ML19345D414: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Created page by program invented by StriderTol
StriderTol Bot change
 
Line 2: Line 2:
| number = ML19345D414
| number = ML19345D414
| issue date = 12/08/1980
| issue date = 12/08/1980
| title = Discusses Lack of NRC Action Re Comments Submitted in 800604 Ltr Concerning Consolidation of Reporting Requirements. Clarification & Consolidation of All Licensee Reporting Requirements Urged
| title = Discusses Lack of NRC Action Re Comments Submitted in Concerning Consolidation of Reporting Requirements. Clarification & Consolidation of All Licensee Reporting Requirements Urged
| author name = Fay C
| author name = Fay C
| author affiliation = WISCONSIN ELECTRIC POWER CO.
| author affiliation = WISCONSIN ELECTRIC POWER CO.
Line 11: Line 11:
| contact person =  
| contact person =  
| document report number = NUDOCS 8012150077
| document report number = NUDOCS 8012150077
| title reference date = 06-04-1980
| document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, INCOMING CORRESPONDENCE, UTILITY TO NRC
| document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, INCOMING CORRESPONDENCE, UTILITY TO NRC
| page count = 1
| page count = 1
Line 16: Line 17:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:i                                                      [b -26 S cb-Jo/
{{#Wiki_filter:[b -26 S i
Wisconsin Electric mea coursur 231 W. MICHIGAN, P.O. 30X 2046. MILWAUKEE. WI 53201 December 8, 1980
cb-Jo/
                                                                              ~2.
Wisconsin Electric mea coursur 231 W. MICHIGAN, P.O. 30X 2046. MILWAUKEE. WI 53201 December 8, 1980
Mr. H. R. Denton, Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION                                         -
~2.
Washington, D. C.                 20555
Mr. H.
R.
Denton, Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Washington, D.
C.
20555


==Dear Mr. Denton:==
==Dear Mr. Denton:==
:l CONSOLIDATION OF REPORTING REQUIREMENTS In our letter to the Secretary of the Commission dated June 4,       1980, we provided comments on 10 CFR 50.72 concerning the immediate reporting of significant events at operating nuclear power reactors. Included in our comments was a request that a consolidated listing of the many diverse NRC reporting requirements be developed. We mentioned that Regulatory Guide 10.1 had at one time provided such a listing but had not been revised since 1977. To date, we have observed no NRC action on this comment.
:l CONSOLIDATION OF REPORTING REQUIREMENTS In our letter to the Secretary of the Commission dated June 4, 1980, we provided comments on 10 CFR 50.72 concerning the immediate reporting of significant events at operating nuclear power reactors.
In light of the recently proposed NRC policy statement on enforcement actions, we believe there is an even more pressing need for consolidated guidance from the NRC regarding all aspects of reportability. The proposed policy statement directs that any failure to provide full, complete, timely, and accurate information and reports be treated as a violation and carry the same severity level enforcement action as the matter not properly reported.
Included in our comments was a request that a consolidated listing of the many diverse NRC reporting requirements be developed.
l   Given the confusion and conflicts in present reporting requirements, i   we believe the lack of a simplified and straightforward reporting l   requirements listing will unavoidably result in automatic licensee l   fines and licensing actions. We, therefore, again urge the NRC staff to clarify and consolidate all licensee reporting requirements so as to eliminate insofar as possible misunderstanding, misinter-pretation, or incorrect application of the diverse reporting requirements.
We mentioned that Regulatory Guide 10.1 had at one time provided such a listing but had not been revised since 1977.
l                                                       Very truly yours, l
To date, we have observed no NRC action on this comment.
C. W. Fay, Director Nuclear Power Department
In light of the recently proposed NRC policy statement on enforcement actions, we believe there is an even more pressing need for consolidated guidance from the NRC regarding all aspects of reportability.
  ?     0 0M 50 Q f                                                                 ,}}
The proposed policy statement directs that any failure to provide full, complete, timely, and accurate information and reports be treated as a violation and carry the same severity level enforcement action as the matter not properly reported.
l Given the confusion and conflicts in present reporting requirements, i
we believe the lack of a simplified and straightforward reporting l
requirements listing will unavoidably result in automatic licensee l
fines and licensing actions.
We, therefore, again urge the NRC staff to clarify and consolidate all licensee reporting requirements so as to eliminate insofar as possible misunderstanding, misinter-pretation, or incorrect application of the diverse reporting requirements.
l Very truly yours, l
C. W.
Fay, Director Nuclear Power Department
?
0 0M 50 Q f
,}}

Latest revision as of 09:43, 24 December 2024

Discusses Lack of NRC Action Re Comments Submitted in Concerning Consolidation of Reporting Requirements. Clarification & Consolidation of All Licensee Reporting Requirements Urged
ML19345D414
Person / Time
Site: Point Beach  
Issue date: 12/08/1980
From: Fay C
WISCONSIN ELECTRIC POWER CO.
To: Harold Denton
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NUDOCS 8012150077
Download: ML19345D414 (1)


Text

[b -26 S i

cb-Jo/

Wisconsin Electric mea coursur 231 W. MICHIGAN, P.O. 30X 2046. MILWAUKEE. WI 53201 December 8, 1980

~2.

Mr. H.

R.

Denton, Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Washington, D.

C.

20555

Dear Mr. Denton:

l CONSOLIDATION OF REPORTING REQUIREMENTS In our letter to the Secretary of the Commission dated June 4, 1980, we provided comments on 10 CFR 50.72 concerning the immediate reporting of significant events at operating nuclear power reactors.

Included in our comments was a request that a consolidated listing of the many diverse NRC reporting requirements be developed.

We mentioned that Regulatory Guide 10.1 had at one time provided such a listing but had not been revised since 1977.

To date, we have observed no NRC action on this comment.

In light of the recently proposed NRC policy statement on enforcement actions, we believe there is an even more pressing need for consolidated guidance from the NRC regarding all aspects of reportability.

The proposed policy statement directs that any failure to provide full, complete, timely, and accurate information and reports be treated as a violation and carry the same severity level enforcement action as the matter not properly reported.

l Given the confusion and conflicts in present reporting requirements, i

we believe the lack of a simplified and straightforward reporting l

requirements listing will unavoidably result in automatic licensee l

fines and licensing actions.

We, therefore, again urge the NRC staff to clarify and consolidate all licensee reporting requirements so as to eliminate insofar as possible misunderstanding, misinter-pretation, or incorrect application of the diverse reporting requirements.

l Very truly yours, l

C. W.

Fay, Director Nuclear Power Department

?

0 0M 50 Q f

,