ML17289B018: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
| issue date = 12/02/1992
| issue date = 12/02/1992
| title = Discusses Siemens Power Corp Cycle Stability Analyses. Analyses Should Be Augmented Based on Results of Instability Event at Facility.Topical Rept,Describing Staif Code, Expected to Be Submitted in June 1993
| title = Discusses Siemens Power Corp Cycle Stability Analyses. Analyses Should Be Augmented Based on Results of Instability Event at Facility.Topical Rept,Describing Staif Code, Expected to Be Submitted in June 1993
| author name = COPELAND R A
| author name = Copeland R
| author affiliation = SIEMENS POWER CORP. (FORMERLY SIEMENS NUCLEAR POWER
| author affiliation = SIEMENS POWER CORP. (FORMERLY SIEMENS NUCLEAR POWER
| addressee name = PHILLIPS L E
| addressee name = Phillips L
| addressee affiliation = NRC OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION (NRR)
| addressee affiliation = NRC OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION (NRR)
| docket = 05000397
| docket = 05000397
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:~ccrc,za~rzo oocvnmwr orsrju vrox svsrz~vv REGULATO4IINFORMATION DISTRIBUTION STEM (RIDE)O ACCESSION NBR:9212090215 DOC.DATE: 92/12/02 NOTARIZED:
{{#Wiki_filter:~ccrc,za~rzo oocvnmwr orsrju vrox svsrz~vv REGULATO4IINFORMATION DISTRIBUTION STEM (RIDE)
NO DOCKET FACIL:50-397 WPPSS Nuclear Project, Unit 2, Washington Public Powe 05000397 AUTH.NAME AUTHOR AFFILIATION COPELAND,R.A.
O ACCESSION NBR:9212090215 DOC.DATE: 92/12/02 NOTARIZED: NO DOCKET FACIL:50-397 WPPSS Nuclear Project, Unit 2, Washington Public Powe 05000397 AUTH.NAME AUTHOR AFFILIATION COPELAND,R.A.
Siemens Power Corp.(formerly Siemens Nuclear Power Corp., RECIP.NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION PHILLIPS,L.E.
Siemens Power Corp. (formerly Siemens Nuclear Power Corp.,
RECIP.NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION PHILLIPS,L.E.
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, Director (Post 870411'UBJECT:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, Director (Post 870411'UBJECT:
Discusses Siemens Power Corp cycle stability.
Discusses Siemens Power Corp cycle stability. analyses.
analyses.Analyses should be augmented based on results of instability event at facility.Topical rept, describing STAIF code, expected to be submitted in June 1993.DISTRIBUTION CODE: YGOID COPIES RECEIVED:LTR 2 ENCL P SIZE: TITLE: Generic Material with no Specific Distribution
Analyses should be augmented based on results of instability event at facility.Topical rept, describing STAIF code, expected to be submitted in June 1993.
'NOTES: RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME PHILLIPSFL
DISTRIBUTION CODE:
~E~~~INTERNAL: ACRS RES/DSIR/EIB RGN2 RGN4 EXTERNAL: NRC PDR COPIES LTTR ENCL 1 REG FILE.-RGNl RGN3 RGN5 01 NSIC RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME COPIES'LTTR ENCL NOTE TO ALL"RIDS" RECIPIENTS:
YGOID COPIES RECEIVED:LTR 2 ENCL P
PLEASE HELP US TO REDUCE WASTE!CONTACT THE DOCUMENT CONTROL DESK, ROOM Pl-37 (EXT.504-2065)TO ELIMINATE YOUR NAME FROM DISTRIBUTION LISTS FOR DOCUMENTS YOU DON'T NEED!TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED: LTTR 16 ENCL 0 0 6g'p (8 Sl pQ December 2, 1992 RAC:92:145 Mr.L.E.Phillips Section Leader, Reactor Systems Branch Division of Engineering and System Technology Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Mail Station P1-1 37 U.S.Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.20555
SIZE:
TITLE: Generic Material with no Specific Distribution NOTES:
RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME PHILLIPSFL ~ E ~
~
~
INTERNAL: ACRS RES/DSIR/EIB RGN2 RGN4 EXTERNAL: NRC PDR COPIES LTTR ENCL 1
REG FILE.-
RGNl RGN3 RGN5 01 NSIC RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME COPIES
'LTTR ENCL NOTE TO ALL"RIDS" RECIPIENTS:
PLEASE HELP US TO REDUCE WASTE! CONTACT THE DOCUMENT CONTROL DESK, ROOM Pl-37 (EXT. 504-2065) TO ELIMINATEYOUR NAME FROM DISTRIBUTION LISTS FOR DOCUMENTS YOU DON'T NEED!
TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED:
LTTR 16 ENCL


