ML12292A035: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
| number = ML12292A035
| number = ML12292A035
| issue date = 10/17/2012
| issue date = 10/17/2012
| title = 2012/10/17 Indian Point Lr Hearing - Draft Indian Point Opinion
| title = Lr Hearing - Draft Indian Point Opinion
| author name =  
| author name =  
| author affiliation = - No Known Affiliation
| author affiliation = - No Known Affiliation
Line 15: Line 15:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:1 IPRenewal NPEmails From: Gray, Dara F [DGray@entergy.com]
{{#Wiki_filter:1 IPRenewal NPEmails From:
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2012 4:21 PM To: Logan, Dennis Cc: Balsam, Briana; Wentzel, Michael; IPRenewal NPEmails
Gray, Dara F [DGray@entergy.com]
Sent:
Wednesday, October 17, 2012 4:21 PM To:
Logan, Dennis Cc:
Balsam, Briana; Wentzel, Michael; IPRenewal NPEmails


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
RE: Draft Indian point opinionDennis Thanks for keeping me "in the loop'.
RE: Draft Indian point opinion Dennis Thanks for keeping me "in the loop'.
As long as the delay is only a few day s, that is ok with Entergy but we agree that we need to get a response from NMFS on what they mean by that (a day or two is fine but after that...),
As long as the delay is only a few days, that is ok with Entergy but we agree that we need to get a response from NMFS on what they mean by that (a day or two is fine but after that...),
especially given your schedule and the holiday.
especially given your schedule and the holiday.
Thanks again  
Thanks again  
-----Original Message-----
-----Original Message-----
From: Logan, Dennis [mailto:Dennis.Logan@nrc.gov
From: Logan, Dennis [mailto:Dennis.Logan@nrc.gov]
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2012 3:28 PM To: Gray, Dara F Cc: Balsam, Briana; Wentzel, Michael; IPRenewal NPEmails  
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2012 3:28 PM To: Gray, Dara F Cc: Balsam, Briana; Wentzel, Michael; IPRenewal NPEmails  


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
RE: Draft Indian point opinion  
RE: Draft Indian point opinion
: Dara,  
: Dara, Very good. E-mail will be fine. I will be working from home Thursday and can call you if you need to discuss anything. I'll be checking voice-and e-mails regularly.
 
Dennis  
Very good. E-mail will be fine. I will be working from home Thursday and can call you if you need to discuss anything. I'll be checking voice- and e-mails regularly.  
 
Dennis  
-----Original Message-----
-----Original Message-----
From: Gray, Dara F [mailto:DGray@entergy.com
From: Gray, Dara F [mailto:DGray@entergy.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2012 3:24 PM To: Logan, Dennis Cc: Balsam, Briana; Wentzel, Michael; IPRenewal NPEmails  
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2012 3:24 PM To: Logan, Dennis Cc: Balsam, Briana; Wentzel, Michael; IPRenewal NPEmails  


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
RE: Draft Indian point opinion  
RE: Draft Indian point opinion Hi Dennis I will get you an answer tomorrow.  
 
-----Original Message-----
Hi Dennis I will get you an answer tomorrow.  
From: Logan, Dennis [mailto:Dennis.Logan@nrc.gov]
-----Original Message-----
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2012 2:33 PM To: Gray, Dara F Cc: Balsam, Briana; Wentzel, Michael; IPRenewal NPEmails  
From: Logan, Dennis [mailto:Dennis.Logan@nrc.gov
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2012 2:33 PM To: Gray, Dara F Cc: Balsam, Briana; Wentzel, Michael; IPRenewal NPEmails  


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
FW: Draft Indian point opinion  
FW: Draft Indian point opinion Dara Julie would like more time to finish the draft biological opinion.
 
