asbestos Insulation Disposal lb.2 Subtotal Period l b Additional Costs Period l b Collateral Costs lb.3.1 Dec0n equipment lb.3.2 Process liquid waste lb3.3 Small tool allowance lb.3.4 Spent Fuel Capital and Transfer tb.3.5 Corporate Overheads lb.3 Subtotal Period lb Collateral Costs Perod 1b Period-Dependent Costs Ib.4.1 Deco0 supplies lb.4.2 Insurance lb.4.3 Property tanes lb.4A Health physics supplies Ib.4.5 Heavy equipment rental 1b.4.6 Disposal of DAW generated lb,4.7 Rant energy budget lb.4.8 NRC Fees lb.4.9 Emergency Plannlig Fees I b.4.10 Spent Fuel Pool O&M b1h4.11 ISFSI Operating Costs lb.4 12 Security Staff Cost lb.4.13 Uidity Staff Cost lb.4 Subtotal Period l b Pedtod-Oependent Costs lb.0 TOTAL PERIOD lb COST 738 738* 22,690 73 33.962 3.403 26,003 26,093 5,087 39,867 37,609 2,258 14.144 1,575 1,575 14.445 423.400 5 580,871 73 51.338 7,745 59.901 45,757 14.445 5 616,761 2,929 52 370 68 158 520 4,103 4.103 773 773--9,407 1 65 558 1 65 558 9,407 713 --229 74 392 70 -942 70 74 392 1,156 -473 91 5 3 1,156 564 5 3 6,201 1,407 80 460 448 1,510-766 448 2,276 121* 81 229 174 292 184 21 1.485--5,595 81 8,101 1,465 4,394 4.394 26 78 78 188 565 565 34 101 101 79 237 237 260 780 780 2,052 6,155 6,155 2.052 6,155 6,155 1,411 10,818 10,815 265 1,662 1.662 1,676 12,480 12,480 107 820 820 293 1,436 1.436 11 91 81 227 1,737 -115 880 0880 752 4,954 3,217 289 1,445 1,445 12 133 133 0 1 1 118 592 592 14 104 104 21 110 110 34 263 263 17 191 191 29 321 28 211 3 24 -223 1,707 1,707 839 6,434 6,434 1.628 11,538 10,981 10,333 10,333 134,329 10,002 134.329 10,002 68,438 1.562 8,542 2.036 4,761 15.667 101,006 I01.008 1,737 1,737 321 211 24 557 2,294 1,561 1,561 1,741 1.741 13,635 93,6344 304 93,644 304 15,968 5-38,829 104,400 15,968 5 143,229 243,942 111,318 143,229 1,087 19,783 6,107 35,126 32,833 TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station Devommissioning Cost Analysis Document N01.1590-002, Rev. I Appendix C, Page 26 of 35 Table C-3 Cooper Nuclear Station 2014 SAFSTOR Decommrissioning Cost Estimate (thousands of' 2008 dollars)I Actiolty Off-SIte LLRW NRC Spent Fuei Sit. Processed Burial Volumes Burial I Utilty and Decon Removal Packaging Transport Processing Disposal Other Total Total Lic. Term. Management Restoration Volume Class A Class B Class C GTCC Processed Craft Contractor Cust Cust Costs Costs Costs Costs Costs Continoonnv Costs Casts Costs Costs Cu. Feet Cu. Feat Cu. Foot Cu. Feet Cu. Feet WL. Lbs. Manhours ManhoursI I  n ex c n Cost Cost Costs costs Costs Costs Costs Costs Cu. Feet Cu.Feet Cu.Feet Cu.Feet Cu.Feet WL. Los. Manhours Manhoom iZ&66&Q;-.
ri PERIOD 1c -Preparations for SAFSTOR Dormancy Perod Ic Direct Decornmissiounir Activities Ic 1.1 Prepare suppotn equipment for storage 1C.1.2 Install containment pressure equal. lines Ic.1.3 Interim survey prior to drmnnncy lC.1.4 Secure building accesses lC.1.5 Prepare & submit inteim report lc.1 Subtotal Period lc Activity Costs Period l1 Collateral Costs lc.3.1 Process liquid waste tc.3.2 Smal tool allowance 1c.3.3 Spent Fuel Capital and Transfer 1c.3.4 Corporate Onerheads 1c.3 Subtotal Period Ic Collateral Costs Penod lc Period-Dependent Costs 1c.4.1 Insurance lc.4.2 Property taoes 1c.4.3 Health physics supplies 1c.4. Heavy equipment rental 1c.4.5 Disposal of DAW generated 1c.4.6 Plant energy budget lc.4.7 NRC Fees lc.4.8 Emergency Planning Fees 1c.4.9 Spent Fuel Pool O&M lc.4.10 ISFSI Operating Costs 1c.4.11 Security Staff Cost 1c.4.12 Utlity Staff Cost 1c.4 Subtotal Period 1 c Period-Dependent Costs 1C.0 TOTAL PERIOD 1c COST PERIOD I TOTALS 387 31 -S -733 58 445 445 5 36 36 220 953 953 3,000 700 15,696 S- 583 19,396 583 58 9 87 67 791 291 1,501 1,501 419 235 3 235 3 160 92 252 76 403 76 403 1 .1 1 1 460 I 1,527-774 460 2,301 301 1,475 1,475 0 3 3 229 1,756 -116 090 890 646 4,124 2,368 1,756 1,756 122 12 134 134 1 0 1 1-40 200 200-14 105 105 18 -5 20 25 231 35 266 266 176 18 194 194 295 30 325 1- 6 28 214 21 3 24 -1,501 225 1,726 1,726 5,07 849 6,505 68505 18 8:191 1,257 9.720 9,157 478 11283 2.195 15,345 13,026 325 214 24 563 2,319 16.757 1,603 1,603 393 393 96,196 313 96,195 313 3,601 3.601 39,260 105,560 1 144,820 235 673 77 404 96,796 19,710 145,403 358,183 131,033 905,393 6,437 2,818 162 866 1,639 82.404 16,047 110,372 91,616 17,205 PERIOD 2a -SAFSTOR Dormancy with Wet Spent Fuel Storage Period 28 Direct Decommissioning Acvtindes 2a.1.1 Quarterly Inspoction 2a. 1.2 Semi-annuai ennironmental sutvey 2a .1.3 Prepare reports 2a.1.4 Bituminous roof replacement 23.1.5 Maitemance supplies 30.1 Subtotal Period 2a Actioty Costs Period 2a Collateral Costs 2a.3.1 Spent Fuel Capital and Transfer 2a.32 Corporate Overheads 2a.3 Subtotal Period 2a Collateral Costs Period 2a Period-Dependent Costs 2a.4.1 Insurance 23.4.2 Property tanes 2a.4.3 Health physics supplies a 9 72 72 126 629 629 135 701 701 63 503 566 26,466 3,970 30,435 -4,139 821 4,759 4,759 30.604 4,591 35,195 4,759 30,435 -.-30,435 --310 .-1,962-8 16 344 196 2,158 1,845 2 18 18 86 430 430 TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper NucLear Station Dectumissiaoniag Cost An~alysis Doumnent NOI.1590-002, Re-. I Appendix C, Page 27 of 35 Table C-3 Cooper Nuclear Station 2014 SAFSTOR Decommrissioning Cost Estimiate (thousands of 2008 dollars)I Off-Site LLRW NRC Spent Fuel site Processed Burial Volumes Burial I Utilty and Decon Removal Packaging Transport Processing Disposal Other Total Total Lic. Term. Management Restoration Volume Class A Class 8 Class C GTCC Processed Craft Contractor Cost Cost Costs Costs Costs Costs Costs Contingency Costs Costs Costs Costs Cu. Feet Cu. Feet C e.et Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Wt, Lbs. Manhours Mlianhours I  n as c v scr Pit n Period 2s Period-Dependent Costs (coninued) 2a4.4 Disposal of DAW generated 2a.4.5 Plant energy budget 2A.4.6 NRC Fees 28.4.7 Emergency Planning Fees 2a,48 Spent Fuel Pool O&M 2a.4.9 ISFSI Operating Costs 2a.4.10 Security Staff Cost 2a.4.11 Utility Staff Cost 2a.4 Subtotal Period 2a Pedod-Oependent Costs 2a.o TOTAL PERIOD 2a COST PERIOD 2b -SAFSTOR Dormancy with Dry Spent Fuel Storage Period 2b Direct Decommissioning Activities 2b.1.1 Quarterly Inspecton 25.1.2 Semi-annual envronmental suorey 2b.1,3 Prepare reports 2b.1.4 Bituminous roof replacement 25.1.5 Maintenance supplies 2b.1 Subtotal Period 2b Activity Costs Period 2b Collateral Costs 21.3.1 Spent Fuel Capital and Transfer 2b.3 Subtotal Period 2b Colatsral Costs Period 2b Peiod-Dependent Costs 2b.4.1 Insurance 2b0.2 Property taoes 2b.4.3 Health physics supplies 2b.4.4 Disposal of DAW generated 2b.4.5 Plant energy budget 2b4.6 NRC Fees 2b.4.7 Emergency Plannug Fees 254.8 ISFSI Operating Costs 2b.4.9 Security Staff Cost 2b.4.10 Utility Staff Cost 20.4 Subtotal Period 2b Pedod-Dependent Costs 2b.0 TOTAL PERIOD 2b COST PERIOD 2c -SAFSTOR Dormancy without Spent Fuel Storage Period 2c Direct Decomnissioning Activites 2C.1.1 Quarterly Inspection 2c.1.2 Semi-annual environmental survey 2C.1.3 Prepare reports 2c. 1.4 Bituminous roof epslacenmet 2c.1.5 Maintenance supplies 2c.1 Subtotal Period 2c Activity Costs Period 2c Period-Dependent Costs 2C.4.1 Insurance 2C.4.2 Property taxes 2C.4.3 Health physics supples 2c.4.4 Disposal of DAW generated 344 344 13 13 13 198 -52 270 270 742 111 853 427 427 807 81 887 887 3,374 337 3,712 -3,712 2,984 448 3,431 3,431 340 51 391 -391 17,728 2,659 20,387 7,788 12,599 18.816 2,822 21.639 4,426 17.213 198 46768 6,845 94.176 16,092 38,083 198 77,939 11.571 90,072 21,553 68,519 4,267 39,138 13 444,561 329,769 4,267 39,139 13 774,330 4,287 39,139 13 774,330 a 65 497 497 863 4,317 4.317 928 4,814 4,814 432 3,453 3,886 1,891 1.981 1.981 80 44 80 44 8o 44 18,092 2,714 20,806 18,092 2,714 20.806 11,977 1,198 13,174 12,683 110 11 121 121-495 2,476 2,476 1,268 -332 1,725 1,725 2,546 382 2,928 2,928 5,536 554 6,090 6,090 23,161 2,316 25,477 2,332 350 2.682 70,072 10,511 80,583 53.452 51,313 7.697 59,010 30,376 1,268 167,047 23,845 194,266 109,850 1.268 189,025 27,487 219,886 114,664 209806 20.606 491 27,278 250.212 84 25,477 2,682 27,131 1.547,177 28,634 916,846 84.416 27,278 250,212 84 2,464,023 105.222 27,278 250.212 84 2,464,023 335 2,677 3,012 8,937 85 1,444 --61 34 961 a 50 385 385 669 3,346 3,346 719 3.732 3,732 894 9.831 9,831 9 94 94 361 1.805 1,805 251 1,308 1,306 20.663 189,540 63 TLG Serviees, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station Deeommaisionting Coat Analysis Document N01-1590-002, Rev. I Appendix C, Page 28 of 35 Table C-3 Cooper Nuclear Station 2014 SAFSTOR Decommissioning Cost Estimate (thousands of 2008 dollars)Off-Site LLRW NRC Spent Fuel Site Processed Burial Volumes Burlal I Utility and Actvily Decon Removal Packaging Transport Processing Disposal Other Total Total Lic. Term. Management Restoration Volume Class A Class B Class C GTCC Processed Craft Contractor Indei Acivit'y Description cost Cost Costs Costs Costs Costs Coots Contintflsco Costs Costs Costs Costs Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet WL. Lbs. Manhtours Manhourn Period 2c Period-Dependent Costs (contnued) 2c.4.5 Plant energy budget 2c.4.6 NRC Fees 2c.4.7 Security Staff Cost 2c.4.8 Utility Staff Cost 2c.4 Subtotal Period 2c Petiod-Dependent Costs 2c.0 TOTAL PERIOD 2c COST PERIOD 2 TOTALS PERIOD Sa. Reactivate Site FoUowing SAFSTOR Dormancy Period 3a Direct Decommissioning Activities 3a.1.1 Prepare preleninary decommissianing cMst 3a. 1.2 Reniew plant dwgs & specs.3a 1.3 Perform detailed rad survey 30. 1 4 End product descrption 30.1.5 Detaied by-product inventory 3a.1.6 Deline malor work sequence 3a.1.7 Perform SER and EA 3a.1.8 Perform Site-Specific Cost Study 3a.1 .9 Prepare/subrldt Ucerrse Termination Plan 3aI1AO Receive NRC approval of terrtinatkin plan Activity Specifications 3a.1.11.1 Re-activate plant & temporary facilities 3a.1.11.2 Plant systems 3a.1.11.3 Reactor internals 3a 1.11.4 Reactor vessel 3a.1.1. 5 Sacrfiioal Shield 3a.1.11.6 Moiture saparators/reheatem 3a 111.7 Reinforced concrete 3a.01116 Main Turbine 3 111s Maein Condersers 3a. 1.11.10 Pressure Suppresson structure 3a. 1.11.11 Drywl1 3a.1.11.12 Plant Structures
& bulidings 3a, 1.11.13 Waste management 3a11.1-14 Facility & site closeout 3a.1.11 Total Planning & Site Preparations 3a.1.12 Prepare dismantrng sequence 3a.1.13 Plant prep. & temp. sVces 3a.1.14 Design water dean-up system 3a.1.15 Rigging/Coot Cntrl Envlps/tooling/etc.
3a.1.16 Procure casksflaters
& containers 3a. 1 Subtotla Period 3a Activity Costs Period 3a Period-Dependent Costs 3a.4.1 Insurance 3a.4.2 Property tames 3a.4.3 Heala physics supplies 30.4.4 Heavy equipment rental 3a.4.5 Disposal of DAW generated 1,444 61 34 1,974--3,866 36.028-20,474 961 71.384 296 2,270 2,270 389 4,275 4,275 5,404 41,432 41,432 3,071 23,545 23,545 10,675 84,558 84.558 20,663 20,663 52.208 1,444 61 34 3,769 154 85 961 74.396 11,394 68,289 88,289 2,427 341,360 50,452 398,247 224,506 173,740 666,257* -388,650 189,540 93 1,054,907 189,540 63 1,054,907 478,891 160 4,293,260 1,300 4,600 1,000 1,300 7,500 3,100 5,000 4,099 130 460 100 130 750 310 500 410 737 417 710 650 100 160 209 209 200--160 312 460 4,463 240 2,700 140 2,100 123 12,558 420 4 62 20 150 150 69 529 529 10 115 115 20 150 1O0 113 863 663 47 357 357 75 575 575 61 471 471 a 111 846 763 63 479 431 107 817 817 98 748 748 8 58 58 15 115 115 24 184 92 31 240 240 31 240 240 30 230 230 24 184 164 47 359 179 69 529 529 14 104 52 669 5,133 4.677 36 276 276 405 3,105 3,105 21 161 161 315 2,415 2,415 16 141 141 1,883 14,439 13,983 42 462 462 0 4 4 81 405 405 55 423 423 16 84 84 92 179 52 456 456 7,370 4,167 7,100 6,500 500 1.000 1,600 2,088 2,018 23000 1,600 3,120 4,600 900 44,633 2,400 1,400 1.230 77,559 324 368-1,329 12.190 2 TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuadear Sationuo Decommissioninsg Coad Anialysis Do sument N01.1590-002, Rev. I Appendix C, Page 29 of"35 Table C-3 Cooper Nuclear Station 2014 SAFSTOR Decommissioning Cost Estimate (thousands of 2008 dollars)m IActivity Off-Sit. LLRW NRC Spent Fuel Site Processed Burial Volumes Burial I Utilty and Decon Removal Packaging Transport Processing Disposal Other Total Total Li. Termn. Management Restoration Volume Class A Class B Class C GTCC Processed Craft Contractor Cost Cost Costs Costs Costs Costs Costs Contingency Costs Costs Costs Costs Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet WLt. Lbs. Manhours Manhour I I Index Actlvits Descriotonn Index Actlvltv Description Period 3a Pefiod-Dependent Costs (continued) 3a.4.6 Plant energy budget 3a.4.7 NRC Fees 3a.4.8 Security Staff Cost 3.4.9 UWily Staff Cost 3a.4 Subtotal Period 3a Penod-Dependent Costs 3s,0 TOTAL PERIOD 3a COST PERIOD 3b -Decommissioning Preparations Period 3b Direct Decommissioning Activities Detailed Work Procedures 3b.1.1.1 Plant systems 3b.1.1.2 Reactor ilternals 3b.11 .3 Remaining buildings 3b.1.1.4 CRD housngs & NIS 3b.1.1,5 Ilncore instrumentation
: 3. I.1 .6 Removal primawy conitainrent 3b51.1,7 Reactor vessel 3b.1. 1.8 Facility closeout 30.1.1.9 Sacrifcial shield 3b.1.1.10 Reinforced concrete 35*1.1.11 Man Turbine 3b. 1.112 Man Condensers 3b 1.1.13 Moisture separatos
& reheaters 3b.1.114 Ratwaste building 3b.1.1.15 Reactor bulding 3W.1.1 Total 3b, 1 Subtotal Period 3b Activity Costs Period 3bAdditionsal Costs 3b.2.1 Site Characterization 3b.2 Subtotal Period 3b Additional Costs Period 3b Collateral Costs 3b.3.1 Deown equipment 3b.3.2 DOC staff relocaton expenses 3b.3.3 Pipe cutting equip-met 3b.3 Subtotal Period 3b Couataral Costs Period 35 Perind-Dependent Costs 3b.4.1 Decwn supplies 3b.42 Insurance 3b.4.3 Property tanes 3b.4A Health physics supplies 3b.4.5 Heavy eciuipment rental 3b.4.6 Disposal of DAW generated 3b.4.7 Plant energy budget 3b.4.8 NRC Fees 3b.4.9 Security Staff Cost 3b.4.10 DOC Staff Cost 3b.4.11 tLility Staff Cost 3b.4 Subtotal Period 3b Period-Dependent Costs 691 4 691 4 927 249 2.855-14,190 62 18,644 139 1,066 1,966 25 274 274 428 3,283 3,283 2.128 16,318 16,318 2,915 22.318 22,318 1,328 1,329 65,179-* 258,629 12,190 4 323.807 12,190 4 401,366 62 31.200 4.799 36,758 36,302 456 473 400 135 100 100 200 363 120 120 100 208 209 200 273 273 3,274 71 544 490 60 460 460 20 155 39 15 115 115 15 115 115 30 230 230 54 417 417 18 138 69 18 138 138 15 115 58 31 239 239 31 240 240 30 230 230 41 314 283 41 314 283 491 3,765 3,405 54 69"58 31 31 360 4.733 4,000 1,350 1,000 1,000 2.000 3.630 1,200 1.200 1.000 2,080 2,088 2,000 2,730 2,730 32,741 32,741 3,274 491 3,785 3,405-----.5,395----5,395 713-1.000 713 1,000 22 179 184 22 363 2 912 912 248 2 35 465 125 1,431 4,378-7,114 35 13,761 1,619 7,014 7,014 1,619 7,014 7.014 107 820 820 137 1,049 1,649 150 1.150 1,150 394 3.019 3,019 5 27 27 25 270 270 0 2 2 45 224 224 28 212 212 9 48 48 70 534 534 12 137 137 215 1,646 1,646 657 5,035 5,035 1,067 8.181 8,181 2,133 16,317 16,317 754 754 6.913 6,913 2 32,679 58,560-129,669 2 220,907 TLG Services, Ian.
Cooper Nuclear Station Decommissioning Coast Analysis Document N01-1590-002, Rev. I Appendix C, Page 30 f835 Table C-3 Cooper Nuclear Station 2014 SAFSTOR Decommissioning Cost Estimate (thousands of 2008 dollars)Off-Site LLRW NRC Spent Fuel Site Processed Burial Volumes Burial / Utility and Activity Decon Removal Packaging Transport Processing Disposal Other Total Total Li, Term. Management Restoration Volume Class A Class B Class C GTCC Processed Craft Contractor Index Activity Description Cost Cost Costs Costs Costs Costs Costa Contingenca Costs Costs Costs Costs Cu. Feel Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Wt Lbs. Manhtours Manhours 3b.0 TOTAL PERIOD 3b COST 735 1.363 2 1 -35 23,342 4,636 30,115 29,755 360 -754 -6,913 2 253,648 PERIOD 3 TOTALS PERIOD 4a -Large Component Removal Perod 4a Direct Decommissioning Acvlities Nuclear Steam Supply System Removal 4a.1.1.1 Recirculation System Piping & Valves 4a.1.1.2 Recirculation Pumps & Motors 4a.1.1.3 CRDM & Nis Removal 4a. 11.4 Reactor Vessel Internals 4a.1.1.5 Vessel & Internals GTCC Disposal 4a.1.1.6 Reaotor Vessel 4a.1.1 Totals Removal of Major Equipment 4a. 1.2 Main Turbine/Generator 4a.1.3 Main Condensers Cascading Costs from Clean Building Demolition 4a.1.4.1 Reactor 4a.1.4.2 Augmented Radwesto 4a.0143 Radwaste 4a.1.4.4 Turbine 4a. 1.4 Totals Disposal of Plant Systems 4a.1.5.1 Augmented Ridwaste El 877 ArealA 4a.1.5.2 Augmented Radwaste E1 903 ArealA 4a.1.5.3 Augmented Radwaste El 918 ArealA 4a.1.5.4 Augmented Radwastse 6929 ArewlA 4a.1.5.5 Augmented Radwaste 6i 929 AresI B 4a.1.5.6 DRYWELL ArealA 40.1.5.7 DRYIOLL AreaIB 4a.1.5.6 Turbine El 932 ArelB 4a.1.5.9 Turbine El 932 Area2C 4a.1.5.10 Turbine El 932 Area3C 4a.1.5.11 Yard ArealB 40.1.5 Totals 4a. 1.6 Scaffolding in support of decomniesioning 4a.1 Subtotal Period 4a Activity Costs Period 4a Collateral Costs 4a.3.1 Process liquid waste 4a0.32 Smatl tool allowance 4a.3 Subtotal Period 4a Collateral Coos Period 4a Period-Depnent Costs 40.4.1 Deoon supplies 4a.42 Insurance 4a.4.3 Property loaes 4a.4.4 Health physics supplies 4a.4.5 Heavy equipment rental 735 2.055 6 3 97 54,542 9,435 66,872 66,056 816 2,083 19.104 6 655,014 16 70 14 13 127 151 86 477 477 6 28 11 26 321 95 488 488 24 139 377 68 317 -174 1,099 1,099 60 1,876 3,729 727 4,679 142 4,912 16,126 16,126---7.470 -1,120 8,590 8,590 4,972 813 351 3.006 142 5,544 14,826 14,828 106 7.085 4,945 1,185 127 15.944 283 11,932 41,608 41,608 167 845 372 6,376 -* 1,138 8,898 8,898 708 588 259 4.439 940 6,932 6,932 499 499 115,643 2487 1.188 132,880 1.125 6.935 --126,494 3,972 -2.181 1,377 344 -361,669 17,025 813--508 89.497 --14,106 * -1,447,089 17,025 813 499 24,908 1.377 344 508 2,273,272 41,634 1.626 61,604 2.772,179 4,438 42,889 1,930,000 19,519 260 25 43 285 613 203 28 28 432 66 6 7 104 52 10 9 139 21 4 5 -73 3 0 0 4 -457 65 84 -1,289 112 1 5 75 2 324 16 86 1,477 8 67 ---S18 50 264 4,517 1,831 202 487 6,073 2,040 2,049 24 11 168 23 39 299 299 4 28 28 7 50 50 43 326 328 92 705 705 166 857 657 44 228 228 50 260 260 25 127 127 1 8 8 458 2,373 2,373 41 235 235 317 2,220 2,220 1 9 10 78 -852 6,201 6.201 1,964 12,597 12,510 547 2,821 2,821 2,055 172,205 5,668 469 41,606 1,42 765 55,345 1,432* 324 29,038 579 386 1,529 75 5,726 513,627 12,634 806 10 33,578 3,384-15,808 641,963 9,170 9 .237 78 --2,083-48,365 -1,964,114 14,340 87 65,016 9,348 3,453.003 51,444 2.486 235 359 4,419 7,498 1,621 101 81,992 27,411 100 12.451 6,604 2,314 17,183 18,007 283 16,614 73,561 73,474 87 171,628 34,358 1,377 344 508 10,510,450 151,944 1,626 38 -14 76 87 38 87 14 76 47 914 1,899 86 86 526 4 53 268 268 13 101 91 66 368 358 12 59 59 53 579 579 0 5 4 228 1,142 1,142 285 2,183 2.183 301 18,078 10 10 301 18.076 0 59 59 TLG Servcees, Inc.
