ML17273A077: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Created page by program invented by StriderTol
StriderTol Bot change
 
Line 2: Line 2:
| number = ML17273A077
| number = ML17273A077
| issue date = 06/23/1982
| issue date = 06/23/1982
| title = to Procedure EVP-001/SL-2, Engineering Verification Program.
| title = To Procedure EVP-001/SL-2, Engineering Verification Program
| author name =  
| author name =  
| author affiliation = FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO.
| author affiliation = FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO.
Line 17: Line 17:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:PROCEDURE NO. EVP-001/SL-2 REV. 0 06/23/82 FLORIDA POWER 6 LIGHT COMPANY ST LUCIE UNIT NO. 2 ENGINEERING VERIFICATION PROGRAM 8207130211   820709' PDR;ADOCK 05000389
{{#Wiki_filter:PROCEDURE NO. EVP-001/SL-2 REV. 0 06/23/82 FLORIDA POWER 6 LIGHT COMPANY ST LUCIE UNIT NO.
( P               PDR
2 ENGINEERING VERIFICATION PROGRAM 8207130211 820709' PDR;ADOCK 05000389
( P


EVP-001/SL-2 REV. 0  06/23/82 FLORIDA POWER  & LIGHT COMPANY ST LUOIE UNIT NO. 2 ENGINEERING VERIFICATION PROGRAN TABLE OF CONTENTS Section            Title                                                          ~Pa  e Introduction........................              ~ ~ ~ ~  ~    1 Selection Process........'............................            2 Engineering Verification Process..................      ~ ..      3 A  Task  Force  Activities.............'..............          3 B  Review  Committee/Project Team Activities........            4-5 IV              Documentation/Reports..............................        ~ . 5 A'ttachments Al.l  Organization  Chart  Task Force A1.2  Organization Chart  Review Committee A2    Engineering Verification Process Flow Chart A3    Independent Design Review Flow Chart A4    Independent Installation Verification, Flow Chart A5    --Independent Start-up Operation Verification Flow Chart
PDR


EVP-001/SL-2 REV. 0 06/23/82 FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY ST LUCIE UNIT NO. 2 ENGINEERING VERIFICATION PROGRAM I  Introduction A program has been      developed to conduct an in-depth (deep cut) engineering verification of Florida        Power & Light Company's St Lucie Unit No. 2 Nuclear Power Plant. This engineering verification will be accomplished by Ebasco and Combustion Engineering Task Forces independent of the St Lucie Project teams.   (See Attachment Al.l for the Task Force Organization Chart)
EVP-001/SL-2 REV.
The program    is divided into the following tasks:
0 06/23/82 FLORIDA POWER
A -  Selection of items to be reviewed in accordance with Section II of this procedure B  Independent verification of the existing designs      for the selected items in accordance with Section procedure.
& LIGHT COMPANY
III of this C  In-place    examination of installed components to verify conformance with the drawings      in accordance with Section III of this procedure.
" ST LUOIE UNIT NO.
D  Comparison    of component design against actual performance based on    startup testing completed to date in accordance with Section III of this procedure.
2 ENGINEERING VERIFICATION PROGRAN TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Title
The independence      of the verification Task Force is maintained in several ways:
~Pa e
1  The Ebasco      and CE personnel  performing the verifications will be individuals    who have had no  prior involvement in the design,.
Introduction........................
installation, or testing of the items being reviewed or in the review selection process. Resumes of Task Force members will be included in the program documentation.
~
2  Task    Force members    will be located  separately from the regular Project  teams and    will communicate  with the Project teams only through the Program Coordinator.
~
3'   The  existing design will not be available to the Task Force during preparatioq of the independent design.
~ ~
4  Regular    status reports documenting progress of the verification program  will be    submitted in parallel to the NRC, FPL, Ebasco and CE.
~
1 Selection Process........'............................
2 Engineering Verification Process..................
~..
3 A Task Force Activities.............'..............
3 B Review Committee/Project Team Activities........
4-5 IV Documentation/Reports..............................
~.
5 A'ttachments Al.l Organization Chart Task Force A1.2 Organization Chart Review Committee A2 Engineering Verification Process Flow Chart A3 A4 Independent Design Review Flow Chart Independent Installation Verification, Flow Chart A5
--Independent Start-up Operation Verification Flow Chart


1    EVP-001/SL-2 REV. 0   06/23/82 II  Selection    Process The  selection of items to      be reviewed by the Task Force     will consist of the following steps:
EVP-001/SL-2 REV.
1 A   determination by FPL of all candidate items (components or isolated sections of a system).
0 06/23/82 FLORIDA POWER
2  An  appropriate division of the candidate items into separate groups by FPL, as outlined below.
& LIGHT COMPANY ST LUCIE UNIT NO.
3  A random  selection by FPL, from these groups of candidate items, of eight (8) specific items to be verified by the Task 'Force.
2 ENGINEERING VERIFICATION PROGRAM I Introduction A program has been developed to conduct an in-depth (deep cut) engineering verification of Florida Power
The  candidate items include      all  "major components" which:
& Light Company's St Lucie Unit No.
1  are  important to safety, and 2  have  multi-discipline interfaces The  candidates  will be    divided into A/E and  NSSS  items, and at least  two (2)  NSSS  items  will be  chosen.
2 Nuclear Power Plant.
The candidates    will also    be  divided by major disciplines as follows:
This engineering verification will be accomplished by Ebasco and Combustion Engineering Task Forces independent of the St Lucie Project teams.
1   Civil/Structural 2  Mechanical 3  Electrical 4  Heating,    Ventilation    and Air Conditioning  (HVAC) 5  Instrumentation      and  Control At least one item      from each    discipline will be selected.
(See Attachment Al.l for the Task Force Organization Chart)
The  general boundaries of the items to be reviewed         will include:
The program is divided into the following tasks:
1  The component    support and/or foundation system including    its interface with the building structure.
A - Selection of items to be reviewed in accordance with Section II of this procedure B Independent verification of the existing designs for the selected items in accordance with Section III of this procedure.
2 Piping up    and down stream to the     first support locations.
C In-place examination of installed components to verify conformance with the drawings in accordance with Section III of this procedure.
3 Local power    supply, instrumentation and controls.
D Comparison of component design against actual performance based on startup testing completed to date in accordance with Section III of this procedure.
Specific boundaries      will be   established by the Task Force after the items have been selected,     and'omponent-specific boundary sketches will be prepared.
The independence of the verification Task Force is maintained in several ways:
1 The Ebasco and CE personnel performing the verifications will be individuals who have had no prior involvement in the design,.
installation, or testing of the items being reviewed or in the review selection process.
Resumes of Task Force members will be included in the program documentation.
2 Task Force members will be located separately from the regular Project teams and will communicate with the Project teams only through the Program Coordinator.
3' The existing design will not be available to the Task Force during preparatioq of the independent design.
4 Regular status reports documenting progress of the verification program will be submitted in parallel to the NRC, FPL, Ebasco and CE.


