ML13151A274

Wolf Creek, Kansas Electric Power Cooperative, Inc., 2012 Annual Report

ML13151A274
Person / Time
Site:	Wolf Creek
Issue date:	12/31/2012
From:	Kansas Electric Power Cooperative
To:	Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
RA 13-0062
Download: ML13151A274 (36)

Text

Annual Report 2012 KANSAS ELECTRIC POWER COOPERATIVE, INC.I In Memory No farewell words were spoken, no time to say goodbye, you were gone before we knew it, and only God knows why.Mr. Stephen E. Parr, Kansas Electric Power Cooperative, Inc. (KEPCo) Executive Vice President& Chief Executive Officer passed away on February 16, 2013 after a courageous battle with Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS). Mr. Parr served as EVP &CEO at KEPCo from 1996 until the time of his passing.Mr. Parr was a member of the Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Company Board of Directors and the Southwest Power Pool Member's Committee.

Mr. Parr was the architect of many of the achievements attained by KEPCo during his tenure, several which will continue to be valued by KEPCo Members for decades to come, such as construction of KEPCo's headquarter building; installation of KEPCo's SCADA system; construction of the Sharpe Generating Station; the execution of a cost-based formula rate purchase power agreement with Westar Energy; and KEPCo's ownership-interest in latan 2, to name just a few.Mr. Parr's dedication to KEPCo and KEPCo's Member Cooperatives was unparalleled.

His tireless determination and resolve were examples of the cooperative principles he lived every day. Our friend is gone, but will never be forgotten.

Stephen E. Parr Contents Page Financial Statements Page Organization and Resources

.................

1 Report of Independent Public Accountants

...... 12 Leadership M essage ..............................................

2-3 Balance Sheets ...................................................

13-14 2012 Highlights

.......................................................

4-5 Statem ents of M argin .........................................

15 KEPCo Trustees and Managers .............................

6-9 Statements of Patronage Capital .........................

15 KEPCo Member Area Map ........................................

9 Statements of Cash Flows ...................................

16 Operating Statistics

.................................................

10 Notes to Financial Statements

.............................

17-33 Organization

& Resources Kansas Electric Power Cooperative, Inc. (KEPCo), headquartered at Topeka, Kansas, was incorporated in 1975 as a not-for-profit generation and transmission cooperative (G&T). It is KEPCo's responsibility to procure an adequate and reliable power supply for its nineteen distribution Rural Electric Cooperative Members at a reasonable cost.Through their combined resources, KEPCo Members support a wide range of other services such as rural economic development, marketing and diversification opportunities, power requirement and engineering stud-ies, rate design, etc.KEPCo is governed by a Board of Trustees representing each of its nineteen Members which collectively serve more than 120,000 electric meters in two-thirds of rural Kansas. The KEPCo Board of Trustees meets regularly to establish policies and act on issues that often include recommendations from working committees of the Board and KEPCo Staff. The Board also elects a seven-person Executive Committee which includes the President, Vice President, Secretary, Treasurer, and three additional Executive Committee Members.KEPCo was granted a limited certificate of convenience and authority by the Kansas Corporation Com-mission in 1980 to act as a G&T public utility. KEPCo's power supply resources consist of: 70 MW of owned generation from the Wolf Creek Generating Station; 30 MW of owned generation from the latan 2 Generating Unit; the 20 MW Sharpe Generating Station located in Coffey County; hydropower purchases of an equivalent 100 MW from the Southwestern Power Administration, and 14 MW from the Western Area Power Administra-tion; plus partial requirement power purchases from regional utilities.

KEPCo is a Touchstone EnergyO Cooperative.

Touchstone Energy is a nationwide alliance of more than 725 cooperatives committed to promoting the core strengths of electric cooperatives

-integrity, accountability, innovation, personal service and a legacy of community commitment.

The national program is anchored by the motto "The Power of Human Connections." Kansas Electric Power Cooperative, Inc.P.O. Box 4877 Topeka, KS 66604 600 SW Corporate View Topeka, KS 66615 (785) 273-7010 www.kepco.org A Touchstone Energy Cooperative I

2012 Message from Kirk Thompson M KEPCo President Stephen E. Parr Executive Vice President& Chief Executive Officer Challenges and opportunities are the very nature of every business.

Addressing challenges and adapting to change is essential to business success, as well as seiz-ing upon opportunities when presented.

For KEPCo, 2012 presented both challenges and opportunities, and strategic decisions were made to capitalize on both.Periodic assessment of a business is essential to suc-cess. Every company, even the largest ones in their mar-kets, has a finite supply of manpower, production capacity and capital. Evaluating a company's strengths helps it determine how to allocate resources in a manner that will result in the highest possible potential for growth and profitability.

The management team examines where the company can compete most effectively and often discovers it has competitive strengths that have not been fully utilized in the past.In January, the KEPCo Board of Trustees enlisted the services of Luecal Consulting to assist with the de-velopment of a strategic planning exercise.

KEPCo's mission and vision statements were reviewed, in addition to an in-depth analysis of KEPCo's strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats. A report was finalized and action items were developed to work toward meeting specific goals as outlined in the report. By performing this analysis, KEPCo will be able to better leverage its strengths, minimize its weaknesses, capitalize on op-portunities, and deter potential threats.KEPCo's fundamental responsibility is to procure a reliable and economical supply of electricity for its Members. Over the past few years, KEPCo has made significant advances in fulfilling this responsibility, most notably with its 38-year cost-based formula rate purchase power agreement with Westar Energy and with its ownership-interest in the latan 2 facility.

In addition, KEPCo's hydropower resources, 100 MW from the South-western Power Administration (SWPA) and 14 MW from the Western Area Power Administration (WAPA) con-tinue to be its least-cost resources.

In August, KEPCo executed a 15-year contract extension with SWPA. The new contract will run to 2031 and provides KEPCo and its Members the security of firm, low-cost energy for the next 18 years.Nationwide, the electric utility industry has invested billions of dollars in environmental controls to comply with the myriad of Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) emission regulations.

Subsequently, utilities pass along the costs associated with compliance to ratepayers.

U.S. carbon dioxide emissions have fallen since 2 the beginning of the century. True, global emissions have risen by approximately one-third this century, but the United States has had a minute part in that global increase.

Global carbon dioxide emissions have continued to rise because nations such as China and India continue to ramp up their industrialization.

China, for example, emits more carbon dioxide than the entire Western Hemisphere and is increasing its carbon dioxide emissions by an average of 10 percent per year. Even if the United States theoretically eliminated all of its emissions today, such action would be rendered moot in less than a decade merely by the corresponding increase from China.As a product of KEPCo's diverse power supply, KEPCo has been able to shield its Members from EPA regulatory compliance capital expenditures on over 40 percent of its power supply. Over the past five years, KEPCo's hydropower allocations have accounted, on average, for 18.5 percent of energy require-ments and Wolf Creek has aver-aged 25 percent. Neither resource emits any greenhouse gas. This attribute will continue to be an economic advantage that only a few utilities in the United States can claim.Several factors can influence the price of electricity, one of which is extreme weather. In 2012, the lack of rain, excessive heat, and 2011-12 KEPCo Executive Committee (seated):

Kenneth Maginley; Larry Ste-vens; Robert Reece; (standing)

Stephen Parr, Executive Vice President

& CEO;protracted drought impacted rates. Kevin Compton, Treasurer; Scott Whittington, Vice President; Kirk Thompson, 2012 was recorded as the sev- President; and Dale Short, Secretary.

enth driest year on record, as all Kansas counties were under a drought emergency.

Droughts cause a host of problems for many industries, including agriculture, recreation, fish and wildlife, municipalities, and yes, utilities.

Streams and rivers that feed into reservoirs within the SWPA footprint are at or near record lows. Reduced inflow has caused a drop in the reservoir water levels and operating efficiencies at the SWPA hydropower facilities.

Water levels in the res-ervoirs were average for the first two months of the year and increased to well above average through April.Beginning in May, the levels declined dramatically.

In December, energy storage in the reservoirs was at 66 percent, compared to the average level for December of 95 percent. The reduced availability of hydroelectric power negatively affected KEPCo's energy costs.Extreme weather conditions also affected energy consumption and peak demand. KEPCo recorded a peak demand of 452 MW, just 3 MW shy of the record peak set in 2011. Kansas experienced a very mild and dry winter and summer arrived early. The result was an increase in irrigation and air conditioner load. Beginning in April and continuing through September, peak demand was higher than forecasted, and energy sales were higher than forecasted as well, just two percent less than the record amount set in 2011. High demand, along with high energy sales, impacted rates.Continued on page 11 3 2012 KEPCo Highlights The KEPCo Board of Trustees participated in the development of a new KEPCo Strategic Plan which will provide guidance for KEPCo staff in providing a reliable, economic power supply for the Members.A new Purchase PowerAgreement was executed with the Southwestern Power Administration (SWPA)which will provide for the continued availability of 100 MW of hydroelectric capacity and the associated clean energy until 2031. -r KEPCo worked with Members (Ark Valley, CMS, Ninnescah, Sumner-Cowley and Victory) in the south central and southwestern part of the state to secure new delivery points, transmission service and generation resources to serve significant load growth expected in the next few years due to oil exploration in the Missis-sippi Lime formation.

