ML19338B974: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
← Older edit
VisualWikitext
Created page by program invented by StriderTol
StriderTol Bot change
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
| number = ML19338B974
| number = ML19338B974
| issue date = 09/30/1977
| issue date = 09/30/1977
| title = Order Denying Petitioners' Emergency Motion to Enforce Mandate.Related Correspondence
| title = Order Denying Petitioners Emergency Motion to Enforce Mandate.Related Correspondence
| author name = Bazelon
| author name = Bazelon
| author affiliation = U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
| author affiliation = U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
Line 17: Line 17:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:.m       ._ _              ...  ..                      __                    _            ..                  _              . _
{{#Wiki_filter:.m
                ,, ;                              .
. ~ - _
_ . . _ . . _ . _ . . .        .      . ~ - _
.-.......-.q
                                                                                                                  .-.......-.q     _                  _ . . .
~-
                -                                                                                                    ~-
^ #j hitch 5fafas Ecurf of AbpeaY'*=
                                                                                  .          _;
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBI A CIRCUlT No.
      ^ #j hitch 5fafas Ecurf of AbpeaY'*=
73-1776 -
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBI A CIRCUlT i
September Term,19 77
No.         73-1776 -                                                             September Term,19 77 e      g-a
-)
                                                                                                                                                                                  -)
i g-e a
l       1 l
l 1
Nelson Aeschliman, et al,                                                                                                                     g      .                %\     l     l Petitioners                                                                                                              -7           '
l Nelson Aeschliman, et al,
l
%\\
                                                                                                                                                                    ,cp
l g
-7 l
Petitioners
,cp i
(
(
1 i
?j O
                                                                                -        -                                                                      N       '
N United States Atomic Energy Comission
United States Atomic Energy Comission                                                                                                           '
,j@
                                                                                                                                                          ?j ,j@   .
and thited States of America, c,
O and thited States of America,                                                                                                                                                 j
A,y.
                                                                                                                              .                    c,       A,y .           /
/
Respondents                                                                                                   .
j Respondents
                                                                                                                                                          * / wt Consumers Power Company,                                                                          United States Court of Appeals for t:w DistM. cf cd=. bis che:lt Intervenor                                                                                                           -
.* / wt United States Court of Appeals Consumers Power Company, for t:w DistM. cf cd=. bis che:lt Intervenor fil.ED 007271977 No. 73-1867 Saginaw Valley Nuclear Study Group, GEORC-{A FISHER g
fil.ED         007271977 No. 73-1867                                         .
ct al Petitioners v.
Saginaw Valley Nuclear Study Group,                                                                 GEORC-{AgFISHER ct al                                                                                               .,
i United States Atomic Energy Comission and United States of America, Respondents i
Petitioners v.
ConsumersTower Company, 1
i United States Atomic Energy Comission                                                                                                                                                 l and United States of America,                                                                                                                                                         <
Intervenor
Respondents                                                                                                                                   '
~
i ConsumersTower Company,                                                                                                                                                               1 Intervenor                                                                                                                                     '
BEIM E: Bazelen, Chief Judge; Fahy, Senior Circuit Judge and Justice *,
                                                                              ~
?
BEIM E: Bazelen, Chief Judge; Fahy, Senior Circuit Judge and Justice *,                                                                                                   ?
-U.S. District Judge for the Eastern District of Texas.
                              -U.S. District Judge for the Eastern District of Texas.                                                                                                     l
.O.R.D.E..R l
,                                                                        .O .R .D .E. .R l
.Upon consideration of petitioners' emergericy motion to enforce mandate, of their f
            .Upon consideration of petitioners' emergericy motion to enforce mandate, of their                                                                                   f motion for imediate and-expedited consideration thereof, of the responses filed by .                                                                                         i respondent Comission and by intervenor Consumers Power Company, and of petitioners'                                                                                         H       ,
motion for imediate and-expedited consideration thereof, of the responses filed by.
reply to the responses, and it app 6aring to the Court that it previously has refused to                                                                                     y stay the mandate and that it is _still in effect, and it further appearing that the                                                                                         L.       1 Comission should completely carry out this' Court's remand with all reasonable expedition,                                                                                           l and it further appearing that our mandate has not itself required a cessation of
i respondent Comission and by intervenor Consumers Power Company, and of petitioners' H
    . construction and that matter.is under consideration within the Commission, it is'
reply to the responses, and it app 6aring to the Court that it previously has refused to y
stay the mandate and that it is _still in effect, and it further appearing that the L.
1 Comission should completely carry out this' Court's remand with all reasonable expedition, and it further appearing that our mandate has not itself required a cessation of
. construction and that matter.is under consideration within the Commission, it is'