Cooper Nauclear Station Deeomminioninebg Cost Analysis Documenert NOI.1590-002, Rev,. I Appendix C, Page 31 of 35 Table C-3 Cooper Nuclear Station 2014 SAFSTOR Decommissioning Cost Estimate (thousands of 2008 dollars)IActivity Off-Sit LLKW NKC Spent fuel Site Processed Burial Voltumes Burial i Utility ana Decon Removal Packaging Transport Processing Disposal Other Total Total LIc. Term. Management Restoration Volume Closs A Class B Class C GTCC Processed Craft Contractor I Cost Cost Costs Costss ts cosCoost s s Contingency Costs Costs Costs Costs Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet WL, Lbs. Manhours Manhtum I m J [gDBX r  n ex Perid 4a Period-Dependent Costs (contrmod) 4a.4.6 DisposalofDAW generated 4a.4.7 Plant energy budget 4a.4.8 NRC Fees 4a.4.9 Liquid Radwaste Processng Equipmnnt/Sevices 4a.4.10 Security Staff Cost 4a.4.11 DOC Staff Cost 4a.4.12 Ultility Staff Cost 4a.4 Subtotal Period 4a Period-Dependent Costs 47 2,812 4a.0 TOTAL PERIOD 4a COST 191 15.351 25 25 14 14 395 946 707 403 3,066 11,154 15,348 395 32,154 6.643 2.404 17,183 18,488 32,437 PERIOD 4b- Site Decontamination Period 4b Direct Decommissioning Acdivities 4b.1.1 Remove spent fuel racks Disposal of Plant Systems 4b.1.2.1 Controtl a 882 AMal1 4b. 1,22 Control al 903 ArealC 4b.11.3 Controa El 918 AmalC 4b. 1.2.4 Control Cl 932 Areal C 4b.1.2.5 Intake 4b.1.2.6 MuS-Purpose Facility 4b.12.7 Radwase El 877 ArealA 4b.1.2.8 Radwasta a 877 Asa2A 4b.1.2.9 Radwaste C 877 Ama3A 4b,12.10 RadwastEa l 903 AralA 4b.1.2.11 Radwasts El 903 Ara2A 4b.1.2.12 Rdwaute El 903 Area3A 4b.1.2.13 Radwaste E 918 AralA 41.1.2.14 Rawwaste B 918 Ama2A 4b.1.2.1 5 Radwast B Sts Aea3A 4b.1.2.16 Radwasts El 934 ArelA 4b.1.2.17 Radwaste C 934 Ama2A 4b.1.2.18 Radwasta El 949 AealA 4b.1.2.19 Reactod al 1001 ArealA 4b.1.2.20 Reactor El 1001 ArealB 4b.1.2.21 Reactor El 859 ArealA 4b.1.2.22 Reactor El 859/AealR 4b.1.2.23 Reactor al 859 Area2A 4b.1.2.24 Reactor El 859 Area2B 4b.1.2.25 Reactor E 859 Area3A 4b.1.2.26 Reactor 8599 Area3B 4b.1.2.27 React ds 859 Area4A 4b.1.2.28 Reactor El 859 Area4B 4b'1.2.29 Reactor El 859 AreaSA 4b.12.30 Reactor El 859 Area5B 4b.1.2.31 Reactor a 903 ArealA 4b.1.2.32 Reactor El 903 ArealB 4b.12.33 Reactsr El 903 Ara2A 4b.1.2.34 Reactor El 903 Area2B 4b.1.2.35 Reactds E 903 Arwea3A 4b.1.2.36 Reactor Ei 903 Area3S 4b.12.37 Reactor El 903 Ares4A 4b.12.38 Reactor E.903 Area4B 4b.1-2.39 Reactor E931 ArealA 262 33 79 88 1.348 280 170 It 22 101 198 398 43 71 110 188 37 18 16 185 26 98 12 5o 62 71 440 72 69 47 33 50 17 e3 37 401 451 4 69 32 21 27 21 25 3 75 9 18 9 36 8 2 3 23 7 11 15 11 25 1 9 0 9 0 16 0 56 6 0 2 10 1 8 1 3 39 14 62 7 13 10 29 7 2 3 22 4 12 2 8 4 16 58 26 8 9 2 8 2 17 2 42 32 0 11 11 3 9 3 674 239 64 994 131 42 31 41 550 190 52 52 949 113 201 153 439 104 30 39 338 60 177 24 121 246 401 137 117 282 651 6 167 136 52 103 537 537 142 1,087 1,087 71 779 778 60 463 483 460 3,526 3,529 1,673 12,828 12,828 2,302 17,650 17,850 5,390 40.837 40,837 22,070 114K767 114,669 498 2,308 2.308 178 1,178 1,178 25 195 10 76 3 28 15 118 88 541 541 353 1,836 1.836 41 213 213 72 372 372 68 351 351 165 856 856 37 190 190 12 64 64 15 75 75 136 705 705 22 115 115 72 370 370 9 47 47 45 230 230 26 157 157 83 430 430 269 1,771 1,771 125 648 648 38 247 247 48 251 251 15 93 93 44 227 227 9 59 59 85 443 443 19 98 98 275 1,424 1,424 201 1,240 1,240 3 14 14 48 320 320 52 272 272 14 90 90 43 223 223 14 90 90 20 104 104 8,501 0 -8,501 97 171,628 43.159 1,377 5,989-7,213 195 76 26 116* 2,558 -5,097 613 1,158 684 1,955 453 135 201 1,690 266 808 105 537 689-1,091 10.641-1.780 1,406 S -608 453 --520 331 1,163 442-2.892 5,890-29 2,039 -S -741 553-686 559 S -232 292,908 7,797 5,155 2,100 702-3,136 103.862 5,430 377,917 10.930 44,992 1,189 79,983 1,969 61.153 3,015 175,093 5,282 41,366 1,029 12.033 477 15,667 448 134,827 5,045 23,735 680 70,665 2.663 9,381 305 48,175 1,261 27,979 1,681 97,874 2,024 432,136 12,411 159.714 2,094 57.093 1,954 54,543 1,321 18.381 951 46.668 1,374 13,424 476 104.381 1,798 17,962 1,087 259,190 10,497 239,197 12,496 2,372 120 82,815 1.915 66,516 929 22,464 6189 54,373 776 22,692 597 20,858 970 537,141 1,004 77,973 26 70.000 154,560--280,000 77,973 26 504,560 344 508 10,906,5O0 152.029 506.186 TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station Document N01-1590-002, Rev. 1 Decommiasioning Coast Analysis Appendixv C, Page 32 of 35 Table C-3 Cooper Nuclear Station 2014 SAFSTOR Decommissioning Cost Estimate (thousands of 2008 dollars)Off-Site LLRW NRC Spent Fuel Site Processed Burial Volumes Burial / Utility and Activity Decon Removal Packaging Transport Processing Disposal Other Total Total Lie. Term. Management Restoration Volume Class A Class B Clans C GTCC Processed Craft Contractor Index Acltn Oescri tlo Coot Coot Costs Coats coste coste Coste Continenco Costs Costs Coots Costs Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet WL Lbs. Manhoum Manhours Disposal of Plant Systems (continued) 4b.12.40 Reactor El 931 ArealB 4b.1.2.41 Reactor El 931 Area2A 4b.12,42 Reactor El 931 Area2B 4b.1.2.43 Reactor El 931 Area3A 4b. 1 2.44 Reactor El 931 Area3B 4b.1.2.45 Reactor El 931 Area4C 4b.1.2.46 Reactor El 931 Avea5C 4b.12.47 Reactor El 958 ArealA 4b.1.2.48 Reactor El 958 ArealB 4b.12.49 Reactor El 958 Area2A 4b,1.2.50 Reactor El 958 Area2B 4b.1.2.51 Reactor El 958 Area3A 4b.1.2.52 Reactor Ea 958 Area3B 4b.12.53 Reactor Ea 976 ArealA 4b.1.2.54 Reactor El 976 Areat B 4b.12.55 Reactor El 976 Area2A 4b.12.56 Reactor El 976 A.rea2B 4b.1.2.57 Turbine El 882 ArealA 4b.1,2.58 Turbin El 882 ArmoIB 4b.1,2.59 Turbine El 892 Area2A 4b.1,2.60 Turbine El 882 Area2B 40.1.2.61 Turbine El 892 Area3A 4b.1.2.62 Turbine El 882 Area3B 4b.1.2.63 Turbine El 903 ArealA 4b.1.2.64 Turbine El 903 ArealB 4b.1.2.65 Turbine El 903 Area2A 4b.12.66 Turbine El 903 Area2B 4b.12.67 Turbine El 903 Area3B 4b.1.2.68 Turbine El 903 Area3C 40.1.2.69 Turbine El 903 Area4B 4b.1.2.70 Yard ArealC 4b0.12 Totals 4b. 1.3 Scaffolding in support of decomnonnl g Decontamination of Site Buildings 40,1.4.1 Reactor 40b.14.2 Augmented Radwaste 4b,1,4.3 Miscelaneous Structures
-Contaminated 4b,1.4.4 Muffi-Purpose Faccity 4b.1A.5 Radaste 4b.1.4.6 Turbine 4b.tIA Totals 4b. 1 Subtotal Period 4b Acivity Costs Pened 4b Additional Costs 4b.2.1 ISFSI Decontaminatioo 4b.22 Final Site Survey 4b.2 Subtotal Period 4b Addriional Costs Penod 4b Collateml Costs 4b.3.1 Procens liquid waste 4b.32 Small tool allowance 4b.3.3 Decomnussioning Equipment Disposition 4b.3 Subtotal Period 40 Collateral Costs 300 20 2 77 2 24 7 56 167 31 10 33 14 11 147 7 37 37 388 21 209 16 607-9 974 5 144 3 108 12 197 7.771 8 40 2 2 0 0 23 22 0 0 9 10 3 16 10 10 1 1 4 3 1 1 1 1 5 25 1 1 1 3 3 3 16 87 2 2 4 22 2 1 27 145 1 1 46 241 1 1 1 7 0 2 0 2 556 1,148 692 35 1 0-2336 149 281 12 153 12 7 -48 10 6 16 422 13 55* 50 1,490 29 374-23 2,478-15 4,133 9 128 35 28 13,202 5,814 186 1,227 1,227 14 74 74 1 3 3 109 567 567 1 3 3 4 28 1 8 54 278 278 87 554 554 49 253 253 6 37 37 21 109 109 7 39 39 7 36 36 104 703 703 5 26 26 18 114 114 23 116 116 335 2.313 2,313 13 67 67 112 721 721 10 52 52 548 3,805 3,805 6 32 32 904 6,299 6,299 4 20 20 56 337 337 6 47 47 16 124 -7 49 49 30 227 -5,535 34,027 33,227 821 4,232 4,232 3.310 15.922 15,922 51 215 215 363 1,777 1,777 90 437 437 141 572 572 477 1,928 1,928 4,432 20,950 20,850 11,285 61,417 60.618 360 2,290 362 1,567 1.567 722 3,857 1,567 113 566 566 35 265 265 130 973 973 278 1,804 1,804 7,412 154 9 0-1,651 28 28 662 3,009 681 125 33-.214 109 29 72 4,521-.57 586 222 15,948-.129 4.006-.101 26,533 S -68 44,251 42 1,375 376 124 299 227 -900 141,342 27.486-2,431 151 301,017 8,410 13.824 544 371 53 134.007 2,165 340 49 767* 213 59,432 1,472 122,212 4,693 61,083 880 8,024 263 19,185 898 7,011 410 6.482 298 183.615 3,931 5,136 172 23,813 1,033 19,878 1.004 647,659 11,113 11,556 504 162,678 5,781 9,017 451 1,077,531 17.302 9,127 232 1,797,054 27.674 3,729 142 55,851 4,040 15,251 97-3,412 12,139 367-5,770 8,056,388 218,627 122,988 41,117 3.073 36 17 252 34 2,880 1.820 52 19 368 167 68 55 159 50 526 142 4.055 2,253 202 422 4 6 is 42 6 12 9 14 35 51 271 547 4.911 2,376 23 60 759 62 115 89 38 161 64 833 5,910 3,382 4,318 13,131 942 1,800 19,364 10,578 656 4 24 -55 1,192.... 1,205 656 4 24 55 2,397 79 -30 161 183 230 .88 50 621 84 79 230 118 210 621 267 52.579 39.536 242 1,099 8,129 452 1234 1,567 404 2.953 688 11,664 63,275 57,271 800 207.048 90,895 2290 -1,050 2,290 1,050 839 6,000 373 ,000 1.012 6,069,283 115.053 119.386 1,978 372.774 12,956 205.066 3,237 310,769 5.883 1,193,496 18,679 8,270,774 157,766 16,987,290 418,513 162,629 17.515 162,629 17,515 38,338 125 303.507 88 341,844 213 2.560 12,480 15,040 TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station Decommissioning Coast Analysis Document N01-1590-002, Rev. I Appendix C, Page 33 of 35 Table C-3 Cooper Nuclear Station 2014 SAFSTOR Decommissioning Cost Estimate (thousands of 2008 dollars)I Activity Off-Sits LLRW NRC Spent Fuel Sits Processed Burial Volumes Burial I Utitty and I Decon Removal Packaging Transport Processing Disposal Other Total Total Lie. Torm, Management Restoration Volume Class A Class B Class C GTCC Processed Craft Contractor
, Coast Cost Costs Costs Costs Costs Costs Contingency Costs Costs Costs Costs Cu. Feet C. Fet CF .Ft Cu. Fot WL, Lbs. Mahors Maours I m I  n ex, Perod 41, Period-Dependent Costs 40.4.1 Decon supplies 1,252 -313 1,565 1,565 4b.4.2 Insurance
-1,199 120 1.319 1,319 40.4.3 Property taes -10 1 11 11 4b.4.4 Health physics supples 2,378 -594 2,972 2,972 41.4.5 Heavy equipment rent0l 4,294 ---644 4,938 4,938 4b.4.6 Disposal of DAW gereroted 55 31 876 -229 1,192 1,192 4b.4.7 Plant energy budget 1,701 255 1,956 1,956 40.4.8 NRC Fees 1,610 161 1.771 1,771 4b.4.9 Uquid Radwaste Processing Equipment/Senvices 918 138 1,055 1,055 4b.4.10 Security Staff Cost 6,984 1.148 8,032 8,032 4b.4.11 DOC Staff Cost 24,760 3,714 28,474 28,474 4b.4.12 Utility Staff Cost 33,266 4.990 38,256 38,256 4b.4 Subtotal Period 4b Period-Oependent Costs 1.252 6,672 55 31 876 70.448 12,207 91,542 91,542 4b.0 TOTAL PERIOD,4b COST 5,649 20,689 1.119 2,064 19,985 11.776 72.845 24,492 158,620 155,530 PERIOD 4e -License Termination Period 4e Direct Decommissioning Acbvtes 4e.1.1 ORISE confmlaatory surcey -.--147 44 191 191 4e.1.2 Terminate icnse a 4e.1 Subtotal Period 4e Activity Costs 147 44 191 191 Period 4e Additional Costs 40.2.1 Final Site Surtey 5,998 1,799 7.797 7,797 4e.2 Subtotal Period 4e Additional Costs 5.998 1,799 7,797 7,797 Period 4e Collateral Costs 4e.3.1 DOC staff relocation expenses 912 137 1,049 1,049 4e.3 Subtotal Period 4e Collateral Costs 912 137 1,049 1.049 Period 64 Perinod-Dependent Costs 40.4.1 Insurance
.. ..48.4.2 Property taxes- 3 0 3 3 4e.4.3 Health physics supplies 735 --184 010 919 4e.4.4 Disposal of DAWgenarated 3 1 42 11 57 57 4e.4.5 Plant energy budget 139 21 160 160 4e.4.6 NRC Fees 530 53 583 583 4e.4.7 Security Staff Cost 1.009 151 1.160 1,160 4e.4.8 DOC Staff Cost 4,442 666 5,108 5,108 40.4.9 Utity Staf Cost ---4.678 702 5,379 5,379 40.4 Subtsotal Period 4e Period-Dependest Costs 735 3 1 42 10.800 1,788 13,369 13,369 4e.0 TOTAL PERIOD 40 COST 735 3 1 42 17,857 3,768 22,407 22,407 PERIOD4 TOTALS 5,840 36,775 7,765 4,470 37,168 30,307 123.139 50,330 295,793 292,606 PERIOD 90 -Sits Restoration Peood 51 Direct Decomissioning Actvities Demoition of Remaining Site Buildings 5b.1.1.1 Reactor 1,491 224 1,715 5b.1.1.2 Augmetesd Radwasts 222 33 255 5b.1.1.3 Control 214 32 246 5b.1.1.4 Intake Structure 523 78 802 18,853 172,932 58 159,464 341,891 602,137 18.853 172,932 58 1,103,493 2,290 800 213,048 111,810 17,664,700 436,298 1,118,533 148,435 6.240 148.435 6.240 904 8,294 3 18,789 57.149---74,371 904 8,294 3 150,309--904 --8,94 148,438 156,549 2,290 897 384.676 155,874 1,377 344 508 28,279,480 736.765 1,781,267 1,715 255 246 602 14,601 2,119 1,655 5,621 TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuleear Station Decommoissioning Cast Analdysis Document N0-1590.002, Rev. I Appendix C, Page 34 of 35 Table C-3 Cooper Nuclear Station 2014 SAFSTOR Decommissioning Cost Estimate (thousands of 2008 dollars)I Actil.ty Off-Site LLRW NRC Spent Fuel Site Processed Burial Volumes Burial I UtUity and I Oemon Removal Packaging Transport Processing Disposal Other Total Total UC. Term, Management Restoration Volume Class A Class B Class C GTCC Pmcessed Craft Contractor I Cast Cost Costs Costs Costs Costs Costs Contlnoenrn Costs Costs Costs Costs Cu. Feet Cu. Fast Cu. Fast Cu. Fast Cu. Fast WRt. Lbs. Manhours Manhours I I n A at n 'o timacrim Cr Demolition of Remaining Site Buildings (continued) 5b.1.1.5 LLRW Storage Pad 5b.1.1.6 Miscellaneous Structures
-Clean 5b.1.1.7 Misetlaneous Structures
-Contaminated 5b.1.1.8 Muo-Purpose Faciity 5b.1.t9 OWC Gas Generator 5b. 1..10 tOfice 5b.1 1.11 Radwase 5b.1 112 Seal Wetl 5b.1 1.13 Sewage Treatment Area 5b 1.1.14 Transfomler Yard 5b.1 .115 Turbine 5b.1.1.16 Turbine Pedestal 5b.1.1 Totals Site Closeout Activities 5b.12 Remove Rubble 5b.1.3 Grade & ltadscape site 51,. 1.4 Finalrepon to NRC 5b. 1 Subtotal Period 5b Activity Costs Period 5b Additional Costs 5b.2.1 ISFSI Demolition 5b.2.2 Concrete Crushing 5b.2.3 Collardsm 5b.2 Subtotal Period 5b Additional Costs Period 5b Collateral Costs 5b.331 Smatl tool allowance 5b.3 Subtotal Period 5b Collateral Costs Period 5b Period-Dependent Costs 5b.4.1 Insurance 5b.4.2 Property laves 5b.4.3 Heavy equipment rental 5b.4.4 Plant energy budget 5b.4.5 Security Staff Cost 5b.4.8 DOC Staff Cost 5b.4.7 Uaty, Staff Cost 5b.4 Subtotal Period 5b Period-Dependent Costs 5b.0 TOTAL PERIOD 5b COST PERIOD S TOTALS TOTAL COST TO DECOMMISSION 145 1.198 27 123 18 156 391 17 4 20 2,596 277 7,418 424 578 8.421 487 499 458 1.444 55 55 4.233 4,233 14,153-14,153 13,012 59,570 8,087 22 167 179 1,375 4 30 18 141 3 20 23 179 59 449 3 20 1 5 3 24 389 2,985 42 318 1,113 8,531 167 1.375 30 141 20 179 449 20 5 24 2,985 318 8.531 488 665 9,684 582 527 1,109 1,227 11,837 572 1.982 283 1.920 3,229 166 53 172 40,503 2,100 88,040 3,286 1,578 1,560 92,904 1.560 4.336 160 3.045 -5,130 12,511 160 84 488.-87 665 -O15 23 179 179 156 1,286 9,863 179 44-52 80 811 76 582 69 527 224 1,720 a 63 8 63 1 9 635 4,869 25 192 363 2,782 1.532 11.744 876 5,183 3,232 24,777 811 611 7 167 2,419 10,212 4,507 17,312 63 63 8 4.869 192 2.782 11,744 5.183-24,777 611 35.634 611 35,634 45,051 127,649 73,209 245,908 105,415 247,628 105.415 247,625 17,520 4,751 36,424 179 17,520 4,751 38,424 179 5,424 37.168 34,469 618,965 131,014 907,708 674,964 195,398 37,347 384.676 227,370 1,377 344 588 29,135.660 973.379 7,882,560 TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document NO].1590.002, Rev. I Appendix C, Page 35 of 35 Table C-3 Cooper Nuclear Station 2014 SAFSTOR Decommissioning Cost Estimate (thousands of 2008 dollars)IActivity Off-Site LLRW NRC Spent Fuel Sit Processed Burial Volumos Burial I Utlibty and Decon Removal Packaging Transport Processing Disposal Other Total Total LIc. Tenm. Management Restoration Volumne Class A Class B Class C GTCC Processed Craft Contractor Cost Cost Costs Costs Costs Costs Costs Casts Costs Cu. Faot Cu. Feat Cu. Foot Cu. Feet Cu. Feet WL, Lbs. Manhours Manhours I* InOAY n as c t iiiiiii6w.
TOTAL COST TO DECOMMISSION WITH 16.87% CONTINGENCY:
$907,708 thousands of 2008 dollats TOTAL NRC UCENSE TERMINATION COST IS 74.36% OR: $674,964 thousands of 2008 dollars SPENT FUEL MANAGEMENT COST IS 21.63% OR: $195,398 thousands of 2008 dollars MON-NUCLEAR DEMOLITION COST IS 4.11% OR: $37,347 thousands of 2008 dollats TOTAL LOW-LEVEL RADIOACTIVE WASTE VOLUME BURIED (EXCLUDING GTCC): 229,092 cublc foot TOTAL GREATER THAN CLASS C RADWASTE VOLUME GENERATED:
608 cubic feet TOTAL SCRAP METAL REMOVED: 30,276 tons TOTAL CRAFT LABOR REQUIREMENTS:
973,379 man-hours End Notes"ia -indicates that this activity not charged as decommissioning expense..-indicates that tlbs activity pertosned by decommnssioning staff.0. Indicates that this value is less than 0.5 but is non-zero.o call containing
--indicates a ze= value TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document N01-1590-002, Rev. 1 Appendix D, Page I of 35 APPENDIX D DETAILED COST ANALYSES 2034 CESSATION OF OPERATIONS T able D -1, D E C O N ...............................................................................................
D -2 Table D -2, D elayed D ECON ...............................................................................
D -13 Table D -3, SA FSTO R ..........................................................................................
D -24 TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station Document NI01-1590.002, Rev. 1 Deoamnissioning Cost Analysis Appendix D, Page 2 of 35 Table D-1 Cooper Nuclear Station 2034 DECON Decommissioning Cost Estimate (thousands of 2008 dollars)Off-Site LLRW NRC Spent Fuel Site Processed Burial Volumes BurlsI Utiity and Activity Decon Removal Packaging Transport Processing Disposal Other Total Total Lic. Teem. Management Restoration Volume Class A Class B Class C GTCC Processed Craft Contractor Index Activity Description Cost Cost Costs Costs Costs Costs Costs Contin ency Costs Costs Costs Costs Cu. Feet Co. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Co. Feet WI. Lbs. Manhours Manhours PERIOD Ia -Shutdown through Transition Period 10 Direct Deconvmissioning Activities 18.1.1 Prepare preliminary decommissianing cost la.I,2 Notifiation of Cessation of Operations la.t13 Remove fuel & source material 10a.1.4 Notification of Permanent Defueling 1:.1.5 Deactivate plant systems & process waste 1 .1.6 Prepare and submit PSDAR 10.1.7 Review plant dwgs & specs.1:.1.8 Perform detailed rad survey 1a.1. 9 Eastiate by-product inventory 1a.1.10 End product description 1a,1.11 Detiailed by-product inventory la.1.12 Define major work sequence ta.1.13 Perform SER and EA 0.1.14 Perform Site-Specific Cost Study ta.1.15 Prepare/subrmt License Termination Ptan la.1.16 Receive NRC approval of termination plan Activity Specitications 1:.1,17.1 Plant & temporary facitites 1a.1.17.2 Plant systems 1:.l.117.3 NSS6 Decontamination Flush la .1.174 Reactor imternas a.1.t17.5 Reactor vessel 1 .1.17.0 Sacrificil shield la.1017.7 Maisture separators/reheaters 1 1.17.8 Reinforced concrete 1:.1.17.9 Man Turbine 10.1 t7.10 Main Cosdensers 10.1.17.11 Pressure suppression structure 10.1.17.12 Drpywal l:.1.17.13 Plant structures
& buildings 10.1.17. 14 Waste management 1:.1.17.15 Facility & site doseout 1.1.17 Total Planning & Site Preparations la.1.18 Prepare dismantling sequence 1:.1.19 Plant prep. & svces 1. 1.20 Design water dean-up system ,0.1.21 Rigging/Cord.
Cntrl Envlps/toolingletc.
10.1.22 Procure caskailineem
& containers la.1 Subtotal Period la Activity Costs Period Ia Colateral Costs la.3.1 Spent Fuel Capital and Transfer 10.3.2 Corporate Overheads la.3 Subtotal Period 1 a Codlateral Costs Period 10 Period-Dependent Costs la.4.1 Insurance ta.4.2 Property taxes 1a.4.3 Hlealth physic supplies la.4A Heavy equipment rental 130 20 150 150 51 1,300 200 460 100 100 130 750 310 500---.--410 492 417 50 710 650 50 100 160 209 209 200 160 312 460 90 4,268 240 2.700 140 2,100 123 12,661 a 30 230 230 69 529 529 15 115 115 15 115 115 20 150 150 113 863 063 47 357 357 75 575 575 61 471 471 a 74 566 509 63 479 431 a 58 58 107 817 817 98 748 748 8 58 58 15 115 115 24 184 92 31 240 240 31 240 240 30 230 230 24 184 184 47 359 179 69 529 529 14 104 52 640 4,909 4,481 36 276 276 405 3,105 3.105 21 161 161 315 2,415 2,415 18 141 141 1,899 14,560 14,132 400 3,129 466 3,570 3.570 874 6,699 3,570 160 1,760 1,760 0 4 4 93 463 463 55 423 423 57 48 92 179 52 428 428 24000 4,600 1,000 1,000 1,300 7,500 3.100 5,000 4,096 4.920 4,167 500 7.100 6.500 500 1.000 1,600 2.088 2.088 2,000 1,600 3.120 4.600 900 42,683 2,400 1,400 1,230 78,609------2,721------3,105------5.825 3.129 3,129 370 368 1,600 4 TLG Services, Inc.
0 Cooper Nuclear Station Deesasmiasstaing Coa, Analsuyis Document N01-1590-002, Rev. I Appendix D, Page 3 of"35 Table D-1 Cooper Nuclear Station 2034 DECON Decommissioning Cost Estimate (thousands of 2008 dollars)Off-Site LLRW NRC Spent Fuel site Processed Burial Volumes BurialI Utility and Activity Decon Removal Packaging Transport Processing Disposal Other Total Total Lic. Torm. Management Restoration Volume Class A Class B Class C GTCC Processed Craft Contractor Index Activity Description Cost Cost Costs Costs Costs Costs Costs Continies Costs Costs Costs Costs Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Wt. Lbs. Manhours Manhours Period 15 Period-Dependient Costs (cortnuel) la.4.5 Disposal of DAW generatsd 1 .4.6 Plant energy budget 1a4.7 NRC Fees ta.4.8 Emergency Planning Fees laA.49 Spent Fuel Pool O&M 1a.4.10 ISFSI Operating Costs t:.4.11 Security Staff Cost ta.4.t2 Uildity Staff Cost la.4 Subtotal Penod la Penod-Dependent Costs la.0 TOTAL PERIOD lo COST PERIOD lb -Decommnissioning Preparations Period lb Direct Decommissioning Activities Detailed Work Procedures lb.1.1.1 Plant systems 1b.1.1.2 NSSS Decont amination Flush lb.1.1.3 Reactor internals lb.1.1.4 Remaining buildings lb.1.1.5 CRD housings & Nis lbt.1.6 Inmore instrumentaton lb.1.1.7 Removal primary containment tb*l.1.8 Reactor voesel lb. 1.9 Facility closeout lb 1.1.10 Sacrdcial shield lb. 1111 Reinforred conorete lb.1.1.12 Main Turbine 1t.1.1.13 Main Condensers lb.1.1.14 Moisture separators
& reheaters lb,1.1,15 Radwaste building lb 1116 Reactor building lb,1.1 Total 1b,1.2 Decon NSSS lb.1 Subtotal Period lb Activity Costs Period l b Additional Costs lb.2.1 Spent Fuel Pool Isolation 1b.22 Site Characterization 1 b.2.3 Asbestos insulation Disposal 15.2 Subtotal Period lb Additional Costs Period lb Collaterl Costs lb.3.1 Decon equipment 1 b,3.2 DOC staff reocauton expenses i b.3.3 Process liquid waste I b.34 Small tool allowance 1 b.3.5 Pipe cutting equipment Ib.3.6 Decon rig 1b.3.7 Spent Fuel Capital and Transfer Ib.3.8 Corporate O=mreeds 1b.3 Subtotal Period 1 b Collateral Costs 738 738 3 -73 927 706 1.185 745 85 5,483* .22.690 3 73 33.424 19 100 100 139 1,069 1,066 71 776 770 118 1,303 -112 857 13 98 -822 6,306 6,306 3,403 26,093 26.093 5.006 39,249 36.991 1,303 857 98 2,258 5.387 428 1,575 1,575 1,575 14,445 14,445 157,471 423,400 5 580,871 3 73 51,910 7,779 60,508 54,693 473 100 400 135 100 100 200 363 120 120 100 208 209 200 273 273 3,374 71 544 490 15 115 110 60 460 460 20 155 39 15 115 115 15 115 115 30 230 230 54 417 417 18 138 69 18 138 138 15 115 58 31 239 239 31 240 240 30 230 230 41 314 283 41 314 283 506 3,880 3.520 174 523 523 54 116"58 31 31 360 14,445 5 659,480-.4,733 1,000-4,000 1,350 1,000-.1,000 2,000 3,630 1.200 1.200 1,000 2,080 2Z088 2,000 2.730 2,730-33,741 1,067 1,067 33,741 134.329 10,002 134.329 10,002 85.905 189 85,905 189 348 348 3,374 680 4.403 4,043 773 773 713 64"11 1,400 2,177 1,011 I 65 1 65 46 46 249 249 9,407 5,395 009 14,802 912 1,80.90 1,880-1,554 1.806 4,346 1,411 10,818 10.818 1,919 7.014 7,014 265 1,662 1,662 3,295 19,493 19,493 107 820 820 137 1,049 1,049 525 2,690 2,690 2 12 12 150 1,150 1,150 210 1,910 1,610 282 2,162 -233 1,787 1,787 1,646 11,280 9.118 2,162 2,162 10.333 10,333 427 543 427 543 TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station Document N01-1590-002, Rev. I Decommissioning Coast Analysij Appendix D, Page 4 of 35 Table D-1 Cooper Nuclear Station 2034 DECON Decommissioning Cost Estimate (thousands of 2008 dollars)off-Site LLRW NRC Spent Fual site Processed Burial Volumes Burial I Utilty and Activity Decon Removal Packaging Transport Processing Disposal Other Total Total Lie. Term. Management Reetoration Volume Clans A Clans B Class C GTCC Processed Craft Contractor index Activity Descrlptlon cost cost costs Costs Costs Cooss Cools ConulnFene Coots cost Cools canto Ca. Feet Ca.u. Fee W. Lbs nhor Manhnour Period lb Period-Dependent Costs lb.4.l Decon supplies lb.4.2 Insurance lb.4.3 Property taxes lb4.4 Health physics supplies 1 bA.5 Heavy eqtuipment rental lb.4.6 Disposal of DAW generated lb.4.7 Plant energy budget lb.4.5 NRC Fees lb.4.9 Emergency planning Fees lb.4.10 Spent Fuel Pool O&M lb.4.11 ISFSI Operating Costs 1b.4.12 Security Staff Cost lb.4.13 DOC Staff Cast lb.4.14 Utility Staff Cost lb.4 Subtotal Period lb Penod-Dependent Costs lb.0 TOTAL PERIOD 1 COST PERIOD I TOTALS PERIOD 2a -Large Component Removal Period 2a Direct Decommissioning Activities Nudear Steam Supply System Removal 2a.1.1.1 Recirculation System Piping & Valves 2a.1.1.2 Recirculation Pumps & Motor 2a.1.1.3 CRDMs & NIs Removal 2a.1.1.4 Reactor Vessel Intertals 2a.1.1.5 Reactor Vessel 2a.I.1 Totals Removal of Major Equipment 2 .12 Main TurbinelGenerator 2a.1.3 Main Condensers Cascading Costs hrom Clean Building Demolition 2a .1.4.1 Reactor 2a.1.4.2 Augmented Radwaste 20.1.4.3 Rodwaste 20.1.4.4 Turbine 2a.1.4 Totals Disposal of Plant Systems 2a.1.5.1 Augmented Radwaste El 877 AnealA 2a.1.5.2 Augmented Radwasle El 903 AtaIA 2a.1.5.3 Augmented Radwaste El 918 AjealA 2a.1.5.4 Augmented Raedaste El 929 AnalA 2a.1.5.5 Augmented Radwaohe El 929 ArealB 2u.1.5.8 DRYVWELL ArealA 20.1.5.7 DRYWELL AreatB 20.1.5.8 Multi-Purpose Facility 20.1.5.9 Reactor El 903 ArealA 2a.1.5.10 Reactor El 903 ArealB 2a.t.5.11 Turbine El 932 ArealB 2a.1.5.12 Turbine El 932 Area2C 22 4* 242 183 --3 2 22 425 3 2 2,547 2,209 49 316 2,547 2,947 54 318 90 71 14 20 33 28 11 29 133 139 377 92 119 2,32 5,343 2,009 56 5,457 1,460 762 431 8,05O 7,205 2,912 171 928 379 722 552 273 260 25 43 285 613 207 28 28 68 6 7 53 10 9 21 4 5 3 0 0 534 85 84 134 3 5 202 6 15 404 56 42 462 13 34 332 52 99 8 244 2 43 924 352 591 372 42 Z,734 4,759 11.380 43 21,400 5 27 27 24 269 269 0 2 2 60 302 302 27 211 211 11 58 58 139 1,063 1,063 35 387 387 59 650 56 427 6 49 410 3,144 3,144 714 5,473 5,473 1,707 13,086 13,086 3,255 25,149 24,023 650 427 49 1,126 -3.288 350 920 8.439 920 8.439 3 78,520 63,440 212,160 3 354,120 2,407 43.922 8,876 60,325 56,677 11,680 543 13,255 543 228,674 11,261 387,861 243,119 11,265 1,047,341 2.480 95.833 16,655 120.833 111.370 8.675 788 303 321 317 16,414 218 5.384 218 22.739 437 6.057 389 3.773 812 432 104 139 73 3 0-1,289 54 28 201 47 651 443 131 882 725 142 639 639 109 532 532 232 1,291 1,291 11,909 38,374 38,374 7.401 20,739 20.739 19.714 61,576 61,576 1,188 9,011 9,011 1,45 7,177 7.177 39 299 299 4 28 28 7 50 8o 43 328 328 92 705 705 167 882 862 45 230 230 50 261 261 25 128 128 1 8 8 477 2,470 2,470 W0 274 274 95 566 566 276 1,428 1,428 221 1,305 1,305 416 2,505 2,505 1 9 997 120,597 4.031 1,188 132,880 1.683 6,935 --126,494 8,209 1,878 976 1,205 378,084 28,075 1,255 11,211 2,128 -1,440,354 28.075 1.255 22,209 3.104 1,205 2.196,409 68,073 2.510 58,524 1,725 36,456 3,604 2,788,381 4,555 1,963,840 19,966 2,486 235 359 4.419 7,498 2,055 172,205 5,783 469 41,606 1,889 765 55,345 1,451 324 29.038 591 36 1 1.538 77 5,726 513,627 15,069 577 126 34,718 4,142 2,148 214 105,982 5,547-2,892 259.190 10,573 4,739 583 244,706 12,864 9,442 3,220 672,225 9,481 237 TLG Servicas, Inc.
Cooper Nuaclear Sioiuso Decommissio~ning Cast Anslyais D -1 NTOJ.13OwdO2 Rer. J Appensdix D), Page 5 of.55 Table D-1 Cooper Nuclear Station 2034 DECON Decommissioning Cost Estimate (thousands of 2008 dollars)m I civityn Off-Site LLRW NRC Spent Fuel Sits Processed Burial Volumes Burial I Utility and Decon Removal Packaging Transport Processing Disposal Other Total Total sic. Tenm. Management Restoration Volume Clans A Class B Class C GTCC Processed Craft Custractor, COst Coot Cnsts Costs Costs Costs Costs Continnaenc Costs Costs Costa Costs Ca. Foot Cu. Fent Cu. Foet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet WL Lbs, Manhours Manhours I* innnl nmmn n ex ..u..v -t Costs Costs C'Osts Costs osts costs Cu. Feet Cu.Fnt Cu.Feet Cu.Feet Cu.Fewt Wt. Lbs. Manhours Manhcurs---------
11.&#xfd; --DiOsposal of Plant Systems (contnued) 2:.1.5.13 Turbine El 932 Ara3C 2 .1.5.14 Yard Areal B 2a.1.5 Totals 2a.1.6 Scaffolding in suppot o1 decommissioning 2a. 1 Subtotal Period 2a Activity Costs Period 2a Collateral Costs 2.3.1 Process liquid waste 2a.3.2 Small tool allowance 20.3.3 Spent Fuel Capital and Transfer 2a.3.4 Corporate Overheads 2a.3 Subtotal Period 2a Collateral Costs Period 2a Period-Dependent Costs 20.4.1 Decen supplies 20.4.2 Insurance 2a.4.3 Property taxes 2a.4.4 Health physics supplies 2a.4.5 Heavy equipment rental 2a.4,6 Disposal of DAW generated 20.4.7 Plant energy budget 20.4.8 NRC Fees 20.4.9 Emergency Planning Fees 20.4.10 Spent Fuel Pool O&M 20.4.11 ISFS1 Operating Costs 20.4.12 Security Staff Cost 20.4.13 DOC Staff Cost 20.4.14 Utility Staff Cost 20.4 Subtotal Period 2a Pedod-Depenadent Costs 20.0 TOTAL PERIOD 2a COST PERIOD 2b -Site Decontamination Period 2b Direct Decohmmssioning Activites Disposal of Plant Systems 2b.1.1.1 Control E 882 AmaolB 2b. 1.1.2 Control El 903 ArealC 25.1.1.3 Control El 918AreaC 2b.1.1.4 Control El 932 ArealC 25.1.1.5 Intake 2b.1.1.6 Radwaste El 877 ArealA 25.1.1.7 Radwaste El 877 Area2A 25.1.1.8 Radwaste El 877 Ara3A 2b.1.1.9 Radwast El 903 ArealA 2b.1.1.10 Radwaste El 903 Ama2A 2b.1.1.11 Radwaste El 903 Area3A 2b.1.1.12 Radwaste El 18 ArealA 2b.1.1.13 Radwaste El t18 Area2A 25.1.1.14 Radwaste El 918 Area3A 2b.1.1.15 Radwaste 934 ArealA 2b.I.1.16 Radwaste El 934 Area2A 25.1.1.17 Radwaste El 949 ArealA 67 -518 110 284 3,013 374 612 2,070 24 11 431 14,647 8,983 4,186 135 -44 231 124 135 124 44 231 61 -1,262 2,480 -34 19 61 3,741 34 19 627 18,513 9.060 4,437* 285 17 42 170 -66 22 101 405 75 62 44 9 7 84 16 13 113 9 10 192 36 29 37 6 7 21 2 2 17 3 3 189 23 22 26 3 4 100 11 12 12 1 2 3.535 1.198 5,117 4,817 168 23 15,116 28,780 437 5,279-3,202 264 8,480 688 6 537 1,235 923 1,183 1,046 119 6,631 16.275 22,962 537 51,067 15,116 29,580 59,985 554 147 -949 113 201 153 439 104 30 39 338 60 177 24 10 78 -1,013 6,657 6,657 2,847 16,780 16.693 553 2,848 2.848 25.519 98,097 98,010 173 847 847 19 143 129 792 6,070 480 3,682 3,682 1,463 10,742 4,657 15 76 76 69 756 756 1 6 6 315 1.577 1,577 372 2,852 2,852 140 730 730 185 1,420 1,420 92 1,016 1,016 116 1.301 157 1.203 18 137 995 7,626 7,626 2,441 18,716 18,718 3.444 26,407 26,407 8.363 63,822 61,182 35,345 172,662 163,849 199 1,243 1,243 25 195 -10 76 3 26 15 116 -355 1.845 1,845 41 214 214 75 308 308 69 355 355 166 861 861 37 191 191 13 68 68 15 76 76 137 710 710 22 115 115 72 372 372 9 47 47 78 --37,846 5.399 87 54,788 21,774 1,621 101 87 151,388 49,413 3,184 6,070 6.070 1,301 1,203 137 2,640--921 14 14 921 11,545 1 -11,545--2,083 2,014,081 14.477 4,144,259 84,262 81,992 28,092 1,205 11.174,880 212,445 2,510 55,244 180 -55,244 180 105,898 35 185,051 222,354 413,989 105,898 35 821,394 1,205 11,336,020 212,660 823,904 299,222 7,975 --5,155 2,100 702-3.136 377,917 11,133 44,992 1,207 79,963 2.349 61,153 3,102 175,093 5,412 41.366 1,047 12.033 572 15,667 455 134,827 5,152 23,735 692 70,665 2,706 9,381 310 8,711 102 151,388 61,878 3,104-5.929 674 195 76 26 116 5,097 613 1,156 684 1,955 463 135 201 1,690 266 808 105 TLG Serviceo, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document N01-15900)02, Rev. I Appendix D, Page 6 of"35 Table D-1 Cooper Nuclear Station 2034 DECON Decommissioning Cost Estimate (thousands of 2008 dollars)IActivity Off-Silo LLRW NRC Spsnt Fuel site Processed Burial Volumes Burial I Utility and i Decon Removal Packaging Transport Processing Disposal Other Total Total Lic, Trnm. Management Restoration Volume Class A Class B Class C GTCC Processed Craft Contractor cost Cast Costs Costs costs costs Costs Conlineonsv Costs Costs Costs Costs Cu. Feet Cu. Fast Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Wt. Lbs. Manhours Manhours I i I tflnAf flOfDN n ex C pt n Disposal of Plant Systems (continued) 2b.1.1.18 Reactor al 859 ealiA 2b.1.1.19 Reacto El 859 AkealB 2b.1.1.20 Reactor a 859 Are2A 2b.1.1.21 Reactor El 859 Area2B 2b.1.1.22 Reoctor E 59 Area3A 2b.1.1.23 Reactor El 859 Area3B 2.1,.1.24 Reactor El 859 Area4A 2b.t.1'25 Reactor El 859 Area48 2b.1.1.26 Reactor El 859 Aret5A 2b.1.1.27 Reactor El 859 Area5B 2b.1.1.28 Reactor El f83 Area2A 2b.1.1.29 Reactor El 903 Area2B 2b.1.1.30 Reactor EA 903 Aroo3A 2b.1.1.31 Reactor EA 9D3 Arwe3B 2b.1.1.32 Reactor Ef 903 Area4A 2b.1.1.33 Reactor El 083 Area4B 2b.I.1.34 Reactor EI 931 AreslA 2b.1.1.35 Reactor El931 ArealB 2b.1.1.36 Reactor El931Area2A 2b.1.1.37 Reactor El 931 Area2B 2b.1.1.38 Reactor El 931 Area3A 2b.1.1.39 Reactor El 931 Are3B 2b51.1.40 Reactor El 931 Area4C 2b.1 .1.41 Reactor El 3l AreasC 2b.1.1.42 Reactor El S58 ArelA 2b. 1.1.43 Reactor El 958 Areml8 2b.1.1.44 Reactor El 958 A8 a2A 2b,51 145 Reactor El s58 Are2B 2b.511.46 Reactor El8 958Ae3A 2b.1.1.47 Reactor EA 958 Area3B 2b51,1.48 Turbine El 882 ArelA 2b.1.1.49 Turbine El 882 ArealB 2b51.1.50 Turbine El 852 Area2A 2b.1.1.51 Turbine El 882 Area2B 2b1,
* 32 Turbine El 882 Area3A 2b.1.1.53 Turbine El 882 Area3 2b.1.1.54 Turbine El 903 ArealA 2b.1.1.55 Turbine FJ 903 AesIB 2b51,156 Turbine El 903 Aea2A 2b51.1.57 Turbine El 03 Area2B 2511.58 Turbine El 903 Aa3B 2b.1.1.59 Turbine 003 Area3C 2b51.1.60 Turbin El 903 Area4B 2b51.1.61 YardAreaiC 2b.1.1 Totals 2b. 1.2 Scaffolding in support of decommnrissioning Decontamination of Site Budings 2b.1.3.1 Reactor 2b.1,3,2 Augmented Redwaste 2b.1.3.3 Mascelaneous Structures
-Contamninated 2b.1.3.4 Mutj-Purposs Facility 2b.1.3.5 Radwaste 2b.1.3.6 Turbine 2b.1.3 Totals 72 449 73 70 48 34 51 17 64 38 4 71 37 25 31 24 25 307 31 3 123 3 24 7 57 171 49 15 38 17 38 394 22 213 17 620 9 995 5 147 3 108 12 197 6,646 15 16 29 64 25 26 3 8 9 9 2 3 9 8 1 2 16 17 2 3 0 0 5 12 10 11 2 3 8 9 1 3 3 3 22 45 2 2 0 0 23 22 0 0 9 10 8 18 10 10 1 1 4 3 1 1 3 3 40 95 2 2 10 23 2 1 62 156 1 1 134 271 1 1 3 8 0 2 0 2 6893 1,087 246 712 344-401 99 40 137 23 23 117 19 14 252 23 23 6 149 51-167 37 17 136 38 17 52 483 256-35 1 0 336 1 0 149 209 88-153 6 14-48 6 12-50 1.101 478-29 301 89-23 1,960 633-15 2.728 1,717-8 105 30 33 2 26 3 8,811 8,996 83 432 432 317 1,914 1,914 125 650 650 44 284 264 49 252 252 18 103 103 44 229 229 11 65 65 86 445 445 19 107 107 3 14 14 55 342 342 54 279 279 17 101 101 44 229 229 17 101 101 20 104 104 222 1,334 1,334 17 87 87 1 5 5 120 625 625 1 4 4 4 28 I 8 -54 279 279 100 594 594 53 276 276 8 46 46 22 116 116 8 45 45 23 117 117 402 2,515 2,515 13 68 68 125 762 762 10 53 53 637 4,068 4,068 6 33 33 1,141 6,983 8,993 4 20 20 62 355 355 7 48 48 16 124 -8 50 50 30 227 -5,365 31,398 30,598 691 3,560 3,560 2,767 13.241 13,241 71 316 316 372 1,815 1.815 118 579 579 196 850 850 689 3,001 3,001 4.214 19,801 19,801 28 8 124 227 8o0-1,091 7,624 1,526-1,780 1,055 177-608 249 103-520 208 82 1.163 242 102 26 1.594 225 741 401 77 666 411 75-232 5,169 1,137 154 7 1 1.651 7 0-662 2,238 392-681 66 63-214 60 54-222 11,784 2.117-129 3,227 405-101 20,984 2,817-68 29.100 7,631-42 1,122 133 357 9 276 11 92,185 41,662 2,028 128 50,830 18.343 242 2,189 8.129 679 1,234 3,087 404 5,886 688 23,302 61,526 51,485 97,874 2,068 440,483 12.740 159,714 2,137 58,760 2,009 54.543 1,356 19,362 975 48,666 1,416 14,010 487-14,381 1,839 18,927 1,114 2,372 123 84.943 1,983 66.516 1,109 23,200 744 54,373 928 23,408 717 20,858 681 311,878 8,640 13,824 881 380 91 134,007 3,509 345 85--767 S -213 59,432 1,492 126.002 4,814 61,083 1.425 8,331 430 19,185 1,070 7,250 491 19,878 1,028 668,352 11,459 11,556 597 166,542 5,929 9,017 461 1,104,460 17,788 6,127 239 1,868,932 28,509 3,729 145 57,476 4,141 15,340 97-3,412 12,251 397.- ,770 7,327,776 189,487 102,490 35.115 3,680,298 101,984 228,383 2,299 395,527 13,327 356.985 3,680 603,975 6,839 2,357,288 21,920 7.622,455 150,050 2,588 30 14 210 29 2.702 1,457 55 32 377 174 72 73 167 98 552 267 3,924 2.088 131 7 is 11 18 70 252 320 10 43 19 26 97 515 4,748 1.116 23 119 759 74 115 172 38 319 84 1,261 5.747 3.061 TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document NI01-1590-002, Rev. I Appendix D, Page 7 of3 5 Table D-1 Cooper Nuclear Station 2034 DECON Decommissioning Cost Estimate (thousands of 2008 dollars)off-sita LLRW NRC Spent Fuel Situ Processed Burial Volumes BurialI Utlty and Activity Decon Removal Packaging Transport Processing Disposal Other Total Total Lic. Term. Management Restoration Volume Class A Class B Class C GTCC Processed Craft Contractor Index Activio Description Cost Cost Costs Costs Costs Costs Costs Contin encv Costs Costs Costs Costs Cu. Feel Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Foot Cu. Feet Wt. Lbs. Manhours Manhours 2b.1 Subtotal Period 2b Activity Costs 3.924 11.322 975 1,616 14,567 12,086 -10.269 54.759 53,960 880 155,741 93.273 --15,052.720 374,651 -Period 2b Collateral Costs 2b.3.1 Process liquid waste 2b.3.2 Small teW allowance 2b.3.3 Spent Fuel Capital and Transfer 2b.3.4 Corporate Overteads 2b.3 Subtotal Period 2b Collateral Costs 184 -54 283 323 211 1,035 1,035-195 29 225 225 -15,867 2.380 18,247 -18,247..... 5,754 863 6,618 6,618 -164 195 54 283 323 21,621 3,483 26.124 7,877 18,247 Period 2b Period-Dependeot Costs 2b.4.1 Decon supplies 1,318 -330 1,648 1,648 2b.4.2 Insutrance
-1,273 127 1.400 1,400 2b.4.3 Property taxes -10 1 11 11 -2b.4.4 Health physics supplies 2,257 -564 2,822 2,822 2b.4.5 Heavy equipment rental 4.559 ---684 5,243 5,243 2b.4.6 Disposal of DAW generated
-53 29 835 -218 1,135 1,135 2b.4.7 Plant energy budget -1,805 271 2.076 2,076 2h.4.8 NRC Fees 1,709 171 1,880 1.880 2b.4.9 Emergency Planning Fees 2,190 219 2,409 2,409 2b.4.10 Spent Fuel Pool O&M 1.936 290 2,227 -2,227 2b.4.11 Liquid Radwaste Processing Equipment/Services 487 73 560 560 -2b.4.12 ISFSI Operating Costs 220 33 254 -254 2b.4.13 Security Staff Cost 12,279 1,842 14,120 14,120 -2b.4.14 DOC Staff Cost 29.008 4,351 33,359 33,359 2b.4.15 Ulily Staff Cost 40,864 6,130 46,993 46,993 -2b.4 Subtotal Period 2b Period-Dependent Costs 1,318 6,816 53 29 835 91.781 15,324 116,137 111,248 4,889 1,126 67.588 220 1,126 67,588 220 17,954 164,691 55 342,634 395,491 734,023 17.954 164.691 55 1.472,109 800 155,741 112,354 15,285.000 374,928 1,472.109 2b.0 TOTAL PERIOD 2b COST PERIOD 2c -Decontamination Folosing Wet Fuel Storage Period 2c Direct Decommissioning Actovilaes 2c.1.1 Remove spent fuel racks Disposal of Plant Systems 2c.1.2.1 Reactor El 1001 ArealA 2c.1.2.2 Reactor El 1001 Areal B 2c. 1.2.3 Reactor El 976 AreslA 2c.1.2.4 Reactor El 976 Area lB 2c.1.2.5 Reactor El 976 Aree2A 2c.1.2.6 Reactor El 976 Area2B 2c.1.2 Totals Decontamination of Site Buildings 2c.1.3.l Reactor (post fuel)2c.1.3 Totals 2c 1.4 Scaffolding in support of decommsuioning 2c.1 Subtotal Period 2c Actiolty Costs Period 2c Additional Costs 2c.2.1 Final Site Survey 2c.2 Subtotal Period 2c Additional Costs 5,407 18.334 1,081 1,928 14,567 13,243 113,402 29,057 197,020 173.085 23.135 267 33 79 88 1,348 50 7 8 121 64 1 4 54 13 i1 1 1 1 16 150 11 27 328 115 7 1 1 -13 38 1 3 42 16 321 23 44 424 293 257 510 97 138 163 1,742 257 510 97 138 163 1.742 500 2,316 2,316 45 231 231 28 164 164 7 36 36 121 752 752 5 26 26 20 121 121 226 1,331 1.331 747 3,656 3,658 747 3.656 3,658 138 712 712 1,611 8,014 8.014 5,988-537 48,175 1,273 578 57 28,513 1,737-72 6,482 324 3,516 511 188,501 4,017-57 5,136 174 449 72 24,474 1,056 4,543 1,305 301,281 8,561 1,749 32,119 3,281,659 18,302 1,749 32,119 3.281,659 18,302 537,141 1,004 518 6 42 6 405 25 6.697 39,437 20,498 7,023 4,140.579 34,890 525 1,382 205 273 630 3,389 1,205 362 1,567 1.567 1,205 362 1,567 1,567 12,480--12,480 TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station Document N01.1590-002, Rev. I Decommissioning Cost Analysis Appendix D, Page 8 of 35 Table D-1 Cooper Nuclear Station 2034 DECON Decommissioning Cost Estimate (thousands of 2008 dollars).off-Sit LLRW NRC Spent Fuei Site Processed Burial Volumes Buriall Utility and Activy Decon Removal Packaging Transport Processing Disposal Other Total Total Lc. Terom Management Restoration Volume Class A Class B Class C GTCC Processed Craft Contractor index Activity Description Cost Cost Costs Costs Cost. Costs Costs ContinIen Cost. Costs Costs Costs Cu. Feet Cu Feet Cu. Feet Cu Feet Cu Feet WI. Lbs. Manhours Manhours Period 2c Collateral Costs 2c.3. 1 Process liquid waste 2c.3 2 Small tool allowance 2c.3.3 Deconmissionng Equtlment Disposition 2c.3.4 Spent Fuel Capital and Transfer 2c.3 Subtotal Period 2c Collateral Costs 101 33 175 200-22 s8 50 621 84--1,949 101 22 121 225 621 284 1,949 Period 2c Period-Dependent Costs 2c.4.1 Decon supplies 90 -2c.4.2 Insurance 197 2c.4.3 Property taxes -2 2c.4.4 Health physics supplies 256 2c.4.5 Heavy equipment rental 707 2c.4.6 Disposal of DAW generated