KEPCo oversaw the installation of Diesel Oxidation Catalysts and a monitoring system on each of the 10 -Adam" diesel generators at the Sharpe Generating Station to comply with the EPA's RICE NESHAP rule.KEPCo obtained Southwest Power Pool (SPP)approval to change the designated resource (power supply) for the KEPCo delivery points in the KCPL area Cl i to Westar Fleet. As a part of this transition, KEPCo as-sumes responsibility for the metering at these delivery points.KEPCo obtained network integration transmission service from the SPP for the CMS and Victory delivery points that allows the designated resource to be either Sunflower Fleet or Westar Fleet. KEPCo now has long term firm transmission service from the SPP for all of its delivery points.For 15 years, KSI has provided valuable engineer-ing services for KEPCo Members while covering its expenses and contributing to KEPCo overheads.

This 4 year, KSI was involved in over 51 projects for 12 KEPCo Members and two non-members.

KEPCo Staff continues to work diligently with KEC and Sunflower on legislative issues in Kansas and in Washington, D.C. Staff testified on several bills in 2012 and tracked numerous pieces of legislation.

In Washington, D.C., Staff participated in the NRECA Legislative Confer-ence.KEPCo staff provided on-going technical consulta-tion to Members on renew-able energy issues in areas such as generator intercon-K S C nections, purchase power agreements, metering, regulatory and policy.KEPCo continues to actively engage in developing transmission policy issues at the Southwest Power Pool through participation on key committees, such as the Board of Directors/Members Commit-tee, the Corporate Governance Committee, the Markets and Op-eration Policy Committee, the Strategic Planning Committee, The Change Working Group, and the Transmission Working Group.KEPCo continued to fund and assist Members in the promotion of KEPCo's Energy Efficiency Rebate Program. Since its inception, KEPCo has issued more than 16,000 water heater rebates and nearly 8,000 heating system rebates.Safety of our employees is essential to the contin-ued success of KEPCo. Safety meetings are conduct-ed throughout the year, not only for KEPCo's SCADA Technicians, but for administrative personnel as well.KEPCo is proud to report there were no lost time ac-cidents recorded in 2012.5 KEPCo Member Cooperatives Trustees, Alternates and Managers Ark Valley Electric Cooperative Assn., Inc.PO Box 1246, Hutchinson, KS 67504 620-662-6661 Trustee Rep. -- Joseph Seiwert Alternate Trustee Rep. -- Bob Hall Manager -- Bob Hall Joseph Seiwert Bob Hall Bluestem Electric Cooperative, Inc.PO Box 5, Wamego, KS 66547 785-456-2212 PO Box 513, Clay Center, KS 67432 785-632-3111 Trustee Rep. -- Kenneth J. Maginley Alternate Trustee Rep. -- Robert M. Ohlde Manager -- Kenneth J. Maginley Kenneth Maginley Bob Ohide Brown-Atchison Electric Cooperative Assn., Inc.PO Box 230, Horton, KS 66439 785-486-2117 Trustee Rep. -- Kevin D. Compton Alternate Trustee Rep. -- Robert Perry Manager -- Robert Perry Kevin Compton Robert Perry Butler Rural Electric Cooperative Assn., Inc.PO Box 1242, El Dorado, KS 67042 316-321-9600 Trustee Rep. -- Dale Short Alternate Trustee Rep. -- Riley Walters Manager -- Dale Short Dale Short Riley Walters Caney Valley Electric Cooperative Assn., Inc.PO Box 308, Cedar Vale, KS 67024 620-758-2262 Trustee Rep. -- Dwane Kessinger Alternate Trustee Rep. -- Allen A. Zadorozny Manager -- Allen A. Zadorozny Dwane Kessinger Alien Laaorozny 6 CMS Electric Cooperative, Inc.PO Box 790, Meade, KS 67864 620-873-2184 Trustee Rep. -- Kirk A. Thompson Alternate Trustee Rep. -- Clifford Friesen Manager -- Kirk A. Thompson Kirk Thompson DS&O Electric Cooperative, Inc.PO Box 286, Solomon, KS 67480 785-655-2011 Trustee Rep. -- Dean Allison Alternate Trustee Rep. -- Donald E. Hellwig Manager -- Donald E. Hellwig Dean Allison Flint Hills Rural Electric Cooperative Assn., Inc.PO Box B, Council Grove, KS 66846 620-767-5144 Trustee Rep. -- Robert E. Reece Alternate Trustee Rep. -- William Hein Manager -- Robert E. Reece Bob Reece Heartland Rural Electric Cooperative, Inc.PO Box 40, Girard, KS 66743 620-724-8251 Trustee Rep. -- Dennis Peckman Alternate Trustee Rep. -- Dale Coomes Manager -- Dale Coomes Dennis Peckman LJEC PO Box 70, McLouth, KS 66054 913-796-6111 Trustee Rep. -- Larry H. Stevens Alternate Trustee Rep. -- Steven Foss Manager -- Steven Foss Larry Stevens Lyon-Coffey Electric Cooperative, Inc.PO Box 229, Burlington, KS 66839 620-364-2116 Trustee Rep. -- Scott Whittington Alternate Trustee Rep. -- Donna Williams Manager -- Scott Whittington Scott Whittington uon MieWig Udal %.,UUo1om Steven i-oss 7 KEPCo Member Cooperatives Trustees, Alternates and Managers Ninnescah Electric Cooperative Assn., Inc.PO Box 967, Pratt, KS 67124 620-672-5538 Trustee Rep. -- Gordon Coulter Alternate Trustee Rep. -- Teresa Miller Manager -- Teresa Miller Gordon Coulter Teresa Miller Prairie Land Electric Cooperative, Inc.PO Box 360, Norton, KS 67654 785-877-3323 District Office, Bird City 785-734-2311 District Office, Concordia 785-243-1750 Trustee Rep. -- Gilbert Berland Alternate Trustee Rep. -- Allan J. Miller Gilbert Berland Manager -- Allan J. Miller Allan Miller Radiant Electric Cooperative, Inc.PO Box 390, Fredonia, KS 66736 620-378-2161 Trustee Rep. -- Dennis Duft Alternate Trustee Rep. -- Don Songer Administrative Manager -- Leah Tindle Operations Manager -- Dennis Duft Dennis Duft Don Songer Lea Rolling Hills Electric Cooperative, Inc.PO Box 307, Mankato, KS 66956 785-378-3151 District Offices, Belleville 785-527-2251 Ellsworth 785-472-4021 Trustee Rep. -- Melroy Kopsa Alternate Trustee Rep. -- Leon Eck Manager -- Douglas J. Jackson Melroy Kopsa Leon Eck Dour Sedgwick County Electric Cooperative Assn., Inc.PO Box 220, Cheney, KS 67025 316-542-3131 Trustee Rep. -- Donald Metzen Alternate Trustee Rep. -- Dave Childers Manager -- Dave Childers ih Tindle gJacKson 8 Sumner-Cowley Electric Cooperative, Inc.PO Box 220, Wellington, KS 67152 620-326-3356 Trustee Rep. -- Charles Riggs Alternate Trustee Rep. -- Cletas Rains Manager -- Cletas Rains Twin Valley Electric Cooperative, Inc.PO Box 368, Altamont, KS 67330 620-784-5500 Trustee Rep. -- Bryan W. Coover Alternate Trustee Rep. -- Ron Holsteen Manager -- Ron Holsteen Victory Electric Cooperative Assn., Inc.PO Box 1335, Dodge City, KS 67801 620-227-2139 Trustee Rep. -- Terry Janson Alternate Trustee Rep. -- Daryl Tieben Manager -- Terry Janson L;ietas Iains aryan uoover Ron Hoisteen KEPCo Member Area Map 9 Wolf Creek O&M and A&G Nuclear Fuel latan 2 O&M and 2.2% A&G 1.2%latan 2 Fuel KEPCo O&M and A&G 3.7%2.5%Operating Depr. and Amort.6.5%0/Expenses Interest___________

6.8%Purchased Power 65.3%Peak Demand Sources of Energy 3W0 latan 2 11.1%WAPA S4.0%SWPA 9.2%I Rates 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 0i9 10 11 12 Sunflower 17.0%Wolf Creek 22.8%/IOUs 35.9%2,250,000 Energy Sales 1.,750000 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 00 10 11 12 Years 2012 Message Continued from page 3 latan 2 performed exceptionally well in 2012, providing KEPCo and its Members with 11 percent of their en-ergy requirements.

The decision in 2005 to invest in the ownership of latan 2 has proven to be advantageous for KEPCo and its Members, both in owning firm, economical generation and in reducing exposure to EPA regulatory compliance capital expenditures.

latan 2 became operational in December 2010, and was construct-ed with the latest, state-of-the-art environmental controls.