[9 E ni1221 $ 13I25 6 Durf Qf Spp2als                                                                                                                                                       ,
[9 E ni1221 $ 13I25 6 Durf Qf Spp2als FOR THE OlSTRICT OF cot.UMGI A CIRCulT 2
FOR THE OlSTRICT OF cot.UMGI A CIRCulT                                                                                                                       -
- No. 73-1776, et at September Term,19.77 e
2       -                                                                              -
. ORDERED by the Court that petitioners' emergency motion to enforce mandate is denied, the Court noting that continuation of construction pending resolution of L
                        - No. 73-1776, et at                                                                       September Term,19.77 e
the remanded issues is at the risk of intervenor Ccasumers Power Company.
                  . ORDERED by the Court that petitioners' emergency motion to enforce mandate
-        is denied, the Court noting that continuation of construction pending resolution of                                                                                                           L the remanded issues is at the risk of intervenor Ccasumers Power Company.
Per Curiam For the Court:
Per Curiam For the Court:
e C.M/
e C.M/
cao               .. nsasa Clerk i'
cao
* Sitting by designation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 5 292(d).                                                                               ,
.. nsasa Clerk i '
                                                                                                                                                                                                                    ;
* Sitting by designation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 5 292(d).
Judge Justice did not participate in the foregoing order.
Judge Justice did not participate in the foregoing order.
l h
h 1
1 l
l 1
1 1
1
                                                                                                                                                                                                                    \
\\
                                                                                                                                                                                                                    ;
e f
e f
i O
i O
l l
l l
l 1
1
1 1
.. j..
                    .. j . .        ..--*                - _ . .            . . . .      _ . . . . .        . _ . . . .                                                                        ..
9
l 9                   .                            - . -        .}}
.}}

Latest revision as of 16:26, 25 December 2024

Order Denying Petitioners Emergency Motion to Enforce Mandate.Related Correspondence
ML19338B974
Person / Time
Site: Midland
Issue date: 09/30/1977
From: Bazelon
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
To:
Saginaw Intervenor
Shared Package
ML19338B972 List:
References
73-1776, NUDOCS 8007291119
Download: ML19338B974 (2)
v • d • e


Text

{{#Wiki_filter:.m . ~ - _ .-.......-.q ~- ^ #j hitch 5fafas Ecurf of AbpeaY'*= FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBI A CIRCUlT No. 73-1776 - September Term,19 77 -) i g-e a l 1 l Nelson Aeschliman, et al, %\\ l g -7 l Petitioners ,cp i ( ?j O N United States Atomic Energy Comission ,j@ and thited States of America, c, A,y. / j Respondents .* / wt United States Court of Appeals Consumers Power Company, for t:w DistM. cf cd=. bis che:lt Intervenor fil.ED 007271977 No. 73-1867 Saginaw Valley Nuclear Study Group, GEORC-{A FISHER g ct al Petitioners v. i United States Atomic Energy Comission and United States of America, Respondents i ConsumersTower Company, 1 Intervenor ~ BEIM E: Bazelen, Chief Judge; Fahy, Senior Circuit Judge and Justice *, ? -U.S. District Judge for the Eastern District of Texas. .O.R.D.E..R l .Upon consideration of petitioners' emergericy motion to enforce mandate, of their f motion for imediate and-expedited consideration thereof, of the responses filed by. i respondent Comission and by intervenor Consumers Power Company, and of petitioners' H reply to the responses, and it app 6aring to the Court that it previously has refused to y stay the mandate and that it is _still in effect, and it further appearing that the L. 1 Comission should completely carry out this' Court's remand with all reasonable expedition, and it further appearing that our mandate has not itself required a cessation of . construction and that matter.is under consideration within the Commission, it is'

[9 E ni1221 $ 13I25 6 Durf Qf Spp2als FOR THE OlSTRICT OF cot.UMGI A CIRCulT 2 - No. 73-1776, et at September Term,19.77 e . ORDERED by the Court that petitioners' emergency motion to enforce mandate is denied, the Court noting that continuation of construction pending resolution of L the remanded issues is at the risk of intervenor Ccasumers Power Company. Per Curiam For the Court: e C.M/ cao .. nsasa Clerk i '

  • Sitting by designation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 5 292(d).

Judge Justice did not participate in the foregoing order. h 1 l 1 1 \\ e f i O l l 1 .. j.. 9 .}}

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML19338B974&oldid=4737068"