GNRO-2016/00029, Grand Gulf, Unit 1 - Comments Regarding License Renewal Safety Evaluation Report ML16090A252 Dated April 4, 2016: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Adams
#REDIRECT [[GNRO-2016/00029, Comments Regarding License Renewal Safety Evaluation Report ML16090A252 Dated April 4, 2016]]
| number = ML16158A487
| issue date = 06/06/2016
| title = Grand Gulf, Unit 1 - Comments Regarding License Renewal Safety Evaluation Report ML16090A252 Dated April 4, 2016
| author name = Mulligan K
| author affiliation = Entergy Operations, Inc
| addressee name =
| addressee affiliation = NRC/Document Control Desk, NRC/NRR
| docket = 05000416
| license number = NPF-029
| contact person =
| case reference number = GNRO-2016/00029
| document type = Letter type:GNRO
| page count = 16
| project =
| stage = Other
}}
 
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:GNRO-2016/00029 June 6,2016U.S.Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: DocumentControlDeskWashington,DC20555-0001 Entergy Operations, Inc.P.O.Box756PortGibson,MS39150 Kevin MulliganSiteVicePresidentGrandGulfNuclearStationTel.(601)437-7500
 
==SUBJECT:==
 
==REFERENCE:==
 
==DearSirorMadam:==
GrandGulf Nuclear Station CommentsRegardingLicenseRenewalSafetyEvaluationReportML 16090A252datedApril4,2016 Grand Gulf NuclearStation,Unit1 DocketNo.50-416LicenseNo.NPF-29U.S.NRCLetter,"SafetyEvaluationReportRelatedtotheLicenseRenewalofGrandGulf NuclearStation,Unit1,ML 16090A252EntergyOperations,Inc.isproviding,inthe Attachment,alistof comments from review-of thereferencedSafetyEvaluationReport(SER)toclarify and/or correct informationinthereporttoensureaccuracy.Additionally,the Advisory Committee for Reactor Safeguards (ACRS)subcommittee meetingheldMay 4,2016 questioned if BWRVIP-18,Revision1,hadbeenapproved(thereferencedSERstatedthat BWRVIP-18 was underreview).YourStaff acknowledgedthatBWRVIP-18,Revision1,hadbeenapprovedandtooka follow-upactiontoidentifyanyother instancesofan SER-referenced documentbeingupdatedsincethe2013SER.Please consider updating AppendixDtothereferencedSER.Thislettercontainsnonew commitments.Ifyouhaveany questionsorrequire additional information,pleasecontactJamesNadeauat 601-437-2103.Ideclareunderpenaltyofperjurythatthe foregoingistrueandcorrect.Executedonthe6thdayofJune,2016.
GNRO-2016/00029Page2of2 Sincerely,--.....rl---_
KJM/ras>>
 
