ML18054A973: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Created page by program invented by StriderTol
StriderTol Bot change
 
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
| number = ML18054A973
| number = ML18054A973
| issue date = 09/11/1989
| issue date = 09/11/1989
| title = Responds to NRC 890811 Ltr Re Violations Noted in Insp Rept 50-255/89-18.Corrective Actions:Informational Statements Placed in Plant Daily Status Sheet & Weekly Plant Bulletin & All Shift Supervisors Counseled on Existing Requirements
| title = Responds to NRC Re Violations Noted in Insp Rept 50-255/89-18.Corrective Actions:Informational Statements Placed in Plant Daily Status Sheet & Weekly Plant Bulletin & All Shift Supervisors Counseled on Existing Requirements
| author name = BERRY K W
| author name = Berry K
| author affiliation = CONSUMERS ENERGY CO. (FORMERLY CONSUMERS POWER CO.),
| author affiliation = CONSUMERS ENERGY CO. (FORMERLY CONSUMERS POWER CO.),
| addressee name =  
| addressee name =  
Line 11: Line 11:
| contact person =  
| contact person =  
| document report number = NUDOCS 8909180163
| document report number = NUDOCS 8909180163
| title reference date = 08-11-1989
| document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, INCOMING CORRESPONDENCE, UTILITY TO NRC
| document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, INCOMING CORRESPONDENCE, UTILITY TO NRC
| page count = 3
| page count = 3
}}
}}
See also: [[followed by::IR 05000255/1989018]]


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:* * consumers  
{{#Wiki_filter:*
Power POWERINli  
consumers Power POWERINli M.ICHlliAN"S PIUlliRESS General Offices:
M.ICHlliAN"S  
1945 West Parnall Road, Jackson, Ml 49201 * (517) 788-1636 September 11, 1989 Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555 DOCKET 50-255 - LICENSE DPR PALISADES PLANT -
PIUlliRESS  
RESPONSE TO INSPECTION REPORT 255/89018 NOTICE OF VIOLATION Kenneth W Berry Director Nuclear LJcensing Nuclear Regulatory Commission Inspection Report 255/89018, dated August 11, 1989 identified an item of violation with items A and B regarding 10 CFR 50 Appendix B, Criterion III Design Control.
General Offices: 1945 West Parnall Road, Jackson, Ml 49201 * (517) 788-1636 September  
Item B to the violation required a response.
11, 1989 Nuclear Regulatory  
The violation and Consumers Power Company's response is as follows:
Commission  
Notice Of Violation (255/89018-02A & B) 10CFR50 Appendix B, Criterion III, Design Control, requires establishment of measures to assure that the applicable regulatory requirements and the design basis of the Plant are maintained.
Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555 DOCKET 50-255 -LICENSE DPR-20 -PALISADES  
The licensee's QA Program at Article 3.2 of CPC-2A Article 3.2 outlines controls for design changes.
PLANT -RESPONSE TO INSPECTION  
Administrative Procedure (AP) 9.31, "Temporary Modification Control", implements controls for design changes which are of short duration and references AP 4.03, "Equipment Control" as an example of a temporary modification where a temporary opening needs to be controlled to maintain the design basis for the system.
REPORT 255/89018  
Contrary to the 'above:
NOTICE OF VIOLATION  
A.
Kenneth W Berry Director Nuclear LJcensing  
During the period of June 21 through August 22, 1988, the Control Room ventilation boundary was breached during maintenance by the removal of several electrical penetration seals without initiation of a Temporary Modification as required for Equipment Control.
Nuclear Regulatory  
This resulted in the failure of the ventilation system's ability to maintain a positive pressure during a surveillance test.
Commission  
The ventilation system is described in FSAR Section 9.8 as being designed to control the flow of airborne radioactivity during an accident so as to minimize the impact on operating personnel.
Inspection  
This opening of the penetrations constituted an unreviewed design change
Report 255/89018, dated August 11, 1989 identified  
* B.
an item of violation  
On June 14 the licensee blocked open the "doghouse" entrance flood door (to the East Safeguards Room from the 590 foot elevation) to facilitate installation of a bushing/retainer ring to MV-3234 per WO 24903179 and did not implement a Temporary Modification as required for Equipment Control.
with items A and B regarding  
OC0989-0187-NL04 8909180163 890911 PDR ADOCK 05000255 Q
10 CFR 50 Appendix B, Criterion  
PDC  
III Design Control. Item B to the violation  
 