As the industry continues to invest capital in order to comply with EPA emission regulations, latan 2 currently meets all EPA emission requirements.

Access to affordable capital is essential to the operations of KEPCo. Many companies throughout the U.S.have been hindered from considering capital investment projects due to tightened lending practices resulting from economic and regulatory uncertainty.

KEPCo continues to have access to affordable capital through Rural Utilities Service (RUS) and the National Rural Utilities Cooperative Finance Corporation (CFC). This year, KEPCo received a loan guarantee from RUS for capital addition projects at Wolf Creek. Financing projects through RUS saves our Members a significant amount of money, due to interest rates being considerably less than those offered by commercial lenders. Low-cost capital for future capital expenditures will continue to be accessed in order to reduce KEPCo's debt service.Rate economy and stability is of utmost importance to KEPCo. A culture was established long ago to continually seek out opportunities to improve efficiency and control costs. Implemented in 1990, KEPCo's load management program enables Members to save energy and reduce peak demand. This year, KEPCo was able to shed 38 MW, or nearly eight percent of its peak load.The KEPCo Board of Trustees deserves a special thank you for their hard work and solid leadership dur-ing the past year. In addition, it has been a challenging year for KEPCo staff, who have done a remarkable job meeting the special project demands of 2012 while fulfilling the responsibilities necessary to operate an electric utility. Several of their joint accomplishments are detailed in this report.Going forward, the electric utility industry is saddled with regulatory and economic uncertainty.

The U.S.continues to lack a comprehensive energy policy, and appears unlikely to adopt one in the foreseeable future.Utility regulation in its present form remains burdensome and expensive, and has collared the industry with indecision.

The sheer volume of regulatory rulemaking that is being contemplated as utilities develop strategic and operational plans is unprecedented.

Wise and sensible regulation based on scientific and economic facts and greater reliance on cost-benefit analysis, along with risk versus risk analysis, should replace the present belief that regulation enables policy. Utilities cannot be certain of making the best decisions on critical infra-structure investments designed to last for decades based on rules that continually change. Until certainty is achieved and a comprehensive energy plan is adopted at the federal level, utilities will continue to be tested to supply affordable, reliable energy.Kirk A. Thompson Stephen E. Parr 11 Financial Statements December 31, 2012 and 2011* Mayer Hoffman McCann PC.An Independent CPA Firm 990 SW Fairlawn Road Topeka, Kansas 66606 785-272-3176 ph 785-272-2903 fx www.mhm-pc.com INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT To the Board of Directors Kansas Electric Power Cooperative, Inc.Topeka, Kansas We have audited the accompanying consolidated financial statements of Kansas Electric Power Cooperative, Inc. and subsidiary

("KEPCo"), which comprise the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, and the related consolidated statements of margin, patronage capital, and cash flows for the years then ended and the related notes to the financial statements.

Management's Responsibility for the Financial Statements Management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of these consolidated financial statements in ac-cordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America; this includes the design, imple-mentation, and maintenance of internal control relevant to the preparation and fair presentation of consolidated financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.Auditor's Responsibility Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free from material misstatement.

An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements.

The procedures selected depend on the auditor's judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal control relevant to the entity's preparation and fair presentation of the con-solidated financial statements in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the entity's internal control. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of significant accounting estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements.

We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our qualified audit opinion.Basis for Qualified Opinion As more fully described in Note 3 to the financial statements, certain depreciation and amortization methods have been used in the preparation of the 2012 and 2011 consolidated financial statements which, in our opinion, are not in accor-dance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The effects on the consolidated financial statements of the aforementioned departure are explained in Note 3.Qualified Opinion In our opinion, except for the effects of using the aforementioned depreciation and amortization methods as discussed in Note 3, the consolidated financial statements referred to in the first paragraph present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of KEPCo as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.Other Reporting Required by Government Auditing Standards In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we also have issued our report dated April 8, 2013, on our consid-eration of KEPCo's internal control over financial reporting and our tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts, and grant agreements and other matters. The purpose of that report is to describe the scope of our testing of internal control over financial reporting and compliance and the results of that testing and not to provide an opinion on the internal control over financial reporting or on compliance.

That report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards in considering KEPCo's internal control over financial reporting and compliance.

Mayer Hoffman McCann P.C.Topeka, Kansas April 8, 2013 Member of Kreston International -a global network of Independent accounting firms 12 Consolidated Balance Sheets December 31, 2012 and 2011 December 31, Assets Utility Plant In-service Less allowances for depreciation Net in-service 2012$307,831,825 (137,817,916) 170,013,909 12,700,102 10,122,622 192,836,633 Construction work in progress Nuclear fuel (less accumulated amortization of $19,473,196 and $16,468,205 for 2012 and 2011, respectively)

Total utility plant Restricted Assets Investments in the National Utilities Cooperative Finance Corporation 12,130,495 Bond fund reserve 4,439,704 Decommissioning fund 14,902,017 Investments in other associated organizations 233,560 Total restricted assets 31,705,776 Current Assets Cash and cash equivalents Member account receivables Materials and supplies inventory Other assets and prepaid expenses Total current assets 2,824,134 13,274,272 5,270,885 841,441 22,210,732 2011$306,611,301 (132,653,611) 173,957,690 5,523,257 9,417,840 188,898,787 12,442,030 4,414,774 12,935,122 226,417 30,018,343 8,990,444 7,649,870 4,371,049 535,665 21,547,028 11,076,368 15,649,598 1,660,362 7,565,887 1,263,029 312,430 644,219 38,171,893

$278,636,051 Other Long-term Assets Deferred charges Wolf Creek disallowed costs (less accumulated amortization of$15,663,720 and $14,906,553 for 2012 and 2011, respectively) 10,319,201 Wolf Creek deferred plants costs (less accumulated amortization of$34,429,111 and $31,299,195 for 2012 and 2011, respectively) 12,519,682 Wolf Creek decommissioning regulatory asset (4,328,140)

Deferred incremental outage costs 1,286,856 Other deferred charges (less accumulated amortization of $8,991,323 and $8,632,685 for 2012 and 2011, respectively) 1,184,847 Unamortized debt issuance costs 225,477 Other 676,008 Total long-term assets 21,883,931 Total assets $268,637,072 13 Consolidated Balance Sheets December 31, 2012 and 2011 December 31, Liabilities and Patronage Capital Patronage Capital Memberships Patronage Capital Accumulated other comprehensive loss Total patronage capital 2012$ 3,200 67,431,537 (8,789,873) 58,644,864 149,068,800 Long-term Debt Other Long-term Liabilities Wolf Creek decommissioning liability Wolf Creek pension and postretirement benefit plans Wolf Creek deferred compensation Other deferred credits Total other long-term liabilities Current Liabilities Current maturities of long-term debt Accounts payable Payroll and payroll-related liabilities Accrued property taxes Accrued income taxes Accrued interest payable Total current liabilities 11,810,322 11,487,819 1,035,171 41,432 24,374,744 20,070,937 13,923,363 345,883 1,587,064 (1,092)622,509 36,548,664

$268,637,072 2011$ 3,200 55,514,966 (8,753,507) 46,764,659 170,480,243 16,298,800 11,609,229 959,392 33,986 28,901,407 18,781,858 11,316,183 328,352 1,406,772 (245)656,822 32,489,742

$278,636,051 Total patronage capital and liabilities 14 Consolidated Statements of Margin December 31, 2012 and 2011 Operating Revenues Sale of electric energy Operating Expenses Power purchased Nuclear fuel Plant operations Plant maintenance Administrative and general Amortization of deferred charges Depreciation and decommissioning Total operating expenses Net operating revenues Interest and Other Deductions Interest on long-term debt Amortization of debt issuance costs Other deductions Total interest and other deductions Operating income Other Income/(Expense)

Interest income Other income Income tax Total other income Net margin Net Margin Other comprehensive income Net earnings arising during year Less amortization of prior year service costs included in net periodic pension costs Comprehensive income Consolidated Statements of Patronage For the years ending December 31, 2012$170,131,188 104,171,556 3,511,788 17,587,807 6,616,513 6,021,574 4,245,720 6,902,435 149,057,393 21,073,795 10,303,239 86,954 79,752 10,469,945 10,603,850 974,021 338,700 1,312,721$11,916,571

$11,916,571 723,090 (759,456)$11,880,205 2011$160,665,182 98,753,310 3,042,914 16,079,663 5,920,215 5,743,089 4,298,279 6,372,928 140,210,398 20,454,784 10,786,538 95,244 79,744 10,961,526 9,493,258 871,618 505,376 (7,516)1,369,478$10,862,736

