ML15075A346: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
(6 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
| number = ML15075A346
| number = ML15075A346
| issue date = 03/10/2015
| issue date = 03/10/2015
| title = NUH32PHB-0203, Revision 2, PWR Fuel Rod Accident Side Drop Loading Stress Analysis for Nuhoms 32 Phb System, Non-Proprietary
| title = NUH32PHB-0203, Revision 2, PWR Fuel Rod Accident Side Drop Loading Stress Analysis for NUHOMS 32 Phb System, Non-Proprietary
| author name =  
| author name =  
| author affiliation = AREVA
| author affiliation = AREVA
Line 17: Line 17:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:ENCLOSURE 13Non-Proprietary NUH32PHB-0203, Revision 2,PWR Fuel Rod Accident Side Drop Loading Stress Analysis forNUHOMS 32 PHB SystemCalvert Cliffs Nuclear Power PlantMarch 10, 2015 Controlled Copy E-281A Form 3.2-1 CalculaflonNo.: I NUH32PHB-0203AR EVA Calculation Cover Sheet Revision No.. 2TRANSUCLEAR INC. TP 3.2 (Revision 6) Page I of 23DCR NO (ifapplicable) : NUH32PHB-013 PROJECt NAME: NUHOMS 32PHB SystemPROJECT NO: 10955 CLIENT: CENG -Calvert Cliff Nuclear Power Plant (CCNPP)CALCULATION TITLE:PWR Fuel Rod Accident Side Drop Loading Stress Analysis for NUHOMS 32PHB SystemSUMMARY DESCRIPTION:1) Calculation SummaryThe purpose of this calculation is to verify the structural adequacy of the fuel cladding subject to side drophypothetical accident loading condition for PWR fuel assemblies to be loaded in the NUH32PHB transfer cask. Inaddition, structural integrity of spacer grids is discussed to assess grid deformation impact onto fuel rod pitch aswell as modal analysis for fuel cladding Is conducted to determine lateral natural frequencies.2) Storage Media DescriptionSecure network server Initially, then redundant tape backup. (Same as Rev.0)IIIIf original Issue, Is licensing review per TIP 3.5 required? N/AYes [l No [I (explaln below) Licensing Review No.:Software Utilized (subject to test requirements of TIP 3.3): Version:ANSYS lO.OA1Calculation is complete:10- 22-13Originator Name and Signature: Ashley SpryDate:Calculation has been checked for consistency, completeness and correctness:Raheel HaroonChecker Name and Signature: Date:Calculation is approved for use:Project Engineer Name and Signature: /Date:II A Calc. No.: NUH32PHB-0203AREVA CalcUlation Rev. No.: 2TRANSNUCLEAR INC. Page: 2of23REVISION SUMMARYAffected AffectedRev. Description of Changes Pages Computational11o0 Initial Issue All All1 Add discussion about M-5 material for AREVA fuel assembly so that all 1,2,5-8,11,15 Nonethe fuel assemblies for NUJH32PHB are taken into account.2 Change oxidation thickness from 120 microns to 125 microns. Stresses 5,6,8,9,11, 12 None,are updated accordingly, A Caic. No.: NUH32PHB-0203AREVA Calculation Rev. No.: 2TRANSNUCLEAR INC. Page: 3of23TABLE OF CONTENTS1.0 Purpose ..................................................................................................................................................... 52.0 References ................................................................................................................................................. 53.0 M ethodology .............................................................................................................................................. 64.0 Assumptions .......... ! ................................................................................................................................. 65.0 Design Criteria .......................................................................................................................................... 76.0 Computation ............................................................................................................................................. 76.1 Finite Element M odel ............................................................................................................................ 76.2 M aterial Properties ..................................................................................................................... ............. 76.3 Selection of Bounding Case ....... ...................................................... 86.4 Calculation for Bending Stress ............................................................................................................... 86.5 Loading ............................................! .............................. L ........................................................ , ........ 97.0 Results ...................................................................................................................................................... 98.0 Conclusion .......................................................................................................................... ................ 99.0 Listing of ANSYS Computer Files ............................................................................................................ 1IAppendix A: -M odal Analysis ............. .................................. ............ .............. !...............................Appendix B: -Fuel Assembly Spacer Grid Integrity ............ .............................. 22 A Caic. No.: NUH32PHB-0203AREVA Calculation Rev. No.: 2TRANSNUCLEAR INC. Page: 4,of23List of TablesTable 1 Analyzed Fuel Rod Characteristics ................................................................................................... 