ML18051B423: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Created page by program invented by StriderTol
 
StriderTol Bot change
 
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
| issue date = 06/10/1985
| issue date = 06/10/1985
| title = Clarifies Operability Requirements for Subcooling Margin Monitor,Per Insp Rept 50-255/85-05,NRC 831214 Evaluation of Util Response to Generic Ltr 82-28 & NUREG-0737,TMI Item II.F.2
| title = Clarifies Operability Requirements for Subcooling Margin Monitor,Per Insp Rept 50-255/85-05,NRC 831214 Evaluation of Util Response to Generic Ltr 82-28 & NUREG-0737,TMI Item II.F.2
| author name = VANDEWALLE D J
| author name = Vandewalle D
| author affiliation = CONSUMERS ENERGY CO. (FORMERLY CONSUMERS POWER CO.),
| author affiliation = CONSUMERS ENERGY CO. (FORMERLY CONSUMERS POWER CO.),
| addressee name =  
| addressee name =  
Line 15: Line 15:
| page count = 2
| page count = 2
}}
}}
See also: [[followed by::IR 05000255/1985005]]


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:.:..*._ .. consumers  
{{#Wiki_filter:.:..*._..
Power company General Offices: 1945 West Parnell Road, Jackson, Ml 49201 * (517) 788-1636 June 10, 1985 Director, Nuclear Reactor Regulation  
consumers Power company General Offices:
US Nuclear Regulatory  
1945 West Parnell Road, Jackson, Ml 49201 * (517) 788-1636 June 10, 1985
Commission  
: Director, Nuclear Reactor Regulation US Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555 DOCKET 50-255 - LICENSE DPR PALISADES PLANT -
Washington, DC 20555 DOCKET 50-255 -LICENSE DPR-20 -PALISADES  
David J VandeWalle Director of Nuclear licensing CLARIFICATION OF SUBCOOLING MARGIN MONITOR OPERABILITY REQUIREMENTS Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) {{letter dated|date=December 14, 1983|text=letter dated December 14, 1983}} provided
PLANT -David J VandeWalle  
_Consumers Power Company an evaluation of our response to Generic Letter 82-28, "Inadequate Core Cooling Instrumentation".
Director of Nuclear licensing  
This NRC letter stated "the design of the presently installed subcooling margin_monitor is acceptable contingent on upgrading of the input range from the pressure and temperature sensors as committed by the licensee".
CLARIFICATION  
Due to recent concerns of our Senior Resident Inspector as documented in Inspection Report 50-255/85005, a clarification of the operabiiity requirements for the subcooling margin monitor is necessary.
OF SUBCOOLING  
Our Technical Specifications require that at least one channel of the subcooling margin  
MARGIN MONITOR OPERABILITY  
~onitor be operable whenever primary coolant system temperature is above 515°F.
REQUIREMENTS  
In addition to a continuous digital display, the subcooling margin monitor also includes an alarm function which is -common _to ~ach of the two otherwise independent channels.
Nuclear Regulatory  
The alarm function of this monitor-is not addressed in our Technical Specifications, but we do calibrate the alarm during the performance of the Technical Specification surveillance procedure for the subcooling margin monitor.  
Commission (NRC) letter dated December 14, 1983 provided _Consumers  
"Clarification of TMI Action Plan Requirements", NUREG-0737, section II.F.2; Instrumentation for Detection of Inadequate Core Cooling, item 5, requires that "the indication must give advanced warning of the approach of ICC (Inadequate Core Cooling)". It is our understanding that this requirement is referencing the composite instrumentation system for detection of inadequate core cooling.
Power Company an evaluation  
This system consists of a primary coolant inventory monitoring system, core-exit thermocouples and subcooling margin monitor.
of our response to Generic Letter 82-28, "Inadequate  
Although the alarm function is 'incorporated in our subcooling margin monitor design and certainly does provide advanced warning, an operable subcooling margin monitor display, itself, also provides advanced warning of the approach of inadequate core cooling, as does the coolant inventory monitoring system.
Core Cooling Instrumentation".  
In addition, there is no specific requirement for an alarm function for the subcooling OC0685-0003B-NL02 r~~=a=50~6~1~7~04:--:--;;4~2~a~50~6~1~0 2
This NRC letter stated "the design of the presently  
5 5
installed  
~~i I  
subcooling  
~DR ADOCK 050~DR
margin_monitor  
)  
is acceptable  
 
