ML19323F955: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) StriderTol Bot change |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) StriderTol Bot change |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:.g :.:. . | {{#Wiki_filter:.g :.:.. | ||
h | h | ||
? | |||
- nvre ennnviDONDENCE W' | |||
.May 3, 1960. NE.% E,.. | |||
N | |||
[p. | [p. | ||
~ | |||
g h | |||
_J United States of 9.merica I | |||
W | i 4 | ||
.. Nuclear Regulatory Commission u | |||
M ' | W 5, | ||
Before the. Atomic Lafety and Licensing Board m | |||
N | s-s!E 4 In the Matter of Metropolitan Edison Co., Three kile Island IhMC' Nuclear Etation, Unit 1, Docket 5C-289 sMS! | ||
b.. | M 's FOILOh-UP TO COfGIONWEALTH'S RECFONSE TO AAMODT INTERROGATORIES ! THIRD E | ||
,q. | |||
n NE, | |||
Relative.to responses to Interrogatory 2, a, b, & c: | |||
N b.. | |||
Interrcgatory 5 Please provide data to demons.trate that | |||
$n- | |||
'. the premisG "is.not a. fact." | |||
Note recent work by Dr. Jan Beyea | |||
.6 | |||
/ of Princeton, N. J. for~NRC. | |||
MM | MM | ||
.7..S, Interrogatory 6. | |||
'A key aspect to our question was the re-d s$ latively narrow arc of a well defined plume. | |||
Are you confide 1t QMP: | |||
uM that proposed monitoring procedures will a.ccurately predict milk | uM that proposed monitoring procedures will a.ccurately predict milk | ||
( contamination? | ( contamination? | ||
if./ | If so, why? | ||
if./ | |||
Interrogatory 7 With regard to question 2 c, recognizing g | |||
the fact that the releases from TMI were not spread over the hg{, entire 3600area surrounding the plant, but were concentrated in | the fact that the releases from TMI were not spread over the hg{, entire 3600area surrounding the plant, but were concentrated in | ||
: g. plume-like fashion, and using ' estimates of actual concentrations | : g. plume-like fashion, and using ' estimates of actual concentrations Qi @ in the path of the plume, what would your response be? | ||
vr F$.w. | |||
F$.w. | |||
s-45[ Relative to responses to Interrogatory 3, a & b: | s-45[ Relative to responses to Interrogatory 3, a & b: | ||
Qg.f | Qg.f Interrogatory 8. | ||
Restated, this question asks whether, in | |||
f.f y to individuals. surrounding a plant in terms of average exposure, j | .]5%,~ the opinion of the Commonwealth, it is appropriate to report dose f.f y to individuals. surrounding a plant in terms of average exposure, j | ||
llasopposedtoactualexposuretopeopleinthepathofaplume. | |||
'm[ rm. | |||
e % +P .f.v Interrogatory 9 | ative-to response.to Interrogatory'4:' | ||
j, 4 | |||
e % +P.f.v Interrogatory 9 Please elaborate in' detail on " degree", | |||
'f. M " type" and " portions" discussed in the last sentence of your 1 | |||
Q B response. | - v., | ||
Q B response. | |||
.%d Respectfully submitted, b%ut. 0. (lesu.dJ MI Norman O. Aamodt | |||
$g%W 4 | |||
." Dated: | |||
May 3, 198C sit | |||
~ | |||
[Wes Y v%o. | |||
8 | |||
[Wes | // | ||
3 e | |||
f.,- | |||
: :,; d.:. | : :,; d.:. | ||
k | m k | ||
A Qh | A Qh 4 | ||
.Y,hg.' | |||
.D | |||
a(fgH. n. | ?hW 8005300 g/et\\ d a(fgH. | ||
OM s | |||
\\ | |||
n. | |||
fki[ | fki[ | ||
l | l MW y?)51'.jd[ | ||
MW | |||
y?)51'.jd[ | |||
May 3, 198C | May 3, 198C | ||
:( | :( | ||
.? t ' | |||
United States of America E# | |||
Nuclear Regulatory Commission | Nuclear Regulatory Commission | ||
-> f Before the Atomic Safety and I.icensing Board | |||
~ | |||
,,;.p, In the Matter of Metropolitan Edison Co., Three idile Island g | |||
Nuclear Generating Ltation. Unit 1 | |||
;. g,{'] __ | |||
Docket 50-289 | |||
# f/jE CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE | |||
,wje 'lt I hereby certify that copies of FOLLOh-UP TO COMI40ti4EALTH'u RESFONSE | |||
#.y_ | |||
lug,Q. TO AAMODT INTERROGATORIES (THIRD LET) were served upon those persons Gyp listed below by deposit in the United Ltates Mail, postage paid, | lug,Q. TO AAMODT INTERROGATORIES (THIRD LET) were served upon those persons Gyp listed below by deposit in the United Ltates Mail, postage paid, | ||
'i$N.' | |||
4%gv. this 3rd day of May,1980.* | |||
. I.SM | |||
[2%1LLa)(). | |||
0,, re- - | |||
g/pg,h\' | Yk ' | ||
:E Wi-i Norman O. Aamodt M | |||
g/pg,h\\' | |||
SERVICE LIST | |||
%@W George F. Trowbridge, Esquire W | |||
i Shaw, Iittman, Potts & Trowbridge | |||
$Mfl 18C0 M Ltreet, N. h. | |||
fAQ hashington, D. C. 20006 | fAQ hashington, D. C. 20006 | ||
-: e:-:,c:. | |||
N.f Ivan h. Smith, Esquire M[g k atomic Safety & Licensing Board E | |||
5 Chairman u | |||
d(EE.i U. 5. Nuclear Regulatory Commission | |||
Dr. h alter H. Jordan Atomic Safety 28.'faicensing Board | $) | ||
hashington, D. C. 2C555 Q.N[- Dr. h alter H. Jordan n. | |||
3 7@. T Atomic Safety 28.'faicensing Board y | |||
O 881 hest Guter Drive 2 cn. | |||
Oak Ridge, Tennessee 3783C e' | |||
%d;i B/ | |||
y& E 5ccc Hermitage Drive;Jr:f Raleigh, North Carolina | c0078 | ||
p, | .M Dr. Linda h. Little USISO M N g * | ||
2 2T | -3} | ||
M'& Atomic Safety & Licensing Board 2 | |||
y& E 5ccc Hermitage Drive;Jr:f Raleigh, North Carolina 27612 6" | |||
L-p,es sm.tirl etceSmt | |||
,,s ne a u.. | |||
2 2T Decketing & Service Station 9 | |||
Bunch N | |||
3 1$ Office of the Secretary C | |||
y J N; U..S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission m/ | |||
hashington, D. C. 20555 | hashington, D. C. 20555 | ||
' ~W;:f r James A. Tourtellotte, Esquire | ' ~W;:f r James A. Tourtellotte, Esquire D" M U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of the Executive Legal Director C '.' | ||
hashington, D. C. 2C555 3._,.., | |||
: 3. _ | Karin W. Carter, Esqui.re Assistant Counsel | ||
: 3. _ | |||
.J 'is Fennsylvania Fublic Utility Commission gsv Post Office Box 3265 y:g{ | |||
.iI:* .y | Harrisburg, Fennsylvania 1712C | ||
.1 | .n. | ||
.iI:* 5 | |||
.y | |||
.1.d | |||
.6#' | |||
[Rf., | [Rf., | ||
~se.}} | |||
Latest revision as of 19:53, 31 December 2024
| ML19323F955 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Crane |
| Issue date: | 05/03/1980 |
| From: | Aamodt N AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED |
| To: | PENNSYLVANIA, COMMONWEALTH OF |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8005300028 | |
| Download: ML19323F955 (2) | |
Text
.g :.:..
h
?
- nvre ennnviDONDENCE W'
.May 3, 1960. NE.% E,..
N
[p.
~
g h
_J United States of 9.merica I
i 4
.. Nuclear Regulatory Commission u
W 5,
Before the. Atomic Lafety and Licensing Board m
s-s!E 4 In the Matter of Metropolitan Edison Co., Three kile Island IhMC' Nuclear Etation, Unit 1, Docket 5C-289 sMS!
M 's FOILOh-UP TO COfGIONWEALTH'S RECFONSE TO AAMODT INTERROGATORIES ! THIRD E
,q.
n NE,
Relative.to responses to Interrogatory 2, a, b, & c:
N b..