11Table 2 Finite E lem ent M odel .............................................................................................................................. 12Table 3 Summary of Stress Results for Accident Condition 75g Side Drop ........................................................... 12Table 4 Fuel Cladding Natural Frequencies ................................................................................................... 16List of FiguresFigure 1 PW R Fuel Cladding G eom etry .............. ............ ................ ...... ................... ................ .......... 13Figure 2 Finite Elem ent M odel Setup .................................................................................. ............................... 13Figure 3 Typical PWR Fuel Assembly Grid and Constraints ............................................................................. 14Figure 4 Bounding Fuel Assembly Bending Stress Under 75g Load .................................................................. 15Figure 5 Natural Frequency -1i Mode ........................................................................... 1..Figure 6 N atural Frequency -2nd M ode ........................................................... .............................................. 1Figure 7 Natural Frequency -3rd Mode ......................................................................... .............. 1Figure 8- N atural Frequency -4th M ode ................................................................................................................2.Figure 9- N atural Frequency -5 MM ode ............................................................................................................... 21Figure 10 Schematic Diagram of Spacer Grid Response (Ref [2.15], Figure nI-1i5) ............................. 23 A I Calc. No.: NUH32PHB-0203AR-EVA CalcUlation Rev. No.: 2TRANSNUCLEAR INC. Page: 5_of231.0 PurposeThe purpose of this calculation is to verify the structural adequacy of the fuel assemblies to be loaded in theNUH32PHB transfer cask. Side drop analysis is performed for hypothetical accident 'load conditions. In addition,structural integrity of spacer grids is discussed to assess grid deformation impact onto fuel rod pitch. Modalanalysis for fuel cladding is also conducted to determine lateral natural frequencies.2.0 References2.1 NUH32PHB.0101, Rev. 2, "Design Criteria Document (DCD) for the NUHOMS 32PHB System forStorage".2.2 TN Calculation No. 972-179, Rev. 0, "TN-68 High BurnUp Cladding Mechanical Properties".2.3 ANSYS Computer Code and User's Manuals, Release 10.0.2.4 DOE/RW-0184, Volume 3 of 6, December 1987, "Characteristics of Spent Fuel,. .High Level Waste, andOther Radiological Wastes which May Require Long-Term Isolation", USDOE, Office of CivilianRadioactive Waste Management.2.5 TN Calculation NUH32PHB-0403, Rev. 0, "Thermal Evaluation of NU1HOMS 32PHB DSC for Storage andTransfer Conditions".2.6 H.E. Adkins, Jr., B.J. Koeppel and T. Tang, "Spent Nuclear Fuel Structural Response when Subjected to anEnd Impact Accident", PVP2004, San Diego, CA, July 25-29, 2004.2.7 TN Calculation NUH32P+--0204, Rev 1, "Fuel 'End Drop Analysis for NUH32P+ Using LS-DYNA".2.8 Raymond J, Roark and Wafren C. Young, "Formulas For Stress and Strain", 5u' edition, McDraw-.HiU BookCompany,2.9 Calvert Cliffs Calculation CA06525, Rev. 0, "Calvert Cliffs Unit 2 Cycle 16 Bounding Fuel PerformanceAnalysis for ZrB2 Implementation at 2746 MWt Core Power".2.10 UCID -21246, "Dynamic Impact. Effects on Spent Fuel Assemblies", Lawrence Livermore NationalLaboratory, October 20, 1987,2.11 NUREG/CR-0200, Vol. 3, Rev. 5 (Table M8.2,4), ORNL/NUREG/CSD-2/V3/R6, "SCALE, A Mod.ular Code.System for Performing Standardized Computer Analysis for Licensing Evaluation for Workstations andPersonal Computers", Oak Ridge National Laboratory, RSIC Computer Code Collection.2.12 Not used.2.13 Not used.2.14 Chun, R., M. Witte, M. Schwarz, "Dynamic Impact Effects on Spent Fuel Assemblies", October, 1987, pp.3.2.15 Report SAND90-2406, "A Method for Determining the Spent-Fuel Contribution 'to Transport CaskContainment Requirements'", Sandia National Laboratories,. November 1992.2.16 TN Calculation No. NUHPHB-0205, Rev. 1, "NUHOMS 32PHB Basket Evaluation for Storage andTransfer Loads".2.17 TN Calculation No. NUH-HBU-0249, Rev: 0, "M5 Cladding Mechanical Properties".
{{#Wiki_filter:ENCLOSURE 13 Non-Proprietary NUH32PHB-0203, Revision 2, PWR Fuel Rod Accident Side Drop Loading Stress Analysis for NUHOMS 32 PHB System Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant March 10, 2015
A Calc. No.: NUH32PHB-0203AREVA Calculation Rev. No.: 2TRANSNUCLEAR INC. Page: 6of23ProprietaryI A Caic. No.: NUH32PHB-0203AREVA Calculation Rev. No." 2TRANSNUCLEAR INC. Page: 7of23Proprietary A Calc. No.: NUH32PHB-0203AREVA Calculation Rev. No.: 2TRANSNUCL.AR INC. Page: 8.of 23Proprietary A Calc. No.: NUH32PHB-0203AR.EVA CalcUlation Rev. No.- 2TRANSNUCLEAR INC. Page: 9.of23Proprietary8.0 ConclusionThe maximum stress under Accident drop conditions among all PWR fuels to be transported, in the NUH32PHB Caskis 45.4 ksi for Zircaloy-4 and 48.0 ksi for M-5, respectively. Those stresses significantly lower than the yield stress ofZircaloy-4 (92 ksi) and M-5 (67.3 ksi) at 750 TF. It is, therefore, concluded that the fuel claddings will not fail underaccident side drop load condition.
 