-12 6 184 -2c.4.7 Plant energy budget -149 2c.4.8 NRC Fees 265 2c.4.9 Emergency Planning Fees 340 2C.4.10 Liquid Radwaste Processing EquipmentlServices 151 2C.4.11 ISFSI Operating Costs 34 2C.4.12 Security Staff Cost 1,159 2c.4.13 DOC Staff Cost 3,126 2C.4.14 Utlity Staff Cost 4,699 2c,4 Subtotal Period 2c Peaod-Dependent Costs 90 963 12 6 184 10,123 130 639 639 3 25 25 130 973 973 292 2,242 -556 3,879 1,637 23 113 113 20 217 217 0 2 2 64 320 320 106 813 813 46 250 250 22 172 172 27 292 292 34 373 -23 174 174 5 39 174 1,333 1,333 469 3,595 3,595 705 5.404 5,404 1,719 13,096 12,684 4,248 26,556 23,902 2,242 2,242 373 39 413 2,654 696 41.756 136 6.000 373 303.507 88 6.000 1,069 345.263 224 3,949 36,227 12 27.930 42,000 80,220 3,949 36,227 12 150,150 2c.0 TOTAL PERIOD 2c COST PERIOD 2e -License Termination Period 2e Direct Decommissioning Activiats 2e.1.1 ORISE confirmatory survey 2e.1.2 Terninate license 2e. 1 Subtotal Period 2e Actuty Costs Period 2e Additional Costs 2e.2.1 Final Site Survey 2e.2 Subtotal Period 2e Additional Costs Period 2e Collateral Costs 20.3.1 DOC staff relocation expenses 2e.3.2 Spent Fuel Capital and Transfer 2e.3 Subtotal Period 2e Collateral Costs Period 2e Period-Dependent Costs 2e.4.1 Insurance 2e.4.2 Property taxes 2e.4.3 Health physics supplies 2e,4.4 Disposal of DAW generated 20.4.5 Plant energy budget 2e.4.6 NRC Fees 2e.4.7 Emergency Planning Fees 2.4.8 ISFS1 Operatng Costs 2e.4.9 Security Staff Cost 2e.4.10 DOC Staff Cost 2e.4.11 Utifity Staff Cost 20.4 Subtotal Period 2e Period-Dependent Costs 2e.0 TOTAL PERIOD 2e COST 716 2,367 337 504 1,251 3,856 13,277 12,697 44.455 4,522,069 35,126 162,630 147 44 191 191 147 44 191 191* 5.912* -5718--...-912-..---571* ~~ , ----1483 737 3 737 3 737 3 327 3 1 42 139 530 633 64 2,125 4,442 5,071 1 42 13,334 1,799 7,797 7,797 1,799 7,797 7,797 137 1,049 1,049 80 656 -222 1,705 1,049 33 360 360 0 3 3 184 921 921 11 58 58 21 160 160 53 583 583 63 696 -10 73 319 2,444 2,444 666 5,108 5,108 761 5,832 5,832 2.121 16.238 15.468 148.435 6,240 148,435 6.240 656 656 696 73 769 1,426 914 8,380 3 50.886 57,149-80,634 914 8,380 3 188,669 I 42 20,962 4.187 25,931 24,506 914 8,380 148.438 194.909 TMG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document N01.1590-002, Rev. I Appendix D, Page 9 of 35 Table D-1 Cooper Nuclear Station 2034 DECON Decommissioning Cost Estimate (thousands of 2008 dollars)Off-Sit. LLRW NRC Spent Fuel Site Processed Burial Volumes Burial I Utlity and Activiy Docon Removal Packaging Transport Processing Disposal Other Total Total Lic. Term. Management Restoration Volume Class A Class B Class C GTCC Processed Craft Contractor Index Acvity Descriptlon Cost Cost Costs Costs Costs Costs Costs Continaenc Costs Costs Costs Costs Cu. Feet Cu. Feat Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet WL Lbs. Manhoure Manhours PERIOD 2 TOTALS 6,750 39,950 10,481 6,870 30,933 46,723 207,625 72,836 422,169 385,342 35,926 901 319,826 219,601 3,104 1,205 31,151,470 771,150 2.653,551 PERIOD 3b -Sit Restoration Period 31 Direct Decommissioning Activities Demolition of Remaining Site Buishings 3b.1.1.1 Reactor 3b.1.1.2 Augmented Radwaste 3b.1.1.3 Control 3b.1.1.4 Intake Structure 31.1.1.5 LLRW Storage Pad 3b.1.1.6 Miscellaneous Structures
-Clean 3b.1.1.7 Misceaneous Stnrutures
-Contaminated 3b.1.1.8 MuiS-Purpose Facilty 3b.1.1.8 OWC Gas Generator 3b.1.1.10 Office 3b.1.1.11 Radreste 3b51.1.12 SealWen 3b 1.1 13 Sewrage Treatment Area 3b.1.1.14 Transfonner Yard 3b.1.1.15 Turbine 3b.1.1.16 Turbine Pedestal 3b.1.1.17 Reactor (post fuel)3b.1.1 Totals Site Closeout Ac'invies 3b. 1 .2 Remove Rubble 3b. 1.3 Grade & landscape site 3b.1.4 Final report to NRC 3b. 1 Subtotal Peard 3b Activity Cosos Period 3b Additonal Costs 3b.2.1 Concrete Crushing 3b.2.2 Cofferdam 3b.2 Subtotal Period 3b Additional Costs Period 3b Collateral Costs 3b.3.1 Small tool alrowance 3b.3.2 Spent Fuel Capital and Transfer 3b.3 Subtotal Period 3b Collateral Costs Period 3b Period-Dependent Costs 3b54.1 InsuranceProperty toxes 3 .4.3 Heavy equapment rental 3b.4.4 Plant energy budget 3b.4.5 NRC ISFSI Fees 3b.4.8 Emergency Planning Fees 3b.4.7 ISFSI Operating Costs 354.8 Security Staff Cost 31.4.9 DOC Staff Cost 3b.4.10 Utility Staff Cost 3b.4 Subtotal Period 3b Pedod-Oependent Costs 3b.0 TOTAL PERIOD 3b COST 1,473 222 214 523 145 1,196 27 123 18 156 391 17 4 20 2,596 277* 18 7,418 424 578 8,421 499 458 957 53 53 4,053 4,053 13,483 221 1,694 33 255 32 246 78 602 22 167 179 1,375 4 30 1i 141 3 20 23 179 59 449 3 20 1 5 3 24 389 2.985 42 318 3 21 1,113 8.531 1.694 255 246 602 167 1,375 30 141 20 179 449 20 5 24 2,985 318 21 8,531 14,089 2,119 1,655 5,621 1,227 11,837 572 1,982 283 1.920 3.229 166 53 172 40.503 2.100 512 88,040 3,288 1,578 1.560 92,904 1.560 64 488-87 6685 156 23 179 179 156 1,286 0,863 179 488 686 9,684 8 76 582-69 527 8 145 1.109-8 61 758 114 872 758 122 932 582 3,045 527 5,130 1,109 8,175 61 872 -872 61 751 7 160 437 1,453 148 4,878 9,777 5,903 23,513 75 826 826 1 8 8 608 4.661 24 184 44 481 481 145 1.598 1,598 22 168 168 732 5,610 4,937 1,467 11,244 -885 6,789 0 1,697 4.003 31.569 0 9.715 4,661 184 673 11,244 5,091 21,853 116,814 122,206 97.944 336,964 101,079 338,524 24,435 5,555 43,473 179 10,587 32,707 TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document NO.1-1590-002, Rev. I Appendix D, Page 10 of"35 Table D-1 Cooper Nuclear Station 2034 DECON Decommissioning Cost Estimate (thousands of 2008 dollars)Off-Sits LLRW NRC Spent Fuel Site Processed Burial Volumes Burial I Utility and Activity Decon Removal Packaging Transport Processing Disposal Other Total Total Lis. Tero. Management Restoration Volume Class A Class B Class C GTCC Processed Crft Contractor Index Activ iDescription Cost Cost Costs Costs Costs Costs Costs Contlngency Costs Costs Costs Costs Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet WI. Lbs. Manhosre Manhours PERIOD 3c -Fuel Storage Operations/Shlpping Period 3c Collateral Costs 3c.3.1 Spent Fuel Capital and Transfer 3c.3 Subtolal Period 3c Collateral Costs Period 3c Period-Dependent Costs 3c.4.1 insurance 3c.42 Property taxes 3c.4.3 Plant energy budget 3c.4.4 NRC ISFSI Fees 3c.4.5 Emergency Planning Fees 3c.4-6 ISFSI Operating Costs 3c.4.7 Security Staff Cost 3c.4.8 Utility Staff Coat 3c.4 Subtotal Period 3c Pedrod-Dependent Costs 3c.0 TOTAL PERIOD 3c COST PERIOD 3d -GTCC shipping Period 3d Direct Decommissioning Acivities Nuclear Steam Supply System Removal 3d.1.1.1 Vessel & Intemat GTCC Disposal 3d,1.1 Totals 3d. I Subtotal Period 3d Activty Costs Period 3d Collateral Costs 3d.3.1 Spent Fuel Capital and Transfer 3d.3 Subtotal Period 3d Collateral Costs Period 3d Period-Dependent Costs 3d.4.1 Insurance 3d.42 Property taxes 3d.4.3 Plant energy budget 3d.4.4 NRC ISFSI Fees 3d.4,5 Emergency Planning Fees 3d.4.6 ISFSI Operating Costs 3d.4.7 Security Staff Cost 3d.4.8 Utility Staff Cost 3d.4 Subtotal Period 3d Period-Dependent Costs 3d.0 TOTAL PERIOD 3d COST PERIOD 3e -ISFSI Decontamination Period 3e Direct Decommissioning Activities Period 3e Additional Costs 3e.2.1 ISFSI Decontamimation 3e.2 Subtotal Period 30 Additional Costs Period 3e Collateral Costs 3e.3.1 Small tool allowance 3e.3.2 Spent Fuel Capital and Transfer 3e.3 Subtotal Period 3e Cotateral Costs 9,855 1.478 11,334 9,855 1,478 11,334 8.525 852 9,377 78 Be 4,964 496 5,460 16,486 1.649 18,135 1- 660 249 1.909 48,727 7,309 56,036 16,889 2.533 10,422 97,329 13,097 110,425 107.184 14,575 121,759 11,334 11,334 --- -9,377 86 5,460 18,135 1,909 56,036 19,422 110,425 121,759* 1,101,291 275,323 1,376,614 1,376,614 660 660 660 S 7,470 S 7,470* 7,470 1,186 9,316 9,316 1,186 0,310 9,316 1,186 9,316 9,316 11 87 11 87 508 89,497 508 89,497 508 89,497* ---76---79 07 -660 17 2 18 0 0 0 a 1 8 32 3 36 3 0 4 96 14 110 33 5 38 189 25 214 7,470 265 1.223 9,618 9,318 18 8 364 4 110 38 214 302 508 89,497-2160 540 2,700 2,700 1.012 9 24 60 1,250 1,012 6 24 60 1,250 460 2,811 460 2,811 2,811 1,175 165.113 26.509 2,560 2,811 1,175 165,113 26,509 2,560 16 6 22 14 14 2 16 5 1 9 5 3 22 TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station Deco .un-ioning Cost Analysis Document NO1.1590-002, Rev. I Appendix D, Page 1 of"35 Table D-1 Cooper Nuclear Station 2034 DECON Decommissioning Cost Estimate (thousands of 2008 dollars)Off-Site LLRW NRC Spent Fuel Site Processed Burial Volumes Burial I Utilty and Activity Decon Removal Packaging Transport Processing Disposal Other Total Total Li. Term. Management Restoration Volume Ciss A Class B Class C GTCC Processed Craft Contractor Index Activity Description Cost Cost Costs Casts Costs Costs Costs Contln en Costs Costs Costs Costs Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Faet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet WL, Lbs. Manhours Manhours Period 3e Period-Dependent Costs 3e.4.1 Insurance 3e.4.2 Property taxes 3e.4.3 Heavy equipment rental 3e.4.4 Plant energy budget 3e.4.5 Security Staff Cost 3e.4.6 Utflity Staff Cost 3A.4 Subtotal Period 3e Peitod-Dependent Casts 3e.0 TOTAL PERIOD 30 COST PERIOD 3f -ISFSI Site Restoration Period 3f Direct Decornrrissioning Activities Period 3f Additional Costs 3f.2.1 ISFSi Dernolition 3W.2 Subtotal Period 3W Additional Costs Period 3f Collateral Costs 31.3.1 Smeal tool atowance 31.3 Subtotal Period 3f Collateral Costs Period 3f Pedod-Oepenvent Costs 314.1 Insurance 31.4.2 Propedy taxes 3f.4.3 Heavy equipment rental 3A.44 Plant energy budget 3X.4.5 Security Staff Cost 3WA.6 Utaity Staff Cost 31.4 Subtatal Period 3W Period-Dependent Costs 31.0 TOTAL PERIOD 3f COST PERIOD 3 TOTALS TOTAL COST TO DECOMMISSION 232 232 1,258 6 24 672 672 145--1 303 249 699 14 159 0 1 35 267 46 349 37 287 132 1,063 109 267 349 287 1,063 3,896 1,175 60 1,954 595 3,896-44 107 824-44 107 824 5,013 38803 6,816 165,113 28,509 11,376-5,898 160-5,898 160 824 824-3 * .-* 3 * -0 4 0 4 4- *4 1 0 1 1 79 12 91 91 155 23 179 179 2,569-110 16 126 126 1,594 79 266 52 396 396 4,163 754 310 160 1,224 1.224 5,898 4,323 15,495 666 24 -7,530 134,148 22,108 179,970 9,495 137,768 32,707 -1,175 -508 254.610 133,486 1,733,537 9.296 58.392 11,201 7,212 30.933 56,732 437,605 111,599 722,972 506,207 182,368 34,396 319,826 234.031 3,647 1,205 508 31,649,200 915,901 5,434.429 TlG Services, Inc.
Coop-rNtudnaStat ion De~commissioning Coot Analysis Document N0I.1590-002, Rev. 1 Appendix D, Page 12 of"35 Table D-1 Cooper Nuclear Station 2034 DECON Decommissioning Cost Estimate (thousands of 2008 dollars)I ctviy Off-Site LLRW NRC Spent Fuel Site Processed Burial Volumes Burial I Utility and i DecO0 Removal Packaging Transport Processing Disposal Other Total Total Lic. Term. Management Restoration Volume Class A Class B Class C GTCC Processed Craft Contractor Cost Cast Costs Casts Casts Costs Costs Contlaoonnon Casts Casts Casts Costs Cu. Fant Cu. Fent Cu. Fant Cu. Foot Cu. Fant Wit. Lbs. Manhoure Manhours I B*  ex cast Cast Costs Costs Costs costs Costs Contingency Costs costs Costs coati Cu. Fast Cu Feel Cu. Fast Cu. Feet .Fast Manhours Manhours TOTAL COST TO DECOMMISSION WITH 18.25% CONTINGENCY:
$722,972 thousands of 2008 dollars TOTAL NRC UCENSE TERMINATION COST IS 70.02% OR: $506.207 thousands of 2008 dollars SPENT FUEL MANAGEMENT COST IS 25.22% OR: $182.368 thousands of 2008 dollars NON-NUCLEAR DEMOLITION COST iS 4.76% OR: 024,396 thousands of 2008 dollam TOTAL LOW-LEVEL RADIOACTIVE WASTE VOLUME BURIED (EXCLUDING GTCC): 238,883 cubic feet TOTAL GREATER THAN CLASS C RADWASTE VOLUME GENERATED:
600 cubic feet TOTAL SCRAP METAL REMOVED: 30.340 tons TOTAL CRAFT LABOR REQUIREMENTS:
915,901 man-hours End Notes: ra -Indicates that his acvity not charged as decommissioning expenrse a -indicates that this activity performed by decommissioning staff.0 -indicates thra this value is less than 0.5 but is non-zem.a cell containing" -" indicates a zero value TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station Decornmissioning Cost Analysis Document N01-1590-002, Rev. 1 Appendix D, Page 13 of 35 Table D-2 Cooper Nuclear Station 2034 Delayed DECON Decommissioning Cost Estimate (thousands of 2008 dollars)Off-Site LLRW NRC Spent Fuel Site Processed Burial Volumes Burial I Utility and Activity Decon Removal Packaging Transport Processing Disposal Other Total Total Lic. Term. Management Restoration Volume Class A Class B Close C GTCC Processed Craft Contractor eIndex Activity Description Cost Cost Costs Costs Costs Costs Costs Contingency Costs Costs Costs Costs Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet WI. Lbs. Manhours Mahours PERIOD is -Shutdown through Transition Period la Direct Decommissioning Activities le.1.1 SAFSTOR site characterization survey lu 1l2 Prepare preliminary decommissioring cost 1a.1.3 Nctiticaton of Cessation of Operations 10.14 Remove furl & source material i. 1.5 Notificaton of Pernranent Defuelrng is. 1.6 Deactivate plant systems & process waste ta.1.7 Prepare and submit PSDAR u.I .8 Review plant dwgs & specs.10.1.9 Perform detailed red survey ul.10 Estimate by-product inventory 1a.1.11 End product descrrption 10.I.12 Detailed by-product inventocy 1:.1.13 Def-oe major mork sequence I0. 1.14 Perform SER and EA 1a.1.15 Perform Site-Specific Cost Study Activity Specifications 18.1.16.1 Prepare plalt and faciities for SAFSTOR la.1.6.2 Plant systems 1a.1.15.3 Plant structures and butilings la.l,16.4 Waste management 10.1.16.5 Facility and site dormancy 1a.1.16 Total Detailed Work Procedures la.1.17.1 Plant systems la.t.17.2 Facility closeout & dormancy la.1.17 Total lus1.18 Procure vacuum drying system la.1.19 Drain/de-energie non-cort.
systems la.1.20 Drain & dry NSSS la.1.21 Drain/de-energize contaminated systems la-. 22 Decon/secure contaminated systems la.1 Subtotal Period 10 Activty Costs Penod Ia Collateral Costs la.3.1 Spent Fuel Capital and Transfer 1a,3.2 Corporate Overheads 1l.3 Subtotal Period tu Collateral Costs Peniod 10 Period-Dependent Costa la.4.1 Insurance 1:.4.2 Property taxes 1.4.3 Health physics supplies 1:.4.4 Heavy equipment rental 1 a.4.5 Disposal of DAW generated la.4.6 Plant energy budget 1a.4.7 NRC Fees 1:.4.6 Emergency Planning Fees 1A.4.9 Spent Fuel Pool O&M 1a,4.10 ISFSI Operating Costs 1a,4.11 Security Staff Cost 346 130 200 130 100 100 150 100 310 500 492 417 312 200 200 1,621 104 450 450 20 150 150 a rda 30 230 230 20 150 150 15 10 115 15 115 115 23 173 173 15 115 115 47 357 357 75 575 575 74 566 566 63 479 479 47 359 359 30 230 230 30 230 230 243 1,864 1.864 18 136 138 18 138 138 36 274 274 1,300 2,000 1,300 1,000 1,0O00 1.500 1,000 3,100 5,000 4,920 4,167 3.120 2.000 2,000 16,207 1,103 1,200 2,383 100-..-..120* ..-.-238 10 2 12 12 a 3,930 642 4.577 4,077 35.890* -----2,721-.--3,105* .....5,825 370 368 -5 1,600 4 73 927 1,165 745 85 6,021 408 3,129 466 3,570 3,570 874 6,699 3,570 160 1.760 1,760 0 4 4 63 463 463 55 423 423 19 100 100 139 1.066 1,066 71 776 776 11i 1,303 112 857 13 68 -903 6,924 6,924 3,129 -..3,129 1,303 857 98 1,575 14,445 5 157.471 TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station Decommissioning Coast Analysis Document N0-1590-002, Rev. 1 Appendix D, Page 14 of 35 Table D-2 Cooper Nuclear Station 2034 Delayed DECON Decommissioning Cost Estimate (thousands of 2008 dollars)IActivity Off-Site LLRW NRC Spent Fuel Site Processed Burial Volumes Burial I Utility and I Decon Removal Packaging Transport Processing Disposal Other Total Total Lic. Term. Management Restoration Volume Class A Class B Class C GTCC Processed Craft Contractor Cost Cost Costs Costs Costs Costs Costs Continienon Costs Costa Costs Costs Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feat Cu. Feet Wt. Lts. Manors Manhours I I I InnBx  n ex n ri Period 1a Period-Dependent Costs (conifnued) la.4.12 Utility Staff Cost 1..4 Subtotal Period la Penod-Dependent Costs la.0 TOTAL PERIOD l a COST PERIOD lb -SAFSTOR Limited DECON Activities Period lb Direct Decormissioning Actvities Decontamination of Site Buildings 1b 1.1.1 Reactor lb. 1.1.2 Augmented Radwaste lb.1.1.3 Misceltaneous Sb'uctures
-Contaminated 1b.1.1.4 Muli-Purpose Facility 1b.1-.15 Radwaste Ib.1.1.6 Turbine lb.1.I Totals Ib.1 Subtotal Period 1 b Activity Costs Period lbAdditiomal Costs lb.2.1 Spent Fuel Pool Isolation lb2.2 Asbestos Insulation Disposal lb.2 Subtotal Period I b Additional Costs Period 1 b Collateral Costs 1b.3*1 Decon equipment Ib.3.2 Process liquid waste 1b.3.3 Small tool allowance lb.3.4 Spent Fuel Capital and Transfer lb.3.5 Corporate Overheads lb.3 Subtotal Period lb Cotateral Costs Period lb Period-Dependent Costs Wb4.1 Decon supplies 1h4.2 Insurance 1b.4.3 Property tavos 1b.4.4 Health physics supples lb.4.5 Heavy equipment rental 1b.4.6 Disposal of DAW generated lb.4.7 Plant energy budget lb.4.6 NRC Fees lb.4.9 Emergency Planning Fees 1.b4.10 Spent Fuel Pool O&M 1b.4.11 ISFS1 Operating Costs lb.4.12 Security Staff Cost 1b.4.13 Utiliy Staff Cost lb.4 Subtotal Period 1 b Penod-Dependent Costs lb.0 TOTAL PERIOD lb COST 738 738* -23,690 3 73 33,962 3 73 43,723 2.929 52 376 68 158 520 4,103 4,103.- .9,407 773 1 65 558 773 1 65 558 9,407 713 ----229
* 74 392 448 70 --930..- -766 942 70 74 392 448 1,695 1,156 -----121* -1 473-01 --.-5 3 81 -229 174 292 184 21 1,485 5,595 1.156 564 5 3 81 8,101 6,201 1,407 so 460 1,087 19,203 3-403 26,093 26,093 5,087 39,867 37,609 6,603 51,144 45,757 1,465 4,394 4,394 26 78 78 188 565 565 34 101 101 79 237 237 260 780 780 2,052 6,155 6,155 2,052 6,155 6,155 1,411 10,818 10,818 265 1,662 1,662 1,676 12,480 12,480 107 820 820 293 1,436 1,436 11 61 81 130 1,069 -115 880 880 665 4,286 3,217 289 1,445 1,445 12 133 133 0 1 1 118 592 592 14 104 104 21 110 110 34 263 263 17 191 191 29 321 28 211 3 24 -223 1,707 1,707 839 6,434 6,434 1,628 11,538 10,981 6,020 34,458 32,833 2,258 5,387 1,675 1,575--423,400 14,445 5 580,871 14,445 5 616,761 68,438 1,562 6,542 2,036 4,761 15,667 101,060 101,008 10,333 134.329 10,002 10,333 134,329 10.002 1,009 1,069 321 211 24 557 1,626 1,561 93,644 304 1,561 93,644 304 1,741 15.98 5 38,829-.104,400 1,741 15,968 5 143,229 13,635 243,942 111,318 143,229 TLG Servdveea Inc.
Cooper Nucekar Stai~on Decomomissioninog Cost Analysis Document N01-1590-002, Rev. I Appendix D, Page 15 of"35 Table D-2 Cooper Nuclear Station 2034 Delayed DECON Decommnissioning Cost Estimnate (thousands of'2096 dollars)IActivity Off-Site LLRW NRC Spent Fuel Site Processed Burial Volumes Burial I Utntyoad n Oecon Removal Packaging Transport Processing Disposal Other Total Total LiO. Term. Management Restoration Volume Class A Clans B Clans C GTCC Processed Craft Contractor I coot Cost Coots Coots Costs Costs Costs Continoorco Costs Costs Cost. Ceot. Cn. Foot Cu. Foet Cu. Feet Cu. Foot Co. Foot est. Ltt. Manhon,, Masnhour.m Innnx  n as A v c n Cost Cast costs Costs Costs costs Costs Cortina"" Costs Costs Costs Costs Cu Fast Cu I Cu Fast Cu. Feet Cu. Fast Wt Los Manhours PERIOD Ic -Preparations for SAFSTOR Dormancy Period lc Direct Decommlssionirg Activities lC.1.1 Prepare support equipmenrt for storage it. 1.2 Install containment pressure equal. lines Ic.1.3 Interim surpey prior to dormancy 1c.1.4 Secure building accesses Ic.1.5 Prepare & submit ioterim report IC.1 Subtotal Period Ic Activiy Costs Period lc Collateral Costs lc.3.1 Process liquid waste lc.32 Small tool aliowance lc.3.3 Spent Fuer Capital and Transfer lc.3.4 Corporate Overheads lc.3 Subtotal Period It Coltateral Costs Period ic Period-Dependent Costs 1cA.1 Insurance IcA4.2 Property loves lc.4.3 Heath physics supplies 1C,4.4 Heavy eqaipment rental 1.4.5 Disposal of DAW generated 1c.4.6 Plant energy budget 1c.4.7 NRC Fees lc.4.8 Emergency Planning Fees lc,4.9 Spent Fuel Pool O&M Itil 0 ISFSI Operating Costs 1c.4.11 Securdy Stafl Cost lc.4.12 Utlity Staff Cost 1c.4 Subtotal Period Ic Penod-Oependent Costs lc.0 TOTAL PERIOD Ic COST PERIOD 1 TOTALS 387 31-733 58 58 445 445 5 36 36 220 953 53 0 67 67 419 791 291 1,501 1,501 3.0D0 700 15,696-*583 19.396 583 96,195 313 96,195 313 235 3 235 3 160 92 252 76 403 76 403 1 I 1 1 460 940-774 460 1,714 301 1,475 1,475 0 3 3 141 1,081 -116 890 890 558 3,449 2.368 122 12 134 134 1 0 1 1-40 200 200-14 105 105 s1 -5 25 25 231 35 266 266 176 18 194 194 295 30 325 188 28 214 21 3 24 -1,501 225 1,726 1,726 5.657 849 6,505 6.505 18 8,191 1,257 9,720 9,157 478 10.696 2,107 14.670 13,026 1.636 73.621 14.730 100,272 91,616 1,081 1,081 325 214 24 583 1,644 8.657 1,603 1,603 393 393 1.996 17,205 3,601 3,601 1 39.260-105,560 1 144,820 235 673 77 404 6,437 2.818 162 866 99,796 19,710 145.403 358,183 131.033 905.393 PERIOD 2a -SAFSTOR Dormancy with Wet Spent Fuel Storage Period 2a Direct Decommissioning Activities 2a.1.1 Quarterly Inspection 2a.1 .2 Semi-annuol environmental survey 2a 1.3 Prepare reports 20.1.4 Bitominous roof replacement 2a. 1.5 Maintenance supplies 20.1 Subtotal Period 2a Activity Costs Pedod 2a Coliateral Costs 2a.3.1 Spent Fuel Capital and Transfer 2a.3.2 Corporate Overheads 2a.3 Subtotal Period 2a Collateral Costs Penod 2a Period-Dependent Costs 2a.4.1 Insurance 2a,4.2 Property laces 2a.4.3 Health physics supplies* -.-63* -.* 553* ---566 a 9 73 72 126 629 629 135 701 701----21.155 3,173 24,329 -* .--4.139 621 4,759 4,759 25.294 3,794 29,069 4,759 24,329 24,329 2,158 18 344 1,962 196 2,158 16 2 18 86 430 430 TLG Services, Inc.
