|
|
| Line 2: |
Line 2: |
| | number = ML19329B971 | | | number = ML19329B971 |
| | issue date = 06/30/1976 | | | issue date = 06/30/1976 |
| | title = Preoperational Aquatic Radiological & Terrestrial Monitoring Programs,Semiannual Repts Jan-June 1976. | | | title = Preoperational Aquatic Radiological & Terrestrial Monitoring Programs,Semiannual Repts Jan-June 1976 |
| | author name = | | | author name = |
| | author affiliation = TOLEDO EDISON CO. | | | author affiliation = TOLEDO EDISON CO. |
| Line 17: |
Line 17: |
|
| |
|
| =Text= | | =Text= |
| {{#Wiki_filter:_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ __ _ | | {{#Wiki_filter:}} |
| ,?' _
| |
| -~
| |
| M-' w WswFEv ,
| |
| k
| |
| _, e us. ,
| |
| . M '.
| |
| E T
| |
| , ,..a f PRE-OPERATIONAL AQUATIC i ECOLOGY MONITORING PROGRAM i FOR THE DAVIS-8 ESSE NUCLEAR E
| |
| POWER STATION, UNIT 1 ,
| |
| PROGRESS REPORT JANUARY 1 - JUNE 30 1976 Prepared by:
| |
| Jeffrey M. Reutter and Charles E. Herdendorf with the assistance of Ocnald H. Davis, William R , DeMott Richard Froelick, Lynwood A. MacLean l and Veronica M. Reutter )
| |
| Prepared for
| |
| {
| |
| Toledo Edison Company l Toledo, Chio
| |
| , Contract No. 1780
| |
| ?
| |
| CENTER FCR LAKE ERIE AREA RESEARCH THE CHIC STATE UNIVERSITY l l COLUMSUS, CHIO '
| |
| August 1973 g 00W1
| |
| | |
| TABLE OF CONTENTS Page:
| |
| L I ST O F TAB L ES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . II L I ST O F FI GU R ES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Vil P ROJ ECT STA F F . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Vill O BJ EC TIVE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 P RO C E D U R E . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 Sampling Station Location . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 Wate r Qual ity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
| |
| . ~
| |
| P l an kto n . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 6 B e n th o s . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8~~---~-
| |
| Fish ............................................... 9 RESULTS ............................................... 10 Wa t e r Qual i ty . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 Plankton ........................................... 10 8 e.+..ho s ............................................ 27
| |
| - sh ri ............................................... 27 Fco d Hab i ts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42 O I S CU S S IO N . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46 Wat e r Qual i ty . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46 Plankton ............................................ 52 S e n th o s . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54 Fish ............................................... 54 Fo o d H ab i ts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56 c
| |
| LIT ~RATURC C ITc~ O . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . ... . .
| |
| 58 A P P EN D I C ES . . . . . . '. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62 A .................................................. 67 8 .................................................. 76 C .................................................. 90 O .................................................. toa E .................................................. 120 F .................................................. 123 G .................................................. 1st f
| |
| L.
| |
| | |
| LIST OF TABLES Page Table 1. Aquatic monitoring program sampling dates at the Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station - 1976 .......................... 5 Table 2. References for the analyttoal methods for the water quality determinations used in the environmental evaluation of the Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station .................. 7 Table 3. Lake Erie water quality analyses for Ma rch 197 6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 Table 4. Lake Erie water quality analyses for A p r il 197 6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 Table 5. Lake Erie water quality analyses for M ay 1 9 7 6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 Table 6. Lake Erie water quality analyses for June 1976 ..................................... 15 Table 7. Solar radiation measurements at Locus:
| |
| * Point ......................................... 16 Table S. Mean values and ranges for water quality parameters tested March-June 1976 ............ 17 Table 9. Monthly mean populations of individual phytoplankton taxa at Locus Point-1976 . . . . . . . . . 18 ,
| |
| Table 10. Monthly mean phytoplankton populations from sampling stations at Locus: Point,
| |
| )
| |
| Lake Erle-1976 ............................... 19 '
| |
| Table 11. Monthly mean popula: tons of individual !
| |
| r coplankton taxa at Locus: Po int-1976 . . . . . . . . . . . 21 l l
| |
| Ii
| |
| | |
| Page Table 12. Monthly mean zooplankton populations from sampling stations at Locust Point, Lake Erie-1976 ............................... 22
| |
| . Table 13. Correlation coefficients for several water quality parameters and plankton collected from stations 1, 8, and 12 or 13 at Locust Point during 1974 and 1975 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 Table 14. Monthly mean populations of individual benthic macrotnvertebrate taxa at Locust Point-1976 ............................ 28 Table 15. Monthly mean benthic macroinvertebrate populations from sampling stations at Locust Point, Lake Erie-1976 ................. 29 Table 16. Giu net catch per unit effort at Locust Point-Station 8, April-June 1976 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30-Table 17. Giu net catch per unit effort at Locust Point-Station 13, April-June 1976 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 Table 18. Shore seine catch per unit effort at Locust Point, 6 Apell 1976 .................... 32 Table 19. Shore seine catch per unit effort at Locust Point, 5 May 1976 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 I. Table 20. Shore seine catch per unit effort at Locust Point, 10 June 1976 .................... 34 Table 21. Trawl catch per unit effort results between A p r il-Ju n e 1976 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33
| |
| , Table- 22. Hoop net catch per unit effort in northwest marsh (station 21), April-June 1976 . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 Table 23 Hoop net catch per unit effort in southeast marsh (station 22), April-June 1976 . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 Table 24 Summary of ichthyoplankton catch per unit effort results at Locust Point, April-June 1976. . 38 Table 25. Ichthyoplankton catch per unit effort from Toussaint Reef, April-June 1976 ............... 43
| |
| _ e ~ e --: m w
| |
| | |
| Page t
| |
| Table 26. Summary of food habits of Lake Erie fish at Lccust Point, April-June 1976 .......... 44
| |
| : Table 27. Analysis of phytoplankton populations at Locust Point, 18 March 1976 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63 Table 28. Analysis of phytoplankton populations at Locust Point, 14 April 1976 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64 Table 29. Analysis of phytoplankton populations at Locust Point, 17 May 1976 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 68 Table 30. Analysis of phytoplankton populations at Locust Point, 16 June 1976 ................. 72 Table 31. Analysis of zooplankton populations at Locust Point, 18 March 1976 ............... 77 Table 32. Analysis of zooplankton populations at Locust Point, 14 Ap ril 1976 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 78 Table 33. Analysis of zooplankton populations at Locust Point, 17 May 1976 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 82 Table 34 Analysis of zooplankton populations at Locust Point, 16 June 1976 ................. 86 Table 35. Multiple regression of phytoplankton populations at Locust Point during 1974 and 1975 with 3 physical water quality parameters, station number, and date . . . . . . . . . . 91 Table 36. Multiple regression of phytoplankton populations at Locust Point during 1974 and 1975 with station number, date, and several physical and chemical water qual ity pa ramete rs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 92 Table 37. Multiple regression of bacillariophycean popu populations at Locust Point during 1974 and 1975 with 3 physical vvater quality parameters, station number, and date . . . . . . . . . . 93
| |
| | |
| ,Page s . .
| |
| Table 38. Multiple regression of bacillariophycean populations at Locust Point during 1974 and 1975 with station nurrber, date, and
| |
| . several physical and chemical water quality parameters ............................. 94 Table 39. Multiple regression of chlorophyceail populations at Locust Point during 1974 and 1975 with 3 physical water quality parameters, station number, an d da te . . . . . . . . . . . 95 Table 40. Multiple regression of chlorophycean populations at Locust Point during 1974 and 1975 with station number, date, and several physical and chemical water quality pa ra m e te r s . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 96 Table 41. Multiple regression of myxophycean populations at Locust Point during 1974 3
| |
| and 1975 with 3 physical water quality parameters, station number, and date . . . . . . . . . . . . 97 Table 42. Multiple regression of myxophycean popJiations at Locust Point daring 1974 and 1975 with station number, date, and several physical and chemical water quality parameters ............................. 98 Table 43. Multiple regression of zooplankton populations at Locust Point during 1974 and 1975 with 3 physical water quality parameters, s'ation number, and date .......... 99 Table 44. Multiple regression of rotifer populations at Locust Point during 1974 and 1975 with 3 physical water quality parameters, station number, and date . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100 Table 45. Multiple regression of copepod populations !
| |
| at Locust Point during 1974 and 1975 with 3 physical water quality parameters, station number, and date ...................... 101 Table 45. Multiple regression of cladoceran populations ,
| |
| at Locust Point during 1974 and 1975 with 3 physical water quality parameters, station numb er, an d da t e . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 102 V
| |
| | |
| Page s ..
| |
| Table 47. Analysis of benthic macroinvertebrate populations at Locust Point, 18 March 1976. . . . . 104
| |
| . Table 48. Analysis of benthic macrotnvertebrate populations at Locust Point, 9 April 1976. . . . . . . 105 Table 49. Analysis of benthic macroinvertebrate populations at Locust Point, 4 May 1976 . . . . . . . . 110 Table 50. Analysis of benthic macrotnvertebrate populations at Locust Point, 7 June 1976 . . . . . . 1 15 Table 51. Species found in the Locust Point a rea 1953 - 197 5 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 121 Table 52. Ichthyoplankton catch per unit effort at Locust Point, 6 April 1976 .................124 Table 53. Ichthyoplankton catch per unit effort at Locust Point, 14 April 1976 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 27 Table 54 Ichthyoplankton catch per unit effort at Locust Point, 30 April 1976 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 0 Table 55. Ichthyoplankton catch per unit effort at Locust Point, 10 May 1976 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 133
| |
| , Table 56. Ichthyoplankton catch per unit effort at Locust Point, 17 May 1976 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 6 Table 57. Ichthyoplankton catch per unit effort at Locust Point, 27 May 1976 .................139 Table 53. Ichthyoplankten catch per unit effort at Locust Point, 11 June 1976 ................. 142 Table 59. Ichthyoplankton catch per unit effort at Locust Point, 17 June 1976 ................. 145 Table 60. Ichthyoplankton catch per unit effort at Locust Point, 28 June 1976 ................. 148 Table 61 Stomach analysis of fish collected at Locust Point, April-June 1976 ................. 152 i
| |
| l vi )
| |
| | |
| s LIST OF FIGURES Page Figure 1. Biological sampling stations at the Davis-Sesse Nuclear Power Statton . . . . . . . . . . 2 Figure 2. Revised sampling staticns at the Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Staticn . . . . . . . . . . 4 Figure 3. R ee fs near Locust Po int . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 Figure 4 Mean monthly hydrogen lon, temperature and dissolved oxygen measurements for Lake Erie at Locust Point during Ma rch-J une 1976 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47 Figure 5. Mean monthly turoidity, suspended solids and transparency measurements for Lake Erie at Locust Point during
| |
| ; March-June 1976 ........................... 48 Figure 6. Mean monthly alkaltnity, dissolved
| |
| ; solids and conductivity measurements for Lake Erie at Locust Point daring March-June 1976 ........................... 49 Figure 7. Mean monthly calcium, chloride and sulfate concentrations in Lake Erie at Locust Point during March-June 1976 . . . . . . . . 50 Figure 8. Mean monthly nitrate, phosphorus and silica concentrations in Lake Erie at Locust Point during March-June 1976 . . . . . . . . 51
| |
| , ., n - -- - e<,
| |
| | |
| PROJECT STAFF Charles E. Herdendorf - Prtrcipal Investigator Physical Parameters Jeffrey M. Reutter - Co-Principal Investigator Biological Parameters Charles Eowen - Field Sampling C. Lawrence Cooper - Ichthyoplankton Sampling and Identification from Toussaint Reef Donald H. Davis - Head of Sampling Team and Ichthyoplankton Identification William R . DeMott - Plankton Identification Jo Ann Frenks - Secretarlal Services Richard Freellch - Collection and Identificatten of Senthic Macrotnvertebrates Michael R. Heniken - Ichthyoplankten Sampling and Identification from Toussaint Reef Carolyn S. Jenkinson - Administrative Assistance Lynwood A. MacLean - Field Sampling and Identification of Fish Stomach Contents Veronica M. Reutter - Statistical and Clerical Aid vill
| |
| | |
| OBJECTIVE The purpose of this investigation is to ascertain the existing character of the aquatic ecosystem at Locust Point, Lake Erie prior to operation of the Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station, Unit 1.
| |
| Included in the assessment are studies of existing plankton, benthos, and fish populations and water quality and recent trends in these parameters. The report contained herein is for the perted 1 January to 30 June 1976.
| |
| PROCEDURE Sampling Station Location In 1974 and 1975 field data were collected from 25 stations, 18 along 4 transects in the open lake, 2 stations in the intake canal, 2 stations in the marshes, and 3 stations along the shoreline (Fig.
| |
| 4 1). Of the 4 transects, one followed the intake conduit, one the discharge conduit, while centrol transects were set up on the east and. west sides of the entire intake and discharge complex. Control west ran due north fecm the shore-end of the intake conduit with sampling stations located at 500 ft (150 m) (Statten 1), 1000 ft (300 m) (Station 2), 2000 ft (610 m) (Station 3), and 3000 ft (910 m)
| |
| (Station 4) frem the shoreline. Sampling stations en the intake were located at 500 ft (150 m) (Station 5), 10C0 ft (300 m) (Station 6),
| |
| 2C00 ft (610 m) (Station 7), 3000 ft (910 m) (Station 8, proposed 4
| |
| intake), and 4000 ft (1,220 m) (Station 9) from shore. Along the discharge transect sampling stations were at distances of 500 ft (150 m) (Station 10), 10C0 ft (300 m) (Station 11), 1500 ft (460 m)
| |
| (Station 12, proposed discharge), 20C0 ft (610 m) (Station 13), and 3000 ft (910 m) (Station 14) from shore. Additional stations were placed 500 ft (150 m) due north of Station 12 (Statten 15) and - 500 ft (150 m) south of Station 12 (Station 16). Centrol east ran perpendi-cular to the shcreline, parallel to the intake, and approximately 2500 ft (760 m) east of the intake. Stations were located 500 ft (150 m) (Station 17) and 1 COO ft (3CO m) (Station 18) from shore.
| |
| Station 19 was located in the center of the intake canal, 10C0 ft (GCO m) from the take shore. Sampling at Station 20 discontinued when it was drained of all water in 1974 Stations 21 and 22 were l located in the northwest and southeast marshes , rescectively. Sta-
| |
| | |
| /x, un MN 8 n 0/ 7 v.,
| |
| Lake Erie N .
| |
| _g,
| |
| ' gg 03
| |
| : g. 8 v
| |
| 23 0
| |
| ,* . $ 21 .,
| |
| Oi 6 Navarre 1
| |
| S G 15 Marsh Qooting
| |
| * Tower 24 to ..
| |
| 11 g_ --@
| |
| 12 g
| |
| w
| |
| ,,, ., $ 13 0 14 10 -
| |
| ,, g 36 -
| |
| \
| |
| * 90 .,
| |
| e 18 Physical Facilitics 20 4 -
| |
| . O 17 O . .2s 8 22 .
| |
| u
| |
| *........ Navarre .,....,,,s.,
| |
| Marsh c
| |
| H j,... .: p ,gg .
| |
| (acom) .
| |
| FIGURE 1 BIOLOGICAL SAMPLING STATIONS AT THE DAVIS-BESSE NUCLEAR POWER grgr10N
| |
| | |
| 3 tions 23 - 25 were on the shoreline at the intersection of the intake conduit and 1500 ft (460 m) to either side.
| |
| In 1976 this sampling format was altered slightly to answer
| |
| - questions which arose following the 1975 field season concerning the intake and discharge (Fig. 2).
| |
| This new station arrangement will provide much more valuable information following operation, and, by initiating it this year, one year of pre-operational data can be obtained. Stations 2,4,5,10, 19, and 20 were eliminated and Stations 26 to 29 were added.
| |
| Station 26 is on the control west transect and located 3800 ft (1,170 m) from its intersection with the shoreline. Station 26 serves as a con-trol station 3000 ft (910 m) northwest of Station 8 (intake) and the same distance offshore as Station 8 (3000 ft). Station 28 is on the discharge transect 4,500 ft (1,380 m) frcm its intersection with the shoreline . Station 28 also serves as a control station for Station 8 as it is 3000 ft (910 m) southeast of Station 8 and equidistant offshore.
| |
| Station 27 is the mirror image of Station 18, with respect to the dis-charge transects and completes a symetrical arrangement of stations around the predicted thermal plume. Station 29 provides a control 3000 ft (910 rn) southeast of Station 13 (plume area). Station 3 is the control to the northwest of Station 13. Stations 3, 13, and 29 are approximately equidistant from shore.
| |
| Water Quality Eighteen water quality parameters were measured mcnthly (Table 1) during the ice-free period of January to June 1976 (March through June) at three Lake Erie sampling stations (1,8, and 13) in the. vicinity of Locust Point (Fig. 2). These parameters and the analytical methods employed for the measurements are listed in Table 2.
| |
| Field Measurements. Water quality measurements were made monthly _ in the field at Stations 1,8, and 13 (Fig. 2). . Temperature ,
| |
| dissolved oxygen and conductivity were measured from a small sur-vey boat with submerged sensors and shipbcard readcut meters. Ols-solved oxygen was determined with a YSI medel 54 meter and conduc-tivity was measured with a Beckman REG-3341 solubridge temperature-ccmpensated meter; each meter was equipped with a thermistor for
| |
| | |
| uo we WN
| |
| * q ga *
| |
| .)
| |
| ''7..('
| |
| . ?;
| |
| AQ ca,c Lake Erie 4% .
| |
| ] >
| |
| -n- gg T
| |
| 93 8
| |
| 7 23
| |
| . .., 0 21 .
| |
| g3 6 9 27
| |
| : 01s
| |
| : Marsh .,**...**J:.
| |
| coling
| |
| * 24 11 12 Area 2 #
| |
| Tower {
| |
| M 9 13 g $4 g
| |
| $ 16
| |
| ( :
| |
| '- g p*N ..
| |
| G 18 Physical gd* .
| |
| g $7 Facilities *
| |
| . , 25 9 22 .;
| |
| = . .
| |
| I Marsh Area .
| |
| ( : * ,,,.*
| |
| ., @ 29
| |
| . . .': =: .
| |
| ..' : = 1000 1
| |
| : feet- - *
| |
| . 1 FIGURE 2 REVISED SAMPLING STATIONS AT THE DAV'IS-BESSE NUCLEAR PC'hER ' STATION
| |
| | |
| 5 TABLE 1 AQUATIC MONITORING PROGRAM SAMPLING DATES AT THE DAVIS-SESSE NUCLEAR POWER STATION - 1976 March April May June WATER QUALITY 18 14 17 -
| |
| 16 SOLAR RADIATION 9 PLANKTON 18 14 17 16 BENTHOS 18 9 4 7 FISH Gill Net 12 10 14 Shore Seir.e 6 5 10 Trawl 19 13 17 Hcop Net 6 5 10 Fry Net 6,14,30 10,17,27 11,17,28 k
| |
| e e - w
| |
| | |
| 6 temperature readings. All sensor readings were taken 10 cm below the surface and approximately 50 cm above the bottom. Transparency was determined with a 30 cm diameter Secchi disk towered on a marked line until it was no longer visible. Solar radiation was measured in June at Station 9 with a Lambda model LI-185 quantum /
| |
| radlemeter/ photometer. This sensor measures the quanta of sunl[ght within the photosynthetically active radiation spectrum (4C0 - 7CO mm) reaching various depths in the lake (measured at 1-meter ini;ervals).
| |
| The amount of sunlight is measured in micreeinsteins m-2 sec-1 where one microeinstein equals 6.02 x 10 17 photons .
| |
| Laboratory Determinations. Surface and bottom (50 cm above) water samples were taken at Stations 1,8, and 13 with a 3-Itter Kemmerer sampler at the same time that fleid measurements were being made. . These samples were placed in polyethylene containers and taken to the laboratory for analysis; in most cases, analyses were completed within 24 hours of the sampling time. Fifteen water quality parameters (Table 2) were determined in the laboratory using the procedures prescribed in " Standard Methods for the Examination of Water, 13th Edition" (American Public Health Association, 1971) and in " ASTM Standards, Part 23, Water" (American Seclety for Testing and Materials, 1973).
| |
| * Plankton Plankton was sampled monthly, April through June of 1976 (Table 1), from 12 stations in the vicinity of Locust Point. In addit [on, weather conditions in March permitted a brief sampling period in which samples were collected from Stations 1, 8, and
| |
| : 13. Duplicate vertical tows, bottom to surface, were taken at each station with a Wisconsin plankton net (12 cm mouth; O.080 mm mesh).
| |
| Each sample was cencentrated to 50 ml and preserved in 5% forma-lin. An equal volume of sugar was added to the formalin which was added to the sample to reduce distertion of zooplankters. The volume of each sample was computed by multiplying the length of the tow by the area of the net' mouth. The works of Chengalath et al.(1971),
| |
| Collins and Kalinsky (1972), Eddy and Hedsen (1964), Ewers (1930),
| |
| Jahoda (1948), Pennak (1953), Taft and Taft (1971), Torke (1974),
| |
| and Ward and Whipple (1959) were used in plankton identification.
| |
| Phytoolankton. Three 1-ml aliquots were withdrawn from each sample and placed in Sedgewick-Rafter counting cells. Whole crgan-ism counts were made from 25 random Whipple disk fields from each 1-ml allquot in the Sedgewick-Rafter counting cell. When filamentous
| |
| | |
| 2 TADLE 2 REFERENCES FOR THE ANALYTICAL MITHODS FOR THE WATER QUALIW DETERMINATIONS USED IN -
| |
| THE ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION OF THE DAVIS-DESSE NUCLEAR POWER STATION . .
| |
| Parameter Units References ro'r Analyttcal Methods OC
| |
| : 1. Temperature APHA (1971): Sec.' .162
| |
| : 2. Dissolved oxygen ppm APIM (1971): Sec. 210B 0
| |
| : 3. Conducttvtty umhos/cm (25 C) ASTM (1973): 01135-64 4 Transparency meters Welch (1940): Seccht disk
| |
| : 5. Calcium (Ca) mg/l APHA (1971): Sec.110C U. Magneutum (Mg) m0/1 APHA (1971): Sec.1228
| |
| : 7. Sodium (Na) mg/l ASTM (1073): D1420-G4
| |
| : 0. Chlortdc (Cl) mg/1- APHA (1971): Sec.1120
| |
| : 9. Nitrate (NO3) m0/1 ASTM (1973): D002-71 *
| |
| : 10. Sulfate (SO4 ) m0/1 ASTM (1973): D516-60C
| |
| : 11. Phosphorus (Total as P) mg/l APHA (1971): Sec. 223F
| |
| : 12. Stitca (SiO2) mg/l ASTM (1073): D050-608
| |
| : 13. Alkaltnity (Total as CACO 3) mg/l APHA (1971): Sec.102
| |
| : 14. Otochemical oxygen demand m0/1 APl% (1971): Sec. 219
| |
| : 15. Suupended solids mg/l APHA (1971): Sec. 224C 16 Dissolved solids mg/l USEPA (1071)
| |
| : 17. Turbtdtty F.T.U. APHA (1971): Sec.163A
| |
| : 10. Hydrogen-!on conc. pH units ASTM (1973): D1293-65 E
| |
| e S
| |
| | |
| 8 forms ' numbered 100 filaments or more in 10 Whipple fields, they were not counted in the remaining 15 fields. Identification was generally to the genus level. Results were reported as number of organisms /1, 4
| |
| Zooplankton. Three 1-ml aliquets were withdrawn fecm each sample and placed in Sedgewick-Rafter cells. The entire cell was scanned under a microscope at 60x while counting and identifying all zooplankters. Incividuals were generally identified to the genus or' species level and reported as number of organisms /1.
| |
| Analytical Methods. Correlation coefficients were computed for the Bacillariophyceae, Chlorophyceae, Myxophyceae, total phytcplank-ton, Rottfera, Copepoda, Cladocera, total zooplankton and several water quality parameters from the results from 1974 and 1975 on an IBM 360 ' computer using the " Statistical Analysis System" (SAS) program which computes these statistics by the method of least squares (Service, 1972). In an effort to explain scme of the varia-tion in the populations frcm these years, multiple regressions were also computed with these plankton components as the dependent varia-bles and water quality parameters, station sampled, and date as independent vartablas. In cil of the analytical computations, only the results of plankton tows from Stations 1, 8, and 12 (13 in 1975) were used as these were the stations at which the water quality was determined. Water samples for chemical analysis were collected at the same time plankton samples were collected. Since the plankton was collected by a vertical tow, bottom to surface, the means of the surface and bcttom water quality determinations from each station were used in the correlations'and regresstens. The results fecm 1976 will be incorporated into these equations and presented in the Progress Report covering the period July 1 - December 31, 1976.
| |
| Benthos Benthos was sampled monthly, April through June (Table 1) from 18 stations in the vicinity of Locust Point. In addition, samples were collected from Stations 1, 8, and 13 in March. Three repil-cate samples were taken at each station with a Ponar dredge (A=
| |
| 0.052 m2). Samples were sieved through 3. U.S . #ao sieve, pre-served in 10% formalin and returned to the laboratory. Individuals were 'Identifled as far as possible (usually to genus; to species where
| |
| ! possible). The number of individuals per square meter was calcu-lated for each of the three replicates by multiplying the number counted in the sample by 19.1. The sample mean and standard devia-
| |
| | |
| 9 tion for each statten were then ecmputed from the 3 replicates. The works 'of Erinkhurst (1963), (1964), (1965), Erinkhurst, Ham ilton, and Herrington (1968), Klemm (1972), Mason (1973), Pennak (1953)
| |
| Stein (1962), Usinger (1956), Walter and Burch (1957), and Ward and Whipple (1959) were used for the benthos identification.
| |
| Fish Fish populations at Locust Point were sampled by 5 methods, gilt nets, shore seine, trawl, hoop nets, and fry net, from April through June 1976 (Table 1). All fish captured were weighed, mea-sured, and identified to species (Trautman, 1957 and Bailey et al. ,
| |
| 1970). Results were reported as catch per unit effort (CPE).
| |
| Gill nets. Experimental gilt nets were set parallel to the intake and discharge pipelines at Stations 8 and 13. Each net (125 ft x 6 ft or 38 m x 1.8 m) consisted of five 25 ft x 6 ft (7.6 m x 1.8 m) contiguous panels [1/2"(1.3 cm), 3/4"(1.9 cm), 1 "(2. 5 cm),
| |
| and 2"(5.1 cm) bar mesh]. The nets were fished for approximately 24 hours monthly. One unit of effort consisted of one 24-hr set with one of these gill nets.
| |
| Shore seine. Shore seining was accomplished monthly with a 100-ft (30.5 m) bag seine (1/4" or 6 mm bar mesh) at Stations 23, 24, and 25. The seine was stretched perpendicular to the shoreline until the shore brall was at the water's edge. The far brail was then dragged through a 90 0 arc back to shore. Two hauls were made at each station. One unit of effort consisted of two hauls with the above mentioned seine.
| |
| Trawl. A 16-ft (4.9 m) trawl was used to collect fish for CPE estimates of abundance and to obtain live fish for stomach analys ts . Four 5-min tows between the intake (Station 8) and the discharge (Station 12) were completed monthly. All four trawls were cons (dered to be one unit of effort. Stomachs were to be taken from a representative number of these fish and preserved in 5-107. formalin prior to analysis.
| |
| Hooo nets. Hoop nets, 2.5 ft (0.8 m) diameter with 1 in (2.5 cm) bar mesh, were set at Stations 21 and 22 in the northwest and southeast marshes. The nets were fished for approximately 24 hours monthly. Cne unit of effort consisted of a 24-hr set with one net. These ' fish were identifled, weighed, measured and released.
| |
| | |
| 10-1 Fry net. A O.75-m diameter oceanographic plankton net (no. 00. ,0.76 mm mesh) was .used to capture tchthyoplankton (fish larvae or fry, and eggs). Five-min circular tows, surface and near-bottom , around Stations 3, 8 (intake), 13 (plume area), 26, 28, and 29 were completed 3 times per month from April through June.
| |
| Additional 5-min tows, surface and near-bottom, were made on 7 occassions from April thecugh June at Toussaint Reef (Fig. 3) One 5-min tow consttNted one unit of effort. Icthyoplankton was preserved in 5% formalin and analyzed under a dissecting microscope. Indivi-duals were identified as far as possible (generally species) using the-works of Fish (1932) and Norden (unpublished).
| |
| RESULTS Water Quality The results of the monthly water quality determinations at Sta-tions 1, 8, and 13 are given in Tables 3-6. Solar radiation measure-ments for Station 9 are given in Table 7. The mean values and ranges for water quality determinations for March through January 1976 are shown in Table 8.
| |
| Plankton i Phytoplankton. Phytoplankters collected March through June 1976 were divided into 28 taxa, generally to the genus level (Table 9).
| |
| Nine taxa were in Eacillaricphyceae, 13 in Chlorophyceae, 1 in Chysophyceae, 2 in Dinophyceae, and 3 in Myxophyceae. Monthly mean pcpulations w'ere highest in - April (103,209/1) and lowest in June (1604.1).
| |
| ~
| |
| ;2cpulations at each station ranged frem 21,247 - 23,558/l in March,
| |
| : j. 82,940 - 135,279/1 in April, 8,705 - 21,163/1 in May, and 1000 -
| |
| 2,118/l in June (Table 10).
| |
| The 8acillaricphycean population was dcminated by Stechanodiscus binderanus in March,1 binderanus and Melostra sp. In April, Olatema
| |
| ; sp. In May,. and Melostra sp. again in June (Table 9). Olatoms com-posed 99.5%, 99.6Si, 88.3%, and 5.S$s respectively, of the monthly mean phytcplankton populations from March to June.
| |
| The Chlorophycean population was dcminated by Pedtastrum sp. in March and June and Mougeotia sp. in April and May (Table '9). Chloro-phyceans were an insignificant compenent of the pcpulation in March and April, constituted 9.9% of the May copulations, and dominated the June population (93.0%).
| |
| l
| |
| | |
| 11 T v
| |
| = car marra iga ,
| |
| p O. arum nu k _A
| |
| ~
| |
| N LAKE ERIE .
| |
| \
| |
| N
| |
| ,.=....,Q
| |
| '' '5II,''"YW ^
| |
| 41'40'-- --
| |
| u eeneasa, ww a urrte ,quazi.,nse, s
| |
| ,s,,,r,,, ,,,,,
| |
| ,f -,c.r..cx
| |
| ~
| |
| o u ruart =r,qJj ?,, ,u, -
| |
| Qacus,n,,rna V h $'*6 J h .
| |
| .ouo.u, b- m.
| |
| o g, ( .
| |
| c.aa...
| |
| f.PS Ao A *o o 4i. ss-7 3 B ATH Y METRIC MAP otria contouas in Fsti satow Low wArsa oAru..:
| |
| + ttAsr stPTH oVIA REEF CONTOUR INT!AVAL $ FEET I
| |
| ~
| |
| - ;a,.h s 2. >daa l
| |
| 83*'05' "v' . . .
| |
| .gwy 83*!CO' X u-1.,
| |
| i FIGURE 3. REEFS NEAR LOCUST i:OINT.
| |
| (From Herdendorf and Hair, 1972)
| |
| [
| |
| l
| |
| | |
| .f TABLE 3 LAKE ERIE WATER QUALITY ANALYSES FOR MARCH 1976 Dates:
| |
| Field 18 March 1971 Laboratory 19 March 1976 Parameters Station No. 1 Station No. 8 Station No. 13 Range Mean Standard Surface Bottom Surface Bottom Surface Bottom Deviation Field Measurements:
| |
| Temperature (OC) 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 O Dissolved Oxygen (ppm) 11.9 11.6 12.5 11.8 12.0 11.8 11.6-12.5 11'.9 O.3 Conductivity (umhos/cm) 350- 350. 340. 350. 350. 360. 340-360 350
| |
| * 6.
| |
| Transparency (m) 0.1 0.15 0.1 0.1-0.15 0.12 .O.03 Depth (m) 2.5 4.75 3.3 2.5-4.75 3.52 1.14 Laboratory Determinations: a Calcium (mg/l) 54.8 51.6 53.2 50.8 52.8 50.4 50.4-54.0 52 . 3 ' ' 1.7 "
| |
| Magnesium (mg/l) 9.6 11.0 10.1 11.3 10.1 11.5 9.6-11.5 10.6 0.8 Sodium (mg/l) 11.0 10.5 10.5 10.5 10.5 10.0 10.0-11.0 10.5 0.3 Chloride (mg/l) 22.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 0 Nitrate (mg/l) 20.3 17.5 18.6 17.0 17.5 17.0 17.O-20.3 17.98 1.3 Sulfate (mg/l) 49.0 49.5 48.5 48.0 51.0 51.0 48.O-51.0 49.5 1.3 Phosphorus (mg/l) 0.26 0.27 0.28 0.28 0.25 0.26 0.25-O.28 0.27 0.01 Silica (mg/l) 5.1 5.6 5.3 5.1 4.7 4.1 4.1-5.6 4.98 0.5 Total Alkalinity (mg/1) 111 112. 113 110 111 110 110-113 11 1 .' 2' 1.2 I
| |
| B .O.D. (mg/l) 4 3 3. 3. 3[ 3
| |
| ~
| |
| 3-4 3' . 2 0.4 Suspended Solids (m0/l) 177 175 142 148 171 170 142-177 164. 15 Dissolved Solids (mg/l) 318 326 320 318. 318. 310'. 310-326 318- 5.1 Turbidity (F.T U .) 150 150 145 145. 150.' 148 . 145-150 148 2.5 pH 7.9 7.9 8.1 0.1 7.9 7.8 7.8-8.1 7.95 0.1
| |
| ' Conductivity (umhos/cm) 407 407 405 410. 383. 392 383-407 401 11 I. ~
| |
| I
| |
| | |
| .a TABLE 4 LAKE ERIE WATER QUALITY ANALYSES FOR APRIL 1976 Dates:
| |
| Fleid 14 April 1976 Laboratory 15 April 197 Parameters Station No. 1 Station No. 8 Station No. 13 Rance Mean Standard Surface Bottom Surface Bottom Surface Bottom Deviation Field Measurements:
| |
| Temperature (OC) 9.0 8.0 9.0 7.O 9.0 8.0 7.O-9.0 0.3 0.8 Dissolved Oxygen (ppm) 12.4 12.4 11.6 11.6 12.4 11.8 11.6-12.4 12.0 0.4 Conductivity (umhos/cm) 280. 200 270, 260 260. 260 260-280 260. 9.8 Transparency (m) 0.4 . 0.5 0.4 0.4-0.5 O.43 0.06.
| |
| Depth (m) 2.5 4.5 3.3 2.5-4.5 3.4 1.0 Laboratory Determinations: ,
| |
| 40.0 40.0 39.2 38.8 40.4 39.6 38.8-40.4 39.7 0.6 0 Calcium (mg/l) 2 Magnesium (mg/l) 6.5 6.7 7.0 7.0 6.2 6.2 6.2-7.0 6.6 0.4 Sodium (mg/l) 12.0 12.0 11.2 11.2 11.5 11.8 11.2-12.0 11.6 0.4 Chloride (mg/1) 19.3 19.0 18.8 18.3 18.8 18.5 18.3-19.3 18.8 0.4 Nitrate (mg/l) 9.8 10.2 10.2 10.2 9.4 10.6 9.4-10.6 10.1 0.4 Sulfate (mg/l) 26.5 26.5 25.0 24.0 26.0 27.3 24.0-27.3 25.9 1.2 Phosphorus (mg/1) 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.06 0.05 0.02 0.02-0.06 0.04 0.02 Silica (mg/l) 0.40 0.37 0.23 0.19 0.23 0.23 0.19-0.40 0.28 0.09 Total Alkalinity (mg/1) 98 100 95 101 100 98 95-101 98.7 2.2 B .O . D . (mg/l) 2 2 2 4 2 2 2-4 2.3 0.8 Suspended Solids (mg/1) 18 14 13 13 15 15 13-18 14.7 1.9 Dissolved Solids (mg/l) 192 182 184 178 190 184 178-192 105 5.2
| |
| ' Turbidity (F.T.U .) 23 23 19 17 20 18 17-23 20 2.5
| |
| .pH 8.4 8.2 8.4 8.3 8.3 8.5 8.2-8,5 8.4 O.1
| |
| { Conductivity (umhos/cm) 307 286 290 294 302 ,
| |
| 272 272-G07 292 12.4 8
| |
| | |
| TABLE 5 LAKE ERIE WATER QUALITY ANALYSES FOR MAY 1976 Dates:
| |
| Field 17 May 1976 Laboratory 18 May IC Parameters Station No. 1 Station No. O Station No. 13 Range Mean Standard Surface Bottom Surface Bottom Surface Bottom Deviation J
| |
| Field Measurements:
| |
| Temperature ( C) 14.0 14.0 14.0 14.0 14.0 14.0 14.0 14.0 0 4
| |
| Dissolved Oxygen (ppm) 9.8 9.8 10.4 10.4 10.0 10.0 9.0-10.4 10.1 0.3 .
| |
| Conductivity (umhos/cm) 275 275 250 250 260 260 250-275 26.2 11 Transparency (m) 0.5 1.0 0.7 0.5-1.0 0.73 0.25 Depth (m) 2.0 5 .~ O 3.5 2.0-5.0 3.5 1.5 Laboratory Determinations: .
| |
| Calcium (mg/l) 41.6 38.4 36.0 30.0 36.0 35.2 35.2-41.6 37.2 2.4 A Magnesium (mO/l) 7.7 9.6 0.6 0.6 8.4 8 .4 7.7-9.6 0.6 0, 6 Sodium (mg/l) 12.7 11.7 12.2 11.2 14.0 13.5 11.2-14.8 12.7 1.3 Chloride (mO/t) 19.0 10.5 17.8 10.0 18.5 17.8 17.0-19.0 18.3 0.5 Nitrate (m0/t) 9.6 9.6 6.2 5.0 5.0 7.1 5.8-9.6 7.4 1.8 Sulfate (mg/l) 30.0 31.0 30.0 29.0 31.0 31.0 29.0-31.0 30.3 0.8 Phosphorus (mg/l) 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 O Silica (m0/l) 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00-0.06 0.01 0.02 Total Alkalinity (mg/1) 97 96 93 93 90 91 90-97 93 2.7 B .O .D. (mg/t) 2 3 2 1 2 2 1-3 2 0.6 Suspended Solids (mg/1) 28 17 ,
| |
| 10 10 17 17 10-20 16.5- 6.6 Dissolved Solids (mg/l) 206 100 154 156 160 154 154-206 170 22 Turbidity (F.T.U .) 11.0 . 7.0 5.0 5.5 7.4 8.5 5.O-11.0 7.4 2.2.
| |
| pH 8.4 8.3 0.3 0.3 . 8.2 8.4 0.2-0.4 8.3 0.00 Conductivity (umhos/cm) 295 290 285 280 270 270 270-295 282 10 i .
| |
| G e
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6 LAKE ERIE WATER QUALITY ANALYSES FOR JUNE 1976 Dates:
| |
| Field 16 June 1976 Laboratory 17 June 19' Parameters Station No. 1 Station No. 8 Station No. 13 Range Mean Standard Surface Bottom Surface Bottom Surface Bottom Deviation Field Measurements:
| |
| Temperature (UC) 22.0 22.0 21.0 21.5 21.0 21.0 21.0-22.0 21 ~. 4 ' O.5 1 Dissolved Oxygen (ppm) 7.1 6.7 7.1 7.0 7.0 6.8 6.7-7.1 6.05 0.16 Conductivity (umhos/cm) 280 280 270 270 270 270 270-280 273 5 Transparency (m) 0.3 0.6 0.5 0.3-O.6 0.47 0.15 Depth (m) 2.2 4.7 3.4 2.2-4.7 3.4 1.3 Laboratory Determinations: .
| |
| Calcium (mg/1) 33.2 34.4 34.0 34.0 34.4 34.0 33.2-34.4 34.0 0.4
| |
| * Magnesium (mg/l) 11.3 10.1 8.9 7.0 8.6 8.4 7.9-11.3 9.2 1.3 ,
| |
| Sodium (mg/l) 10.0 10.1 10.0 10.0 10.3 10.2 10.0-10.3 10.1 0.12 Chloride (mg/l) +18.3 18.8 16.0 15.5 16.8 16.3 15.5-18.8 16.05 1.3 Nitrate (m0/l) 7.2 6.1 7.5 7.2 7.0 7.2 6.1-7.'O 7.2 0.6 Sulfate (m0/l) 20.0 26.0 24.0 21.0 20.0 21.0 20.0-29.0 23.5 3.5 Phosphorus (mg/1) O.04 O.06 O.04 O.04 O.04 O.04 O.04-0.06 0.0 m O.01 Silica (m0/l) 0.55 0.59 0.66 0.74 0.66 0.78 0.55-0.78 0.66 0.09 Total Alkalinity (mg/l) 102 100 06 97 95 95 95-102 07.5 2.9 B .O.D. (mg/1) 2 2 2 1 2 1 1-2 1.7 0.5 Suspended Solids (mg/1) 56 60 26 42 31 53 26-56 45 14 Dissolved Solids (mg/l) 186 204 182 178 206 194 178-206 192 12
| |
| ; Turbidity (F.T.U.) 50 42 13 22 18 25 13-50 28 14 pH 8.2 7.9 8.2 0.0 0.1 8.1 7.0-8.2 8.0 0.1 Conduct 8.vity (umhos/cm) 302 304 288 285 284 233 284-302 293 0.6 l
| |
| --- ___-- __ _ __ _ _ \
| |
| | |
| 16 TABLE 7 SOLAR RADIATION MEASUREMENTS AT LOCUST POINT Air Readings (0.5 meter above water surface)
| |
| Upwelling (sensor pointing toward sky): 880 a,b Downwelling (sensor pointing toward water): 90 Water Readings Depth Upwelling Downwelling 1 cm 460 29 1 meter 170 12 2 meters 70 6.1 3 meters 33 3.3 4 meters 12.5 1.8 a Reading e>: pressed in microeinstines/ m2 / see b Measurements taken at Station 9 cn 9 June 1976 at 0815 hrs.
| |
| | |
| 17 TABLE 8 MEAN VALUES AND RANGES FOR WATER QUALLTY PARAMETERS TESTED MARCH - JUNE 1976 March - June 1975 Parameter Mean Range Units Temperature 11.3 .1.5-22.0- CC Dissolved oxygen 10.2 6.7-12.5- ppm Conductivity 288 250-G60 umhos/cm Transparency 0.4 0.1-1.0 m Calcium 40.8 33.2-54.8 mg/l Magnesium 8.8 6.2-11.5 mg/l Sodium 11.2 10.0-14.8 mg/l Chloride 19.0 15.5-22.0 mg/l Nitrate 10.7 5.8-20.3 mg/l
| |
| - Sulfate 32.3 20.0-51.O mg/l Phosphorus 0.09 0.02-0.28 mg/l Sit tea 1.5 0.00-5.6 mg/l Total Alkalinity 100 90-113 mg/l 500 2.3 1-4 mg/l Suspended Solids 60 10-177 mg/l Dissolved Solids 216 154-326 mg/l Turbidity 50.9 5-150 F.T.U.
| |
| Hydrogen-lens 8.2 7.8-8.5 pH
| |
| | |
| 18 TASLE9 MONTHLY MEAN PCPtJLATICNS* OF INCIVICUAL. -
| |
| PHYTCPLAlWTON TAXA AT LOCLST PCINT - 1970 March 18 ** Acet t 14 i May 17 m 10 Mean S.O. Mean S.O. ' Mean S.O. Mann 'S.O.
| |
| BACILLARICPHYCEAE (Otatoms)
| |
| Asterionetta so. 2166 367 18889 2371 77 40 9 14 -
| |
| Centrics (single-called) 14 2 837 541 4 to Ctatoma so. 2778 287 18682 1642 4113 7C5 Fractlarta so. 584 46 8552 1909 2496 1119 7 7 Matostra so. 840 89 24166 6412 15C9 746 71 45 Sreonamoctacus btncerarus 15869 1313 26389 5641 401 227 1 3 Sveteella so. 4 13 Syrecea so. 101 52 1150 514 113 53 Tacettarta so. 57 20 6231 831 2S86 707 2 5 Swcocal 224'04 1173 102830 14183 11414 3200 90 46 CHLCRPHYCEAE *
| |
| (Green Algae)
| |
| Actiaastrun so. 30 36 Binuclearta so. 8 8 4 15 146 59 Clostertun so. 57 29 28 49 75 47
| |
| * Coetastrum so. 4 15 Cactyomenasciun so. 5 8 .
| |
| is 30 1 3 Karennerteita so. -
| |
| Maccactiniwn so. 5 12 Mougeotta so. 1 3 153 160 902 2C9 1 4 Ceccgonin. so.
| |
| Cocystis so. 18 21 31 24 1 2 5 10 Pectastrun so. 24 31 SS 42 Scenecommus so. 1381 320.
| |
| 5 17 16 19 Stawasceun so.
| |
| Swtocah 5 8.
| |
| 31 37 210 175 1273 281 1491 335 CHAYSCPHTCEAE (Yellow-Geeen Algae)
| |
| Ctredeven sp.
| |
| . 85 125 131 2C5 Ct PHYCEAE (Otnortagellatas)
| |
| Cerattun so. 3 5 12 Pemdintun so. 17 4 13 S @ total 4 13 3 5 12 17 MYXCPHYCEAE (Stue-Geeen Algae)
| |
| Anaeanna so.
| |
| * Aonanizereenen/Oscit tr.teria Cscattatorta sp. too 75 1 2 82 25 81 90 12 Setotal 21 .
| |
| 82 28 81 90 100 75 12 21
| |
| ~
| |
| TCTAt* 22517 1172 1CO2CG 14132 12921 3610 1604 358 6
| |
| Exoressed as no. of mio organtsms/l anc corrouted 6 duciteata vertical *m Gottom to swface) with a Wisconstn clarmton net (12 cm diameter , O.CSO mm mesh) from 12 sarroltry stations on the cates indicated.
| |
| S.C. = Stancard Ceviation *
| |
| ; Cnty stations 1, 8, and 13 were sarroled en tels cate.
| |
| | |
| 19 TABLE 10 MONTHLY MEAN PHYTOPLANKTON POFULATIONS* FROM SAMPLING STATIONS AT LOCUST POINT, LAKE ERIE - 1976 March 18 L Acril 14 'l May 17 June 16 l Station Mean iS.D. Mean S.O. Mean S.0. Mean iS.O. l 1 23558 810 112926 4956 21163 410 2064 171 3 10'4261 4777 12931 790 1607 15 6 135279 24738 13285 722 1981 19 8 22747 6203 89470 11613 8705 8 1348 249 12 103913 30096 17988 1097 1909 146 13 21247 2179 113846 17899 14294 622 1597 110 14 110837 5167 11685 344 1000 161 18 10C856 4862 11712 648 1508 207 26 82940 2363 9797 437 2118 331 27 100133 1348 9841 146 1514 83 28 87765 540 10191 1357 1119 32 29 96284 69 13455 606 1488 263 Grand Mean 22517 1172 103209 14132 12921 3610 1604 358 Data presented as no./l and computed frem duplicate vertical tows (bottom to surface) with a Wisconsin plankton ret (12 cm diameter,
| |
| * O.080 mm mesh) at each station. . .
| |
| S .O. = Standard Ceviation
| |
| * 20 Chrysophyceae was represented only by Dinebryon sp. and was never a significant component of the phytcplankton population (Table 9). They were absent from the population in March and June.
| |
| Dinophyceans were never a significant component of the phyto-plankton population and were totally absent in March (Table 9).
| |
| Ceratium so, and Peridinium sp. were the only representatives of this class.
| |
| Myxophyceans occurred in all months but were never a signift-cant component of the population (Table 9). They were most abun-dant in May when the taxa Achanizomenon/Oscillatoria reached a concentration of 100/l.
| |
| Additional phytoplankton data are contained in Appendix A.
| |
| Zooolankten. Zocplankters collected March through June 1976 were placed into 40 taxa, generally to the species level (Table 11).
| |
| Fifteen taxa were in Rotifera, 12 in Copepoda, 12 in Cladecera, and 1 in Protozoa. Monthly mean populations were highest in May (787/1) and lowest in March (32/1). Populations at each station ranged fecm 30.2 - 34.3 in March, 126.9 - 310.7/1 in April, 615.1 - 1,007.3/1 in May, and 501.3 - 1,C82.9/1 in June (Table 12).
| |
| The rotifer population was dominated by Synchaeta spp. In March, Notholca spp. In April, Keratella cuadrata in May, and Conochiloides sp. In June (Table 11). Rotifers were the dominant zcoplankters (by number) from March to May composing 84.07?, 80.77?,
| |
| and 57.5%, respectively, of the monthly mean populations.
| |
| Copepoda was dominated by Cycicpold nauplit or immatures during all months. Copepods never dominated the zooplankton popu-lation but did constitute 15.1%, 18.8%, 34.5% and 40.0%', respectively of the monthly populations from March to June.
| |
| Cladocerans were only a significant portion of the zooplankton popu-lation in May (5.5%) and June (47.4%). Bosmina longirostris, Eubosmina coregoni, and Daphnia retrocurva were the dominant taxa.
| |
| Protozoans were represented by only one taxa, Otfflugia sp. and were never a dominant zooplankton form.
| |
| Additional zcoplankton data are contained in Appendix 8.
| |
| Correlation Coeffic!ents. ' Ccerelation coefficients (r) were com-puted for each of the following variables frcm 1974 and 1975 against each of the other variaoles and presented in Table 13: total phyto-
| |
| | |
| 21
| |
| . TABLE 11
| |
| * MONTHt.Y MEAN PCPt.tLATTONS* CF INOMOUAE ZCCPt ANKTCN TA>:A AT 1.CCt.:ST PCINT - 1978 T I es u, is " t Aorit sa May IT , June is IMean eS.O. iMean S.O Mean S.O. Mean S.O.
| |
| RCT FERA Asolancrma petodonta 0.1 0.1 40.5 9.0 0.1 0.2 seacnionus anoutarts 0.9 1.0 1.4 1.2 2.1 gg calvciftom 1.2 3.4 2.2 0.2 0.4 3.0 1.3 2.2 1.0 Ba urcootecta_ 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 Conocnllotees so.
| |
| Fittnia temenetts 4.3 1.S 44.9 28.3 0.4 0.2 0.6 S.4 Metticottta tonctsoine 0.5 2.7 0.33 0.1 0.1 0.2 1.7 0.4 14.8 Maratetta coceteares 1.2 3.9 7.9 4.5 x 0.5 5.5 3.9 27.2 15.2 10.5 4.0 a ,cuaccata 1.0 1.1 hetnotea sog.
| |
| 0.7 0.7 268.7 112.4 9.2 4.2 0.8 0.4 123.7 28.1 Polyarev e sop. 2.7 2.0 0.03 0.1 6.3 1.6 6.5 4.9 59.5 27.0 9.S Pomonotyw sulcata 4.6 Synceaeta app. 16.5 0.2 0.4 1.2 18.7 7.8 14.1 5.0 Testudinetta spo. 0.02 0.1 Teterocerca muttlertnis 0.3 S wtotal 27.2 0.2 1.5 1.3 2.5 161.7 39.5 422.5 112.8 87.3 33.3 .
| |
| CCPEPOCA Catanoto Cocopods Otactomt.m spp.
| |
| 1.2 0.7 4.8
| |
| . Episct t.n-e tacustris 2.0 2.5 1.1 Evevtemoem afPints 0.02 0.1 Immens ee. Ciaotomus 0.9 0.7 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.4 16.7 3.9 Immatures, & a*Nnts 2.4 0.8 Naunill, Calanoid 0.2 2.8 1.6 1.0 0.9 Cycteooid Copepots 0.2 14.2 3.5 32.5 3.5 12.9 12.0
| |
| ) Cyclops eicusoidatus 0.9 0.5 e.1 2.3
| |
| .Q,,a.verna li s 0.04 0.2 3.8 Mesocvetces edam 0.1 4.4 1.7 70.8 65.3 Trecoevetecs ceasinus 0.03 0.1 Immata.com, Cvetcas 0.03 0.1 0.5 0.3 0.9 0'. 5 57.6 Newt!!, Cyclopota 4.1 0.8 8.4 110.2 54.5 20.3 4.8 Paa 1 Simecat 4.9 0.3 29.5 73.7 16.7 37.7 S.0 271.9 36.3 282.5 120.9 Ct.AOCCERA Alona so.
| |
| Boomt'na tonotrestets 0.t 0.1 0.2 0.4 Ceesecacenta so, 0.1 0.2 16.4 4.5 99.2 53.3 Chyoocus senaericua 0.2 0.4 0,1 0,g '
| |
| Caennea gateata 0.03 0.1 1,g 1,4 3,1 4,g O
| |
| g peevuta 1.2 1.2 O,g outam
| |
| _ C.2 0.2 0,: re *m 0.04 0,1 0.1 0.2 0.8 0.4 Diaonacomorna so. 3.9 1.7 137.7 48.3 Ewoosmina coregoel 0.1 0.1 0,4 0,3 Petooecte gtooem 0.2 0.2 20.5 S.3 92.7 35.3 0.1 0.1 Satotal
| |
| _Leotocora M 0.02 0.1 0.04 0.2 0.2 1.1 0.1 0.5 43.0 9.9 334.7 75.9 PROTCZCA ~
| |
| . Dimutta so. 0.1 0.2 19.7 14.7 2.'2 1.6 !
| |
| TOTAL.
| |
| * 32.4 2.1 200.4 43.9 787.*2 105.7 706.7 168.2 Escrosseo as no./t and comouted from cuoticate verttcal tows (eottom to surface) ws:n a W6sconain plannten not (12 cm clameter. 0.C80 mm mesh) from 12 sampling stations
| |
| * on too ca:es incteated.
| |
| S.0. = Stancarc Deviation
| |
| ** Cnty stations 1, 8, and 13 were samoted. .
| |
| . , , . , , - .- y y e
| |
| | |
| 22
| |
| * TABLE 12 MONTHLY MEAN ZOOPLANKTON POPULATIONS
| |
| * FROM SAMPLING STATIONS AT LOCUST POINT, LAKE ERIE - 1976 March 18 l April 14 May 17 .lJune 16 Station Mean l' S.O. : Mean S.O. Mean S.O.I' Mean S.OT 1 34.3 10.0 310.7 11.3 762.9 58.9 1082.9 97.5 3 218.3 0.3 1007.3 6.4 759.3 210 :
| |
| 6 208.5 84.6 767.9 96.9 717.9 68.
| |
| 8 30.2 0.9 126.9 10.3 846.2 45.4 677.5 32.E 12 188.8 52.2 739.9 55.9 909.7 23.1 13 32.6 2.9 218.6 39.6 781.0 42.4 803.4 45. :
| |
| 14 219.0 7.1 744.2 58.0 501.3 10.'
| |
| 18 196.5 1.8 662.0 10.0 527.4 9.1 26 163.8 25.1 917.2 132.7 722.8 36.
| |
| 27 l 198.0 16.1 841.9 38.7 590.0 1.4 28 185.5 6.2 760.7 62.3 565.0 0.C 29 170.6 6.2 615.1 5.0 621.9 9.5 Grand Mean 32.4 2.1 200.4 43.9 787.2 105.7 706.7 168.2
| |
| * Data presented as no./l and computed from duplicate vertical tows (bottom to surface) with a Wisconsin plankton net (12 cm diameter, 0.080 mm mesh) at each station.
| |
| S .D . = Standard Ceviation
| |
| | |
| 23 plankton, Bacillariophyceans, Chlorophyceans, Myxophyceans, total zooplankton, rotifers, copepods, cladocerans, temperature, trans-parency, turbidity, alkalinity, phosphorus, nitrate and silica. The same variables from 1976 will be added to these computations and presented in the July 1 - December 31 Progress Report, Based on the combined 1974 and 1975 results, the entire phyto-plankton population was significantly correlated (5% level) with 2 of its components, Bacillariophyceans and Myxophyceans (highly corre-lated), and with transparency and alkalinity (negative) (Table 13).
| |
| These coefficients of the total phytoplankton population changed dras-ttcally when the two years were considered separately. In 1974 the r values for total phytoplankton vs. the Bacillarlophyceans, Myxo-phyceans, and transparency were 0.969, 0.021, and -0.213, respec-tively. In 1975, these values changed to 0.073, 0.946, and 0.513, respectively. In 1975, these values changed to 0.073, 0.946, and 0.513, respectively. When these same computations were made on the the 1974 and 1975 results without cens!dering the results from August 1975 (Myxophycean bloom), r for transparency became -0.C71.
| |
| Bacillarlophycean populations frem 1974 and 1975 were signift-cantly correlated (5% level) with the total phytoplankton population, total zooplankton population (negative), cladoceran populaticn (negative) temperature (negative), transparency (negative.),and phosphorus (Table 13). These correlations were most significant for temperature and phosphorus.
| |
| Chlorophgean populations from 1974 and 1975 were signift-cantly correlated (5% level) with phosphorus (negative) and nitrate (Table 13). No other correlations were significant.
| |
| Myxophycean populations from 1974 and 1975 were significantly correlated (5% level) with the total phytoplankton population, tempera-ture, transparency, and alkalinity. The correlation was very high with the total phytcplankton (r= 0.C97) and quite high with transparency (r = 0.604).
| |
| The total zooplankton population and all three of its components, rotifers, copepods, and cladocerans, were significantly correlated (5% level) with temperature. Cepepods and cladocerans were signifi-cantly correlated, while rotifer populations were not correlated with either of them. Bacillariophyceae was the only phytoplankton group
| |
| | |
| . 24 .
| |
| ~ m '~ -
| |
| -m-c
| |
| : e. ~., --
| |
| : e. o. 8 e
| |
| .e e l. ~ me celo. om oo
| |
| - ~- ~ ~o
| |
| ~
| |
| -m e.
| |
| -~ oc -, -
| |
| o m..8 ~o
| |
| -m.
| |
| e~ .~
| |
| mo oc oc 8 ~e 88 5 d. d .' d d. i d. d d. a d. d d,d d. o d. o*d. d do dd ad d.d ad .
| |
| * e- e -ie e ow~N.o~e em e "gN ^ -N co - - 4 ma e- -e emeO m.e- oo goc~*
| |
| eco
| |
| $ m
| |
| ~ ~9 ". g **- ., "a . " . ,m g ** ~ .9** ** 9 a.o ao o. c o. o oc oo o.o .o a.o y o.o oo o.o a.o a. o a.o
| |
| * e~o e~ m. ..
| |
| ~ m. ~R e om ..
| |
| om ~ . , ~. ~~ e-ee.. e.
| |
| == g*
| |
| e m< ge gg~o
| |
| * :g -~
| |
| ee . ~- m g 7 ** * . .
| |
| : ,~ ~~ g9 a. * -"
| |
| .9 . .
| |
| .~'
| |
| =*.
| |
| om ao a.o .
| |
| 11 a.o o.o ao ao a.o o. c o.o oC oo == oc.o ao z- n
| |
| ., ~~
| |
| , s. o~
| |
| ~
| |
| me
| |
| - g.. ~~
| |
| m m, s. og - ~s~
| |
| m
| |
| . s.
| |
| n.
| |
| ~e e.
| |
| .~, ,m s. ~c gg c a.s.g--
| |
| e s.n .
| |
| e Se ~
| |
| Qg y 4 o.o o. o ao a.o ao o.c oc oo o. c o.c oc .= o oooo ao o
| |
| e >
| |
| V- I a.e ee ca ~e o. m. c. == # . o we ~~em a .
| |
| O -
| |
| -~
| |
| -~
| |
| ~-
| |
| m ~~ - ma ~~
| |
| ~ ~~
| |
| no ~- ~-
| |
| o* -~ a e .a 8 **
| |
| mo a***
| |
| -m--
| |
| ~
| |
| e E
| |
| s d. d dd d. d d. d d. d d. d d. d d. i d. d d. o 'a dd didd dd h
| |
| o *g Z
| |
| (S $ dt e~ m-e-
| |
| ~.
| |
| 39 ~mee ~e . ne ne eg e 99 m 5 c~A ~%e,m ~
| |
| e~
| |
| MO c,2 .~ 8 . m. o. 8. .e 4. M. m. a. ~. 3 o..~.-. ~ , . 6 55 e. a. m. a. m. e. =. 8 v. 8 cz Q-u p l.
| |
| oc o.c o.o oc om ao o.c oc co -o o.c o.o o.co.o a.o h - - ee ~ ~_ e~ . e m. ~m.- e .-
| |
| H m a 3 ~e m- e ~ 8 ~
| |
| '.a . * , -5 m -~ m Z
| |
| oL o ." * . . .5 " . * . * . . mO 5.
| |
| co o. c o.o ao ao b o. ao ". O.
| |
| ao -c.. oo o.c o. o
| |
| : 0. *"* e - m" g g3 o.c.o.o o. o .
| |
| s ~~ m- ~m
| |
| $w 8' < ~8 -
| |
| e a.e8, *.oa.a.a.~8
| |
| #~ m. ~ee- .o-e ce
| |
| .a
| |
| (
| |
| 3:
| |
| Qg oc
| |
| ,~ ~9 oo oo oo oo oo oo -o ,o. o o.o ,~--
| |
| -~m QQoo
| |
| ~-
| |
| ocoo x.8 ao
| |
| =.
| |
| a e l .
| |
| 6., c.
| |
| mo
| |
| ,~ ~e o um o c. oeem em (m)$ b C ~..e.2 -m m- e ~c ~ m e. .n Ow ele. e
| |
| -u< ~m mm ~m m, *co. ~= 9. o8 5.
| |
| ** e
| |
| == anm nn.N,mm o o,. oC "
| |
| o in mm g o.o c.o a.o a.o oo
| |
| == o oc oo ?g g g o.o o. c o.o a.o C e &.
| |
| (J5 (, 8. ~
| |
| o ~-
| |
| e wM N m
| |
| Nm o
| |
| .8 N- ee m-..
| |
| ~~~o Nome e .,
| |
| * p <. . -. -~ m8 o ~-~e. o ~. e co -m ~8 ~ o. m e.- ~ 8e-~.mo ec oc g g
| |
| c? U = da d.d &.& dd dd ad ad dd dd dd 2
| |
| o d. a d. d dad. d , d. d O
| |
| mk ee es co eo es
| |
| -b --
| |
| * e, ~~ ao 3 ~e 88 m o o8 ~,e. me eo we ~ as
| |
| ~o om o. co ~8 ao 8
| |
| 7 -e co mo ~o mooo o
| |
| ~-- ~ . ~ c-.
| |
| ~ -~
| |
| s.
| |
| a 5 o. e
| |
| ,8, t d. d d. d 46 dd ad dd dd dd ed do d. e#dd d. o . d d. d t.. _2.' .
| |
| mm sz ,. ~ ,.,-~e e .m ~o ~m ~ , ~o~~ ~.. ~.
| |
| "R 20 E -- ~o*. - ~ ~~ mm -- -- o
| |
| ~-m8 ecc. ~. S o.
| |
| $ u dd d "d dd ad dd dd di dd dd dd dodd didd C' ~~ -a -* ao e ~-* -aa- -
| |
| So p
| |
| gf d d" Q
| |
| < a.
| |
| Ef LL .4 @'y o%
| |
| m~ ~e88 ~.
| |
| me
| |
| ~m e es ~ ,~
| |
| -m om
| |
| ,~ c. ,
| |
| ,a mm.m. 8 m.' ee . co k Q$ .c.
| |
| : o. en. ==. m.o. o. o. e. c. 40. ' O.wq N. a . w.
| |
| o.c ee a . w. o o .- ~ o N. "1 o. g4 N. o. n. Q. N. o.
| |
| m et o-8ge
| |
| : o. o e.occo oc co == o oo ao oc oo .
| |
| oc oo ocoo co Lc O- * * * * * ' ' '
| |
| w8 za . -
| |
| O O -
| |
| o Ea oc bd O H
| |
| O 9
| |
| e c,
| |
| <O v o
| |
| o
| |
| : e. . e-mM we O. m
| |
| ~-
| |
| in ~
| |
| ~e st e NN m- -o mo ee n .-
| |
| co e .m e .e
| |
| % CciaWa= ==- ~-
| |
| 40 o
| |
| $e U
| |
| em. m.N. o. s.~. . se. m. o. an. o. m. o. w c1 o. = N.
| |
| N "U b p . o. =. m.- g. go jas y mm. N. b 9 U
| |
| ]g . o.o o.-o oc oc co oo oo oc oc oc o cjo o o. co.go. o . oc
| |
| [1] y . .
| |
| gg 1
| |
| $g g g_ 8 8 f ~g O 'O N -* * *C d O* N* '3 " *N 80*NN * ~ * " * -""
| |
| .O.,
| |
| *f 8 C3 e :3 ~ o
| |
| ~o om . - , ' O 'e,'*m~~Q" ~8
| |
| -- a#
| |
| 8m NC e e,~ o N o,~ cc N=
| |
| -..'d. jo j%z dd dddd ad dd -dd dd ad dd do e .o -~,o dddd dddd oo rm --
| |
| dd
| |
| .o tp 833 o,
| |
| = i g 4#
| |
| o 1 C 1 D 1 O o S I
| |
| a 3 1 5 3 "
| |
| =5 S > 0 -
| |
| 4 2 3' E x 3 2 $~
| |
| 2 u = d f a o e g su a
| |
| o -
| |
| n u
| |
| $ g -
| |
| n .u 4
| |
| : g. .E u c
| |
| 1 -o s au x-0 a c
| |
| ~- n o t 9 o- 2 ud p u
| |
| ,o
| |
| . { 8 o
| |
| u o -
| |
| e E o u 1
| |
| 3
| |
| ]
| |
| g l
| |
| 1 c 0 2 N g O Q p F s ( 1 Z 4- . ;
| |
| i l
| |
| | |
| 25 that was significantly correlated (5?? level - negative) with the zoo-plankton.
| |
| _R_egression Analysis. Results of multiple regressions with total phytoplankton from 1974 and 1975 and its major components as the dependent variables are presented'in Appendix C, Tables 35 - 42 (Reutter, 1976). Two regressions were develcped for each dependent variable, one with the physical parameters of temperature, turbidity, transparency, station number and date (month) as independent varia-bles and another which added the chemical parameters of alkalinity, phosphorus, nitrate, and silica to the list of independent variables.
| |
| Results of multiple regressions with total zooplankton from 1974 and 1975 and its ccmponents as dependent variables are also pre-sented in Appendix C, Tables, 43 - 46 (Reutter, 1976). One regression was developed for each dependent variable with the physical parameters of temperature, turbidity, transparency, station and date serving as independent variables.
| |
| The multiple regression of the total phytoplankton population against only the physical parameters explained 57.93? (r 2 of R-Square
| |
| = 0.579) of the variation in the total phytoplankton population (Table 35)J Temperature, transparency, and date a.ll centributed signift-cantly (57? tevel). Transparency was the most important single vart-able. With the 4 chemical parameters added to the regresalon 75.0$?
| |
| (r2 = 0.750) of the variation in the phytoplankton population was explainable with transparency, date, alkalinity, and nitrate contribu-ting significantly (5?? level) (Table 36). Transparency continued to be the most significant single variable.
| |
| The multiple regression of the Bacillariophycean population against the physical parameters accounted for 69.2i? (r = 0.692) of the variation in the diatom pcpulation during 1974 and 1975 (Table 37).
| |
| Temperature, turbidity, and date all centributed significantly (5S? level) to this regression with date the most important single variable. When the 4 chemical parameters were added to the equation, 88.83? (r =
| |
| 0.888) of the variability in the Bacillarlophycean population was explained with turbidity, date, phosphorus, nitrate, and silica all contributing significantly at the 5?? level (Table 38). Silica and date were the most important parameters.
| |
| Variations in the Chlorophycean population were the most difft-cult to explain. The regression of the Chicrophycean population against the pnysical parameters accounted for only 46.5?? (r2 = 0.465)
| |
| | |
| 23
| |
| /
| |
| of the variation in the population as only date contributed significantly (5% level) (Table 39). When the 4 chemical parameters were added
| |
| - to the regression, 71.6% (r2 = 0.716) of the variation in the Chloro-phycean population was explained with date, alkalinity, nitrate, and silica contributing significantly to the regression (Table 40). Nitrate was the most important single variable.
| |
| The regression of the Myxophycean population against the physt-cal parameters accounted for 67.5% (r2 = 0.675) of the variation in the blue-green algae population (Table 41). Transparency and date made significant contributions (5% level) to the regression with trans-parency as the most important single variable. When the 4 chemi-
| |
| , cal parameters were added to the regression, 76.5% (r2 = 0.765) of the variation in the Myxcphycean population was explainable with transparency, date, alkalinity, and nitrate contributing significantly (5% level) to the regression (Table 42). Transparency, was the most impcrtant single variable.
| |
| The regressicn of the 5 physical parameters against the total zooplankton population was able to explain 82.9%,(r2 = o,ggg) or the variability in the population (Table 43). Temperature, station, and date centr'ibuted significantly (5% level) to the regression. Date, was the most important single parameter.
| |
| The regression of the rotifer population against the 5 physical parameters explained 59.2% (r2 = 0.592) of the variability in the ratifer pcpulation (Table 44). Station and date contributed signift-cantly (5% level) to the regression with station acting as the most ,
| |
| important single variable.
| |
| The multiple regressicn of the copepod population against the 5 physical parameters accounted for 68.0% (r2 = 0.680) of the variability (Table 45). Only date centributed significantly to the regression.
| |
| The multiple regression of the cladoceran p pulations against the 5 physical parameters accounted for 65.2% (r = 0.652) of the variation in the cladoceran population (Table 46). Temperature and date contributed significantly (5% level) to the regression.
| |
| Values fecm 1976 will be added to these regressions and pre-sented in the 1 July - 31 December 1976 Progrees Report.
| |
| | |
| 27 Benthos Benthic macrotnvertebrates collected at Locust Point March through June 1976 were placed into 36 taxa, generally to the genus cr species level (Table 14). The populatten was dominated by oligo-chaetes as the phylum Annelida composed 88.4%, 93.6%, 65.9% and 56.9%, respectively, of the monthly populations from March through June. Tne total benthic macrotnvertebrate population per square meter per station ranged from 57.3 - 191.0 in March, 12.7 -
| |
| 3,081.5 in April, 82.8 - 1,598.0 in May, and 108.2 - 3,724.5 in June (Table 15). Additional data are contained in Appendix D.
| |
| Fish The five fishing methods employed yielded 15,155 fish represent-Ing 21 species during the period April - June 1976. Scientific and common names of the fish are contained in Appendix E.
| |
| Gill Net. Gill netting from April through Jure yielded 796 fish (CPE = 133) representing 17 species (Tables 16 and 17). De catch from Station 8 (intake) totaled 165 fish of 13 species, while 631 fish of 15 species were captured at Station 13 (discharge). Ccnsequently the CPE at Station 8 was 55, while at Station 13 it was 210.
| |
| Shore Seine. The yield from shore seines during the period April through June was 1,451 fish of 9 species (Tables 18-20). De CPE was 43 in April, 378 in May, and 63 in June. Notropis atheri-noides constituted 87.5% (by number) of the 3-month catch, comprising 18.0%, 97.8%, and 72.0%, respectively, of the monthly populations (April - June).
| |
| Trawl. Trawling at Locust Point from April - June yielded 70 fish (CPE = 23) of 9 species (Table 21). Only 5 yellow perch were collected. Notroots hudsonius corstituted 64% of the catch.
| |
| Hooo Net. Only 5 fish of 3 species were collected from April-June from Stations 2I and 22 in the marshes on either side of the plant site. Consequently, the CPE was less than 1 (Tables 22-23).
| |
| Fry Net. A total of 12,933 larvae representing 14 species and 4,838 eggs were collected frem the 6 sampling stations at Locust Point thrcugh June 197S (Table 24 and Appendix F). A total of 8,354
| |
| | |
| 28 . -
| |
| ., . TAsti 14 .
| |
| " -' ~
| |
| MCNTHLY MEAN CCP' P!CNS* CF INCIV1CUAL BENTHIC MACRCINVERTEBR# t. ''AAA AT LOCUST PCINT = 1976 T Maren td* l Aceit 9 6 May a a Wune 7 Mean iS.O. i Mesa S.O. Mean i S.O. Mean S.O.
| |
| CCEt.ENTERATA Hyora so. (buccing po% 0.4 1.5 21.6 44.3 S7.3 126.6 Here so. (single polyp) 2.S S.0 29.0 a9.6 52.7 88.8 Setotat 2.8 S.4 50.6 92.3 110.0 208.5 ANNEt.:DA Hirudinne Holoboetta Pusca , 0.4 1.5 0.6 .2.4 H. tirwata
| |
| { scagnatte 0.4 1.5 2.1 4.9 1.0 2.3 Ot19ocneeca Iremaares (heir setae) 0.4 1.5 0.6 2.4 2.8 7.6 trrwnaturea (no date setme) 112.3 74.4 470.4 761.9 366.4 349.6 553.9 466.0 Scenenvues sewereyt 3.9 10.5 3.S 6.3 S.7 11.3 . -
| |
| L imnoceilus c oev'= 3.9 7.6 7.8 12.S 9.9 14.7 b etacareceanus 3.2 6.3 1.0 2.3 6.4 8.7 b clamac.ceams-ceMw 1.1 2.5 L maeensts 3.2 6.3 S.O 9.7 7.3 10.7
| |
| : 1. uce=eeiacus 1.8 6.1 2.8 6.3 6.7 13.0 Cenicomes seeeeetna
| |
| * 95.S 112.1 Forarrocar,= moscavieas t s 13.4 18.9 Setotal S.7 7.5 21.6 37.5 112.5 74.4 SCS.8 807.4. 368.2 310.6 7CS.8 534.2 ARTMRCPCCA C " era Leotodoes ktacett Amonsooca 22.S 21.7 29.7 29.2 Gammarus fasetatL8 6.4 6.4 S.S 12.3 wyatetta azteca 14.5 30.6 29.4 36.9 Cioteca-Cniconcrnican 1.8 4.6 CNeenemus so. 7.4 14.2 Cairerea us owa 44.9 St.S 333.S 483.0 Cryctmentreremus so. 1.1 2.5 4.2 7.3 15.6 14.7 27.9 43.6 8.9 11.2 Freetacius so. 0.4 1.5 Tanvtaesus so. 6.1 18.9 1.8 4.8 0.5 2.4 1.4 3.5 toeemerecteen Caenis so. , ,, 0,7 3,o 3,5 g,e Teicnooteen Polycentreous so. ,,,,.
| |
| 1.0 2.3 !
| |
| Potarevsa so. 0.7 3.0 Asycrevia so. ~ ~
| |
| 0.4 1.5 Setotat 10.6 31.1 3.6 34.7 111.1 67.3 420.2 509.2 MCLLUSCA Gaatropoca BitN asa tecescutata 0.7 3.0 Goaiceasts so. 0.4 Lymnaea so. 1.3 0.S 2.4 Pelecypoca Amelema so. 2.1 3.7 0.7 3.0 Fuseonata flava 0.4 1.5 0.7 2.1 Lamositis so.
| |
| * 0.6 2.4 ti m a so.
| |
| Proceece so. 0.4 1.S 0.6 2.4 Cwervla so. 2.1 3.7 0.4 St.ctotal 1.5 4.2 7.3 0.7 3.0 1.8 6.1 2.1 S.3 TOTAL 127.3 67.1 540.1 830.2 558.S 444.4 1245.4 1051.5 Emceossed as ro./m2 and ccmouted from 3 graes wi*n a Penar crecce (A-0.052m2 ) from eacn of 18 samoting stat.ons on tre cates lecteated.
| |
| S.D. = Starnavn Cevtation
| |
| " Only stations 1, 8. and 13 were samotec.
| |
| | |
| 29 TABLE 15 MONTHLY MEAN BENTHIC MACROINVERTEERATE POPULATIONS
| |
| * FROM SAMPLING STATIONS AT LOCUST POINT, LAKE ERIE - 1976 March 18 l Acril 9 May 4 l June 7 Station Mean iS.O. Mean S.O. Mean l S .O. I Mean 'S.O.
| |
| 1 133.7 38.2 12.7 22.1 337.4 436.5 662.1 264..
| |
| 3 171.9 95.5 388.4 260.7 1553.5 1240.-
| |
| 6 490.2 452.9 579.4 286.7 923.2 444.(
| |
| 7 2196.5 463.2 350.2 134.2 528.4 144.t 8 57.3 50.5 63.7 77.2 872.2 209.5 1598.0 1290.7 9 178.3 48.1 1559.8 164.7 3724.5 2553.1 11 89.1 29.2 312.0 116.7 967.7 405.3 12 57.3 68.9 522.1 235.7 439.3 144.5 13 191.0 163.2 82.8 39.8 280.1 1C8.6 623.9 650.@
| |
| 14 1177.8 755.9 783.8 399.8 2171.0 121.3 15 25.5 29.2 229.2 83.3 592.1 547.9 16 63.7 29.2 229.2 187.5 121.0 39.8 17 267.4 1C6.3 191.0 68.9 108.2 29.2 18 458.4 234.7 184.6 187.5 452.0 254.9 26 573.0 525.5 986.8 429.4 3132.4 1494.6 27 3C81.5 710.6 496.6 716.4 2565.8 2167.2 29 509.1 528.4 1598.0 677.0 1655.3 890.2 29 203.7 96.1 82.3 72.3 598.5 148.4 Grand BAean 127.3 67.1 540.1 830.2 558.5 444.4 1245.4 1051.5 Data presented as no./m and ccmputed frem 3 grabs with a Pcnar 2
| |
| dredge (A=0.052 m ) at each station on the dates indicated.
| |
| S .O . = Standard Deviation
| |
| | |
| 30 TABLE;16 i, GILL NET CATCH PER UNIT EFFORT
| |
| * AT LOCUST POINT - STATION 8 APRIL - JUNE 1976 ,
| |
| Length (mm) Weight ( g )
| |
| Date Taxa No. Mean Range Mean l Total 12 April 1976 Notroots hudsonius 2 112 108-115 16 32 Perca flavescens 21 176 147-191 59 1229 Percopsis omiscemaycus 1 105 14 14 Stizostedion v. vitreum 2 300 225-374 287 574-Subtotal 26 1849 10 May 1976 Alosa pseudcharengus 2 165 155-175 29 58 Aplodinotus grunniens 4 244 136-303 191 763 Morone chrysops 1 252 175 175 Notroots atherinoides 2 113 110-116 10 20 N. hudsonius 52 111 101-123 11 565 t Perca flavescens 13 162 142-198 41 536 Percepsis omisecmayeus 2 111 110-111 11 21 r St!zostedien canadense 1 225 88 88 l
| |
| S. v. vitreum 3 280 203-349 211 634 Subtotal
| |
| ' 77- 2860 1
| |
| l 14 June 1976 Aplodinotus grunniens 9 300 163-380 303 2731 Carasstus auratus 2 285 275-295 3287 656 Cyprinus carpio 7 317 130-383 515 3605 Corosema cepedianum 6 312 225-407 351 2108 Ictaturus punctatus 2 285 268-301 259 518 Notropis hudsonius 1 10 10 10 Perca flavescens 35 168 93-205 56 1947 Subtotal 62 11575 TOTAL. 165 16284 Cne 24-hr bottom set with a 125-ft experimental gill net consisting of five 25-ft x 6-ft contiguous panels of 1/2in, 3/4in, itn, 1 -1/2in , and 2 inch bar mesh.
| |
| | |
| 31 TABLE 17 GILL -NET CATCH PER UNIT EFFORT
| |
| * AT LOCUST POINT - STATION 13 APRIL - JUNE 1976 Length (mm) Weight ( g )
| |
| Date Taxa No. Mean Range Mean Total 12 ~ April 1976 Cyprinus carpio 2 450 307-592 -1666- 3331 i Dorosoma cecedlanum 3- 291 133-374 359 1078 Notroots hudsonius - 142 113 103-132 15 2157, 1 Perca flavescens 119 177 143-203 63 7556 Percopsis omiscemaycus 3 108 100-114 13 40 Subtotal 269 11162 10 May 1976 Alosa pseudcharengus 34 168 150-187 33 1106 Cyprinus carolo 5 375 309-500 753 3764 ;
| |
| , Dorosoma cecedlanum 3 315 162-395 447 1252 Ictaturus nebulosus 4 245 207-280 190 760 Morone__ chryscos 1 265 246 246 Notrcols hudsonius 236 116 105-135 13 3068 Osmerus mordax 1 187 28 28 Perca navescens 26 162 95-209 42 1092 7 Stizostedien canadense 2 303 238-368 324 648 j S. v. vitreum 1 192 50 50 Subtotal 313 -
| |
| 12014 14 June 1976 Alosa pseudcharengus 9 175 157-190 46 416 ,
| |
| Aplodinotus crunniens 9 272 110-356 200 1796 Cvpelnus carolo 10 389 310-580 901 9013 Oorosoma cecedianum 9 280 157-401 282 2542
| |
| ; Hyboosts storerlana 1 190 60 60 I
| |
| Ictaturus punctatus 1 167 38 38 Morone chryscos 2 199 145-253 123 246 Notrepis hudsonius 6 126 115-133 19' 113.
| |
| Perca navescens 34 161 98-195 51 1749 i Pomoxis annularis - 1 164 46 46 Stizostedien canadense 1 256 133 133 S . v. vitreum 3 350 230-578 743 2229 Subtotal 49 4614 TOTAL 631 27790 One 24-hr bottom set with a 125-ft experimental gill net censisting of
| |
| 'five 25-ft x 6-ft contiguous panels of 1/21n, 3/4 in, tin, 1 -1/2in , and 2 'in - bar' mesh.
| |
| p
| |
| | |
| ~_
| |
| TABLE 18 SHCRE SEINE CATCH PER UNIT EFFCRT* AT LOCUST POINT -
| |
| 6 APRIL 1976 Length (mm) Weight ( g )
| |
| Station Taxa No, Mean Range Mean >
| |
| Total 23 Corosoma cecedianum 3 148 141-154 31 93 Notropis atherinoides 16 68 46-85 3 42
| |
| & hudsonius 4 96 82-112 11 43 SLbtotal 23 . 178, 24 Carassius auratus 4 154 63-401 260 1041 Cycrinus carolo 21 500 392-624 2046 42976 Dorosoma cecedlanum 8 197 131-406 139 1114 Notreols atherinoides 2 73 59-87 4 8
| |
| & hudsonius 5 101 82-1;2 12 61 Pcmoxts nigromaculatus 1 170 66 66 -
| |
| Subtotal 41 45266 25 Carassius auratus 1 52 2 2 Cyorinus carolo 50 503 81-590 1955 97752 Corosoma cepedlanum 6 268 109-400 285 1711 Notrcols atherinoides 5 .6.1 48-84 2 9
| |
| & huesonius 2 122 114-129 19 38 Subtotal 64 99512 TOTAL 128 144956 Two hauls through a 90 arc with a 1CO-ft bag seine (1/4 in bar mesh) at each station, e
| |
| | |
| 33 TABLE 19 ,
| |
| SHORE SEINE CATCH PER UNIT EFFCRT*
| |
| AT LOCUST POINT 5 MAY 1976 Length (mm) Weight ( g )
| |
| Station Taxa No. Mean Range Mean Total 23 Carassius auratus 6 250 225-273 309 1855
| |
| . Cyprinus carpio 4 483 442-558 1790 7161
| |
| , Corosema ceoedlanum 1 125 19 19 Notroots atherinoides 485 55 43-101 2 888 N. hudsonius 5 98 82-124 11 56 Pcmoxts nigromaculatus 2 190 165-225 118 235 Subtotal
| |
| * 503 10214 24 Morcne chrysoos 1 137 29 29 Notree's_ atherinoides 315 64 39-95 2 747 Subtotal
| |
| * 316 776 25 Carassuis auratus 1 225 260 260 Cyprinus carpio 2 656 645-667 4515 9030 Morer.e chryscos 2 145 139-150 35 69 Notroois r2therinoides 310 60 42-95 2 545 Subtotal
| |
| * 315 9904 TOTAL 1134 20894 Two hauts through a 90 arc with a 100-ft bag seine (1/4 in, bar mesh) at each station.
| |
| I l
| |
| l 1
| |
| | |
| a TABLE 20 SHCRE SEINE CATCH PER UNIT EFFCRT*
| |
| AT LOCUST POINT ,
| |
| 10 JUNE 1976 Length (mm) Weight ( g )
| |
| Station Taxa No, Mean Range Mean '
| |
| Total 23 Carassius auratus 2 275 272-277 395 790 Cyprinus carpio 3 450 403-505 1349 4047 Corosoma cepedianum 1 362 405 405 Notropls atherinoldes 17 74 42-120 4 ,
| |
| 74 Suttotal* 23 5316 24 Carassius auratus 1 240 320 320 Cyprinus carpio 10 471 276-572 1621 16210 Morone chrysops 2 190 143-236 103 205 Notroots athertnoldes 106 73 40-95 4 374 Stizostedlen n vitreum 1 32 Subtotal
| |
| * 120 17109 25 Carassius auratus 2 256 229-281 373 745 Cyorinus carpio 6 501 291-740 2411 14467
| |
| { Notropis atherir.oides 13 69 40-100 4 46
| |
| & hudsonius 24 89 73-120 9 210 Perecosts omiscomaycus 1 54 2 2 Subtotal
| |
| * 46 15470 4
| |
| TOTAL 189 37895 Two hauls through a 90c arc with a 100-ft bag seine (1/4 in, bar mesh) at each station.
