ML15090A192: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:A Exeton Generation.George GellrichSite Vice | {{#Wiki_filter:A Exeton Generation. | ||
George GellrichSite Vice President Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant1650 Calvert Cliffs ParkwayLusby, MD 20657410 495 5200 Office717 497 3463 Mobilewww.exeloncorp.com george.gellrich@exeloncorp.com 10 CFR 50.90March 27, 2015U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Document Control DeskWashington, DC 20555Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant, Unit Nos. 1 and 2Renewed Facility Operating License Nos. DPR-53 and DPR-69NRC Docket Nos. 50-317 and 50-318 | |||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
==References:== | ==References:== | ||
Supplemental Information -Atmospheric Dump Valves License | |||
Document Control DeskMarch 27, 2015Page 2I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on March 27,2015.Respectfully,George H. GellrichSite Vice | Supplemental Information | ||
-Atmospheric Dump Valves License Amendment Request1. Letter from G. H. Gellrich (Exelon) to Document Control Desk (NRC), datedJanuary 13, 2014, License Amendment Request: | |||
Add Technical Specification for Atmospheric Dump Valves2. Letter from G. H. Gellrich (Exelon) to Document Control Desk (NRC), datedMarch 3, 2015, Request for Additional Information Regarding Atmospheric Dump Valves License Amendment RequestReference 1 submitted a license amendment request to add a Technical Specification for theAtmospheric Dump Valves. As part of their review, the NRC staff has requested additional information and responses to the requested additional information were provided inReference | |||
: 2. During a subsequent phone call with the NRC staff on March 17, 2015, it wasidentified that supplemental information was needed to clarify the response provided inReference | |||
: 2. The requested information is in Attachment (1).This additional information does not change the No Significant Hazards Determination providedin Reference | |||
: 1. No regulatory commitments are contained in this letter.Should you have questions regarding this matter, please contact Mr. Michael J. Fick at(410) 495-6714. | |||
AQ~ | |||
Document Control DeskMarch 27, 2015Page 2I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. | |||
Executed on March 27,2015.Respectfully, George H. GellrichSite Vice President GHG/PSF/bjm | |||
==Attachment:== | ==Attachment:== | ||
(1) Supplemental Information cc: NRC Project Manager, Calvert CliffsNRC Regional Administrator, Region INRC Resident Inspector, Calvert CliffsS. Gray, MD-DNR ATTACHMENT (1)SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power PlantMarch 27, 2015 ATTACHMENT 1SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION During a phone call with the NRC Staff on March 17, 2015, clarifying information was providedto address how the atmospheric dump valve (ADV) manual operator is designed to withstand adesign basis event, including a seismic event.GDC-2As stated in our Final Safety Analysis Report submittal (1971) the plant design and construction proceeded based upon the intent of the draft General Design Criteria (GDC). General DesignCriteria-2 (1967 draft) states, "Those systems and components of reactor facilities which areessential to the prevention of accidents which could affect the public health and safety or tomitigation of their consequences shall be designed, fabricated, and erected to performance standards that will enable the facility to withstand, without loss of the capability to protect thepublic, the additional forces that might be imposed by natural phenomena such as earthquakes, | |||
: tornados, flooding conditions, winds, ice, and other local site effects. | |||
The design bases soestablished shall reflect: | |||
(a) appropriate consideration of the most severe of these naturalphenomena that have been recorded for the site and the surrounding area and (b) anappropriate margin for withstanding forces greater than those recorded to reflect uncertainties about the historical data and their suitability as a basis for design."Unlike the current GDC-2, the draft GDC did not require consideration of appropriate combinations of the effects of normal and accident conditions with the effects of the naturalphenomena. | |||
Therefore, a number of systems, including the ADVs, were not designed for acombination of accident loads with natural phenomenon. | |||
The safety function of the ADVs is torespond to a Steam Generator Tube Rupture event; a seismic event is not considered concurrently with a Steam Generator Tube Rupture event.Seismic Il/IThe issue of seismic qualification of mechanical and electrical equipment was designated asUnresolved Safety Issue (USI) A-46 in December 1980. The safety concern was thatequipment in nuclear power plants with construction permit applications docketed before 1972was not reviewed according to current licensing criteria. | |||