required a response.  
Nuclear Regulatory Commission Palisades Plant Response to Inspection Report 255/89018 September 11, 1989 The provision of flood doors to protect safety-related equipment is described in FSAR Secti~n 5.4.
The violation  
Blocking the flood door open constituted unreviewed design change.
and Consumers  
This is a Severity Level IV violation.
Power Company's  
Reason For Violation 2
response is as follows: Notice Of Violation  
B.
(255/89018-02A  
On June 15, 1989 Plant Maintenance personnel opened the water-tight "doghouse" hatch from the 590 foot elevation of the Component Cooling Room to the East Safeguards Room in. order to facilitate passing welding cables required for completion of an ~n-progress work activity.
& B) 10CFR50 Appendix B, Criterion  
The work activity, WO 24903179, involved the removal of and replacement of thrust rings, a yoke bushing and a new collar for the safety injection tank drain line isolation valve MV-3234A.
III, Design Control, requires establishment  
Prior to opening the water-tight hatch, Maintenance personnel contacted and obtained permission from the Control Room to allow opening of the door.
of measures to assure that the applicable  
While personnel had been posted as a door watch with instructions to disconnect the cables if directed by the Control Room, a Temporary Modification (TM) had not been processed as required by AP 4.03.
regulatory  
The Shift Supervisor had the work activity secured upon identification that a TM had not been processed.
requirements  
AP 4.03 states that, "in general, the removal of floor plugs or blocking open hatches and flood doors shall be approved by the Shift Supervisor.
and the design basis of the Plant are maintained.  
In addition, the use of a Temporary Modification or associated controls as specified in Administrative Procedure 9.31, 'Temporary Modification Control' shall be used whenever the primary coolant system is greater than 325 degrees F... ".
The licensee's  
AP 9.31 is designed to control TMs in a manner that ensures awareness of Operations personnel, conformance with design intent and operability requirements and preserves Plant and personnel safety.
QA Program at Article 3.2 of CPC-2A Article 3.2 outlines controls for design changes. Administrative  
This procedure provides requirements for controlling and documenting TMs for all safety-related and nonsafety-related systems.
Procedure (AP) 9.31, "Temporary  
TMs are Plant modifications which are intended to be minor in scope, of short duration (typically less than 90 days) and be few in number such that updating drawings and other documents is not warranted, The failure to perform a TM of inplace associated controls per AP 9.31, as required by AP 4.03, has been attributed to inadequate knowledge and review of controlling Plant procedures during both the planning and implementation phase of the work activity.
Modification  
Corrective Actions Taken And Results Achieved In order to heighten Plant personnel awareness of existing procedural require-ments for water-tight door, plug* and hatch control, informational statements*
Control", implements  
were placed in the Plant Daily Status Sheet and the Weekly Plant Bulletin.
controls for design changes which are of short duration and references  
These documents are available to all Plant personnel and receive extensive distribution.
AP 4.03, "Equipment  
A memorandum detailing procedural requirements was issued to all licensed operators and additionally, all Shift Supervisors and Shift Engineers were counselled on existing requirements.
Control" as an example of a temporary  
modification  
where a temporary  
opening needs to be controlled  
to maintain the design basis for the system. Contrary to the 'above: A. During the period of June 21 through August 22, 1988, the Control Room ventilation  
boundary was breached during maintenance  
by the removal of several electrical  
penetration  
seals without initiation  
of a Temporary  
Modification  
as required for Equipment  
Control. This resulted in the failure of the ventilation  
system's ability to maintain a positive pressure during a surveillance  
test. The ventilation  
system is described  
in FSAR Section 9.8 as being designed to control the flow of airborne radioactivity  
during an accident so as to minimize the impact on operating  
personnel.  
This opening of the penetrations  
constituted  
an unreviewed  
design change * B. On June 14 the licensee blocked open the "doghouse" entrance flood door (to the East Safeguards  
Room from the 590 foot elevation)  
to facilitate  
installation  
of a bushing/retainer  
ring to MV-3234 per WO 24903179 and did not implement  
a Temporary  
Modification  
as required for Equipment  
Control. OC0989-0187-NL04  
8909180163  
890911 PDR ADOCK 05000255 Q PDC
Nuclear Regulatory  
Commission  
Palisades  
Plant Response to Inspection  
Report 255/89018  
September  
11, 1989 The provision  
of flood doors to protect safety-related  
equipment  
is described  
in FSAR  
5.4. Blocking the flood door open constituted  
unreviewed  
design change. This is a Severity Level IV violation.  
Reason For Violation  
2 B. On June 15, 1989 Plant Maintenance  
personnel  
opened the water-tight "doghouse" hatch from the 590 foot elevation  
of the Component  
Cooling Room to the East Safeguards  
Room in. order to facilitate  
passing welding cables required for completion  
of an  
work activity.  
The work activity, WO 24903179, involved the removal of and replacement  
of thrust rings, a yoke bushing and a new collar for the safety injection  
tank drain line isolation  
valve MV-3234A.  
Prior to opening the water-tight  
hatch, Maintenance  
personnel  
contacted  
and obtained permission  
from the Control Room to allow opening of the door. While personnel  
had been posted as a door watch with instructions  
to disconnect  
the cables if directed by the Control Room, a Temporary  
Modification (TM) had not been processed  
as required by AP 4.03. The Shift Supervisor  
had the work activity secured upon identification  
that a TM had not been processed.  
AP 4.03 states that, "in general, the removal of floor plugs or blocking open hatches and flood doors shall be approved by the Shift Supervisor.  
In addition, the use of a Temporary  
Modification  
or associated  
controls as specified  
in Administrative  
Procedure  
9.31, 'Temporary  
Modification  
Control' shall be used whenever the primary coolant system is greater than 325 degrees F ... ". AP 9.31 is designed to control TMs in a manner that ensures awareness  
of Operations  
personnel, conformance  
with design intent and operability  
requirements  
and preserves  
Plant and personnel  
safety. This procedure  
provides requirements  
for controlling  
and documenting  
TMs for all safety-related  
and nonsafety-related  
systems. TMs are Plant modifications  
which are intended to be minor in scope, of short duration (typically  
less than 90 days) and be few in number such that updating drawings and other documents  
is not warranted, The failure to perform a TM of inplace associated  
controls per AP 9.31, as required by AP 4.03, has been attributed  
to inadequate  
knowledge  
and review of controlling  
Plant procedures  
during both the planning and implementation  
phase of the work activity.  
Corrective  
Actions Taken And Results Achieved In order to heighten Plant personnel  
awareness  
of existing procedural ments for water-tight  
door, plug* and hatch control, informational  
statements*  
were placed in the Plant Daily Status Sheet and the Weekly Plant Bulletin.  
These documents  
are available  
to all Plant personnel  
and receive extensive  
distribution.  
A memorandum  
detailing  
procedural  
requirements  
was issued to all licensed operators  
and additionally, all Shift Supervisors  
and Shift Engineers  
were counselled  
on existing requirements.  
OC0989-0187-NL04  
OC0989-0187-NL04  
.. 
* Nuclear Regulat_ory Commission Palisades Plant Response to Inspection Report 255/89018 September 11, 1989 Corrective Actions To Be Taken To Avoid Further Non-Compliance 3
* * * *Nuclear Regulat_ory  
Procedures governing the control of water-tight doors and hatches and the compensatory measures which need to be taken when they are opened are being revised.
Commission  
These revisions will include placing control requirements existing in AP 4.03 and AP 9.31 into AP 4.02, "Control of Equipment Status".
Palisades  
This procedure defines requirements and operator responsibilities for identifying,  
Plant Response to Inspection  
.maintaining and verifying proper status of Plant systems and components.
Report 255/89018  
In order. to ensure the design intent of water-tight doors, floor plugs and hatches currently requiring a TM be performed is maintained, an encompassing 10CFR50.59 safety evaluation will be required by the procedure.
September  
By placing required controls into one procedure and by performing a single safety evaluation, more consistent application and quality of controls will result.
11, 1989 Corrective  
Additionally, AP 5.01, "Processing Work Requests/Work Orders" will be revised to highlight the need for compensatory measures during the work planning process.
Actions To Be Taken To Avoid Further Non-Compliance  
Specific training on these changes will be provided t_o Plant Maintenance, Operations and Radiological Decontamination personnel.
3 Procedures  
Additionally, this issue will be presented to the Training Review and Tracking Committee (TRTC) for evaluation and potential inclusion into Plant-wide training.
governing  
Date When Full Compliance Will Be Achieved The revision to AP 4.02 will be inplace by October 1, 1989 with AP 5.01 revised by October 15, 1989.
the control of water-tight  
The work group specific training will be completed by November 15, 1989.
doors and hatches and the compensatory  
The TRTC will evaluate this issue by October 26, 1989.-
measures which need to be taken when they are opened are being revised. These revisions  
Kenneth W Berry Director, Nuclear Licensing CC Administrator, Region III, USNRC NRC Resident Inspector - Palisades OC0989-0187-NL04}}
will include placing control requirements  
existing in AP 4.03 and AP 9.31 into AP 4.02, "Control of Equipment  
Status". This procedure  
defines requirements  
and operator responsibilities  
for identifying, .maintaining  
and verifying  
proper status of Plant systems and components.  
In order. to ensure the design intent of water-tight  
doors, floor plugs and hatches currently  
requiring  
a TM be performed  
is maintained, an encompassing  
10CFR50.59  
safety evaluation  
will be required by the procedure.  
By placing required controls into one procedure  
and by performing  
a single safety evaluation, more consistent  
application  
and quality of controls will result. Additionally, AP 5.01, "Processing  
Work Requests/Work  
Orders" will be revised to highlight  
the need for compensatory  
measures during the work planning process. Specific training on these changes will be provided t_o Plant Maintenance, Operations  
and Radiological  
Decontamination  
personnel.  
Additionally, this issue will be presented  
to the Training Review and Tracking Committee (TRTC) for evaluation  
and potential  
inclusion  
into Plant-wide  
training.  
Date When Full Compliance  
Will Be Achieved The revision to AP 4.02 will be inplace by October 1, 1989 with AP 5.01 revised by October 15, 1989. The work group specific training will be completed  
by November 15, 1989. The TRTC will evaluate this issue by October 26, 1989.-Kenneth W Berry Director, Nuclear Licensing  
CC Administrator, Region III, USNRC NRC Resident Inspector  
-Palisades  
OC0989-0187-NL04
}}

