ML17116A049: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:From: | {{#Wiki_filter:From: | ||
kernnature@aol.com To: | |||
Docket, Hearing; Scro, Jennifer; Hsu, Kimberly | |||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
[External_Sender] nuclear power hearing Date: | [External_Sender] nuclear power hearing Date: | ||
Tuesday, April 25, 2017 5:02:50 PM | |||
==Dear Officials:== | ==Dear Officials:== | ||
The consumption of fossil fuels and their effect on global warming are so critical that it forces us to look again at nuclear energy. We will need both additional nuclear plants and renewable sources such as wind and solar to turn the corner on this problem. | The consumption of fossil fuels and their effect on global warming are so critical that it forces us to look again at nuclear energy. We will need both additional nuclear plants and renewable sources such as wind and solar to turn the corner on this problem. | ||
Everyone knows of the problem with the storage of nuclear waste and other issues posed by nuclear. Someday we may not need to take these risks, but today we must make real progress on global warming and do it quickly, otherwise South Florida is going to be underwater in less than a hundred years. | Everyone knows of the problem with the storage of nuclear waste and other issues posed by nuclear. Someday we may not need to take these risks, but today we must make real progress on global warming and do it quickly, otherwise South Florida is going to be underwater in less than a hundred years. | ||
The Turkey Point plants have done us well so far. Lets lead the way in bringing nuclear back, at least until we develop our renewable sources. We have frightened our citizens into rejecting nuclear unnecessarily. Our people do not fully understand what sea level rise means for our area. If they did, I believe most would opt for more nuclear power. | The Turkey Point plants have done us well so far. Lets lead the way in bringing nuclear back, at least until we develop our renewable sources. We have frightened our citizens into rejecting nuclear unnecessarily. Our people do not fully understand what sea level rise means for our area. If they did, I believe most would opt for more nuclear power. | ||
Richard C. Kern 23050 SW 156 Ave. | Richard C. Kern 23050 SW 156 Ave. | ||
Miami, FL 33170}} | Miami, FL 33170}} | ||
Latest revision as of 10:17, 9 January 2025
| ML17116A049 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Turkey Point  |
| Issue date: | 04/25/2017 |
| From: | Kern R - No Known Affiliation |
| To: | Kaihwa Hsu, Jennifer Scro Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel |
| SECY/RAS | |
| References | |
| Download: ML17116A049 (1) | |
Text
From:
kernnature@aol.com To:
Docket, Hearing; Scro, Jennifer; Hsu, Kimberly
Subject:
[External_Sender] nuclear power hearing Date:
Tuesday, April 25, 2017 5:02:50 PM
Dear Officials:
The consumption of fossil fuels and their effect on global warming are so critical that it forces us to look again at nuclear energy. We will need both additional nuclear plants and renewable sources such as wind and solar to turn the corner on this problem.
Everyone knows of the problem with the storage of nuclear waste and other issues posed by nuclear. Someday we may not need to take these risks, but today we must make real progress on global warming and do it quickly, otherwise South Florida is going to be underwater in less than a hundred years.
The Turkey Point plants have done us well so far. Lets lead the way in bringing nuclear back, at least until we develop our renewable sources. We have frightened our citizens into rejecting nuclear unnecessarily. Our people do not fully understand what sea level rise means for our area. If they did, I believe most would opt for more nuclear power.
Richard C. Kern 23050 SW 156 Ave.
Miami, FL 33170