III  En ineerin A  Task Verification Force Activities Process t    EVP-001/SL-2 REV. 0 06/23/82 The Task Force   will determine the design inputs considered necessary to perform an independent design review for the items selected. Utilizing the latest design inputs, inde-pendent calculations and sketches will be generated and compared with the existing calculations and drawings.
1 EVP-001/SL-2 REV.
Differences between the independent and existing designs will be documented and analyzed. If the differences are determined to be acceptable, the rationale will be docu-mented and the design review phase considered complete.
0 06/23/82 II Selection Process
If  the differences cannot be resolved, the procedure out-lined for unresolved items in Section III.B.1 hereunder will be   followed.
- The selection of items to be reviewed by the Task Force will consist of the following steps:
Upon  completion of the design review phase for a specific item, the independent field installation verification phase can proceed. The Task Force will obtain copies of the latest drawings and other design documents used to install the item and will perform an in-place examination to verify the as-built installation, against those drawings and documents. Differences will be documented and analyzed. If the differences are
1 A determination by FPL of all candidate items (components or isolated sections of a system).
              .determined to be acceptable, the rationale will be documented and the field installation verification  phase considered  com-plete. If'he differences cannot be resolved, the procedure outlined in Section III.B.1 will be followed.
2 An appropriate division of the candidate items into separate groups by FPL, as outlined below.
Upon  completion of the field installation verification phase for a specific item, the independent start-up operation verification .phase can proceed. The Task Force will obtain all  applicable performance documents not previously provided in addition to pertinent start-up procedures and start-up test data completed to date. A comparison will then be made of the design requirements versus actual performance based on the start-up testing completed to date by Plant Operations.
3 A random selection by FPL, from these groups of candidate items, of eight (8) specific items to be verified by the Task 'Force.
Differences will be documented and analyzed. If the differ-ences are determined to be acceptable, the rationale will be documented and the start-up operation verification phase considered complete. If the differences cannot be resolved, the procedure outlined in Section III.B.1 will be followed.
The candidate items include all "major components" which:
4  Task  Force activities outlined above are depicted on the flow charts  ( Attachments A2 through A5).
1 are important to safety, and 2 have multi-discipline interfaces The candidates will be divided into A/E and NSSS items, and at least two (2)
NSSS items will be chosen.
The candidates will also be divided by major disciplines as follows:
1 Civil/Structural 2 Mechanical 3 Electrical 4 Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning (HVAC) 5 Instrumentation and Control At least one item from each discipline will be selected.
The general boundaries of the items to be reviewed will include:
1 The component support and/or foundation system including its interface with the building structure.
2 Piping up and down stream to the first support locations.
3 Local power supply, instrumentation and controls.
Specific boundaries will be established by the Task Force after the items have been selected, and'omponent-specific boundary sketches will be prepared.


EVP-001/SL-2 REV. 0 06/23/82 B Review Committee/Pro'ect     Team Activities Any   item for which the differences cannot be resolved by the Task Force   whether in the design review phase, field installation verification phase, or start-up operation veri-fication phase will be classified as an unresolved item (discrepancy), documented, and transmitted to the Review Committee   for resolution.
III En ineerin Verification Process t
The Review Committee     will consist of the FPL Engineering Project Manager, FPL Program Coordinator, Ebasco Project Engineer, CE Project Manager, and the Task Force Managers.
EVP-001/SL-2 REV.
Technical support will be provided as necessary'y FPL, Ebasco and CE Project team personnel. (See Attachment A1.2)
0 06/23/82 A Task Force Activities The Task Force will determine the design inputs considered necessary to perform an independent design review for the items selected.
Should the Review Committee determine through its own review     supplemented as necessary by support from the Project   team that   the unresolved item (discrepancy) is actually acceptable, the rationale will be documented and the item recycled to the Task Force for its agreement and continuation of the verification procedure.
Utilizing the latest design inputs, inde-pendent calculations and sketches will be generated and compared with the existing calculations and drawings.
Should the Review Committee determine through its own review     supplemented as necessary by support from the Project team that the discrepancy is not acceptable; the rationale will be documented and the unresolved item i.dentified as either a ~findin or an observation.
Differences between the independent and existing designs will be documented and analyzed.
Any unresolved item which could affect the safety of the plant   will be identified as a ~findin . An nnresolved item which results from either a generic technical process flaw or generic procedural program flaw will also be identified as a ~findin An unresolved item not affecting plant safety but resulting from either an isolated technical process flaw or isolated procedural program flaw     will be identified as an observation.
If the differences are determined to be acceptable, the rationale will be docu-mented and the design review phase considered complete.
The Review Committee     will document all findings and obser-vations before transmitting them to the Project     team for its review and further processing.
If the differences cannot be resolved, the procedure out-lined for unresolved items in Section III.B.1 hereunder will be followed.
Upon completion of the design review phase for a specific item, the independent field installation verification phase can proceed.
The Task Force will obtain copies of the latest drawings and other design documents used to install the item and will perform an in-place examination to verify the as-built installation, against those drawings and documents.
Differences will be documented and analyzed.
If the differences are
.determined to be acceptable, the rationale will be documented and the field installation verification phase considered com-plete.
If'he differences cannot be resolved, the procedure outlined in Section III.B.1 will be followed.
Upon completion of the field installation verification phase for a specific item, the independent start-up operation verification.phase can proceed.
The Task Force will obtain all applicable performance documents not previously provided in addition to pertinent start-up procedures and start-up test data completed to date.
A comparison will then be made of the design requirements versus actual performance based on the start-up testing completed to date by Plant Operations.
Differences will be documented and analyzed.
If the differ-ences are determined to be acceptable, the rationale will be documented and the start-up operation verification phase considered complete.
If the differences cannot be resolved, the procedure outlined in Section III.B.1 will be followed.
4 Task Force activities outlined above are depicted on the flow charts
( Attachments A2 through A5).
 
EVP-001/SL-2 REV.
0 06/23/82 B Review Committee/Pro'ect Team Activities Any item for which the differences cannot be resolved by the Task Force whether in the design review phase, field installation verification phase, or start-up operation veri-fication phase will be classified as an unresolved item (discrepancy),
documented, and transmitted to the Review Committee for resolution.
The Review Committee will consist of the FPL Engineering Project Manager, FPL Program Coordinator, Ebasco Project
: Engineer, CE Project Manager, and the Task Force Managers.
Technical support will be provided as necessary'y
: FPL, Ebasco and CE Project team personnel.
(See Attachment A1.2)
Should the Review Committee determine through its own review supplemented as necessary by support from the Project team that the unresolved item (discrepancy) is actually acceptable, the rationale will be documented and the item recycled to the Task Force for its agreement and continuation of the verification procedure.
Should the Review Committee determine through its own review supplemented as necessary by support from the Project team that the discrepancy is not acceptable; the rationale will be documented and the unresolved item i.dentified as either a ~findin or an observation.
Any unresolved item which could affect the safety of the plant will be identified as a ~findin An nnresolved item which results from either a generic technical process flaw or generic procedural program flaw will also be identified as a ~findin An unresolved item not affecting plant safety but resulting from either an isolated technical process flaw or isolated procedural program flaw will be identified as an observation.
The Review Committee will document all findings and obser-vations before transmitting them to the Project team for its review and further processing.
Following Project team determination of, the corrective action to be taken for each finding, and observation, but prior to actual implementation, Task Force concurrence will be obtained.
Following Project team determination of, the corrective action to be taken for each finding, and observation, but prior to actual implementation, Task Force concurrence will be obtained.
This will enable'the Task Force to assure itself that all aspects of the unresolved item     it originally identified have been accounted     for.
This will enable'the Task Force to assure itself that all aspects of the unresolved item it originally identified have been accounted for.


t   EVP-001/SL-2 REV. 0 C
t EVP-001/SL-2 REV.
06/23/82 B Review   Committee/Pro'ect     Team Activities (Cont'd) 9 At the same time 'the project team implements the necessary
0 06/23/82 C
              'corrective action for a finding, it will determine report-ability. Reportable findings require preparation and submittal to the NRC of the appropriate 10CFR 50.55(e) or 10CFR 21 reports.
B Review Committee/Pro'ect Team Activities (Cont'd) 9 At the same time 'the project team implements the necessary
10 Documentation     of item closeout by the Project team will follow implementation of corrective action for each find-ing and observation.
'corrective action for a finding, it will determine report-ability.
ll - Review   Committee/Project     team activities outlined above are depicted on the     same flow charts illustrating Task Force activities   (Attachments A2 through     A 5) .
Reportable findings require preparation and submittal to the NRC of the appropriate 10CFR 50.55(e) or 10CFR 21 reports.
IV Documentation/Re     orts The engineering verification program will have a high degree of visibil-ity, with all     process steps in each phase being properly documented for record purposes and the NRC being kept fully apprized of progress via regular status reports.
10 Documentation of item closeout by the Project team will follow implementation of corrective action for each find-ing and observation.
The following reports     will be generated during the program:
ll - Review Committee/Project team activities outlined above are depicted on the same flow charts illustrating Task Force activities (Attachments A2 through A 5).
1 Meekly   status summaries of the overall program 2 Minutes   of all Review Committee meetings 3 Reportable     findings,   if any 4 Component     completion reports as the verification process for each selected item is completed 5 A   final report     upon overall program completion Copies of telephone conversation logs         will be included in the weekly status summaries.
IV Documentation/Re orts The engineering verification program will have a high degree of visibil-ity, with all process steps in each phase being properly documented for record purposes and the NRC being kept fully apprized of progress via regular status reports.
Distribution of correspondence will be         made concurrently to the NRC, FPL, Ebasco     and CE.
The following reports will be generated during the program:
1 Meekly status summaries of the overall program 2 Minutes of all Review Committee meetings 3 Reportable findings, if any 4 Component completion reports as the verification process for each selected item is completed 5 A final report upon overall program completion Copies of telephone conversation logs will be included in the weekly status summaries.
Distribution of correspondence will be made concurrently to the NRC, FPL, Ebasco and CE.


r L.utch VV ~umph>C q uSH'f COMPhltlg ATTAcHQE'g T gl;i.
r L.utch VV
5T. LUG(E UNA NO- 2 EBS/QTERIHG VFRt FlCATlOM PROSRAM                                 j7AYE  ~4
~umph>C q uSH'f COMPhltlg 5T. LUG(E UNA NO-2 EBS/QTERIHG VFRtFlCATlOM PROSRAM
:OPGttI,MIZATlON CHART-       TASK FORCE TA5K FORCE CHh)CKMhOJ TAStC F4Rcl                                                           TASK   Fbi.C Aha k AOfk                                                            HALtAlgrQEZ V-'wopOR                                                                P. HI L.LS'R Pckav           PL.Au T            Res.H Ct VlL EATERS          APPpgATOS          DESI&~
:OPGttI,MIZATlON CHART-TASK FORCE ATTAcHQE'gT gl;i.
                        %%HERS                                             ghJQWQ             oTwen,s As                                              tgTtC I               AS 8 cmC.               84)'.
j7AYE
EBASC.O   SERVtC ES           J NC                               l OMBUST(OQ Eh!&(NEER'1WG lMe NOTE   - Communication, Adiuinistration, Project InterEace
~4 TA5K FORCE CHh)CKMhOJ TAStC F4Rcl Aha kAOfk V-'wopOR TASK Fbi.C HALtAlgrQEZ P. HI L.LS'R Ct VlL Pckav EATERS PL.AuT APPpgATOS Res.H DESI&~
                            'Ries   Exist Between Task Force and FPL Kngrg Pro)ect Hgr, EBASCO Prospect Engr, and C.E. Project Ngr.
%%HERS As ghJQWQ tgTtC I 8 cmC.
oTwen,s AS 84)'.
EBASC.O SERVtC ES J NC l OMBUST(OQ Eh!&(NEER'1WG lMe NOTE - Communication, Adiuinistration, Project InterEace
'Ries Exist Between Task Force and FPL Kngrg Pro)ect
: Hgr, EBASCO Prospect
: Engr, and C.E. Project Ngr.


                                                          ~       ~
V
~
~
      . 'RBVtRA ....QQMfht'T.TBK                                                         WFCa~tCAt.. SuPt oav
~
                                                  ~    <<  ~  ~  ~                          As H~cassAR Y FL.ORtDA     .Pawpp. 4 t.!GHl                                                       p~gtyg     f5Lv6R g ktGHT gMSJMESttlNQ PRcQRCT MAM468R                                                        . Prole,cy TFAM UV  SOTSO N
~
                                                                                                      ~   ~
. 'RBVtRA....QQMfht'T.TBK
Ft.oRt9h Mwcm, $ l.tcHy osaAH aoORotvAmR H R,AN@I 6.%
~
                                              ~ ~
~
FSPQCD        QQRvtCCS gplg                                                          8'PASCCt SERVlCSS        th4C PRO~acv        e~s tweed                                                              P f@Pd EL%'shM I
~
~~ (~                                              ~ ~
~
                            ~  ( ~  ~ ~  ~      ~
WFCa~tCAt..
caMSUS'AOQ EN&fvE6RtMS,INC                                                          ~MEUMAg            EQQQFERWS,l PR'OJ 8 C'l  fvi*gp 46.5t                                                          paoaac.T        -TFA.M 4  C    lvloL'Tee@
SuPt oav As H~cassAR Y FL.ORtDA.Pawpp. 4 t.!GHl gMSJMESttlNQ PRcQRCT MAM468R UV SOTSO N p~gtyg f5Lv6R g ktGHT
                                                                                                            ~ ~ ~
. Prole,cy TFAM
          ~      ~                        w(, ~.
~
I
~
              ~
Ft.oRt9h Mwcm, $ l.tcHy osaAH aoORotvAmR H R,AN@I6.%
p9ASCO      SGRv<cBS,thkc GVP TAgK, FbRCS klAQASS
~ ~
                                                                                        ~      &      \    ~ ~
~ ~
                                                                            ........ J.ESSkD 8VP, =. EustHEQRtNt" QplhSVSTtOQ EN6tNQBRWS, )HE                                                                  , VER&#xc3;ghTtOyur pRO&RAhh    .
BVP TASK, PORES QAMAGGR                          ..
DD Mtwt KQ.                                        .
                                                            ~
                                                                    ~ ~~ ~~      ~
                                                                        ~  ~ ( a    ~ ~
( ~
( ~
FSPQCD QQRvtCCS gplg PRO~acv e~s tweed I
~
~
8'PASCCt SERVlCSS th4C P f@Pd EL%'shM
~ (
~
~
~
~
~
caMSUS'AOQ EN&fvE6RtMS,INC PR'OJ 8 C'l fvi*gp 46.5t 4
C lvloL'Tee@
~
~
~
w(, ~.
I p9ASCO SGRv<cBS,thkc GVP TAgK, FbRCS klAQASS
~MEUMAg EQQQFERWS,l paoaac.T
-TFA.M
~
~
~
~
\\
~
~
........ J.ESSkD QplhSVSTtOQ EN6tNQBRWS, )HE BVP TASK, PORES QAMAGGR DD Mtwt KQ.
.. ~
~
~ ~
~ ~
~
8VP, =. EustHEQRtNt"
, VER&#xc3;ghTtOyur pRO&RAhh.
~
~ ( a
~
~
(
~