0 Cooper Nuclear Station Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document N01.1590-002, Rev. I Appendix D, Page 16 of 35 Table D-2 Cooper Nuclear Station 2034 Delayed DECON Decommissioning Cost Estimate (thousonds of 2008 dollars)I Act.iity Off-Site LLRW NRC Spent Fuel Site Processed Burial Volumes Burial I Utility and I Decon Removal Packaging Transport Processing Disposal Other Total Total Lc. Term. Management Restoration Volume Class A Class B Class C GTCC Processed Craft Contractor Cost Cost Costs Costs Costs Costs Costs Contingency Costs Costs Costs Costs Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Faet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Wt., Lbs. Manhours Manhours I m n ex Period 2a Period-Dependent Costs (iconnued) 2a.4.4 Disposal of DAW geeerated 2a.4.5 Plant energy budget 2a.4. NRC Fees 28.4.7 Emergency Planning Fees 2a.4.8 Spent Fuel Pool O&M 2a,4.9 ISFSI Operating Costs 2a.4.10 Security Staff Cost 2a.4.11 Ublity Staff Cost 28.4 Subtotal Period 2a Perod-Deeondent Costs 20.0 TOTAL PERIOD 2a COST PERIOD 2b -SAFSTOR Dormancy with Dry Spent Fuel Storage Pedod 2b Direct Decommissioning Activities 2b.1.1 Quarterly Inspec t i on 21b.1.2 Semi-annual environmental survey 2b.1.3 Prepare reports 2b.1.4 Bituminous roof replacement 2b.1.5 Maintenance supplies 2b 1 Subtotal Period 2b Activity Costs Penod 2b Collateral Costs 2b.3.1 Spent Fuel Capital and Transfer 2b.3 Subtotal Period 2b Collateral Costs Pedod 2b Period-Dependent Costs 2b.4.1 Insurance 21.4.2 Property taues 2b.4.3 Health physics supples 2b.4.4 Disposal of DAW generated 2b.4.5 Plant energy budget 2b.4.e NRC Fees 2b.4.7 Emergency Planning Fees 2b.4. ISFSI Operating Costs 2b.4.9 Security Staff Cost 2b.4.10 Utility Staff Cost 2b.4 Subtotal Period 2b Period-Oepenrdent Costs 2b.0 TOTAL PERIOD 2b COST PERIOD 2 TOTALS PERIOD 3a -Reactivate Sits Following SAFSTOR Dormancy Period 3a Direct Decorrmmusioning Actnifies 3a.1.1 Prepare prelminadry decommissioning cost 3a.1.2 Review plant dwgs & specs.3a.1.3 Perform detailed rod  3a.1.4 End product description 3a. 1.5 Detailed by-product inventory 3a. 1.6 Defires major work sequence 3a.1.7 Perform SER and EA 3a.1.8 Perform Sts-Speciflc Cost Study 3a. 1.9 Prepare/subrmit License Terninabotn Plan 3a. 1.10 Receliv NRC approval of termination plan 13 7 198 -52 270 270 -742 111 053 -853 007 01 887 887 -3,374 337 3.712 -3,712 2.984 448 3.431 3,431 340 51 391 391 17.728 2,659 20,387 20,387 188- 816 2,822 21,639 -21,639 344 13 7 198 46.768 6,845 54.176 1,587 52.588 4,267 39,139 13 444,561 329,769 4,267 39,139 13 774,330 344 13 7 198 72.628 10.775 83,965 7T048 76,917 4,267 39.139 13 774.330 a 53 407 407 706 3,531 3,531 759 3,938 3,938 354 2,825 3.178 13,214 1,982 15,197 13,214 1,982 15.197 15,197 15,197 1,620-66 36 1,620 66 36 1.620 66 36 1,964 78 43 9,796 980 10,775 10.775 90 9 99 -99"-405 2,025 2,025 1,037 -271 1,411 1,411 -2.083 312 2,395 -2.395 4.528 453 4,981 4,981 18.944 1,894 20,838 -20,838 1,908 286 2.194 2,194 57,312 8,597 65,909 65.909 41,970 6,295 48,265 48,265 1.037 136.630 19,503 158.892 8,416 150,476 1.037 153,023 22,244 178,026 12,354 165,672 1,236 225,651 33,019 261.991 19,402 242,589 22,311 204,651 68 1,265,451 749,897 22,311 204.651 68 2,015,349 22.311 26,578 204,651 68 2.015.349 243,790 681 2.789.679 130 460 100 130 750 310 500 410 20 150 150 69 529 529 a 15 11. 115 20 150 150 113 863 863 47 357 357 75 575 575 61 471 471 a 1.300 4.600 1,000 1,300 7,500 3,100 5,000 4.096 TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuvkar Station Dereoziiaaonig Cost A-mlysis Document N01.1590-002, Rev. 1 Appendix D, Page 17 of 35 Table D-2 Cooper Nuclear Station 2034 Delayed DECON Decommissioning Cost Estimate (thousands of 2008 dollars)Off-Sita LLRW NRC Spent Fuel Sits Processed Burial Volumes Burial I Utility and Activity Decon Removal Packaging Transport Processing Disposal Other Total Total Lic. Tenm. Management Restoration Volume Class A Class B Class C GTCC Processed Craft Contractor Index Activity Description Cost Cost Costs Costs Costs CostsCosts Costs Costs Cu. Fent Co.Fee Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet WI. Lbs. Manhours Manhours Activity Specifications 3a.1.11.1 Re-activate plant & temporary focilities 3a.1.11.2 Plant systems 3a.1.11.3 Reactor internals 3a.1.11,4 Reactor vessel 3a.1.11-5 Sacriflcial shield 3a.1.11.6 Moisture separators/rerheaters 3a.1.11.7 Reinforced concrete 3a.1.11 .8 Main Turbine 30.1.11.9 Main Condensers 3a.1.11.10 Pressure suppression structure 3a.1.11.11 Drysell 3a.1.11.12 Plant structures
& buildings 3a. 1.11.13 Waste management 3a.1.11.14 Faciity & site closeout 3a.1.11 Total Planning & Sits Preparations 30.1.12 Prepare dismantling sequence 3a.1.13 Plant prep. & temp. svoes 3a.1.14 Design "ster clear.up system 3a.1.15 Rigging/Cont.
Cotd Envlps/tooUngletc.
3a.1.16 Procure casistliners
& containers 30.1 Subtotal Period 3a Activity Costs Period 3a Period-Dependent Costs 30.4.1 Insurance 3a.4.2 Property taxes 3a.4.3 physics supplies 3a.4.4 Heavy equipment rental 3a.4.5 Disposal of DAW generated 3a.4.6 Plant energy budget 3a.4.7 NRC Fees 3a.4.8 Security Staff Cost 3a.4.9 Utitily Staff Cost 3a.4 Subtotal Period 3a Perlod-Depenoent Costs 3a.0 TOTAL PERIOD 3a COST PERIOD 3b -Decommissioning Preparations Perod 3b Direct Decommissioning Activities Detailed Work Procedures 3b.1.1.1 Plant systems 38.1.1.2 Reactor internals 3b.1.1.3 Remaining buildings 310.1.1.4 CRD housings & Nis 3b.1.1.5 Incore instrumentation 3b.1.1.6 Removal primary containment 3b.1.1.7 Reactor vessel 3b.1.1.8 Facility closeout 3b, 1.1.9 sacrifcial Shield 3b.1.1.10 Reionorced concrete 3b'1.1.11 Main Turbine 3b01 1.12 Main Condensers 737 417 710 650 50 100 160 209 209 200 160 312 460 90 4.463 324 368 691 691 240 2,700 140 2,100 123 12,556 420 4 2 62 027 249 2,855-14,190 2 62 18.644 111 848 763 63 479 431 107 817 917 98 748 748 8 58 58 15 115 115 24 184 92 31 240 240 31 240 240 30 230 230 24 184 184 47 359 179 69 529 529 14 104 52 669 5,133 4,677 36 276 276 405 3,105 3,105 21 161 161 315 2,415 2,415 10 141 141 1,883 14,439 13,983 42 462 462 0 4 4 81 405 405 55 423 423 16 84 84 130 1.066 1,096 25 274 274 428 3,283 3,203 2.128 16,318 16,318 2,915 22,318 22.318 92"52 456 456 1.329 1.329 456 1.329 7,370 4,167 7.100 6.500 500 1,000 11.600 2,088 2,088 2,000 1,6w0 3,120 4,600 900 44,633 2.400 1,400 1.230 77,559 4 65,179-258,629 4 323,807 12,190 12.190 62 31.200 4,799 36,758 36,302 12,190 4 401,366 473 400 135 100 100 200 363 120 120 100 208 209 71 544 490 60 460 460 20 155 39 15 115 115 15 110 115 30 230 230 54 417 417 18 138 69 18 138 138 15 115 58 31 239 239 31 240 240 54 116 69 58 4,733 4,000 1,350 1,000 1.000 2,000 3,630 1,200 1,200 1,000 2,080 2.088 TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Sftaton Decn reiasioning Cost Analoysis Document N01-1590-002, Rev. I Appendix D, Page 18 of 35 Table D-2 Cooper Nuclear Station 2034 Delayed DECON Decommissioning Cost Estimate (thousands of 2008 dollars)I Actity.off-Site LLRW NRC Spent Fuel site Processed Burial Volumes Burial I Utility and Decon Removal Packaging Transport Processing Disposal Other Total Total Lie. Term. Management Restoration Volume Clans A Class B Clase C GTCC Processed Craft Contractor Cost Cost Costs Costs Costs Costs Costs Continnosno Costs Costs Costs Costs Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Fast Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Wt. Lbs. Manhours MachoursI m InlAY n ex v c Detailed Work Procedures (continued) 3b*1.1.13 Moisture separalors
& reheaters 3b1.1.14 Radwastebuilding 3b 1.1.15 Reactor building 3b.1.1 Total 3b, 1 Subtotal Period 3b Actvity Costs Period 3b Addtl~onal Costs 3b.2.1 Site Charactetization 3b.2 Subtotal Period 3b Additional Costs Period 3b Collateral Costs 3b.3.1 Decon equipment 3b.3.2 DOC staff relocation expenses 3b.3.3 Pipe cutting equipment 3b.3 Subtotal Period 3b Collateral Costs Period 3k Period-Dependent Costs 3b.4.1 Decon supplies 3b.4.2 Insurance 3.4.3 Property taxes 3b.4,4 Health physics supplies 3b.4.5 Heavy equipment rental 3b.4.6 Disposal of DAW generated 3b.4.7 Rant energy budget 3b.4,8 NRC Fees 31.4.9 Security Staff Cost 3b.4.10 DOC Staff Cost 3b.4.11 UWlly Staff Cost 3b.4 Subtotal Period 3b Period-Dependent Costs 31.0 TOTAL PERIOD 3b COST PERIOD 3 TOTALS PERIOD 4a -Large Component Removal Period 4a Direct Decommissioning Actvimies Nuclear Steam Supply System Removal 4a.1.1.1 Recirculation System Piping & Vatnes 4a.1.1.2 Recirculation Pumps & Motors 4a.1.1.3 CROMs & Nis Removal 4a.1.1.4 Reactor Vessel Internals 4a. 1.1.5 Vessel & Internals GTCC Disposal 4a.'1.1.6 Reactor Vessel 4a. 1.1 Totals Removal of Major Equipment 4a 1.2 Main TurbinelGenerator 4a 1.3 Main Condensers Cascading Costs from Clean Building Demolation 4a.1.4.1 Reactor 4a.1.4.2 Augmented Radwaste 4a.1.4.3 Radwaste 200 273 273 3.274 3,274 30 230 230 41 314 283 41 314 283 491 3,765 3,405 491 3,765 3,405 31 31 360 360 2,000 2,730 2,730 32.741 32,741 5,395 1,619 7.014 7,014 5.395 1,619 7.014 7,014-107 820 820 912 137 1,049 1.049-150 1,150 1.150 912 394 3,019 3.019 713-1,000 713 1.000 22 179 184 22 363 735 1,303 735 2,055 16 70 6 28 24 139 86 1,959 5,054 132 7.250 246 2 35 465 125 1,431 4,370-7.114 35 13,761 35 23,342 97 54,542 2 6 5 27 27 25 270 270 0 2 2 45 224 224 28 212 212 9 48 48 70 534 034 12 137 137 215 1,646 1,646 657 5,035 5,035 1,067 8,181 8,151 2,133 16,317 16,317 4,636 30,115 29,755 9,435 668,72 66,056 101 512 512 95 488 488 174 1,099 1,099 5,535 18,124 18.124 1,120 8.590 8.590 6.332 17,205 17,205 13.357 46,018 46,018 360 816 754 754 754 2,083 6,913 6,913 6.913 19,104 2 32,679 58,560-129,669 2 220,907 2 253,648 6 655,014 2.487 -1,125 3,972 18,900 888 18,900 888 45.384 1.776 14 11 377 3,871 906 5,179 14 28 68 912 351 1,371 25 272 321 317 -5.607 155 7,470-4,408 155 25 18,395 309 100 897 119,606-1,188 132,880 6.935 --126,494 1,878 1,252 470 -359,044--508 89,497 11,247 2,859 --1,447,089 100 22,145 4,111 470 508 2.274,610 167 845 372 6,376 706 588 259 4,439 260 -25 43 1,138 8,898 8,898 940 6,932 6,932 61,604 42,889 2,772,179 4,438 1,930,000 19.519 39 299 299 4 28 26 7 50 50 2,486 235 359 TLG Ser-ices, Ins.
Cooper Nuclear Station Deeommissiaaoning Cosd Analvais Document NO-1590-002, Rev. I Appendix D, Page 19 of 35 Table D-2 Cooper Nuclear Station 2034 Delayed DECON Decommissioning Cost Estimate (thousands of 2008 dollars)Actlnfty off-Site LLRW NRC Spent Fuel Site Processed Burial Volumes Burial I Utility and lDecon Removal Packaging Transport Processing Disposal Other Total Total Lc. Tens. Management Restoration Volume Class A class B Class C GTCC Processed Craft Contractor Cost Cost Costs Costs Costs Costs Costs Contlnoency Costs Costs Costs Costs Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet W". Lbs. Manhours Mantrours I ActiVVl ri In n ex Cascading Costs from Clean Budilding Demolition (continued) 4a.1.4.4 Turbine 40.1.4 Totals Disposal of Plant Systems 4a.1.5.1 Augmented Radwasts E 877 ArealA 4a.1.5.2 Augmented Radwasta El 903 ArealA 4a.1.5.3 Augmented Rrdwasts El 918 ArealA 4a.1.5.4 Augmented Radmasta El 929 ArealA 4a.1.5.5 Augmented Radwaste El 929 Aeal B 40.1.5.6 DRYWELLArealA 4a.1.5.7 DRYWELL ArealS 4a.1.5.8 Turbine El 932 Areal B 4a.1.5.9 Turbine El 932 Area2C 4a.1.5.10 Turbine El 932 Area3C 4a1.5.11 Yard ArealB 4a.1.5 Totals 285 613 203 66 52 21 3 457 112 324 67 518 1,831 28 28 6 7 10 9 4 5 0 0 85 84 1 5 16 8s 50 264 202 487 24 11 6,838 2,500 432 104 139-73 4 1,289 75 2 1.477 4,517 6,073 2,040 168 23 17,081 20.457 309 4a.1.6 Scaffoldng in support of decommissioning
-2,049 4a.1 Subtotal Period 4a Activity Costs 132 12,616 Period 4a Collateral Costs 4a.3.1 Process liquid waste 69 -4a.3.2 Smail tool allowance 90 40.3 Subtotal Period 4a Collateral Costs 69 90 Period 4a Period-Dependent Costs 4a.4.1 Decon supplies 49 4a.4.2 Insurance 4a.4.3 Property taes 4a.4.4 Health physics supplies 944 4a.4.5 Heavy equipment rental 1,981 4a.4.6 Disposal of DAW generated 4a.4.7 Flant energy budget 4a.4.8 NRC Fees 4a.4.9 Liquid Radwaste Processing EquipmenteSurvices 4a.4.10 Security Staff Cost 4a.4.11 DOC Staff Cost 4a.4.12 Utility Staff Cost 4a.4 Subtotal Period 4a Penod-Dependent Costs 49 2,925 40.0 TOTAL PERIOD 4a COST 250 15,631 PERIOD 4b -Site Decontamination Peded 4b Direct Decommissioning Activities 4b.1.1 Remove spent fuel racks 262 33 Disposal of Plant Systems 4b.1.2.1 Control El 882ArealB 280 4b.1.2.2 Control El03ArealC 170 4b.1.2.3 Control El 818 Arneal C 66 4b.1.2.4 Control El 932 Areal C 22 4b.1.2.5 Intake 101 4b.1.2.6 Mua-Purpose Faciity 198 4b.1.2.7 Radwaste El 877 AvealA 398 24 125 143 24 125 143 26 14 26 14 6,887 2,640 549 4-405 587 737 420 3,199 11,638 16,014 405 33.548 17,081 21,005 33,858 43 328 328 92 705 705 166 857 857 44 228 228 50 260 260 25 127 127 1 8 8 458 2,373 2,373 41 235 235 317 2,220 2,220 1 9 10 78 852 6,201 6,201 1.964 12,597 12,510 547 2,921 2,121 18,039 77,972 77,885 91 451 451 14 104 94 105 555 545 12 61 61 55 604 604 0 5 4 236 1.180 1,180 297 2.278 2,278 106 551 551 148 1,135 1,135 74 811 811 63 483 483 480 3.679 3,679 1,746 13.384 13,384 2,402 18.416 18,416 5,619 42,586 42,585 23,762 121,113 121,016 498 2,308 2,308 178 1,178 1,178 25 195 10 76 3 28 15 116 -88 541 541 353 1.836 1,838 2,055 469 765-324 38 5.726 806 10-15.808 78*78 -* -48.365 -87 65,016 9,348 1,821 101 87 171,229 31,594 4,111 470-498 -10 *10 498 0 8,708 0 8.708 -98 171,229 40,800 4.111 470 172.205 5,668 41,606 1,842 55,345 1,432 28,038 579 1,529 75 513,627 12,634 33,576 3,304 641,963 9,170-* 237-2,083 1,964,114 14,340 3.453,003 51.444 81,992 27,411 508 10,511,780 155,694 1,776 29,865 97 29,865 97 79,878 27 73,036 181,263 292,143 79,878 27 526,441 508 10,621.530 155,818 528,217 537,141 1,004 -292,908 7.797 5.155-2,100 702-3,136 103,862 5,430 377,917 10.930 4,419 7,498 79 88 1,348 5,986 7 39 3 14 75 62 674 239-949-7.213 195 -76 26 116 7 2,558-* 5,097 TLG Service., Inc.
Cooper Nuclearo Station.Decomissaionig Coast Analysis Doaeamon, NOI.1590-002.
