ML17258B085: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Created page by program invented by StriderTol
StriderTol Bot change
 
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
| number = ML17258B085
| number = ML17258B085
| issue date = 04/28/1981
| issue date = 04/28/1981
| title = Responds to NRC 810403 Ltr Re Violations Noted in IE Insp Rept 50-244/81-02.Corrective Actions:Changed Procedure ES-5.1.Samples Will Be Picked Up on Next Normal Working Day, Climatological Conditions Permitting
| title = Responds to NRC Re Violations Noted in IE Insp Rept 50-244/81-02.Corrective Actions:Changed Procedure ES-5.1.Samples Will Be Picked Up on Next Normal Working Day, Climatological Conditions Permitting
| author name = WHITE L D
| author name = White L
| author affiliation = ROCHESTER GAS & ELECTRIC CORP.
| author affiliation = ROCHESTER GAS & ELECTRIC CORP.
| addressee name = SNYDER G L
| addressee name = Snyder G
| addressee affiliation = NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
| addressee affiliation = NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
| docket = 05000244
| docket = 05000244
Line 11: Line 11:
| contact person =  
| contact person =  
| document report number = NUDOCS 8106080096
| document report number = NUDOCS 8106080096
| title reference date = 04-03-1981
| package number = ML17258B084
| package number = ML17258B084
| document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, INCOMING CORRESPONDENCE, UTILITY TO NRC
| document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, INCOMING CORRESPONDENCE, UTILITY TO NRC
| page count = 4
| page count = 4
}}
}}
See also: [[followed by::IR 05000244/1981002]]


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:fr/j",/I~'I",(I,'I','ti't"'"'"
{{#Wiki_filter:fr/j",/I~'I",(I,'I','ti't"'"'"Ie i<<p""
Iei<<p""'",,g','t
'",,g','t """'
"""'ROCHESTER
ROCHESTER GAS AND ELECTRIC CORPORATION
GASANDELECTRICCORPORATION
~ 89 I ('I l al g
~89I('Ilalg'~teerStattEASTAVENUE,ROCMESTER,
~
N.Y.146d9LEOND,WHITE.JR.Executive
teer Statt EAST AVENUE, ROCMESTER, N.Y. 146d9 LEON D, WHITE. JR.
VIeePreeiaent
Executive VIee Preeiaent tCI CPNO IC iece cooc tIe 546.2700 April 28, 1981 Mr. Gary L. Snyder, Chief Emergency Preparedness and Program Support Branch Division of Emergency Preparedness and Operational Support U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region I 631 Park Avenue King of Prussia, Pennsylvania 19406
tCICPNOICiececooctIe546.2700April28,1981Mr.GaryL.Snyder,ChiefEmergency
 
Preparedness
==Subject:==
andProgramSupportBranchDivisionofEmergency
I.E. Inspection 81-02 Notice of Violation Failure to collect weekly filterable dust samples R. E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant, Unit No.
Preparedness
1 Docket No. 50-244
andOperational
 
SupportU.S.NuclearRegulatory
==Dear Mr. Snyder:==
Commission
This letter is in response to your {{letter dated|date=April 3, 1981|text=April 3, 1981 letter}} concerning the routine inspection conducted by Ms. C. Sakenas on January 20-22, 1981.
RegionI631ParkAvenueKingofPrussia,Pennsylvania
The violation was identified, "Section 4.10.1 of the REG Technical Specifications requires that samples of filterable dust be collected weekly.
19406Subject:I.E.Inspection
Contrary to the above, weekly filterable dust samples were not collected from the six onsite locations from March 30, 1979 to April 13, 1979."
81-02NoticeofViolation
On April 6, 1979, the normal day which the samples are collected, the weather was so inclement that the samples could not be picked up.
Failuretocollectweeklyfilterable
Since the Tech Spec indicates samples need only be collected and not counted, the individual in charge decided a two week composite sample would meet the intent of the Tech Spec.
dustsamplesR.E.GinnaNuclearPowerPlant,UnitNo.1DocketNo.50-244DearMr.Snyder:ThisletterisinresponsetoyourApril3,1981letterconcerning
The Tech Spec requires the samples be "collected."
theroutineinspection
Since filterable dust samples are normally a one week composite during which the samples are being collected continuously, it was thought that a two week composite would be sufficient to meet the Tech Spec requirements.
conducted
 