$10,862,736 (715,020)(2,454,035

$7,693,681 December 31, 2012 and 2011 Balance at December 31, 2010 Net margin Defined benefit pension plans: Net loss arising during year Less amortization of prior year service costs included in net periodic pension costs Comprehensive income Balance at December 31, 2011 Net margin Defined benefit pension plans: Net earnings arising during year Less amortization of prior year service costs included in net periodic pension costs Comprehensive income Balance at December 31, 2012 Capital Patronage Capital$44,652,230 10,862,736 Memberships

$3,200 Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)$(5,584,452)

Total$39,070,978 10,862,736 (715,020)(715,020)(2,454,035)

(2,454,035) 3,200 55,514,966 11,916,571 (8,753,507) 723,090 (759,456)$(8,789,873) 46,764,659 11,916,571 723,090 (759,456)$58,644,864

$3,200$67,431,537 15 Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows December 31, 2012 and 2011 Cash Flow From Operating Activities Net margin Adjustments to reconcile net margin to net cash flows from operating activities Depreciation and amortization Decommissioning Amortization of nuclear fuel Amortization of deferred charges Amortization or deferred incremental outage costs Amortization of debt issuance costs Changes in Member accounts receivable Materials and supplies Other assets and prepaid expense Accounts payable Payroll and payroll-related liabilities Accrued property tax Accrued interest payable Accrued income taxes Other long-term liabilities Net cash flows from operating activities Cash Flows From Investing Activities Additions to electrical plant Additions to nuclear fuel Additions to deferred charges Additions to deferred incremental outage costs Investments in decommissioning fund assets Investments in associated organizations Investments in bond reserve assets Proceeds from the sale of property Net cash flows from investing activities Cash Flows From Financing Activities Principal payments on long-term debt Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt Payments unapplied Net cash flows from financing activities Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents Cash and Cash Equivalents, Beginning of year Cash and Cash Equivalents, End of Year Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information Interest paid For the years ending December 31, 2012$11,916,571 6,417,670 1,500,024 3,004,990 4,245,720 7,179,415 86,953 (5,624,402)

(899,836)(305,776)2,607,180 17,531 180,292 (34,313)(847)(106,340)30,184,832 (9,658,692)

(3,709,772)

(280,455)(900,384)(1,966,895) 304,392 (24,930)7,958 (16,228,778)

(18,781,860) 1,048,000 (2,388,504)

(20,122,364)

(6,166,310) 8,990,444$ 2,824,134$10,417,400 2011$10,862,736 5,895,848 47,317 2,604,250 4,298,277 7,965,177 95,243 4,542,945 (749,197)(32,946)(754,741)3,054 6,482 (107,769)(2,182)(1,038,178) 33,636,316 (5,684,518)

(2,330,827)

(21,452)(13,911,758)

(572,960)(195,045)(9,279)20,504 (22,705,335)

(17,676,717) 8,523,204 2,863,733 (6,289,780) 4,641,201 4,349,243$ 8,990,444$10,974,100 16 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements December 31, 2012 and 2011 (1) Nature of Operations and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Nature ofOperations

-Kansas Electric Power Cooperative, Inc., and its subsidiary (KEPCo), headquartered in Topeka, Kansas, was incorporated in 1975 as a not-for-profit generation and transmission cooperative (G&T). KEPCo was granted a limited certificate of convenience and authority by the Kansas Corporation Commission (KCC) in 1980 to act as a G&T public utility. It is KEPCo's responsibility to procure an adequate and reliable power supply for its 19 distribution rural electric cooperative members pursuant to all requirements of its power supply contracts.

KEPCo is governed by a board of trustees representing each of its 19 members, which collectively serve approximately 120,000 electric meters in rural Kansas.System of Accounts -KEPCo maintains its accounting records substantially in accordance with the Rural Utilities Service (RUS) Uniform Systems of Accounts and in accordance with accounting practices prescribed by the KCC.Rates -Under a 2009 change in Kansas state law, KEPCo has elected to be exempt from KCC regulation for most purposes, including the setting of rates. Rates are set by action of the Board, subject only to statutory review by the KCC if demanded by four or more members. KEPCo's rates were last set by the KCC by an order effective September 1, 2008. KEPCo's rates now include an Energy Cost Adjustment (ECA)mechanism, an annual Demand Cost Adjustment (DCA) mechanism and a Margin Stabilization Adjustment (MSA) mechanism, allowing KEPCo to pass along increases in certain energy and demand costs to its member cooperatives.

Principles of Consolidation

-The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of KEPCo and its wholly owned subsidiary, KEPCo Services, Inc. Undivided interests in jointly owned generation facilities are consolidated on a pro rata basis. All material intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Estimates

-The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Utility Plant and Depreciation

-Utility plant is stated at cost. Cost and additions to utility plant include contractual work, direct labor, materials and interest on funds used during construction.

No interest has been capitalized in 2012 and 2011. The cost of repairs and minor replacements are charged to operating expenses as appropriate.

The original cost of utility plant retired and the cost of removal less salvage are charged to accumulated depreciation.

The composite depreciation rate for electric generation plant for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 was 3.63% and 3.50%, respectively.

The provision for depreciation computed on a straight-line basis for electric and other components of utility plant is as follows: Transportation and equipment 25-33 years Office furniture and fixtures 10-20 years Leasehold improvements 20 years Transmission equipment (metering, communication and SCADA) 10 years 17 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements December 31, 2012 and 2011 latan 2 -latan 2 is an 850 MW high efficiency coal-fired power plant utilizing state-of-the-art environmental controls that became commercially operational December 31, 2010. KEPCo owns a 3.53% share of latan 2, or 30 MW. latan 2, located in Weston, MO, is operated and majority owned by KCP&L.Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation

-KEPCo owns 6% of Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation (WCNOC), which is located near Burlington, Kansas. The remainder is owned by the Kansas City Power &Light Company (KCPL) 47% and Kansas Gas & Electric Company (KGE) 47%. KGE is a wholly owned subsidiary of Westar Energy, Inc. KCPL is a wholly owned subsidiary of Great Plains Energy, Inc. KEPCo's undivided interest in WCNOC is consolidated on a pro rata basis. KEPCo is entitled to a proportionate share of the capacity and energy from WCNOC, which is used to supplement a portion of KEPCo's members'requirements.

KEPCo is billed on a daily basis for 6% of the operations, maintenance, administrative and general costs, and cost of plant additions related to WCNOC.WCNOC's operating license expires in 2045. Wolf Creek is regulated by the nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), with respect to licensing, operations and safety related requirements.

WCNOC disposes of all classes of its low-level radioactive waste at existing third-party repositories.

Should disposal capability become unavailable, WCNOC is able to store its low-level radioactive waste in an on-site facility for up to four years under current regulations.

Nuclear Fuel -The cost of nuclear fuel in the process of refinement, conversion, enrichment and fabrication is recorded as a utility plant asset at original cost and is amortized to nuclear fuel expenses based upon the quantity of heat produced for the generation of electric power. The permanent disposal of spent fuel is the responsibility of the Department of Energy (DOE). KEPCo pays one dollar per net megawatt (MWh) of nuclear generation to the DOE for the future disposal service. These disposal costs are charged to nuclear fuel expense.Nuclear Decommissioning

-Nuclear decommissioning is a nuclear industry term for the permanent shutdown of a nuclear power plant and the removal of radioactive components in accordance with Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) requirements.

The NRC will terminate a plant's license and release the property for unrestricted use when a company has reduced the residual radioactivity of a nuclear plant to a level mandated by the NRC. The NRC requires companies with nuclear plants to prepare formal financial plans to fund nuclear decommissioning.

These plans are designed so that sufficient funds required for nuclear decommissioning will be accumulated prior to the expiration of the license of the related nuclear power plant.Wolf Creek files a nuclear decommissioning site study with the KCC every three years.The KCC reviews nuclear decommissioning plans in two phases. Phase one is the approval of the revised nuclear decommissioning study including the estimated costs to decommission the plant. Phase two involves the review and approval of a funding schedule prepared by the owner of the plant detailing how it plans to fund the future-year dollar amount of its pro rata share of the decommissioning costs.In 2011, we revised the nuclear decommissioning study. Based on the study, our share of decommissioning costs, including decontamination, dismantling and site restoration, is estimated to be $37.8 million. This amount compares to the prior site study estimate of $35.6 million. The site study cost estimate represents the estimate to decommission Wolf Creek as of the site study year. The actual nuclear decommissioning costs may vary form the estimates because of changes in regulations and technologies as well as changes in costs for labor, materials and equipment.

We are allowed to recover nuclear decommissioning costs in our prices over a period equal to the operating 18 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements December 31, 2012 and 2011 license of Wolf Creek, which is through 2045. The NRC requires that fund sufficient to meet nuclear decommissioning obligations be held in a trust. We believe that the KCC approved funding level will also be sufficient to meet the NRC requirement.

Our consolidated financial results would be materially affected if we were not allowed to recover in our prices the full amount of the funding requirement.