Latest revision as of 09:11, 6 January 2025

Responds to NRC Re Violations Noted in Insp Rept 50-255/89-18.Corrective Actions:Informational Statements Placed in Plant Daily Status Sheet & Weekly Plant Bulletin & All Shift Supervisors Counseled on Existing Requirements
ML18054A973
Person / Time
Site: Palisades 
Issue date: 09/11/1989
From: Berry K
CONSUMERS ENERGY CO. (FORMERLY CONSUMERS POWER CO.)
To:
NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
References
NUDOCS 8909180163
Download: ML18054A973 (3)


Text

consumers Power POWERINli M.ICHlliAN"S PIUlliRESS General Offices:

1945 West Parnall Road, Jackson, Ml 49201 * (517) 788-1636 September 11, 1989 Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555 DOCKET 50-255 - LICENSE DPR PALISADES PLANT -

RESPONSE TO INSPECTION REPORT 255/89018 NOTICE OF VIOLATION Kenneth W Berry Director Nuclear LJcensing Nuclear Regulatory Commission Inspection Report 255/89018, dated August 11, 1989 identified an item of violation with items A and B regarding 10 CFR 50 Appendix B, Criterion III Design Control.

Item B to the violation required a response.

The violation and Consumers Power Company's response is as follows:

Notice Of Violation (255/89018-02A & B) 10CFR50 Appendix B, Criterion III, Design Control, requires establishment of measures to assure that the applicable regulatory requirements and the design basis of the Plant are maintained.

The licensee's QA Program at Article 3.2 of CPC-2A Article 3.2 outlines controls for design changes.

Administrative Procedure (AP) 9.31, "Temporary Modification Control", implements controls for design changes which are of short duration and references AP 4.03, "Equipment Control" as an example of a temporary modification where a temporary opening needs to be controlled to maintain the design basis for the system.

Contrary to the 'above:

A.

During the period of June 21 through August 22, 1988, the Control Room ventilation boundary was breached during maintenance by the removal of several electrical penetration seals without initiation of a Temporary Modification as required for Equipment Control.

This resulted in the failure of the ventilation system's ability to maintain a positive pressure during a surveillance test.

The ventilation system is described in FSAR Section 9.8 as being designed to control the flow of airborne radioactivity during an accident so as to minimize the impact on operating personnel.

This opening of the penetrations constituted an unreviewed design change

  • B.