A ICalc. No.: NUH32PHB-0203AR EVA Calculation Rev. No.: 2TRANSNUCLEAR INC. Page: 10of23Proprietary AAREVATRANSNUCLEAR INC.Calc. No.: NUH32PHB-0203CalculationRev. No.: 2Page: 11 of 23Proprietary A Calc. No.: NUH32PHB-0203AREVA Calculation Rev. No.: 2TRANSNUCLEAR INC. Page: 12-of23Proprietary A Calc. No.: NUH32PHB-0203AREVA Calculation Rev. No.: 2TRANSNUCLEAR INC. Page: 13of23Proprietary A Caic. No;: NUH32PHB-0203AREVA Calculation Rev. No.. 2TRANSNUCLEAR INC. Page: 114 of 23Proprietary.I A Calc. NO.: NUH32PHBM0203ARENA Calculation Rev. NO.-, 2TRANSN.UCLEAR INC. Page: 15 of 23Proprietary A ICalc. No.: NUH32PHB-0203AREVA Calculation Rev. No.: 2TRANSNUCLEAR INC. PRage: 16of23Proprietary A Caic. No.: NUH32PHI-0203.AREVA Calculation Rev. NO.'1 2TRANSNUCLEAR INC. 'Page: 17 of 23Proprietary.1 A CaIc. No.: NUH32PHB-0203AREVA Calculation Rev. No.: 12TRANSNUCLEAR INC. Page: 18 of 23Proprietary'I
Controlled Copy E-281 A
,.IProprietary A Calc. No;: NUH32PHB-0203AREVA Calculation Rev. No., 2TRANSNUCLEAR INC. Page: 20 of 23Proprietary'I A J Calc No.: NuH32PHB-0203AREVA Calculation Rev. No.: 2TRANSNUCLEAR INC. Page: 21 of 23Proprietary A Calc. No.: NUH32PHB-0203AREVA Calculation Rev. No.: 2TRANSNUCLEAR INC. Page: 22of23ProprietaryI A Calc. No.: NUH32PHB-0203AR EVA Calculation Rev. No.: 2TRANSNUCLEAR INC. Page: 23of23ProprietaryI}}
Form 3.2-1 CalculaflonNo.:
I NUH32PHB-0203 AR EVA Calculation Cover Sheet Revision No..
2 TRANSUCLEAR INC.
TP 3.2 (Revision 6)
Page I of 23 DCR NO (ifapplicable) : NUH32PHB-013 PROJECt NAME: NUHOMS 32PHB System PROJECT NO: 10955 CLIENT: CENG - Calvert Cliff Nuclear Power Plant (CCNPP)
CALCULATION TITLE:
PWR Fuel Rod Accident Side Drop Loading Stress Analysis for NUHOMS 32PHB System
 
==SUMMARY==
DESCRIPTION:
: 1) Calculation Summary The purpose of this calculation is to verify the structural adequacy of the fuel cladding subject to side drop hypothetical accident loading condition for PWR fuel assemblies to be loaded in the NUH32PHB transfer cask. In addition, structural integrity of spacer grids is discussed to assess grid deformation impact onto fuel rod pitch as well as modal analysis for fuel cladding Is conducted to determine lateral natural frequencies.
: 2) Storage Media Description Secure network server Initially, then redundant tape backup. (Same as Rev.0)
II I
If original Issue, Is licensing review per TIP 3.5 required? N/A Yes [l No [I (explaln below)
Licensing Review No.:
Software Utilized (subject to test requirements of TIP 3.3):
Version:
ANSYS lO.OA1 Calculation is complete:
10- 22-13 Originator Name and Signature:
Ashley Spry Date:
Calculation has been checked for consistency, completeness and correctness:
Raheel Haroon Checker Name and Signature:
Date:
Calculation is approved for use:
Project Engineer Name and Signature: /Date:
I I
 
A Calc. No.:
NUH32PHB-0203 AREVA CalcUlation Rev. No.:
2 TRANSNUCLEAR INC.
Page:
2of23 REVISION
 
==SUMMARY==
Affected Affected Rev.
Description of Changes Pages Computational 11o 0
Initial Issue All All 1
Add discussion about M-5 material for AREVA fuel assembly so that all 1,2,5-8,11,15 None the fuel assemblies for NUJH32PHB are taken into account.
2 Change oxidation thickness from 120 microns to 125 microns. Stresses 5,6,8,9,11, 12
: None, are updated accordingly,
 
A Caic. No.:
NUH32PHB-0203 AREVA Calculation Rev. No.:
2 TRANSNUCLEAR INC.
Page:
3of23 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Purpose.....................................................................................................................................................
5 2.0 References.................................................................................................................................................
5 3.0 M ethodology..............................................................................................................................................
6 4.0 Assumptions.......... !.................................................................................................................................
6 5.0 Design Criteria..........................................................................................................................................
7 6.0 Computation.............................................................................................................................................
7 6.1 Finite Element M odel............................................................................................................................
7 6.2 M aterial Properties.....................................................................................................................  
............. 7 6.3 Selection of Bounding Case.......
8 6.4 Calculation for Bending Stress...............................................................................................................
8 6.5 Loading............................................
L
........................................................,........ 9 7.0 Results......................................................................................................................................................
9 8.0 Conclusion..........................................................................................................................
9 9.0 Listing of ANSYS Computer Files............................................................................................................
1I Appendix A: - M odal Analysis.............
Appendix B: - Fuel Assembly Spacer Grid Integrity............
22
 
A Caic. No.:
NUH32PHB-0203 AREVA Calculation Rev. No.:
2 TRANSNUCLEAR INC.
Page:
4,of23 List of Tables Table 1 Analyzed Fuel Rod Characteristics...................................................................................................
11 Table 2 Finite E lem ent M odel..............................................................................................................................
12 Table 3 Summary of Stress Results for Accident Condition 75g Side Drop...........................................................
12 Table 4 Fuel Cladding Natural Frequencies...................................................................................................
16 List of Figures Figure 1 PW R Fuel Cladding G eom etry..............
13 Figure 2 Finite Elem ent M odel Setup..................................................................................
13 Figure 3 Typical PWR Fuel Assembly Grid and Constraints.............................................................................
14 Figure 4 Bounding Fuel Assembly Bending Stress Under 75g Load..................................................................
15 Figure 5 Natural Frequency - 1i Mode...........................................................................
1..
Figure 6 N atural Frequency - 2nd M ode...........................................................
1 Figure 7 Natural Frequency - 3 rd Mode.........................................................................
1 Figure 8-N atural Frequency - 4th M ode................................................................................................................
2.
Figure 9-N atural Frequency - 5 MM ode...............................................................................................................
21 Figure 10 Schematic Diagram of Spacer Grid Response (Ref [2.15], Figure nI-1i5).............................
23
 