| |
| t
| |
| | |
| co -
| |
| TABLE 21
| |
| . TRAWL CATCH PER UNIT EFFCRT'RESULTS BETWEEN STATIONS 8 ANO 13 AT LOCUST POINT APRIL - JUNE 1976 Length (mm) Weight ( g )
| |
| Date Taxa No. Mean Range Mean Total 19 April 1976 BAcrone chrysops 1 127 25 25 Notecpts atherinoldes 2 100 95-105 6 12 N_. hudsonius 41 96 63-126 9 374 Perca flavescens 3 164 91-211 63 190-Percina cacrodes 1 105 11 11 Percopsis omiscomaycus 1 89 7 7 Subtotal 49 619 c 13 May 1976 Notroots hudsonius 4 127 105-182 32 126 Perca flavescens 2 166 142-190 56 112 Subtotal 6 238 17 June 1976 Aolodinotus crunniens 6 219 141-319 155 927 Ictalurus punctatus 6 186 71-290 99 593 Notropis atherinoides 1 96 7 7 Perca flavescens 1 162 51 51 Stizostedion v. vitreum 1 189 62 62
| |
| ., Subtotal 15 1640 TOTAL _ 70 22497 Four 5-minute tows with a 16-ft trawl (1/8 in. bag) on each of the dates indicated.
| |
| | |
| 36 TABLE 22 HCOP NET CATCH PER UNIT EFFCRT*
| |
| IN NCRTHWEST MARSH (STATION 21)
| |
| APRIL - JUNE 1976 Length (mm) Weight ( g )
| |
| Date Taxa No, Mean Range Mean ! Total 6 April 1976 Cyorinus carpio 2 428 328-517 1096 .2191 5 May 1976 -
| |
| Cyprinus caroto 1 580 2038 2038 10 June 1976 No Fish TOTAL 3 4229 One 24-hr- set with a 2.5-ft. diameter, 1 in bar mesh hoop net, t
| |
| | |
| 37 TABLE 23 HOOP NET CATCH PER UNIT EFFORT
| |
| * IN SOUTHEAST MARSH (STATION 22)
| |
| APRIL - JUNE 1976 Length (mm) Weight ( g - )
| |
| Date Taxa No. Mean Range Mean Total 6 April 1976 Carassius auratus 1 221 151 151 5 May 1976 .
| |
| No Fish 10 June 1976 Pcmoxts nigromaculatus 1 208 115 115 TOTAL 2 266 One 24-hr. set with a 2.5-ft. diameter, 1 tr. bar mesh hcop net.
| |
| | |
| c*
| |
| a l
| |
| T t a 1 0 0 N o 1 3 O
| |
| I T 1 4 P
| |
| T S
| |
| U C
| |
| O n 4 5 L i o 2 t0 T a2 A S t
| |
| S T n L i o 0 9 U t 2 2 S t a0
| |
| - E S R
| |
| a n T o 3 6 iG 2 3 R t a2 O t F S F
| |
| E 6 n 7 o 7 3 T9 I
| |
| 1 i0 t
| |
| a2 4 1 2
| |
| 4 N t 2 U S E
| |
| E RN n L EU o 7 2 B PJ i3 t 9 A a 1 T H- t S
| |
| CL TI AR n o
| |
| CP A i
| |
| t3 1 7 N t a 1 1
| |
| 4 O S T
| |
| K ch N
| |
| A t c L E L E L E L E L e L E L a P C O kt Yl - p e
| |
| I T D S S B B S S B B S S B B H
| |
| C I
| |
| F O
| |
| Y R 6 6 A 6 7 7 M 7 9 9 9 1 1 M 1 l l U l i
| |
| i r
| |
| i r
| |
| S r p p e p A A t
| |
| a A 4 0 D 0 1 3 l , ;
| |
| | |
| 1 I!ll IIll l
| |
| T a t 1 8 5 0 7 9 N o 3 9 3 4 I
| |
| O T
| |
| P T
| |
| S U .
| |
| C O n 6 5 0 2 3 L i o 1 2 t8 T a2 A S t
| |
| S T n L i o 1 2 3 4 3 U t a8 2 1 S t E S R
| |
| a n T o i
| |
| 6 5 3 5 1 R t a2 1 1 O t F S T F N E 6 n O 7 o 2 7 6 1 C T9 I 1 i9 t
| |
| a2 4 N t 2 U S E
| |
| E RN n L EU o 7 5 4 7 1 3 B PJ i3 t 1 3
| |
| A a T H- t S
| |
| CL TI AR n o
| |
| CP i 1 7 -
| |
| 0 5 A t3 a
| |
| 1 N t O S T
| |
| K N h A t c L E L E L E L E L E L E L a P C O
| |
| Y i t
| |
| p H e T D S S B B S S B 8 S S B B H
| |
| C I
| |
| F O
| |
| Y R
| |
| A 6 6 6 7 7 M 7 9 9 9 M 1 1 1 U y y y S a a a t
| |
| e M M M a 7 7 D 0 1 2 1
| |
| | |
| t l
| |
| T a 3 3 7 6 3 9 6 4 0 2 5 t
| |
| 0 9 2 4 3 7 3 9 5 2 N o 1 4 9 3 4 3 1 9 I
| |
| O T 4 7 2 P
| |
| T S
| |
| U C
| |
| O n 5 3 4 0 0 0 8 0 L o 6 5 0 9 4 9 i 1 0 2 t 8 T a2 A t S
| |
| S T n o
| |
| L i 9 9 0 5 7 4 6 0 2 5 U t a0 6 1 1 9 6 9 4 S t 1 5 1 2 2 3 E . S R
| |
| a n 6 0 1 6 0 0 0 T o 1 2 2 2 2 8 4 i6 2 9 5 4 R t a2 1 O t F S T F N E 6 n 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 O 7 o 2 4 1 2 5 5 0 C T9 I
| |
| 1 i9 t
| |
| a2 1 5 9 1
| |
| 1 4 6 4 N t 2 U S E
| |
| E RN n L EU o 9 1 4 2 2 2 0 0 .
| |
| B i3 1 2 6 9 4 8 2 0 PJ t 1 2 2 0 A a 1 1 T H- t S
| |
| CL TI AR o n
| |
| 4 7 0 0 0 0, CP i t 3 3 3 1
| |
| 2 2 7 8 2 A a 3 4 N t 3 O S T
| |
| K N l i
| |
| A t c L E L E L E L E L E L E -
| |
| L a _
| |
| P C O kt Y p H -
| |
| T D e S S B 8 s S 8 B 3 S B 8 H -
| |
| C I
| |
| F -
| |
| O -
| |
| Y R .
| |
| A 6 6 6 7 7 7 M 9 9 9 _
| |
| M 1 1 1 _
| |
| U e e e S n n n .
| |
| e u u u _
| |
| t J J J _
| |
| a _
| |
| D 1 7 0 _
| |
| 1 1 2 _
| |
| | |
| TABLE 24 CONT.
| |
| | |
| ==SUMMARY==
| |
| OF ICHTHYOPLANKTON CATCH PER UNIT EFFORT" RESULTS AT LOCUST POINT Date DeptN Catch Station Station Station Station Station Station Totai''
| |
| 3 13 29 26 0 28 TOTAL S L 3452 1322 1030 1846 461 443 8354 S E 292
| |
| ~
| |
| 1920 926 693 1 605_. 4437 B L 600 1200 1122 744 534 279 4479 B E 20 02 299 401 a One 5-min tow with a 0.75-m diameter heavy-duty oceanographic plankton net (no. 00, 0.76 mm mesh) at the surface and bottom of each station on each date, b S = Surface; B = Bottom c L = Larvae; E = Eggs
| |
| | |
| 42 larvae and 4,437 eggs were collected at the surface, while 4,479 larvae and 401 eggs were collected near the bottom. No larvae were collected at Locust Point prior to 30 Apell, and, with the exception of one -egg found on 6 April at Station 3 and 3 at Station 28 on 11 June, no eggs were collected until 17 June.
| |
| Notrocis atherinoides and Dorosema cecedianum were the domi-nant species constituting 49% and 44% respectively, of the total larvae captured. Notroots atherinoides first appeared on 11 June, but did not contribute significantly to the population untti 28 June when 6,300 were captured (3,110 in one tow at the surface of Station 3) (Table 60). Dorosoma cecedianum first appeared en 10 May and increased steadily through 28 June.
| |
| Perca flavescens and Stizostedton v_. vitreum, two commerct-ally valuable species, constituted 5% and less than 1% respectively of the larvae. Both species first appeared on 30 April, and for all practical purposes, were gone by 27 May. These 4 species, Occo-sema cecedianum, Notroots atherinoides, Perca flavescens, and Stizo-stedien 3 vitreum comprised 99% of the larvae collected.
| |
| A total of 98 larvae were collected from Toussaint Reef (Table 25). No eggs were collected over the reef. Again, Dorosoma eeoedianum and Notroots atherinoides were the dominant species composing 71% and 20%, respectively, of the larvae captured.
| |
| A complete breakdown of the catch is contained in Appendix F.
| |
| Food Habits Thirty-four fish stomachs from 9 species were examined from .
| |
| April - June (Table 26). Crustaceans were the primary fecd items dominated by Sosminidae, Dachnia spp. , Q retrocurva, Lectodora kindtli, and calanoid and cyclopold copepoids. Additional data are contained in Appendix G.
| |
| s
| |
| | |
| 43 TABLE 25 ICHTHYOPLANKTON CATCH PER UNIT EFFORT
| |
| * FROM TOUSSAINT REEF APRIL - JUNE 1976 Cate Soecies Surface Bottom 16 April 1976 23 April 1976 29 April 1976 Perca flavescens 3 10 May 1976 Osmerus mordax t Perca flavescens 1 Subtotal 1 1 21 May 1976 Osmerus mordax 1 2 9 June 197S Corosema cepedianum 3 23 June 1976 Corosoma ceoedianum 30 37 Notroots atherinoides 19 1 Subtotal 49 38 TOTAL 51 47-One 5-minute tow with a 0.75-m diameter oceanographic plankton net (no. CO, 0.76 mm mesh).
| |
| L
| |
| | |
| T A B t ti 26
| |
| | |
| ==SUMMARY==
| |
| OF FOOD HABITS OF LAKE ERIE FISH AT LOCUST POINT APRIL - JUNE 1976
| |
| . I I I F000 ITEMS a
| |
| ~
| |
| i
| |
| {a k %
| |
| * d $ a* 1 8 ; A . 3 g .) 1 o : : . . . =
| |
| ~
| |
| d b
| |
| - 1 j i 3 3 k t b .A 5
| |
| i I
| |
| tenath(==)
| |
| y k
| |
| 1: .h i 8 -
| |
| i f,
| |
| k o j #
| |
| n f
| |
| i 8
| |
| I
| |
| * w 8 '8 4
| |
| 4 k j [ ,
| |
| No. Containing d 8 8 8 .h a .N
| |
| { f/ f. -E 8
| |
| Dste Species Sampled, Food (Mean Rano. I H d d A. A I C' d .k E
| |
| ~
| |
| ?) April Ernne dw'ymops l 100 177 X Nutropia n'therinoides''' 2 100 100 % -106 _X N. hude.onius r 3 100 % 6 % 121 0.2 X Perca flavescens 3 67 164 91-211 X Percina coprodes 105 1 100 ,X g Forcty.si:. omiscommycus g goo ty) 6 _X_
| |
| Subtotal I3 92 11 Ny Nutropis hudsonlue 3 100 109 105-115 0.1 0.1 0.1 _X, X Perce flavescens 3 100 171 142-190 1 0.3 03 X X Subtotal 6 100 If Juno Aplodinotus grunniens 6 100 219 141-319 1 0.2 X[
| |
| Ictalurus punctatus 6 100 106 71-2') 2 1 0.3 0.2 0.2 7 0.3 _X_ X Notropis otherinoides 1 100 96 12 X l'occa flavoscens 1 100 162 X Stirostedion v. witrous 1 100 109 1 Subtotal l$ 100 r0 tat. I 34 97 .
| |
| i I "X" Arcrehages. .i
| |
| | |
| TABL, 26 CONT.
| |
| | |
| ==SUMMARY==
| |
| OF FOOD HABITS OF LAKE ERIE FISH AT LOCUST POINT APRIL - JUNE 1976 I l I
| |
| . F000 ITDtS
| |
| : . i B i* 1.
| |
| * t t a
| |
| . . a ." g , *
| |
| . 5 ! Length (mm)
| |
| }g yi i 5 5
| |
| i3 y
| |
| ! 5
| |
| { !.
| |
| u E
| |
| es. I.g {*
| |
| 3 h 1 g { E Date SPecies No.
| |
| Sampled Containing Fooo '.Meon '
| |
| Renae
| |
| .S*
| |
| U 2
| |
| Y U
| |
| . 1 S
| |
| d 6 5 di di di 3 A
| |
| S. b d k4 19 April Mornno obrysops- 1 100 177 3 3 9 122
| |
| ' ^
| |
| Notrop!'s atherinoidAs''" ' 2 100 Ido' 'p>.105 14 _1 2 14 3
| |
| ~
| |
| . , N. hudsonius $ 100 95 65-121 123 2 04 0.2 1 Porca flavoscons 3 67 164 91-211 1 3 7 25 2 _10 102 Percina esprodes 1 100 105 2 1 10 10 4:
| |
| , Porcopsis omiscoseycus 1 100 09 3 2 5 2 1 267 Subtotal 13 92 13 May' tiotropte budsontue 3 100 109 10$-11$ 10 1 7 34 03 0.3 1 Perca flavescer.s 3 100 .
| |
| 171 142-190 03 2 9 Suble*al . 6 100 17 Juno Aplodinotus grunntena 6 100 219 141-319 0.3 4 0.2 2/ $3 1 0.3
| |
| !ctalurus punctatus 6 100 106 71-29 3 6 9 15 0.2 2 0.2 tiotropia atherinoldes 1 100 96 1 2 Perce flavescens 1 100 162 2 12 1 $33 19 Stirostedion v. vitreue 1 200 ,
| |
| 109 Subtotal 1$ 100 TOT 4. l 34 97 - - - -
| |
| I e gg
| |
| | |
| 4d DISCUSSION Water Quality Seasonal Variations. The quality of the water in the vicinity of the Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station during the period March through June 1976 was typical for the scuth shore of western Lake Erie and showed normal seasonal trends. Water temperature rose nearly 20C C during the G-month period from mid-March to mid-June while the dissolved oxygen level fell 5 ppm (Fig. 4). The turbulence of the early spring period and the corresponding high sediment load are reflected in the high turbidity and suspended solids values and low transparency observed for March (Fig. 5). A 5-fold improve-ment in the clarity of the water took place during April and May.
| |
| The biochemical oxygen demand was rather low during the entire period even at the time of high turbidity indicating that the suspended material was largely of an inorgante nature.
| |
| In a like manner the dissolved substances in the water were highest in the early spring and decreased later in the season (Figs.
| |
| 6-8). Alkalinity and pH remained relatively constant while the major tons such as calcium and sulfate decreased by 30-50 percent. Sto-logical nutrients such as nitrate, phosphorus and silica also showed dramatic decreases as spring algal populations uttitzed these materials.
| |
| Station Variations. Stations 1, 8, and 13 are located approxt-mately 500, 3,000 and 1,500 feet offshore, respectively. Generally a slight temperature decrease was noted in an offshore direction, particularly in the late spring. More noticeable decreases were found for such parameters as conductivity, most of the speelfic tons, alkalinity, 800, suspended and dissolved solids and turbidity. Con-versely, transparency increased away from the shcre. Station 1 (nearshore) had the poorest water quality for most parameters while Station 8 (farthest offshore) had the best quality.
| |
| Differences between the surface and bottom water quality were slight because of the shallowness of this portion of Lake Erte. Some depression in the level of dissolved oxygen was noted near the bottom.
| |
| Water Quality Trends. The Chlo State University, Center for Lake Erie Area Research initiated water quality studies at Locust Point in July 1972. Over the past four years most parameters Pave shown typical seascnal trends with only small variations frcm year to I
| |
| 1
| |
| | |
| 47 25--
| |
| Hydrogen Ion (pH)
| |
| Olssolved Oxygen (ppm)
| |
| ~~
| |
| Temperature (OC) 15- -
| |
| 7 7 10- - / /
| |
| / / /
| |
| 1
| |
| / 2 / /
| |
| / ? / / Tl 7 S+
| |
| l
| |
| / / / '
| |
| /
| |
| / . o /
| |
| / ''
| |
| /
| |
| c / l'n$. / / -
| |
| /
| |
| / \ / / i /
| |
| ' E -
| |
| O--
| |
| March April May June FIGURE 4 MEAN MONTHLY HYCROGEN ION, TEMPERATURE AND DISSOLVED OXYGEN MEASUREMENTS FOR LAKE ERIE AT LOCUST POINT CURING MARCH-JUNE 1975
| |
| | |
| su c175 -- .
| |
| (?. Turtidity (FTU)
| |
| Suspended Solids
| |
| ~~
| |
| Transparency (cm) 125. .
| |
| I 100 - -
| |
| l 1
| |
| 75 -
| |
| 50'--
| |
| )
| |
| / '
| |
| /
| |
| 25 --
| |
| /
| |
| / l
| |
| /
| |
| ' / / . /
| |
| 1
| |
| / / /
| |
| l 0 -'
| |
| / > / 4 /
| |
| March April May June FIGURE 5. MEAN MONTHLY TURBIDITY, SUSPENDEO SOLIDS AND TRANSPARENCY MEASUREMENTS FOR LAKE ERIE AT LOCUST POINT DURING NMRCH-JUNE 1976 l
| |
| l l
| |
| | |
| 49 400 -
| |
| Alkalinity (mg/1)
| |
| Dissolved Solids (mg/1)
| |
| Cenductivity (umhos/cm) 7
| |
| /
| |
| 300 - -
| |
| j
| |
| /
| |
| /
| |
| /
| |
| /
| |
| /
| |
| /
| |
| /
| |
| /
| |
| 200 - -
| |
| -/
| |
| / r- /
| |
| / / /
| |
| / / 7 /
| |
| / / / /
| |
| / / / '/
| |
| / / / /
| |
| / / / /
| |
| / / / /
| |
| !/ / / /
| |
| / g / . / gg /
| |
| / A/ M/ w /
| |
| t, /
| |
| w / if // Ag /
| |
| Pa /
| |
| 9 1/
| |
| j% /
| |
| M/ Y@t / f //
| |
| - !! w /
| |
| Y. / &/ ~
| |
| /
| |
| M/ M/ ~
| |
| 1
| |
| / .id /
| |
| k /
| |
| /
| |
| 5 /
| |
| /
| |
| t:
| |
| /
| |
| /
| |
| fas /
| |
| /
| |
| O --
| |
| March April May June FIGURE S , MEAN MONTHLY ALKALINITY, DISSOLVED SOLIDS AND CONOUCTIVITY MEASUREMENTS FOR LAKE ERIE AT LOCUST PCINT CURING )
| |
| MARCH-JUNE 1976 l
| |
| | |
| 50 Calcium (mg/l)
| |
| Chloride (mg/l) 50 --
| |
| Sulfate (mg/1) 40 --
| |
| ( i N
| |
| 5 h 30 --
| |
| re .
| |
| a ,
| |
| 20 --
| |
| #//
| |
| ,- 51 vs r
| |
| ?
| |
| 1 / / f& r-
| |
| ?/ , 1 / '
| |
| / , /
| |
| . / '
| |
| i / / /
| |
| r'
| |
| ' ~~
| |
| / / / .
| |
| , /
| |
| / ? / D@M/ i /
| |
| / c,
| |
| / ti / a /
| |
| :/ 1
| |
| / ? / Rys /
| |
| ER /
| |
| O -- 1% March
| |
| /
| |
| Pa /
| |
| +z /
| |
| April b's$s
| |
| /
| |
| /
| |
| May jra /
| |
| ;s /
| |
| June FIGURE 7. MEAN MONTHLY CALCIUM, CHLORIDE AND SULFATE CONCENTRATIONS IN LAKE ERIE AT LOCUST POINT CURING MARCH-JUNE 1976
| |
| | |
| 20 --
| |
| Nitrate (mg/1)
| |
| Phosphorus (mg/1)
| |
| Silica (mg/l) i 10 --
| |
| ~
| |
| N, .
| |
| l 5 - 1 b
| |
| ?
| |
| :Y i,.
| |
| 3 i %$' @,j' kL f$ 5 Ig (k W $$
| |
| ($!!
| |
| ! la lR C#
| |
| !?i
| |
| ~'~ '
| |
| O -- # ' I "'-
| |
| March April May ' June FIGURE 8. MEAN MONTHLY NITRATE, PHOSPHCRUS AND SILICA CONCENTRATIONS IN LAKE ERIE AT LOCUST POINT CURING MARCH-JUNE 1976
| |
| | |
| 52 year. - A detailed discussion of long-term water quality trends will be contained in the semi-annual report covering the remainder of 1976.-
| |
| Plankton 4
| |
| Phytoplankton. Phytoplankton populations from March through June 1976 were similar in composition to those observed during 1974 and 1975 (Reutter and Herdendorf, 1975 and 1976). These results will be added to the 1974 and 1975 multiple regressions in order to more accurately describe the variation in the populations from year-to year. These regressions will be presented with the more thor-ough plankton analysis in the Progress Report covering the second half of 1976.
| |
| The most significant finding of the past year was the fact that change in water quality was determined to be the major reason for the large increase in the Myxophycean population from 1974 to 1975.
| |
| 1 The multiple regressions of Myxophycean populations with physical and chemical water quality parameters indicated that 67.5% (physt--
| |
| 1 cal parameters only) or 76.5% (physical and chemical parameters) of the variations in the Myxophycean population could be explained by variations in the water quality parameters. Chandler and Weeks (1945) felt that warm, calm, clear water favored blooms of Myxophy-ceans and Chlorophyceans and the present results support their con-tention. Correlation coefficients indicated that 36.5% (r = 0.604) of the variation in the Myxcphycean population was explainable by changes in transparency, and 11.2% (r = 0.335) was explainable by changes in temperature. This contention was given added weight
| |
| : l. when the temperatures and transparencies of 1974 and 1975 were recalled. The mean water temperatures for April, May, and June 1974 were 8.70 C, 14.60 C, and 18.8 0C, respectively, while in 1975 the temperatures recorded for those months were 7.2 C, U 20.30C, and 21.2 C, respectively. Following this early warming in 1975 came a relatively calm summer with a 2-fold increase in 4
| |
| transparency and a 10-fold decrease in turbidity. In Augyst 1975, the time of the Myxophycean pulse, the transparency was Cu% greater than in 1974 and the turbidity was only 20% of that fcund in 1974 These regressions have helped in the extremely difficult task of predicting phytoplar.kten pcpulations in thermal discharges. By observing the individual 8 values the change in phytoplankton popu-lation' brought about by a change in one cf the independent sariables, while all the other independent variables remain constant, can be estimated (Tables 35-42). Table 35 indicates that an increase in
| |
| . _ _ _ _ _ -~ . - _ , m., ,
| |
| | |
| :>.1 temperature of 1 C, with turbidity, transparency, station, and date remaining constant, will reduce the phytoplankton population by approximately 19,153 individuals /1. Although the accuracy is sus-
| |
| ' pect, (coefficient variation = 119.3%), a helpful estimate is pro-vided.
| |
| Zooplankton. Zooplankton populations from March through June 1976 at Locust Point were similar in size and composition to those observed from 1972-1975 by Hair and Herdendorf (1973) and Reutter and Herdendorf (1974), (1975), and (1976).
| |
| This was the first year that samples were obtained in March.
| |
| The monthly mean value of G2.4/1 was the lowest observed in our years of sampling at Locust Point. However, it was similar to that observed by Reutter and Reutter (1975) during March 1974 at Put-in-Bay, Ohio. The population in April was the largest ever observed but still comparable to 1975. The population in May fell midway between that cbserved in 1975 and those observed in 1973 and 1974 The June population was much smaller than the huge June population of 1975, but felt midway between the populations of 1973 and 1974 In general, the populations observed at Locust Point in 1974 and 1975 were higher than those observed in 1972 and 1973, populations observed in 1976 fell within the range of the previous years. There are several plausible explanations for the variation which has occured.
| |
| Samples in 1972 were collected with a 3-1 Kemmerer water bottle at the surface. In 1973, 1974, and 1975 samplec were collected by a vertical tow, bottom to surface, with a Wisconsin plankton net.
| |
| A brief comparison study in 1973 showed that the vertical tow cap-
| |
| ~ tured approximately 50 percent more taxa than a 3-1 grab (Reutter and and Herdendorf, 1974). The staticns sampled in 1972 and 1973 were similar to those sampled in 1974 and 1975, but not the same. In 1973 the intake and discharge pipelines were being dredged, and in 1972 tropical storm Agnes affected the weather. Also, due to the weather, samples were neither collected en the same day of the month each year nor spaced exactly one month apart. Hubschman (1960) pointed out the tremendous differences which occurred between daily samples, and these samples were taken monthly, while Wieber and Holland (1968) showed that even with replication, . wide variation can occur due to patchiness in population densities. Finally, the unusually high spring populations from 1975 were undcubtedly largely due to the unusual weather conditions associated with that spring and
| |
| | |
| 54 the corresponding changes in water quality (early warming and less turbidity) as the total zooplankton population is significantly ccerelated with both temperature and turbidity (r = 0.587 and -0.328, respect-tvely).
| |
| 8enthos Benthic macrotnvertebrate populations from March through June 1976 were typical for the southwest shore of Lake Erie. They were dominated by oligochaetes and chironomids. The populations were smaller than those from 1974 but similar to those from 1975. The sampling date in March was the earliest samples had ever been col-tected, and the populations observed were the lowest observed to date. However, the March populations were similar to those cbserved in December 1975 indicating that the over-wintering population was quite low (100-2CO/m2).
| |
| Fish As in the past, the species composition and relative abundance in the catch varied by month and by season for all fishing methods indi-cating that a transient population was being sampled. This is not surprising as there is little shelter at Locust Point to support a resi-dent population. Since this was a transient population, extreme caution should be exercised when trying to quantitatively compare CPE results from year to year, as samples were collected monthly.
| |
| In a resident population, collecting samples one month apart would not produce serious errors, however, a transient population can change significantly with time. This is especially true when compar-Ing CPE results for schooling species such as Alosa pseudoharengus, Dorosoma cepedianum, Notroots atherinoides, Perca flavescens, and the larvae of all species. When dealing with these populations and monthly sampling effort one should not apply too much significance to CPE results.
| |
| In reviewing results from previous years, we observed that although 46 different , species have been captured at Locust Point since 1963, there were only 10 species which were of any real numerical or commercial significance (Reutter, 1976). In 1974 and 1975, 7 species, Alosa pseudoharengus, Cyprinus carcio, Corosoma ceoedianum, Morone chrysops , Notrcpis atherinoides, _N. hudsonius ,
| |
| and Perca flavescens, constituted 97?4 and 99%, respectively, of
| |
| | |
| 55 the total number of fish captured. Dorosoma cepedianum was the dcminant species both years. In 1973, Aplodinotus grunniens and Ictalurus punctatus were also considered to be a significant compon-ent of the population (Reutter and Herdendorf, 1974). Herdendorf and Hair (1972) presented commercial fishing results from Locust Point from 1963 - 1972 which showed that Cyprinus carpio, Ictalurus punc-tatus, and Morone chrysops were the dominant species, composing 99% (by weight) of the total catch from that 10 year period. Stizo-stedion 3 vitreum should be added to the above Itst of 9 species due to the emphasis placed on this species by sports fishermen, commercial fishermen, and the Ohio Division of Wildlife. There-fore, the 10 species of numerical and commercial significance at Locust Point were Alosa pseudoharengus, Aolodinotus grunniens, Cyorinus carpio, Dorosoma cecedianum, Ictalurus punctatus, Morone chrysops, Notropis atherinoides, N. hudsonius, Perca flavescens, and Stizostedien v. vitreum. These same species also dominated the catch from the first 3 sampling months (April - June) of 1976.
| |
| TN size of the Perca flavescens population, an important com-mercial population, appears to have varied considerably from 1973 to 1976. Gill nets were the best Indicators of this. During April, May and June, the CPE of yellow perch with gill nets was 12 in 1974, 176 in 1975, and 41 in 1976. Van Vooren et al. (1975) also observed this variability from 1973 - 1975, but their results indt-cated a high 1974 population and low populaticns in 1973 and 1975, the reverse of the present findings. This type of variability is not unusual since Van Vooren et al. (1975) sampled only in spring and fall with a trawl, whereas we sampled. only monthly, and this is a transient, schooling population; .
| |
| Ichthyoplankton sampling has shown the same variation cbserved with gilt nets. Notroots atherinoides, composed 81% of the 1974 larvae, 1% of the 1975 larvae, and 49% of the 1976 larvae. Pecca flavescens composed 5% of the 1974 larvae, 70% of the 1975 larvae, and 5% of the 1976 larvae. Dorosoma ceped! anum larvae Increased greatly to constitute 44% of the 1976 population. Much of this variability in the yellow perch larval population was undoubtedly due to the variability observed in the adult population.
| |
| Although there is tremendous variability in the Ichthyoplankton catches, an important conclusicn can be drawn. There are only three species which contribute significantly to the ichthycplankton pcpulations at Locust Point: Perca flavescens, Notropis atherinoides, and Doro-sema ceoedianum. It also appears that these species occur frcm
| |
| | |
| 56 late April through July in the following order: Perca flavescens, late April to late May; Dorosema cecedlanum, June to late July, and Notroots atherinoides, late June and July (Reutter, 1976). Entrainment of the larvae of these species is most likely to occur at these times,
| |
| : j. It should be noted that the loss of a particular species from the catch does not necessarily mean that the species has left the area, for they may still be present, but large enough to avoid the net. Of, the 3 species, Perca flavescens is~ the only one W1(ch warrants special attention, although entratement of all larvae, if or when it occurs ,
| |
| will be documented after Unit 1 is operational.
| |
| In 1976, control stations were sampled on either side of the intake (Station 8 ) and plume area (Station 13) to determine if unusually large fish larvae populations were occuring due to possible i spawning in the ialp-rap material around these stations. It appears that populations at Stations 8 and 13 were normally within the range set by the control stations indicating that populations occurring' In the vicinity of the intake and discharge were not unusual for the shcre' of Lake Erie near Locust Point.
| |
| j As in 1975, Toussaint Reef was sampled in an effort to com-pare tchthyoplankton populations from a known spawning reef (Baker, j 1969) with those near the shore and Davis-Besse. Again, in 1976, !
| |
| larvae populations near shore were much larger than those on the
| |
| ; reef indicating that larvae migrate to the inshore waters after hatch-j ing .
| |
| The number cf fish eggs collected has changed drastically. In 1975, 190 eggs were collected and 98% of these were from Toussaint Reef. In 1976, 4,838 eggs were collected with none coming from Toussaint Reef. However, the fact that 90% of the eggs collected were taken on one date, 17 June, makes one suspect that this is natural variation caused by the frequency of the sampling schedule.
| |
| The time of the occurrence,of this large catch, 17 June, Indicates that no Perca flavescens or Stizostedlon E vitreum eggs were collected..
| |
| The fact that approximately two weeks later a large number of Notropis atherinoides and Corosoma cecedianum were captured indicates that the eggs were probably of these 2 species.
| |
| Food Habits l
| |
| As in 1974 and 1975, crustaceans were the primary fish food at Locust Point. Senthic organisms were not significantly utilized as a w- - - , , + ,-e-- . - -- -..-.uv. ,, 7.-.- - , ,,,-,,,,..,n,-
| |
| | |
| 57
| |
| . food source. As in the past, bosminids, Caphnia sp., ,D. retrocu rva, and Leptodora kindtil were ccmmon food items along with calanoid and cyclopold cepepods. A more thorough analysts will appear in the prog-ress report. for the second half of 1976.
| |
| L I
| |
| 1 1
| |
| +- - . , - . - , , _ - .
| |
| | |
| 58 LITERATURE CITED American FUblic Health Association.1971. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. 13th ed. APHA, New York. 847 ' pp.
| |
| American Society for Testing and Materials. 1973. Annual book' of ASTM standards, part 23, water; atmospheric analysts.
| |
| ASTM, Philadelphia. 1108 pp.
| |
| Bailey, R .M. , J .E. Fitch, E.S. Herald, E.A. Lachner, C.C.
| |
| , Lindsey, R .C. Robins, and W.B. Scott. 1970. A list of common and scientifte names of fishes from the United States and Canada. Third ed. Amer. Fish. Soc. Spec. Pub. No.6.
| |
| 150 pp.
| |
| Baker, C. 1969. Lake Erie fish population trawling survey. Ohio Dept. Natural Resources, Columbus, Chlo. Olv. Wildlife Project F-35-R-7(3),. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Progress Rept.
| |
| 32 pp.
| |
| Brinkhurst, R.O.1963. Taxonomical studies on the Tubtfieldae
| |
| ('annellda, Oligochaeta) h R . Woltereck, ed., Internationale i review der gesamten hydrobiologie. Systematische bethefte
| |
| : 2. Akademie-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 1-89.
| |
| Brinkhurst, R.O. 1964. Studies on the North American aquat!c Oligochaeta I: Naldidae and Opistocystidae. Proc. Acad. Nat.
| |
| Sci. , Phil. 116:195-230.
| |
| Br[nkhurst, R .O . 1965. Studles on the North American aquatic Oligochaeta II: Tub tf tc tdae. Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci., Phila.
| |
| 117:117-172.
| |
| Brinkhurst, R .O . , A. L. Hamilton, and H.B. Herrington. 1968.
| |
| Components of the bottom fauna of the St. Lawrence Great Lakes. Univ. Torcnto, Gt. Lakes Inst. PR 33. 49pp.
| |
| Chandler, O .C . , and 0. 8. Weeks . 1945. Limnological studies of western Lake Erie V: relation of timnological and meteor-u ' ological conditions to the production of phytoplankton in 1942.
| |
| Eccl. Monogr. 15:435-456.
| |
| Chengalath, R., C.H. Fernando, and 8.G. George. 1971. The planktonic Rotifera of Ontario with keys to genera and species.
| |
| M iv. Waterico Biology Series, Cnt. No. 2. 40 pp.
| |
| . ~
| |
| | |
| ow Collins, G.B. , and R .O. Kalinsky. 1972. The diatoms of the Scioto River basin. The Ohio State Univ. Columbus, Ohio.
| |
| The Dept. of Botany, unnumbered mimeo. 18 pp.
| |
| Eddy, S . , and A .C . Hodson . 1964 Taxoncmic keys to the common animals of the north central states. Burgess Publish-ing Company, Minneapolis, Minnesota. 162 pp.
| |
| Ewe rs , L.A. 1930. Tne larval development of fresh-water copepoda.
| |
| Contrib. No. 3, The Franz Theodore Stone Lab, Put-In-Bay, Ohio. 43 pp.
| |
| Hair, E.M. and C.E. Herdendorf. 1973. Environmental evaluation of a nuclear power plant on Lake Erie. The Chlo State Univ.
| |
| Columbus, Ohio . Project F-41-R-4, U.S. Fish and Wildlife ,
| |
| Service Rept. 45 pp. ,
| |
| Herdendorf, C . S . and E .M. Hair. 1972. Aquatic biology of Lake Erie in the vicinity of Locust Point, Ohio. The Chio State Univ. ,
| |
| Columbus, Ohio. CLEAR Tech. R ept. No. 23. 30 pp.
| |
| Hubschman, J .H . 1960. Relative daily abundance of . planktonic crustacea in the island region of western Lake Erie. Chlo J.
| |
| t Sci. 60:335-G40.
| |
| Jahoda, W.J . 1948. Seasonal differences of Olaptomus (Copedpoda) in western Lake Erie. Ph. D. Thesis, The Ohio State Univ. ,
| |
| Columbus, Chlo. 100 pp.
| |
| Klemm, D.J. 1972. Biota of freshwater ecosystems identification manual No. 8 Freshwater leeches (Annelida: Hirundinea) of North American. U.S. E . P .A. , 53 pp .
| |
| Mason, W.T. 1973. An introduction to the identification of chironomid larvae. Fed. Water Poll. Contr. Admin. 89 pp.
| |
| . Pennak, R.W. 1953. Fresh-water Invertebrates of the United States. Tne Ronald Press Company, New York. 769 pp.
| |
| ~
| |
| Reutter, J.M. and C.E. Herdendorf. 1974 Enviror. mental evalu-ation of a nuclear power plant on Lake Erie. Chio State Univ . , Columbus, Ohio. Project F-41-R-5, Study I and II. U.S .
| |
| Fish and Wildlife Service Rept. 145 pp.
| |
| | |
| 60 Reutter, J.M. and C.E. Herdendorf. 1975. Pre-operational aquatic ecology monitoring program for the Davis-Besse nuclear l
| |
| power station, unit 1. The Chio State Univ. , Columbus.,
| |
| Ohio. Progress Rept. July 1 - Dec. 3 , 1974. Toledo Edison Co. 123 pp.
| |
| Reutter, J.M. and C.E. Herdendorf. 1975. Pre-operational aquatic ecology monitoring program for tne Davis-Sesse nuclear power station, unit 1. The Chio State Univ., Columbus, Ohio. Progress Rept. July 1 - Dec. 31, 1975. Toledo Edison Co. 156 pp.
| |
| 4 Reutter, J . M. 1975. . An Environmental Evaluation of a Nuclear Power Plant on Lake Erie: Some Aquatic Effects. Ph.D.
| |
| Olssertation, . The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
| |
| 242 pp.
| |
| Reutter, V.M. and J .M. Reutter. 1975. Zooplankton of western Lake Erie at Put-in-Eay; a quantitative study, April 1973 -
| |
| March 1974 Chio J. Sci. 7:256-262. '
| |
| S'ervice , J . 1972. A User's Guide to the Statistical Analysis System . North Carolina State Univ., Rallegh, N.C. 260 pp.
| |
| Stein, C.B. 1962. Key to the fresh-water mussels (Family Unionidae) of western Lake Erie. Ohio State Univ. Museum of Zool. Mimeo. 7 pp.
| |
| Taft, 'C. E . and C .W. Taft. 1971. The algae of western Lake Erie . Bull. Chlo Biol. Survey, New Series 4:1-185. ,
| |
| Torke, 8.G. 1974 An illustrated guide to the identification of the planktonic crustacea of Lake Michigan with notes on their ecol-
| |
| ! ogy. Center for Great Lakes Studies, The Univ. of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Special Report No. 17, 42 pp.
| |
| Trautman,- M. S . 1957. The Fishes of Ohio. The Chio State Univ.
| |
| , _ Press, Columbus, Ohio. 683 pp.
| |
| j Usinger, R . L. 1956. Aquatic insects of California. Univ.
| |
| Calif. Press, Serkeley. 508 pp. .
| |
| Van Vooren, A .R . , O.H . Davies, and G . A . Emond . 1975. Lake Erie fishery Research. Chio Capt. of Nat. R es . Civ. of l Wildlife . Project F-35-R-13. 65 pp. .
| |
| | |
| 61 Walter, H.J . and J .B. Burch, 1957. Key to the genera of fresh-water gastropods (snails and limpets) occurring in Michigan. Univ. Mich. Museum of Zool. , Circ, No. 3.8 pp, Ward , H .G . and G .C . Whipple . 1959. Fresh-water Biology. 2nd ed., ed. , W.T. Edmondson. John Wiley and Sons, New York.1248 pp.
| |
| Welch, P.S.1948. Limnological Methods. McGraw-Hill, New York.
| |
| 381 pp.
| |
| Wieber, P .H . and W.R . Holland. 1968. Plankton patchiness:
| |
| effects on ' repeated net tows. Limnol. Oceanogr. 13:315-321.
| |
| o l
| |
| | |
| 62 APPENDIX A .
| |
| PHYTOPLANKTON POPULATIONS FROM LOCUST POINT, L.AKE ERIE MARCH - JUNE 1976 3
| |
| o m- - - , , . _y-_y. .- _ --.. , ---
| |
| | |
| a 63 e
| |
| m TABLE 27 ANAYLSIS OF PHYTCPLANKTCN POPULATIONS AT LOCUST POINT
| |
| * 1 18 MARCH 1976 TM Station 1 ' Station 8 Station 13 Mean/ S.D.
| |
| Mann S.D. ' Mean S D. Mean S D. Statt en BACILLARIOPHYCEAE (Otatoms) .
| |
| As+ertenella sp. 2$37 3 83 1804 342 2157 296 2166 367 Centries (single-celled) 15 15 15 0" 12 12 14 2 Of atom a sp. 2449 118 2994 896 -298S .443 2776 287 Fracilaria sp. 531 59 607 30 613 204 584 46 Matostra sp. 900 162 881 141 738 375 840 89 Stechanodiscus binderanus 16904 207 16310 51C6 14392 1476 15869 1313 Svnedra sp. 45 15 111 22 57 148 101 52 Tabet taMa sp. 45 15 45 15 80 57 57 20 t
| |
| S 4 total 23425 825 22555 6225 21122 2213 22404 1173 -
| |
| 1 CHLOROPHYCEAE (Green Algae)
| |
| BtrvacteaMa sp. 15 15 8 8 8 8 Pedtastrum sp. 59 0 12 12 24 31 SWtotal 74 15 8 8 12 12 31 37 MYXOPHYCEAE Oscittatoria sp. 59 0 74 30 114 23 82 28 TOTAL 23558 810 22747 $203 21247 2179 22517 1172 Cata presented as no./1.
| |
| S.O. = Standard Ceviation e
| |
| 6 0
| |
| e G
| |
| 'l es e
| |
| e
| |
| -_m, . , ~ , ,
| |
| | |
| 64 a
| |
| TABLE 2e
| |
| . ANALYSIS OF PHYTCPt ANKTON POPULATICNS AT LCCUST POINT
| |
| * 14 APRIL 1975 T Station 1 1 Statten 3 SM *(en 6 Station 8 Mean iS.O. Mean S.O. Mean S.O. Mean S.O.
| |
| BACILLARICPHYCEAE (Clacoma)
| |
| Astertometta sp. 21329 2107 16670 391 16C2S 2400 13950 CeMetca (single cetted) 1328 125 1070 Ctatoma sp. E87 85 2128 497 215CS 1859 402 225 Fenellarf a sp. 20132 1145 16725 2400 18733 8496 991 8317 2814 Metosten sp. 536 13239 1324 7901 1t94 34250 3842 250C9 3070 37C58 Seeomanodiscus biedersrus
| |
| * 18585 4551 18090 2251 991 24639 -1170 38297 Suriretta sp. 12411 23477 4390 Syredra sp. 2124 743 940 0 1891 Tabet tar's sp. 5310 272S 0 724 113 6464 865 7742 1075 S@tecat 112925 4956 57C8 0
| |
| , 104157 4222 135102 24653 689e9 11638 CHLCRCPHYCEAE (Green Algae) aiructosefa sp.
| |
| * Ctoseerium sp. ,
| |
| CtcMsommerNm sp. 40 56.
| |
| Mouceceta sp. 40 56 Scenedesmus sp. 80 0 Ceetastrum sp.
| |
| S e cocal teo o CHRYSCPHYCEAE (Youaw-Creen algae)
| |
| Cind)rven sp.
| |
| * 52 73 118 0 161 113 CYNCPHYCEAE (Cinoftagettates)
| |
| Perfetsfum sp.
| |
| MYXCPHYCEAE (Blue-Green algae)
| |
| Qsc(Itatoria sp.
| |
| 52 73 59 83 181 113 TOTAL 112926
| |
| , 4955 1042S1 4777 135279 24738 89470* 11613
| |
| * Cata presented as no.A.
| |
| S.C.
| |
| * Stancarc Covtation
| |
| | |
| 65 s
| |
| 4 TABLE 28 CCNT.
| |
| . ANALYSIS Of: PHYTCPLANKTCN POPUL.,ATICNS AT LOCUST POINT
| |
| * 14 APRIL 1975 s
| |
| station 12 . scatten 13 Semeten 14 ' station te Me .7 'S.O. Mean S.O. Mean S.O. Mean S.O.
| |
| BACILLARICPHYCEAE (Otatoms)
| |
| Astertonetta, sp. 11579 5468 18194 1987 19246 682 18251 382
| |
| ' Centrics (single cetted) 1137 228 1301 332 Otet m so. 770 202 477 95 17552 7862 19553 1242 19427 Freottarta __ sp. 182 16548 295S 9752 2398 104C2 3475 8128 Meloeien sp. 22 8581 O 27596 5383 25556 8385 21730 Stochanoctscus 5tnce-srus 2171 2C609 3CS2 27aS1 5919 31500 1572 32942 SuMeetta so. 1970 28466 0 S weera sp. 1728 1CS6 10CS 249 1387 i Tecettarta sp. 6401 188 749 95 1830 S797 1904 6574 Snatocat lC3195 591 6266 1336 29943 11331S 17983 11C272 5228 1C0176 5054
| |
| - CHLCRCPHYCEAE (Green Algae) '
| |
| Btnuctearia so. ,
| |
| e Closteatum sp. 51 71 Otcawsceaertum sp. .
| |
| Mouceotta sp.
| |
| 240 6 355 167 309 Scorecesmus sp. 7 4C9 192 Coetastrum sp. 59 83 S@cocal 240 6 414 84 359 64 409 192 CHRYSCPHYCEAE (Yettow-Creen algae)
| |
| Cinob m n sp.
| |
| * 419 76 CINCPHYCF.AE . '
| |
| (Dinottagettates)
| |
| Peetetnium sp.
| |
| MY>CPHYCEAE
| |
| - (Blue-Creen algse)
| |
| Osetttatseta so. 59 83 118 0 206 4 272 0 TOTAL' 103913 30C96 1138 9 17899 110837 S167 10C056 4862
| |
| * Cata presented as no.A.
| |
| S.O. - Scandard Ceviation e
| |
| e w
| |
| | |
| 66 i
| |
| 2 .
| |
| 1 l taste 28 CCNT. *
| |
| . ANAt.YSIS CF PHYTCP1 ANKTON POPULATICNS AT LCCUST PCINT
| |
| * 14 APRIL 1976
| |
| * 7g S*mt ten 26 l Stat!cn 27 Statten 29 Statiert 20 Mean 'S.O. Mean i S.O. Mean S.O. Mean S.O.
| |
| BACit.LARICPHYCEAE
| |
| * j (Otatoms)
| |
| AsteNonella sp. 15451 1368 18303 j 2342 15629 125 18026 580 Centrica (stegte cetted) 257 12S 5C7 C 622 125 414 Olatnera so. , e3 16606 249 19114 638 17700 1616 2C449 FraattaMa sp. 1324 5861 374 7504 1847 7323 2001 6619 Meloetra so. 18693 C
| |
| 685 22207 1278 '16517 S71 20154 1242 Stoorwediscus birderanus -20424 622 24742 944 23799 249 22350 2661 SeMeetta so. 45 63 Syneces so. 622 249 1014 141 607 228 1005 249
| |
| . Tabettae's sp. 4629 374 5541 71 5639 435 6797 S.htocat 580 82496 2239 99G30 1348 87587 S40 $5812 70 CHLCRCPHYCEAE (Green Algae)
| |
| * Sinucteeria sp.
| |
| . Closteetum so. 134 63 Oteevosom a erfum sp. 45 63 118 C.
| |
| 89 0 Moucoceta sp. 59 83
| |
| ; 152 71 296 54 Scenedestrus_ so.
| |
| Costastras m sp. 51 71 s e cocal 223 63 202 0 45 63 472 Q CHRYSCPHYCEAE (YeltaWn algae)
| |
| Otnoora m sp.
| |
| * 178 0 89 O CINCPHYCEAE (Olnoflageltatas)
| |
| PeMdtnium so. 45 63 MYXCPHYCEAE (Blue-Creen algae)
| |
| Osetttatoria sp.
| |
| 45 s3 .
| |
| TOTAL 82940 2363 100133 1348
| |
| , 87785 540 96284 69 5
| |
| '
| |
| * Cata presented as no. A.
| |
| . S.D. = Standard Ceviatten 6
| |
| ,y e -w. - _.
| |
| w._ ,-.~,._..m, . # ,.-p.- . r.
| |
| | |
| 67 b
| |
| TABLE 28 CCNT. ,
| |
| ANALYSIS OF PHYTCPLANKTCN PCPUL.ATIONS AT LCCUST PCINT
| |
| * 14 APRIL 1976 TAXA S.C.
| |
| BACILLARICPHYCEAE
| |
| * (Clatoms)
| |
| Astericeetta so. 16889 2571 Cen,tries (single cetted) 837 541 Ctatoma sp. 18682 1642 Frac (taria sp. 8552 1909 Meloeira so.
| |
| * 24166 6412 Stepma codiscus binderenus 26389 5641 Sue (retta 50. 4 13 Syneces so. 1150 514 Tatiettarta sp. 6231 831 S@tetat ,
| |
| 102830 14183 CHLCRCPHYCEAE (Green Algae)
| |
| Olnuclearta sp. 4 15
| |
| . Closterium sp. 29 49 OteevescraerNm sp. 16 go Moucevta so. 153 160 Scenedesreus sp. 5 37 Coetastrum sp. 4 15
| |
| . S w total 210 175 CHRYSCPHYCEAE (Yello.#seen algae)
| |
| Otecerven sp. 83 125 DINCPHYCEAE (Ctriottagellates)
| |
| Pertelnium sp. 4 13 MY)CCPHYCEAE (Blue-Green algae)
| |
| Osetttatorts sp. 81 90 TOTAL 1CX3209 14132
| |
| 'Onta presorted as no ./1.
| |
| S.C. = Stancare Oevtation s
| |
| re-
| |
| | |
| cd TASLE 29
| |
| * ANAL.YSIS OF PHYTCPLANKTON POPUt.ATICNS AT LCCUST POINT *
| |
| . 17 MAY 1976
| |
| .g.g __ Station 1 l S*atten 1 ' Statten
| |
| * Stattee a Mean 'S.O. ' Mean S.O. Mean S.O. Mean S.O.
| |
| BACLLARIC PHYCS AE (Qtatcms)
| |
| * Asteetenetta so. 138 138 138
| |
| - Centetes (single cetted)
| |
| * 55 S3 20 72 28 Otatoma sp. .
| |
| 4363 275 5130 179 3842 Feme:tteNa sp. 522 2994 156 5365 138 2312 256 2413 Matosies so. 279 1254 83 3596 579 1182 83 1950
| |
| _Steenenodiscus binder snus 78 879 0 854 220 325 59 354 Syneces sp. 116 259 9 217 27 129 41 TeoetitHs so. 87 50 68 37 3950 193 2355 317 S J tocet 3045 199 1959 1C2 18491 139 11572 790 11754 1159 7500 1C2 CNLCRCPHYCEAE (Geeen Algae)
| |
| AettneetNm sp. 39 0 30 13 Olnucteerta so. 256 27 2s te 128 14 164 22 73 Ctostee um so. 158 110 69 14 9
| |
| * OleMeomerAm so. 49 69 73 36 Miemenruum sp.
| |
| * Mouceo:Lt 30. 1101 110 985 111 1112 441 465 Cecoconium so. 40 55 37 Cocystis sp. 59 to Pedlestr Jm sp. 118 0 69 42 76 3 66
| |
| _Sceneceemus sp. 39 0 20 19 27 38 18 S e toest 1749 S3 13C0 28 1439 467 1168 110 CHRYSCPHYCEAE Or ettow-gmen Algte)
| |
| Cinoe w so. 649 632 30 13 89 20 7
| |
| . 9 O!NCtpHyCgAg '
| |
| (Cinot.agetta.es)
| |
| Caesetam so.
| |
| MWCPWCS % E (Stue geven Algse)
| |
| Acnenizen tenon /O scit t neef t 275 0 30 41 33 9 IODb 21163 410 12931 790 13285 .722 8735 9 Oa:a presented as no./t.
| |
| S.O. = Sundard Oevtttion 6
| |
| r,-- ,,
| |
| | |
| 69 l
| |
| 1 TABLE 29 CCNT.
| |
| ANAt.YSIS Ofr PHYTCPLANKTON PCPUL.ATICNS AT LCCtJST PCINT * '
| |
| 17 MAY 1976 7g __ Stat t en 12 ' Statton 13 14
| |
| ' Station Station 18 Mean S.O. Mean ,S.O. Mean i
| |
| S.O. Mean S.O.
| |
| BACLLARfCPHYCEAE (Ctatoms)
| |
| * Astertonetta so. 98 71 109 Centries (sangte cetted) 41 44 0 99 36 15 27 Ctstoma , sp. 5194 134 3950 620 3848 393 3525 Fesatteria sp.
| |
| 3746 43 83 3004 97 2183 405 Melosten so. 2298 35 1744 21*A 2TS 96 1207 114 1399 69 Stoomenootseus bindersnus 844 25 463 Svneer t so. 97 304 93 2ES 48 1CS 14 99 83 141 11 30 Tesettseta so. 35C0 678 3162 179 13 Setotal 2588 11 2918 414 15912 800 12530 748 10293 197 10254 703 CHt_ CRC PHYCEAT (Green Algse)
| |
| Actinestrum sp. 48 1 20 0 15 21 Ginuctemets so. 217 27 138 28 2C7 21 89 14 '
| |
| Clostertum 30. 169 5 89 14 Otceyosemser fum sp. $7 11 59 28 Micegettnaum sp.
| |
| to 14 Mcusectis sp.
| |
| to 14 845 126 1232 59 Ceco; onium so. 881 32 739 124 Ocevstts ss. . 30 20 30 13 Pediestr sm sp. 8 11 167 97 1d8 41 CO 41 109 13 Scenedesmus so. 48 32 Satotil 1493 20 0 24 1646 97 1256 95 1045 138 CHRYSCPHYCEAE *
| |
| (Yettow green Algte)
| |
| Otnnbeven sp. 402 298 30 41 30 0 256 tSt CtNCPHYCEAE (Cinottagettates)
| |
| Ceestfum so.
| |
| 8 11 MY)(CPHVCE %E (Stue-green Atgse) .
| |
| Achtniron teeon/O scit t 1:orit 181 22 89 14 89 62 148 41 TOUL 17980 1C97 14294 622 11585 344 , 117t2 648 Cata pensented as no./1.
| |
| S.O.
| |
| * Sisadted Oevutten
| |
| | |
| 4 I
| |
| r 70 }
| |
| 1
| |
| )
| |
| TABLE 29 CCNT.
| |
| ANA!.YSIS CF PHYTCPLANKTCN PCPULATICNS AT LCCUST POINT '~
| |
| 17 MAY 197S .
| |
| : e. - .
| |
| TM Statt n is ' S seten 27 Statt n M Sta*1en 29 Mean t S.O. Mean S.O. Mean S.O. Mean S.O.
| |
| BACLLARICPHYCEAE .
| |
| (Ctatoms) -
| |
| Asterfecetta sp. 37 10 15 Centrica (smgte cetted) 21 37 to 79 O S 11 Ctatema so. 4 18 591 33a9 18a 4041 Fregtteria so. 788 5054 510 1451 145 1857 52 1850 239 2394 152 Metostes so. 895 52 977 62 981 Stoo*wnedtscus bimcorsms 170 73 11' '320 83 341 41 185 73 404 Syneers sp. 96 14 52 67 11 119 20 Tementsets sp. 1872 197 0 73 1843 448 1973 S e cocet 425 3C33 207 8539 436 8495 2C8 9C95 1379 12530 497 CHLCPCPHYCEAE (Gmen Algse)
| |
| Acetnesen;m sp. 8 11 23 ,11 134 41 Blnucteerts so. 148 20 27 104 119 41 "9 Ctencertum so. 21 148 41 =
| |
| 67 11 52 11 Otcryoscaserfum sp. 40 27
| |
| _Mieree!! mum so.
| |
| %9eo"11 sp. 844 104 1CC6 0 777 94 433 Cecocentum so. 37 to 0
| |
| _Cecys:ts sp. 20 27 Peetestr sm so. 74 0 59 21 23 59 29 Scemecesmus so. .
| |
| 1,1 S@cocst ~ 1177 10 30 13 1258 41 992 21 748 54 CH4YSCPHYCEAE (Yellow-green Algse)
| |
| Ctecer- e so. 15 0 8 11 49 14 CINCPHYCEAE (C(nottagella.e s)
| |
| Cam:t;m so.
| |
| 15 21 8 11 MY>'OPHYCE AE (Stua-green A!;se)
| |
| Achtnizon eeron/O setti Moels 52 11 89 21 89 21 129 41 TCT %t,.
| |
| 9797 437 9841 146 10191 1357 13455 eCe
| |
| * [
| |
| Cata presen ac as no./t.
| |
| S.C. = Staedted O*vi*tio"
| |
| | |
| 71 s'
| |
| TABLE 29 CONT.
| |
| ANALYSIS Cl PHYTCPLANKTON PCPULATICNS AT LOCUST PCINT
| |
| * 17 MAY 1976 TA>:A M**"/
| |
| station S*o*
| |
| BACILLARICPHYCEAE (Ctatoms)
| |
| Asterionetta so. 77 40 Centries (stngle cetted) 4 10 Otstoma so. 4113 7C5
| |
| _1 esottsr is so. 2496 1119 Metostem sp. 1509 746 Steonenediscus eineers.ms 401 227 Syneers so. 113 53 Tecettacts so. 2686 707 Secocal 11414 3206 a
| |
| CHLORCPHYCEAE (Green Algae)
| |
| * Actinastmm so. 30 36 ,
| |
| Blnucteerta sp.
| |
| _Clostes-tum sp.
| |
| led 59 75 47 Ctetvosomseetum, so. 1 3 Mleractietum so. 1 3 Mougeotis so.
| |
| . 902 209 Cecocontum so. 18 21 Coevs:ts so. 1 2 Pectasemm sp. 88 42 Scenecesmus so. 16 19 Swototal 1273 281 CHRYSCPHYCEAE (Yellew-green Algse)
| |
| Cinobeven sp. 131 20s CINCPHYCEAE (Cinoflagetta:es)
| |
| Caes:!um so. 3 5 MYXC PHvCE % E (Stue-green Algse)
| |
| Aoh nnizontenen/O setti n: ort s 1CO 75 MT%L 12921 3510
| |
| +
| |
| * Cata presented as no./1.
| |
| S.D. = Stancarc Ceviation E-
| |
| | |
| ~
| |
| 72 TABLE 30 ANALYSIS CF PHYTCPLANKTCN PCPULATIONS AT LCCUST POINT
| |
| * 16 Jurm 1976 TM Statten 1 statten J ; s..eien 6 I sentier a Mean S.O. Mean S.O. Mean S.O. Mean 'S.O.
| |
| BACILLARICPHYCEAE (Ctatoms)
| |
| Asterferetta sp.
| |
| Fragttarta sp.
| |
| 28 39 10 14 Melostra so. 159 73 30 14 127 20 111 52 Steonarectset s bir<araeus Taoettarta sp.
| |
| 10 14 15 0 -
| |
| Swototal 159 73 50 14 155 60 125 52 CHLCRCPHYCEAE (Green Algae)
| |
| Biruclearta sp. 87 25 79 0 127 99 52 11 Closterhin so.
| |
| Ccetastram sp. 28 39 8 11 greenerteita sp.
| |
| Mou:ectta so. 14 20 Cecocomcm sp. 69 0 20 0 Coevstis so.
| |
| 15 o i 10 14 28 C 23 11 Pectastr's so. 1735 49 1428 14 1574 158 11te 300 Scorecesenus sp.
| |
| Staurastrun so. 20 0 S w total 1906 98 1557 29 1770 39 1214 311 CINCPHYCEAE (Ctreflagellates)
| |
| Cerattwn sp.
| |
| MY)CPHYCEAE (Blue-;rsen algae)
| |
| Anabaera so.
| |
| AenantremecerVCset t tatoria 56 39 Satetal e 11 56 39 8 tt TCTAt. . 2064 171 1607 15 19e1 19 1348 249 Cata presenrec as ro./l S.D. = Stanfard Ceviation s--
| |
| | |
| 73 TABLE 30 CCNT.
| |
| ANALYSIS CF PHYTCPt.ANKTCN PCPULATICNS AT t CCUST PCINT*
| |
| 16.ltaw 1976 9
| |
| 0 Th Statt n 82 ' Stat! 13 ' S?stien 14 S stfen 18 Mean S.O. Mean i S.O. Mean S.O. Mean S.O.
| |
| SACILLARICPHYCEAE (Ctatorn s)
| |
| Asteriorwita sp. 35 0 ,
| |
| 10 14 Fragttaeta sp. 18 25 20 0 8 11 Melostra sp. 52 24 109 13 58 11 59 O Steenanociscus 5tncererus to 14 Tanettarta sp.
| |
| Statotal 105 48 139 27 66 23 69 14 CHLCRCPPffCEAE (Green Algae) .
| |
| Ofnuclearta sp. 52 24 30 14 58 11 30 14 ClosteMtrn so.
| |
| Coetastrw so. 10 14 kiremnertella sp. 40 29 to 14 Mougeotta sp.*
| |
| Cecocente sp. ,
| |
| 73 29 33 23 40 28 Cocystis so.
| |
| Pectastrun sp. 1701 97 1291 14 820 137 1340 249 Scenecesrnus sp.
| |
| Staurastm sp. 20 28 to 14 Stctotal 1753 74 1458 83 910 12S 1439 221 CINCANYCEAE (Ctreflagellates)
| |
| Ceratte sp. 25 11 MYXCPHYCEAE (Blue-green algae)
| |
| Anabanna sp.
| |
| Aonanizernenon/Csetttateria "2 24 Swtatan 52 24 TCTAL 19c9 146 1597 110 toco 161 15c8 207 Data presented as ro./l S.D. = Standard Ceviatten e
| |
| (
| |
| | |
| 14 TABLE 30 CCNT.
| |
| . ANALYSIS CF PHYTCPLANKTCN PCPULATIONS AT LCCUST PCINT*
| |
| 16 .tne 1978 7 Station 2's ' Station 27 stattem 29 Mean eS.O. Mean ' Statten 29 S.O. Mean S.O. Mean S.O.
| |
| BAClkt.ARICPHYCEAE (Diatorna)
| |
| Asterterwlta sp. 8 11 Fracelarta sp. 8 30 14 11 9 12 8 Metostra sp. 11
| |
| - 23 11 51 48 15 21 59 0 Steomanodiscus biru*erarus
| |
| _Taceitarta 30.
| |
| Satotal 38 11 60 60 23 32 ,89 14 CHLCRCPHYCEAE (Green Algae)
| |
| Binuclearta sp. 59 21 43 11 52 52 20
| |
| _Ctesterturn so. 27 Ceetastm sp.
| |
| 8 11 Klechneetetta sp. 15 O Mouceotta so.
| |
| Cecocentun sp. 30 0 34 0 30 0 20 0 '
| |
| Coevstts sp.
| |
| _Pemastrum so. 1917 259 1335 24 962 Scenecesmus sp. 83 1350 289 Staurastrun sp. 9 12 StAtotal 2021 290 1420 24 1C52 41 1389 262 O!NCPHYCEAE (Ctreflagellatas)
| |
| Cerattum sp. 30 20 34 0 45 41 to 14 MY>:CPHYCEAE' *
| |
| -(Stue-green algae)
| |
| Anaeaena sp. 8 11 AcManizerreren/Cscit tatoeta 22 31 Suo:otal 30 20 TCTAL 2118 331 1514 B3 1119 32 1488 253 Data presented as no./l S.D. = Stardard Ceviatton e
| |
| - a
| |
| | |
| 75 TABLE 30 CCNT.
| |
| ANALYSIS CF PHYTCPLANKTCN PCPULATICNS AT LCCUST PCINT*
| |
| 16 . June 1976 TM S.Ov y.
| |
| SACILt.ARICPHYCEAE (Olatorna)
| |
| Astertonella sp. 9 14 Fragtlarta sp, 7 7 Motoetra sp. 71 45 Steomamoiseus binceranus 1 3 Taceitaria sp. 2 3 Satotal 90 de CHLCRCPHYCEAE (Geeen Algael Bleuclearia sp. 57 29 Closteete ap.
| |
| Ceetasteten so. 5 8 -
| |
| Ktreenerteita sp. 5 12 Mouceetta sp. 1 4 Cecoccete sp. 31 24 ,
| |
| Oceystis sp. 5 10 Peciastrun sp. 1381 320 Scenecestnus sp.
| |
| * Staurastrun sp. 5 8 Swctotat 1491 33S O!NCPHYCEAE (Cinottagellates) ,
| |
| Cerattum sp. 12 17 MYXCPHYCEAE .
| |
| (Blue-green algae)
| |
| Anabaeca sp. 1 2 Acmar..romoeorv'Oscittatoria 12 21 Suototal 12 21 TOTAL. 1604 358 Data presented as no./l S.O = Staccarc Deviation
| |
| | |
| (
| |
| 76 APPENOlX 8 ZOOPLANKTON POPULATIONS FROM LOCUST POINT, LAKE ERIE MARCH - JUNE 1976 a
| |
| | |
| 77 TABLE 31 ANALYSIS OFr ZOCPLANKTCN POPULATICNS AT LOCUST POINT
| |
| * 18 MARCH 1976 TM Station 1 Statte 8 Station 13 Mean S.O. Mean Meand S
| |
| * D *
| |
| .S.O. Mean S.O. Stattoe ROTIfrERA OmcNanus anowtarts 0.4 0.4 0.2 0.2 2.0 0.3 0.9 1.0 s c.alvet rtoms a 0.7 0.0 0.2 0.4 Filleta teminatte 0.4 0.4 0.2 0.2 0.6 0.S 0.4 0.2 Kelticoatta tonctsoina 0.3 0.3 0.1 0.2 Kemtella Cocnleerts 1.1 1.1 0.8 0.4 1.7 0.0 1.2 0.5 K
| |
| w ondents 2.2 1.5 0.3 1.0 Nothotca so.
| |
| 0.4 0.4 0.3 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.0 1.0 0.3 0.3 0.8 0.4 Pc'.varenes so. 3.1 0.0 S.0 0.4 4.9 2.6 S.3 1.0 Sechneta sp. 18.3 5.2 15.4 0.6 17.7 2.3 16.5 1.2 S @ total 29.5 7.4 24.5 27.7 1.2 0.9 27.2 2.5 COPEPCOA Catanoid nauptt! 0.4 Cyctcpe trornature 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.7 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.6 0.0 0.5 0.3 Cyclopold naucitt 3.7 2.2 5.0 1.3 3.7 2.0 4.1 0.8 SAtotal 4.8 2.6 1.5 5.2 4.6 1.7 4.9 0.3 CLAOCCERA Bosmina tonctmetria 0.2 0.1 Caoeta mtmeum 0.2 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.1 0.2 S @ total 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 PROTCAOZ CtPmuota so. 0.4 0.4 0.1 0.2 TOTAL 34.3 10.0 30.2 32.6 0.9 2.3 32.4 2.1 -
| |
| Data pensented as no./t.
| |
| S.0. = Standard Deviation
| |
| . +
| |
| e
| |
| | |
| 78
| |
| + .
| |
| TABLE 32 Afht.YSIS CF' CCCPLANWTCN PCPut.AT:CNS AT LCCUST POINT '
| |
| 14 april 197S Statten 1 I S?ntlen Mean S 'l Station 9 Statim 9 tS.O. Mean I S.O. Mean S.O. Mean S.O.
| |
| ROTIFERA Asotane*ra pefodonta .
| |
| Braentonus angutarts 3,4 0.S 3.8 B. catyetrierus 2.2 0.3 0.4 1.1 S.9 0.0 0.6 B. ureeotarte 4.0 0.0 1.3 0.4 2.9 0.3
| |
| - Filinta co-menalle 0.8 Kettlece ta _toncisotna 1.1 1.8 1.0 1.0 0.7 0.0 I'3 0.2 0.3 Erstatta cocatearts 0.9 0.0 Ca8 0''
| |
| 14.8 2.1 11.7 3*I C'6 K. ownersta 1.5 3.9 1.4 1.2 0.7 Ectnoten sac. 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.4 potverenes spo. 189.1 10.9 1C9.8 2.2 133.3 17.4 S0.8 69.4 4.3 Svnenseta spp. 4.8 15.0 5.0 1.8 1.1 27.4 0.3 35.9 3.1 0.6 Tesseteetta sp. 1.0 35.5 15.2 9.5 1.0 p total 0.2 0.3 259.3 9.8 182.9 3.4 168.2 70.1 90.3 S.S CCPEPCOA Catanoid Ccpopods Ofactorrus sco. 0.4 0.4 trnmature.s. Otactomus 0.2 0.3 1.0 0.7 0.9 0.3 Nauptlt Calanotd 0.8 1.1 0.7 0.8 Cyclopold Copepods 17.8 6.3 8.0 3.8 16.9 12.0 10.9 1.0 Cycteos bicusoid9tus 0.7 C wenet t s 0.0 1.4 0.7 1.8 0.7 0.3 0.0 Ern. _
| |
| rnatures, Cycteos 0.3 0.4 1.1 0.S 1.8 0.7 Nauptit, Cyclopold 29.5 1.0 0.0 0.7 0.S Subtotal 7.3 23.6 1.0 17.3 49.5 1.0 0.4 22.8 S.7 34.8 3.8 38.5 14.1 36.2 7.0 Ct ACCCERA Bosmina tenetrestris O.4 0.4 .
| |
| Cnyeorus senaaetchs 0.5 0.0 Oaoenta reteccarve 1.5 0.0 0.4 Eu3ommtna coreconi 0.0 1.3 0.4 0.2 0.3 S 4 total 0.2 0.3 1.9 0.3 0.0 0.6 0.5 0.3 1.8
| |
| - 0.7 0.5 0.3 TCTAt.,
| |
| . 310.7 11.3 218.3 0.3 2C8.5 84.6 J25.9 13.3 '
| |
| 'Cata presented as no./l.
| |
| S.O. = Stancaro Deviation W
| |
| | |
| . 79 TABLE 32 CCt(T.
| |
| ANAL.YSIS CF ZCCPt ANKTCN PCPULATICNS AT t CCUST PCINT * .
| |
| 14 APRIL 1976
| |
| .g.g i Statten 12 ! Station 13 ' S*a tien 14 IMean i Statte is
| |
| 'S.O. Mean S.O. Mean S.O. Mean S.O.
| |
| ACTTFERA .
| |
| AsotanePna pefodonta Q.3 c.4 Besentonus aewtarts 0.8 0.4 1.3 E. calyctMoms 0.4 1.1 1.0 0.3 2.8 0.3 2.0 0.7 3.9 c.4
| |
| : g. _urceotarts 0.5 c.7 o,3 1.4 1.1 c.o o,4 Altmea terminalls Q.3 C.4 0.3 Kettlecetta _toecisoina 2.0 0.4 0.2 0.4
| |
| . 0.0 1.8 0.4 2.4 0.8 0.6 Karatetta .coentenets 3.5 2.1 5.9 2.1 0.C 5.3 4.2 2.9
| |
| : 5. cuacceta 0.3 0.4 o,e 0.8 Nothatcm spp.
| |
| * 123.6 18.S o.3 0.0 0.C Potvarenes spp. 140.4 40.2 134.1 13.2 3.8 1.7 133.4 4.1 6.1 2.4 S.7 1.1 Synemasta spp. 11.9 8.1 2.3 0.8 17.2 2.8 21.3 9.8 Testuetmetta sp. 14.0 0.4 S e total 149.4 39.9 175.1 35.8 175.9 7.7 155.1 3.1 CCPEPCCA
| |
| . Catanoid Copepod.s Otaccoms sop. o.3 Imrnatures, Otaceorrus 0.4 1.5 1.4 2.0 0.3 '
| |
| 1.0 0.7 2.3 1.7
| |
| . Naupl11 Calanote 0.3 0.4 0.2 0.3 0.3 0,4 17.3 c.8 19.5
| |
| . Cyclopold Copecoca 4.8 16.2 1.5 14.9 1.7 Cvetooa bicusoicatus 1.o c.o o,3 C._vernatts o.7 1.3 0.7 0.9 0.4 Immatures, Cyeteos 1,o Nauptli, Cyclopcac 0.0 0.8 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.3 ty.S 11.1 18.9 0.4 h total 38.7 11.3 3.8 21.9 2.4 21.7 1,7 41.5 3.8 41.9 0.7 40.2 1.3 Ct.ACCCERA Bosmfr.a toectrostr4s 0.3 Cnyeorus sonaerleus 0.0 0.2 0.3 Cacenia reteoeveva 0.8 0.2 0.3 1.0 1.3 c.4 c.7 0.4 Eubosemira coregoni O.3 0.9 C.4 S4 total 0.8 0.4 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.4 1.0 2.0 0.0 1.3 0.1 1.2 0.1 TCTAL 188.8 52.2 238.6 39.S 219.0 7.1 196.5 1.8
| |
| * Data presented as no./t.
| |
| S.O. = Stancard Ceviation .
| |
| | |
| ou TABLE 32 CCNT.
| |
| ANALYSIS CF 2CCPLANKTCN PCPULATIONS AT LCCUST PCINT
| |
| * 14 APRIL 1976 7 _Statten ?S ' Statten 27 1 Station ?9 Mean iS.O. Mean I Statten 29 S.O. Mean S.O. Mean S.O.
| |
| ROTIFERA ,
| |
| Asolencena pefodonta .
| |
| Breenionus angutaMs , 0.6 0.3 0.4
| |
| : g. catwho 0.3 2.3 0.8 3.2 0.3 3.S 0.8 0.6 0.5 0.7
| |
| @._ueceotaria 0.3 2.4 1.8 3.2 '6.7
| |
| _F_litela temtnatts 0.2 0.3 ketticot ta toncisoina O.S 0.3 0.4 C.S 0.S 2.4 0.3 2.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 Kerstetta cocntearts 0.8 1.3 0.3 1.8 1.1 3.4 1.1 6.3
| |
| [.. cuacrata 1.7 0.3 1.3 2.4 3.9 0.3 3.5 1.4 Neenotea spp. 100.9 0.0 1.3 0.3 1.3 1.1 Polvartnee app. 23.7 118.9 S.S 117.9 5.5 113.4 6.0 2.7 5.0 3.1 Smeta spp. 13.2 1.4 0.0 7.6 2.8 2.9 0.0 Testudinetta sp. 16.S 3.8 20.0 2.1 12.0 2.4 -
| |
| Subtotal 13 1.7 27.3 156.9 8.0 156.2 8.1 13 9.5 4.5 CCPEPCCA Catanoid Copepods
| |
| ' Claccomus sco. 0.6 0.3 1.1 Immatures, Otactonws 1.0 1.5 0.0 ' 2.2 0.2 0.3 1.3 1.0 Nauptli Catanoic 11.1 0.0 C.4 0.6
| |
| . Cyclopold Copepocs 0.0 13.9 5 .3 12.4 0.3 11.5 2.4
| |
| * Cyclees bleusoidatus 1.3 0.3 C. _verna t t s 0.8 0.3 0.6 0.8 0.5 0.7 Immature s, Cveteos C.7 0.0 0.2 0.3 Nauptil, Cyclopota 1.7 0.8 0.2 0.3 17.6 2.4 22.3 1.5 0.7 Su3tocat 1.8 12.8 0.3 14.5 31.4 3.2 40.8 2.5 8.3 28.0 1.8 30.2 1.1 CLAOCCERA Bosmina toectrostets C5ycorua sonaerteus 0.2 0.3 Deennia retnoc m 0.8 C.S Eu3osmina coeecent 0.7 0.0 1.0 0.7 Suotocat 0.2 0.3 0.6 0.3 0.8 0.5 0.4 0.0 1.3 0.3 1.0 0.7 TOTAt 163.8 25.1 198.0 16.1 185.5 S.2 170.0 S.2
| |
| * Cata presented as no./1.
| |
| S.O. = Standarc Ceviation l .
| |
| k
| |
| | |
| 89 TABLE 32 CCNT.
| |
| ANALYSIS CFr 2COPLANKTON POPULATlONS AT LOCUST POINT
| |
| * 14 APRIL 1976 T S *O g ta nonPm
| |
| ^solancW petodenta 0.1 Besentonus angularts 0.1 1.4 1.2
| |
| : 8. calvetfterus 3.0 1.3
| |
| : 8. _uresclarts 0.1 0.2 Filinta terminalls 0.5 0.5 KetitOcttf a ICMQtsctra . .1,7 0.3 Karatetta cocntearts 5.5 3.9
| |
| : 5. _cusersta 0.7 0.7
| |
| _Notretca spp. 123.7 23.1 Polyarence spp. S.5 4.9 i
| |
| Svneraaeta spp. 18.7 7.8 l
| |
| Testudinetta sp. 0.02 0.1 S@cotat 161.7 39.5 CCPEPCCA e Catanoid Copepods Clactornus spp. 1.2 0.7 Irwr.atures, _ Ctactemus O.4 0.4 Nauptli Catanota 14.2 3.5
| |
| . Cyclocold Copepods
| |
| * Cveloos bicusoidatus 0.9 0.5 C. .wmlts 0.04 0.1 Irnrnatures, CYetops 0.9 0.5 Naustil. Cyclopoid 20.0 4.6 Subtotal 37.7 S,0 CLACCCERA ecoreina tonotrestris 0.1 0.2 Chvceeus scraerteus 0.03 0.1:
| |
| _Daoerna retrocurva O.S 0.4 Eubosmina corecent 0.2 0.2 Setocat 1.1 0.5 TCTAL . 200.4 43.9
| |
| *Cata presented as no.A.
| |
| S.O. = Standard Ceviation 1
| |
| l i
| |
| l s
| |
| _ _ _ , _ _ , _ . . ' ~~
| |
| | |
| 82
| |
| . Y .
| |
| * TABLE 33 ANALYSIS CF ZOOPt.ANKTCN POPJLAT:CNS AT LOCUST F' CINT
| |
| * 17 MAY ,1978 7g Sta tion 1 1 Station 4 Sta?!on 9 f S*a?!m 9 I Mean oS.O. Mean S.O. Mean S.O.i Mean S.O.
| |
| ROTIFERA AsotancMna ortodonta 55.0 9.1 53.7 8.S 34.9 5.9 33.4 S.9 Bracnt:rmas a@taria 5.0 2.7 1.8 0.4 0.6 0.0 2.6 0.0 B,. calvciftorua 5.9 0.0- 1.8 'O.4 3.8 1.7 1.2 0.7
| |
| : 9. ureeotarts **
| |
| 0.2 0.3 Conoenitoices sp. 5.5 3.4 5.4 4 .1 5.3 4.8 S.1 4.3 Filinta terminella 11.9 5.9 5.9 2.7 4.4 0.8 S.1 2.5 Ketticcetta tonctsmina 8.4 3.5 13.0 1.7 12.9 4.6 19.7 4.8 Kerstetta coenteerts S3.9 2.0 25.5 4.8 19.9 6.2 17.0 0.3 K. cuacrata 109.4 10.4 403.3 24.7 243.7 33.a 4C5.5 1.S ctholca spp. S.5 2.0 3.2 1.7 1.$ 0.4 0.7 0.6 Potysmara spp. 130.2 20.1 110.8 9.6 49.2 Synenaem spp.
| |
| 2.9 69.0 8.8
| |
| , , 15.9 4.1 14.0 5.1 19.3 2.6 13.4 0.3 Tetenocerca rnuttlerints 0.3 0.4 0.2 0.3 Suotatal 417.2 28.4 63G.3 10.6 395.4 40.3 574.7 15.4 COPEPCOA .
| |
| Catanoid copepoda Diaocorvus spp. -
| |
| 4.9 0.0 7.5 4.2 4.8 3.5 Episcnura facustr-(s Eurytemora affinis 3.0 1.4 0.3 0.4 1.3 0.9 0.4 0.5
| |
| * Irnma:ures, Dia:tonus 11.9 0.0 18.4 23.S 0.4 6.9 15.2 3.2 Immaures, J. a*ftnis 2.5 1.3 2.5 0.8 2.3 0.0 Nauptll, catanoid 30.7 5.6 38.5 5.8 30.S 2.9 25.7 4.6 Cyclopold copepoes Cvetees blevestents 4.5 0.7 10.8 0.0 0.1 4.4 1.7 1.0
| |
| .Q. w mal t s_ S.5 2.0 S.4 0.7 6.0 3.0 2.2 1.2 Treeceveteos cessinus 0.3 0.4 Immanares, Cv; tops 48.0 13.2 57.9 17.2 64.6 1.0 48.9 0.5 Nau;Lil, cyclopoid 170.3 28.3 170.8 20.9 152.3 20.2 123.1 8.8 Sustetal 274.9 36.5 309.5 3.0 302.5 32.1 225.1 23.2 CLACCCERA Essmina tonotrestets 9.4 2.1 17.0 7.2 22.3 11.4 11.9 0.9 Coatecaer.nia sp. 1.5 0.7 Cnyeeeus senneefeus 5.0 , 1.3 0.5 0.7 2.5 , 0.8 1.9 0.2 -
| |
| Osennta wter 0.2 0.3 0,. retrocura 0.5 0.7 5.7 0.4 4.1 2.1. 4.5 1.7 ,
| |
| Diaonanosome s.o .
| |
| Etoamms con;oni S.4 3.5 24.5 4.8 25.7 S.0 17.9 3.7 Holomacium geserum 0.3 0.4 n eotSEtns:tt 0.3 0.4 Suototal 24.8 1.5 47.5 10.9 56.2 21.2 36.3 S.0 PROTO2CA Olfftugia sp. 46.1 7.6 11.0 3.1 13.8 3.2 10.1 0.7 TOTAL 762.9 58.9 1007.3 S.4 757.9 96.9 846.2 45.4
| |
| . I l
| |
| Cata oresen*ed as no./t.
| |
| 3.0. = 5:ancaro caviation O
| |
| T
| |
| | |
| w TABLE 33 CCNT.
| |
| ANALYSIS CF 2COPt ANKTCN POPULAT!CNS AT LOCUST POINT
| |
| * 17 MAY 1975 ,
| |
| T l _ Sta tion 12 i Station 13 Sta tten 14 St2t f on '8 IMean S.O. I Mean 6 S.O. Mean 4 S.O. Mean IS.O.
| |
| itOTIFERA Asolencena ortodonta 42.9 2.0 35.3 Bracnionus angutarts S.2 33.2 0.8 25.5 2.7 3.6 1.5 2.0 0.0 0.7 0.0 1.8, 1.1 9.calvetrtorus 4.2 0.1 ' 1.5 0.0 1.1 B. uresolaet s 0.6 0.0 2.3 0.4 0.0 0.5 0.0 Cono:nito4ces sp. S.9 7.4 2.3 0.4 4.1 4.1 3.4 0.7 Filinia terminalls 11.2 3.4 S.9 0.7 Ketticattia tonetsmina 10.3 3.6 2.3 S.9 2,1 1.3 18.2 4.1 17.1 7.8 10.8 S.S Kerneetta coentearts 45.4 8.8 38.5 12.7 i
| |
| K. cuacrata 22.4 1.8 14.0 4.5 122.7 13.2 211.7 13.7 295.3 30.6 2C4.8 l Notmotes spp. 7.5 S.7 1.1 3.5 1.3 O.8 2.0 Polyartnes spp. 80.2 17.2 64,7 1.' 1.3 Synenneta spp.
| |
| 3.4 67.9 11.6 32.4- 2.0 13.0 0.8 12.1 0.4 10.0 3.6 10.8 4.1 Tetenocerca muttter ints 0.0 0.0 0.8 Suotocat 348.1 0.5 0.3 0.4 38.6 395.9 33.3 447.6 C2.4 313.4 2.5 COPEPCCA .
| |
| Catanoid copepods Ciantonus spp. 4 . Q' 1.4 Episcrura tacustris 3.7 1.1 S.1 S.5 7.4 1.3 Eurgemora affinis 0.9 0.4 1.3 1.1 0.4 0.5 1.0 0.7 Immatures, Of setomus 15.4 0.7 12.7 0.0 20.9 2.4 19.5 1.4 Immatures,1. a"ints 0.8 0.0 4.4 0.7 Nauptli, calanold 37.4 3.9 2.8 1.3 0.4 9.3 30.9 S .S 30.8 Cycteoo(d cocepoca 2.5 33.8 0.7 Cveteos bLeusolcatus 7.9 2.0 8.4 0.7 .3.6 1.1 C,. veensits_ 7.4 2.7 3.9 1.1 S.4 1.4 2.1 0.2 6.1 Treco:v-tc=s en s(nus s 2.4 -
| |
| Immaures, CWees 59.4 4.6 74.5 Nauctil, cyclor.4td 2.7 47.4 4.1 54.6 S.S 169.9 14.8 149.2 7.8 130.8 Suotocat S.5 140.7 9.6 3C8.7 0.8 291.3 1.1 247.8 2.2 276.2 4.4 Ct.ACCCERA Eosm!na tecctrostets 13.4 2.2 25.3 Certoev: ente sp. 2.5 13.9 0.3 17.2. S.2 Chvcorus semeeWeu s 0.6 0.0 0.3 3.7 . 0.9 0.4 -
| |
| Osornia cuter 2.0 1.3 0.6 *C.2 1.0 0.0 0.3 0.4 0,,._retrocu m 2.1 Clacramosome sp.