==Attachment:==
 
CommentsfromreviewoftheSafetyEvaluationReportRelatedtotheLicenseRenewalofGrandGulf NuclearStation,Unit1,ML 16090A252cc:with Attachment U.S.Nuclear Regulatory CommissionATTN:Mr.EmmanuelSayoc, NRR/DLR Project ManagerOfficeofLicenseRenewalMailStop 0-11 F1Washington,DC20555cc:without Attachments U.S.Nuclear Regulatory CommissionATTN:Mr.MarkDapas Regional Administrator,RegionIV U.S.Nuclear Regulatory Commission1600EastLamarBoulevardArlington,TX76011-4511 U.S.Nuclear Regulatory CommissionATTN:Mr.JimKim, NRR/DORLMailStop OWFN/8 G1411555RockvillePikeRockville,MD 20852-2378 NRC Senior Resident InspectorGrandGulf Nuclear StationPortGibson,MS39150 Attachment to GNRO-2016/00029 CommentsfromreviewoftheSafetyEvaluationReportRelatedtotheLicenseRenewalofGrandGulf NuclearStation,Unit1,ML 16090A252 Attachment to GNRO-20 16-00029 Comment Section/Pg.#
Comment No.1.1.5/1-8OpenItem3.0.3.1.39-1Service Water Integritydoesnotinclude anyinformationdescribingwhattheopenitemwasorwhatsectionintheSERcoversthisitem.Thisis inconsistentwithtwooftheotheropenitems.Alsoopenitem4.2.1-1referstoSERsectionthatcoverstheopenitembutfailsto describetheopen item.2.1.7/1-10Licensecondition2 incorrectlyreferstothe commitmentlistintheLRAasbeinginSectionA.5whenitis actuallyinSectionA.4asstatedintheresponsetoRAIA.1-1inthe12-20-13letter.ChangeA.5toA.4 3.2.1.3.1.2/2-4 1 stparagraph,5thline,deletecomma after controls.4.2.1.4.2.2/2-112ndfullparagraph,1 stsentence:Deletecommasbeforeand after directly connectedtoSSCssincethisisarestrictiveclause.
5.2.1.4.3.2/2-14 1 st paragraph under2.1.4.3.2states,"Aspartofthisreview,duringthescopingandscreening methodologyaudit,the staff had discussionswiththeapplicant,reviewed implementing proceduresandthetechnicalbasis documents,licenserenewal drawings,andscopingresultsreports."ForGGNS,thescopingresultsareincludedinonescopingresultsreport.
Ratherthanreferringto"scopingresultsreports," suggestrevisingtosay"reviewed...scopingresults"or"reviewed...
applicable sections ofthescopingreport."Also,Inlast sentenceofthisparagraph, suggestchanging"scopingreportresults referenced"to"scoping report referenced." This commentappliesineach instanceofthe discussion ofmultiplescopingreports.
Attachment to GNRO-20 16-00029 Comment Section/Pg.#
Comment No.6.2.1.4.3.2/2-14 The discussionofregulatedeventsreferstotechnicalbasis documentsforlicenserenewaltopics.Forexample,thefireprotectionscoping discussionrefersto"theFire Protection technical basis document." A numberoftechnicalbasis documentswereusedduringthe(a)(3)scoping,butnot necessarilyaspecifictechnicalbasis documentforeachoftheregulatedevents.
Considerrevisingtosay"the applicable technical basis documents." This commentappliestoscoping discussionsthatrefertoasingle specifictechnicalbasis document.7.2.1.4.3.2/2-14 UnderFireProtection, paragraphsays,"...thestaffreviewedaselectedsampleofscopingreportsforthesystemsand structures identifiedintheFireProtectiontechnicalbasis document."Thisisnotan accurate descriptionofwhatthe staffreviewedforscopingfor10CFR50.48becausetherewasasinglescopingreportwith sectionsforindividualsystems.LRASection2.1.1.3.1 discussesscopingforfireprotectionand identifiesthetechnical documentsusedforscoping.
8.2.1.4.3.2/2-14 Under Environmental Qualification, staffs discussionofEQscopingdoesnotincludetheboundingmethodusedfor electricalscoping.The implementing procedure describesthebounding approachforscopingratherthanaprocessthat considers EQtechnicalbasis documents.
As describedinLRASection2.1.1and2.1.1.3.2,plantEICsystemsareincludedinthescopeoflicenserenewalbydefault.Thisincludes equipmentreliedupontoperformafunctionthat demonstrates compliancewiththe Commission'sregulationsfor environmental qualification.
Attachment to GNRO-2016-00029 Comment Section/Pg.#
Comment No.9.2.1.4.3.2/2-14 Under Anticipated Transient WithoutScram,thereisnomentionoftheboundingapproachtoscoping electricalandI&C commoditygroups.AsindicatedinLRASection2.1.1and2.1.1.3.4,plantEIC systemsareincludedinthescopeoflicenserenewalbydefault.
Consequently, EIC equipment that supports the requirementsof10CFR50.62isincludedinthescopeoflicenserenewal.
10.2.1.4.3.2/2-15 UnderStationBlackout, discussionstates,"Inaddition,thestaffreviewedaselectedsampleofscopingreportsforthe systems and structuresidentifiedintheSBO technical basis document."Thisisan inaccurate descriptionoftheGGNSscopingand screeningprocess.AsindicatedinLRASection2.1.1and 2.1.1.3.5,plantEIC systemsareincludedinthescopeoflicenserenewalbydefault.
Consequently, electrical equipment that supports the requirementsof10CFR50.63isincludedinthescopeoflicenserenewal.
11.2.1.4.4.2/2-16TheSER discussesscopingresults reports,plural.ForGGNS,onescopingreport documentsthescopingresultsforallGGNSsystems.Itwouldbemore appropriate to discussreviewsof sectionsofthereportor simply"scopingresults,"ratherthanscopingresultsreports.
12.2.1.4.6.2/2-18 2nd paragraph, discussionrefersto scoping reports.ForGGNS,itismore appropriatetorefertothe"discussion of structuresinthescopingreport." 13.2.1.4.6.2/2-18 2nd paragraphshouldhave structure intended functionsinsteadof system intended functions.
14.2.3.2.3/2-38 ReferencetoLRASection2.3.2.1shouldbetoSection2.3.2.3.
15.2.3.3.4.1/2-47 LeakageDetectionandControlconsistsofthreesystems.The SER discussion in paragraph1&2coverstheleak detectionsystemonly.
Attachment to GNRO-20 16-00029 Comment Section/Pg.#
Comment No.16.2.3.3.19.1/2-67Inthefirstline,the section referenced should be 2.3.3.19.Note: LRA Section 2.3.2.8 is correctly referenced in section 2.3.2.8.1,page2-42.17.2.3.3.19.1/2-67 Correctfirstlistof systems and sections as follows:-Control Room Heating, VentilationandAir Conditioning (LRA Section 2.3.3.17)-Heating, VentilationandAir Conditioning (LRA Section 2.3.3.18)18.2.4.1.1.5/2-82In3rd bullet item, please change"in vessel" to"in-vessel." The meaning is ambiguous as written.19.2.4.3.1.3/2-90 Last paragraph under Transformer and Switchyard Support Structures and Foundations contains duplicate informationofthe previous paragraph.
Please deleteoneofthelasttwo paragraphs.
20.2.4.4.1/2-92In2nd paragraph, please change"LRA Table 2.4-2" to"LRA Table 2.4-4".Table 2.4-4 correspondstothis sectionoftheSER.21.2.4.4.1/2-92The3rd paragraph contains duplicate informationofthe previous paragraph.
Please deletethe3rd paragraph: "LRA Table 2.4-4 identifies bulk commodities component types that are within the scope of license renewal and subjecttoan AMR." 22.2.5/2-93 First paragraph,in1 5t sentence,addRAI number as follows.Inits scoping evaluation, the staff reviewed the applicable LRA sectionsandtheRAI2.5-1 response, focusing on components thathavenotbeen identifiedaswithinthe scope of license renewal.23.2.5.1.2/2-94 Last paragraph, 2nd sentence: The scoping boundary consistsofthe34.5kV breakers (552-4-;4G4 1104and5522,104 2104)and115kV breaker (J1365).24.2.6/2-95 Third paragraph-"renewed licenses"-