byMs.C.SakenasonJanuary20-22,1981.Theviolation
jL
wasidentified,
 
"Section4.10.1oftheREGTechnical
April 28, 1981 Mr. Gary L. Snyder, Chief Spr.""7 wo.
Specifications
To insure this interpretation is not repeated and to insure timely sample pick up, a change has been made in procedure ES-5.1.
requiresthatsamplesoffilterable
The change indicates that if the samples cannot be obtained on the scheduled sampling date, they will be picked up on the next normal working day when permitted by climatological conditions.
dustbecollected
We can be considered in full compliance with the Tech Spec at this time.
weekly.Contrarytotheabove,weeklyfilterable
Very truly yours,
dustsampleswerenotcollected
~4M L. D. Wh e, 7r.
fromthesixonsitelocations
Subscribed and sworn to me on this 28th day of April, 1981.
fromMarch30,1979toApril13,1979."OnApril6,1979,thenormaldaywhichthesamplesarecollected,
SHARON G. CAVALERI NOTARY PUBLIC, Stateot N.Y., htonroe County My Commission Expires March 30, 19.p~~}}
theweatherwassoinclement
thatthesamplescouldnotbepickedup.SincetheTechSpecindicates
samplesneedonlybecollected
andnotcounted,theindividual
inchargedecidedatwoweekcomposite
samplewouldmeettheintentoftheTechSpec.TheTechSpecrequiresthesamplesbe"collected."
Sincefilterable
dustsamplesarenormallyaoneweekcomposite
duringwhichthesamplesarebeingcollected
continuously,
itwasthoughtthatatwoweekcomposite
wouldbesufficient
tomeettheTechSpecrequirements.
jL
April28,1981Mr.GaryL.Snyder,ChiefSpr.""7wo.Toinsurethisinterpretation
isnotrepeatedandtoinsuretimelysamplepickup,achangehasbeenmadeinprocedure
ES-5.1.Thechangeindicates
thatifthesamplescannotbeobtainedonthescheduled
samplingdate,theywillbepickeduponthenextnormalworkingdaywhenpermitted
byclimatological
conditions.
Wecanbeconsidered
infullcompliance
withtheTechSpecatthistime.Verytrulyyours,~4ML.D.Whe,7r.Subscribed
andsworntomeonthis28thdayofApril,1981.SHARONG.CAVALERINOTARYPUBLIC,StateotN.Y.,htonroeCountyMyCommission
ExpiresMarch30,19.p~~
}}

Latest revision as of 10:44, 8 January 2025

Responds to NRC Re Violations Noted in IE Insp Rept 50-244/81-02.Corrective Actions:Changed Procedure ES-5.1.Samples Will Be Picked Up on Next Normal Working Day, Climatological Conditions Permitting
ML17258B085
Person / Time
Site: Ginna 
Issue date: 04/28/1981
From: White L
ROCHESTER GAS & ELECTRIC CORP.
To: Snyder G
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
Shared Package
ML17258B084 List:
References
NUDOCS 8106080096
Download: ML17258B085 (4)


Text

fr/j",/I~'I",(I,'I','ti't"'"'"Ie i<<p""

'",,g','t """'

ROCHESTER GAS AND ELECTRIC CORPORATION

~ 89 I ('I l al g

~

teer Statt EAST AVENUE, ROCMESTER, N.Y. 146d9 LEON D, WHITE. JR.

Executive VIee Preeiaent tCI CPNO IC iece cooc tIe 546.2700 April 28, 1981 Mr. Gary L. Snyder, Chief Emergency Preparedness and Program Support Branch Division of Emergency Preparedness and Operational Support U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region I 631 Park Avenue King of Prussia, Pennsylvania 19406

Subject:

I.E. Inspection 81-02 Notice of Violation Failure to collect weekly filterable dust samples R. E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant, Unit No.

1 Docket No. 50-244

Dear Mr. Snyder:

This letter is in response to your April 3, 1981 letter concerning the routine inspection conducted by Ms. C. Sakenas on January 20-22, 1981.

The violation was identified, "Section 4.10.1 of the REG Technical Specifications requires that samples of filterable dust be collected weekly.

Contrary to the above, weekly filterable dust samples were not collected from the six onsite locations from March 30, 1979 to April 13, 1979."

On April 6, 1979, the normal day which the samples are collected, the weather was so inclement that the samples could not be picked up.

Since the Tech Spec indicates samples need only be collected and not counted, the individual in charge decided a two week composite sample would meet the intent of the Tech Spec.

The Tech Spec requires the samples be "collected."

Since filterable dust samples are normally a one week composite during which the samples are being collected continuously, it was thought that a two week composite would be sufficient to meet the Tech Spec requirements.

jL

April 28, 1981 Mr. Gary L. Snyder, Chief Spr.""7 wo.

To insure this interpretation is not repeated and to insure timely sample pick up, a change has been made in procedure ES-5.1.

The change indicates that if the samples cannot be obtained on the scheduled sampling date, they will be picked up on the next normal working day when permitted by climatological conditions.

We can be considered in full compliance with the Tech Spec at this time.

Very truly yours,

~4M L. D. Wh e, 7r.

Subscribed and sworn to me on this 28th day of April, 1981.

SHARON G. CAVALERI NOTARY PUBLIC, Stateot N.Y., htonroe County My Commission Expires March 30, 19.p~~