The NRC Staff determined that it wasnot feasible to require older operating plants to meet current licensing requirements (NUREG-1211). | |||
Therefore, a number of alternative processes were investigated. | |||
The processchosen used seismic experience data to evaluate the seismic capability of equipment. | |||
Thisalternative provided the most reasonable and cost effective means to ensure that the intent ofGDC-2 is met. To implement this resolution to USI A-46, the NRC issued GL 87-02.Supplement 1 to GL 87-02 approved the industry's methodology and criteria for evaluating equipment. | |||
This methodology was used to evaluate the Calvert Cliffs ADVs and their enclosures in the1990's. The methodology included addressing potential adverse seismic interactions (seismic Il/I concerns). | |||
: Recently, the chain wheel and in-line gear assembly supports on top of the ADV enclosures were once again evaluated as part of a replacement effort. Since the equipment is located inthe Auxiliary | |||
: Building, in the vicinity of SR-CATI equipment, these components are required tobe supported in accordance with seismic li/I criteria (i.e., no damage to safety-related components from this equipment shall occur during or after a safe shutdown earthquake). | |||
Theevaluation was performed to compare the original components to the new components todetermine that they continue to meet seismic Il/I criteria. | |||
1 ATTACHMENT 1SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION Depending on which unit they are installed, the chain wheel and in-line gear assembly supportsconsist of either stiffened, welded steel plate mounting | |||
: brackets, or W4xl 3 steel sections, withwelded adaptor plates. Both of these configurations are welded directly to the top of theirrespective ADV enclosure. | |||
By observation of the structural robustness of the welded supports it was determined that thenew replacement chain wheel and in-line gear assemblies, subjected to design basis seismicdemand accelerations, will not adversely impact the structural integrity of their supports, theADV enclosures, or nearby Category I equipment. | |||
The support brackets are sufficiently stiffened and welded to preclude them from developing significant bending or shear stresses. | |||
The chain wheel and in-line gear assembly supports are acceptable. | |||
Maintenance RuleThe ADVs and the manual operator have a maintenance rule function and are included in theMaintenance Rule program. | |||
Specifically, the Maintenance Rule function for the ADV manualoperator is, "Manual Operators for ADVs operate to depressurize the affected SteamGenerator." | |||
One functional failure is allowed per 24 month period.2}} | |||
Revision as of 02:33, 1 July 2018
| ML15090A192 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Calvert Cliffs |
| Issue date: | 03/27/2015 |
| From: | Gellrich G H Exelon Generation Co |
| To: | Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| Download: ML15090A192 (5) | |
Text
A Exeton Generation.
George GellrichSite Vice President Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant1650 Calvert Cliffs ParkwayLusby, MD 20657410 495 5200 Office717 497 3463 Mobilewww.exeloncorp.com george.gellrich@exeloncorp.com 10 CFR 50.90March 27, 2015U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Document Control DeskWashington, DC 20555Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant, Unit Nos. 1 and 2Renewed Facility Operating License Nos. DPR-53 and DPR-69NRC Docket Nos. 50-317 and 50-318
Subject:
References:
Supplemental Information
-Atmospheric Dump Valves License Amendment Request1. Letter from G. H. Gellrich (Exelon) to Document Control Desk (NRC), datedJanuary 13, 2014, License Amendment Request:
Add Technical Specification for Atmospheric Dump Valves2. Letter from G. H. Gellrich (Exelon) to Document Control Desk (NRC), datedMarch 3, 2015, Request for Additional Information Regarding Atmospheric Dump Valves License Amendment RequestReference 1 submitted a license amendment request to add a Technical Specification for theAtmospheric Dump Valves. As part of their review, the NRC staff has requested additional information and responses to the requested additional information were provided inReference
- 2. During a subsequent phone call with the NRC staff on March 17, 2015, it wasidentified that supplemental information was needed to clarify the response provided inReference
- 2. The requested information is in Attachment (1).This additional information does not change the No Significant Hazards Determination providedin Reference
- 1. No regulatory commitments are contained in this letter.Should you have questions regarding this matter, please contact Mr. Michael J. Fick at(410) 495-6714.
AQ~
Document Control DeskMarch 27, 2015Page 2I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
Executed on March 27,2015.Respectfully, George H. GellrichSite Vice President GHG/PSF/bjm
Attachment:
(1) Supplemental Information cc: NRC Project Manager, Calvert CliffsNRC Regional Administrator, Region INRC Resident Inspector, Calvert CliffsS. Gray, MD-DNR ATTACHMENT (1)SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power PlantMarch 27, 2015 ATTACHMENT 1SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION During a phone call with the NRC Staff on March 17, 2015, clarifying information was providedto address how the atmospheric dump valve (ADV) manual operator is designed to withstand adesign basis event, including a seismic event.GDC-2As stated in our Final Safety Analysis Report submittal (1971) the plant design and construction proceeded based upon the intent of the draft General Design Criteria (GDC). General DesignCriteria-2 (1967 draft) states, "Those systems and components of reactor facilities which areessential to the prevention of accidents which could affect the public health and safety or tomitigation of their consequences shall be designed, fabricated, and erected to performance standards that will enable the facility to withstand, without loss of the capability to protect thepublic, the additional forces that might be imposed by natural phenomena such as earthquakes,
- tornados, flooding conditions, winds, ice, and other local site effects.
The design bases soestablished shall reflect:
(a) appropriate consideration of the most severe of these naturalphenomena that have been recorded for the site and the surrounding area and (b) anappropriate margin for withstanding forces greater than those recorded to reflect uncertainties about the historical data and their suitability as a basis for design."Unlike the current GDC-2, the draft GDC did not require consideration of appropriate combinations of the effects of normal and accident conditions with the effects of the naturalphenomena.
Therefore, a number of systems, including the ADVs, were not designed for acombination of accident loads with natural phenomenon.
The safety function of the ADVs is torespond to a Steam Generator Tube Rupture event; a seismic event is not considered concurrently with a Steam Generator Tube Rupture event.Seismic Il/IThe issue of seismic qualification of mechanical and electrical equipment was designated asUnresolved Safety Issue (USI) A-46 in December 1980. The safety concern was thatequipment in nuclear power plants with construction permit applications docketed before 1972was not reviewed according to current licensing criteria.
The NRC Staff determined that it wasnot feasible to require older operating plants to meet current licensing requirements (NUREG-1211).
Therefore, a number of alternative processes were investigated.
The processchosen used seismic experience data to evaluate the seismic capability of equipment.
Thisalternative provided the most reasonable and cost effective means to ensure that the intent ofGDC-2 is met. To implement this resolution to USI A-46, the NRC issued GL 87-02.Supplement 1 to GL 87-02 approved the industry's methodology and criteria for evaluating equipment.
This methodology was used to evaluate the Calvert Cliffs ADVs and their enclosures in the1990's. The methodology included addressing potential adverse seismic interactions (seismic Il/I concerns).
- Recently, the chain wheel and in-line gear assembly supports on top of the ADV enclosures were once again evaluated as part of a replacement effort. Since the equipment is located inthe Auxiliary
- Building, in the vicinity of SR-CATI equipment, these components are required tobe supported in accordance with seismic li/I criteria (i.e., no damage to safety-related components from this equipment shall occur during or after a safe shutdown earthquake).
Theevaluation was performed to compare the original components to the new components todetermine that they continue to meet seismic Il/I criteria.
1 ATTACHMENT 1SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION Depending on which unit they are installed, the chain wheel and in-line gear assembly supportsconsist of either stiffened, welded steel plate mounting
- brackets, or W4xl 3 steel sections, withwelded adaptor plates. Both of these configurations are welded directly to the top of theirrespective ADV enclosure.
By observation of the structural robustness of the welded supports it was determined that thenew replacement chain wheel and in-line gear assemblies, subjected to design basis seismicdemand accelerations, will not adversely impact the structural integrity of their supports, theADV enclosures, or nearby Category I equipment.
The support brackets are sufficiently stiffened and welded to preclude them from developing significant bending or shear stresses.
The chain wheel and in-line gear assembly supports are acceptable.
Maintenance RuleThe ADVs and the manual operator have a maintenance rule function and are included in theMaintenance Rule program.
Specifically, the Maintenance Rule function for the ADV manualoperator is, "Manual Operators for ADVs operate to depressurize the affected SteamGenerator."
One functional failure is allowed per 24 month period.2