ML19339A856: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:- .- | {{#Wiki_filter:-.- | ||
i 35 "K" Drive Pennsville,!i. J. 03070 September _3,.1980 liarold R. Denten, Director Office of liuclear Reactor Regulation | |||
i 35 "K" Drive Pennsville,!i. J. 03070 | |||
September _3,.1980 liarold R. Denten, Director Office of liuclear Reactor Regulation | |||
==Dear 31:== | ==Dear 31:== | ||
s | s LIC2'ISE SCF SAL 3.* II A.. | ||
/- | |||
The " full"/ license for Salem II is still under review. | |||
' f}, | |||
LIC2'ISE SCF SAL 3.* II A.. | |||
The " full"/ license for Salem II is still under | |||
review. | |||
3ack in April when the Commission voted on the | 3ack in April when the Commission voted on the | ||
" limited" license for Salem II I received a phone call from your office informing me.of the vote the next day. | |||
At that time I inquired abt,ut the caposition to the ll:ense by Lower Alloways Creek and Salem County (in addition to our own). | |||
phone call from your office informing me.of the vote the next day. | I was told the Commission was not aware of any opposition by Lower Alloways CreekLor Salem County. | ||
At that time I inquired abt,ut the caposition to the ll:ense by Lower Alloways Creek and Salem | |||
County (in addition to our own). I was told the Commission was not aware of any opposition by Lower Alloways CreekLor Salem County. | |||
At this peint has their opposition come to your attention? | At this peint has their opposition come to your attention? | ||
'Also, because of FZf.A requirements it is my under-standing something might finally be done about the lack of Ivacuation Pl.ans for communities close to | |||
'the nuclear facilities in Sales County. | |||
I would urge the !!EC to require every 3alem County resident to be knowledgable about whatever plan is' developed.. It is also desirable that the "public" be included in the planning._.le are currently. ''in the dark" about what's being done. | |||
I would urge the !!EC to require every 3alem County resident to be knowledgable about whatever plan is' developed. . It is also desirable that the "public" be included in the planning._ .le are currently. ''in the dark" about what's being done. .le have been | .le have been | ||
~ | |||
trying to ur6e everyone from the local level right on up the line to get this evacuation plan underway even before-3alem I was licensed but the utility industry was so b tsy ccnvincin; the public it wasn't necessary., nothing was done. | trying to ur6e everyone from the local level right on up the line to get this evacuation plan underway even before-3alem I was licensed but the utility industry was so b tsy ccnvincin; the public it wasn't necessary., nothing was done. | ||
Very_truly_yours, r | Very_truly_yours, r | ||
r h&M YW 31eanor G. Col' man. | |||
t | t 60L103o- $Q | ||
60L103o- $Q | |||
,.-t, | |||
. DISTRIBUTION: | |||
; 50-311 1 | |||
Docket yFile T4KU FDK Local PDR NRR Reading DL:LB #3 Files | |||
- HDenton ECase HBerkow DEisenhut RTedesco FMiraglia - | |||
i JKerrigan JLee SCavanuagh (NRR-4318) | |||
EHughes-MFudge-BGrimes SHanauer Dross FSchroeder BSnyder. | |||
-RVollmer PPAS JMoore, OELD CGrimes 1 | |||
l' a | |||
4 | |||
? | |||
HBerkow | |||
FMiraglia - | |||
i | |||
JLee SCavanuagh (NRR-4318) | |||
EHughes-MFudge-BGrimes SHanauer | |||
Dross FSchroeder BSnyder. | |||
4 I | 4 I | ||
-c, | |||
~,,,}} | |||
Latest revision as of 12:43, 25 December 2024
| ML19339A856 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Salem  |
| Issue date: | 09/03/1980 |
| From: | Coleman E AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED |
| To: | Harold Denton Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19339A855 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8011050553 | |
| Download: ML19339A856 (2) | |
Text
-.-
i 35 "K" Drive Pennsville,!i. J. 03070 September _3,.1980 liarold R. Denten, Director Office of liuclear Reactor Regulation
Dear 31:
/-
The " full"/ license for Salem II is still under review.
' f},
3ack in April when the Commission voted on the
" limited" license for Salem II I received a phone call from your office informing me.of the vote the next day.
At that time I inquired abt,ut the caposition to the ll:ense by Lower Alloways Creek and Salem County (in addition to our own).
I was told the Commission was not aware of any opposition by Lower Alloways CreekLor Salem County.
At this peint has their opposition come to your attention?
'Also, because of FZf.A requirements it is my under-standing something might finally be done about the lack of Ivacuation Pl.ans for communities close to
'the nuclear facilities in Sales County.
I would urge the !!EC to require every 3alem County resident to be knowledgable about whatever plan is' developed.. It is also desirable that the "public" be included in the planning._.le are currently. in the dark" about what's being done.
.le have been
~
trying to ur6e everyone from the local level right on up the line to get this evacuation plan underway even before-3alem I was licensed but the utility industry was so b tsy ccnvincin; the public it wasn't necessary., nothing was done.
Very_truly_yours, r
r h&M YW 31eanor G. Col' man.
t 60L103o- $Q
,.-t,
. DISTRIBUTION:
- 50-311 1
Docket yFile T4KU FDK Local PDR NRR Reading DL:LB #3 Files
- HDenton ECase HBerkow DEisenhut RTedesco FMiraglia -
i JKerrigan JLee SCavanuagh (NRR-4318)
EHughes-MFudge-BGrimes SHanauer Dross FSchroeder BSnyder.
-RVollmer PPAS JMoore, OELD CGrimes 1
l' a
4
?
4 I
-c,
~,,,