A I
Calc. No.:
NUH32PHB-0203 AR-EVA CalcUlation Rev. No.:
2 TRANSNUCLEAR INC.
Page:
5_of23 1.0 Purpose The purpose of this calculation is to verify the structural adequacy of the fuel assemblies to be loaded in the NUH32PHB transfer cask. Side drop analysis is performed for hypothetical accident 'load conditions. In addition, structural integrity of spacer grids is discussed to assess grid deformation impact onto fuel rod pitch. Modal analysis for fuel cladding is also conducted to determine lateral natural frequencies.
2.0 References 2.1 NUH32PHB.0101, Rev. 2, "Design Criteria Document (DCD) for the NUHOMS 32PHB System for Storage".
2.2 TN Calculation No. 972-179, Rev. 0, "TN-68 High BurnUp Cladding Mechanical Properties".
2.3 ANSYS Computer Code and User's Manuals, Release 10.0.
2.4 DOE/RW-0184, Volume 3 of 6, December 1987, "Characteristics of Spent Fuel,..High Level Waste, and Other Radiological Wastes which May Require Long-Term Isolation", USDOE, Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management.
2.5 TN Calculation NUH32PHB-0403, Rev. 0, "Thermal Evaluation of NU1HOMS 32PHB DSC for Storage and Transfer Conditions".
2.6 H.E. Adkins, Jr., B.J. Koeppel and T. Tang, "Spent Nuclear Fuel Structural Response when Subjected to an End Impact Accident", PVP2004, San Diego, CA, July 25-29, 2004.
2.7 TN Calculation NUH32P+--0204, Rev 1, "Fuel 'End Drop Analysis for NUH32P+ Using LS-DYNA".
2.8 Raymond J, Roark and Wafren C. Young, "Formulas For Stress and Strain", 5u' edition, McDraw-.HiU Book
: Company, 2.9 Calvert Cliffs Calculation CA06525, Rev. 0, "Calvert Cliffs Unit 2 Cycle 16 Bounding Fuel Performance Analysis for ZrB2 Implementation at 2746 MWt Core Power".
2.10 UCID - 21246, "Dynamic Impact. Effects on Spent Fuel Assemblies", Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, October 20, 1987, 2.11 NUREG/CR-0200, Vol. 3, Rev. 5 (Table M8.2,4), ORNL/NUREG/CSD-2/V3/R6, "SCALE, A Mod.ular Code.
System for Performing Standardized Computer Analysis for Licensing Evaluation for Workstations and Personal Computers", Oak Ridge National Laboratory, RSIC Computer Code Collection.
2.12 Not used.
2.13 Not used.
2.14 Chun, R., M. Witte, M. Schwarz, "Dynamic Impact Effects on Spent Fuel Assemblies", October, 1987, pp.3.
2.15 Report SAND90-2406, "A Method for Determining the Spent-Fuel Contribution 'to Transport Cask Containment Requirements'", Sandia National Laboratories,. November 1992.
2.16 TN Calculation No. NUHPHB-0205, Rev. 1, "NUHOMS 32PHB Basket Evaluation for Storage and Transfer Loads".
2.17 TN Calculation No. NUH-HBU-0249, Rev: 0, "M5 Cladding Mechanical Properties".
 
A Calc. No.:
NUH32PHB-0203 AREVA Calculation Rev. No.:
2 TRANSNUCLEAR INC.
Page: 6of23 Proprietary I
 
A Caic. No.:
NUH32PHB-0203 AREVA Calculation Rev. No."
2 TRANSNUCLEAR INC.
Page: 7of23 Proprietary
 
A Calc. No.:
NUH32PHB-0203 AREVA Calculation Rev. No.:
2 TRANSNUCL.AR INC.
Page:
8.of 23 Proprietary
 
A Calc. No.:
NUH32PHB-0203 AR.EVA CalcUlation Rev. No.-
2 TRANSNUCLEAR INC.
Page:
9.of23 Proprietary 8.0 Conclusion The maximum stress under Accident drop conditions among all PWR fuels to be transported, in the NUH32PHB Cask is 45.4 ksi for Zircaloy-4 and 48.0 ksi for M-5, respectively. Those stresses significantly lower than the yield stress of Zircaloy-4 (92 ksi) and M-5 (67.3 ksi) at 750 TF. It is, therefore, concluded that the fuel claddings will not fail under accident side drop load condition.
 
A ICalc.
No.:
NUH32PHB-0203 AR EVA Calculation Rev. No.:
2 TRANSNUCLEAR INC.
Page:
10of23 Proprietary
 
A AREVA TRANSNUCLEAR INC.
Calc. No.:
NUH32PHB-0203 Calculation Rev. No.:
2 Page:
11 of 23 Proprietary
 
A Calc. No.:
NUH32PHB-0203 AREVA Calculation Rev. No.:
2 TRANSNUCLEAR INC.
Page:
12-of23 Proprietary
 
A Calc. No.:
NUH32PHB-0203 AREVA Calculation Rev. No.:
2 TRANSNUCLEAR INC.
Page:
13of23 Proprietary
 
A Caic. No;:
NUH32PHB-0203 AREVA Calculation Rev. No..
2 TRANSNUCLEAR INC.
Page: 114 of 23 Proprietary
.I
 