On June 14 the licensee blocked open the "doghouse" entrance flood door (to the East Safeguards Room from the 590 foot elevation) to facilitate installation of a bushing/retainer ring to MV-3234 per WO 24903179 and did not implement a Temporary Modification as required for Equipment Control.

OC0989-0187-NL04 8909180163 890911 PDR ADOCK 05000255 Q

PDC

Nuclear Regulatory Commission Palisades Plant Response to Inspection Report 255/89018 September 11, 1989 The provision of flood doors to protect safety-related equipment is described in FSAR Secti~n 5.4.

Blocking the flood door open constituted unreviewed design change.

This is a Severity Level IV violation.

Reason For Violation 2

B.

On June 15, 1989 Plant Maintenance personnel opened the water-tight "doghouse" hatch from the 590 foot elevation of the Component Cooling Room to the East Safeguards Room in. order to facilitate passing welding cables required for completion of an ~n-progress work activity.

The work activity, WO 24903179, involved the removal of and replacement of thrust rings, a yoke bushing and a new collar for the safety injection tank drain line isolation valve MV-3234A.

Prior to opening the water-tight hatch, Maintenance personnel contacted and obtained permission from the Control Room to allow opening of the door.

While personnel had been posted as a door watch with instructions to disconnect the cables if directed by the Control Room, a Temporary Modification (TM) had not been processed as required by AP 4.03.

The Shift Supervisor had the work activity secured upon identification that a TM had not been processed.

AP 4.03 states that, "in general, the removal of floor plugs or blocking open hatches and flood doors shall be approved by the Shift Supervisor.

In addition, the use of a Temporary Modification or associated controls as specified in Administrative Procedure 9.31, 'Temporary Modification Control' shall be used whenever the primary coolant system is greater than 325 degrees F... ".

AP 9.31 is designed to control TMs in a manner that ensures awareness of Operations personnel, conformance with design intent and operability requirements and preserves Plant and personnel safety.

This procedure provides requirements for controlling and documenting TMs for all safety-related and nonsafety-related systems.

TMs are Plant modifications which are intended to be minor in scope, of short duration (typically less than 90 days) and be few in number such that updating drawings and other documents is not warranted, The failure to perform a TM of inplace associated controls per AP 9.31, as required by AP 4.03, has been attributed to inadequate knowledge and review of controlling Plant procedures during both the planning and implementation phase of the work activity.

Corrective Actions Taken And Results Achieved In order to heighten Plant personnel awareness of existing procedural require-ments for water-tight door, plug* and hatch control, informational statements*

were placed in the Plant Daily Status Sheet and the Weekly Plant Bulletin.

These documents are available to all Plant personnel and receive extensive distribution.

A memorandum detailing procedural requirements was issued to all licensed operators and additionally, all Shift Supervisors and Shift Engineers were counselled on existing requirements.

OC0989-0187-NL04

  • Nuclear Regulat_ory Commission Palisades Plant Response to Inspection Report 255/89018 September 11, 1989 Corrective Actions To Be Taken To Avoid Further Non-Compliance 3

Procedures governing the control of water-tight doors and hatches and the compensatory measures which need to be taken when they are opened are being revised.

These revisions will include placing control requirements existing in AP 4.03 and AP 9.31 into AP 4.02, "Control of Equipment Status".

This procedure defines requirements and operator responsibilities for identifying,

.maintaining and verifying proper status of Plant systems and components.

In order. to ensure the design intent of water-tight doors, floor plugs and hatches currently requiring a TM be performed is maintained, an encompassing 10CFR50.59 safety evaluation will be required by the procedure.

By placing required controls into one procedure and by performing a single safety evaluation, more consistent application and quality of controls will result.

Additionally, AP 5.01, "Processing Work Requests/Work Orders" will be revised to highlight the need for compensatory measures during the work planning process.

Specific training on these changes will be provided t_o Plant Maintenance, Operations and Radiological Decontamination personnel.

Additionally, this issue will be presented to the Training Review and Tracking Committee (TRTC) for evaluation and potential inclusion into Plant-wide training.

Date When Full Compliance Will Be Achieved The revision to AP 4.02 will be inplace by October 1, 1989 with AP 5.01 revised by October 15, 1989.

The work group specific training will be completed by November 15, 1989.

The TRTC will evaluate this issue by October 26, 1989.-

Kenneth W Berry Director, Nuclear Licensing CC Administrator, Region III, USNRC NRC Resident Inspector - Palisades OC0989-0187-NL04