EBASCO SERVICES IHCORPORATED AHCCT~ OS~
EBASCO SERVICES IHCORPORATED AHCCT~ OS~
ATTACKMENT A2
ATTACKMENT A2 CLICOT OAOJ ~ CT ADO/CCT
                                                                                                                                                                                                                    ~
~
CLICOT OAOJ ~ CT                                                                                                                                                                                               ~~~jL       'ATC ADO/CCT
'ATC
( Rf VIEWS                                                                                                                                  DOCUMENT VERIFIED                                                                                                               RATIDVA        VEICI PY PNNITTSE ITEII                                          APPlorAL E
~~~jL ITEII ESEIECTI ON(
C.E.                                                                                                                   fND OF        pfAND c/DAN C
i PROCESS IDfNTIST ITEN FOR ENGRG VfRIFI CATION COMPILE LATEST DESIGN (NPQTS VERIFIED C.E.
ESEIECTI ON(                                   ISO RICE lvfI                                                                                                                                LNSTALL Eaaauo                                                                                                                                       AT I DN        AT i PROCESS                                      I DCSIC/I )          INPUT                                                                                                        DI      VfATION RIFI        START.UP DOCUMENT LClLCS     J                                               Ul       TIDNllE         VERIFY FIEI.D DOC UMEN    ANALYZE
INPUT PERFORM IN DfPfND ENT CAI.CS COur ARE WITH ETISTINO DESIGN DOCUME DIFFER-ENCES
                                                                                                                                                                                  ~ J          H*    E EN'D OF INSTALL DIFFER     DIFFER DESIGLI                                            ENC'&S EMCEE Rf VIEW            ATIDN DDCVN VT IDfNTIST            COMPILE        PERFORM              COur ARE                        ANALYZE P HAS E                                                                'RATKAIAL       DCCVIIfNT ITEN FOR                                                                  DOCUME LATEST          IN Df Pf ND              WITH                                                                                                                          END OF ENGRG                                                                                    DIFFER-                                                                            R  4          START VP       DIFFfR DESIGN            ENT                  ET ISTINO        DIFFER-VfRIFI              (NPQTS          CA I.CS                                ENCES          ENCES                                                                                            VRRIFI CATIO N E      S CATION                                                   DESIGN                                    I->~ o                                                                                  'PHASE Sa                            DOCUMEN IL C
( RfVIEWS PNNITTSE E
                                                                                                        ~                            RESOI.
APPlorAL ISO RICElvfI Eaaauo
ITEK V                        (DISCRfli                    IF AIOT READII Y    IF ROAD LY ANCT>                      ACcf PTAELE          /ICCSPTAOL'E ANALYZE TO REVIEW COkk/TT                                                                                                                                DIFFER-ENCES
)
                                                                                                  'TASK       CO(CCE       ACTIVITIES REVIEW COMMITTEE PROJECT              ACRE&M- TEAAE ACTIV/TIES SOD NLT RECYCLE              P',.                             DETERNUI                      IOCFR SLSS(6 TO 'TASIC            C                                 RfPORT      IcfFoarhal          Olr V                                                                    ADILITY                      PART gl FORCE                STACTl/I FOR                                                                                  REPORT a
I DCSIC/I LClLCS J ANALYZE DIFFER-ENCES Ul I->~ o Sa IL ~C V
K ENTT ul Qf VIEW                          4  O I
DOCUMENT TIDNllE EN'D OF DESIGLI RfVIEW P HASE VERIFY FIEI.D INSTALL ATIDN DOCUMEN RESOI.
DOCUM EN            O IIURESOLVED Rf VICIV                                            I D CNTI      PROI &tT                           TAKE              DOCVMfN ITEN          CCNNIITEE                                                AS IJ                                  FINDING                                        CORRR CT (DISCREP ANCT)        RATIONAL                                                            TEALI                               IVE                1TE,M AND I(
ITEK (DISCRfli ANCT>
DOCVkfNT      REVIEW                             ACTION            CIOSE OVT              ENGINEERING a                                                                    OSTAIN~
DOCUMEN DIFFER EMCEE ANALYZE DIFFER ENC'&S R 4 DI
O ATEOORI I TASK I 4
~J DOCUMENT RATIDVA fND OF LNSTALL ATIDN VfRIFI ATION H* E DDCVN VT
POTEN  TIA                                              FORCE )                                           VERlF[CATlON PROCESS CONCUR )
'RATKAIAL END OF START VP VRRIFI CATION
PRILIECT                            I        FNIDVI6                                                  ACNCE E TEALI O
'PHASE VEICIPY pfc/DAN ANDC AT START.UP DCCVIIfNT DIFFfR E
IDENTIFY AS PRO/ EC                  J        TAKE.               DOCvIIE                 FLOW CHART SUPPORT                                                              OSS ERV        TEAM                              CORRECT              ITEM A'I ho N                                          IVf AND      REVIEW                                                CLOSEOV DOCVNENT ACTION NIO/I N
S IF AIOT READIIY IF ROAD LY TO REVIEW COkk/TT ACcfPTAELE
/ICCSPTAOL'E ANALYZE DIFFER-ENCES REVIEW COMMITTEE PROJECT TEAAE ACTIV/TIES
'TASK CO(CCE ACTIVITIES QfVIEW IIURESOLVED ITEN (DISCREP ANCT)
PRILIECT TEALI SUPPORT DOCUM EN RfVICIV CCNNIITEE RATIONAL V
4 IJ I(
aO 4
aK ul OO IO RECYCLE TO 'TASIC FORCE FOR ACRE&M-ENTT ATEOORI POTEN TIA FNIDVI6 P',.
C STACTl/I I DCNTI AS FINDING AND DOCVkfNT IDENTIFY AS OSS ERV A'I ho N AND DOCVNENT PROI &tT TEALI REVIEW PRO/ EC TEAM REVIEW DETERNUI RfPORT ADILITY OSTAIN~
I TASK I FORCE )
CONCUR )
ACNCE EJ IcfFoarhal TAKE CORRR CT IVE ACTION TAKE.
CORRECT IVf ACTION SOD NLT IOCFR SLSS(6 Olr PART gl REPORT DOCVMfN 1TE,M CIOSE OVT DOCvIIE ITEM CLOSEOV ENGINEERING I VERlF[CATlON PROCESS FLOW CHART NIO/I N


EBASCO SERVICES IIICORPORATED                                                      ~ <<tA'F~ OF    I r
CL>a<<r
A'TTACHI/LIGHT    A3 CL>a<<r                                                                                                                                                                 '
~'I>0> ~ CT
~ 'I>0> ~ CT           UC le vL>>r Llo.                                                                                                              ,.~or  a  e.
>>/I/SC'>
>>/I/SC'>      F>L GM &INE ERIN 6  I/     Fl AT>OH I
UC le vL>>r Llo.
SL 2     Pap SEC T TEAM   PROGRAM         CCORDLNATLDR               TAS        FORC B I                                 >>I PREPARE     Llsr>NG   or                                           TR/LLISIULLT SPECIFIC         X)ETERMINE DESIGN INPoTS COMSIDE R-CALID>bATG LTCHS    AND                                            LIST FOR INITIAL              ED HECESSAILY TO PERFORM LHDEPEHD-PERFORM RANDOH SELECT-                                                                            EHT EHGIHEERIN 6 lLESLEH CALCVLATLOHS.
F>L GM &INE ERIN6 I/
ION OF SPEC lFlC ITCH S                                                                          SLILS/>LIT WRITTEN >EGO<ST         FOIL TRANSMIT SPECIFIC LIST                                                                              LATEST DESI4H INFVTS ASSEMBLE LATEST DES>6M INPUTS FEIL REQOE.ST TRAHSNLT 'TO      PRUAECr              PERfoRNL INDEPENDENT EH4IL6.
Fl AT>OH EBASCO SERVICES IIICORPORATED
DESIGN CALCVt AT>OILS SKETCHES I:
~<<tA'F~ OF I
TRANSMIT DESIGN LN POTS            Ill*MS>/LLT To 'TASK FORC SuBMIT WRiTTEN        'RECLUEST'OTL RETRIEVE EXISTING 'DH'LL>H       TRAHSMLr7o PRO JEC,T                    EXLSTIN6 DESLGH CALCS D WAS
r A'TTACHI/LIGHT A3
                                                /
,.~or a e.
CALCS D W6 5 FRUM F. ILKS
SL 2 Pap SEC T TEAM PROGRAM CCORDLNATLDR I
                                                                        'TRANSMIT 'ID TASK FORCE 1RANSNLT CALCS DWGS
>>I I