Rev. I Appenadix D, Page 20 of 35 Table D-2 Cooper Nuclear Station 2034 Delayed DECON Decommissioning Cost Estimate (thousands of 2008 dollars)Off-Sita LLRW NRC Spent Fuel Site Processed Burial Volumes BurialI Utility and Activity Cecon Removal Packaging Transport Processing Disposal Other Total Total Lie. Tenn. Management , Restoration Volume Class A Class B Class C GTCC Processed Craft Contractor lides Actviy Description Cost Cost Costs Costs Costs Costs Costs Contlo encv Costs Costs Costs Costs Cu. Feet- Cu. Fee Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet WI. Lbs. Manhours Manhours Disposal of Plant Systems (continued) 4b.1.2.8 Radwaste El 877 Area2A 4b.1.2.9 Radwaste El 877 A.ea3A 4b.1.2.10 Radaste El 903 AealA 4b.1.2.11 Radwaste El 903 Area2A 40b1.2.12 Radwast El 903 Area3A 4b.1.2.13 Radwaste E 918 AnnalA 4b.1.2.14 Radwaste El 918 Area2A 4b.1.2.15 Radwaste a] 918 Area3A 4b.1.2.16 Radwaste El 934 ArealA 4b.12.17 Radwaste El 934 Area2A 4b.1.2.18 Radwaste, E 949 ArealA 40.1.2.19 Reactor El 1001 ArealA 40t.1.2.20 Reactor E 1001 ArealB 4b.1.2.21 Reactor E[ 8595AealA 4b.1.2.22 Reactorl [ 859 ArealB 4b.1.2.23 Reactor El 859 Area2A 4b.1.2.24 Reactor [] 859 Area2B 41b.1.2.25 Reactor El 859 Area3A 4b.1.2.26 Reactor El 859 Area3B 4b.12.27 Reactor Cl 859 Area4A 4b.1.2.28 Reactor C 859 Area4B 4b.1.2.29 Reactor El 859 AreaSA 4b.1.2.30 Reactor C 859 AreaB5 4b.1.2.31 Reactor Ej 903 ArealA 4b.1.2.32 Reactor" [ 903ArealB 4b.1.2.33 Reactor El 903Area2A 4b.1.2.34 Reactor El 903 Area2B 40.1,2,35 Reactor El 903 Area3A 4b.1.2.36 Reactor El 903 Area3B 4b.1.2.37 Reactor El 903 Area4A 4b0.1.2.38 Reactor E 903 Area4B 40.1 2.39 Reactor E] 031 ArealA 4b.12.40 Reactor El 931 Areal B 40.1.2.41 Reactor C 931 Area2A 4b.1.2.42 Reactor El 931 Area2B 40.1.2.43 Reactor CJ 931 Area3A 4b.1.2.44 Reactor El 931 Area3B ,40.1.2.45 Reactor CJ 931 Area4C 4b.1.2.46 Reactor El 931 Area5C 4b0.1.2.47 Reactor El 958ArealA 4b.1.2.48 Reactor El 958 Areal B 4b.1.2.49 Reactor EC 958 Area2A 40.1.2.50 Reactor C 958 Area2B 4b.1.2.51 Reactor El 958 Area3A 4b.1-2.52 Reactor C 958 Area3B 4b.1.2.53 Reactor C 976 ArealA 4b.1.2.54 Reactor El 976 ArealB 40.1.2.55 Reactor EJ 976 Area2A 4b.1.2.56 Reactor Cl 976 Area2B 4b.1,2.57 Turbine El 882 ArealA 40.1.2.58 Turbine El 882 ArealB 4b.1.2.59 Turtbie El 882 Area2A 40. 1.2.60 Turbine C 882 Area2B 4b.1.2.61 Turbine C] 882 Area3A 4b.1.2.62 Turbine El 882 Area38 4b.1,2.63 Turbine EC 903 ArealA 43 71 110 188 37 18 16 185 26 98 12 50 62 71 440 72 69 47 33 50 17 63 37 401 451 4 69 32 S 21 27 21 25 300 20 2 77 2 24 7 56 167 31 10 33 14 11 147 7 37 37 386 21 209 16 607 9 9 7 18 13 9 10 36 29 6 7 2 2 3 3 23 22 3 4 11 12 I 2 7 8 1 4 15 16 11 58 25 26 1 8 9 9 0 2 g 8 0 2 16 17 0 2 56 42 6 32 0 0 2 11 10 11 1 3 8 9 t 3 3 3 8 40 2 2 0 0 23 22 0 0 9 10 3 18 10 10 1 1 4 3 1 1 1 1 5 25 1 1 1 3 3 3 16 87 2 2 4 22 2 1 27 145 1 1 113 201 153 439 104 30 39 338 60 177 24 121 64 248 994 -401 131 --137 42 -117 31 -262 41 651 550-6 190-167 52 136 52 --2 52 692-35 1 0 338 149 281 -* 153 12 7 48 10 6 16 422 13 55-50 1,490 29 374 23 2,478-15 41 213 213 72 372 372 68 351 351 165 856 856 37 190 190 12 64 64 15 75 75 138 705 705 22 115 115 72 370 370 9 47 47 45 230 230 26 157 157 83 430 430 269 1,771 1,771 125 648 648 38 247 247 48 251 251 15 93 93 44 227 227 9 59 59 85 443 443 16 98 98 275 1,424 1.424 201 1,240 1,240 3 14 14 48 320 320 52 272 272 14 90 90 43 223 223 14 90 90 20 104 104 186 1,227 1,227 14 74 74 1 3 3 109 567 567 1 3 3 4 28 1 8 54 278 278 87 554 554 49 253 253 6 37 37 21 109 109 7 39 39 7 36 36 104 703 703 5 26 29 18 114 114 23 116 116 335 2,313 2,313 13 67 67 112 721 721 10 52 52 548 3,805 3,805 6 32 32 613 1,156 684 1,955 463 135 201 1,690 266 8O8 105 537 689-1,091 10,641 --1,780 1.406 -S 9608 453-520 331 -* 1,163 442 --2,892 0.890 -26 2,039 -741 553 606 559 -232 7,412 .-154 9 0 1,651 8 662 3,009-681 125 33-214 109 29 72 4,521 57 586 222 15,948-129 4,006 101 26,533 -68 44.992 1,189 79.983 1,969 61.153 3,015 175,093 5,282 41,366 1.029 12,033 477 15,667 448 134,827 5,045 23,735 680 70,665 Z663 9,381 305 48,175 1,261 27.979 1,681 97,874 2,024 432,136 12,411 159,714 2,094 57,093 1,954 54,543 1,321 18,381 951 46,666 1,374 13,424 476 104,381 1,798 17.982 1,087 259.190 10.497 239.197 12,496 2,372 120 82,815 1,915 68,516 929 22,464 618 54,373 776 22,692 597 20,858 670 301,017 8,410 13,824 544 371 53 134,007 2,165 340 49 767-213 589,432 1,472 122,212 4,693 61.083 880 8,024 263 19.185 898 7,011 410 6,482 298 183,615 3.931 5,138 172 23,813 1,033 19,878 1,004 647,659 11,113 11,556 584 162,678 5,781 9,017 451 1,077.531 17,302 6,127 232 TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document NOI-1590-002, Rev. I Appendix D, Page 21 of 35 Table D-2 Cooper Nuclear Station 2034 Delayed DECON Decommissioning Cost Estimate (thousands of 2008 dollars)Off-Site LLRW NRC Spent Fuel Site Processed Burial Volumes Buriul I Utility and Activity Decon Removal Packaging Transport Processing Disposal Other Total Total LIc. Term. Management Restoration Volume Class A Class B Class C GTCC Processed Craft Contractor Index Activtv Descrlptlon Cost Cost Costs Costs Costs Costst s sts Cootlnl es CCosts Costs Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Wt. Lbs. Manhours Manhours Disposal of Plant Systems (continued) 4b. 12.64 Turbine E4 03 AreaIS 4b, 1.2.65 Turbine El 903 Area2A 4b.1.2.66 Turbine El 903 Area2B 4b.1.2.67 Turbine El 903 Area3B 4b.1.2.68 Turbine El 903 Area3C 4b.1.2.69 Turbine FA 903 Aes4B 4b.1.2.70 Yard AealC 4b.1.2 Totals 4b.1.3 Scaffolding in support of deconmnissioning Decontamination of Site Buildings 4b.1.4.1 Reactor 45.1.42 Augmented Radwaste 4b.1.4.3 Miscelaneous Sruturms -Contaminated 4b, 1 .4.4 Facility 4b51.4.5 Radwaste 4b51.4.6 Turbine 4b5.1A Totals 4b.t Subtotal Period 40 Actvity Costs Period 4b Additional Costs 4b.2.1 ISFSI Decontamination 4b.2.2 Final Ste Survey 4b.2 Subtotal Period 40 Additional Costs Period 4b Coilateral Costs 4b.3.1 Process liquid vaste 4b.3.2 Small tooi allowance 4b.3.3 Decommissioning Equipment Disposition 45.3 Subtotal Period 45 Colluteral Costs 974 5 144 3 108 12 197-7.771 46 241 4,133 -1 1 6 1 7 128 0 2 35 0 2 28 556 1.148 13.202 5,814 3,073 36 17 252 34 904 6,299 6,299 4 20 20 56 337 337 6 47 47 16 124 -7 49 49 30 227 -5,535 34,027 33,227 821 4,232 4,232 3,310 15.922 15,922 51 215 215 363 1,777 1,777 90 437 437 141 572 572 477 1,928 1.628 4,432 20,850 20,850 11,285 61,417 60,618 44,251 42 1,375-376 124 --299 227 -800 141.342 27,486-2,431 151 52,579 39,536 242 1,099 8,129 452 1,234 1,567 404 2,953 688 11,664 63.275 57,271 800 207,048 90,895 1,797,054 27,674 3.729 142 55,851 4.040 15,251 97-3,412 12,139 367 5,770 8,056,388 218,627 122,988 41,117 6,069,283 115,053 119,326 1,978 372.774 12,956 205,068 3,237 310,769 5,863 1,193,496 18,679 8,270.774 157,769 16,987,290 419,513 2,880 1.820 52 19 368 167 68 55 159 50 526 142 4,055 2,253 202 422 4 6 15 42 6 12 9 14 35 51 271 547 4,911 2,376 23 60 759 62 115 89 38 161 64 633 5,910 3.362 4,318 13.131 942 , 1,800 19,364 10,578 1,012 6 24 60 1,250 460 2,811 -1,205 362 1,567 1,567 1,012 6 24 60 2,455 821 4,378 1,567 2,811 1,175 2.811 1,175 165,113 26,509 2,560 12,460 165,113 26.509 15,040 143 -49 262 235-6 50 143 235 137 312 299 621 84 621 363 Period 4b Period-Dependert Costs 4b.4.1 Decon supplies 1,252 4b.4.2 Insurance 45.4.3 Property tanes 4b.4.4 Health physics supplies 2,404 4b.4.5 Heavy equipment rental 4,270 4b.4.6 Disposal of DAW generated 4b.4.7 Plant energy budget 4b.4.8 NRC Fees 4b.4.9 Liquid Radwaste Processing Equipment/Servioes 4b.4.10 Security Staff Cost 4b.4.1 I DOC StaflCost 45.4.12 Utiity Staff Cost 4b.4 Subtotal Period 4b Pedod-Dependent Costs 1,252 6.674 4b.0 TOTAL PERIOD 4 COST 5,712 21,052 PERIOD 4a -License Termination PeFod 4e Direct Decommissioning Actvities 45. t.1 ORISE confirmatory survey 4e,1.2 Terminate license 48.1 Subtotal Period 4e Activity Costs 55 55 1,192 10 31 876 1,691 1,601 913 6,945 24,622 33,00 31 876 70,053 190 944 944 35 270 270 130 973 973 356 2,187 2,187 313 1,564 1,564 119 1,312 1,312 1 11 11 601 3,005 3,005 641 4,911 4,911 229 1,191 1,191 254 1,945 1,945 160 1,761 1,761 137 1,049 1,049 1,042 7,987 7.987 3,693 28,315 28,315 4,962 38,042 38,042 12,151 91,092 91,092 24,614 159,074 155,463 18,832 18,832 2,811 800 213,048 112.318 1,042 6,000 373 6,000 1,415 172,741 172,741 58 158,571 339,977 598,766 58 1,097,314 62,521 203 303,507 68 368,028 291 1,140 2,168 19,985 11.897 72,508 17,691,170 445,371 1,112.354 147 44 191 191 147 44 191 191 TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Stations Derooomia.ionaing Coast Anaolysi Document N01-1590-002, Rev. I Appendix D, Page 22 of 35 Table D-2 Cooper Nuclear Station 2034 Delayed DECON Decommissioning Cost Estimate (thousands of 2008 dollars)1o1.S110 LLRW NRC Spo.lFuel Site Processed 50.i1,Volms Burial I Uility  Activity DOcon Removal Packaging Transport Processing Disposal Other Total Total Lin. Trom. Management Restoration Volume Class A Class B Class C GTCC Processed Craft Contractor Index Activity Description Cost Cast Costs Costs Costs Costs Costs Continaencs Costs Costs Costs Casts Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Fast Cu. Fest Wt Lbs. Manhours Manhouos Perod 4a Additonal Costs 4e.2.1 Final Sits Survey 4e.2 Subtotal Period 4e Additienal Costa Peiod 4e Collateral Costs 4e.3.1 DOC staff relocation expenses 48.3 Subtotal Period 4e Collateral Costs Poed 4e Period-Dependent Costs 4e.4.1 Insurance 4e.4.2 Property tales 4e.4.3 Health physics supplies 4e.4.4 Disposal of DAW generated 4e.4.5 Plant energy budget 4e.4.6 NRC Fees 4e.4.7 Security Staff Cost 4e.4.8 DOC Staff Cost 4e.4.9 Utility Staff Cost 4e.4 Subtotal Period 4e Petiod-Dependent Costs 4e.0 TOTAL PERIOD 4e COST PERIOD 4 TOTALS PERIOD Sb -Site Restaraton Period 5b Direct Decommissioning Activites Demolition of Remaining Site Buildings 5b.1.1.1 Reactor 55.1.1.2 Augmented Radwasta 5b.1,1.3 Control 5b.1..4 Intake Structue 5b.1.1.5 LLRW Storage Pad 5b.1.1.6 Miscellaneous Structures
-Clen 5b.1.1.7 Misceltaneous Structues
-Contaminated 5b.1.1.8 Mutb-Puroses Facility 5b.1.1.9 OWC Gas Generator 5b,1.1.10 Office 5b.1,1.11 Radwaste 5b51.1.12 Seal Well 5b.1.1.1 3 Sewage Treatment Area 5b.1.1.14 Transformer Yard 5b.51.115 Turbine 5.1.1.16 Tubine Pedestal 55.1.1 Totals Site Closeout Activties 5b.1.2 Reovne Rubble 5b. 1.3 Grade & landscape site 55. 1.4 Final report to NRC 5b.1 Subtotal Period 5b Acivity Costs Period Sb Additional Costs 5b.2.1 ISFSI Demolition 5b.2.2 Concrete Crushing 5b.2.3 Cofferdam 5.99S 1.799 7,797 7,797 5.998 1,799 7,797 7,797 912 137 1.049 1.049 912 137 1,049 1.049 148,435 6,240 148.435 6,240 736 736 3 1 42 -140 532 1,012 4,458--4,695 1 42 10,839 1 42 17,897 0 3 3 184 920 920 11 57 57 21 161 161 53 585 585 152 1,164 1,164 669 5.126 5,126 704 5,399 5,399 1,794 13,418 13,416 3,774 22,453 22,453 52,151 302,640 298,932 907 8,324 3 18,857 57,357--74,643 907 8,324 3 150,857 3 736 3 907 8,324 148.438 157,097 5,962 37.419 8.030 4,807 37,066 32.944 124,262 2,811 897 384,277 154.025 4.111 470 508 28,321.020 749,627 1,797.609 1,491 222 214 523 145* 1,199 27 123 18 156 391"17 4 20 2,596 277 7,418 424 578 5,421 672 499 458 224 1,715 33 255 32 246 78 602 22 167 179 1,375 4 30 18 141 3 20 23 179 59 449 3 20 1 5 3 24 389 2,985 42 318 1,113 8.531 64 488 87 665 -23 179 179 1,286 9.863 179 107 824 76 582 69 527 1.715 255 246 6D2 167 1,375 30 141 20 179 449 20 5 24 2,985 318 8,531 488 665 9.684 14.601 2,119 1,655 5,621 1,227 11,837 572 1,982 283 1.920 3.229 166 53 172 40,503 2,100 86,040 3,286 1,578-1.560 92,904 1,560 5,898 160 3,045 5,130 156* ---158 44 824-582 527 TLG Services, Inc.
CaaperA'odriw slolat-Deeomaisioneing Coad Anealysis Documsent NO -1,590-002, Rev. I Appensdix D, Page 23 of 55 Table D-2 Cooper Nuclear Station 2034 Delayed DECON Decommissioning Cost Estimate (thousands of 2008 dollars)m IAdtivity aot -Ste i Li.W Trm. MSpent guem siou Vrole Ca A urClas Volumes C C uril I UCilt anat Decon Removal Packaging Transport Processing Disposal Other* Total Total Ic.Jc Teom. Management Restoration Volume Class A Class B Class C GTCC Processed Craft CoratI I  ACtIVITY Until tion Cost Cast cost. Costs Costs Costs Costs Contingency Costs Costs costs Costs CuFeet Cu Feet Cu Fast Cu Feet Cu Feet WL Lbs Manhoum 5b.2 Subtotal Period 5b Additional Costs Period 5b Collatertl Costs 5b.3.1 Smal tool allowance 5b.3 Subtotal Period 5b Colateral Costs Penod 5b Period-Dependent Costs 5b .4.1 Insurance 5b.4.2 Property tawas 5b.4.3 Heavy equipment rental 5b.4.4 Plant energy budget 5b.4.5 Security Staff Cost Sb4.6 DOC Staff Cost 5b.4.7 Utlity Staff Cost 5b.4 Subtotal Period 5b Pedod-Dependent Costs 5b.O TOTAL PERIOD 5b COST PERIOD 6 TOTALS TOTAL COST TO DECOMMISSION 1,629 52 252 1.933 824 1.109- .14,073 160 56 56 4.233 4,233 14,339 14,339 8 64 8 64 7 1 8 5- 63 4.869 167 25 192 2,419 363 2,782 10,212 1.532 11,744 4,507 676 5,183 17.312 3.232 24,777 17,520 4,779 36,638 179 17,520 4,779 36,638 179-64-64 4,869 -.-* 192 -..-* 2,7a2 .-.-* 11,744 -.---5,183.24.777- ---824 235,634 ---45,051 127,646 73,209 245,906 106.977 247.626 824 35,634 106,977 247.626 13,133 58,595 8,276 5,720 37,066 35,914 495,597 114.112 768,414 476,185 254.881 37,348 384.277 199,891 4,111 470 508 28,942,100 987,724 6,395.380 TOTAL COST TO DECOMMISSION WITH 17.44% CONTINGENCY:
$768,414 thousands of 2008 dollars TOTAL NRC LICENSE TERMINATION COST IS 61.97% OR: $476,185 thousands of 2008 do6am SPENT FUEL MANAGEMENT COST IS 33.17% OR: $264,881 thousands of 2008 dollars NON-NUCLEAR DEMOLITION COST IS 4.86% OR: $37,348 thousands of 2008 dolam TOTAL LOW-LEVEL RADIOACTIVE WASTE VOLUME BURIED (EXCLUDING GTCC): 204,472 cubic feet TOTAL GREATER THAN CLASS C RADWASTE VOLUME GENERATED:
W08 cubic eset TOTAL SCRAP METAL REMOVED: 30.276 tons TOTAL CRAFT LABOR REQUIREMENTS:
987,724 man-hours End Notes: n/a -indicates that this actvity not charged as decommissioning expense.a -indicates that this activity performed by decommissioning staff.0 -indicates that this vatue is less than 0.5 but is ion-zeso.a cell containing" -"indicates a zer value TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station De-om.issioning Cost Analysia Docueanet NOI.1590.OOZ, Rev. I AppendixD, Page 24 of 35 Table D-3 Cooper Nuclear Station 2034 SAFSTOR Decommissioning Cost Estimate (thousands of 2008 dollars)SOff-Site LLRW NRC Spent Fuel Site Processed Burial Volumes Burial I Utility and Activity Decon Removal Packaging Transport Processing Disposal Other Total Total LIO. Term, Management Restoration Volume Clasw A Clans B Class C GTCC P acessed Croft Contractor Index Activity Description Cost Cost Costs Costs Costs Costs Costs Contanheac' Costs Costs Costa Costs Cu. Feet C.Ft Cu.'Feet C. .Feet Lbs. ManWouL Manhours PERIOD la -Shutdown through Transition Period 1 a Direct Decommissioning Activities 1a.1.1 SAFSTOR site characterizotion survey 1a.1.2 Prepare preliminary decommissioning cost la.1.3 Ncotification of Cessation of Operations.a.1.4 Remove fuel & source material la.1.5 Notifcation of Permanent Defueling 1.-1.6 Deactivate plant systems & process waste 18.1.7 Prepare and subirt PSDAR Ia.1.,8 Re.ie plant dgs & specs.10.1.9 Performr detailed lad survey 1a.1.10 Estimate by-product inventory 1a.1,11 End product description 10.1.12 Detailed by-product inventory 10.1.13 Defre major work sectuence 10.1.14 Perform SER and EA 10.1.15 Perform Smie-Specific Cost Study Activity Specrfications 1:.1.16.1 Prepare piant and tacilies for SAFSTOR 1a.1.18.2 Plant systems la.1.16.3 Plant structures and buildngs a.1.16,4 Wasts management 1a.1.16.5 Facilty and site dormancy 1a.1.16 Total Detailed Work Procedures 10.1.17.1 Plant systems 1a.1.17.2 Facility closeout & dorrnancy 10.1.17 Total 1.1.16 Procure vacuum drying system 1a.1.18 Orairlde-energize non-cont.
sypstes.1.20 Drain & dry NSSS 0.1.21 Drainde-energize contaminated systems 1:.1.22 Deconlsecure contaminated system 10. 1 Subtotal Period 1 a Activity Costs Period Ia Collateral Costs la.3.1 Spent Fuel Capital and Transfer la.3.2 Corporate Overheads 10.3 Subtotal Period 10 Collateral Costs Period 10 Period-Dependent Costs la.4.1 Insurance la.4.2 Properly loves 1.4.3 Health physics supplies 1:.4.4 Heavy equipment rental 1 .4.5 Diaposal of DAW generated 10.4.6 Plant energy budget 1a.4.7 NRC Fees tl.4.8 Emergency Planning Fees 10.49 Spent Fuel Pool O&M 1:.4.10 ISFSI Operating costs 0.4.11 Security Stafl Cost 346 130 200 130 100 100 150 100 310 500 104 450 450 20 150 150 a tria 30 230 230 20 150 150 15 115 115 15 115 115 23 173 173 15 115 115 47 357 357 75 575 575 74 566 566 63 479 479 47 359 359 30 230 230 30 230 230 243 1 864 1.864 18 136 136 18 138 138 36 274 274 1,300 2,000 1,300 1.000 1.000 1,500 1,000 3,100 5,000 4,920 4,167 3.120 2,000 2.000 16,207 1,183 1,200 2.383 492 417 312 200 200 1.621 118 120 238 10 2 12 12 3,935 642 4,577 4,577 35,690------2,721------3,105------5.825 370 368 5 1,600 4 73 -927 706 1 .1 8 5 745 85 6&021 408 3,129 -468 3,570 3,570 874 6.699 3,570 160 1,760 1,760 0 4 4 93 463 463 55 423 423 15 100 100 139 1,066 1,060 71 778 776 110 1,303 112 857 13 98 -903 6.924 6,924 3,129 3,129 1,303 857 98 1,575 14,445 5 157,471 TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station Document N01.1590-002, Rev. I Decommissioning Coast Analysis Appendix D, Page 25 of 35 Table D-3 Cooper Nuclear Station 2034 SAFSTOR Decommissioning Cost Estimate (thousands of 2008 dollars)Off-Sits LLRW NRC Spent Fuel Sits Processed Burial Volunses Burial Utilty and Activity escon Removal Packaging Transport Processing Disposal Other Total Total Lic. Teom. Management Restoration Volume Class A Class B Class C GTCC Processed Craft Contantor Index Activity Description Cost Cost Costs Costs Costs Costs Costs Contingency Costs Costs Costs Costs Cu. Feet Cu. Foat Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet W.L Lbs. Manhours Manhours Period ia Period-Dependent Costs (conornued) la.4.12 Utility Staff Cost la.4 Subtotal Period Ia Period-Dependent Costs la.0 TOTAL PERIOD Io COST PERIOD lb -SAFSTOR Limited DECON Activities Period lb Direct Decommnssioning Activities Decontamination of Site Buildings lb.1.1.1 Reactor lb.1.1.2 Augmrnted Radwasts lb.1.1.3 Mscellaneous Sructures
.Contaminated lb.1.1.4 Muot-Purpose FaCiitty lb 1.1.5 Radwaste 1.1.6 Turbine 1I1 Totals 738 738-22,690 73 33.962 73 43,723 2.929 52 376 68 158 520 4,103 lb.1 Subtotal Period I b Actvity Costs 4,103 Period 1 b Additional Costs lb.2.1 Spent Fuel Pool Isolation
---9.407 lb.2.2 Asbestos Insulation Disposal 773 1 65 558 lb.2 Subtotal Period l b Additional Costs 773 1 65 558 9.407 Period 1 b Collateral Costs lb.3.1 Decor equlpment 713 ---lb.3.2 Process lquid waste 229 -74 392 448 lb.3.3 Small tooi allowance
-70 lb.3.4 Spent Fuel Capital and Transfer 930 lb,3.5 Ccrportte Overheads
..... 766 lb.3 Subtotal Period I b Collateral Costs 942 70 74 392 448 1,695 Period lb Period-Dependent Costs 1A4.1 Decon supplies 1,156 -10.4.2 Insurance 121 lb.4.3 Property taxes -I 1b.4.4 Health physics supplies 473 1b.4.5 Heavy equipment rental 91 ---lb.4.6 Disposal of DAW generated 5 3 8151 S0.47 Plant energy budget 229 1b.4.8 NRC Fees 174 10'4.9 Emergency Planning Fees 292 1b.4.10 Spent Fuel POol O&M 184 1b.4.11 ISFSl Operaing Costs 21 lb.4.12 Security Staff Cost 1.485 lb.4.13 Uilty Staff Cost 5,595 1b.4 Subtotal Period lb Period-Dependent Costs 1,156 564 5 3 81 8,101 lb.0 TOTAL PERIOD lb COST 6.201 1.407 80 460 1.087 19,203 3.403 26,093 26,093 5,087 39,867 37,609 6,603 51,144 45,757 1,465 4,394 4.394 26 78 78 188 565 565 34 101 101 79 237 237 260 780 780 2,052 6,155 6,155 2,052 6,155 6,155 1,411 10,818 10,818 265 1,662 1,662 1,676 12,480 12.480 107 820 820 293 1,436 1,436 11 81 81 139 1,069 -115 880 880 665 4,286 3,217 289 1,445 1,445 12 133 133 0 1 1 118 592 592 14 104 104 21 110 110 34 263 263 17 191 191 29 321 -28 211 3 24 -223 1,707 1,707 839 6.434 6,434 1,628 11,538 10,981 6,020 34,458 32,833 2,258 1,575 5.387 1,575 68,438 1,562 8,542 2.036 4,761 15,667 101,006 101,006--423,400 14.445 5 580,871 14,445 5 616,761 10,333 134,329 10,002 10.333 134,329 10,002 1,069 1,669 321 211 24 557 2 1,626 1.561 93,644 304 1.561 93,644 304 1,741 15,968 5 38,829-.104,400 1,741 15,.68 5 143,229 13,635 243,942 111,318 143,229 TLG Serviese, Inc.
Cooper Nuolear Station Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document N01-1590-002, Rev. I Appendix D, Page 26 of 35 Table D-3 Cooper Nuclear Station 2034 SAFSTOR Decommissioning Cost Estimate (thousands of 2008 dollars)I Activity Icnde Activity Description PERIOD Ic -Preparations for SAFSTOR Dormancy Period i Direct Decommissioning Actvities 1C.1.1 Prepare support equipment for storage Ic.1.2 Install containment pressure equal. lines Ic. 1.3 Interim survey prior to dormancy lc.1.4 Secure building accesses ic. 1.5 Prepare & submit interim report 1C.1 Subtotal Period ic Activity Costs Period Ic Collateral Costs lc.3.1 Process iquid waste 1c.3.2 Small tool allowance lc.3.3 Spent Fuel Capital and Transfer lc.3.4 Corporate Over-eads lc.3 Subtotal Period lc Collateral Costs Period 1c Period-Dependent Costs lc.4.1 Insurance lc.4.2 Propertytaxs 1c.4.3 Health physics supplies ic,4.4 Heavy equipment rental lc.4.5 Disposal of DAW generated 1c.4.6 Plant energy budget 1c.4.7 NRC Fees ic.4.8 Emergency Planning Fees 1c.4.9 Spent Fuel Pool O&M Ic.4,l0 ISFSI Operating Costs lc.4.11 Security Staff Cost 1c.4.12 Utility Staff Cost lc.4 Subtotal Period ic Period-Dependent Costs lc.0 TOTAL PERIOD ic COST PERIOD I TOTALS off-Sita LLRI NRC Spent Fuel site Processed Burial Volumes Burial I Utility and Decon Removal Packaging Transport Processing Disposal Other Total Total Lic. Ten. Management Restoration Volume Class A Class B Class C GTCC Processed Craft Contractor I Cast Cost Costs Casts Costs Costa costs nsts Costs Costs Costa Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feat Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Wt,. Lbs. Manhours Manhours I 387 31 419 85 445 445-5 36 36 733 220 953 953 58 9 67 67 791 291 1,501 1,601 235 76 403 460 3 940..... 774 235 3 76 403 460 1,714 301 1,475 1,475 0 3 3 -141 1,081 -1,081 116 890 890 558 3,449 2,368 1.081 160 92 -* -1 1 252 1 1 235 673 77 404 6,437 2.818 162 866 122 12 134 134 1 0 1 1-40 200 200-14 105 105 18 -5 25 25 231 35 266 266 176 18 194 194 295 30 325 -325 186 28 214 214 21 3 24 -24 1,501 225 1.726 1,726 -5 057 849 6.505 6,505 18 80,191 1,257 6,720 90157 563 478 10.696 2,107 14,670 13,026 1.644 1,638 73.621 14,730 100,272 91,616 8.657 3,000 700 15,696-0583 19,396 583 1,603 96,195 313 -1,603 96,195 313 393 3,601 1 39,260 105,560 393 3,601 1 144,820 1.996 99,796 19,710 145,403 17,205 358,183 131,033 905,393 PERIOD 2a -SAFSTOR Dormancy with Wet Spent Fuel Storage Period 2a Direct Decommissionlng Acivitles 2a.i.1 Quarterly Inspection 2a.1.2 Semi-annual environmental survey 2. 1.3 Prepare reports 2a.1.4 Bituminous roof replacement 2a.1.5 Maintenance supplies 20.1 Subtotal Period 2a Activity Costs Perod 2a Collateral Costs 2a.3.1 Spent Fuel Capital and Transfer 2a.3.2 Corporate Ocerheads 2a.3 Subtotal Period 2a Collateral Costs Period 2a Period-Dependent Costs 2a.4.1 Insurance 20.4.2 Property taces 2a.4.3 Health physics supples a 9 72 72 126 629 629 135 701 701 63 503 566 21.155 3.173 24,329 -24,329 4.139 621 4,759 4,759 25.294 3,794 29,088 4.759 24,329 344 1,962 16 196 2.158 1,848 2 18 18 88 430 430 310 -- --TLo Serices, Ine.
