ML19044A029: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| issue date = 02/01/2019 | | issue date = 02/01/2019 | ||
| title = Response to Request for U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Support for Washington Department of Ecology Public Meeting | | title = Response to Request for U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Support for Washington Department of Ecology Public Meeting | ||
| author name = Habighorst P | | author name = Habighorst P | ||
| author affiliation = NRC/OIP | | author affiliation = NRC/OIP | ||
| addressee name = Price J | | addressee name = Price J | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
| docket = 11005986 | | docket = 11005986 | ||
| license number = XW019 | | license number = XW019 | ||
| contact person = Freeman S | | contact person = Freeman S | ||
| document type = Letter | | document type = Letter | ||
| page count = 2 | | page count = 2 | ||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON , D.C. 20555-0001 Mr. John Price Tri-Party Agreement Section Manager State Environmental Policy Act Official State of Washington Department of Ecology 3100 Port of Benton Blvd. Richland, WA 99354 | {{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C . 20555-0001 February 1, 2019 Mr. John Price Tri-Party Agreement Section Manager State Environmental Policy Act Official State of Washington Department of Ecology 3100 Port of Benton Blvd. | ||
Richland, WA 99354 | |||
==SUBJECT:== | ==SUBJECT:== | ||
RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION SUPPORT FOR WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY PUBLIC MEETING | RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION SUPPORT FOR WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY PUBLIC MEETING | ||
==Dear Mr. Price:== | ==Dear Mr. Price:== | ||
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) received your letter dated December 18, 2018, wherein you requested an NRC representative to attend a Washington Department of Ecology (Ecology)-sponsored public meeting (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. | |||
I have considered your request and determined, based on budgetary constraints and in conjunction with the NRC's Office of the General Counsel, that the NRC will not be able to support staff attendance at the Ecology-sponsored public meeting. Due to Perma-Fix Northwest Richland, Inc., (PFNW) having an export license application currently pending before the Commission, NRC regulations in Subpart Hof 10 C.F.R. Part 110 provide the exclusive basis for hearings or receipt of public comments on the application. | The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) received your letter dated December 18, 2018, wherein you requested an NRC representative to attend a Washington Department of Ecology (Ecology)-sponsored public meeting (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML19015A128), scheduled for March 13,2019. | ||
Thus, to the extent that questions or comments emerge at the public meeting intended for the NRC's consideration on the decision to issue or deny PFNW's license application, NRC staff would have limited ability to engage in such discussion outside the public participation procedures codified in 10 C.F.R. Part 110. In your letter you state that although the DWR permit is separate from the license issued by the Washington Department of Health for PFNW's low-level waste (LLW) operations, state SEPA regulations require that Ecology analyze the potential adverse environmental impacts of those separately-licensed LLW operations (including the potential impacts of international waste) as part of Ecology's environmental analysis. | You indicated that the purpose of the public meeting is to collect comments on the scope of a State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) evaluation of PFNW's Dangerous Waste Regulations (DWR) permit for its mixed waste operations in Richland, Washington. I have considered your request and determined, based on budgetary constraints and in conjunction with the NRC's Office of the General Counsel, that the NRC will not be able to support staff attendance at the Ecology-sponsored public meeting. Due to Perma-Fix Northwest Richland, Inc., (PFNW) having an export license application currently pending before the Commission, NRC regulations in Subpart Hof 10 C.F.R. Part 110 provide the exclusive basis for hearings or receipt of public comments on the application. Thus, to the extent that questions or comments emerge at the public meeting intended for the NRC's consideration on the decision to issue or deny PFNW's license application, NRC staff would have limited ability to engage in such discussion outside the public participation procedures codified in 10 C.F.R. Part 110. | ||
You thus have requested an NRC representative to attend the meeting "to be available to answer any questions about the NRC licensing of imports and exports of international waste processed at the [PFNW] facility." This followed your request for a hearing, dated November 9, 2018 (ADAMS Accession No. | In your letter you state that although the DWR permit is separate from the license issued by the Washington Department of Health for PFNW's low-level waste (LLW) operations, state SEPA regulations require that Ecology analyze the potential adverse environmental impacts of those separately-licensed LLW operations (including the potential impacts of international waste) as part of Ecology's environmental analysis. You thus have requested an NRC representative to attend the meeting "to be available to answer any questions about the NRC licensing of imports and exports of international waste processed at the [PFNW] facility." This followed your request for a hearing, dated November 9, 2018 (ADAMS Accession No. ML18341A145), on PFNW's export license application (XW019) seeking approval for the export of LLW waste to Mexico, which is currently pending before the Commission. NRC believes that technical areas for this meeting may well go beyond international waste whereas, additional NRC staff maybe necessary. | ||
NRC believes that technical areas for this meeting may well go beyond international waste whereas, additional NRC staff maybe necessary. | |||
J. | J. Price Your letter also states that Ecology is planning on distributing information at the public meeting concerning the NRC's import/export licensing process, and that you request "assistance developing accurate and informative presentation materials and handouts." I believe this is a more efficient and cost-effective means by which multiple NRC staff can support your public meeting in lieu of live attendance. I would be happy to have my staff review, in advance , any such materials or handouts that you are planning tQ present or distribute concerning general information on the NRC import/export licensing process, to ensure that such information is accurate and current. I would ask that you submit any such request as soon as possible to ensure there is ample time for our review. | ||
I would be happy to have my staff review, in advance , any such materials or handouts that you are planning tQ present or distribute concerning general information on the NRC import/export licensing process, to ensure that such information is accurate and current. I would ask that you submit any such request as soon as possible to ensure there is ample time for our review. We appreciate your taking the time to write us and encourage you to continue to be involved in public outreach activities.}} | We appreciate your taking the time to write us and encourage you to continue to be involved in public outreach activities.}} | ||
Latest revision as of 02:10, 20 October 2019
| ML19044A029 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | 11005986 |
| Issue date: | 02/01/2019 |
| From: | Peter Habighorst NRC/OIP |
| To: | Price J State of WA, Dept of Ecology |
| Freeman S | |
| References | |
| Download: ML19044A029 (2) | |
Text
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C . 20555-0001 February 1, 2019 Mr. John Price Tri-Party Agreement Section Manager State Environmental Policy Act Official State of Washington Department of Ecology 3100 Port of Benton Blvd.
Richland, WA 99354
SUBJECT:
RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION SUPPORT FOR WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY PUBLIC MEETING
Dear Mr. Price:
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) received your letter dated December 18, 2018, wherein you requested an NRC representative to attend a Washington Department of Ecology (Ecology)-sponsored public meeting (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML19015A128), scheduled for March 13,2019.
You indicated that the purpose of the public meeting is to collect comments on the scope of a State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) evaluation of PFNW's Dangerous Waste Regulations (DWR) permit for its mixed waste operations in Richland, Washington. I have considered your request and determined, based on budgetary constraints and in conjunction with the NRC's Office of the General Counsel, that the NRC will not be able to support staff attendance at the Ecology-sponsored public meeting. Due to Perma-Fix Northwest Richland, Inc., (PFNW) having an export license application currently pending before the Commission, NRC regulations in Subpart Hof 10 C.F.R. Part 110 provide the exclusive basis for hearings or receipt of public comments on the application. Thus, to the extent that questions or comments emerge at the public meeting intended for the NRC's consideration on the decision to issue or deny PFNW's license application, NRC staff would have limited ability to engage in such discussion outside the public participation procedures codified in 10 C.F.R. Part 110.
In your letter you state that although the DWR permit is separate from the license issued by the Washington Department of Health for PFNW's low-level waste (LLW) operations, state SEPA regulations require that Ecology analyze the potential adverse environmental impacts of those separately-licensed LLW operations (including the potential impacts of international waste) as part of Ecology's environmental analysis. You thus have requested an NRC representative to attend the meeting "to be available to answer any questions about the NRC licensing of imports and exports of international waste processed at the [PFNW] facility." This followed your request for a hearing, dated November 9, 2018 (ADAMS Accession No. ML18341A145), on PFNW's export license application (XW019) seeking approval for the export of LLW waste to Mexico, which is currently pending before the Commission. NRC believes that technical areas for this meeting may well go beyond international waste whereas, additional NRC staff maybe necessary.
J. Price Your letter also states that Ecology is planning on distributing information at the public meeting concerning the NRC's import/export licensing process, and that you request "assistance developing accurate and informative presentation materials and handouts." I believe this is a more efficient and cost-effective means by which multiple NRC staff can support your public meeting in lieu of live attendance. I would be happy to have my staff review, in advance , any such materials or handouts that you are planning tQ present or distribute concerning general information on the NRC import/export licensing process, to ensure that such information is accurate and current. I would ask that you submit any such request as soon as possible to ensure there is ample time for our review.
We appreciate your taking the time to write us and encourage you to continue to be involved in public outreach activities.