license should be singular.25.3.0.2.4/3-6 and The paragraphs discussing NotesBthruEdonot belonginthis 3-7 section,whichistitled"Documentation and Documents Reviewed.The same discussion is already in 3.0.2.2.
Attachment to GNRO-20 16-00029 Comment Section/Pg.#
Comment No.26.3.0.3.1.1/3-12 OperatingExperience,first paragraph states: u***visual inspectionofthe condensatestoragetank(CST)conductedin2007found indications of age-related degradation."Byletter GNRO-2014/00030dated5/13/14,LRAsectionB.1.2 AbovegroundMetallicTanks,operating experiencesectionwaschangedtoindicatethatthisvisualinspectionfoundno indicationsofage-related degradation.
27.3.0.3.1.1/3-13 Letter GNRO-2014/00030revisedtheLRAtoindicatethatthe Fire-WaterSystemProgram managestheeffectsofagingonthe fire watersystemtanksratherthanthe Aboveground MetallicTanksProgram describedinLRAsectionB.1.2.The operatingexperiencedescriptionforthisprogramwas correspondinglyrevisedtoremove discussionofthefire water storage tanks.However,theSERincludes discussion of plant-specific operating experiencerelatedtothefire waterstoragetanksinsection 3.0.3.1.1 AbovegroundMetallicTanks.
28.3.0.3.1.4/3-23TheSERstatesinthe2ndparagraph,1 stsentence,"The"preventive actions" program elementinGALLReportAMP XI.M41 recommendsthatcoatingsarein accordancewithSection3.4ofNACE RP0285-2002."Thisisincorrect.In ISG-LR-2011-03,GALLAMPXI.M41 recommendsthatcoatingsarein accordancewithTable1ofNACE SP0169-2007orSection3.4of NACE RP0285-2002.
29.3.0.3.1.7/3-38TheSERmakesseveral referencestoAAINo.5 specific tostartinghalfway BWRVIP-27.ThereferenceshouldbetoAAINO.4.
According todownthepage BWRVIP-27-A,Section4.1,pdfPage83of90thereisnoAAINo.andcontinuing5for BWRVIP-27.onPage3-39.30.3.0.3.1.18/3-91Pleaseremoveblankline(extrareturn)insecondtothelast paragraphonthispage Attachment to GNRO-2016-00029 Comment Section/Pg.#
Comment No.31.3.0.3.1.20/Page The beginningofthis sectionlistsa number of letterstothe NRC 3-101 from Entergy that describetheFWSAMP.
However, it does not list letters datedMay15,2012, June27,2012,and August 13, 2012.32.3.0.3.1.20/Page The SER Exception6,last sentence,states,"The applicant also 3-106 (Exception stated that it performs holiday testing and ultrasonic thickness 6)checks or mechanical measurements of any corroded areas." This is incorrect.
Exception#6inthe August 19, 2015 letter (GNRO-2015/00055)totheNRC states,"When indications are identifiedinthefire water tank coating, GGNS performs holiday testing.In addition, GGNS performs ultrasonic thickness checks or mechanical measurementsofany corroded areas." Holiday testing is only performedonthe coating in areas where there are indications of coating degradation.
33.3.0.3.1.20/PageThe4th sentencereads,"Inits responsetoRAI 3.5.2.4-4, dated 3-108 June 27,2012......"Thedateofthe response is July 25,2012, not (Enhancement June 27,2012.2)4th Sentence 34.3.0.3.1.20/Page The SER sentencereads,"The stafffindsthe applicant's3-110,2nd response acceptable because the plant-specific configuration for paragraph under the distribution piping does not include nozzles." Our response Enhancement doesnotsaythatthepiping does not include nozzles.Our10,1st Sentence responsesayswe thought the wording"fire water distribution piping" was better than nozzles because the vendor manual was ambiguous with respecttothe presence of nozzles.Itwasnot clearinthe vendor manual if there were nozzles or simply holes drilledinthepipe.The conclusion was that GGNS would perform air testing to ensure no blockage and inspect fire water distribution piping, including nozzlesifany,whenthe charcoal is replaced.35.3.0.3.1.23/3-137In2nd paragraph, last sentence, please change"RAI 8.124-2" to"RAI8.1.24-2".
Attachment to GNRO-20 16-00029 Comment Section/Pg.#
Comment No.36.3.0.3.1.36InvariousplaceswithinSection3.0.3.1.36,fluencevaluesare Generalgiventhatareno longervalidasaresultofupdatedneutron transport analysesandthe issuanceoftheresponsetoRAI 4.2.1-2c(5)(b)[GNRO-2105/00048,DatedJuly29,2015].
Without additional discussiononupdatedfluencevalues,itis unclear thatthefluencevaluesshownarenotcurrent.
SuggestaddingareferencetotheresponsetoRAI 4.2.1-2c(5)(b)withanotethat says slightly different f1uencevalueswereprovided,butthe conclusionsregardingprogram acceptabilitywerenotaltered.
37.3.0.3.1.37/3-185In"Summary",lastsentence,pleaseclose quotationmarkaftertheword"effects"toread: "detectionofagingeffects"and"acceptancecriteria"program.
38.3.0.3.1.39/3-192Thelastsentenceinthe2nd paragraphstates,"butthe majority of the inspectionswereconductedsince August 2013, apparently asaresultoftheissuesrelatedtothe Predecisional Enforcement ConferenceconductedonJuly16,2013."Thisseemsa speculative statement.
Recommend deletion of"apparentlyasaresultoftheissuesrelatedtothe Predecisional Enforcement ConferenceconductedonJuly16,2013"fromthelastpartofthis sentence.39.3.0.3.1.40/3-198 In Enhancement1,secondsentence,pleaseadd"(GGN2)" after"containment building".
40.3.0.3.1.40/3-200Inlastparagraph,1stsentence,pleasedeletethecommaaftertheword"May."
Attachment to GNRO-2016-00029 Comment Section/Pg.#
Comment No.41.3.0.3.2.1/3-214 Last paragraph-RAI8.1.1-1wasnotforthesubject discussed.ThiswasRAI 8.1.1-2.Thisneedstobecorrectedintherestof the statementsforRAlsinthe"CorrectiveAction"sectionofthis AMP discussion.InaletterdatedJune22,2012,the staffissuedRAI81.11 8.1.1-2,requestingthe applicantrevisethe corrective actions as appropriatetoincludethe correctiveactionswhen inspection acceptancecriteriaarenotmetorprovideatechnical justificationofhowtheproposedcorrective actions are consistentwithSRP-LRSectionA.1.2.3.7,...42.3.0.3.2.1/3-216 Last paragraph-RAI 8.1.1-2wasnotforthe subject discussed.ThiswasRAI 8.1.1-1.Thisneedstobecorrectedintherestof the statementsforRAlsinthe"Operating Experience"sectionofthisAMP discussion.InaletterdatedJune22,2012,thestaffissuedRAI81.12 8.1.1-1,requestingthe applicantconfirmthatMH-15 containing in-servicecableshasbeeninspected.
43.3.0.3.3.2/3-226 Under MonitoringandTrendingofResults,theSER quotes fromtheLRAsaying,"...and(b)thecoating inspectionreportwillincludealistandlocationofallareas evidencing deterioration...".Thelatestchangetothereferencedsectionwasprovidedina letter dated November6,2014,which includes the statement"the coating inspectionreportwillincludealistof locations identifiedwithcoating degradation."TheSER statement is incorrectasthe quoted statementisnotfoundintheLRA.
Attachment to GNRO-20 16-00029 Comment Section/Pg.#
