ML16197A002: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 15: Line 15:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From:                               Lamb, John Sent:                               Tuesday, July 12, 2016 2:40 PM To:                                 Poole, Justin
{{#Wiki_filter:1 NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From:
Lamb, John Sent:
Tuesday, July 12, 2016 2:40 PM To:
Poole, Justin


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
FW: Seabrook Follow Up Flag:                     Follow up Due By:                             Wednesday, July 13, 2016 3:30 PM Flag Status:                         Flagged From: Debbie Grinnell [mailto:debbie@c-10.org]
FW: Seabrook Follow Up Flag:
Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2016 2:23 PM To: Lamb, John
Follow up Due By:
Wednesday, July 13, 2016 3:30 PM Flag Status:
Flagged From: Debbie Grinnell [mailto:debbie@c-10.org]
Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2016 2:23 PM To: Lamb, John  


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Line 25: Line 31:
: 1) The NRC response to Nuclear Regulatory Commission Report 50-443/87-07 on November 12, 1987 involved the numerous unresolved cracks and leaks, BUT the as built failures and construction failures and as as builder staff not trained in ANSI standards required by UE&C.was scary years ago. The unresolved issues fail to be NRC followed after constructionand the plant passive issues were active, rightly?
: 1) The NRC response to Nuclear Regulatory Commission Report 50-443/87-07 on November 12, 1987 involved the numerous unresolved cracks and leaks, BUT the as built failures and construction failures and as as builder staff not trained in ANSI standards required by UE&C.was scary years ago. The unresolved issues fail to be NRC followed after constructionand the plant passive issues were active, rightly?
: 2) The five cores from R. Conte in 2011 in an email has about the NRC and NextEra agreement to test the cores for tensileNextEra did not test them. Where are they?
: 2) The five cores from R. Conte in 2011 in an email has about the NRC and NextEra agreement to test the cores for tensileNextEra did not test them. Where are they?
Debbie 1
Debbie  


Hearing Identifier:     NRR_PMDA Email Number:           2943 Mail Envelope Properties     (ac375ab118ae4a58a4ed2a6f0766e2d9)
Hearing Identifier:
NRR_PMDA Email Number:
2943 Mail Envelope Properties (ac375ab118ae4a58a4ed2a6f0766e2d9)  


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
FW: Seabrook Sent Date:               7/12/2016 2:39:43 PM Received Date:           7/12/2016 2:39:46 PM From:                   Lamb, John Created By:             John.Lamb@nrc.gov Recipients:
FW: Seabrook Sent Date:
7/12/2016 2:39:43 PM Received Date:
7/12/2016 2:39:46 PM From:
Lamb, John Created By:
John.Lamb@nrc.gov Recipients:  
"Poole, Justin" <Justin.Poole@nrc.gov>
"Poole, Justin" <Justin.Poole@nrc.gov>
Tracking Status: None Post Office:             HQPWMSMRS05.nrc.gov Files                           Size                     Date & Time MESSAGE                         793                     7/12/2016 2:39:46 PM Options Priority:                       Standard Return Notification:             No Reply Requested:                 No Sensitivity:                     Normal Expiration Date:
Tracking Status: None Post Office:
Recipients Received:             Follow up By 7/13/2016 3:30:00 PM}}
HQPWMSMRS05.nrc.gov Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 793 7/12/2016 2:39:46 PM Options Priority:
Standard Return Notification:
No Reply Requested:
No Sensitivity:
Normal Expiration Date:
Recipients Received:
Follow up By 7/13/2016 3:30:00 PM}}

Latest revision as of 21:53, 9 January 2025

NRR E-mail Capture (External_Sender) - FW: Seabrook
ML16197A002
Person / Time
Site: Seabrook NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 07/12/2016
From: Grinnell D
NextEra Energy Seabrook
To: John Lamb
Plant Licensing Branch IV
References
Download: ML16197A002 (2)


Text

1 NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From:

Lamb, John Sent:

Tuesday, July 12, 2016 2:40 PM To:

Poole, Justin

Subject:

FW: Seabrook Follow Up Flag:

Follow up Due By:

Wednesday, July 13, 2016 3:30 PM Flag Status:

Flagged From: Debbie Grinnell [1]

Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2016 2:23 PM To: Lamb, John

Subject:

[External_Sender] Seabrook Hi John, I own you information and so does the NRC.

1) The NRC response to Nuclear Regulatory Commission Report 50-443/87-07 on November 12, 1987 involved the numerous unresolved cracks and leaks, BUT the as built failures and construction failures and as as builder staff not trained in ANSI standards required by UE&C.was scary years ago. The unresolved issues fail to be NRC followed after constructionand the plant passive issues were active, rightly?
2) The five cores from R. Conte in 2011 in an email has about the NRC and NextEra agreement to test the cores for tensileNextEra did not test them. Where are they?

Debbie

Hearing Identifier:

NRR_PMDA Email Number:

2943 Mail Envelope Properties (ac375ab118ae4a58a4ed2a6f0766e2d9)

Subject:

FW: Seabrook Sent Date:

7/12/2016 2:39:43 PM Received Date:

7/12/2016 2:39:46 PM From:

Lamb, John Created By:

John.Lamb@nrc.gov Recipients:

"Poole, Justin" <Justin.Poole@nrc.gov>

Tracking Status: None Post Office:

HQPWMSMRS05.nrc.gov Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 793 7/12/2016 2:39:46 PM Options Priority:

Standard Return Notification:

No Reply Requested:

No Sensitivity:

Normal Expiration Date:

Recipients Received:

Follow up By 7/13/2016 3:30:00 PM