                                                                                                                  'OMPARE IHDEPENDEQT DE'5LEN TRANSMIT'VERIFIED>               'TRANSNlT To TASK FORCE                   WITH ELLLSTLH6 DESIGN A C.Ee INPUT> AS                                                                          VERIFIED C.E. IHPor APPLICAQLE FoR ITEMS SELLLCTED DOCONEL>T ALID ANALYZE D>FFEILENCE IF REAL>>LY ACCEPI h'>L.E, DOCUMENT RAT>O>>ALE A>/D E>/D Dgs>ON &Ev>CW P//ASE IF Hor 'READ>AY AccEPrASLE,bocUNc>LT V@RESOLVE'b ITE>L (D>SC<f PANC Y)
TAS FORC B PREPARE Llsr>NG or CALID>bATG LTCHS AND PERFORM RANDOH SELECT-ION OF SPEC lFlC ITCH S TRANSMIT SPECIFIC LIST ASSEMBLE LATEST DES>6M INPUTS FEIL REQOE.ST TRANSMIT DESIGN LNPOTS TR/LLISIULLT SPECIFIC LIST FOR INITIAL TRAHSNLT 'TO PRUAECr Ill*MS>/LLTTo 'TASK FORC X)ETERMINE DESIGN INPoTS COMSIDER-ED HECESSAILY TO PERFORM LHDEPEHD-EHT EHGIHEERIN 6 lLESLEH CALCVLATLOHS.
AMP'rRANSM>r rO RE>/LEw'o>>>L>rr6 I MDEPEWDEMT. DES IGN                   R EVI EV/ FLOW CHART
SLILS/>LIT WRITTEN >EGO<ST FOIL LATEST DESI4H INFVTS PERfoRNL INDEPENDENT EH4IL6.
>>}D/I >I
DESIGN CALCVtAT>OILS SKETCHES I:
RETRIEVE EXISTING 'DH'LL>H CALCS/ DW65 FRUM F. ILKS 1RANSNLT CALCS DWGS TRAHSMLr7o PRO JEC,T
'TRANSMIT 'ID TASK FORCE SuBMIT WRiTTEN 'RECLUEST'OTL EXLSTIN6 DESLGH CALCS DWAS TRANSMIT'VERIFIED>
C.Ee INPUT> AS APPLICAQLE FoR ITEMS SELLLCTED
'TRANSNlT To TASK FORCE
'OMPARE IHDEPENDEQT DE'5LEN WITH ELLLSTLH6 DESIGN A VERIFIED C.E. IHPor DOCONEL>T ALID ANALYZE D>FFEILENCE IF REAL>>LY ACCEPI h'>L.E, DOCUMENT RAT>O>>ALE A>/D E>/D Dgs>ON &Ev>CW P//ASE IF Hor 'READ>AY AccEPrASLE,bocUNc>LT V@RESOLVE'b ITE>L (D>SC<f PANCY)
AMP'rRANSM>r rO RE>/LEw'o>>>L>rr6
>>}D/I>I I MDEPEWDEMT.
DES IGN R EVI EV/
FLOW CHART


EBASCO SERVICES IKCORPORATEO                                           ~ NccT~ OF~
cL<av LOP ID POW IG'ttT 0 QNIPAL)
~Ioi~cc tUIJCC'l IVE'EK V Rtt=t AT om EBASCO SERVICES IKCORPORATEO
~NccT~ OF~
anZCVMEur A 4.
anZCVMEur A 4.
I G'ttT cL<av    LOP ID    POW                  0 QNIPAL)
rP DATC~~~~
~ Ioi ~ cc tUIJCC'l            IVE'EK        V Rtt=t AT om DATC ~~~~ rP SL 2 PROJBCT         T'EANI     PRO&RAM     Cao&Dlhl AToR.                   l-AS V Fo Rc 6 I           C I   EtID OF %6stott tREvtew PHASE Foa ~
SL 2 PROJBCT T'EANI PRO&RAM Cao&DlhlAToR.
l-ASV Fo Rc 6 I
C I
EtID OF %6stott tREvtew PHASE Foa
~
SPEcIFIC I'TFM L.
SPEcIFIC I'TFM L.
S08thIT WRITTEt4 tZESII EST Fct A.
ASSEMBLE
ASSEMBLE 'REQUESTED             TRANSMIT To PRcVEC              COhlTlzoLLED CbPIES OF LA'rf~T I NST'AI.LATIOt4                                               DWGS    AQD OTKfR MSIOH DIICUMENS All D OTttfA. DESI'~                                           'USED  rO IIISTAI L SPECIFIC ITEM DOCVME II'TS TRRHSAIIT COLITROt.LED         TEAIISerr Vo TASlt: FoacE COP I R>                I LOCATE     (t45TALLE,D'TEM, PERt   +RM AAI   IH- PL*CE EXAMINATI4H AND
'REQUESTED I NST'AI.LATIOt4 AllD OTttfA. DESI'~
                                                                                              <ERIF'0 THE AS-SIIILT I HSTALLATIoN AGAINsT THE DW&S AIID OTHER.
DOCVMEII'TS TRRHSAIIT COLITROt.LED COP IR>
56 SIGN   QOcl+4E hl'TS, 30CUNEQT   Akj) AltALYZE DIFFEREIICES IF READIL'r ACCEPTABLE, DOCUMENT RATttttdALE i4I4D RttD FIELD INSTALL-ATIDII VERIRICA'Troll PHASE, IF IIOT WRADILY ACCEPTAQLS, POCUttfltT IINQES>LVEP ITEM PDISCRf FANCY) AND fRAM5 HIT TO 'R4VIGW C OMMtYTEE ttlc/I t4 INDEPEhJPEKJT           FIELD INSTALLATION VERIFICATION FLON CHART
TRANSMIT To PRcVEC I
TEAIISerr Vo TASlt: FoacE S08thIT WRITTEt4 tZESIIEST Fct A.
COhlTlzoLLED CbPIES OF LA'rf~T DWGS AQD OTKfR MSIOH DIICUMENS
'USED rO IIISTAIL SPECIFIC ITEM LOCATE (t45TALLE,D'TEM,PERt +RM AAI IH-PL*CE EXAMINATI4H AND
<ERIF'0 THE AS-SIIILT I HSTALLATIoN AGAINsT THE DW&S AIID OTHER.
56 SIGN QOcl+4E hl'TS, 30CUNEQT Akj) AltALYZE DIFFEREIICES IF READIL'r ACCEPTABLE, DOCUMENT RATttttdALE i4I4D RttD FIELD INSTALL-ATIDII VERIRICA'Troll PHASE, IF IIOT WRADILY ACCEPTAQLS, POCUttfltT IINQES>LVEP ITEM PDISCRf FANCY) AND fRAM5 HIT TO 'R4VIGW C OMMtYTEE ttlc/I t4 INDEPEhJPEKJT FIELD INSTALLATION VERIFICATION FLON CHART
 
'C


'C EBAKO SEIVICH IIICORPORATED                                               SH ~ cc~ op~
oscar OR
~aozccv S
~Uclccc POPE OC ULII T
COM g
EIZIP mt Ohl EBAKO SEIVICH IIICORPORATED SH ~cc~ op~
ATTACHMENTA5 J
ATTACHMENTA5 J
oscar    OR        POPE                T  COM  g
oivc~<~~
~ aozccv
Sl. 2 PRO)ECT
~ Uclccc S    OC      ULII EIZ IP  mt Ohl oivc ~<~~
'TEAM SL 2 PLAHT OPERA'TtONS PROGRAM C&RDINATOR.
Sl. 2 PRO)ECT 'TEAM         SL 2 PLAHT       OPERA'TtONS PROGRAM     C&RDINATOR.                       7Ase     Fog.c6 QNb OF FIEl-D !INSTALLATION VERIFICATIOnl l 'PHASE     FOIZ   S PECIFIC   I TEAl I
7Ase Fog.c6 QNb OF FIEl-D
ASSEMSL6 QPPLICABL
!INSTALLATION VERIFICATIOnl l 'PHASE FOIZ S PECIFIC ITEAl I
                                                                                                $ IIBMIT INRITI'EH KEOIUEST FOR ALL A'PPLICABLE PERFORMAHCE,                                              ~RAIOSMn TO PROJ ECT            PERFoRAtAQOE CK)CUMEHTS HOT F'REVIOUSL'f DOCUMEHTS  Ne T  SoRE-PROVIDEP FO< 'S PGC)PIC tTBM, SUcH AS PIOUSLY PROVIDED                                                                          VENDOR SHOP 'TltST 'DA'TA, TlCANSMt T PERFO&f          $ 5$ EMQL'E %'EQUEJTE'P
ASSEMSL6 QPPLICABL PERFORMAHCE, DOCUMEHTS N e T SoRE-PIOUSLY PROVIDED TlCANSMtT PERFO&f
    -AHCE DOCU+EIHTS              5TART-UP PROCEDURES          TRAHSltll W  OPERaTiaVS        $ U EMIT %Ill'1TTE+   Q6CIUE g'P FOR STAItT-VP HD COMPLEtKD TEST DATA                                      PROCEDURES AND START'-UP. VEST 'DATA TRAHSNIT PROCEDURE S                                          COMPLETED TO bATE FOR SPECIFIC ITEM AIID TE ST bhTh V'ghNSMIT TO CASK FOtac6 COI4PhRE,. 'QELSIQ t4 Wlc'CLQ IQ,I IA6+TS vs AC,VVAI P ERFORMIjt,QC6 5TART QP TESTIN 0 COMPLETES 70 'DhT8 I
-AHCE DOCU+EIHTS
                                                                                                    'DOCIIMEHT AUD ANALYZE >IFFQILS'HCES 1P SEA'PILY ACCEI'TATILE, DOCUMEHT RATIOHAL AHP EHD STAItT.UP OPEItmloU VERIF tchttoH PvASE IF HOT RKADILT ACCEr I ABLE,DoctttcEHT UNttEsoLVEV ITEM{DISCE6PAICY)AMO mANSW7 14 ItEV<EW COH<tzygE NIO/MI JMDEPEN9EHT         START-UP OPERATION AERIFICATION FLOW CHART}}
$ 5$ EMQL'E
%'EQUEJTE'P 5TART-UP PROCEDURES HD COMPLEtKD TEST DATA TRAHSNIT PROCEDURE S AIID TE ST bhTh
~RAIOSMn TO PROJ ECT TRAHSltll W OPERaTiaVS
$IIBMITINRITI'EH KEOIUEST FOR ALL A'PPLICABLE PERFoRAtAQOE CK)CUMEHTS HOT F'REVIOUSL'f PROVIDEP FO< 'S PGC)PIC tTBM, SUcH AS VENDOR SHOP 'TltST
'DA'TA,
$ UEMIT
%Ill'1TTE+
Q6CIUE g'P FOR STAItT-VP PROCEDURES AND START'-UP. VEST 'DATA COMPLETED TO bATE FOR SPECIFIC ITEM V'ghNSMIT TO CASK FOtac6 COI4PhRE,.
'QELSIQ t4 Wlc'CLQIQ,IIA6+TS vs AC,VVAI P ERFORMIjt,QC6 I
5TART QP TESTIN 0 COMPLETES 70 'DhT8
'DOCIIMEHT AUD ANALYZE >IFFQILS'HCES 1P SEA'PILY ACCEI'TATILE, DOCUMEHT RATIOHAL AHP EHD STAItT.UP OPEItmloU VERIFtchttoH PvASE NIO/MI IF HOT RKADILT ACCEr I ABLE,DoctttcEHT UNttEsoLVEV ITEM{DISCE6PAICY)AMO mANSW7 14 ItEV<EW COH<tzygE JMDEPEN9EHT START-UP OPERATION AERIFICATION FLOW CHART}}

Latest revision as of 08:54, 8 January 2025

To Procedure EVP-001/SL-2, Engineering Verification Program
ML17273A077
Person / Time
Site: Saint Lucie 
Issue date: 06/23/1982
From:
FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO.
To:
Shared Package
ML17212B718 List:
References
EVP-001-SL-2, EVP-1-SL-2, NUDOCS 8207130211
Download: ML17273A077 (17)


Text

PROCEDURE NO. EVP-001/SL-2 REV. 0 06/23/82 FLORIDA POWER 6 LIGHT COMPANY ST LUCIE UNIT NO.

2 ENGINEERING VERIFICATION PROGRAM 8207130211 820709' PDR;ADOCK 05000389

( P

PDR

EVP-001/SL-2 REV.

0 06/23/82 FLORIDA POWER

& LIGHT COMPANY

" ST LUOIE UNIT NO.

2 ENGINEERING VERIFICATION PROGRAN TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Title

~Pa e

Introduction........................

~

~

~ ~

~

1 Selection Process........'............................

2 Engineering Verification Process..................

~..

3 A Task Force Activities.............'..............

3 B Review Committee/Project Team Activities........

4-5 IV Documentation/Reports..............................

~.

5 A'ttachments Al.l Organization Chart Task Force A1.2 Organization Chart Review Committee A2 Engineering Verification Process Flow Chart A3 A4 Independent Design Review Flow Chart Independent Installation Verification, Flow Chart A5

--Independent Start-up Operation Verification Flow Chart

EVP-001/SL-2 REV.

0 06/23/82 FLORIDA POWER

& LIGHT COMPANY ST LUCIE UNIT NO.

2 ENGINEERING VERIFICATION PROGRAM I Introduction A program has been developed to conduct an in-depth (deep cut) engineering verification of Florida Power

& Light Company's St Lucie Unit No.

2 Nuclear Power Plant.

This engineering verification will be accomplished by Ebasco and Combustion Engineering Task Forces independent of the St Lucie Project teams.

(See Attachment Al.l for the Task Force Organization Chart)

The program is divided into the following tasks:

A - Selection of items to be reviewed in accordance with Section II of this procedure B Independent verification of the existing designs for the selected items in accordance with Section III of this procedure.

C In-place examination of installed components to verify conformance with the drawings in accordance with Section III of this procedure.

D Comparison of component design against actual performance based on startup testing completed to date in accordance with Section III of this procedure.

The independence of the verification Task Force is maintained in several ways:

1 The Ebasco and CE personnel performing the verifications will be individuals who have had no prior involvement in the design,.

installation, or testing of the items being reviewed or in the review selection process.

Resumes of Task Force members will be included in the program documentation.

2 Task Force members will be located separately from the regular Project teams and will communicate with the Project teams only through the Program Coordinator.

3' The existing design will not be available to the Task Force during preparatioq of the independent design.

4 Regular status reports documenting progress of the verification program will be submitted in parallel to the NRC, FPL, Ebasco and CE.

1 EVP-001/SL-2 REV.

0 06/23/82 II Selection Process

- The selection of items to be reviewed by the Task Force will consist of the following steps:

1 A determination by FPL of all candidate items (components or isolated sections of a system).

2 An appropriate division of the candidate items into separate groups by FPL, as outlined below.

3 A random selection by FPL, from these groups of candidate items, of eight (8) specific items to be verified by the Task 'Force.

The candidate items include all "major components" which:

1 are important to safety, and 2 have multi-discipline interfaces The candidates will be divided into A/E and NSSS items, and at least two (2)

NSSS items will be chosen.

The candidates will also be divided by major disciplines as follows:

1 Civil/Structural 2 Mechanical 3 Electrical 4 Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning (HVAC) 5 Instrumentation and Control At least one item from each discipline will be selected.

The general boundaries of the items to be reviewed will include:

1 The component support and/or foundation system including its interface with the building structure.

2 Piping up and down stream to the first support locations.

3 Local power supply, instrumentation and controls.

Specific boundaries will be established by the Task Force after the items have been selected, and'omponent-specific boundary sketches will be prepared.

III En ineerin Verification Process t

EVP-001/SL-2 REV.

0 06/23/82 A Task Force Activities The Task Force will determine the design inputs considered necessary to perform an independent design review for the items selected.

Utilizing the latest design inputs, inde-pendent calculations and sketches will be generated and compared with the existing calculations and drawings.

Differences between the independent and existing designs will be documented and analyzed.

If the differences are determined to be acceptable, the rationale will be docu-mented and the design review phase considered complete.

If the differences cannot be resolved, the procedure out-lined for unresolved items in Section III.B.1 hereunder will be followed.

Upon completion of the design review phase for a specific item, the independent field installation verification phase can proceed.

The Task Force will obtain copies of the latest drawings and other design documents used to install the item and will perform an in-place examination to verify the as-built installation, against those drawings and documents.

Differences will be documented and analyzed.

If the differences are

.determined to be acceptable, the rationale will be documented and the field installation verification phase considered com-plete.

If'he differences cannot be resolved, the procedure outlined in Section III.B.1 will be followed.

Upon completion of the field installation verification phase for a specific item, the independent start-up operation verification.phase can proceed.

The Task Force will obtain all applicable performance documents not previously provided in addition to pertinent start-up procedures and start-up test data completed to date.

A comparison will then be made of the design requirements versus actual performance based on the start-up testing completed to date by Plant Operations.

Differences will be documented and analyzed.

If the differ-ences are determined to be acceptable, the rationale will be documented and the start-up operation verification phase considered complete.

If the differences cannot be resolved, the procedure outlined in Section III.B.1 will be followed.

4 Task Force activities outlined above are depicted on the flow charts

( Attachments A2 through A5).

EVP-001/SL-2 REV.

0 06/23/82 B Review Committee/Pro'ect Team Activities Any item for which the differences cannot be resolved by the Task Force whether in the design review phase, field installation verification phase, or start-up operation veri-fication phase will be classified as an unresolved item (discrepancy),

documented, and transmitted to the Review Committee for resolution.

The Review Committee will consist of the FPL Engineering Project Manager, FPL Program Coordinator, Ebasco Project

Engineer, CE Project Manager, and the Task Force Managers.

Technical support will be provided as necessary'y

FPL, Ebasco and CE Project team personnel.

(See Attachment A1.2)

Should the Review Committee determine through its own review supplemented as necessary by support from the Project team that the unresolved item (discrepancy) is actually acceptable, the rationale will be documented and the item recycled to the Task Force for its agreement and continuation of the verification procedure.

Should the Review Committee determine through its own review supplemented as necessary by support from the Project team that the discrepancy is not acceptable; the rationale will be documented and the unresolved item i.dentified as either a ~findin or an observation.

Any unresolved item which could affect the safety of the plant will be identified as a ~findin An nnresolved item which results from either a generic technical process flaw or generic procedural program flaw will also be identified as a ~findin An unresolved item not affecting plant safety but resulting from either an isolated technical process flaw or isolated procedural program flaw will be identified as an observation.

The Review Committee will document all findings and obser-vations before transmitting them to the Project team for its review and further processing.

Following Project team determination of, the corrective action to be taken for each finding, and observation, but prior to actual implementation, Task Force concurrence will be obtained.

This will enable'the Task Force to assure itself that all aspects of the unresolved item it originally identified have been accounted for.

t EVP-001/SL-2 REV.

0 06/23/82 C

B Review Committee/Pro'ect Team Activities (Cont'd) 9 At the same time 'the project team implements the necessary

'corrective action for a finding, it will determine report-ability.

Reportable findings require preparation and submittal to the NRC of the appropriate 10CFR 50.55(e) or 10CFR 21 reports.

10 Documentation of item closeout by the Project team will follow implementation of corrective action for each find-ing and observation.

ll - Review Committee/Project team activities outlined above are depicted on the same flow charts illustrating Task Force activities (Attachments A2 through A 5).

IV Documentation/Re orts The engineering verification program will have a high degree of visibil-ity, with all process steps in each phase being properly documented for record purposes and the NRC being kept fully apprized of progress via regular status reports.

The following reports will be generated during the program:

1 Meekly status summaries of the overall program 2 Minutes of all Review Committee meetings 3 Reportable findings, if any 4 Component completion reports as the verification process for each selected item is completed 5 A final report upon overall program completion Copies of telephone conversation logs will be included in the weekly status summaries.

Distribution of correspondence will be made concurrently to the NRC, FPL, Ebasco and CE.

r L.utch VV

~umph>C q uSH'f COMPhltlg 5T. LUG(E UNA NO-2 EBS/QTERIHG VFRtFlCATlOM PROSRAM

OPGttI,MIZATlON CHART-TASK FORCE ATTAcHQE'gT gl;i.

j7AYE

~4 TA5K FORCE CHh)CKMhOJ TAStC F4Rcl Aha kAOfk V-'wopOR TASK Fbi.C HALtAlgrQEZ P. HI L.LS'R Ct VlL Pckav EATERS PL.AuT APPpgATOS Res.H DESI&~

%%HERS As ghJQWQ tgTtC I 8 cmC.

oTwen,s AS 84)'.

EBASC.O SERVtC ES J NC l OMBUST(OQ Eh!&(NEER'1WG lMe NOTE - Communication, Adiuinistration, Project InterEace

'Ries Exist Between Task Force and FPL Kngrg Pro)ect

Hgr, EBASCO Prospect
Engr, and C.E. Project Ngr.

V

~

~

~

. 'RBVtRA....QQMfht'T.TBK

~

~

~

~

WFCa~tCAt..

SuPt oav As H~cassAR Y FL.ORtDA.Pawpp. 4 t.!GHl gMSJMESttlNQ PRcQRCT MAM468R UV SOTSO N p~gtyg f5Lv6R g ktGHT

. Prole,cy TFAM

~

~

Ft.oRt9h Mwcm, $ l.tcHy osaAH aoORotvAmR H R,AN@I6.%

~ ~

~ ~

( ~

FSPQCD QQRvtCCS gplg PRO~acv e~s tweed I

~

~

8'PASCCt SERVlCSS th4C P f@Pd EL%'shM

~ (

~

~

~

~

~

caMSUS'AOQ EN&fvE6RtMS,INC PR'OJ 8 C'l fvi*gp 46.5t 4

C lvloL'Tee@

~

~

~

w(, ~.

I p9ASCO SGRv<cBS,thkc GVP TAgK, FbRCS klAQASS

~MEUMAg EQQQFERWS,l paoaac.T

-TFA.M

~

~

~

~

\\

~

~

........ J.ESSkD QplhSVSTtOQ EN6tNQBRWS, )HE BVP TASK, PORES QAMAGGR DD Mtwt KQ.

.. ~

~

~ ~

~ ~

~

8VP, =. EustHEQRtNt"

, VERÃghTtOyur pRO&RAhh.

~

~ ( a

~

~

(

~

EBASCO SERVICES IHCORPORATED AHCCT~ OS~

ATTACKMENT A2 CLICOT OAOJ ~ CT ADO/CCT

~

'ATC