A Calc. NO.:
NUH32PHBM0203 ARENA Calculation Rev. NO.-,
2 TRANSN.UCLEAR INC.
Page:
15 of 23 Proprietary
 
A ICalc.
No.:
NUH32PHB-0203 AREVA Calculation Rev. No.:
2 TRANSNUCLEAR INC.
PRage:
16of23 Proprietary
 
A Caic. No.:
NUH32PHI-0203
.AREVA Calculation Rev. NO.'1 2
TRANSNUCLEAR INC.  
'Page:
17 of 23 Proprietary
.1
 
A CaIc. No.:
NUH32PHB-0203 AREVA Calculation Rev. No.: 12 TRANSNUCLEAR INC.
Page:
18 of 23 Proprietary
'I
 
,.I Proprietary
 
A Calc. No;:
NUH32PHB-0203 AREVA Calculation Rev. No.,
2 TRANSNUCLEAR INC.
Page:
20 of 23 Proprietary
'I
 
A J Calc No.:
NuH32PHB-0203 AREVA Calculation Rev. No.: 2 TRANSNUCLEAR INC.
Page:
21 of 23 Proprietary
 
A Calc. No.:
NUH32PHB-0203 AREVA Calculation Rev. No.:
2 TRANSNUCLEAR INC.
Page: 22of23 Proprietary I
 
A Calc. No.:
NUH32PHB-0203 AR EVA Calculation Rev. No.:
2 TRANSNUCLEAR INC.
Page:
23of23 Proprietary I}}

Latest revision as of 13:49, 10 January 2025

NUH32PHB-0203, Revision 2, PWR Fuel Rod Accident Side Drop Loading Stress Analysis for NUHOMS 32 Phb System, Non-Proprietary
ML15075A346
Person / Time
Site: Calvert Cliffs  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 03/10/2015
From:
AREVA
To:
Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards
Shared Package
ML15075A350 List:
References
NUH32PHB-0203, Rev. 2
Download: ML15075A346 (24)


Text

ENCLOSURE 13 Non-Proprietary NUH32PHB-0203, Revision 2, PWR Fuel Rod Accident Side Drop Loading Stress Analysis for NUHOMS 32 PHB System Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant March 10, 2015

Controlled Copy E-281 A

Form 3.2-1 CalculaflonNo.:

I NUH32PHB-0203 AR EVA Calculation Cover Sheet Revision No..

2 TRANSUCLEAR INC.

TP 3.2 (Revision 6)

Page I of 23 DCR NO (ifapplicable) : NUH32PHB-013 PROJECt NAME: NUHOMS 32PHB System PROJECT NO: 10955 CLIENT: CENG - Calvert Cliff Nuclear Power Plant (CCNPP)

CALCULATION TITLE:

PWR Fuel Rod Accident Side Drop Loading Stress Analysis for NUHOMS 32PHB System

SUMMARY

DESCRIPTION:

1) Calculation Summary The purpose of this calculation is to verify the structural adequacy of the fuel cladding subject to side drop hypothetical accident loading condition for PWR fuel assemblies to be loaded in the NUH32PHB transfer cask. In addition, structural integrity of spacer grids is discussed to assess grid deformation impact onto fuel rod pitch as well as modal analysis for fuel cladding Is conducted to determine lateral natural frequencies.
2) Storage Media Description Secure network server Initially, then redundant tape backup. (Same as Rev.0)

II I

If original Issue, Is licensing review per TIP 3.5 required? N/A Yes [l No [I (explaln below)

Licensing Review No.:

Software Utilized (subject to test requirements of TIP 3.3):

Version:

ANSYS lO.OA1 Calculation is complete:

10- 22-13 Originator Name and Signature:

Ashley Spry Date:

Calculation has been checked for consistency, completeness and correctness:

Raheel Haroon Checker Name and Signature:

Date:

Calculation is approved for use:

Project Engineer Name and Signature: /Date:

I I

A Calc. No.:

NUH32PHB-0203 AREVA CalcUlation Rev. No.:

2 TRANSNUCLEAR INC.

Page:

2of23 REVISION

SUMMARY

Affected Affected Rev.

Description of Changes Pages Computational 11o 0

Initial Issue All All 1

Add discussion about M-5 material for AREVA fuel assembly so that all 1,2,5-8,11,15 None the fuel assemblies for NUJH32PHB are taken into account.

2 Change oxidation thickness from 120 microns to 125 microns. Stresses 5,6,8,9,11, 12

None, are updated accordingly,

A Caic. No.:

NUH32PHB-0203 AREVA Calculation Rev. No.:

2 TRANSNUCLEAR INC.

Page:

3of23 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Purpose.....................................................................................................................................................