| |
| 2.0 3.9 1.4 4.8 1.5 S.2 1.1 Eusormins co.*e:ent 0.3 0,4 15.4 3.9 25.S 2.0 18.3 Hotosectum sto3*mm 3.4 29.5 4.1 Laotooses ktr>stta 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.4 Stotocal 36.4 S7.8 4.6 2.3 37.8 2.2 52.S 2.0 PROTOZOA ClfftuCla so. 46.8 13.4 35.3 10.3 11.1 0.0 19.9 1.1 TOTAL 739.9 55.9 781.0 42.4 744.2 58.0 662.0 10.0 Cats oresentes as no./L.
| |
| S.C. = Stancar Ceviation ,
| |
| 4
| |
| - - , - - - , - , . - -n , . . . , , s- y , , - - -
| |
| | |
| 84 4
| |
| TABLE 33 CONT.
| |
| ANALYSIS CF ZCOPt ANKTCN PORJLATIONS AT LCCtJST POINT
| |
| * 17 MAY 1975 7 Sentien 2 85 Statice 27 : Sectfon 2e I S!stion M Mean eS.O. Mean S.O. Mean S .O. ' Mean S.O.
| |
| ROTIFERA Asetanenna priodonta 44.3 3.9 45.7 11.6 42.8 4.4 35.5 11.3 Bracnionus anwtaris 2.6 0.5 1.3 0.8 1.7 B. calvetrtorus ~
| |
| 0.3 1.5 0.0 2.1 1.3 0.7 0.0 0.6 0.2 1.0
| |
| : 3. ureestart a 0.0 0.5 0.7 Conoenitotees sp. 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.4 1.3 0.3 3.7 1.0 2.6 0.0 Fitinia terminetta 7. 8 1.1 3.7 1.0 6.5 5.9 5.5 0.3 3.7 0.7 Kettic:ttia tonelsoina 19.5 2.3 15.1 2.5 19.1 Kerstetta es:nteneta 1.8 12.8 0.6 12.6 1.1 22.0 S.4 17.6 1.3 K . Ous:cata 393.0 25.5 3.4 85.5 349.9 31.9 357.7 16.3 137.3 Notnoten s;p. 1.3 3.4 7dotyar.ren spp.
| |
| 0.3 0.9 0.3 1.1 0.6 2.7 1.7 57.8 16.1 57.7 8.3 63.1 Synenasta spp. 25.7 3.4 50.5 2.7 7.2 10.8 0.5 15.8 2.3 7.9' 1.3 Tricnocerca r uttiertnis 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.3 Suo tocal 573.4 0.4 116.3 512.S 35.0 528.8 12.4 284.5 14.1 COPEPOCA Catanoid copepoca Ciaccorrus spo. S.S 1.1 3.7 0.5 4.3 0.2 5.4 1.4 Emiscnura tacustr ts 0.2 Eury:emora affinis 0.3 0.0 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.8 tmmacares, Ots:tomus 1.1 0.3 0.4 17.4 1.0 19.4 16.7 Immaturss, E. amnis 4.4 0.5 10.1 1.1 4.8 0.S 4.3 1.3 4.3 0.2 Nauct!!, ca1Nid 31.5 4.7 33.1 3.2 0.4 S.4 29.6 S7 36.5 0.4 Cyclopold copepod.s Cveteos bleusoicams 5.0 2.4 C,. wwtt s 5.2 1.7 5.6 3.2 7.1 1.7 2.5 0.8 4.8 0.S 3.0 Teceoev-tees era stnus 1.5 3.9 1.4 Imeraores, CW'oes 55.5 1.5 Naastil, cyclogoid 55.4 2.9 54.8 2.0 SS.S 3.8 173.0 21.5 135.9 70.0 Suntotal 3.6 75.7 15a.1 14.0 295.7 20.7 2E2.4 5.3 189.0 65.5 280.1 7.8 CLAOCCERA Hosm:na fencf rss ris 18.5 2.1 19.5 Ceeteesennia so.
| |
| 4.4 13.5 4.9 14.5 0.4 Cnycer=ss screeri us 2.8 , 1.3 1.5 0.6 1.3 0.3 Caennia cuter -
| |
| O_. retrocuevr; 4.5 1.S 2.4 1.3 Ola:* anosory 23. 3.0 1.5 S.4 0.7 Eusosmins co e;=ni 14.4 O.3 0.4 0.0 29.C 1.3 19.9 10.6 16.7 Hoto:e:ium gisserum 3.4 t so:oura nin::st Suoto.at 40.2 2.5 51.3 4.9 37.6 16.8 37.8 4.1 PROTOZOA OifftuMa sp. 8.0 1.8 15.5 4.1 5.4 1.8 12.8 2.7 TOTAL 917.2 132.7 841.9 38.7 750.7 62.3 615.1 5.0 Cats trese9:ec sa t o./l.
| |
| 3.0. = Stancar: Ceviation
| |
| ~
| |
| v "'
| |
| | |
| 85 TABLE 33 CCNT.
| |
| , ANALYSIS OF COOP 1.ANKTON POPULATIONS AT t.OCtJST POINT
| |
| * 17 MAY 1975 TAXA M **"/'
| |
| Station S.C.
| |
| ROT!FERA Asotanchna ortoconta 40 5 83ntemiangutaris 90 2 1 1.2 8, . _ceiveart oms _
| |
| 2.2 1.6 S_. ureeotarts 0.2 0 2 Cono:mitotees sp. 4 3 1.6 Fillnaa terminstis 6.4 2.7 Kstt :dtt's toncashina 14 8 3.9 ,
| |
| Karatetta cochlearts 27.2 15.2 K. cuscru*a 268.7 112.4 Sothetes spp.
| |
| 2.7 2.0 Potyarthru spp. 69*5 Syn:naeca~ sop. 27.0 14.1 5.0 Trtenecerca trutticetnis
| |
| ~
| |
| 0.3 0.2
| |
| %c cocat 452.6 112.8 CCREPCOA Catanoid Copepods ,
| |
| Giaccomus spp.
| |
| 4.8 2.0 Emisenurs lacustris 0.02 Eurytemora aMinis 0.05 0.9 0.7 Imena:ures,~ Ola=tomus 16.7 3.9 Immatures,1. _a ftnisa 2.8 Nauptli, catanoid 1.6 Cyctcpold copepods 32.5 3.5 Cyclece laleusoidatus 6.1 2.3 C._v=ceatts T 4.4 1.7 Eeeevetoes omstrus 0.03 0.09 Immatures, Qv-tggs 57.6 Nauctil, cyclopoid 8.4 148.3 29.5 Suototal 271.9 36.3 CLACCCERA Sosm fen _t encim stet s 16.4 4.5 Cetoceemnea so. C.2 0.4 Chvecrus senaerfeus 1.9 , 1. 4 Onornia cutex 0.04 0.1 O. retrocurva 3.9 1.7 Ota:narosome so. O.1 0.1 Euoosmirm co-e;cnt 20.5 6.3 Metoaacium giosemm 0.1 0.1 L.soemes 4:rutig 0.02 0.05 Subtotal 43.0 9.9 PROTOZCA Difflugia so. 19.7 14.7 TOTAL 787.2 105.7 Data omsented as no./L."
| |
| S.0. = Standard Deviation
| |
| . a i
| |
| | |
| . N O
| |
| 4 TABLE 34 .
| |
| ANALYSIS OF 2CCPLANKTCN PCPULAYCNS AT t.CCUST PCINT*
| |
| 16 June 1970 St"ti " 12 i3 TM l St tt " St'v'" 18 St'tf
| |
| * ie Mean nS.O. ' Mean t S.D. Mean S.O. Mean :
| |
| S.D.
| |
| RCTIFERA Asolancena pelocoeta Beacheocus ancutarts 8.7 '4.9 2.0 2.7 2.9 5.0 5.4 2.8 L _Mavemaer.sts .
| |
| Conocnitoicas so. 48.3 1.8 45.8 3.8 62.1 11.2 13.5 1.1 Filinta terminalls Ketticottta toncisoina 6.1 0.0 11.3 3.4 10.7 0.5 7.9 2.7 .
| |
| Keratella coenlearts 16.5 3.6 12.0 1.7 8.7 2.9 7.4 2.7 K quaccata 10.5 1.2 15.2 S.9 8.4 3.2 8.9 2.7 Nemolca spo.
| |
| Potvare ra app. 8.7 2.4 12.3 10.9 Pomenclyx sulcata 0.6 0.3 7.1* 1.7 Synceasta spp.
| |
| Trichocerca multterinis 4.4 2.5 3.0 2.7 1.0 0.3 2.3 0.4 Satotag 1 Cn.1 101.4 11.8 2.0 106.7, 2.8 52.3 4.0 CCPEPCOA Catanoid Copepeda Clacternus spp. 1.7 0.0 3.2 0.4 2.1 0.6 3.0 Eurytemora a#!nts 0.6 Immati.res. Ctactomus 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.4 2.2 1.8 2.3 0.4 1.9 0.9 Immati res, E affints 3.7 1.1 3.1 1.9 1.0 1.4 0.6 0.3 0.8 Nauplit, Calanoic 13.1 0.0 11.3 2.8 0.4 Cyclopoid Copepoca 7.S 1.4 8.8 0.0 Cyclocs bicuseteatus 15.3 0.S 13.3 5.5 6.8 0.3 0.4 2.0 L vernatts 73.5 10.4 77.7 8.5 28.1 8.3 46.S 0.0 Mesceyctees e<*ax Imrnatures, Cyclcos 137.5 11.0 103.2 1.1 65.0 1.4 81.1 3.8 Nauplit. Cyclopold 100.5 11.6 72.1 8.2 51.5 S4 total 346.8 4.3 57.4 12.4 37.3 283.8 6.3 163.4 3.2 207.8 17.2 CLACCCERA Atona sp.
| |
| * sosmina toncirestets 186.7 7.9 147.0 Certocaemnia sp. 25.3 20.3 13.5 100.0 2.0 Chveorus s:caericus 1.7 0.4 0.0 0.3 0.4 0.0 2.2 1.0 1.0 Caennia caleata 4.a 2.5 0.3 1.3 0.4
| |
| . O. parvuta 1.0 1.4 1.4 0.3 1.0 0.7 0.5 0.7 0.3 0.4 c retrectr=ve 137.5 8.5 149.0 19.3 122.8 5.5 93.4 3aonamosome so. 0.5 0.7 3.2 Ectosmica cocewel 121.8 1.3 117.4 7.2 53.3
| |
| (_sotocora kirette 5.2 70.1 10.3 Suetotal 452.9 15.5 416.8 51.0 229.2 3.4 255.0 11.4 PROTC2CA Otfflucta_sp.
| |
| * 7.0 4.8 1.5 ~
| |
| 0.0 2.1 0.6 1.5 0.7 TOTAL- 909.7
| |
| , 23.7 803.'4 45.5 50'1.3 10\1* 527.4 9.7 Cata pr esented as no./1 S.O. = Stancard Cavtat!on t
| |
| | |
| ' 87 TA81.E 34 CCNT. .
| |
| ANAL rSIS CF 2CCPLANKTCN PCPtJt.ATkCNS AT LCCUST PCINT*
| |
| to June 1976
| |
| .g.g ' station 1 Station 3 ' sen tim 6 statien 9 Meso S.O. Mean '
| |
| S.O. Mean S.O. Mean S.O.
| |
| ROTIFERA Asotancena ortodonta O.3 0.4 0.7 1.0 Brachiceus arcularis 2.2 1.8 2.2 1.7 1.8 0.5 3.2 0.2
| |
| & mavanaensts Concemitolces so. 21.4 1.1 6.7 3.4 88.7 7.5 Ft timia teminalls O.4 0.0 Kettleottia lent:tsolna 1.3 1.8 7.4 - . 2.7 3.5 1.0 8.9 1.1 .
| |
| Keestatta cocatearts 13.1 9.7 6.S 2.0 13.3 12.3 9.8 1.1 L cuacrata 15.3 0.6 6.7 0.5 7.6 1.3 NotPotea spp.
| |
| O.4 0.5 Polyamea spp. 5.7 0.6 10.5 Pemeno tyw sulcata 3.1 6.0 1.5 14.1 2.6 0.5 0.6 Syneneeta spp.
| |
| Tetchoceres multtertnis 0.5 0.6 0.5 0.7 0.4 0.5 Su:: total 38.4 49.0 3.7 4.8 38.9, 13.2 135.3 6.4 CCPEPCCA Calanoid Copepods Otaccomus spo. 4.8 4.3 0.5 0.0 2.8 2.9 3.0 1.5 Eurv*emcen afftnts O.4 0.5
| |
| !mmatures, Diactomus 1.8 1.2 2.2 1.7 1.1 0.5 2.4- 2.4 Immatures, E affiets 0.8 Nauplit, Calarcia 5.7 1.1 3.0 8.3 0.0 8.1 0.5 14.4 0.0 Cyc!ccoid Copepods Cveteos bicusoteatus 8.7 1.3 4.4 0.7 13.3 1.0 5.9 1.5 *
| |
| $ veenalis 258.4 68.2 99.0 24.7 100.5 12.3 35.0 9.0 Mescevetces edaw Immaa res, Cyclo;;s 260.6 6.7 137.7 29.1 135.8 1.0 86.1 13.2 Nauolit, Cyctepold 77.0 4.2 88.0 33.3 63.0 2.9 84.0 12.5
| |
| .S 4 total u16.9 74.3 340.0 22.0 324.5 17.2 231.8 33.9 CtACCCERA Atena sp. 0.5 0.6 Besmina foretrestris 1.4 2.0 149.7 20.7 130.1 15.4 157.2 7.4 54.4 5.2 Certocacenta so. O.3 C.4 Chveorus sceaericu.s 18.3 3.6 3.9 0.7 3.2 0.5 1.5 0.6 Caemnea caleata 0.8 1.1 0.7 1.0 0.4 0.6 g earvula 0.5 0.6 0.5 0.0
| |
| ,0. _ retreet.rva 0.2 0.3
| |
| * 90.1 15.2 102.4 143.4 93.5 3.4 159.9 8.3 Cimenanosome sp. 0.5 0.6 1.0 0.7 1.0 0.8 Euoosmica ecget 167.1 11.0 129.5 29.4 97.7 26.0 91.4 9.8 Lectocera ktnctti Suetotal 426.4 27.9 368.5 187.9 353.5 38.2 308.7 6.2 PROTC20A ,
| |
| Of f"tuota so. 1.3 0.6 1,. 8 0.4 1.1 0.5 1.7 1'.3
| |
| ~
| |
| TCTAL- 1C62.9 97.9 759.3
| |
| , 210.2 717.9 58 1. 677.5 32.8 Cata presented as no./l S.D. = Starcard Ceviation
| |
| | |
| 88 TABLE 34 CCNT. .
| |
| ANALYSIS OF 2CCPLANKTCN PCPtJLATICN$
| |
| AT LCCUST POINT
| |
| * 16 June 1976 7g Station 29 Station 27 sestt en 29 Stetten 29 Mean 1 S.O. Mean S.O. Mean S.O. Mean S.D.
| |
| ROT!FERA Asotanc%na pelooonta eraentonus anoutaris 2.3 1.1 5.3 2.6 1.9 0.0 1.3 0.4 8 4havanaensis Conoenitotees sp. 52.4 13.2 70.4 3.3 58.5 2.1 70.9 20.2 Fillnia termtnatts Kelticottta toretsoina 9.3 3.5 15.4 2.1 12.4 1.8 keratella cochtearts 17.3 S.O 5.3 0.4 S.O 2.6 10.3 0.0 L quaccata_ 5.4 0.3 l 0.3 9.9 10.8 3.2 11.3 2.7, Notholea spp.
| |
| Polvemen spp. -13.7 8.3 8.4 4.1 17.2 4.9 Pomeeotyw sulcata 1.1 1.5 1.0 0.8 Svnchaeta spp.
| |
| TeteWeeca muttlerints 1.7 0.3 2.1 0.5 2.0 0.0 Subtetat 101.9 4.1 117.7 8.2 107.7 S.0 95.2 23.3 COPEPCOA
| |
| * Catariold Copepods Otaccomus spp. 2.1 0.2 1.7 0.0 2.1 3.8 2.7 1.0 Eurveemora atttnts 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.0 Immatte es, Otactomus 1.7 0.3 3.S 1.5 3.0 0.0 3 . 2- 1.0 ImmatL.res, E afflets 0.4 0.5 1.9 1.5 1.5 0.6 1.3 0.4 Nasolti, Ca! M id 5.5 1.3 9.5 1.5 52.0 1.8 9.6 3.8 Cyclopoic Copepoca Cvetees bleuscldatus 5.3 2.1 10.1 1.2 S.2
| |
| * 0.8 13.5 3.8 L vernatts 37.9 5.5 36.8 10.3 14.3 3.9 41.7 ' 1.3 Mesocyetees edar ,
| |
| 0.3 0.4 Immatures. Cyclops 79.6 S.2 54.7 4.1 74.8 2.S 96.1 Nauplit, Cyclopold 11.0 99.4 32.4 70.S 0.5 52.0 1.8 68.6 1.4 Subtetal 233.7 41.2 198.8 3.9 205.1 5.5 236.8 18,.5 CLAOCCERA Atona so.
| |
| Bosmica loncfrostets 72.9 15.5 58.5 14.4 18.3 1.3 Ceef ocachnia sp. 55.0 12.7 Chycerus sceaerleus 2.5 0.8 0.5 0.7 1.5 0.3 0.6 0.8 Dacenta caleata 1.7 0.6 1.7 0.8 O gparwta 1.5 0.0 O. eeteceurva 0.5 0. Q' 256.3 22.3 135.7 S.2 165.2 Diaonanosema sp. 1.8 144.3 2.4 0.4 0.6 0.4 0.0 1.5 0.7 Euoosmica ecce; cat 52.2 2.1 75.2 8.8 61.5 Lactocera kinctit 1.1 74.5 1.4 Subtotal 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.4 385.9 8.1 273.1 2.3 2a7.8 0.2 288.0 15.1 PRCTCZCA Ot % fa_so. 1.3 0.3 1.3 0.6 3.5 0.3 2.0 1.3 TOTAL. 722.8 30.9 590.7
| |
| , 1.4 555.0 0,0 621.9 9.9 Cata peesented as no./t S.O. = Stancard Covtatton
| |
| . I i
| |
| i s ]
| |
| | |
| tSW TAst.E 34 CCNT.
| |
| ANAt.YSIS CF ZCCPt ANKTCN PCPt/CATICNS AT LCCtJST POINT
| |
| * 16 m 1976 TAXA S.D.
| |
| 1 RCT! FEMA Asotanerne petodonta 0.1 0.2 Becchionus ancutams 3.4 2.2 8 mavanaensfs Conoemitoices sp. 44.9 29.3
| |
| * Fttenta terminatts 0.03 0.1 Kettteottia fonciscina 7.9 4.5 .
| |
| Keratella eccetearts 10.8 4.0 L cuacrata_ 9.2 4.2 NotPolce app. 0.03 0.1
| |
| * Polvertree app. 9.S 4.6 Pomorotyx sulcata 0.2 0.4
| |
| _Syncreeta spp.
| |
| Tetemeceeca multicMnis 1.5 1.3 Sut, total 87.3 33.3*
| |
| CCPEPCCA Catanoid Ow_te Otactomus spp. 2.5 1.1 Eurytemoea afflets 0.1 0.2 lenmaturas, Diaotomus 2.4 0.8
| |
| !mmatures E affint s 1.0 0.9 Nawltl, Calanoid 12.9 12.6 Cyclopold Ccpepods Cyeteos bicusoidatus 9.2 3.8 i L vercalls 70.9 65.3 i
| |
| l Mesocyclocs edan 0.03 0.1 Immatures. Cyclops 110.2 54.6 j
| |
| Nauptlt, Cyclopold 73.7 16.7 9 Subtotal 292.5 120.9 j CLAOCCERA Atoca sp. O.2 0.4
| |
| ) Bosmina tonotrestets i
| |
| 99.2 53.3 Certodacenta sp. 0.1 0.2 Cdyearus semaerfeus 3.1 4.9 Oaommta catpata 1.2 1.2 O. osewta 0.2 0.2 E retrocurve 137.7 46.3 Otaomanosoma sp, 0.4 0.5 Euocamira corescot 92.7 35.3 Leetc.doen kinetti O.04 0.1 Subtotag 334.7 75.9 PROTOZCA OtM1uote sp. 2.2 1.S
| |
| ~
| |
| To7^' .
| |
| 706.7 156.2 Cata presented as no./t S.O. = Starcard Deviation 4
| |
| . _ - , , o .- - _, f r .-
| |
| | |
| Y:
| |
| APPENDIX ' C MULTIPLE REGRESSIONS WITH PHYTOPLANKTON AND ZOCPLANKTON POPULATIONS FROM 1974 AND 1975 AS DEPENDENT VARIABLES AND WATER QUALITY P/RAVETERS AS INDEPENDENT VARIABLES i
| |
| I
| |
| )
| |
| I 1
| |
| l
| |
| | |
| 91 o2 z . b 3k !i' $ E .
| |
| 5 (a L G R .
| |
| m0oo>
| |
| bH n 6
| |
| e 9s e a 2 3
| |
| $ wd Se 9
| |
| 2h8s b -Q B* Ig -
| |
| of z
| |
| 9 p
| |
| * a < a o 1 - -
| |
| m k~ $ ogem.N%
| |
| h tL $
| |
| 00 j g S ;; R R 0_8 gNgeg2E hh
| |
| ~
| |
| W $ k f k h h * **kNh g g o k! v f e=
| |
| Ei ! R m ''
| |
| ME $ a' ,
| |
| az e - -
| |
| 2 89 ar s-z 2
| |
| h E mea E^
| |
| ph ^ g g*sNa
| |
| <a z % o wh 8 $. wm }2_g.g.88eggergg$o 2
| |
| g a 14 g s www UE o ff hil55 hj3 Eg3{o o
| |
| z' m -
| |
| o 25 er W
| |
| m 5 ks 5rdedddkE43 doe 3 y -
| |
| W h o.
| |
| J
| |
| * gE H
| |
| a 't gg 8 5?hna3$
| |
| z , g sssas E_g a a ya- 4 W a a e a
| |
| g j 80388 h5m z? g u ,i isdad' eq :-
| |
| 3 o#
| |
| C 2, t i
| |
| EI a :: s
| |
| ! 2 8 3...
| |
| 2 823
| |
| '6 m :
| |
| I 8 4 ; m RjRao 53 -w S 3 3 gEW anCES s !
| |
| agg ! $5!"l 5 5 E28
| |
| $s E 0 .o 189 i
| |
| wg 2
| |
| 3 3 d m 2 m 2
| |
| ; 88 e a 8 5.8 ---..
| |
| f' . 50 5B us Q o tL gee OE
| |
| 'D %
| |
| . i- 0 2 9 a , ou 3 3 O "
| |
| 3 zJ d x g'.
| |
| E ! ' 5 E$
| |
| 8 e e =s ?!.s!s e ix 5! 0 0 St Ass 3d w --
| |
| -m - ee-r, ,_-%w--- e .,-r--+- p-- .-- --
| |
| | |
| DN
| |
| (
| |
| DN N E .
| |
| RO E
| |
| . AI DL 0 1 DA T N O A 3 Nt EI 2 AV PR 6 TEFEA SDODV T
| |
| N S E E 5R 7 E DL 2 9T N NB A 5
| |
| 7 1 EI 3 E A PR 5 DM NA C FEA AR MOOV 4 A T . )
| |
| 7 P N Y.
| |
| 9 E .M 1 Y I OI T C OT I
| |
| I F 3 INL A F A 7 RU E R I
| |
| 9 S E
| |
| UQ D OFA 2302S24S494 558587425 5000S269023434050546
| |
| . COV U 37 03t 5331 057 30586505 R L 97 25503047227994 0435 TE A 7 1 01 21 411 0275022 - 924 NT I
| |
| E V 8 - 3 - 1 2 - 1 2 3 -
| |
| R -
| |
| OA A O PW U 0 TL Q 76 SA S 3 UC R
| |
| - 0 1 CI T y r
| |
| ) ))
| |
| OM N e r c o 0
| |
| ( 80 L E l F 1 E u n e 2 ) e7
| |
| )((
| |
| rryu s
| |
| ) 0 DE t ayr1 01 ) 5 s (
| |
| TCi B 0 NL t
| |
| pria t 1 ))) ( ia eet r AD O 0 EB e ed pnnn(2 cpi s ooo 3 (((4t ne 5
| |
| d rttio nhe R PA et2 nnt pt a SN NA P 0 EIR r
| |
| embniii t t t r a aaa t
| |
| te y nl pa J
| |
| e y g *p to ue a sa t
| |
| s ric .
| |
| D t
| |
| eurt t t uu uecoolivck rut l InTTTSSSAMJJASOt DAPNSi i
| |
| OI L E NA 0 U V 3 TA 3 I i
| |
| AC LI L
| |
| A 8
| |
| t 5 L US V O
| |
| A PYOi l
| |
| F F3 3251 70450 050071 01 0 0206004 00 T PP 0 4
| |
| 6 G
| |
| O 1 1 00001 03 NL 1 2
| |
| 4 R 0000U0000 OA 3 1
| |
| 5 P TR 2 7 KE 0 3 NV E 4
| |
| 0 3 5 E 2054G7970 AE LS R 5 1
| |
| 7 2
| |
| U L
| |
| 7400241 01 NA 1
| |
| 24331 211 1
| |
| _ P D AU A 1 1 O V T N EQ YA MS :f H ,
| |
| 5 PE 6 4 3
| |
| 6 T 7 0 5 91 u510771 FA 5 0 5 09$ 950603 OD 9 4 9 7
| |
| 2 3 S 704 5501 06 2l D02b437 d S 3 1 5ub21 0662 r
| |
| OR I 0'J 0
| |
| 7 0
| |
| 5 2
| |
| LF E 30d33026Jr Rt 0 2 1 AOR I
| |
| 51 24 t 10032
| |
| : 7 1 1 7 1 22 SI E A 7 0 S T A 77G033070 SB M 1 2 0 3 RMU 46061 1 523 EM UF XX AUQ 41 73 3 RU SOf PS S CN Ed RlO I
| |
| ET LA S M S M PT I
| |
| E O 7 3 0 E O TS E D 1 3 5 E D 1 1 1 201 1 11 Ll R E R E UiT G E G E M1 EFR EFR W DOF DOF l
| |
| a T y t
| |
| o e c T N r n s n E f t u
| |
| yr u yru io d Di a t t io E s e NL ria C s t
| |
| EB ed pn s o nhe c pi ipt .4a R e r e PA l U r g
| |
| o r r r EI mbiwti r
| |
| eurt alathiti oas r. ct k o t O e r o DR TTTSDAPNS S R E C NA I V
| |
| ;: i
| |
| | |
| -- - . . . . .. . - . . ._ - -. . . -- - - - . ~ . - - - - . . . - .
| |
| 4 TABLE' 37 MULTIPLE
| |
| * REGRESSION OF HACILLARIOPflYCEAN POPULATIONS A'T LOCUST POINT DURINO 1974 ANO 1976 WITil 3 PHYSICAL WATER QUALITY PARAMETERS, STATION NUMOER, AND DATE I. STANDARD DEGREES MEAN DEVIATION SUM OI: COEFFICIENT OF OF OF MEAN Of:
| |
| sot >RCE FREEDOM SQUARES DEPENDENT DEPENDENl -
| |
| SQtJARE F vat.UE PROG >f R-SQUARE VARIATION (%) VARIABt.E VAltlAHtE Regression 13 46b59004867 3501466297 6.30 0.0008 0.092 103.1 22977 23685 Error 37 2075G914609 600397092 Corrected Total 50 67315070470 DECREES PARTIAL lNDEPENDENT OF SUM OF INDEPENDENT
| |
| /Af4 f AOL.E FREEDOM SQUARES f: VALUE PROOsF VARIAOLE B VALUES Temper.aturw 1 5407060104 0.64 0.0036 Intercept 194(D9 4
| |
| Turtsidity 1 2060170G36 6.33 0.0267 Temper.atur, , -8999 Transpuwicy- csj400140 (
| |
| 1 1.10 0.0030 Tuttaldity -570 I Stattosi 2 61b471400 0.40 0.0407 Transparency
| |
| -01974 Dato 0 24200751037 6.41 0.0003 Station 1 1636 Station 8 -4703 Station 12 or 13 3073 .
| |
| April (1) -2U 735 May (2) 44360 Jtsu (3) 12015 July (4) 45002 August (5) 65344 Septentaer (0) 11412 Octcher (7) -34710 Novenbor (0) -70538 Decorrdaer (9) -03410 --
| |
| 1 e'
| |
| | |
| ~1 DN N F .
| |
| RO E F AI J
| |
| .. O T DN L BA O
| |
| S NIA El I AV Pt l TEFEA SDODV T
| |
| 5S N 7 E E_ 7 9 RE Dt 7 1
| |
| N8 9 DE T N EIA 2 2
| |
| NM A PR E: 1 EA
| |
| . AA 4R M0DV 7A T .)
| |
| 9P 1 N .%
| |
| GY E i(
| |
| I NT C .I O 7 I
| |
| I RL I
| |
| F T 5 UA F A I 6
| |
| S DU Q E R E T Of A 2S2760036047960J52l 5 U 732S20007 NR COV L 5005831 63e09291 060 4 0243487 43060 E 201 6 230035221 431931 242 043 I
| |
| A OT E V 1 9 - 1
| |
| - 1 - 8 5 FA R A 6
| |
| - - - 2 -
| |
| TW f 0 B
| |
| * S .t 0 L .Q 0 UA S C - 3 OIC .R T 1
| |
| LM N e y r )
| |
| 6 ))
| |
| TlE AlC
| |
| .y 1 0
| |
| E DE t r
| |
| u c
| |
| n e 2 o (
| |
| ) r7 5
| |
| )((
| |
| e(
| |
| 09 rryr s
| |
| u G 0 NL t pri ayr1 81 )
| |
| ) ) ( a eot S D tmey hio t
| |
| 0 0 EB e ed ps nooo a.
| |
| n n 1
| |
| (2)3 ( 4 t ra
| |
| . N N 4 0 . PA npl ( ( s et 2 d
| |
| r r tnhe c T
| |
| pt a sa gpto vck ee e o ri t
| |
| O Pl EI a niii t ut t I
| |
| T A DR emt at eurt aaa s
| |
| t irywy pa E
| |
| t
| |
| : s. luuecoel >hii t l NA In TTTSSSAMA.JASONDAf t t 0
| |
| 3 AL LA U 3 I V NS
| |
| . . L 4 UCI A E PS V 5 L
| |
| B OY Pl F 1
| |
| :f 021 232972 e i >
| |
| A l' O 1 01 302040 T N O J 40000020 306500000 AL 7 7
| |
| 5 R CA 1 7 P 000000000 e CR 2 0 YE 3 3
| |
| 0 l V i E PE E 7 1
| |
| 10 7 U 7 60601 440 OS R 5 2 L 0 6 4. S. 0 2 2 5 0 I
| |
| R D NA 3 2 A 040053350 A N AU V 1 1 L A EQ L MS F I
| |
| C E A 2 6 BT A 0 4 7 ,
| |
| 0 7 4 090202652 FD S 7
| |
| 4 4
| |
| 9 6
| |
| 7 S 067505077 .
| |
| O 00 u324050 E 0 4
| |
| 2 3
| |
| 9 6
| |
| LFE 530257255 664033004 NR E R 9 1 1 A O R 204024302 I
| |
| 7 2 3 T A OI D SM M UFQ UA 9 6
| |
| 5 7
| |
| 7 6 R MJ AUQ t
| |
| 1 034 72722 23051 38 60 2011 237021 SU PS S 0 31 4 EN SOS 1 R
| |
| GN EO RIT EA S M S M LT E O E O PS I
| |
| ,E D 7
| |
| 1 3
| |
| 3 0
| |
| 5 E D 1 1 1 201 1 1 1 TH R E R E LT C E G E UI E:1 H EFR M W D0F DOF l
| |
| a t T o y N e :p T E r s u yu d DE ayraw E tM t
| |
| e NL r s o s
| |
| rs ed xg n t t C s t
| |
| EB tnhpt ea pna ni o r c R e o e PA t r r EI ea b rla.c J
| |
| t O
| |
| 0 r r r DR mt mtal eurt r at k lotiil
| |
| _
| |
| * o S R E C NA I J TTTSDAPNS 1 i
| |
| | |
| . _ _ _ . . _ . . _ . . - =_ _. .
| |
| TADLE 39 -
| |
| MULTIPLE REGRESSION OF CitLOROPifYCEAN POPULATIONS AT LOCUST FCINT DURING 1974 AND 1975
| |
| , WITil 3 PitYSICAL WATEll QUALITY PARAMETEllS, , STATION NUMBER AND DATE STANDARO DEGIEES MEAN DEVIATION SUM Ot OF COEFFICIENT OF OF MEAN OF SOURCE FREEDOM SQUARES DEPENDENT DEPENDEN''
| |
| SQtJARE F# VALUE PROG)F R-SQUARE VARIATIOM%) VARIABLE VARIABLii Regression l 13 97U7S0022 75200S2S 2.47 0.0165 0.46S 108.5 6883 6518 Error 37 11207S6400 30452870 Corrected Total 50 2105507028 DEGREES PARTIAt.
| |
| INDEPENDENT OF SUM OF ENDEPENDENT JARIAOLE FREEDOM SQUARES F VALUE PROGW VARIAOLE O VALUES Temperature 12040423 1 0.40 0.5333 Intercept 2SO9 O TurtAdity 44710404 1 1.47 0.2333 Torvipurature
| |
| * 42S Tran:.psswewy I t u tti23J9 0.03 0.4328 Tus121dity -70 St.atica s 2 63005170 0.06 0.5004 Transparency Dato -5432 8 50274U840 2.43 0.0316 Station 1 1529 Station 8 -781 Station 12 or 13 -748 .
| |
| Apctl (1) 227 i May (2) -4707 Juno (3) *
| |
| -2233 July (4) -6245 '
| |
| August (S) -4944 Septenter (8) -3SS Octateer (7) 6072 Noverveer (6) 0028 Decemtier (9) 2337 , e
| |
| : m. e l
| |
| | |
| TAGLE 40 MULTIPLE REGRESSION Of:
| |
| CitLOHOPitYCEAN POPULATIONS AT LOCUST POINT DURING $074 ANO 1975 WLTit STATION NUMUCit, DATE, AND SEVERAL PilVSICAL AND CitEMICAL WATER QUALITY PARAMETERS ,
| |
| t STANDARD DEGREES SUM MEAN DEVtATION Of OF COEFFICIENT OFr OF MEAN OF SOURCE FREEDOM SQtJARES DEPENDENT DEPENOCN1 SQtJARE F VAltlE PROGDF R-SQtjARE Regression VARIATIOP(%) VARIAHt.E VARIAOL E 17 150u316677 081724510 4.00 0.0001 0.716 82.4 5183 4254 Erroc 33 507100550 10006663 Corrected Total b0 2toS50722a DEGREES PARTIAL lNOtIPENOtENT OF SUM OF
| |
| /ARIAULE INDEPENDENT FRECOOM SQUARES F VALuti PROG >F VARIABLE 8 VAtUES Temperaturo 1 20032u07 1.14 0.2934 latercept Tuttalthty 60501 1 43414325 2.40 0.1309 Terrporature.'
| |
| Trant. gor uem:y 1 -1871 1201u624 L tation 2 '62600053
| |
| .0.71 1.73 0.4042 0.1011 Turtaldity -200 h Dato u Transparmwy -5445 613000202 4.24 0.0017 Stetton i Alkalinity 1 105740770 1778 f%3sphorus 6.04 0.0213 Station 0 -1518 1 077500 0.05 0.0271 NLtrato Stattori 12 oc 13 -200 1
| |
| 332tl73301 18.30 0.0001 Silica 1 01130400 AprtI (1) -16641 4.40 0.0419 May (2) 1202
| |
| .Jurma (3) 7909 July (4) 3703 AuyJat (5) 11413 Septerrcer (6) 6407 October (7) -1042 Nowtrber- (U) 071 Decerveer (9) -13702 ,
| |
| AIkatinity -500 Pho: phorus -4775 Nitrate 2404 Silica 7465 e
| |
| se
| |
| | |
| C%
| |
| (
| |
| * a ON 1N E ,
| |
| RO E AI D L DT NB 1 NR EtA 5 9
| |
| AV Pn 3 TEFEA 6 SDODV T
| |
| N E E DB L 9 N 0 5
| |
| 7 N EIA 1 9 A PR 5 2
| |
| 1 EFEA D MOOV N .)
| |
| A T .%
| |
| N 4E 7 E N I ,
| |
| 9 T C O 1 A I 1
| |
| D F TI 4 G F A 1 E RI 2 S RIND N OFA E
| |
| . U A COV U 9054e6007 o0S3200 L 57 007 3 502t 8 0 u060 D .
| |
| A 948 1 01 0028 952090 2 R E V 1 101 8 05 601 9t 02043 T
| |
| N B E R -
| |
| 01 2 01 4381 351 I 3 - 1 4-A 5 O OM U 7 FU Q 0 T N S
| |
| - 0 3 SN R T
| |
| * 1 UO N y r
| |
| )
| |
| 6 ))
| |
| CIT E e c o ( 09 F 3 r n )((
| |
| OA ) 0 DE u e i 01 2) ) e7 LT TS O
| |
| O 0
| |
| 0 NL t t ayr EB priuinnn(23) e ed t 1 )) ( e 5 ss t
| |
| ( rr ee rt a ad A,
| |
| .P R 0 PA cpl a wiii EI r nt a t taaa ooo l ( (4 t momr
| |
| ( s et utvc a
| |
| o eo y
| |
| S S leyeyDpt A ter ss t E
| |
| DR pa uu nl uecoe NR NV I n eurt t t 1
| |
| O E U. 0 2 I rrfSSSAMJ JASOl D f 4 I TE T t A
| |
| E L AMLA V 5 B UR F F> 331 04 AP T OP A 2 n 1 O 25000 704 0 P 2 0 1 001 0 R
| |
| N TY 4
| |
| 1 1
| |
| 7 P 00000 AI 1 2 1
| |
| EL 3 1
| |
| 7 E CA E 3 2
| |
| 0 U 8 5900 YU R 7 1
| |
| 0 L 50472 HQ NA 1 2 A 2371 3 P R AU V 2 O E EQ X MS :
| |
| Y T f
| |
| A M W 2 G 0 F L 0 U 7 4 5 0 03027 OA 0 0 9 00201 4 7 NC S 4 1
| |
| 0 S 35:
| |
| 40300 E 0 n 0 L A :f E o3260 1 2 OSI I
| |
| R 3 k t 2 L OR u4043 SY l A 0
| |
| 4 0
| |
| 7 8 7
| |
| T A 091 1 004 3 8 7 Si M J 2 0 3 RMU EP t UFQ t
| |
| 2 1 3 AUQ 3202 PSS 71 00 1 81 7 h t G3 SOS EH RTI EW L
| |
| PI S M S M E O E O T C D 3 1
| |
| 7 3
| |
| O G E D L R E 1 1 1 20 R E U .
| |
| C E G E M EFR EFR .
| |
| DOF DOF l
| |
| t a T o N e y
| |
| T E r c n u n o d OEs t ayr e C i s e r L ra apn t
| |
| C s t
| |
| c EH ud R e r o e PA p62 nio-r r E! R U
| |
| O g
| |
| e r
| |
| r r o mtr rat nto D A euria S H E C N J TTTLD I
| |
| | |
| TAGLE 42 4
| |
| MULTIPLE REGRESSION OF MYXOPHYCEAN POPULATIONS AT LOCUST POINT DURINO 1974 AND 1975 WITH. STATION NUMBER, DATE, AND SEVERAL PlfVSICAL AND Cl4EMICAL WATER QUALITY PARAMETERS l STANDARD MEAN OEvlAIION DEGREES SUM OF Of COEFFICIENT OF lOF MEAN 01: OCPENDENT DEPENDEN1 SOURCE FREEDOM SQUARES EX3tJARE F VALUE PROO)F R-SQUARE VARfATIOPY1C) VARIABL E" VAfifABL t.*
| |
| Ro0ression 17 2b3720170693 '14924715923 6.31 0.0001 0.765 192.9 25199 48619 Error 33 700000403u3 2363037U30 Corrected Total 50 331720010078 OEGREES PARTIAt INDEPENDENT OF SutA OF INDEPENDENT
| |
| /ARIABLE FR EEDOM SQUARES F VALUE PROG)F VARIAEILE B VALUES lemperaturu 1 2499117630 1.05 0.3821 Intercept 620408 g)
| |
| Turteidity 3270717852 1.30 1 0.2473 Temperature * -12007 G '
| |
| T r.v u. nruncy 1 46u055uu032 19.40 0.0001 Turtidity 1014 beativo 2 12130100310 2.57 0.0904 Transparency 324446 ,
| |
| O. ate 0 079057tEGO7 3.tiO O.0044 Station i 14050 .
| |
| Alkalinity 20002300078 0.0064 1 8.40 Station 8 -24492 Paw >prorus 1 b25469700 0.22 0.0404 Station 12 or 13 10442 PJitrato 1 10770330014 7.09 0.0110 April (1) al36232 Silica 1 6s021 0.00 0.00bo May (2) 23084 .
| |
| June (3) 07333 July (4) 72808 August (S) 231120 Septenter (6) 41070 j
| |
| Octtbor (7) -47067 tJovenbec (0) -Ultso n Decondaer* (9) -190301 .
| |
| * Alkalinity -t472 Phobphorus 116046 i
| |
| i Nitrate .17000 Silica -213 .
| |
| r o
| |
| _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - _ - -, i--- --- m g --
| |
| | |
| ~ . - - _ ._- - - .
| |
| ~
| |
| TABLE 43 MULTIPLE REORESSION OF 2OOPLANKTON POPULATIONS' AT LOCUST POINT (yJRING 1974 AND 1975 WlH13 PliYSICAt. WATER QUAllW PARAMETERS, STATION NUMBER, AND DATE STANDARD DECREES SUM MEAN DEVIATION OF OF COEFFICICNT Of: OF MEAN OF SOtJRCE FREEDOM SQUARES DEPENDENT DEPtENDEN SQUARE F VALUE PROO)F R-SQUARE VARIATIOM%) VARIABLE RegreLLlan van tat 3L E 13 10013418 770263 13.75 0.0001 0.829 39.2 004 237 Ceror 37 2072429 56042 Corrected Total 50 12035047 DEGRtfES PART1AL INDEPENDENT OF C,UM OF INDEPENDENT
| |
| /ARIAllL E FREEDOM SQUARES F VALUE PROOW VARfAOLE D VALUES Temperaturu 370S00 1
| |
| 6.02 0.0143 Intercept -662 Turunotty 1 26Gud 0.40 0.4943 Terry >araturo h
| |
| 74 Trannuruncy 1 60523 0.90 0.3404 btation 2 794217 Tusbidity . -2 7.09 0.0020 Transparoncy 279 (Ante 0 6087600 11.20 0.0001 Station 1 106 Stattun 0 -130 Station 12 or 13 -40 .
| |
| Aprit (1) 232 3 May (2) -104 Juru (3) 600
| |
| * July (4) -100 August (5) -004 Septenbar (6) -000 October (7) -19 Novuntser (0) 165 Decomt2er (9) 000 .
| |
| e h
| |
| | |
| TADLE 44 MULTIPLE
| |
| . REGRESSION OF ROTIFETt POPUL.ATIONS AT LOCUST POINT DURING 1974 ANO 1975 WITil 3 PtrtSICAL. WATER QUALITY PARAMETERS, STATh0N NUMOER, AND DATE 4
| |
| * STANDARO DEGRCES MEAN DEVIATION SUM COEFFICIENT OF OF 5 OF OF MEAN OF OEPENDENT SOORCE FREEDOM SQtJARES DEPCNDEN'I SOlJARE f: val _UE PROB >ft R-SQtJARE VARIATIOM%) VARIABLE val 41ABL E Regression 13 1547476 189037 4.13 0.0005 0.592 08.1 249 170 Error 3T 10G'2930 20003 '
| |
| Corrected Total 60 2d13482 DEGREES PARTIAL INDEPENDENT OF SUM OF INDEPENDENT i
| |
| /ARIABLE FREEDOM SQtJARES F VALUE PROB >l VARIABLE B VALUES
| |
| * a Temrecatuni 1 2331 0.0a 0.7777 Intercept 354 Tudaldaty 't 11420 0.40 0.5327 Temperature * -0 h Trant,psruncy 1 463 0.02 0.0000 Turt>1dity -t
| |
| *>tation 2 316011 5.40 0.0003 Transpironcy 20 Datu o 60tt4,7 2.43 0.0315 Station 1 113 Station 8 -99 Station 12 or 13 -14 .
| |
| April (1) -106 1
| |
| May (2) -42 '
| |
| June (3) 19 July (4) 371 i
| |
| August (5) 100 .
| |
| Septent>er (6) 63 .
| |
| Octcher (7) -190 Nowniser (8) -116 ,
| |
| Decont>er (9) ~48 .
| |
| 1
| |
| -t l
| |
| e 5
| |
| | |
| TADLE 45 +
| |
| MULTIPLE RCCRESSION OF COPEPOD TOPULATIONS AT LOCUST POINT OURING 1974 AND 1975 WITil 3 PitYSICAL WATER QUALITY PAllAMCTERS, STATION NUMOER, ANO DATE STANDARD MEAN DEVIATION OECREES SUM COEFFICIENT Ott Of:
| |
| Ot: Of: MEAN OF DEPENDENT OEPENDENT SOtJHCl? FREEDOM SQtJARES SQUARf? F VALUE PROR>f: R-SQUARE VARIATIOf(%) VARIAOLE 'VAftlAOLE Regresston 13 030300 04505 8.05 0.0001 0.600 60.2 151 103
| |
| , Error 37 394601 10GG7 Corrected Total 50 12J4209 OEGREES PARTIAL.
| |
| * INDEPENDENT OF SUM Of: INDEFENDENT
| |
| /ARIAOLE FREEDOM SQtJARES F VALUE PROtuf: VARIAOLl? O VALUES .
| |
| Temper.ituru 1429 Turtsidity 1
| |
| 0.13 0.7164 Intercept g 130 C 1 500 0.00 0.0854 Tengwraturu 5 Tranagurency I 0041 0.00 0.3470 Turtidity -O btation 2 10360 0.40 0.6244 Data Transswarwelcy -122 a 405123 6.09 0.0002 Station 1 22 Statton 8 -t3 Station 12 or 13 -t1 -
| |
| April (1) -90 May (2) 111 Juru (3) 247 July (4) 62 Au>Jst (5) -00 Septervtor (0) -57 October (7) -54 Nownuar (a) -73 Decent >er (9) -50
| |
| * I
| |
| ~
| |
| TABLE 40 f.ULTIPLE RE084CSSION OF CLADOCERAN POFWTIONS AT LOCUST POINT DURINO 1974 ANO 1975 WITil 3 PifYSICAL WATER QUALITY PARAMEMEllS, STATION NUMBER, AND OATE l STANDARD MCAN OCVIATION DEGREES SUM COEFFICIENT Of OF OI: OF MEAN Of:
| |
| OEPENDENT DEPENDEN" FREEDOM Mh ntCE SQUARES SQUARE F VALLIE PROEDf: R-SQUARE VARIATIOP(%) VARIABL E ' VARIABLl?
| |
| RcOrer.ston 13 232761 21751 0.0001 0.652 5.34 71.0 90 -
| |
| e4 Error 37 1b0304 4070 Correctud Total 50. 43.3505 DECREES PARTIAL lNDEPEf40ENT OF SUM OF INDEPF.NDENT JARIABLE FREEDOM SQUARES F VALUE PROB >F VARIABLE D VAltJES Ten nperature 57592 Turbidity T ransgurwx:y 1
| |
| 1 1342 07 14.13 0.33 0.0000 0.b69t3 Intercept Temperatuns
| |
| -357 29 f 1 0.02 0.0u40 Turistdtty -o Stattuen 2 2048 0.36 0.7120 Transparency -12 Dato 0 207013 0.38 0.0001 f.kation 1 8 Station 8 -Il Station 12 or 13 3 Aprit (1) 154
| |
| * May (2) -28 June (3) . -37 July (4) -172 August (5) =024 Septeryt>er (6) -1b0 Octd>er (7) 157 Noveryt>er (8) 134 Decerrter (0) 259 ,
| |
| ~ . - - --
| |
| | |
| 103
| |
| .~
| |
| APPENDIX D BENTHIC MACROINVERTEBRATE POPULATIONS FROM LOCUST POINT, LAKE ERIE MARCH - JUNE 1976
| |
| | |
| .ww v
| |
| TABLE 47 ANALYSIS OF SENTHIC MACROINVERTESRATE POPUL.ATICNS AT LOCUST POINT
| |
| * 18 MARCH 1975 Tm IStatton 1 ' Sta tion 8 I Sta tion 13 fMean/
| |
| y,,e 9y , ,,, , , g q_,_ i v,,n q m i c e,e m S.C.
| |
| ANNELICA Citgochaeta Imman. ares (no hata= setae: 127.3 48.1 31.5 55.1 178.3 181.5 112.5 74.4 ARTHRCPCOA AmpNpoca Gammen.as fasciatus 6.4 11.0 12.7 22.1 6.4 6.4 Chironomadae a ,
| |
| CrycrocNewomus sp. 12,7 22.1 Suotocat 4.2 . 7.3 6.4 11.0 12.7 22.1 12.7 22.1 10.6 3.6 MOLLUSCA Pelecypoca Ametoma sp. 6.4 11.0 2.1 3.7 Cadruta so. e.4 11.0 2.1 3.7 Swtotal 12.7 22.1 4.2 7.3 TOTAL 133.7 38.2 $7.3 50.5 191.C 163.2 127.3 67.1 Catm presented as no./m2 S.D. = StaMard Deviation S
| |
| | |
| 105 TABLE 48 ANALYSIS OF BENTHIC MACROINVERTEBRATE POPULATIONS AT LCCUST POINT
| |
| * 9 AFRIL 76 YAXA Station s . Scatten 3 Station at St ation 7 Mean S.O. Mesa S.O. Mean S.O. Mean S.O.
| |
| CCELENTERATA Hydra so. (single' polyp)
| |
| Hyces sp. (budding polyp) S.4 11.0 Setotal S.4 11.0 ANNELICA Hirudtnea Heloedella stagnatts 12.7 22.1.
| |
| H. tbsca Ottgocnaeta S.4 11.0 Immatures (no hata= setae) 6.4 11.0 1592 '105.2 369.3 415.1 1935.5 425.9 Immattares ( hate setae) S .4 11.0 Branchyura newereyt S.4 11.0 57.3 83.3 t tmnocetlus cervur S.4 11.0 S.4 L. clamarecearus 11.0 S.4 11.0 12.7 22.1 12.7 11.0
| |
| [L. ciaoerecasrus - cervix .
| |
| L . _maumtensis 19.1 L. uceuemianus 19.1 Potamothetx moldaviensis S@cotat S .4 11.0 6.4 11.0 171.S 95.5 394.7 458.5 2C62.8 368.4 ARTHROPCOA Amphipoda
| |
| . Ga menarus fasetatus 19.1 Tricnopters - 0.0 50.9 72.3 Psychomyta sp.
| |
| Cntronomacae Chironomus so. 44.6 77.2 44.5 77.2 Crveteenarceomus so. S.4 11.0 25.5 29.2 31.8 11.0 Procladius so. S.4 11.0 Tanvtar we sp. S.4 11.0 S dCCC81 S.4 11.0 95.5 50.5 133 .7 133.7 -
| |
| MOLLUSCA Pelecypoda Arretema sp.
| |
| TOTAL .
| |
| 12.7 22.1 171.9 95.5 490.2 52.9 ,2196.5 483.2 . .
| |
| Cata presented no./m.2 S.C. = Standsed Ceviation
| |
| | |
| 106 i
| |
| TABLE 48 CONT.
| |
| ANALYSIS OFr OENTHIC MACRCINVERTEBRATE POPULATICNS AT LOCUST POINT
| |
| * 9 APRIL 1976 T* l Station 8 'Stanen 9 Sta tion 11 t St ation 12 I vean s.o. v ev, s.o. ' veans.o. Mean s.o.
| |
| CCELENTERATA Hydra sp. (single polyp) 19.1 33.1 Men sp. (budding polyp)
| |
| S4 total 19.1 33.1
| |
| * ANNELICA Hirvoinea Hetoedetta stacnalls 12.7 22.1
| |
| : d. Naca Ot tgocnneta ,
| |
| Immatures (no hair setae) 50.9 72.3 121.C 29.2 76.4 19.1 38.3 66.2 Immatures ( hate setae)
| |
| BrancMura sowereyt Lamnocestus cervtn
| |
| _L. cla:areceanua L. etaperecuarus - cervtac
| |
| ,L . maumsensis
| |
| ~L. ucememiarus Potamothetx moldaviensis 6.4 11.0 Setotal 50.9 72.3 133.7 19.1 82.8 29.2 38.2 58.2 ARTHROPCOA Amphtpoda Ga mmarus Pasclatus 6.4 11.0 6.4 11.0 Trscnoptera Psychomyia sp. 5.4 11".O Cnsronomscne CNeonomus so.
| |
| Crvotochtrenomus so. 19.1 19.1 Procladius sp.
| |
| Taevtarsus so. 6.4 11.0 19.1 S @ totat 19.1
| |
| :2.7 11.0 25.5 11.0 5,4 11.0 19.1 19.1 MOLLUSCA Pelecypoda Amatema sp.
| |
| TCTAL . 63.7 77.2 179.3 89.1 48.1 29.2 57.3 68.9 Cata presenteo as no./m.'
| |
| S.D. = Stancard Ceviation
| |
| | |
| 107 4 .
| |
| TABLE 48 CCNT.
| |
| ANALYSIS CF SENTHIC MACRCINVERTEERATE POPULATIONS AT LCCUST PCINT
| |
| * 9 APRIL 1976 l Station 13 Station 94 Station ,s St atton te IMean S.O. Mean S.O. vnn S.0. Mean S.O.
| |
| CCE1ENTERATA Hycra so. (sin 9te ' polyp) 6.4 11.0 Hycen so. (buccing potyp) 6,a 11.0 Setotal 12.7 22.1 .
| |
| ANNELIDA Hirudines Heloodella stagnatts H. fusca Ot tgocaneta .
| |
| Immatures (no hala= setae) 53.7 39.8 1053.2 7C8.1 25.5 29.2 31.8 22.1 Immatures ( hatr= setae)
| |
| Bronchyura Bower *Jyt 6.4 11.0 t_tmrvsorttus cervt.x 6.4 11.0
| |
| _L. clacerecears.ts 19.1 33.1
| |
| _L. etacarecearus - cervlac .
| |
| g . maurntensts 6.4 11.0 L. vcekemiarus heamotnetx moldaviensis 6.4 11.0 25.5 22.1 19.1 19.1 S 4 tocat 70.0 44.1 1125.9 775.1 25.5 29.2 50.9 39.8 ARTHRCPCCA Amphipoda
| |
| _Ga mmarus fasciatus 6.4 11.0 6.4 11.0 Tr scnoptera Psychomyta sp.
| |
| Cntronomicae CNronomus so. 12.7 11.0 Cryctochtrecomus so. S.4 11.0 31.S 22.1 Pvladius sp.
| |
| TarM:arsus sp.
| |
| Setotag 12.7 11.0 38.2 19.1 12.7 11.0 MCLLUSCA Pelecypoda Amblema sp.
| |
| TOTAL . 82.8 39.9 1177.9 755.9 25.5 29.2 63.7 29.2 Cata presented as no./m.2 S.O. = Standard Cevtation
| |
| | |
| 10t$
| |
| TABL!!" 48 CCNT.
| |
| ANALYSIS CI: BENTHIC MACRO!NVERTEBRATE PCPULATICNS AT LCCUST POINT
| |
| * 9 APRIL 1976 Station 17 i Station 18 Statton 26 i St ation 27 Mean S.D. I Vaan 5.0. Mean S.0. Mean S.O.
| |
| CCELENTERATA Hydra sp. (stngie pot >9) 11.0 6.a Hyera sp. (budding polyp)
| |
| S4tocat e.4 11,o ANNELIDA HirVdtnea Hetencetta stapits 12.7 11.0 U* -
| |
| Cligoc.caeca .
| |
| Immatures (no bair setae) 165.5 61.4 398.4 204.2 503.0 487.1 2345.9 625.4 Immatures ( hatr= setae)
| |
| BrancNvura sowertryt 6.4 11.0 44.6 29.2 Lirnnodettus cervt.x 6.4 11.0 L. claasreceanus 6.4 11.0 31.8 39.8
| |
| 'L clacarwesanus = cervix 12.7 11.0
| |
| ~L . maumaensts .
| |
| 19.1 19.1 I-. vcexemianus 6.4 11.0 25.S
| |
| ~Potamoenrix moldavtansis 44.1 70.0 44.1 12.7 11.0 31.8 29.2 S@ccant 235.6 lC5.2 413.9 226.3 515.7 506.4 3C24.2 729.4 ARTHACPCOA Amphipoda
| |
| . Ga mmarum fasciatus 6.4 11.0 Tescncocera Psychomyta sp.
| |
| Cnaronomicae Chironomus sp. 6.4 11.0 11.0 6.4 6.4 11.0 12.7 11.0 Ceyeteentrenomus sp. 23.S 29.2 31.8 22.1 33.2 38.2 33.2 0.0 Pvtadius sp.
| |
| Tava sus sp.
| |
| Sut> total 31.8 23.2 44.S 29.2 44.3 33.8 50.9 11.0 MCLLUSCA Pelecypoda Arnblema sp.
| |
| 12.7 11,0 TOYAL *
| |
| '267.4 tCS.3 458 .4 234.7 573.0 525.5 3081.5 710.6 Cata presenteo as no./m.2 S.O. = Standarc Ceviation k
| |
| | |
| sw TABLE 48 CCNT.
| |
| ANALYSIS CF BENTH1C MACRCINVERTEBRATE POPUt ATIONS AT LCCUST POINT
| |
| * 9 APRIL 1975 i Statten 29 l Stattm 29 Mean/
| |
| IMean S.D. 9 Mesn S.D. Sta tion S'O' COELENTERATA Hydra sp. (singte polyp) 6.4 11.0 2.5 5.0 Hycru sp. (budding pctyp) 0.4 1.5 S@ tout 6.4 11.0 2.8 5.4
| |
| * ANNELCA Htrudtnea Heloocetta stacnalls 2.1 4.9 H. Nsca O '.4 1.5 OtIgochaeta Immatures (no hate setae) 483.9 493.0 140.1 48.1 470.4 751.9 tmmatures ( hate metae) 0.4 1.5
| |
| * Brancgura sowertryt 3.9 10.5
| |
| * Limnocettus cervtx 3.9 7.S L. clasarecearus 3.2 6.3 t . clamarecsanus = cor vix
| |
| ~[ . mawmtensis 6.4 11.0 6.4 11.0 3.2 6.3
| |
| ~L. ucexamianus 1.8' 6.1 Po ar ctnrix motcaviensis 25.5 29.2 38.2 50.5 13.4 18.9 S4CO3L 515.7 SC2.1 184.6 108.6 505.8 BC7.4
| |
| * ARTHROPCOA Ampetpoda Gammarus fasciatus 5.6 12.3 Tricxeters Psychomyta sp.
| |
| Charvnomicae O.4 1.5 Wmoms sp. .
| |
| CryctocMireecmus sp. 7.4 14.2 12.7 11.0 12.7 11.0 15.5 14.7 Proctacius so, o,4 g,g Tawns sp. g,g 4,3 S4 total 12.7 11.0 12.7 11.0 31.1 34.7 MCLLUSCA Petecypoda Arratema sp.
| |
| O.7 3.0 TOTAL 52a.4 SC9.1 203.7 Ga.1 540.1 ,930.2 e
| |
| l
| |
| '' Cata presented as no./m.2 S.O. = Standard Deviation 4
| |
| ,.. ' ~
| |
| | |
| 110 TABLE 49 ANALYSIS OF DENTHIC MACROINVERTESRATE' POPULATICNS AT LCCUST POINT
| |
| * 4 May 1976 -
| |
| TN l Station 1 l Statien 3 Station e i St.atten 7 I Mean S.O. I Mean F.O. von S.O. Mean s.0.
| |
| CCELENTERATA Hyora sp. (budding polyp)
| |
| Hyers so. (single polyp) 6.4 11.0 19.1 19.1 12.7 22.1 6.4 11.0 Subtotal 19.1 19.1 12.7 22.1 12.7 22.1 ANNELIDA
| |
| * Hirudleen Heloedelia Nsca H. stagnetts Otigochaata Immatures (hair setae)
| |
| Imenatures (no hatra setae) 95.5 116.2 266.5 193.8 490.2 204.2 178.3 Brancrrvura sowreyt 72.3 6.4 11.0 19.1 33.1 6.4 11.0 Limnocritus cervue 19.1 33.1
| |
| * L. ciaoerwcaanus 6.4 11.0 L. claceroemanus -ceMac L. maurniensis 12.7 22.1 L. ude*comtanus 6.4 11.0 -
| |
| Pe*ame".netx moldaviensis 6.4 11.0 Subtotat 116.2 331.1 95.5 254.3 522.1 248.5 184.6 79.5 ARTHROPOCA Ctadocera Lectodora k1mett! 31.8 29.2 19.1 19.1 Ampntpoca 6.4 11.0 89.1 55.1 Gemrr.arus fasc!atus 6.4 11.0 6.4 11.0 19.1 33.1 Olpte ra-Cetecr'omic as f2.7 11.0 l
| |
| Chironomus sp. 191.0 298.a 11.0 i S.4 12.7 11.0 31.8 11.0-Cryp*c:nironows sp.
| |
| Proctacius sp.
| |
| 6.4 11.0 12.7 11.0' l
| |
| Tany*arsus so. '
| |
| Epnemerestera Caants so. 12.7 11.0 Triceopterm
| |
| * s Polyesetro::us so.
| |
| Po:amvia sp. 6.4 11.0 Suetotat 241.9 320.4 38.2 19.1 44.S 44.1 152.8 66.2 MOLLUSCA Castropod,a '
| |
| SitNet tentacut sen .
| |
| Lyreneen so.
| |
| Petecypoca Lamositts so. s g
| |
| Prootera so.
| |
| S a totat TOTAL . 337.4 436.5 393.4 250.7 579.4 29'S.7 350.2 134.2 Data peesen:ed c.s no./m.2
| |
| * S.O. = Standtro Ceviattoa
| |
| | |
| 111 TABLE 49 CCNT.
| |
| ANAt YSIS OF BENTHIC MACRCINVERTEBRATE
| |
| * POPULATIONS AT LCCUST POINT * ',
| |
| 4 May 1976 -
| |
| Station e Statien 9 Station 11 Station 12 Mean S.O. Mean S.O. Mesn S.O. Mean S.O.
| |
| CCELENTERATA Rffra sp. (taudding polyp) 152.8 Hyces so. (single polyp) 169.8 121.0 94.2 . 6.4 11.0 Su stoca'L 164.6 204.2 106.2 90.3 19.1 337.4 231.0 229.2 184.2 19.)
| |
| 25.5 22.t ANNELIDA .
| |
| Hirudinea Hetoedella Neca l _H. stagnetts 6.4 11.0 Citgocnseca 6.4 11.0
| |
| * Immatures (hste setae) 6.4 11.0 Immatures (no hale setae) 350.2 474.6 4114.2 468.0 222.8 134.2 290.1 187.5 Branc.wra sewereyt Limnocritus cervix 6.4 11.0 19.1 33.1 6.4 11.0 25.5 29.2 L. etacareceanus L. etapereceanus -cervin L. maumtensts 6.4 11.0 11.0 6.4 ' '
| |
| L. udewomierus ,,
| |
| 6.4 i t '.O
| |
| ~Potamor.netx rroldaviensis 12.7 11.0 Setotat 6.4 11.0 350.2 474.6 5146.0 440.5 290.1 122.9 30S.0 231.6 l
| |
| l ARTHROPCOA Cladocers -
| |
| Lectodore ktndtti 38.2 38.2 Ampnipoda Gammanas fasciatus 121.0 96.0 63.7 67.1 O(ptera-Chirocomicae ' 6.4 11.0 i
| |
| Chironomus sp. 19.1 19.1 31.8 l 39.8 38.2 19.1 146.4 Cevocoentrenews sp. ! 38.2 19.1 39.8 Proctactus sp. 31.8 29.2' l
| |
| Tanytarsus so. ' .
| |
| 4 4
| |
| Eonemerepterm r 6.4 11.0:
| |
| Caenis so.
| |
| . Trienopters Polycentrecus sp. 3.4 11,0 Potamyta sp.
| |
| 12.7 11.0 S4 total 159.2 111.3 178.3 148.4 38.2 19.1 198.0 87.5.
| |
| MOLLUSCA Ga stropoda 8tthtnt tentacuta *a 12.7 22.1 Lyrnnsea sa.
| |
| Pelecypoca 6.4 11.0 Layosilts so. 6.4 11.C g Proctere so.
| |
| Suototat 6.4 11.0 * '*
| |
| ' 25.5 11.0 6.4 11.0
| |
| , TOTAL *, , 672.2 209.5 1559.3 164.7 i
| |
| 312.C l'16.7 522.1 235.7 '
| |
| Catl p. asented as no./m.
| |
| S.O. = Standses CeWation f
| |
| - . , ~ . . m - ~.
| |
| | |
| l 112 -l l
| |
| 1 TABLE 49' CONT.
| |
| ANALYSIS OF BENWIC MACRCINVERTEBRATE' POPULAT:CNS AT LCCUST PotNT
| |
| * 4 MAY 1975- -
| |
| TAXA Station 13 Station 54 Station is i Sr stion 16 M ens ' S.O. Men - S.D. Mesn S.O. Mean S.O.
| |
| CCELENTERATA Hydra sp. (budding potA) 19.1 19.1 Hycra so. (single polyp) 25.5 ' 9.2 2 12.7 Suetocat .
| |
| 11.C 44.S 29.2 12 7 11.0 ANNELIDA .
| |
| Hirudinea Helo5della fVaca
| |
| _H. s*J ona t t s Ot tgocmaeta -
| |
| immatures (hale sdtae)
| |
| Irnmatures (no hale setae) 166.5 77.2 643.0 3CS.8 121.C 39.8 184.6 121.3 Branchyurs sower */yt 6.4 11.0 Liennocettus cervtw ' 31.8 29.2 12.7 22.1 L. clacerecearus
| |
| * L. claonreceanus - cervtx L. maumiensis 12.7 11.0 12.7 11.0
| |
| {. ucewemiarus 6.4 41.0"
| |
| _Potamocnetx molcavf ensis 6.4 11.0 ,
| |
| S w tocal 19.1 33.1 203.6 1C5.3 674.3 304.6 121.0 39.8 222.8 154.4 ARTHROPCCA ,
| |
| Ctadocera Leotodora ktncett 25.5 44.1 38.2 $0.5 12.7 22.1 19.1 33.1 Amphipoca Gammarus fasetatus 6.4 11.C Otstera-Chironomicae ~~ i Chironomua so. l 6.4 11.0 75.4 GS.2 $0.9 48.1 31.8 11.0 Cryotoentreco-rus sp. S.4 11.0 25.5 29.2 25.5 11.0-Proctactus 33. '
| |
| Tanvtarsus so.
| |
| Epnemeroptera .
| |
| Cnents sp.
| |
| Tetenoptera Potveent cous sp.
| |
| Potamvia sp.
| |
| Subtotal 31.8 39.8 121.0 111.9 95.5 50.5 7S.4 33.1 MCLLUSCA Gastropoda Bf tMni tentaculata Lymnsea sp.
| |
| Pelecypoca Lamosilts sp.
| |
| Proctora sp. g Subtotal
| |
| * TOTA , 230.1 109.6 783.8 394.8 229.2 83.3 299.2 187.5 Cat 5 presented as no./m.
| |
| S.O. = banewc Ceviation
| |
| | |
| 113 TABLE 49 CCNT.
| |
| ANALYSIS OF DENTHIC MACRCINVERTEBRATE POPut.ATICNS AT LCCUST PCINT
| |
| * 4 MAY 1976 "
| |
| TAXA Station 17 sastion sq Saatton a Seacton 2r Mean S.O. Mean S.O. Mean S.D. Mean S.O.
| |
| CCELENTERATA Hycra sp. (buddin9 polyp)
| |
| Hydra sp. (singte polyp)
| |
| * 50.9 88.2 . 6.4 '11.0 Suutocat 6.4 11.0 38.2 66.2 6.4 11.0 99.1 154.4 6.4
| |
| ~
| |
| 11.0 ANNELICA .
| |
| Hirudinea Hotebdet ta RJaca H. stagnalts Cit 9oen..ta 6.4 11.0
| |
| * Immatures (hate setae)
| |
| Immatures (no hate setae) 114.6 19.1 89.1 77.2 757.6 259.3 241.9 402.6 Branenwea sowerevi ..,
| |
| Limnocettus cervix L. clacarecearus 6.4 1 f.0
| |
| -L. claomrecearus -carvix L. maumtensts . ,
| |
| ~L. udekemiarus 6.4 11.0 Petamotnetz motcavionals 19 .1 19.1 12.7 Subtotal 22.1 19.1 33.1 .
| |
| 140.1 39.9 101.9 'G9.0 783.1 291.4 241.9 402.6 ARTHROPCCA .
| |
| Ctadocera Lectocora htncett 25.5 29.2 r
| |
| Amphipoca 31.8 29.2 25.5 29.2 Cammarus fasetams Ctptera-Cntronomicae CPtre%mus sp. '
| |
| 6.4 11.0 12.7 22.1 19.1 19.1 38.2 Cevotoentrenows sp. '
| |
| 19.1 19.1 63.7 68.2 110.3 57.3 57.3 184.6 214.7 '
| |
| Proctactus so.
| |
| Tanvtarsus sp.
| |
| Ephameroptera .
| |
| , Caents sp.
| |
| Trichoptern I Potvcentmoss sp.
| |
| Po'.amvia sp.
| |
| Suetotal 50.9 29.2 76.4 101.1 1C8.2 ' 44.1 222.8 278.3 MCLLUSCA Castropoda Githini tentaculata .
| |
| Lymmees sp.
| |
| Petecypoca
| |
| _' an psil t s sg , .
| |
| Prootera sp. g
| |
| ! e Suotocat *
| |
| * TOTAL . 191.0 69.9 184.6 187.5 906.3 4'29.4 496.6 716.4 I -
| |
| s .
| |
| Cata presented as no./m.2 S.O. = Stancsrc Ceviation i
| |
| | |
| 114
| |
| = = =
| |
| TABLE 49 CCNT. .
| |
| ANALYSIS OF BENTHIC MACACINWRTEBRATE POPULAT!CNS AT LCCUST POINT '
| |
| 4 MAY 1976 Y Station 79 l S*.atton 29 Mean/ l Mesn S.O. Mesn S.O. Statten S,c, CCELENTERATA Hyden sp. (budciing polyp) 25.5 22.1 Myers sp. (singte polyp) 21.6 44.3 89.1 138.2 29.0 Sintocal 114.6 151.5 4 9 .15 50.6 92.3-ANNELICA Hirv$inea Helo5dstia fusca 0.6 ;2.4
| |
| _H . stagnatis Citgocaseca 1.0 2.3
| |
| * Irnmatures (hale setae) 0.6 -2.4 Immatures (no nate setae) 1222.4 416.3 39.2 33.1 355.4 343.S Bennchyura sewereyt ' 3.5
| |
| , 6.3 timn:cettus cerytw 38.2 50.5 L. etacareenarus 7.8 12.5 5.4 11.0 1.0 '2.3 -
| |
| L. claomewarus- cervix
| |
| [L. maumiensis 38.2 50.5 S'O
| |
| . 9.7,'
| |
| L. usewemtarus 25.S 22.1 2.8 . S .3 Potamotnetx rnotenv(ensis S.7 Subtotat T.5 885.0 789.1 38.2 33.1 368.2 310.S ARTHRCPCCA . .
| |
| Ctadocera Lectodera kinct!! 38.2 39.2 S.4 11.0 22.6 Ampntpoca 21.7 l .
| |
| Ga-emarus fasciatus 19.1 19.1 14.5 Cister a-Chtrwmscae
| |
| { 30.6 Chironomus sp. I 89.1 122.S 51.5 Ceyc*oemtronows sp. 12.7 11.0 19.1 44.9 Proct actus sp. '
| |
| 19.1 27.9 43.S Tanv anus sp.
| |
| Epnamoroptera O.S 2.4 Caenis sp.
| |
| Tetenopters 0.7 3.0 Polycentrocus sp.
| |
| Potamyta sp. 1.0 2.3 Subcotal 0,7 3.0 127.3 1C9.S 44.6 29.8 111.1 S7.3 MCLLUSCA Ga strepoda 8tteint tentaculata Lymnsen so. 0.7 '3 . 0 Pelecypoca 0.5 2.4 La~osilts sp. )
| |
| Peco! era so. \ O.S 2.4 Suotetal O.S 2 . 4' 1.91 S.1
| |
| . TOTA'L ., 1539.0 S77.0 82.8 72.3 558.5 444.4
| |
| * Oata presented as no./m.2 S.O. = StancarS Ceviation
| |
| | |
| 1 15 b
| |
| TABLE 50
| |
| * ANALYSIS CF BENTHIC MACRCINVERTEERATE PCPOLAT!CNS AT LCCUST PC!NT*
| |
| .7 .%ne 1975 7g Sentien 1 i SMtten 3 Shtien 6 '
| |
| Stetten 7 Mean iS.O. -
| |
| Mean t S.O. Mean S.O. Mean S.O.
| |
| CCELENTERATA Hvdra sp. (budcing polyp: 63.7 39.8 12.7 22.1 12.7 22.1
| |
| ><vera spisWte polyp) 210.1 169.8 25.5 44.1 19.1 33.1 St etotal 273.4 203.s 38.2 66.2 31.8 55.1 -
| |
| ANNELICA - , -
| |
| Hirudensa Helobdetta Itneata .
| |
| Cligocnasta Immatures ( bate setae Immatures (no hate setae) 296.5 114.5 509.3 173.3 655.8 365.S 318.3 145.9 erenchvt.ra soweevi 12.7 22.1 19.1 19.1 44.5 48.1 Limnocetts.s carvur 38.2 50.5 31.8 29.2 L ctacam ceanus 12.7 22.1 b claoarecearus-cerv 1.x 6.4 11.0 b n-aefensis 38.2 19.1 19.1 0.0 19.1 33.1 6 udekemianus 6.4 11.0 Cchecommis semettna 31.8 55.1 70.0 67.0 Petarncert.x moldaviensis 6.a 11.0 S.4 11.0 ,
| |
| Subtotal 318.3 72.3 568.5 775.5 751.3 4C2.6 388.4 138.2 ARTHRCPCCA Cladocera Leotodera kincett 32.1 11.3 38.2 33.1 63.7 48.1 Ampnipoca Gammarvs faselatus 31.8 22.1 19.1 33.1 57.3 50.5 19.1 19.1 Hyatetla az-m S.4 ~ 11.'O Ciptara-Chironomidae Chironomus so. 19.1 19.1 8C2.2 1C26.2 19.1 19.1 12.7 22.1
| |
| } Caseeremus y 6.4 11.0 Cry =tecnieceems.s sp.
| |
| Proctactus sp.
| |
| . ~~arnstarsus sp.
| |
| Epnemercotara Caents sp. 19.1 19.1 6.4 11.0 19.1 0.0 Subtotal 70.0 22.1 878.6 1014.5 133.7 33.1 1Ce.2 44.1 MOLLUSCA Gastrepoca Gonfebasts sp.
| |
| Pelecypoca Ambtema so.
| |
| Fuscenata flava Liqumia sp.
| |
| Coaceuta sp.
| |
| 3 @ total
| |
| * TOTAL ,
| |
| 582.1 254.9 1553.5 1240.2 923.2 444.0 528.4 144.'6 Cata preserated as no./m2 S.D. = Stancarc Ceviattori 4
| |
| | |
| eev TABLE 50 CCNT.
| |
| ANALYSIS CF BENTHIC MACRCINVERTE8AATE PCPtJLATICNS AT LCCL3T PCINT*
| |
| 7 June 1976 TM S I'' ' I ** 8 S t*
| |
| * I'" 9 ' S '* " 1 i 5''t'
| |
| * 1 Mean t S.O. Mean S.O. Mean S.O. Mean S.O.
| |
| CCELENTERATA Hycea sp. (buedtrg polyp; 197.4 86.1 12.7 11.0 76.4 99.2 Hycea sp(single polyp) 191.0 119.3 12.7 11.0 89.1 39.8 S4 total 388.4 134.2 25.5 22.1 165.5 136.2.
| |
| ANNELICA Hirudenna Helobdella lineata Cligocneeta Immatures ( hair setae , 6.4 11.0 6.4 11.0 Immatures (no hals setas; 859.5 860.3 15C8.9 865.4 827.7 379.3 127.3 61.4 Branchvues sowerbyt 6.4 11.0 Limnoert tus cervbc 6 ctucarecearus 12.7 22.1 12.7 11.0 L claearecearus-cer vix b .maumisesis 12.7 22.1 12.7 22.1 ueewemiarus So.9 58.4 b,,ecocais sereereina ce n .o 6.4 ice.2 39.8 Potamotnet;c reotdaviensis 6.4 11.0 146.4 48.1 6.4 11.0 s agogag 897.7 910.2 1738.1 986.4 846.8 384.1 235.6 29.2 ARTHRCPCCA Cladocara -
| |
| Leotocera kinettt 19.1 19.1 89.1 11.0 6.4 11.0 12.7 22.1 Ampnspoca ,
| |
| Gammarus fasetatus 159.2 210.4 12.7 22.1 12.7 11.0 19.1 19.1 Hyacella azteca 19.1 33.1 6.4 11.0 Clotera@lronomidae Chironomus sp. 82.8 79.5 1769.9 15CO.2 50.9 22.1 6.4 11.0 Chironemus essa Cryotcentrecomus sp. 19.1 33.1 38.2 0.0 t Pmetadius sp. 76.4 76.4 6.4 11.0 Tanytarsus so. 6.4 11.0
| |
| . Ephemeroptera Caents sp.
| |
| 12.7 22.1 S4tocat 303.6 363.9 1954.6 1544.0 95.5 0.0 38.2 50.5 MCLLUSCA '
| |
| * Castropoca Gontebasis so.
| |
| Pelecypoca Amblema so.
| |
| Fuscenata flava 6.4 11.0 Ltqvmta sp.
| |
| CuacrNta sp.
| |
| 5 2 total 6.4 11.0
| |
| * TCTAL
| |
| * 1596.0 1250.7 3724.'s 2553.1 967.7 405.3 439.3~ . 144.2 Cata presented as no./m2 t
| |
| S.O. = Stancard Ceviatten ,
| |
| 0
| |
| | |
| TAOLE 50 CCNT. .
| |
| ANALYSIS CF BENTHIC MACRCINVERTESRATE PCPULATICNS AT LCCUST PCINT*
| |
| 7 June 1976 Sentien 13 I Sts m n 14 Sta*ien 15 Sta tien 16 Mean S.O. Mean S.O. Mean S.O. Mean I S.O.
| |
| CCELENTERATA Hycen so. (buccing polyp; 50.9 71.0 82.8 94.2 Hvera spisingle polyp) 57.3 119.3 38.2 66.1 Suototal 108.2 138.2 121.0 160.2 ANNEL.!DA.
| |
| Hirudenna Hetoecella Itneata Cligocnasta Immatures ( hate setae : 6.4 11.0 31.8 22.1 Immatures (no male setae) 184.6 253.6 594.0 2C2.4 127.3 108.6 70.0 61.4 Branemvt.ra sowgebvt 12.7 11.0 Limneemtus esevtac 6.4 11.0 44.6 29.2 L etacar caems 25.5 22.1 b clacarmeeeeus-cervtx b matsy'fensts 19.1 19.1 Q udekemf ar'us Cceeconais serecettea 191.0 165.4 216.5 148.4 146.4 154.4 25.5 29.2 Petamotnetz motcavtensis 6.4 11.0 12.7 22.1 6.4 11.0 6.4 11.0 Subtotal 352.9 280.6 1056.2 335.4 280.1 271.7 101.9 29.2 ARThACPCCA Ctacocera Leotocora kinetti 38.2 33.1 12.7 11.0 89.1 44.1 6.4 11.0 Ampnspoca ,
| |
| Gammarus fasetatus 44.5 77.2 57.3 50.5 Hyacetta azteca
| |
| * Diptera-Chironcmicae Chirenomus so. 76.4 83.3 1018.7 3C5.8 25.5 29.2 6.4 11.0 Chtronemus pp 6.4 11.0 Craetocneremmus sp. 6.4 11.0 6.4 11.0 6.4 11.0 e -ociactus sp. 6.4 11,.O 25.5 22.1 Tanytarsus sp. 6.4 11.0 Eipnemereptera Caents sp. 6.4 11.0 S4 total 121.0 79.5 1114.2 347.1 191.0 119.3 19.1 19.1 MOLLUSCA Gastropoda Gentobasts sp.
| |
| Pelecypoca Amblema sp.
| |
| Fuscenata flave Liqumta sp.
| |
| Cuaceuta sp.
| |
| S4totan
| |
| * TOTAL _
| |
| 623.9 650.6 2171.0 121.3 592.1 547,9 121.0 ,39.8 Cata omsented as no./m2 S.O. = Stancarc Ceviation i
| |
| l l
| |
| | |
| 118 TABLE 50 CCNT.
| |
| ANALYSIS CF BENTHIC MACRCINVERTESRATE
| |
| ' PCPULATICNS AT LCCUST PCINT*
| |
| - 7 .lune 1976 TM Station 17 i Statten to Sestion 26 i Seatton 27 Mean 'S.O. Mean S.O. Mean i S.O. Mean 'S.O.
| |
| 4 CCELENTERATA Hydra sp. (bucatng polyp; 522.1 381.6 Hycra sp(single polyp) 299.2 354.9 6.4 11.0 Smtal 821.3 715.4 6.4 11.0: .
| |
| ANNELIDA Hirudensa
| |
| * Helebdella lineata S.4 11.0 Cligocnasta Immatures ( hair setae ,
| |
| Immatures (no hate setae) 57.3 19.1 159.2 127.2 1349.7 551.4 1279.7 1289.4 Oranchvues sowereyt 6.4 11.0 ,
| |
| Limnocritus cervt,x 12.7 11.0 19.1 19.1 L clasareceanus 12.7 22.1 25.5 22.1 .
| |
| b clacareceanus-carvtm. S.4 11.0 b m a W ensis S.4 11.0 L ucekemianus 19.1 19.1 12.7 11.0 12.7 22.1 C::Mecenats seroeettna 57.3 36.2 216.5 193.2 401.1 243.9 i
| |
| Potan othetx motcavtensis 6.4 11.0 e3.7 94.2 76.4 33.1 12.7 11.0 Suetocat 63.7 11.0 318.3 271.7 1874.4 800.0 1757.2 1807.8 .
| |
| ARTHRCPCCA Cladocera Lecteccca kinetti 6.4 11.0 i Mpntpoca 50.9 48.1 44.6 48.1 ,
| |
| 4 Gammarus fasclatu.s 25.5 29.2 19.1 19.1 31.8 Hyace!!a azteca 29.2 19.1 19.1 C(ptera-Chlrovemidae Chtreremus so. S.4 11.0 70,0 72.3 496.5 83.3 700.3 Chironemus pc .
| |
| 567.3 Cryotochirenomta sp. 12.7 11.0 19.1 19.1 19.1 I Pecetacius sp. 19.1 25.5 11.0 25.5 22.1 S.4 11.0 Tanytarsus sp.
| |
| , _Ennemeroptera Caents sp.
| |
| 3 4 totat 44.6 22.1 114.S 57.3 e23.9 140.8 795.8 559.8 MCLLUSCA Castrepode Gontceasts sp.
| |
| Pelecypoca 6.4 11.0 .
| |
| Amtlema sp. 6.4 11.0 j
| |
| Fuscenata flava 6.4 Ltqumia sp. 11.0 6.4 11.0 7 Guaceuta sp. 6.4 11.0 Statotal 19.1 19.1 12.7 11.0 i
| |
| TCTAL., } 1C8.2 20.2 452.0 264.9 3132.4 1194.6 2565.9 2167.2 Cata presented a.s no./m2
| |
| ) S.D. = Stancard Ceviatten o
| |
| i e
| |
| J l
| |
| I J
| |
| . - . - . - - , , , _. , - ~ . .-., - . - . , - . . , - - . _ , . , . . . ,, .
| |
| | |
| 119 TABLE 50 CONT.
| |
| ANALYSIS CF BENTH!C MACRCINVERTESRATES PCPULATICNS AT LCCUST POINT
| |
| * 7 June 1976
| |
| _ Station M I Station 29 Maan/
| |
| .g.
| |
| Mean S.O. 'Mean S.O. Station S*D*
| |
| COELENTERATA Hycra sp. (budding polyp; 57.3 126.6 Hycea sp(single polyp) 52.7 88.8 Subtotal 110.0 208.5 ANNELICA Hirudenna Helebdella Itneata 0.4 1.5 Cil9cchanta Immatures ( Malr= setae 3 2.8 7.6 Imrratures (no hele setae) 744.9 413.2 210.1 114.6 553.9 466.0 Branchyura sewerbyt 5.7 11.3 Limnocettus eeevix 19.1 33.1 6.4 11.0 9.9 14.7 L .clapareceacus 6.4 11.0 6.4 11.0 6.4 8.7 *
| |
| * b claearedeems-cervt.x 6.4 11.0 1.1 2.5 b mawnierais 6.4 11.0 7.5 10.7 6 ucekemierus 19.1 33.1 6.7 13.0 Coheconats sereentina 200.7 86.1 44.6 77.2 95.5 112.1 Potamothetx motcavtansis 12.7 11.0 12.7 11.0 21.6 37.5 Subtotal ,
| |
| 993.2 513.9 305.6 39.2 708.8 554.8 ARTHtCPCCA Cladocera lectodera kinctti 6.4 11.0 28.7 29.2 Ampntpoca Garnmarus fascla%s 29.4 36.9 Hyacelta azteca 1.8 4.8 Otstera-cNecnomidae Chironomus so. 566.6 436.5 273.8 39.8 333.5 483.0 Chironomus pp 6.4 11.0 1.1 2.5 CrvetscNecremus sp. 6.4 11.0 8.9 11.2 Proetadius sp. 8.1 18.9
| |
| , Tarytarsus sp. 12.7 22.0 1.4 3.5
| |
| ' Ephememptara
| |
| * Caents sp. . 3.5 6.6 Subtotal 662.1 436.5 292.9 58.4 420.2 509.2 MOLLUSCA Gastropoda Goniobasts sp. O.4 1.5 Pelecypoca Amblema so. O.4 1.5 Fuscenata flava 0.7 2.1 Ligtmta sp. O.4 1.5 Quaceuta sp. O.4 1.5 S@ total 2.1 5.3 e
| |
| * TOTAL 1655.3 890.2 $98.5 148.4 '245.4 t 1051,.5 Data presented as rio./m2 S.O. = Stancard Ceviation i
| |
| i
| |
| , _ . , ,,n
| |
| | |
| 120 i
| |
| e APPENDIX E SCIENTIFIC AND COMMON NAMES OF FISH FOUND AT LOCUST POINT, LAKE ERIE
| |
| | |
| ~
| |
| 129 TABLE 5,1 SPECIES FOUND IN THE LCCUST POINT AREA 1963 - 1975 CJ O T C c- r- 8 r-o o o c)
| |
| Scientific Nam 8 Common Name Amlidae
| |
| . 'e e' Amia calva bowfin Atherinidae
| |
| . . Labidesthes siccutus brook silwesides Catostomidae
| |
| . Carolodes everinus quillback carpsucker
| |
| . . . .' Catostomus commersent common white sucker
| |
| . Minvtrema melances spotted sucker-
| |
| , Moxostema erythrurum golden redhorse
| |
| .. Icticcus cvorinellus bigmouth buffalo fish Centrarchidae
| |
| . Ambleelites rvcestris ncethern reckbass
| |
| . . . Leocmis cyanellus green sunfish
| |
| . . 6 gibbosus pumpkinseed sunfish 6 humilis orangespotted sunfish
| |
| . 6 macrochirus northern bluegill sunfish 6 microtechus redear sunfish
| |
| .. '. . Micrecterus detomieut smallmcuth bass
| |
| . . M. salmeldes
| |
| * largemeuth bass
| |
| . . . Pomoxts annularis white crappie
| |
| . . . . 3 nigromaculatus black crapple Clupeldae
| |
| ,. . . . Alcsa pseudoharency.:s alewife
| |
| . . . . Dorosema cecedianum gizzard sbad Cyprinidae
| |
| .. . . . Car assius auratus goldfish
| |
| . . E auratus x Cyor-inus carcio car p x goldfish hybrid
| |
| . . . . Cyprinus carcio
| |
| * car p
| |
| . . . Hyeoosis stor er tana silver' chub
| |
| . . . . Notr cols atherinoices emerald shiner-
| |
| . . . . N hudsenius spottall shiner-
| |
| | |
| 122 TABLE . 51 CONT. .
| |
| I SPECIES FOUNO IN THE LCCUST POINT AREA 1963 - 1975 E R R E 3 3 9 3 Scientific Name 2 Commen Name
| |
| . . & solicoterus spotfin shiner
| |
| . . & volucellus mimic shiner
| |
| . Pimechales promelas fathead minnow Esocidae ,
| |
| . Esox luctus northern pike Ictaturidae .
| |
| . . Ictaturus metas black bullhead
| |
| . . . I_. natalis yellow bullhead
| |
| . . . . I. nebulosus brown bullhead
| |
| . . . . I. punctatus channel catfish Noturus flaws stonecat madtom Lepisoste'idae
| |
| . Leoisosteus esseus longnose gar Osmeridae .
| |
| . . . . Osmems mordax ratrbow smelt Percidae
| |
| . Etheostoma nigrum johnny darter
| |
| . . . . Perca flavescens yellow perch
| |
| . . . Peretna caoredes - logperch darter
| |
| . Setzestedton canadense sauger
| |
| . . . . S. v. vitreum walleye Percichthyldae
| |
| . . . . Morone chryscos white bass Percopsidae
| |
| . . . Percoosts omiscemayeus troutperch Petromy:entidae
| |
| . Petromyzen marinus sea lamprey Salmenidae
| |
| . . Oncorhynebus kisutch coho salmen Sclaenidae
| |
| . . . . Aplodinctus grunniens freshwater drum
| |
| @ $ $ $ Total Species I 2 Reutter and Herdendorf (197S) 8atley et al. (1970) l I _ _ _ - - - - _ _ _ .,_ ... . . - . , - . _ _ __ _ . ~ . .__ _
| |
| | |
| 223 APPENDIX F ANALYSIS OF ICHTHYOPLANKTON SAMPLES COLLECTED AT LOCUST POINT, LAKE ERIE MARCH - JUNE 1976 s..
| |
| I i
| |
| | |
| T. r E 52 -
| |
| 1 ICHTHYOPLANKTON CATCH PER UNIT EFFORT
| |
| * AT LOCUST POINT l 6 APRIL 1976 l Sta. O Surface Sta. 3 Bottom Sta. 13 Surface Sta . 13 Bottom Species Rang e * *~
| |
| Number Number Range *
| |
| * Number Range ** Number Range *
| |
| * F ish Eggs 1 Alosa pseudohareneus Aplodinotus grunniens Carpiodes cyprinus
| |
| ~
| |
| ; Catostomus commersoni Cyprinus carpio Dorosoma cepedianum $#
| |
| Morone chrysops Notropis atherinoldes
| |
| ! N.
| |
| ~hudsonius Osmerus mordax Perca flavenscenu
| |
| { j Pomoxis sp.
| |
| I Stizostedion v.
| |
| ; vitreum Unknown i TOTA L
| |
| ; (Larvae only)
| |
| *: One 5-min tow with a 0.75-in diameter heavy-duty oceanographic plankton net (no. 00, 0.76mm mesh).
| |
| *
| |
| * Range = total length in mm
| |
| | |
| Te rE 52 CONT.
| |
| '. ! ICHTHYOPLANKTON CATCH PER UNIT EFFORT
| |
| * AT LOCUST POINT 1
| |
| C APRIL 1976
| |
| * Sta. 20 Surface Sta.29 Bottom Sta.26 Surface Sta. 26 Bottom S Pecies Range *' Number Number Range *
| |
| * Number Range ** Number Range **
| |
| , F ish
| |
| ! Eggs I
| |
| Alosa pseudohareneus
| |
| _Aplodinotus grunniens Carpiodes cyprinus Catostomus commersoni Cyprinus carpio Dorosoma cepedianum -*
| |
| _ to Morone ui chrysops
| |
| , Notropts atherinoides i N.
| |
| -hudsontus Osmerus mordax Perca . _ . .
| |
| flavenscenu
| |
| ~
| |
| i j ! Pomoxis sp.
| |
| i Stizostedion v.
| |
| l vitreum Unknown l I TOTAL (Larvae only)
| |
| * ~ One S-min tow with a 0.75-in diameter heavy-duty oceanographic plankton net (no. 00, 0.76mm mesh).
| |
| ** Range = total length in mm
| |
| | |
| TABLE 52 CONT.- - -
| |
| ICHTHYOPLANKTON CATCH PER UNIT EFFORT
| |
| * AT LOCUST POINT 6 APRIi 1976 Species Sta . 8 Surface. Sta. O Bottom Sta. 20 Surface Sta. 28 Bottom Total Number Range ** Number Range *
| |
| * Number . Range ** Number Ra ng e *
| |
| * Surface Bottom '
| |
| Fish E 9g e 1
| |
| Aloua pseudoharengus Apiodinotus
| |
| ,_grunnie ns Carplades cyprinus Catostomus commersoni Cyprinus carpio Dorocoma cepedianum Morono
| |
| _ Cl arY_19PS Notropis atherinoiries N.
| |
| hudnonius Osmerus i
| |
| morciax ,
| |
| Perca flavescens Pomoxis 1:.p.
| |
| Stinostedion v.
| |
| vltreum Unknown
| |
| ~l 0 l' A L (Larvae only) -
| |
| One 5-min tow with a O.75-in diameter heavy-duty oceanographic plankton net (no. 00, 0.76 mm mesh).
| |
| * o Range n total length in mm
| |
| | |
| T, _E M -
| |
| I; ICHTHYOPLANKTON CATCH PER UNIT EFFORT
| |
| * AT LOCUST POINT
| |
| , 14 APRIL 1976 i Sta. 3 Surface I Sta. 3 Bottom Species ' Sta.13 Surface Sta .13 Bottom Number Range *
| |
| * Number Range *
| |
| * Number Range ** Number . Range *
| |
| * F ish
| |
| . Eggs Alosa gscudohareneus Aplodinotus grunniens Carpiodes
| |
| ~
| |
| cyprinus Catostomus commersoni Cyprinus carpio Dorosoma cepedianum "
| |
| Moronc IC N
| |
| chrysops Notropis atherinoides
| |
| ! N.
| |
| ~~~hudsonius Osmerus mordax Perca
| |
| - flavenucenc j Pomoxis sp.
| |
| Stizostedion v. -
| |
| ; vitreum I :
| |
| ', Unknown i ~ TOTAL (Larvae only) j
| |
| * ' One 5-min tow with a O.75-in diameter heavy-duty oceanographic plankton net (no. 00, 0.7Gmm mesh).
| |
| *
| |
| * Rang e =: total length in mm
| |
| | |
| 8
| |
| +
| |
| T. .LE G3 CONT.
| |
| ICHTHYOPLANKTON CATCH PER UNIT EFFORT
| |
| * AT LOCUST POINT
| |
| -14 APRIL 1976 Species Sta. 29 Surface Sta.29 Bottom Sta. 26 Surface Sta. 26 Bottom Number Range ** Number Range *
| |
| * Number Range ** Number Range **
| |
| F ish
| |
| { E90s pggg ~ - - - -
| |
| pseudohareneus Aplodinotus grunniens
| |
| . Carpiodes cyprinus
| |
| ., Catostomus 4
| |
| commersont Cyprinus carpio Dorosoma copedianum
| |
| * r Morone (
| |
| j_ chrysops
| |
| , Notropis atherinoides
| |
| ; ! N.
| |
| ~-hudsonius Osmerus mordax Perca i flesvunucenu i
| |
| l Pomoxis sp.
| |
| t Stizostedian v.
| |
| j vitreum Unknown i TOTAL (Larvae only) .
| |
| * . One 5-min tow with a 0.75-in diameter heavy-duty oceanographic plankton net (no. 00, 0.76mm mesh).
| |
| ** Range = total length in mm
| |
| | |
| tat 3LE 53 CONT.
| |
| ICHTHYOPLANKTON CATCH PER UNIT EFFORT
| |
| * AT LOCUST POINT 14 APRIL 1976 -
| |
| Species Sta. O Surface Sta. O Bottom Sta. 28 Surface Sta. 20 Bottom Total Number Range *
| |
| * Number Range *
| |
| * Number . Ra ng e *
| |
| * Number Range *
| |
| * Surface Bottom Fish E(g.s Alo.s.a-pseudoharengun Aplodinotus
| |
| ,_grunniens Carpiode,s
| |
| -cyprinus Catostomus commer soni Cyprinus carpio Dorosoma cepedianum .
| |
| Moronc
| |
| _ chrysops Notropis athr.rinoides N.
| |
| hudsonius Osmerus mordax .
| |
| Perca flavescens Pomoxis sp.
| |
| Stizostedion v.
| |
| vitreum __
| |
| Unl<nown TO'lAL (Larvaa only)
| |
| C One S-min low with a O.75-in diameter heavy-duty oceanographic plankton net (no. 00, 0.76 mm mesh).
| |
| * o Range == total length in mm
| |
| | |
| 't
| |
| \
| |
| TABLE 54 i
| |
| ! ICHTHYOPLANKTON CATCH PER UNIT EFFORT
| |
| * AT LOCUST POINT 30 APRIL 1976 l' Sta. 3 Surface Sta. 3 Bottom Sta . 13 Surface Sta . 13 Bottom Species Number Range
| |
| * C Number Range ** Number Range ** Number Range **
| |
| F ish Eggs Alosa pseudoharengus Aplodinotus grunniens Carpiodes cyprinus Catostomus commersoni 1 18 2 15-17 Cyprinus carpio Dorosoma cepedianum -
| |
| Morone chrysops Notropis atherinoides
| |
| .p_
| |
| --nudsonius Osmerus mordax Perca fluvenccents 16 G-0 41 6-0 5 ~ 7-10 ' 89 6-0
| |
| ~
| |
| Pomoxis sp.
| |
| i Stizostedian v. -
| |
| ; vitreum G 10-11 1
| |
| : Unknown i TOTAL (Larvae only) 17 41 7 02
| |
| * ' One 5-min tow with a 0.75-in diameter heavy-duty oceano0raphic plankton net (no. 00, 0.76mm mesh).
| |
| - _ _ _ _ _ _* + Teareceve xm kwasa -- _ --
| |
| | |
| i Tr.al_E 54 CONT.
| |
| l ICHTHYOPLANKTON CATCH PER UNIT EFFORT
| |
| * AT LOCUST POINT i 30 APRIL 197G l Sta. 29 Surface Sta. 29 Bottom Sta. 26 Surface Sta. 26 Bottom Species ~
| |
| Number Range *
| |
| * Number Range'
| |
| * Number Range ** Number Range **
| |
| l F ish l Eggs Alosa pseudohareneus
| |
| 'Aplodinotus grunniens Carpiodes cyprinus Catostomus commersoni 2 14-15 1 14 1 15 Cyprinus carpio Dorosoma cepedianum Morone chrysops
| |
| : Notropis atherinoides
| |
| ! N.
| |
| -hudsonius Osmerus mordax Perca
| |
| . flavenscenu 45 6-10 135 6-11 22 5 35 6-7 1
| |
| Pomoxts sp.
| |
| Stizostedlan v.
| |
| viircum 70 10-11 Unknown
| |
| ' TOTAL 47 213 23 36
| |
| ; (Larvae only)
| |
| * One 5-min tow with a 0.75-in diameter heavy-duty oceanographic plankton net (no. 00, 0.76mm mesh).
| |
| *
| |
| * Range = total _ lem@n fla _ cmrAm I
| |
| | |
| \
| |
| ''',. TABLE 54 CONT.
| |
| ICHTHYOPLANKTON CATCH PER UNIT EFFORT
| |
| * AT LOCUST POINT 30 APRIL 1976 Species Sta. O Surface Sta . O Bottom Sta.20 Surface Sta . 28 Bottom Total '
| |
| Number Range *
| |
| * Number Range *
| |
| * Number . Range ** Number Range *
| |
| * Surface Gottom Fish Eggs Alosa
| |
| _ _ _ pseudoharengus Aplodinotus
| |
| __ grunniens Carpiodes cyprinus Catostomus commersont 3 14-18 1 14 10 1 Cyprinus carpio Dorosoma '
| |
| (
| |
| cepedianum .I Morone j 'i ' 7 ctirym ps Notropis at herinoides N.
| |
| ht$dconius Osmerus
| |
| ._tnStrS}px .
| |
| Perca flavescens 17 . 6-8 28 6-0 3 6-7 24 6-7 108 352 Pomoxis sp. 1 0 M Stizostedian v.
| |
| vitroom
| |
| : Unknown TOTAL (Larvae only) 20 29 4 ,
| |
| 25 118 436 0
| |
| on_n_ One m5-min m tow with a 0.75-in diameter heavy-duty oceanographic plankton net (no. 00, 0.76 mm mesh).
| |
| | |
| ? .
| |
| * '.f 1 ABLE 55 a . -
| |
| i' j
| |
| ICHTHYOPLANKTON CATCH PER UNIT EFFORT
| |
| * AT LOCUST POINT 10 MAY 1976
| |
| !- Sta . 3 Surface -
| |
| S Pecles Sta. 3 Bottom Sta.13 Surface Sta . 13 Bottom Number Range *
| |
| * Number Range *
| |
| * Number Range ** Number
| |
| . Fish Range **
| |
| ! Eggs E
| |
| Alosa-pseudohareneus
| |
| 'Aplodinotus -
| |
| , , _ grunniens Carpiodes cyprinus
| |
| , Catostomus commersont 1 21 2 23-24 Cyprinus carpio Dorosoma cepedianum Morone
| |
| '4 chrysops '
| |
| Notropis
| |
| , atherinoides
| |
| ! N.
| |
| ; -hudsonius t
| |
| Osmerus mordLLX Porca 17 flavenacenu -
| |
| 6-8 5 8-9 35 6-9 r .
| |
| I
| |
| ; Pomoxis sp.
| |
| l Stizostedion v j vitreum i
| |
| 1 Uni mwn I TOTAL '
| |
| (Larvae only) 1 17 7 35
| |
| ** One S-min tow with a 0.75-in diameter heavy-duty oceanographic plankton net (no 00, 0.76mm mesh).
| |
| Range = total leap @n Ron rrw6m - - - -
| |
| | |
| A a
| |
| TA ,E 55 CONT.
| |
| : ICHTHYOPLANKTON CATCH PER UNIT EFFORT
| |
| * AT LOCUST POINT
| |
| , 10 MAY 19,'O j
| |
| Sta. 29 Surface Sta. 29 Bottom Sta. 26 Surface Sta. 26 Bottom Sp cies Range *
| |
| * Number
| |
| ! Number Range *
| |
| * Number Range *
| |
| * Number Range * *
| |
| '! F ish l Eggs
| |
| .Alosa pseudohareneus
| |
| ~Xplodinotus
| |
| , grunniens i
| |
| . Carpiodes cyprinus
| |
| 'Catostomus commersoni 1 23 Cyprinus carpio Dorosoma cepedianum 2 10-11 m :
| |
| O Morone A chrysops
| |
| ' Actropis
| |
| ! atherinoides N.
| |
| -hudsonius Osmerus
| |
| . mordax Perca '
| |
| flavenscenu 1 8 6 7-8 3 7-8 13 7-9 t
| |
| , Pomoxis sp.
| |
| i Stizostedion ~v.
| |
| ; vitreuni 1 16 '
| |
| { Unknown i i TOTAL (Larvae only) 2 7 5 13
| |
| * ' One 5-min tow with a O.75-in d!ameter heavy-duty oceanographic plankton net (no. 00, 0.76mm mesh)'
| |
| ** Range = total length in mm
| |
| | |
| -- . . ~ - -- . . - _ . - _ . _. . -. --
| |
| e TABLE 55 CONT. - -
| |
| ICHTHYOPLANKTON CATCH PER UNIT EFFORT
| |
| * AT LOCtJST POINT 10 MAY 197G Spectes Sta. O Surface Sta. 8 Bottom Sta. 28 Surface Sta. 28 Bottom Total Number Range *
| |
| * Number Range *
| |
| * Number . Range ** Number Range *
| |
| * Surface Gottom Fish Egr,c Alosa pseudoharengus Aplodinotuu
| |
| ,_grunniens Carpiodes cyprinus Catostomus commersoni 2 21-23 4 2 Cyprinus carpio Dorosoma i
| |
| cepedianum 4 O-11 2 4.
| |
| Morore
| |
| _ -chry sops Notropis atherinoiries N.
| |
| hudsonius Osmerus mor(lL1X Perca flavescens 17 7-9 16 7-9 3 7-9 25 91 Pomoxis sp.
| |
| ; Stizostedion v.
| |
| vitroum 1 Unknown TOIAL (Larvae only) 21 16 . S 31 98 '
| |
| o One S-min tow with a O.75-in diameter heavy-duty oceanographic plankton net (no. 00, 0.76 mm mesh). - - - -
| |
| | |
| Tuot_E 56 i
| |
| ICHTHYOPLANKTON CATCH PER UNIT EFFORT
| |
| * AT LOCUST POINT 17 MAY 1976 l Sta. 3 Surface
| |
| ; Species Sta . 3 Bottom ' Sta. 13 Surface Sta. 1a Bottom Number Range ** Number Range *
| |
| * Number Range *
| |
| * Number Range *
| |
| * F ish i Eggs Atosa
| |
| _ pseudoharengus Aplodinotus grunniens Carpiodes cyprinus Catostomus commersont Cyprinus carpio Dorosoma cepeaianum Morone "ca chrysops G Notropis atherinoides
| |
| =--9.
| |
| -hudsonius Osmerus mordax Perca fluvenscenn 9 7-10 5 7-9 4 a 7 7' '. '
| |
| j Pomoxts sp.
| |
| ! Stizostedion v.
| |
| ; vitreum
| |
| * i 1
| |
| Unknown TOTAL (Larvae only) 9 5 4 7
| |
| + ~ One 5-min tow with a 0.75-in diameter heavy-duty oceanographic plankton net (no. 00, .O.76mm mesh).
| |
| *
| |
| * Range a total leng;th in cem
| |
| | |
| .I T. , E 56 CONT.
| |
| I ICHTHYOPLANKTON CATCH PER UNIT EFFORT
| |
| * AT LOCUST POINT 17 MAY 1976
| |
| ! Sta. 29 Surface Sta.29 Bottom Sta. 26 Surface Sta. 26 Bottom Species Number Range *
| |
| * Number Range *
| |
| * Number Range ** Number Range * *
| |
| . F ish
| |
| ~! Eggs Alosa pseudohareneus.
| |
| Aplodinotus grunniens Carpioces cyprinus Catostomus commersont t Cyprinus 1 carpio Dorosoma cepedianum Morone 3
| |
| N chrysops Notropis ^
| |
| atherl.'cides
| |
| : N.
| |
| ~~hudsonius Osmerus mordax 1
| |
| Perca flavenscens 5 7-9 15 7-8 ,
| |
| t
| |
| . Pomoxis sp.
| |
| i Stizostedion v.
| |
| 1 g i vit reum .
| |
| 1 9
| |
| ; ! - Unknown l i TOTAL (Larvae only) 6 15 ,
| |
| * ' One 5-min tow wIth a O.75-in diameter heavy-duty oceanographic plankton net (ro. 00, 0.76mm mesh),
| |
| i
| |
| ** Range = total length in mm
| |
| = _ .__ _
| |
| | |
| t TABLE 56 CONT. - -
| |
| ICHTHYOPLANKTON CATCH PER UNIT EFFORT
| |
| * AT LOCUST POINT 17 MAY 1976 Species Sta.O Surface Sta . O Bottom Sta. 28 Surface Sta. 28 Bottom Total
| |
| * Rangc *
| |
| * Number Number Range *
| |
| * Number Range ** Number Range *
| |
| * Surface Bottom
| |
| ~
| |
| Fish E(;ps Alosa pseudoharengut; 2 0 2
| |
| hplodinotuu
| |
| ,_grunniens Carpi.odps cyprinus '
| |
| Catostomus commersoni Cyprinus carpio e Dorosoma cepedi inum 1 0 g.
| |
| Morore -
| |
| o
| |
| _ chrysops m . i Noiropis atherinoidqs N. .
| |
| chtid
| |
| . . s.,o. -nius -
| |
| Osmerus mordax ,
| |
| 2 10 10 7-9 20 0-10 2 8 flavescens 35 44 Pomoxts sp.
| |
| Stizostedion v.
| |
| vitrcum 1 Unknown TOfAL (Larvae only) 2 13 20 , 2 35 48 *
| |
| +
| |
| +n_ One S-min tow with a O.75-in diameter heavy-duty oceanographic plankton net (no. 00, 0.76 mm mesh).
| |
| | |
| Tr rE 57 l ICHTHYOPLANKTON CATCH PER UNIT EFFORT
| |
| * AT LOCUST POINT 27 MAY 1976 Species
| |
| - Sta . 3 Surface '
| |
| Sta. 3 Bottom Sta. 13 Surface Sta. 13 Bottom Number Range '' Number Range'* Number Range *
| |
| * Number Range *
| |
| * F ish Eggs Alosa pseudoharenous Aplodinotus
| |
| _ grunniers Carpiodes cyprinus
| |
| ~Catostomus commersoni Cyprinus carpio Dorosoma cepedianum 1 8 Morone $
| |
| chrysops Notropis atherinoides N.
| |
| -hudsonius Osmerus mordax Perca ~
| |
| l flavenscenn 1. , 14 2 0-13 i
| |
| ; Pomoxis sp.
| |
| i Stizostedion v.
| |
| i vitreum -
| |
| 2 f Unknown
| |
| : TOTAL (Larvae only) I O
| |
| * One 5-min tow with a 0.75-In diameter heavy-duty oceanographic plankton net (no. 00, 0.76mm mesh).
| |
| ** Range = total length in mm
| |
| | |
| 4 T. r E 57 CONT.
| |
| i ICHTHYOPLANKTON CATCH PER UNIT EFFORT
| |
| * AT LOCUST POINT.
| |
| 27 MAY 1976 Species Sta. 29 Surface Sta. 29 Bottom Sta. 26 Surface Sta .26 Bottom Number Range *
| |
| * Number Rango** Number Range *
| |
| * Number Range *
| |
| * Fish Eggs
| |
| .Alosa pseudohareneus
| |
| 'Aplodinotus grunniens Carplodes
| |
| ~~
| |
| cyprinus Catostomus commersoni Cyprinus carpio Dorosoma -
| |
| cepecianum 1 14 -
| |
| Morone (
| |
| chrysops Notropis atherinoides N.
| |
| -hudsonlus Osmerus mordax Porca flavenscenu 1 12 l Pomoxis sp.
| |
| ! Stizostedion v j vitreum 8
| |
| Unknown i TOTAL (Larvae only) I I
| |
| * ~ One S-min tow with a O.75-in diameter heavy-duty oceanographic plankton not (no. 00, 0.76mm mesh).
| |
| ** Range = total length in mm
| |
| | |
| TABLE 57 CONT. - -
| |
| ICHTHYOPLANKTON CATCH PER UNIT EFFORT
| |
| * AT LOCUST POINT 27 MAY 1976 Sp cies Sta.8 Surfaco Sta. 8 Bottom Sta. 28 Surface Sta . 28 Bottom Total Number Rango *
| |
| * Number Range ** Number . Range *
| |
| * Number Rang e *
| |
| * Surface Bottom 1:ish Egg:s Alosa
| |
| _ pseudoharengus Aplodinotus
| |
| ,_grunniens C,9713,i,gd_gy cyprinus Catostomus commersont Cyprinus -
| |
| carpio Dorosoma 1 13 13 2 10-11 2 cepe(flanum 1 4, {
| |
| Moi or e
| |
| _ clicynons Notropis atherinoicles N.
| |
| i i hyg,ygof3 1 ys_
| |
| j 2
| |
| Osmerus 2 2-10 2 mordax -
| |
| Perca flavescens 3 0-10 1 8 5 3 l.
| |
| Pomoxis sp.
| |
| Sttrostedlon v.
| |
| vitreum t
| |
| Unkrown TOfAL i (l.arvae only) -
| |
| One 5-min tow with a O.75-in diameter heavy-duty oceanographic plankton net (no. 00, 0.76 mm mesh). -
| |
| i
| |
| *o h ne h
| |
| | |
| _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - -. . - = _ _ .
| |
| TAL I 58 ,
| |
| ICHTHYOPLANKTON CATCH PER UNIT EFFORT
| |
| * AT LOCUST POINT 11 JUNE 1976 Sta.3 Surface Sta . 3 Bottom Sta . 13 Surface Sta . 13 Bottom pe les Number Range *
| |
| * Number Rana c *
| |
| * Number Range *
| |
| * Number Range **
| |
| F ish ^
| |
| . Eggs Alosa
| |
| _pseudohareneus Aplodinotus grunniens Carplodes cyprinus Catostomus commersoni Cyprinus carpio Dorosoma cepedianum 26 7-18 37 6-12 13 12-15 21 10-13 Morone $
| |
| chrysops N Notropis auierinoides 3 7 i N.
| |
| ~hudsonius 4 6-7 Osmerus mordax Perca flavenscenu 1 15 3 15-17 i
| |
| ; Pomoxis sp. ,
| |
| i Stizostedion v.
| |
| l vltreum i Sucker family i Unknown 3 8-0
| |
| : TOTAL (Larvae only) 34 37 19 21 j * ~. One 5-min tow with a O.75-in diameter heavy-duty oceanographic plankton net (no. 00, 0.76mm mesh).
| |
| i
| |
| ** Range = total length in mm
| |
| | |
| TA. I58 CONT.
| |
| -! . .ICHTHYOPLANKTON CATCH PER UNIT EFFORT *- AT LOCUST POINT '
| |
| 11 JUNE 1976
| |
| ~ .
| |
| Species
| |
| * Sta.29 Surface Sta. 29 Bottom Sta. 26 Surface Sta. 26 Bottom Number Range *
| |
| * Number Range *
| |
| * Number Range ** Number Range *
| |
| * F ish
| |
| . Eggs Alosa~
| |
| pseudohareneus 2 6-10 Aplodinotus Grunniens Carpioces cyprinus Catostomus .
| |
| commersont i Cyprinus
| |
| . carpio 1 6
| |
| , Dorosoma I
| |
| cepecianum 18 5-17 143 6-11 9 6.5-16 220 6-16 -
| |
| -Morone b 3
| |
| chrysops Notropis atherinoides 1 11 5 7-8 N.
| |
| ~"-hudsonius 1 6 Osmerus i mordax Perca flavenscenc 1 16
| |
| ; ; Pomoxis sp.
| |
| j i Stizostedion v. ;
| |
| ~
| |
| l vitreum t
| |
| j Unknown 1 12 J I TOTAL (Larvae only) 20 .146 16 220
| |
| **. .RangeOne 5-min tow with a 0.75-in diameter heavy-duty oceanographic plankton net (no. 00, 0.76mm mesh).
| |
| = total length in mm x
| |
| | |
| b TADLE 50 CDNT.- - -
| |
| ICHTHYOPLANKTON CATCH PER UNIT EFFORT
| |
| * AT LOCUST' POINT .
| |
| 11 JUNE 1976 Sta. 8 Surface Sta. 8 Bottom Sta.20 Surface Sta. 28 Bottom Spec.tes Total Number Ranac +
| |
| * Number Range *
| |
| * Number . Range *
| |
| * Number Rang e *
| |
| * Surface Bottom Flub Eces 3 3
| |
| ' Alona
| |
| )scudoharengun 1 -9 1 2
| |
| Aplodinotuu grunniens Carpiodes -
| |
| cyprinus 2 7-0 2 1 Catostomus c_omme rsont '
| |
| Cyprinus carpio Dorosoma i*
| |
| cep. dianum 3 7-9 9 9-15 2 8 64 6-11 71 494 i Morore .
| |
| _-chryy p_s Notropis
| |
| . 2 7-8 2 7-8 aymrinoides 13 N.
| |
| huifso_n!us 5
| |
| ; Osmerus
| |
| . TR r!.'"* *
| |
| ., Porca 1 16 6 l_ flavescent Pomoxts up.
| |
| Stizoctedion v.
| |
| 4 vitreum i '
| |
| Unl<nown 1 7.5 5 TO'IAL j (Larvae only) 9 9 5 64 103 497
| |
| * One S-min tow with a 0.75-in diameter heavy-duty oceanographic plankton net (no. 00, 0.76 mm mesh).
| |
| .
| |
| * o Khrmts - AstafL h
| |
| | |
| _ .- _ _______~ .
| |
| - - . . .- . .. .. . - .- .. _ _ . . . ~ - - _ - -- - - - - .
| |
| TAL i 59 . -
| |
| 6 1 .I ICHTHYOPLANKTON CATCH PER UNIT EFFORT
| |
| * AT LOCUST POINT 17- JUNE 1976 Sta. 3 Surface Sta. 3 Bottom Sta.13 Surface Sta.13 Bottom Species Number Range *
| |
| * Number Range *
| |
| * Number Range ** Number Range *
| |
| * Fish
| |
| : Eggs 202 82 I
| |
| Alosa "
| |
| __pceudohareneus 26 10-14 1 16 Aplodinotus
| |
| __ ' grunniens Carpiodes t cyprinus Catostomus commersont Cyprinus
| |
| ]
| |
| carpio I
| |
| Dorosoma cepedianum 20 12-18 20 10-13 31 4-15 41 10-18 !
| |
| Morone y
| |
| chrysops O'
| |
| ; Notropis atherinoides 1 12 7 10-11
| |
| ! N.
| |
| ~hudsonius Osmerus mordax Perca
| |
| ! - flavenscenu' i
| |
| * Pomoxis sp.
| |
| ' i t
| |
| Stizostedion v. -
| |
| l vitreum i
| |
| i Unknown TOTAL (Larvae only) 21 20 64 42
| |
| ''. One 5-min tow with a O.75-in diameter heavy-duty oceanographic plankton net (no. 00, 0.76mm mesh).
| |
| l '' Range = total length 'in mm
| |
| | |
| Te _E 59 CONT.
| |
| I
| |
| : ICHTHYOPLANKTON CATCH PER UNIT EFFORT
| |
| * AT LOCUST POINT 17 JUNE 1976 Sta. 29 Surface Sta. 29 Bottom Sta. 26 Surface Sta. 26 Bottom Species Range * *~
| |
| Number Number Range ** Number Range *
| |
| * Number Range *
| |
| * F ish l Eggs 1920 926 Alosa pseudoharer.cus Aplodinotus grunniens Carpiodes cyprinus Catostomus commersont Cyprinus carpio Dorosoma cepedianum 510 12-19 150 7-16 20 11-18 20 10-12 Morone o chrysops Notropis atherinoides 1 9
| |
| ! N.
| |
| ~hudsonius Osmerus ITtordc1X Perca l flavenscents j Pomoxis sp.
| |
| i Stizostedion v.
| |
| vitreum n
| |
| Unknown 8 TOTAL (Larvae only) 51 0 150 21 20
| |
| *' One 5-min low with a O.75-In diameter heavy-duty oceanographic plankton net (no. 00, 0.76mm mesh).
| |
| ** Range = total length in mm
| |
| | |
| TABLE 59 CONIE.
| |
| JCHTHYOPLANKTON CATCH PER UNIT EFFORT
| |
| * AT LOCUST POINT 17 JUNE 1976 b P Sta. 8 Surface Sta. 8 Bottom Sta. 28 Surface Sta . 28 Bottom Total Number Range *
| |
| * Number Range ** Number . Range *' Number Range *
| |
| * Surface Gottom F ir.h IL,[.s 515 294 690 4343 376 Alo_sa pseudoharengtpi 26- 1 Aptodinotuu
| |
| ,_gr'IbnienEt I 7 1 Cacpi. odes cyprinus Catostomus cornrnersoni Cyprinus ca_rpio Dorosoma cepodiantin3 158 9-20 110 0-16 150 11-20 90 9-14 009 431 Morone a cl erylops 5 7-9 54 Notropis Boff _I_L.PMn N.
| |
| IH!sjrgnjtts_
| |
| Osmerus mOrdaX 1 o5 l .
| |
| Perca flavescens I 11 1 Pomoxis sp.
| |
| Stiroetedlan v.
| |
| vitreurn 1 Unknown I Il TO~lAL (L arvae only) 100 117 150 90 926 439' O
| |
| One 5-rnin tow with a O.75-in diameter heavy-duty oceanographic plankton not (no. 00, 0.7G mm mesh). -
| |
| | |
| T. _E 60 -
| |
| ICHTHYOPLANKTON CATCH PER UNIT EFFORT
| |
| * AT LOCUST POINT 28 JUNE 1976 :
| |
| Species Sta. 3 Surface ~
| |
| Sta. 3 Bottom Sta. 13 Surface Sta.13 Bottom Number Range +* Number Range ** Number Range ** Number F ish Range *
| |
| * Epps 20 Alosa pseudoharenqus Aploainotus grunniens Carpioces cyprinus Catostomus commerson!
| |
| Cyprinus carpio 10 6 Dorosoma cepeatanum 2G0 7-13 460 6-12 230 0-14 980 0-13 Moi one ~^
| |
| chrysops Notropis atherinoides 3110 11-28 20 11-12 000 11-14 7.
| |
| ~huaconius Osmerus mpfgax Ferca flavenucenu Pomoxis sp. 10 6 Stizostedion v.
| |
| vitreum Unknown TOTAL (Larvae only) 3370 480 1220
| |
| , 1000
| |
| *
| |
| * One RangeS-min tow with a O.75-in diameter heavy-duty oceanographic plankton net (no. 00, 0.76mm mesh).
| |
| = total length in mm
| |
| | |
| TA ,E
| |
| _ 60 CONT. .
| |
| ICHTHYOPLANKTON CATCH PER UNIT EFFORT
| |
| * AT LOCUST POINT .
| |
| 20 JUNE 1976 '
| |
| Sta. 20 Surface Sta. 20 Bottom Sta. 20 Surface Sta. 26 Bottom P I*
| |
| Number Rango *
| |
| * Number Range *
| |
| * Number Range ** Number Range *
| |
| * F ish Eers Alosa
| |
| ~
| |
| pseudoharcneus Aplodinotus
| |
| (;runnion's Carpiades cyprinus Catostomus commersoni Cyprinus carpio Dorosoma cepocianum 280 10-22 000 7-13 10 15 370 10-14 -
| |
| 4 Morone o chrysops
| |
| . Notropis atherinoides 170 8.5-12 1570 0-13 70 0-12 N.
| |
| ~~hudsonius Osmerus mo roax _
| |
| Ferca flavenucenu Pomoxis sp. -
| |
| Stizostedion v.
| |
| vitreum Unknown lOTAL (Larvae only) 450 000 1500 440
| |
| * One 5-min tow wIth a O 75-in diameter heavy-duty oceanographic plankton net (no. 00, 0.76mm mesh).
| |
| ** Range = total length in mm :
| |
| | |
| ~'
| |
| TABLE 60 CONT, ICHTHYOPLANKTON CATCH PER UNIT EFFORT
| |
| * AT LOCUST POINT 28 JUNE 1976 Species Sta. O Surface Sta, u Bottom Sta. 20 Surface Sta. 20 Bottom Total Number Range *
| |
| * Number Range *
| |
| * Number . Range *
| |
| * Number Rango *
| |
| * Surface Gottom Fish Eggs 90 5 00 25 Alosa
| |
| ___ pseudoharengus Aplodinotus agrunniens 4 5-0 4 Carptodes ,
| |
| cyprinus Catostomus commersont Cyprinus carpio i 8 11 Dorosoma cepedianum 26 10-20 320 0-18 131 10-10 81 0-19 937 2010.
| |
| Morone -
| |
| - 2 7 cliry_ sops $
| |
| Notropis
| |
| ! 240 0-12.5 0 10-12 117 10-13 5 11-12 6197 103 a t..h.e.r i. n. .o. i rl.e. s I N.
| |
| htg!s_galus Osmerus (norctax Perca flavescens Pomoxis sp. 5 5-7 15 i Sttzostedlon v.
| |
| vitroom Unknown TOfAL (Larvae only) 2616 342 248 90 7134 2052 O
| |
| __o One m _ 5-min tow with a 0.75-in diameter heavy-duty oceanographic plankton net (no. 00, 0.76 mm mesh).
| |
| _ . _ _ . m m sm - - - -
| |
| o
| |
| | |
| 151 APPENDIX G STOMACH ANALYSIS OF FISH COLLECTED AT LOCUST POINT, LAKE ERIE APRIL - JUNE 1976 s
| |
| l I
| |
| l
| |
| | |
| . _ . . . _ _ - _ _ ...._...___s__
| |
| . __.___m..._ _ . . . . _ , . _ _ _ _ _ _.. . . _ _ _ _ .
| |
| t TABLE 01 STOMACH ANALYSIS OF FISH COLLECTED AT LOCUST POINT
| |
| ~
| |
| APRIL - JUNE 1976
| |
| . l l I i
| |
| . rm me ; i .
| |
| 8 -
| |
| 6 y * :: ; -
| |
| ~
| |
| * , 5
| |
| % I i i a n -
| |
| [ e e
| |
| e I [ [ f I j I = = f '
| |
| I ! I ;
| |
| g . 5 .{ i
| |
| {
| |
| *elet. I. l. } J} . 4 i I J Ja
| |
| -$ I h I de de f
| |
| se I f J
| |
| I I 6 4 Y I I f .}. 7} 7I I S j j 1 I .*
| |
| mee see.a .e f.i) :t- _?_ -
| |
| It a 6 - - 2
| |
| . m ol ,
| |
| g 15 4 -41 E(eas stayeeps 121 2$
| |
| J _) $ I?? .3,_
| |
| 4 A htropie otheria .Jee' 95 $ 27 ) 67 6 N. ethersaeldes lu$ 7 N. h w aave 65 3 $4 16 8 6 N. bwalus 41$ $ IS2 19 3 g a l W. I Joeatue ?) Il yal 12 61 4 A N. SwJevnime 10) Il 20 32 0 a N. Ba.J antes 178 18 j
| |
| Perce f a s.ex ae $1 8 5 It) 16 6 29 JUS g P. fievoweae 191 le 4 a P. flavanceae 211 10fs emp i ,
| |
| Pere t as e.go.e.. Im n __
| |
| g i l0 18 A hee,.si e c.l scomove.o DJ J ) 2 j 2 1 T.) _
| |
| 6
| |
| _ 8, _
| |
| I --
| |
| : 1) Ite, Atr. ee wual.a 10$ ll _y 2tl I ___
| |
| l A a i m. hudsoalue 106 Il 14 B l I _
| |
| 8 1 '
| |
| N. bawalve ll$ IS 30 2 l l I I A 1 Perce fla eeceas 142 32 1 l n i .I 8 P. flavesceas 102 ($ j _ j
| |
| } _ _ _
| |
| ! P. f le..sc a. I'JO 80 _ _ _ _4 g I I _
| |
| 8 8
| |
| - ._ - - - - - - - = - -
| |
| 1
| |
| | |
| 4 1
| |
| TABLE 01 CONT. ,
| |
| STOMACH ANALYSIS OF FISH COLLECTED AT LOCUST POINT APRIL - JUNE 1976 I
| |
| l l 1 I
| |
| . ro= ime ; i .
| |
| : } 3 t
| |
| b a
| |
| I 2 a- l .
| |
| i I.
| |
| 3-
| |
| ,. ; 8
| |
| ,I 1 1 I
| |
| * 1 . , . .
| |
| l , ,
| |
| . . . . . = x -,
| |
| i - l i l. .i. .I: i i i a a i
| |
| e, s.
| |
| t i-i l ! s
| |
| ! i
| |
| ). 1 I.
| |
| 6 J
| |
| 6 f
| |
| al i l l i l i 2ll 3 1 j 8
| |
| : o. . s. .. . .
| |
| m e.,,,.. ,=,
| |
| si
| |
| . } -
| |
| t g g t t ,
| |
| -1 3 -
| |
| j
| |
| .g ir *i.ai a. .. -- i . i4 so .
| |
| e is
| |
| : i. iw ei i, 61 e i i e A. gemaal.a. 192 74 3 :'6 8? 2 2 1 e A. grunal.as 27, 150 2 I W 24 e
| |
| , s. grer alene Ph I?? Il 29 e
| |
| : a. 119 4r 2 r i. 4 30s J c istat re. p.actate. 11 3 2 1 Il I I e ! I I 1$ e I pon.t .t.. W to e 15 21 t' 2 4 A
| |
| : 8. p=aetetwa l's? 16 3 5 5 0 t i a
| |
| : 1. p=act t : 216 92 3 3 6 7 1 A
| |
| ; .l. pu ct.tw. bl 148 3 t) 19 *p 7 4 2 1 8 4 e i 11. punct.t . 2$ 262 I I A sa. trees. .tt.er Ia.id.. % 7 I i 12 8 h.rce fi ss.c. 162 $1 2 12 1 $)) I'J A
| |
| !Lis t.Jten .. .itr.u 10) 62 1
| |
| : n. a i #, . s.. . __ _ _
| |
| l e smt y [. e act i
| |
| j C _ rMiful e-m,nt _
| |
| 3
| |
| -- m w mesu> -
| |
| | |
| 4 8
| |
| O r
| |
| O O_.
| |
| O r
| |
| t f
| |
| | |
| , NALCC E NVI A C N M E NT AL SCIENCES
| |
| '= 1500 F A ON T AG E A C AO o NOATHSAOCK. f t.t IN CIS 8006 2 o AAEA 312 -5 G 4 -0 7 C 0 NALCO CMEMsCAL COM88ANY
| |
| . REPORT TO TOLEDO EDISON COMPANY TOLEDO, OHIO PREOPERATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING FOR THE DAVIS _BESSE NUCLEAR POWER PLANT OAK HARBOR, OHIO SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT JA11UARY - JUNE 1976 NALCO No. 5501-05590 r
| |
| I PREPARED AND SUBMITTED BY NALCO ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Report approved by:
| |
| B. G. Jonnson, Ph.D.
| |
| Manager Environmental Sciences August 13, 1976
| |
| | |
| NALCC G]NVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES PREFACE The staff of the Nuclear Sciences Section of the Environmental
| |
| . Sciences Division of Nalco Chemical Company was responsible for the acquisition of the data presented in this report.
| |
| The report was prepared by P. Fonseca, Project Leader, under the direction of L. G. Huebner, Head, Nuclear Sciences Section.
| |
| a h
| |
| (
| |
| [
| |
| 6 ii
| |
| _ .- ._ , _ . _ . . . _ - - _. . ~ . . . - , , _ . . . .
| |
| | |
| NALCD ENVIRONM:JNTAL SCIENCEO TABLE OF CONTENTS Page
| |
| , Preface . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ii List of Figures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . IV List of Tables . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Vii I. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 II. Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 III. Methodology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 A. The Atmospheric Environment . . . . . . . . . . . .
| |
| 3 B. The Terrestrial Environment . . . . . . . . . . . 5 C. The Aquatic Environment . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 IV. Results and Discussion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 A. The Atmospheric Environment . . . . . . . . . . . 9 B. The Terrestrial Environment . . . . . . . . . . . 11 C. The Aquatic Environment . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 V. References Cited . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 106 Appendix A. Maximum Permissible Concentration of Radioactivity-in Air and Water . . . . . . . A-1 B. Radiochemical Analytical Procedures . . . . . 3-1 i
| |
| iii
| |
| = 4 s
| |
| | |
| NALCO CNVIMONMUNTAL OCI:2NCED LIST OF FIGURES No. Caption Page 1 Sampling location on the site periphery, Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Plant . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 2 Sampling location (excepting those on the site periphery), Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Plant . . . . . . . 19 3 Air particulate samples, analyses for gross alpha and gross beta, collected near inlet canal (T-1, site boundary, 0.6 miles NE of plant) . . . . . . . . . . 20 4 Air part'iculate samples, analyses for gross alpha and gross beta, collected at the site boundary, (T-2, 0.9 miles E of plant) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 5 Air particulate samples, analyses for gross alpha and gross beta, collected near the Toussaint River and the storm drain (T-3, site boundary, 1.4 miles SE of plant) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 6 Air particulate samples, analyses for gross alpha and gross beta, collected at Locust Point and Toussaint River (T-4, site boundary, 0.8 miles S of plant) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 7 Air particulate samples, analyses for gross alpha and gross beta, collected at Sand Beach (T-7, 0.9 miles NNW of plant) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 8 Air particulate samples, analyses for gross alpha and gross beta, collected at the Earl Moore Farm (T-8, 2. 7 miles WSW of plant) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 9 Air particulate samples, analyses for gross alpha and gross beta, collected at Oak Harbor (T-9, 6.8 miles SW of plant) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 10 Air particulate samples, analyses for gross alpha and gross beta, collected at the Erie Industrial Park (T-10, 6.5 miles SE of plant) . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 11 Air particulate samples, analyses for gross alpha and gross beta, collected at Port Clinton (T-ll, 9.5 miles SE of plant) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 12 Air particulate samples, analyses for gross alpha and gross beta, collected at Toledo (T-12, 23.5 miles WNW of plant) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 iv
| |
| | |
| NALCC ENVIRONMGNTAL CCIENCEO LIST OF FIGURES (continued)
| |
| No. Caption Pace 13 Air particulate samples, analyses for gross alpha and gross bota, collected at Put-In-Bay Lighthouse (T-23, 14.3 miles ENE of plant) . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 14 Air particulate samples, analyses for gross alpha and gross beta, collected at McGee March (T-27, 5.3 miles WNW cf plant) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 15 Gamma-ray spectrum of air particulate filters (Ge (Li) ) ,
| |
| collected 5 April - 28 June 1976, composite of all indicator locations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 16 Gamma-ray spectrum cf well water, collected 3 June 1976 at Hess Sunoco (T-18, 1.3 miles S of plant, Route 2) . . 33 17 Milk samples, analyses for Sr-90, collected from Earl Moore Farm (T-8, 2.7 miles WSW of plant) . . . . . . 34 18 Milk samples, analyses for Sr-90, collectcd from a Toledo Dairy (T-12, 23.5 miles WNW of plant) . . . . . . 35 19 Milk samples, analyses for Sr-90, collected from Daup Farm (T-20, 5.4 miles SSE of plant) . . . . . . . . 36 20 Milk samples, analyses for Sr-90, collected from Toft's Dairy in Sandusky (T-24, 24.9 miles SE of plant) . . . . 37 21 Gamma-ray spectrum of milk (NaI), collected 3 May 1976 from Tof t's Dairy in Sandusky (T-24, 24.9 miles SE of plant) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 22 Gamma-ray spectrum of rhubarb, (Ge(Li)), collected 13 May 1976 from Earl Moore Farm (T-8, 2.7 miles WSW of plant) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 23 ' Gamma-ray spectrum of chicken, (Ge(Li)), collected 3 June 1976 from Earl Moore Farm (T-8, 2.7 miles WSW of plant) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40 24 Gamma-ray spectrum of muskrat flesh, (Ge rm, 1, collected 20 June 1976 in vicinity of 9.1,nn . . . . . . . 41 25 Gamma-ray spectrum of silage, (Ge(L1 , u .;ected 31 March 1976 from Earl Moore Farm (tw8, 2.7 ailes WSW of plant) . . . . - . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . 42 v
| |
| | |
| NALCD ENVIRONIVIENTAL SCIENCED LIS7 CF FIGURES (continued)
| |
| No. Caption Page 26 Gamma-ray spectrum of soil (Ge(Li)), collected 3 June 1976 at Port Clinton (T-ll, 9.5 miles SE of plant) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43 27 Treated surface water samples, gross beta activity, collected from Erie Industrial Park (T-10, 6.5 ,
| |
| miles SE of plant) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44 28 Treated surface water samples, gross beta activity, collected from Port Clinton (T-11, 9.5 miles SE of plant) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45 29 Treated surface water samples, gross beta activity, collected from Toledo Water Treatment Plant (T-12, 23.5 miles WNW of plant) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46 30 Treated surface water samples, gross beta activity, collected from Unit 1 Treated Water Supply (T-28,
| |
| , onsite) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47 31 Gamma-ray spectrum of the composite untreated surface water, (NaI), April - June 1976, collected from Erie Industrial Park (T-10, 6.5' miles SE of. plant) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48 32 Gamma-ray spectrum of alewife, (Ge ( Li) ) , collected 11 May 1976 from Lake Erie in the vicinity of site . . . 49 33 Gamma-rt ; spectrum of bottom. sediments, (Ge (Li) ) ,
| |
| collected 3 June 1976 from Lake Erie (T-1, 0.6 miles NE of plant, near intake canal) . . . . . . . . . . 50 4
| |
| 'l vi
| |
| | |
| NALCO ENVI ACNMGN"rAL CCl3NCCS LIST OF TABLES Caption Page No.
| |
| 'l Radioactivity in environmental samples, January -
| |
| 51 March 1976 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
| |
| 2 Radioactivity in environmental samples, April - 55 June 1976 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
| |
| 3 Sampling locations, Davis-Besse Nuclear Pcwer 59 Plant . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ,. . . . . . . . . .
| |
| 4 Type.and frequency of collection . . . . . . . . . . . 6; Sample codes used in Table 4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62 5
| |
| 6 Airborne particulate and charcoal samples collected at Location T-1; analyses for gross alpha, gross beta, 63 and iodine-131 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
| |
| 7 Airborne particulate and charcoal samples collected at Location T-2; analyses for gross alpha, gross beta, 64~
| |
| and iodine-131 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
| |
| 8 Airborne particulate and charcoal samples collected at Location T-3; analyses for gross alpha, gross beta, and iodine-131 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65 9 Airborne particulate and charcoal samples collected at Location T-4; analyses for gross alpha, gross beta, and iodine-131 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66 10 Airborne particulate and charcoal samples collected at Location T-7; analyses for gross alpha, gross beta, and iodine-131 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 67 11 Airborne particulate and charcoal samples collected at Location T-8; analyses for gross alpha, gross beta, and iodine-131 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 68 12 Airborne particulate and charcoal samples collected at i
| |
| Location T-9; analyses for gross alpha, gross beta, 69 and iodine-131 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
| |
| 13 Airborns particulate and charcoal samples collected at Location T-10; analyses for gross alpha, gross beta, and iodine-131 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70 vii
| |
| /
| |
| | |
| NALOC ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES LIST OF TABLES (continued)
| |
| No. Caotion .Page 14- Airborne particulate and charcoal samples collegted at Location T 'l; analyses for gross alpha, gross beta, and iodine .31 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71 15 Airborne particulate and charcoal samples collected at Location T-12; analyses for gross alpha, gross beta, and iodine-131 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72 16 Airborne particulate and charcoal samples, collected at Location T-23; analyses for gross alpha, gross beta, and iodine-131 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 73 17 Airborne particulate and charcoal samples collected at Location T-27; analyses for gross alpha, gross beta, and iodine-131 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74 18 Airborne particulates, monthly average, minima and maxima for gross alpha and gross beta, January -
| |
| June 1976 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 75 19 Airborne particulates, analyses for Sr-89, Sr-90, and gamma-emitting isotopes, quarterly composites from indicator and background monitoring locations for January - March and April - June 1976 . . . . . . . . 78
| |
| . 2.0 Area monitors-TLD (mrem), monthly, January -
| |
| June 1976 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 79 21- Area monitors-TLD (mrem), que.rterly, January -
| |
| June 1976 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 81 22 Area monitors-TLD (mrem), annually, July 1975 -
| |
| June 1976 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 82 23 Monthly precipitation samples, analyses for gross beta and tritium, January - June 1976 . . . . . . . . 83 24 Well-water samples, analyses for gross alpha, gross beta, and tritium,-January - June 1976 . . . . . . . . 84 25 Well water samples, analyses for Sr-90 and gamma-emitting isotopes, January - June 1976 . . . . . . . . 85 26 Milk samples, analyses for gross beta, Sr-89, Sr-90, and gamma-emitting isotopes, January - June 1976 . . . 86 viii ,
| |
| i l
| |
| 1 l
| |
| | |
| NALCO CNVIRONIVIENTAL SCidNCED LIST OF TABLES (continued)
| |
| No. Caption Page 27 Milk samples, analyses for calcium, stable potassium, and ratios of pCisr-90/gca and pCics-137/gK, January -
| |
| June 1976 . . .- . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 88 28 Milk samples collected weekly at Location T-8; analysis for I-131 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 89 29 Fruit and vegetable samples, analyses for gross alpha, gross beta, Sr-90, and gamma-emitting isotopes, January - June 1976 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90 30 Domestic meat sample, analyses for gross beta and gamma-emitting isotopes, collected from Earl Moore Farm (T-8, 2.6 miles SW of plant) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 91 31 Wildlife sample, analyses for gross beta, Sr-90, and gamma-emitting isotopes, collected from the vicinity of the site . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 92 32 Animal feed samples, analyses for gross alpha, gross beta, Sr-90, and gamma-emitting isotopes, January -
| |
| June 1976 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 93 33 Soil samples collected 3 June 1976, analyses for gross beta, Sr-90, and gamma-emitting isotopes . . . . 94 34 Soil samples collected 3 June 1976, analyses for gamma-emitting isotopes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 95 35 Treated surface water samples, analyses for gross alpha, gross beta, and tritium, collected from the Erie Industrial Park (T-10, 6.5 miles SE of plant) . . . 96 36 Treated surface water samples, analyses for gross alpha, gross beta, and tritium, collected from Port Clinton (T-il, 9.5 miles SE of plant) . . . . . . 97 37 Treated surface water samples, analyses for gross alpha, gross beta, and tritium, collected from Toledo water treatment plant (T-12, 23.5 miles WNW of plant) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 98 38 Treated surface water samples, analyses for gross alpha, gross beta, and t itium, collected from Unit 1 treated water supply (T-28, onsite) . . . . . . 99 i::
| |
| | |
| NALCO ENVl54CNMCNTAL CCIUNCED LIST OF TABLES (continued)
| |
| No. Caption Page 39 Treated surface water samples, quarterly composites of weekly grab samples, for January - March and April - June 1976, analyses for Sr-90 and gamma-emitting isotopes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100 40 Untreated surface water samples, monthly composites of weekly grab samples, analyses for gross alpha, gross beta, and tritium, January - June 1976 . . . . . 101 41 Untreated surface water samples, quarterly composites of weekly grab samples, for January - March and April - June 1976, analyses for Sr-90 and gamma-emitting isotopes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 102 42 Fish samples, analyses for gross beta, Sr-90, and gamma-emitting isotopes, collected from Lake Erie in the vicinity of site (T-1, site boundary, NE of plant) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 103 43 Fish samples, analyses for gross beta, Sr-90, and gamma-emitting isotopes, collected from Put-In-Bay, more than 10 miles from the plant . . . . . . . . . . . 104 44 Bottom sediment samples, analyses for gross alpha, gross beta, Sr-90, and gamma-emitting isotopes . . . . 105 i
| |
| i l.
| |
| l l
| |
| M
| |
| | |
| NALCD ENVIRONMONTAL SCIENCES I. Introduction i Because of the many potential pathways of radiation exposure to man from both natural and man-made sources, it is necessary to document levels of radioactivity and the variability of these levels which exist in an area prior to the anticipated release of any i additional radioactive nuclides. To meet this objective, an exton-f sive preoperational environmental radiological monitoring program was initiated by Industrial BIO-TEST Laboratories, Inc. (BIO-TEST) in' July'1972 for the Toledo Edison Company in the vicinity of the Davis Besse Nuclear Power Plant site. The program included col-lection (both onsite and of fsite) and radiometric analysis of air-borne particulates, airborne iodine, ambient gamma radiation, sur-face water, ground water, precipitation, soil, bottom sediments, fish, clams, food crops, vegetation, milk, meat, and wildlife.
| |
| DIO-TEST /NALCO ES completed the first three and one-half years t
| |
| of preoperational monitoring in December of 1975. Results of radio-metric analyses of samples collected from January through June 1976 are reported herein. This report, prepared by Nalco Environmental i
| |
| t Sciences, together with the. previous reports (Industrial BIO-TEST 1
| |
| l Laboratories, Inc. 1973a, 1973b, 1973c, 1973d, 1974a, 1974b, 1975a, and Nalco Environmental Sciences 1975B) will help to establish environmental baseline radiological values prior to operation of
| |
| ) -
| |
| l the Davis-Desse Nuclear Power Plant.
| |
| 1 I
| |
| i 1
| |
| m 3- -e - y- c-- -- - - - . ,m y - y
| |
| | |
| NALCO ENVI AcNM!2NTAL SCIENCEO 4
| |
| II. Summary Results of sample analyses during the period January-June 1976 are presented by quarter in Tables 1 and 2. Monitoring data collected during the period January-June 1976 were similar to data obtained during the same period of 1975 with the exception of the following:
| |
| Gross beta activity in airborne particulates during January-June 1976 by a factor of three to four lower than in those reported during January-June 1975.
| |
| d i
| |
| f T
| |
| f I
| |
| 1 I
| |
| a 2
| |
| L
| |
| | |
| NALCO ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES .
| |
| III. Methodology The sampling locations for the Preoperational Environmental Radiological Monitoring Program at the Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Plant are shown in Figures 1 and 2 and are described in Table 3.
| |
| The type of samples collected at each location and the frequency of collections are presented in Table 4. The sample codes used in this study are presented in Table 5.
| |
| A. The Atmospheric Environment
| |
| : 1. Airborne Particulates Airborne particulate samples were collected at a volumetric rate of approximately one cubic foot per minute on 47 mm membrane filters of 0.8 micron porosity. Vacuum air pumps were used. The filters were collected weekly from twelve locations,
| |
| , (T-1, T-2, T-3, T-4, T-7, T-8, T-9, T-10, T-11, T-12, T-23, and 4
| |
| T-27), placed in individual glassine protective envelopes, and l
| |
| i dispatched by mail to Nalco Environmental Sciences for radiometric I The filters were counted approximately five days after analyses.
| |
| collection to allow for decay of short-lived naturally-occurring radionuclides. In order to minimize counting variables, all samples
| |
| -were counted on the same instrument. The quarterly composites of all air particulate samples from indicator locations (T-1, T-2, T-3, T-4, T-7, and T'-8) and of all air particulate samples from back-ground locations (T-9, T-10, T-ll, T-12, T-23, and T-27) were gamma scanned, using Ge(Li) detector and analyzed for Sr-89 and Sr-90.
| |
| 3 -
| |
| | |
| NALCO ENVI ACNMENTAL SCIENCES
| |
| : 2. Airborne Iodine Each air sampler was equipped with a charcoal trap inline after the filter holder. The charcoal trap at each location was changed at the same time as the particulate filters and dis-patched to NALCO ES. The samples were analyzed for iodine-131 by gamma spectroscopy immediately after arrival at the laboratories.
| |
| : 3. Ambient Gamma Radiation .
| |
| Ambient gamma and beta exposure from natural radiation was measured with thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLD). Monthly and quarterly TLD's were placed on 12 January 1976 and annual TLD's on 30 June 1975 at the eighteen locations (the twelve air sampling lo-cationa and Locations T-5, T-6, T-14, T-15, T-24 and T-26). Monthly TLD's were exchanged on 2 February, 1 March, 5 April, 3 May, 1 June, and 6 July 1976. Quarterly TLD's were exchanged on 5 April and 6 July 1976. The annual TLD's were collected on 6 July 1976.
| |
| Each shipment of TLD's included controls which were stored in a shield at the Plant and returned with'the field TLD's after their removal. In-transit exposures were measured by the con-trol TLD's and subtracted from the field TLD measurements to obtain their net exposure.
| |
| : 4. Precipitation Monthly precipitation samples were collected from two locations, casite (T-1) and Put-In-Bay (T-23). (The June sample from T-23 was of insufficient quantity for analysis due to dry 4
| |
| | |
| ' NALCD ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES i
| |
| weather). The samples were analyzed for gross beta activity and
| |
| ! tritium.
| |
| B. The Terrestrial Environment
| |
| : 1. Groundwater One-gallon water samples were collected quarterly from wells at four locations (T-7, T-17, T-18 and T-27). The gross alpha and gross beta activities were determined on the suspended and dis-solved-solids of each sample. The tritium content was determined by direct counting of samples using liquid scintillation techniques.
| |
| Strontium-90 activity was determined by milking yttrium-90. The ,
| |
| samples were also gamma scanned for identification and quantifica-tion of gamma-emitting isotopes.
| |
| : 2. Milk 4 One-gallon milk samples were collected monthly from j two herds that gra:e within five miles of the Plant site (T-8 and l
| |
| t T-20) and from milk processing plants in Toledo (T-12) and Sandusky (T-24). Ten milliliters of 37% formaldehyde solution were added i'
| |
| .to each gallon of milk collected at T-12 as a preservative before shipment._ The samples were analyzed by gamma spectroscopy for I-131, Ba/La-140,-Cs-137, and K-40 immediately after receiving them at the laboratory. The samples from T-8, T-20 and T-24 were also analyzed _for I=131 using chemical separation and beta counting.
| |
| Samples-were also analyzed for Sr-89, Sr-90, gross beta, and for stable calcium and potassium. Beginning in May samples were col-Llected on'a weekly basis from T-8 and analyzed for I-131 by chemical 5
| |
| | |
| NALCQ ENVI ACNMENTAL SClONCES separation and beta counting.
| |
| : 3. Fruits and Vegetables Rhubarb was collected on 13 May 1976 at location T-8 and analyzed for gross alpha, gross beta, Sr-90, and gamma-emitting nuclides.
| |
| : 4. Domestic Meat A sample of chicken was collected on 3 June 1976 at location T-8. The flesh was separated from the bone and analyzed for gross beta and gamma-emitting isotopes.
| |
| : 5. Wildlife A representative species of fauna (muskrat) was col-I lected on 20 June 1976 from the vicinity of the site. The muscle was separated from the bone, gamma scanned, and analyzed for gross beta activity; the bone was analyzed for strontium-90.
| |
| : 6. Animal Feed Silage and hay samples were collected on 31 March 1976 at locations T-8 and T-20, respectively. The samples were analyzed for gross alpha, gross beta, strontium-90, and gamma-emitting iso-topes.
| |
| : 7. Soil Soil samples were collected on 3 June 1976 at locations
| |
| ; T-1, T-2, T-3, T-4, T-7, T-8, T-9, T-11, T-12 and T-27 and on 6 August at location T-23. The samples were taken from the top two inches of soil, where vegetation was not growing. All samples were analyzed for gamma-emitting nuclies. The samples collected at l-locations T-1 and T-8 were also analyzed for gross beta activity i 6
| |
| | |
| NALCO ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES and strontium-90.
| |
| C. The Aquatic Environment
| |
| : 1. Treated Surface Water Weekly grab samples of treated water were collected from four filtration plants (T-10, ' T-ll, T-12 and T-28) and ana-lyzed for gross alpha and_ gross beta activities in total residue, and for tritium. Quarterly composites were gamma scanned and analyzed for strontium-90.
| |
| : 2. Untreated ~ Surface Water Weekly grab samples of untreated water were col-lected from Lake Erie at three filtration plants (T-10, T-ll and T-12) and at three onsite locations (T-1, T-2 and T-3). The samples were composited monthly and analyzed for gross alpha and gross beta activities in suspended and dissolved solids, and for tritium.
| |
| Quarterly composites were gamma scanned and analyzed for stron-tium-90.
| |
| : 3. Fish Three species of fish were collected on 11 May 1976 from Lake Erie in the vicinity of the site and three species were collected on 16 May 1976 in the Put-In-Bay, more than 10 miles dis-tant from the site (as background samples). The muscle was sepa-rated from the bone, gamma scanned and analyzed for grose beta activity; the bone was analyzed for strontium-90.
| |
| : 4. Clams Clams were not available during the period.
| |
| 7-I
| |
| | |
| NALCO ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCEO
| |
| : 5. Bottom Sediments Bottom sediments were collected on 3 June 1976 from Lake Erie in the vacinity of the site (T-1) and on 4 May 1976 in the vicinity of the' intake and discharge areas (T-29 and T-30).
| |
| ~
| |
| The samples were collected approximately 50 feet offshore with the use of an Ekman dredge. The samples were gamma scanned and ana-lyzed for gross alpha, gross beta, and strontium-90 activities'.
| |
| 4 l
| |
| 1 1
| |
| b i
| |
| 6 l
| |
| 2 8
| |
| | |
| - NALCO ENVI ACNMENTAL SCIENCED IV. Results and Discussion The discussion of the results of data collected during the semi-annual reporting period, January through June 1976, has been
| |
| . divided into three broad categories: the air, the terrestrial, and the aquatic environments. Any references made to data collected during previous years for the Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Plant refers to data collected by Industrial BIO-TEST Laboratories, Inc., and NALCO ES, unless stated otherwise in the text. In this report, and in the preceeding report (July-December 1975) the mean values are reported with one standard deviation while in previous reports the mean values were reported with two standard deviations.
| |
| A. The Atmospheric Environment Results of weekly measurements of gross alpha and beta activities in air particulate samples are listed in Tables 6-17.
| |
| Monthly averages of gross alpha and gross beta activities are given in Table 18 and indicate the minimum and maximum values for each location. Weekly activities are presented graphically in Figures 3-14.
| |
| Gross alpha activity showed no definite trend throughout the period and was about the same as the activity reported for the same period of 1975 (mean value of 0.0023 pCi/m3 for all lo-cations as compared to a mean value of 0.0019 pCi/m 3 for all lo-cations in 1975. Mean gross beta activity for all locations for the first quarter of 1976 was lower by approximately a factor of three, (0.041 pCi/m 3 in 1976 as compared to 0.131 pCi/m3 in 1975).
| |
| Mean gross beta activity for all locations for the second quarter 9
| |
| | |
| NALCO ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES of 1976 was lower by approximately a factor of four than the acti-vity reported for the second quarter of 1975 (0.:36 pCi/m 2 in 1976 as compared to 0.142 pCi/m3 in 1975). There was little variation in gross alpha and gross beta activities among all sampling loca-tions.
| |
| The results of gamma-spectroscopic and radiostrontium analy-ses for quarterly composited samples from indicator and background locations are presented in Table 19. A representative Ge (Li) de-tector gamma-ray spectrum of composited samples from all indicator locations during the dirst quarter is presented in Figures 15.
| |
| Beryllium-7, which is produced continusously in the upper atmos-phere_by cosmic ray interaction (Arnold and Al-Salid 1955) was the predominant gamma-emitting radionuclide in indicator and back-ground samples, ranging from 0.033 pCi/m3 to 0.120 pCi/m3 for the first two quarters, and was lower than that reported for the same period in 1975 (range 0.120 pCi/m3 to 0.159 pCi/m3). Some addi-tional beta and gamma activity was due to fission and neutron activation products resulting from nuclear detonations (Russell and Bruce 1969). No marked difference in the level of gamma-emitting radionuclides was observed between indicator and background locations during the first two quarters of 1976.
| |
| Weekly levels of airborne I-131 were below the minimum level of detection (0 2 pCi/m 3) at all locations (Tables 6-17).
| |
| Ambient' gamma radiation levels as measured by thermolumines-cent disometers (TLD's) are presented in Tables 20-22.
| |
| Monthly and quarterly TLD measurements averaged slightly lower a
| |
| 10 l
| |
| .-. _ _ _ . _ _ = - , _ -
| |
| | |
| NALCQ ENVI ACNMENTAL SCIENCES for this reporting period as compared to those for the same period in 1975 (25.4 mrem for. January-June 1976 as compared to 26.7 mrem for January-June 1975) .
| |
| Annual TLD measurements ranged from 33.6 mrem (T-1) to 65.1 mrem (T-12) for the period June 1975 - July 1976,and were similar to those reported for July 1974 - June 1975 (range 38.0 mrem to 67.5 mrem). Readings averaged lower at locations T-1, T-2 and T-3, which is probably due to low radionuclide content in the sandy soil which surrounds these locations, as evidenced by the soil sample values.
| |
| The results of precipitation analyses are listed in Table 23.
| |
| 1 Gross beta activity in precipitation was lower by approximately a factor of four than during the same period on 1975. Tritium acti-i vity in rain water was also slightly lower than during the same i
| |
| period in 1975 (mean value of 0.18 pCi/ml in 1976 as compared to mean value of 0.28 pCi/ml in 1975).
| |
| Values of radiostrontium activities for the first two quarters in 1976. were also lower than those reported for the same period in 1975.
| |
| B. The Terrestrial Environment The results of well water analyses are presented in Tables 24 and.25. Gross alpha and gross beta activities had the following ranges (in pCi/1):
| |
| 1 9
| |
| 11
| |
| | |
| NALCC ENVIFIONMENTAL SCIENCES Alpha Beta Minimum Maximum Minimum Maximum Suspended solids <0.06 <0.2 <0.12 <0.88 Dissolved solids <0.05 <4.1 <1.82 <3.78 Total residue <0.06 <4.3 <1.82 <4.06 Gross alpha, gross beta, and tritium activities were similar to those measured during January through June 1975. Gross beta activity in dissolved solids in the sample collected from T-18 during February 1976 was higher than in water collected from other wells and was similar in activity to that collected in January 1975 from the same well. Strontium-90 and tritium acti-vities were similar to those obtained during the same period in 1974 and 1975. A representative gamma-ray spectrium of well water is presented in Figure 16.
| |
| The results of milk analyses are presented in Tables 26-28 and in Figures 17-20. Strontium-89, iodine-131, and barium-140 activities were below detection limits in all samples. Gross beta activity ranged from 917 pCi/l to 1155 pCi/l and was sinilar to that measured in samples collected during the same period in 1975.
| |
| Strontium-90 activity was also similar to the activity in samples collected from January through June 1975 (Figures 17-20), ranging from 1.19 pCi/l to 4.43 pCi/1.
| |
| A representative gamma-ray spectrum of a milk sample is presented in Figure 21. Cesium-137 and potassium-40 activities ranged from <3.5 pCi/l to 5.6 pCi/l and from 1160 pCi/l to 1320 pCi/1, respectively. Cesium-137 activity was lower while potassium-40 activity was similar to that measured during the same period in 12
| |
| | |
| NALCO ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES 1975.
| |
| Due to the chemical similarities between strontium and calcium, and cesium and potassium, organisms tend to deposit cesium-137 in the soft tissue and muscle and strontium-89 and -90 Consequently, the ratios of strontium-90 activity in the bones.
| |
| to the weight of calcium in milk and cesium-137 activity to the weight of potassium in milk were determined in order to estimate the potential accumulation of these radionuclides. The normal concentrations of calcium and potassium in milk are relatively constant, averaging 1.16t0.08 g/l for calcium and 1.5:0.21g/l for potassium (National Center for Radiological Health 1968). As a result of their metabolic similarities, a change in the ratio 1
| |
| of ctrontium-90 to calcium or cesium-137 to potassium would indicate an altered environmental concentration of these isotopes.
| |
| The ratios of strontium-90 to calcium during the first half of 1976 ranged from 1.08 pCi9 0S r/gCa at location T-20 to 4.22 pCi 90S r/gCa at location T-12 and were essentially the same as during the first half of 1975. Ratios of cesium-137 activity to potassium ranged from 1.84 pCi C s/gK at location T-8 to 3.81 pCi l37Cs/gK l 37 at location T-12 and were slightly lower than values reported during the first half of 1975 (range 1.59 pCi l37Cs/gK to 5.40 pCi l37 Cs/gK) .
| |
| Results of analyses of rhubarb are presented in Table 29, and a' gamma-ray spectrum is presented in Figure 22. Gross alpha and iodine-131 activity was below the limits of detection. Gross beta activity was 2.6 pCi/g-wet weight and strontium-90 activity I
| |
| ! was 0.006 pCi/g-wet weight.
| |
| 13
| |
| | |
| NALCD ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Results of analyses of a domestic meat (chicken) sample are presented'in Table 30 with the gamma-ray.spectrium of the sample shown in Figure 23. Gross beta, cesium-137, and potassium-40 acti-vities were 2.08 pCi/g-wet weight, <0.04 pCi/g-wet weight, and 6.7 pCi/g-wet weight, respectively.
| |
| The results of analyses of a wildlife (Muskrat) sample are presented in Table 31. A gamma-ray spectrum of Muskrat flesh is presented in Figure 24. Gross beta, cesium-137, and potassimm-40 activities in flesh and strontium-90 in bone were similar to those found in Muskrat callected in March 1974.
| |
| Results of the analyses of cattle feed samples are presented in Table 32. Gross alpha and beta activities, based on dry weight, ranged from less than 0.2 pCi/g to less than 0.3 and from 15.5 pCi/g to 28.7 pCi/g, respectively. Strontium-90 activity ranged from 0.21 pCi/g dry weight to 0.26 pCi/g dry weight. Analyses for gamma-emitting isotopes indicated that most of the activity was due to naturally-ocurring potassium-40. Trace quantities of cesium-137 was present in silage. All other gamma-emitting isotopes were below the minimum detection levels. A typical gamma-ray spectrum of cattle feed is shown in Figure 25.
| |
| Results of analyses of soil samples are presented in.
| |
| Table 33 and 34, a gamma-ray spectrum of soil is presented in Figure 26. Gross beta activity, ranging from 6.3 pCi/g to 30.7 pCi/g dry weight, was similar to the activity in samples collected during the same period on 1975 (ranging from 12.4 pCi/g to 32.0 pCi/g dry weight) . Strontium-90 activity of samples collected
| |
| ~14
| |
| | |
| NALCQ ENVI ACNMENTAL SCIENCES at locations T-1 and T-8 was less than 0.21 pCi/g and 0.27pCi/g dry weight, respectively. Cesium-137 and potassium-40 activities in-samples collected during the first half of 1976 were similar to those in samples collected during the same period of 1975, except for the soil sample collected from T-23 which had a higher cesium-137 level (1.73 pCi/g dry weight).
| |
| C. The Aquatic Environment The results of analyses of surface water samples are given in Tables 35-39 and graphically presented in Figures 27-30.
| |
| Alpha activity of treated surface water samples ranged from less than 0.1 pCi/l to 1.25 pCi/1; beta activity ranged from 1.17 pCi/1 to 4.92 pCi/1. Gross beta activity at location T-ll was slightly higher than at locations T-10 and T-12 (with a six-month average of 2.65 pCi/l at T-ll versus 2.64 pCi/l at T-10 and 2.12 pCi/l at T-12). Tritium activities were relatively uniform for all samples and ranged from less than 0.11 pCi/ml to 0.56 pCi/ml. Strontium-90 activity in quarterly composites ranged from less than 0.2 pCi/l at T-12 to 1.03 pCi/l at location T-ll). No gamma-emitting isotopes were detected above background levels. No seasonal variations were cbserved for treated surface water activities (Figures 27-30).
| |
| Untreated surface water samples were analyzed for gross alpha and gross beta in suspended solids, dissolved solids, and total residue. Ranges of activities were as follows (pCi/1) :
| |
| ~
| |
| 15
| |
| | |
| NALCO ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES .
| |
| Alpha Beta Maximum Minimum Maximum Minimum Suspended solids <0.1 <l.22 <0.1 <2.39 Dissolved solids <0.2 <1.26 <l.55 <3.92 Total residue <0.3 <2.16 <2.00 <5.78 Tritium activity in these samples was similar to those in treated water samples, ranging from less than 0.20 pCi/l to 0.48 pCi/1.
| |
| Strontium-9.0 activity in quarterly composites ranged from 0.48 pCi/l to 0.92.pCi/1. No gamma-emitting radionuclides were detected above the background level as is shown in the gamma-ray spectrum of an untreated surface water sample (Figure 31).
| |
| Three species of fish were obtained from Lake Erie in the vicinity of the site and three species were obtained from Put-In-Bay of Lake Erie. Gross beta and potassium-40 activities in the fish muscle were similar in all samples, averaging 2.0 pCi/g and 2.6 pCi/g-wet weight, respectively. Cesium-137 activity in the fish muscle ranged from 0.004 pCi/g-wet weight in carp to 0.09 pCi/g-wet weight in Alewife. Strontium-90 activity in the fish bones ranged
| |
| .i from 0.21 pCi/g-dry weight in carp at location T-1 to 0.75 pCi/g-dry weight in carp.at Put-In-Bay. Fish samples collected and ana-lyzed between January and June 1976 had activities which were similar to those found in fish samples collected during the same period in 1975. Tables 42 and 43 contain the results of fish sample:
| |
| analyses and Figure 32 is a gamma-ray spectrum of a sample of Alewife.
| |
| Gross alpha activity was below the limit of detection in bottom sediment samples collected at location T-1 (less than 2.9 pCi/g dry weight) , while gross alpha activity 'at locations T-29 and T-30 was 10.9 pCi/g and 7.8 pCi/g-dry weight, respectively. The i
| |
| 16
| |
| | |
| NALCO ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES gross beta activity was lower at location T-1 (12.5 pCi/g-dry weight) than atl locations T-29 and T-30 (22.1 pCi/g and 16.9.pci/g-dry weight respectively). Strontium-90 activity ranged from less-than 0.21 pCi/g to less than 0.24 pCi/g-dry weight. Cesium-137 and potassium-40 activities were lower at location T-1 than at loca-tions T-29 and T-30. A representative gamma-ray spectrum of a I bottom sediment sample is presented in Figure 33.
| |
| Results of battom sediment analyses are provided in Table 44.
| |
| 9 17
| |
| | |
| I i i
| |
| ( O 52
| |
| >o c
| |
| .9 4_ . '
| |
| M \
| |
| i l
| |
| -o o o
| |
| - t 8 >- !
| |
| no s B l U5 o Io W W '
| |
| zz e- O ta ~
| |
| N g6J n-0-
| |
| E o
| |
| - l i
| |
| 0 -
| |
| m o -
| |
| 'di N Q:
| |
| i a <_a x
| |
| <*o o E '
| |
| 2 5 lE @ .l -- J W% to -
| |
| 2x i ..
| |
| z l- j * .
| |
| O a- p . j -
| |
| 50 . i
| |
| :: n N. .p'N . -
| |
| ~
| |
| N --
| |
| . .'. ! . m, na 1 .
| |
| l C<
| |
| . : .i '
| |
| , . , 2
| |
| : i. .. . U
| |
| : +
| |
| .E O -
| |
| w~ -
| |
| .. :o Q+Rs A t N-t u
| |
| .~
| |
| 'l 5 ;.
| |
| l CC i
| |
| i 7
| |
| % % [( in ex
| |
| .t c ."
| |
| m 5 O&+g; iO ..... .- .-
| |
| d l ,g ,e . i gf.,,
| |
| o is , ,
| |
| .. .. o u+ 1
| |
| . .*,) * '
| |
| 5 9 l *=
| |
| z ' f
| |
| ' O !.'f ,.
| |
| O
| |
| * O,'h[jb G to I w
| |
| / .
| |
| - so ._C. 4 EI mn
| |
| ! O i6 ,sO'h.~ U pm $$ .
| |
| 3':' $
| |
| * - ,A.- O tu 2 a' .C I -
| |
| a \~P , 3 .- .r c.
| |
| j - o \ y o: - % , 'C
| |
| 's o n. . . W , o y
| |
| ,h *i C.
| |
| \ til l 3*
| |
| * V lCh
| |
| * 4
| |
| * e R : l -
| |
| i .t
| |
| \ n o m' 3to . *l
| |
| . , e
| |
| #' q -) >u . .
| |
| n o
| |
| [ L. :
| |
| l .c
| |
| 'o-
| |
| < i
| |
| .- . i h$
| |
| j f-elC] j !
| |
| ~
| |
| :- E!ci .
| |
| M i~ b . i U j 4 - ! [@i) .s. ..
| |
| =
| |
| : n. * * .' e f -
| |
| m -. N~ /
| |
| ~y s
| |
| Q
| |
| - ~ ~ _ . _ - .
| |
| g:
| |
| 4 .
| |
| : a
| |
| .Y Q
| |
| * . Q
| |
| , T 3 .
| |
| 3 .- '
| |
| ~
| |
| l 1
| |
| ! IG :l ..e r: o j W >
| |
| ,..... .- *
| |
| * I, . : j a
| |
| <~ '
| |
| ' .)
| |
| 18
| |
| | |
| gf North B: \, c'
| |
| @ TGl5do es u ( h ,,, I'/h .
| |
| \
| |
| G 0 regen '
| |
| I f IED). a ; .
| |
| e.. SmL Stctes\
| |
| hf \
| |
| ! 27 ... . . . South Sass I.
| |
| f . }
| |
| N
| |
| ? _ _ si, c
| |
| ], Kelleys L
| |
| . <' I,
| |
| ,g ,
| |
| .- zo \pp O Har
| |
| \ ak b z 0,. ; , ,.i f ' ; '' .
| |
| Q. -
| |
| 100 \ @Q VS
| |
| * i,;fPort Clinton : >
| |
| : w. , . - - O
| |
| ? f~
| |
| \ s o r-i g .
| |
| g f '
| |
| ,p ..- ,. ...
