ML20008F414: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) Created page by program invented by StriderTol |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) StriderTol Bot change |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| number = ML20008F414 | | number = ML20008F414 | ||
| issue date = 03/06/1981 | | issue date = 03/06/1981 | ||
| title = Notifies That Util Review of NRC 810304 Evaluation of Facility Response to NUREG-0588 Indicates That Plant Meets General Design Criteria 4 & Can Operate safely.Item-by-item re-evaluation Per | | title = Notifies That Util Review of NRC 810304 Evaluation of Facility Response to NUREG-0588 Indicates That Plant Meets General Design Criteria 4 & Can Operate safely.Item-by-item re-evaluation Per Will Be Provided Later | ||
| author name = Clayton F | | author name = Clayton F | ||
| author affiliation = ALABAMA POWER CO. | | author affiliation = ALABAMA POWER CO. | ||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:- | {{#Wiki_filter:- | ||
Atbsma r'ower Company 600 North 18tn street Post Office Box 2641 Birmmgham Atacama 35291 Telegnone 205 250-1000 L | |||
sk I s | F. L CLAYTON, JR. | ||
Mr. R. L. Tedesco | Senior vice Pres cent Alabama Power March 6,1981 rne soum mre - | ||
sk I fg s | |||
U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission | Docket No. 50-364 Mr. R. L. Tedesco | ||
Washington, D. C. | . 5 | ||
JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT - UNIT 2 | 'N4 Assistant Director for Licensing JgI88/h{31 | ||
%/ | |||
Division of Licensing g. /, f U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission | |||
,J/ | |||
Washington, D. C. | |||
20555 | |||
.?/ | |||
a0 (.Y JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT - UNIT 2 ENVIRONMENTAL QUA'.IFICATION OF SAFETY-RELATED ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT Re: | |||
(1) APC0 Letter to NRC Dated September 12, 1980 (2) APC0 Letter to NRC Dated Septembe" 18, 1980 (3) APC0 Letter to NRC Dated October 10, 1980 (4) APC0' Letter to NRC Dated Octobe-30, 1980 (5) APC0 Letter to NRC Dated Feberary 12, 1981 (6) APC0 Letter to NRC Dated Feb uary 20, 1981 | |||
==Dear Mr. Tedesco:== | ==Dear Mr. Tedesco:== | ||
Alabama Power Company has reviewed the preliminary results of the NRC evaluation of the Farley Unit 2 response to NRC NUREG 0588 that was provided in your letter of March 4,1981. Alabama Power Company has conducted a review of these potential deficiencies and has made an assessment of the impact on the safe operation of the Farley Nuclear Plant. We find that in the interim until detailed resolution, none of these potential deficiencies will significantly impact the safe operation of the Farley Nuclear Plant, and the plant continues to meet General Design Criteria 4. | |||
Alabama Power Company has reviewed the preliminary results of the NRC evaluation of the Farley Unit 2 response to NRC NUREG 0588 that was provided in your letter of March 4,1981. Alabama Power Company has conducted a review of these potential deficiencies and has made an assessment of the impact on the safe operation of the Farley Nuclear Plant. We find that in the interim until detailed resolution, none of these potential deficiencies will significantly impact the safe operation of the Farley Nuclear Plant, and the plant continues to meet General Design Criteria 4. Based on the results of this review, we have concluded that Farley Unit 2 can operate safely. | Based on the results of this review, we have concluded that Farley Unit 2 can operate safely. | ||