Cooper Nuclear Station Deom.missioning Cost Analysis Document N01-1590-002, Rev. I Appendix D, Page 27 of 35 Table D-3 Cooper Nuclear Station 2034 SAFSTOR Decommnissioning Cost Estimate (thousands of 2008 dollars)IlActivity-Off-Site LLRW NRC Spent Fuel Site Processed Burial Volumes Burial I Utility and Decon Removal Packaging Transport Processing Disposal Other Total Total LIc. Term. Management Restoration Volume Clas A Class 8 Clans C GTCC Processed Craft Contractor I cost, t' Costs costs costs costs Costs Continmenca Costs Costs Costs Costs Cu. Feet Cu. FPst Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feat Wt. Lbs. Manhours ManhoursI I  C i6u.&#xfd; -Period 2a Period-Dependent Costs (continued) 2a.4.4 Disposal of DAW generated 2a.4.5 Plant energy budget 2a.4.6 NRC Fees 2a.4.7 Emergency Planning Fees 2a.4.8 Spent Fuel Pool O&M 2a.4.9 ISFSI Operating Costs 2a.4.10 Security Staff Cost 2a.4.11 Utiity Staff Cost 2a.4 Subtotal Period 2a Periad-Dependent Costs 2a.0 TOTAL PERIOD 2a COST PERIOD 2b -SAFSTOR Dormancy with Dry Spent Fuel Storage Period 2b Direct Decommitssioning Activities 2b.1-1 Quad"y Inspection 2b. 1.2 Semi-ennual environmental survey 2b.1.3 Prepare reports 2b. 1A Bituminous roof replacement
: 21. 1.5 Maintenance supplies 2b. 1 Subtotal Period 2b Activity Costs Period 2b Coulateral Costs 2b.3.1 Spent Fuel Capital and Transfer 2b.3 Subtotal Period 2b Collateral Costs Period 2b Period-Dependent Costs 2b.4.1 Insurance 2b.4.2 Property taxes 2b.4.3 Health physics supplies 2h.4A Disposal of DAW generated 2b.4.5 Plant energy budget 2b.4.6 NRC Fees 2b.4.7 Emergency Planning Fees 2b.4.8 ISFSI Operating Costs 2b.4.9 Security Stuff Cost 2b.4.10 Utility Staff Cost 2b.4 Subtotal Period 2b Period-Dependent Costs 20.0 TOTAL PERIOD 2b COST PERIOD 2oc -SAFSTOR Dormancy wvithout Spent Fuel Storage Penod 2c Direct Decommissioning Activities 2c. 1.1 Quarterly Inspection 2c. 1.2 Semi-annud envronnmental survey 20c1.3 Prepare reports 2c. 1.4 Bituminous roof replacement 2c.1.5 Maintenance supplies 2c.1 Subtotal Period 2c Activity Costs Period 2c Period-Dependent Costs 2C04.1 Insurance 2C.4.2 Property taxes 2C.4.3 Health physics supplies 2c.4.4 Dispoe at of DAW generated 344 344 13 7 13 7 13 7 198 -52 270 270 --742 111 853 427 427 807 81 887 887 -3,374 337 3,712 -3,712-,984 448 3,431 3,431 340 51 391 -391 17,728 2,659 20,387 7,788 12.599 18-816 2,822 21,639 4,426 17,213 198 46,768 6,845 54,176 16,092 382.63 198 72,628 10,775 83.965 21,553 62,412 4,267 39,139 13 444,561-- -329.769 4.267 39,139 13 774,330 4.267 39,139 13 774,330 53 407 407 706 3,531 3,531 759 3,938 3,938 354-2, 52 3,178 13,214 1,982 15,197 13214 1,982 15.197 16,197 15,197 1.620 1,620 1,620 66 36 66 36 66 36 9,796 980 10.775 10,373 402 90 9 99 99 --405 2,025 2,025 1.037 -271 1,411 1.411-2.083 312 2.390 2,395 4.528 453 4,981 4,981 -18,944 1,894 20,838 -20,838 1,908 266 2,194 -2.194 67,312 8,597 65,909 43,719 22.190 41,970 6,295 48,265 24,845 23,420 1,037 136.630 19.503 156,892 89,847 69,045 1,037 153,023 22,244 178,026 93,785 84,241 22,311 204.651 68 1.265,451 749,897 22,311 204.651 68 2,015,349 22,311 204.651 68 2,015,349 a 62 476 476 82e 4,132 4,132 889 4,608 4,608 414 3,306 3,720 11,037 1,104 12,140 12,140-105 11 116 110 1.783 ---446 2,229 2,229-75 42 1,186 310 1,613 1,613 25,518 234,065 78 TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station Decommissioning Cast Analysis Document N01-1590-002, Rev. I Appendix D, Page 28 of35 Table D1-3 Cooper Nuclear Station 2034 SAFSTOR Decommissioning Cost Estimate (thousands of 2008 dollars)I Ac t io y Off-Site LLRW NRC Spent Fuel Site Processed Burial Volumes Burial Utlity 0and Decon Removal Packaging Transport Processing Disposal Other Total Total Lit. Term. Management Restoration Volume Class A Class B Class C GTCC Processed Craft Conetrsrta Cost Cost Costs Costs Costs Costs Costs Continsency Costs Costs Costs Costs Cu. Feet Cu. FePt Cu. Fast Cu. Feet Cu. Fast WLt. Lbs. Manhours Manbosra I n ex -- l-Period 2c Peaiod-Dependunt Costs (contnued) 2c.4.5 Flant energy budget 2c.4.6 NRC Fees 2c.4.7 Security Staff Cost 2c.4.8 Utility Stff Cost 2c.d Subtotal Period 2c Period-Dependent Costs 2c.0 TOTAL PERIOD 2c COST PERIOD 2 TOTALS PERIOD 3a -Reactivate Site Following SAFSTOR Dormancy Period 3a Direot Decommissioning Activities 3s.1.1 Prepare prelimonary decovnossiorrng cost 3a. 12 Review piant dwgs & specs.3a. 1.3 Perform detailed rod survey 3a. 1.4 End product description 3a.1.5 Detaiste by-product inventory 3,a.16 Defrae major work sequence 3a. 1.7 Perform SER and EA 3a. 1,8 Perform Site-Specific Cost Stuly 3a. 1. Preparepsoubit Lcense Teorination Plan 3a.1.10 Receive NRC approval of termination plan Activity Specifications 3a.1.11.1 Re-actvate plant & temporary facilities 3a.1.11.2 Plant systema 3a1.11.3 Reactor internans 3a.1.11.4 Reactor vessel 3a1.11.5 Sacritfcial shaid 3a.1.11.6 Moisture Separ atorstrheatars 3a. I.1.7 Reinforced concreta 3a.1,11.8 Main Turbine 3a01.11.9 Main Condensers 3a.1.11.10 Pressure suppression structure 3a.1.11.11 Drywel 3a. 1.11.12 Plant structures
& buildings 3a. 1.11,.13 Waste management 3a.1.11.14 Facility & sits closeout 3a.1.11 Total Planning & Site Preparations 30.1.12 Prepare disaotnrrng sequence 3a.1.13 Plant prep. & itmp. svcs 3a01.14 Design wtar clsaa-up system 3a01.15 Rigging/Coat, Cntt Eovlpsitoolingletc, 3a. 1.16 Procure csktliners
& containers 3a.1 Subtotal Period 3a Activity Costs Period 3a Period-Dependent Costs 3a04.1 ilasurone 3a.4.2 Property taxes 30.43 Healit phrysics suppies 3a.4.4 Heavy equipment rental 3a.4.5 Disposal of DAW generated 1,783 75 42 2.437 4,799 44,492-25,284 1,186 88,153 366 2,803 2,803 480 5,279 5,279 6,674 51,165 51,165 3,793 29,076 29,076 13,182 104,422 104,422 25.51 -25,518 52,095 822,771--479,950 234,065 78 1,302.721 234,065 78 1,302,721 477,855 160 4,092.400 1,783 75 42 3,748 153 85 1,186 91,873 14,071 109,030 109,030 2,422 317,524 47,090 371,021 224.368 146,654 130 460 100 130 750 310 500 410 737 417 710 65O 50 100 160 209 209 200 160 312 460 90 4,463 240 2,700 140 2,100 123 12,556 20 150 150 69 529 529 15 115 115 20 150 10 113 863 863 47 357 357 75 575 575 61 471 471 a 111 848 763 63 479 431 107 817 817 98 748 748 6 58 58 15 115 115 24 184 92 31 240 240 31 240 240 30 230 230 24 184 184 47 359 179 69 529 529 14 104 52 669 5,133 4,677 36 276 276 405 3,105 3.105 21 161 161 315 2,415 2,415 16 141 141 1,883 14,439 13,983 42 462 462 0 4 4 81 405 405 55 423 423 16 84 84 1,300 4.600 1,000 1,300 7.500 3,100 5.000 4.096 85 468 692 179 52 456 456 -7,370 4,167 7,100 6,500 500-.000 1,600 2.088 2,088 2.000 1,600 3,120 4,600 900 44,633 2,400 1,400 1,230 77,559 324 368 62 420 4 1,329 12,190 TLG Services, Inc.
0 Cooper Nuclear Station Decommissioning Coast Analysis Document N01.1590-002, Rev. 1 Appendix D, Page 29 of"35 Table Dl-3 Cooper Nuclear Station 2034 SAFSTOR Decommissioning Cost Estimate (thouesansds of 2008 dollars)IActsity Off-Site LLRW NRC Spent Fuel Site Processed Burial Volumes Burial I Utility and I Decon Removal Packaging Transport Processing Disposal Other Total Total LIc. Term. Management Restoration Volume Class A Class B Class C GTCC Processed Craft Contractor Cont Cost Cosnt costs Costs Costs Cat Cuntinnenev Costs Cnsts Costs Costs Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Wt. Lbs. Manhours Manhoursre n ex v n Q6ail.iiiu
-Period 3a Period-Dependent Costs (coninued) 3a.4.6 Plant energy budget 3a.4.7 NRC Fees 3a.4.8 Security Staff Cost 3a.4,9 Utility Staff Cost 3a.4 Subtotal Period 30 Period-Dependent Costs 3a.0 TOTAL PERIOD 3a COST PERIOD 3b -Decommissioning Preparations Period 3b Direct Decommissioning Activities Detailed Work Procedures 3b.1.1.1 Plant systems 3b.1.1.2 Reactor internals 3b.1.1.3 Remaining buildings 3b,.1.1.4 CRD housings & Nis 3b.1.1.5 Incore instrumentation 3b.I.1.6 Removal primaty containment 3b.1.1.7 Reactor vessel 3b 1.1.8 Facliity closeout 3b.1.1.9 Sacrificial shield 3b.11.10 Reinforced concrete 3b. 11 .1 Maji Turbine 3b0.1.1.12 Muin Condensers 3b.1.113 Moisture seperators
&reheaters X01.1.14 Radwaste building 3b01.1 15 Reactor building 301.1 Total 3b.1 Subtotal Period 3b Activity Costs Period 3b Additional Costs 31,2.1 Site Characterzation 3b.2 Subtotal Period 3b Additional Costs Penod 3b Coliateral Costs 3b.1 Decon equipment 303.2 DOC staff relocaion0 expenses 3b.3.3 Pipe cutting equipment 30.3 Subtotal Period 3b Collateral Costs Perod 3b Period-Dependent Costs 3b.4.1 Decon supplies 3b.4.2 Insurance 3b0.4.3 Property taues 3b.4.4 Hoalth physics supplies 3b.4..5 Heavy equipment rental 3b.4.6 Disposal of DAW generated 3b.4.7 Plant energy budget 3b.4.8 NRC Fees 3b.4.9 Security Staff Cost 3b.4.10 DOC Staff Cost 3b.4.11 Utility Staff Cost 30.4 Subtotal Period 3b Period-Dependent Costs 691 4 2 927 249-2,800-14,190 62 18,644 139 1,066 1,066 25 274 274 428 3,283 3,283 2,128 16,318 16,318 2,915 22.318 22,318 1,329 1,329 65,179--258,629 12,190 4 323,807 12,190 4 401,366 691 4 2 62 31,200 4,799 36,758 36,302 473 400 135 100 100 200 363 120 120 100 208 209 200 273 273 3.274 71 544 490 60 460 460 20 155 39 15 115 115 15 115 115 30 230 230 54 417 417 18 138 89 18 138 139 15 115 58 31 239 239 31 240 240 30 230 230 41 314 283 41 314 283 491 3.765 3,405 54 1186 69 58 31 31 360 360 4.733 4,000 1,350 1,000 1,000 2,000 3,630 1,200 1,200 1,000 2,080 2,088 2,000 2,730 2,730 32,741 32,741 3,274 491 3,765 3,4058----5.395 1,819 7,014 7,014* ---5,395 1,618 7,014 7,014 713 1,000 713 1,000-107 820 820 912 137 1,049 1,049-150 1,150 1,150 912 394 3,019 3,019 22 179 184 22 363 2 2 246 2 35 -465 125 1,431 4,378-7,114 35 13,761 5 27 27 25 270 270 0 2 2 45 224 224 28 212 212 9 48 48 70 534 534 12 137 137 215 1,646 1,848 657 5,035 5,035 1,067 8.181 8,181 2,133 16,317 16,317 754 754 6,913 8,913 2 32,678 58,560-129,669 2 220.907 TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Statione Decoo~rmissioreirg Coast Amalyais Document NOI-1590-002, Rev. I Appendix:D, Page 30 of 35 Table D-3 Cooper Nuclear Station 2034 SAFSTOR Decommissioning Cost Estimate (thousands of 2008 dollars)Off-Site LLRW NRC Spent Fuel Site Processed Burial Volumes Burial/ Utility and Activity Decon Removal Packaging Transport Processing Disposal Other Total Total Lic. Tenm. Management Restoration Volume Class A Class B Class C GTCC Processed Craft Contractor Index Activit Description Cost Cost Costs Costs Costs Costs Costs Continuenev Costs Costs Costs Costs Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet WI. Lbs. Manhours Manhours 3b.0 TOTAL PERIOD 3b COST 735 1,363 2 1 35 23.342 4,636 30,115 29,755 360 754 6,913 2 253,646 PERIOD 3 TOTALS 735 2,055 6 3 97 54,542 9,435 66,872 66.056 616 2,083 19.104 6 655,014 PERIOD 4a -Large Component Removal Period 4a D~rect Decommnissioning Activities Nuclear Steam Supply System Removan 4a.1.1.1 Recirculation System Piping & Valves 4a.1.1.2 Recirculation Pumps & Motors 4a.1.1.3 CRDMs & Nis Remonal 4a. 1.1.4 Reactor Vessel Internals 4a.1.1.5 Vessel & Internals GTCC Disposal 4a.1.1.6 Reactor Vessel 4a.1.1 Totals Removal of Major Equipment 4a. 1.2 Main Turbine/Generator 4a.1.3 Main Condensers Cascading Costs from Clean Building Demolition 4a. 1.4.1 Reactor 4a.1.4.2 Augmented Radwaste 4a.1.4.3 Radwaste 40.1.4.4 Turbine 40. 1.4 Totals Disposal of Plant Systems 4a.1.5.1 Augmented Radwaste El 877 AreslA 4a.1.5.2 Augmented Radwaste EA 903 ArealA 4a.1.5.3 Augmented Radwuast El 918 ArealA 4a. 1.5.4 Augmented Radtasts El 929 ArealA 4a.1.5.5 Augmented Radwaste El 929 Areal B 4a.1.5.6 DRYWELL ArealA 4a.1.5.7 DRYVWELL ArealB 4a.1.0.8 Turbine El 932 AnealB 4a.1.5.9 Turbine El 932 Area2C 4a.1.5.10 Turbine El 932 Area3C 4a.1.5.11 YardAuealB 4a.1.5 Totals 4a. 1.6 Scaffolding in support of decommissioning 4a. I Subtotal Period 4a Acivity Costs Period 4a Collateral Costs 4a.3.1 Process liquie masne 40a3.2 Small tool allowance 4a.3 Subtotal Period 4A Cotlateral Costs Period 4a Period-Dependent Costs 4a.4.1 Decon sewpiLes 4a.4.2 Insurance 4a.4.3 Property taxes 4a.4.4 Health physics supplies 4a.4.5 Heavy equipnent rental 16 70 14 13 127 151 6 28 11 26 -321 24 139 377 68 317 86 1,959 3,871 912 5,169 155---7,470 -5.054 906 351 3,006 155 132 7,250 5,179 1,370 127 16,431 309 167 945 372 6,376 709 588 259 4,439 260 25 43 285 613 203 28 23 432 66 6 7 104 52 10 9 139 21 4 5 -73 3 0 0 4 -457 85 84 -1,289 112 1 5 75 2 324 16 86 1,477 8 67 ---518 50 264 4,517 1,831 202 487 6,073 2.040 2,049 24 11 168 23 132 12,616 6,838 2,499 17,183 18,493 309 36 -14 76 87 90 38 90 14 76 87 86 477 477 95 488 498 174 1 099 1,099 5,314 17,462 17,462 1,120 8,590 8,590 5.631 15,103 15,103 12,420 43,219 43,219 1,138 8,898 8,898 940 6,932 6,932 39 299 299 4 28 28 7 50 50 43 328 328 92 705 705 166 857 857 44 228 228 50 260 260 25 127 127 1 a 8 458 2,373 2.373 41 235 235 317 2,220 2,220 1 9 10 78 -852 6,201 6,201 1.964 12,597 12,510 047 2,821 2,821 17,102 75,172 75,085 54 270 270 14 104 94 67 374 363 12 59 59 53 579 579 0 5 4 232 1,159 1,159 285 2,183 2,183 499 499 1,188 6,935 -1,878 1,252 14,106 499 24,605 1,252 61,604 42,889 470 470 115,643 2,487 132,880 1,125 126,494 3,972 359,044 18,900 508 89,497 1,447.089 18,900 508 2,270.647 45,384 2,055 469 765* -324"38 -32 5,726 806 10" 15.808* 9 78 --76 48,365"87 65,016 9,348 1,921 101 87 171.628 34,065 1,252"10 304 10 --0 304 -2,772,179 4,438 1,930,000 19,519-2,486 235 359 4,419 7,498 172,205 5,688 41,606 1.842 55,345 1,432 29,038 579 1,529 75 513,627 12,634 33,576 3,384 641,963 9,170 237-2,083 1,964,114 14,340 3,453.003 51.444 81,992 27.411 470 5068 10.507.820 155,694-18,226 59 18,226 59 888 888 1,776 1.776 47 927 1,899 529 4 0 TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station.Decuonami-laonitig Coot Analysis Document NO0-1590-002, Rev. 1 AppendiarD, Page 31 of 35 Table D-3 Cooper Nuclear Station 2034 SAFSTOR Decommissioning Cost Estimate (thousands of 2008 dollars)Off-Site LLRW NRC Spent Fuel Site Processed Burial Volumes Burial I Utility and Activity Decon Removal Packaging Transport Processing Disposal Other Total Total Lic. Tens. Management Restoration Volume Class A Class B Class C GTCC Processed Craft Contractor Index Activit Descrilption Cost Cost Costs Costs Costs Costs Costs Contlingenc Costs Costs Costs Costs Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu.Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feel W.L Lbs. Manhours Manhours Period 40 Period-Dependent Costs (continued) 4a.4.6 Disposal of DAW gemerated 4a.4.7 Plant energy budget 4a.4.8 NRC Fees 4a.4.9 Liquid Radwaste Processing EquipnrentlServices 4a.4.10 Security Staff Cost 4a.4.11 DOC Staff Cost 4a.4.12 Utility Staff Cost 4a.4 Subtotal Peniod 4a Period-Dependent Costs 47 2.825 4a.0 TOTAL PERIOD 4a COST 217 15.531 25 25 14 401 -946 707 403 3,066 11,154 15,348 14 401 32.154 6,878 2,590 17,183 18,982 32.463 PERIOD 4b -Site Decontamination Period 4b Direct Decommissioning Activitias 4b.1.1 Reerove spent Wuel racks Disposal of Plant System 4b.1.2.1 Contro El 882 ArealB 4b.1.2.2 Controd El 903  4b.1.2.3 Control E 918 Area1C 4b.1.2.4 Control El 932 AreslC 4b. .2.5 Intake 4b.1.2.6 Multi-Purpose Facility 4b.1.2.7 Radwaste El 877 ArealA 40.11.8 Radwaste El 877 Area2A 4b.1.2.9 Redwaste El 877 Area3A 4b.1.2.10 Radwasta El 903 AreslA 4b,1.2.11 Radwaste El 903 Ara2A 4b.1.2.12 Radwaste El 903 Area3A 4b.1.2.13 Radwaste El 918 ArealA 4b.1.2.14 Radwaste El 918 Area2A 4b.1.2.15 Radwaste El 918 Arne3A 4b.1.2.16 Radwasta El 934 ArealA 4b.1.2.17 Radwaste El 934 Area2A 4b.1.2.18 Radwaste El 949 ArealA 4b.1.2.19 Reactor al 1001 ArealA 4b.1.2.20 Reactor El 1001 Areal*4b.1.2.21 Reactor El 859 ArealA 4b.1.2.22 Reactor E 859 ArealB 4b.1.2.23 Reactor aJ 859 Area2A 4b.1.2.24 Reactor 8l 859 Ares2B 4b.1.2.25 Reactor 8l 859 Area3A 4b. 1.2.26 Reactor El 859Area3B 4b.1,2.27 Reactor El g59 Are4A 40.,1.2,20 Reactor E[]588Area4B 4b0.1.2.29 Reactor El 5' AreasA 4b.1.2.30 Reactor 81855 A8es5 4 s.1.2.31 Reactor El 9OAreslA 40.1.2.32 Reaor [903 AeslB 4b.1.2.33 Reactor El 903 ArealA 401.12.34 Reactor El 903 Area2B 4b1.2.35 Reactor El 903 Area3A 4b.1.2.35 Reactor El 903 Area3 Qb.1.236 Reactor El 903  4b. 1.2.37 Reactor El 903 Ares4A 4b.1.2.38 Reactor El 903 Area4B 4b.1 .2.39 Reactor El 931 AreaIA 262 33 79 88 280 170 66 22 101 198 398 43 71 110 188 37 18 16 185 26 98 12 50 62 71 440 72 69 47 33 50 17 63 37 401 451 4 69 32 21 27 21 25 3 75 9 16 9 36 6 2 3 23 3 11 1 7 1 is 11 25 1 9 0 9 0 16 0 56 6 0 2 10 8 39 674 14 239 -62 949 7 113 13 201 10 153 29 439 7 104 2 30 3 39 22 338 4 60 12 177 2 24 8 121 4 64 16 246 58 994 401 0 131 -9 137 2 42 8 117 2 31 17 282 2 41 -42 651 32 550 -0 0 11 190 II -167 3 52 -9 136 3 52 3 52 105 546 548 142 1.087 1,087 71 778 778 60 463 463 460 3,526 3,528 1,073 12,828 12,828 2,302 17,650 17,650 5,394 40.882 40.861 22,564 116,408 116,310 498 2,308 2,308 178 1,178 1,178 25 195 10 76 3 26 15 116 88 541 541 353 1,836 1.836 41 213 213 72 372 372 68 351 351 165 858 856 37 190 190 12 64 64 15 75 75 136 705 705 22 115 115 72 370 370 9 47 47 45 230 230 26 157 157 83 430 430 289 1,771 1,771 125 648 648 38 247 247 48 251 251 15 93 93 44 227 227 9 59 59 85 443 443 16 98 98 275 1,424 1,424 201 1,240 1.240 3 14 14 48 320 320 52 272 272 14 90 90 43 223 223 14 90 s0 20 104 104 8,638 0 8,636 98 171,628 42.995 1,252 78 20 118 7,213 2,558-5,097 613 1,156 684 1.955 463 135 201 1,690 268 808 105 537 689-1,091 10,641 1,780 1,406-608 453 520 331 1,163 442-2,892 5,890 26 2,039-741 553 , 606 559-232 79,217 28 70,000 154,560 280,000 79,217 28 504,560 470 508 10,605,260 155,780 506.336 5,986 292.908 7.797-5,155 2,100 702-3,136 103,862 5,430 377,917 10,930 44,992 1,189 79,963 1,969 61,153 3,015 175,093 5,282 41,366 1,029 12,033 477 15,667 448 134,827 5,045 23,735 680 70,605 2.663 9,381 305 48,175 1,261 27,979 1,681 97,874 2,024 432,136 12,411 159,714 2,094 57,093 1.954 54,543 1,321 18,381 951 46,666 1,374 13.424 476 104,381 1,798 17,962 1,087 259.190 10,497 239,197 12,496 2,372 120 82,815 1,915 66,516 929 22,464 618 54,373 776 22,692 597 20,858 670 537,141 1,004 TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper' Nuclerar Stationa Dneo-aaairrrirag Coat Anaalysis Document N01-1590-002, Rec. I Appendix D, Page 32 of 35 Table D-3 Cooper Nuclear Station 2034 SAFSTOR Decommissioning Cost Estimate (thousands of 2008 dollars)off-Site LLRW NRC Spent Fuel Sits Processed Burial Volumes Burial I Utility and ActUvty Decon Removal Packaging Transport Processing Disposal Other Total Total Lc. Tenm. Management Restoration Volume Clasn A Class B Class C GTCC Processed Craft Contractor I ndex Activit Description Cast Coast Costs Costs Costs Costs. Costs Contn enc Costs Costs Costs Costs Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet WL9 Lbs. Manhours Manhours Disposal of Plant Systems (continued) 4b.1.2.40 Reactor El 931 ArealB 4b.1.2.41 Reactor El 931 Area2A 41.1.2.42 Reactor El 931 Area2B 4b.1.2.43 Reactor El 931 Area3A 4b.1,2.44 Reactor Ea 931 Area3B 4b.1 .2.45 Reactor El 931 Area4C 4b.1.2.46 Reactor El 931 Anea5C 4b.1.2.47 Reactor El 9589 ealA 4b.1.2.48 Reactor El 958 Aeal B 4b. 1.2.49 Reactor El 958 Area2A 4b9.12.50 Reactor El 958 Area2B 4b).1.2.51 Reactor El 958 Area3A 4b.1.2.52 Reactor El 958 Area3B 4b.1.2.53 Reactor Ea e76 AealA 4b.1.2.54 Reactor El 976 AeaIB 4b. 1 2.55 Reactor E9 976 Area2A 4b.1.2.56 Reactor El 976 Area2B 4b.21.57 Turbine El 882 krMIA 4b.1.2.58 Turbine El 882 ArealB 4b.12.59 Turbine El 882 Area2A 4b.1.2.60 Turbine El 882 Area2B 4b.1.2.61 Turbine El 882 Area3A 4b.1.2.62 Turbine E9 882 Aee3B 4b.1.2.63 Turbine El 903 ArealA 4b.1.2.64 Turbine E9 903 ArealB 4b91.2.65 Trmbine E 903 Area2A 4b.1.2966 Turbim El 903 Area2B 4b.1.2.67 Turbine El 903 Area3B 4b.1.2.68 Turbine El 903 Area3C 4b.1.2.69 Turbine E9 903 Area4B 4b.1.2.70 Yard ArealC 4b.1.2 Totals 4b.1.3 Scaffolding In support decomeissoning Decontaminaton of Site Buildings 4b.1.4.1 Reactor 4b.1.4.2 Augmented Radwaste 4b.1.4.3 Miscellaneous Stuctures
-Contaminated 4b.1.A.4 MuS-Pulpose Facility 4b.1.4.5 Radwaste 4b.1.4.6 Turbine 4b.1.4 Totals 4b9 1 Subtotal Period 4b Activity Costs Period 4b Additional Costs 4b.2.1 ISFSI Decontamination 4b.2.2 Final Site Survey 4b.2 Subtotal Period 4b Additional Costs Period 4b Collateral Costs 4b.3.1 Process liquid waste 4b.3.2 Smua tool allowance 4b.3.3 Decommissioning Equipment Disposition 4b.3 Subtotal Period 4b Coltaterol Costs 300 20 2 77 2 24 7 56 167 31 10 33 14 11 147 7 37 37 386 21 209 16 607-9 974 5 1 144-3-1012 12 197 7.771 3.073 2.880 1,820 52 19 368 167 68 55 159 50 526 142 4.055 2,253 4,318 13,131 8 40 2 2 0 0 23 22 0 0 9 10 3 19 10 10 1 1 4 3 1 1 1 1 5 25 1 1 1 3 3 3 16 87 2 2 4 22 2 1 27 145 1 1 46 241 1 1 1 7 0 2 692-35 1 0-336 149 281 153 12 7 48 10 6-16 422 -13 51-50 1,490 29 374-23 2,478-15 4,133-9 128 35 28 13,202 5.814 252 34 4,911 2,376 23 60 759 62 115 89 38 161 64 633 5,910 3.382 19,364 10,578 186 1,227 1,227 14 74 74 1 3 3 109 567 567 1 3 3 4 28 1 a -54 278 278 87 554 554 49 253 253 a 37 37 21 109 109 7 39 39 7 39 36 104 703 703 5 26 26 18 114 114 23 116 116 335 2.313 2,313 13 67 67 112 721 721 10 52 52 548 3,605 3,805 6 32 32 904 6.299 6,299 4 20 20 56 337 337 6 47 47 16 124 -7 49 49 30 227 -5,535 34,027 33,227 821 4,232 4,232 3,310 15.922 15,922 51 215 215 363 1,777 1,777 90 437 437 141 572 572 477 1.928 1 ,98 4,432 20,850 20,850 11,285 61,417 60.618 O 556 36 202 4 15 6 9 35 27t 942 7.412--154 9 0-1,651 8 28 662 3,009 .681 125 33 S- 214 109 29 S- 72 4.521--57.-222 15,948.-129 4,006--101 26,533-.68 44,251 42 1,375 376 124 299 2 27 -&0 141,342 27,486 2,431 151 52,579 39,536 242 1,099 8,t29 452 1,234 1,567 404 2,953 688 11,664 63,275 57,271 8 o0o 207,048 90,895 2,811 1,175 2,811 1,175 639 6,000 373 6,000 1.012 301,017 8,410 13,824 544 371 53 134,007 2,165 340 49 767-213 59,432 1,472 122,212 4,693 61,083 880 8,024 263 19,185 898 7,011 410 6.482 298 183,615 3,931 5,136 172 23,813 1,033 19,878 1,004 647,659 11.113 11,556 584 162,678 5,78t 9,017 451 1,077,531 17.302 6,127 232 1,797.054 27.674 3,729 142 55,851 4,040 15,251 97-3,412 12,139 367-5,770 8,056,388 218,627 122,968 41,117 6,069,283 115,053 119.386 1.978 372.774 12,956 205.066 3,237 310,769 5.863 1,193,496 18,679 8,270,774 157,766 16,987,290 418,513 1,148 17 422 6 42 12 14 51 547 1,800 1.012 6 24 so 1,250 460 2,811 -.... 1,205 362 1,567 1,597 1,012 6 24 s0 2.455 921 4,378 1,567 165.113 26,509 165.113 26.509 2,560 12,480 15.040 79 -30 235 88 79 235 118 161 50 210 183 621 84 621 267 113 566 566 35 270 270 130 973 973 278 1,810 1,810 38,338 125 303,507 88 341,844 213 TLG Service&, Inc.
Coope, Nucka-Statio.n Decomoaniaaioning Cost Analysis Doeument N01-1590-002, Rev. I Appendix D, Page 33 of 35 Table D-3 Cooper Nuclear Station 2034 SAFSTOR Decommissioning Cost Estimate (thousands of 2008 dollars)Table D-3 Cooper Nuclear Station 2034 SAFSTOR Decommissioning Cost Estimate (thousands of 2008 dollars)
LIL NRC.Activity Decon Removal Packaging Transport Processing Disposal Other Total Total Lin. Term.Index Activity Description Cost Cost Costs Costa Costs Costa Costs Contlnoency Costs Costs Period 4b Period-Dependent Costs 4b.4.1 Decon supplies 1.252 -313 1.565 1,565 4b.4.2 Insurance 1,199 120 1,319 1,319 4b.4.3 Property taxes -10 1 1-t 11 4b.4.4 Healtl physics supples 2.409 -602 3.011 3.011 4b.4.5 Heavy equipment rental 4,294 6 --644 4,938 4.938 4b.4.8 Disposal of DAW generated 55 31 876 -229 1,192 1,192 4b.4.7 Plant energy budget 1,751 255 1.950 1,958 4b.4.8 NRC Fees 1.610 161 1.771 1,771 45.4.9 Liquid Radwaste Processing Equipment/Services 918 138 1,055 1.055 4b.4.10 Security Staff Cost 6,984 1.048 8,032 8,032 4b.4.11 DOC Staff Cost 24,760 3,714 28,474 28.474 4b.4.12 Utiity Staff Cost 33,266 4,990 38,256 38,256 4b.4 Subtotal Period 4b Period-Dependent Costs 1,252 6,703 55 31 876 70.448 12,215 91,580 91,580 4b.0 TOTAL PERIOD 4b COST 5,649 21,081 1,121 2,065 19,985 11.782 72,902 24,600 159,185 155,574 PERIOD 4o -License Termination Period 4e Direct Decommissioning Activities 48.1.1 ORISE confrmatory survey --147 44 191 191 4e.1.2 Terminate license a 4e.1 Subtotal Period 4e Actvity Costs 147 44 191 191 Period 4e Additonal Costs 4e.2.1 Final Site Survey 5,998 1,799 7.797 7,797 4e.2 Subtotal Period 4e Addritonal Costs 5.998 1,799 7.797 7,797 Period 4e Collateral Costs 4e.3.1 DOC staff relocaton expenses 912 137 1,049 1,049 4e.3 Subtotal Period 4e Collateral Coals 912 137 1,049 1.049 Period 4e Period-Dependent Costs 4 0.4.1 Insurance
.- -4e.4.2 Properytayes-h 3 0 3 3 4e.4.3 Health physics supplies 735 ---184 919 919 4e.4.4 Dlsposal of DAW generated 3 1 42 11 57 57 4e.4.5 Plant energy budget 139 21 160 160 48.4.6 NRC Fees 530 53 583 583 4e.4.7 Security Staff Cost 1.009 151 1.160 1,160 44.4.0 DOC StaffCost 4,442 666 5,108 5,108 4e.4.9 Ul1ity Staff Cost ---4,678 702 5,379 5,379 48.4 Subtotal Period 4e Period-Dependent Costs 735 3 1 42 10,800 1,788 13,369 13,369 4e.0 TOTAL PERIOD 4e COST 735 3 1 42 17,857 3,768 22,407 22,407 Spent Fuel Sits Processed Burial Volumes Burial I Uility and I Management Restoration Volume Class A Class 8 Class C GTCC Processed Craft Contractor I Costa Costs Cu. Feet Cua Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet WI. Lbs. Manhouro Manhours I 18,853 172.932 58 159,464 341,891 602,137 18,853 172,932 58 1,103,493 800 213.048 111,935 17,667,180 445,292 1,119,533 2,811 148.435 6.240 148,435 6,240 PERIOD 4 TOTALS PERIOD 8b -Site Restoration Period 5b Direct Decommissioning Acbvites Demoliton of Remainig Site Buildings 5b.1.1.1 Reactor 5b.1.1.2 Augmented Radwaste 5b.11.3 Control 5b8 1 1.4 Intake Structore 5,8a8 37,348 8,001 4,658 1.491 --222 214 523 37.168 30,806 123,223 50,932 297,999 294,291 904 8,294 3 18,789 57,149-.--74,371 904 8,294 3 150,309-904 8,294 148,438 156,549 2,811 897 384,676 155,834 1,252 470 508 29,280,740 749,510 1,781,417 1,715 -----14.601 255 2,119 248 1.655 602 5,621 224 1,715 33 255 32 246 78 602 TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station Decommissioniog Cost Analysis Document N01.1590.002, Rev. I Appendix D, Page 34 of 35 Table D-3 Cooper Nuclear Station 2034 SAFSTOR Decommissioning Cost Estimate (thousands of 2008 dollars)m IActiy Off-Sit. LLRW NRC Spent Fuel Sits Processed Burial Volumes Burial I Ulity and Decon Removal Packaging Transport Processing Disposal Other Total Total UC. Term. Management Restoration Volume Class A Class 8 Class C GTCC Processed Craft Contractor I Cost Cost Costs Costs Costs Costs Costs ontinenc Costs Costs Costs Costs Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Wt. Lbs. Manhours Manhour I H n ex Demo5l5oe of Remaining Site Buildings (continued) 5b.1.1.5 LLRW Storage Pad 5b.1.1.6 Miscellaneous Siructures
-Clean 5b.1.1.7 Miscellaneous Structures
-Contarminated S1t 10.8 MulS-Purpose Facility 5b 1.1-9 OVWC Gas Generator 5b.1.1.10 Office Sb.1.I.11 Radwasle 5b.1.1.12 Seal Well St.1.1,13 Sewage TreatmentArea 5b.1.1.14 Transornier Yard St..1.,15 Turbine 5b.1.t.16 Turbine Pedestal 5b.1.t Totals Site Closeout Activities 5b.1- Remove Rubble 5b, 1.3 Grade & landscape site 5b. 1.4 Final report to NRC 5b. I Subtotal Period 5b Activity Costs Peniod 5b Additional Costs 5b.2.1 ISFSI Demolition 5b2.2 Cocrete Crushing W0.2.3 Cofferdam 5b.2 Subtotal Period Sb Additional Costs Period 5b Collateral Costs 5b.3.1 Small tool allowance 5b.3 Subtotal Period 5b Cotateral Costs Period 5b Period-Dependent Costs 5b.4.1 Insurance 5b.4.2 Property tanes 5b.4.3 Heavy equipment rental 5b.4.4 Plant energy budget 50,4.5 Security Staff Cost 5b.4.6 DOC Staff Cost 5b.4.7 U lity Staff Cost 104 Subtotal Period So Period-Dependent Costs 5b.0 TOTAL PERIOD Sb COST PERIOD 5 TOTALS TOTAL COST TO DECOMMISSION 145 1,196 27 123 158-156 391 17 4 20 2,596 277 7,418 424 578 8,421 672 499 458 1,629 22 167 179 1,375 4 30 18 141 3 20 23 179 59 449 3 20 1 5 3 24 389 2.985 42 310 1,113 8,531 167 1,375 30 141 20 179 449 20 5 24 2,985 318 8,531 488 665 9.684 1.227 11,837 572 1,982 283 1,920 3,229 166 53 172 40,503 2.100 88.040 3,286 1,578 S -1,560 92.904 1,560 5,898 0 16 3.045 5.130 14.073 160 64 488-8 07 665 156 23 179 179 156 1,286 9.063 179 44 107 824 8 76 582-69 527 52 252 1.933 824 824 582 527 1,100 560.560-4,233 4,233 14,339-14,339 13,038 60,307 8,323 7* 167 2,419 10.212 4,507 17,312 a 64 8 64 1 8 635 4.869 25 192 363 2,782 1,532 11,744 676 5.183 3.232 24.777 64 64 4,869 192 2,782 11,744 24,7877 824 35,634 824 35.634 45,051 127.64" 73,209 245.906 106.977 247,626 106.977 247,626 17,520 4,779 36,638 179 17,520 4,779 36,638 179 5.611 37,168 34,963 580.430 126,964 872.803 676.510 158,945 37,348 384.676 227,217 1.252 470 508 29,135,880 987.685 7,681.850 TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuarka, Statio~n Decovaajarnsionirg Cost Anaalysis Document N01-1590-002, Rev. I Appendix D, Page 35 of35 Table D-3 Cooper Nuclear Station 2034 SAFSTOR Decommissioning Cost Estimate (thousands of 2008 dollars)Off-Site I.RW NRC Spent Fuel Site Processed Burial Volumes BurialI Utility and Activity Decon Removal Packaging Transport Processing Disposal Other Total Total Lic. Term. Management Restoration Volume Class A Class B Class C GTCC Processed Craft Contractor Index Activity Description Cost Cost Costs Costs Costs Costs Costs Continefc Casts Costs Costs Costs Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Wt. Lbs. Manhours Manhours TOTAL COST TO DECOMMISSION WITH 17.02% CONTINGENCY:
$872,803 thousands of 2008 dollars TOTAL NRC LICENSE TERMINATION COST IS 77.51% OR: $676,510 thousands of 2008 dollars SPENT FUEL MANAGEMENT COST IS 18.21% OR: $158,945 thousands of 2008 dollars NON-NUCLEAR DEMOLITION COST IS 4.28% OR: $37.348 thousands of 2008 dtolars TOTAL LOW-LEVEL RADIOACTIVE WASTE VOLUME BURIED (EXCLUDING GTCC): 228.939 cubic feet TOTAL GREATER THAN CLASS C RADWASTE VOLUME GENERATED:
008 cubic feet TOTAL SCRAP METAL REMOVED: 30,276 tons TOTAL CRAFT LABOR REQUIREMENTS:
987,686 man-hours End Notes: nca -indicates that this activity not charged as decommissioning expense.a -indicates that this activity performed by decommissioning staff.0 -indicates that this value is less than 0.5 but is nos-zero.a cll containing
-"indicates a zero value TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document N01-1590-002, Rev. 1 Appendix E, Page 1 of 8 APPENDIX E WORK DIFFICULTY ADJUSTMENT FACTORS TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station Document N01-1590.002, Rev. 1 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Appendix E, Page 2 of 8 APPENDIX E WORK DIFFICULTY ADJUSTMENT FACTORS TLG has historically applied work difficulty adjustment factors in determining Unit Cost Factors to account for working in a radiological controlled environment.
In performing an area-by-area decommissioning cost/schedule estimate the work difficulty factors are to be applied on an "area" basis, based on the nominal area conditions.
Where practical, areas are established based on similar working conditions.
The intent of the use of these factors is to provide the estimator an appropriate means to achieve an additional element of consistency within the estimate.Access Factor: Controlling Variables:
* Height of the component above the working floor* Difficulty in working around the component (restricted access)Source of Variable Information:
* Estimators observation or judgment* Plant drawings Range of Access Factor Adjustments:
0% Components are accessible and located near a working level floor or platform 10% Scaffolding (component less than <12 feet above floor) is required to access the majority of the components or the area around the components is congested.
20% Scaffolding (component less than <12 feet above floor) is required to access the majority of the components and the area around the components is congested.
30% Scaffolding (component between 12 -20 feet above floor) is required to access the majority of the components or the areas around the components are extremely congested.
TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station Document NO1-1590-002, Rev. 1 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Appendix E, Page 3 of 8 40% Scaffolding (component between 20 -45 feet above floor) is required to access the majority of the components).
50% Scaffolding (component greater than 45 feet above floor) is required to access the majority of the components).
Respiratory Protection Factor: Controlling Variables: " Component surface contamination levels (internal or external)* Type of work (potential to create an airborne problem)* General area surface contamination levels* Site-specific requirements for maintaining respirator qualifications (initial qualification, requalification, etc.)* Personal air sampler requirements Sources of Variable Information:
* Radiation Work Permit Requirements
* Area Survey Maps* Site Radiation Protection Program Manual Range of Respiratory Pr-otection Factor Adjustments:
0% Respiratory protection is not required (clean system or loose surface contamination has been removed).25% Respiratory protection is only required during limited segments of the work (i.e. physical cutting).50% Respiratory protection is continuously required while working on the component.
Radiation/ALARA Factor: Controlling Variables:
* Component contact dose rate* General area dose rate TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station Document NO1-1590-002, Rev. 1 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Appendix E, Page 4 of 8 o Site-specific requirements for maintaining radiation worker qualification (initial qualification, requalification, etc.)* Dosimetry requirements I Sources of Variable Information:
* Area Survey Maps* Site Radiation Protection Program Manual* Radiation Work Permit Requirements Range of Radiation/ALARA Factor Adjustments: (Note surface contamination levels are principally accounted for in protective clothing requirements and respiratory protection requirements) 0% Component is clean and is not located in a radiological controlled area.10% Component is located in a radiological controlled area (General Area Radiation field < 2.5 mrem/hr).20% Component is located in a radiological controlled area (General Area Radiation field between 2. 5 to 15 mrem/hr).40% Component is located in a radiological controlled area (General Area Radiation field between 16 and 99 mrem/hr).100% Component is located in a radiological controlled area (General Area Radiation field > 100 mrem/hr).Protective Clothing Factor: Controlling Variables:
* Component surface contamination levels (internal or external)" General area surface contamination levels* Type of activity (wet/dry work, potential to create a surface contamination problem)* Site specific work schedule arrangements TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station Document N01-1590-002, Rev. 1 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Appendix E, Page 5 of 8 Sources of Variable Information: " Radiation Work Permit Requirements" Area Survey Maps* Site Radiation Protection Program Manual Range of Protective Clothing Factor Adjustments (alternate site-specific schedules may dictate alternate adjustments):
0% Component is clean and is not located in a radiological controlled area.30% Component is clean or contaminated and is located in a surface contamination controlled area. Work is to be completed in accordance with the requirements of an RWP, which specifies a single or double set of "PC's", or "PC's" with plastics.50% Components is located in a surface contamination controlled area. Work is to be completed in accordance with the requirements of an RWP, which specifies "plastics" in addition to double PC's for protective clothing.100% Component is located in a surface contamination controlled area. Work is to be completed in accordance with the requirements of an RWP, which specifies double "PC's" and double "plastics" (extremely wet or humid working environment).
Work Break Factor: Controlling Variables:
* Site specific work schedule arrangements Sources of Variable Information:
* Typical site work schedule Range of Work Break Factor Adjustments:
8.33% Workday schedule outlined in AIF/NESP-036 (alternate site-specific schedules may dictate alternate adjustments).
TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document N01-1590-002, Rev. 1 Appendix E, Page 6 of 8 TABLE E-1 WORK DIFFICULTY ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Work Difficulty Factors Area Identification Area Description Access Respirator ALARA Clothing Reactor El 1001 Area 1 Refuel floor 14% 25% 14% 30%Reactor El 859 Area 1 Torus 14% 25% 14% 30%HPCI Room, B&D RHR Reactor El 859 Area 2 Room 14% 25% 14% 30%Reactor El 859 Area 3 B Core Spray Pump Room 14% 25% 14% 30%Reactor El 859 Area 4 RCIC Pump Room 14% 25% 14% 30%Reactor El 859 Area 5 A&C RHR Pump Room 14% 25% 14% 30%CRD Hyd Control Units, Reactor El 903 Area 1 TIP Room 14% 25% 14% 30%Reactor El 903 Area 2 Steam Tunnel 14% 25% 14% 30%Reactor El 903 Area 3 A RHR Room 22% 25% 40% 30%Reactor El 903 Area 4 B RHR Room 22% 25% 40% 30%RBCCW pumps & heat Reactor El 931 Area 1 exchangers 14% 25% 14% 30%Reactor El 931 Area 2 RWCU Recirc pump room 10% 25% 100% 30%Reactor El 931 Area 3 RWCU heat exchangers 10% 25% 100% 30%Reactor El 931 Area 4 4 KV Switchgear 16% 0% 0% 0%Reactor El 931 Area 5 Roof Area 16% 0% 0% 0%Reactor El 958 Area 1 General Area 14% 25% 14% 30%Reactor El 958 Area 2 Fuel Pool Cooling room 10% 25% 100% 30%Reactor El 958 Area 3 RWCU piping 22% 25% 40% 30%Reactor El 976 Area 1 Rx Recirc MG Sets 14% 25% 14% 30%TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document N01-1590-002, Rev. 1 Appendix E, Page 7 of 8 TABLE E-1 (continued)
WORK DIFFICULTY ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Work Difficulty Factors Area Identification Area Description Access Respirator ALARA Clothing Reactor El 976 Area 2 Standby Liquid Control 14% 25% 14% 30%DRYWELL Drywell 22% 25% 40% 30%Emergency CST's, RHR Control El 882 Area 1 service water pumps 14% 25% 14% 30%Control El 903 Area 1 Switchgear 16% 0% 0% 0%Control El 918 Area 1 Battery Rooms 16% 0% 0% 0%Control Room, Computer Control El 932 Area 1 Room 14% 0% 0% 0%Turbine El 882 Area 1 Condenser 14% 25% 14% 30%Turbine El 882 Area 2 Diesel / Boiler Room roof 14% 25% 14% 30%Condensate
& FW Pumps Turbine El 882 Area 3 SJAE Room 14% 25% 14% 30%Turbine El 903 Area 1 FW heaters, condenser 14% 25% 14% 30%Turbine El 903 Area 2 Generator Bus Duct 14% 25% 14% 30%Diesels/Boilers/Water Turbine El 903 Area 3 Treatment 10% 0% 0% 0%Turbine El 903 Area 4 Machine Shop 16% 0% 0% 0%Turbine El 932 Area 1 Turbine operating floor 14% 25% 14% 30%Maintenance Office I Turbine El 932 Area 2 Storage Area 10% 0% 0% 0%Turbine El 932 Area 3 Switchgear room 10% 0% 0% 0%Augmented Radwaste El 877 Area 1 Waste Concentrator 14% 25% 14% 30%Augmented Radwaste El 903 Area 1 Cask Shipping 14% 25% 14% 30%Augmented Radwaste Concentrator heat El 918 Area 1 exchangers 14% 25% 14% 30%Augmented Radwaste El 929 Area 1 Roof above charcoal tanks 14% 25% 14% 30%TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document N01-1590-002, Rev. 1 Appendix E, Page 8 of 8 TABLE E-1 (continued)
WORK DIFFICULTY ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Work Difficulty Factors Area Identification Area Description Access Respirator ALARA Clothing Radwaste El 877 Area 1 General Basement area 14% 25% 14% 30%Spent Resin & Backwash Radwaste El 877 Area 2 Separator Tanks 14% 25% 14% 30%Sludge & Phase Separator Radwaste El 877 Area 3 Tanks 22% 25% 40% 30%Drum Capping Handling Radwaste El 903 Area 1 Area 14% 25% 14% 30%Resin Loading Station &Radwaste El 903 Area 2 Control Room 14% 25% 14% 30%Radwaste El 903 Area 3 Corridor 14% 25% 14% 30%Radwaste El 918 Area 1 Resin Hoppers 22% 25% 40% 30%Condensate Filter Radwaste El 918 Area 2 Demineralizer 14% 25% 14% 30%Offices, Rad Chem Lab, Radwaste El 918 Area 3 Drum loading area 14% 25% 14% 30%Radwaste El 934 Area 1 Resin Centrifuges 14% 25% 14% 30%Demin removal area, Radwaste El 934 Area 2 Laundry, filter units 14% 25% 14% 30%Radwaste El 949 Area 1 Radwaste Roof 14% 25% 14% 30%Multi-Purpose Facility Multi-Purpose Facility 14% 25% 14% 30%Intake Intake 10% 0% 0% 0%Elevated release point, Yard Area 1 tanks 10% 0% 0% 0%TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document N01-1590-O02, Rev. 1 Appendix F, Page 1 of 14 APPENDIX F AREA MAPS Cooper Nuclear Station Document NO1-1590-002, Rev. I Decommissioning Cost Analysis Appendix F, Page 2 of 14 REACTOR BUILDING o @'..... I II_ V.I IC4 .L____ __-___. .............
....___ ---_ ---__D-L L iT ii /TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document N01-1590-002, Rev. I Appendix F, Page 3 of 14 REACTOR BUILDING%U w F.I.~~-976-1-9 7 6 -V-T-11&#xfd;1 QWQ H TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document N01-1590-002, Rev. I Appendix F, Page 4 of 14 REACTOR BUILDING-Al:... ....... ...--........_-.u 4MI R-958-1"Ti Kc'~~JtF'._ ,~1 -1~&#xa3;~95 -1 I -S A A: 01 C&#xfd; S 7-,~7I I TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document NO1.1590-002, Rev. 1 Appendix F, Page 5 of 14 REACTOR BUILDING TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document N01-1590-002, Rev. I Appendix F, Page 6 of 14 REACTOR BUILDING~'1 TLG Services, Inc.
0 Cooper Nuclear Station Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document N01-1590-002, Rev. I Appendix F, Page 7 of 14 REACTOR BUILDING (elevation 881)TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document N01-1590-002, Rev. 1 Appendix F, Page 8 of 14 REACTOR BUILDING TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document N01.1590-002, Rev. I Appendix F, Page 9 of 14 CONTROL AND TURBINE BUILDINGS__ ~ U P ~T-93,4..-IM --lY" T-932 9-31 1 -ITh , %0--s I'-'- -4 L1J~~.f.SftV~I g2~M I I 1 ~IvfI L I 0 TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document N01-1590-002, Rev. I Appendix F, Page 10 of 14 CONTROL AND TURBINE BUILDINGS TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document N01-1590-002, Rev. I Appendix F, Page 11 of 14 CONTROL AND TURBINE BUILDINGS TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document N01-1590-002, Rev. I Appendix F, Page 12 of 14 RADWASTE-4 -- --4;A 9'n.4 7--Z.-~ K"-'-~~2 j ti-Jc-,- cL~T~I r- ii
* k n 7~2Th ~C'C ELEV 534 Or[B[I--I-A...FIRY51 FLOOIR D t 4'55" 4 A c L ILL AR &#xfd;-929&#xfd;W1-I]
ROOF PLAN_iE P!A' "C' 1q'Y -, 454,003664
-INFORMATION ONLY .'S -........ .. a.... .. .... .-.TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document NOI-1590-002, Rev. 1 Appendix F, Page 13 of 14 RADWASTE N --4--FA r Th-7__ _ A4-~-----I I-Affi&#xfd; - dial w-- 11 ii 4 4 Fi 'r# ~r&#xa3;-Nt:-* E W/-0 p~J!RI:III:ITII I A I K7 A i J-EUEVM~OeJ 1 4"._ 1i i % se-ORU* SON A .4---- ----"----.,- --~~- I-;-.~fL'*~z~aIm~.t-q FRtm-- EMS -it TLG Services, Inc.
Cooper Nuclear Station Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document NOI-1590-002, Rev. I Appendix F, Page 14 of 14 YARD TLG Service4 Inc.}}

Latest revision as of 13:52, 14 January 2025

Decommissioning Cost Analysis
ML083580119
Person / Time
Site: Cooper Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 12/15/2008
From: Vanderkamp D
Nebraska Public Power District (NPPD)
To:
Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NLS2008098
Download: ML083580119 (212)
v • d • e


Text

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=NLS2008098,_Decommissioning_Cost_Analysis&oldid=5321985"