ML14345A855: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:Yes ( | {{#Wiki_filter:Proceed to Question 2 Question 1: Is the Figure 1: | ||
site on EPAs Stay-informed of Military National Priorities Yes (0) | |||
List under EPA activities Radium Site oversight? Prioritization Diagram No Proceed to Question 2 Question 2: Are radioactive materials in Apply NRCs Are engineered burials, landfills, fill monitoring approach barriers going to be areas, or other areas to all base areas used in conjunction where engineered that meet this with land use barriers and/or land criteria controls? Yes use controls are Proceed to Question 3 potential remedies? (10) | |||
No (8) | |||
Control No s Only Proceed to Question 3 Apply NRCs monitoring approach Have significant Perform monitoring to 1 to 2 separate NRC comments reviews on all base base areas with been generated areas of the site that different land use which point to require use controls/restrictions potential health and restrictions and that meet this safety concerns? institutional controls criteria Question 3: At present Apply NRCs (or known plans) are monitoring approach Have significant radioactive materials or Is there significant to 2-3 areas/ NRC comments Perform monitoring devices in soil, groundwater buildings with the been generated reviews on all base buildings, groundwater, Yes contamination/ | |||
reviews on all base areas/buildings that | most significant which point to areas/buildings that or a combination of all environmental three, with potential for contamination potential health and will be reused Proceed to Question 4 transport? Yes future unrestricted (review at least 1 safety concerns? | ||
(6) building) release? | |||
No (4) | |||
No Apply NRCs Have significant monitoring approach NRC/State to the 1 area/building Perform monitoring Proceed to Question 4 comments been with most significant reviews on all base generated which contamination (review areas/buildings that at least 1 building point to potential will be reused onsite if none in area health and safety identified) concerns? | |||
Question 4: Are small Sum scores and apply weighting factor amounts of radioactive material in only soil or Stay-informed of Stay-informed of buildings potentially Yes (0) activities activities below screening values with potential Note (recognizing that a base will for future unrestricted have multiple sites): As part of release? site prioritization, for each site answer questions 1-4. Sum up No the point values associated with questions 1-4 and apply a weighting factor. The sites with Sum scores and apply weighting factor the highest point values will be prioritized higher than sites with lower values.}} | |||
Latest revision as of 19:37, 31 October 2019
| ML14345A855 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 01/13/2015 |
| From: | NRC/NMSS/DDUWP/MDB |
| To: | |
| References | |
| Download: ML14345A855 (1) | |
Text
Proceed to Question 2 Question 1: Is the Figure 1:
site on EPAs Stay-informed of Military National Priorities Yes (0)
List under EPA activities Radium Site oversight? Prioritization Diagram No Proceed to Question 2 Question 2: Are radioactive materials in Apply NRCs Are engineered burials, landfills, fill monitoring approach barriers going to be areas, or other areas to all base areas used in conjunction where engineered that meet this with land use barriers and/or land criteria controls? Yes use controls are Proceed to Question 3 potential remedies? (10)
No (8)
Control No s Only Proceed to Question 3 Apply NRCs monitoring approach Have significant Perform monitoring to 1 to 2 separate NRC comments reviews on all base base areas with been generated areas of the site that different land use which point to require use controls/restrictions potential health and restrictions and that meet this safety concerns? institutional controls criteria Question 3: At present Apply NRCs (or known plans) are monitoring approach Have significant radioactive materials or Is there significant to 2-3 areas/ NRC comments Perform monitoring devices in soil, groundwater buildings with the been generated reviews on all base buildings, groundwater, Yes contamination/
most significant which point to areas/buildings that or a combination of all environmental three, with potential for contamination potential health and will be reused Proceed to Question 4 transport? Yes future unrestricted (review at least 1 safety concerns?
(6) building) release?
No (4)
No Apply NRCs Have significant monitoring approach NRC/State to the 1 area/building Perform monitoring Proceed to Question 4 comments been with most significant reviews on all base generated which contamination (review areas/buildings that at least 1 building point to potential will be reused onsite if none in area health and safety identified) concerns?
Question 4: Are small Sum scores and apply weighting factor amounts of radioactive material in only soil or Stay-informed of Stay-informed of buildings potentially Yes (0) activities activities below screening values with potential Note (recognizing that a base will for future unrestricted have multiple sites): As part of release? site prioritization, for each site answer questions 1-4. Sum up No the point values associated with questions 1-4 and apply a weighting factor. The sites with Sum scores and apply weighting factor the highest point values will be prioritized higher than sites with lower values.