We recovered in our prices and deposited in an external trust fund for nuclear decommissioning approximately

$0.5 million in 2012 and $0.5 million in 2011. We record our investment in the NDT fund at fair value, which approximated

$14.9 million and $12.9 million as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

Asset retirement obligation

-KEPCo recognizes and estimates the legal obligation associated with the cost to decommission Wolf Creek. KEPCo initially recognized an asset retirement obligation at fair value for the estimated cost with a corresponding amount capitalized as part of the cost of the related long-lived asset and depreciated over the useful life.A reconciliation of the asset retirement obligation for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 is as follows: 2012 2011 Balance at January 1 $16,298,000

$15,356,672 Accretion 622,388 942,128 Decrease from 2011 study (5,110,066)

-Balance at December 31 $11,810,322

$16,298,000 Any net margin effects are deferred in the Wolf Creek decommissioning regulatory asset and will be collected from members in future electric rates.Cash and Cash Equivalents

-All highly liquid investments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less are considered to be cash equivalents and are stated at cost, which approximates fair value.Cash equivalents consisted primarily of repurchase agreements, money market accounts and certificates of deposit.The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation insures amounts held by each institution in the Company's name in interest bearing accounts up to $250,000.

For the period, December 31,2010 through December 31, 2012, all noninterest-bearing transactional accounts are fully insured, regardless of the balance of the account at all FDIC-insured institutions.

Beginning January 1, 2013, all amounts held by each FDIC-insured institution in the Company's name are insured up to $250,000.

At various times during the fiscal year, the Company's cash in bank balances exceeded the federally insured limits.KEPCo's repurchase agreements have collateral pledged by a financial institution, which are securities that are backed by the federal government.

Accounts Receivable

-Accounts receivable are stated at the amount billed to members and customers.

KEPCo provides allowances for doubtful accounts, which is based upon a review of outstanding receivables, historical collection information and existing economic conditions.

Materials and Supplies Inventory

-Materials and supplies inventory are valued at average cost.Unamortized Debt Issuance Costs -Unamortized debt issue costs relate to the issuance of the floating/19 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements December 31, 2012 and 2011 fixed rate pollution control revenue bonds, mortgage notes payable to the National Rural Utilities Cooperative Finance Corporation (CFC) trusts and fees for re-pricing the Federal Financing Bank (FFB) debt. These costs are being amortized using the effective interest method over the remaining life of the bonds and notes.Cash Surrender Value of Life Insurance Contracts

-The following amounts related to Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation (WCNOC) corporate-owned life insurance contracts, primarily with one highly rated major insurance company, are included in other long-term assets on the consolidated balance sheets.2012 2011 Cash surrender value of contracts

$6,470,143

$6,121,449 Borrowings against contracts (6,246,370)

(5,895,140)

$ 226,773 $ 226,309 Borrowings against contracts include a prepaid interest charge. KEPCo pays interest on these borrowings at a rate of 5.00% and 5.81% for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

Revenues -Revenues are recognized during the month the electricity is sold. Revenues from the sale of electricity are recorded based on usage by member cooperatives and customers and on contracts and scheduled power usages as appropriate.

Income Taxes -As a tax-exempt cooperative, KEPCo is exempt from income taxes under Section 501(c)(12) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. Accordingly, provisions for income taxes have not been reflected in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

KEPCo is no longer subject to federal or state income tax examinations by taxing authorities for years prior to 2009.KEPCo Services, Inc., a subsidiary of Kansas Electric Power Cooperative, Inc., is not exempt from income taxes. The organization's present accounting policy for the evaluation of uncertain tax positions is to review those positions on an annual basis. A liability would be recorded in the financial statements during the period which, based on all available evidence, management believes it is more likely than not that the tax position would not be sustained upon examination by taxing authorities and the liability would be incurred by the organization.

There has been no interest or penalties recognized neither in the statements of margin nor in the balance sheets related to uncertain tax positions.

In addition, no tax positions exist for which it is reasonably possible that the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits will significantly increase or decrease within the next twelve months. Tax years with open statutes of limitations are 2009 and forward.(2) Factors That Could Affect Future Operating Results KEPCo currently applies accounting standards that recognize the economic effects of rate regulation and, accordingly, has recorded regulatory assets and liabilities related to its generation and transmission operations in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 980, Regulated Operations.

In the event KEPCo determines that it no longer meets the criteria of ASC 980, the accounting impact could be a noncash charge to operations of an amount that would be material.

Criteria that could give rise to the discontinuance of ASC 980 include: 1) increasing competition that restricts KEPCo's ability to establish prices to recover specific costs and 2) a significant change in the manner in which rates are set by regulators from a cost-based regulation to another form of regulation.

20 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements December 31, 2012 and 2011 KEPCo periodically reviews these criteria to ensure the continuing application of ASC 980 is appropriate.

Any changes that would require KEPCo to discontinue the application of ASC 980 due to increased competition, regulatory changes or other events may significantly impact the valuation of KEPCo's investment in utility plant, its investment in Wolf Creek and necessitate the write-off of regulatory assets. At this time, the effect of competition and the amount of regulatory assets that could be recovered in such an environment cannot be predicted.

The 1992 Energy Policy Act began the process of restructuring the United States electric utility industry by permitting the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to order electric utilities to allow third parties to sell electric power to wholesale customers over their transmission systems. KEPCo has elected to deregulate its rate making for sales to its members under recent statutory amendments.

Subject to the possibility of KCC review, KEPCo's member rates are now set by action of the Board. KEPCo's ability to timely recover its costs is enhanced by this change.(3) Departures From Generally Accepted Accounting Principles Effective February 1, 1987, the KCC issued an order to KEPCo requiring the use of present worth (sinking fund) depreciation and amortization.

As more fully described in Note 6, such depreciation and amortization methods constituted phase-in plans that did not meet the requirements of ASC 980-340 Regulated Operation, Other Assets and Deferred Costs.Effective February 1, 2002, the KCC issued an order that extended the depreciable life of Wolf Creek from 40 years to 60 years. This order also permitted recovery in rates of the $53.5 million cumulative difference between historical present worth (sinking fund) depreciation and amortization and straight-line depreciation and amortization of the Wolf Creek generation plant and disallowed costs over a 15-year period. Recovery of these costs in rates is included in operating revenues, and the related amortization expense is included in deferred charges in the consolidated statements of margin.The effect of these departures from accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America is to overstate (understate) the following items in the consolidated financial statements by the following amounts: 2012 2011 Deferred charges $14,254,536

$17,818,171 Patronage capital $14,254,536

$17,818,171 Net margin $ (3,563,634)

$ (3,563,634)

(4) Investments in Associated Organizations Investments in associated organizations are carried at cost. At December 31, 2012 and 2011, investments in associated organizations consisted of the following:

2012 2011 Cooperative Finance Corporation Memberships

$ 1,000 $ 1,000 Capital term certificates 395,970 395,970 Patronage capital certificates 792,064 562,375 Equity term certificates 8,441,461 8,982,685 Member capital certificates 2,500,000 2,500,000 12,130,495 12,442,030 Other 233,560 226,417$12,364,055

$12,668,447 21 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements December 31, 2012 and 2011 (5) Bond Fund Reserve KEPCo has entered into a bond covenant whereby KEPCo is required to maintain, with a trustee, a bond fund reserve of approximately

$4.4 million. This stipulated amount is sufficient to satisfy certain future interest and principal obligations.

The amount held in the bond fund reserve is invested by the trustee in tax-exempt municipal securities, pursuant to the restrictions of the indenture agreement, which are carried at amortized cost.(6) Deferred Charges Wolf Creek Disallowed Costs -Effective October 1, 1985, the KCC issued a rate order relating to KEPCo's investment in Wolf Creek, which disallowed

$26.0 million of KEPCo's investment in Wolf Creek ($10.3 million net of accumulated amortization as of December 31, 2012). A subsequent rate order, effective February 1, 1987, allows KEPCo to recover these disallowed costs and other costs related to the disallowed portion (recorded as deferred charges) for the period from September 3, 1985 through January 31, 1987, over a 27.736-year period starting February 1, 1987. Pursuant to a KCC rate order dated December 30, 1998, the disallowed portion's recovery period was extended to a 30-year period. Through December 31, 2001, KEPCo used the present worth (sinking fund) method to recover the disallowed costs, which enabled it to meet the times-interest-earned ratio and debt service requirements in the KCC rate order dated January 30, 1987. The method used by KEPCo through 2001 constituted a phase-in plan that did not meet the requirements of ASC 980- 340, Regulated Operations, Other Assets and Deferred Costs.Effective February 1, 2002, the KCC issued an order permitting recovery in rates of the $6.5 million cumulative difference between historical present worth (sinking fund) and straight-line amortization of Wolf Creek disallowed costs over a 15-year period. Such depreciation practice does not constitute a phase-in plan that meets the requirements of ASC 980-340.If the disallowed costs were recovered using a method in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, the costs would have been expensed in their entirety upon implementation of the KCC order, with a corresponding decrease in patronage capital.Wolf Creek Deferred Plant Costs -Effective February 1, 2002, the KCC issued an order permitting recovery in rates of the $46.9 million cumulative difference between historical present worth (sinking fund) depreciation and straight-line depreciation of Wolf Creek generation plant over a 15-year period. Such depreciation practice does not constitute a phase-in plan that meets the requirements of ASC 980-340. In 2002, this cumulative difference was reclassified from utility plant allowance for depreciation to deferred charges on the consolidated balance sheets to reflect the amount as a regulatory asset.Amortization of the Wolf Creek deferred plant costs is included in amortization of deferred charges and amounts to $3.1 million for each of the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011.If the deferred plant costs were recovered using a method in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, the costs would have been expensed in their entirety upon implementation of the KCC order, with a corresponding decrease in patronage capital.Deferred Incremental Outage Costs -In 1991, the KCC issued an order that allowed KEPCo to defer its 6%share of the incremental operating, maintenance and replacement power costs associated with the periodic refueling of Wolf Creek. Such costs are deferred during each refueling outage and are being amortized over the approximate 18-month operating cycle coinciding with the recognition of the related revenues.

Additions 22 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements December 31, 2012 and 2011 to the deferred incremental outage costs were $0.9 million and $13.9 million in 2012 and 2011, respectively.

The current year amortization of the deferred incremental outage costs was $7.2 million and $8 million in 2012 and 2011, respectively.

Other Deferred Charges -KEPCo includes in other deferred charges the early call premium resulting from refinancing.

These early call premiums are amortized using the effective interest method over the remaining life of the new agreements.

(7) Line of Credit As of December 31, 2012, KEPCo has a $20 million line of credit available with the Cooperative Finance Corporation.

There were no funds borrowed against the line of credit at December 31, 2012. The line of credit requires the Cooperative to pay down the balance to zero annually.

Interest rates vary and were 2.90% at December 31, 2012, and 3.20% at December 31, 2011. This line of credit expires in March 2014.At December 31, 2012, KEPCo has a $10 million line of credit available with CoBank, ACB. There were no funds borrowed against the line of credit at December 31, 2012. Interest rate options, as selected by the Company, are a weekly quoted variable rate in which CoBank establishes a rate on the first business day of each week or a LIBOR option at a fixed rate equal to LIBOR plus 1.6%. This line of credit expires March 2013.(8) Long-Term Debt Long-term debt consists of mortgage notes payable to the United States of America acting through the Federal Financing Board, the CFC and others. Substantially all of KEPCo's assets are pledged as collateral.

The terms of the notes as of December 31 are as follows: Mortgage notes payable to the FFB at fixed rates varying from .898% to 9.21%, payable in quarterly installments through 2043 Mortgage notes payable to the Grantor Trust Series 1997 at a rate of 7.522%, payable semi-annually, principal payments commencing in 1999 and continuing annually through 2017 Floating/fixed rate pollution control revenue bonds, City of Burlington, Kansas, Pooled Series 1985C, variable interest rate of .42%, payable annually through 2015 Mortgage notes payable, equity certificate loans and member capital security notes to the CFC at fixed rates of 3.10% to 7.70%, payable quarterly through 2034.Less current maturities 2012$ 53,630,090 23,240,000 2011$ 63,367,854 27,540,000 9,195,000 12,395,000 83.074.647 169,139,737 (20,070,937)

$ 149,068,800 85.959.247 189,262,101 (18,781,858)

$170,480,243 23 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements December 31, 2012 and 2011 Aggregate maturities of long-term debt for the next five years and thereafter are as follows: 2013 $ 20,070,937 2014 21,608,185 2015 20,870,676 2016 11,726,861 2017 10,213,039 Thereafter 84,650,039

$ 169,139,737 Restrictive covenants require KEPCo to design rates that would enable it to maintain a times-interest earned ratio of at least 1.05 and debt-service coverage ratio of at least 1.0, on average, in the two best years out of the three most recent calendar years. The covenants also prohibit distribution of net patronage capital or margins until, after giving effect to any such distribution, total patronage capital equals or exceeds 20% of total assets, unless such distribution is approved by the Rural Utility Service. KEPCo was in compliance with such restrictive covenants as of December 31, 2012 and 2011.In 1997, KEPCo refinanced its mortgage notes payable to the 1988 CFC Grantor Trust through the establishment of a new CFC Grantor Trust Series 1997 (the Series 1997 Trust) by CFC. This refinancing reduced the guaranteed interest rate payable on the mortgage notes to a fixed rate of 7.522%. The mortgage notes payable are pre-payable at any time with no prepayment penalties.

The Trust holds certain rights the Cooperative assigned to the Trust under an interest rate swap agreement.

The swap agreement was put into place in order to mitigate the interest rate risk inherent in the Trust, which holds a fixed rate asset with a variable rate obligation.

The swap agreement terminates in 2017, but is subject to early termination upon the early redemption of the debt. However, any termination costs relating to the termination of the assigned interest rate swaps is KEPCo's responsibility.

At December 31, 2012, the termination obligation associated with the assigned swap agreement to early retire the mortgage notes payable is approximately

$4.3 million.This fair value estimate is based on information available at December 31, 2012, and is expected to fluctuate in the future based on changes in interest rates and outstanding principal balance.KEPCo also is exposed to possible credit loss in the event of noncompliance by the counterparty to the swap agreement.

However, KEPCo does not anticipate nonperformance by the counterparty.

(9) Benefit Plans National Rural Electric Cooperative Association (NRECA) Retirement and Security Program -KEPCo participates in the NRECA Retirement and Security Program for its employees.

THE NRECA is a defined benefit pension plan qualified under Section 401 and tax-exempt under Section 501 (a) of the Internal Revenue Code. It is a multiemployer plan under the accounting standards.

A unique characteristic of a multiemployer plan compared to a single employer plan is that all plan assets are available to pay benefits of any plan participant.

Separate asset accounts are not maintained for participating employers.

This means that assets contributed by on employer may be used to provide benefits to employees of other participating employers.

24 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements December 31, 2012 and 2011 KEPCo's contributions to the RS Plan in 2012 and 2011 represented less than 5 percent of the total contributions made to the plan by all participating employers.

KEPCo's expense under this program was approximately

$0.5 million, for both years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011. There have been no significant changes that affect the comparability of 2012 and 2011 contributions.

NRECA Savings 401(k) Plan -All employees of KEPCo are eligible to participate in the NRECA Savings 401(k) Plan. Under the plan, KEPCo contributes an amount not to exceed 5%, dependent upon each employee's level of participation and completion of one year of service, of the respective employee's base pay to provide additional retirement benefits.

KEPCo contributed approximately

$0.1 million to the plan for each of the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011.WCNOC Pension and Postretirement Plans -KEPCo has an obligation to the WCNOC retirement, supplemental retirement and postretirement medical plans for its 6% ownership interest in Wolf Creek. The plans provide for benefits upon retirement, normally at age 65. In accordance with the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, KEPCo has satisfied its minimum funding requirements.

Benefits under the plans reflect the employee's compensation, years of service and age at retirement.

WCNOC uses a measurement date of December 31 for its retirement plan, supplemental retirement plan and postretirement plan (collectively, the Plans). Information about KEPCo's 6% of the Plans' funded status follows: Pension Benefits 2012 2011 Postretirement Benefits 2012 2011 Change in benefit obligation:

Benefit obligation beginning of year $Service cost Interest cost Plan participants' contributions Benefits paid Actuarial losses (gains)Amendments Other Benefit obligations, end of year $20,603,780 773,872 962,263 (1,094,009) 1,252,917 83,034 22,581,857

$ 16,782,406 632,826 940,792 (387,117)2,634,873$1,293,078 24,483 52,432 77,589 (126,126)85,357$1,294,884 21,132 58,514 78,334 (124,969)(45,977)11,160$1,293,078

$ 20,603,780

$1,406,813 Pen 2 201 Change in plan assets: Fair value of plan assets, beginning of year $ 10,305,630 Actual return on plan plan assets 1,501,730 Employer contributions 1,772,810 Plan participants' contributions Benefits paid (1,063,016)

Fair value of plan assets, end of year 12,517,154 Funded status, end of year $(10,064,703) sion Benefits 2011$ 9,713,047 (329,141)1,277,849 (356,125)10,305,630

$(10,298,150)

Postretirement Benefits 2012 2011$ 487 49,748 77,589 (126,126)1,698$(1,405,115)

$47,123 78,333 (124,969)487$(1,292,591) 25 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements December 31, 2012 and 2011 Amounts recognized in the consolidated balance sheets: Other long-term liabilities Wolf Creek pension and postretirement benefit plans 2012$11,487,819 2011$11,609,229 Amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) not yet recognized as components of net periodic benefit cost consist of: Pension Benefits 2012 2011$ 8,238,528

$ 8,332,722 86,195 3,875 Postretirement Benefits 2012 2011$ 465,118 $ 409,528 Net Loss Prior service cost Transition obligation

$ 8,324,723$ 8,336,597 32$ 465,150 7,382$ 416,910 Information for the pension plan with an accumulated benefit obligation in excess of plan assets: Projected benefit obligation Accumulated benefit obligation Fair value of plan assets Pension Benefits 2012 2011$ 22,581,857

$20,603,781 18,092,202 16,421,267 12,517,153 10,305,630 Postretirement Benefits 2012 2011$1,406,813

$ 1,293,078 487 1,698 Weighted average actuarial assumptions used to determine net periodic benefit obligation:

Pension Benefits 2012 2011 4.16% 4.55%4.00% 4.00%Postretirement Benefits 2012 2011 3.78% 4.10%N/A N/A Discount rate Annual salary increase rate Wolf Creek uses a measurement date of December 31 for its pension and post-retirement benefit plans.The discount rate to determine the current year pension obligation and the following year's pension expense is based on a bond selection-settlement portfolio approach.

