ML11221A352: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
| number = ML11221A352
| number = ML11221A352
| issue date = 12/17/2010
| issue date = 12/17/2010
| title = Watts Bar Nuclear Plant, Unit 2 - Amendment 102 to Final Safety Analysis Report (Fsar), Figure 2.5-571, ERCW Pipeline Section A-A, Sheet 4 of 4
| title = Amendment 102 to Final Safety Analysis Report (Fsar), Figure 2.5-571, ERCW Pipeline Section A-A, Sheet 4 of 4
| author name =  
| author name =  
| author affiliation = Tennessee Valley Authority
| author affiliation = Tennessee Valley Authority
Line 15: Line 15:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:750 740 730 720 710 700 690 680 670 660 50 51 '52 53 54 57 I I 1 I I I 1 A-A -1 /CCLASS "A" BACK AUX BLOG PIPE TUNNEL- -- UNIT i ILL 7 750 1 740 730 i 720 - 710 - 700 690 1 680 670 660 POTENTIAL SETTLEMENT BASED ON I. 5 O/t
{{#Wiki_filter:750 740 730 720 710 700 690 680 670 660 50 51  
* CRITERIA (INCHES) (E) POTENTIAL SETTLEMENT BASED ON 6% 6 CRITERIA (INCHES) - DESIGN WATER TABLE -!E WATER TABLE (24. HR) MH SOIL CLASSIFICATION I3 BLOW COUNT POTENT I ALLY L I QUEF IA BLE SO I L (SEE NOTE) -WS WEATHER1ED SHALE NOTE: I. LtQ~EFACT~ON BASED ON TOP OF GROUND ACCEtlERATlON OF 0.49 AND SEED - IDRtSS (1971) CORRELATION FOR SANDS. Added by Amendment 50 WATTS BAR NUCLEAR PLANT FINAL SAFETY ANALYStS REPORT 1 ERCW PIPELINE SECTION A-A SREET 4 OF 4 FIGURE 2.5-571 ,}}
'52 53 54 57 I
I 1
I I
I 1
A-A  
-1  
/CCLASS "A" BACK AUX BLOG PIPE TUNNEL-UNIT i ILL 7 750 1 740 730 i 720 710 700 690 1
680 670 660 POTENTIAL SETTLEMENT BASED ON I. 5 O/t CRITERIA (INCHES)
(E) POTENTIAL SETTLEMENT BASED ON 6 % 6 CRITERIA (INCHES) -
DESIGN WATER TABLE  
-!E WATER TABLE (24.
HR)
MH SOIL CLASSIFICATION I3 BLOW COUNT POTENT I ALLY L I QUEF IA BLE SO I L (SEE NOTE)  
-WS WEATHER1ED SHALE NOTE:
I. LtQ~EFACT~ON BASED ON TOP OF GROUND ACCEtlERATlON OF 0.49 AND SEED - IDRtSS (1971) CORRELATION FOR SANDS.
Added by Amendment 50 WATTS BAR NUCLEAR PLANT FINAL SAFETY ANALYStS REPORT 1 ERCW PIPELINE SECTION A-A SREET 4 OF 4 FIGURE 2.5-571  
,}}

Latest revision as of 04:52, 13 January 2025

Amendment 102 to Final Safety Analysis Report (Fsar), Figure 2.5-571, ERCW Pipeline Section A-A, Sheet 4 of 4
ML11221A352
Person / Time
Site: Watts Bar Tennessee Valley Authority icon.png
Issue date: 12/17/2010
From:
Tennessee Valley Authority
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
Download: ML11221A352 (1)


Text

750 740 730 720 710 700 690 680 670 660 50 51

'52 53 54 57 I

I 1

I I

I 1

A-A

-1

/CCLASS "A" BACK AUX BLOG PIPE TUNNEL-UNIT i ILL 7 750 1 740 730 i 720 710 700 690 1

680 670 660 POTENTIAL SETTLEMENT BASED ON I. 5 O/t CRITERIA (INCHES)

(E) POTENTIAL SETTLEMENT BASED ON 6 % 6 CRITERIA (INCHES) -

DESIGN WATER TABLE

-!E WATER TABLE (24.

HR)

MH SOIL CLASSIFICATION I3 BLOW COUNT POTENT I ALLY L I QUEF IA BLE SO I L (SEE NOTE)

-WS WEATHER1ED SHALE NOTE:

I. LtQ~EFACT~ON BASED ON TOP OF GROUND ACCEtlERATlON OF 0.49 AND SEED - IDRtSS (1971) CORRELATION FOR SANDS.

Added by Amendment 50 WATTS BAR NUCLEAR PLANT FINAL SAFETY ANALYStS REPORT 1 ERCW PIPELINE SECTION A-A SREET 4 OF 4 FIGURE 2.5-571

,