Comment No.44.3.0.3.3.2/3-227SERstates:"Bylettersdated August19,2015,and November 23,2015,the applicantstated...lfbasemetalisexposedand accompanied by acceleratedcorrosion,a volumetric examinationwillbe performed...".Thisisincorrect.Theword"accelerated"wasnotfoundinlettersdated August19,2015,and November23,2015.TheSER earlierstated:"Initsresponsedated November6,2014,the applicantstatedthattheterm"accelerated corrosion"wasrevisedto"corrosion".
45.3.3.2.3.1/3-361,Atthebottomofthepage,thethree paragraphs discussing 362carbonsteelheat exchanger componentsexposedtoraw watershouldbemovedtosection 3.3.2.3.16 46.3.3.2.3.9/3-369Secondfullparagraphis redundant to conclusion paragraph attheendofthesection.
47.3.3.2.3.14/3-374 Introductory statement that staffreviewedtable 3.3.2-14 is missing.48.3.7/3-504 Second paragraph-"renewed licenses"-licenseshouldbe singular.49.4.1.1.1/4-2Inthesecondbulletedlistonthepage,pleaseaddclosing")" afterLRASection4.4.
50.4.1.2.1.1/4-3The"RVaxialweld probability"shouldbe"RVaxialweld failure probability"tomatchLRASection4.2.5.
51.4.1.2.1.2/4-17Intheparagraph"Potentially ApplicableTLAAs..., BWRVIP-48Ashouldbe BWRVIP-48-A (add dash)
Attachment to GNRO-20 16-00029 Comment Section/Pg.#
Comment No.52.4.2.4.2/4-47ThelastparagraphofSection4.2.4.2,inpart,states,"The stafffindsthe applicant's conclusionforthisTLAA acceptable because....(b)the applicant committedthatitwill request relieffromthe requirement to perform volumetric examinations of the RPV circumferentialwelds,in accordance with 10CFR50.55a, prior to entering the period of extended operation".Theonly explicit commitmentisthatthereliefwillbe submitted in accordancewith10CFR50.55(a),whichmaynotrequiresubmittalpriortotheperiodof extended operation.
Suggestre-wordingtostate,"The stafffindsthe applicant's conclusionforthisTLAA acceptable because....(b)the applicant committedthatitwill request relieffromthe requirement to perform volumetric examinations of the RPV circumferentialwelds,in accordance with 10CFR50.55a., prior to entering the period of extended operation.
Attachment to GNRO-20 16-00029 Comment Section/Pg.#
Comment No.53.4.2.6.2/4-51Thethird paragraphinSection4.2.6.2 Staff Evaluation states,"By letter dated June 5,2012,the staff issued RA/4.2.6-1 requestingthatthe applicant providethefol/owing information and calculationstoconfirmthatthe applicant's RV materials are boundedbythe analysisinthe Ranganath paper as referenced intheLRA: (a)additional supporting informationandcalculations, including the projected fracture toughness values of the RV materials in comparisontothe acceptable RV fracture toughnessvaluesforthe postulatedevent,(b)confirmation as to whether the applicant's bounding-case analysisinLRASection 4.2.6 includesaI/the relevant RVmaterials,thefast f1uence values ofwhichare projected to exceed 1x1017 n/cm'duringthe period of extendedoperation,not omitting any newly identified limiting material or extended beltline material(e.g.,not omitting the relevant materials addressedinLRATable 4.2-2),and(c)justificationforwhythe applicant's RV is sufficiently similartothe RV analyzedinthe paperforcomparison.RAI4.2.6-1 request summarieslabeledas(a),(b),and(c)inthisparagraph actuallyrelatetoRAI4.2.6-1 requests(a.1),(a.2),and (a.3), respectively.
Additionally,RAI4.2.6-1 requests(b)and(c)arenot summarized.Itisnotedthat althoughRAI4.2.6-1 requests(b)and(c)arenot summarized, response summariesforall5partsoftheRAI request (a.1 throughc)are addressedinthe*SER.54.4.3.1/4-53Thelast sentenceonthepageshouldrefertoLRATable4.3-1 55.4.3.1/4-57Thethird paragraph last sentenceshouldbeTable4.3-1 (singular) 56.4.7.2.3/4-92Thefirst sentenceinSection 4.7.2.3refersto"....LRASection A2.5.2...." ChangeLRASection referencetoA.2.5.2.(addperiod between Aand2)#
Attachment to GNRO-20 16-00029 Comment Section/Pg.#
Comment No.57.4.8/4-99 Second paragraph-"renewed licenses"-licenseshouldbe singular.58.AppA/A-5Initem2of Commitment9,thephrase"duringeach 10-yearperiod"shouldberevisedto"duringeach5-yearperiod."Thisis consistentwiththe commitmentasrevisedin letter GNRO-2013/00021.AppA/A-6Thelastbullet underitem3of Commitment9(ESM)shouldbesplitintotwoitems.A separatebulletedparagraphshouldincludethesectionbeginningwith"Removaloftightly adhering insulationthatis impermeable..."[SeeLetter GNRO-2014/00030]59.AppA/A-8 Commitment12(Fire WaterSystemProgram),4 thpara,4th line:wetpipesystemswereremovedfromthis commitment.
Delete"andwetpipe"fromthisparagraph.[SeeLetter GNRO-2015/00055]
60.AppA/A-9 Commitment12(Fire WaterSystemProgram),2ndpara:Forbettertechnicalclarityandeaseofusetothereader, considerindentingthesecondparaasitbelongstoitem2aboveinthe SER.61.AppA/A-13 Commitment12(Fire WaterSystemProgram),1stparagraph:The acceptance criteria statementwasremoved consistentwithLR-ISG-2012-02asshownin letter GNRO-2014/00030.Deletethe last sentenceinthisparagraph.62.AppA/A-18 Commitment 27: Consideraddingletter GNRO-2012/00081totheSourcecolumn.63.AppA/A-22 Commitment 30 (Structures MonitoringProgram),lastparagraph:codesACI201.1R-92andACI 349.3R-96withnospacebetweentherevisionlevels.TheSERshowsACI201.1withaspacebetweenthecodeandR-92.For consistencyshowbothcodes withoutaspacebetweentherevisionlevels.
Attachment to GNRO-2016-00029 Comment Section/Pg.#
Comment No.64.App A1A-24 Commitment 31 (Water ChemistryControl-ClosedTreated Water Program)lastpara,2ndsentence,general observation:Typo-"...200/0ofthepopulation..."should read"...20%ofthepopulation...".
65.App A1A-26 Commitment35(Service Water IntegrityProgram),paraiii,1stsentence:Typo-"mediation"shouldread"remediation".
66.App A1A-28 Commitment36(Wallthinning otherthanFAC):this commitment
.item numberismissingfromtheSER.Add Commitment36totheSERperletter GNRO-2013/00096.Alsoaddletter GNRO-2013/00096totheSourcecolumn.
67.AppendixB/B-9Thefollowingarenotidentifiedinthe appendix October11,2013 GNRO-2013/00079 Responsetoset49 October 27,2014 GNRO-2014/00074forthe2014annualupdate.
November21,2013RAIletterfromNRCforset48 December10,2015 GNRO-2015/00080forthe2015annual update.68.Appendix 0/0-3 The proprietary informationnotewasnotincludedfor BWRVIP-05,38,130and183.
Consideraddingthenote.
69.3.0.3.1.5/3-29SecondparagraphcitingwhatisstatedintheLRAisnotaccurate.TheSERaddswordstowhattheLRA actuallystates.Forexample,theLRAsaystheprogram manages cracking.TheSERsaysthattheLRAstatesthattheprogram manages the effects of cracking.70.Section6/p.6-1It appearsthatthesecondparaqraphshouldbeupdatedtoreflectclosureofopenitems.71.EntireSERACRS subcommittee questioned if BWRVIP-18,Revision1,hadbeenapproved.TheSERstatesthatBWRVIP-18is under review.Determine if BWRVIP-18,Rev1hasbeenapproved.
72.EntireSERReviewSERto identifyanyother instancesofan SER-referenced documentbeingupdatedsincethe2013SER.73.Appendix0 Update Appendix0toincludeallreferenced documents.
 
GNRO-2016/00029 June 6,2016U.S.Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: DocumentControlDeskWashington,DC20555-0001 Entergy Operations, Inc.P.O.Box756PortGibson,MS39150 Kevin MulliganSiteVicePresidentGrandGulfNuclearStationTel.(601)437-7500
 
==SUBJECT:==
 
==REFERENCE:==
 
==DearSirorMadam:==
GrandGulf Nuclear Station CommentsRegardingLicenseRenewalSafetyEvaluationReportML 16090A252datedApril4,2016 Grand Gulf NuclearStation,Unit1 DocketNo.50-416LicenseNo.NPF-29U.S.NRCLetter,"SafetyEvaluationReportRelatedtotheLicenseRenewalofGrandGulf NuclearStation,Unit1,ML 16090A252EntergyOperations,Inc.isproviding,inthe Attachment,alistof comments from review-of thereferencedSafetyEvaluationReport(SER)toclarify and/or correct informationinthereporttoensureaccuracy.Additionally,the Advisory Committee for Reactor Safeguards (ACRS)subcommittee meetingheldMay 4,2016 questioned if BWRVIP-18,Revision1,hadbeenapproved(thereferencedSERstatedthat BWRVIP-18 was underreview).YourStaff acknowledgedthatBWRVIP-18,Revision1,hadbeenapprovedandtooka follow-upactiontoidentifyanyother instancesofan SER-referenced documentbeingupdatedsincethe2013SER.Please consider updating AppendixDtothereferencedSER.Thislettercontainsnonew commitments.Ifyouhaveany questionsorrequire additional information,pleasecontactJamesNadeauat 601-437-2103.Ideclareunderpenaltyofperjurythatthe foregoingistrueandcorrect.Executedonthe6thdayofJune,2016.
GNRO-2016/00029Page2of2 Sincerely,--.....rl---_
KJM/ras>>
 
==Attachment:==
 
CommentsfromreviewoftheSafetyEvaluationReportRelatedtotheLicenseRenewalofGrandGulf NuclearStation,Unit1,ML 16090A252cc:with Attachment U.S.Nuclear Regulatory CommissionATTN:Mr.EmmanuelSayoc, NRR/DLR Project ManagerOfficeofLicenseRenewalMailStop 0-11 F1Washington,DC20555cc:without Attachments U.S.Nuclear Regulatory CommissionATTN:Mr.MarkDapas Regional Administrator,RegionIV U.S.Nuclear Regulatory Commission1600EastLamarBoulevardArlington,TX76011-4511 U.S.Nuclear Regulatory CommissionATTN:Mr.JimKim, NRR/DORLMailStop OWFN/8 G1411555RockvillePikeRockville,MD 20852-2378 NRC Senior Resident InspectorGrandGulf Nuclear StationPortGibson,MS39150 Attachment to GNRO-2016/00029 CommentsfromreviewoftheSafetyEvaluationReportRelatedtotheLicenseRenewalofGrandGulf NuclearStation,Unit1,ML 16090A252 Attachment to GNRO-20 16-00029 Comment Section/Pg.#
Comment No.1.1.5/1-8OpenItem3.0.3.1.39-1Service Water Integritydoesnotinclude anyinformationdescribingwhattheopenitemwasorwhatsectionintheSERcoversthisitem.Thisis inconsistentwithtwooftheotheropenitems.Alsoopenitem4.2.1-1referstoSERsectionthatcoverstheopenitembutfailsto describetheopen item.2.1.7/1-10Licensecondition2 incorrectlyreferstothe commitmentlistintheLRAasbeinginSectionA.5whenitis actuallyinSectionA.4asstatedintheresponsetoRAIA.1-1inthe12-20-13letter.ChangeA.5toA.4 3.2.1.3.1.2/2-4 1 stparagraph,5thline,deletecomma after controls.4.2.1.4.2.2/2-112ndfullparagraph,1 stsentence:Deletecommasbeforeand after directly connectedtoSSCssincethisisarestrictiveclause.
5.2.1.4.3.2/2-14 1 st paragraph under2.1.4.3.2states,"Aspartofthisreview,duringthescopingandscreening methodologyaudit,the staff had discussionswiththeapplicant,reviewed implementing proceduresandthetechnicalbasis documents,licenserenewal drawings,andscopingresultsreports."ForGGNS,thescopingresultsareincludedinonescopingresultsreport.
Ratherthanreferringto"scopingresultsreports," suggestrevisingtosay"reviewed...scopingresults"or"reviewed...
applicable sections ofthescopingreport."Also,Inlast sentenceofthisparagraph, suggestchanging"scopingreportresults referenced"to"scoping report referenced." This commentappliesineach instanceofthe discussion ofmultiplescopingreports.
Attachment to GNRO-20 16-00029 Comment Section/Pg.#
Comment No.6.2.1.4.3.2/2-14 The discussionofregulatedeventsreferstotechnicalbasis documentsforlicenserenewaltopics.Forexample,thefireprotectionscoping discussionrefersto"theFire Protection technical basis document." A numberoftechnicalbasis documentswereusedduringthe(a)(3)scoping,butnot necessarilyaspecifictechnicalbasis documentforeachoftheregulatedevents.
Considerrevisingtosay"the applicable technical basis documents." This commentappliestoscoping discussionsthatrefertoasingle specifictechnicalbasis document.7.2.1.4.3.2/2-14 UnderFireProtection, paragraphsays,"...thestaffreviewedaselectedsampleofscopingreportsforthesystemsand structures identifiedintheFireProtectiontechnicalbasis document."Thisisnotan accurate descriptionofwhatthe staffreviewedforscopingfor10CFR50.48becausetherewasasinglescopingreportwith sectionsforindividualsystems.LRASection2.1.1.3.1 discussesscopingforfireprotectionand identifiesthetechnical documentsusedforscoping.
8.2.1.4.3.2/2-14 Under Environmental Qualification, staffs discussionofEQscopingdoesnotincludetheboundingmethodusedfor electricalscoping.The implementing procedure describesthebounding approachforscopingratherthanaprocessthat considers EQtechnicalbasis documents.
As describedinLRASection2.1.1and2.1.1.3.2,plantEICsystemsareincludedinthescopeoflicenserenewalbydefault.Thisincludes equipmentreliedupontoperformafunctionthat demonstrates compliancewiththe Commission'sregulationsfor environmental qualification.
Attachment to GNRO-2016-00029 Comment Section/Pg.#
Comment No.9.2.1.4.3.2/2-14 Under Anticipated Transient WithoutScram,thereisnomentionoftheboundingapproachtoscoping electricalandI&C commoditygroups.AsindicatedinLRASection2.1.1and2.1.1.3.4,plantEIC systemsareincludedinthescopeoflicenserenewalbydefault.
Consequently, EIC equipment that supports the requirementsof10CFR50.62isincludedinthescopeoflicenserenewal.
10.2.1.4.3.2/2-15 UnderStationBlackout, discussionstates,"Inaddition,thestaffreviewedaselectedsampleofscopingreportsforthe systems and structuresidentifiedintheSBO technical basis document."Thisisan inaccurate descriptionoftheGGNSscopingand screeningprocess.AsindicatedinLRASection2.1.1and 2.1.1.3.5,plantEIC systemsareincludedinthescopeoflicenserenewalbydefault.
Consequently, electrical equipment that supports the requirementsof10CFR50.63isincludedinthescopeoflicenserenewal.
11.2.1.4.4.2/2-16TheSER discussesscopingresults reports,plural.ForGGNS,onescopingreport documentsthescopingresultsforallGGNSsystems.Itwouldbemore appropriate to discussreviewsof sectionsofthereportor simply"scopingresults,"ratherthanscopingresultsreports.
12.2.1.4.6.2/2-18 2nd paragraph, discussionrefersto scoping reports.ForGGNS,itismore appropriatetorefertothe"discussion of structuresinthescopingreport." 13.2.1.4.6.2/2-18 2nd paragraphshouldhave structure intended functionsinsteadof system intended functions.
14.2.3.2.3/2-38 ReferencetoLRASection2.3.2.1shouldbetoSection2.3.2.3.
15.2.3.3.4.1/2-47 LeakageDetectionandControlconsistsofthreesystems.The SER discussion in paragraph1&2coverstheleak detectionsystemonly.
Attachment to GNRO-20 16-00029 Comment Section/Pg.#
Comment No.16.2.3.3.19.1/2-67Inthefirstline,the section referenced should be 2.3.3.19.Note: LRA Section 2.3.2.8 is correctly referenced in section 2.3.2.8.1,page2-42.17.2.3.3.19.1/2-67 Correctfirstlistof systems and sections as follows:-Control Room Heating, VentilationandAir Conditioning (LRA Section 2.3.3.17)-Heating, VentilationandAir Conditioning (LRA Section 2.3.3.18)18.2.4.1.1.5/2-82In3rd bullet item, please change"in vessel" to"in-vessel." The meaning is ambiguous as written.19.2.4.3.1.3/2-90 Last paragraph under Transformer and Switchyard Support Structures and Foundations contains duplicate informationofthe previous paragraph.
Please deleteoneofthelasttwo paragraphs.
20.2.4.4.1/2-92In2nd paragraph, please change"LRA Table 2.4-2" to"LRA Table 2.4-4".Table 2.4-4 correspondstothis sectionoftheSER.21.2.4.4.1/2-92The3rd paragraph contains duplicate informationofthe previous paragraph.
Please deletethe3rd paragraph: "LRA Table 2.4-4 identifies bulk commodities component types that are within the scope of license renewal and subjecttoan AMR." 22.2.5/2-93 First paragraph,in1 5t sentence,addRAI number as follows.Inits scoping evaluation, the staff reviewed the applicable LRA sectionsandtheRAI2.5-1 response, focusing on components thathavenotbeen identifiedaswithinthe scope of license renewal.23.2.5.1.2/2-94 Last paragraph, 2nd sentence: The scoping boundary consistsofthe34.5kV breakers (552-4-;4G4 1104and5522,104 2104)and115kV breaker (J1365).24.2.6/2-95 Third paragraph-"renewed licenses"-