Dara  
 
Julie would like more time to finish the draft biological opinion.
I have some concern if by "towards the end of that week" she means Friday close of business.
I have some concern if by "towards the end of that week" she means Friday close of business.
Both Entergy and NRC need time to comment and get back to NMFS in time that NMFS can then incorporate the comments and produce the final. I will be out of the office the week of November 12 to 16, and that put some time constraints on our review here at NRC.  
Both Entergy and NRC need time to comment and get back to NMFS in time that NMFS can then incorporate the comments and produce the final. I will be out of the office the week of November 12 to 16, and that put some time constraints on our review here at NRC.  


2I think that for NRC, a delay of only a day or two would make little difference.  
2 I think that for NRC, a delay of only a day or two would make little difference.
 
I plan to express the concern above to NMFS. Do you have any further concerns with NMFS proposed delay?
I plan to express the concern above to NMFS. Do you have any further concerns with NMFS proposed delay?  
Dennis  
 
Dennis    
 
-----Original Message-----
-----Original Message-----
From: Julie Email [mailto:jecrocker@verizon.net
From: Julie Email [mailto:jecrocker@verizon.net]
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2012 1:53 PM To: Logan, Dennis; Balsam, Briana  
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2012 1:53 PM To: Logan, Dennis; Balsam, Briana  


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Draft Indian point opinion  
Draft Indian point opinion Hi Dennis We are making good progress on internal review of the draft opinion for Indian point - we had told you we would have it to you on oct 22 but it is looking like it will be more towards the end of that week. Just wanted to let you know. I think we have enough time built in after that (final due nov 28) that meeting the final date will not be a problem. Let me know if you have any concerns Julie


Hi Dennis We are making good progress on internal review of the draft opinion for Indian point -
Hearing Identifier:
w e had told you we would have it to you on oct 22 but it is looking like it will be more towards the end of that week. Just wanted to let you know. I think we have enough time built in after that (final due nov 28) that meeting the final date will not be a problem. Let me know if you have any concerns
IndianPointUnits2and3NonPublic_EX Email Number:
 
3873 Mail Envelope Properties (DA94DFACF1201C4A91A21BD336C2520A08603FC3)  
Julie
 
Hearing Identifier: IndianPointUnits2and3NonPublic_EX Email Number: 3873   Mail Envelope Properties   (DA94DFACF1201C4A91A21BD336C2520A08603FC3)


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
RE: Draft Indian point opinion Sent Date:   10/17/2012 4:21:02 PM Received Date: 10/17/2012 4:21:06 PM From:   Gray, Dara F Created By:   DGray@entergy.com Recipients:     "Balsam, Briana" <Briana.Balsam@nrc.gov>
RE: Draft Indian point opinion Sent Date:
Tracking Status: None "Wentzel, Michael" <Michael.Wentzel@nrc.gov>
10/17/2012 4:21:02 PM Received Date:
Tracking Status: None "IPRenewal NPEmails" <IPRenewal.NPEmails@nrc.gov> Tracking Status: None "Logan, Dennis" <Dennis.Logan@nrc.gov> Tracking Status: None  
10/17/2012 4:21:06 PM From:
 
Gray, Dara F Created By:
Post Office:   litxmetsp002.etrsouth.corp.entergy.com Files     Size     Date & Time MESSAGE   2515     10/17/2012 4:21:06 PM
DGray@entergy.com Recipients:  
 
"Balsam, Briana" <Briana.Balsam@nrc.gov>
Options Priority:     Standard   Return Notification:   Yes   Reply Requested:   No   Sensitivity:     Normal Expiration Date:     Recipients Received:}}
Tracking Status: None "Wentzel, Michael" <Michael.Wentzel@nrc.gov>
Tracking Status: None "IPRenewal NPEmails" <IPRenewal.NPEmails@nrc.gov>
Tracking Status: None "Logan, Dennis" <Dennis.Logan@nrc.gov>
Tracking Status: None Post Office:
litxmetsp002.etrsouth.corp.entergy.com Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 2515 10/17/2012 4:21:06 PM Options Priority:
Standard Return Notification:
Yes Reply Requested:
No Sensitivity:
Normal Expiration Date:
Recipients Received:}}