==Dear Mr.Phillips:==
0 0
6g
'p (8
Sl pQ


December 2, 1992 RAC:92:145 Mr. L. E. Phillips Section Leader, Reactor Systems Branch Division of Engineering and System Technology Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Mail Station P1-1 37 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C. 20555
==Dear Mr. Phillips:==
==Subject:==
==Subject:==
SPC Stability Evaluations Based on the knowledge gained as a result of the WNP-2 instability event, Siemens Power Corporation (SPC)has concluded that the cycle stability analyses performed by SPC should be augmented.
SPC Stability Evaluations Based on the knowledge gained as a result of the WNP-2 instability event, Siemens Power Corporation (SPC) has concluded that the cycle stability analyses performed by SPC should be augmented.
The revised stability evaluation procedure will augment the cycle dependent COTRAN analyses with STAIF analyses to conservatively establish potential changes to the exclusion regions.The more conservative of the two analytical results will be used.STAIF is a one-dimensional, multichannel frequency domain code which explicitly includes fuel and power/flow characteristics on a channel basis.Therefore, different fuel types, thermal hydraulic, and core loading effects are explicitly considered.
The revised stability evaluation procedure will augment the cycle dependent COTRAN analyses with STAIF analyses to conservatively establish potential changes to the exclusion regions.
The more conservative of the two analytical results will be used.
STAIF is a one-dimensional, multichannel frequency domain code which explicitly includes fuel and power/flow characteristics on a channel basis.
Therefore, different fuel types, thermal hydraulic, and core loading effects are explicitly considered.
In general the STAIF code, when compared to COTRAN, gives results which are more conservative at lower flow conditions and COTRAN gives results vvhich are more conservative than STAIF at higher flow conditions.
In general the STAIF code, when compared to COTRAN, gives results which are more conservative at lower flow conditions and COTRAN gives results vvhich are more conservative than STAIF at higher flow conditions.
SPC is currently planning to submit a topical report describing the STAIF code to the NRC in June 1993.The approach of using the more conservative of STAIF and COTRAN results is an interim approach directed at conservatively addressing the impact of stability until STAIF is generically approved.fn addition to incorporating STAIF results in future cycle stability evaluations, Siemens Power Corporation is also reassessing the current cycle stability evaluations for the utilities supported with SPC COTRAN analyses.This reassessment provides a comparison of COTRAN-STAIF as a function of the power/flow at 0.75 decay ratio.This comparison is then adjusted to the plant specific power/flow map so that the utility can review the results for consistency with their Technical Specifications and Operating Procedures.
SPC is currently planning to submit a topical report describing the STAIF code to the NRC in June 1993.
Another concern highlighted by the WNP-2 instability event was the sensitivity to power distribution and the need for operator awareness that the boundaries of the exclusion regions are not absolute due to variables such as power distribution.
The approach of using the more conservative of STAIF and COTRAN results is an interim approach directed at conservatively addressing the impact of stability until STAIF is generically approved.
This is of particular concern 08005 Siemens Power Corporation Nuclear Division-Engineering and Manufacturing Facility t 0 2101 Horn Rapids Road, PO Box 130 Richland, WA 99352-0130 Tel: (509)375-8100 Fax: (509)375-8402 92i2090215 921202 PDR ADOCK 05000397 P PDR t l Mr.L.E.Phillips December 2, 1992 Page 2 during reactor maneuvering close to the exclusion regions.Although the scope of the SPC support to utility customers ha's been contractually limited, i.e., the scope has not included defining additional reactor maneuvering limits, SPC will offer to the utility to better define the stability limits during reactor maneuvering.
fn addition to incorporating STAIF results in future cycle stability evaluations, Siemens Power Corporation is also reassessing the current cycle stability evaluations for the utilities supported with SPC COTRAN analyses.
This definition of stability limits during reactor maneuvering can be adapted to be consistent with the revisions to the interim stability criteria being developed by the BWR Owners Group.In addition to these evaluations, SPC is developing the STAIF/MODES code into a package capable of using the POWERPLEX~
This reassessment provides a comparison of COTRAN-STAIF as a function of the power/flow at 0.75 decay ratio. This comparison is then adjusted to the plant specific power/flow map so that the utility can review the results for consistency with their Technical Specifications and Operating Procedures.
II core monitoring information.
Another concern highlighted by the WNP-2 instability event was the sensitivity to power distribution and the need for operator awareness that the boundaries of the exclusion regions are not absolute due to variables such as power distribution. This is of particular concern 08005 Siemens Power Corporation Nuclear Division - Engineering and Manufacturing Facility t 0 2101 Horn Rapids Road, PO Box 130 Richland, WA 99352-0130 Tel: (509) 375-8100 Fax: (509) 375-8402 92i2090215 921202 PDR ADOCK 05000397 P
This stability predictor can be coupled with ANNA~, to provide an on-line monitor/predictor for the operator.A prototype of this system should be available in early 1993.If you have questions about our actions, or if additional information is needed, please contact me.Very truly yours, R.A.Copeland, Manager Product Ucensing/smg cc: Mr.R.C.Jones v.~<<4 l'~~}}
PDR
 