Interrcgatory 5 Please provide data to demons.trate that
$n-
'. the premisG "is.not a. fact."
Note recent work by Dr. Jan Beyea
.6
/ of Princeton, N. J. for~NRC.
MM
.7..S, Interrogatory 6.
'A key aspect to our question was the re-d s$ latively narrow arc of a well defined plume.
Are you confide 1t QMP:
uM that proposed monitoring procedures will a.ccurately predict milk
( contamination?
If so, why?
if./
Interrogatory 7 With regard to question 2 c, recognizing g
the fact that the releases from TMI were not spread over the hg{, entire 3600area surrounding the plant, but were concentrated in
- g. plume-like fashion, and using ' estimates of actual concentrations Qi @ in the path of the plume, what would your response be?
vr F$.w.
s-45[ Relative to responses to Interrogatory 3, a & b:
Qg.f Interrogatory 8.
Restated, this question asks whether, in
.]5%,~ the opinion of the Commonwealth, it is appropriate to report dose f.f y to individuals. surrounding a plant in terms of average exposure, j
llasopposedtoactualexposuretopeopleinthepathofaplume.
'm[ rm.
ative-to response.to Interrogatory'4:'
j, 4
e % +P.f.v Interrogatory 9 Please elaborate in' detail on " degree",
'f. M " type" and " portions" discussed in the last sentence of your 1
- v.,
Q B response.
.%d Respectfully submitted, b%ut. 0. (lesu.dJ MI Norman O. Aamodt
$g%W 4
." Dated:
May 3, 198C sit
~
[Wes Y v%o.
8
//
3 e
f.,-
- :,; d.:.
m k
A Qh 4
.Y,hg.'
.D
?hW 8005300 g/et\\ d a(fgH.
OM s
\\
n.
fki[
l MW y?)51'.jd[
May 3, 198C
- (
.? t '
United States of America E#
Nuclear Regulatory Commission
-> f Before the Atomic Safety and I.icensing Board
~
,,;.p, In the Matter of Metropolitan Edison Co., Three idile Island g
Nuclear Generating Ltation. Unit 1
- . g,{'] __
Docket 50-289
- f/jE CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
,wje 'lt I hereby certify that copies of FOLLOh-UP TO COMI40ti4EALTH'u RESFONSE
- .y_
lug,Q. TO AAMODT INTERROGATORIES (THIRD LET) were served upon those persons Gyp listed below by deposit in the United Ltates Mail, postage paid,
'i$N.'
4%gv. this 3rd day of May,1980.*
. I.SM
[2%1LLa)().
0,, re- -
Yk '
- E Wi-i Norman O. Aamodt M
g/pg,h\\'
SERVICE LIST
%@W George F. Trowbridge, Esquire W
i Shaw, Iittman, Potts & Trowbridge
$Mfl 18C0 M Ltreet, N. h.
fAQ hashington, D. C. 20006
-: e:-:,c:.
N.f Ivan h. Smith, Esquire M[g k atomic Safety & Licensing Board E
5 Chairman u
d(EE.i U. 5. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
$)
hashington, D. C. 2C555 Q.N[- Dr. h alter H. Jordan n.
3 7@. T Atomic Safety 28.'faicensing Board y
O 881 hest Guter Drive 2 cn.
Oak Ridge, Tennessee 3783C e'
%d;i B/
c0078
.M Dr. Linda h. Little USISO M N g *
-3}
M'& Atomic Safety & Licensing Board 2
y& E 5ccc Hermitage Drive;Jr:f Raleigh, North Carolina 27612 6"
L-p,es sm.tirl etceSmt
,,s ne a u..
2 2T Decketing & Service Station 9
Bunch N
3 1$ Office of the Secretary C
y J N; U..S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission m/
hashington, D. C. 20555
' ~W;:f r James A. Tourtellotte, Esquire D" M U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of the Executive Legal Director C '.'
hashington, D. C. 2C555 3._,..,
Karin W. Carter, Esqui.re Assistant Counsel
- 3. _
.J 'is Fennsylvania Fublic Utility Commission gsv Post Office Box 3265 y:g{
Harrisburg, Fennsylvania 1712C
.n.
.iI:* 5
.y
.1.d
.6#'
[Rf.,
~se.