license should be singular.25.3.0.2.4/3-6 and The paragraphs discussing NotesBthruEdonot belonginthis 3-7 section,whichistitled"Documentation and Documents Reviewed.The same discussion is already in 3.0.2.2.
Attachment to GNRO-20 16-00029 Comment Section/Pg.#
Comment No.26.3.0.3.1.1/3-12 OperatingExperience,first paragraph states: u***visual inspectionofthe condensatestoragetank(CST)conductedin2007found indications of age-related degradation."Byletter GNRO-2014/00030dated5/13/14,LRAsectionB.1.2 AbovegroundMetallicTanks,operating experiencesectionwaschangedtoindicatethatthisvisualinspectionfoundno indicationsofage-related degradation.
27.3.0.3.1.1/3-13 Letter GNRO-2014/00030revisedtheLRAtoindicatethatthe Fire-WaterSystemProgram managestheeffectsofagingonthe fire watersystemtanksratherthanthe Aboveground MetallicTanksProgram describedinLRAsectionB.1.2.The operatingexperiencedescriptionforthisprogramwas correspondinglyrevisedtoremove discussionofthefire water storage tanks.However,theSERincludes discussion of plant-specific operating experiencerelatedtothefire waterstoragetanksinsection 3.0.3.1.1 AbovegroundMetallicTanks.
28.3.0.3.1.4/3-23TheSERstatesinthe2ndparagraph,1 stsentence,"The"preventive actions" program elementinGALLReportAMP XI.M41 recommendsthatcoatingsarein accordancewithSection3.4ofNACE RP0285-2002."Thisisincorrect.In ISG-LR-2011-03,GALLAMPXI.M41 recommendsthatcoatingsarein accordancewithTable1ofNACE SP0169-2007orSection3.4of NACE RP0285-2002.
29.3.0.3.1.7/3-38TheSERmakesseveral referencestoAAINo.5 specific tostartinghalfway BWRVIP-27.ThereferenceshouldbetoAAINO.4.
According todownthepage BWRVIP-27-A,Section4.1,pdfPage83of90thereisnoAAINo.andcontinuing5for BWRVIP-27.onPage3-39.30.3.0.3.1.18/3-91Pleaseremoveblankline(extrareturn)insecondtothelast paragraphonthispage Attachment to GNRO-2016-00029 Comment Section/Pg.#
Comment No.31.3.0.3.1.20/Page The beginningofthis sectionlistsa number of letterstothe NRC 3-101 from Entergy that describetheFWSAMP.
However, it does not list letters datedMay15,2012, June27,2012,and August 13, 2012.32.3.0.3.1.20/Page The SER Exception6,last sentence,states,"The applicant also 3-106 (Exception stated that it performs holiday testing and ultrasonic thickness 6)checks or mechanical measurements of any corroded areas." This is incorrect.
Exception#6inthe August 19, 2015 letter (GNRO-2015/00055)totheNRC states,"When indications are identifiedinthefire water tank coating, GGNS performs holiday testing.In addition, GGNS performs ultrasonic thickness checks or mechanical measurementsofany corroded areas." Holiday testing is only performedonthe coating in areas where there are indications of coating degradation.
33.3.0.3.1.20/PageThe4th sentencereads,"Inits responsetoRAI 3.5.2.4-4, dated 3-108 June 27,2012......"Thedateofthe response is July 25,2012, not (Enhancement June 27,2012.2)4th Sentence 34.3.0.3.1.20/Page The SER sentencereads,"The stafffindsthe applicant's3-110,2nd response acceptable because the plant-specific configuration for paragraph under the distribution piping does not include nozzles." Our response Enhancement doesnotsaythatthepiping does not include nozzles.Our10,1st Sentence responsesayswe thought the wording"fire water distribution piping" was better than nozzles because the vendor manual was ambiguous with respecttothe presence of nozzles.Itwasnot clearinthe vendor manual if there were nozzles or simply holes drilledinthepipe.The conclusion was that GGNS would perform air testing to ensure no blockage and inspect fire water distribution piping, including nozzlesifany,whenthe charcoal is replaced.35.3.0.3.1.23/3-137In2nd paragraph, last sentence, please change"RAI 8.124-2" to"RAI8.1.24-2".
Attachment to GNRO-20 16-00029 Comment Section/Pg.#
Comment No.36.3.0.3.1.36InvariousplaceswithinSection3.0.3.1.36,fluencevaluesare Generalgiventhatareno longervalidasaresultofupdatedneutron transport analysesandthe issuanceoftheresponsetoRAI 4.2.1-2c(5)(b)[GNRO-2105/00048,DatedJuly29,2015].
Without additional discussiononupdatedfluencevalues,itis unclear thatthefluencevaluesshownarenotcurrent.
SuggestaddingareferencetotheresponsetoRAI 4.2.1-2c(5)(b)withanotethat says slightly different f1uencevalueswereprovided,butthe conclusionsregardingprogram acceptabilitywerenotaltered.
37.3.0.3.1.37/3-185In"Summary",lastsentence,pleaseclose quotationmarkaftertheword"effects"toread: "detectionofagingeffects"and"acceptancecriteria"program.
38.3.0.3.1.39/3-192Thelastsentenceinthe2nd paragraphstates,"butthe majority of the inspectionswereconductedsince August 2013, apparently asaresultoftheissuesrelatedtothe Predecisional Enforcement ConferenceconductedonJuly16,2013."Thisseemsa speculative statement.
Recommend deletion of"apparentlyasaresultoftheissuesrelatedtothe Predecisional Enforcement ConferenceconductedonJuly16,2013"fromthelastpartofthis sentence.39.3.0.3.1.40/3-198 In Enhancement1,secondsentence,pleaseadd"(GGN2)" after"containment building".
40.3.0.3.1.40/3-200Inlastparagraph,1stsentence,pleasedeletethecommaaftertheword"May."
Attachment to GNRO-2016-00029 Comment Section/Pg.#
Comment No.41.3.0.3.2.1/3-214 Last paragraph-RAI8.1.1-1wasnotforthesubject discussed.ThiswasRAI 8.1.1-2.Thisneedstobecorrectedintherestof the statementsforRAlsinthe"CorrectiveAction"sectionofthis AMP discussion.InaletterdatedJune22,2012,the staffissuedRAI81.11 8.1.1-2,requestingthe applicantrevisethe corrective actions as appropriatetoincludethe correctiveactionswhen inspection acceptancecriteriaarenotmetorprovideatechnical justificationofhowtheproposedcorrective actions are consistentwithSRP-LRSectionA.1.2.3.7,...42.3.0.3.2.1/3-216 Last paragraph-RAI 8.1.1-2wasnotforthe subject discussed.ThiswasRAI 8.1.1-1.Thisneedstobecorrectedintherestof the statementsforRAlsinthe"Operating Experience"sectionofthisAMP discussion.InaletterdatedJune22,2012,thestaffissuedRAI81.12 8.1.1-1,requestingthe applicantconfirmthatMH-15 containing in-servicecableshasbeeninspected.
43.3.0.3.3.2/3-226 Under MonitoringandTrendingofResults,theSER quotes fromtheLRAsaying,"...and(b)thecoating inspectionreportwillincludealistandlocationofallareas evidencing deterioration...".Thelatestchangetothereferencedsectionwasprovidedina letter dated November6,2014,which includes the statement"the coating inspectionreportwillincludealistof locations identifiedwithcoating degradation."TheSER statement is incorrectasthe quoted statementisnotfoundintheLRA.
Attachment to GNRO-20 16-00029 Comment Section/Pg.#
Comment No.44.3.0.3.3.2/3-227SERstates:"Bylettersdated August19,2015,and November 23,2015,the applicantstated...lfbasemetalisexposedand accompanied by acceleratedcorrosion,a volumetric examinationwillbe performed...".Thisisincorrect.Theword"accelerated"wasnotfoundinlettersdated August19,2015,and November23,2015.TheSER earlierstated:"Initsresponsedated November6,2014,the applicantstatedthattheterm"accelerated corrosion"wasrevisedto"corrosion".