5 2.0 References.................................................................................................................................................

5 3.0 M ethodology..............................................................................................................................................

6 4.0 Assumptions.......... !.................................................................................................................................

6 5.0 Design Criteria..........................................................................................................................................

7 6.0 Computation.............................................................................................................................................

7 6.1 Finite Element M odel............................................................................................................................

7 6.2 M aterial Properties.....................................................................................................................

............. 7 6.3 Selection of Bounding Case.......

8 6.4 Calculation for Bending Stress...............................................................................................................

8 6.5 Loading............................................

L

........................................................,........ 9 7.0 Results......................................................................................................................................................

9 8.0 Conclusion..........................................................................................................................

9 9.0 Listing of ANSYS Computer Files............................................................................................................

1I Appendix A: - M odal Analysis.............

Appendix B: - Fuel Assembly Spacer Grid Integrity............

22

A Caic. No.:

NUH32PHB-0203 AREVA Calculation Rev. No.:

2 TRANSNUCLEAR INC.

Page:

4,of23 List of Tables Table 1 Analyzed Fuel Rod Characteristics...................................................................................................

11 Table 2 Finite E lem ent M odel..............................................................................................................................

12 Table 3 Summary of Stress Results for Accident Condition 75g Side Drop...........................................................

12 Table 4 Fuel Cladding Natural Frequencies...................................................................................................

16 List of Figures Figure 1 PW R Fuel Cladding G eom etry..............

13 Figure 2 Finite Elem ent M odel Setup..................................................................................

13 Figure 3 Typical PWR Fuel Assembly Grid and Constraints.............................................................................

14 Figure 4 Bounding Fuel Assembly Bending Stress Under 75g Load..................................................................

15 Figure 5 Natural Frequency - 1i Mode...........................................................................

1..

Figure 6 N atural Frequency - 2nd M ode...........................................................

1 Figure 7 Natural Frequency - 3 rd Mode.........................................................................

1 Figure 8-N atural Frequency - 4th M ode................................................................................................................

2.

Figure 9-N atural Frequency - 5 MM ode...............................................................................................................

21 Figure 10 Schematic Diagram of Spacer Grid Response (Ref [2.15], Figure nI-1i5).............................

23

A I

Calc. No.:

NUH32PHB-0203 AR-EVA CalcUlation Rev. No.:

2 TRANSNUCLEAR INC.

Page:

5_of23 1.0 Purpose The purpose of this calculation is to verify the structural adequacy of the fuel assemblies to be loaded in the NUH32PHB transfer cask. Side drop analysis is performed for hypothetical accident 'load conditions. In addition, structural integrity of spacer grids is discussed to assess grid deformation impact onto fuel rod pitch. Modal analysis for fuel cladding is also conducted to determine lateral natural frequencies.

2.0 References 2.1 NUH32PHB.0101, Rev. 2, "Design Criteria Document (DCD) for the NUHOMS 32PHB System for Storage".

2.2 TN Calculation No. 972-179, Rev. 0, "TN-68 High BurnUp Cladding Mechanical Properties".

2.3 ANSYS Computer Code and User's Manuals, Release 10.0.

2.4 DOE/RW-0184, Volume 3 of 6, December 1987, "Characteristics of Spent Fuel,..High Level Waste, and Other Radiological Wastes which May Require Long-Term Isolation", USDOE, Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management.

2.5 TN Calculation NUH32PHB-0403, Rev. 0, "Thermal Evaluation of NU1HOMS 32PHB DSC for Storage and Transfer Conditions".

2.6 H.E. Adkins, Jr., B.J. Koeppel and T. Tang, "Spent Nuclear Fuel Structural Response when Subjected to an End Impact Accident", PVP2004, San Diego, CA, July 25-29, 2004.

2.7 TN Calculation NUH32P+--0204, Rev 1, "Fuel 'End Drop Analysis for NUH32P+ Using LS-DYNA".

2.8 Raymond J, Roark and Wafren C. Young, "Formulas For Stress and Strain", 5u' edition, McDraw-.HiU Book

Company, 2.9 Calvert Cliffs Calculation CA06525, Rev. 0, "Calvert Cliffs Unit 2 Cycle 16 Bounding Fuel Performance Analysis for ZrB2 Implementation at 2746 MWt Core Power".

