ML082671192: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Created page by program invented by StriderTol
StriderTol Bot change
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 18: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:Accession No. ML082671192  
{{#Wiki_filter:Accession No. ML082671192 From:
 
Peter Tam Sent:
From: Peter Tam Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2008 4:11 PM To: 'Blake, Tim M.'; Loeffler, Richard A. Cc: Frank Orr  
Tuesday, September 23, 2008 4:11 PM To:  
'Blake, Tim M.'; Loeffler, Richard A.
Cc:
Frank Orr  


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Draft RAI re. proposed amendment to TS 3.5.1, ECCS (TAC MD9170)
Draft RAI re. proposed amendment to TS 3.5.1, ECCS (TAC MD9170)
Rick: We are reviewing your 6/26/08 application for amendment. Our reviewer, Frank Orr, has the following draft RAI question that we would like to discuss with you in a conference call.  
Rick:
 
We are reviewing your 6/26/08 application for amendment. Our reviewer, Frank Orr, has the following draft RAI question that we would like to discuss with you in a conference call.
Your application identifies the worst-case event as a recirculation line break event. For this event, protection systems appear to respond with acceptable consequences. Please discuss a feedwater line break event and protection systems response, showing that the consequences are not greater than those of the recirculation line break event. In a feedwater line break event, is the RPS qualified for the environment? Does the operator have to take actions? If so, show that the operator can act on a timely basis to depressurize the reactor vessel so that other mitigating equipment can function.
Your application identifies the worst-case event as a recirculation line break event. For this event, protection systems appear to respond with acceptable consequences. Please discuss a feedwater line break event and protection systems response, showing that the consequences are not greater than those of the recirculation line break event. In a feedwater line break event, is the RPS qualified for the environment? Does the operator have to take actions? If so, show that the operator can act on a timely basis to depressurize the reactor vessel so that other mitigating equipment can function.
The sole purpose of this e-mail is to prepare you and others for the proposed conference call. This e-mail does not formally request for additional information, and does not convey a formal NRC staff position. With or without the requested conference call, we plan to formally issue the above draft RAI in final form around 10/17/08.
The sole purpose of this e-mail is to prepare you and others for the proposed conference call. This e-mail does not formally request for additional information, and does not convey a formal NRC staff position. With or without the requested conference call, we plan to formally issue the above draft RAI in final form around 10/17/08.
 
Peter S. Tam, Senior Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch 3-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Tel. 301-415-1451 E-mail Properties Mail Envelope Properties ()  
Peter S. Tam, Senior Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch 3-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Tel. 301-415-1451  
 
E-mail Properties Mail Envelope Properties ()  


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Draft RAI re. proposed amendment to TS 3.5.1, ECCS (TAC MD9170)
Draft RAI re. proposed amendment to TS 3.5.1, ECCS (TAC MD9170)
Sent Date:       09/23/2008 3:42:48 PM Received Date:       09/23/2008 4:10:00 PM From:               Peter Tam  
Sent Date: 09/23/2008 3:42:48 PM Received Date: 09/23/2008 4:10:00 PM From: Peter Tam Created By: Peter.Tam@nrc.gov Recipients:
 
Created By:         Peter.Tam@nrc.gov  
 
Recipients:
Tim.Blake@xenuclear.com ('Blake, Tim M.')
Tim.Blake@xenuclear.com ('Blake, Tim M.')
Tracking Status: None Richard.Loeffler@xenuclear.com (Loeffler, Richard A.)
Tracking Status: None Richard.Loeffler@xenuclear.com (Loeffler, Richard A.)  
Tracking Status: None        Frank.Orr@nrc.gov (Frank Orr)
Tracking Status: None
 
Post Office:
 
Files                Size        Date & Time
 
MESSAGE        7628        09/23/2008
 
Options Expiration Date:
Priority:                        olImportanceNormal ReplyRequested:        False Return Notification:        False


Sensitivity:         olNormal Recipients received:}}
Tracking Status: None Frank.Orr@nrc.gov (Frank Orr)
Tracking Status: None Post Office:
Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 7628 09/23/2008 Options Expiration Date:
Priority: olImportanceNormal ReplyRequested: False Return Notification: False Sensitivity: olNormal Recipients received:}}

Latest revision as of 15:00, 14 January 2025

Draft Request for Additional Information, Proposed Amendment to TS 3.5.1, ECCS
ML082671192
Person / Time
Site: Monticello 
Issue date: 09/23/2008
From: Tam P
Plant Licensing Branch III
To: Blake T, Loeffler R
Nuclear Management Co
Tam P
References
TAC MD9170
Download: ML082671192 (2)


Text

Accession No. ML082671192 From:

Peter Tam Sent:

Tuesday, September 23, 2008 4:11 PM To:

'Blake, Tim M.'; Loeffler, Richard A.

Cc:

Frank Orr

Subject:

Draft RAI re. proposed amendment to TS 3.5.1, ECCS (TAC MD9170)

Rick:

We are reviewing your 6/26/08 application for amendment. Our reviewer, Frank Orr, has the following draft RAI question that we would like to discuss with you in a conference call.

Your application identifies the worst-case event as a recirculation line break event. For this event, protection systems appear to respond with acceptable consequences. Please discuss a feedwater line break event and protection systems response, showing that the consequences are not greater than those of the recirculation line break event. In a feedwater line break event, is the RPS qualified for the environment? Does the operator have to take actions? If so, show that the operator can act on a timely basis to depressurize the reactor vessel so that other mitigating equipment can function.

The sole purpose of this e-mail is to prepare you and others for the proposed conference call. This e-mail does not formally request for additional information, and does not convey a formal NRC staff position. With or without the requested conference call, we plan to formally issue the above draft RAI in final form around 10/17/08.

Peter S. Tam, Senior Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch 3-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Tel. 301-415-1451 E-mail Properties Mail Envelope Properties ()

Subject:

Draft RAI re. proposed amendment to TS 3.5.1, ECCS (TAC MD9170)

Sent Date: 09/23/2008 3:42:48 PM Received Date: 09/23/2008 4:10:00 PM From: Peter Tam Created By: Peter.Tam@nrc.gov Recipients:

Tim.Blake@xenuclear.com ('Blake, Tim M.')

Tracking Status: None Richard.Loeffler@xenuclear.com (Loeffler, Richard A.)

Tracking Status: None Frank.Orr@nrc.gov (Frank Orr)

Tracking Status: None Post Office:

Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 7628 09/23/2008 Options Expiration Date:

Priority: olImportanceNormal ReplyRequested: False Return Notification: False Sensitivity: olNormal Recipients received: