ML16049A533: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
← Older edit
VisualWikitext
Created page by program invented by StriderTol
StriderTol Bot change
 
(8 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 13: Line 13:
| page count = 2
| page count = 2
}}
}}
See also: [[followed by::IR 05000458/2016201]]
See also: [[see also::IR 05000458/2016201]]


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:
{{#Wiki_filter:February 19, 2016
[[Issue date::February 19, 2016]]
Mr. Robin Cook, Security Manager
Entergy Operations, Inc.
River Bend Station
5485 U.S. Highway 61N
St. Francisville, LA  70775
SUBJECT:  
RESPONSE TO FORMAL DISAGREEMENT WITH ADVERSARY
CHARACTERISTICS, ATTRIBUTES, OR TACTICS EMPLOYED OR
PREPARED AS PART OF A U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
FORCE-ON-FORCE EVALUATED EXERCISE - DISPUTED ITEM
05000458/2016201-01
Dear Mr. Cook:  
Thank you for your email dated February 17, 2016.  The Division of Security Operations (DSO),
Security Performance Evaluation Branch received a Formal Disagreement with Adversary
Characteristics, Attributes, or Tactics Employed or Prepared as Part of an NRC Force-on-Force
Evaluated Exercise, in accordance with Addendum 4 of U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
(NRC) Inspection Procedure 71130.03 Contingency Response - Force-on-Force Testing. 
In your email, you dispute a tactic, technique, or procedure (TTP) within scenario 1 developed
by the NRC force-on-force inspection team.
The NRC has carefully reviewed your formal escalation, and concluded that the disputed TTP is
approved for use within the NRC-evaluated scenario for the following reasons: (1) it is within the
design basis threat, (2) it is supported by available data, (3) it is within your ability to provide
defense-in-depth, (4) it can be safely performed and controlled, and (5) it provides a credible
and realistic challenge to your sites protective strategy.
If you would like to appeal this decision, please provide a written response upon receipt of this
letter with the basis for your appeal, to the Deputy Director, DSO. 
Sincerely,
/RA/
Daniel Cardenas, Branch Chief (Acting)
Security Performance Evaluation Branch
Division of Security Operations
Office of Nuclear Security and Incident Response


Mr. Robin Cook, Security Manager Entergy Operations, Inc. River Bend Station 5485 U.S. Highway 61N St. Francisville, LA 70775


SUBJECT: RESPONSE TO FORMAL DISAGREEMENT WITH ADVERSARY CHARACTERISTICS, ATTRIBUTES, OR TACTICS EMPLOYED OR PREPARED AS PART OF A U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION FORCE-ON-FORCE EVALUATED EXERCISE - DISPUTED ITEM 05000458/2016201-01
ML16049A533
 
OFFICE
==Dear Mr. Cook:==
NSIR/DSO  
Thank you for your email dated February 17, 2016. The Division of Security Operations (DSO), Security Performance Evaluation Branch received a "Formal Disagreement with Adversary Characteristics, Attributes, or Tactics Employed or Prepared as Part of an NRC Force-on-Force Evaluated Exercise," in accordance with Addendum 4 of U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Inspection Procedure 71130.03 "Contingency Response - Force-on-Force Testing."
NSIR/DSO  
 
NSIR/DSO  
In your email, you dispute a tactic, technique, or procedure (TTP) within scenario 1 developed by the NRC force-on-force inspection team.
NAME  
 
J. Willis  
The NRC has carefully reviewed your formal escalation, and concluded that the disputed TTP is approved for use within the NRC-evaluated scenario for the following reasons: (1) it is within the design basis threat, (2) it is supported by available data, (3) it is within your ability to provide defense-in-depth, (4) it can be safely performed and controlled, and (5) it provides a credible and realistic challenge to your site's protective strategy.
L. Pearson  
 
D. Cardenas  
If you would like to appeal this decision, please provide a written response upon receipt of this letter with the basis for your appeal, to the Deputy Director, DSO.
DATE  
 
02/18/16  
Sincerely,/RA/ Daniel Cardenas, Branch Chief (Acting)
02/18/16  
Security Performance Evaluation Branch Division of Security Operations Office of Nuclear Security and Incident Response February 19, 2016
02/18/16
 
Mr. Robin Cook, Security Manager Entergy Operations, Inc. River Bend Station 5485 U.S. Highway 61N St. Francisville, LA 70775
 
SUBJECT: RESPONSE TO FORMAL DISAGREEMENT WITH ADVERSARY CHARACTERISTICS, ATTRIBUTES, OR TACTICS EMPLOYED OR PREPARED AS PART OF A U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION FORCE-ON-FORCE EVALUATED EXERCISE - DISPUTED ITEM 05000458/2016201-01
 
==Dear Mr. Cook:==
Thank you for your email dated February 17, 2016. The Division of Security Operations (DSO), Security Performance Evaluation Branch received a "Formal Disagreement with Adversary Characteristics, Attributes, or Tactics Employed or Prepared as Part of an NRC Force-on-Force Evaluated Exercise," in accordance with Addendum 4 of U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Inspection Procedure 71130.03 "Contingency Response - Force-on-Force Testing."
 
In your email, you dispute a tactic, technique, or procedure (TTP) within scenario 1 developed by the NRC force-on-force inspection team.
 
The NRC has carefully reviewed your formal escalation, and concluded that the disputed TTP is approved for use within the NRC-evaluated scenario for the following reasons: (1) it is within the design basis threat, (2) it is supported by available data, (3) it is within your ability to provide defense-in-depth, (4) it can be safely performed and controlled, and (5) it provides a credible and realistic challenge to your site's protective strategy.
 
If you would like to appeal this decision, please provide a written response upon receipt of this letter with the basis for your appeal, to the Deputy Director, DSO.
 
Sincerely,/RA/ Daniel Cardenas, Branch Chief (Acting)
Security Performance Evaluation Branch Division of Security Operations Office of Nuclear Security and Incident Response ADAMS Accession No. ML16049A533 OFFICE NSIR/DSO NSIR/DSO NSIR/DSO NAME J. Willis L. Pearson D. Cardenas DATE 02/18/16 02/18/16 02/18/16 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY
}}
}}

Latest revision as of 03:27, 10 January 2025

Response to Formal Disagreement with Adversary Characteristics, Attributes, or Tactics Employed or Prepared as Part of NRC Force-On-Force Evaluated Exercise - Disputed Item 05000458/2016201-01
ML16049A533
Person / Time
Site: River Bend 
Issue date: 02/19/2016
From: Cardenas D
NRC/NSIR/DSO/DDSO/SPEB
To: Cook R
Entergy Operations
Joe Willis
References
Download: ML16049A533 (2)
v • d • e


See also: IR 05000458/2016201

Text

February 19, 2016

Mr. Robin Cook, Security Manager

Entergy Operations, Inc.

River Bend Station

5485 U.S. Highway 61N

St. Francisville, LA 70775

SUBJECT:

RESPONSE TO FORMAL DISAGREEMENT WITH ADVERSARY

CHARACTERISTICS, ATTRIBUTES, OR TACTICS EMPLOYED OR

PREPARED AS PART OF A U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

FORCE-ON-FORCE EVALUATED EXERCISE - DISPUTED ITEM 05000458/2016201-01

Dear Mr. Cook:

Thank you for your email dated February 17, 2016. The Division of Security Operations (DSO),

Security Performance Evaluation Branch received a Formal Disagreement with Adversary

Characteristics, Attributes, or Tactics Employed or Prepared as Part of an NRC Force-on-Force

Evaluated Exercise, in accordance with Addendum 4 of U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

(NRC) Inspection Procedure 71130.03 Contingency Response - Force-on-Force Testing.

In your email, you dispute a tactic, technique, or procedure (TTP) within scenario 1 developed

by the NRC force-on-force inspection team.

The NRC has carefully reviewed your formal escalation, and concluded that the disputed TTP is

approved for use within the NRC-evaluated scenario for the following reasons: (1) it is within the

design basis threat, (2) it is supported by available data, (3) it is within your ability to provide

defense-in-depth, (4) it can be safely performed and controlled, and (5) it provides a credible

and realistic challenge to your sites protective strategy.

If you would like to appeal this decision, please provide a written response upon receipt of this

letter with the basis for your appeal, to the Deputy Director, DSO.

Sincerely,

/RA/

Daniel Cardenas, Branch Chief (Acting)

Security Performance Evaluation Branch

Division of Security Operations

Office of Nuclear Security and Incident Response

ML16049A533

OFFICE

NSIR/DSO

NSIR/DSO

NSIR/DSO

NAME

J. Willis

L. Pearson

D. Cardenas

DATE

02/18/16

02/18/16

02/18/16

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML16049A533&oldid=5176312"