ML12054A078: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| issue date = 09/16/2011 | | issue date = 09/16/2011 | ||
| title = Email from M. Khanna, NRR to K. Karwoski, NRR Et Al on North Anna Acceptance Criteria R2 Comments.Docx | | title = Email from M. Khanna, NRR to K. Karwoski, NRR Et Al on North Anna Acceptance Criteria R2 Comments.Docx | ||
| author name = Khanna M | | author name = Khanna M | ||
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL | | author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL | ||
| addressee name = Karwoski K | | addressee name = Karwoski K, Stuchell S | ||
| addressee affiliation = NRC/NRR/DE, NRC/NRR/DPR | | addressee affiliation = NRC/NRR/DE, NRC/NRR/DPR | ||
| docket = 05000338, 05000339 | | docket = 05000338, 05000339 | ||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:Martin, Robert From: Sent: To: Cc: | {{#Wiki_filter:Martin, Robert From: | ||
Sent: | |||
To: | |||
Cc: | |||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
Attachments: | Attachments: | ||
Khanna, Meena I \\Friday, September 16, 2011 5:38 PM Karwoski, Kenneth; Stuchell, Sheldon Manoly, Kamal; Wilson, George; Boyle, Patrick; Martin, Robert North Anna Acceptance Criteria R2 Comments.docx North Anna Acceptance Criteria R2 Comments.docx Ken and Sheldon, Attached are some comments that we received regarding the proposed acceptance criteria from Gerry McCoy in Region II. Could we pls meet on Monday to discuss and then conduct a call with him? I plan to go ahead and send the proposed acceptance criteria to OGC so that we can obtain input from them in parallel.Thanks!Meena Short-Term Technical Acceptance Criteria For Demonstrating The Acceptability For North Anna Plant Restart Confirm the adequacy of the scope of the licensee's inspections, tests and analyses which demonstrate that no functional damage resulted from the earthquake to systems, subsystems, trains, components and devices (systems, structures, or components | Khanna, Meena I \\\\ | ||
[SSCs]) for the current licensing basis (1) that are required to be operable by TSs, (2) SSCs not explicitly required to be operable by TSs, but that perform required support functions to maintain a TS required system operable; and (3) SSCs that are not described in TSs but which warrant programmatic controls to ensure that SSC availability and reliability are maintained. | Friday, September 16, 2011 5:38 PM Karwoski, Kenneth; Stuchell, Sheldon Manoly, Kamal; Wilson, George; Boyle, Patrick; Martin, Robert North Anna Acceptance Criteria R2 Comments.docx North Anna Acceptance Criteria R2 Comments.docx Ken and Sheldon, Attached are some comments that we received regarding the proposed acceptance criteria from Gerry McCoy in Region II. Could we pls meet on Monday to discuss and then conduct a call with him? I plan to go ahead and send the proposed acceptance criteria to OGC so that we can obtain input from them in parallel. | ||
Refer to NRC Inspection Manual Part 9900, "Operability Determinations and Functionality Assessments for Resolution of Degraded or NonConforming Conditions Adverse to Quality or Safety" for more detailed guidance for determinations of operability and resolution of degraded or nonconforming conditions. | Thanks! | ||
Contact: Carl Schulten, NRR/ITSB}} | Meena | ||
Short-Term Technical Acceptance Criteria For Demonstrating The Acceptability For North Anna Plant Restart Confirm the adequacy of the scope of the licensee's inspections, tests and analyses which demonstrate that no functional damage resulted from the earthquake to systems, subsystems, trains, components and devices (systems, structures, or components [SSCs]) for the current licensing basis (1) that are required to be operable by TSs, (2) SSCs not explicitly required to be operable by TSs, but that perform required support functions to maintain a TS required system operable; and (3) SSCs that are not described in TSs but which warrant programmatic controls to ensure that SSC availability and reliability are maintained. Refer to NRC Inspection Manual Part 9900, "Operability Determinations and Functionality Assessments for Resolution of Degraded or NonConforming Conditions Adverse to Quality or Safety" for more detailed guidance for determinations of operability and resolution of degraded or nonconforming conditions. | |||
==Contact:== | |||
Carl Schulten, NRR/ITSB}} | |||
Latest revision as of 19:52, 12 January 2025
| ML12054A078 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | North Anna  |
| Issue date: | 09/16/2011 |
| From: | Meena Khanna Division of Operating Reactor Licensing |
| To: | Karwoski K, Stuchell S Division of Engineering, Division of Policy and Rulemaking |
| References | |
| FOIA/PA-2011-0357 | |
| Download: ML12054A078 (2) | |
Text
Martin, Robert From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:
Khanna, Meena I \\\\
Friday, September 16, 2011 5:38 PM Karwoski, Kenneth; Stuchell, Sheldon Manoly, Kamal; Wilson, George; Boyle, Patrick; Martin, Robert North Anna Acceptance Criteria R2 Comments.docx North Anna Acceptance Criteria R2 Comments.docx Ken and Sheldon, Attached are some comments that we received regarding the proposed acceptance criteria from Gerry McCoy in Region II. Could we pls meet on Monday to discuss and then conduct a call with him? I plan to go ahead and send the proposed acceptance criteria to OGC so that we can obtain input from them in parallel.
Thanks!
Meena
Short-Term Technical Acceptance Criteria For Demonstrating The Acceptability For North Anna Plant Restart Confirm the adequacy of the scope of the licensee's inspections, tests and analyses which demonstrate that no functional damage resulted from the earthquake to systems, subsystems, trains, components and devices (systems, structures, or components [SSCs]) for the current licensing basis (1) that are required to be operable by TSs, (2) SSCs not explicitly required to be operable by TSs, but that perform required support functions to maintain a TS required system operable; and (3) SSCs that are not described in TSs but which warrant programmatic controls to ensure that SSC availability and reliability are maintained. Refer to NRC Inspection Manual Part 9900, "Operability Determinations and Functionality Assessments for Resolution of Degraded or NonConforming Conditions Adverse to Quality or Safety" for more detailed guidance for determinations of operability and resolution of degraded or nonconforming conditions.
Contact:
Carl Schulten, NRR/ITSB