~~~jL ITEII ESEIECTI ON(

i PROCESS IDfNTIST ITEN FOR ENGRG VfRIFI CATION COMPILE LATEST DESIGN (NPQTS VERIFIED C.E.

INPUT PERFORM IN DfPfND ENT CAI.CS COur ARE WITH ETISTINO DESIGN DOCUME DIFFER-ENCES

( RfVIEWS PNNITTSE E

APPlorAL ISO RICElvfI Eaaauo

)

I DCSIC/I LClLCS J ANALYZE DIFFER-ENCES Ul I->~ o Sa IL ~C V

DOCUMENT TIDNllE EN'D OF DESIGLI RfVIEW P HASE VERIFY FIEI.D INSTALL ATIDN DOCUMEN RESOI.

ITEK (DISCRfli ANCT>

DOCUMEN DIFFER EMCEE ANALYZE DIFFER ENC'&S R 4 DI

~J DOCUMENT RATIDVA fND OF LNSTALL ATIDN VfRIFI ATION H* E DDCVN VT

'RATKAIAL END OF START VP VRRIFI CATION

'PHASE VEICIPY pfc/DAN ANDC AT START.UP DCCVIIfNT DIFFfR E

S IF AIOT READIIY IF ROAD LY TO REVIEW COkk/TT ACcfPTAELE

/ICCSPTAOL'E ANALYZE DIFFER-ENCES REVIEW COMMITTEE PROJECT TEAAE ACTIV/TIES

'TASK CO(CCE ACTIVITIES QfVIEW IIURESOLVED ITEN (DISCREP ANCT)

PRILIECT TEALI SUPPORT DOCUM EN RfVICIV CCNNIITEE RATIONAL V

4 IJ I(

aO 4

aK ul OO IO RECYCLE TO 'TASIC FORCE FOR ACRE&M-ENTT ATEOORI POTEN TIA FNIDVI6 P',.