| |
| . s
| |
| ,Sondusky
| |
| . ..y__
| |
| ~.,
| |
| Bowling Green U
| |
| S mi /
| |
| @ \ #T s ,.
| |
| ste \ ! 90
| |
| ) f
| |
| \ ' 2omi Fremont N /
| |
| [p. N -
| |
| N Norwolk 4
| |
| -] )
| |
| somi , . NAlCD
| |
| ., g s ENVIRONMENTAt. SCIENCES DIVISION Fostoriok.
| |
| l - -
| |
| - NORMR0011LUNOIS 60062 - -
| |
| Figure 2. Sampling locations (excepting those on the site periphery), Davis-Besse NPS.
| |
| l
| |
| | |
| N ALCD ENVI A C NM EN'T'AL SCICNCET3 o o - o O
| |
| * C C
| |
| ~
| |
| $ d f {C/}DC[
| |
| 'II I I 1
| |
| * f f I8 I e I I e fit t iI t I e t i gg
| |
| ,v ae
| |
| ~Q '
| |
| ,O - -
| |
| g a C1 y l, g O- -
| |
| g CCrs,.l, 3 '1,.,,,
| |
| - C -' d Od
| |
| *C Cd5 -[ l
| |
| 'C '
| |
| CC ~ a- '
| |
| O ''
| |
| O ' )D
| |
| - - ~
| |
| 7 M~
| |
| ua O C' ec
| |
| .O c Q,' O - H
| |
| 'C ..' O -
| |
| G
| |
| - D .b- O c iu 40 0
| |
| Q'***~ CD (C. O 'C ' - . , . 'E
| |
| * ~
| |
| 4 Is c O' ^ a -
| |
| o Q m ca
| |
| =y er ~
| |
| s s a-g h x,N N. N NO O,.
| |
| r MC U3 O
| |
| -H O D- <
| |
| U2 o-3 CC l' o g', b
| |
| -C
| |
| .t.Ls.
| |
| 4 _L-.! L - M J ;
| |
| p uc OC e
| |
| b -
| |
| -% OWO g ej
| |
| 'blI l 'q -
| |
| y>i>
| |
| O l
| |
| 5 -
| |
| l
| |
| ~
| |
| Cf~, ur'"5~i ,
| |
| ~
| |
| $, ?
| |
| * Cc-- fi d -
| |
| $' $ 5 elm E$
| |
| a -c
| |
| (.l $l ,hd & HH ll Q~
| |
| k ty 0 '[ ~
| |
| >9@
| |
| u d
| |
| ~
| |
| 'O I d y %- .
| |
| .b -
| |
| '6Waze Q llI . l C 3 U1 4 u O
| |
| ll CEa s [. a.
| |
| C 'D j~5 uun
| |
| :''r_) l 'I .J Cf <
| |
| d .3 "
| |
| O ' : C 's O k'+% l yl li s
| |
| 1
| |
| 'O
| |
| . f-s e v*
| |
| OH a
| |
| a o .~
| |
| o
| |
| [ M li e Ce
| |
| . 'u uam l -
| |
| r3 4 CA I o 1 i e1 l i> >
| |
| ^
| |
| Y e -
| |
| Z O A \ c-N
| |
| - < b A G , s l Il'c 13 'D ~
| |
| .[
| |
| is i iiii i .i'iiii i sii i iii i i i s o a em/1Dd - ~
| |
| c _
| |
| e o
| |
| ~
| |
| . . O C C o'
| |
| 20
| |
| | |
| NALCO ENVIFICNMENTAL CCIENCED C C - c C - c c M
| |
| . . eo
| |
| - o ew o o
| |
| u i, i,,, . , , , . . . , /,! a d , i,,,,,, , ; , em Q . M d C 9-o UM
| |
| ,- D p 3.@
| |
| c,-l d,, -
| |
| a ~
| |
| !w oo o . 5 L J. -_ J '= =sl lj_u -
| |
| C-.--x($A f -
| |
| c' c o- - u -
| |
| ., .g-l rl g -
| |
| e c.,
| |
| .a c.
| |
| N s -
| |
| ~
| |
| a ,* M -
| |
| m L1 0
| |
| ~
| |
| h O :.1 o
| |
| o am ao O m cc c ,_ m, SD 'o. -
| |
| 5 .*
| |
| 9- 'w- > -
| |
| : b. nn
| |
| ,D m ac c -
| |
| cr0- c.
| |
| 2 - e a .-.
| |
| ,A) . N D o a m=
| |
| Q Os _ a - mo O O r-,
| |
| Q / - <@ W O.
| |
| s o' o u
| |
| E I . -6 - t uo
| |
| .- s
| |
| - o
| |
| : q. w.
| |
| o o u a:
| |
| O e - m am m.. - 0l
| |
| .: ee T .$ e J m-Q-
| |
| G-Aa. a C z-
| |
| -e G, O" V
| |
| ,Q l
| |
| R l co .m 4 ,cf s
| |
| a E
| |
| a 5 *.
| |
| w ~ o d pp ,
| |
| T,C p o e m
| |
| $g 3 "'
| |
| ~
| |
| Gr OC cf N IY [$b $2 bb Co i
| |
| -Q ' c
| |
| 't37.
| |
| '' S' oe C - - 6 pt b -mv g% e Ti Yu . % 2 3 5 c:
| |
| ." eo
| |
| ' Y ' i UR 0 r-,
| |
| .O' I.
| |
| f0 )- -
| |
| .a a o .c W, ' ^M* . ,f'l_j E i 1 Q #
| |
| < wu e l A . W,' ?.$
| |
| ob T):S o- . . ua s 4
| |
| e g -
| |
| . C:3 y
| |
| H4 4
| |
| <av Y h
| |
| ~
| |
| y d '
| |
| 'Q[.
| |
| C( s ,
| |
| ,G 2i O q l
| |
| < =
| |
| t 0 , o 5 ,' ;.
| |
| ~
| |
| l IM l 4 ,,' O
| |
| ,. . .. , , . ..,2 , , , , , , , , , , , ,
| |
| o o t*lTDd - ~
| |
| - o 5 i e g 21
| |
| | |
| hggy5}.gm2hr un mf$
| |
| 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1
| |
| 0
| |
| ::'~-
| |
| mk~ 0
| |
| - . - - ~' -
| |
| 0
| |
| _ ds ee cg f
| |
| . tl d C ei cm E
| |
| b 1
| |
| q,- . D 14
| |
| [, - o.
| |
| c1 4 n V
| |
| O,p- O ay
| |
| . N tr ea n bd s
| |
| ''p .
| |
| su n ,
| |
| so j ,9 .
| |
| T C
| |
| ob8 r
| |
| 'D .
| |
| O gee tl z i .
| |
| dib nsa o i .
| |
| P a ,T n/ .
| |
| E a3 m
| |
| / S 4- h - o n pTr l( f
| |
| 'o a
| |
| \ .
| |
| 6 ne q .
| |
| G 7 sir saa
| |
| - %~iU 9 1 or o . A rda 0- O g t aa r
| |
| qo
| |
| - L .
| |
| L rrd Of I
| |
| i U
| |
| oo
| |
| - fte b f J O sh a i s T 33 ' ~
| |
| t e
| |
| I ee g~ b . . sh yt .
| |
| n ~g _
| |
| N P S Qr U 5 l
| |
| adP K }D, c J 7 9
| |
| nn1 aa 1
| |
| e C 1 m A Q
| |
| b l Y
| |
| A O-
| |
| ,rs ses eve lid f pR-0 . h m s
| |
| - a ~
| |
| O ati snv
| |
| \
| |
| q s.
| |
| e
| |
| ,d.
| |
| R eaD ia n
| |
| \
| |
| /-d sh-
| |
| ,b. A P t s as ,
| |
| l u) y
| |
| \ -
| |
| uot
| |
| . cTn R i a k t el f
| |
| g- >
| |
| f ~
| |
| i C
| |
| A M
| |
| rhp at p f Q
| |
| ~ ,,t u ro ra q
| |
| y,
| |
| ~
| |
| ~
| |
| Q E
| |
| @B .
| |
| ieE AnS
| |
| ~
| |
| F k
| |
| Aci
| |
| -(
| |
| ~ .
| |
| ' /)h
| |
| : b. S nf up_ -
| |
| I i
| |
| o J N
| |
| A r
| |
| e u
| |
| g s! i K
| |
| F
| |
| __ - - - - - _ - ::~~~- : - - ~ ~
| |
| 0 0
| |
| 0 1
| |
| miQ 1 0
| |
| 1 0
| |
| 0 1
| |
| 0 0 0
| |
| a r
| |
| | |
| N ALCO CNVIRONMONTAL CCIENCOO , -
| |
| e o - o o - o o a o
| |
| o o
| |
| c -
| |
| ,,i i , , . , , .....i gu.:/,Tod
| |
| , , i,...i , . , e v .--
| |
| u a By I
| |
| :(o Ic T
| |
| o
| |
| ,W oc o-Q) k - C C **
| |
| OW 1 OO 6 .
| |
| b sn >O O -
| |
| c' "
| |
| Q.- &
| |
| H - 2 Um 00
| |
| =~*H n
| |
| -s d .
| |
| . mE
| |
| ~
| |
| E y to D oO -
| |
| u .
| |
| mo 6 ,9 -
| |
| 1 -
| |
| t - .
| |
| 'O Y . Ch k O
| |
| : c. cw o 9U -
| |
| a e a ce c AC a i i c. c
| |
| $ L MO W C P - w c.
| |
| on .ao d
| |
| v N Cm p ca Cf3 OOH oa .H d -'A l <; O Od CW (dff: 0; y, " 2 3
| |
| ;; Lho -
| |
| ; u.;e5 L.
| |
| I.. - ' o- ~
| |
| U Q % Oi E* E C ry') O b -08 3 I~ ~ T 'c0b -
| |
| m u' IjOE ' 1 ' 3 (ttj ll
| |
| -)* rl ~y+y&
| |
| $$H$
| |
| >>o-2
| |
| ~ , =::. L. ' rd .r Fg _
| |
| p = m a .a u a
| |
| : o. ccec Nl
| |
| . - r-
| |
| %{_{3_- l- 'm o c E i-- * -
| |
| ~ cam
| |
| ~y q
| |
| mcec p :e ..
| |
| y O: -
| |
| >' on -
| |
| l ,+mo=
| |
| ' e C. 3 4 0 y ,e -
| |
| o g g ;~ 3-s
| |
| ? fg R' .
| |
| m.$
| |
| Q L:s'~ ,
| |
| l . '~bw
| |
| ;-. o = ~ =.
| |
| M c4 e i ir---,.
| |
| Opg. ''
| |
| c .- m m
| |
| 'j2yj
| |
| [A r, d'p~ 5C :3 2 ",
| |
| g g ", 'e
| |
| , , in .
| |
| m Wu>4
| |
| : 2. o
| |
| ) r f -
| |
| ~
| |
| W .H O e
| |
| <a2-E*
| |
| ~
| |
| i O . l .
| |
| I i v> ,i m~ x . a O(Q e/
| |
| j ,
| |
| z o
| |
| A L OC - 4 Y M m e lWl14 b G .
| |
| i i
| |
| * is i e i e i e .iiiie ie siiiii i e i o
| |
| o o gm/!Dd -
| |
| C C
| |
| . . o o C o'
| |
| 23 t
| |
| | |
| l l
| |
| NALCC ENVIRONMONTAL CCIONCEO -
| |
| l C O - O O O C a
| |
| * . . . 1E o
| |
| em/,}3 d o c o ii i ,, . , , ... ., i . , sii. ,,, i i i eu U s' O ~
| |
| . a Os Q O Oo p .
| |
| k
| |
| ~
| |
| g n
| |
| au en
| |
| ~ ^
| |
| f, Oc d (7 _
| |
| . Uy D $ -
| |
| o a'
| |
| * 3 b , .
| |
| z av c n or
| |
| =>
| |
| d O! s -
| |
| m
| |
| 't 'P
| |
| ~
| |
| :- 82 O uz O - O m:
| |
| C"' rf
| |
| ,'O; .
| |
| DC cm
| |
| &'Q F a *5 em O'e.l- j, &
| |
| i . , ~.
| |
| l 0 - c>
| |
| f3 d -
| |
| O r~
| |
| e mo n
| |
| 4< N p 'd cn m O
| |
| O' ,,4l~ < 0 ~
| |
| .C o $2 t.j ~Os ' . -
| |
| u5
| |
| - 'Q-
| |
| ,- "- Q ~
| |
| ~
| |
| D Os ue c ,,- 3 ' 'Q
| |
| ~
| |
| mu
| |
| ~ . - u OO
| |
| ~
| |
| os, e N. a $
| |
| m - .e
| |
| _O' "I T l gIs< l _,r
| |
| ~
| |
| '$ $m O a i 2
| |
| . -~
| |
| a g/ md r% m
| |
| ~
| |
| Y UU N. . <
| |
| l H C CB
| |
| ~ ^ g
| |
| 'O \M 41 / O he' e
| |
| a- i i.3 i
| |
| ,i
| |
| ~
| |
| 5
| |
| ~
| |
| d l I EO o r~
| |
| Q ' -
| |
| a ai l M lOsj
| |
| ~
| |
| fD
| |
| 'b W '
| |
| Q- -
| |
| 3% .
| |
| "r O- -
| |
| i.
| |
| .d3 c' km uc e-H C a l.
| |
| ~
| |
| W <MS
| |
| (,
| |
| y y 1 r.
| |
| ) s d 9
| |
| i
| |
| . a N m
| |
| o
| |
| !lQ D ~
| |
| H as a ie i i i sinei i i a sia ai e i i o em /IDd -
| |
| o .o. e o
| |
| . . C
| |
| $ C o
| |
| 24
| |
| | |
| NALCC ENVIRONMCNTAL CCIGNCES i O O - o
| |
| .O - O o aM
| |
| . . . . 4#
| |
| o o o a
| |
| =
| |
| .. i , , . , , .....,gu.1/ i tad.
| |
| i
| |
| , is, , ,,..i_i 'gt
| |
| / -
| |
| . ua vQ
| |
| ~
| |
| Q U .O g o ;-
| |
| ' 'A i
| |
| y'
| |
| .w O'
| |
| C C o.
| |
| (t, (Os .
| |
| -=
| |
| w ': 0 m
| |
| , #v ,# '*)g aD W V ~
| |
| d .
| |
| 0s -
| |
| mE s
| |
| 'A, W 8&
| |
| ,o -
| |
| o u .~
| |
| O
| |
| ~'
| |
| A - o o>
| |
| (f y$
| |
| C;
| |
| 'o Wj C
| |
| . c 5 ' .
| |
| ) O' M W
| |
| \
| |
| - U2 c3
| |
| .= c
| |
| : t. I O ac e.4 e-t IO' - 'o c c.
| |
| / . rs J O C * "*
| |
| J : H p .
| |
| g0 b ~
| |
| - < uO 4 O~ T O C$ ~
| |
| \ J-d l "' J.:o -
| |
| u O*
| |
| 0 ~". ..
| |
| p Q wo C '
| |
| H q n
| |
| ~
| |
| W.j 9.-
| |
| $D3lk ~
| |
| l{-& -
| |
| r$,r41 i* d. /^f 0$!"I
| |
| * O M' ~
| |
| d ,- 9 m' b v-
| |
| .s m y .>- g l r=4 J
| |
| ( 'o
| |
| - a-
| |
| " 6
| |
| $f'7 04 -
| |
| gg, a
| |
| c<
| |
| lfa l- b
| |
| .WNw, c: a noe S
| |
| b O'X at h
| |
| ,A DN1A I^%
| |
| $83
| |
| .S
| |
| * b 04'-o 5 i
| |
| N A6 3 ' -- ,- E "t8 eea l
| |
| .2 1 l a r.a u
| |
| ( l ) ( b'd- = . Wcc
| |
| .~ .= a b r.7 50 M c 0 c .
| |
| - e -
| |
| \ b g 3 p
| |
| A 4
| |
| u 3
| |
| D s , tn
| |
| ) lh rYi **
| |
| is i i i a i . iiisi i -i i i at t iiiiiii o
| |
| O e etc/ Dd - -
| |
| C
| |
| . . O
| |
| ~
| |
| .d o &
| |
| 25
| |
| | |
| NALCO ENVIRONMENTAL GCICNCEO o o - e o - e o a
| |
| . . . . c
| |
| ~ o qwj tDd o o G
| |
| ,, is i i . i ....e i i . i re . , e i .
| |
| U
| |
| : i go
| |
| . uu O O
| |
| ; C.O -
| |
| a oo
| |
| ( Q- - C' Cc o
| |
| c- .
| |
| s- oc Q .
| |
| .c a
| |
| i' O ct Z $o t
| |
| i .
| |
| [-
| |
| N
| |
| ~
| |
| .a .c s
| |
| Q 's s m
| |
| , O . ;
| |
| . m
| |
| 'Q 'Q -
| |
| O Q
| |
| u c.
| |
| -d O mg s, c. y -[ d) o= -
| |
| i
| |
| ~' ~
| |
| ' ' -0 'O - c i 3o cm .
| |
| ' L1 W ca
| |
| . - A
| |
| .c m O. I g e-4 L1 A/ . O cH
| |
| - . r. >
| |
| q '
| |
| W s _-p O o a
| |
| ma L1 o 5 A O:! ry'
| |
| <O 0.
| |
| o --.
| |
| ud
| |
| . .O I I 20 -
| |
| C,,,
| |
| p' g a
| |
| D Q W gg
| |
| ,-4 O
| |
| N '%3 0]
| |
| O~k l
| |
| 'Q47 ;
| |
| .E Ek=-
| |
| G,S ''- c. \A. Z
| |
| . *O
| |
| -4 2:
| |
| ~ D tn ca C,,
| |
| l e, x-9 ,O' l - m o c m eo G
| |
| * VOf . ..S
| |
| .O M -
| |
| >. 9 $$
| |
| 9- 'q) w.
| |
| l H
| |
| C. m IQ N,3 -
| |
| s - 4 O E * -
| |
| - I s f cc
| |
| ~
| |
| K [
| |
| q_
| |
| b, )^3'b.A_ .
| |
| I I $,$
| |
| Q [ l
| |
| ' ' '9
| |
| *~*
| |
| Ou
| |
| .a o .
| |
| Q Q
| |
| < U .a N u u .-9
| |
| #~
| |
| Q aq ~ IT to Pa .
| |
| mus V O- Y
| |
| 'o -
| |
| : -' c c Q '.; O <0?
| |
| b 9 'f~
| |
| b el O'"Gl '
| |
| d' I dI o .
| |
| c O
| |
| 0
| |
| - < a
| |
| *~ m O i1 I i 'to -
| |
| ,-4
| |
| ~
| |
| iiiii i . . iiiiii i i i iiiiii i . . .
| |
| o o em/ tDd -
| |
| o -
| |
| e o
| |
| . . o o o g 26
| |
| | |
| NALCC ONVIRONMRNTAL GCIONCCG o o - e a o - o o ec
| |
| * . . . 4 o o o C8 is i ei . , e
| |
| , , , , , , gm, /,}3 d , r.,ii , ._ e , o us v9 O,
| |
| ~
| |
| o r.,
| |
| o ob
| |
| -m
| |
| .e '.g ,
| |
| ] Z I T-. N I oo
| |
| 'c % -
| |
| co E
| |
| (U j t
| |
| Q uc ci
| |
| ~ ~
| |
| 'O d -Q '.j O(
| |
| d4 ,
| |
| % N P
| |
| oc p
| |
| ' ~
| |
| u D,
| |
| o o--
| |
| ~ o et Y ]#
| |
| .D . ec n ~
| |
| ,) -
| |
| %O O 7-O m Eu
| |
| -o O
| |
| O d- e :c 3- p- . & m to n
| |
| O, c - ae a
| |
| om U
| |
| < o a ,.
| |
| - A T:
| |
| x -r 5 -
| |
| $.m o
| |
| e O~\ L =0
| |
| - % in k
| |
| (4 g - p" .
| |
| -$ f 9 M UU OC, 3 nt_ @'
| |
| e l~dg, Cw~
| |
| 8 N >, o e - -
| |
| l - ~~
| |
| w ci
| |
| 'N' h Y ch~
| |
| Ml .3, I $ k '$-
| |
| c' se s 9 g aet ,,.
| |
| i O f c i ,,-o -
| |
| n e v -
| |
| > Y .- m a
| |
| /
| |
| ,, eo/ ! - <
| |
| 4 I
| |
| I 1
| |
| EH e ec-O Qlqs AC e -
| |
| O m. .c -
| |
| C C d B Oc ,
| |
| a c--
| |
| Q l l- ub
| |
| ~. ,
| |
| < 33 0- 0, .
| |
| Y l'O ' o~}Y w
| |
| - i 'E .y e ccci%
| |
| sa s eue
| |
| . m . . , ,
| |
| >: e ''c 7 T-i) ar uoa
| |
| )') "$f
| |
| ~
| |
| d kb$
| |
| a < A -
| |
| a N.- M , _s OcL Yh $* ~ ~: "
| |
| D rp> 20 tw-L--n i, i rin ...,,, , , , ..i,,, , , , ,
| |
| o o o gmjiDd -
| |
| o o
| |
| 27
| |
| | |
| NALCC ENVIRONMENTAL 3CIGNCES ~
| |
| o o - u o - o o e
| |
| ~ d gtn/,Tod d d, e isi i i . . . . . . . i , , i,..,,, , , oo I C
| |
| 'D U ~ ~1 -g l- O
| |
| ($
| |
| o Q' -
| |
| 'A RM O o%
| |
| 0Q[l Cf m oo y --
| |
| M, , ,. ,-os
| |
| -c c-
| |
| 'O '
| |
| ~,
| |
| 'o O us o
| |
| p n 1 0-
| |
| - Z 0' m5 mm o.JT. ,' O-
| |
| 'y -
| |
| S' oZ d -
| |
| o me
| |
| /o C w, '
| |
| _ O m o(_ em w : 88i T
| |
| a .
| |
| ~
| |
| (4 5*
| |
| 0" . '~ . .O:: h.N
| |
| ;D 'T_
| |
| V -
| |
| d?
| |
| o e~
| |
| $n' oa b d'$ _
| |
| ~ < u=
| |
| d i O o p o . W C4 C..
| |
| O' '
| |
| a o
| |
| &vo
| |
| 'o 'Os n %,Q_
| |
| m o e re
| |
| $ oM
| |
| ~-4 6
| |
| o g a t/2 o#
| |
| i[ ch'M-~ i o .,
| |
| km
| |
| @3 Gr" ,, l l D*,s O ,D, ~*Q~ *y
| |
| 's, Q n' ,
| |
| c'J,0 l
| |
| o.
| |
| o-
| |
| ~a o
| |
| h b d
| |
| ~
| |
| 'O FG
| |
| ^ ' '
| |
| ,o- ll 1 g ul _
| |
| y a?
| |
| u-G;C y 4 l- c ? I -
| |
| 'O l lD $
| |
| o fi i go" '
| |
| . .3 $ .3 kn C Cf? . j U Z iS J) I b [in' ~$ 6-I
| |
| -O
| |
| - cos a ug uuo l l -
| |
| .a o u l Qs <su
| |
| .'O I .
| |
| W s % IOQ l _
| |
| C N, 6 ''D
| |
| , _ d o
| |
| u q g!
| |
| t ,
| |
| tr , - < a N
| |
| * h ih A O1' ~
| |
| N
| |
| ,i i i . i i . iii.ii i i i .iiiii i i .
| |
| o o o g /IDd t -
| |
| o o
| |
| * o C
| |
| * d ,
| |
| i i 28 -
| |
| | |
| 2b{0aj l la{)p n9a2yo 0 0 'l 0 1 o 1 o o d
| |
| .- - - - - - ' _~~ . R_ __~_--- _
| |
| ~"
| |
| - e t e p' ,
| |
| o Pc C
| |
| . cr ea
| |
| ,b ,
| |
| E l l a g'! D 3
| |
| ' \ 0 ot ca G'd (21; ,
| |
| . ,d V ae d o.g ,
| |
| O th f -
| |
| g'i i
| |
| f N
| |
| b eT s .
| |
| P
| |
| , / .
| |
| sP l
| |
| T oP 1 r1 C g
| |
| \
| |
| O e
| |
| , ds k,
| |
| ns
| |
| . ae B
| |
| P .
| |
| N a-Y E hs i ..
| |
| R_" , S pi l v p aa
| |
| , 6 D s
| |
| y G 97 s ,
| |
| s 9 \
| |
| U 1 A
| |
| o) rt gn n
| |
| \
| |
| '{
| |
| ~ 9' o rl a
| |
| V- op 1s pi L f t -
| |
| d i
| |
| U J
| |
| C so f
| |
| iU a i
| |
| e
| |
| .i
| |
| /
| |
| <f
| |
| ~ t b
| |
| e ,$ i sW yI 1 lW N
| |
| 1 .
| |
| g
| |
| * A,M5 U 7 a
| |
| ns g\ i3.
| |
| t
| |
| - /
| |
| 29Q.I .
| |
| J 9 ael 1
| |
| - g '., t4 ,i sm R 9 ,
| |
| O e o
| |
| N / G
| |
| [' ,
| |
| Y A
| |
| - l5 p .
| |
| s \ -
| |
| P m3 M O kD -
| |
| \j
| |
| .V v a2 s
| |
| ] ,
| |
| e2
| |
| 'o _
| |
| t i t1 .
| |
| P 2g9 a5 b b_/
| |
| : r. A lT1
| |
| >\ .h u(
| |
| r c e k -
| |
| P, ,
| |
| . iol tdb
| |
| 'p W Q h ,
| |
| t l
| |
| A rea alt g- ,
| |
| k,f. iE ,
| |
| M po Tm r o g .
| |
| it r g8b
| |
| , i g~ l Aaf E
| |
| 4' g q b. .
| |
| . 0?
| |
| , F 2
| |
| \b N'2 A -
| |
| \p 0 N
| |
| 1 e
| |
| : o. O- f G 4 A
| |
| r u
| |
| [A d
| |
| rg l 8r r J
| |
| i F
| |
| g
| |
| _ ~ _ ~- } - _ __- -_ _
| |
| 0 0
| |
| 0 ).
| |
| " 1 1 0 1
| |
| 0 0 m*
| |
| | |
| ;n2hT nO i2U -
| |
| 2 {0 $ n i
| |
| 0 0 1 o t 0 1 0 o a o
| |
| e s
| |
| l 0
| |
| _. ~_ 3 0 h
| |
| dh t
| |
| eT
| |
| ' o. '
| |
| C c
| |
| 'O p '
| |
| E e .
| |
| lP O h ' D lP oU i
| |
| a\ c e
| |
| S. .
| |
| ,j '
| |
| V
| |
| ,s O as
| |
| \ O t e O
| |
| ' \
| |
| ' N eB b-s
| |
| : n. si f /
| |
| . sv
| |
| /
| |
| o / '
| |
| T oa rD C
| |
| 'o
| |
| \
| |
| . + ' O g
| |
| d) 0 u g g' P .
| |
| nt a.a n
| |
| 0 g'/ '
| |
| E al d S hp p
| |
| L -
| |
| O' lf i
| |
| ao
| |
| /p, 6 sE j - '
| |
| G 7 sN U 9 oE A 1 r h f"'
| |
| a gs rl e
| |
| \"' L oi
| |
| . \ O' i U o f m A e J s3 a #
| |
| e .
| |
| % t e
| |
| l s4 4 b - 1 . y1 g N l
| |
| / h_ i U a ,
| |
| ! 5 n3 n1 f A Hi '9 J / a2 O A f _
| |
| 1 ,T s( .
| |
| O O Hh O e g 9' Y
| |
| A l e1 ps 6
| |
| W'-
| |
| g Y'b . M O- mue aol shb 7 -
| |
| a b s' i . t a
| |
| - d R ehT
| |
| \ \ t g
| |
| ' P O
| |
| i r ai m A lLo d M 9- 7 u r 4 l. cyf y f /
| |
| 1 R
| |
| A ia tB e r- r kd, i
| |
| ~
| |
| M ana pI
| |
| - a W
| |
| O t rtt l iua l
| |
| E APd I.
| |
| f 4; 8p -
| |
| c
| |
| 'j,F 3
| |
| - _ e, 0, -
| |
| _ _ 1 o _
| |
| _\
| |
| b ,
| |
| N e
| |
| s A r 9 .
| |
| J u
| |
| g _
| |
| y - i
| |
| - - - - - _ ' - - - ~ _- _ _ _ _ _ , F 0 0 g 1 1
| |
| 0 0 1 0 0
| |
| 1 0 0 0
| |
| | |
| i NALCO GNVIRONMENTAL SCICNCES e e - e o - e o o e o
| |
| e
| |
| . . . . , i gtu i s i i . . . .
| |
| . /.t o d . ii. . i e i i i , 3, s~- Oa V' ' . L O h -
| |
| o om i
| |
| ~0 s b _
| |
| rA.
| |
| -i c e
| |
| Q~' C' -
| |
| C oo d - -, o .c o=r p'r f
| |
| s '
| |
| c O P
| |
| * O O -
| |
| Z h- .$ -$
| |
| ccq '' 4 _ ga g 'M -
| |
| g* 8y u mo l> ~ o a of''O O' w
| |
| ]
| |
| a .a c',
| |
| C
| |
| ~
| |
| 'o O' 0-e$ .
| |
| l'O Q W .c o 0
| |
| * h p S'~.
| |
| e.
| |
| e Is0 Q-c N
| |
| D Li c f Q mH L1 4 S
| |
| (h _ p $d ~
| |
| Q < m CT' .'O L O w
| |
| : 4o f U.. .
| |
| o
| |
| -, m' !
| |
| A wI L -
| |
| p z m O or ccr;g 2 ~ 1 oFR
| |
| ; >)<.'
| |
| I 3 g
| |
| l A
| |
| ~
| |
| 'ea7 c ~%u D tn 2
| |
| . 33 c .g Ca
| |
| ~
| |
| l iD, l (*1
| |
| ~
| |
| P /s ~.9 aa Q, c a O o R >
| |
| Q s<' Nsp M 9
| |
| C 5 l In' em O
| |
| d A Nd- d 6 3 4 n* -
| |
| -~
| |
| u .gN g a tiiiii.
| |
| og -
| |
| * 0
| |
| ' a ,c c C' l l l ly'l g
| |
| - n d L1 H d i Ve " *H W .Q O /l l' w -
| |
| < : cc
| |
| - _. oze
| |
| ^ h .s To co -
| |
| : aoa QN .
| |
| 'Q' 6.. -
| |
| ~
| |
| < WOO c0W c.c g% j g 2 cgu
| |
| , W c Q' -- I ,
| |
| l l , C'. - 'd # W
| |
| =- <cc hi2 q% W A .;
| |
| c jh py .
| |
| ~
| |
| pa, -
| |
| y ,.L;o -
| |
| i 8
| |
| a d '
| |
| s' P bg 9 m I'' ,n O I~ -l '' -O ] 'y
| |
| :5 5 i 6 6 i 6 i ti l iie i i sii i i a i a i e
| |
| o .a gtu/ tod a e
| |
| . . C
| |
| ~ O
| |
| * C g l
| |
| 31 1 1
| |
| | |
| - w w - u w s o o o o o o o R oo o o o o O o o o g gg ~ 5 y , ; , i - -- n,,_ -- q ~ -g c o o, - a oe M E5 ~%% 3L C xo W
| |
| -P s- K y" {g yf- -
| |
| '34 144Ce 186 226Ra h 145 141Cc
| |
| =~ z.
| |
| wo_ LI _ 238 216Pb 4-@ _
| |
| _wOa w wo ;r HO H D oc 1:1 gL z;C-DOOE h r" E2
| |
| * D L1 m ,- t- If rt C D 0 H- % t
| |
| :A
| |
| '.r f
| |
| {)F tw D0 M 478 7e B
| |
| zop ~;f ;I H th 0%
| |
| m~ %
| |
| g w
| |
| y, o Q
| |
| I:
| |
| ,3 M
| |
| Q-----
| |
| c l --
| |
| 4 hot gg~ 'y- 511 , A 497 103nu C cc O O HwmO g
| |
| . 20871 4,h.[
| |
| '< H X rt i --
| |
| 583 4 512 106Ru .
| |
| mHM b~- -_
| |
| 51
| |
| *~
| |
| H wC ;.
| |
| C3 a w.H E J
| |
| $ \ 609 214Bi k >
| |
| 'G2
| |
| ' 137Cs m O .3 -a
| |
| *O M
| |
| { 'I 724 95gr
| |
| *M D L. wo-us o
| |
| : c. N n
| |
| - 756 d -
| |
| 'a 765 95Nb DEH oo - :
| |
| HtM 3 4 MH 1 &
| |
| Ot ? g o .. p s T O M '
| |
| H n n L H p H- i 7 OHO g, T, 7 OMC oo_ s ,.
| |
| n H oo otC oo $ ;f GDn l MC }g '
| |
| U1 rt Li g H~ s ,
| |
| >0 ( !'
| |
| TCw h I MHo 4 1 H W l y u, $
| |
| mo wouo_
| |
| Heu a r
| |
| e s **
| |
| D' m Co M H-j OHW C et O cC< ,
| |
| D* M +
| |
| y ~m p -
| |
| 1461 40n -
| |
| =0e g g ._ _
| |
| OG oo QBM CCC 3OO >
| |
| C tn rt HO H et M C O ** ' ,
| |
| r 4
| |
| ww $
| |
| ma
| |
| .O O wo_ an X 'O Q wo t2, G~
| |
| yn oo c.
| |
| no o O X
| |
| O OHHH Y. c '
| |
| cm c - n v-U H* ~ h n3 o L1 % CC C-
| |
| .. Hm ,
| |
| O' oo Q= oo, m
| |
| ~" 1 I I i 1, I I l oOO - w w a oMg - w w e o o o o o e o y o o o o o o o t
| |
| / -
| |
| S3DNBIOS 1V.1.NatAINo t:ll ANa DC IVN l
| |
| | |
| L-4--, .-- z :k. -~
| |
| N 25000 2000 20000 _
| |
| _ 20000 2
| |
| )
| |
| i 15000 15000 h
| |
| O k m il l 2 o \
| |
| 8 i v\ $
| |
| R ' II O
| |
| I! lh It 10000.{; g
| |
| '\ _. 10000 2
| |
| ;'" S fj b (I 511 V
| |
| $ % m o
| |
| 9 0 5000 - - 5000 -
| |
| I .1461 40x m 2
| |
| W g Sample plus background 0 Background. / / 0 0 o l I ..
| |
| I i 1 0 Channel No. 100 200 300 400 500 0 Energy, kev *500 1000 1500 2000 2500 Figure 16 Gamma-ray spectrum of well water, 0-2560 kev. Detector: 10 cm x 10 cm NaI (Tl),
| |
| (No. 1) . Sample: 3.5 1 of well water, collected 3 June 1976 at liess Sunoco Garage (T-18, 1.3 mi. S of plant, Route 2). Counts: 925 min. on 21 June 1976.
| |
| | |
| i 1 iI 1)
| |
| Z>rn0 m2<.BhE g-j yrmnggnmG 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 O 0
| |
| 1 1
| |
| ADO
| |
| * _ - - - - - - - - - - - _ : - - - - _ - - 2 3
| |
| i C
| |
| n i
| |
| E ,
| |
| D 8 i
| |
| T .
| |
| - . (6 V 2
| |
| ' m O .
| |
| O re i N al s
| |
| - Fb a
| |
| * e eT r
| |
| i T om C oo A i e
| |
| O l
| |
| f f
| |
| r
| |
| ' l re ar i
| |
| P Ea i
| |
| E M e S ma ot
| |
| _ - ra fd i
| |
| . 6 i
| |
| G 7 de 9 eh O i U 1 tT
| |
| - A c i
| |
| G e
| |
| _. l .
| |
| - . lP e
| |
| L oP clf D
| |
| i U G i J ,e
| |
| - rs Ss
| |
| - i
| |
| . 0 e
| |
| - N 5 9 B i
| |
| U 7 -
| |
| ;C- i J 9 1
| |
| rs oi f v a
| |
| 4 O- sD e
| |
| Y s ,
| |
| i A - y) lt i
| |
| M O an na
| |
| _ al p
| |
| f i
| |
| l i ,
| |
| i P sf J ~
| |
| i A
| |
| l eo pW i
| |
| R mS A
| |
| aW s
| |
| eW i i
| |
| M ke s
| |
| l l
| |
| , 3 ii l
| |
| E Mm i
| |
| F .
| |
| 7 1
| |
| N e
| |
| r OO i A
| |
| J u g
| |
| i F
| |
| .-____~ -
| |
| - - _ _ - - ~ _ _
| |
| 0 0
| |
| UD 0 I
| |
| 0 0 1 0 0 1 1
| |
| A -
| |
| | |
| 2)r00 2<g023n2Yr gg.n20mC i
| |
| .i 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0
| |
| 1 1
| |
| m)A 5 T .
| |
| 3 2
| |
| C E ,
| |
| O , D 2 1
| |
| . T6 V ( 2 O
| |
| O ye
| |
| - , N rl
| |
| - ib aa DT T om O. C do er O lf o
| |
| Te r
| |
| P aa E
| |
| b
| |
| , S ma ot t ra fd r
| |
| \~ ,
| |
| G79 6
| |
| de eh n- t U 1 tT
| |
| , A c e
| |
| ,- O l .
| |
| , - . lP L oP U bN O, ,
| |
| J O ,e
| |
| / rs Ss
| |
| , . e N B U 57 rs
| |
| - N ,
| |
| J 9
| |
| 1 oi f v a
| |
| N-o O sD Y - e s ,
| |
| A - -
| |
| y)
| |
| M O - lt O~ ,
| |
| an na al Ac t
| |
| i p
| |
| P sf A eo
| |
| ~\
| |
| l pW l mN aH
| |
| >o l
| |
| A s 2
| |
| M s
| |
| - ke ll
| |
| , l ii l
| |
| E Mm
| |
| ,F .
| |
| 8
| |
| - 1 g
| |
| N e A r O ,
| |
| I. u g
| |
| i - 8 F
| |
| 0 0
| |
| g}R 0 1
| |
| 0 0 1 0 0 1 1
| |
| wm
| |
| | |
| 2)rQ 2< yO25g rgg.G20mU 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 aN,o.
| |
| 1 s
| |
| , - - - - - - - - - - - ~ - __ - - - - e l
| |
| ,, i C
| |
| m E
| |
| , D 1 5
| |
| V
| |
| - 0 O 2
| |
| -u , N -
| |
| - T .
| |
| (6
| |
| - , 2 m
| |
| T re o , C al Fb O a
| |
| - ' pT u
| |
| s ,
| |
| P am
| |
| ' Do E r S mf o
| |
| - re 8
| |
| f r
| |
| . 6 a G 7 d 9 ea
| |
| , U 1 tt A ca N @ ed l
| |
| l e q
| |
| L oh U -
| |
| cT
| |
| , J 0 ,
| |
| r .
| |
| _ SP
| |
| , . 0 P N 9 N
| |
| , l t
| |
| 5 7 re M9 ,
| |
| J 9 1
| |
| os fs e
| |
| ~N O s3 1 Y - e-ss A
| |
| /'
| |
| - yi
| |
| - l v MO aa nD a
| |
| g t
| |
| i ,)
| |
| P st A en l a
| |
| - pl mp o/
| |
| , t
| |
| - l a
| |
| A sf M o k s .
| |
| lI
| |
| _ , 3 iS 1
| |
| E MS F
| |
| o_ E' 9
| |
| 1 e
| |
| uN r A u J g i
| |
| F ;
| |
| _ - _ . - - . . - _- _ - ~_ -
| |
| O 0 HNi.c o 0 1 0 0 1 0
| |
| 0 1 1
| |
| ,m t
| |
| | |
| 2)r00 my< E02ga21)r mn a20iW- n 0 0 0 1 0 0 .
| |
| 0 1 g). 0O 1 0 6 2
| |
| 1 k
| |
| - - - - - - - : - ~ ~ - . : - - - - - - _ e yl C kb sa O ,
| |
| E uT
| |
| - D d nm ao
| |
| - . Sr V f O n ie D, , N r ya
| |
| - r ia T
| |
| at Da C d W ,
| |
| O '
| |
| s .
| |
| e N th
| |
| -~ fT P
| |
| o T
| |
| E R ,
| |
| , S mP oP N f rN
| |
| . 6 e G 79 ds o es U 1 t e
| |
| :., A cB o e-l s li
| |
| /., ,
| |
| L ov
| |
| , ca U O D
| |
| 'O, , J r
| |
| - S)
| |
| . 0 t N 5 9 n U 79 a rl d J 1 op f
| |
| O so f
| |
| Y
| |
| - e O - sE A yS MO l as
| |
| ' ne y ,
| |
| t
| |
| . al i
| |
| i
| |
| ,m 3
| |
| 4.,
| |
| W ,
| |
| P A
| |
| s e9 l .
| |
| "~ _
| |
| p4 t m2 l
| |
| A a s ,
| |
| M k2 4
| |
| . l -
| |
| x ,
| |
| B iT gW
| |
| * E F
| |
| M(
| |
| 0 2
| |
| /~
| |
| N e
| |
| @ A r J u g
| |
| i P ,
| |
| 0 0
| |
| ~g~)on. 0 1
| |
| 0 0 1 0
| |
| 0 1 1
| |
| M '
| |
| | |
| 2>h0 m2snO2 M2yr m2Og 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 5 0 5 0 5 .
| |
| 2~ 2 1 1 9
| |
| )- l L
| |
| I55 00 00 4
| |
| 2 2
| |
| )
| |
| I ,
| |
| Ty l
| |
| (k s
| |
| d Iu n ad u
| |
| o Nn r
| |
| g
| |
| _ a mS k
| |
| c a :.
| |
| c, b 04
| |
| : 12 s
| |
| u n 00 -
| |
| l l p
| |
| I 00 40 xT(
| |
| 2 e m l
| |
| p - co m
| |
| d a 0e S 1l o.
| |
| ~ :
| |
| rm9 T6 7
| |
| / --
| |
| oo1 tr cfe e n t6 u e7J 00 00 D9 I I 35 15
| |
| - 1 1
| |
| .y
| |
| #* f Van
| |
| .:#r 1 eMo k
| |
| 3 ,
| |
| 0 n 6di 5em 2t c7 0e1 N
| |
| ~
| |
| ,l l9
| |
| ~
| |
| ko lc:
| |
| l 4~ I 00 00 20 1
| |
| i m ,t fl u oi o kn s
| |
| mC m
| |
| e
| |
| . n8l
| |
| %v n
| |
| t uf ro.)
| |
| c1t e
| |
| p5 a n
| |
| s .l 3 p y
| |
| , 00 a
| |
| r:o f
| |
| 1
| |
| -N H' 1
| |
| 00 15 e
| |
| ale mpS 3ka2% a- n N min aai d GSm n
| |
| ~"3c ,n r
| |
| \' u o
| |
| r .V .
| |
| g oe 1 k ik g, c a
| |
| r l ,
| |
| 2 (go B ey ng nr e
| |
| r ae u
| |
| - l
| |
| { ;
| |
| g t e hn CE g
| |
| \
| |
| i
| |
| - $ lI 2 4
| |
| l l 3( ii- ! , , , i O0 F 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 5 0 5 2 2 1 1 3j:e5 33 :
| |
| u
| |
| | |
| NVI DO BN\/IdtCNIAIBNL.Vi~ SOIBNOBS j o o o o o o o o o o o o o o 3 e b u e s w Oc M
| |
| - l l l l l } l -@@
| |
| oo sO O CO mw iL Z O
| |
| * HH nw OM wu 9 mE E WM mn c s
| |
| ' wQ O ' O5 MS % i O oc n r -o oa u.
| |
| - >> w g av rt o .m
| |
| * ww m m E J-DC Jmaw wo H wH V C mmc
| |
| -QC oo oo QZQ
| |
| ~ [ O SU w cc
| |
| .R p n04 1641 ~ ~ - -b ** ,~.
| |
| J'
| |
| . i MCO OO
| |
| , tr
| |
| * Cac
| |
| $q- , CDW
| |
| *7 ! tr tf 3
| |
| << oO cI-g g eem o ow eH u
| |
| ww Hc is + O l< O 1(t, m c ..
| |
| N ~J l C t'Lf oc 'M p P.Y > apc i o g
| |
| ?
| |
| >b f-o*ooo u 'C CaO I aw 1 _-
| |
| oM u
| |
| U LJ 1 'v w h- I .
| |
| Mn U ! C ,Q p f "M c Vil I WmH st I C O C*
| |
| a "C
| |
| , 5 co
| |
| * 3 cm f e $j "M O 2 ( u s W i m oc E N s. O H nt l} iD412906
| |
| * E Tp \ C B c-. C .. H
| |
| .H g 1:802
| |
| /385 .f,, HG3 tt H
| |
| : h. 115 ,{-~SE @ j*
| |
| A ow D* W M f*5 $ u art ht
| |
| ~
| |
| -4 l N' N cc ps' }.
| |
| D + i MH6
| |
| -7 /. 353 :-
| |
| 1; 8 D^
| |
| X bP412 g p --e f'1 rk 592 - 't d -ow 00 bx5
| |
| ~QM T'E.f OOO
| |
| * L-r!
| |
| *i ys bP212 832 --
| |
| ! ow w O O C"
| |
| [J.
| |
| 'J aR622 681 % tf J .=<
| |
| OC N
| |
| :Y'
| |
| * b:
| |
| * zm M hC P
| |
| $$O eD C i s g 22 n I m -- i __ .i n/ m,l l l l l g- ,c c r: u
| |
| =
| |
| c o o o o o o o o o nM *H o o o o - o o o ac e a ot E6 e a u oo ne
| |
| .......,.....,....vs
| |
| | |
| N W 1''D C S N \/ l ih C N IAI B N.1.V 7 S O I B N O E S O o o o o o o o o .
| |
| s o o o o o o &C j
| |
| V M w u N w 0=
| |
| I I I l- I i l oo
| |
| - ^ C Q oo QQ
| |
| .~ wn
| |
| ''' OO wO O2 C w 5 C" %
| |
| n c
| |
| DO w: <
| |
| On 8 m mS, o - ~. w WC P i o I% *O DW 4 0 "O
| |
| 6
| |
| [p J% w
| |
| : 2. . m N.
| |
| O .
| |
| mU ( Hm s w q
| |
| .- C m r.t *t 3 H
| |
| ,i -C OQN oO H
| |
| - . co.O W c x041641 :_- _ --- .
| |
| .L gg Q
| |
| . . ,c MO@
| |
| ,i 0 tt H
| |
| *r O OC%
| |
| l' 1 CHO r- tc H g $ 00
| |
| * u ( o
| |
| - z oo oM 003.y g
| |
| n( w =3
| |
| *3
| |
| * $[i 4GC QXo E s woo
| |
| : .H w=
| |
| y . O o .e
| |
| *% ,' _ooOO m .c m
| |
| - r oo I O tr sw - O C3
| |
| {
| |
| t W 'ni C s* wO
| |
| - n
| |
| !+ wn E
| |
| * OO s e y
| |
| x .
| |
| 4 y O OL
| |
| * I$ , OO *H W 00 =e=
| |
| a.
| |
| 4 ,i 3
| |
| re O-e mH 9 q,- m *t sC/" 31 266 _ ,ti o n.t iD412906 1 %
| |
| rb \ E .. O
| |
| .D.y . .h g a / 385 ~ .%. v NOE I-} 1 802 \ 115 3 tt H nI
| |
| - ? oo O t *!:
| |
| ~
| |
| M 3-2'I -So P "
| |
| CU tnteot.P N A! W F1 N *
| |
| -}f.I i ,-- ~;
| |
| ?, ', D *
| |
| * e- / 353 $<
| |
| nHM N
| |
| - P: bP412 \ 592 r I P pH -
| |
| .f. ?
| |
| : .t ~3 BXC
| |
| -C R
| |
| _--->; ]. .- _8 E 5ycoqi
| |
| ;$ bP 21,.
| |
| 4 832 ow
| |
| ** ~: w CO-EE/ r c 5::
| |
| e.
| |
| aE622 681 bf
| |
| ~-
| |
| C.,J .i.
| |
| ce zr W
| |
| .y .s -
| |
| w EY b iE;-
| |
| &yr O7 I w% oo O
| |
| .. . -j -
| |
| r: a -- ...- -u -l- J- -
| |
| g- 7 ,.
| |
| l o o o o o o on c i o o o H l o o o o o o o co
| |
| * a w w w w w ~ .r, J . nim 0001/stnuoc ,etar tnuoC i FU
| |
| | |
| 6.
| |
| Count rate, countc/1000 min.
| |
| w w .~ w w 4 o o o o o
| |
| ": oo o o o o o o
| |
| .o o o
| |
| o
| |
| .H 7 . ..T - 1 1' f "j' p ~-- ' - ''-'-l 1
| |
| *1 Me -s -
| |
| C $g kC M.
| |
| N
| |
| .:. [E- I).
| |
| x ::
| |
| -7
| |
| * a-
| |
| $ .0 .k.;
| |
| : v. z -
| |
| 186 226Ra f$.
| |
| soo uo ~ .7 23E 212Pb j-7 rj MHD rt O A 88 6 c'-
| |
| NUap5 E
| |
| .$.a-
| |
| '95
| |
| '\ 214pd $>
| |
| tw Oai EM ~ 353 / '
| |
| et. M J2
| |
| * PUN cc se kT g
| |
| J ,.
| |
| O ceh3 wog- 7 - 511 '''
| |
| ~~"
| |
| Hc0 n 20BTl hh.k 583 [
| |
| nDC e
| |
| (c~-
| |
| : x. gJ
| |
| .H 5 609 214Bi $
| |
| o f s -
| |
| w 662 13'/Cs O % b O to w ,
| |
| h re m hf N S *""
| |
| oo
| |
| ~
| |
| in H N (
| |
| *. OM &
| |
| : e. D r
| |
| & I z H
| |
| OH%
| |
| I1 oe H >
| |
| OVO t
| |
| w a. N e gn oo {- ''. ..-.
| |
| \
| |
| sur w- ~
| |
| 88 ~
| |
| .U LQ w ['
| |
| i Oo 4 --
| |
| O eti i D N D
| |
| wwO WWW "y 1 v
| |
| .l.
| |
| ~
| |
| Q N oo wo- t g t
| |
| COO C HO< -
| |
| \
| |
| NH+ '
| |
| H HO \
| |
| @OO t [
| |
| $$O y i L. . _ ~ 1461 40g j
| |
| - ao O
| |
| wo-t r _
| |
| M rr oo !
| |
| 00 '
| |
| M Q ..
| |
| C D
| |
| GQ O e Hm i
| |
| b D' LO OU M *J f
| |
| O
| |
| ".3 h g
| |
| MH y8~ E O
| |
| s wm m
| |
| oo [ M d" O MG g 8, em o. w -
| |
| C, m c g, an --
| |
| U* Co .
| |
| O !
| |
| O k
| |
| <B P* W sa oo O oo I I I I I I I M* g y w M N W -J I o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o SBONSICS !V.I.NBIAINot:f1 AN3 037VN ;
| |
| | |
| I. Y Count rate, countL/1000 r.in.
| |
| ~ w w w w w A o e o o o u o o o o o o o o o M o o o o o -o oo o o H
| |
| d j 1 l w - :-,. . .~~ l -
| |
| 9 l g
| |
| n ,o - re C N - -- 13 r, 14 4Ce QE
| |
| -w h- 7' ?
| |
| N wm -
| |
| 1 r$
| |
| d
| |
| .m 00 M
| |
| -*---18 6 2 6aa e
| |
| jy#
| |
| <- p 9 eoa w f - 238 212Pb -C -
| |
| i3w 08- l JE 5-MaE oo + -
| |
| 295 s s p 214pd IP' 4
| |
| OW - 353 1.v
| |
| -O I I
| |
| 4Dn :
| |
| I XD I CO H. %
| |
| - D 4 H to 4L.
| |
| ~~
| |
| ~ ~
| |
| \ 208:1 {
| |
| l zEG
| |
| . ~
| |
| r
| |
| ~- 5 5 3
| |
| - 609 214Bi
| |
| {
| |
| j.i CD C O h.
| |
| C ** m l B g
| |
| W E O a wo wo~'
| |
| y t*.
| |
| ~
| |
| mWM oo n wg
| |
| 'O m H Li WQ H= ka
| |
| : w i et O P ,
| |
| "hd 1 i
| |
| + 0 g 1,
| |
| a- wa -
| |
| M gg-:
| |
| ON w oo O o $
| |
| C 10 I i
| |
| c 3HN :
| |
| rt H o I '
| |
| LQ Wb g
| |
| i
| |
| .. c Co C tb
| |
| . x
| |
| ^ O Ug "
| |
| mO< wo- 3 wO+ co j W
| |
| BW HOO DOO e et rt OO OpO '-
| |
| --- e 14(1 40g 3 rt -
| |
| WO wm ~
| |
| NWM wo-oo w e.
| |
| oo ao una NOO w w v.
| |
| e
| |
| .3 LD w te tT to i Ww Es kk m Jm g.g
| |
| . m gg._. g.
| |
| Qw CD oo Q ne mm n n 8 8.o om o a
| |
| a~
| |
| ac g n ..
| |
| n t'3 E c w M
| |
| -O gg
| |
| * W oon I ! I I ! I !
| |
| l j
| |
| 30 oo O en y u w w u w o o o o o o o
| |
| - 00 o o e o n o e Ma o o o o o o o o o g
| |
| SBO NSIC S iV.! NB M.1N o t:fl ANB OO"1VN
| |
| | |
| u
| |
| _ Count ra+e, 4 counts /1000 min. v.
| |
| y c
| |
| y
| |
| : v. o w o w o o o o o o o o o o o N oo o o o o o w- ' ' '
| |
| e .
| |
| ri- n c :r -(- -- ['
| |
| t I' i ".&
| |
| j yf 4- l C co g M mv fe O QE { .
| |
| v2
| |
| ~~ 1 Jc w
| |
| m x :: E f-Z
| |
| @: . 186 226na s # ~~ ~
| |
| r ~*
| |
| s
| |
| ~
| |
| eoa wo_ y 2 238 212Pb y{o _
| |
| * OP oo ir 295 214Pb t.r vi ci g tr Mo 353 214Pb
| |
| " I *-~
| |
| ~ $" $
| |
| A?
| |
| *wM T:
| |
| * D st to N Tt It tn tn a 's G - -
| |
| O P 'O oo- _ ,,,_ _ 511 IL en :s O oo \ p OO 200T1 -
| |
| ;83 / -
| |
| 't H tt
| |
| [O 3
| |
| c 5
| |
| ~'
| |
| I[f*
| |
| _.609 214Bi
| |
| * 662 137Cs tt *
| |
| -J O
| |
| * O*
| |
| c w il 727 213ni (n wo- #p}. = 769 214Bi n go o go ,
| |
| O H-COH 1 it 3 et - t u er 11 tn C, W
| |
| *. 911 N Mo [p'.- 228Ae
| |
| $< , 966 /
| |
| H vo o m0s tJ
| |
| ~*
| |
| gg- l{
| |
| 1
| |
| ),
| |
| o V- Co ao es
| |
| & Q g~ x :{
| |
| r- O s r,. 1120 214n1 pa< h o.
| |
| Ow p& ,
| |
| 3H if CD t3 WDO hf- ~
| |
| .t* cv et w"
| |
| wo $ ~
| |
| oo q,
| |
| O CD J 4%O c e ,
| |
| wwO
| |
| < M f
| |
| Q .. i HC - 1461 4Og
| |
| $haO ,
| |
| k =-
| |
| . ~
| |
| wo
| |
| .mpm oo-oo cr 4 V' m-D r- co '
| |
| cn
| |
| : c. cr O co -w tr en M
| |
| CO N8-oo E
| |
| y pu oa a e OW E
| |
| .i[3 na e c O H' O O o,
| |
| c 'o . ..
| |
| 3w E, E' rt O in O L9 30 g u to oo l l l l l l l h > - - .
| |
| - c. w o * .Ao w w a G o o o o o o *
| |
| = n n u o o o o o SBONSIDS ~1V.LNBIAINChil AN3 COWN
| |
| | |
| 2)r00m2gI0 I 2 br0D.)2DlO .g n 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0
| |
| 1 1
| |
| aNd -
| |
| ; __-- - - : - - - - _ - - - - - - - - a t
| |
| m .
| |
| ca C id O ,
| |
| E r O_ , D Ee h
| |
| mT o . o V r f .
| |
| O P MO , N dP eN t
| |
| O ce
| |
| . es T l s C l e WC O
| |
| O P
| |
| oB c-yv t a
| |
| ,i s
| |
| 3 ,
| |
| E iD f
| |
| C , S v i,
| |
| O. t) ct o_ ,
| |
| 6 an G 9 7 a g ,
| |
| , U 1 al t p O, A e O
| |
| 0 bf o
| |
| s X ,
| |
| L sE oS 0 ,
| |
| U G r 4 , J gs e
| |
| 0 ,l O . si em
| |
| '- N 5, l U
| |
| 7 p5 J 9 n .
| |
| r 1 a6 s
| |
| R ,
| |
| O r0 Y -
| |
| e1 A - t -
| |
| M O- aT .
| |
| w( 5 .
| |
| C 3 Or , .
| |
| ek cr e t R aal P
| |
| s ,
| |
| A fP b r a o ul T sa o ,
| |
| R i m dr o A et r 07 ,
| |
| M t sf au ed e I
| |
| rnr I
| |
| TI a
| |
| , E F .
| |
| 7
| |
| . 2 N e o ,
| |
| A r u
| |
| I. g i
| |
| O F
| |
| _- _ _ _ _ _ _ _~ _ - ~ : _ - _ _ - -
| |
| 0 0
| |
| sxa.
| |
| * 0 1
| |
| 0 0 1 0
| |
| 0 1 1
| |
| r;_
| |
| | |
| 2>r{ n2<_10 l3 7On.O2 nmo n 0
| |
| 0 0
| |
| 1 o.
| |
| t n6 0 0 1 0 m i3 0 1 H l 1
| |
| Ce
| |
| . . - - : - - - _ _ ~ -
| |
| l C, .
| |
| tb C ra d ,
| |
| E P oT
| |
| , D m
| |
| %o mo or rf V f w ,
| |
| O N dr e
| |
| ea t
| |
| Y ca 4
| |
| - . et T l a M
| |
| C ld o
| |
| E O ce h
| |
| M'c ,
| |
| P
| |
| . y t
| |
| ,T o ,
| |
| E i .
| |
| vP o , S iP o tN c
| |
| o ,
| |
| 6 ae 7 s
| |
| ~
| |
| G 9 as o
| |
| , U 1 t el eI o 'g _
| |
| , A G b-s si q\ ,
| |
| L sv oa "o U G rD g
| |
| _ , J
| |
| _ o. ,)
| |
| _g . st en N 5. l a U
| |
| 7 pl A.O s
| |
| J 9 1
| |
| mp a
| |
| sf o ,
| |
| O o s ,
| |
| Y -
| |
| r eE lv< ,
| |
| A M
| |
| tS a
| |
| wse O
| |
| el ci q_W ,
| |
| R P
| |
| A f
| |
| am r5 b
| |
| * u .
| |
| i - s1
| |
| _c , t 1
| |
| - l d
| |
| A e ,
| |
| ,M tl al ffk
| |
| , B
| |
| , E e-rT T(
| |
| ,F .
| |
| ? 8
| |
| 'O ~ ,
| |
| 2 N e A r J
| |
| u g
| |
| _ - - .. - - _: ~_
| |
| Y ~ _ __~- _ _ _
| |
| i F ;
| |
| 0 0
| |
| a E 0 1
| |
| 0 0 1 0 0 1 1
| |
| | |
| 2>{0 M2< y02 -
| |
| g ggUznm1D 1
| |
| 0 0 0 0 0 0
| |
| 1 1 d3
| |
| _- - ' ~ ~ - - - - .- _ - - - _ . - _ $ - _ - o d
| |
| p ,
| |
| C e
| |
| lP h ,
| |
| E oP n , D TH me
| |
| \ . os rs V
| |
| O f e B
| |
| , N d -
| |
| o es ti cv g
| |
| ea T lD
| |
| , C l o,
| |
| O c)
| |
| N ,
| |
| ,n t
| |
| ya P tl E ip S v if to c
| |
| . a1 1 G 67 U Mg ,
| |
| U A 1 9 t a11 es be O-0 l si o ,
| |
| L sm U o r5 q , J 0 g .
| |
| _ 3
| |
| ,2 s
| |
| N e ,
| |
| U l2 .
| |
| J 57 p1 7
| |
| . m- 3 9 aT
| |
| $_ 1 s( e l
| |
| Y O rt b
| |
| - en a A - t aT M - al O wP m o
| |
| et r R
| |
| cnf n ,
| |
| P ae f me
| |
| [x ,
| |
| A rt r ua a
| |
| . se R r a dT t
| |
| _h ,
| |
| A e a
| |
| ~ J ,
| |
| M t rd ae et e
| |
| _"\
| |
| _ O' i rah
| |
| ~
| |
| l E TWT F
| |
| P_ ,
| |
| \ 9
| |
| - _ 2 N
| |
| O' ,
| |
| e A r J u g
| |
| e O' i F
| |
| _- ____ _ _ __- _ _. _ .. ___~- _ _ -
| |
| 0- 0 g3 1 0 0 0 0 1 1
| |
| | |
| Ii' 2>r00M2<j0 ' r gg m20mW 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 aN4, 1
| |
| ,t
| |
| _ - - - - - - - - - - _ - - - - - - - 1 m
| |
| fc ,
| |
| C E
| |
| to ir nf
| |
| , D U n_d' e mr
| |
| _ c' V
| |
| . oa r
| |
| C .
| |
| f a
| |
| ~ .
| |
| O t
| |
| . N da t
| |
| ed ce eh
| |
| ~ . T lT C l o.
| |
| O c P
| |
| ,P Q .
| |
| P E
| |
| yH t
| |
| ie S vs
| |
| @O-is t e cB t
| |
| D -
| |
| . 6 a-G 79 s (y U ai 1 t v d .
| |
| A ea Q bD O
| |
| (, . s ,
| |
| L s) i U oe rt i J O gi 9 s
| |
| ,n N
| |
| so e
| |
| U i
| |
| l ,
| |
| p8
| |
| & . J 5 7
| |
| 9 m2 a-i .
| |
| 1 sT(
| |
| 9 .
| |
| YO -
| |
| r ey A - tl 9( .
| |
| M ap O, W -
| |
| wp O u
| |
| 'V
| |
| * i t
| |
| i P
| |
| . es c
| |
| ar f e s O* ,
| |
| A rt ua N '
| |
| s -
| |
| . sw.8 R
| |
| A dd3 ee M tt e aal eeb l
| |
| l E
| |
| rra TtT o F "s
| |
| 0
| |
| ~g- ,
| |
| 3 N e O ,
| |
| A r p ,
| |
| J u g
| |
| i F
| |
| _- _ - _ - - _ __ _- - _ '- - __ __ . - ~
| |
| O 0 aN- 0 '
| |
| 0 0 l 0 1 1
| |
| D
| |
| | |
| 35000 25000' -
| |
| l I I r l i l
| |
| - 20000 30000 -
| |
| 2
| |
| , t-
| |
| _ 15000 0 15000 -
| |
| 0 M
| |
| 5~ 2 o, -
| |
| Il
| |
| : co 9
| |
| i M _ 10000 E 10000 o ,
| |
| 2 J l i -t V
| |
| gka - 511 U) 3 o
| |
| i o
| |
| 5000 - %u'\ - 1461 40x 5000 g 2
| |
| n s
| |
| f Sample plus background m
| |
| g)
| |
| Background , _
| |
| I I I I I 200 300 403 500 O Channel 1;o. 100 2500 500 1000 1500 2000 0 Energy, kcV 1
| |
| Gamma-ray spectrum of untreated surface water, 0-2560 kev. Detector: 10 cm x Figure 31.
| |
| 10 cm NaI (Tl), (No. 1). Sainple : 3.5 1 of untreated surface water composite of weekly grab samples, collected from 5 April through 28 Juric 1976 from Erie Indus-trial Park water intake (T-10, 6 5 mi. SE of plant) . Counes: 1000 min. on .
| |
| 9 July 1976.
| |
| | |
| N f:'I"D C 3 N All:t D N W B N.1.V 1~ S CI S N O D S n o o o o o o o o D e o o o o o o w w w w w w oo X
| |
| i I I i t I I ! oo am "S8 C&
| |
| "N ht 05
| |
| - wO OM
| |
| .o m :
| |
| n w ,
| |
| @ 5 -
| |
| "c .c wn n
| |
| e om 4~
| |
| or c w oo o o o "' o@
| |
| an c ow .w wc se a~ w m
| |
| @. 2 oc N
| |
| >k p ac rt - ll2 w
| |
| Hw *
| |
| ; eHm
| |
| - a-I ot a o
| |
| "" ' oo QQp i
| |
| ,no o &
| |
| ng x04 16 41 -- . - ------r -
| |
| .. C&
| |
| i i M& c
| |
| ' OwQ
| |
| -1 WO a
| |
| t Onb
| |
| , 0
| |
| )! j 3
| |
| :f oo "o : O fa f -8" no w eE*
| |
| !j ) MU H
| |
| / 1,- .t .
| |
| t <C5 N(
| |
| r I GH t* *, woo
| |
| :: o
| |
| ~
| |
| 5$ } 3C Co t* 4y s w
| |
| ,a l [ oo oa MO yt ,
| |
| y
| |
| _gg i = -
| |
| 11 aw a nt nt wcn D.,2, ..} p rt G -m C 4o % GOO C m O t P 2e r- 2
| |
| _ ff ?j o nt o n.c woo LI- :. ow w
| |
| ewc vl *W
| |
| % } m w nt om
| |
| * sC731 2GG, .b iB412 906
| |
| ,[
| |
| [
| |
| 5 7$
| |
| - cnog .. O
| |
| _.;T.
| |
| Q=
| |
| ** / 385._._ 7-i tr W n 1TS02 -
| |
| D, OO
| |
| - -=
| |
| a 115 -
| |
| @y oo
| |
| - o ne o 5' HO CGH a ot',:tt o 3.:!
| |
| ,. & .H
| |
| .j. , 7 N <
| |
| -.v I .r.1< C
| |
| * 71 .
| |
| d Mw y> .- j 353 -
| |
| -; g~
| |
| g w -H pH
| |
| :? bP412 si =MC
| |
| % 592 ECW k.J.
| |
| ((
| |
| t 5T ~8$ gOM N3 bP212 832 C I.
| |
| ow w
| |
| aom
| |
| -r T -3.T if at1622 681 . :E
| |
| * Ed _i'5'
| |
| .fg :: r ot v
| |
| -. W = ~'
| |
| n_,:m'8- wo .
| |
| o<
| |
| ne o m--
| |
| s_ = n n i ^g. - {g c
| |
| 'l e 4 cr -
| |
| ,g 8 o o o oo T E S S S S u w w w w w ~
| |
| . nim 0001/ctnuoc ,etar tnuoC P6
| |
| | |
| U ::
| |
| Ccunt rate, counts /1000 rain.
| |
| s-- w w w n o o vi o w o
| |
| *C u o o o o P-eo o o o O o o o o g o o o e nn D= :
| |
| : j i 4 ;'-Z6 . ''~ l M #$ F.~ j j a
| |
| O c= .i *:: >.-
| |
| : s. ce r qX u w a W w :: I2 :ii v-c<.O y L _
| |
| 166 226n3 m, tC '
| |
| + .i H nOO ;
| |
| j.)
| |
| wg_f ,- 238 212Pb 0
| |
| ?y@ _
| |
| L 5 LO S o$ i:b I -
| |
| 295 214pd c 0m 4L 338 22gAc H MGl f.y W Pb M P M
| |
| ~ XOO [g+.
| |
| O, 3 N "! J it F* 4 [ f cM M I
| |
| j?.
| |
| a.
| |
| W M O 'O +:
| |
| mHOO*
| |
| * OPO w@oo-L
| |
| \
| |
| 511 l' X tt
| |
| : w. g oo \ 20BT1 $
| |
| Hi D C -
| |
| SE3 / ":
| |
| G09 214Di h ,H 3
| |
| - O ~
| |
| - 662 137Cs m i' &
| |
| o to 727 212Di mh[ yg 6 769 214Di g5% $$~l Y e
| |
| l 1.T
| |
| .v. ..
| |
| OO g .
| |
| h-t Id g m !
| |
| )
| |
| mod c c, I
| |
| f x 911
| |
| \
| |
| $ 220Ac O o P-m i
| |
| 966 /
| |
| B l 7 ec wa ,
| |
| 'O53 H LS et 88-}
| |
| oo ;
| |
| 4 C (n 0
| |
| 3O* J ft m w 7 11202 14Bi I
| |
| D. o Ip DM i ,
| |
| C *< N l }k E e 2 tg i
| |
| }?(- -
| |
| O CO
| |
| : p. rt wo~l oo D et X l rt O O i a
| |
| G .' L w B .< ,r O :n ~
| |
| O ;
| |
| "' - -- 14G1 40x .
| |
| O ppC.o D g, [
| |
| c 5 ft mo ,
| |
| QQC o o HCO w ft et
| |
| * LS O '
| |
| =
| |
| n.
| |
| OO l OO t CHO ! E w
| |
| HO wa t c t* tn D.r c n g ao
| |
| &o='
| |
| i
| |
| *T **
| |
| Wk O9 I
| |
| EOw 6 co O p* O ee rt M- c c 'w Q w* U O
| |
| Co
| |
| * c *o H ' DW o Q CO o i 45 ..%
| |
| o C.4 .m C 03 I se rOO gg ! l oo i l lI I E t I
| |
| 1 1 ! I I I I .
| |
| .D H w oc W w w e-.
| |
| C *
| |
| * o
| |
| * o.
| |
| * o o o c Ow o c, o o o o o o o UO o o o SEDN3IOS W.I.N3INNDt:ll/\NS 03"TVN
| |
| | |
| n-
| |
| . Table 1 Radioactivity In Environmental ~ Samples
| |
| . t e
| |
| Facility D5vis-Desso tiPP Docket N3.s 50-346 Heportir.g 13eriod: January-14 arch 1976 I
| |
| Li!Filo hai collection Fract.meyrTyp.2 tocation b Average Ouarterly pasultsC '
| |
| Manthly TLD's Quarterly TLD's Anaual TLD's (Krem/nuatter) 'farem/guartar) (mrem / year) s.x** r.41 radia tion, (I) 7-1, 0.6 ni NC 9.121.6 d.3fT!I'~~
| |
| TLO's .
| |
| -(1) 7-2, 0.9 s i E 10.3tl.4 10.111.7 E/ * , './I, A/1 (I) 7- 3, 1.4 p.1 SC 3.St2.C 9.2:1.3 (1) 7-4, 0.8 mi 5 13.(12.2 12.911.8 (1) 7-5, 0.25 mi W 14.222.2 11.5t2.0 *
| |
| (1) 7-6, 0.G n-i 17.1.
| |
| 11.921.5 5.721.7 )3 (Il T-7, 0.9 mi NtPJ 12.211.6 11.5 1.3 g-(1) T-8, 2.7 ni itsW 15.912.0 11.511.6 (D) .T-9, 6. 8 .si JW E.311.s 9.720.8 ($
| |
| (B) T-10, 6.5 n! SE 11.611.8 11.411.1 ()
| |
| (L). T-11, 9.5 mi sc 13.111.7 12.9:1.1 (H) 7-12, 23.5 mt UNW 16.412.2 15.111.1
| |
| * s'i '
| |
| (d) T-14, 3.s mi WOJ 12.521.8 16.511.5 *A (h) 7-15, - 6.6 ni SEE 14.121.4 14.121.3 (D) T-23, 14.3 mi ENE 17.222.0 12.022.0 E"I C
| |
| (b) T-24, 24.9 mi LC 17.912.1 12.912.2 (D) T-26, 35.1 mi SW 15.421.s 16.510.9 II-
| |
| ; (u) T-27, 5. 3 mi W'n 14.011.6 12.012.3 [j LN I
| |
| 10 I4p ci/cc hb
| |
| *8 gros 3 alpha gro th tata J -i ll filterable ais t,orne (3) T-3, 0.6 mi HC 0.1930.08 3.111.5 s2 particulates and (I) T-2, 0.9 na C 0.22*0.09 4.02).1 <2 I cta rcoa t (3) T- 3, 1.4 ms sc 0.24t0.06 4.611.4 <2 [d g
| |
| U/C (3) T-4, 0.8 mi S 0.25*0.11 4.6tl.2 s2 .g (Il T-7, 0.9 mi Ht4W- 0. 2 5t o. 0 7 4.410.9 s2 g, '
| |
| (Il T-8, 2.7 mi USW 0.15t0.05 2.3t0.6 (2 (B) T-9, 6.8 mi SW 0.25t0.11 4.411.0 <2 I.
| |
| l (D) T-lo, 6.5 asi SE 0.27t0.11 4.510.9 (2 +
| |
| (B) T-11, 9.5 ni SE 0.3020.11 4.8 1.5 <2 (B) 7-12, 23.5 mi WNu 0.3120.13 4.221.1 <2 [/)
| |
| L 4- (3) T-23, 14.3 mi ChE 0.2210.07 3.721.2 <2 1 (0) T-27, 5.3 mi WNW 0.2810.08 4.711.1 <2 1
| |
| Sr-90 Co-144 Co-141 Be-7 RU-101
| |
| ['.I d
| |
| 3 j
| |
| J' ' O/Co Cuspositu of background locations 0.0110.02 0.2020.10 <0.1 S.C20.4 ~<0.10 i
| |
| - Composite of indicator lucationa 0.0110.02 0.06+0.04 <0.02 3.310.2 <0.01 b.l '
| |
| 2r-95 Nh-95 Sr-S9 O
| |
| M9-106 co-137 Conoosite of background locations 0760ID706 0.0210.51 <0.05 <0.02 0.0620.02
| |
| . Composite of indicator locations 0.0610.04 0.02:0.01 (0.02 <0.01 <0.01 N
| |
| k 4
| |
| t u_______ . _ . _ . . . _ _ _ - . _ _ . . . -
| |
| | |
| .- . . . - - . - _- - . ~ . . - - - . .
| |
| Table 1 (cont'd)
| |
| Tscility: Davis-Bessa NPP Docket No. 50-346 Repcrtino Period: January-March 1976 32:sle anc collection T re c te r.= f /Ty p ea Locationb Average Quarterly ResultsC 10-9pC1/ul ross alyf.a gross beta h-3
| |
| , Treated sarface water' (D) T-10, 6.5 mi SE g'6757EO . 21- 2.6520.39
| |
| * 290tEO
| |
| ,(E-iaking) (b) T-11, 11.5 ni SE 0.3820.C5 2.8520.30 350t120 W/G (D) 7-12, 23.5 mi WGW 0.5510.24 2.6020.96 330260 (I) T-28, Unit I water supply 0.4020.05 2.7521.24 330180 Sr-90 Cr-137 2
| |
| C/Ca (b) T-10, 6.5 mi SE 0.5920.20 <3.7 g3 (B) 7-11, 11.5 ni SE C.7020.17 <3.7 I~
| |
| (b) T-12, 23.5 mi inni <0.2 <3.7 II (I) 7-28, Unit 1 water supply 0.3610.21 <3.7
| |
| [}
| |
| 10-9p ci/ml __ (g gross alpha gross beta 14 _- 3 3j.
| |
| *'ntreated
| |
| . surface T-1, 0.6 mi MS water (I)
| |
| T-2, 0.9 mi E 0.8120.62 3.4420.45 300:40 '*
| |
| (I) <1.26 4.5210.05 380160 <[
| |
| W/G-M/Co' (I) T-3, 14. ci SE 1.06 0.39 4.4120.82 gg (a) T-10, 6.5 mi SE 2602110 **
| |
| 1.2310.58 4.5011.17 370290 33 IJ (b) T-11, 9.5 mi SE 0.7920.23 3.1920.62 270250 (B) 7-12, 2 3. 5 mi tcad 2.0010.23 4.4611.25 250260 []
| |
| Sr-90 Cs-137 2
| |
| Q/co (1) T-1, 0. 6 mi t:E 0.6720.24 (I) T-2, 0.9 mi E -
| |
| <3.7 (I) T-3, 1.4 mi SE -
| |
| El (B) T-10, 6.5 mi SC g),
| |
| 0.6720.23 <3.7 (u) T-11, 9.5 mi SE 0.6810.23 'S (D) T-12, 23.5 mi W!al <3.7 0.4810.23 <3.7 N 10-9p ci/ml I*
| |
| gross alpha gross beta Sr-90 Cs-137 j (O Well water T-7, 0.9 mi NT4 l -]
| |
| (I) <0.u 2.9410.69 <0.2 <3.7 390280 O/G (1) T-17, 0.7 mi* SW 2.4621.64 4.0621.06 0.8920.31 <3.7 250!50
| |
| [] '
| |
| (b) T-38, 1.3 mi S <3.9 3.7811.77 <0.2 <3.7 (n) 7-27, 5.3 mi WNW 150tB0 bl
| |
| <2.94 1.8221.51 <0.2 <3.7 10-9pci/mi
| |
| <100 '{
| |
| g gross beta 11 - 3 10-6p ci/m2 gross beta
| |
| []
| |
| Precipitatson T-1, 0,6 mi NU g)
| |
| (I) 7.6711.29 140160 386147
| |
| * Mic (D) T-23, 14. 3 mi ENE 16.1415.49 170130 [g 640270 10-9p ci/mi g oss beca 1-111 Sr-89 Sr-90 ba-140 C2-137 X-40 ilk (I) T-8, 3.2 mi WSW 1068253 <0.5 <0.5 1.6610.15 T-8 17'612.1 1310240
| |
| ?./G (D) T-12, 23.5 mi LINW 1056251 < 3. 2 <0.5 3.5210.89 T-12 5.210.6 1260!!0 (b) 7-20, 5.4 mi SSE 1046272 <0.5 <0.5 1.3710.16 T-20 4.410.3 1200 40 (a) T-24, 24.9 mi SE 963142 <0.5 <0.5 2.6420.33 T-24 <3.5 1280240
| |
| | |
| -. .. . . . . . ~ . _ - . . . - . . . .- - - .- _-- --. - . - . - . .
| |
| Table l'(cont'd)
| |
| ?s:tlity: D.tvi s-Lesse !!?P Docket No. 50-346 Reporting Period: January-March 1976 E!rsiw and colluction +
| |
| Frchtency/ Type 4 Locationb Average Quarterly Results0 10-3p ci/kg-wet gross beta Cs-13_7 K-40 Meat (b) T-8, 2.7 mi WSW Not required this quarter SA/G 10-3p ci/kg-dry 2$
| |
| gross sicha grcss beta I-lii Sr-90 Cs-137 E-40_ gg .
| |
| **a7 2: ables and f ruits
| |
| . (I) T-8, 2. 7 mi WSh*
| |
| p.
| |
| IA/C .(h) T-19,.3.7 ni h Not required this quarter (1) T-25, 1.3 mi S II 10-9pC1/mi O gross alpha gross beta I- 1 1"i Sr-90 Cs-137 K-40 p}
| |
| Crape juica (a) T-16, 15.3 mi ENE Not required this quarter 33 A/G ==
| |
| i 10-3p ci/kg-dry <
| |
| ==
| |
| groes alpha gross beta Sr-90 Cs-137 K-40 33 Antra 1 feed (I) T-8, 2.7 mi USu (Silage) <0.3 28.711.1 0.2620.02 0.0720.04 28.or1.4 ()
| |
| 3A/G .
| |
| (D) 7-20, 5.4 cl SSE (lloy) <0.2 15.510.6 0.2120.02 <0. 0 5 ' 16.311.3 b!
| |
| s tn R**
| |
| gg 10-3p ci/kg-dry []
| |
| gross slpr.a gross beta Sr-90 Cs-137 K-40 ty 3 trtvecd (I) Vicinity of site 2;ot required this quartor
| |
| ^!" l}
| |
| l p
| |
| l gross beta Sr-90 10-3p ci/kCs-137D-dr E-40
| |
| [*
| |
| l Soil (I) T-1, 0.6 mi NC UI 51/G (I) T-8, 2.7 mi WSW Not required this quarter () '
| |
| . (S) T-19, 3.7 mi S ** '
| |
| (B) T'20, 5.4 mi SSE 61
| |
| *S 10-3pCi/kg-dry . b:
| |
| gross alpha gross beta Sr-90 Cs-137 E-40 () .
| |
| Bott m sedi. cats (1) T-1, 0.6 mi NC Dj (I) T-29, 1.5 mi NC Not required this qaarter g)
| |
| (I) T-30, 0.9 mi EriU 10-3p ci/kq-wet (flesh) 10-3p ci/kg-dry (bones)
| |
| [ 3ross beta Cs-137 K-46~ Sr-90 W11d11fe (I) Vicinity of site Not required this quarter 5A/G
| |
| (
| |
| 10-3pCi/ky-wet (flesh) 10-3p ci/k_g-dry (bones) gross beta Cs-137 K-40 Sr-90 ,
| |
| Waterfowl (I) Vicinity of site Not required this gaarter i A/3
| |
| | |
| i Table 1 (cont'd) racitatyr DaviG-Desse NPP Docket No. *s0-346 'ta sor t ir.c Period : J r.c.n r y .w..i r ch 1976 3a:,1c, and colecctica Fr e coa. car /Tv v a Lccationb A crace cuarterly Poccit:C 10- 3i .C i /k et-<,o t (fles5) 10~3,Cf/ko-dry (to al gress tats C m- 137 a ,G Sr-90 riaa (1) Lske crio, vicinity of site ;3ot roquired thas quarter .y C/C (!) T-3, 1.4 mi SE ~
| |
| lo*3pci/w-wet M I,
| |
| orm et t e C -13? K-43 Cla: s (3) T-1, 0.6 N.i NC 1:Ot requitad this q'ai.Itcr b TI./G ()
| |
| e.
| |
| N
| |
| 'r' req ue r.c y : W-Weckly, M-::onthly, 0-Quarterly, SA-Semi-annually, TA-T.'.ree tiums a year, A-Annually. S Ty us G-Crab, C-Continuous, P-Proportional, Co-Composite, I-Integrating.
| |
| LLa;caticas I-Int:icator, I:-Lackg round; distanco and directior. are given frca station.
| |
| (
| |
| %s altr. savun ere the mean 1 stenJard dcviation for weckly ar.d raonthly a.aalyst s. .Nesults of quarterly, semi-annua, and annual "]
| |
| er.alyses are re;crted with the coantinJ error at the 9 H ccr.fider.co level. Lasa thar. (<) values oivan are the hii; hest loss taan values f or the re;>ortir.9,pertod. 0_
| |
| C h
| |
| w .2
| |
| .t s y 2
| |
| d, b
| |
| I-0 0
| |
| l.s 9s II O
| |
| | |
| Table 2 Radioactivity in Environmental Samples facility: Davis-hesse NPP Docket No. 50-346 Reporting Porlod is .~.t e ar.c c ,Ilecticn April-June 1976 Trer ercy/Tvpe d Location b Average Ouarterly Results c Monthly TLD's Quarterly TLD's Annual TLD's (mren./qua rt e r) (rnr e n/qua r t e r ) (mrem / year)
| |
| External radiation, (I) T-1, 0.6 mi NE Ti. ,'s 8.721.0 12.010.0 33.611.5 (I) T-2, 0.9 mi E W :, Q/I, A/I 11.611.1 12.421.6 34.111.4 (I) T-3, 1.4 mi SE 11.5 1.5 13.6:1.7 34.S 1.3 {
| |
| (I) T-4, 0.8 ni S (I) 'I-5, G.25 mi W 12.6*l.1 17.3:2.3 54.3 3 1.5 h (I) 7-6, 0.6 mi Mf 16.0 3 1.2 19.8:2.2 54.131.2 p 12.431.3 14.0 2 2.0 46.031.6 g (1) T-7, 0.9 mi m 12.7 3 1.3 13.3 2 1.6 43.6 2 1.4 (1) T-8, 2.7 mi USW (B) T-9, 6.6 mi SW 17.6 2 1.5 11.8:1.4 21.432.4 57.312.a 0 (b) T-10, 6.5 mi SC 14.0:3.0 37.8 3 1.5 (b) T-11, 9.5 mi SE 14.221.2 18.6s).5 55.4 1.6 @
| |
| (b) T-12, 23.5 mi Ut.*
| |
| 13.2 3 1.2 12.832.1 46.5 t l.6 2
| |
| (D) T-14, 3.8 mi H30 17.021.4 19.332.1 65.121.9 (B) T-lS, 6.6 ci SSE 15.821.5 20.322.5 $d.2g2.6 ,,
| |
| 14.1 1.5 17.6 3 2.2 (u) T-2 3, 14. 3 :ni ENE 13.6 3 0.9 14.5 3 2.0 53.7 2 2.6 49.lg2.4 g (b) 7- 2 '. , 24,9 mi SC 19.B:2.4 (n (b) T-26, 35.1 mi su 17.3 1.6 15.6 3 1.4 14.5 1.9 51.8 3.8 62.332.4 0
| |
| m (u) T-27, 5. 3 mi MN 14.531.4 16.9 1 2.4 49.82.4 10 14pci/cc 2
| |
| ~
| |
| gross a l p!.a gross bota ralterculo airborno (I) T-1, 0.6 ni NE 1-131 (h p :n c.;1.ates and (I) T-2, 0.9 ni E 0.22:0.3068 3.430.015 (u.0' #
| |
| c..1::c a l T- 3, 1.4 mi 0.2220.0009 4.020.011 (0.02
| |
| (!) SE {
| |
| (1) T-4, 0.8 mi S 0.21:0.0009 3.710.017 <0.02 p T-7, 0.9 ml H:N 0.2310.0013 3.810.022 <0.02 (I)
| |
| (1) T-0, 2.7 mi USW 0.2110.0009 3.210.010 (0.02 I.
| |
| (3) 7-9, 6.8 mi SW 0.2420.0015 4.0tu.024 <0.02 g (h) T-10, 6.5 mi SE 0.2710.0012 4.520.028 <0.02 (e) T-11, 9.5 mi SC 0.2210.0010 3.810.013 <d.02 O (E) T-12, 23.5 mi UNW 0.2110.0009 3.520.013 <0.02
| |
| ~
| |
| g' US) T-21, 14.3 mi ENE 0.2020.00C9 Y.0:0.014 <0.02 (u) T-27, 5. 3 mi WIN 0.1710.0007 3.120.011 <0.02 d
| |
| 0.2710.0020 4.410.026 <0.02 g Sr-90 Co-144 Ce-141 De-7 N C/Ca Composite of background locations Ru-103 0.04 0.01 0.10:0.03 <0.02 Corg.osite s.,f indicator locations 0.0410.01 0.0210.01 10.410.2 (0.01 @
| |
| <0.01 12.020.4 <0.03 Ru-106 Cs-137 2r-95 f.b-9 5 Sr-89 Composite of backe,.ound locationJ 0.1010.04 0. 0 6.t 0. 01 Co.iposite of indicator locations <0.02 <0.01 <0.01 0.130.1 0.07:0.01 <0.03 <0.01 <0.02
| |
| | |
| - . . - _. . -. ~ . -
| |
| Table 2 (cont'd) hcl incket IJo. : to-34E Heporting PerioJ: April-June 1976 G _;,gyggvis-Det.se
| |
| ,e anc cc!Tection HPP Fruauency/ Typus Loestten b Averaue Ouarterly Hesults c 10-9pCi/ml gross beta 14 - 3 grous sylta Treated surfacu water (a) T-10, 6.5 mi SC 'GTloID . Gl~ 2.4410.33 266Tio (Drinking) (D) .T-11, 11.5 mi SE 0.7320.38 2.45t0.3)' 310270 (u) :T-12, 23.5 mi kHW 0.3220.04 1. 6 4 t 0'.14 300200 W/G
| |
| '(1) T-23, Unit I water supply 0.4510.14 2.0320.40 3302100 Sr-90 Cs-137 23 Q/Co (E) T-10, 615 mi SE 0.!fiC752 . <3.7 33 (u) T-11, 11.5 mi SE 1.0 3t o. 38 <3.7 I~
| |
| (a) T-12, 23.5 mi W:.V 0.4210.19 <3.7 (1) T-28, Unit I water supply 0.6920.30 < 3. 7 ()
| |
| 10~9pci/ml a l .lia grown beta . H-J [j Lntreated surface (I) T-1, 0.6 mi NC Lrces0.77f6.;5E~ 2.1411.05 296if0 j.
| |
| w tcr (I) T-2, 0.9 mi E 0.7820.78 3.6311.32 310t30 h U/G-:4/Co (t) T- 3, 1.4 mi SC 0.7720.39 3.8310.56 290260 C[ .
| |
| ==
| |
| (D) T-10, 6.5 mi SE 0.88t0.52 3.2710.83 3401130 (D) T-11, 9.5 mi SE 0.4920.49 3.1010.68 270110 33 (D) T-12, 23.5 mi WNW 0.9320.64 2.7820.87 340!!30 ()
| |
| Sr-90 .
| |
| Cs-137
| |
| * 23.
| |
| Q/Co (1) T-1, 0.6 mi NE 0. 5T''0!2 6 ~R3.1 -3
| |
| <l.7 .a U3 (1) T-2, 0.9 mi E 0.8720.17 64 (I) T-3, 1.4 mi SE 0.9210.28 <3.7 [j (b) T-10, 6.5 mi SC 0.5210.21 <3.7 _
| |
| 0.86tc.25 <3.1 (D)
| |
| (b)
| |
| T-11, 9.5 mi S.7 T-12, 23.5 mi wuW 0.8410.27 <3.7 *l b
| |
| 10*8pCl&l [*
| |
| <ross algla gross bota Sr-90 Cs-137 H-1
| |
| ~4=11 water (Il T-7. 0.9 mi NNW UTI j 2.0Ff677I~ 0.6176737 ~RI7i~ 166Ti10 bl O/G (I) T-17, 0.7 mi Su <2.1 <4.7 0.5210.42 <3.7 1602110 [}
| |
| (B) T-18, 1.3 mi S <4.3 <4.0 <0.3 <3.7 <140 --
| |
| (B) T-2 7, 5. 3* mi land <3.7 <3.7 <0.2 <3.7 <140 f.l
| |
| ~3 I*
| |
| 10-9pC1/ml 10-6p ci/m2 (}
| |
| gross beta H- T" gross beta Precipitation (!) T-1, 0.6 mi NE 7.3112.22 220il0 160160 lil
| |
| ::/C (D) T-23, 14.3 mi ENE 17.96211.05 190210 3402130 g) 10 9pCl/ml _
| |
| gross beta I-131 Sr-89 Sr-90 ba-14@ Cs-137 E-40
| |
| .%t a l k (I) T-8, 2.7 mi 6:Su 1113164 ~E075 <0.5 1.7410.23 <3.7 4!773!! 33i3?io M/G (D) T-12, 2 3.5 mi L.?nd 999161 <3.2 . <0.5 2.6020.26 <3.7 <3.5 1317*10 (h) T-20, 5.4 mi SSC . 1031243 <0.5 <0.5 2.1120.32 <3.7 4.923.2 1250:50' (D) 7-24, 24.9 mi SE 1057167 <0.5 <0.5 3.0510.61 <3.7 4.020.1 1290200 d
| |
| | |
| Table 2 ( it'd)
| |
| Docket No. 55-346 Reporting Period: Acril-June 1976 r.ac i l i t **
| |
| * D vis-Sesse tJP barple an fcollection a gocatinnb Averago Quarterly ResultsC F r a; i,cne//Tric 10* 3p ri /k n-wet bets Cs-!J) k-40 7-8, 2.7 ami WSW g} robs
| |
| .04:0.06 T03 6.71E4
| |
| '4ec t (B) sA/G IG-3p ci/kg-dry gross a t; he .ross >eca j 1-131 Er-9C Cs-137 6-40 T-8, 2.7 sii WSW (rhubarb) <0.4 GC7D~C <0.14 0.T6:0.04 %5T 16.1:1.5 W9etables ar.d f ruits (I)
| |
| SA/G
| |
| * l'0-9p ci/ml gross alena gross beta 1-131 $r-90 Cs-137 K-40 2 (B) T-16,15. 3 mi E:lE lix required in this quar ter y A
| |
| Gra;.4 juice A/G F 10-3pc if_kk g-d rv 'O g ro t a. alpna .g. aut a $r-90 Cs-117 L-40 0
| |
| 1.nu.1 recd (1) T-8, 2.7 mi WSW Hot required in this quarter r,1 5^/G ,
| |
| 10-3p ci/p -dry 2 gross alpna gross beta St-90 Cs-137 K-40 (
| |
| (I) Vicinity of site Not rcquired in thieb qua rter S.artweed y A/G to-3p en,kq-dry O Sa-90 Cs-137 K-40 (a) T-1, 0.6 mi un gross tieta OTC ~ ROI 0.UE5 32 6.7id!s 2.3 coil - - 0.3520.04 8.320.6 h g T-1 and T EA/G (I) T-2, 0.9 ma t;
| |
| - 0.2610.04 11.220.7 g
| |
| .,,,3 All other locattor.s - (1) T- 3, 1. 4 mi SE -
| |
| - 0.0520.03 15.6to.9 y cr.cu cve r/ 3 years (I) T-4, 0.8 mi s -
| |
| 7.520.5 t-
| |
| ,, - 0.04t0.03 (I) T-7, 0.9 mi KNu T-8, 2.7 rai WSW
| |
| .30.72 3.5 0.27 0.25 0.3610.05 19.Stk.1 -l (I)
| |
| - - 0.1720.04 15.610.9 *p ib) 7 's , 6.8 mi SW (u) T-11, 9. 5 mi SE - - 0.04to.02 11.720.7 p T-12, 23.5 mi WSu - - 0.4410.05 16.830.9 (D) - 1.7310.09 8.330.8 (f)
| |
| (DI T-23, 14.3 mi ENE -
| |
| 18.321.0
| |
| - - 0.4520.06 (b) T-27, 5. 3 ral 61u lo-3ncifkg-dry M ss alpha j
| |
| < a oc. a>u t a Sr-90 Cs-13) k-40 -
| |
| (1) T-1, 0.6 mi NE g<2.9 U.523.1 ~ <0.2T 0.5525 3 2 11. 0iE6 Ectten sedic.cnts T-29, 15. mi NC 10.914.8 22.123.4 <0.24 <0.10 29.222.0 O TA/C (I) 16.923.6 <0.24 <0.09 14.711.7 [i]
| |
| (1) T-30, 0.9 mi l'HE 7.834.4 10-3pCi/kq-wot (fIesh) 10-3p ci/k.1-3 y.(bones)
| |
| .gr os sa b.it a Cs-131 K-40 1.r-90 Wildlife (1) Vicinity of site (muskrat) EI610.08 EDI 3.320.4 0.isTt b722 SA/G d l o- 3pc i/,k_g-wo t (flesh) 10-3pC1/kg .iry (bones) gross tacta Cs-117 E-40 Sr JO
| |
| '. a te rfowl (I) Vicinity of site tiot sequired in this quarter I./G Y
| |
| | |
| -. . . _ . - _ i . , _ _ . _ - . . . _ _ _ . . .
| |
| Table.2 ( t. .it'd)
| |
| Paritz:r- Davis-Bcsse t)?P Docket No.: 50-146' Reporting Period: April-June'1976 44.ple and collection Tre;2cre /Tenea Locationb Average Ouarterly pesultsc 1
| |
| 10-3nci/kg-wet (flech) 10-3pci/kq-drv (bone) crocs tacta Cs-117 K-4C Sr-90 Fi st. (I) ' T-1, 0.0 mi Ne ' (Carp) ~1.07:0.66 C.00410.003 3.TE0!! 0.2110.03 C/G : (I) .T-1, C.6 mi EC (alewife-whole) 2.38 0.13 0.0910.01 3.C20.1 0.1820.03 (I) T-1, 0.6 .?.i KE (purch-whole) 2.5720.1C 0.0410.10 5.820.3 0.2110.03 (L) Put-In-Bay (Bullhead) 2.5510.07 0.0220.01 3.010.3 1.2120.36 (L) Pac-Ir.-Lay (Carp) 2.5910.10 0.01020.002 2.620.1 0.7510.09 (B) Put-In-Bay (Whita Crappie) 2.6420.13 0.03:0.01 3.620.2 0.5820.08 10-3p ci/ko-wet gross Lata Cs-137 K-40 Cit: s (B) T-1, 0.6 ani. NE NOT AVAILABLE 2!
| |
| C/3 ' }.,
| |
| r O
| |
| 3?rstecncy: 1-ilcokly, it-:tonthly, 0-Quarterly, SA-Ecmi-annually,.TA-Thrco times 4 year, A-Annually.
| |
| (Typs G-Grab, C-Coninuous, P-Proportional, CO-Composite, I-Integrating.
| |
| [3
| |
| -L;;4 tion: I-Ir. dica t or , B-Background; distance and direction are given f rom station.
| |
| C?.usJ1ts given era the Lean standard deviation for weekly and monthly analyses. Results of quarterly, semi-annual and annual b.
| |
| - aralyse; ero rcperted with the counting error at the 951 confidence level. Less than (<) values given are the highest less than C(
| |
| .altes for the reparting period. .=
| |
| tn 00 ()
| |
| 2 3
| |
| ta 2!
| |
| .4 D
| |
| r-
| |
| ,(
| |
| U1 (1
| |
| Id
| |
| :)
| |
| m LO l
| |
| 4
| |
| | |
| NALCC ENV134ONMENTAL SCIENCES Table 3. Sampling locations, Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Plant.
| |
| Type of Code Location a Location T- 1 I Site boundary, 0.6 miles NE of plant, near intake canal.
| |
| T- 2 I Site boundary, 0.9 miles E of plant.
| |
| T- 3 I Site boundary, 1.4 miles SE of plant, near Toussaint River and storm drain.
| |
| T- 4 I Site boundary, 0.8 miles S of plant, near Locust Point and Toussaint River.
| |
| T- 5 I Main entrance to site, 0.25 miles W of plant.
| |
| T- 6 I Site boundary, 0.6 miles NW of plant.
| |
| T- 7 I Sand Beach, 0.9 miles NNW of plant.
| |
| T- 8 b I Earl Moore Farm, 2.7 miles WSW of plant.
| |
| i T- 9 B Oak Harbor, 6.8 miles SW of plant.
| |
| I T-10 B Erie Industrial Park, 6.5 miles SE of plant.
| |
| J T-ll B Port Clinton, 9.5 miles SE of plant.
| |
| T-12 B Toledo, 23.5 miles NNW of plant.
| |
| T-14 B Township school, 3.8 miles WSW of plant.
| |
| T-15 B Lacarne, 6.6 miles SSE of plant.
| |
| T-16 B Put-In-Bay winery, 15.3 miles ENE of plant.
| |
| T-17 I Irv Fick's well onsite, 0.7 miles SW of plant.
| |
| T-18 B Hess Sunoco Garage, 1.3 miles S of plant, Route 2.
| |
| 1 T-19 B Miller Farm, 3.7 miles S of plant.
| |
| T-20 B Daup Farm, 5.4 miles SSE of plant.
| |
| T-21c B Haynes Farm, 3.6 miles SSW of plant.
| |
| T-22 B Peter Farm, 2.6 miles SW of plant.
| |
| i 59
| |
| | |
| NALCQ ENVI AONMENTAL SCIENCES Table 3. (Continued)
| |
| Type Code Location a Location T-23 B Put-In-Bay Lighthouse, 14.3 miles ENE of plant.
| |
| T-24 B Sandusky, 24.9 miles SE of plant.
| |
| T-25 I Winter Farm, 1.3 miles S of plant.
| |
| T-26 B Fostoria, 35.1 miles SW of plant.
| |
| T-27 B Magee Marsh, 5.3 miles WNW of plant.
| |
| T-28 I Unit 1 treated water supply, onsite.
| |
| T-29 I Lake Erie, Intake area, 1.5 miles NE of plant.
| |
| T-30 I Lake Erie, discharge area, 0.9 miles ENE of plant.
| |
| I= Indicator locations; B= Background locations.
| |
| b Distance has been redetermined and is 2.7 miles WSW at plant (previous distance reported was 3.2 miles),
| |
| c Farm was sold and sampling discontinued in September 1975.
| |
| 4 60
| |
| | |
| j) l l 1 2yrh m2$3 hjg2hrL0,yn] 1 1
| |
| 3 y 1 l
| |
| t n 1 u W r n F o r n M f e
| |
| A S W d tr e
| |
| zyua DDDDDDDDDDDDDD DD DD LLLLLLLLLLLLLLI LL LL l q TTTTTTTTTTTTTTW TT TT a nd r l
| |
| a 3 d
| |
| L ng 6 y a n l
| |
| l W D c s r i
| |
| a F FE i u u sd n
| |
| n A AM a a , b de
| |
| - O O OO l c yt i
| |
| S S SS k e m , , el l e E E E eo S
| |
| V V V wc as l
| |
| s a n a L a o r C F d g e ;
| |
| aa t r y
| |
| a 3 SS l cet e l
| |
| r 3 DI l r o a l
| |
| t e
| |
| a WW W cu q r
| |
| F W e a
| |
| u W WW W r ts ei Q , .
| |
| w g DDDDDDDDDDDDDD DD D D.
| |
| LLLLLLLLLLLLLL LL LI 8 ni
| |
| . TTTTTTTTTTTTTT TT TT .nr ou n sid o rt e ad ce l
| |
| i t t r ot c aLc u e e y P P qml l l
| |
| l l
| |
| h b h or o t c o t n M M MM M 4 f )
| |
| c o , , , d s y f M DDDDDDDDDDDDDD DD DD ne a al b o LLLLLLLLLLLLLL LL LL p
| |
| . TTTTTTTTTTTTTT TT TT , n r o d i g r a n n y 3 s i i ,k a r r TTT T di g l
| |
| u g
| |
| WWW SSS W
| |
| S 2nmdn i , , , '
| |
| r5
| |
| ,a f UUU UUU a7 e y
| |
| d l
| |
| k WWW SSS b
| |
| M WWW SSS e9 g y1 a n e ayi l
| |
| a e , , ,
| |
| I l I l l 1 l I I I, l l a s e
| |
| W AAAA AAAAAA A A sM(
| |
| e p , , , , , ,,,,, , , mg de y PPPP PPPPPP P P in e t i f T AAAA AAAAAA A A e nn e l ei t I
| |
| r gt
| |
| . h e a 4 n TDC o " 1 2
| |
| c e i t
| |
| l a 23 45678 901 2 45678901 23 4567890 b c 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2222222223 a o T L mM
| |
| | |
| NALCC2 ENVIMONMENTAL SCIENCES Table 5. Sample codes used in Table 4.
| |
| Code Description AP Airborne Particulate AI Airborne Iodine TLD (M) Thermoluminescent-Dosimeter - Monthly TLD (Q) Thermoluminescent Dosimeter - Quarterly TLD (A) Thermoluminescent Dosimeter - Annual SWU Surface water - Untreated SWT Surface water - Treated (tap)
| |
| WW Well water (Ground Water)
| |
| P Precipitation BS Bottom Sediments SO Soil M Milk ME Domestic Meat WL Wildlife F Fish CL Clams VE Fruits and Vegetables WI Wine SMW Smartweed AF Animal Feed (silage, grain, grass)
| |
| WF Waterfowl 62
| |
| | |
| NALCC ENVI ACNNIENTAL 3CIENCE3 Table 6. Airborne particulate and charcoal samples collected at Location T-1; analyses for gross alpha, gross beta, and iodine-131.
| |
| Date Volume Gross alpha Gross beta I-131 Collected (m3) (cci/m3) a (cCi/m3)a (oCi/m3) a 1-06-76 313.6 0.002110.0007 0.039' O.003 <0.02 1-12-76 285.7 0.0027 0.0008 0.045t0.003 <0.02 1-19-76 278.3 0.0036t0.0014 0.050 0.004 <0.02 1-26-76 306.8 0.0024 0.0011 0.033!0.003 <0.02 2-01-76 321.1 0.0025 0.0011 0.040t0.004 <0.02 2-07-76 300.8 0.0011t0.0007 0.028 0.003 <0.02 2-17-76 268.8 0.0026!0.0012 0.046 0.004 <0.02 2-23-76 286.7 0.0009:0.0007 0.018t0.003 <0.02 3-01-76 275.6 <0.0005 0.008t0.002 <0.02 3-06-76 290.5 0.0008 0.0007 0.007 0.002 <0.02 15-76 288.4 0.000810.0007 0.009!0.002 <0.02 3-22-76 287.3 0.0013 0.0008 0.037!0.004 <0.02 3-29-76 168.8 0.0017 0.0009 0.035t0.003 <0.02 4-05-76 238.9 0.0011 0.0009 0.027 0.004 <0.02 4-12-76 270.8 0.0015 0.0009 0.041 0.004 <0.02 4-19-76 187.8 0.0032 0.0011 0.072t0.005 <0.02 4-26-76 206.3 0.0013!0.0007 0.030 0.003 <0.02 3-03-76 202.2 0.0021t0.0012 0.029 0.004 <0.02 5-11-76 233.0 0.0029!0.0010 0.041 0.003 <0.02 5-17-76 76.2 0.0025t0.0017 0.042t0.006 <0.02 5-25-76 225.1 0.0020 0.0012 0.031 0.004 <0.02 6-01-76 211.5 0.0021!0.0012 0.025t0.004 <0.02 6-07-76 202.8 0.0032:0.0015 0.033t0.004 <0.02 6-14-76 182.2 0.0033 0.0016 0.064 0.006 <0.02 6-21-76 285.2 0.0011:0.0008 0.024!0.003 <0.02 6-28-76 276.9 <0.0005 0.031!0.004 <0.02 Mean is.Db (1st Quarter) 0.0019t0.0008 0.031 0.015 Mean tS.D. (2nd Quarter) 0.002210.0008 0.038 0.015 aThe error given is the probable counting error at the 95% confidence level. Less than (<) values are based on 3 sigma counting error for background sample.
| |
| bless than (<) values are not included in the mean.
| |
| 63
| |
| | |
| NALCO ENVI ACNMENTAL SCIENCES Table 7. Airborne particulate and charcoal samples collected at Location T-2; analyses for gross alpha, gross beta, and iodine-131.
| |
| Date Volume Gross alpha Gross beta I-131 Collected (m3) (pCi/m3) a (pci/m3) a (pci/m3) a 1-05-76 259.9 0.0032 0.0009 0.041 0.003 <0.02 1-12-76 227.4 0.0030 0.0009 0.052!0.004 <0.02 1-19-76 254.7 0.0024!0.0012 0.059 0.005 <0.02 1-26-76 192.2 0.0036t0.0017 0.051!0.005 <0.02 2-01-76 271.2 0.0019 0.0010 0.042!0.004 <0.02 2-07-76 244.0 0.0019!0.0011 0.036 0.004 <0.02 2-17-76 316.4 0.0016t0.0008 0.039 0.004 <0.02 2-23-76 315.8 0.0014t0.0008 0.022 0.003 <0.02 3-01-76 285.4 0.0040!0.0014 0.050 0.004 <0.02 3-08-76 346.3 0.0017 0.0008 0.025t0.003 <0.02 3-15-76 284.1 0.0024 0.0011 0.037t0.004 <0.02 i
| |
| 3-22-76 288.6 0.0011 0.0008 0.041t0.004 <0.02 3-29-76 178.2 0.001220.0008 0.030 0.003 <0.02 4-05-76 270.3 0.0008t0.0007 0.022!0.003 <0.02 4-12-76 389.2 0.0010 0.0006 0.025t0.003 <0.02 4-19-76 391.0 0.0019t0.0006 0.033t0.002 <0.02 4-26-76 325.3 <0.0003 0.014t0.002 <0.02 5-03-76 229.2 0.0007 0.0007 0.025 0.004 <0.02 5-11-76 306.5 0.0022 0.0007 0. 0 31t 0. 0 0 2 <0.02 5-17-76 78.5 0.0024 0.0017 0.032 0.005 <0.02 5-25-76 313.0 0.0009t0.0007 0.019 0.003 <0.02 6-01-76 274.3 0.0023t0.0011 0.017!0.003 <0.02 6-07-76 238.2 0.002310.0012 0.036t0.004 <0.02 6-14-76 252.3 0.0024t0.0012 0.049 0.005 <0.02 6-21-76 274.0 0.0015 0.0009 0.028 0.003 <0.02 6-28-76 275.6 0.0022:0.0011 0.037t0.004 <0.02 Mean tS.DD (1st Quarter) 0.0022!0.0009 0.04000.011 Mean ts.D. (2nd Quarter) 0.0017 0.0007 0.027 0.001 i
| |
| aThe error given is the probable counting error at the 95% confidence level. Less than (<) values are based on 3 sigma counting error y
| |
| for background sample.
| |
| OLess than (<) values are not included in the mean.
| |
| 64
| |
| | |
| NALCC ENVI ACNMENTAL SCIENCES
| |
| -Table 8.. Airborne particulate and charcoal samples collected at Location T-3; analyses for gross alpha, gross beta, and iodine-131.
| |
| Date Volume Gross alpha Gross beta I-131 (pCi/m3)a (pCi/m3) a Collected (m3) (pci/m3)a 1-05-76 212.5 0.0027 0.0009 0.054!0.004 <0.02 1-12-76 202.9 0.0031 0.0011 0.070i0.004 <0.02 1-19-76 194.1 0.0032!0.0016 0.071 0.006 <0.02 1-26-76. 219.5 0.0024 0.0013 0.048 0.005 <0.02 2-01-76 292.2 0.0026t0.00ll 0.045 0.004 <0.02 2-07-76 265.5 0.0021 0.0011 0.030!0.004 <0.02 2-17-76 318.1 0.0035 0.0013 0.044!0.004 <0.02 2-23-76 238.5 0.0017 0.0011 0.030t0.004 <0.02 3-01-76 277.1 0.0026t0.0012 0.055t0.005 <0.02 3-08-76 284.9 0.0022 0.0011 0.032 0.004 <0.02 3-15-76 275.0 0.0014 0.0009 0.041 0.004 <0.02 3-22-76 280.0 0.0020 0.0011 0.045 0.004 <0.02 3-29-76 188.4 0.0014t0.0008 0.032!0.003 <0.02 4-05-76 257.3 0.0009!0.0008 0.023t0.003 <0.02 4-12-76 272.2 0.0017t0.0010 0.036t0.004 <0.02 4-19-76 215.4 0.0042 0.0012 0.071 0.004 <0.02 4-26-76 271.9 0.0008t0.0007 0.024 0.003 <0.02 5-03-76 264.8 0.0015 0.0009 0.020:0.003 <0.02 5-11-76 297.0 0.0021:0.0007 0.038 0.003 <0.02 5-17-76 154.6 0.0029 0.0012 0.027 0.003 <0.02 5-25-76 195.6 0.0018 0.0012 0.030 0.004 <0.02 6-01-76 225.5 0.0024 0.0013 0.026 0.004 <0.02 6-07-76 225.1 0.0023 0.0012 0.036 0.004 <0.02 6-14-76 237.7 0.0024t0.0012 0.057t0.005 <0.02 6-21-76 277.0 0.0015 0.0009 0.023 0.003 <0.02 6-23-76 169.4 0.0024t0.0015 0.06410.006 <0.02 Mean tS.DD (1st Quarter) 0.0024t0.0006 0.046t0.014 Mean :S.D. (2nd Quarter) 0.002110.0009 0.037t0.017 aThe error given is the probable counting error at the 95% confidence level. Less than (<) values are based on 3 sigma counting error for background sample.
| |
| b Less than (<) values are not included in the mean.
| |
| s 65
| |
| | |
| NALCO ENVIRCNMENTAL SCIENCES Table 9. Airborne particulate and charcoal samples collected at Location T-4; analyses for gross alpha, gross beta, and iodine-131.
| |
| Date Volume Gross alpha Gross beta I-131 Collected (m3) (pCi/m3)a (pCi/m3) a (cci/m3)a 1-05-76 182.7 0.0032!0.0012 0.041 0.004 <0.02 1-12-76 209.8 0.0025:0.0009 0.061 0.004 <0.02 1-19-76 219.4 0.004210.0017 0.068 0.006 <0.02 1-26-76 235.5 0.0026t0.0013 0.045!0.005 <0.02 2-01-76 261.2 0.0029 0.0013 0.054 0.005 <0.02 2-07-76 242.6 0:0018!0.0011 0.039!0.004 <0.02 2-17-76 308.3 0.0037t0.0013 0.046!0.004 <0.02 2-23-76 232.4 0.0016!0.0010 0.034t0.004 <0.02 3-01-76 244.1 0.0038t0.0015 0.061 0.005 <0.02 3-08-76 296.8 0.0026t0.0012 0.036!0.004 <0.02 3-15-76 282.3 0.0011 0.0008 0.034!0.004 <0.02 3-22-76 354.6 0.0007:0.0006 0.040 0.003 <0.02 3-29-76 303.6 0.0018 0.0006 0.037t0.003 <0,02 4-05-76 245.3 0.0010!0.0008 0.023 0.003 <0.02 4-12-76 283.7 0.0017 0.0009 0.035:0.004 <0.02
| |
| ! 4-19-76 155.6 0.0054!0.0016 0.068 0.005 <0.02 4-26-76 147.3 0.0037 0.0019 0.045 0.006 <0.02 5-03-76 264.5 0.0013 0.0008 0.024:0.003 <0.02 5-11-76 294.8 0.0029 0.0008 0.039:0.003 <0.02 5-17-76 134.4 0.001510.0010 0.029 0.004 <0.02 5-25-76 202.1 0.0017t0.0012 0.017 0.003 <0.02 6-01-76 182.7 0.0014!0.0011 0.03310.005 <0.02 6-07-76 230.1 0.0012 0.0009 0.032 0.004 <0.02 6-14-76 261.0 0.0021 0.0011 0.056 0.005 <0.02 6-21-76 189.0b <0.0007 0.003t0.002 <0.02 6-28-76 121.7 0.0033!0.0021 0.085 0.009 <0.02 Mean ts.CG (1st Quarter) 0.0025 0.0011 0.046 0.012 Mean'ts.D. (2nd Quarter) 0.002310.0013 0.038 0.022 aThe error given is the probable counting error at the 95% confidence level. Less than (<) values are based on 3 sigma counting error for background sample.
| |
| b There was no particulate matter in the filter paper.
| |
| cLess than (<) values are not included in the mean.
| |
| 66
| |
| | |
| ,e-NALCC ENVI ACNMENTAL SCIENCE 3 Table 10. Airborne particulate and charcoal samples collected at Location T-7; analyses for gross alpha, gross beta, and iodine-131.
| |
| Gross alpha Gross beta I-131 Date Volume .
| |
| (pCi/m3) a (pCi/m3) a Collected (m3 ) (pCi/m3) a 0.0032!0.0009 0.043t0.003 <0.02 1-05-76 271.3 0.06110.004 <0.02 1-12-76 256.7 0.0037t0.0010 1-19-76 269.1 0.0023!0.0011 0.057 0.005 <0.02 1-26-76 242.6 0.0019 0.0011 0.051 0.005 <0.02 2-01-76 288.3 0.0033i0.0013 0.047 0.004 <0.02 2-07-76 272.4 0.0022 0.0011 0.035t0.004 <0.02 317.5 0.0021i0.0009 0.042:0.004 <0.02 2-17-76 2-23-76 239.8 0.0032 0.0014 0.036 0.004 <0.02 3-01-76 274.2 0.0029t0.0012 0.055t0.005 <0.02 3-08-76 285.4 0.0020!0.0011 0.031:0.003 <0.02 3-15-76 285.2 0.0015t0.0009 0.041!0.004 <0.02 3-22-76 270.5 0.0022:0.0011 0.040 0.004 <0.02 3-29-76 271.2 0.0016 0.0006 0.037 0.003 <0.02 4-05-76 271.2 0.0015t0.0009 0.024t0.003 <0.02 4-12-76 266.9 0.0024 0.0012 0.039t0.004 <0.02 4-19-76 266.9 0.004320.0011 0.057 0.003 <0.02 273.5 0.0025!0.0012 0.026 0.003 <0.02 4-26-76 <0.02 5-03-76 274.8 0.0012 0.0008 0.026i0.003 5-11-76 306.5 0.0020t0.0007 0.036t0.003 <0.02 5-17-76 147.3 0.002920.0010 0.027 0.003 <0.02 5-25-76 226.3 0.0033 0.0010 0.022:0.003 <0.02 6-01-76 188.8 0.0019t0.0010 0.025t0.004 <0.02 232.7 0.001120.0009 0.031 0.004 <0.02 6-07-76 <0.02 6-14-76 259.5 0.0012 0.0009 0.044!0.004 ~
| |
| 276.0 0.001710.0010 0.023 0.003 <0.02 6-21-76 6-28-76 -270.0 0.001510.0009 0.03220.004 <0.02 Mean 1S.04 (1st Quarter) 0.0025t0.0007 0.044!0.009 Mean jS.D. (2nd Quarter) 0.0021 0.0009 0.032 0.010 aThe error given is the probable counting error at the 95% confidence level. Less than (<) values are based on 3 sigma counting error for background sample.
| |
| bLess than (<) values are not included in the mean.
| |
| 67
| |
| | |
| NALCO ENVI"IONiviENTAL SCIENCES
| |
| ~
| |
| ' Table 11. Airborne particulate and charcoal samples collected at Location T-8; analyses for gross alpha, gross beta, and iodine-131.
| |
| Date Volume Gross alpha Gross beta I-131 Collected (m3) (pCi/m3) a (pCi/m3) a (pCi/m3) a 1-05-76 373.3 0.0022!0.0006 0.029t0.002 <0.02 1-12-76 370.8 0.0026 0.0007 0.029!0.002 <0.02 1-19-76 370.2 0.0019 0.0008 0.039 0.003 <0.02 1-26-76 371.1 0.001320.0007 0.026 0.003 <0.02 2-01-76 371.1 0.0015!O 0007 0.02810.003 <0.02 2-07-76 368.9 0.0016 0.0008 0.020 0.002 <0.02 2-17-76 421.9 0.0012 0.0006 0.023 0.002 <0.02 2-23-76 315.8 0.0011 0.0007 0.016 0.002 <0.02 3-01-76 368.9 0.0015 0.0007 0.016 0.002 <0.02 3-08-76 397.1- 0.0012 0.0007 0.018 0.002 <0.02 3-15-76 394.3 0.0011!0.0006 0.018o0.002 <0.02 3-22-76 380.7 <0. 00 0 4 0.025 0.003 <0.02 3-29-76 393.9 0.0007 0.0004 0.016 0.002 <0.02 05-76 312.8 0.0017 0.0009 0.020t0.003 <0.02
| |
| '4-12-76 244.1 0.0017t0.0010 0.047t0.005 <0.02 4-19-76 166.5 0.0048t0.0015 0.078 0.005 <0.02 4-26-76 311.9 0.0023 0.0010 0.022!0.003 <0.02 5-03-76 267.5 0.0017 0.0009 0.02310.003 <0.02 5-11-76 216.4 0.002110.0007 0.036 0.003 <0.02 5-17-76 135.7 0.0010 0.0009 0.032:0.004 <0.02 5-25-76 222.9 0.0019t0.00ll 0.020r0.003 <0.02 6-01-76 180.1 0.001610.0012 0.024o0.004 <0.02 6-07-76 227.3 0.0018 0.0011 0.032t0.004 <0.02 6-14-76~ 116.4 0.006710.0029 0.097t0.010 <0.02 6-21-76 183.8 0.0031!0.0016 0.037 0.005 <0.02 6-28-76 211.3 0.0013 0.0010 0.046 0.005 <0.02 Mean tS.DD (1st Quarter) 0.0015 0.0005 0.023 0.006 Mean !S.D. (2nd Quarter) 0.0024 0.0015 0.040t0.024 a
| |
| The error given is the probable counting error at the 95% confidence
| |
| , level. Less than (<) values are based on 3 sigma counting error for background sample.
| |
| b Less than (<) values are not included in the mean.
| |
| 68
| |
| | |
| NALCC ENVI ACNMENTAL SCIENCES Table 12. Airborne particulate and charcoal samples collected at Location T-9; analyses for gross alpha, gross beta, and iodine-131.
| |
| Date Volume Gross alpha Gross beta I-131 Collected (m3) (pCi/m3)a (pCi/m3) a (pci/m3) a 05-76 272.9 0.0026 0.0008 0.045 0.003 <0.02 1-12-76 243.1 0.0049t0.0012 0.062 0.004 <0.02 1-19-76 270.9 0.0024 0.0012 0.056 0.005 <0.02 1-26-76 224.2 0.0020!0.0012 0.048t0.005 <0.02 2-01-76 276.9 0.0022 0.0011 0.046 0.004 <0.02 2-07-76 244.0 0.0026!0.0013 0.042 0.004 <0.02 2-17-76 326.2 0.0027!0.0011 0.042 0.004 <0.02 2-23-76 247.8 0.0015t0.0009 0.028 0.004 <0.02 3-01-76 224.0 0.0040t0.0016 0.060 0.005 <0.02 3-08-76 289.7 0.0014!0.0009 0.035t0.004 <0.02 3-15-76 281.7 0.0026 0.0012 0.039!0.004 <0.02 3-22-76 297.2 0.0023!0.0011 0.039 0.004 <0.02 3-29-76 288.7 0.0006t0.0005 0.034 0.003 <0.02 4-05-76 273.3 0.001510.0009 0,030 0.004 <0.02 4-12-76 208.7 0.0027t0.0014 0.052t0.005 <0.02 4-19-76 89.0 0.0057i0.0022 0.132t0.009 <0.02 4-26-76 255.3 0.0016 0.0010 0.024r0.003 <0.02 5-03-7G 220.6 0.0030!0.0014 0.032!0.004 <0.02 5-11 272.5 0.0038!0.0010 0.045t0.003 <0.02 5-16-76 94.4 0.0030 0.0017 0.04110.005 <0.02 5-25-76 177.3 0.0014!0.0011 0.022 0.004 <0.02 6-01-76 146.0 0.0033 0.0018 0.033t0.005 <0.02 6-07-76 223.4 0.001610.0010 0.035t0.004 <0.02 6-14-76 228.3 0.0033!0.0015 0.063!0.005 <0.02 6-21-76 206.7 0.0026 0.0014 0.034 0.004 <0.02 6-28-76 221.3 0.0017 0.0011 0.045!0.005 <0.02 Mean S.D M (1st Quarter) 0.0025 0.0011 0.044 0.010 Mean tS.D. (2nd Quarter) 0.0027!0.0012 0.045 0.028 aThe error given is the probable counting error at the 95% confidence level. Less than (<) values are based on 3 sigma counting error for background sample.
| |
| bLess than (<) values are not included in the mean.
| |
| 69
| |
| | |
| NALCO ENVIACNMENTAL SCIENCES Table 13. Airborne particulate and charcoal samples collected at Location T-10; analyses for gross alpha, gross beta, and iodine-131.
| |
| Date Volume Gross alpha Gross beta I-131 Collected (m3) (pci/m3)a (pci/m3)a (pCi/m3 ) a 1-05-76 275.6 0.0032 0.0009 0.044 0.003 <0.02 1-12-76 260.4 0.0046 0.0011 0.055 0.003 <0.02 1-19-76 270.4 0.0046 0.0016 0.057 0.005 <0.02 1-26-76 252.7 0.0019t0.0011 0.052t0.005 <0.02 2-01-76 272.8 0'.0023!0.0011 0.038 0.004 <0.02 2-07-76 259.6 0.0024 0.0012 0.039 0.004 <0.02 2-17-76 314.8 0.0035!0.0013 0.042!0.004 <0.02 2-23-76 236.9 0.0019 0.0011 0.031 0.004 <0.02 3-01-76 251.2 0.0034 0.0014 0.061t0.005 <0.02 3-08-76 278.3 0.0024 0.0012 0.037!0.004 <0.02 3-15-76 284.5 0.0021t0.0011 0.040!0.004 <0.02 3-22-76 284.7 0.0011!0.0008 0.048 0.004 <0.02 3-29-76 256.9 0.0015 0.0007 0.036 0.003 <0.02 4-05-76 285.7 0.0015!0.0009 0.023 0.003 <0.02 4-12-76 263.7 0.001910.0011 0.042 0.004 <0.02 4-19-76 248.3 0.0041 0.0011 0.067 0.004 <0.02 4-26-76 283.8 <0.0005 0.026t0.003 <0.02 5-03-76 246.4 0.0020 0.0011 0.031!0.004 <0.02 5-11-76 317.2 0.0020 0.0007 0.039t0.003 <0.02
| |
| ; 5-17-76 128.3 0.0012!0.0010 0.032t0.004 <0.02 5-25-76 191.9 0.0030 0.0015 0.024 0.004 <0.02-6-01-76 161.7 0.0018!0.0013 0.029 0.005 <0.02 6-07-76 192.6 0.0023:0.0014 0.038 0.005 <0.02 6-14-76 245.5 0.0037!0.0015 0.054 0.005 <0.02 6-21-76 94.2 <0.0015 0.044!0.008 <0.02 6-28-76 244.1 0.0008!0.0008 0.042 0.004 <0.02 Mean iS.D b (1st Quarter) 0.0027!0.0011 0.045!0.009 Mean S.D. (2nd Quarter) 0.0022!0.0010 0.038 0.013 aThe error given is the probable counting error at the 95% confidence level. Less than (<) values are based on 3 sigma counting error for background' sample.
| |
| bL ess than (<) values are not included in the mean.
| |
| 1 l
| |
| 70
| |
| _ _ _ _ , __ . _ _ . _l
| |
| | |
| NALCC ENVI ACNiVIENTAL SCIENCES 4 Table 14 Airborne particulate and charcoal samples collected at Location T-11; analyses for gross alpha, gross beta, and iodine-131.
| |
| Date Volume Gross alpha Gross beta I-131 Collected (m3 ) (pCi/m3)a (pCi/m3) a (oCi/m3)a 1-05-76 248.4 0.0040t0.00ll 0.049 0.003 <0.02 1-12-76 201.4 0.0042 0.0012 0.079t0.005 <0.02 1-19-76 228.6 0.0043!0.0017 0.06320.005 <0.02 1-26-76 187.6 0.0044 0.0019 0.058 0.006 <0.02 2-01-76 283.1 0.0021 0.0011 0.048 0.004 <0.02 2-07-76 253.8 0.0016 0.0009 0.034!0.004 <0.02 j 2-17-76 295.3 0.0022 0.0011 0.045 0.004 <0.02 2-23-76 236.9 0.0031 0.0014 0.030t0.004 <0.02 3-01-76 225.4 0.0035 0.0015 0.063t0.006 <0.02 3-08-76 278.3 0.0021t0.0011 0.032 0.004 <0.02 3-15-76 279.0 0.0022 0.0011 0.044 0.004 <0.02 3-22-76 NSD NS NS NS 3-29-76 239.4 0.0021 0.0012 0.03420.003 <0.02 4-05-76 278.3 0.0019!0.0010 0.025t0.003 <0.02 4-12-76 263.7 0.0010 0.0008 0.038t0.004 <0.02 4-19-76 248.3 0.0045t0.0011 0.066t0.004 <0.02 4-26-76 278.3 0.0011!0.0008 0.028 0.003 <0.02 5-03-76 279.4 0.0020 0.0010 0.024 0.003 <0.02 5-11-76 314.0 0.0029!0.0008 0.039 0.003 <0.02 5-17-76 145.7 0.001310.0009 0.030t0.004 <0.02 5-25-76 188.5 0.0022 0.0013 0.020!0.004 <0.02 6-01-76 210.0 0.0021 0.0012 0.022 0.004 <0. 0 2 -
| |
| 6-07-76 221.4 0.0023 0.0013 0.035t0.004 <0.02 6-14-76 261.5 0.003000.0013 0.052 0.005 <0.02 6-21-76 265.6 0.0016t0.0010 0.029t0.004 <0.02 6-28-76 221.1 0.001710.0011 0.04610.005 <0.02 Mean tS.Dc (1st Quarter) 0.0030o0.00ll 0.048 0.015 Mean S.D. (2nd Quarter) 0.0021!0.0009 0.035 0.013 aThe error given is the probable counting error at the 95% confidence level. Less than (<) values are based on 3 sigma counting error for background sample, bNS = No sample r power failure.
| |
| c Less than (<) values are not included in the mean.
| |
| 71
| |
| | |
| NALCC ENVI ACNMENTA1. SCI:3NCES Table 15 Airborne particulate and charcoal samples collected at Location T-12; analyses for gross alpha, gross beta,.and iodine-131.
| |
| Date Volume Gross alpha Gross beta I-131 Collected (m3) (pCi/m3)a (pCi/m3) a (pCi/m3) a 1-05-76 209.8 0.0045 0.0012 0.048 0.004 <0.02 1-12-76 242.6 0.0046t0.0012 0.052 0.003 <0.02 1-19-76 187.0 0.0055 0.0021 0.065t0.006 <0.02 1-26-76 241.2 0.0034!0.0014 0.044t0.004 <0.02 2-01-76 219.8 0.0033 0.0015 0.053 0.005 <0.02 2-07-76 235.5 0.0030t0.0014 0.034 0.004 <0.02 2-17-76 255.5 0.0029!0.0013 0.038 0.004 <0.02 2-23-76 259.7 0.0031!0.0013 0.030!0.004 <0.02 3-01-76 238.3 0.0039:0.0015 0.048 0.005 <0.02 3-08-76 269.7 0.0027!0.0012 0.02810.003 <0.02 3-15-76 278.3 0.0012 0.0008 0.035 0.004 <0.02 3-22-76 284.0 0.001410.0009 0.037!0.004 <0.02 3-29-76 271.2 0.0014 0.0006 0.031!0.003 <0.02 4-05 251.2 0.0024t0.0012 0.024t0.003 <0.02 4-12-76 251.2 0.000810.0008 0.03610.004 <0.02 4-19-76 258.3 0.0032 0.0010 0.05910.004 <0.02 4-26-76 259.3 0.0017 0.0010 0.026t0.003 <0.02 5-03-76 241.2 0.0016t0.0010 0.01720.003 <0.02 5-10-76 256.9 0.001900.0008 0.027 0.002 <0.02 5-17-76 256.9 0.0014t0.0007 0.016t0.002 <0.02 5-24-76 266.9 0.0021 0.0011 0.023 0.003 <0.02 5-31-76 271.2 0.0007 0.0007 0.017t0.003 <0.02 6-07-76 256.9 0.0029t0.0013 0.030t0.004 <0.02 6-14-76 256.9 0.0034t0.0014 0.056t0.005 <0.02 6-21-76 271.2 0.0014:0.0009 0.024 0.003 <0.02 6-28-76 131.2 0.0028:0.0019 0.040t0.006 <0.02 Mean iS.Db (1st Quarter) 0.003120.0013 0.042 0.011 Mean is.D. (2nd Quarter) 0.0020 0.0009 0.030 0.014 The error given is the probable counting error at the 95% confidence level. Less than (<) values are based on 3 sigma counting error for background sample.
| |
| bLess than (<) values are not included in the mean.
| |
| 72
| |
| | |
| NALCC ENV!McNMENTAL SCIENCES
| |
| (
| |
| Table 16. Airborne particulate and charcoal samples collected at Location T-23; analyses for gross alpha, gross beta, and iodine-131.
| |
| Date Volume Gross alpha Gross beta I-131 Collected (m3) (pCi/m3) a (pci/m3)a (oCi/m3)a 1-05-76 383.0 0.0017t0.0006 0.030 0.002 <0.02 1-12 262.6 0.0022 0.0008 0.049 0.003 <0.02 1-19-76 235.5 0.0041 0.0016 0.066 0.005 <0.02 1-26-76 221.2 <0.0007 0.048 0.005 <0.02 2-01-76 376.3 0.0020!0.0008 0.034 0.003 <0.02 2-07-76 371.1 0.0023 0.0009 0.025 0.003 <0.02 2-17-76 410.8 0.0023:0.0008 0.029 0.003 <0.02 2-23-76 320.6 0.0027 0.0011 0.031!0.003 <0.02 3-01-76 318.1 0.0024 0.0011 0.045t0.004 <0.02 3-08-76 285.6 0.002000.0011 0.030 0.003 <0.02 3-15-76 268.5 0.0021 0.0011 0.037!0.004 <0 . 0 2 3-22-76 273.2 0.0023o0.0012 0.042!0.004 <0.02 3-29-76 362.2 0.0007t0.0004 0.020 0.002 <0.02 4-05-76 286.9 0.0008!0.0007 0.026 0.003 <0.02
| |
| ) 4-12-76 292.7 0.0020 0.0010 0.038!0.004 <0.02 4-19-76 253.6 0.0027 0.0009 0.053 0.003 <0.02 4-26-76 271.0 0.001110.0008 0.019!0.003 <0.02 5-03-76 264.2 0.0017 0.0009 0.025 0.003 <0.02 5-10-76 248.7 0.0022 0.0008 0.031t0.003 <0.02 5-17-76 249.8 0.002220.0008 0.027 0.003 <0.02 5-24-76 251.2 <0.0005 0.019!0.003 <0.02 5-31-76 237.1 0.0013 0.0009 0.020 0.003 <0.02 6-08-76 256.4 0.0015 0.0009 0.038 0.004 <0.02 6-14-76 233.9 0.0026 0.0013 0.050!0.005 <0.02 6-22-76 252.9 0.0009 0.0008 0.033 0.004 <0.02 6-28-76 287.1 0.0012:0.0008 0.028 0.003 <0.02 Mean S.DY (1st Quarter) 0.0022 0.0007 0.037 0.012 Mean tS.D. (2nd Quarter) 0.0017!0.0007 0.031 0.011 aThe error given is the probable counting error at the 95% confidence level. Less than (<) values are based on 3 sigma counting error for background sample.
| |
| b Less than (<) values are not included in the mean.
| |
| 73
| |
| | |
| NALCC ENVI ACNMENTAL SCIENCES
| |
| ,c t -Table 17. Airborne particulate and charcoal samples collected at Location T-27; analyses for gross. alpha, gross beta, and iodine-131.
| |
| Date. Volume Gross alpha Gross beta I-131 Collected (m3) (pCi/m3) a (pci/m3) a (oci/m3) a 3
| |
| 1-05-76 277.6 0.0033 0.0009 0.054t0.003 <0.02 1-12-76 249.1 0.0042 0.0011 0.054 0.003 <0.02 i 1-19-76 232.2 0.0037 0.0015 0.072 0.006 <0.02 i 1-26-76 234.4 0.0019!0.0011 0.051 0.005 <0.02 2-01-76 279.8 0.002520.0011 0.051 0.004 <0.02 2-07-76 262.8 0.0035 0.0014 0.038 0.004 <0.02 2-17-76 242.9 0.0033t0.0014 0.054t0.005 <0.02 2-23-76 233.8 0.0027 0.0013 0.034 0.004 <0.02 3-01-76 265.2 0.0025t0.0012 0.042 0.004 <0.02 3-08-76 281.6 0.0020t0.0011 0.033 0.004 <0.02 3-15-76 280.2 0.0024 0.0011 0.042 0.004 <0.02 3-22-76 284.3 0.0033 0.0013 .0.045!0.004 <0.02 3-29-76 273.9 0.0013t0.0006 0.032 0.003 <0.02 4-05-76 .273.2 0.0014 0.0009 0.023 0.003 ~<0.02 4-12-76 218.8 0.0020!0.0012 0.054t0.005 <0.02 4-19-76 138.2 0.0080 0.0020 0.099 0.006 <0.02 4-26-76 368.4 0.001310.0007 0.020 0.003 <0.02 5-03-76 242.0 0.0026!0.0012 0.033t0.003 <0.02 5-11-76 393.1 0.001810.0006 0.029t0.002 <0.02 i 5-17-76 152.1 0.002510.0012 0.051t0.004 <0.02 4
| |
| 5-25-76 210.1 0.0028 0.0014 0.025 0.004 <0.02 6-01-76 181.6 0.0014 0.0011 0.024!0.004 <0.02 6-07-76 267.5 0'0012 0.0008
| |
| . 0.029t0.004 <0.02 6-14-76 114.2 0. 00 5 3t 0. 00 26 0.080t0.009 <0.02 6-21-76 257.4 0.001420.0009 0.032 0.004 <0.02
| |
| ' 0.0036t0.0020 0.075 0.008 <0.02 6-28-76 141.3 Mean iS.Db -(1st Quarter) 0.0028:0.0008 0.047t0.011 I 'Mean tS.D. (2nd Quarter) -0.0027 0.0020 0.04410.026
| |
| [ aThe error given is the probable counting error at the 95% confidence level. Less than (<) values are based on 3 sigma counting error for boekground sample, bless than (<) values are not included in the mean.
| |
| 4 i
| |
| 74
| |
| | |
| NALCD ENVI ACNMENTAL SCl2NC33
| |
| (
| |
| G c c omHmHONNmmcN comHmmoHmmmv O 5 mmbccMQmboch vmmccNOccvem a e H oooooooooooo cooooooooooo H M X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
| |
| C 5 d cococcococco cooocoococco N E m H m O O a 2 MHmHMommovoH =Normemsovmv CNMMMHNMMMNM W w 3 MvvvvNvMvvMm
| |
| @ G oooooooooooo ocooooococco c H . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
| |
| cococoococco W O C cooocococcoo O C H W 4 Z 4 L1 E 2 0 H O m HmmvNmHmmNme obomNmMMMmMN X W 4 vvmemWmvmmem NMevvHvvvMMC c . O W ococcooooooo cooooooooooo Em c . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
| |
| m > cooococcocco cococooococo tZ <
| |
| C 40 m
| |
| Mm &
| |
| Ec o ceNNhemovmHN comeNoommmhm Hm - E MMMvmNevemvv NvmMMHvmMMNM C l 9 H oooooooooooo cococooococo
| |
| .4 m E i: oooooooooooo cocooocoooco SH
| |
| -c
| |
| % m
| |
| -- 7.
| |
| U ooooooooo'ooo cococooococo oc a m - E C
| |
| * 3 HmmmmMomHMhm to v h c h H m o c c M m WW d 2 NHNNMHNHNMoH oHHHNHHHHNNN ch r H oooooooooooo ocococococco
| |
| >m C C
| |
| +
| |
| oooooooooooo ococooococco mH H . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
| |
| c ocococococco ocoooooooooo 50 V V H C m A2 m o un C
| |
| O W
| |
| d hmmammmMmMmH NNNMNHNMMvNM mNmbonhecNeo ONNNNHNNNMNM g oa C W oooooooooooo oooooooooooo .
| |
| E o oooooooooooo ococoooooooo
| |
| -W < oooooooooooo oooooooooooo mn 03 4 C m CC 0
| |
| &M kH 3 De O
| |
| H c
| |
| =
| |
| QE uo mmtommmmmmmme vvvvvvvvvvvv MM dm WO Z CO W 1 O m
| |
| Um CO C 4h O OD H HNMvhmooHNMN HNMvhmmoHNMN 4 4 MHHNN HHHNN Wt c I I l- 1 I I I I I I I I I t 1 I I I i i i e i t H C U bbbbbbbbbbbb bbbbbbbbbbbb
| |
| <c A 0
| |
| H > W W d D 2 0 3 H u 3 L 4 C C 4 4 0 4 0 8 % O A 75
| |
| | |
| N ALCO ENVI ADNMENTAL SCIENCES l'
| |
| E o N N m o e e tn m o coes ,-4 eevtnv&meNeoo e M M M M M w M m N Mtn o n w co v en o tn tn ta tn co
| |
| --e4 E
| |
| y 000000ooo0o0 oOoooooo.oOOO M
| |
| E c cooCocoOooOC oOOooCocoooo N Z H
| |
| U C. E to r- C h N o N v O W m V V cc M M M N e co o e co O w d N r-4 N e 4 N N N N N e4 e-4 N NNNoNMMMNNNN Q
| |
| E en OCoocoOoOOOO cooOOooCOOOO y c . . . . . . . . . e . . oOOOOOoOooOo 0 -e4 000OCOOOOOOO 4 %
| |
| m L1 (U, in tn O O m co tn ,-4 co r-4 e N co cc in v a M v to a co & v O c MNMMNNMMNNNM M M v v M tn v v v M M tn 4 r0 O W OcoOOOOOoCCO O o.........
| |
| o O o o O C O o o. o . ,
| |
| Q . . . . . . . . . . . . OOOOoOCOoooO
| |
| > OOooooOOOOCO E
| |
| c m v cn m M c-4 Co o m e-4 N cc M v v Mrw N M N O v c M NNNNMNMMNNNN M N N M c=4 Q M M M M N in
| |
| - E OoOOooOOoOeo ooOooooooooo (1
| |
| C
| |
| -eq M oCoooOoOOOOO OooOOOcoOcoo x e . .. . . . . . . . . . 000000000000
| |
| .e4 Z C00000000000 0
| |
| C.
| |
| E o m co e o O e M M c- in v tn in tn e- ,-4 rn e co o v o m o o M <-4 O e-4 H e-4 O ,H rH c eH rc Q N o H e4 r-4 rH e-4 e-4 eH O O H 0oo0o00oo000
| |
| .C .,4 0o0000o00o0C p, C C. o. .c .o O.o.O. O. O . .oo . o. O. c. O.O. o. C . .o .o C.C. o. O
| |
| ,.a . t Z OOOOooooOOCo V oCoCCCCoOCoo r3 V V m
| |
| L1 O cn ,-4 N & T N M r- N e e m o r.r v O M m :n 5 m O ,H to in es N N N r-4 N r-4 N N N e-4 ed N e-4 N N H rH M N o-4 N N r-4 N c w 4 4 C000o00o00oO 00oo0o000o0c e
| |
| > CocoCoco.OooO
| |
| . . . . . . . . . . . COooo
| |
| . ...... ooo.ooOO . . . .
| |
| .c OccocoCoOOOO o00o0oo000o0 rn O
| |
| W r-f O CL 2E Em svvevvvveven envvvevvvven s u:
| |
| Z a~ %
| |
| 'O O ,
| |
| o D
| |
| C
| |
| --4 O e-4 N M e r- O m O e4NMN .-4 N M e ts co m o e 4 N M m a en r-4 e-4 a-4 N N c4 H e4 N N C M i 1 1 I i i i I i i i O d i I i i i i i ! i i I t bSb99SSSb98b U
| |
| ~
| |
| U bS89bSSSSbbb 3
| |
| o c-4
| |
| @ C o e< a C
| |
| .Q C >< c c 0 c t3 b i Z Z 76
| |
| | |
| NALCC ENVli:tCNMENTAL SCIENCES E
| |
| o NamoamomeNNm NMHoheNNComm E MvvvvNMvvMvv NMNCmhMCommm s ococcoHooooo m M o o o o.o o.o. o. .o. o. .o o E c cococococcoo o0000C00000C N E e4 O
| |
| a E hvoMvNTMvNmm
| |
| ~ G NONTHCvcNmoN E ONMMMMMMMNNM NHNNNNNNNHHN y
| |
| c -a C) H
| |
| = oooooo.oooooo oooooooooooo cooooooooooo COoooooooooo S E m
| |
| M O O & ' NMmbhoNoNMNm ohmmvmemCNNC W c NMMMMMMvNOMM VNMMMMmMMMMT C 4 o
| |
| oooooo.oooooo oooooooooooo oooooooooooo cocococococo 4
| |
| E D hvNONNcvNNMM NmNvMmbHONho
| |
| - E HNNNNHNNNNNM MHvmvvmvvMNm 9 -m ococooococco cooooocococo E X oooooooooooo cooooooooooo s c . . . . . . . . . . . . ............
| |
| H Z oooooooooooo cocococoocco O
| |
| a
| |
| ~ E d WHvNmvcHHNNM HMmoNNmmommM c 5 oHHoHooHNHoH HooHHHHoHooH 4 s cooooooooooo oooooooooooo a -;C occooooooooo C0o0000000oo H . . . . . . . . . . . . ............
| |
| N E oooooooooooo oooooooooooo V V V m
| |
| m C O & NchmmmNmHNmN comcmemmHmNH W c HHHHHoHHNHHN HoHNHNNHNHHM O W oooooooooooo cococococcoo o oooooooooooo oooooooooooo
| |
| > . . . . . . . . e e . . .........e . .
| |
| < C00000o00000 000000000o00 m
| |
| C WH Ca E
| |
| kc 3M vevvvvvvMvve mmmmmmmmmmmm Z
| |
| C O O s 3
| |
| C C H O U s HNMVNwmOHNMN HNMeNmmoHNMN C U H H & sM N &HHNN O c i I I !1 1 : i i I i i ii i I I I I I I i 1 1
| |
| 'O O bbbbbbbbbbbb bbbbbbbbbbbb
| |
| - o s J
| |
| m M
| |
| O L 2 H 7
| |
| e-4 4 0 e4 4 C W W c O c a b Z E <
| |
| s-77
| |
| | |
| NALCC ENVI:ACNM: ENTAL. SCIENCES 41 4 0O eH M v c-4 .
| |
| a% o o N o o O D o e-t o N o r4 o o N e4 ff) a u) C o o o o o o o o o o c1 O OO 3
| |
| * o
| |
| * o
| |
| * o *
| |
| * o o 41 3
| |
| , 41 O O o o o o o o o o o o o e-4
| |
| ..a .,4 W +1 * +1 * +1 * +1 +1 *
| |
| * 4C a y v o ,-4 o e o o e o o :>
| |
| cn c x o V o V o V ** o V V CO O O o e4 o o *
| |
| .,4 0 m o e
| |
| * o o ,-4 .
| |
| a -4 c3
| |
| * C o e
| |
| * OO a ej o o o >4
| |
| .e4 O C O C.
| |
| EC D .4 si
| |
| * O e4 M "3 C I 4 I C U) O cO e-4 0 ei E ^4 ed CCD E .e4 W H r-4 0CU cc a o r-4 v e4 o "O30 GO sc W o N o o M o o M e4 --i O c-i E O o o o o o o o o o W W e-4 r0 y
| |
| * o e 'o-4 e o *
| |
| * o o CGO Ct c o o o o o o o o o o OMO cc U +1 * +1 * +1 * +1 +f *
| |
| * OO s . v o N o o o e-i & o o eu oO t c V o V N V o o V V * .O O mu = o o ed o o n.n I m m o * *
| |
| * o oua -
| |
| WX
| |
| * o o o e OC U) O o o c) % .c4 c .C O d2 o
| |
| U W%
| |
| O i
| |
| ! t 4Wt WC e 4 e4 U1 C 0E N 4 4L o N W ed O tn O OO
| |
| * O o e4 v o o 4 C .C
| |
| %Me o o o o o C 4 .c4 a ch t o o o o o o C4 L1 O m C * *
| |
| * rH
| |
| * H *
| |
| * LA N CO D e4 r=4 3 o o o o o o o o o o O3M c1 C O +1 +8 +8 o +1 o +1 +1 o o CO
| |
| >, C O W H Q N
| |
| * o
| |
| * CC N O O r4 O >,
| |
| c-4 ,, C & O o o o cc o o o e
| |
| * a c c p M o o o V o V o o o o Cc0 CEm 0 o o *
| |
| * o o V V cEo c0 I .c c *
| |
| * O O *
| |
| * O tn c W e4 O C3 o C o o O . -t
| |
| -Na W L1 >,
| |
| : 0) W c 0 M 0:I) C. Z e-4 M ci
| |
| 'M 3 eC I .Q >
| |
| c4 >
| |
| W c C c4 M e4 t .O O 4
| |
| = 0) C c N O O OOC D o v v r-4 Wtc
| |
| .e4 c., C o o N O o Cao l 4 E .c c W o e-I o
| |
| o o o o c1 O 4OO b O o o N o -4 o o N r-4 o c e4 c0W J
| |
| * o e o
| |
| * o e
| |
| * O o ,C O t p, c c o o o o o o o o o o a a
| |
| >, E O +1 o
| |
| * +t o +t o +1 +1 o o eW c -4 I -4 ed o
| |
| * M
| |
| * e N *
| |
| * c1 4 C u >, - t o V o o M o o e o o .e4 a4 W c4 C o o V o V o o V V O OM c H o o
| |
| * O O C c1 %
| |
| .O W . 3 *
| |
| * o *
| |
| * O0 1
| |
| 4CC o o o o >39
| |
| .e4 3c .c4 rH O 4 79 OcM
| |
| >0 W G e O-W m WVW e4 - c 4-O M v H M w h c O c E o cn v v o o M to u1 C
| |
| .4 % o o e-, e4 m a e4 e4 m m oao
| |
| .O -e4 I I I i 1 1 I i 1 I .c .c W c U W W C 0 0 3 O L1 W .3 Sac
| |
| 'e C U2 U2 O O C3 % % O N Z c l
| |
| l
| |
| .. 78 l
| |
| ~.
| |
| l
| |
| | |
| Table 20. Area monitors - TLD (mrem), January - June 1976 Total for Total for quarter January February flarch January-March adjusted to Location 21 days 28 days 35 days 84 days 91 days T-1 2.810.7 2.911.0 3.010.8 8.7tl.5 9.411.6 T-2 2.510.7 3.411.0 3.610.7 9.511.4 10.311.4 T-3 T-4 1.910.5 2.810.9 2.711.8 4.811.7 3.610.5 5.110.7 8.211.9 12.7!2.0 8.912.0 13.612.2 fr T-5 3.410.7 4.311.7 5.410.7 13.112.0 14.212.2 0 T-6 1.910.7 4.911.1 4.210.7 11.0 1.5 11.911.5 0 T-7 3.110.7 3.411.3 4.810.7 11.311.6 12.211.6 m T-8 3.410.9 5.311.3 6.010.9 14.711.8 15.912.0 2 T-9 1.610.9 .2.211.5 3.910.5 7.711.8 8.311.8 $
| |
| T-10 2.210.5 3.411.5 5.110.5 10.711.7 11.611.8 M T-11 3.110.7 4.811.3 4.210.7 12.111.6 13.111.7 0 q T-12 3.410.7 5.711.7 6.010.7 15.112.0 16.412.2 2
| |
| * T-14 3.410.7 3.411.5 5.410.5 11.911.7 12.911.0 E T-15 2.810.7 5. 71.t .1 4.510.5 13.011.4 14.111.4 .)
| |
| T-23 5.910.7 4.811. 5 5.110.7 15.911.8 17.212.0 T-24 3.710.7 7.111.5 5.710.9 16.511.9 17.912.1 y>
| |
| T-26 3.710.7 5.711.5 4.810.5 14.211.7 15.411.8 r T-27 2.8t0.9 5.311.1 4.810.7 12.911.6 14.011.6 y a i Mean iS.D.a 3.011.0 4.411.3 4.710.8 l'2.212.6 13.212.8 fM M
| |
| | |
| Table 20. (continued)
| |
| Total for Total for quarter April May June April-June adjusted to Location 28 days 29 days 35 days 92 days 91 days T-1 2.610.5 2.910.5 3.310.7 8.811.0 8.711.0 T-2 3.910.5 3.510.5 4.310.8 11.711.1 11.611.1 .d T-3 3.3 0.7 3.510.7 5.2 0.8 12.0 1.5 11.911.5 y T 4.510.5 4.910.7 3.310.6 12.7!1.1 12.611.1 l-16.211.2 16.011.2 U T-5 4.510.5 5.510.7 6.210.8 0 T-6 3.910.7 4.010.5 4.611.0 12.511.3 12.411.3 12.711.3 M T-7 3.610.9 4.610.7 4.610.6 12.811.3 17.811.5 17.611.5 2 T-8 5.510.7 5.510.7 6.811.1 4.010.5 4.611.1 11.911.4 11.811.4 b T-9 3.310.7 3 T-10 5.210.7 4.6 0.5 4.610.9 14.411.2 14.211.2 .
| |
| T-ll 4.210.7 4.010.5 5.210.8 13.411.2 13.211.2 h m T-12 6.110.7 4.310.8 6.810.9 17.211.4 17.011.4 T-14 5.510.5 4.911.1 5.610.8 16.011.5 15.811.5 h T-15 4.510.7 4.910.5 4.911.2 14.311.5 14.111.5 2 T-23 4.510.5 4.310.5 4.910.6 13.710.9 13.610.9 5.911.2 17.513.6 17.311.6 4>
| |
| T-24 6.110.7 5.510.8 r T-26 5.810.5 4.310.9 5.610.9 15.711.4 15.611.4 T-27 5.210.7 5.210.7 4.310.9 14.711.4 14.511.4 $
| |
| m Mean 1S.D. 4.611.0 4.510.7 4. Gil. 7 13.513.6 13.413.6 2 0
| |
| m W.
| |
| US.D. = Standard deviation.
| |
| | |
| NALCO ENVlf4cNMGNTAL OCIENCED N
| |
| Table 21. kreamonitors-TLD (mrem), quarterly, January-June 1976.
| |
| 1st quarter 1st quarter 2nd quarter 2nd quarter January-March adjusted to April-June adjusted to Location 92 Days 91 Days 84 Days .91 Days T- 1 8.4tl.8 8.3!1.8 11.0 0.7 12.0 0.8 T- 2 10.2 1.7 10.l!1.7 11.3tl.5 12.4!1.6 T- 3 9.3 1.3 9.2 1.3 12.4 1.6 13.6 1.7 T- 4 13.0 1.8 12.9!1.8 15.8 2.1 17.3 2.3 T- 5 11.612.0 ll.5t2.0 17.212.0 18.8t2.2 T- 6 9.8 1.7 9.7 1.7 12.8 1.8 14.0 2.0 T- 7 11.6 1.3 11.521.3 12.1 1.5 13.3!1.6 T- 8 16.7 1.6 16.5 1.6 19.5t2.2 21.4t2.4 T- 9 9.8 0.8 9.7 0.8 12.8 2.7 14.0t3.0 T-10 13.511.1 13.421.1 17.0!3.2 18.6 3.5 T-11 13.0 1.1 12.9 1.1 11.7 1.9 12.812.1 T-12 15.3tl.1 15.l!1.1 17.6tl.9 19.3 2.1 4
| |
| T-14 16.7tl.5 16.5:1.5 18.5 2.3 20.3!2.5 T-15 14.311.3 14.1 1.3 16.1 2.0 17.622.2 1
| |
| T-23 12.1 2.0 12.0 2.0 13.2tl.8 14.5 2.0 T-24 13.0t2.2 12.912.2 18.1!2.2 19.8t2.4 T-26 16.7t0.9 16.5 0.9 13.2 1.7 14.5!1.9 T-27 12.lt2.3 12.0 2.3 15.4t2.2 16.9 2.4 Mean t S.D.a 12.6t2.6 12.5!2.6 14.8t2.8 16.2:3.0 aS.D. = Standard deviation.
| |
| 1 4
| |
| 81
| |
| | |
| NALCC ONViMcNMENTAL CCIENCEG Table 22. Area monitors-TLD (mrem), annual, July 1975 - July 1976.
| |
| 1 Exposure (mrem)
| |
| - for the period Exposure (mrem) 30 June 1975-6 July 1976 adjusted to Location (372 days) 365 days T- 1 34.211.5 33.611.5 T- 2 34.8 1.4 34.ltl.4 T- 3 35.531.3 34.8 1.3 T- 4 55.321.5 54.321.5 T- 5 55.1t1.2 54.1 1.2 T- 6 ,
| |
| 46.9tl.6 46.0tl.6 T- 7 44.4tl.4 43.6!1.4 T- 8 58.4!2.0 57.3 2.0
| |
| - T- 9 38.5!1.5 37.8 1.5 T-10 56.Stl.6 55.4 1.6 T-11 47.4!1.6 46.5 1.6 T-12 66.3 1.9 65.1t1.9
| |
| ; T-14 59.3t2.6 58.2:2.6 T-15 54.7 2.6 53.7t2.6 T-23 50.0 2.4 49.l!2.4 T-24 52.823.8 51.8!3.8 j T-26 63.512.4 62.3t2.4 T-27 50.8 2.4 49.8:2.4 j
| |
| Mean ! S.D.a 50.2 9.7 49.3 9.7
| |
| ; aS.D. = Standard deviation.
| |
| 'l 4
| |
| 4
| |
| )
| |
| 82
| |
| | |
| N ALCC ENVI ACNMt!NTA1 SClONCES Table 23. Monthly precipitation samples, analyses for gross beta and tritium, January - June 1976.
| |
| Date Gross betaa Tritiuma Location Collected pCi/l pCi/m2 pCi/ml T-1 (site boundary January 7.7110.67 350:30 0.18t0.09 0.6 mi NE of February 6.37!0.38 370!20 0.09t0.09 plant, near March 8.94!0.68 440t30 <0.14 inlet canal)
| |
| Mean S.D.b 7.67tl.29 386t47 0.14t0.06 April 5.39t0.62 210 20 0.22 0.11 May 9.74:1.20 90!10 0.24 0.11 June 6.80t0.57 170!20 0.21!0.08 Mean 2S.D. 7.31 2.22 160!60 0.22 0.02 T-23
| |
| ( P ut-In-Bay , Januaryc 17.64t0.74 690 30 0.14 0.09 14.3 mi. ENE Februaryc 10.06t0.59 690:40 0.17:0.09 of station) Marchc 20.73tl.39 540 40 0.20t0.11 Mean S.D. 16.14!5.49 640170 0.17 0.03 Aprile 25.77 2.66 250 30 0.19!0.11 Mave 10.14t0.53 430 20 0.18 0.11 June NAd NAd NAd Mean S.D. 17.96!11.05 340 130 0.19 0.01 aThe error given is the probable counting error at the 95% confidence level. Less than (<) values are based on 3 sigma counting error for background sample.
| |
| bS.D. = Standard Deviation. Less than (<) values are not included in the mean, cNo gamma-emitting isotopes were detected above background level.
| |
| dNA = Not analyzed due to insufficient quantity.
| |
| 83
| |
| | |
| N ALCC ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Table 24. Well water samples, analyses for gross alpha, gross beta, and tritium, January - June 1976.
| |
| . . r ,s a l t.n a ' nc u l t d Cross tot 2 W /Ind
| |
| .w ,, m ao a6 .- 6 Lt. 5o, ;r, T. .c. . ic i . .,e 2 6 Tritium
| |
| ~,6tue .2 :a.4 r e s t Ac motts. sMin rastwe oc.< .'
| |
| fucitte collectad
| |
| <0.07 <3.7 <0.4 <0.12 2.94:0.69 2.9420.69 0.39:3.09
| |
| ?-7 2-17-76 2.89:0.74 0.1620.11 (sand nesch, 6-03-76 <3.13 <0.5 <0.6 0.37:0.22 2.52:0.72 0.1 mi. NNW Of station) 2-17-76 <3.36 2.46:1.64 2.4 21.64 0.6510.10 3.4121.06 4.06:1.06 c.25:3.35 T-17 C.8820.27 <3.5 <4.7 0.1620.11 (Irv rick's 6-03-76 <0.13 <2.0 <2.1 wc11 0.7 mi. SW of station)
| |
| <3.gb <3,) <0.12 3.7321.77 3.7321.77 0.1520.C8 7-19 2-17-75 <0.08 <3.14 Oless Sunoco 6-03-76 <0.20 <4.lb <4.3 <0.20 <3.g <4.0 C t r ag e 1. 3 :si . S of station.
| |
| stato Poute 2) 2-17-76 <0.10 <2.8 <2.9 <c.12 1.42:1.51 1.82:1.51 <0.10 T-27 <0.20 <3.5 <3.7 <3.14 (M:Geo Marth. 6-03-76 <0.20 <3.5b <3.7
| |
| : 5. 3 mi. h3W of station)
| |
| * 1he cr at .itvcTt s Lt.e ;,tocaniJ countang error ar. tite J 5'e con Adones icvei. :.ess tnan t<1 vaiwes are based on 3 sigm a counting ot rar for bant:oed sanple.
| |
| b Analyses f ac :ta-226 showed that ;ta-226 activity was less than 0.5 pCi/1.
| |
| 84
| |
| | |
| NALCO ENVIRONMEN'TAL SCIENCES 1-Table 25. Well water samples, analyses for Sr-90 and gamma-emitting isotopes.
| |
| 1 Date pCi/la Location Collected Sr-90 Cs-137D T-7 2-17-76 <0.2 <3.7 (Sand Beach, 6-03-76 0.54t0.37 <3.7 0.9 mi. NNW of plant)
| |
| T-17 2-17-76 0.8910.31 <3.7 (Irv Fick's well, 6-03-76 0.52 0.42 <3.7 0.7 mi. SW of plant)
| |
| T-18 2-17-76 <0.2 <3.7 (Hess Sunoco Garage 6-03-76 <0.3 <3.7 1.3 mi. S of plant, State Route 2)
| |
| T-27 2-17-76 <0.2 <3.7 (McGee Marsh, 6-03-76 <0.2 <3.7
| |
| : 5. 3 mi.. WNW of plant) aThe error given is the probable counting error at the 95% confidence level. Less than (<) values are based on 3 sigma counting error for background sample.
| |
| bNo other gamma-emitting isotopes were detected above background level.
| |
| J 85
| |
| | |
| -Table 26. Milk samples, analyses for gross beta, Sr-89,and gamma-emitting isotopes January-June 1976.
| |
| pCi/la Date Gross Location Collected beta Sr-89 Sr-90 I-131)I Ba-140 Cs-137 K-40 T-8 1-12-76 1129131 <0.5 1.6810.31 <0.5 <3.7 3.612.1 1350130 g (Earl Moore 2-01-76 1031143 <0.5 1.8010.31 <0.5 <3.7 <3.5 1290150 )
| |
| Parm, 2.7 mi. 3-01-76 1044130 <0.5 1.50 0.25 <0.5 <3.7 <3.5 1290t50 F USW of plant)
| |
| Mean iS.D.c 1068153 1.6610.15 3.612.1 1310140 g 4-05-76 1039130 <0.5 1.48io.40 <0.5 <3.7 <3.5 1300120 b 5-03-76 1155145 <0.5 1.8410.40 <0.5 <3.7 4. 71 3. 2 1310150 y 6-03-76 1144145 <0.5 1.9110.36 <0.5 <3.7 <3.5 1300150 2
| |
| $ Mean 1S.D. 1113164 1.74 0.23 4.713.2 1310140 3
| |
| m 2
| |
| T-12 1-02-76 1082!44 <0.5 2.6610.50 <3.2 <3.7 4.812.3 1270i30 g (Toledo Dairy, 2-02-76 997142 <0.5 3.4710.36 <3.2 <3.7 5.613.4 1270150 p 23.5 mi. WNW 3 01-76 1088136 <0.5 4.4310.62 <3.2 <3.7 <3.5 1250120 g of plant) n-Mean 1S.D.c 1056151 3.5210.89 5.210,6 1260110 j;;
| |
| 2 3-30-76 929132 <0.5 2.5110.42 <3.2 <3.7 <3.5 1290150 0 4-30-76 1044131 <0.5 2.4010.53 <3.2 <3.7 <3.5 1320150 N 2.8910.48 <3.2 <3.7 <3.5 1310 20 m 5-21-76 1023142 <0.5 Mean S.D c 999161 2.6010.26 1310110
| |
| | |
| Table 26. (Continued) pCi/la Date Gross Location Collected beta Sr-89 Sr-90 1-131 b Ba-140 Cs-137 'K-40 T-20 1-12-76 1066144 <0.5 1.5010.50 <0.5 <3.7 4.411.3 1240120 (Daup Farm, 2-01-76 967 41 <0.5 1.1910.27 <0.5 <3.7 <3.5 1200150 5.4 mi. SSE of plant) 3-01-76 1106 33 <0.5 1.4310.34 <0.5 <3.7 <3.5 1160150 fr 1046172 1.3710.16 4.411.3 1200140 n Mean iS.D.c U 4-05-76 990 30 <0.5 1.81 0.41 <0.5 <3.7 <3.5 1210 ISO N 2.44 0.47 <0.5 <3.7 4.913.2 1240150 2 5-03-76 1028142 <0,5 6-03-76 1075143 <0.5 2.09i0.50 <0.5 <3.7 <3.5 1310 50 $
| |
| B 2.1110.32 4.9 3.2 1250150 0 Mean iS.D. 1031143 2 2.7010.55 <0.5 <3.7 <3.5 1250150 S T-24 1-12-76 973141 <0.5 (Toft's Dairy 2-01-76 917128 <0.5 2.2910.24 <0.5 <3.7 <3.5 1280130 $
| |
| in Sandusky, 3-01-76 1000129 <0.5 2.9410.50 <0.5 <3.7 <3.5 1320150 .;
| |
| 24.9 mi. SE b
| |
| r of plant) m I Mean iS.D.c 963142 2.6410.33 1280140 O
| |
| 4.013.2 1280150 I 4-05-76 1033142 <0.5 3.73t0.55 <0.5 <3.7 5-03-76 1132131 <0,5 2.90t0.34 <0.5 <3.7 4.111.4 1310120 n 6-03-76 3005i42 <0.5 2.5410.47 <0.5 <3.7 <3.5 1280t1Q m i W
| |
| Mean is.D. 1057 67 3.0510.61 4 010.1 1290120 a The error given is the probable counting error at the 95% confidence level. Less than
| |
| [
| |
| (<) values are based on 3 sigma counting error for background sample.
| |
| b Iodine-131 values were obtained by chemical separation, except for location T-12, which were done by ganea spectroscope analyses.
| |
| c Less than (<) values are not included in the mean.
| |
| | |
| ~
| |
| Table 27. Milk samples, analyses for calcium, stable potassium, and ratios of pCiSr-9QQCa and pCics-137/gG January - June 1976. -
| |
| Date Calcium Potassium pCia pCi Location Collected g/l g/l Sr-90/gCa Cs-137/gK T-8 1-12-76 1.03 1.58 1.63 2.25 (Earl Moore Farm, 2-01-76 1.16 1.51 1.55 2.14 2.7 mi. WSW of 3-01-76 1.05 1.50 1.42 <2.33 plant) 2 4-05-76 1.05 1.55 1.40 1.84 y 5-03-76 1.00 1.53 1.84 3.08 r 6-03-76 1.05 1.52 1.82 <2.30 0-0 ,
| |
| nt T-12 1-02-76 0.97 1.49 2.74 3.22 2 (Toledo Dairy, 2-02-76 1.06 1.48 3.27 3.81 b 23.5 mi. WSW of 01-76 1.05 1.46 4.22 <2.40 3 plant) 3-30-76 1.08 1.51 2.32 <2.32 0 m 4-30-76 1.02 1.55 2.35 <2.41 2 5-21-76 1.12 1.53 2.58 <2.29 f2 T-20 1-12-76 1.08 1.45 1.39 3.06 (Daup Farm, 2-01-76 1.10 1.41 1.08 <2.48 5.4 mi. SSE of 3-01-76 1.17 1.35 1.22 <2.59 plant) $
| |
| 4-05-76 0.98 1.41 1.85 <2.48 -
| |
| 5-03-76 0.96 1.45 2.54 3.41 $
| |
| 6-03-76 1.01 1,53 2.06 <2.29 n D1 bl T-24 1-12-76 1.12 1.46 2.41 <2.39 (Toft's Dairy in 2-01-76 1.03 1.49 2.22 <2.35 Sandusky, 24.9 3-01-76 1.01 1.46 2.91 <2.40 mi. SE of plant) 4-05-76 1.02 1.50 3.65 2.65 5-03-76 1.13 1.52 2.57 2.69 6-03-76 1.00 1.50 2.54 <2.33 a Less than (<) values are based on 3 sigma counting error for background sample.
| |
| | |
| NALCO ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
| |
| . .. r.
| |
| Table 28. Milk samples collected weekly at Location T-S (Earl Moore Farm, 3.2 mi WSW of plant); analyses fer I-131.
| |
| Date pCi/la Collected I-131 5-03-76 <0.5 5-11-76 <0.5 i
| |
| 5-17-76 <0.5
| |
| , 5-25-76 <0.5 .
| |
| 6-03-76 <0.5 d
| |
| 6-07-76 <0.5 6-16-76 <0.5 1.
| |
| 6-21-76 <0.5 6-28-76 <0.5 i
| |
| 1 1
| |
| l aThe error given is the probable counting error at the 95%
| |
| confidence level. Less than (<) values are based on 3 sigma counting error for background sample.
| |
| 0 89
| |
| | |
| Table 29.- Vegetable samples, analyses for gross alpha, gross beta, Sr-90, and. gamma-emitting isotopes, collected 13 May 1976.
| |
| pCi/ga Sample Gross Location Type Weight (g) alpha Gross beta Sr-90 I-131 Cs-137 K-40 T-8 Rhubarb Wet 5007.0 <0.02 2.610.1 0.00610.001 <0.01 <0.002 2.810.1 (Earl Moore Dry 186.0 <0.4 69.712.6 0.1610.04 <0.14 <0.04 76.711.5 2 Farm, 2.7 Ash 46.2 <l.8 281.0110.6 0.6410.15 <0.56 <0.16 308.815.9 mi USW of h n.
| |
| plant) 0
| |
| , m
| |
| '2 11 O
| |
| aThe error given is the probable counting error at the 95% confidence level. Less than 2-
| |
| $ (<) values are based on 3 sigma counting error for background sample. Gamma-spectral 3 analyses showed that all other gamma-emitting isotopes were less than the minimum Id detectable levels. 2 Y
| |
| r
| |
| > lD O
| |
| E 2
| |
| , n rd W
| |
| | |
| NALCO ENVIRCNMENTAL SCIENCES c.
| |
| Table 30 Domestic meat sample, analyses for gross beta and gamma- !
| |
| emitting isotopes.
| |
| Sample Date pCi/ca Type Collected weight (g) Gross beta Cs-137 K-40 Chicken 6-03-76 Wet 625.0 2.08 0.06 <0.04 6.7 0.4 Ash 5.6 231.16t7.06 <l.4 256.0tl3.0 aThe error given is the probable counting error at the 95% confidence level. Gamma spectral analyses showed that all other gamma-emitting isotopes were less than the minimum detectable levels.
| |
| i 91
| |
| .-- - - - , - . - , . . - , . -m-- - , - - - .,- - . , - - . , .,
| |
| | |
| -.~ . . _ _. _ . _ . _ . . _ __ _ _ . _ _ _
| |
| Table 31. . Wildlife samples, analyses for gross beta, Sr-90, and gamma-emitting isotopes, collected from the vicinity of the site.