45.3.3.2.3.1/3-361,Atthebottomofthepage,thethree paragraphs discussing 362carbonsteelheat exchanger componentsexposedtoraw watershouldbemovedtosection 3.3.2.3.16 46.3.3.2.3.9/3-369Secondfullparagraphis redundant to conclusion paragraph attheendofthesection.
47.3.3.2.3.14/3-374 Introductory statement that staffreviewedtable 3.3.2-14 is missing.48.3.7/3-504 Second paragraph-"renewed licenses"-licenseshouldbe singular.49.4.1.1.1/4-2Inthesecondbulletedlistonthepage,pleaseaddclosing")" afterLRASection4.4.
50.4.1.2.1.1/4-3The"RVaxialweld probability"shouldbe"RVaxialweld failure probability"tomatchLRASection4.2.5.
51.4.1.2.1.2/4-17Intheparagraph"Potentially ApplicableTLAAs..., BWRVIP-48Ashouldbe BWRVIP-48-A (add dash)
Attachment to GNRO-20 16-00029 Comment Section/Pg.#
Comment No.52.4.2.4.2/4-47ThelastparagraphofSection4.2.4.2,inpart,states,"The stafffindsthe applicant's conclusionforthisTLAA acceptable because....(b)the applicant committedthatitwill request relieffromthe requirement to perform volumetric examinations of the RPV circumferentialwelds,in accordance with 10CFR50.55a, prior to entering the period of extended operation".Theonly explicit commitmentisthatthereliefwillbe submitted in accordancewith10CFR50.55(a),whichmaynotrequiresubmittalpriortotheperiodof extended operation.
Suggestre-wordingtostate,"The stafffindsthe applicant's conclusionforthisTLAA acceptable because....(b)the applicant committedthatitwill request relieffromthe requirement to perform volumetric examinations of the RPV circumferentialwelds,in accordance with 10CFR50.55a., prior to entering the period of extended operation.
Attachment to GNRO-20 16-00029 Comment Section/Pg.#
Comment No.53.4.2.6.2/4-51Thethird paragraphinSection4.2.6.2 Staff Evaluation states,"By letter dated June 5,2012,the staff issued RA/4.2.6-1 requestingthatthe applicant providethefol/owing information and calculationstoconfirmthatthe applicant's RV materials are boundedbythe analysisinthe Ranganath paper as referenced intheLRA: (a)additional supporting informationandcalculations, including the projected fracture toughness values of the RV materials in comparisontothe acceptable RV fracture toughnessvaluesforthe postulatedevent,(b)confirmation as to whether the applicant's bounding-case analysisinLRASection 4.2.6 includesaI/the relevant RVmaterials,thefast f1uence values ofwhichare projected to exceed 1x1017 n/cm'duringthe period of extendedoperation,not omitting any newly identified limiting material or extended beltline material(e.g.,not omitting the relevant materials addressedinLRATable 4.2-2),and(c)justificationforwhythe applicant's RV is sufficiently similartothe RV analyzedinthe paperforcomparison.RAI4.2.6-1 request summarieslabeledas(a),(b),and(c)inthisparagraph actuallyrelatetoRAI4.2.6-1 requests(a.1),(a.2),and (a.3), respectively.
Additionally,RAI4.2.6-1 requests(b)and(c)arenot summarized.Itisnotedthat althoughRAI4.2.6-1 requests(b)and(c)arenot summarized, response summariesforall5partsoftheRAI request (a.1 throughc)are addressedinthe*SER.54.4.3.1/4-53Thelast sentenceonthepageshouldrefertoLRATable4.3-1 55.4.3.1/4-57Thethird paragraph last sentenceshouldbeTable4.3-1 (singular) 56.4.7.2.3/4-92Thefirst sentenceinSection 4.7.2.3refersto"....LRASection A2.5.2...." ChangeLRASection referencetoA.2.5.2.(addperiod between Aand2)#
Attachment to GNRO-20 16-00029 Comment Section/Pg.#
Comment No.57.4.8/4-99 Second paragraph-"renewed licenses"-licenseshouldbe singular.58.AppA/A-5Initem2of Commitment9,thephrase"duringeach 10-yearperiod"shouldberevisedto"duringeach5-yearperiod."Thisis consistentwiththe commitmentasrevisedin letter GNRO-2013/00021.AppA/A-6Thelastbullet underitem3of Commitment9(ESM)shouldbesplitintotwoitems.A separatebulletedparagraphshouldincludethesectionbeginningwith"Removaloftightly adhering insulationthatis impermeable..."[SeeLetter GNRO-2014/00030]59.AppA/A-8 Commitment12(Fire WaterSystemProgram),4 thpara,4th line:wetpipesystemswereremovedfromthis commitment.
Delete"andwetpipe"fromthisparagraph.[SeeLetter GNRO-2015/00055]
60.AppA/A-9 Commitment12(Fire WaterSystemProgram),2ndpara:Forbettertechnicalclarityandeaseofusetothereader, considerindentingthesecondparaasitbelongstoitem2aboveinthe SER.61.AppA/A-13 Commitment12(Fire WaterSystemProgram),1stparagraph:The acceptance criteria statementwasremoved consistentwithLR-ISG-2012-02asshownin letter GNRO-2014/00030.Deletethe last sentenceinthisparagraph.62.AppA/A-18 Commitment 27: Consideraddingletter GNRO-2012/00081totheSourcecolumn.63.AppA/A-22 Commitment 30 (Structures MonitoringProgram),lastparagraph:codesACI201.1R-92andACI 349.3R-96withnospacebetweentherevisionlevels.TheSERshowsACI201.1withaspacebetweenthecodeandR-92.For consistencyshowbothcodes withoutaspacebetweentherevisionlevels.
Attachment to GNRO-2016-00029 Comment Section/Pg.#
Comment No.64.App A1A-24 Commitment 31 (Water ChemistryControl-ClosedTreated Water Program)lastpara,2ndsentence,general observation:Typo-"...200/0ofthepopulation..."should read"...20%ofthepopulation...".
65.App A1A-26 Commitment35(Service Water IntegrityProgram),paraiii,1stsentence:Typo-"mediation"shouldread"remediation".
66.App A1A-28 Commitment36(Wallthinning otherthanFAC):this commitment
.item numberismissingfromtheSER.Add Commitment36totheSERperletter GNRO-2013/00096.Alsoaddletter GNRO-2013/00096totheSourcecolumn.
67.AppendixB/B-9Thefollowingarenotidentifiedinthe appendix October11,2013 GNRO-2013/00079 Responsetoset49 October 27,2014 GNRO-2014/00074forthe2014annualupdate.
November21,2013RAIletterfromNRCforset48 December10,2015 GNRO-2015/00080forthe2015annual update.68.Appendix 0/0-3 The proprietary informationnotewasnotincludedfor BWRVIP-05,38,130and183.
Consideraddingthenote.
69.3.0.3.1.5/3-29SecondparagraphcitingwhatisstatedintheLRAisnotaccurate.TheSERaddswordstowhattheLRA actuallystates.Forexample,theLRAsaystheprogram manages cracking.TheSERsaysthattheLRAstatesthattheprogram manages the effects of cracking.70.Section6/p.6-1It appearsthatthesecondparaqraphshouldbeupdatedtoreflectclosureofopenitems.71.EntireSERACRS subcommittee questioned if BWRVIP-18,Revision1,hadbeenapproved.TheSERstatesthatBWRVIP-18is under review.Determine if BWRVIP-18,Rev1hasbeenapproved.
72.EntireSERReviewSERto identifyanyother instancesofan SER-referenced documentbeingupdatedsincethe2013SER.73.Appendix0 Update Appendix0toincludeallreferenced documents.}}

Latest revision as of 10:19, 28 January 2019

Redirect to:

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=GNRO-2016/00029,_Grand_Gulf,_Unit_1_-_Comments_Regarding_License_Renewal_Safety_Evaluation_Report_ML16090A252_Dated_April_4,_2016&oldid=1232663"