ML19332B859: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Created page by program invented by StriderTol
 
StriderTol Bot change
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:y;.
{{#Wiki_filter:'
w     ,.
=
                '
y;.
                          ,
- g w
                                        ,
eg 0 00
                                          - g eg
(,"
                                                                        =
/
                                                                            .                                                                    ,
yCommonwealth Edleon7
(,"                               /         yCommonwealth Edleon7                                                             0 00
(
    ;?L;. 'M
;?L;. t 4,M: '*g' A -'~'
    "        t 4 ,M: '*g' (A -'~' :[. 72 West Adams Street Chicigo, lihnoisKddress Reply to: Post Office Box 767~ -
:[. 72 West Adams Street Chicigo, lihnoisKddress Reply to: Post Office Box 767~ -
(!:         ;j.ayl
'M
(!:
;j.ayl
* A V ' Chicago, ilhoois 60690 0767 E;
* A V ' Chicago, ilhoois 60690 0767 E;
Y                                                                         October 31, 1989
Y October 31, 1989 s
:
MkA.'BertDavis p
s     ,
Regional Administrator 0
:
U.S.= Nuclear Regulatory'Comm1ssion p
  "
            .                  MkA.'BertDavis p                             Regional Administrator 0                             U.S.= Nuclear Regulatory'Comm1ssion p                 ,
Region III
Region III
                            ;799 Roosevelt Road .
;799 Roosevelt Road.
k                         : Glen E11yn,11L;~60137
k
: Glen E11yn,11L;~60137


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Byron Station Units 1 and 2 Additional Information for e                                                          . Response to Inspection' Report                                                         1 50-454/89016 and 50-455/89018                                                         'l la                                                           NRC Docket Nos. 50-454 and SQ-15.5                                                     j
Byron Station Units 1 and 2 Additional Information for
          ,
. Response to Inspection' Report 1
e 50-454/89016 and 50-455/89018
'l la NRC Docket Nos. 50-454 and SQ-15.5 j


==References:==
==References:==
  '(a) August 29, 1989, i.etter from H.- D. Shafer to Cordell Reed (b) ; September 28, 1989, letter from R. A. Chrzanowski                                     <
  '(a) August 29, 1989, i.etter from H.- D. Shafer to Cordell Reed (b) ; {{letter dated|date=September 28, 1989|text=September 28, 1989, letter}} from R. A. Chrzanowski to A. B. Davis W
to A. B. Davis W                 :


==Dear Mr. Davis:==
==Dear Mr. Davis:==
 
. In response to.the Byron Inspection Report contained in reference j
                                . . .
Ma), reference (b) was submitted.
                                              . In response to.the Byron Inspection Report contained in reference                                     j
In that submittal, supplemental'information-iregarding the Commonwealth Edison. corporate review of the generic ti
      .
. applicability ~of 10 CFR 50.59. safety evaluations was to be provided by
    ''
Ma), reference (b) was submitted. In that submittal, supplemental'information-iregarding the Commonwealth Edison. corporate review of the generic                                                     ti
                            . applicability ~of 10 CFR 50.59. safety evaluations was to be provided by                                                 ,
: November 1, 1989.1 This. letter provides that information.
: November 1, 1989.1 This. letter provides that information.
Commonwealth Edison has decided that if the following conditions
Commonwealth Edison has decided that if the following conditions
                            ' exists;
' exists;
        '
- equipment is taken out-of-service or,-
                                                    - equipment is taken out-of-service or,-                                                           t
t
                                                    - 'there 1s degraded equipment or,                                                                 '
- 'there 1s degraded equipment or,
                                                    - an abnormal line-up exists t
- an abnormal line-up exists t
                              ;then-'the plant condition will be further evaluated utilizing a screening process to' determine if a 50.59 evaluation is required.
;then-'the plant condition will be further evaluated utilizing a screening process to' determine if a 50.59 evaluation is required.
L                                         The: specific screening criteria and the process itself is in undar development.             Further information describing the screening process will be                                 -r forthcoming by December 15, 1989.
L The: specific screening criteria and the process itself is in undar development.
Hf                                               Please direct any questions regarding this matter to this office.                                     !
Further information describing the screening process will be
1 L                 _ _. . _
-r forthcoming by December 15, 1989.
Hf Please direct any questions regarding this matter to this office.
1 L
Very truly yours,
Very truly yours,
:8911210090 PDR 891031 ADOCK 05000454
:8911210090 891031 PDR ADOCK 05000454
!2                  O                                    PDC                            [- - - @W[
[- -
          '.
- @W[
R. A. hrzanowski Nuclear Licensing Administrator g b\
!2 O
                                                                                                                                        '
PDC g b\\
* l l                              - /sc1:0339T:27
R. A.
                              .cc:: Byron Resident Inspector                                                                                           .
hrzanowski Nuclear Licensing Administrator l
NRC Document Control Desk                                                               HOV 'A BB3         <
- /sc1:0339T:27 l
                                                                                                                                                        *
.cc:: Byron Resident Inspector NRC Document Control Desk HOV
                          ..                -          -,            -        -    - -.-      .        - . _ . _ - _ _ _ - _ _ .    .
'A BB3
                                                                                                                                            . _ .  .}}
.}}