2.10 UCID - 21246, "Dynamic Impact. Effects on Spent Fuel Assemblies", Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, October 20, 1987, 2.11 NUREG/CR-0200, Vol. 3, Rev. 5 (Table M8.2,4), ORNL/NUREG/CSD-2/V3/R6, "SCALE, A Mod.ular Code.

System for Performing Standardized Computer Analysis for Licensing Evaluation for Workstations and Personal Computers", Oak Ridge National Laboratory, RSIC Computer Code Collection.

2.12 Not used.

2.13 Not used.

2.14 Chun, R., M. Witte, M. Schwarz, "Dynamic Impact Effects on Spent Fuel Assemblies", October, 1987, pp.3.

2.15 Report SAND90-2406, "A Method for Determining the Spent-Fuel Contribution 'to Transport Cask Containment Requirements'", Sandia National Laboratories,. November 1992.

2.16 TN Calculation No. NUHPHB-0205, Rev. 1, "NUHOMS 32PHB Basket Evaluation for Storage and Transfer Loads".

2.17 TN Calculation No. NUH-HBU-0249, Rev: 0, "M5 Cladding Mechanical Properties".

A Calc. No.:

NUH32PHB-0203 AREVA Calculation Rev. No.:

2 TRANSNUCLEAR INC.

Page: 6of23 Proprietary I

A Caic. No.:

NUH32PHB-0203 AREVA Calculation Rev. No."

2 TRANSNUCLEAR INC.

Page: 7of23 Proprietary

A Calc. No.:

NUH32PHB-0203 AREVA Calculation Rev. No.:

2 TRANSNUCL.AR INC.

Page:

8.of 23 Proprietary

A Calc. No.:

NUH32PHB-0203 AR.EVA CalcUlation Rev. No.-

2 TRANSNUCLEAR INC.

Page:

9.of23 Proprietary 8.0 Conclusion The maximum stress under Accident drop conditions among all PWR fuels to be transported, in the NUH32PHB Cask is 45.4 ksi for Zircaloy-4 and 48.0 ksi for M-5, respectively. Those stresses significantly lower than the yield stress of Zircaloy-4 (92 ksi) and M-5 (67.3 ksi) at 750 TF. It is, therefore, concluded that the fuel claddings will not fail under accident side drop load condition.

A ICalc.

No.:

NUH32PHB-0203 AR EVA Calculation Rev. No.:

2 TRANSNUCLEAR INC.

Page:

10of23 Proprietary

A AREVA TRANSNUCLEAR INC.

Calc. No.:

NUH32PHB-0203 Calculation Rev. No.:

2 Page:

11 of 23 Proprietary

A Calc. No.:

NUH32PHB-0203 AREVA Calculation Rev. No.:

2 TRANSNUCLEAR INC.

Page:

12-of23 Proprietary

A Calc. No.:

NUH32PHB-0203 AREVA Calculation Rev. No.:

2 TRANSNUCLEAR INC.

Page:

13of23 Proprietary

A Caic. No;:

NUH32PHB-0203 AREVA Calculation Rev. No..

2 TRANSNUCLEAR INC.

Page: 114 of 23 Proprietary

.I

A Calc. NO.:

NUH32PHBM0203 ARENA Calculation Rev. NO.-,

2 TRANSN.UCLEAR INC.

Page:

15 of 23 Proprietary

A ICalc.

No.:

NUH32PHB-0203 AREVA Calculation Rev. No.:

2 TRANSNUCLEAR INC.

PRage:

16of23 Proprietary

A Caic. No.:

NUH32PHI-0203

.AREVA Calculation Rev. NO.'1 2

TRANSNUCLEAR INC.

'Page:

17 of 23 Proprietary

.1

A CaIc. No.:

NUH32PHB-0203 AREVA Calculation Rev. No.: 12 TRANSNUCLEAR INC.

Page:

18 of 23 Proprietary

'I

,.I Proprietary

A Calc. No;:

NUH32PHB-0203 AREVA Calculation Rev. No.,

2 TRANSNUCLEAR INC.

Page:

20 of 23 Proprietary

'I

A J Calc No.:

NuH32PHB-0203 AREVA Calculation Rev. No.: 2 TRANSNUCLEAR INC.

Page:

21 of 23 Proprietary

A Calc. No.:

NUH32PHB-0203 AREVA Calculation Rev. No.:

2 TRANSNUCLEAR INC.

Page: 22of23 Proprietary I

A Calc. No.:

NUH32PHB-0203 AR EVA Calculation Rev. No.:

2 TRANSNUCLEAR INC.

Page:

23of23 Proprietary I