This approach develops a discount rate by selecting a portfolio of high quality, non-callable corporate bonds that generate a sufficient cash flow to provide for the projected benefit payments of the plan. After the bond portfolio is selected, a single interest rate is determined that equates the present value of the plan's projected benefit payments discounted at this rate with the market value of the bonds selected.I Pension Benefits 2012 2011 Postretirement Ber 2012 Components of net periodic cost (benefit):

Service cost Interest cost Expected return on plant assets Amortization Transition obligation, net Prior service cost Actuarial loss, net Net periodic cost$ 773,872 962,263 (839,619)714 685,000 1,582,230$ 632,826 940,792 (753,900)6,653 2,087 457,736 1,286,194$ 24,483 52,432 7,350 29,767 114,032$ 2 5 nefits 2011 1,132 8,514 7,350 29,054 116,050 26 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements December 31, 2012 and 2011 Pension Benefits Postretirement Benefits Other changes in plan obligations recognized in other comprehensive income: Current year actuarial loss (gain)Amortization of actuarial loss Current year prior service cost Amortization of prior service cost Amortization of transition obligation Total recognized in other comprehensive income Total recognized in net periodic cost and other comprehensive income 2012 590,806 (685,000)83,034 (714)(11,874)$ 1,570,356 2011 3,717,913 (457,736)(2,087)(6,653)3,251,437$ 4,537,631 2012 85,357 (29,767)(7,350)48,240$ 162,272 2011 (45,977)(29,054)(7,350)(82,381)$ 33,669 Weighted average actuarial assumptions used to determine net periodic cost: Discount rate 4.55% 5.45% 4.10% 4.90%Expected long term return on plan assets 7.50% 7.50% N/A N/A Compensation rate Increase 4.00% 4.00% N/A N/A We estimate that we will amortize the following amounts from regulatory assets into net periodic cost in 2013: Actuarial loss Prior service cost Transition obligation Total Pension Benefits$ 691,980 7,440$ 699,420 Postretirement Benefits$ 33,780 32$ 33,812 The expected long-term rate of return on plan assets is based on historical and projected rates of return for current and planned asset classes in the plans' investment portfolios.

Assumed projected rates of return for each asset class were selected after analyzing long-term historical experience and future expectations of the volatility of the various asset classes. Based on target asset allocations for each asset class, the overall expected rate of return for the portfolios was developed, adjusted for historical and expected experience of active portfolio management results compared to benchmark returns and for the effect of expenses paid from plan assets.For measurement purposes, the assumed annual health care cost growth rates were as follows: Health care cost trend rate assumed for next year Rate to which the cost trend rate is assumed to decline Year that the rate reaches the ultimate trend rate 2012 8.0%5.0%2011 8.0%5.0%2019 2018 27 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements December 31, 2012 and 2011 The health care cost trend rate affects the projected benefit obligation.

A 1% change in assumed health care cost growth rates would have effects shown in the following table: One percentage One percentage point increase point decrease Effect on total of service and interest cost (1,226) 1,239 Effect on post-retirement benefit obligation (16,450) 16,353 In 2012, Wolf Creek changed its investment advisor resulting in the sale of its then existing levels 1, 2 and 3 investments and the purchase of other level 2 and 3 investments.

Its pension and post-retirement plan investment strategy is to manage assets in a prudent mannerwith regard to preserving principal while providing reasonable returns. It has adopted a long-term investment horizon such that the chances and duration of investment losses are carefully weighed against the long- term potential for appreciation of assets. Part of its strategy includes managing interest rate sensitivity of plan assets relative to the associated liabilities.

The primary objective of the pension plan is to provide a source of retirement income for its participants and beneficiaries, and the primary financial objective of the plan is to improve its funded status. The primary objective of the post-retirement benefit plan is growth in assets and preservation of principal, while minimizing interim volatility, to meet anticipated claims of plan participants.

Wolf Creek delegates the management of its pension and post-retirement benefit plan assets to independent investment advisors who hire and dismiss investment managers based upon various factors. The investment advisors strive to diversify investments across asset classes, sectors and manager styles to minimize the risk of large losses, based upon objectives and risk tolerance specified by Wolf Creek, which include allowable and/or prohibited investment types. It measures and monitors investment risk on an ongoing basis through quarterly investment portfolio reviews and annual liability measurements.

The target allocations for Wolf Creek's pension plan assets are 31 % to international equity securities, 25% to domestic equity securities, 25% to debt securities, 10% to real estate securities, 5% to commodity investments and 4% to other investments.

The investments in both international and domestic equity include investments in large-, mid- and small-cap companies, private equity funds and investment funds with underlying investments similar to those previously mentioned.

The investments in debt include core and high-yield bonds. Core bonds include funds invested in investment grade debt securities of corporate entities, obligations of U.S. and foreign governments and their agencies, and private debt securities.

High-yield bonds include a fund with underlying investments in non-investment grade debt securities of corporate entities, private placements and bank debt. Real estate securities include funds invested in commercial and residential real estate properties while commodity investments include funds invested in commodity-related instruments.

All of Wolf Creek's pension plan assets are recorded at fair value using daily net asset values as reported by the trustee. However, level 3 investments in real estate funds and alternative funds are invested in underlying investments that are illiquid and require significant judgment when measuring them at fair value using market-and income-based models. Significant unobservable inputs for underlying real estate investments include estimated market discount rates, projected cash flows and estimated value into perpetuity.

Alternative funds invest in a wide range of investments typically with low correlations to traditional investments.

Similar to other assets measured at fair value, GAAP establishes a hierarchal framework for disclosing the transparency of the inputs utilized in measuring pension and post-retirement benefit plan assets at fair value.From time to time, the Wolf Creek pension trust may buy and sell investments resulting in changes within the hierarchy.

Where quoted market prices are available in an active market, plan assets are classified within 28 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements December 31, 2012 and 2011 Level 1 of the valuation hierarchy.

Level 1 plan assets include cash equivalents, equity and debt investments.

If quoted market prices are not available, then fair values are estimated by using pricing models, quoted prices of plan assets with similar characteristics or discounted cash flows. Level 2 investments include cash equivalents, equity, debt and commodity investments.

In certain cases where Level 1 or Level 2 inputs are not available, plan assets are classified within Level 3 of the hierarchy and include certain real estate investments.

Significant inputs and valuation techniques used in measuring Level 3 fair values include market discount rates, projected cash flows and the estimated value into perpetuity.

The following table provides the fair value of KEPCo's 6% share of Wolf Creek's pension plan assets and the corresponding level of hierarchy as of December 31, 2012 and 2011: Fair Value Measurements Using Quoted Prices in Active Significant Markets for Other Significant Identical Observable Unobservable Assets Inputs Inputs (Level 1) (Level 2) (Level 3)December 31, 2012 Cash equivalents Equity securities U.S. companies International companies Debt securities Core bonds Commodities Alternative investments Real estate Fair Value$ 37,956 3,102,797 3,891,671 3,161,175 611,305 497,891 1,214,360$12,517,155

$-$ 37,956-3,102,797-3,891,671-3,161,175-611,305-634,695$497,891 579,665$1,077,556 Total$$11,439,599 Fair Value Measurements Usinq December 31, 2011 Cash equivalents Equity securities U.S. companies International companies Debt securities Core bonds High-yield bonds Commodities Real estate Fair Value$ 250,792 3,925,961 2,300,910 2,282,188 523,603 558,822 463,355$10,305,631 Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)$3,925,961 1,270,683 523,603$ 5,720,247 Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)$ 250,792 1,030,227 2,282,188 558,822$ 4,122,029 Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)$463,355$ 463,355 Total 29 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements December 31, 2012 and 2011 The following tables provides reconciliation of KEPCo's 6% share of Wolf Creek's pension plan assets measured at fair value using significant level 3 inputs for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011: Balance at January 1, 2012 Actual return on plan assets Relating to assets still held at the reporting date Relating to assets sold during the year Purchases, sales and settlements Balance at December 31, 2012 Real Estate Securities

$ 463,355 (52,517)96,384 72,443$ 579,667 Real Estate Securities

$ 403,427 63,736 268 (4,076)$ 463,355 Alternative Investments

$2,891 495,000$ 497,891 Alternative Investments

$Balance at January 1, 2011 Actual return on plan assets Relating to assets still held at the reporting date Relating to assets sold during the year Purchases, sales and settlements Balance at December 31, 2011 r reflect expected future Estimated future benefit payments as of December 31, 2012, for the Plans, which services, are as follows: Pension Benefits Post-retirement Benefits Expected contributions:

2013 Expected benefit payments: 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018-2022 To/from trust$1,200,000 From company assets$ 31,020 To/from trust$ 79,800 From company assets 466,980 550,380 643,020 744,180 850,620 5,984,460 31,020 30,000 28,920 27,780 26,640 114,720 81,480 87,780 95,220 101,400 107,580 572,580 (10) Commitments and Contingencies Current Economic Environment

-KEPCo considers the current economic conditions when planning for future power supply and liquidity needs. The current instability in the financial markets may have an impact on the Cooperative's members, which may impact the Cooperative's volume of future sales, which could have an adverse impact on the Cooperative's future operating results. The current economic climate may also affect the Cooperative's ability to obtain financing.