Latest revision as of 21:58, 11 January 2025

Lr Hearing - Draft Indian Point Opinion
ML12292A035
Person / Time
Site: Indian Point  Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 10/17/2012
From:
- No Known Affiliation
To:
Division of License Renewal
References
Download: ML12292A035 (3)


Text

1 IPRenewal NPEmails From:

Gray, Dara F [DGray@entergy.com]

Sent:

Wednesday, October 17, 2012 4:21 PM To:

Logan, Dennis Cc:

Balsam, Briana; Wentzel, Michael; IPRenewal NPEmails

Subject:

RE: Draft Indian point opinion Dennis Thanks for keeping me "in the loop'.

As long as the delay is only a few days, that is ok with Entergy but we agree that we need to get a response from NMFS on what they mean by that (a day or two is fine but after that...),

especially given your schedule and the holiday.

Thanks again


Original Message-----

From: Logan, Dennis [1]

Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2012 3:28 PM To: Gray, Dara F Cc: Balsam, Briana; Wentzel, Michael; IPRenewal NPEmails

Subject:

RE: Draft Indian point opinion

Dara, Very good. E-mail will be fine. I will be working from home Thursday and can call you if you need to discuss anything. I'll be checking voice-and e-mails regularly.

Dennis


Original Message-----

From: Gray, Dara F [2]

Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2012 3:24 PM To: Logan, Dennis Cc: Balsam, Briana; Wentzel, Michael; IPRenewal NPEmails

Subject:

RE: Draft Indian point opinion Hi Dennis I will get you an answer tomorrow.


Original Message-----

From: Logan, Dennis [3]

Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2012 2:33 PM To: Gray, Dara F Cc: Balsam, Briana; Wentzel, Michael; IPRenewal NPEmails

Subject:

FW: Draft Indian point opinion Dara Julie would like more time to finish the draft biological opinion.

I have some concern if by "towards the end of that week" she means Friday close of business.

Both Entergy and NRC need time to comment and get back to NMFS in time that NMFS can then incorporate the comments and produce the final. I will be out of the office the week of November 12 to 16, and that put some time constraints on our review here at NRC.

2 I think that for NRC, a delay of only a day or two would make little difference.

I plan to express the concern above to NMFS. Do you have any further concerns with NMFS proposed delay?

Dennis


Original Message-----

From: Julie Email [4]

Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2012 1:53 PM To: Logan, Dennis; Balsam, Briana

Subject:

Draft Indian point opinion Hi Dennis We are making good progress on internal review of the draft opinion for Indian point - we had told you we would have it to you on oct 22 but it is looking like it will be more towards the end of that week. Just wanted to let you know. I think we have enough time built in after that (final due nov 28) that meeting the final date will not be a problem. Let me know if you have any concerns Julie

Hearing Identifier:

IndianPointUnits2and3NonPublic_EX Email Number:

3873 Mail Envelope Properties (DA94DFACF1201C4A91A21BD336C2520A08603FC3)

Subject:

RE: Draft Indian point opinion Sent Date:

10/17/2012 4:21:02 PM Received Date:

10/17/2012 4:21:06 PM From:

Gray, Dara F Created By:

DGray@entergy.com Recipients:

"Balsam, Briana" <Briana.Balsam@nrc.gov>

Tracking Status: None "Wentzel, Michael" <Michael.Wentzel@nrc.gov>

Tracking Status: None "IPRenewal NPEmails" <IPRenewal.NPEmails@nrc.gov>

Tracking Status: None "Logan, Dennis" <Dennis.Logan@nrc.gov>

Tracking Status: None Post Office:

litxmetsp002.etrsouth.corp.entergy.com Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 2515 10/17/2012 4:21:06 PM Options Priority:

Standard Return Notification:

Yes Reply Requested:

No Sensitivity:

Normal Expiration Date:

Recipients Received: