ML062020123: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:Dai io-Re: Fwd: PSEG letter Pagel 1 From: A. Randolph Blough F_ 3(To: David Vito Date: 3/2/04 11:25AM | {{#Wiki_filter:Dai io-Re: Fwd: PSEG letter Pagel 1 From: | ||
A. Randolph Blough F_ 3( | |||
To: | |||
David Vito Date: | |||
3/2/04 11:25AM | |||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
Re: Fwd: PSEG letter 3/18 is the very IikgJy date for the meeting>>> David Vito 03/02/04 07:25AM >>-SENSITIVE ALLEGATION INFORMATION | Re: Fwd: PSEG letter 3/18 is the very IikgJy date for the meeting | ||
>>> David Vito 03/02/04 07:25AM >> | |||
- SENSITIVE ALLEGATION INFORMATION - | |||
Thanks.CC: Gwm | - PROTECT ACCORDINGLY - | ||
~z'David Vito -Re: Fwd: PSEG letter 7 age From: Ernest Wilson 0 To: A. Randolph Blough; Anne Passarelli; Brian Holian; Daniel Orr; David Vito; Diane Screnci; Eileen Neff; George Malone; Gilbert Johnson; Glenn Meyer; Hubert J. Miller; James Wiggins;Jeffrey Teator; Karl Farrar; Marc Ferdas; Mel Gray; Neil Sheehan; Scott Barber; Theodore Wingfield; Tracy Walker I ýDate: 3/2/04 7:53AM | Please see the attached questions from the alleger. I should probably get back to he~r today. Based on my knowledge so far, I am assuming: | ||
: 1. All we have received so far is the faxed version of the PSEG 2/27/04 letter, and that when we do get the official version, it will not be in electronic form, and; | |||
: 2. We are not planning on sending PSEG an interim response in advance of the meeting. | |||
Please get back to me as soon as possible with the answers to these questions. Thanks. | |||
CC: | |||
Gwm | |||
~z'David Vito -Re: | |||
Fwd: PSEG letter 7 age From: | |||
Ernest Wilson 0 To: | |||
A. Randolph Blough; Anne Passarelli; Brian Holian; Daniel Orr; David Vito; Diane Screnci; Eileen Neff; George Malone; Gilbert Johnson; Glenn Meyer; Hubert J. Miller; James Wiggins; Jeffrey Teator; Karl Farrar; Marc Ferdas; Mel Gray; Neil Sheehan; Scott Barber; Theodore Wingfield; Tracy Walker I ý Date: | |||
3/2/04 7:53AM | |||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
Re: Fwd: PSEG letter 01 has nothing to add to Dave's assumptions. | Re: Fwd: PSEG letter 01 has nothing to add to Dave's assumptions. | ||
>>> David Vito 9J/~02/04 07:25AM >>>>-SENSITIVE ALLEGATION INFORMATION | >>> David Vito 9J/~02/04 07:25AM >>>> | ||
- SENSITIVE ALLEGATION INFORMATION - | |||
- PROTECT ACCORDINGLY - | |||
Thanks.CC: CC: Daniel Holody; Leanne Harrison; Sharon Johnson}} | Please see the attached questions from the alleger. I should probably get back to her today. Based on my knowledge so far, I am assuming: | ||
: 1. All we have received so far is the faxed version of the PSEG 2/27/04 letter, and that when we do get the official version, it will not be in electronic form, and; | |||
: 2. We are not planning on sending PSEG an interim response in advance of the meeting. | |||
Please get back to me as soon as possible with the answers to these questions. Thanks. | |||
CC: | |||
CC: | |||
Daniel Holody; Leanne Harrison; Sharon Johnson}} | |||
Latest revision as of 07:55, 15 January 2025
| ML062020123 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Salem, Hope Creek  |
| Issue date: | 03/02/2004 |
| From: | Blough A Division of Nuclear Materials Safety I |
| To: | Vito D Division of Nuclear Materials Safety I |
| References | |
| FOIA/PA-2005-0194 | |
| Download: ML062020123 (2) | |
Text
Dai io-Re: Fwd: PSEG letter Pagel 1 From:
A. Randolph Blough F_ 3(
To:
David Vito Date:
3/2/04 11:25AM
Subject:
Re: Fwd: PSEG letter 3/18 is the very IikgJy date for the meeting
>>> David Vito 03/02/04 07:25AM >>
- SENSITIVE ALLEGATION INFORMATION -
- PROTECT ACCORDINGLY -
Please see the attached questions from the alleger. I should probably get back to he~r today. Based on my knowledge so far, I am assuming:
- 1. All we have received so far is the faxed version of the PSEG 2/27/04 letter, and that when we do get the official version, it will not be in electronic form, and;
- 2. We are not planning on sending PSEG an interim response in advance of the meeting.
Please get back to me as soon as possible with the answers to these questions. Thanks.
CC:
Gwm
~z'David Vito -Re:
Fwd: PSEG letter 7 age From:
Ernest Wilson 0 To:
A. Randolph Blough; Anne Passarelli; Brian Holian; Daniel Orr; David Vito; Diane Screnci; Eileen Neff; George Malone; Gilbert Johnson; Glenn Meyer; Hubert J. Miller; James Wiggins; Jeffrey Teator; Karl Farrar; Marc Ferdas; Mel Gray; Neil Sheehan; Scott Barber; Theodore Wingfield; Tracy Walker I ý Date:
3/2/04 7:53AM
Subject:
Re: Fwd: PSEG letter 01 has nothing to add to Dave's assumptions.
>>> David Vito 9J/~02/04 07:25AM >>>>
- SENSITIVE ALLEGATION INFORMATION -
- PROTECT ACCORDINGLY -
Please see the attached questions from the alleger. I should probably get back to her today. Based on my knowledge so far, I am assuming:
- 1. All we have received so far is the faxed version of the PSEG 2/27/04 letter, and that when we do get the official version, it will not be in electronic form, and;
- 2. We are not planning on sending PSEG an interim response in advance of the meeting.
Please get back to me as soon as possible with the answers to these questions. Thanks.
CC:
CC:
Daniel Holody; Leanne Harrison; Sharon Johnson