Latest revision as of 03:04, 31 December 2024

Submits Addl Info Re Violations Noted in Insp Repts 50-454/89-16 & 50-455/89-18.Util Decided That If Listed Conditions Exists Plant Condition Will Be Further Evaluated Utilizing Screening Process
ML19332B859
Person / Time
Site: Byron  
Issue date: 10/31/1989
From: Chrzanowski R
COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO.
To: Davis A
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
References
0339T:27, 339T:27, NUDOCS 8911210090
Download: ML19332B859 (1)


Text

'

=

y;.

- g w

eg 0 00

(,"

/

yCommonwealth Edleon7

(

?L;. t 4,M
'*g' A -'~'
[. 72 West Adams Street Chicigo, lihnoisKddress Reply to: Post Office Box 767~ -

'M

(!:

j.ayl
  • A V ' Chicago, ilhoois 60690 0767 E;

Y October 31, 1989 s

MkA.'BertDavis p

Regional Administrator 0

U.S.= Nuclear Regulatory'Comm1ssion p

Region III

799 Roosevelt Road.

k

Glen E11yn,11L;~60137

Subject:

Byron Station Units 1 and 2 Additional Information for

. Response to Inspection' Report 1

e 50-454/89016 and 50-455/89018

'l la NRC Docket Nos. 50-454 and SQ-15.5 j

References:

'(a) August 29, 1989, i.etter from H.- D. Shafer to Cordell Reed (b) ; September 28, 1989, letter from R. A. Chrzanowski to A. B. Davis W

Dear Mr. Davis:

. In response to.the Byron Inspection Report contained in reference j

Ma), reference (b) was submitted.

In that submittal, supplemental'information-iregarding the Commonwealth Edison. corporate review of the generic ti

. applicability ~of 10 CFR 50.59. safety evaluations was to be provided by

November 1, 1989.1 This. letter provides that information.

Commonwealth Edison has decided that if the following conditions

' exists;

- equipment is taken out-of-service or,-

t

- 'there 1s degraded equipment or,

- an abnormal line-up exists t

then-'the plant condition will be further evaluated utilizing a screening process to' determine if a 50.59 evaluation is required.

L The: specific screening criteria and the process itself is in undar development.

Further information describing the screening process will be

-r forthcoming by December 15, 1989.

Hf Please direct any questions regarding this matter to this office.

1 L

Very truly yours,

8911210090 891031 PDR ADOCK 05000454

[- -

- @W[

!2 O

PDC g b\\

R. A.

hrzanowski Nuclear Licensing Administrator l

- /sc1:0339T:27 l

.cc:: Byron Resident Inspector NRC Document Control Desk HOV

'A BB3

.