| |
| Date Sample pCi/ga Sample ' Collected type Weight (g) Gross beta Sr-90 Cs-137 K-40 Muskrat 6-20-76 Muscle Wet 112.0 2.1610.08 NA '<0.01 '3'310.4 Ash 1.39 173.4316.13 NA <l.70 268.3134.0 2
| |
| ~
| |
| Bone Dry 20.2 NA 0.8610.22 NA NA h x Ash 11.6 NA 1.4910.38 NA NA 0 m
| |
| e 2 M
| |
| aThe error given'is the probable counting error at the 95% confidence level. Less than 0
| |
| (<) values are based on 3 sigma counting error for background sample. 2 e s g
| |
| \ N
| |
| , 2 h
| |
| / p_
| |
| / to
| |
| / O m
| |
| : 2 4 /
| |
| n r N W
| |
| 4
| |
| /
| |
| s -
| |
| 4
| |
| \
| |
| s
| |
| | |
| f ,.
| |
| (
| |
| \
| |
| }
| |
| Table 32. Animal feed samples, analyses for gross alpha, gross beta, Sr-90, and gamma-emitting isotopes, collected 31 March 1976.
| |
| DCi/ga Sample Gross Gross Location Type Weight (g) alpha beta Sr-90 Cs-137 K-40 T-8 Silage b Wet 2050.0 <0.2 16.110.6 0.15i0.01 0.0410.02 16.010.8 2 (Earl Moore Dry 1146.0 <0.3 28.7 1.1 0.2610.02 0.07 0.04 28.611.4 h Farm, 2.7 Ash 122.0 <3.2 269.7 10.5 2.4810.21 0.6610.38 268.7113.2 n mi NSW of 0 plant) gg 2
| |
| T-20 llay Wet 1068.0 <0.2 14.1 0.6 0.1910.02 <0.05 14.811.2 <
| |
| -(Daup Parm, Dry 970.0 <0.2 15.510.6 0.2110.02 <0.05 16.311.3 11 5.4 mi SSE Ash 61.9 <3.0 243.4!9.6 3.2310.27 <0.78 255.7120.4 0 2
| |
| e 3 u
| |
| M 2
| |
| aThe error given is the probable counting error at the 95% confidence level. Less than N
| |
| (<) values are based on 3 sigma counting error for background sample. Gamma spectral I analyses showed that all other gamma-emitting isotopes were less than the minimum a detectable levels in hay and silage samples. E bThe sample does not look like corn silage. It appears to be cut alfalfa. !j n
| |
| m W
| |
| ;l I
| |
| | |
| D Table 33. Soil samples collected 3 June 1976, analyses for gross beta, Sr-90, and gamma-emitting isotopes, pCi/g dry weighta Location Gross beta Sr-90 Cs-137 K-40 T-1 6.3 2.2 <0.21 0.0710.02 6.710.5 (Site boundary, 0.6 mi. 14E of 2 station) fn T-8 30.713.5 0.2710.25 0.3610.05 19.511.1 0 (Earl 14oore Parm, 3.2 miles HSW ga of station) 2 3
| |
| 0 2
| |
| "The error given is the probable counting error at the 95% confidence level. Less than 3
| |
| (<) values are based on 3 sigma counting error for background samples. LH d
| |
| -l r
| |
| W D
| |
| m 2
| |
| 0 m ,
| |
| W i
| |
| | |
| 12' Table 34. Soil samples, collected 3 June 1976, analyses for gamma-emitting isotopes, pCi/g dry weighta Location Cs-137" K-40 T-1 0.0710.02 6.710.5 (Site boundary, 0.6 miles NE of station, near intake canal)
| |
| T-2 0.3510.04 8.310.6 2 (Site boundary, 0.9 miles E of station) >
| |
| r T-3 0.2610.04 11.210.7 0 (Site boundary, 1.4 miles SE of station) g 2
| |
| T-4 0.05 0.03 15.610.8 <
| |
| (Site' boundary, 0.8 miles S of station) g 0
| |
| , T-7 0.0410.03 7.510.5 2 m (Sand Beach, 0.9 miles NNW of site) 3 m
| |
| T-8 0.3610.05 19.511.1 2 (Earl Moore Farm, 2.7 miles WSW of site) fr T-9 0.1710.04 15.810.9 m (Oak llarbor, 6.8 miles SW of site) 9 m
| |
| T-11 0.0410.02 11.710.7 2 (Port Clinton, 9.5 miles SE of site) @
| |
| m T-12 0.4410.05 16.810.9 (Toledo, 23.5 miles WNW of site)
| |
| T-23c (Put-In-Bay Li,ghthouse, 14.3 miles ENE of site) 1.7310.09 8.310.8 T-27 0.4510.06 18.311.0 (Magee March, 5.3 miles WNW of site) aThe error given is the probable countina error at the 95% confidence level, b No gamma-emitting isotopes were detected above background level, except for those naturally occurring isotopes.
| |
| cSample was collected on 6 August 1976. --
| |
| | |
| NALCD ENVIRCNNIENTAL SCIENCES Table 35. Treated surface water samples collected at Location T-10, analyses for gross alpha, gross beta, and tritium.
| |
| Date pCi/la pCi/mla Collected cross alpna cross ceta Tritium 1-05-76 <0.7 3.03!0.50 0.16!0.11 1-12-76 <0.7 2.88!0.40 0.23 0.11 1-19-76 <0.5 2.71!0.35 0.31 0.11
| |
| > 1-26-76 <0.5 2.95 0.32 0.30!0.11 2-01-76 <0.4 2.22!0.44 0.35 0.11 2-09-76 0.56:0.43 2.86!0.28 0.44 0.11 2-17-76 0.93 0.53 3.24 0.42 0.28 0.08 2-23-76 0.36t0.28 2.17 0.32 0.34!0.09 3-01-76 0.50!0.43 2.90 0.49 0.30 0.09 3-08-76 <0.4 2.9000.46 0.37 0.09 3-15-76 <0.4 2.48t0.37 0.22 0.11 3-22-76 0.48t0.15 3.63 0.16 0.30t0.08 3-29-76 <0.3 3.04 0.29 0.19t0.ll Mean i S.D.b 0.57!0.22 2.85!0.39 0.29 0.08 4-05-76 <0.3 2.64 0.27 0.21 0.08 4-12-76 <0.3 2.53!0.38 0.31 0.09 4-19-7G <0.3 2.78t0.39 0.31!0.09 4-26-76 <0.3 2.67!0.38 0.22 0.11 1
| |
| 5-03-76 <0.4 2.3620.37 0.31t0.11 5-11-76 <0.4 2.62 0.38 0.20!0.13 4
| |
| 5-17-76 <0.4 2.08!0.37 0.20!0.11 l 5-25-76 <0.3 2.69:0.40 0.20 0.11 6-01-76 <0.3 1.90 0.38 0.30 0.11 6-07-76 0.37 0.34 2.62 0.41 0.41!0.08 6-14-76 <0.2 2.40t0.38 0.36 0.08 6-21-76 <0.2 2.67 0.39 0.32 0.08 6-28-76 0.34t0.33 1.77:0.34 0.30 0.08 Mean i S.D.D 0.36 0.02 2.44 0.33 0.28 0.07
| |
| ^ The error given is the probable counting error at the 95%
| |
| confidence level. Less than (<) values are based on 3 sigma counting error for background sample.
| |
| b Less than (<) values are not included in rhe mean.
| |
| 96
| |
| | |
| NALCC ENVI -1CNMENTAL SCIENCES
| |
| /
| |
| Table 36. Treated surface water samples collected at Location T-ll, analyses for gross alpha, gross beta, and tritium, January - June 1976.
| |
| Date pCi/la pCi/mla Collected Gross alpha Gross beta Tritium 1-05-76 <0.6 2.89:0.42 0.1710.11 1-12-76 <0.6 2.98 0.36 0.33 0.11 1-19-76 <0.5 2.81t0.48 0.56!0.11 1-26-76 <0.5 3.01 0.49 0.29 0.11 2-01-76 <0.5 2.78t0.28 0.23 0.11 2-09-76 0.34t0.32 2.59!0.38 0.42 0.11 2-17-76 0.44t0.38 3.00 0.40 0.49 0.08 2-23-76 <0.4 3.36 0.52 <0.11 3-01-76 <0.5 2.2010.45 0.46!0.09 3-08-76 <0.6 2.83 0.47 0.27t0.09 3-15-76 <0.4 3.17 0.42 0.24!0.11 3-22-76 0.37!0.16 2.47t0.18 0.40 0.11 3-29-76 <0.4 2.99 0.50 0.32 0.11 Mean t S.D.b 0.3820.05 2.85 0.30 0.35!0.12 4-05-76 <0.3 2.6000.28 0.24t0.08 4-12-76 <0.3 2.28t0.36 0.42!0.09 4-19-76 <0.3 2.68t0.38 0.44t0.09 4-26-76 0.76!0.65 2.77t0.39 0.24:0.11 5-03-76 1.25t0.98 2.66!0.39 0.3610.11 5-11-76 <0.4 2.16:0.36 0.26 0.13 5-17-76 <0.5 2.26t0.38 0.28!0.11 5-25-76 <0.3 2.14 0.38 <0.14 6-01-76 <0.4 2.15t0.40 0.24t0.11 6-07-76 0.54t0.39 2.74 0.42 0.30 0.08 6-14-76 <0.2 3.03t0.41 0.31 0.08 6-21-76 0.38 0.35 2.54 0.40 0.33!0.08 6-28-76 <0.3 1.89t0.35 0.33!0.08 4
| |
| Mean 1 S.D.D 0.73 0.38 2.45t0.32 0.31:0.07 a The error given is the probable counting error at the 95%
| |
| confidence level. Less than (<) values are based on 3 sigma counting error for background sample, b Less than (<) values are not included in the mean.
| |
| 97
| |
| | |
| . - =- . . . . - -
| |
| 1 NALCD ENVIRONMENTAL. SCIENCES Table 37 Treated surface water samples collected at Location T-12, i analyses for gross alpha, gross beta, and tritium,.
| |
| January - June 1976.
| |
| l Date pCi/la pCi/mla Collected Gross alpha Gross beta Tritium 1-05-76 <0.4 2.40 0.37 0.36 0.11 1-12-76 <0.2 1.46!0.25 0.38 0.11 1-19-76 <0.6 2.97:0.50 0.38 0.11 26-76 .<0.7 3.67 0.54 0.30 0.11 2-02-76 0.27 0.25 1.69 0.27 0.29!0.11 2-09-76 nab NA 0.29 0.06 2-16-76 0.70 0.51 2.46 0.46 0.37t0.09 2-23-76 <0.2 2.80t0.49 <0.11 3-01-76 <0.2 1.63!0.29 0.3,7 0.06 3-08-76 <0.3 2.54 0.27 0.39!0.11 3-15-76 <0.3 2.48 0.37 0.23 0.11 3-22-76 <0.2 2.17 0.25 0.22 0.11 3-29-76 0.67t0.38 4.92!0.35 0.36 0.09 Mean S.D.c 0.55!0.24 2.60 0.96 C.33 0.06 4-05-76 <0.2 1.65t0.23 0.40!0.09 4-12-76 <0.2 1.63:0.31 0.31:0.11 4-19-76 <0.2 1.81 0.32 0.4120.1A i 4-26-76 <0.2 1.72 0.32 0.1710.11
| |
| : 5-03-76 <0.2 1.54 0.30 0.30 0.11 l 5-10-76 <0.2 1.37 0.31 0.27to.11 5-17-76 <0.3 1.34 0.35 0.28 0.11 5-24-76 <0.3 1.67t0.37 0.34t0.11 5-31-76 <0.3 1.64!0.36 0.13:0.11 6-07-76 0.29t0.28 1.67!0.33 0.35t0.08 6-14-76 0.35t0.31 1.7610.34 0.40 0.08 6-21 <0.2 1.78t0.34 0.32 0.08 6-28-76 <0.2 1.69t0.33 0.28!0.08'
| |
| ~Mean t S.D.c 0.32t0.04 1.64 0.14 0.30 0.08 a The error given is the. probable counting error at the 95%
| |
| confidence level. Less than (<) values are based on 3 sigma counting error fo'r background sample.
| |
| b NA = Insufficient sample for gross alpha and gross beta analyses.
| |
| < Sample was leaking when received.
| |
| c Less than'(<) values are not included in the mean.
| |
| r 98
| |
| . . _ _ _ = _ . _ _ . _ ___ .,-
| |
| | |
| NA! CC ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Table 38. Treated surface water samples, collected at Location T-28, analyses for gross alpha, gross beta, and tritium, January - June 1976.
| |
| Date pCi/la pCi/mld Collected Gross alpha Gross beta Tritium 1-05-76 <0.4 2.05:0.34 0.34 0.11 1-12-76 <0.2 2.31 0.26 0.45!0.11 1-19-76 <0.6 3.03 0.50 0.32:0.11 1-26-76 0.42 0.37 2.52 0.37 0.40 0.11 2-01-76 <0.5 2.53 0.38 0.35 0.11 2-09-76 0.43 0.37 3.51 0.43 0.33 0.11 2-17-76 <0.1 2.72t0.38 0.41 0.08 2-23-76 0.39 0.36 2.42 0.45 0.24 0.09 3-01-76 <0.5 2.87:0.50 0.34 0.09 3-08-76 <0.4 1.94t0.37 0.39:0.09 3-15-76 <0.3 1.17 0.28 0.31 0.11 3-22-76 0.31!0.15 2.80!0.19 0.13 0.11 3-29-76c 2.45 0.74 6.45 0.48 0.24!0.1]
| |
| Mean i S.D.D 0.40!0.05 2.49 0.59 0.33 0.08 4-05-76 0.33:0.19 2.46 0.19 0.27 0.06 4-12-76 <0.3 2.00 0.24 0.37 0.06 4-19-76 <0.3 2.21 0.35 0.31:0.09 4-26-76 0.41 0.38 1.73 0.32 0.25!0.11 5-03-76 <0.3 1.94 0.24 0.27:0.11 5-11-76 <0.3 2.04t0.34 0.26 0.13 5-17-76 <0.3 2.28:0.38 0.34t0.11 5-25-76 0.6130.41 1.86 0.35 0.30 0.11 6-01-76 <0.3 1.69 0.37 0.15 0.11 6-07-76 <0.2 1.74t0.34 0.40t0.08 6-14-76 <0.2 1.69 0.33 0.55t0.08 6-21-76 <0.2 3.09t0.48 0.42 0.08 6-28-76 <0.2 1.69 0.33 0.37 0.08 Hean t S.D.b 0.45 0.14 2.03 0.40 0.33!0.10 1
| |
| a The error given is the probable counting error at the 95%
| |
| confidence level. Less than (<) values are based on 3 sigma
| |
| " counting error for background sample, b Less than (<) values are not included in the mean.
| |
| c Sample received appears to be untreated water contcining sediment.
| |
| Not included in the mean.
| |
| 99
| |
| | |
| NALCC ENVIMcNMENTAL SCIENCES <
| |
| Table 39. Treated surface water samples, quarterly corposites of weekly grab samples, for January - March and April -
| |
| June 1976, analyses for Sr-90 and gamma-emitting isotopes.
| |
| pCi/la Location Composited Sr-90 Cs-1370 T-10 January-March 0.59 0.20 <3.7 (Erie Industrial Park Tap April-June 0.59t0.52 <3.7 water, 6.5 mi. SE of plant)
| |
| T-11 January-March 0.70!0.17 <3.7 (Port Clinron tap water, April-June 1.03 0.38 <3.7 9.5 mi. SE of plant)
| |
| T-12 January-March <0.2 <3.7 (Toledo tap water, April-June 0.42!0.19 <3.7 l
| |
| 23.5 mi. WNW of plant)
| |
| T-28 January-March 0.36!0.21 <3.7 (Unit 1 treated water April-June 0.69r0.30 <3.7 supply, onsite)
| |
| - aThe error given is the probable counting error at the 95% confidence level. Less than (<) values are based on 3 sigma counting error for background sample, bNo. other gamma-emitting isotopes were detected above background level.
| |
| 100
| |
| | |
| N A: ca IINv:mNontrJT.".L S C:mrdCT.iG Table 40. Untreated surface water samples, monthly composites of weekly grab samples, analyses for gross alpha, gross beta, and tritium, January-June 1976.
| |
| Gem ; ata guls d
| |
| ..ry.s .i Qi 3'7Tl 4 O s cw.*1' veit ' 7 otal Lais.:ndeva D a r. .o3r.d t-> ta I J,rl e i'sa 3Eg*?:Ed colids ml i d a: t h i4.c 90r/nle aol i t:s sa l_ L,Js reuda
| |
| ,fg.gfon 0.3720.35 <0.1 2.03to.40 2.03to.40 0.3520.11 T-1 Januaty < 0 .1 ' O.37tc.35 0.93:0,19 2.8710.40 3.10to.44 0.27t0.09 (Stto bourdary, ret,r u a ry 0.3210.25 <0.4 <1.50 o . h to ,11 0.7110.62 1.25t3.65 0.et.n.19 1.05 1.53 3 w:0.cG 0.G mi. NC of March 0.47*0.13 pl. int ne;se 0.7420.25 2.9510.09 3.44to.45 0.3020.04 inlet canal) Maan is.D. 0.G5t0.25 0.53to.23 0.3120.62 0.2510.20 3.73*0.53 3.00to.57 0.27 0.11 Ap ril <0.2 0.7720.54 0.7710.56 2.18'0.50 0.23to.11
| |
| <0.4 0.3720.20 2.01*0.46 May <0.1 <0.3 0.45to.?a 1, M t ? .M 2,,ff,'yJ, 1.,3720.04 June (0.1 <0.5 <0.6 _
| |
| 0.3Gt0.10 2.4321.15 2.7333.05 0.23:0.07 Mcas 2S.D. 0.7710.56 0.7710.56 gg,3, y,g, ;g , 3 ,
| |
| y,g, ;g,3, ;g ,3, T-2 January N.S.b 3.9220.G9 4.55to.11 0.42t1.00 (Sito tsoundary, rehruary C 0.4213.20 <a.6 <1.22 0.63to.18 3.33!0.11 0.9 mi. C of March 0. 5 4
| |
| * 0,JJ, <0.5 <1.26 yggy 1.10to.63 4.43*3.67 plant) 1.01:0.53 3.51 0.53 4.52!0.05 0.3810.06 MeJn 25.0. 0.pt0.J3 1.2220.50 2.16 0.35 2.97.to.49 5.1320.60 0.32:0.11 April 1.22to.50 <0.1 2.5320.34 3.1020.38 3.27?0.03 May so.2 <3.3 <0.5 0.51!0.16 0. 32 to .0 4 0.4:20.44 JhL 2.6610.49 2.6ta0.49 June <n . 2 ,_ 0.1420.44 0.8310.55 2.7220.23 3.63tl.32 0.3120.03 Moan 2S.D. 1.22:3.50 0.44:0.44 0.7820.73 fl . S. fl . S . II. N . '8. 3.
| |
| N.S. fl . S .
| |
| ?-3 Jaw 1ey ed .S .
| |
| 0.51:0.11 2.3110.40 3.31:3.46 0. 35! 3.M (Site boundary, February C 0.11!0.31 <0.7 <1.41 0.20!n.11 U.7DO.26 0.33to.27 t . 0 /i t o . 3 ) 1. 'n t o . ? l 3.2710.30 t . c. S t a . 3 3 1.4 ui. SE of tiarch talant near 1.0620.33 1.1210.S6 3.01:0.33 4.41 0.82 0.2310.11 Toussainr. itiver .Mean 15.0. 0.5820.21 0.3310.29 and storm Itain) <0.3 1.04*0.43 1.c3:0.31 2.84:0.43 4.1720.57 0.3110.11 April 1.0 20.33 0.8)to.41 0.1110.23 2.3010.43 3.5130.54 0.2210.11 May <0.2 0.4910.41 3.?0to.50 3. H ' 0. 5 3_ 0.13to.73 June <1. 2_ <0.5 <0.7 h21ty g 0.7720.37 0.97:0.70 2.25*0.22 3.83*0.56 0.2910.06 Hean 15.0. 1.04to.43 0.49to.41
| |
| <0.3 0.22:0.19 3.15t0.41 3.37t0.44 0.3420.11 T-10 Janua ry <0.1 <0.2 0.3120.09 0.7210.38 0.51t0.44 1.2320.53 1.32to.35 3.07:0.41 5.7113.21 (Crie Industrial Febrmry
| |
| <3.3 <1.65 1.32to.21 2.51t0.23 4.41to.37 0.48to.11 Park intaice, 6 March 0. 0 8t t o . 27 sai SE of plant) 0.5110.44 1.23 0.59 1.1520.36 2.9120.35 4.50:1.17 0.37to.02 ttean 23.D. 0.a5 9.10
| |
| <0.9 1.4810.30 2.6720.38 4.1510.43 0.31to.11 April 9.36t0.25 <3.3 2.5110.49 2.5120.43 0.23:3.11 May 0.23:0.19 1.01*0.65 1.2tt0.G3 <0.2 3.16*0.53 0.4??0.04 June <0.2' O.51?0.16 0.4010.20 0.10*0.00 2.76-0.50 0.G3 0.52 0.9420.76 2.6520.13 3.27*0.03 0.3420.13 Mean !S.D. 0.30!O.09 0.7610.35
| |
| <0.2 <0.3 <0.2 2.9020.40 2.90*0.40 0.2520.03 T-11 January <3.1 3.9120.34 0.33to.06 0.4020.20 3.55to.43 0.95:0.52 1.25to.21 2.66:0.23 (Port Citnten February
| |
| <0.2 0.63to.31 1.01*0.27 1.7Gto.23 2.7710.35 0.23!0.00 watar intake. March 0.G3!J.31
| |
| -9.5 ni SC of 0.79:0.23 1.1310.17 2.4420.60 3.1920.62 0.2720.05 plant) Mean tS.D. 0.5210.16 0.5520.48 0.93to.26 2.03:0.49 3.3620.55 0.30t0.11
| |
| <0.2 0.4910.43 0.4020.49 0.25:3.11 April
| |
| <0.7 0.53 0.22 2.02:0.46 2.60!3.51 May 0.13to.15 <3.3
| |
| <0.5 0.4120.14 2.39:0.47 2.10eo.19 0.27!0.03_
| |
| <0.02 ."0 . 3 Juno 0.64to.27 2.45t0.46 3.1010.G3 0.27:0.03 Mean ts.D. 0.13 3.13 0.4910.42 0.41!0.49
| |
| <0.1 <0.7 <3.8 <3.2 3.30:3.42 3.3020.12 0.32to.11 T-12 January 3.2010.42 4.3120.47 0.2310.0)
| |
| Fclat ua t y 0.61!0.26 0.G1!0.46 1.3320.53 1.11to.20 (Toledo water 1. M
| |
| * 0 l.1 2 M.* Mi Z U.*L H 1.1**0.54 L.U. tall n . 23:1.03 intako, 23.5 ui ta rch 1.f 0
| |
| * 0. %
| |
| WN:4 of plant) 0.94t0.4G 2.0020.23 1.75to.31 3.30 0.10 4.4Gt1.25 0.23:3,04 Mcan 15.0. 0.7f*20.21 1.33!0.58 0.5720.24 2.0520.35- 3.7310.42 0.23t0.11 April 0. N.* 0. 2 6 1. 0 2 tJ . 6 3
| |
| : 2. A!3.53 2.5?to.53 0.3bo.11 so.1 so.4 <i.05 <0.2 May 1. :s t
| |
| * 0.13 2. 0 ? t o , t A_ 0.4 4t o.M Janc <0.J 0.48'0.77 0.43**.39 N 9*9.t?
| |
| 0.75t0.10 0.91!0.G4 3.4310.34 2. 4.*10. G 2 2.78t0.97 0.34t3.13 Me.an is.D. 0. 36 t :1. 2 G
| |
| '*!1w e.rt est giv n Lt ttw prsd..d,!.. swe.f i te s ..rrnr .it t he %) con f i.I. .nce b. Vel. ow than ( .. ) vatuv4 arc !.aCol on 3 Gt.tm.s countinq ..r re s t e=r t av'.. s oua.f %stp t...
| |
| I'M*i i we p aeg . l . . s . w.. i ved .m.. e ,. i n.9 c sit w. w !str.
| |
| Poe.e w. .at eu t 1. et i. a . : n.. I t. s uc . as. w ather.
| |
| t e kos i i valu.m m . n." I d u.5 4 in dic WCM.
| |
| 'l % 15 . !;t a nd.s t .1 v bttoa. 101
| |
| | |
| NALCC ENVIS:lCNMENTAL 3CIENCES Table 41. Untreated surface water samples, quarterly composites of -ieekly grab samples, for January - March and April -
| |
| June 1976, analyses for Sr-90 and gamma-emitting isotopes.
| |
| pCi/la Location Composited Sr-90 Cs-137D T-1 January-March 0.67 0.24 <3.7 (Site boundary, 0.6 mi. NE April-June 0.67 0.26 <3.7 of plant near inlet canal)
| |
| T-2 . January-March NSc psc (Site boundary, 0.9 mi. E April-June 0.87 0.17 <3.7 of plant)
| |
| T-3 January-March NS NS (Toussaint River, site April-June 0.92 0.28 <3.7 boundary 1.4 mi. SE of plant)
| |
| T-10 January-March 0.67 0.23 <3.7 (Erie Industrial Park April-June 0.52:0.21 <3.7 intake, 6.5 mi. SE of plant)
| |
| T-ll January-March 0.68!0.23 <3.7 (Port Clinton water intake, April-June 0.86!0.25 <3.7 11.5 mi. SE of plant)
| |
| T-12 January-March 0.48 0.22 <3.7 (Toledo water intake, April-June 0.84!0.27 <3.7
| |
| : 23. 5 mi WNW o f plant) aThe error given is the probable counting error at the 95% confidence
| |
| * level. Less than (<) values are based on 3 sigma counting error for background sample.
| |
| w
| |
| ~No other gamma-emitting isotopes were detected above background level.
| |
| cNo sample due to inclement weather.
| |
| 102
| |
| | |
| L Table 42._ Fish samples, analyses for gross beta, Sr-90, and gamma-emitting isotopes, collected from Lake Eric in the vicinity of site (T-1, site boundary, NE of station)I Type- Date Sample pCi/ga of Pish Collected- Type Weight (g) Gross beta Sr-90 Cs-137 K-40 Carp 5-11-76 Muscle Wet 1304.0 1.0710.06 nab 0.00410.003 3.110.1 2 Ash 17.82 78.01 4.17 NA 0.2810.22 230.017.4 b.
| |
| n Bone Dry 13.28 NA 0.2110.03 NA NA D
| |
| , Ash 7.12 NA 3.5210.44 NA NA m 2
| |
| Alewife 5-11-76 Whole Wet 2391.0 2.3810.13 0.0410.01 0.0910.01 3.010.1 5 Ash 75.0 75.84 4.08 1.3510.27 2.8910.16 95.613.3 0 e 2 o
| |
| 3 Perch 5-11-76 Whole Wet 2379.0 2.5710.18 0.0510.01 0.0410.10 5.810.3 m fb Ash 136.0 44.9113.16 1.71!0.36 0.6910.18 101.015.0 r
| |
| m aThe error given is the probable counting error at the 95% confidence level. O bNA = Not analyzed. Analysis not required, j l
| |
| o m
| |
| i W l
| |
| 4
| |
| | |
| Table 43. Fish samples, analyses for gross beta, Sr-90, and gamma-emitting isotopes, collected from Put-In-Bay.
| |
| Type Date Sample pCi/ga of Pish Collected Type Weight (g) Gross beta Sr-90 Cs-137 K-40 Bullhead 5-16-76 Muscle Wet 766.0 2.5510.07 NAb 0.0210.01 3.010.3 Ash 7.69 254.4217.32 NA 1.5910.90 296.41242.0 2
| |
| )
| |
| Bone Dry 9.46 IIA 1.21 0.36 NA NA n Issh 4.96 UA 2.32 0.67 NA NA 0 N
| |
| 2 Carp 5-16-76 Muscle Wet 1140.0 2.5910.10 NA 0.010 0.002 2.810.1 <
| |
| Ash 22.35 132.1115.30 NA 0.5310.11 144.713.2 3 0
| |
| e Bone Dry 20.93 UA 0.7510.09 NA NA 2 Ash 9.69 NA 2.4610.31 NA NA 3 W
| |
| 2
| |
| -I White 5-16-76 Muscle Wet 1381.0 2.6410.13 NA 0.0310.01 3.610.2 )
| |
| Crappie Ash 43.09 84.5014.34 NA 0.8910.28 116.418.0 r-W Bone Dry 8.63 NA 0.5810.08 NA NA O Ash 4.90 NA 1.56t0.21 NA NA N 2
| |
| n N
| |
| to aThe error given is the probable counting error at the 95% confidence level.
| |
| b NA = Not analyzed.
| |
| Analysis not required.
| |
| I
| |
| | |
| Table 44. Bottom sediment samples, analyses for gross alpha, gross beta, Sr-90, and gamma-emitting isotopes.
| |
| Date pCi/g dry weight Location Collected G. allsha G. beta, Sr-90 Cs-137 K-40 T-1 6-03-76 <2.9 12.513.1 <0.21 0.0510.02 11.010.6 (Site boundary, 0.6 mi, NE of plant) . .
| |
| r T-29 5-04-76 10.914.8 22.113.4 <0.24 <0.10 19.112.0 0 (Lake Erie, intake area 0 1.5 mi. NE of plant) til 2
| |
| T-30 5-04-76 7.814.4 16.913.6 <0.24 <0.09 14.711.7 $
| |
| (Lake Erie, discharge E area, 0.9 mi. ENE of 0
| |
| e plant) 2 0
| |
| u, a 5
| |
| y 2
| |
| >i
| |
| " Tne error given is the probable counting error at the 95% confidence level. Less than r
| |
| (<) values are based on 3 sigma counting error for background sample. Gamma-spectral analyses showed that all other gamma-emitting isotopes were less than the minimum j
| |
| detectable levels, O
| |
| fil DI e
| |
| 4
| |
| *9
| |
| | |
| NALCC ENVl'ACNMENTAL GCl3NCES ,
| |
| V. References Cited A rnold, J. R. and H. A. Al-Salth. 1955. Beryllium-7 produced by Cosmic Rays. Science 121:451-453.
| |
| Industrial BIO-TEST Laboratories, Inc. 1973a. Preoperational environ-mental radiological monitoring for the Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station, Oak Harbor, Ohio. Jul'f through December 1972. IBT Project No. W1997. Northbrook, Illinois.
| |
| . 1973b. Preoperational environmental radiological monitoring ~
| |
| for the Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station, Oak Harbor, Ohio. First Quarterly Report, January through March 1973. IBT Project No. 64301997.
| |
| Northbrook, Illinois.
| |
| . 1973c. Prcoperational environmental radiological monitoring for the Davis-Besse Nucicar Power Station, Oak Harbor, Ohio. Second Quarterly Report, April through June 1973. IBT Project No. 64301997.
| |
| Northbrook, Illinois.
| |
| . 1973d. Preoperational environmental radiological monitoring for the Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station, Oak Harbor, Ohio. Third Qua rterly Report, July through September 1973 IET Project No. 64301997.
| |
| Northbrook, Illinois.
| |
| . 1974a. Preoperational environmental radiological monitoring for the Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station, Oak Harbor, Ohio. Fourth Quart erly Report, October through December 1973. IBT Project No.
| |
| 64301997. Northbrook, Illinois.
| |
| . 1974b. Pecoperational environmental radiological monitoring for the Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station, Oak Harbor, Ohio. S e mi-Annual Report, January-June 1974. IBT Project No. 64301997.
| |
| Northb rook, Illinois.
| |
| . 1975. Preoperational environmental radiological monitoring for the Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station, Oak Harbor, Ohio. Semi-Annual Report, July-December 1971. IBT Project No. 64305590.
| |
| Northbrook, Illinois.
| |
| National Center for Radiological Health. 1968. Section 1. Milk and food.
| |
| Radiological Health Data and Reports. Vol. 9, Number 12. 730-746.
| |
| Rus sell, R. S. and R. S. B ruce. 1969. Envircnmental contamination with fallout from nuclear weapons. A review. Proc. Environmental Contamination b'f Radioactive Materials. International Atomic Energy Agency. Vienna. 3 p.
| |
| 106
| |
| | |
| NALCC ENVI ACNNIENTAL SCIENCES APPENDIX A Maximum Permissible Concentrations of Fadioactivity in Air and Water I
| |
| e em 9
| |
| 1 A-1
| |
| | |
| r NALCO ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Maximum Permissible Concentration of Radioactivity in Air and Watera Air Water Gross alpha 3 pCi/m3 Strontium-89 3,000 pCi/l Gross beta 100 pCi/m2 Strontium-90 300 pCi/l Iodine-131 b 0.14 pCi/m3 Cesium-137 20,000 pCi/l Barium-140 20,000 pCi/1 Iodine-131 300 pCi/l Potassium-40c 3,000 pCi/l Gross alpha 30 pCi/l Gross beta 100 pCi/l Gross betad 1,000 pCi/1 Tritium 3x10 6 pCi/l Taken from Code of Federal Regulations Title 10, Part 20, Table II and appropriate footnotes.
| |
| b Frem 10 CFR 20 but adjusted by a factor of 700 to reduce the dose resulting from the air-grass-cow-milk-child pathway.
| |
| c A natural radionuclide, 30 FR 15801, in footnotes 10*CFR Part 20, Table II.
| |
| d Federal drinking water 1962,.U. S. Public Health Serdice.
| |
| ~
| |
| t 4
| |
| 9 A-2
| |
| | |
| N ALCC ENVI ACNM' ENTAL SCIENCES 9
| |
| APPENDIX B Radiochemical Analytical Procedures G
| |
| d m
| |
| ! B-1
| |
| | |
| N ALCO ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Radiochemical Analytical Procedures All procedures are equal to or better than-those recommended by the U. S. Public Health Service.b/
| |
| A. Airborne Particulates
| |
| : 1. Gross Alpha and Gross Beta Store the sample for 5 days from the day of collection to allow for decay of short-lived radon and thoron daughters. -
| |
| . Place the 47 mm filter on a stainless steel planchet and count the samples in a Beckman Widebeta-II Proportional Counter.
| |
| Calculate the activity in pCi/m3, correcting for the counter effici-ency.
| |
| Calculations Gross alpha (beta) activity, pCi/m3 =
| |
| 3 A ,2 YEsb2 + Eb2 J B x C x 2.22 - B x C x 2.22 i
| |
| Where: A = net alpha (beta) count rate (cpm)
| |
| B = efficiency for counting alpha (beta) activity (cpm /dgm)
| |
| C = volume of sample (m3)
| |
| Esb = counting error of sample plus background J
| |
| Eb = counting error of background
| |
| ! 2. Gamma Analyses by NaI(Tl) Detector Place the filter on a 4" x 4" sodium iodide crystal detector. Determine the gamma spectrum using 512 channels of the gamma spectrometer with a setting of 5 Kev per channel. Identify gamma emitters (if present) by their specific energy peaks.
| |
| 1/,
| |
| ~
| |
| U. S. Public ifealth Service. January 1967. Radioassay Procedures for Environmental Samples.
| |
| B-2
| |
| | |
| N ALCO ENVI ACNMS-:NTAL SCIENCES Calculations Follow.the same procedure as for gross alpha (beta) calculations, except make additional correction for radioactive decay.
| |
| Note: If more than one isotope is present use the method of simultaneous equations to calculate net count rate. -
| |
| : 3. Gamma Analyses by Ge (Li) Detector Place the filter on 86.8 cm3 detector. Determine the gamma spectrum rising 4096 channels of gamma spectrometer with a setting of 0.5 Kev per channel. Identify gamma emitters (if present) by their specific energy peaks.
| |
| Calculations Follow the same procedure as for NaI detector calcula-tions if total efficiency for a particular isotope is used. If gamma efficiency is used make additional corrections.for branching factor (abundance) and electron conversion f actor.
| |
| : 4. Strontium-90 Strontium and barium carrier are added to the composited filter paper samples _and fused with sodium hydroxide and sodium car-bonate. The melt is taken up in distilled water, washed and treated with sodium carbonate to yield a precipitate of alkaline earth car- ,
| |
| bonates. Silicates are removed by dehydration with nitric acid and the carbonate converted to nitrates. Radium is coprecipitated with barium as chromate; calcium is separated by reprecipitation in nitric B-3
| |
| | |
| NALCC ENVI ACNMTENTAL SCIENCES acid: and rare earth impurities are removed by adding scavenger solution. Strontium carbonate is precipitated, dissolved in nitric acid, yttium carrier added and the solution is stored for yttrium-90 ingrowth. The strontium is again precipitated and separated from 70% nitric acid with the yttrium nitrate being in the supernate.
| |
| Yttrium nitrate is then converted into oxalate and collected on a i glass fiber filter for counting. .
| |
| Calculations Strontium-90 activity (pCi/m3) = A BxCxDxExF Where: A = net beta count rate of yttrium 90 (cpm)
| |
| B = recovery of strontium carrier C = efficiency for counting yttrium 90 as yttrium oxalate (cpm /dgm)
| |
| ]
| |
| D = sample volume (meters)
| |
| ^
| |
| E = correction factor e-At for yttrium 90 decay, where t is the time from decantation of the strontium supernate (Step 19) to the time of counting (Step 25)
| |
| F = correction factor 1-e-At for the degree of equilibrium B. Airborne Iodine Transfer charcoal to a plastic scintillation vial. Place the vial in the Automatic Gamma Counter (Packard Instrument Co. Model 5975) and count. Record time.
| |
| Calculations 131 I activity (pCi) = A B x 2.22 Where: A = net count rate of 131I in the 0.36 MeV peak.
| |
| B-4
| |
| | |
| NALCO ENVI ACNMENTAL SCIENCES B = efficiency for counting 131I activity in 0.36 MeV peak (cpm /dpm)
| |
| C'orrection for decay:
| |
| Ao = AAleAt2 Al eat 2 when t1 <<1 F (1 - e-^Cl F x t1 Where: Ao = activity of 131I at the time of collection (pCi/m3)
| |
| A1 = activity of 131I at time of counting e = 2.71828 A = 0.693/ half life (days) = 0.693/8.08=
| |
| 0.09576/ day t1 = duration of collection (in days) t2 = elapsed time between collection and counting (in days)
| |
| F = m 3/ day C. Thermoluminescent Dosimeter (TLD)
| |
| Place TLD crystal on the crystal holder and read current
| |
| ~
| |
| between 140 and 250' C. Repeat the reading.
| |
| Calculations Subtract the second reading from the first to obtain net reading. Calculate exposure in mR, using cali-bration curve obtained with TLD crystals exposed to a known source (Ra).
| |
| * D. Water
| |
| : 1. Gross Alpha and Gross Beta in Total Residue i
| |
| Evaporate the sample in a beaker to a smal1 volume, l
| |
| i -
| |
| quantitatively transfer to a 2" stainless steel planchet, evaporate to dryness, bake in the muffle furnace to a dark cherry red color i
| |
| B-5
| |
| | |
| NALCO ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES (550' C), cool in a-dessicator and count in a Beckman Widebeta-II Proportional Counter. . Calculate the gross alpha and beta activity
| |
| - in the total residue in pCi/1, correcting for ef ficiency, self-absorption, and volume.
| |
| Calculations Gross alpha (beta) activity, pCi/ liter =
| |
| ~
| |
| A \!Esb 2 + Eb2 .
| |
| BxCxC x 2.22 + 2 B x C x D x 2.22 Where: A = net alpha (beta) count (cpm)
| |
| B = efficiency for counting alpha (beta) activity (cpm /dpm)
| |
| C = volume of sample (liters) 4 D = correction factor for self-absorption in the sample Esb = counting error of sample plus background Eb = counting error of background
| |
| : 2. Gross Alpha and Gross Beta in Suspendcd and Dissolved Solids .
| |
| Filter one liter of water through a 47 mm diameter
| |
| , membrane filter with 0.8 micron pore. Dry the filter paper, put it in the stainless steel planchet and add a few drops of solution of glucoto in acetone. Let it dry. Count in a Widebeta-II Proportional
| |
| ' Counter.
| |
| Evaporate filtrate to a small volume, quantitatively transfer to a 2" stainless steel planchet, evaporate to dryness, bake in the muffle furnace to a. dark cherry red color (550* C), cool-in a dessicator and count.
| |
| I B-6 ,
| |
| l
| |
| - - _ __ ,_ _ ~ ,- _,
| |
| | |
| NALCD ENVI ACNMSNTAL SCIENCES
| |
| ~
| |
| Calculations Calculations are similar to those for air particulates and well water.
| |
| : 3. Tritima (direct counting)
| |
| Distill a 10-ml water sample just to dryness. Dispense 3 ml of distilled sample and 15 ml of scintillation medium into a vial. Count the sample in Liquid Scintillation Counter for 4 to 8 hours, depending on sample activity.
| |
| Calculations Tritium activity (pCi/ml) = A B x 2.22 x C Where: A = net count rate of tritium (cpm)
| |
| B = efficiency for counting tritium (cpm /dpm)
| |
| C = sample volume
| |
| : 4. Strontium-90 The acidified sample of clear water, with stable stron-tium and calcium carriers, is treated with oxalic acid pH 3.0 to precipitate insoluble oxalates. The oxalates are dissolved in nitric acid and strontium nitrate is separated from calcium as a precipitate, in 70% nitric acid. The residue is purified by adding iron and rare earth carriers and precipitating them as hydroxides. After a second strontium nitrate precipitation from 70% nitric acid, the nitrates are dissolved in water and, with added yttrium carrier, are stored for ingrowth of yttrium-90. The strontium is again precipibated, and separated from 70% nitric acid, with the yttrium nitrate being in the supernate. For counting either total radiostrontium, yttrium-90 or_both, each fraction is precipitated separately as an oxalate B-7
| |
| | |
| N ALCC ENVI ACNMENTAL SCIENCES .
| |
| and collected on a glass fiber filter or planchet.
| |
| Calcula tions Follow the same procedure as for air particulate samples.
| |
| E. Precipitation
| |
| : 1. Gross Beta Transfer solids and liquids in the container to a beaker, evaporate to a small volume, and quantitatively transfer to a tared planchet for counting.
| |
| : 2. Tritium (direct counting)
| |
| Follow the same procedure as for water. -
| |
| Calculations Follow the same procedure as for water.
| |
| F. Bottom Sediments and Soil
| |
| : 1. Gross Alpha and Gross Beta Dry, grind, and sieve the sample. Place 100-200 mg of sample into a 2" planchet and count in a Beckman Widebeta-II Proport-ional Counter. Calculate the activity, correcting for efficiency and self-absorption.
| |
| : 2. Gamma by Go (Li) Detector Dry and grind 0.5 to 1.0 kilagrams of the sample. Put 450 cc in a one-pint container, place on the detector and count.
| |
| e
| |
| : 3. Strontium-90 Fuse-the sample with sodium carbonate and sodium hydroxide. Dissolve in hydrochloric acid. Purify strontium by 1-removing existing yttrium using the TBP extrac tion method. Hold for one to two weeks to allow for new yttrium ingrowth. Repeat the TSP D-8 i
| |
| | |
| NALCO ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES extraction to separate yttrium-90, count and calculate strontium-90 from yttrium-90 activi.ty.
| |
| Calculations i
| |
| Follow the same procedures as for air particulate samples.
| |
| G. Milk
| |
| : 1. Iodine-131, Barium-140, Cesium-137, Potassium-40 and Stable K by Gamma Spectroscopy An aliquot of the milk sample is poured into a Marinelli-type beaker and counted on 4" x 4" NaI (Tl) crystal. The isotopes are identified by their specific energy peaks and activities are calculated using the method of simultaneous equations. ,
| |
| Note: Stable K (g/1) = A 830 Where: A = activity of K-40 in pCi/1, 1 g of potassium contains 830 pCi of K-40
| |
| : 2. Strontium-89 and Strontium-90 and Calcium Age the sample for at least two (2)' weeks to allow the yttrium-90 daughter ingrowth. Add carriers to one (1) liter of milk and separate. yttrium from strontium, barium and calcium by passing the milk sample successively through cation-and anion-exchange resin columns. Yttrium, which is retained by the anion-exchange resin, is eluted with hydrochloric acid (hcl) and precipitated as the oxalate.
| |
| The precipitate is weighed to determine recovery of yttrium carrier and is then counted for yttrium-90 activity. Strontium-90 is cal-
| |
| - culated from these data.
| |
| Strontium, barium and calcium are eluted from the B-9
| |
| _ _ ,.a-_ _. -
| |
| | |
| N ALCO ENVI ACNMTENTAL SCIENCES cation-exchange resin with a sodium chloride (Nacl) solution, diluted, and precipitated as carbonates. The carbonates are converted to nitrates and strontium and barium nitrates are precipitated. The nitrate precipitate is dissolved and the barium is precipitated as the chromate. From the supernate, strontium is precipitated as the nitrate, dissolved in water, and reprecipitated as strontium nitrate.
| |
| .The nitrate is converted to the oxalate, which is filtered, weighed
| |
| ~
| |
| to determine strontium carrier recovery, and counted for " total radio-strontium" and yttrium-90 are counted in the-Beckman Widebeta-II Proportional Counter.
| |
| The concentration of strontium-89 is calculated as the difference between the activity for " total radiostrontium" and the activity due to strontium-90.
| |
| Calcium is determined from an aliquot of the cation-exchange column eluate described below. After dilution, cal.cium oxalate is precipitated, dissolved in dilute hydrochloric acid (hcl),
| |
| the oxalate is titrated with standardized potassium premanganate, and calciun calculated.
| |
| Calculations
| |
| : a. Strontium-90 Follow the same procedure as for air particulate-filters.
| |
| : b. Strontium-89 Strontium-89 activity (pCi/1)= -
| |
| 1 A BxC DxE - ( *" +
| |
| * B-10
| |
| | |
| NALCC ENVI ACNMGNTAL SCIENCES Where: A = net beta count rate of " total radiostrontium" (cpm) e D'= counter efficiency for counting strontium-89 as strontium oxalate mounted on a 2.5-cm diameter membrane filter (cpm /Ci)
| |
| C = correction factor e-At for strontium-89 decay, where t is the time from sample collection to the time of counting.
| |
| D = recovery of strontium carrier E = volume of milk sample (1)
| |
| F= strontium-90 concentration (pCi/1) from Part a r
| |
| G = self-absorption factor for strontium-90 as strontium oxalate mounted on a 2.5-cm dia-meter membrane filter, (F-16)
| |
| !! = counter ef ficiency for counting strontium-90 as strontium oxalate mounted on a 2.5-cm diameter membrane filter (cpm /dpm)
| |
| I = counter efficiency for counting yttrium-90 as yttrium oxalate mounted on a 2.5-cm diameter membrane J = correction factor 1-e-At for yttrium-90 ingrowth, where t is the time from the last decantation of the nitric acid supernate from the strontium nitrate precipitate to the time of counting
| |
| : c. Calcium Calcium (g/1) =AxBxC D
| |
| Where: A = volume of KMnO 4 solution used for titration (ml)
| |
| B = nor.sality 'of standardized KMnO4 solution (meg /ml) (average of three valu,es from
| |
| , the standardization)
| |
| C = milli-equivalent'of calcium (mg/meq)
| |
| D = sample volume (ml)
| |
| B-11
| |
| | |
| N ALCO ENVI ACNMENTAL SCIENCES Since the sample is 20 ml and the milli-equivalent weight of calcium is 20 mg, the equation reduces to calcium (g.1) =AxB H. Domestic Meat, Fish, Clams, and Wildlife Gross Beta,' Strontium-90, and Gamma Scan Separate flesh from bones and ash.at 400* C; ash bones at 600* C. Follow the same procedures as for soil. .
| |
| I. Food Crops and Vegetation
| |
| : l. Gross Alpha and Gross Beta Dry and grind the sample. Transfer 100-200 mg of the dry sample to a stainless steel planchet and count in a Beckman Nidebeta-II Proportional Counter. Correct for efficiency and self-absorption.
| |
| : 2. Uantma Scan by NaI Detector Dry and grind two (2) to three (3) kilograms'of the sample. Put 450 cc in a one-pint container, place on a 4" x 4" sodium iodide crystal detector and gamma scan using 512 channels of Gamma Spectrometer set at five (5) Kev per channel. Calculate the activity, correcting for counter ef ficiency.
| |
| : 3. Gamma Scan by Ge (Li) Detector 1
| |
| Follow the same procedure as for NaI detector except correct for branching factor and electron transition factor when rising gamma efficiency.
| |
| : 4. Strontium-90 Dissolve. ashed sample in hydrochloric acid (hcl) and purify strontium by removing existing yttrium using the tri-n-butyl B-12
| |
| | |
| NALCD ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES phosphate (TBP) extraction method. Hold for one to two weeks to allow for new yttrium ingrowth. Repeat the TBP extraction to sepa-rate yttrium-90, count and calculate strontium-90 from the yttrium-90 activity.
| |
| Calculations Follow the same procedure as for soil.
| |
| J. Wine -
| |
| 3 Gross Alpha, Gross Beta, Strontium-90 and Gamma Scan Evaporate one liter of wine or grape juice to dryness in a beaker. Add a few ml of H2SO4 and digest over a hot plate. . Ash at 600* C.
| |
| Analyses and Calculations Follow the same procedures as for vegetation samples.
| |
| l e
| |
| a m
| |
| 6
| |
| - B-13
| |
| | |
| 0 m
| |
| X I
| |
| A (D
| |
| -l r
| |
| s
| |
| | |
| 1
| |
| /
| |
| 4 i.
| |
| PRE-OPEPATIONAL TERRESTRIAL ECCLCCI MCNITORING i
| |
| FOR' THE DAVIS-BESSE NUCI. EAR PCWER STATICN, UNIT I SDiI-ANNUAL PIPORT, JUNE 1976 l '
| |
| 4 i
| |
| 1 i
| |
| k s
| |
| 3 i
| |
| Prepared for Toledo Edison Cc: pany Toledo, Ohio f
| |
| I l
| |
| , s 7
| |
| s
| |
| )
| |
| 1 by Environmental Studies Center-l Ecwling Green State' University 1 Scwling Green, Ohio 43403 August 1976
| |
| | |
| A Environmental Studies Center
| |
| ' Bowling Creen State University Bowling Creen. Ohio 43403
| |
| /
| |
| - I419) 372-0207 SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT TERRESTRIM., MCNI"CRITG PROGPA'd JUNE 1976 Preface In this report we continue reporting the observations and data collected to provide the basis for establishment of environmental baselines. We continue to see the variability of environ = ental elements. This last period, with very cold air and soil temperatures followed by an extended period of standing water or soil saturation, exhibited striking changes in the spring flora.
| |
| For some sites and parameters, these data complete the two-year observation period of spring events. A pre-operational profile of relevant environmental factors, based on two to three years of data, will be part of the next report.
| |
| Both high water and construction projects had successively elimi-nated earlier sites that had been selected for reference studies. The wooded site at the Ottawa National Wildlife Refuge, briefly described in the last report, has new been instru=ented; and routine data are being collected. This area, unaffected by site operations, will provide part of the data base from which environmental impact evaluatiens will be made.
| |
| I 1
| |
| l 1
| |
| William 3. Jackson Director and Professor of Biology Editor i
| |
| | |
| TABLE CF CONTENTS Pace Preface....................................................... ii List of Tables................................................ iii List of Figures............................................... iv A. Designation and Mapping of Plant Communities.............. A-1 Re sults and Di scus s io n . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A-1 Reference Area............................................ A-4 B. Soil Environments......................................... B-1 Soil Temperature.......................................... B-1 Soil Moisture............................................. B-5 Reference 51te............................................ B-6 C. Terrestrial Fauna......................................... C-1 Introduction.............................................. C-1 Amphibians and Reptile s . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . C-1 Winter Birds.............................................. C-2 1
| |
| Spring and Su==er Birds................................... C-3 Small Mammals............................................. C-3 Large Ma=mals............................................. C-4 D. Atmospheric Environment................................... D-1 Introduction.............................................. D-1 Instruments and Measurements.............................. D-2 Presentation of Data...................................... D-3 Interpretation of Data.................................... D-4 d
| |
| l l
| |
| l 1
| |
| | |
| LIST CF TABLES
| |
| -No. Caption Page A-1 Importance values for woody species observed in the one-half by two meter quadrats, Spring and Fall, 1975 and Spring, 1976...................................A-5 A-2 Importance values for herbaceous species observed in the one-half by two meter quadrats, Spring and Fall, 1975 and Spring, 1976...................................A-6 A-3 Numbers of herbaceous and woody species observed in the one-half by two meter quadrats, Spring and Fall, 1975 and Spring, 1976...................................A-7 A-4 Importance values for wcody and herbaceous species observed in one-half by two meter quadrats at reference site, Ottawa National Wildlife Refuge, Spring 1976.....A-8 B-1 Summary of weekly average soil and air temperatures
| |
| ('F), Beach and Cooling Tower Woods sites, weeks of December 5, 1975 to June 4, 1976....................... 3-7 B-2 Weekly soil moisture variations, precipitation, and actual evaporation, weeks of December 5, 1975 to June 4, 1976................................................ 3-8 C-1 Reptiles and amphibians observed in the study area Spring, 1976............................................C-6 C-2 Winter bird populations on study area circuit...........C-7 C-3 Birds observed at the Davis-Sesse site during spring 1976 migratory period. Study site and mud flats routes c o mb in ed . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . C - 8 C-4 June 1976 bird population on the study area circuit. . . . .C-ll C-5 Captures and population estimates of white-footed mice (Peromyscus leucocus) in the study area grid, Spring l976.C-13 s
| |
| C-6 Summary of Lincoln-Peterson population estimates at Davis-Besse for white-footed mice.......................C-14 C-7 Results of large mammal live-trapping, Spring 1976......C-15 C-8 Miscellaneous observations of mammals by Sowling Green State University personnel..............................C-16 111
| |
| | |
| LIST OF FIGURES Bjo,. Caption Page A-1 I=portance values for principal herbaceous species (top) and woody species (bottom) in one-half by two meter quadrats in Cooling Tower Woods . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A-9 A-2 Importance values for principal herbaceous species (top) and woody species (bottom) in one-half by two ceter quadrats in Hackberry-Box Elder community........A-10 A-3 Importance values for principal herbaceous species (top) and woody species (bottom) in one-half by two meter quadrats in Hackberry II community...........A-ll A-4 Importance values for principal herbaceous species (top) and woody species (bottom) in one-half by two meter quadrats in Kentucky Coffee Tree community.......A-12 4
| |
| A-5 Importance Values for principal herbaceous species (top) and woody species (bottom) in one-half by two meter quadrats in Hackberry I community................A-13 4
| |
| A-6 Weekly soil moisture levels in Toledo soil of the Cooling Tower Woods at 10, 20, and 50 cm depths between the period of November 7, 1975 and July 16, 1976.
| |
| Values are in percent saturation. Moisture readings be-tween December 5, 1975 and January 16, 1976 were not obtained...............................................A-14 A-7 Weekly soil moisture levels in Fulton soil of the Cooling Tower Wocds at 10, 20, and 50 cm depths between the period of November 7, 1975 and July 16, 1976.
| |
| Values are in percent saturation. Moisture readings between December 5, 1975 and January 16, 1976 were not obtained...............................................A-15 B-1 Beach site - Temperature ranges at 10, 20, and 50 cm depths in air, weeks of Dece=ber 5, 1975 to June 4, 1976...................................................B-9 B-2 Tower Woods Site - Temperature Ranges at 10, 20, and 50 cm depths and in air, week of December 5,1975 to June 4, 1976...........................................B-10 D-1 Climatological Su:r.ary for December 1975 and Discrimi-nant Function Coefficients.............................D-3 iv l
| |
| l f
| |
| l-
| |
| | |
| m.
| |
| LIST OF FIGURES CCNTINUED
| |
| -No. Caption Page D-2 Climatological Summary for January 1976 and Discrimi-nant Function Coefficients.............................D-9 D-3 Climatological Su= mary for February 1976 and Discri-minant Function Coefficients...........................D-10 D-4 Climatological Summary for March 1976 and Discriminant Function Coefficients..................................D-ll D-5 Climatological Sammary for April 1976 and Discriminant Function Coefficients..................................D-12 D-6 Climatological Summary for May 1976 and Discriminant Function Coefficients..................................D-13 D-7 Maximum temperature differences frem the =eteorological tower base Station "T" by weekly averages for the three network stations during the study period December 5, 1975 through June 4, 1976..............................D-14 D-8 Minimum temperature differences from the meteorological tower base Station "T" by weekly averages for the three network stations during the study period December 5, 1975 through June 4, 1976...................................D-15 D-9 Average temperature differences from the =eteorological tower base Station "T" by weekly averages for the three network stations during the study period December 5,
| |
| , 1975 through June 4, 1976..............................D-16 D-10 Range temperature differences frem the meteorological tower base Station "T" by weekly averages for the three network stations during the study period December 5, 19 7 5 through June 4 , 19 7 6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . D-17 D-ll Relative humidity differences from the meteorological tower base Station "T" by weekly averages for the three network stations during the study period December 5, 1975 through June 4, 1976..............................D-18 D-12 Dew point differences from the meteorological tcwer base Station "T" by weekly averages for the three network stations during the study period Cecember 5, 1975 through June 4, 1976...................................D-19 v
| |
| | |
| d 2
| |
| SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT ~
| |
| DAVIS-BESSE TF.RPISTRIAL MONITORING CCNTRACT JULY 1976 A. Designation and Mapping of Plant Comunities
| |
| , Ernest S. Hamilton and Leonid Cserow
| |
| . Department of Biological Sciences 1 , The spring flora was sampled in 213 permanent gaadrats in the five study areas on the Davis-Besse site during the report period. We can
| |
| .now compare species composition in the seedling and herbaceous layers for two successive spring periods.
| |
| i t All methods of collection and data treatment are identical to those previously described (Semi-annual Report, Section A, June 1974). All nomenclature follows Fernald (1950) .
| |
| ', Results and Discussion I
| |
| Imoortance Values (IVs) for woody and herbaceous species for each cc=munity are depicted in Tables A-1 and A-2 for the Spring and Fall of f
| |
| 1975 and Spring of 1976. In addition, IV values for the more abundant species also are presented graphically in Figures A-1 through A-5.
| |
| The fluctuation of species, both in terms of number and importance values, -in relation to changing edaphic conditions, particularly soil
| |
| =oisture, has been alluded to in previous reports. As more data are col-lected, such seasonal variations become more and more evident. Although 4
| |
| some variation was anticipated, the magnitude exhibited in these plant l
| |
| ~
| |
| ! communities was not expected. It appears that large fluctuations in species present, at least on these soils (Toledo and Fulten) , is a natural occurrence
| |
| , in' response to season changes in soil moisture. It would also now appear
| |
| ; that these soil moisture fluctuations =ay override effects of other environ-4
| |
| /
| |
| f
| |
| | |
| A-2 mental factors, such as light mediated through canopy closure and shade tolerances of individual species.
| |
| The Cooling Tower woods best illustrates these trends. In the Toledo soils al.1 three layers (10 cm, 20 cm, and 50 cm) were saturated from 20 February 1976 until 18 June 1976, a period of 17 weeks, including the critical spring germination period (Fiv. A-6). Visual observations con-firmed standing water of up to 6" depth. Although the Fulton soils were not comparably saturated, =oisture levels were high until the middle of May and fluctuated sharply during the remainder of the spring germination and growth period (Fig. A-7) . The dramatic drop in numbers of woedy and herbaceous species and the elimination of many during this Spring is un-doubtedly related to the saturated soil (Table A-1, A-2, and A-3), the greatest changes apparently occurring on the Toledo soils. Such moist woody species as Acer negundo, Parthenocissus quinquefolia, and Ribes ameri-canum now account for better than two-thirds of the total woody importance value, while Celtis occidentalis, a dry-to-moist species is no longer present.
| |
| The same trends are also evident in the Spring herbaceous flora, with the wet species Floerkea proserpinaccides recorded for the first time in this area and accounting for nearly one-third of the total importance values. Other moist-to-wet species as Pilea pumila and Impatiens capensis also have increased substantially over the previous spring. In contrast, dry-type species, such as Acalypha virginica, Scrophularia marilandica, and Saponaria officinalis, are absent from this Spring's flera.
| |
| It would appear that small moisture differences between the Toledo and Fulton soils are extremely important in effecting species distribution, particularly as moisture levels approach saturation. We are now in the
| |
| | |
| A process of separating and reevaluating the last two year's \ by 2 m
| |
| ~
| |
| quadrat data based on soil types. Hopefully the natural species fluctua-tions on the two soils will become more evident and will provide a better basis for future evaluation of this layer of the plant communities under investigation.
| |
| These same trends are evident in the four other site communities under investigation, but to a lesser extent. Visual observation in the Spring of 1976 indicated no standing water or saturated soil conditions, a result of the more sandy nature and slightly higher elevation of the substrate.
| |
| Consequently, the reduction in number of species present is much less dramatic; and in the Hackberry-Box Elder and Hackberry I ccc:munities the number of herbaceous species actually increased slightly (Table A-3).
| |
| Moist-type woody species, such as Acer nequndo, Parthenocissus quinquefolia, Ribes americanum and Cornus drummondii, where present, are generally in-creasing in Importance Value, while dry types, such as Celtis occidentalis and Rubus occidentalis, are decreasing or being eliminated frem the cem= unity (Table A-1). Small fluctuations from these trends are undoubtedly due to minor differences in microtopography, which can have a major effect on moisture retention. Many of the moist-type herbaceous species, as Hydro-phyllym appendiculatum and H. virginianum, that are absent from saturated soil are also increasing, while dry types, as Acalphya virginiana and Saponaria officinalis, are either decreasing or entirely absent for the Spring 1976 sample (Table A-2).
| |
| ( The herbaceous flora in all study areas exhibits a fairly wide range r
| |
| of seasonal and yearly natural fluctuations that appear to be related to r
| |
| l' changes in seasonal. soil moisture, with soil saturation during the spring
| |
| | |
| m A-4 playing a critical role in species survival. As more data are collected, we hope to be able to relate more closely soil moisture levels to herba-ceous species distribution and to determine the range of natural seasonal fluctuations in species composition relative to soil moisture conditions.
| |
| Reference Area The reference area at the Ottawa National Wildlife Refuge (see December 1975 report) was permanently staked and contains 180 sets of nested quadrats covering both Toledo and Fulton soils. Initial identification of woody and herbaceous species has been completed importance values have been calculated, and the list is included as Table A-4. Climatological onitoring instrumentation has been installed. Integration and interpretaion of data will not be attempted until the next report.
| |
| | |
| TABLE A-1. Importance values for woody species observed in the one-half by two meter quadrats, Spring and Fall, 1975 and Spring, 1976.
| |
| ~
| |
| Cooling Tower Woods llackberry-llox Elder llackberry II Kentucky Coffee Tree Itackberry I Species Spring Fall Sprirg Spring Fall Spring Spring Fall Spring Spring Fall Epring Spring Fall Spring Acer negundo 33.18 33.41 30.37 33.80 10.21 34.24 - - - - - -
| |
| 17.36 18.30 25.16 36.26 45.77 11.18 12.40 22.3) 7.81 20.64 Partt.enocissus quinquefolia 16.17 20.19 - -
| |
| 1(ibes Americanum 6.07 14.97 17.23 6.39 9.85 8.57 6.40 12.46 12.13 - - - - - -
| |
| 0.66 2.78 1.91 6.59 10.68 8.26 8.76 14.35 18.63 7.61 - -
| |
| Ithus toxicodendron 13.61 17.63 15.79 2.10 8.46 - - - - -
| |
| 9.2 Vitis sp. - -
| |
| 5.80 - - - -
| |
| ,5.72 - - -
| |
| Vitis acutivalle 6.22 - - 2.24 - - - - - -
| |
| 3.00 2.87 - 1.16 - - 10.63 16.01 - - - -
| |
| 8.24 - -
| |
| Vitis riparta Crataegus sp. 3.98 2.97 3,42 - - 1.84 - - - - - - -
| |
| 0.49 0.97 1.10 - - - 3.67 -
| |
| 1.65 - - - - - -
| |
| 1.onicera tatarica 5.41 21.47 6.41 27.57 26.11 22.10 - - - -
| |
| 33.05 5.2 Cornua drun ondil 2.38 3.21 0.95
| |
| - - 0.27 - - - - - -
| |
| 6.01 - -
| |
| 29.21 -
| |
| fraxinus pennuylvanica 18.34 4.77 17.82 25.90 41.63 -
| |
| : 40. M Prunus virginiana 0.44 - -
| |
| 12.89 - - - -
| |
| 13.44 52.01 7.35 11.94 27.51 22.23 8.14 - -
| |
| 13.42 6 . 31 Celtis occidentalis 7.27 14.07 -
| |
| 0.25 3.83 3.68 1.88 - - - - -
| |
| 9.70 - - -
| |
| Gymnocladus dloica - -
| |
| - - - - - - 11.91 33.73 -
| |
| 31.33 5.61 15.E Staphylea trifolia - - -
| |
| >e 08
| |
| | |
| , , . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ,__w. _ - . _ _ _ . . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ .
| |
| A-6 e
| |
| s
| |
| ' ' l I i I .t e,fiM eJ c
| |
| M ~ -le
| |
| : c. .e ..e -e
| |
| ~
| |
| ,.,. ~. C.
| |
| , re 9.ee i
| |
| ~~e m.
| |
| . m!.M.
| |
| .et
| |
| : e. of. e e. e .e Oe t e e e e a.
| |
| M ee4 se e4e %r N N Nh M N N hM N
| |
| & ** I se ce WB sue e se O *s9 e e me e e e et
| |
| == WB *'9
| |
| =rtri O em e 884 s'= en ee ee se a=e em St .se e etene
| |
| ==ope g of e e De am se e
| |
| o e
| |
| aptoe e9 ee Ste N ese =ee oro O ce he M
| |
| to W 4 es e 4 @ se M e =r 3 C e es e pum se em 4 =e re see Oe =r. e.
| |
| emi
| |
| : e. cee O emee a e. er.
| |
| w w e M = N h NN= b N b 1 Sus h N=
| |
| et en M M9 N
| |
| +es .e *9 .* e m om ee e en e o.e ~e re e e. .e 8oe9e ee e e d .e e
| |
| = s a.
| |
| ee9 e 4 O.
| |
| c ee==
| |
| om e e.
| |
| e e e d
| |
| e eo O.e e e e o es MMM j'D== nF O 4Oe e e we ee d Oed w M M d e* ga 6' ee me ee e's Oe e
| |
| ** umn se ee 89 em @ d e 4 eum tM
| |
| *8 e en eo O em ame Oee eme 8
| |
| 0 ==
| |
| Qg **Oee e o e art a e e Me e
| |
| me 3 e Een ee St er M d suee M es 48% 4 GP h M as 4 el
| |
| 's*' 3 C O* d ee e ***e =e art "Je == ==e ce Me es == N O'=n em se Q g3 m y C. 4. Stme.
| |
| so St
| |
| '9'' Cm e e o NOe e e . e . a e e N se
| |
| $ e6 Du e =P es M me e e9 au ( d8% M ce ene es.
| |
| 46 &b -e m Pe e
| |
| 2 me I* W Sb #9 =A O e et 888e 64 P =#** @ 8''# On eM *F em ** OOe e6 @ =0 en tM e e* wp 79 em ce am N eB 4 ee C4m E3pm ein cee c'*e9 e Mewea er ef**esde 33e e ePe. e. ce. e e o
| |
| ==C em e @e- e et e se e e e
| |
| ** W =We O Pt in er ein == me W9 Oo O O M O =t em N s's M se O O se C O. en M O b e*t 8 M A
| |
| +
| |
| U es em MO = M in h ee M Sh e 89 in er St e un e em em 89 es C
| |
| O se ==
| |
| g Oe e e ==.
| |
| e e
| |
| er e
| |
| des"un e4 en.' 4 e
| |
| ene em e e e9 e o as se ee Dm ise.. NO O so wp 4'e cc Oem e9o re se ag I m M =
| |
| ** eup 8**
| |
| 3 9 d en rm et me .e q em pe ce es e W9 .se C en e e e 0 e "G8 , e3 =eg er o O se 4 e M ** @ O, see r9 e.
| |
| > een e se g et. M. =p .
| |
| ,r. e. amee e . em. sel e e e.
| |
| . re. ce. e. e.,g d. e
| |
| ** 1 es es O O =a eO d O O *e me a O =* d C OO *= 0 C e's O 8 OM es 9
| |
| G G e se 885 m em e ,ii Se es et % f*
| |
| * d St s M d ** ** C%e es es
| |
| ==er* to w .=.
| |
| N 4 e ==
| |
| e e o e en e
| |
| Efesem e Ce see .,ee e ce na e,D,em 46 64r = em e.,p m,su3 4 aoe G.tO e ei e e . e e e . e. .
| |
| 4 es se me ee e,3ien. =r*=e4 8"e
| |
| * OeCe o e O Po e O ** eeO 4 4=rece===.eO O O O O O OoOOe C w *= a,
| |
| -e ab O 54 W e me' M
| |
| E U S em W% tR em F9 m e M ce e 4 O Ft d d 3 E e == se se e se ce em Oh =F O O ** g g e e e e o see est,are e e e e =re g he th das .
| |
| @e Pt 88% e4 W't M pe 5'In e= M ==ee 4 O tf i Go ' es me e9 9 183 as e3 40 W ee *9 43 g amo ce P* eB M mm ee O gn es em e em ets'9 e en O GP f a == sue we art t ab d't dM =# em == 0 ** ge **
| |
| A e o m o e e =ro ee *'o e e o e o e e e o =s8e e ne e se en e et O ee Oo ee C em M see eMN O M he 89 O v3 me -
| |
| O *=
| |
| me et s=e 9
| |
| ef
| |
| * t$ an C es W4t Mt e som em or -= e O at em 89 e 2 ** pu e.Pd e O 8'*'Oter't we
| |
| *='**
| |
| 9 Gi
| |
| =3 a.)
| |
| e ce e e e e og e e Of f en e4 e a ec'*
| |
| o eee; so m rm e e e e *=4we e e e.le e Moc9eO e as se anlO.
| |
| * 1 3 t=, O em O e a= d M ** esme= = O'O O O O O O O O O O eO
| |
| > *e oa" e9 == -e W a5 U C s E 4 e me ce e9 @ ee as o ** Pe 55 es .e en sie me ,e M ce me 3 == O d'9 c* ce ==* M .e M N et e en U 3 g e e e =ee e e Oo =*e c'S d. C. e6e e e e Me
| |
| -e me O C,e O
| |
| ** E te la e O *= ,e O w9 -e me O O O ce Oe 3 == ee e,.
| |
| A te g 0O CM
| |
| **M' en se em e ao e s=6 e am et a s en .e etd e as s't me se e o sat an ce ad se e e me me se se Ft vt en e a3 e C e=t Oe C Pt
| |
| ==. e o e e d. J6 e -ee e. ' Ne e e e e e ese se cee Qo e o e e e e'
| |
| e$I e
| |
| e Y N=$ M Pe cee ame eN M N ee e
| |
| as 9 3
| |
| 63 e en 1 E 4 e e& e =e =
| |
| at 7 3
| |
| *C == 3 C =W U 3 u 5 9 e 4'S to 2 9= = me em U S G W =e **
| |
| W 1 em u 9 3 e 1 3 3 $S = = = 8 3 em =0 i ==
| |
| as '9 3
| |
| *=
| |
| *1 s1 3 w =
| |
| 4 se 3 9 >
| |
| m-s 1 1 w as 11 e 1 1 3 g C -e se 1 s .3e== = 9
| |
| *a
| |
| *'h
| |
| =w 1 =p me 2 J3 ee
| |
| >1 G ee =o to seam== 2 W 'i w=== 14 =e ee 3 e .3 12 = =
| |
| ***=-e 1===4, 1 9 3 h J 't S == a 1
| |
| =O es =
| |
| =
| |
| w
| |
| ==m***= 's 1 *
| |
| .3 =,=
| |
| # w
| |
| * 26 4*s9=
| |
| ==.
| |
| c 1 9 me= -e
| |
| = w 5
| |
| ee-81 1 3 pe e
| |
| s& em 3
| |
| *d =3 e 3 - 3 = ==*3,=
| |
| = ==4 a.1 - .=2 s: - .1 =-4 = e
| |
| .= see
| |
| = 1 3 3 = ,.a. s
| |
| . . .3 =a 1
| |
| -3 .1 1 =,w .e 2 4 e, ws - e we 1== =
| |
| = = =: T1 L*=Qs=3 Sese 9 9 2w a= e ee L e 4 1 2 J J "y w C.
| |
| 0
| |
| =
| |
| g1= 39 33== 3 5==
| |
| me ; s 3 9 == =ne=
| |
| 2 2 : = 2e Sm t= == .2 ga *33 93 eee 0 =ee e =w .=.=w eAy a=
| |
| 1 *. 3 3 A ==1=== 7 e $
| |
| = 1=
| |
| = *y 1 am == == 3 ==1 .: 3 "e =p % 1 - *
| |
| * 2 'e W Sm *e W es 8 = ?
| |
| a- 2 3 ==3 -==na $==
| |
| een Q J == 1R "1 .=&=
| |
| 1 1 3 2 2 1
| |
| * 1 em 4=== 3 3 *3 == =. 3 3* L hs =
| |
| ae *1 9=
| |
| 1
| |
| * me 1 =3
| |
| * 2t 3 % ; T ? a ==w 1 ==mm
| |
| * J Wg WewG a u = = 1=
| |
| 2 4. 2 1 1.a c.e a=
| |
| * e> 3 i s > = =1 = 3 as >:9 = : 2am1 =1 =a: ; 4 ,= - v4: = sa==
| |
| 3 $e== w 3 w3 3 == 1 g 9 3 1 a=1 3 1 = -e =3 L@={aaaJ a *
| |
| * e * *1 1 3 4w G
| |
| *e aemy -1 1 as=a W S 1 M 0 7 4 . : 2 2 = 3 =e ==== ee 3 de aus 3 a b
| |
| > : en a *7 == **= = -emm
| |
| * a .g**4**!***= . 3 =*O 2 1 2 se es
| |
| # 3===
| |
| 3 1 3-========
| |
| 3 4 *e s .1.
| |
| = g2. $2 13ge3 e4 = e. =d w m, $ =
| |
| * ar me
| |
| =ee J
| |
| 2 7 =2
| |
| :e3
| |
| * = = >
| |
| 9 ae 1 *r 1 2 1=
| |
| = = = == 1p, g a g 1=
| |
| d
| |
| =eme
| |
| . J
| |
| * =w=$see
| |
| =
| |
| T= ? n$ == )a'e
| |
| *f
| |
| .== =
| |
| L :
| |
| &1= = = a3 ema 3
| |
| te e w &
| |
| $ d J= 9'mD e. 5 $ $ g j Mg 1$ $ w 1E $ =1 =e W b
| |
| wt duDdeme4 ee == JtA>3e>Jvtet3W345$J Vt et e C eE Q e= em W W D J =4 O 4 at th J 4 VB A == Q 'A to M A tA ind ab W D E
| |
| | |
| .- . . . ._m _ _ . . _ _ . _
| |
| TABI.E A-3. Numbers of herbaceous and woody species observed in the one-half by two meter quadrats, Spring and Fall, 1975 and Spring, 1976.
| |
| Cooling Tower Woods llackberry-Box Elder Itackberry II Kentucky Coffee Tree llackberry '.
| |
| Spring Fall Spring Spring Fall Spring Spring Fall St ag Spring Fall Spring Spring Fall Spring ._
| |
| lierbaceous 35 26 24 28 18 32 30 17 28 19 15 19 17 15 20 species Woody 16 11 9 10 6 10 9 6 7 8 4 4 5 6 6 species Total 51 17 33 38 24 43 39 23 35 27 19 23 22 21 26 species 9
| |
| N i N
| |
| | |
| A-8 TABLE A- 4. Importance values for woody and herbaceous species observed in one-half by two meter quadrats at reference site, Ottawa :Tational Wildlife Refuge, Spring 1976.
| |
| Herbaceous Species L:portance Needy species Importance Values Values Impatiens capensis 20.92 Rhus toxicodendron 51.63 Tovara virginiana 16.60 Cornus sp. 13.86 Geum canadense 10.39 Vitis sp. 12.23 Solidago sp. 9.24 Ribes americanup 5.07 Amphicarpa brachtoata 6.52 Parthenocissus quinquefolia 3.31 Geranium maculatum 6.01 Rosa setigera 2.11 Viola sp. 4.38 Tilia americana 1.21 Grass sp. 3.03 Pranus sp. 1.06 Circaea quadrisulcata 2.72 Ulmus rubra 1.04 Sanicula trifoliata 2.59 Acer saccharinum .95 Scrophylaria rarilandica 2.38 Crataegus sp. .84 Hydrophyllum virginianum 2.25 Quercus sp. .47 Cxalis europaea 1.81 Xanthoxylem americanum .23 Smilax sp. 1.36 Sambucus canadensis .16 Cynareae Tribe 1.29 Pcpulus deltoides .14 Potentialla norvegica 1.13 Fraxinue pennsylvanica .16 Laportea canadensis .39 Carya sp. 5.52 Menispermum canadense .84 Galium sp. .75 Pilea pumila .70 Arisaema dracontium .63 Unknown species .62 Solanum dulcamara .60 Rubus occidentalis .53 Lysimachia quadrifolia .44 Arctium lappa .34 Ranunculus abortivus .32 Taraxacum officinale .28 Sonchus sp. .16 Acalypha virginica .12 Thalietrum polygamum .13 99.97 99.99
| |
| | |
| FIGURE A-1. Importanco valuss for principal h:rbiccous spsciss (cop) and woody spsciss (bottom) in one-half by two =eter quadrats in Cooling Tower Woods.
| |
| - 35
| |
| - 33 25
| |
| . - 23 -
| |
| .- 15
| |
| - 13
| |
| - 5
| |
| .o rail 1974 Spring 1975 Psil 1975 Sprinc 1976
| |
| ,C o
| |
| : t. a e .a. .e.. e -
| |
| - - e. : - .
| |
| *
| |
| * 2 s : , g c e
| |
| e -
| |
| .. = - *a s 5
| |
| s.
| |
| e.
| |
| e a
| |
| =
| |
| b v
| |
| e C.
| |
| e e -
| |
| v
| |
| : s. -
| |
| e
| |
| =
| |
| e s
| |
| , t me as . == b a k en - g b $ as J 1. 3- k e t e - 2 o s* 4 e e e a s o -
| |
| s P -m 8
| |
| == a == -L e P a ?
| |
| : . .& s e : e . - = ee - =.= e e' = .l
| |
| = c e - a : - , s : - 6 - g -
| |
| ' s a U 3 $ L e $ -.b, & L P . 4 L f. a- b
| |
| (
| |
| .b.
| |
| ,, e
| |
| .u ..
| |
| .g- -
| |
| =
| |
| e g .c. ,.
| |
| .So. . 6
| |
| .e..
| |
| g
| |
| - ., - e o . - e i. : - -
| |
| s : - a 6 - s . - . . . 2 2 - - e a .e e s > a. s = c c e. > c .
| |
| e a. a < c - c
| |
| - 35 3o
| |
| - 25
| |
| - 23
| |
| - 15
| |
| - 13
| |
| - 5 l -3 Fill 1974 3prins 1975 Fall 1*75 aprtr.c 1973 e
| |
| .s.'i
| |
| .e
| |
| : 3. C C 3 6 6 h 6 3 s e a 3 3 3 3 y .
| |
| ?
| |
| . &' r g - - - -
| |
| =
| |
| 24 == 3 =
| |
| - : 3 7
| |
| 6 m rJ -
| |
| m .
| |
| - . s. r' s e e r -2
| |
| '5- -8
| |
| * 5 3 =* ?*
| |
| : # : : R == .i : P 8t -
| |
| 2*
| |
| 1e J -
| |
| 3 m u e 2, 1 - r e C T
| |
| * r *" *' ?
| |
| "s * .t' "J 2 C * ; "J 3 ?. *f
| |
| -) -l 7 r - =t *J* - t -u u =4 : 9 3 L =* sI : - 4 c =* 8 u L u = . L u
| |
| -. ce r -
| |
| * t ' -m + vie : - e o a =l y p -
| |
| - b'l
| |
| =
| |
| i.
| |
| t'
| |
| 'l : G D
| |
| *j se f" 3 :
| |
| .l
| |
| *. : l''
| |
| a 5
| |
| 2 -
| |
| E -i .
| |
| Si 3 .' .' i a e .- ae 14 .cJ L ..
| |
| 2.) -
| |
| ' ** - 14
| |
| .s E 2.a y 3 *-. .r D - 4' eE '$' . ' * .me J t.)
| |
| p J.
| |
| as a
| |
| es I. '
| |
| F. *
| |
| -m
| |
| = ,
| |
| * == h p c* . c - p 2''' - p * * .
| |
| .eJ.
| |
| 2 LI l'. "*
| |
| O .%el X, Q pi **
| |
| * 4 C 4. As at 3.$ *i.
| |
| I
| |
| | |
| FIGURE A-2. Importcaco valuso for principal h:rbrecous specico (top) c.nd woody species A-10 (bottom) in one-half by two meter quadrats in Hackberry-Box Elder community.
| |
| 35
| |
| - 33
| |
| - 25
| |
| . - 22
| |
| - 15
| |
| - 10
| |
| - 5
| |
| -o Fall 1974 3prins 1975 Fall 1975 Spring 1970 5
| |
| .I. I 2 r
| |
| .e. - .b.
| |
| .c.
| |
| e c '*
| |
| p e f ==
| |
| * 3 as a U %1 # #
| |
| m F G == Ai M 8
| |
| = ,u - -
| |
| m -b = -g -
| |
| e , -pl "" 8 - S 2
| |
| * 8 8 8 8 8 g .e .a s 7
| |
| * O E 3 -*J * *8 8 b F "I
| |
| = g' 6, c - 6 g : = - : c -' e
| |
| * 2 : .i
| |
| - . o - - . . .I - a e a -
| |
| = g
| |
| * 7 =e y em ** f =
| |
| -2 -e g. y e r 1- e g - : 5
| |
| % . c. = = c. e a c* > >
| |
| y1 M
| |
| -. 3 - 3 J 4 f- - *
| |
| * F * &
| |
| si
| |
| . d. '
| |
| & L U e
| |
| k e
| |
| e a v
| |
| * b 5- u 8-
| |
| : . : = -> -
| |
| - e g 7 r= 6 1 - gl == ==m 6 E b e g ** - 9 L L 5 0 -0 C 3 S 3 5 L
| |
| * E 0 ** **
| |
| .3 m =
| |
| 3 e e4 .ea e
| |
| ==:g a,3 >
| |
| b m1 et 3 u
| |
| 9 0 a= -
| |
| F.
| |
| e
| |
| =P "
| |
| > . "a*..
| |
| 50
| |
| - 45 r"
| |
| 35 e
| |
| - 30
| |
| - 25
| |
| - 23 -
| |
| 15
| |
| -1 .
| |
| I no <
| |
| d
| |
| '"*"?
| |
| I a
| |
| F211 1974 c,acin.; 1975 :sil 1*75 seeins u7e j em
| |
| . .a e _.s '
| |
| me ao j d a d i !
| |
| c !-
| |
| e
| |
| .me. ;
| |
| ee.e
| |
| .el e
| |
| e n
| |
| 9 me
| |
| =
| |
| .mo
| |
| *i me se es v
| |
| * 3 a=1 d a. =m t
| |
| {' 7 *
| |
| .e
| |
| .~. 8*'
| |
| * ** f* =*
| |
| * 4 f" *j r' ,
| |
| ' . * *! a 7 ; * ; .n s j' j'
| |
| * C i
| |
| 7 E SI E' *. C i V
| |
| ~
| |
| 7 T 3
| |
| ,_ a .- s- ; - . n :. o
| |
| **g 9 : - .* u .:
| |
| == , e i b ? ft ** t ** ** 8 * -
| |
| : 4. .-8 t,'
| |
| '"5 .-
| |
| -el 2. "2".
| |
| +
| |
| "u* *
| |
| .~ 4 8 **F 1'.' == I. t
| |
| ; es - s.
| |
| I
| |
| : 4. at * . t y
| |
| ..ca . Si *6 ,*
| |
| +-l g=
| |
| 7: r* . s >
| |
| !e ai 1 %' I t
| |
| ~
| |
| i* a L % - t P ;- e ea t a'l t 4e ce y e ;, e g a .y a e
| |
| .f*
| |
| n .e 4 . We v0 -9 **
| |
| e.
| |
| 6.' ; !.$ .a ,. 5= g a. 1. ..I $' .' I b e
| |
| .e g ng 4 . s.
| |
| l ..
| |
| e4
| |
| . .. . i.-
| |
| 3 r
| |
| . s a ' .. . I al -3
| |
| * f
| |
| * I 6 6 ..!
| |
| | |
| FIGURE A-3. Importanco valuss for principal h:rLccccus spscico (top) and woody species A.11 (bottor) in one-half by two mator qutdrats in F.cckberry II community.