In accordance with the provisions of your March 4,1981 letter, it is our intention to provide an item-by-item reevaluation in a detailed documented manner at a later date. | In accordance with the provisions of your {{letter dated|date=March 4, 1981|text=March 4,1981 letter}}, it is our intention to provide an item-by-item reevaluation in a detailed documented manner at a later date. | ||
Should you have any questions concerning the above, please advise. | Should you have any questions concerning the above, please advise. | ||
N Yours very truly, | N Yours very truly, F. L. Clayton, Jr. | ||
F. L. Clayton, Jr. | FLCjr/RWS:rt cc: | ||
FLCjr/RWS:rt cc: | (See Page 2, Also Notarized Statement) fde$ | ||
8'? | |||
8108180sy | |||
d '' | d '' | ||
U. S. Nuclear Regulator / Comissicn March 6,1981 Page 2 cc: Mr. R. A. Thomas | U. S. Nuclear Regulator / Comissicn March 6,1981 Page 2 cc: Mr. R. A. Thomas 5'a'ORN TO Aj0 SUBSCRIBED BEFORE r | ||
Mr. L. L. Kin +mer | Mr. G. F. Trowbridge ME THIS & | ||
Mr. W. H. Bradford MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: | DAY OF //44CM, | ||
Mr. L. L. Kin +mer 1981. | |||
Mr. W. H. Bradford MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: | |||
')b d 0 | |||
' ' Notary Molic 2 | |||
.}} | |||
Latest revision as of 03:27, 23 December 2024
| ML20008F414 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Farley  |
| Issue date: | 03/06/1981 |
| From: | Clayton F ALABAMA POWER CO. |
| To: | Tedesco R Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| RTR-NUREG-0588, RTR-NUREG-588 NUDOCS 8103130399 | |
| Download: ML20008F414 (2) | |
Text
-
Atbsma r'ower Company 600 North 18tn street Post Office Box 2641 Birmmgham Atacama 35291 Telegnone 205 250-1000 L
F. L CLAYTON, JR.
Senior vice Pres cent Alabama Power March 6,1981 rne soum mre -
sk I fg s
Docket No. 50-364 Mr. R. L. Tedesco
. 5
'N4 Assistant Director for Licensing JgI88/h{31
%/
Division of Licensing g. /, f U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
,J/
Washington, D. C.
20555
.?/
a0 (.Y JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT - UNIT 2 ENVIRONMENTAL QUA'.IFICATION OF SAFETY-RELATED ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT Re:
(1) APC0 Letter to NRC Dated September 12, 1980 (2) APC0 Letter to NRC Dated Septembe" 18, 1980 (3) APC0 Letter to NRC Dated October 10, 1980 (4) APC0' Letter to NRC Dated Octobe-30, 1980 (5) APC0 Letter to NRC Dated Feberary 12, 1981 (6) APC0 Letter to NRC Dated Feb uary 20, 1981
Dear Mr. Tedesco:
Alabama Power Company has reviewed the preliminary results of the NRC evaluation of the Farley Unit 2 response to NRC NUREG 0588 that was provided in your letter of March 4,1981. Alabama Power Company has conducted a review of these potential deficiencies and has made an assessment of the impact on the safe operation of the Farley Nuclear Plant. We find that in the interim until detailed resolution, none of these potential deficiencies will significantly impact the safe operation of the Farley Nuclear Plant, and the plant continues to meet General Design Criteria 4.
Based on the results of this review, we have concluded that Farley Unit 2 can operate safely.
In accordance with the provisions of your March 4,1981 letter, it is our intention to provide an item-by-item reevaluation in a detailed documented manner at a later date.
Should you have any questions concerning the above, please advise.
N Yours very truly, F. L. Clayton, Jr.
FLCjr/RWS:rt cc:
(See Page 2, Also Notarized Statement) fde$
8'?
8108180sy
d
U. S. Nuclear Regulator / Comissicn March 6,1981 Page 2 cc: Mr. R. A. Thomas 5'a'ORN TO Aj0 SUBSCRIBED BEFORE r
Mr. G. F. Trowbridge ME THIS &
DAY OF //44CM,
Mr. L. L. Kin +mer 1981.
Mr. W. H. Bradford MY COMMISSION EXPIRES:
')b d 0
' ' Notary Molic 2
.