ML20054G006: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
StriderTol Bot insert
 
StriderTol Bot change
 
Line 17: Line 17:
=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:.
{{#Wiki_filter:.
d         ad June 14 ,. 1982 d                                                   <
d ad June 14,. 1982 d
2 r i s t ine ih F,ohl                                                     -
2 r i s t ine ih F,ohl
                                                                                                                  .,n-Dr. John li. Buce
.,n-cJJ
                                                                                                                  -s.'   ;/
-s.' ;/
cJJ        s s
Dr. John li. Buce s
Thomas S. Moore                                                                                       ..g. - -
Thomas S. Moore
a Dear Appeal poard Judges; On G/7/02, I submitted an Appeal Regarding the Irreversible Arrect of A:cncndment No. 3 to Construction Permits on the OM-OL As explained in the cover 1ctter attached to the Appeal, Pryceeding, I <i id not appeal the Board 's April 30, 1982 Memorandum and Order for unriler, because at that point the independent NRC concurrence
..g. - -
    >_:T'. remedial work outside of the hearing was a possibility but na'       a re111ty.                         Thu N O.C       l '. c to bring their integrated review to a hearing.
s a
                    'th, a t '; > i r J :panr:ent ' r.C concu r r..nce d ir' occur (5/25/32 Ictter la won) nt about the saac time that t :;c A~cncnd:ntn t N o . 3 aas issued
Dear Appeal poard Judges; On G/7/02, I submitted an Appeal Regarding the Irreversible Arrect of A:cncndment No. 3 to Construction Permits on the OM-OL 1ctter attached to the Appeal, Pryceeding, As explained in the cover I <i id not appeal the Board 's April 30, 1982 Memorandum and Order for unriler, because at that point the independent NRC concurrence
          !      t to .;r i t e the appeal. The Appeal Regarding the (3/2G/32), I decide I rreve r;. ibic Af fect of Arae ndment N o . 3 is an appeal against the ponrd's i /'' C /n2 ?,:u. w a nd u~. , uince.the Isaucs of'the recorhndum and the am;wndine n t tre *         .e     in the s mac .                     Picase c.:t e nd the lates sct forth at the end of
>_:T'. remedial work outside of the hearing was a possibility but na' a re111ty.
    ' vil 3';t h Mc norr ndur                                 cnd Crder in ,:hich to file an appeal,for the L2 e c ' e s .:
Thu N O.C l '. c to bring their integrated review to a hearing.
'th, a t '; > i r J :panr:ent ' r.C concu r r..nce d ir' occur (5/25/32 Ictter la won) nt about the saac time that t :;c A~cncnd:ntn t N o. 3 aas issued (3/2G/32), I decide to.;r i t e the appeal.
The Appeal Regarding the t
I rreve r;. ibic Af fect of Arae ndment N o. 3 is an appeal against the ponrd's i /'' C /n2 ?,:u. w a nd u~., uince.the Isaucs of'the recorhndum and the am;wndine n t tre *
.e in the s mac.
Picase c.:t e nd the lates sct forth at the end of
' vil 3';t h Mc norr ndur cnd Crder in,:hich to file an appeal,for the L2 e c ' e s.:
have ncntioned.
have ncntioned.
d u 3:]6:C t f u l l -F
d u 3:]6:C t f u l l '/
                                                                                                              '/
-F b *~
b *~                         ''        V 82061ang3[                                                                               Bar.h- a Stamiris c...ces c. . n: 'c1 i
V 82061ang3[
I
Bar.h-a Stamiris I
(
(
u... s. . . f, ,t.
c...ces
                        < ~      n. m_ ..e . i . . .                                     . r c e l a nd , S'. i c h . 40623
: c.. n: 'c1 i
                              't        $]    !            dh I.
.. f,,t.
                                                        .'..~
: n. m_... i...
s
. r c e l a nd,
                            =   Es
S'. i c h. 40623
                                            ,(   p 8}}
~
e u.
s.
. '.. ~
I.
$]
dh s
't 8
=
Es
,(
p}}

Latest revision as of 17:59, 17 December 2024

Requests Extension of Deadline to Appeal ASLB 820430 Memorandum & Order Re Irreversible Effect of Amend 3.Delay in Submittal of Appeal Caused by Pending Hearing on Soils Remedial Work
ML20054G006
Person / Time
Site: Midland
Issue date: 06/14/1982
From: Stamiris B
STAMIRIS, B.
To: Buck J, Kohl C, Moore T
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel
References
NUDOCS 8206180331
Download: ML20054G006 (1)


Text

.

d ad June 14,. 1982 d

2 r i s t ine ih F,ohl

.,n-cJJ

-s.' ;/

Dr. John li. Buce s

Thomas S. Moore

..g. - -

s a

Dear Appeal poard Judges; On G/7/02, I submitted an Appeal Regarding the Irreversible Arrect of A:cncndment No. 3 to Construction Permits on the OM-OL 1ctter attached to the Appeal, Pryceeding, As explained in the cover I _:T'. remedial work outside of the hearing was a possibility but na' a re111ty.

Thu N O.C l '. c to bring their integrated review to a hearing.

'th, a t '; > i r J :panr:ent ' r.C concu r r..nce d ir' occur (5/25/32 Ictter la won) nt about the saac time that t :;c A~cncnd:ntn t N o. 3 aas issued (3/2G/32), I decide to.;r i t e the appeal.

The Appeal Regarding the t

I rreve r;. ibic Af fect of Arae ndment N o. 3 is an appeal against the ponrd's i / C /n2 ?,:u. w a nd u~., uince.the Isaucs of'the recorhndum and the am;wndine n t tre *

.e in the s mac.

Picase c.:t e nd the lates sct forth at the end of

' vil 3';t h Mc norr ndur cnd Crder in,:hich to file an appeal,for the L2 e c ' e s.:

have ncntioned.

d u 3:]6:C t f u l l '/

-F b *~

V 82061ang3[

Bar.h-a Stamiris I

(

c...ces

c.. n: 'c1 i

.. f,,t.

n. m_... i...

. r c e l a nd,

S'. i c h. 40623

~

e u.

s.

. '.. ~

I.

$]

dh s

't 8

=

Es

,(

p