Given the volatility of the current economic conditions, the values of assets and liabilities recorded in the 30 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements December 31, 2012 and 2011 financial statements could change rapidly, resulting in material future adjustments that could negatively impact the Cooperative's ability to meet debt covenants or maintain sufficient liquidity.

Currently under state statutes, the Cooperative's rate making is deregulated and, therefore, expects to be able to recover any economic losses through future rates.Litigation

-The Cooperative is subject to claims and lawsuits that arise primarily in the ordinary course of business.

It is the opinion of management that the disposition or ultimate resolution of such claims and lawsuits will not have an adverse effect on the consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows of the Cooperative.

There is a provision in the Wolf Creek operating agreement whereby the owners treat certain claims and losses arising out of the operations of Wolf Creek as a cost to be borne by the owners separately (but not jointly) in proportion to their ownership shares. Each of the owners has agreed to indemnify the others in such cases.Nuclear Liability Insurance

-Pursuant to the Price-Anderson Act, which was reauthorized through December 31, 2025 by the Energy Policy Act of 2005, KEPCo is required to insure against public liability claims resulting from nuclear incidents to the full limit of public liability, which is currently approximately

$12.6 billion. This limit of liability consists of the maximum available commercial insurance of $375 million, and the remaining

$12.2 billion is provided through mandatory participation in an industry wide retrospective assessment program.Under this retrospective assessment program, owners are jointly and severally subject to an assessment of up to $117.5 million ($7.1 million -KEPCo's share) at any commercial reactor in the country, payable at no more than $17.5 million ($1.1 million -KEPCo's share) per incident per year, per reactor.This assessment is subject to an inflation adjustment based on the Consumer Price Index and applicable premium taxes. This assessment also applies in excess of the worker radiation claims insurance.

The next scheduled inflation adjustment is scheduled for August 2013. In addition, Congress could impose additional revenue-raising measures to pay claims.The owners of Wolf Creek carry decontamination liability, premature decommissioning liability and property damage insurance for Wolf Creek totaling approximately

$2.8 billion ($168 million KEPCo's share). This insurance is provided by Nuclear Electric Insurance Limited (NEIL). In the event of an accident, insurance proceeds must first be used for reactor stabilization and site decontamination in accordance with a plan mandated by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

KEPCo's share of any remaining proceeds can be used to pay for property damage, decontamination expenses or, if certain requirements are met, including nuclear decommissioning the plant, toward a shortfall in the decommissioning trust fund.The owners also carry additional insurance with NEIL to cover costs of replacement power and other extra expenses incurred during a prolonged outage resulting from accidental property damage at Wolf Creek. If significant losses were incurred at any of the nuclear plants insured under the NEIL policies, KEPCo may be subject to retrospective assessments under the current policies of approximately

$1.9 million.Although KEPCo maintains various insurance policies to provide coverage for potential losses and liabilities resulting from an accident or an extended outage, KEPCo's insurance may not be adequate to cover the costs that could result from a catastrophic accident or extended outage at Wolf Creek. Any substantial losses not covered by insurance, to the extent not recoverable through rates, would have a material adverse effect on KEPCo's financial condition and result of operations.

Decommissioning Insurances

-KEPCo carries premature decommissioning insurance that has several 31 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements December 31, 2012 and 2011 restrictions, one of which can only be used if Wolf Creek incurs an accident exceeding

$500 million in expenses to safely stabilize the reactor, to decontaminate the reactor and reactor station site in accordance with a plan approved by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and to pay for on-site property damages.Once the NRC property rule requiring insurance proceeds to be used first for stabilization and decontamination has been complied with, the premature decommissioning coverage could pay for the decommissioning fund shortfall in the event an accident at Wolf Creek exceeds $500 million in covered damages and causes Wolf Creek to be prematurely decommissioned.

Nuclear Fuel Commitments

-At December 31, 2012, KEPCo's share of WCNOC's nuclear fuel commitments was approximately

$5.4 million for uranium concentrates expiring in 2017, $0.8 million for conversion expiring in 2017, $13.6 million for enrichment expiring at various times through 2045 and $4.6 million for fabrication through 2045.Purchase Power Commitments

-KEPCo has supply contracts with various utility companies to purchase power to supplement generation in the given service areas. KEPCo has a contract with Westar Energy, Inc., through December 2045. KEPCo has provided the Southwest Power Pool a letter of credit to help insure power is available if needed.(11) Fair Value of Assets and Liabilities ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements, defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.ASC Topic 820 also establishes a fair value hierarchy which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. The standard describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value: Level 1 Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities Level 2 Observable inputs other than Level 1 prices, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities Level 3 Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities Following is a description of the valuation methodologies used for assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis and recognized in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets, as well as the general classification of such assets and liabilities pursuant to the valuation hierarchy.

Decommissioning Fund -The decommissioning fund consists of various mutual funds where fair value is determined by quoted market prices in an active market and, as such, are classified within Level 1 of the valuation hierarchy.

The following table presents the fair value measurements of assets and liabilities recognized in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets measured at fair value on a recurring basis and the level within the ASC 820 fair value hierarchy in which the fair value measurements fall at December 31, 2012: 32 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements December 31, 2012 and 2011 Fair Value Measurements Using Quoted Prices in Active Significant Markets for Other Significant Identical Observable Unobservable Fair Assets Inputs Inputs Value (Level 1) (Level 2) (Level 3)Decommissioning fund $ 14,902,017

$ 14,902,017

$ -$The following methods were used to estimate the fair value of all other financial instruments recognized in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets at amounts other than fair value.Cash and Cash Equivalents

-Due to the short term maturity of cash and cash equivalents, the carrying amount approximates fair value.Investments in CFC and Other Associated Organizations

-KEPCo considers CFC and other associated organizations certificates to be a condition of borrowing and patronage capital certificates to be directly related to borrowing.

As such, KEPCo management believes the fair value of these assets is not determinable and they are reflected at their carrying amount.Bond Fund Reserve -The bond fund reserve consists of various held-to-maturity securities where the fair value is primarily based on quoted market prices.Line of Credit and Long-Term Debt Variable-Rate Debt -The carrying amount approximates fair value because of the short-term variable rates of those debt instruments.

Fixed-Rate Debt -The fair value of all fixed-rate debt is based on the sum of the estimated value of each issue, taking into consideration the current rate offered to KEPCo for debt of similar remaining maturities.

The following table presents estimated fair values of KEPCo's financial instruments at December 31, 2012 and 2011: December 31, 2012 December 31, 2011 Carrying Fair Carrying Fair Value Value Value Value Financial assets: Cash and cash equivalents

$ 2,824,134

$ 2,824,134

$ 8,990,444

$8,990,444 Bond fund reserve 4,439,704 4,607,690 4,414,774 4,583,992 Financial liabilities Long-term debt $169,139,737

$189,582,020

$189,262,101

$210,787,844 (12) Patronage Capital In accordance with KEPCo's bylaws, KEPCo's current margins are to be allocated to members. KEPCo's current policy is to allocate to the members based on revenues collected from the members as a percentage of total revenues.

If KEPCo's consolidated financial statements were adjusted to reflect accounting principles generally accepted in the United Stated of America, total patronage capital would be substantially less. As noted in the consolidated statements of changes in patronage capital, no patronage capital distributions were made to members in 2012 and 2011.(13) Subsequent Events The Company has evaluated subsequent events through April 8, 2013, which is the date the financial statements were available to be issued. No events were significant enough to warrant disclosures in the accompanying financial statements or notes.33 KANSAS ELECTRIC POWER COOPERATIVE, INC.A Touchstone Energy Cooperative P.O. Box 4877 a Topeka, KS 66604 600 SW Corporate View .Topeka, KS 66615 (785) 273-7010 .www.kepco.org