contingent  
Director, Nuclear Reactor Regulation Palisades Plant Subcooling Margin Monitor June 10, 1985 2
on upgrading  
margin monitor in Appendix B of NUREG-0737, "Design and Qualification Criteria for Accident Monitoring Instrumentation".
of the input range from the pressure and temperature  
For operability declarations as well as subsequent reportability determinations, we believe it is appropriate to take credit for the operable display.
sensors as committed  
Consequently, the inoperability of the alarm function of the subcooling margin monitor, for whatever reason, does not constitute inoperability of the subcooling margin monitor provided that the subcooling margin monitor detection and display capabilities are unaffected.
by the licensee".  
The alarm function should, however, be prudently maintained in an operable condition.
Due to recent concerns of our Senior Resident Inspector  
Director, Nuclear Licensing CC Administrator, Region III, USNRC NRC Resident Inspector - Palisades OC0685-0003B-NL02}}
as documented  
in Inspection  
Report 50-255/85005, a clarification  
of the operabiiity  
requirements  
for the subcooling  
margin monitor is necessary.  
Our Technical  
Specifications  
require that at least one channel of the subcooling  
margin  
be operable whenever primary coolant system temperature  
is above 515°F. In addition to a continuous  
digital display, the subcooling  
margin monitor also includes an alarm function which is -common _to  
of the two otherwise  
independent  
channels.  
The alarm function of this monitor-is  
not addressed  
in our Technical  
Specifications, but we do calibrate  
the alarm during the performance  
of the Technical  
Specification  
surveillance  
procedure  
for the subcooling  
margin monitor. ' "Clarification  
of TMI Action Plan Requirements", NUREG-0737, section II.F.2; Instrumentation  
for Detection  
of Inadequate  
Core Cooling, item 5, requires that "the indication  
must give advanced warning of the approach of ICC (Inadequate  
Core Cooling)".  
It is our understanding  
that this requirement  
is referencing  
the composite  
instrumentation  
system for detection  
of inadequate  
core cooling. This system consists of a primary coolant inventory  
monitoring  
system, core-exit  
thermocouples  
and subcooling  
margin monitor. Although the alarm function is 'incorporated  
in our subcooling  
margin monitor design and certainly  
does provide advanced warning, an operable subcooling  
margin monitor display, itself, also provides advanced warning of the approach of inadequate  
core cooling, as does the coolant inventory  
monitoring  
system. In addition, there is no specific requirement  
for an alarm function for the subcooling  
OC0685-0003B-NL02 I ADOCK )
. " Director, Nuclear Reactor Regulation  
Palisades  
Plant Subcooling  
Margin Monitor June 10, 1985 2 margin monitor in Appendix B of NUREG-0737, "Design and Qualification  
Criteria for Accident Monitoring  
Instrumentation".  
For operability  
declarations  
as well as subsequent  
reportability  
determinations, we believe it is appropriate  
to take credit for the operable display. Consequently, the inoperability  
of the alarm function of the subcooling  
margin monitor, for whatever reason, does not constitute  
inoperability  
of the subcooling  
margin monitor provided that the subcooling  
margin monitor detection  
and display capabilities  
are unaffected.  
The alarm function should, however, be prudently  
maintained  
in an operable condition.  
Director, Nuclear Licensing  
CC Administrator, Region III, USNRC NRC Resident Inspector  
-Palisades  
OC0685-0003B-NL02
}}

Latest revision as of 09:49, 6 January 2025

Clarifies Operability Requirements for Subcooling Margin Monitor,Per Insp Rept 50-255/85-05,NRC 831214 Evaluation of Util Response to Generic Ltr 82-28 & NUREG-0737,TMI Item II.F.2
ML18051B423
Person / Time
Site: Palisades 
Issue date: 06/10/1985
From: Vandewalle D
CONSUMERS ENERGY CO. (FORMERLY CONSUMERS POWER CO.)
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
RTR-NUREG-0737, RTR-NUREG-737, TASK-2.F.2, TASK-TM GL-82-28, NUDOCS 8506170442
Download: ML18051B423 (2)


Text

.:..*._..

consumers Power company General Offices:

1945 West Parnell Road, Jackson, Ml 49201 * (517) 788-1636 June 10, 1985

Director, Nuclear Reactor Regulation US Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555 DOCKET 50-255 - LICENSE DPR PALISADES PLANT -

David J VandeWalle Director of Nuclear licensing CLARIFICATION OF SUBCOOLING MARGIN MONITOR OPERABILITY REQUIREMENTS Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) letter dated December 14, 1983 provided

_Consumers Power Company an evaluation of our response to Generic Letter 82-28, "Inadequate Core Cooling Instrumentation".

This NRC letter stated "the design of the presently installed subcooling margin_monitor is acceptable contingent on upgrading of the input range from the pressure and temperature sensors as committed by the licensee".

Due to recent concerns of our Senior Resident Inspector as documented in Inspection Report 50-255/85005, a clarification of the operabiiity requirements for the subcooling margin monitor is necessary.

Our Technical Specifications require that at least one channel of the subcooling margin

~onitor be operable whenever primary coolant system temperature is above 515°F.

In addition to a continuous digital display, the subcooling margin monitor also includes an alarm function which is -common _to ~ach of the two otherwise independent channels.

The alarm function of this monitor-is not addressed in our Technical Specifications, but we do calibrate the alarm during the performance of the Technical Specification surveillance procedure for the subcooling margin monitor.

"Clarification of TMI Action Plan Requirements", NUREG-0737, section II.F.2; Instrumentation for Detection of Inadequate Core Cooling, item 5, requires that "the indication must give advanced warning of the approach of ICC (Inadequate Core Cooling)". It is our understanding that this requirement is referencing the composite instrumentation system for detection of inadequate core cooling.

This system consists of a primary coolant inventory monitoring system, core-exit thermocouples and subcooling margin monitor.

Although the alarm function is 'incorporated in our subcooling margin monitor design and certainly does provide advanced warning, an operable subcooling margin monitor display, itself, also provides advanced warning of the approach of inadequate core cooling, as does the coolant inventory monitoring system.

In addition, there is no specific requirement for an alarm function for the subcooling OC0685-0003B-NL02 r~~=a=50~6~1~7~04:--:--;;4~2~a~50~6~1~0 2

5 5

~~i I

~DR ADOCK 050~DR

)

Director, Nuclear Reactor Regulation Palisades Plant Subcooling Margin Monitor June 10, 1985 2

margin monitor in Appendix B of NUREG-0737, "Design and Qualification Criteria for Accident Monitoring Instrumentation".

For operability declarations as well as subsequent reportability determinations, we believe it is appropriate to take credit for the operable display.

Consequently, the inoperability of the alarm function of the subcooling margin monitor, for whatever reason, does not constitute inoperability of the subcooling margin monitor provided that the subcooling margin monitor detection and display capabilities are unaffected.

The alarm function should, however, be prudently maintained in an operable condition.

Director, Nuclear Licensing CC Administrator, Region III, USNRC NRC Resident Inspector - Palisades OC0685-0003B-NL02