t l
 
Mr. L. E. Phillips December 2, 1992 Page 2 during reactor maneuvering close to the exclusion regions.
Although the scope of the SPC support to utility customers ha's been contractually limited, i.e., the scope has not included defining additional reactor maneuvering limits, SPC will offer to the utilityto better define the stability limits during reactor maneuvering.
This definition of stability limits during reactor maneuvering can be adapted to be consistent with the revisions to the interim stability criteria being developed by the BWR Owners Group.
In addition to these evaluations, SPC is developing the STAIF/MODES code into a package capable of using the POWERPLEX~ II core monitoring information. This stability predictor can be coupled with ANNA~, to provide an on-line monitor/predictor for the operator.
A prototype of this system should be available in early 1993.
If you have questions about our actions, or if additional information is needed, please contact me.
Very truly yours, R. A. Copeland, Manager Product Ucensing
/smg cc:
Mr. R. C.Jones
 
v.~<<4 l'
~
~}}

Latest revision as of 05:20, 8 January 2025

Discusses Siemens Power Corp Cycle Stability Analyses. Analyses Should Be Augmented Based on Results of Instability Event at Facility.Topical Rept,Describing Staif Code, Expected to Be Submitted in June 1993
ML17289B018
Person / Time
Site: Columbia Energy Northwest icon.png
Issue date: 12/02/1992
From: Copeland R
SIEMENS POWER CORP. (FORMERLY SIEMENS NUCLEAR POWER
To: Phillips L
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
RAC:92:145, NUDOCS 9212090215
Download: ML17289B018 (6)


Text

~ccrc,za~rzo oocvnmwr orsrju vrox svsrz~vv REGULATO4IINFORMATION DISTRIBUTION STEM (RIDE)

O ACCESSION NBR:9212090215 DOC.DATE: 92/12/02 NOTARIZED: NO DOCKET FACIL:50-397 WPPSS Nuclear Project, Unit 2, Washington Public Powe 05000397 AUTH.NAME AUTHOR AFFILIATION COPELAND,R.A.

Siemens Power Corp. (formerly Siemens Nuclear Power Corp.,

RECIP.NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION PHILLIPS,L.E.

Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, Director (Post 870411'UBJECT:

Discusses Siemens Power Corp cycle stability. analyses.

Analyses should be augmented based on results of instability event at facility.Topical rept, describing STAIF code, expected to be submitted in June 1993.

