ML082671192: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) Created page by program invented by StriderTol |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) StriderTol Bot change |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:Accession No. ML082671192 | {{#Wiki_filter:Accession No. ML082671192 From: | ||
Peter Tam Sent: | |||
From: Peter Tam Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2008 4:11 PM To: 'Blake, Tim M.'; Loeffler, Richard A. Cc: Frank Orr | Tuesday, September 23, 2008 4:11 PM To: | ||
'Blake, Tim M.'; Loeffler, Richard A. | |||
Cc: | |||
Frank Orr | |||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
Draft RAI re. proposed amendment to TS 3.5.1, ECCS (TAC MD9170) | Draft RAI re. proposed amendment to TS 3.5.1, ECCS (TAC MD9170) | ||
Rick: | Rick: | ||
We are reviewing your 6/26/08 application for amendment. Our reviewer, Frank Orr, has the following draft RAI question that we would like to discuss with you in a conference call. | |||
Your application identifies the worst-case event as a recirculation line break event. For this event, protection systems appear to respond with acceptable consequences. Please discuss a feedwater line break event and protection systems response, showing that the consequences are not greater than those of the recirculation line break event. In a feedwater line break event, is the RPS qualified for the environment? | Your application identifies the worst-case event as a recirculation line break event. For this event, protection systems appear to respond with acceptable consequences. Please discuss a feedwater line break event and protection systems response, showing that the consequences are not greater than those of the recirculation line break event. In a feedwater line break event, is the RPS qualified for the environment? Does the operator have to take actions? If so, show that the operator can act on a timely basis to depressurize the reactor vessel so that other mitigating equipment can function. | ||
The sole purpose of this e-mail is to prepare you and others for the proposed conference call. This e-mail does not formally request for additional information, and does not convey a formal NRC staff position. With or without the requested conference call, we plan to formally issue the above draft RAI in final form around 10/17/08. | The sole purpose of this e-mail is to prepare you and others for the proposed conference call. This e-mail does not formally request for additional information, and does not convey a formal NRC staff position. With or without the requested conference call, we plan to formally issue the above draft RAI in final form around 10/17/08. | ||
Peter S. Tam, Senior Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch 3-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Tel. 301-415-1451 E-mail Properties Mail Envelope Properties () | |||
Peter S. Tam, Senior Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch 3-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Tel. 301-415-1451 | |||
E-mail Properties Mail Envelope Properties () | |||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
Draft RAI re. proposed amendment to TS 3.5.1, ECCS (TAC MD9170) | Draft RAI re. proposed amendment to TS 3.5.1, ECCS (TAC MD9170) | ||
Sent Date: | Sent Date: 09/23/2008 3:42:48 PM Received Date: 09/23/2008 4:10:00 PM From: Peter Tam Created By: Peter.Tam@nrc.gov Recipients: | ||
Created By: | |||
Recipients: | |||
Tim.Blake@xenuclear.com ('Blake, Tim M.') | Tim.Blake@xenuclear.com ('Blake, Tim M.') | ||
Tracking Status: None Richard.Loeffler@xenuclear.com (Loeffler, Richard A.) | Tracking Status: None Richard.Loeffler@xenuclear.com (Loeffler, Richard A.) | ||
Sensitivity: | Tracking Status: None Frank.Orr@nrc.gov (Frank Orr) | ||
Tracking Status: None Post Office: | |||
Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 7628 09/23/2008 Options Expiration Date: | |||
Priority: olImportanceNormal ReplyRequested: False Return Notification: False Sensitivity: olNormal Recipients received:}} | |||
Latest revision as of 15:00, 14 January 2025
| ML082671192 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Monticello |
| Issue date: | 09/23/2008 |
| From: | Tam P Plant Licensing Branch III |
| To: | Blake T, Loeffler R Nuclear Management Co |
| Tam P | |
| References | |
| TAC MD9170 | |
| Download: ML082671192 (2) | |
Text
Accession No. ML082671192 From:
Peter Tam Sent:
Tuesday, September 23, 2008 4:11 PM To:
'Blake, Tim M.'; Loeffler, Richard A.
Cc:
Frank Orr
Subject:
Draft RAI re. proposed amendment to TS 3.5.1, ECCS (TAC MD9170)
Rick:
We are reviewing your 6/26/08 application for amendment. Our reviewer, Frank Orr, has the following draft RAI question that we would like to discuss with you in a conference call.
Your application identifies the worst-case event as a recirculation line break event. For this event, protection systems appear to respond with acceptable consequences. Please discuss a feedwater line break event and protection systems response, showing that the consequences are not greater than those of the recirculation line break event. In a feedwater line break event, is the RPS qualified for the environment? Does the operator have to take actions? If so, show that the operator can act on a timely basis to depressurize the reactor vessel so that other mitigating equipment can function.
The sole purpose of this e-mail is to prepare you and others for the proposed conference call. This e-mail does not formally request for additional information, and does not convey a formal NRC staff position. With or without the requested conference call, we plan to formally issue the above draft RAI in final form around 10/17/08.
Peter S. Tam, Senior Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch 3-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Tel. 301-415-1451 E-mail Properties Mail Envelope Properties ()
Subject:
Draft RAI re. proposed amendment to TS 3.5.1, ECCS (TAC MD9170)
Sent Date: 09/23/2008 3:42:48 PM Received Date: 09/23/2008 4:10:00 PM From: Peter Tam Created By: Peter.Tam@nrc.gov Recipients:
Tim.Blake@xenuclear.com ('Blake, Tim M.')
Tracking Status: None Richard.Loeffler@xenuclear.com (Loeffler, Richard A.)
Tracking Status: None Frank.Orr@nrc.gov (Frank Orr)
Tracking Status: None Post Office:
Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 7628 09/23/2008 Options Expiration Date:
Priority: olImportanceNormal ReplyRequested: False Return Notification: False Sensitivity: olNormal Recipients received: