ML081490634: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| issue date = 05/22/2008 | | issue date = 05/22/2008 | ||
| title = Draft Requests for Additional Information for the DC Cook SBLOCA Reanalysis | | title = Draft Requests for Additional Information for the DC Cook SBLOCA Reanalysis | ||
| author name = Cushing J | | author name = Cushing J | ||
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/ADRO/DORL/LPLIII-1 | | author affiliation = NRC/NRR/ADRO/DORL/LPLIII-1 | ||
| addressee name = Scarpello M, Tam P | | addressee name = Scarpello M, Tam P | ||
| addressee affiliation = American Electric Power Co, NRC/NRR/ADRO/DORL/LPLIII-1 | | addressee affiliation = American Electric Power Co, NRC/NRR/ADRO/DORL/LPLIII-1 | ||
| docket = 05000315, 05000316 | | docket = 05000315, 05000316 | ||
| license number = DPR-058, DPR-074 | | license number = DPR-058, DPR-074 | ||
| contact person = tam P | | contact person = tam P, NRR/DORL, 415-1451 | ||
| case reference number = TAC MD5297 | | case reference number = TAC MD5297 | ||
| document type = E-Mail | | document type = E-Mail | ||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:From: Jack Cushing Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2008 4:55 PM To: 'mkscarpello@aep.com'; Peter Tam | {{#Wiki_filter:From: | ||
Jack Cushing Sent: | |||
Thursday, May 22, 2008 4:55 PM To: | |||
'mkscarpello@aep.com'; Peter Tam | |||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
Draft RAIs for the DC Cook SBLOCA Reanalysis.doc Attachments: Second Round RAIs for the DC Cook SBLOCA Reanalysis.doc | Draft RAIs for the DC Cook SBLOCA Reanalysis.doc Attachments: | ||
Second Round RAIs for the DC Cook SBLOCA Reanalysis.doc Mike Attached are the draft RAIs that resulted from the Telcon with Keith Steinmetz. There were no changes for the RAIs for the other RAIs discuss on the call. Keith Steinmetz wanted to get working on the information needs. | |||
Mike | Jack E-mail Properties Mail Envelope Properties () | ||
Jack | |||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
Draft RAIs for the DC Cook SBLOCA Reanalysis.doc Sent Date: | Draft RAIs for the DC Cook SBLOCA Reanalysis.doc Sent Date: 05/22/2008 4:49:58 PM Received Date: 05/22/2008 4:55:00 PM From: Jack Cushing Created By: Jack.Cushing@nrc.gov Recipients: | ||
Created By: | |||
Recipients: | |||
mkscarpello@aep.com ('mkscarpello@aep.com') | mkscarpello@aep.com ('mkscarpello@aep.com') | ||
Tracking Status: None Peter.Tam@nrc.gov (Peter Tam) | Tracking Status: None Peter.Tam@nrc.gov (Peter Tam) | ||
Tracking Status: None | Tracking Status: None Post Office: | ||
Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 30257 05/22/2008 Second Round RAIs for the DC Cook SBLOCA Reanalysis.doc 24388 Options Expiration Date: | |||
Post Office: | Priority: olImportanceNormal ReplyRequested: False Return Notification: False Sensitivity: olNormal Recipients received: | ||
Files | |||
MESSAGE | |||
Options Expiration Date: | |||
Priority: | |||
Sensitivity: | |||
Draft RAIs for the DC Cook SBLOCA Reanalysis 1.0 Please provide the mixture and liquid levels in the uphill side of the steam generators connected to the hot leg for all of the break sizes provided to the staff for review. | |||
2.0 Please also show the mass flow rate vs time at the inlet to the steam generator at the tube sheet for the breaks submitted to the staff for review. | |||
3.0 Please provide a comparison of the liquid levels in the downcomer and the inner vessel (upper plenum, core, and lower plenum) region of the reactor vessel. Please also show the top and bottom elevation of the core. | 3.0 Please provide a comparison of the liquid levels in the downcomer and the inner vessel (upper plenum, core, and lower plenum) region of the reactor vessel. Please also show the top and bottom elevation of the core. | ||
4.0 Please show the effect of a reduction in time step on the mixture levels for the 2 and 2.5 inch breaks. Show convergence such that further reductions in time step have no effect on the mixture level.}} | 4.0 Please show the effect of a reduction in time step on the mixture levels for the 2 and 2.5 inch breaks. Show convergence such that further reductions in time step have no effect on the mixture level.}} | ||
Latest revision as of 16:34, 14 January 2025
| ML081490634 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Cook  |
| Issue date: | 05/22/2008 |
| From: | Jack Cushing NRC/NRR/ADRO/DORL/LPLIII-1 |
| To: | Scarpello M, Tam P American Electric Power Co, NRC/NRR/ADRO/DORL/LPLIII-1 |
| tam P, NRR/DORL, 415-1451 | |
| References | |
| TAC MD5297 | |
| Download: ML081490634 (2) | |
Text
From:
Jack Cushing Sent:
Thursday, May 22, 2008 4:55 PM To:
'mkscarpello@aep.com'; Peter Tam
Subject:
Draft RAIs for the DC Cook SBLOCA Reanalysis.doc Attachments:
Second Round RAIs for the DC Cook SBLOCA Reanalysis.doc Mike Attached are the draft RAIs that resulted from the Telcon with Keith Steinmetz. There were no changes for the RAIs for the other RAIs discuss on the call. Keith Steinmetz wanted to get working on the information needs.
Jack E-mail Properties Mail Envelope Properties ()
Subject:
Draft RAIs for the DC Cook SBLOCA Reanalysis.doc Sent Date: 05/22/2008 4:49:58 PM Received Date: 05/22/2008 4:55:00 PM From: Jack Cushing Created By: Jack.Cushing@nrc.gov Recipients:
mkscarpello@aep.com ('mkscarpello@aep.com')
Tracking Status: None Peter.Tam@nrc.gov (Peter Tam)
Tracking Status: None Post Office:
Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 30257 05/22/2008 Second Round RAIs for the DC Cook SBLOCA Reanalysis.doc 24388 Options Expiration Date:
Priority: olImportanceNormal ReplyRequested: False Return Notification: False Sensitivity: olNormal Recipients received:
Draft RAIs for the DC Cook SBLOCA Reanalysis 1.0 Please provide the mixture and liquid levels in the uphill side of the steam generators connected to the hot leg for all of the break sizes provided to the staff for review.
2.0 Please also show the mass flow rate vs time at the inlet to the steam generator at the tube sheet for the breaks submitted to the staff for review.
3.0 Please provide a comparison of the liquid levels in the downcomer and the inner vessel (upper plenum, core, and lower plenum) region of the reactor vessel. Please also show the top and bottom elevation of the core.
4.0 Please show the effect of a reduction in time step on the mixture levels for the 2 and 2.5 inch breaks. Show convergence such that further reductions in time step have no effect on the mixture level.