C STACTl/I I DCNTI AS FINDING AND DOCVkfNT IDENTIFY AS OSS ERV A'I ho N AND DOCVNENT PROI &tT TEALI REVIEW PRO/ EC TEAM REVIEW DETERNUI RfPORT ADILITY OSTAIN~

I TASK I FORCE )

CONCUR )

ACNCE EJ IcfFoarhal TAKE CORRR CT IVE ACTION TAKE.

CORRECT IVf ACTION SOD NLT IOCFR SLSS(6 Olr PART gl REPORT DOCVMfN 1TE,M CIOSE OVT DOCvIIE ITEM CLOSEOV ENGINEERING I VERlF[CATlON PROCESS FLOW CHART NIO/I N

CL>a<<r

~'I>0> ~ CT

>>/I/SC'>

UC le vL>>r Llo.

F>L GM &INE ERIN6 I/

Fl AT>OH EBASCO SERVICES IIICORPORATED

~<<tA'F~ OF I

r A'TTACHI/LIGHT A3

,.~or a e.

SL 2 Pap SEC T TEAM PROGRAM CCORDLNATLDR I

>>I I

TAS FORC B PREPARE Llsr>NG or CALID>bATG LTCHS AND PERFORM RANDOH SELECT-ION OF SPEC lFlC ITCH S TRANSMIT SPECIFIC LIST ASSEMBLE LATEST DES>6M INPUTS FEIL REQOE.ST TRANSMIT DESIGN LNPOTS TR/LLISIULLT SPECIFIC LIST FOR INITIAL TRAHSNLT 'TO PRUAECr Ill*MS>/LLTTo 'TASK FORC X)ETERMINE DESIGN INPoTS COMSIDER-ED HECESSAILY TO PERFORM LHDEPEHD-EHT EHGIHEERIN 6 lLESLEH CALCVLATLOHS.

SLILS/>LIT WRITTEN >EGO<ST FOIL LATEST DESI4H INFVTS PERfoRNL INDEPENDENT EH4IL6.

DESIGN CALCVtAT>OILS SKETCHES I:

RETRIEVE EXISTING 'DH'LL>H CALCS/ DW65 FRUM F. ILKS 1RANSNLT CALCS DWGS TRAHSMLr7o PRO JEC,T

'TRANSMIT 'ID TASK FORCE SuBMIT WRiTTEN 'RECLUEST'OTL EXLSTIN6 DESLGH CALCS DWAS TRANSMIT'VERIFIED>

C.Ee INPUT> AS APPLICAQLE FoR ITEMS SELLLCTED

'TRANSNlT To TASK FORCE

'OMPARE IHDEPENDEQT DE'5LEN WITH ELLLSTLH6 DESIGN A VERIFIED C.E. IHPor DOCONEL>T ALID ANALYZE D>FFEILENCE IF REAL>>LY ACCEPI h'>L.E, DOCUMENT RAT>O>>ALE A>/D E>/D Dgs>ON &Ev>CW P//ASE IF Hor 'READ>AY AccEPrASLE,bocUNc>LT V@RESOLVE'b ITE>L (D>SC<f PANCY)

AMP'rRANSM>r rO RE>/LEw'o>>>L>rr6

>>}D/I>I I MDEPEWDEMT.

DES IGN R EVI EV/

FLOW CHART

cL<av LOP ID POW IG'ttT 0 QNIPAL)

~Ioi~cc tUIJCC'l IVE'EK V Rtt=t AT om EBASCO SERVICES IKCORPORATEO

~NccT~ OF~

anZCVMEur A 4.

rP DATC~~~~

SL 2 PROJBCT T'EANI PRO&RAM Cao&DlhlAToR.

l-ASV Fo Rc 6 I

C I

EtID OF %6stott tREvtew PHASE Foa

~

SPEcIFIC I'TFM L.

ASSEMBLE

'REQUESTED I NST'AI.LATIOt4 AllD OTttfA. DESI'~

DOCVMEII'TS TRRHSAIIT COLITROt.LED COP IR>

TRANSMIT To PRcVEC I

TEAIISerr Vo TASlt: FoacE S08thIT WRITTEt4 tZESIIEST Fct A.

COhlTlzoLLED CbPIES OF LA'rf~T DWGS AQD OTKfR MSIOH DIICUMENS

'USED rO IIISTAIL SPECIFIC ITEM LOCATE (t45TALLE,D'TEM,PERt +RM AAI IH-PL*CE EXAMINATI4H AND

<ERIF'0 THE AS-SIIILT I HSTALLATIoN AGAINsT THE DW&S AIID OTHER.

56 SIGN QOcl+4E hl'TS, 30CUNEQT Akj) AltALYZE DIFFEREIICES IF READIL'r ACCEPTABLE, DOCUMENT RATttttdALE i4I4D RttD FIELD INSTALL-ATIDII VERIRICA'Troll PHASE, IF IIOT WRADILY ACCEPTAQLS, POCUttfltT IINQES>LVEP ITEM PDISCRf FANCY) AND fRAM5 HIT TO 'R4VIGW C OMMtYTEE ttlc/I t4 INDEPEhJPEKJT FIELD INSTALLATION VERIFICATION FLON CHART

'C

oscar OR

~aozccv S

~Uclccc POPE OC ULII T

COM g

EIZIP mt Ohl EBAKO SEIVICH IIICORPORATED SH ~cc~ op~

ATTACHMENTA5 J

oivc~<~~

Sl. 2 PRO)ECT

'TEAM SL 2 PLAHT OPERA'TtONS PROGRAM C&RDINATOR.

7Ase Fog.c6 QNb OF FIEl-D

!INSTALLATION VERIFICATIOnl l 'PHASE FOIZ S PECIFIC ITEAl I

ASSEMSL6 QPPLICABL PERFORMAHCE, DOCUMEHTS N e T SoRE-PIOUSLY PROVIDED TlCANSMtT PERFO&f

-AHCE DOCU+EIHTS

$ 5$ EMQL'E

%'EQUEJTE'P 5TART-UP PROCEDURES HD COMPLEtKD TEST DATA TRAHSNIT PROCEDURE S AIID TE ST bhTh

~RAIOSMn TO PROJ ECT TRAHSltll W OPERaTiaVS

$IIBMITINRITI'EH KEOIUEST FOR ALL A'PPLICABLE PERFoRAtAQOE CK)CUMEHTS HOT F'REVIOUSL'f PROVIDEP FO< 'S PGC)PIC tTBM, SUcH AS VENDOR SHOP 'TltST

'DA'TA,

$ UEMIT

%Ill'1TTE+

Q6CIUE g'P FOR STAItT-VP PROCEDURES AND START'-UP. VEST 'DATA COMPLETED TO bATE FOR SPECIFIC ITEM V'ghNSMIT TO CASK FOtac6 COI4PhRE,.

'QELSIQ t4 Wlc'CLQIQ,IIA6+TS vs AC,VVAI P ERFORMIjt,QC6 I

5TART QP TESTIN 0 COMPLETES 70 'DhT8

'DOCIIMEHT AUD ANALYZE >IFFQILS'HCES 1P SEA'PILY ACCEI'TATILE, DOCUMEHT RATIOHAL AHP EHD STAItT.UP OPEItmloU VERIFtchttoH PvASE NIO/MI IF HOT RKADILT ACCEr I ABLE,DoctttcEHT UNttEsoLVEV ITEM{DISCE6PAICY)AMO mANSW7 14 ItEV<EW COH<tzygE JMDEPEN9EHT START-UP OPERATION AERIFICATION FLOW CHART