DISTRIBUTION CODE:

YGOID COPIES RECEIVED:LTR 2 ENCL P

SIZE:

TITLE: Generic Material with no Specific Distribution NOTES:

RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME PHILLIPSFL ~ E ~

~

~

INTERNAL: ACRS RES/DSIR/EIB RGN2 RGN4 EXTERNAL: NRC PDR COPIES LTTR ENCL 1

REG FILE.-

RGNl RGN3 RGN5 01 NSIC RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME COPIES

'LTTR ENCL NOTE TO ALL"RIDS" RECIPIENTS:

PLEASE HELP US TO REDUCE WASTE! CONTACT THE DOCUMENT CONTROL DESK, ROOM Pl-37 (EXT. 504-2065) TO ELIMINATEYOUR NAME FROM DISTRIBUTION LISTS FOR DOCUMENTS YOU DON'T NEED!

TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED:

LTTR 16 ENCL

0 0

6g

'p (8

Sl pQ

December 2, 1992 RAC:92:145 Mr. L. E. Phillips Section Leader, Reactor Systems Branch Division of Engineering and System Technology Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Mail Station P1-1 37 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C. 20555

Dear Mr. Phillips:

Subject:

SPC Stability Evaluations Based on the knowledge gained as a result of the WNP-2 instability event, Siemens Power Corporation (SPC) has concluded that the cycle stability analyses performed by SPC should be augmented.

The revised stability evaluation procedure will augment the cycle dependent COTRAN analyses with STAIF analyses to conservatively establish potential changes to the exclusion regions.

The more conservative of the two analytical results will be used.

STAIF is a one-dimensional, multichannel frequency domain code which explicitly includes fuel and power/flow characteristics on a channel basis.

Therefore, different fuel types, thermal hydraulic, and core loading effects are explicitly considered.

In general the STAIF code, when compared to COTRAN, gives results which are more conservative at lower flow conditions and COTRAN gives results vvhich are more conservative than STAIF at higher flow conditions.

SPC is currently planning to submit a topical report describing the STAIF code to the NRC in June 1993.

The approach of using the more conservative of STAIF and COTRAN results is an interim approach directed at conservatively addressing the impact of stability until STAIF is generically approved.

fn addition to incorporating STAIF results in future cycle stability evaluations, Siemens Power Corporation is also reassessing the current cycle stability evaluations for the utilities supported with SPC COTRAN analyses.

This reassessment provides a comparison of COTRAN-STAIF as a function of the power/flow at 0.75 decay ratio. This comparison is then adjusted to the plant specific power/flow map so that the utility can review the results for consistency with their Technical Specifications and Operating Procedures.

Another concern highlighted by the WNP-2 instability event was the sensitivity to power distribution and the need for operator awareness that the boundaries of the exclusion regions are not absolute due to variables such as power distribution. This is of particular concern 08005 Siemens Power Corporation Nuclear Division - Engineering and Manufacturing Facility t 0 2101 Horn Rapids Road, PO Box 130 Richland, WA 99352-0130 Tel: (509) 375-8100 Fax: (509) 375-8402 92i2090215 921202 PDR ADOCK 05000397 P

PDR

t l

Mr. L. E. Phillips December 2, 1992 Page 2 during reactor maneuvering close to the exclusion regions.

Although the scope of the SPC support to utility customers ha's been contractually limited, i.e., the scope has not included defining additional reactor maneuvering limits, SPC will offer to the utilityto better define the stability limits during reactor maneuvering.

This definition of stability limits during reactor maneuvering can be adapted to be consistent with the revisions to the interim stability criteria being developed by the BWR Owners Group.

In addition to these evaluations, SPC is developing the STAIF/MODES code into a package capable of using the POWERPLEX~ II core monitoring information. This stability predictor can be coupled with ANNA~, to provide an on-line monitor/predictor for the operator.

A prototype of this system should be available in early 1993.

If you have questions about our actions, or if additional information is needed, please contact me.

Very truly yours, R. A. Copeland, Manager Product Ucensing

/smg cc:

Mr. R. C.Jones

v.~<<4 l'

~

~