| |
| - 30
| |
| - 25 i
| |
| - 20
| |
| - 15
| |
| - 10
| |
| - 5 .
| |
| , ?til 194 Si.rtnG 1975 I'll ''975 =8rL # 197 4
| |
| I s
| |
| .K -
| |
| C 3
| |
| .a. .
| |
| . - e, e e! .e. '
| |
| .e s e y e a.' y c. * .=. = .= g
| |
| - = - e e s e = o e .S.
| |
| = . = = - L - . .=
| |
| .'.g 5
| |
| -. g. =,
| |
| . .=. - .=. u - -
| |
| .=.
| |
| a . = v u - = = - .
| |
| w ,. e = : - . w e .v. a w
| |
| -w w s = , - - w s 6. w .g - g w w e c 2
| |
| = ,. . 6 - w = w a - u a. .=. a
| |
| = = = r : o - c - e i.
| |
| =-== s -,
| |
| g . = = = . e s - - c- =-
| |
| C e a f
| |
| =.
| |
| ? * >,
| |
| .a.
| |
| > s *
| |
| .e.
| |
| g =, -.T.
| |
| 6 .
| |
| - 6 :: 2 - . 6
| |
| . . 6 . 6 e =. 6 -
| |
| 6 o e e = .= = .- , $, r = = e e e =
| |
| pa ; *J g
| |
| ( - .m .e. .e - b b - . - 3 o c. 6 L e a.s. - C,
| |
| : -= - = 3 o 3 - .' .=. - .
| |
| -, rs s s,
| |
| : e., . ei - =,,
| |
| > e = c os > -
| |
| >
| |
| * s' = =a L = .<- s:t . > r.
| |
| - 35 '
| |
| - 30
| |
| . 25 -
| |
| 9 20
| |
| - 15
| |
| - 10
| |
| - 5
| |
| - 3 Fall ICR Spring 1975 F 11 1975 spring 1776 e' ,
| |
| we .s.
| |
| C 0 3 6 % 6 3 y 2 3 3 :
| |
| C'' '.'
| |
| = el 7
| |
| .m. i. - .m.i e 1
| |
| = . .a.
| |
| l
| |
| .4
| |
| ; .e 3 '
| |
| .ae .-' es. ; ?' l e 1 ; y .. p f =4 e as.,
| |
| . es i : =a
| |
| : . =.
| |
| = m' i
| |
| = m
| |
| = .F*
| |
| .a
| |
| =
| |
| 1*
| |
| = d 8'
| |
| =
| |
| 7'
| |
| = :l D
| |
| .-l e : -
| |
| : : e
| |
| .- e , - . ,e -i r r :
| |
| , ,r a
| |
| - =
| |
| a a s.
| |
| ( r .
| |
| == -1 ! e -0 *:
| |
| L b
| |
| r .m.
| |
| b
| |
| = 4 - V L
| |
| ? -
| |
| is
| |
| }
| |
| b C
| |
| .e.
| |
| W
| |
| : p. *=
| |
| L e a ., L u -
| |
| 4 a t.-- E el r .o- > u a f .
| |
| 3
| |
| : 4. 4 *J C Lt U : * % : 4 i f*
| |
| . -L8 -
| |
| -L 0 .m =
| |
| 0 e' a e 4 e- og s e
| |
| * e 4 er .c. e =
| |
| e .r. a e -
| |
| ;'l e .=- e. C .,,. .a .e *
| |
| = ta m e
| |
| : s. c .ee L .?: ,.a.
| |
| C +-
| |
| r t.
| |
| . f.
| |
| L'
| |
| * 90
| |
| . , 6 .s .;
| |
| 3-L .. L . .a U.
| |
| . . ?* . -
| |
| * t c * =
| |
| t/ 1. * '
| |
| 2.i t 'l -F 3 L- l tm *
| |
| -2 t. . .b Q Q Z 3
| |
| | |
| FIGURE A-4. Importence valu:s for principal horbicacun spncise (top) and woody spscias A-12 (bottom) in one-half by two meter quadrats in Kentucky Coffee Tree coc:munity.
| |
| - - 35 1
| |
| l 3a
| |
| - 25
| |
| - to
| |
| - 15
| |
| - 10
| |
| -5
| |
| .o Spring 1976 Fall 1974 Spring 1975 Fall 1975 I
| |
| ~
| |
| a
| |
| , e e 5 e -
| |
| .e. .e. .v.
| |
| s =
| |
| s . . - .: .=. - e n * # A L & a :
| |
| e b e b >
| |
| 9 e
| |
| 9 a e u u a :I .I
| |
| : s 2
| |
| e 3
| |
| 2 9
| |
| e U g Q
| |
| * l C
| |
| e m 2 9
| |
| =- .x . s -t' c o - s . . i.
| |
| * .a 3
| |
| 2 2'
| |
| * .= me J . &
| |
| - t S
| |
| V
| |
| : w. 1 " * '
| |
| * 1- l' a m a e
| |
| . I. = = - . = -s ., :
| |
| (J* i == 2 s : .:
| |
| g ed a
| |
| ==
| |
| o k
| |
| p e 3
| |
| as o s : 2 h .a p
| |
| .g .P T e 9 .e s' ea I e -
| |
| : c. e r - g r -e - - e e r - r s e -
| |
| .u. - . e - 6 - 3 - .
| |
| - u . -
| |
| 6 -
| |
| g E *a =a e E k m = E m e 9 e .t. C ?
| |
| = = = a =. = 0 0
| |
| .=b G D E = G a. = t g*. & G 1 -50
| |
| - 45
| |
| . 40
| |
| - 35 30 25
| |
| - 20
| |
| - 15 13 ___
| |
| l
| |
| - 5 l
| |
| Q r hil 19h Sprin.; 1975 Fali 1975 ssetng 1973 a
| |
| 1
| |
| .se .ea e
| |
| - 3 Q Q Q b b b
| |
| 5
| |
| :lI; I ; ,
| |
| - : , e , = :
| |
| - - e O = .' .* n 3 .a. - a ; y e ; u y ' r, g y . q q f g q .=
| |
| { g .j g 7 ~
| |
| e' 5 $ ~
| |
| .a C. U 2' e - i e - 1 +
| |
| -*i. at r 2 ; e *)
| |
| 3 - 3 : G : : 2 L
| |
| -."='
| |
| e t- T e b -es o "L 5 m - 7
| |
| -' aa .=a= S
| |
| * e =a *s J O m.'
| |
| .a.o na .-
| |
| .?. 8 .T. .n. ;,
| |
| * .z.
| |
| g
| |
| .. et 5 .
| |
| * g'
| |
| : c. .e. st = ..
| |
| 6 . .t. 5 i.
| |
| 0 = P > es :* 1= 4 w ?
| |
| ^ c Y
| |
| e
| |
| *t Y
| |
| tl 'r
| |
| . 4-
| |
| $, 5 J vl TJ * .i * .*
| |
| ~
| |
| ,'' aj q .,
| |
| * e ql m
| |
| r t ;:
| |
| ~
| |
| ;. i ; :? t* J ..e i_ . . .i -, ;
| |
| = c.I P., .
| |
| - v .- g v.
| |
| i 44 f b
| |
| : t. ..
| |
| 6 -]
| |
| t.g
| |
| .s.,
| |
| - =
| |
| r-
| |
| ' 3 .*$ ni e .. t .a . t in . : t- e
| |
| | |
| FIGURE A-5. Importe.nca valuno for principal h:rbecccus spcciss (top) and woody spscies (bottom) in one-half by two meter quadrats in A-13 Hackberry I community.
| |
| - 30
| |
| - 25
| |
| .- 23
| |
| ~
| |
| - 15 13 5
| |
| ~
| |
| =
| |
| 0 Ps11 1974 sprins 1975 Fall 1975 0< ring 1976
| |
| * g I'
| |
| ==
| |
| 5,
| |
| = C
| |
| . -l C
| |
| 8 8 8 a C y .E. m' '
| |
| ** l
| |
| = - e
| |
| .=. , _. .-' - -
| |
| *=,t g 1 s e
| |
| =- --'u =8 s e S =8 e j 8
| |
| * y a &
| |
| .a .L. #l
| |
| = - s - -b
| |
| .,. , u - -
| |
| > ~
| |
| 8 .e= g 34 9 .u. > e == = *J e .9 **
| |
| b a
| |
| =3 e e . us J{ .s,' *J ; = L g a b
| |
| w a - L
| |
| * g w .=. e ft 28 L ; e b
| |
| .8 8 *g I O a A* e 5 - A b aa EI S. g" b ** C.
| |
| g a e *
| |
| * 3- S g == P a *= E e S y* u & 3 2 =
| |
| 8
| |
| .=
| |
| 6 0
| |
| .go*
| |
| v.
| |
| e 2
| |
| ?
| |
| 3 h- 4 2
| |
| a
| |
| -2l. ' u C
| |
| s b
| |
| # 88
| |
| -J [,
| |
| O u
| |
| h
| |
| .a i = i a a L u g g d o
| |
| - ,= a. 2 = a : e . _ s = e : 6 . =*.$, =
| |
| == u
| |
| * . = *J g g L == m. == T ca O' 2 *= f.
| |
| O -e' = g *L L == 0 $ ** E
| |
| * 4 8 0 i a
| |
| c L
| |
| 3 h
| |
| 3 o - M t' e e
| |
| e N
| |
| = u s
| |
| d e
| |
| 6 e
| |
| 0 e e t ( =
| |
| -h si e ui = 4
| |
| * = fr.1 *: : = -
| |
| - 45 40
| |
| - 35
| |
| - 30
| |
| - 25
| |
| - 20
| |
| - 15 L 10 l l
| |
| l
| |
| -5
| |
| -o hil 197'4 Spring 1975 F211 19t5 prinas 1976 a
| |
| 3 et f 9
| |
| == == =
| |
| , we m me' pe se c c 3 3 b b b b k- y I I S.
| |
| .n.~ 1
| |
| .l.'\ . , - - r .e.'
| |
| , .r, : q -
| |
| ; ~ > - : - e* : -. -
| |
| g e 4* - 7 . .
| |
| 7 m ;=1 - 9 0
| |
| 'l ; e .? * . .=a G .1 r
| |
| .e. b e ;' b .?
| |
| e .- v: 6, == b =
| |
| 2
| |
| * 2 = *l 0 -
| |
| L em 9 *) t O C & .J
| |
| ==
| |
| --E L O
| |
| Ll ** 2 e t. es at =i= @ .su L' 7 ed M 6#1 Jt ti *I
| |
| * F "'"S i ' i *8 **
| |
| g#
| |
| 6 E.* = .
| |
| == *' 6*
| |
| M c * ~'
| |
| E e a y t. .. e e- y .a. 1,
| |
| ?
| |
| a
| |
| * S t
| |
| T
| |
| * y 3
| |
| >) F ?* g P r s .t = J
| |
| * 3 s ek 7 t
| |
| ..t. -. O Ll .;
| |
| .+ e.3, .p , t
| |
| .'a $1 c m e-
| |
| **y a 7 Ut' S A J -
| |
| w.l 6 .! ..I **
| |
| : r. E .
| |
| 1:
| |
| :: r. l
| |
| : ::t n*
| |
| pg 4.
| |
| vi 2 -l rc
| |
| .4 A .e g r. . ..{ - ,* 4 ad &l
| |
| : g. !*l ..N .n. r* a **l 4 3 .e j (*) t9 .h t *- f La
| |
| | |
| i ficul~; A-6, bitrii solt PN8sf uhi L evtts IN tot tbu 50ll or i t cousus vowen woons Al 10. 20. Anu 50 cn urins baiwstu set risico or novtewtm 1.1975 ano July 16. 1976. vatuts ARE in etacini sAluaAijog -
| |
| noisivut u Aoincs stiwctu otctnata 5. 1975 Ano JAMuAuf 16. 1976 WE At NOI Obi AINtfe.
| |
| YJi* ^
| |
| 8 .*--
| |
| G-
| |
| .D -
| |
| 26 -
| |
| 0- -
| |
| g i:) - ,
| |
| b-W .,
| |
| tr .
| |
| 2.- e u-IL-K--
| |
| b8J~
| |
| c 26~
| |
| 3-0 g 3 3 3 3 g! !i g
| |
| ~
| |
| I # 3 I 3 I 4 a 1~l b 7 14 2 uuvinatuj9/$2d 12 16 25 5ctctnata JAnuaur fu ^ "ftsanu^NV
| |
| !! 20 21 k nAAcn 12 3
| |
| 2 3,,9 t 16 23 30 7 nAY 14 3 3 21 28 3 i di 11 18 25 2 9 16
| |
| * Juht Jut v
| |
| '- ~.
| |
| | |
| A-15 i -
| |
| r =
| |
| #**k n
| |
| N 4
| |
| E g'
| |
| ,e J
| |
| -a M
| |
| W,2 N
| |
| 3 I J
| |
| - ~
| |
| N 1
| |
| - a a
| |
| N :t k a
| |
| > e e.
| |
| m t
| |
| =2 5
| |
| 4
| |
| %d a
| |
| d -
| |
| s5*-o m-=
| |
| S, 2o~j
| |
| =S9 c
| |
| A=
| |
| * i s id an in"ga= ?'
| |
| . .e o
| |
| . = . i4 9;
| |
| :S jt25 ,
| |
| ~
| |
| 0- *
| |
| =ca i
| |
| %m ,=
| |
| -.3,33 , >
| |
| j gQ O = =h=
| |
| =
| |
| d <
| |
| .2 32= .* :i: 1 d
| |
| ~'
| |
| f=r8~ =
| |
| djw5*3.
| |
| o
| |
| :t
| |
| * i
| |
| = ~
| |
| -~2 N
| |
| c
| |
| ^ s 5.d 5 2; ,
| |
| C 1 .
| |
| *3 0 $ :: ~9 ** R 1 u..
| |
| *
| |
| * 1 '5 =
| |
| :i C
| |
| . 5 5 :; 1 e
| |
| ~ =
| |
| & 3 3 ,g 2 4
| |
| = ' **
| |
| =
| |
| l M
| |
| 4
| |
| .i
| |
| ), a .f-5 i L ,
| |
| i i w .i
| |
| . r i a e e
| |
| * n*
| |
| a
| |
| ,,e a, ,- ,., a r2 .. . 3 A e
| |
| >a
| |
| ..,, c4 a ., s J sw g' **
| |
| * f '*
| |
| | |
| SEMI-AIPJUAL REPCRT DAVIS-SESSE TERRESTRIAL MONITORING COUTFACT JULY 1976
| |
| : 3. Soil Environments Arthur Lirbird Department of Geography The monitoring of the soil environment follows the procedures des-cribed in previous semi-annual reports. Soil temperatures and moisture levels have been =enitored (en a weekly or continuous basis) at the three beach and the two cooling Tower Woods monitoring sites. Soil samples were not secured from any of the sites during the Winter or Spring of 1976, as it was deemed unnecessary to have further preoperational chemical ana-lyses for these seasons. Beginning with the Su=mer of 1976, soil samples will be chemically analyzed each season. In additien, preliminary soil mapping and instrument site selection were carried out at the reference site at Otawa National Wildlife Refuge.
| |
| Soil Temceratures Weekly soil and air temperature averages have been used as in previous reports to su=marize the daily temperature changes and to discuss the sea-sonal changes which have occurred at the conitoring sites. The changes in seasonal average temperatures are assessed at the 10, 20, and 50 cm depths and collectively, when appropriate, for each monitoring site. The sumac cccmunity on the beach and the Fulton soil area in the Cooling Tower Woods have continuous soil temperature records for the weeks of Decerter 5, 1975 to June 4, 1976, which represents a continuation of the data presented in the previous report.
| |
| i i
| |
| | |
| 3-2 Soil temperatures fluctuated in response to air te=perature changes, although the buffering effect of the soil reduced heating and cooling variations (Table B-1). Ranges in weekly soil temperatures generally de-creased with depth (Figures 3-1 and 3-2) . However, low temperature ranges occurred at all three depths in both sites during the period from the week of December 19 to the week of February 13.
| |
| Beach area. Soil temperature in the sumac community of the beach area at the 10 cm depth was below freezing at the start of the data period and cooled rapidly during mid-December. Temperatures remained low until a mid-February thaw where average air temperatures rose to above 40' F (Table B-1). The 10 cm depth refrozo, but by mid-March was thoroughly thawed and temperatures increased rapidly. Temperatures were considerably higher than one year before for the corresponding weeks (See Semi-annual report July, 1975). The consequences of these significantly warmer soil temperatures with regard to vegetation remain to be seen.
| |
| The range of soil temperatures at the 10 cm depth at the beach site was lower than in the winter of 1974-75, as the soil froze early and remained solidly frczen until mid-February (see also discussion of Soil Moisture).
| |
| After-that soil temperatures fluctuated more in response to air temperature (Fig. B-1).
| |
| l The average soil temperature at the 20 cm depth in the sumac community was below the freezing point at the start of the data period and remained i as low or lower than at the 10 cm depth throughout the data period, as in the previous years. The average range in soil temperatures at 20 cm was less than at 10 cm, and was much more pronounced than in 1974-75; but a response to the warming of air temperatures in mid-February was evident.
| |
| | |
| 3-3 There appears to be a peak period of temperature ranges at both the 10 and .
| |
| 20 cm depths from late March to early May, as shown by data from both 1975
| |
| , and 1976 (Figure 3-1).
| |
| The average soil temperatures at the 50 cm depth responded least to air temperature changes throughout the data period. The soil did not freeze
| |
| ; until the week of December 19 and remained warmer than the 10 and.20 cm generally until the end of March. The 50 cm depth responded more slowly to the February thaw. Once the soil warmed at this greater depth, it retained the heat and was warmer than at 10 and 20 cm through April and May; but, as at the shallower depths, temperatures were considerably higher than at the corresponding times in 1975, a response to warmer air temperatures.
| |
| i Cooling Tower *4oods. The more compact and finer textured soils of the Cooling Tower woods responded somewhat more slowly than the beach sands i
| |
| to air temperature changes. The average soil temperature at 10 cm was below freezing at the start of the data period and declined to the mid-20s by mid-December, later than in 1974. Temperatures at 10 cm responded more slowly to the February thaw than on the beach and remained 4* to 5* cooler i
| |
| until the last weeks of the data period, as in the spring of 1975. The average range of temperatures at 10 cm in the tower woods was about the same as for the beach area during the below-freezing peried but increased with the February thaw, though not reaching the range fluctuation for the
| |
| , beach site, and was. greatest from mid-March to mid-May.
| |
| The average soil' temperatures at the 20 cm depth decreased from freezing
| |
| !- in mid-December to the low 20s by January. Temperatures fluctuated less in response to air temperature changes than at 10 cm, returning to above freezing l one week later in March than-at the shallower depth. The soil warmed more I
| |
| l l
| |
| l l 1
| |
| l
| |
| _ _, _ - -_. - . , _ _ . . _ . . - ._ . - , - , , ~ , ,
| |
| | |
| B-4 rapidly in the spring of 1976 than in the spring of 1975. The range of temperatures had minimal fluctuations during the cold winter period but by mid-February had increased, though not as noticeably as at the 10 cm depth. The spring ranges were greater in 1976 than in 1975, in response to earlier than usual warm air temperatures, but as in previous years, were much less than those of the beach area (Figures 3-1 and B-2) .
| |
| The soil at the 50 cm depth cooled = ore slowly than at 10 and 20 cm, as in 1974, the lowest temperatures not occurring until mid-February.
| |
| Similarly the response to warmer spring temperatures was slow. The tower woods soil was colder at 50 cm than was the beach site soil from mid-January to the end of the data period but was considerably warmer in 1976 than in 1975.
| |
| Overall, soil temperatures continued the usual, seasonal fluctuations.
| |
| The 10 cm depth was most influenced by changes in air temperature. The soil site at the beach has a greater amplitude and more rapid response to air temperature changes. The two trends first noticed a year earlier (See semi-l annual report, Ju 1975) have continued and seem to be characteristics that can be expected each year: one, the declining winter response of soil temperature ranges to air temperature ranges; two, the period of large tem-perature changes in Spring in response to warmer air temperatures and a thawed soil. The beach soil is noticeably warmer in late Winter and early Spring than the woods scil (Table B-1) . The low temoeratures ranges o:
| |
| Winter were a response to cold air temperatures; and moisture in the ground froze more thoroughly, making the soil even less responsive to air tempera-ture changes than in 1974-75 and making soil moiscure unavailable (see dis-cussion of soil moisture).
| |
| | |
| B-5 Soil meisture Soil moisture was recorded at the five menitoring locations frcm the week of January 9 to the week of June 4, 1976. A period of five weeks in December and early January had no data collected due to unforeseen circum-stances. Soil moisture in the study sites followed the seasonal patterns discussed in previous semi-annual reports.
| |
| During the winter, moisture fluctuated very little from week to week at the 20 and 50 cm depths in response t,o relatively continuous, below-free:ing soil temperatures; the availability of seme moisture indicates the soil is not frozen solidly. The situation was such different at the 10 cm depth at both sites, unlike in previous years. Cnce the ground thawed in the spring, soils in both areas continued recharging to near 100%
| |
| moisture availability.
| |
| At the beginning of the data period the sumac community showed the impact of the cold air temperatures of early January. The levels of available soil moisture were stabilized due to frozen water in the pore spaces of the soil and in contact with the moisture blocks, as in previous winters. The available moisture remained at about 85% in the 20 cm depth, near 87% in the 50 cm depth, and near 95% in the 100 cm depth until the spring thaw. The 10 cm depth was greatly affected by the cold air tempera-tures, unlike the previous year. The moisture level dropced to O percent as the surface soil froze solidly, making no free water available, and remained at 0 percent until the warm temperatures in mid-to-late February began to free up water. During the spring, moisture available was above 90% at all four levels measured, which was similar to previcus years.
| |
| In the tower woods, the soil moisture available at the 20 cm and 50 cm depths was stabill:ed due to frozen conditions at about 82% and 35%,
| |
| | |
| 1 l
| |
| l B-6 l
| |
| respectively. The 10 cm depth was greatly affected by air temperatures and the soil water freecing. A reading of 0 percent moisture corresponded to the period of January and early Februarf cold temperatures, but moisture available increased with the February thaw. The average decrease, or moisture " drawdown," at all three levels in the tower woods correscends directly with an increase in actual evaporation and seems to have been = ore pronounced in 1976 than in previous years.
| |
| Moisture available increases in the Spring along with warmer air tem-peratures. In 1976 the beach soils seemed to be able to recharge moisture and retain moisture more than soils in the tewer woods, unlike in 1975.
| |
| Reference site Investigations of the soils of the reference site were undertaken in late Spring 1976. A reconnaisance mapping of the area indicated the presence of Toledo and Fulton soils in a pattern stnilar to that found in the Cooling Tower Woods. A complete mapping of soils and correlation of soils with vegetation is in progress.
| |
| Two locations were selected in the reference site area for the installation of monitoring equipment. An insturment shelter has been set up on the Fulton soil to collect climatic data and record soil temperatures using the remote recording thermograph at 10, 20, and 50 cm depths. Moisture blocks were installed at ihe same depths. The second location, on Toledo soil, has moisture blocks and dial thermometers in place. The locations are environ-i mentally similar to the corresponding sites in the Cooling Tower woods.
| |
| Soil chemical analyses for the control site soils will be taken seasonally and compared to the soils of the tower woods.
| |
| J.
| |
| , . . , . + -_- ., ..c.,
| |
| | |
| i B-7 TABLE B-1. Su -nary of weekly average soil and air temperatures
| |
| (*F), Beach and Cooling Tower Woods sites, weeks of ,
| |
| December 5, 1975 to June 4, 1976.
| |
| BEACH (cm depth) TCWER WCCDS (em depth)
| |
| Week of 10 20 50 air air 10 20 50 Dec. 5 30.9 29.6 35.6 35.9 35.4 29.9 32.0 32.9 Dec. 12 31.7 30.9 36.3 35.7 35.3 31.6 32.1 34.4 Dec. 19 23.1 23.1 31.6 24.0 24.4 24.7 26.4 30.6 Dec. 26 23.4 23.3 30.9 28.7 27.9 24.7 26.4 29.1 Jan. 2 21.4 21.9 29.4 19.4 19.1 24.0 24.9 28.6 Jan. 9 21.3 21.7 26.7 23.6 23.4 20.9 20.4 28.0 Jan. 16 22.6 21.0 29.8 18.3 17.9 22.0 22.9 25.9 Jan. 23 21.1 20.4 27.4 25.4 25.4 23.0 23.0 25.7 Jan. 30 20.9 21.0 28.3 19.7 19.3 21.6 22.3 25.6 Feb. 6 22.3 20.6 27.3 29.6 29.4 22.1 21.4 24.3 Feb. 13 23.7 21.9 26.7 36.7 35.4 23.4 22.7 24.1 Feb. 20 31.4 28.3 30.4 40.7 38.7 27.0 25.1 24.7 Feb. 27 36.4 33.6 35.4 42.6 43.3 31.4 29.0 28.7 Mar. 5 30.4 29.7 34.1 33.6 32.4 29.9 29.0 30.0 Mar. 12 28.6 27.4 32.3 33.9 33.6 28.3 27.9 28.7 Mar. 19 40.4 35.6 35.4 47.4 47.6 35.1 31.9 30.1 Mar. 26 41.4 39.7 40.4 44.4 46.7 37.9 36.0 33.4 Apr. 2 42.7 38.1 38.9 42.7 41.7 36.3 35.6 33.9 -
| |
| Apr. 9 45.3 41.4 40.6 48.4 47.7 39.6 38.1 34.3 Apr. 16 56.1 53.4 49.0 61.4 62.7 52.6 47.9 41.3 Apr. 23 53.4 4926 49.7 43.4 43.7 42.7 43.4 41.3 Apr. 30 48.1 46.0 45.6 50.3 51.1 44.9 41.9 40.4 May 7 53.6 49.1 47.7 54.7 53.3 47.1 44.4 42.0 May 14 50.3 48.3 49.0 57.9 57.3 48.4 47.6 43.3
| |
| : May 21 52.3 49.8 49.3 58.4 54.4 49.6 48.0 44.3 May 28 54.3 53.3 51.6 63.1 61.4 52.1 51.6 46.0 June 4 58.3 56.7 53.4 68.6 67.7 58.9 54.3 47.6
| |
| | |
| ' )l l l I)1 ill1l!
| |
| Wm
| |
| )
| |
| h
| |
| * t 0 E 44 2 3 5 8902 5 05680 00087 26 l p5 I 88888 88999 99990 00099 99 i e B 1 1 1 1 od A S L m I nc0 A 4101 3 45788 55980 00009 58 o( 2 V 88888 88888 99990 00097 44 t A 1 1 1 1 l
| |
| u p o
| |
| f SF D 0 g j
| |
| 00000 04888 55658 64 1 75 22 o 1 4888 99998 99988 44 s
| |
| k e n e o w i t) ak n t w 6003 7 0581 0 3 2730 9 3 7 4'0 93000 08 o i / 501 82 80720 9281 0 22028 3 8 0 4 0, 20 i i pn t i i 01 000 00000 001 00 00000 00000 1 0 a c(
| |
| r e o
| |
| p r
| |
| p a
| |
| v e
| |
| n l o a i) u l tk t aaw 6544 22 c ur/ 00000 00000 00000 00000 0821 8 52 a t on c pi 00000 00000 00000 00000 0131 0 02 d aa(
| |
| n v a e n
| |
| o i 0 5 0465 753 65 50000 00000 03 t 0 90999 99999 90000 00000 09 a
| |
| * 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 t y i t p i) i nh c ut0 65557 00090 05550 08909 90 e n s p5 88880 99989 99990 09909 90 e r
| |
| p n e 2 ' 1 1 1 1 r od I u
| |
| ,6
| |
| . c B t m A s s7 cc0 L 54356 803 92 55660 00000 00 i n9 a( 2 I 88888 89989 99990 00000 00 o o1 m A 1 1 1111 1 1 m i u V t , S A e a4 p i 0 g 20000 05060 554 20 3 7090 58 l
| |
| b re 1 g 4 4989 99999 99090 99 a an 1 1 l vu i J a e n v ro ut i o a t t) f s5 ak 90144 8691 0 10093 1 2222 80L 60 i7 t w 821 94 81 820 45211 76 o 5513 8 58090 01 o9 i/ . . . . . . . t t
| |
| pn 01000 m1 ci l , A ii c(
| |
| 00001 102 00 00000 00000 1 0 n e
| |
| i5 E e c o B r r sr p e e p yb l m e k e n r ec o) a ee l ik s WD at w 365 8 11 e ua/ 00000 00000 00000 00000 09946 41 u t rn . l
| |
| . coi 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 01 e 2 ap(
| |
| - a V B v e
| |
| E L
| |
| B A f 52962 963 06 30752 96296 3 0741 84 T o 1 1 2 1 22 1 22 1 1 2 1 23 1 2 2 k . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . e e
| |
| e ccccn nnnnn bbbb r rrrrr rryyy yn eeeea aaaaa eeeea aappp ppaaa au W DDDDJJJJJJFFFFMMMA AAAAMMMMJ I
| |
| | |
| 3-9 1
| |
| Figure B-2. Tower Woods Site - Temperature Ranges at 10, 20, and l
| |
| 1 50 cm depths and in air, week of December 5,1975 to 28 ' -' : June 4, 1976.
| |
| 24 .-
| |
| 20 -
| |
| AIR 16 -
| |
| 1 O t D 12 -
| |
| m C3
| |
| =
| |
| = -
| |
| m CC C3 s 8-G m
| |
| E W
| |
| /,\ b\
| |
| /
| |
| /
| |
| \ \ l0 cm I~>
| |
| ~
| |
| \
| |
| 4 - A / \
| |
| i\
| |
| i\ f ^4 ..
| |
| Lm
| |
| \
| |
| w
| |
| \ i t
| |
| 20cmy!.
| |
| g
| |
| ^ %..;Q.g g ,J & -.^ . ~. .,,,. M. R
| |
| , , , , , . , , , , , ,,;i1 , , , , , , ,,,i O c. C 9 T. > ll C.
| |
| O @ CJ O u ~3 D O 3 : C" 9 *1 M 3 C == E N er , , u. - s O k M "1 N N s N cn W N w U1 Q N N
| |
| WEEK
| |
| | |
| l a-lo Figure B Beach site ' p rature Ranges at 10 2' 50 cm depths fn a r, weeks of December 5 1975 ,
| |
| J to June 4, 1976.
| |
| l 28""'
| |
| y 24 -
| |
| 20 -
| |
| AIR
| |
| &, 16 -
| |
| ~
| |
| u O
| |
| = '
| |
| E w I
| |
| =
| |
| 12~ h 5
| |
| E /\
| |
| E -
| |
| m
| |
| ~ /
| |
| / \
| |
| 8' / .
| |
| \ h
| |
| *. \/ \
| |
| /
| |
| y i
| |
| /'t ' /*. .
| |
| '20 cm
| |
| \ ^
| |
| \ / /* '
| |
| ..i,. ./ \
| |
| I'*
| |
| li.....
| |
| 'I , L* .
| |
| \/
| |
| i 4~ , i,''s '
| |
| ,...; f.
| |
| .. . V
| |
| . *g ,,' . .
| |
| . ry '
| |
| s f. '
| |
| / 'y '
| |
| i ~~. . '
| |
| .A. I. ,
| |
| '' . .,,/
| |
| \r ' 's.d'0cm ~- . ,/
| |
| b,62,ye d[.,V /-*- - - /
| |
| M 0
| |
| ;;,, I I I I ig , I I I ( I I I i i e
| |
| 5 c c E
| |
| jbI n
| |
| ca
| |
| @. 5 m I E
| |
| =
| |
| $ $ $ 5 -
| |
| O 2 2- ~ N Q $ ~ - m s ~
| |
| i N y Q N,
| |
| . W W c N N
| |
| WEEK
| |
| | |
| l l
| |
| Environmental Studies Center Bowling Creen State University Bowling Creen, Ohio 43403 a t419) 3724207 9Q P SEMI-AmiUAL REPORT DAVIS-BESSE TERRESTRIAL MCNITORING CONTRACT JULY 1976 C. Terrestrial Fauna S.H. Vessey, D. Flemming, and S. Spaulding Depar*aent of Biological Sciences Introduction With rcre than two year's data collected according to procedures established in the spring of 1974, we have a better understanding of pre-operational variation in species numbers and composition. The only procedural modification from previous reports was an increased effort searching for herptiles and trapping large mammals.
| |
| Amphibians and Rectiles Thirty-four man-hours were spent in April and May searching for amphibians and reptiles in the study area peninsula and along the shore while running large mammal trap lines. Two observers searched together instead of the usual one. Total numbers seen were much higher than in previous years, possibly due to unusually warm weather early in April I
| |
| as well as to the additional observer (Table C-1). More observations were i
| |
| made in April than in previous years in conjunction with the increased i
| |
| large =ammal trapping effort in April. Most of the difference was in the i
| |
| large numbers of Blanding's and painted turtles as well as garter snakes.
| |
| Two' species, the fox snake and the five-lined skink, had not been seen in l previous years. However, neither is unusual in this part of Ohio. The
| |
| | |
| C-2 broad-headed skink observation reported last fall could not be confirmed.
| |
| .Approximately 10% of the garter snakes seen were celanistic, not an unusual statistic in this area. Evening checks in April revealed large numbers of spring peepers in the marsh between the study area peninsula and the dike, as was the case last year.
| |
| Comparing this year with both spring and fall of last year, six species were found in both years. Three species were seen only this year, while two were seen only last year. Scme observations are planned for this summer in conjunction with large mammal trapping. While no attempt is being made to estimate populations, it is important to verify the spe-cies present and collect qualitative data on abundance.
| |
| Winter Birds Peninsula study area circuits were conducted only during January this year to avoid including early or late migrants as had occurred previously (Table C-2). Twenty-four species were seen, probably none of them in the process of migration. Several were flying over the area, and others were feeding there in flocks but roosting elsewhere. At least 14 species resided within the area.
| |
| i Several species were seen this year that were not recorded last year.
| |
| Some, such as the chickadee, nuthatch, brown creeper, and winter wren, are likely winter residents and may simply have been missed or were not in the specific area last year. Others, such as the lapland longspur, were in transient, feeding flocks. Although the number of resident species was similar in both years, =uch =cre turnover in species composition took place from one winter to the next than with su=mer breeding residents. Only about half the winter resident species seen this year were seen last year. These
| |
| | |
| C-3
| |
| _s year-to-year fluctuations in species composition are to be expected but are more pronounced in winter than in summer because of the low numbers of both species and individuals in winter.
| |
| Spring and Summer Birds Observations at the site during the spring migration period are tabulated in Table C-3. No unusual migrants were encountered.
| |
| Three circuits of the study area were made in June, 1976 to estimate resident species. Results are quite sinilar to those of the past three years, averaging 36 species in 1974, 36 in 1975, and 38 in 1976. In each year 5 or 6 species were present in one year but not in another. Often those found one year but not another were stragglers, such as the bay-breasted warbler and rusty blackbird seen this year.
| |
| As usual, species diversity is high, with most represented by only two or three pairs. Red-winged blackbirds, yellow warblers, and tree swallows were the only residents in large numbers. An attempt was =ade to enumerate yellow warblers and red-winged blackbirds this year. If these species can be counted reliable in the future, it will be possible to calculate species diversity indices. Such calculations would provide a composite measure of year-to-year changes in numbers of species and indi-viduals.
| |
| Small Mammals Small mammal live-trapping was done en four consecutive weekends in May. In 480 trap nights 7 different white-footed mice were captured 19 times. The Lincoln-Peterson estimate was 3 mice for the entire grid (Table C-5), down frem 84 the previous fall and 13 the previous spring.
| |
| | |
| C-4 Cur results suggest that the spring population sets the stage for fall (peak) numbers. Thus in 1974 a very low spring pcpulation yielded a low fall population. Very low winter mortality that year resulted in a high 1975 spring density, which increased to unusually high fall numbers (Table C-6). Heavy mortality during the winter of 1975-76 has reduced the estimated population this year to 8. We predict that the fall 1976 populations will be intermediate between that of Fall 1974 and Fall 1975.
| |
| The reference population at Carter Woods, after being lower than Davis-Besse last year, is higher this spring (21 mice per hectare versus 13 per hectare). The two populations continue to fluctuate in phase annually, but the amplitudes are so different that the local environmental variables seem to be controlling.
| |
| Large Mammals Opossums were the most frequently captured large mammal this spring; five individuals were caught eight times (table C-7). Two raccoons, two rabbits, and one skunk also were caught in 494 trap nights.
| |
| The poor trap success (2.3%) is typical for spring, especially for raccoons. Trapping will continue into the fall in an attempt to get better information on population sice and movements of raccoons and opossums.
| |
| Some of these animals range over surprisingly large areas. For e:msple, an adult female opossum (#9) was caught several times within the study area peninsula as well as in the woodlot 1200 m south of the cooling tcwer during a one month period.
| |
| Choice of bait is a variable affecting species caught. The use of sardines is effective in trapping raccoons, opossums, and skunks, while corn attracts raccoons, woodchucks, and rabbits into the traps. Both types of bait will continue to be used.
| |
| | |
| C-5 Cther camals observed in the study area were muskrats, fox squirrel, deer, and red fox (Table C-8). Twenty-eight muskrat houses were counted in the marsh between the dike and the study area in January, up frem 10 the previous year. Since .he level was lowered this spring, we expect another decrease in the nu=bers of muskrats by next fall.
| |
| Three white-tailed deer still frequent the area. The fox sightings ,
| |
| i were of two kits near their den in the study area peninsula. Burrow counts were not made this spring. It appeared that several species were using these burrows besides woodchucks. This su=mer samples of hair from animals entering and leaving burrows will be collected, permitting species identi-fication.
| |
| d l
| |
| .I 1
| |
| i l
| |
| l
| |
| | |
| C-6 TABLE C-1. Reptiles and anphibians observed in the study area Spring, 1976. Numbers in parentheses indicate .
| |
| numbers of individuals.
| |
| Species Date Blanding's turtle 20 March (2) 2 May (3)
| |
| (Emyeloidea blandingi) 28 March (3) 8 May (5) 10 April (1) 23 May (3) 18 April (1) 30 May (3) 23 April (2) 9 June (1) 24 April (2)
| |
| Painted turtle 30 March (5) 24 April (1)
| |
| (Chrysemys picta) 28 March (6) 2 May (4) l 10 April (5) 8 May (10) .
| |
| 17 April (1) 23 May (6) 23 April (1) 30 May (6)
| |
| Garter snake 28 March (1) 23 April (1) *
| |
| (Thamnophis sirtalis) 10 April (5) 30 April (1) 10 April (1)
| |
| * 30 April (1)
| |
| * 16 April (1) 2 May (4) 17 April (3) 8 May- (6) 18 April (2) 23 May (5) 19 April (5) 30 May (8) 23 April (1) 9 June (1)
| |
| * Northern brown snake 28 March (1) 30 May (1)
| |
| (Stereria dekayi)
| |
| Northern water snake 19 April (1) 8 May (9)
| |
| (Natrix sipedon) 24 April (1)
| |
| Bullfrog 24 April (1) 2 May (1)
| |
| (Rana catesbeiana) 30 April 'll Five-lined skink 15 May -(l) ,5 June (5)
| |
| (Eumeces fasciatus) 30 May (1) 9 June (2)
| |
| , Fox snake 2 June (1)
| |
| ) (Elaphe vulpina)
| |
| Snapping turtle 30 May (2) 5 June (1)
| |
| (Chelydra serpentina) ***
| |
| Spring peeper 16 April (C) ** 23 April (C) **
| |
| '(Hyla crucifer) melanistic form
| |
| ** evening choruses
| |
| *** abundant in the area adjacent to the study area
| |
| | |
| C-7 1
| |
| TABLE C-2. Winter bird populations on study area circuit.
| |
| . Species No. of Individuals Counted Est. Resident Poo.
| |
| i Dates of obseri. 17 Jan. 1976 18 Jan. 1976 19 Jan. 1976 Times of obseri. 0800-1100 0830-1230 0830-1230 Great Blue Heron 8 8, 20 T*
| |
| Ring-necked pheasant 2 2 Herring gull 7 5 35 T Ring-billed gull 7 1 T
| |
| ; Rock Dove 1 1 j- Downy woodpecker 5 5 6 6 Eastern Kingbird 2 T
| |
| ; Common crow 1 T Black-capped chickadee 5 5 8 8 Tufted citmouse 1 3 1 3 White-breasted nuthatch 1 1 Brown creeper 3 2 3 House wren 1 T i Winter wren 1 1 Carolina wren 2 1 1 2 Golden-crowned kinglet 3 3 Cedar waxwing 3 25 T Loggerhead shrike 1 1 Cardinal 3 6 8 8 Tree sparrow 3 3 Field sparrow 1 1 Song sparrow 10 10 10 10 Lapland longspur 10 8 T Snow bunting 1 3 T
| |
| ; TOTALS 3
| |
| 1 Species 13 14 17 Individuals. _. _ .64 61 127 L
| |
| T = Transients; these birds feed en or fly over the site but nest and roost off site.
| |
| | |
| 4 C-8 TABLE C-3. Birds observed at the Davis-Sesse site during spring 1976 migratory period. Study site and =ud flats routes combined; observations by Manfred Temme.
| |
| Cates (1976) 28 10* 24 13 March April April May sunny sunny sunny sunny cool cool cool warm NNE-wind scong 3Pecies ... ****
| |
| Horned Grebe 2 6 Pied-billed Grebe , 11 2 4 Double-crested Car =orant 3 Great Blue Heron 25 40 21 30 Green Heron 1 10 Common Egret 8 10 17 9 Slack-crowned night heron 49 30 9
| |
| - American Bittern 2 Canada Goose 158 100 12 15
| |
| ; Mallard 58 40 5 24 Black Duck 28 2 1 Gadwall 5 2 3 Blue-winged Teal 35 15 17 4 American Widgeen 4 Shoveler 22 40 11 Wood Duck 4 Redhead 100 2 1 Ring-necked Duck 350 8 Canvasback 80 2 Lesser Scaup 1500 5 Bufflehead 18 14 Ruddy Duck 40 30 6 J
| |
| Common Merganser 100 30 Red-breasted Merganser 10 2 Turkey Vulture 4 Red-tailed Hawk 1 Sparrow Hawk 1 Sora 1 2 Common Gallinule 7
| |
| , American Coot 200 200 200 200 Killdeer 7 6 2 5 American Woodcock 1 Common Snipe 1 Spotted Sandpiper 8 Solitary Sandpiper 1 2 Greater Yellowlegs 1 Lesser Yellowlegs 2 Herring Gull 68 35 25 45 Ring-billed Gull 11 Sonaparte's Gull 150
| |
| | |
| C-9 TABLE C-3
| |
| ' Species 28 10 24 13 March April April May Caspian tern 2 .
| |
| Mourning Dove 4 6 3 Great Horned Owl 1 Chi =ney Swift 3 Belted Kingfisher 1 1 Common Flicker 4 3 6 3 Yellow-bellied Sapsucker 4 Downy Woodpecker 9 2 6 Eastern Kingbird 8 Crested Flycatcher 2 Eastern Phoebe 1 1 Least Flycatcher 2 Wood Pewee 2 Tree Swallow 10 10 80 25 Barn Swallow 8 8 Purple Martin 2 2 Blue Jay 190**
| |
| Common Crow 3 Black-capped Chickadee 7 3 Tufted Titnouse 1 White-breasted Nuthatch 2 Red-breasted Muthatch 2 4 Brown Creeper 4 House Wren 1 4 Catbird 1 22 Brown Thrasher 1 3 Robin 5 2 2 Wood Thrush 2 Hermit itrush 5 Swainson's Thrush 6 Blue-gray Gnatcatcher 1 Golden-crowned Kinglet 8 Ruby-crowned Kinglet 5 Cedar waraing 15 Starling 70 16 12 White-eyed Vireo 1 Red-eyed Vireo 3 Black and White Warbler 4
| |
| , Tennessee Warbler 3 Nashville Warbler 3 Yellow Warbler 1 54 Magnolia Warbler 5 Cape May Warbler 5 Yellcw-rumped (Myrtle) Warbler 3 15 Black-throated Blue Warbler 3 Black-throated Green Warbler 1 Blackburnian Warbler 3 Chestnut-sided Warbler 5 Bay-breasted Warbler 5 Palm Warbler 2
| |
| | |
| 1' 6 C-10 TABLE C-3 Species 28 10 24 13 March April April May Norther Waterthrush 1 Yellowthroat 2 American Redstart 2 House sparrow 1 2 Red-winged Blackbird cec: mon cccmon ecccon common Northern Criole 4 Rusty Blackbird 1 1 Common Grackle 15 7 7 Bronw-headed Cowbird 13 Scarlet Tanager 13 Cardinal 13 4 Rose-breasted Grosbeak 11 Indigo Sunting 3 American Goldfinch 1 18 Rufous-sided Towhee 3 Slate-colored Junco S 3 Chipping Sparrow 3 Field sparrow 1 White-crowned Sparrow 15 White-throated Sparrow 4 22 Fox Sparrow 17 2 Lincoln's Sparrow 1 Song Sparrow 27 2 4 8 TO*AL SPECIES 51 33* 38 79 113
| |
| * systematic observations not made; only portion of site surveyed
| |
| ** Blue Jays migrating in groups of 6 to 12 birds
| |
| *** assisted by Tem Scott
| |
| **** assisted by Bill Fox and Matt Sigler d
| |
| | |
| C-11 TABLE C-4 June 1976 bird populations on the study area circuit.
| |
| Species No. of Individuals Counted Est. Min. Resident I Dates of observ. 9 June 1976 10 June 1976 11 June 1976 Times of observ. 0700-1100 0730-1030 0715-1015 Great blue heron 17 19 18 T*
| |
| Green heron 4 1 2 4 Great egret 18 26 12 T Black-cr. night heron 22 18 16 T Least bittern 1 1 2 Canada goose 5 T Mallard 5 6 Blue-winged ceal 4 4 Wood duck 2 5 2 6 Common Merganser 2 T American coot 2 2 Killdeer 2 1 2 Spotted sandpiper 1 2 Herring gull 38 58 50 T Mourning dove 7 5 3 8 Black-billed cuckoo 1 2 2 Common nighthawk 1 T Chimney swift 10 T Common flicker 2 1 2 Downy woodpecker 5 9 2 10 Eastern kingbird 3 4 2 4 Great-crested flyca cher 3 3 5 6 Eastern phoebe 2 2 Least flycatcher 1 2 Eastern wood pewee 3 1 1 4 Tree swallow 28 15 29 30 Barn swallow 2 1 2 Purple =artin 3 2 4 31ue jay 24 18 5 6 Tufted titmouse 2 2 House wren 8 5 2 8 Long-billed marsh wren 3 3 4 Catbird 2 5 6 6 Brown thrasher 2 2 Robin 1 2 2 2 Cedar waraing 2 2 2 2 Starling 20 6 15 6 Red-eyed vireo 2 2 Prothonotary warbler 2 2 1 2 Yellow warbler 31 33 14 34 Bay-breasted warbler 1 T Yellowthroat 4 4 2 4 Yellow-breasted chat 1 2 i
| |
| l 1
| |
| l l
| |
| | |
| C-12 TABLE C-4. Cont.
| |
| Species No. of Individuals Counted Est. Min. Res. Pop.
| |
| Dates of observ. 9 June 1976 10 June 1976 11 June 1976 Ti:nes of observ. 0700-1100 0730-1030 0715-1015 House sparrow 2 1 2
| |
| ; Red-winged blackbird 122 125 90 126 Northern oriole 7 7 2 8 Rusty blackbird 1 T Common grackle 15 5 16 Brown-headed cowbird 5 6 Cardinal 8 3 5 8 Indigo bunting 8 3 3 8 American goldfinch 4 6 4 6 Song sparrow 9 4 7 10 TOTALS:
| |
| Species 42 38 36 Individuals 302** 259** 212** 216**
| |
| *T = Transients; frequently these birds feed on site but nest and roost off site
| |
| **Does not include yellow warbler and red-winged blackbird i
| |
| 4 J
| |
| 4 e ,- -- -
| |
| e , , - --, -- ,yr
| |
| | |
| C-13 TABLE C- 5. Captures and population estimates of white-footed mice (Perectvscus leucopus) in the study area grid, Spring 1976.
| |
| Date Caught Released Total Recap. Unmarked Racap. day before May 2 1 1 1 3 2 2 2 8 2 2 2 2 9 2 2 1 1 1 TOTALS 7 7 3 3 4 i
| |
| May 15 3 3 2 1 1 16 2 2 2 1 22 3 3 1 1 2 23 4 4 4 1 TOTALS 12 12 9 4 3 Lincoln-Peterson Estimate M,m M=4 where M = nu=ber of different mice marked itnd released N n May 2-9.
| |
| n=6 n = nuc er of different mice caught May 15-23 m=3 m = number of different mice caught May 15-23 that were marked May 2-9.
| |
| N = 8 3* in 0.64 hectares, or 13 mice / hectare
| |
| *ene standard deviation
| |
| | |
| C-14 TABLE C- 6. Summary of Lincoln-Peterson population estimates at Davis-Besse for white-footed mice.
| |
| Year Spring Estimate Fall Estimate 1974 1 23 1975 19 92 1976 8 --
| |
| | |
| C-15 TABLE C-7 Results of large mammal live-trapping, Spring 1976.
| |
| Location numbers refer to field map (Annual Report, June 1974). Traps 27-30 were in the woodlot 1200 m due south of Cooling Tower.
| |
| Species Date Location Weight (lbs) sex IDil Opossum 17 April 14 10 F A-2 9
| |
| Opossum 19 April 19 5 F 9 Opossum ? May 7 11 'F 2 Opossum 2 May 34 6 F 9 Raccoon 3 May 23 9 M 23 Opossum 8 May 18 7 M 15 Opossum 8 May 23 6.5 F 9 Opossum 10 May 24 8 F 9 Opossum 17 May 30 8 F 9 Rabbit 23 May 31 4 Skunk 23 May 31 Raccoon 24 May 30 10 M 12 Rabbit 31 May 27 1-2 i
| |
| | |
| C-16 TABLE C-8 Miscellaneous observations of ma=c:als by 3owling Green State University personnel. Parentheses indicate num-ber seen.
| |
| Date Location 17 April (5) Woodchucks . Dike Roads 2 May (1) N. Dike Road 2 May (1) E. Dike Road 3 May (1) Grid-Shack Road 11 June (3) E. & N. Dike Road 17 April (3) Muskrats in Marsh along Dike Road 2 May (3) in Marsh...
| |
| 3 May (3) in Marsh...
| |
| 11 June (3) in Marsh...
| |
| 17 April (3) Rabbits along roads & study area 2 May (10) 9 June (10) " "
| |
| 10 June (15) " "
| |
| 11 June (6) 15 May (1) Fox squirrel Grid 18 April (1) Deer along path to grid 20 April (2) North of grid in Marsh 3 May (3) North of grid in Marsh 24 April (2) Red fox near trap 13 2 May (1) near trap 13 29 May (1) Opossum E. Dike road 11 June (1) N. Dike road 1 May (1) Raccoon E. Dike Road 1 May (1) N. Dike Road s
| |
| e
| |
| +
| |
| \ . .
| |
| | |
| SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT DAVIS-SESSE TERRESTRIAL MONITCRING CCNTRACT JUNE 1976 D. Atmosoberic Environment Glen R. Frey Department of Geography Introduction Atmospheric fluctuations are fundamenta1'to changes in living compo-nents and soil elements. In the continuing effort to establish both spatial and temporal patterns of normal climatic fluctuations observations are proceed-ing as described in Section D, Semi-Annual Report, June 1974. As in previous reports, discussion is based on recorded meteorological elements which are su=marized by different time periods.
| |
| Ihe long-term weather patterns are typical of most middle latitude stations containing the basic seasonal variations. In addition, within a small region the fluctuations are similar frem one sta: ion to another. While it is expected that the long-term weather patterns will be the same from year to year and station to station, each season and each location has unique variations that make it different from all others no ma:ter how similar the overall climatic conditions.
| |
| On a short-term basis each s tation and individual climatological element will exhibit a variability pattern. Depending on the local conditions surround-ing the station, individual clima:ic elements will have slightly varying inter-rela:icnships, thus se tting a dis tinct pattern of variability. In order to create a profile from which logical assessments can be made concerning artifi-cially induced condi: ions, data analysis must be oriented toward determining i
| |
| variabili:y patterns between different components of the a =ospheric environment i
| |
| | |
| D-2
| |
| -and interrelating their fluctuations.
| |
| Instruments and Measurements 1
| |
| Climatological stations are maintained at three primary locations on the Davis-Besse site. S tation "T" is the base s tation at the microwave /meteorolog-ical tower and is se t up according to weather service standards. It is located in a fenced in area on a grass surface. Because of the great distance from any trees or other obstructions and very level terrain advection processes are at 4
| |
| a maximum. Station "A" is in the cooling tower woods and highly influenced by a continuous and complete forest canopy. The fairly close. proximity to open water and generally. open nature of the woods all influence the climatological measurements. S tation "3" is located in the woods on the sandy soil of a former
| |
| ; beach ridge. The station, in a clearing, does not have 'a forest canopy but in-1 s tead is surrounded by dense growth. The sandy soil, which drys very rapidly, J
| |
| coupled with almost a complete lack of wind currents results in different characteristics. Four supplemental locations on the Davis-3 esse site are set i up with nonrecording rain gauges and read weekly to provide additional data on rainfall patterns. S tation "3G", the reference s tation, at Bowling Green State 4
| |
| University is slightly influenced by proximity to buildings. An additional reference site , S ta tion "0W", was se t up at Ottawa National Wildlife Refuge in i
| |
| June. This station is in a setting very similar to Station "A" close to the j 1ake in a woods with complete canopy cover. However, because of the great
| |
| . extent' of ' the woods it offers more res triction to the wind. Data frem this
| |
| , s tation will be presented in the next report.
| |
| l l Instrumentation in the climate shelters records data continuously on paper i
| |
| s trip charts. From this the -information is summarized by day, week, month, and reporting period for analysis. Recording evapometers were reinstalled according i
| |
| to schedule at the end of April. Graphic presentation of the evaporation data
| |
| ~
| |
| i p :-
| |
| i
| |
| - --y y, , . - . , ,,. _ _ - - - , , . . --,-u ~, -. .
| |
| m
| |
| | |
| D-3 will be presented for the entire summer period in the next report.
| |
| Calibration of the hygrothermograph was verified by using an Assman Psy-chrometer and by rotating the back-up hygrothermograph between sites. Evapora-tion instrumentation was also checked primarily by rotating the back-up evapo-meter between sites. Soil temperatures were checked by portable soil ther=cm-eters. Problems developed during this period in the humidity element at S ta tion "T" . The linkage appeared to have some corrosion resulting in slightly lower response. For this reason the meter was brought in at the end of this report period for a thorough cleaning. The back-up hygrothermograph was opera-tional at the site without loss of data. The net radiometer (for =easuring the flow of heat) was broken off of its mour. ting in spring and damaged beyond field repair. It was removed and sent back to the factory for repair and calibration.
| |
| Meanwhile, an alternate was ins talled so that data would not be lost.
| |
| Presentation o f Data The discussion in this report is based primarily on.the period December 5, 1975 through June 4, 1976. The entire month of June is not included because of the time needed for data reduction, analysis , and display. Files of data are maintained and analyzed by day, week, and month. In addition, graphic displays are completed by week and month for summarized normals , s tandard deviations, departures from average, and deviations from Station "T". Data are presented in two basic parts for this report. Part-I: Figures D-1 through D-6 are monthly summaries of normals and variations of the elements together with discriminant ~ function coefficients. Part II: Figures D-7 through D-12 repre-sent weekly interstation deviations with fluctuations being graphed about the values for the base Station "T".
| |
| | |
| D-4 Intercretation of Data ENTIRE PERIOD. Little fluctuation occurred be tween s tations for mos t of the winter period December through April. This period actually began in Septem-ber 1975 (see Semi-Annual Report, Section D, December 1975) and lasted into the firs t part of May 1976. Dif ferences between stations began to increase in the warm parts of April but were not large until May (see Figures D-1 through D-6).
| |
| With the exception of January most of the winter period was considerably warmer than the long-term averages would indicate. Spring conditions, where the lake locations are cooler than the inland locations , were particularly evident in the warmer parts of April and May, Maximum temperatures , in terms of departures from S tation "T", are an 4
| |
| : exce llen t example of the changes in interstation relationships that occurred 4
| |
| throughout this reporting interval (Figure D-7) . Temperatures were relatively close during the cooler part of the year. Once the warmer season approached the maximum temperatures at "3" and "3G" were =uch higher than at "T" and tem-peratures at "A" were much lower. "SG" was warmer primarily because of the in-land location and "3" was warmer because of the isolating effect of trees. "A" was' generally cooler because of the canopy effect of the trees.
| |
| Minimum temperatures from the base station at "T" were much smaller and more uniform. Station "BG" was slightly warmer than the other stations during the winter months because of a heat island effect from the university buildings.
| |
| S tations "A" and "B" were fairly close to "T" in overall departures and fluctu-ation patterns (Figure D-8). As the warmer season approached, all s tations were l reasonably close with the fluctuations that occurred dependent on the local
| |
| . se tting of each s tation.
| |
| 1 I
| |
| Average temperature departures reflected similar deviations to =aximum temperature fluctuations (Figure D-9). S tations "A" and "B" were fairly close to "T" during the winter months, with "30" slightly warmer. As spring and
| |
| | |
| l D-5 summer approached the fluctuation about "T" became larger.
| |
| Similarly, the range in air temperature was small during the winter and then increased significantly from the middle of April through May (Figure D-10).
| |
| Stations "B" and "BG" generally had larger ranges of temperature than "T" during the warmer period, while "A" had a lower range. During the cooler portion of the year the fluctuations were small despite an increase in day to day variability.
| |
| Relative humidity departures Senerally have a high degree of fluctuation because of its dependence on actual mois ture in the air and temperature condi-tions. During the cooler portion of the period fluctuations were generally less than during the war =er time of the year (Figure D-11) . Station "A" and "B" generally had higher relative humidities than "T" or "SG".
| |
| I Dew point fluctuations generally followed a similar pattern to average temperatures (Figure D-12) . Variations were =oderately large throughout the period but as the warmer period approached they increased slightly.
| |
| DECEMBER. Temperatures were generally higher than normal because of two invasions of warm gulf air resulting in new daily maximum te=peratures on the 5th and 13th of the month. Precipitation was above normal totaling almost one inch above the long-term average. Dif ferences be tween s tations were small which is typical of the winter months as illustrated by the discriminant function coefficients (Figure D-1). The greates t dif ference involved S tation "A" which generally had cooler temperatures, slightly higher humidities, and less total precipitation. Maximum temperature at Station "A" averaged 2 F less than most of the stations. This is in direct contrast to the previous year when temperatures were below normal throughout the month and Station "3G" was cooler than the thre stations at Davis-Besse. The individual element that contributed most to the small differences was the l'cw precipitation at "A" . This was caused by interception by the trees.
| |
| -JANUARY. Continuous cold temperatures were recorded each day of the 4
| |
| -n , vr--- - w-r-a t-~
| |
| | |
| D-6 entire month. Precipitation was again above nor=al with a high frequency of precipitation days. Climatic fluctuations were very similar again in January.
| |
| Station "A" with icwer temperature, precipitation, and slightly higher relative
| |
| , humidities is the location that exhibits the greates t dif ference from other stations (Figure D-2). It should be emphasized, however, that all differences are small. January was opposite to both the previous month and to January of last year in terms of departures from normal.
| |
| FEBRUARY. Temperatures the firs t week were colder than averag'e. On the 8th a warm southerly flow moved the thermometer upward and it remained there for the rest of the month. The extremely warm temperatures near the end of the month helped set near record conditions for the entire month. Precipitation was above normal again this =onth principally as the result of one heavy rainfall on the 16 th. Despite very warm and humid conditions, interstation variations are very small and uniform with no outstanding fluctuations (Figure D-3). Precipitation was the mos t variable element because of convective showers in the middle of the month, i
| |
| MARCH. Both maximum and minimum temperatures continued much warmer than normal as in the previous month. With this continued warming the lake locations remained significantly cooler (Figure D-4). Precipitation was again above average for the fourth month in a row. Even though temperatures were warming
| |
| . rapidly going into spring, the winter pattern of very similar climatic fluctu-ations continued as illustrated by the discriminant function coefficients. The larges t dif ferences were be tween Stations "A" and "B".
| |
| APRIL. .The warm spell continued well past the middle of the month until the las t week which was much cooler than average. Precipitation was near normal although the amount from each storm was highly variable amongst the stations.
| |
| Overall interstation variability was small, typical of a winter regime (Figure D-5)., Maximum temperatures, however, showed expected spring characteristics
| |
| - , _ . - - _ , ~ , -
| |
| | |
| D-7 with Station "BG" averaging 6 ? warmer than the Davis-Besse s ta tions. This f
| |
| ~
| |
| j ,
| |
| was caused by lake effects primarily during the very warm spell during the i middle of the month.
| |
| i MAY. Temperatures averaged near normal but precipitation was nearly cne inch below normal. Spring characteristics continued with warmer inland temper-atures and much larger ranges of air temperature away from the more protected i forest locations. The overall Dsq discriminant function coefficients increased as is to be expected in .the early summer (Figure D-6) . The greatest values were 1
| |
| in connection with Station "B" indicating the influence of the lake. This was most evident on a daily basis when comparing the days with the highest average temp'eratures. Inters tation variation in precipitation' totals also was important in determining the increasing interstation climatic variability.
| |
| 1 1
| |
| i 1
| |
| d o
| |
| ~
| |
| l l
| |
| I e
| |
| t l
| |
| | |
| CLIMATOLOGICAL
| |
| | |
| ==SUMMARY==
| |
| FOR DECEMBER 1975 Station A Station B Station T Station BG Mean Std. Dev. Mean Std. Dev. Mean Std. Dev.
| |
| Mean Std. Dev.
| |
| IfAX TPif.. AIB. _35.29 9.91 36.48 9.66 3LJ3 9, 9 3.__ 3 7.. _4 5 _. _ .__ _._._. 9. 84__
| |
| HM TRIP AIR._ _ 24.97 10.26 25.19 10.25 26,_26 9,82__ 27177 _8.83.
| |
| AVE TEt1P AIR 30.81 9.44 31.19 9.48 32.06 9,39_. 32,65 __.______ _8.95..
| |
| RANGE _ TEMP AIR 10.65 6.43 11.29 6.30 10.77 6.15 9.68 5.,_38_
| |
| TOT _ PI(ECl P 2.06 2.90 2,72 __
| |
| .. _ _. _ _ _ 2 , 91 . _ __ _ .
| |
| AgTUAL EVAp _0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 AVE REI.IluM ~86T74 7.98 80.29 9.81 81.19 9.59 81.19 10.73 AVE DEW PT 27.58 9.81 26.19 9.82 28.84 13.50 28.52 10.18 G9--- 2Cl9 MAX TEMP SOII.10 CM 28!71 5.47 M1H TEMP SOIL 10 CM 26.90 3.10 26.10 3.86 EE TEMP SOIL 10 CM 27.87 4.03 27.23 4.,80 R ANCE TEMP SOIL 10 CM 1.81 2.05 2.10 2., 3] _ ___ . . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
| |
| MAX TEMP S0lt 20 CM 30.10 3.59 27.77 4.96 MIN TEMP SOII. 20 CH 28.90 2.72 25.84 3.16 AVE TEMP SOIL 20 CH 29.52 3.12 26.71 4.04
| |
| ' RANGE TEMP SOIL 20 CM 1.16 1.08 1.94 2.03 MAX TEMP SOIL 50 CM 32.6] 2J1__ Jd ._4 2_ __ 3. 07__ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ . . _ _ . _
| |
| MIN TEMP S0!!. 50 CM 3],87 2,j ]_ 33,j 9 _. 2 A4__ .________ ___ _ .
| |
| AVE TEMP SOIL 50 CM 32,]9 2,26 33,77 2,64_. _ _ _ _ _ . . _ _ _ _ _ _ . . .
| |
| R ANCE TEMP SOIL 50 CM 0.74 0.67 1.23 1.21 DISCRIMINANT FUNCTION COEFFICIENTS A-T B-T A-B A-11G ll- liG T-13G MAX TEMP AIR -0.007.13- -0.0d503 _-0.00820 20.00907 _0.00660 . 0.089.11 MIN TEMP AIR ._0.00537_ _0.04514 0.00634 _0.00533 20.01003 .:0.09290 _
| |
| AVE TEMP A!!L __ .0.00210 _____ 20.00224.- .:0.00211__ __0.00938.__ _ _D.00773 _ _ .0.00729____
| |
| HANCE TEMP __AI!L _0.00597__._ _0.04523__ _ __0.00699 _.0.00767 =0.00753 _..__ 20.09084_ _.
| |
| TOT PRECI P 2D & B60 _R.02222 20 E 699 20.05243 2a.QlB26 2 0.01181 ACTUAL EVAP - - - - - -
| |
| 58 AVE REL llUM ..D.00152 ____ _0,D0059 _01,00034 ._0 00313 0,00152 0,0013L _ _
| |
| AVE DEW PT -0,00068 0.00207 0.00396 0.00668 -0.00516 0.00482
| |
| .0VER AI.1, psg 0.74812 0.08255 0.76877 1.?0268 0.37168 0,39434
| |
| | |
| CLIMATOLOGICAL SUMMAltY FOlt JANUAltY 1976 Station A Station B Station T Station BG Mean Std. Dev. Mean Std. Dev. Mean Std. Dev. Mean Std. Dev.
| |
| MAX. TEMP AIR _27_,J 0 7 . 2 B __. .28.68 6.53_ 29.10 6. 7 7___ 29.48 L 70_
| |
| t!!!! TE!{P_ A]R _]5.45 ____ _ 7.28 15_48 7.28 _ _16.03 7.56_ .17.68. _ __.8. 6 L AVE. TptP A!!i. .2L24 7.30 22d6 6.98_ .22.94- 6.76 _ 23.61_.._.______..7.32_
| |
| RANCE_ TEMP AIR 11.71 4.32 _12.87 4.08 13.06 4,.29 _1_1 35 7.56_
| |
| T9T_ P!tEGl]' 2 ]3 3 M1 2,93 .,
| |
| 3,16 __ .
| |
| ACTUAL EVAP 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 AVE REl. IIUM 81.71 8.77 75.42 8.76 77.06 7,90__ 78,13 _ __._ ._ 9,94 _
| |
| AVE DEW PT 17.16 8.79 15.19 8.93 17.29 7.61 18.13 9,_] 3_
| |
| MAX TEMP SOIL 10 CM 23.03 1,_45 .22.16 1.17_ _ __
| |
| MIN _ TEMP S0lt 10 CM 22.26 1.80 21.39 1.38 AVE TEMP SOIL 10 CH 22.61 1,56 21_JA 1,27 HANCE TEMP SOIL 10 CM 0.87 0. 99__ 0.77 _
| |
| 0.91 MAX TEMP S01L 20 CH 23.16 2.03 21.65 1.26 __ .___ ._. _ . . _ _ _
| |
| MIN TEMP SOIL 20 CM 22.90 1.89 21.16 1.30 AVE TEMP SOIL 20 of 23.00 1.95 21.39 1.24 RANCE TEMP SOIL 20 01 0.26 0.44 0.48 0.67 iia'X TEMP SOII. 50 CH 27.19 1.40 28.52 1.48 M1H TEMP SOIL 50 CM 26.90 1.40 28.00 1.41 AVE TEMP SOIL 50 CH 27.03 1.38 28.23 1.45 R ANGE TEMP SOII. 50 CM 0.29 0.52 1.48 S.24 DISCitIMINANT FUNCTION COEFFICIENTS A-T li-T A-li A-IlG B-IlG T-11G t1AX_ . TEMP _ A_lR .___ -0,015]5 0.00381 -0.00647 -0.01007 -0,00]38 -0,0004).
| |
| !!!!! TE!![ Allt _.. .,0,01048 -0.00251 -0,00514 '0.00428
| |
| -0,00003 _0,00148 AVE TEMP AIR 0.00412 0.00032 0.00762 0.01366 0.00278 0,00279 _.
| |
| R ANCE TEMP AIR 0.01150 -0.00316 -0.00044 0.00309 0.00129 0.00455 TOT l' REC 1 P 0.00554 0.00526 0.00468 0.01625 0.00690 0.00132 g ACTUAL. EVAP - - -
| |
| 1 AVE REL !!9M _.0,00177 0.00016 0.00320 _0.00277 0.00014 -0.00085 AVE DEU PT -0.00093 -0.00176 0.00037 -0.00243 -0.00172 0.00209 OVERA],1. nSg 0.77071 0.21807 1.79564 1.42655 0.22845 0.30399
| |
| | |
| CLIMATOLOGICAL
| |
| | |
| ==SUMMARY==
| |
| FOR FEBRUARY 1976 Station A Station B Station T Station BG Mean Std. Dev. Mean Std. Dev. Mean Std. Dev. Mean Std. Dev.
| |
| t!AX , TEM!* AIR _4 LB6 13.15_ _41.24 12.60 _4dd4 12,86_ .45J2 13.39.
| |
| MIN TEMP AIR 24.72 11.66 24.03 13.19 _25.69 13.05_ .28.69_ ___12 . 6 5.
| |
| AVE. T.EMl". A]R . _32.66 . ___ ll 52_ .33.59 __ . .._. .. _ _1.1 . 4 7. 34.62. .___.11.58 3 7.17_. - _ _ - . _ 12.57.
| |
| RANCE TEMP AIR 17.14 6.95 19.21 6.94 18.45 6.86_ 16.59 6.05 TOT PRECIP _1.36 2.12___ L90 __. . _._ 5 . 0 3 .._ __ .
| |
| ACTUAL EVAP __0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O AVE _l(E!n!!UM ._80.41 ._Lo ,4 2 74.00 9.92 73.86 _7 . 3 7.. 75,93. _.._.11,66 AVE.DEQ PT _2Z,90 __]Q,85_ _26,24 11.08 27.69 10.28 30.34 11.83 MAX TEMP SOIL 10 CM 25,.35 _
| |
| 4,.69_ 27J2 7_.13 MIN TEMP SOII.10 CH 23.90 3.53 24.83 S.58 AVE TEMP SOIL 10 CM 24.62 4.10 26.34 6.50 RANCE TEMP SOIL 10 CM __1.55 _. L73_ ___2. 6 9 _2. 72. ._ _ .__ _ __ _ __ _ ___ _ .. _ _
| |
| MAX TEMP SOIL 20 CM _ .24.21 3. 28._ _25.52 6.01. _ . _ _ _ . . _ . . . _ _ .
| |
| MIN TEMP SOIL 20 CM _23.52 2.91_ _23.38 4.41. __ _ __._ ..__ _ ._
| |
| AVE TEMP SOIL 20 CM _23,86 3,01 _ _24,3 8 5,23 __ ._. _ _ _ _ . . _ _ .
| |
| RANGE TEMP SOIL 20 CM 0.69 0.99 2.14 1.91 MAX TEMP SGIL 50 CM _25,.28 1.39 29.66 3.01 _ . . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . . _ .
| |
| MIN TEMP Solt 50 01 _24,76 1.30 28.24 3.11 .___.__ _. _ _._._ ___ _ _ .._
| |
| AVE TEMP SOIL 50 CM 25.00 1.46 29.00 3.11 _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _
| |
| RANGE TEMP S0lt 50 CM 0.52 0.72 1.45 0.97 DISCRIMINANT FUNCTION COEFFICIENTS A-T H-T A-B A-BG B-BG T-liG MAX TEMP AIR _0.00818 ___ -0.00076 _-0.00290 _-0,00068 _-0.00384. ._0.00287____
| |
| MIN TEMP AIR -0.00859._ _ _ _D.00145 _0.00186 _0,00202 0,00660 -0.00504 AVE TEMP AIR _ .-0.00056._ _ _0.00796 _-0.00264 _-0.00233 __0,00176_.. 0.00630._._
| |
| RANGE.TE{jl* Allt -0.00899. __ ._0.00124 ._0.00182 __.0.00157 _.0,00642._ . -0. 004 7 ? _._._
| |
| Tor PRECIP _.20.02.415 _Q.D0224 -0.02468 -0.01398 -0.00765 0.00683 c, ACTUAI. EVAP _ _ _ _ _ _
| |
| 4 AVE REL HUM .0.0011.1.. _0,00294 -0.00011 0.00037 0.00110 0,00200 AVE DEW PT 0.00146 ____ _-0.00960 -0,00421
| |
| __0.00435 _0.00052_ _-0. 00 54 4. ._.__. .
| |
| .0VER A],1. nSQ 0.60697 0.31519 0.65486 0.45409 0.54997 _ 0.44780
| |
| | |
| CLIMATOLOGICAL
| |
| | |
| ==SUMMARY==
| |
| FOR MAltCil 1976 Station A Station B Station T Station BG Mean Std. Dev. Mean Std. Dev. Mean Std. Dev. Mean Std. Dev.
| |
| ItAX TEMP AIR 48.48._. _____12.84 _ _49.35 _ _._. ._12. 65_ _50 <03. _ _ ..13,10___ 52,_13_. _12.32 MIN TEMP AIR. 33.55._______ _ _9.22_. .33.97 _..._9,27_ _3.4 ml.3 _ _ _. 9 ,4 0_. .35,23 8.97 AVE TEMP AIR .._ 4 0,4 2 ._ __ . ._ _10, 3 9 _ 39,97 __ 10.04 41,48 . __10,2 L 43a 94 _ _ 9,99 B ANCE_ TEMP _ AIR .__ _11,94 .
| |
| 7.85 15.32 7.72 15.58 8.06 16.90 7.72 TOT PRECIP _ ... _ __2.29 _. 3 <03 2.96 2.28 ACTUAL EVAP 0. . 0 0 0 _0 0 0 __
| |
| 0 AVE REl.IluM 77.13..__ 10,31 _ _68, 7 t _ __ __ 10.85 69.84 9.34 72.71 12.62 AVE DEU PT. . _ . _ _. 34.06. _..._ _ _.10,20 31,32 9.96 32.55 9.97 35.52 11.03
| |
| {1AX TEMP Soll.10 cM . 34,32 5 , 31_ _ 38.03_ 6.79 MIN TEMP SOII 10 cM 30.16 4.02 32.03 5.98 AVE..TEttP SOII 10 CM 32.39 4.60 35.00 6.33 RANCE TEMP SOIL 10 CM 4.16 2.38 6.00 3.17 MAX TEMP SOIL 20 cli 32.58 4.10 35.03 5.59 HIN TEMP SOIL 20 CH 30.39 3.53 30.16 4.52 ~ ~
| |
| AVE TEMP SOII. 20 cti 31.16 4.27 ~ ~ ~32.81 5.37 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~
| |
| RANCE TEMP SOIL 20 CM 2.19 ~~~ T. 61 ' ~ 4.87 ~ ~ ~ ~ " - ~~~ ~ ~ 2.15 ~
| |
| ~
| |
| MAX TEMP SOIL 50 CM 30.58 1 74~-- ~3T> 23 3 29-MIN TEMP S0lt SO 01 29.81. 2.04 34.45 3.20 i
| |
| AVE TEMP SOIL 50 CM 30.23 1.79 35.29 3.24 RANCE TEMP SOIL 50 CM 0.61 0.79 1.74 1.27 DISCRIMINANT FUNCTION COEFFICIENTS A-T B-T A-B A-BG B-BG T-BG MAX TEttP AIR -0.01193 -0.00021 ...-0.01247 ._. _ 0.00261__ __ __0.01290 _0,01513___.
| |
| MIN TEMP AIR 0.00745. _0.00247._ _ _0.00645 _0.00201.___. _-0.00803 20,00482___..
| |
| AVE TEMP AIR 0.00403 -0.00238._.__ __0.00298 _ _.-0.00504 ._ _.0.00499_____ 20,01037 _
| |
| R ANGE_ TEMP AIR 0.00999 .0.00095____ _ __. 0. 0102 6 _.__ _. _-0.00063 _-0.01109_____ 20.01053 .
| |
| TOT PRECI P -0.0138(i _0.00253 _-0.01343 0.009H5 0.00358 0.00709 ACTUAL EVAP - - - - - -
| |
| 7 g
| |
| AVE REL IHRI 0,00085 -0.00079 -0.00100 "
| |
| 0.00185 . .-0.00036 0.00040 AVE DEW PT
| |
| ~
| |
| 0.00009 -0.00007 0.00317 -0.00017 -0.00025 -0.00006 0VhRALI. DSQ l.10321 _
| |
| 0.29260 1.29632 0.55103 1.05354 l.61615~ ~
| |
| | |
| l l
| |
| l CLIMATOLOGICAL
| |
| | |
| ==SUMMARY==
| |
| FOR APRIL 1976 Station A Station B Station T Station BG Mean Std. Dev. Mean Std. Dev. Mean Std. Dev. Mean Std. Dev.
| |
| MAX TEMP AIR _. . 55.93. _..__ 13.0L _5Z.80 .12. 4 6_. _SL80. _ _13,76_ .62,53 .. 13.43 HIN TEMP, AIR. _ . _ _ . . .
| |
| 41,63_ _ _
| |
| Q,7L .AQ,90 8,_Q L. _41.,90 9., 3 9_ J h67 ._11,47 AVE. TEMP AIR , _ _
| |
| 48,8Q.__. _ __ _l1,50_ .48,87 ___ _ _ _.10,.5 4_. J9J.3 . _ _ll z.36 52,_43 ._11,25 RANCE TEMP AIR ,_}f,30 S.85 _16 97 6.25 15.83 6.55 19.13 6,6 3._
| |
| TOT.PRECIP. ..
| |
| _. . . . _ . 1 , 7 3 _ _ . __
| |
| 2,36 2.36 1.77 ACTUAL EVAP 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 AVE REl. UUM ._ _ .. _ 69. 23 _ ..._ . __. _1 LSI 62.37 _____ __10.93 63.30 10.51 65.90 14.52 AVE DEU PT 39.20 10.63 36.30 8.52 37.73 9.78 40.83 11.19 MAX TEMP SOIL 10 CM 45.23 7.46 S3.27 6.86 MIN TEMP SOIL 10 cM 39.57 7.11 44.37 7.86 AVE TEMP Soll.10 CH 42.60 7.17 49.07 6.99 RANGE TEMP Soll 10 CM S.67 1.66 9.00 3.89 MAX TEMP SolL 20 CM 42.47 S.61 48.47 6.62 MIN TEMP SOII, 20 CH_ 39.97 __ _S 39_ _41,03 __ __1,.l l_ _ . . . _ . ... _
| |
| AVE TEMP SolL 20 CM .. 41.37 ___._S,46 _45,_40 6,6L . _ _ _ ._.._ _.. . _ .
| |
| RANCE TEMP SOIL 20 CH 2,.43 1.,_12 6.63 1.60 MAX TEMP SOII, 50 CM 37.87 3.71
| |
| . .35.27______ _..._S.22._ . . _ . . , _ . .. ..
| |
| MIN 'IDIP SOIL 50 Of 37.43 3,60 43.43 S.02 AVE TEMP S0lt 50 CM 37.63 3.63 44.47 S.04 RANCE TEMP SOII. 50 CH 0.43 0.72 1.83 1.51
| |
| ; DISCRIMINANT FUNCTION COEFFICIENTS A-T B-T A-H A-BG B-BG T-HG MAX JEMP AIR -0.00160 _0.00114. .._0.023/1._._._ __.0.00253 -0.00086 0.00059 MUI TEMP AIR. -0.00129 .__
| |
| 0,00453 -0,02886 -0.00573 0.00243 0.00318 AVE TEMP AIR 0.00198 0.00298 0.00236 -0.00171 0.00329 0.00493 RANCE TEMP AIR -0.00028 0.00263 -0.02741 -0.00604 0.00288 0.00314 i
| |
| TOT PRECI P -0.02080 -0.00993 -0.02335 -0.006S2 0.01812 -0.01875 7 ACTUAL EVAP - - - - - - H AVE REl. IlUM -0.00041 0.00337 -0.00029 -0.00181 0.00255 0.00416 AVE DEW PT 0.00123 -0.01026 0.00372 0.00537 -0.00474 -0.00957 DVERAI,I. DSQ 0,38118 _
| |
| 0.43109 0.97490 .
| |
| 0.88749 0.47821 0.78920
| |
| | |
| CLIMATOLOGICAL
| |
| | |
| ==SUMMARY==
| |
| FOR MAY 1976 Station A Station B Station T Station BC Hean St.d. Dev. Mean Std. Dev. Mean Std. Dev. Mean Std. Dev.
| |
| [ FAX TEMP AIR _ . . _ , 6L16____ ._J,34 _6 6 ,2 9. __. _L_4 7__ _64.,32 ___L94.__ .69,06 . 6,4 3..
| |
| M m TEM P. A I!1. _ __ .._ __ _ _ .48.48_,__ _ 7,08 __4 L 9.4_ __.. . 7. , 5 6_ _48,65 _. _L 2 9 __ 49,68 ._9,01.
| |
| AVE TEMP AIR. _.
| |
| 55.06..._ ._ _ .6,55 __ _56.48 __.L 5 2__. _S6,00 .__L 70 _59,29 .0,08 B At!GE _IEt[P_ AIR _13.68 5,.32 _]H.35 5.86 15.68 5.09 19.39 6.66 TOT.PRECIP . _ _ _ _ _ _ . . __ _..__].23__ _ 3 . 31_._ _. L 05 2 15 0_ _ _ . . . . . . . .
| |
| ACTUAL EVAP _ _ , . _ , _ _ _ _l,66 1,48 0,72 0.57 ._2.14 1.37 2.04 1.29 AVE REL llHM 7Q.32 13.63 73.13 14.16 70.39 14.06 70.81 12.97 AVE DEW PT 48.13 8.44 47.81 9.50 46.16 8.83 _48.74 9.50
| |
| !!AX TEMP SOII.10 CM 50.23 2.87 54.45 3.61 Mill TEMP SOII.10 CM 45.84 3.87 48.48 4.59 AUE TEMP Soll 10 CM 48.16 3.20 51.35 3.66 RANCE TEMP SOIL 10 CM 4.35 2.15__ .__6.00 3,39 MAX TEMP S011. 20 CH . _ 47.58 _
| |
| 2,56 51,.61__. _ __._ ._ _ _ 2 . 8 9 MIN TEMP SOII. 20 CM . 45,94 3,.08 JL26 3.49 AVE TEMP SOIL 20 CM , 46.81 ___ 2. 7 6. . ._ .49,13 3.35 RANCE TEMP SOII. 20 CM _],77 0.87 __4.13 2.38 MAX TEMP SOIL 50 CM 43.10 _ .. l ,80._ ._49,00 1,81 MIN TEMP Son 50 CM 42.90 _
| |
| l.87 47.81 2.29 _ _ _ . _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ . . ,_
| |
| AVE TEMP S0lt 50 Ct1_ 43,03 1,82 48.29 2.04 R ANCE TEMP SGIL 50 CM 0.16 0.37 1.19 0.86 DISCRIMINANT FUNCTION COEFFICIENTS A-T B-T A-li A-BG B-BG l T-BG MAX TEM!' AIR -0.00225 .0.01808 .__-0.00385 -0,00335_
| |
| 3 -0,00915 0.27158 MIN TEMP AIR. -0.00088 _ -0.02042 _:0,00146 0100050 0.00371 -0.27183 AVE TEMP AIR 0,00733 _
| |
| _0,00227 0.00634 0.00131 0.00800 0.00233 RANGE TEMj' AIR 0,00000 .-0,01356 -0.00206 -0.00170 0.00551 -0.26739 TOT PRECI P -0,02775 0.00910 -0.03835 0.00216 0.04704 -0.00209 ACTUAL. EVAP 0.00552 -0.04783 0.04142 0.01639 0.04814 -0.00943 7
| |
| e 5E5I!@!.'liut! 0.00330. ... . - 0. 0008 7._ __ _. _._0.00404. _0.00181. ._0,00375 0,00031 A.VE DEW PT -0.00553 __ _.0.00024 ____. ._:0.00399. _-0 00070.____.. -0.00413 _ __ -0.00117 OYFRALI. nsg 0.89499 4.83906 _ 4./3426 1.96687 3.66711 2.84898
| |
| ~ . .
| |
| | |
| D-14 MAXIMUM TEMPERATURE DEPARTURES i i i L
| |
| I l 3 ' I _.
| |
| 4 e. . . . . .. } l l l
| |
| : i 7
| |
| 3 . . ..
| |
| i i
| |
| .BG -! I i I
| |
| . I i ! I' D l r .
| |
| i ; : I e . .
| |
| i i I l g I t \ 9 I t r ! 8 4 , ,
| |
| i
| |
| ~ ~ l ,t 8~ 1 g
| |
| ~ ~ ~ ~ 7[ .i
| |
| ,# ~~
| |
| 3 ---
| |
| , - - - l ',-l , ,-
| |
| mo ! i f n ,
| |
| :_p
| |
| .__.--..-.a.- _
| |
| J._s_g._',_
| |
| , , ,r}}
| |
